Abstract
Forty-eight lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from fermented mussels in Thailand were evaluated for their probiotic properties, bile salt hydrolase (BSH), cholesterol assimilation and immunomodulatory effects. They were identified as Companilactobacillus formosensis (Group I, 10 isolates), Lentilactobacillus buchneri (Group II, 8 isolates), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum (Group III, 16 isolates), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (Group IV, 1 isolate), Pediococcus pentosaceus (Group V, 5 isolates) and P. acidilactici (Group V, 1 isolate), Enterococcus thailandicus (Group VI, 2 isolates), En. hirae (Group VII, 1 isolate), En. durans (Group VI, 1 isolate), Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (Group VII, 1 isolate), Lc. lactis subsp. hordinae (Group VII, 1 isolate), and Leuconostoc lactis (Group VIII, 1 isolate), based on their phenotypic and genetic characteristics. Seven isolates, L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1, LM6-2, LM7-2-2B, LM12-1, LM14-1, LM15-1P and LM15-2 expressed bile salt hydrolase activity. All isolates assimilated cholesterol ranging from 20.73 to 79.40%. BSH-producing isolates were tolerant to acidic and bile conditions and showed the adhesion ability to Caco-2 cells. The BSH-producing and selected isolates showed the immunomodulatory effects to stimulate interleukin-12 (IL-12), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), human beta defensin-2 (hBD-2) and nitric oxide (NO) production at various levels. Therefore, these results indicated that the isolates meet the standard probiotic criteria and beneficial effects.
Keywords: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Thai fermented mussel, Cholesterol-lowering effects, Immunomodulation, Probiotics
Highlights
-
•
Distribution of lactic acid bacterial species in Thai fermented mussels was investigated.
-
•
Seven Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum isolates exhibited bile salt hydrolase activity.
-
•
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LM1-1 and Enterococcus thailandicus LM4-1 were shown to have high levels of cholesterol assimilation.
-
•
Heat-killed LAB cells of isolates exhibited the immunomodulation effect to levels of IL-12, IFN-γ, hBD-2, and NO production.
-
•
Thai traditional fermented mussel is an attractive source of potential probiotics.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB); Thai fermented mussel; Cholesterol-lowering effects; Immunomodulation; Probiotics.
1. Introduction
Hoi-dong is a traditional low-salt fermented green mussel meat produced organically from Perna viridis (Hoi-ma-laeng-poo). It has a dark orange semi-solid appearance with a sour and salty flavor (Figure 1) (Phithakpol et al., 1995; Tanasupawat and Komagata, 1995). L. pentosus, L. plantarum, and Tetragenococcus halophilus isolates were found in the products (Tanasupawat and Daengsubha, 1983; Tanasupawat and Komagata, 1995). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an essential role in fermentation, resulting in improved taste, aroma, and texture. In addition, they could be used in food preservation. They are also used as probiotics in several Asian fermented foods (Ngasotter et al., 2020). LAB are classified as normally regarded as safe (GRAS) (FAO/WHO, 2002). Presently, various investigations support the beneficial significance of probiotics as a functional food with cholesterol-lowering, and immunomodulatory effects (Albano et al., 2018; Domingos-Lopes et al., 2020; Hameed et al., 2022).
Figure 1.
Fermented mussel (Hoi-dong).
Probiotics have various health effects, such as the ingestion of LAB alleviating certain risk factors for coronary disease (CAD) (De Vries et al., 2006). According to Albano et al. (2018), even at 1% decrease in blood cholesterol can reduce the CAD risk. Furthermore, LAB are presently still interesting since they modulate immunity and immune-boosting effect and are used in special disorders such as immunodeficiency and autoimmune diseases (Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017; Iwabuchi et al., 2012). Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine associated in limiting of infection, cancer, as well as the induction of IFN-γ production (Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017). IFN-γ has a role in the prevention of intracellular pathogen infection. There have been numerous investigations of LAB-stimulating IL-12 and IFN-γ secretion (Chen et al., 2013; Moon et al., 2019; Nakai et al., 2019; Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017). Moreover, human beta defensin-2 (hBD-2) is a human antimicrobial peptide that serves vital functions in host defense and is induced by inflammation or infection. Several LAB isolates have been shown to stimulate BD expression, hence enhancing BD expression could prevent infections (Kobatake and Kabuki, 2019). In addition, nitric oxide (NO) plays an essential function in infection defense and immunomodulatory effects (Wang et al., 2009) and there have been numerous investigations into LAB-induced NO production (Kmonickova et al., 2012; Surayot et al., 2014).
Fermented food products might be a source of novel LAB isolates with probiotic potential. Studies on the bioactive properties of LAB isolated from fermented mussels are scarce to none. Currently, the study of Nanasombat et al. (2012) and Boonprab (2022) reported the biological activity and the using of LAB starter. The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of LAB from Thai fermented mussel (Hoi-dong) and screen their bile salt hydrolase activity, cholesterol assimilation capacity, immunomodulatory effects as well as related probiotic properties, in vitro.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Raw material and isolation of LAB
Eighteen fermented mussel (Hoi-dong) samples were gathered from Samut Prakarn (13°35′37.2″N 100°35′46.6″E), Bangkok (13°44′35.1″N 100°30′15.3″E), Rayong (12°37′59.5″N 101°28′40.5″E), Samut Songkhram (13°25′30.9″N 99°57′17.8″E), Samut Sakhon (13°30′52.6″N 100°23′07.5″E), Nakhon Pathom (13°49′02.7″N 100°03′28.6″E) and Chonburi provinces (13°20′19.0″N 100°55′20.2″E) (Table 1). For each sample, 10 g was homogenized to 90 mL MRS broth (Difco) as well as incubated at 30 °C for 72 h (De Man et al., 1960). After incubation period, one loopful was streaked on MRS agar with 0.3% (w/v) CaCO3 and incubated under the same conditions. The colonies with clear zone were picked up for purification. Pure cultures were strored at −20 °C in 40% (v/v) glycerol and lyophilized with 10% (w/v) skim milk.
Table 1.
Isolate number, group, nearest relatives, 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (%) of the representative isolates.
| Isolate no. | Group: Nearest relatives | Similarity (%) | Length (bp) | Accession no. | Cholesterol assimilation ability (%) | BSH activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM15-2A | I: Companilactobacillus formosensis S215T | 99.86 | 1,354 | LC547212 | 62.07 ± 3.06 | − |
| LM16-2 | 99.71 | 1,358 | LC547232 | 30.73 ± 4.16 | − | |
| LM10-2M | − | − | − | 60.73 ± 4.62 | − | |
| LM15-2B | 99.85 | 1,354 | LC546812 | 49.40 ± 3.46 | − | |
| LM18-3 | 99.85 | 1,367 | LC547231 | 57.40 ± 7.21 | − | |
| LM7-1SP | 99.93 | 1,352 | LC546814 | 59.40 ± 7.21 | − | |
| LM7-2S | 99.79 | 1,411 | LC702436 | 64.07 ± 6.43 | − | |
| LM10-3M | 100 | 1,367 | LC546813 | 32.07 ± 3.06 | − | |
| LM10-1M | 99.64 | 1,375 | LC702435 | 74.07 ± 5.03 | − | |
| LM15-3 | 99.56 | 1,378 | LC547229 | 64.73 ± 3.06 | − | |
| LM17-6 | II: Lentilactobacillus buchneri JCM 1115T | 99.93 | 1,382 | LC702433 | 52.07 ± 2.31 | − |
| LM17-7 | − | − | − | 51.40 ± 6.00 | − | |
| LM17-2 | − | − | − | 42.07 ± 1.15 | − | |
| LM17-5 | − | − | − | 45.40 ± 5.29 | − | |
| LM17-4 | 99.93 | 1,375 | LC547234 | 36.73 ± 2.31 | − | |
| LMK9-3 | 99.81 | 1,394 | LC547223 | 28.07 ± 6.11 | − | |
| LM7-3 | − | − | − | 38.73 ± 11.37 | − | |
| LM18-4 | 99.93 | 1,359 | LC702434 | 50.07 ± 6.11 | − | |
| LM16-1 | III: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC 14917T | 100 | 1,384 | LC546818 | 68.73 ± 2.31 | − |
| LM6-1 | 100 | 1,375 | LC546819 | 67.40 ± 3.46 | + | |
| LM7-2-2B | 99.78 | 1,337 | LC546820 | 67.40 ± 2.00 | + | |
| LM15-1P | 99.93 | 1,370 | LC546815 | 67.40 ± 8.72 | + | |
| LM6-2 | 99.93 | 1,389 | LC547211 | 54.07 ± 11.37 | + | |
| LM14-1 | 99.85 | 1,345 | LC547215 | 46.73 ± 4.16 | + | |
| LM15-2 | 100 | 1,387 | LC546816 | 67.40 ± 6.93 | + | |
| LM12-1 | 100 | 1,384 | LC547230 | 40.07 ± 8.08 | + | |
| LM18-2 | 100 | 1,384 | LC547227 | 49.40 ± 5.29 | − | |
| LMK11-2 | 100 | 1,335 | LC547222 | 55.40 ± 6.00 | − | |
| LM12-2 | − | − | − | 38.07 ± 2.31 | − | |
| LM2-3 | − | − | − | 38.07 ± 6.43 | − | |
| LM3-2 | − | − | − | 45.40 ± 8.00 | − | |
| LM3-1 | 100 | 1,379 | LC702437 | 72.73 ± 4.62 | − | |
| LM16-3 | − | − | − | 34.07 ± 3.06 | − | |
| LMK11-3 | − | − | − | 37.40 ± 9.17 | − |
| Isolate no. | Group: Nearest relatives | Similarity (%) | Length (bp) | Accession no. | Cholesterol assimilation ability (%) | BSH activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM1-1 | IV: Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136T | 100 | 1,342 | LC546811 | 77.40 ± 2.00 | – |
| LMK9-1 | V: P. pentosaceus DSM 20336T | 100 | 1,368 | LC547220 | 34.07 ± 10.26 | – |
| LM13-1 | 99.86 | 1,404 | LC547226 | 54.73 ± 1.15 | – | |
| LM17-3 | 99.93 | 1,450 | LC547228 | 52.73 ± 2.31 | – | |
| LM13-3 | 99.93 | 1,362 | LC702898 | 40.07 ± 9.87 | – | |
| LM5-2 | – | – | – | 36.07 ± 8.33 | – | |
| LM5-1 | V: P. acidilactici DSM 20284T | 99.93 | 1,355 | LC547214 | 62.07 ± 6.43 | – |
| LM4-1 | VI: En. thailandicus DSM 21767T | 100 | 1,326 | LC546817 | 79.40 ± 4.00 | – |
| LM4-2 | 100 | 1,369 | LC547218 | 20.73 ± 11.02 | – | |
| LM1-2 | VI: En. hirae ATCC 9790T | 100 | 1,373 | LC547213 | 68.07 ± 1.15 | – |
| LM2-1 | VI: En. durans NBRC 100479T | 99.63 | 1,335 | LC547217 | 48.07 ± 4.16 | – |
| LM2-2 | VII: Lc. lactis subsp. lactis JCM 5805T | 100 | 1,385 | LC547219 | 42.73 ± 10.26 | – |
| LM8-2 | VII: Lc. lactis subsp. hordniae NBRC 100931T | 99.93 | 1,378 | LC547224 | 68.73 ± 8.08 | – |
| LMK9-2L | VIII: Leuconostoc lactis JCM 6123T | 99.71 | 1,357 | LC547233 | 26.73 ± 4.16 | – |
Sample LM1 and LM2 are collected from Samut Prakarn; LM3, LM4, LM16, LM17 and LM18 from Bangkok; LM5 and LM6 from Rayong; LM7, LM8 and LM9 from Samut Songkhram; LM10, LMK11 are collected from Samut Sakhon; LM12 and LM13 from Nakhon Pathom; and LM14 and LM15 are from Chonburi.
2.2. Identification methods
2.2.1. Phenotypic characterization
Colony appearance, cell shape, cell arrangement, and Gram staining were determined after cultivation on MRS agar plate incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. Physiological and biochemical characteristics including propagation at increasing NaCl concentration (4%, 6%, and 8%), temperature (15 °C, 30 °C, and 45 °C), and pH (3.0, 6.0 and 9.0), catalase activity, nitrate reduction, gas generation, hydrolysis of aesculin and arginine, and acid formation from carbohydrates were determined as described by Tanasupawat et al. (1998). Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the phenotypic characteristics was performed using SPSS v22.
2.2.2. Genotypic characterization
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates were PCR amplified (Phuengjayaem et al., 2017) and analyzed using a DNA sequencer (at Microgen, Inc.) with universal primers (Lane 1991). On the EzBiocloud system, the sequence similarity values between the isolates and associated reference isolates were computed (Yoon et al., 2017). A phylogenetic tree based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) was constructed using MEGA 7 (Kumar et al., 2016). The confidence values of each branch in the phylogenetic tree were computed using a bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications (Felsenstein, 1985). The identified sequences were submitted into DDBJ (DNA Data Bank of Japan).
2.3. Bile salt hydrolases (BSH) activity
The BSH activity was determined as informed by Shehata et al. (2016). A portion (20 μL) of the overnight culture broth was spotted on MRS agar containing 0.5% (w/v) taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) (sodium salt hydrate) as well as 0.037% (w/v) calcium chloride (CaCl2). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h under anaerobic condition. Precipitated zone around colonies or white opaque colonies indicated bile salt hydrolase activity. As the negative control, the MRS was used. The BSH-producing LAB isolate was selected for evaluation of probiotic properties.
2.4. Cholesterol assimilation
MRS broth containing cholesterol-polyethylene glycol (PEG) 600 (Sigma, India) (final concentration 100 μg/ml) was used to determined cholesterol assimilation capability. Each loopful (1%, v/v) was seeded into MRS containing cholesterol-PEG 600 and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The cholesterol was isolated following the method of Tomaro-Duchesneau et al. (2014). The residual quantity of cholesterol was determined using modified procedure of Rudel and Morris (1973). A standard curve was generated using the following cholesterol concentrations: 0, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, as well as 125 μg/ml in MRS. The amount of cholesterol was read off a standard curve. The capability was reported as the cholesterol assimilated (%). The percentage of cholesterol assimilated was quantify using the following Eq. (1):
| (1) |
2.5. Evaluation of probiotic properties
2.5.1. LAB cell suspension
According to observation of Pithva et al. (2014), cell suspension was prepared. The selected isolates were propagated in MRS broth at 30 °C for 24 h. After incubation period, the cells were collected by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 M, pH 7.2, containing 0.85% (w/v) NaCl), and solubilized in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7) to obtain bacterial suspension of A600 = 1 and 109 CFU/ml.
2.5.2. Acid and bile tolerance
The acid and bile tolerance were observed by the modified observation of Thamacharoensuk et al. (2017). In brief, the cell suspension was inoculated into MRS broth (pH 2 and pH 3) or MRS broth containing 0.3% and 0.8% (w/v) bile salt and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. The viable cells were enumerated by a 10-fold serial dilution, spot plate technique as well as incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The viable cells were reported as log CFU/ml.
2.5.3. Adhesion assay
The adhesion capacity was determined using Caco-2 cells following the investigation of Han et al. (2017) with modification. Caco-2 cells were provided by Professor Shinichi Yokota, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine. Caco-2 cells were routinely proliferated in Dulbecco modified Eagle Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (PS) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The Caco-2 cells (5×105 cell/ml) was inoculated and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. PBS was used to wash Caco-2 cells and the cell suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C and solubilized again in DMEM containing no antibiotics. Each LAB cell suspension was added as well as incubated for 90 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Following incubation, Caco-2 cells were cleansed by PBS. 0.05% of Triton-X100 solution was used to lyse the cells. The adherence cells were counted by spot-plate technique on MRS agar as well as incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. As control, the Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG was used. The adhesion capability of selected isolates was evaluated using the following Eq. (2):
| (2) |
where; Nt = the quantity of adherent LAB cells to the Caco-2 cells, N0 = the sum of LAB cell inoculated.
2.5.4. The immunomodulatory effects
The selected isolates were prepared and evaluated for immunomodulatory effects following the method of Hosaka et al. (2021).
2.5.4.1. Preparation of sterilized lactic acid bacteria powder
Each isolate was propagated in MRS broth medium (Difco) as well as incubated with shaking (120 rpm) at 30 °C for 24 h. The LAB pellet was centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 10 min. Cells were rinsed with distilled water and then lyophilized to obtain LAB powder. Test sample was solubilized in PBS at 200 μg/ml.
2.5.4.2. Cell culture
RAW264.7 cells were proliferated in DMEM (Sigma) containing 5% FBS (Biological Industries) as well as 0.2% PS (Gibco) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Caco-2 cells were provided by Professor Shinichi Yokota, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine. Cultures were propagated in DMEM (Sigma) containing 5% FBS as well as 0.25% PS in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. THP-1 cells were cultivated in RPMI 1640 medium (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Japan) containing 10% FBS as well as 0.2% PS in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.
Caco-2 cells (1.5 × 105 cells) were innoculated on cell culture inserts (Falcon, 24-Well Hanging Inserts 0.4 μm) and cultured for 3 days. The media supplemented with 5 mM sodium butyrate was substituted as well as incubated for 4 days to trigger differentiation. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) using Millicell-ERS (Merk) was applied to evaluate differentiated cells, and differentiated cells (>400 Ωxcm2) were used. THP-1 cells were innoculated on a multi-well plate (24 well, Falcon) as well as incubated for 3 days in media containing cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3; 100 ng/ml) and phorbol12-myristate13-acetate (PMA; 10 nM) to differentiate into macrophage-like cells. After differentiation, Caco-2 and THP-1 cells were co-cultured in Transwell.
2.5.4.3. Production of Nitric oxide (NO)
NO production was determined as reported by Yang et al. (2018). RAW264.7 cells were solubilized in DMEM medium (5% FBS + 0.2% PS) at a concentration of 3 × 105 cells/ml, innoulcated in each 24-well multi-well plate and incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. The test sample was added to stimulate the cells (20 μg/ml; final conc.). The negative control was PBS, while the positive control was lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (10 g/ml) (Fujifilm Wako). Following activation, the medium was harvested, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min and evaluated by Griess reaction, as reported by Baek et al. (2015). A portion of each Griess reagent, medium supernatant sample, and 3.125–125 μg/ml sodium nitrite (NaNO3) standard solution was supplemented and incubated for 20 min. The absorbance at 550 nm was used as well as the nitrite concentration was quantify by standard curve.
2.5.4.4. Intestinal immunity model
Co-culture cell culture inserts (apical side) and multi-well plates (basal side) were used to simulate an intestinal immune model. Test sample dissolved in RPMI 1640 medium was seeded to the apical side (final concentration 20 μg/ml), as well as the cells were triggered in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 48 h. Following incubation, the basal side of the medium was collected, and centrifugated at 12,000 rpm for 20 min, the supernatant was harvested to remove foreign substances. For IL-12 and IFN-γ, proteins were precipitated by applying a 25% volume of 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to the supernatant sample. After a 2-minute heat treatment at 100 °C, the precipitates were cleaned with acetone to remove TCA and solubilized in 1× sample buffer for enrichment.
SDS-PAGE was used to isolate the protein following the procedure of Laemmli (1970). According to Towbin et al. (1979), the target proteins were observed via Western blot. Standard curves were constructed using IFN-γ (Gibco) as well as IL-12 (Gibco) standard to quantify the IFN-γ and IL-12 production. As an endogenous control, production was adjusted by measuring β-actin. For hBD-2, unenriched supernatant was quantified by the Dot blot, as well as the hBD-2 production was adjusted from the total protein by CBB staining. The values were determined relative to PBS (non-stimulation).
2.6. Statistical analysis
All tests were carried out in triplicate. Observations were reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The acid and bile tolerance results and adhesion results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS v 22.0 software. For comparison, Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) was used for mean values at a significant level of p < 0.05. The immunomodulatory effect was analyzed by Welch's t-test at a significant level of p < 0.05.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Identification of isolates
Forty-eight LAB isolates were isolated from Thai fermented mussel (Hoi-dong) samples from various provinces (Table 1). All isolates were Gram-positive, catalase-negative, and facultatively anaerobic belonging to the members of genera Companilactobacillus, Lentilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, Lacticaseibacillus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Lactococcus and Leuconostoc; they did not reduce nitrate. They were divided into 8 Groups when the hierarchical cluster was analyzed based on their phenotypic characteristics, and the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of the representative isolates was determined (Figures 2 and 3 and Table 1).
Figure 2.
Dendrogram of the hierarchical cluster based on phenotypic characteristics.
Figure 3.
Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene of the representative isolates from each group.
Group I included ten rod-shaped isolates (LM15-2A, LM16-2, LM10-2M, LM15-2B, LM18-3, LM7-1SP, LM7-2S, LM10-3M, LM10-1M and LM15-3). They produced no gas from glucose. They proliferated at pH 3, in 8% NaCl, at 15 °C and 45 °C but they could not proliferate at pH 9.0. They hydrolyzed arginine, produced D-lactic acid and contained meso-DAP in the cell wall. However, they synthesized no acid from arabinose, cellobiose, lactose, mannitol, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose as well as sorbitol. The representative isolates in this group showed 99.56%–100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Companilactobacillus formosensis S215T (Figure 2). Therefore, they were identified as Companilactobacillus formosensis (Zheng et al., 2020). Their variable phenotypic characteristics are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Phenotypic characteristics of isolates.
| Characteristics | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of isolate | 10 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Cell shape | Rods | Rods | Rods | Rods | Tetracocci | Cocci in chains | Cocci in chains | Cocci in chains |
| Gas from glucose | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Growth in 6% NaCl | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Growth in 8% NaCl | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| Growth at pH 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| pH 9 | − | + | + (−5) | − | − | + | + | + |
| Growth at 15 °C | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 45 °C | + | + | + (−1) | + | − (+1) | + | − | + |
| Arginine hydrolysis | + | + | + (−4) | + | − (+1) | + | + | − |
| Acid from: | ||||||||
| L-Arabinose | − | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| D-Cellobiose | − | − (+1) | + | + | + | + | w1 | − |
| Fructose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Galactose | + | + | + | + | + | + (−1) | + | + |
| D-Glucose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Lactose | − | − | + | + | + (−1) | + | + | + |
| D-Mannose | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Maltose | w5 | + | + | + | + (−1) | + | + | + |
| D-Mannitol | − | − (+1) | + (−1) | + | − (+1) | + (−1) | + | − |
| D-Melibiose | − | + | + (−1) | + | w3 | + (−1) | w1 | + |
| D-Raffinose | − | w4 | + (−1) | + | w3 | + (−1) | − | + |
| L-Rhamnose | − | − | + (−1) | + | − (+2) | w2 | − | − |
| D-Ribose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Salicin | + | − | + | + | + | + (−1) | + | + |
| D-Sorbitol | − | − (+1) | + (−2) | + | − (+1) | + (−1) | − | − |
| D-Sucrose | + | + (−3) | + | + | + (−1) | + (−1) | w1 | + |
| D-Trehalose | + (−4) | + | + | + | + | + (−1) | + | − |
| D-Xylose | + (−2) | + | + | + | + | + (−1) | + | + |
| Aesculin | + | + | + (−2) | − | + | + (−1) | − | − |
| meso-DAP | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| Isomer of lactic acid | D | DL | DL | L | DL | L | L | D |
+, positive reaction; w, weak reaction; −, negative reaction. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of isolates showing the reaction.
Group II included eight rod-shaped isolates (LM17-6, LM17-7, LM17-2, LM17-5, LM17-4, LMK9-3, LM7-3, and LM18-4). They synthesized gas from glucose. They propagated at pH 3 and 9, 15 °C as well as 45 °C and in 8% NaCl. The isolates had no meso-DAP in the cell wall. DL-lactic acid was produced. All isolates produced no acid from lactose, mannose, rhamnose and salicin. They were able to hydrolyze arginine. The representative isolates in this cluster showed 99.81%–99.93% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Lentilactobacillus buchneri JCM 1115T (Figure 2). Therefore, they were identified as Lentilactobacillus buchneri (Zheng et al., 2020). Their variable phenotypic characteristics are illustrated in Table 2.
Group III consisted of sixteen rod-shaped isolates (LM16-1, LM6-1, LM7-2-2B, LM15-1P, LM6-2, LM14-1, LM15-2, LM12-1, LM18-2, LMK11-2, LM12-2, LM2-3, LM3-2, LM3-1, LM16-3, LMK11-3). They did not produce no gas from glucose. They proliferated at pH 3 and in 8% NaCl. The isolates contained meso-DAP in the cell wall. DL-lactic acid was synthesized. The representative isolates in this cluster presented 99.78%–100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC 14917T (Figure 2). Hence, they were identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum (Zheng et al., 2020). Their variable phenotypic characteristics are illustrated in Table 2.
Group IV contained one rod-shaped isolates (LM1-1). It produced no gas from glucose. It propagated at pH 3, 15 °C and 45 °C and in 6% and 8% NaCl but did not propagate at pH 9. The isolate contained no meso-DAP in the cell wall. L-lactic acid was generated. It did not synthesized acid from aesculin. It hydrolyzed arginine. The representative isolate in this cluster displayed 100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136T (Figure 2). Consequently, it was identified as Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (Zheng et al., 2020).
Group V was comprised of six tetracoccal isolates (LMK9-1, LM13-1, LM17-3, LM13-3, LM5-2, and LM5-1). They produced no gas from glucose. They proliferated at pH 3 and, 15 °C, and in 8% NaCl but did not proliferate at pH 9. DL-lactic acid was produced. The representative isolates in this group included LMK9-1, LM13-1, LM17-3, and LM13-3, which exhibited 99.86%–100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 20336T (Figure 2), and isolate LM5-1 revealed 99.93% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 20284T (Figure 2). Their variable phenotypic characteristics are presented in Table 2.
Group VI contained four coccal isolates (LM4-1, LM4-2, LM1-2 and LM2-1). They could not synthesize gas from glucose. They developed at pH 3 and 9, 15 °C and 45 °C, and in 6% and 8% NaCl. The isolates had no meso-DAP in the cell wall. L-lactic acid was produced. All isolates produced no acid from arabinose. Acid production was variably observed in galactose, mannitol, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose, salicin, sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, xylose and aesculin. They hydrolyzed arginine. The representative isolate LM4-1 and LM4-2 revealed 100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Enterococcus thailandicus DSM 21767T (Figure 2), isolate LM1-2 exhibited 100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Enterococcus hirae ATCC 9790T (Figure 2), and LM2-1 exhibited 99.63% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Enterococcus durans NBRC 100479T (Figure 2).
Group VII consisted of two coccal isolates (LM2-2 and LM8-2). They produced no gas from glucose. They proliferated at pH 3 and 9, 15 °C, and in 6% but did not proliferate at 45 °C, pH 9 and in 8% NaCl. L-lactic acid was synthesized. All isolates could not synthesize acid from raffinose, rhamnose, sorbitol and aesculin. They hydrolyzed arginine. The representative isolate LM2-2 expressed 100% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Lc. lactis subsp. lactis JCM 5805T (Figure 2), and isolate LM8-2 expressed 99.93% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Lc. lactis subsp. hordniae NBRC 100931T (Figure 2) and they were identified as Lc. lactis.
Group VIII included one coccal isolates (LMK9-2L). It generated gas from glucose. It propagated at pH 9, 15 °C and 45 °C, and in 6% but did not propagate at pH 3 and in 8% NaCl. The isolate contained no meso-DAP in the cell wall. It synthesized D-lactic acid. It generated no acid from cellobiose, mannitol, rhamnose, sorbitol, trehalose and aesculin. It could not hydrolyze arginine. The representative isolate LMK9-2L revealed 99.71% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table 1) to Leuconostoc lactis JCM 6123T (Figure 2) and was identified as Leuconostoc lactis.
3.2. Bile salt hydrolase activity
BSH activity has been regarded as a factor related to the cholesterol-lowering activity, and BSH activity is now often referred as an essential feature for choosing probiotics (Miremadi et al., 2014). BSH activity promotes bacterial growth and colonization in gut by deconjugating bile salts (Begley et al., 2006). Out of 48 isolates, only 7 isolates, LM15-1P, LM15-2, LM6-1, LM7-2-2B, LM6-2, LM14-1, and LM12-1 expressed BSH activity by the development of opaque white colonies (Table 1). These BSH-positive isolates were recognized as L. plantarum subsp. plantarum (99–100% similarity). Based on the screening, this study is consistent with several earlier publications (Abushelaibi et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). The presence of BSH activity help to diminish the cholesterol quantity and make BSH-producing strain endure to bile condition (Noriega et al., 2006). The in vivo study of Costabile et al. (2017) found that the ingestion of L. plantarum ECGC 13110402 (great BSH-producing strain) twice daily could significantly reduce the cholesterol, and it could also improve the quantity of high-density lipoprotein. Besides, the application of L. rhamnosus BFE5264 resulted in a consequential lowering of the serum cholesterol amount in murine model (Park et al., 2018). Furthermore, this work might demonstrate the presence of BSH-producing isolates in non-human isolation sources.
3.3. Cholesterol assimilation
Dyslipidaemia is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is a leading cause of mortality (Labarthe and Dunbar, 2012). Hence, the reducing of cholesterol level is vital for prevention. In this study, all isolates revealed that the cholesterol assimilation ranged from 20.73% to 79.40% (Table 1). Only two isolates showed the percentage of cholesterol assimilation to be greater than 75%. En. thailandicus LM4-1 and L. rhamnosus LM1-1 potentially assimilated cholesterol at 79.40% and 77.40%, respectively. Moreover, it could be concluded that the amount of assimilated cholesterol revealed a wide variation among isolates. The cholesterol assimilation ability result in this study is in agreement with the findings of various earlier observations (Miremadi et al., 2014; Shehata et al., 2016; Tomaro-Duchesneau et al., 2014). Furthermore, probiotic species (i.e., L. bulgaricus, L. sporogenes and L. reuteri) could decrease cholesterol in human study (Khare and Gaur, 2020). Besides, L. paracasei DTA81 revealed a great cholesterol assimilation ability and lowered the total cholesterol in mice model (Tarrah et al., 2021). Remarkably, BSH activity and cholesterol assimilation are the cholesterol-lowering mechanisms as well as desirable probiotic properties (Ishimwe et al., 2015). LAB can utilize cholesterol for their physiological functions; therefore, luminal cholesterol quantity accessible for absorption are decreased (Bordoni et al., 2013).
3.4. Acid and bile tolerance
Acid and bile tolerance are the fundamental characteristics, as it dictates their capacity to endure in the acidic gastric environment as well as small intestine, and as a result, their ability to perform their functional role as a probiotic (Ruiz et al., 2013; Tannock, 2004). Based on BSH-positive activity, all BSH-positive isolates were selected to investigate. The impacts of an acidic and bile environment on selected isolates are illustrated in Table 3. In the acidic conditions, the findings revealed that none of the isolates could survive at pH 2. However, all isolates tolerated at pH 3 and revealed a statistical difference in cell viability compared to the MRS control (18.19–35.91% reduction). This observation is consistent with earlier research (Hassanzadazar et al., 2012). The endurance at pH 3 was established as a criterion for probiotics (Liong and Shah, 2005).
Table 3.
Survival of selected isolates after incubation for 3 h at various pH and bile concentrations.
| Isolate no. | Viable cells (log CFU/ml) |
% Reductionb |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSa | pH 2 | pH 3 | 0.3% Bile | 0.8% Bile | pH 2 | pH 3 | 0.3% Bile | 0.8% Bile | |
| LM6-1 | 8.07 ± 0.16 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 6.11 ± 0.18∗ | 8.95 ± 0.14∗ | 8.75 ± 0.26∗ | 100.00 | 24.29 | +10.90 | +8.43 |
| LM6-2 | 9.03 ± 0.23 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 4.85 ± 0.33∗ | 9.81 ± 0.22∗ | 9.74 ± 0.23∗ | 100.00 | 46.29 | +8.64 | +7.86 |
| LM7-2-2B | 8.69 ± 0.21 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 6.34 ± 0.09∗ | 9.72 ± 0.12∗ | 9.21 ± 0.19∗ | 100.00 | 27.04 | +11.85 | +5.98 |
| LM12-1 | 8.94 ± 0.19 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 5.73 ± 0.34∗ | 9.85 ± 0.20∗ | 9.67 ± 0.19∗ | 100.00 | 35.91 | +10.18 | +8.17 |
| LM14-1 | 8.79 ± 0.20 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 5.87 ± 0.38∗ | 9.62 ± 0.15∗ | 8.80 ± 0.30 | 100.00 | 33.22 | +9.44 | +0.11 |
| LM15-1P | 9.24 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 7.07 ± 0.26∗ | 9.62 ± 0.15∗ | 9.01 ± 0.09∗ | 100.00 | 23.48 | +4.11 | 2.49 |
| LM15-2 | 8.80 ± 0.04 | 0.00 ± 0.00∗ | 5.98 ± 0.07∗ | 9.19 ± 0.08∗ | 8.93 ± 0.20 | 100.00 | 32.05 | +4.43 | +1.48 |
Data expressed as mean ± SD.
∗p < 0.05, compared to negative control.
MRS used as a negative control.
Percentage reduction of bacterial number as compare to negative control; +, indicated enhance of bacterial viability.
With various degrees of bacterial availability, all isolates were capable of remaining alive in the content of different percentage of bile salts (Table 3). Statistically, the vitality of isolates significantly altered compared to the MRS control. In the case of isolate LM15-1P, this isolate was tolerated only in the presence of 0.3% bile salt. However, the vitality of L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1, LM6-2, LM7-2-2B, LM12-1, LM14-1, LM14-2, and LM15-2 was enhanced (+0.11–11.85 % reduction) in the level of 0.3–0.8% bile salts with statistical differences compared to the MRS control. This observation is in accordance with the earlier observation (Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017). Consequently, selected isolates could endure and propagate under the bile environment, and bile salts might enhance the vitality.
Their high endurance to low-pH conditions and the occurrence of bile salts, these isolates might endurance in the stomach and intestine or even compete with other bacterial groups in this condition, suggesting a promising probiotic potential.
3.5. Adhesion properties
Based on BSH-positive activity and acid and bile endurance, seven isolates, including L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1, LM6-2, LM7-2-2B, LM12-1, LM14-1, LM15-1P, and LM15-2 were chosen to determine. The adhesion capability is illustrated in Figure 4. L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM14-1 showed the lowest adhesion ability at 0.17 ± 0.06%. While the adhesion ability of L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1 (1.38 ± 0.95%), LM7-2-2B (1.27 ± 0.43%), LM12-1 (1.06 ± 0.54%), and LM6-2 (0.93 ± 0.54%) did not revealed statistical difference when compared with L. rhamnosus GG (1.22 ± 0.55%; positive control). Furthermore, L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM15-1P (5.03 ± 1.26%) and LM15-2 (2.37 ± 1.23%) showed greater adhesion capability with a statistical difference compared to L. rhamnosus GG. Adhesion ability of LAB in this work is compatible with published research findings (Duary et al., 2011; García-Cayuela et al., 2014; Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017). From this study, it could be indicated that the adhesion ability of selected isolates to Caco-2 was isolate-specific and varied within the same species (Duary et al., 2011). In conclusion, most of the L. plantarum subsp. plantarum isolated from the fermented mussel samples showed similar and/or better able to adhere epithelial cells under in vitro investigation as compared to the L. rhamnosus GG. These fermented food isolates show remarkable potential and might be potential candidate probiotics for further intensive in vivo investigations to evaluate their additional wellbeing effects due to better gut colonization.
Figure 4.
Percentage of selected isolates adhesion to Caco-2 cell lines. Selected isolates were enumerated by bacterial culture and interpreted as the percentage adherence compared with the control. All experiments are done in triplicate and the results were reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The different alphabets mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
3.6. Immunomodulatory effects of LAB
The observation illustrated that the immunomodulatory effects of the chosen and representative isolates varied with and without statistically significant differences from the control (Table 4).
Table 4.
Immunomodulatory effects of the selected and representative isolates.
| Species/isolate no. | IL-12 (ng/ml) | IFN-γ (ng/ml) | hBD-2 (relative value) | NO (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. formosensis LM10-1M | 29.90 ± 5.15 | 26.88 ± 8.52 | 1.29 ± 0.19 | 14.15 ± 0.07∗∗ |
| L. buchneri LM17-6 | 10.31 ± 2.74∗ | 60.43 ± 20.35 | 1.43 ± 0.18 | 10.38 ± 0.04∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1 | 7.15 ± 1.22∗ | 21.84 ± 6.64 | 2.26 ± 0.20∗ | 17.89 ± 0.05∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-2 | 20.62 ± 4.82 | 49.25 ± 18.21 | 1.91 ± 0.23∗ | 13.52 ± 0.28∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM7-2-2B | 9.97 ± 3.92∗ | 35.42 ± 11.44 | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 16.65 ± 0.08∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM12-1 | 53.12 ± 6.43∗ | 59.93 ± 16.02 | 1.67 ± 0.25 | 16.64 ± 0.05∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM14-1 | 9.21 ± 3.15∗ | 31.01 ± 8.57 | 1.50 ± 0.10∗ | 17.76 ± 0.17∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM15-1P | 51.78 ± 4.72∗ | 27.40 ± 4.63 | 1.58 ± 0.04∗ | 15.75 ± 0.14∗∗ |
| L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM15-2 | 24.77 ± 3.42 | 35.91 ± 8.79 | 1.61 ± 0.06∗ | 16.03 ± 0.39∗∗ |
| L. rhamnosus LM1-1 | 33.74 ± 8.43 | 25.96 ± 9.17 | 1.18 ± 0.05∗ | 17.44 ± 0.24∗∗ |
| P. pentosaceus LM13-1 | 22.31 ± 6.72 | 47.79 ± 19.05 | 1.50 ± 0.10∗ | 18.19 ± 0.36∗∗ |
| P. acidilactici LM5-1 | 23.15 ± 4.38 | 43.03 ± 14.72 | 1.43 ± 0.11∗ | 19.59 ± 0.17∗∗ |
| Lc. lactis subsp. lactis LM2-2 | 53.98 ± 7.66∗ | 53.55 ± 21.27 | 2.04 ± 0.06∗ | 17.20 ± 0.33∗∗ |
| Lc. lactis subsp. hordinae LM8-2 | 20.32 ± 10.85 | 45.68 ± 14.93 | 1.48 ± 0.06∗ | 15.89 ± 0.17∗∗ |
| En. thailandicus LM4-1 | 16.03 ± 5.76 | 33.89 ± 11.99 | 3.03 ± 0.23∗ | 14.68 ± 0.23∗∗ |
| En. hirae LM1-2 | 10.43 ± 5.27∗ | 27.05 ± 7.66 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 12.13 ± 0.15∗∗ |
| En. durans LM2-1 | 18.38 ± 7.41 | 33.64 ± 11.14 | 3.01 ± 0.25∗ | 19.15 ± 0.18∗∗ |
| Len. lactis LMK9-2L | 10.60 ± 6.35∗ | 27.29 ± 6.92 | 1.54 ± 0.26 | 6.78 ± 0.11∗∗ |
| PBS (no stimulation) | 29.52 ± 5.87 | 43.23 ± 12.72 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | Not detected |
| LPS (positive control) | Not determined | 32.47 ± 0.14 | ||
Data expressed as mean ± SD.
∗p < 0.05, compared to PBS (no stimulation) within each column.
∗∗p < 0.05, compared to LPS (positive control).
For IL-12 induction, the ability to stimulate IL-12 production was best in Lc. lactis subsp. lactis LM2-2 (53.98 ± 7.66 ng/ml), whereas L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1 had the lowest (7.15 ± 1.22 ng/ml). The IL-12 induction ability of LAB in this finding is consistent with past publication (Chen et al., 2013; Iwabuchi et al., 2012; Thamacharoensuk et al., 2017).
For IFN-γ induction, L. buchneri LM17-6 had the highest ability to stimulate IFN-γ production (60.43 ± 20.35 ng/ml), while L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1 had the lowest (21.84 ± 6.64 ng/mL). The IFN-γ induction in this work is in accordance with earlier findings (Ou et al., 2011; Yamane et al., 2018).
For hBD-2 production, En. thailandicus LM4-1 and En. durans LM2-1 increased hBD-2 production, but En. hirae LM1-2 and L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM7-2-2B decreased it. According to the in vitro results, En. thailandicus LM4-1 and En. durans LM2-1 had a stimulatory effect on hBD-2 expression. The result of hBD-2 stimulation in this research is in accordance with the published investigation (Kobatake and Kabuki, 2019; Schlee et al., 2008). As a result, this study demonstrates that beneficial LAB promote innate immunity through defensin induction. Also, LAB stimulation is an attractive, innovative therapy technique for enhancing innate immunity (Schlee et al., 2008).
For nitric oxide (NO) production, NO production is physiologically advantageous to the host's immune response. From the outcomes of NO assay, all representative isolates stimulate NO production at a wide range of rates with statistically significant differences from the control (Table 4). The highest NO production was found in P. acidilactici LM5-1 (19.59 ± 0.17 μM), followed by En. durans LM2-1 (19.15 ± 0.18 μM), P. pentosaceus LM13-1 (18.19 ± 0.36 μM), and L. plantarum subsp. plantarum LM6-1 (17.89 ± 0.05 μM) and LM14-1 (17.76 ± 0.17 μM). The NO-induced production of LAB in this examination is similar to earlier publications (Kmonickova et al., 2012; Korhonen et al., 2001; Surayot et al., 2014).
As a consequence, these isolates have the potential to be effective against invading pathogens via stimulation immunity (Kang et al., 2021a, Kang et al., 2021b; Kato et al., 1999). Surprisingly, the heat-killed cells in this study still had immunomodulation activities; hence, the benefits of inactive cells include a lower risk of antibiotic resistance and sepsis and an extension of life span since there is no requirement to retain the viability (Shripada et al., 2020; Zendeboodi et al., 2020). Furthermore, this obeservation revealed that bacterial isolates, even though they belonged to the same species, might have various functional properties (Kang et al., 2021a, Kang et al., 2021b).
4. Conclusions
This observation demonstrated the distribution of LAB in Thai fermented mussel (Hoi-dong) which includes the genera Companilactobacillus, Enterococcus, Lentilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus. This is the first observation on the LAB distribution these food origins. Seven L. plantarum subsp. plantarum isolates expressed BSH activity by the development of an opaque white colony as well as could tolerate and propagate in acidic (pH 3) and bile salt (0.3 and 0.8%) environments. Besides, they also had a great adhesion capability to Caco-2 cells. Additionally, the BSH-producing isolates as well as representative isolates showed immunostimulatory effects. Lc. lactis subsp. lactis LM2-2 induced the most IL-12 production, while L. buchneri LM17-6 induced the most IFN-γ production, En. thailandicus LM4-1 induced the most hBD-2 secretion, and P. acidilactici LM5-1 potentially stimulated NO production. The function of LAB in hypercholesterolemia management and immunomodulatory is increasingly receiving attention. Consequently, these isolates may be regarded as good probiotics since they have cholesterol-removing effects, immunomodulatory ability, adhesion ability, and tolerance of acid and bile, all of which are beneficial probiotic characteristics. Additional research, such as clinical trials, is required.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Engkarat Kingkaew: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.
Hiroshi Konno: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data.
Yoshihito Hosaka: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Wongsakorn Phongsopitanun: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.
Somboon Tanasupawat: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.
Funding statement
This study was supported by the Thailand Research Fund and the National Research Council of Thailand for the 2017 Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program as a scholarship to E. K. (PHD/0226/2560) and the Grant for International Research Integration: Research Pyramid, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund (CUGRP-61-01-33-01), Chulalongkorn University.
Data availability statement
Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.
Declaration of interest's statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Pharmaceutical Research Instrument Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University for providing research facilities.
References
- Abushelaibi A., Al-Mahadin S., El-Tarabily K., Shah N.P., Ayyash M. Characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from camel milk. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2017;79:316–325. [Google Scholar]
- Albano C., Morandi S., Silvetti T., Casiraghi M.C., Manini F., Brasca M. Lactic acid bacteria with cholesterol-lowering properties for dairy applications: In vitro and in situ activity. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101(12):10807–10818. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baek K.-S., Hong Y.D., Kim Y., Sung N.Y., Yang S., Lee K.M., Park J.Y., Park J.S., Rho H.S., Shin S.S. Anti-inflammatory activity of AP-SF, a ginsenoside-enriched fraction, from Korean ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2015;39(2):155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Begley M., Hill C., Gahan C.G. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72(3):1729–1738. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonprab K. Rice flour powder carrying mixed starter culture of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KU-LM173 and Pediococcus acidilactici KU-LM145 for fermented mussel, Perna viridis Linnaeus 1758. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022;132(2):1197–1209. doi: 10.1111/jam.15270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bordoni A., Amaretti A., Leonardi A., Boschetti E., Danesi F., Matteuzzi D., Roncaglia L., Raimondi S., Rossi M. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics: in vitro selection and in vivo testing of bifidobacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97(18):8273–8281. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costabile A., Buttarazzi I., Kolida S., Quercia S., Baldini J., Swann J.R., Brigidi P., Gibson G.R. An in vivo assessment of the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum ECGC 13110402 in normal to mildly hypercholesterolaemic adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C.Y., Tsen H.Y., Lin C.L., Lin C.K., Chuang L.T., Chen C.S., Chiang Y.C. Enhancement of the immune response against Salmonella infection of mice by heat-killed multispecies combinations of lactic acid bacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013;62:1657–1664. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.061010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Man J., Rogosa d., Sharpe M.E. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1960;23(1):130–135. [Google Scholar]
- De Vries M.C., Vaughan E.E., Kleerebezem M., de Vos W.M. Lactobacillus plantarum—survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16(9):1018–1028. [Google Scholar]
- Domingos-Lopes M.F.P., Stanton C., Ross R.P., Silva C.C.G. Histamine and cholesterol lowering abilities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020;129(6):1428–1440. doi: 10.1111/jam.14733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duary R.K., Rajput Y.S., Batish V.K., Grover S. Assessing the adhesion of putative indigenous probiotic lactobacilli to human colonic epithelial cells. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011;134(5):664. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.90992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAO/WHO working group . FAO/WHO Working Group; 2002. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Cayuela T., Korany A.M., Bustos I., de Cadiñanos L.P.G., Requena T., Peláez C., Martínez-Cuesta M.C. Adhesion abilities of dairy Lactobacillus plantarum strains showing an aggregation phenotype. Food Res. Int. 2014;57:44–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hameed A., Condò C., Tauseef I., Idrees M., Ghazanfar S., Farid A., Muzammal M., Al Mohaini M., Alsalman A.J., Al Hawaj M.A. Isolation and characterization of a cholesterol-lowering bacteria from Bubalus bubalis raw milk. Fermentation. 2022;8(4):163. [Google Scholar]
- Han Q., Kong B.H., Chen Q., Sun F.D., Zhang H. In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Harbin dry sausages and selected probiotics. J. Funct.Foods. 2017;32:391–400. [Google Scholar]
- Hassanzadazar H., Ehsani A., Mardani K., Hesari J. Investigation of antibacterial, acid and bile tolerance properties of lactobacilli isolated from Koozeh cheese. Vet. Res. Forum. 2012;3(3):181. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosaka Y., Itoh K., Matsutani S., Kawate S., Miura A., Mizoura Y., Yamada S., Konno H., Grave E., Nagata K. Fermented food Tempeh induces interleukin 12 and enhances macrophage phagocytosis. J. Food Biochem. 2021;45(11) doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishimwe N., Daliri E.B., Lee B.H., Fang F., Du G. The perspective on cholesterol-lowering mechanisms of probiotics. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015;59(1):94–105. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwabuchi N., Yonezawa S., Odamaki T., Yaeshima T., Iwatsuki K., Xiao J.-Z. Immunomodulating and anti-infective effects of a novel strain of Lactobacillus paracasei that strongly induces interleukin-12. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012;66(2):230–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.01003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang C.-H., Kim J.-S., Kim H., Park H.M., Paek N.-S. Heat-killed lactic acid bacteria inhibit nitric oxide production via inducible nitric oxide Synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in RAW 264.7 cells. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2021;13(6):1530–1538. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09781-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang C.-H., Kim J.-S., Park H.M., Kim S., Paek N.-S. Antioxidant activity and short-chain fatty acid production of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Korean individuals and fermented foods. 3 Biotech. 2021;11(5) doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02767-y. 217–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kato I., Tanaka K., Yokokura T. Lactic acid bacterium potently induces the production of interleukin-12 and interferon-γ by mouse splenocytes. Int. J. Immunopharm. 1999;21(2):121–131. doi: 10.1016/s0192-0561(98)00072-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khare A., Gaur S. Cholesterol-lowering effects of Lactobacillus species. Curr. Microbiol. 2020;77(4):638–644. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-01903-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kmonickova E., Kverka M., Tlaskalová-Hogenová H., Kostecka P., Zídek Z. Stimulation of nitric oxide, cytokine and prostaglandin production by low-molecular weight fractions of probiotic Lactobacillus casei lysate. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2012;33(3):166–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobatake E., Kabuki T. S-layer protein of Lactobacillus helveticus SBT2171 promotes human β-defensin 2 expression via TLR2–JNK signaling. Front. Microbiol. 2019;2414 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen R., Korpela R., Saxelin M., Mäki M., Kankaanranta H., Moilanen E. Induction of nitric oxide synthesis by probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in J774 macrophages and human T84 intestinal epithelial cells. Inflammation. 2001;25(4):223–232. doi: 10.1023/a:1010971703271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labarthe D.R., Dunbar S.B. Global cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention 2011 and beyond. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2667–2676. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.087726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane D.J. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
- Liong M.T., Shah N.P. Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88(1):55–66. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72662-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y.F., Zhao F.C., Liu J.Y., Wang H.M., Han X., Zhang Y.X., Yang Z.Y. Selection of cholesterol-lowering lactic acid bacteria and its effects on rats fed with high-cholesterol diet. Curr. Microbiol. 2017;74(5):623–631. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1230-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miremadi F., Ayyash M., Sherkat F., Stojanovska L. Cholesterol reduction mechanisms and fatty acid composition of cellular membranes of probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. J. Funct.Foods. 2014;9:295–305. [Google Scholar]
- Moon P.-D., Lee J.S., Kim H.-Y., Han N.-R., Kang I., Kim H.-M., Jeong H.-J. Heat-treated Lactobacillus plantarum increases the immune responses through activation of natural killer cells and macrophages on in vivo and in vitro models. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019;68(3):467–474. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakai H., Hirose Y., Murosaki S., Yoshikai Y. Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 upregulates hyaluronic acid production in epidermal cells and fibroblasts in mice. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019;63(9):367–378. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nanasombat S., Phunpruch S., Jaichalad T. Screening and identification of lactic acid bacteria from raw seafoods and Thai fermented seafood products for their potential use as starter cultures. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2012;34(3) [Google Scholar]
- Ngasotter S., Waikhom D., Mukherjee S., Devi M.S., Singh A.S. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in fermented fish products: a review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020;9(5):2238–2249. [Google Scholar]
- Noriega L., Cuevas I., Margolles A., Los Reyes-Gavilan C.G.D. Deconjugation and bile salts hydrolase activity by Bifidobacterium strains with acquired resistance to bile. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16(8):850–855. [Google Scholar]
- Ou C.C., Lin S.L., Tsai J.J., Lin M.Y. Heat-killed lactic acid bacteria enhance immunomodulatory potential by skewing the immune response toward Th1 polarization. J. Food Sci. 2011;76(5):M260–M267. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park S., Kang J., Choi S., Park H., Hwang E., Kang Y., Kim A., Holzapfel W., Ji Y. Cholesterol-lowering effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 and its influence on the gut microbiome and propionate level in a murine model. PLoS One. 2018;13(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phithakpol B., Varanyanond W., Reungmaneepaitoon S., Wood H. Kuala Lumpur; 1995. The Traditional Fermented Foods of Thailand ASEAN Food Handling Bureau; p. 157. [Google Scholar]
- Phuengjayaem S., Phinkian N., Tanasupawat S., Teeradakorn S. Diversity and succinic acid production of lactic acid bacteria isolated from animals, soils and tree barks. Res. J. Microbiol. 2017;12:177–186. [Google Scholar]
- Pithva S., Shekh S., Dave J., Vyas B.R. Probiotic attributes of autochthonous Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains of human origin. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014;173(1):259–277. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-0839-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudel L.L., Morris M. Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. J. Lipid Res. 1973;14(3):364–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz L., Margolles A., Sánchez B. Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:396. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlee M., Harder J., Köten B., Stange E.F., Wehkamp J., Fellermann K. Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL# 3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008;151(3):528–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03587.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shehata M., El Sohaimy S., El-Sahn M.A., Youssef M. Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2016;61(1):65–75. [Google Scholar]
- Shripada R., Gayatri A.-J., Sanjay P. In: Precision Medicine for Investigators, Practitioners and Providers. Faintuch J., Faintuch S., editors. Acad. Pr; 2020. Chapter 5 – paraprobiotics; pp. 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Surayot U., Wang J., Seesuriyachan P., Kuntiya A., Tabarsa M., Lee Y., Kim J.-K., Park W., You S. Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: structural analysis, molecular weight effect on immunomodulation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014;68:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanasupawat S., Daengsubha W. Pediococcus species and related bacteria found in fermented foods and related materials in Thailand. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1983;29(6):487–506. [Google Scholar]
- Tanasupawat S., Komagata K. Lactic acid bacteria in fermented foods in Thailand. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995;11(3):253–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00367094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanasupawat S., Okada S., Komagata K. Lactic acid bacteria found in fermented fish in Thailand. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1998;44(3):193–200. doi: 10.2323/jgam.44.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tannock G.W. A special fondness for lactobacilli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70(6):3189–3194. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3189-3194.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarrah A., dos Santos Cruz B.C., Sousa Dias R., da Silva Duarte V., Pakroo S., Licursi de Oliveira L., Gouveia Peluzio M.C., Corich V., Giacomini A., Oliveira de Paula S. Lactobacillus paracasei DTA81, a cholesterol-lowering strain having immunomodulatory activity, reveals gut microbiota regulation capability in BALB/c mice receiving high-fat diet. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021;131(4):1942–1957. doi: 10.1111/jam.15058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thamacharoensuk T., Taweechotipatr M., Kajikawa A., Okada S., Tanasupawat S. Induction of cellular immunity interleukin-12, antiproliferative effect, and related probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated in Thailand. Ann. Microbiol. 2017;67(8):511–518. [Google Scholar]
- Tomaro-Duchesneau C., Jones M.L., Shah D., Jain P., Saha S., Prakash S. Cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus probiotic bacteria: an in vitro investigation. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 1–9. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/380316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1979;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Mendelsohn R., Dinar A., Huang J., Rozelle S., Zhang L. The impact of climate change on China's agriculture. Agric. Econ. 2009;40(3):323–337. [Google Scholar]
- Yamane T., Sakamoto T., Nakagaki T., Nakano Y. Lactic acid bacteria from kefir increase cytotoxicity of natural killer cells to tumor cells. Foods. 2018;7(4):48. doi: 10.3390/foods7040048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y., Xing R., Liu S., Qin Y., Li K., Yu H., Li P. Immunostimulatory effects of sulfated chitosans on RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages via the activation of PI3 K/Akt signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;108:1310–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon S.-H., Ha S.-M., Kwon S., Lim J., Kim Y., Seo H., Chun J. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017;67(5):1613. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zendeboodi F., Khorshidian N., Mortazavian A.M., da Cruz A.G. Probiotic: conceptualization from a new approach. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020;32:103–123. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J., Wittouck S., Salvetti E., Franz C., Harris H., Mattarelli P., O'Toole P.W., Pot B., Vandamme P., Walter J., Watanabe K., Wuyts S., Felis G.E., Gänzle M.G., Lebeer S. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020;70(4):2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.




