Abstract
For a fixed finite group G, the power graph of G was defined to be the simple graph whose vertex set , and edge set . In this paper the extreme vertices of the power graph of abelian groups, dihedral groups and dicyclic groups have been characterized.
Keywords: Power graph of a group, Extreme vertices, Abelian group, Dihedral group
Power graph of a group; Extreme vertices; Abelian group; Dihedral group
1. Introduction
For a fixed finite group G, the directed power graph of G, , was defined by Kelarev et al. (2001), to be the digraph whose vertex set is the elements of the finite group G and there is an arc from x to y if and only if and , that is for some integer m. Note here that digons (or bidirectional arcs) will appear if and only if . The underlying graph of power graph of G was first studied by Chakrabarty et al. (2009), it was denoted by . To be more clear the underlying graph of the power graph of G is the graph with vertex set G and two different vertices are adjacent if and only if one of and is subset of the other.
Many researchers were attracted to work on both directed and undirected power graphs of a finite group G. For example Cameron and Ghosh (2011) proved that if power graphs of two finite groups G and H are isomorphic then G and H have the same number of elements of each order. Cameron (2010) answered the classical isomorphism question: For two abelian groups and , if and are isomorphic, then and are isomorphic. Furthermore, they proved that for a power graph of a finite group G, the automorphism group is the same as that of its power graph if and only if G is the Klein 4-group. Also, Curtin and Pourgholi (2013) proved that maximum size of power graphs of finite groups, of same order, can be obtained in the set of the cyclic groups. In fact many graph invariants and properties of power graph and power digraph were also investigated, see Aalipour et al. (2017); Tamizh Chelvam and Sattanathan (2013); Mirzargar et al. (2012); Moghaddamfar et al. (2014); Pourgholi et al. (2015). In recent years, the study of power graphs has been growing for example, the strong metric dimension of the power graph of a finite group has been studied in Ma and Zhai (2021) and power graphs of (non)orientable genus two have been studied in Ma et al. (2019). Many results and open problems on power graphs can be found in the survay papers Abawajy et al. (2013) and Kumar et al. (2021).
Recall that if G is an abelian group of order n where is the prime decomposition of n, then where . Finally, for two positive integers r and m, we denote greatest common divisor of r and m by . Moreover the Euler's totient function of an integer n, , (some times called Euler's phi function) is defined to be the number of positive integers less than n and co-prime with n. For a graph G, the neighborhood of a vertex v is defined by , the degree of the vertex v is defined to be . For any two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, denotes the length of a shortest path between u and v. Finally, a vertex v in a graph G is called an extreme vertex if the subgraph induced by its neighborhood is complete.
In this paper we investigate the extreme vertices of the power graph of a finite group. We find the extreme vertices of the power graph of finite abelian groups, dihedral groups and dicyclic groups. The abstract concept of convexity and extreme points concept were introduced and investigated in the fifties of last century. These concepts have been extended to graph theory. In fact extreme points play an essential role in studying abstract convexity especially in graph theory. For example every geodetic set of a graph must contain its extreme vertices.
2. Extreme vertices of power graph of groups
We examine the conditions on the elements of a group G to be extreme vertices of .
Theorem 1
Suppose that g is an element of a group G. If pq divides , where p and q are two distinct primes, then g is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Observe that contains an element of order p and an element of order q, say these elements are x and y. The two vertices x and y are adjacent to g in but they are not adjacent in . Thus g is not an extreme vertex of . □
According to the previous theorem, the candidates for extreme vertices in are elements in G of prime power order. We state this result in the following corollary.
Corollary 1
Let g be an element of a group G. If g is an extreme vertex of , then where p is a prime number and n is a non-negative integer.
In the following results, we examine some cases where elements of prime power order are not extreme vertices.
Theorem 2
Let and r be distinct prime numbers and g be an element of a group G with . Suppose that G contains an element x of order and an element y of order with and . Then g is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Since and , then the vertex g is adjacent to both of the vertices x and y in . Since , and q and r are distinct primes, then the vertices x and y are not adjacent in . Therefore g is not an extreme vertex of . □
Theorem 3
Let p and q be two distinct prime numbers and g be an element of a group G with . Suppose that G contains an element x of order , , and an element y of order , , with and . Then g is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
It is similar to the proof of Theorem 2. □
Theorem 4
Let and r be distinct prime numbers and g be an element of a group G with . Suppose that G contains an element x of order such that . Then g is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Since , then the vertex g is adjacent to x in . We have and . Note that the two vertices and are adjacent to the vertex g but they are not adjacent to each other in . Therefore g is not an extreme vertex of . □
3. Extreme vertices of power graphs of Abelian groups
Now, let us look at the extreme vertices of where G is an abelian group. The following theorem shows that has no extreme vertices for many abelian groups.
Theorem 5
Let p, q and r be distinct prime numbers and G be an abelian group. If pqr divides the order of G then has no extreme vertices.
Proof
According to Corollary 1, an element is a possible extreme vertex if its order is of prime power. Suppose that and where is a prime number. The prime number is not equal to at least two of the primes p, q and r. Without loss of generality we can assume that and . Since q and r are primes, then G has an element of order q and an element of order r, say these elements are y and z, respectively. Since G is abelian, then xy and xz are elements of order and , respectively. Using Theorem 2, x is not an extreme vertex of and thus has no extreme vertices. □
Let G be an abelian group. According to previous theorem can have extreme vertices only if where p and q are prime numbers. We have the following results for cyclic groups of order .
Theorem 6
Let p and q be two distinct prime numbers and G be a cyclic group of order where n and m are positive integers. If and where , then x is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Suppose that and where . Then where a is an element of order . Consider the two elements and where b is an element of order q in G. Since gcd, then there exists a positive integer t such modulo . Therefore, there exists an integer s such that . Now , since . Because , then . The last equality follows from the fact that . Hence . Also . Use Theorem 3 to get x is not an extreme vertex of . □
Theorem 7
Let p and q be two distinct prime numbers and G be a cyclic group of order where n and m are positive integers. If and , then x is an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Suppose that and . Since G is a cyclic group of order , then where H is a cyclic group of order and K is a cyclic group of order with (G is the internal direct product of H and K). Since , then and the vertex x is adjacent to all the elements of , i.e. x is adjacent to all elements of order . These are all the elements z such that divides and it is clear that all of these elements are mutually adjacent. If y is another element that is adjacent to x, then divides and thus for some . Since G is cyclic and , then and thus x is adjacent to y. Therefore the vertices that are adjacent to x are all the elements of order where and elements of order where . It is clear that elements of order where are adjacent to each other. It is easy to check that elements of order where are adjacent to elements of order where . Suppose that and are elements of order and , respectively with . Since G is cyclic, then and so and are adjacent in . Hence x is an extreme vertex of . □
We get the same results for elements of order where . Combining these results with Theorem 1 we get the following corollary.
Corollary 2
Let p and q be two distinct prime numbers and G be a cyclic group of orderwhere n and m are positive integers. An elementis an extreme vertex ofif and only ifor.
According to Theorem 5, Theorem 6 and Theorem 7 we get the following classification for the extreme vertices of the power graph of a cyclic group.
Corollary 3
Let G be a cyclic group and p, q are prime numbers.
- •
Ifhas three distinict prime factors, thenhas no extreme vertices.
- •
If, sayand, then the set of extreme vertices ofis
- •
If, thenis complete graph, seeChakrabarty et al. (2009). Thus the extreme vertices ofare the set of all elements of G.
Now, we want to look at abelian but not cyclic groups of order . Assume G is an abelian group of order . Then , where , , , , and . If , then , where the 's ≥0 and the 's ≥0. If one of the 's >0 and one of the 's >0, then pq divides the order of g and according to Theorem 1 g is not an extreme vertex of .
Assume and . Then , , and . Consider and . Then and since p and q are relatively prime, we get . Thus and so g and are adjacent in . Similarly, g and are adjacent in . Since and , then and are not adjacent in . Hence g is not an extreme vertex of . According to this we get the following theorem.
Theorem 8
Suppose that G is an abelian group with , where , , and ( ). If , then has no extreme vertices.
Now, we want to look at abelian groups of the form , where , , , , and (case gives cyclic groups and we have discussed cyclic groups before). Suppose that and g is of the form , where the 's ≥0 and . If one of the 's >0, then using Theorem 1, g is not an extreme vertex of . If all 's =0, then and using a similar argument to the one before Theorem 8, we get g is not an extreme vertex of . Thus candidates for extreme vertices are elements of the form , where the 's ≥0. In the following theorems, we characterize which ones of these elements are extreme vertices.
Theorem 9
Suppose that G is an abelian group and , where , , , , and . Let and such that ( ) for all i. Then g is not an extreme vertex of .
Proof
Since , one can find such that for all i. Define . Observe that if , then and . Thus g is adjacent to z in . Now, define where and . Observe that . Since p and q are relatively primes, then and thus . Hence g is adjacent to w in . So, we have seen that g is adjacent to z with and it is also adjacent to w with . Since does not divide and does not divide , then z and w are not adjacent in . Therefore g is not an extreme vertex of . □
The following example explains previous theorem.
Example 1
Let . Then is not an extreme vertex of . Observe that and are adjacent to g but z and w are not adjacent in .
Suppose that G is an abelian group and , where , , , , and . According to previous theorem, the only candidates for extreme vertices in are elements of the form such that and for at least one i. Ultimately, we will show that these elements are the extreme vertices of . First, we want to find all the elements that are adjacent to g where such that and for at least one i. To do that we need the following notations and results from Sehgal and Singh (2019). We write , and to denote respectively the out-degree of g, the in-degree of g and the number of bidirectional edges incident to g in the diagraph . Note that the degree of a vertex g in equals the sum of the in-degree and out-degree of g minus the number of bidirectional edges incident to g. It is easy to check that and . Thus . To determine , we need to count . In Sehgal and Singh (2019), the authors investigated this problem for abelian groups and gave the following results.
Theorem 10
( Sehgal and Singh (2019) ) Let be an abelian p-group where , and . If is a nonidentity element of G and , then
where k is the smallest non-negative integer such that .
Theorem 11
( Sehgal and Singh (2019) ) Let G be a group and let H and K be two normal subgroups of G such that and are relatively prime. If G is the internal direct product of the subgroups H and K, then for an element of the group G where and ,
- i
.
- ii
.
- iii
.
As mentioned earlier, our objective is to find all the elements that are adjacent to g where such that () and for at least one i. The element g is in the abelian group , where , , , , and . Let and . Observe that for at least one i, and thus we get
Therefore, according to Theorem 10 we get and thus . Write where and . Use Theorem 11 to get
,
and
. Thus .
Consider the sets and . It is easy to check that and each element of is adjacent to g. Since and each element of is adjacent to g, then the elements of are precisely the vertices that are adjacent to g in . We are now in a position to determine the extreme vertices of .
Theorem 12
Suppose that G is an abelian group and , where , , , , and . The extreme vertices of are precisely the elements g of the form such that and for at least one i.
Proof
According to what we have shown prior to Theorem 10, the only candidates for extreme vertices in are elements of the form such that and for at least one i. Our goal is to show that any element of this form is an extreme vertex of . We have seen that the elements that are adjacent to g are precisely the elements of the set where and . The induced subgraph on forms a complete graph because for some . Let . Then and since gcd, we get . Thus any element of A is adjacent to all the elements of B. Let with . Then and thus any element of B is adjacent to any other element of B. Therefore, the induced subgraph on is complete and hence g is an extreme vertex of . □
For instance, the elements and are extreme vertices in .
Using a similar argument, we get the following result.
Theorem 13
Suppose that G is an abelian p-group where and . The extreme vertices of are precisely the elements g of the form such that and for at least one i.
4. Extreme vertices of power graphs of dihedral and dicyclic groups
In this section, we examine the extreme vertices for the dihedral and dicyclic groups. The dihedral group of order 2n is
Chattopadhyay and Panigrahi (2014) characterized power graphs of dihedral groups.
Theorem 14
( Chattopadhyay and Panigrahi (2014) ) For , .
The vertices of in are . These vertices are of degree one in and thus each one of them is an extreme vertex of . Since , then the other extreme vertices of are the extreme vertices of . Use Theorem 5 and Corollary 2 to get the following result about the extreme vertices of .
Theorem 15
The extreme vertices of are if and only if n has three different prime factors. If where p and q are distinict primes, then the extreme vertices of are , all elements of of order and all elements of of order . If where p is a prime number, then the extreme vertices of are all elements of except the identity element.
The dicyclic group of order 4n is
The characterization of the power graphs of dicyclic groups was given in Chattopadhyay and Panigrahi (2014).
Theorem 16
( Chattopadhyay and Panigrahi (2014) ) For , where A is the subgraph of induced by .
The graph of is given in Fig. 1, McKemmie (2017).
Figure 1.
Γ(Q4n).
For , we have . The element is adjacent only to and and the induced subgraph on is complete. Therefore the elements are extreme vertices of the group . Use Theorem 5 and Corollary 2 to get the following characterization of the extreme vertices of .
Theorem 17
The extreme vertices of are if and only if n has two different odd prime factors. If where q is an odd prime number and , then the extreme vertices of are , all elements of of order and all elements of of order . If , then the extreme vertices of are and all elements of of order . If , then the extreme vertices of are all elements of except the identity and .
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Omar A. AbuGhneim: Conceived and designed the analysis; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper. Mohammed Abudayah: Conceived and designed the analysis; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability statement
Data will be made available on request.
Declaration of interests statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
References
- Aalipour G., Akbari S., Cameron P.J., Nikandish R., Shaveisi F. On the structure of the power graph and the enhanced power graph of a group. Electron. J. Comb. 2017;24 [Google Scholar]
- Abawajy J., Kelarev A., Chowdhury M. Power graphs: a survey. Electron. J. Graph Theory Appl. 2013;1:125–147. [Google Scholar]
- Cameron P.J. The power graph of a finite group, ii. J. Group Theory. 2010;13:779–783. [Google Scholar]
- Cameron P.J., Ghosh S. The power graph of a finite group. Discrete Math. 2011;311:1220–1222. [Google Scholar]
- Chakrabarty I., Ghosh S., Sen M.K. Undirected power graphs of semigroups. Semigroup Forum. 2009;78:410–426. [Google Scholar]
- Chattopadhyay S., Panigrahi P. Connectivity and planarity of power graphs of finite cyclic, dihedral and dicyclic groups. Algebra Discrete Math. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- Curtin B., Pourgholi G.R. Edge-maximality of power graphs of finite cyclic groups. J. Algebraic Comb. 2013;40:313–330. [Google Scholar]
- Kelarev A.V., Quinn S.J., Smolíková R. Power graphs and semigroups of matrices. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2001;63:341–344. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar A., Selvaganesh L., Cameron P.J., Chelvam T.T. Recent developments on the power graph of finite groups–a survey. AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. 2021;18:65–94. [Google Scholar]
- Ma X., Walls G.L., Wang K. Power graphs of (non) orientable genus two. Commun. Algebra. 2019;47:276–288. [Google Scholar]
- Ma X., Zhai L. Strong metric dimensions for power graphs of finite groups. Commun. Algebra. 2021;49:4577–4587. [Google Scholar]
- McKemmie E. 2017. Power graphs of finite groups. [Google Scholar]
- Mirzargar M., Ashrafi A.R., Nadjafi-Arani M.J. On the power graph of a finite group. Filomat. 2012;26:1201–1208. [Google Scholar]
- Moghaddamfar A.R., Rahbariyan S., Shi W.J. Certain properties of the power graph associated with a finite group. J. Algebra Appl. 2014;13 [Google Scholar]
- Pourgholi G.R., Yousefi-Azari H., Ashrafi A.R. The undirected power graph of a finite group. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2015;38:1517–1525. [Google Scholar]
- Sehgal A., Singh S.N. The degree of a vertex in the power graph of a finite abelian group. 2019. arXiv:1901.08187
- Tamizh Chelvam T., Sattanathan M. Power graph of finite abelian groups. Algebra Discrete Math. 2013 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.

