Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;25(12):105436. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105436

Table 5.

Comparison of effect size regarding MHINT results when aided with different hearing assistive devices

Condition Coefficient SE 95% CI p
Quiet (dB A)
 Premium HA vs Basic HA −2.1 2.8 −7.6 to 3.4 0.45
 Premium HA vs AirPods Pro −1.9 2.8 −7.4 to 3.6 0.49
 Premium HA vs AirPods 2 −9.2 3.0 −15.1 to −3.2 <0.05
 Basic HA vs AirPods Pro 0.2 2.8 −5.3 to 5.7 0.94
 Basic HA vs AirPods 2 −7.0 3.0 −13.0 to −1.1 <0.05

Noise fronta (dB SNR)
 Premium HA vs Basic HA −1.2 0.8 −2.9 to 0.4 0.15
 Premium HA vs AirPods Pro −2.1 0.8 −3.8 to −0.5 <0.05
 Premium HA vs AirPods 2 −3.6 1.0 −5.6 to −1.6 <0.05
 Basic HA vs AirPods Pro −0.9 0.8 −2.6 to 0.7 0.27
 Basic HA vs AirPods 2 −2.4 1.0 −4.4 to −0.3 <0.05

Noise leftb (dB SNR)
 Premium HA vs Basic HA −1.5 1.2 −3.8 to 0.9 0.22
 Premium HA vs AirPods Pro −0.7 1.2 −3.0 to 1.7 0.58
 Premium HA vs AirPods 2 −2.5 1.2 −4.8 to −0.1 <0.05
 Basic HA vs AirPods Pro 0.8 1.2 −1.6 to 3.2 0.50
 Basic HA vs AirPods 2 −1.0 1.2 −3.4 to 1.3 0.4

Note: HA, hearing aid; CI, confidence interval; dBA, A-weighted decibels; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio.

a

Noise and the targeting speech were both from the front direction of each participant.

b

Noise and the targeting speech were from different direction (noises were from the left side of each participant).