Skip to main content
PNAS Nexus logoLink to PNAS Nexus
. 2022 Sep 27;1(5):pgac213. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac213

PEZO-1 and TRP-4 mechanosensors are involved in mating behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans

Katherine I Brugman 1,#, Vladislav Susoy 2,#, Allyson J Whittaker 3, Wilber Palma 4, Stephanie Nava 5, Aravinthan D T Samuel 6, Paul W Sternberg 7,
Editor: Nancy Bonini
PMCID: PMC9802279  PMID: 36712331

Abstract

Male mating in Caenorhabditis elegans is a complex behavior with a strong mechanosensory component. C. elegans has several characterized mechanotransducer proteins, but few have been shown to contribute to mating. Here, we investigated the roles of PEZO-1, a piezo channel, and TRP-4, a mechanotransducing TRPN channel, in male mating behavior. We show that pezo-1 is expressed in several male-specific neurons with known roles in mating. We show that, among other neurons, trp-4 is expressed in the Post-Cloacal sensilla neuron type A (PCA) sensory neuron, which monitors relative sliding between the male and the hermaphrodite and inhibits neurons involved in vulva detection. Mutations in both genes compromise many steps of mating, including initial response to the hermaphrodite, scanning, turning, and vulva detection. We performed pan-neuronal imaging during mating between freely moving mutant males and hermaphrodites. Both pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants showed spurious activation of the sensory neurons involved in vulva detection. In trp-4 mutants, this spurious activation might be caused by PCA failure to inhibit vulva-detecting neurons during scanning. Indeed, we show that without functional TRP-4, PCA fails to detect the relative sliding between the male and hermaphrodite. Cell-specific TRP-4 expression restores PCA's mechanosensory function. Our results demonstrate new roles for both PEZO-1 and TRP-4 mechanotransducers in C. elegans mating behavior.

Keywords: TRPN, Piezo, C. elegans, mechanosensation, mating


Significance Statement.

Caenorhabditis elegans male copulatory behavior has emerged as a paradigm for the study of complex innate behavior in a comprehensive manner. We find that the orthologs of Piezo and TRPN account for some of the mechanosensation predicted for male mating, thereby allowing us to refine the model for this innate behavior. Most notably, we identify the key role of TRPN in the ability of the PCA sensory neuron to detect relative movement between the male and his partner. By monitoring relative movement, PCA can provide inhibitory input to the downstream circuit for vulva detection, contributing to switching between two temporally adjacent behaviors. We provide an example of how brain-wide activity imaging, genetics, and connectomics combine to understand the function of a neural circuit.

Introduction

Mechanosensory transduction converts diverse mechanical stimuli into biological responses from the workings of cochlear hair cells to osmotic pressure regulators in bacteria to proprioception and touch (1–4). Mechanosensation is adapted to rapidly changing stimuli through the direct sensitivity of diverse ionotropic receptors (5). Several primary mechanotransducers have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans, including a TRPA ortholog TRPA-1, a TRPV ortholog OSM-9, a TRPN ortholog TRP-4, and a DeG/ENaC channel composed of MEC-4/MEC-10 and accessory proteins. These channels regulate diverse rapid behavioral responses (6–8).

Caenorhabditis elegans also expresses PEZO-1, an invertebrate homologue of the piezo class of mechanosensory proteins. Piezo proteins comprise nonselective and conserved cation channels found in plants, animals, and fungi (9–14). All piezo proteins form a homotrimeric structure with a cation-selective central pore surrounded by three N-terminal propeller blades and a cap that covers the pore (15–17). Piezo proteins have diverse mechanosensory roles, from nociception in Drosophila to blood cell volume regulation in mice, zebrafish, and humans (10, 13, 18–25). Like other invertebrates, C. elegans has a single piezo protein, PEZO-1. In the hermaphrodite, PEZO-1 has been shown to have roles in ovulation, defecation, and food intake (11, 26–28).

Ionotropic channels in the TRP superfamily are composed of six transmembrane domain proteins that form large cation-selective pore-forming tetramers (4, 29). Transient Receptor Potential class of cation channels (TRP) channels are divided into six subfamilies based on function and sequence identity (4). TRP channels are implicated in diverse sensory modalities, including thermosensation, mechanosensation, taste, smell, and hearing (4, 30–35). The C. elegans TRP-4 channel is part of the mechanosensative TRPN subfamily and has been implicated in locomotion: trp-4 mutant animals exhibit exaggerated body bending, likely due to a defect in proprioception mediated by the TRP-4 expressing DVA neuron (7, 30).

C. elegans is a self-fertilizing species with occasional males (36–39). Mating in the C. elegans male is a complex behavior that involves several different steps, or behavioral motifs, including initial attraction, scanning for the vulva, turning, stopping at the vulva, insertion of the spicules, and release of sperm (40, 41). Each step exhibits distinct dynamics. Scanning starts when the male contacts the hermaphrodite with the ventral part of his tail and backs along her cuticle. Turning occurs whenever the male reaches the hermaphrodite head or tail during scanning, and allows him to continue scanning on her other side. The male stops when he reaches the vulva. Vulva recognition is followed by prodding when he rapidly presses his spicules (sclerotized structures for mating) into her vulval region, along with fine-scale location of the vulva opening (42). Successful spicule insertion triggers sperm release. The dynamics of mating behavior is driven by diverse patterns of sensory recognition of the hermaphrodite by neurons in the male tail (40, 43).

Many male sensory neurons appear to be polymodal with both chemosensory and mechanosensory functions. For example, the hook neurons HOok sensillum neuron type A (HOA) and HOok sensillum neuron type B (HOB) have ciliated sensory endings but are also embedded in a structure with a mechanosensory morphology (the hook) (44). The ciliated ray neurons (R[1–9]A and R[1–9]B) are open to the exterior of the worm (except the R6 neurons), and are embedded in elongated sensory rays. The postcloacal sensilla are a pair of sensory structures just posterior to the cloaca and each contain the ciliated Post-Cloacal sensilla neuron type A (PCA), Post-Cloacal sensilla neuron type B (PCB), and Post-Cloacal sensilla neuron type C (PCC) sensory neurons (44, 45). Laser ablation of these sensory structures results in a defect in particular motifs of mating (40). Ablation of rays along with other ventral organs results in a male that fails to initiate scanning in response to ventral contact (40). Ablation of either the hook sensillum or either associated neuron (HOA and HOB) results in a male that is unable to stop at the vulva normally, instead backing slowly with spicule partially extruded until contacting the vulva (40). Ablation of postcloacal sensilla neurons results in a male with nearly wild-type mating ability except that he tends to “lose” the vulva more often (40). Ablation of both the hook sensillum and post cloacal sensillum results in a male that is unable to stop at the vulva or locate the vulva through slow searching (40).

A prior study confirmed the role of one of the known mechanoreceptors, the MEC-4/MEC-10 complex (DeG/ENaC channel) in mating. Specifically, mec-4 gain-of-function, mec-4 reduction-of-function, and mec-10 loss-of-function mutants have turning defects, suggesting the involvement of the MEC-4/MEC-10 complex in regulating turning behavior during mating (8). Another study demonstrated that LOV-1 and PKD-2, C. elegans homologs of human PKD1 and PKD2, are involved in mating behaviors with mechanosensory components—initial response to the hermaphrodite and vulva detection (46). PKD1 is thought to have mechanosensory properties (47). Here, we examine two other potential mechanoreceptors, namely the piezo mechanoreceptor in C. elegans, PEZO-1, and the transient receptor potential channel protein, TRP-4, which is expressed in PCA and several ray neurons. We generate mutants defective in pezo-1 and trp-4 and establish their contribution to male mating by analyzing behavior and neuronal activity in freely moving males.

Methods

General methods

Caenorhabditis elegans strains were cultured at 23°C (41). Assays were also conducted at this temperature, except the egg-laying assay, which was performed at 20°C.

Genomic information was obtained from WormBase

Caenorhabditis elegans strains

This study:

  • PS7489 pezo-1(sy1113) IV

  • PS8908 pha-1 III; him-5 V;syEx1771 [pBX-1 + pezo-1(p3)::GFP]

  • PS8909 pha-1 III; him-5 V;syEx1792 [pBX-1 + pezo-1(p5)::GFP]

  • PS8040 hpIs675 [Prgef-1 GCaMP6::3xNLS::mNeptune + lin-15(+)]; him-5 (e1490) V

  • PS8041 hpIs675 [Prgef-1 GCaMP6::3xNLS::mNeptune + lin-15(+)]; pezo-1(sy1113) IV; him-5 (e1490) V

  • PS9157 hpIs675 [Prgef-1 GCaMP6::3xNLS::mNeptune + lin-15(+)]; pezo-1(av240) IV; him-5 (e1490) V

  • PS9045 hpIs675 [Prgef-1 GCaMP6::3xNLS::mNeptune + lin-15(+)]; trp-4 (sy695) I; him-5 (e1490) V

  • PS9669 syEx1715[(pWP082)Peat-4(p8)::TRP-4::unc-54 3'UTR + unc-122::RFP];hpIs675[Prgef-1GCaMP6::3xNLS::mNeptune + lin-15(+)]; trp-4 (sy695) I; him-5 (e1490) V

Other strains:

  • CB4088 him-5 (e1490) V

  • AG570 pezo-1(av240) IV

  • PS1905 trp-4 (sy695) I; him-5 (e1490) V

  • ZM9624 hpIs675 [Prgef-1 GCaMP6::3xNLS:: mNeptune] X

  • ADS1002 aeaIs010 [Prgef-1::GCaMP6s::3xNLS + lin-15(+)]

  • BB92 uuEx18 [dcr-1(wild-type) + dpy-30::mCherry]

  • ADS1014 otIs377 [myo-3p::mCherry]; unc-64(e246) III

  • OH10235 bxIs19 [trp-4p::GFP]

  • OH13105 him-5 (e1490) otIs564 [unc-47(fosmid)::SL2::H2B::mChopti + pha-1(+)] V

  • OH13645 pha-1 (e2123) III; him-5(e1490) V; otIs518 [eat-4(fosmid)::SL2::mCherry::H2B + pha-1(+)]

  • OH10972 otIs376 [eat-4(prom4)::GFP + rol-6(su1006)]

  • OH11152 otIs392 [eat-4(prom6)::GFP + ttx-3::DsRed]

  • OH16719 otIs138 [ser-2(prom3)::GFP + rol-6(su1006)] X; otIs521 [eat-4(prom8)::tagRFP + ttx-3::GFP]

  • OH14018 otIs520 [eat-4(prom11)::GFP + ttx-3::mCherry]

pezo-1:: GFP transcriptional fusions

To visualize the cellular expression patterns of pezo-1, a transcriptional fusion plasmid of several predicted regulatory regions and Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) were generated and injected into N2 hermaphrodites along with a myo-2 DsRed coinjection marker (Fig. 1A and B). Several suspected regulatory regions were selected, including the region 2 kb preceding the start codon (ATG) site of the primary isoform as well as those of proposed alternate isoforms. A combined transcriptional fusion plasmid was generated from a 9-kb combination of the regions that exhibited the broadest expression patterns (TCCTACCTTGTGCCTGTCTACGTA…TCTGTTGTTGCTGTGTTACGACCA and GCACATGCTGCAGGTTAGTTTATT…AGGGTATCGCCTGAAAAAACAATG) in both him-5 background with a myo-2 DsRed coinjection marker and in pha-1 background with a pha-1 rescue plasmid as a marker. Expression patterns were examined with epifluorescence microscopy and a 10x objective.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

pezo-1 and trp-4 gene structure and expression. (A) Gene layout for pezo-1 in C. elegans. (B) Noncoding regions used for creating transcriptional fusion reporters. pezo-1(p5) included two regulatory regions fused together. (C) A 2.1-kb C-terminal deletion was generated using Crispr/Cas9. The deletion affected the pore domain of PEZO-1. (D) Gene layout for trp-4; mutant trp-4 allele is shown. (E) GFP expression of transcriptional fusion using pezo-1(p1), a region 2 kb upstream of the start codon. Only some intestinal glands express GFP. (F) GFP expression under pezo-1(p2), which includes most of the central intron minus ∼100 bp at the 5′ end. Only the intestinal expression is visible. (G) GFP expression under pezo-1(p3), which includes the front half of the central intron. Neuronal expression is visible, including expression in the PCB sensory neuron. (H) Expression pattern of pezo-1(p4), which captures the back half of the central intron. Neuronal expression is visible. (I to K) GFP expression for pezo-1(p5), which includes the fusion of two regulatory regions, is shown, coexpressed with Peat-4:: mCherry (I and J) and Punc-47:: mChopti (K). PCB and PVV, which show strong pezo-1:: GFP expression, are shown in relation to the marker strains. (L and M) Glutamatergic PCA shows trp-4:: GFP expression. PCA identity is confirmed based on the expression of eat-4, a PCA marker. Strong expression of trp-4:: GFP is also observed in the hook socket cell and a weak trp-4:: GFP expression can be seen in the HOA sensory neuron.

CRISPR/Cas9 deletion mutant

To generate the 2-kb deletion mutant, pezo-1(sy1113), we injected a 46,168 Crispr/Cas9 plasmid (peft-3:: Cas9-sv40_NLS:: ttb-2 UTR) along with pRB1017 plasmids (pU6:: gRNA construct) containing our guide RNA sequences (CAGAAGCTCGTAAGCCAGG, AGGTCGAGGTCGTGAGCGG, CCACCACTTTACGAGATGG, ATAGGCAGCTTCGAACTGG) into young adult hermaphrodites (48, 49). In addition, we coinjected a dpy-10 guide RNA plasmid, also inserted into pRB1017, and a repair oligo with the dpy-10 mutation as a marker, which was later crossed out prior to use. Successful injections were identified by the presence of Dumpy or Roller progeny. A total of 120 Dumpy and Roller progeny were singled onto individual plates and screened for the deletion mutation. Worm lysate was split between a control PCR with one internal and external primer (GGCGACCGTTGGTTGGGCTGGTTT, AATACGAGAGCCTTCACATCATC) and a detection PCR with two primers external to the proposed deletion (GGCGACCGTTGGTTGGGCTGGTTT, ATCCTGTGTCCGATCCTGACG). A homozygous mutation line was determined by the absence of a band in the control PCR and the presence of a 500 bp band in the detection PCR (Fig. 1C). The strain was then outcrossed and crossed into him-5 to remove the Dumpy and Roller marker mutations and verified by PCR with the above primers. The deletion was also sequenced and verified to be in frame and at the location, IV:9,347,253. . .9,345,244.

Imaging strains

For pan-neuronal imaging, we used ZM9624, a strain designed to coexpress calcium indicator GCaMP6s and red fluorescent protein mNeptune in all neuronal nuclei under the rgef-1 promoter (43). PS8041 was generated by crossing ZM9624 into a pezo-1(sy1113); him-5(e1490) mutant background, PS8040 was generated by crossing ZM9624 into him-5(e1490), and PS9045 was generated by crossing ZM9624 into trp-4(sy695); him-5(e1490). To track mating events, we used hermaphrodites that expressed red fluorescent markers in their cuticle or muscles. To encourage the richness of male behavior, we used partners with normal motility or showing only mild unc phenotypes.

Cell-specific rescue of trp-4

We sought to rescue the trp-4(sy695) mutation (Fig. 1D) by expressing TRP-4 in the PCA neuron. PCA is a glutamatergic neuron expressing eat-4 (50, 51). Theeat-4 promoter is known to drive gene expression in multiple neurons. Previously, it was shown that different parts of the eat-4 promoters drive expression in different subsets of glutamatergic neurons in the hermaphrodite (52, 53). We screened four existing marker lines to identify eat-4 promoter regions that drive specific gene expression in PCA—OH10972, OH11152, OH16719, and OH14018 (52, 53). We found that one line—OH16719, which included a 289-bp region starting 5327 bp upstream of the eat-4 start codon, showed strong tagRFP expression in PCA and HOA neurons in the tail and three neurons in the head [OLL, OLQ, and RIA, based on Serrano-Saiz et al. (2013) (52)]. We used the 289-bp promoter and the coding sequence of trp-4 to generate a rescue construct. The construct was directly injected, along with a coinjection marker into PS9045 imaging strain, which carried trp-4(sy695) mutation. The resulting strain—PS9669—was screened for animals showing expression of the coinjection marker, which were selected for pan-neuronal imaging.

Recording of neuronal activity in freely moving males

To record the activity of neurons in freely moving males, we used a custom-built spinning disc confocal microscopy setup (43, 54). Briefly, virgin L4 males were picked onto a separate plate with OP50 and were kept on the plate for 15 to 20 hours before imaging. For the imaging experiments, a single virgin male was placed onto a 10 cm Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) agar plate containing a small amount of OP50 for food, 10 μl of NGM buffer, and three to five fluorescently labeled hermaphrodites. The plate was covered with a No1 coverslip. The animals were able to navigate freely under the coverslip. The volumetric imaging was performed with a 40 × 0.95 NA oil objective (Nikon Plan Apo Lambda series) controlled by a piezoelectric stage. We imaged ten brain volumes per second, each volume consisting of 20 optical slices approximately 1.75 micrometers apart. The emitted light from the objective was split into green and red channels and imaged with two separate Andor Zyla 4.2 sCMOS cameras at 200 Hz. Each camera recorded a 256 × 512 pixel region with 0.45 μm pixel size. The posterior nervous system of the male was tracked continuously throughout the imaging session. This was achieved by adjusting the microscope stage position in x, y, and z. Imaging experiments lasted from 1.5 to 10 minutes and specifically aimed at capturing scanning, turning, and vulva detection events.

Extraction of neuronal activity signals

Neuronal activity traces were extracted from the raw data following image preprocessing and registration. Registered data were down-sampled to 5 volumes per second. Neuronal segmentation and tracking were performed using manual and semiautomated methods with the help of the Fiji plugin MaMuT 0.27 (55, 56). Fluorescent signals from green and red channels were extracted for 2.25 × 2.25 × 3.5 μm regions of interest centered on neuronal nuclei. Savitzky–Golay filtering with polynomial order of 1 and frame length 13 was used for noise reduction (57). To minimize motion artifacts, a ratiometric approach was used for calculating neuronal activity traces (43).

For pezo-1(sy1113),pezo-1(av240), and trp-4(sy695) males, we extracted activities of eight neurons implicated in vulva detection and scanning (40, 43, 58). These neurons included postcloacal sensilla neurons PCB, PCC, and PCA, the hook neurons HOA and HOB, the spicule neuron SPicule neuron type C (SPC), the ray neuron R2B, and the interneuron Posterior Ventral neuron type X (PVX). In addition, we extracted the activities of ray neurons R2A, R4A, and R6A for trp-4 males and of the PVV interneuron for pezo-1(av240) males. For trp-4 rescue males (PS9669), we quantified PCA activity. For control males, we used previously generated recordings of ZM9624 males, which were performed using the same microscopy setup (43). From the recordings of mating of mutant and control males, we also tabulated discrete behavioral motifs expressed by the male, which included ventral contact with the hermaphrodite, vulva contact, successful, and failed turning attempts and switching between backward and forward sliding relative to the hermaphrodite.

To quantify neuronal responses to the onsets of discrete behavioral motifs, we extracted neuronal activity traces aligned to the onsets of those specific behavioral motifs for a window spanning 7 seconds before and 13 seconds after each motif onset. Dataset-averaged response curves were calculated for each neuron and motif and normalized to a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 1. We calculated cross-correlations between these normalized traces and binarized behavioral event traces, with the lag parameter set to five (which corresponds to 1 second). A time lag with the absolute maximum correlation across all motif instances was identified. One-sample t test was used to test if the correlation between the neuron's traces and behavior at that time lag was significantly greater than zero.

Mating with freely moving hermaphrodites

L4 males were picked onto a separate plate overnight and all experiments were performed on the next day. Mating plates were prepared by placing 2 μl of concentrated Escherichia coli OP50 solution onto a 6 cm NGM agar plate and allowed to dry. Two him-5 hermaphrodites were placed onto the OP50 spot and allowed to acclimate for 5 minutes. A single male was added to the plate, and the plate was imaged with a Nikon microscope equipped with a 10x objective and a PointGrey camera. The male was tracked continuously by adjusting the stage position with a stage controller. The experiment was recorded at 5 frames/ second. The recording started when the male approached a hermaphrodite, and continued for 15 minutes or until sperm release, whichever was earlier. Mutant and control males were imaged in parallel.

Collected recordings of mating were analyzed blindly. For each experiment, we tabulated timestamps for the following behavioral events: (i) ventral contact of the male tale with the hermaphrodite body, (ii) loss of ventral contact, (iii) contact with the vulva, (iv) end of vulva contact, (v) successful turns, (vi) failed turn attempts, (viii) sliding over to lateral sides of the hermaphrodite, (vii) beginnings and ends of pauses away from the vulva, and (viii) copulation and sperm release. From these timestamps, we calculated several measures of mating performance: (i) turning success rate, (ii) the number of ejaculation events per ventral contact duration, (iii) the number of ejaculation events per vulva contact duration, (iv) the ratio between spurious pausing duration and vulva contact duration, (v) the ratio between passing the vulva events and ventral contact duration, (vi) mean vulva contact, (vii) the number of “sliding over” events per ventral contact duration, and (viii) the number of ventral contact loss events per ventral contact duration.

Body size measurements

Mutations in pezo-1 were previously shown to cause feeding-related phenotypes in C. elegans (27, 28). To test whether trp-4 and pezo-1 mutants showed signs of starvation, we measured their body size. L4 males were picked onto a separate plate and imaged On the next day. The males were mounted on a glass slide with an agar pad and immobilized using sodium azide. Imaging was done with a 4x objective. We measured the surface area of the sagittal section of each male using Fiji (56), as a proxy for body size (Fig. S1).

Results

pezo-1 and trp-4 are expressed in male-specific neurons

To determine pezo-1 expression, we generated five transcriptional fusion constructs that included different predicted regulatory regions for the pezo-1 gene (Fig. 1A and B). These constructs showed different but overlapping expression patterns (Fig. 1E to H). Even small differences in the promoter region used for fusion constructs resulted in substantial changes in the expression pattern. For promoters 2 and 3, a 100 bp difference at the 5’ end coincided with a substantial difference in expression among male neurons, suggesting that this region is important for determining pezo-1 expression. A fusion of the region 4 kb upstream of pezo-1 and its largest intron [Fig. 1B, pezo-1(p5)] led to an expression pattern that contained all the sparser expression patterns with other transcriptional fusions.

We observed pezo-1 expression in several head neurons, pharynx-intestinal valve, vulval muscle, spermatheca, Canal Associated Neuron (CAN), and male tail neurons. Male-specific neurons that showed strong pezo-1 expression included PCB, PVV, and several sensory ray neurons [Fig. 1G to K, see also Millet et al. (2021) (27)]. PCB was previously shown to be required for vulva recognition (40). PVV initiates sharp ventral bending during turning (43). Ray neurons are required for hermaphrodite recognition and scanning (40, 59).

trp-4 was previously shown to be expressed in eight pairs of A-type ray neurons (59). We examined trp-4 expression using the OH10235 bxIs19 [trp-4p:: GFP] transcriptional fusion and noted that trp-4 is also expressed in the hook neuron HOA and in the PCA postcloacal sensilla neuron (Fig. 1L to N). HOA and PCA expression was confirmed using otIs518, an eat-4 marker (51, 60). HOA is required for vulva recognition (40, 43). PCA becomes active when the male slides backwards relative to the hermaphrodite, and thus, PCA has been proposed to have mechanosensory function (43). PCA also becomes active shortly after spicule insertion (43, 51), and, together with other postcloacal sensilla neurons, it has been implicated in vulva recognition (40, 61).

pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants have impaired mating

Given that both pezo-1 and trp-4 are expressed in neurons with key roles in mating behavior, we wanted to test if mutations in pezo-1 and trp-4 compromise male mating. We quantified the mating efficiency of two pezo-1mutants (pezo-1(sy1113) and pezo-1(av240)), a trp-4 (sy695) mutant, and control males (him-5). Virgin males were allowed to mate for 15 minutes with freely moving hermaphrodites. Freely moving hermaphrodites allow a more complete analysis of behavioral phenotypes as they present greater challenges to successful mating. For each male, we calculated the mating success index: the number of ejaculation events per courtship duration. This index is higher when the male succeeds in mating after a short period of scanning. The index is lower when the male succeeds in mating after a long period of scanning or fails to mate at all. pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) mutants, but not pezo-1(sy1113) were significantly less efficient at mating compared to control males (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.037, P < 0.045, and P < 0.45, respectively) (Fig. 2A). Only 10% of pezo-1(av240) and 20% of trp-4(sy695) mutant males were able to mate successfully, compared to 60% and 50% of control and pezo-1(sy1113) males, respectively. We conclude that both pezo-1 and trp-4 mutations compromise mating efficiency.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Mating phenotypes of mutants with freely moving hermaphrodites. (A) The pezo-1(av240) mutant—a full deletion of the pezo-1 gene—and trp-4(sy695) have low mating efficiency compared to control males [him-5(e1490)] and C-terminal pezo-1 deletion, pezo-1(sy1113). (B) Multiple steps of mating are compromised in pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) mutants. These mutants have fewer successful turns per turning attempt, more spurious pausing, more vulva passes, and fewer ejaculation events per time spent at the vulva. All mutant strains in this experiment were crossed with him-5(e1490). Ten males of each strain were recorded. Wilcoxon test, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns—not significant.

Multiple motifs of mating are compromised in pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants

Low mating efficiency can result from defects in any one of the many steps that comprise overall mating behavior. To pinpoint the phenotypes of pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants, we analyzed video recordings of mating behavior, focusing on specific behavioral motifs: scanning, turning, stopping at the vulva, spurious spicule insertion attempts away from the vulva, sliding over the hermaphrodite's lateral side, and sperm release. We found that pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) mutants, but not pezo-1(sy1113) were significantly less efficient at multiple motifs of mating behavior. Compared to control males, pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) mutants were less likely to complete successful turns (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.011, andP < 0.004, respectively), showed more spurious spicule insertion attempts away from the vulva (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.039, andP < 0.027), and were less likely to stop at the vulva (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.043, and P < 0.048). When pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) males did reach the vulva, they were less likely to perform the full spicule insertion and sperm release (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.044, and P < 0.026) (Fig. 2B). pezo-1(av240) males also lost the hermaphrodite more easily (Wilcoxon test andP < 0.007). Mutations in both genes compromise multiple steps of mating, and result in partially-overlapping phenotypes.

Full deletion of pezo-1 has a stronger phenotype than a C-terminal deletion

The pezo-1(av240) mutant (a complete deletion of pezo-1) had much stronger mating defects compared to the pezo-1(sy1113) mutant (a 2-kb in-frame C-terminal deletion). The C-terminal deletion in pezo-1(sy1113) removes the pore domain of PEZO-1(Fig. 1C). One interpretation is that piezo with the large C-terminal deletion retains some function. Consistent with this hypothesis, a prior study in hermaphrodites showed that the full deletion of pezo-1(av240) has a much stronger effect on the brood size compared to pezo-1(sy1199), a mutant with a Crispr/Cas-9 knock-in of a “STOP-IN” cassete (62) that prevents C-terminus translation (26). We tested if the hermaphrodite brood size is also different between pezo-1(av240) and pezo-1(sy1113) mutants. Indeed, brood size comparisons show that the pezo-1(sy1113) mutants have a significantly larger brood size than the pezo-1(av240) mutants, ∼80 progeny per animal vs ∼20 progeny per animal over a three-day period (Fig. S2). A complete deletion of pezo-1 has a significantly larger effect on both mating efficiency and egg laying compared to a C-terminal deletion, which affects the pore domain.

pezo-1mutant males are more likely to fail turn attempts but show normal PVV activity upon successful turns

pezo-1 is strongly expressed in the PVV interneuron (Fig. 1I to K). Based on the results of functional imaging, ablation phenotypes, and synaptic wiring, PVV has been implicated in turning behavior (43, 63). The male performs turning via sharp ventral bending of his tail when he reaches either end of the hermaphrodite. In the wild-type males, most turning attempts are successful and end with the tail attaching itself to the other side of the hermaphrodite, allowing the male to continue scanning for the vulva (Fig. 2B). In the pezo-1 (av240) mutant, 32% ± 12% ,(SD) turn attempts fail and the tail loses contact with the hermaphrodite. We tested whether PVV showed different activity upon turning attempts in the wild-type males and pezo-1 (av240) mutants. PVV activity was extracted and aligned to the onset of turning attempts. Successful turns and failed turns were analyzed separately. In the wild type, PVV activity starts rising shortly before the turn and peaks 1.2 seconds (median) after the turn onset (Fig. 3A). In the pezo-1 (av240) mutants, PVV activates upon turning and its temporal dynamics is similar to the wild type (PVV peaks at 1.4 seconds, Fig. 3B). In the pezo-1 (av240) mutants, more than 50% of turning attempts were unsuccessful during brain-wide imaging experiments. In both wild-type and mutant males, PVV peaks later—at 1.8 seconds—when the turning is unsuccessful (Fig. 3C to E). Althoughpezo-1 (av240) mutants show compromised turning, and compromised turning is associated with a delay in PVV activation (both in mutants and wild type), it is uncertain if the pezo-1 mutation itself causes the delayed activation of PVV.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Activities of neurons aligned to behavioral events in pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants. (A) PVV activates with the onset of turning. Mean dataset-averaged activity is shown as well as PVV traces for individual turning attempts. (B to D) pezo-1 mutants show similar PVV dynamics to wild-type males during both successful and failed turning attempts. (E) PVV activates later during failed turning attempts in both wild-type and pezo-1 males. Peak activation time relative to the turn onset is shown; Wilcoxon test, * P < 0.05, ns—not significant. (F) Activities of neurons of the vulva-detecting circuit aligned to the onset of vulva detection. Vulva detection involves a circuit of recurrently-connected neurons, including two postcloacal sensilla neurons, PCB and PCC, the hook neurons HOA and HOB, the R2B ray neuron, and the PVX interneuron. In the wild-type control, these neurons become active when the tail reaches the vulva. In pezo-1(sy1113), pezo-1(av240), and trp-4(sy695), activation of PCB, PCC, HOA, HOB, R2B, and PVX appears to be largely uncompromised. Black traces show normalized mean dataset-averaged activities across all animals; standard deviation is indicated in gray. The number of animals is shown; the number of events recorded across all animals is shown in parentheses. One-sample t test, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns—not significant.

Neurons for vulva detection show normal activity upon vulva detection in pezo-1 and trp-4

Given that pezo-1 and trp-4 are expressed in neurons involved in vulva detection, we tested whether neurons in the previously identified vulva-detecting circuit—PCB, PCC, HOA, HOB, R2B, and PVX—exhibited different activity upon vulva contact in mutant males compared to control males. We recorded the activity of the male's entire posterior brain during mating with freely moving hermaphrodites. We extracted activities of PCB, PCC, HOA, HOB, R2B, and PVX and aligned them to the onset of vulva-detecting events. In control males, PCB, PCC, HOA, HOB, R2B, and PVX show a sharp increase in activity when the male tail contacts the vulva (Fig. 3F). The same neurons show a similar increase in activity upon vulva contact in pezo-1(sy1113), pezo-1(av240), and trp-4(sy695) mutants (Fig. 3F). Thus, in pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants, the response of individual neurons of the vulva-detecting circuit to vulva detection events is largely unaffected.

Neurons for vulva detection show spurious activation away from the vulva in pezo-1 and trp-4

pezo-1(av240) and trp-4(sy695) mutants frequently pause scanning away from the vulva and show spurious spicule insertion attempts (Fig. 2B). Previously, pausing away from the vulva was shown to be accompanied by pulses of spurious activation in the vulva-detecting neurons (43). We screened recordings of pezo-1(sy1113), pezo-1(av240), and trp-4(sy695) mutants for such spurious activation of the vulva-detecting circuit (Fig. 4). In control males, spurious activation is uncommon. A total of 2 out of 24 (9%) control males showed brief pulses of spurious activation. In contrast, spurious activity was observed in 5 of 19 (26%) pezo-1(sy1113) males, 5 of 10 (50%) pezo-1(av240) males, and 13 of 15 (86%) trp-4(sy695) males.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

pezo-1 and trp-4 mutants show spurious activation among vulva-detecting neurons. Normalized activity traces of neurons involved in vulva detection, copulation, and scanning in wildtype, trp-4, and pezo-1 males. In the control males, sensory neurons PCB, PCC, HOA, HOB, and R2A activate specifically when the male passes over the vulva and are inactive when scanning, 5 of 19 (26%) pezo-1(sy1113) males, 5 of 10 (50%) pezo-1(av240) males, and 13 of 15 (86%) trp-4(sy695) males exhibited spurious activation during scanning. In the figure, examples of spurious activation in the mutant males are shown. Red triangles indicate bursts of spurious activation. The activities of additional neurons are shown in gray: PVX, an interneuron which nonspecifically activates with vulva location; SPC, which activates with spicule insertion, and PCA which activates with backward sliding.

PCA role in mechanosensation is compromised in trp-4 mutants

Previously, it was suggested that PCA mechanosensory activation with backward scanning inhibits spurious activation of the vulva-detecting circuit (43). When PCA is ablated, the vulva-detecting circuit becomes active away from the vulva (43). The molecular mechanism of this inhibition is likely glutamatergic (58). PCA is presynaptic to several neurons involved in vulva detection, including HOA, PCB, and PVX (63, 64). Given that trp-4 is expressed in the PCA neuron, we asked if the spurious activity in trp-4 mutants might be caused by the loss of mechanosensory function of PCA and the consequent release of the vulva-detecting circuit from glutamatergic inhibition from PCA.

In control males, the activity of PCA is correlated with the relative sliding between the male and the hermaphrodite. When the male tail slides backward relative to the hermaphrodite, PCA increases its activity (t test, P < 0.001). When the male tail slides forward, PCA activity decreases (Fig. 5A) (t test, P < 0.001). In contrast, in trp-4 males, PCA activity does not change when the direction of the relative sliding changes (Fig. 5A) (t test, P < 0.528 and P < 0.342). Also, unlike in control males, in trp-4 mutants PCA does not become active upon ventral contact with the hermaphrodite (Fig. 5B) (t test, P < 0.001 for control and P < 0.762 for trp-4 males). This suggests that mechanosensation in PCA is dependent on the TRP-4 channel. Without functioning TRP-4, PCA cannot monitor the relative sliding between the male and hermaphrodite and is thereby unable to provide glutamatergic inhibition to vulva-detecting neurons during scanning. Lack of inhibition results in the spurious activation of vulva-detecting neurons.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

trp-4 role in mechanosensation. (A) In control males, PCA activity increases when the male tail slides backwards relative to the hermaphrodite, and decreases when the tail slides forwards. In trp-4 mutants, no change in activity occurs. (B) Control males but not trp-4 mutants exhibit activation of PCA upon ventral contact with the hermaphrodite. A-type ray neurons show activation upon ventral contact in both control and trp-4 mutant males (C). (D) A 289-bp promoter 5327 bp upstream of the eat-4 start codon (eat-4(p8)) drives expression in PCA and HOA. Right lateral aspect; PCA and its processes are shown. (E) Cell-specific expression of TRP-4 using eat-4(p8) promoter (PS9669) restores PCA sensitivity to sliding. (F) PCA's mode of action. PCA uses TRP-4 to sense when the male tail slides backwards relative to the hermaphrodite. Glutamatergic PCA, activated with sliding, hyperpolarizes HOA via the inhibitory glutamate-gated chloride channel AVR-14. Hyperpolarization of HOA can propagate to vulva-detecting neurons via electrical synapses (UNC-7). TRP-4 mutation compromises PCA's mechanosensation, thereby releasing vulva-detecting neurons from inhibition and resulting in their spurious activation away from the vulva. Black traces show normalized mean dataset-averaged activities across all animals; standard deviation is indicated in gray. The number of animals is shown; the number of events recorded across all animals is shown in parentheses. One-sample t test, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and ns—not significant.

A-type ray neurons show normal activity in trp-4 mutants

Like the PCA neuron, A-type ray neurons express trp-4 and have been implicated in mechanosensation. Many A-type ray neurons increase their activity upon ventral contact with a hermaphrodite. We tested whether the A-type ray neurons in trp-4 mutants are less activated by the contact. We extracted activities of R2A and R6A and aligned them to the onset of the ventral contact between the male and the hermaphrodite. We also extracted activities of R4A, which does not express trp-4 (59). Like R2A and R6A, R4A increases its activity upon contact (Fig. 5C). In trp-4 males, R2A, R4A, and R6A all showed similar activity, and like in control males, these ray neurons were activated upon contact (Fig. 5C), although the activation appeared weaker compared to control males. These results are consistent with previous observations that trp-4 males show a normal hermaphrodite response (59). We conclude that A-type ray neurons do not rely solely on TRP-4 for hermaphrodite recognition.

Cell-specific TRP-4 expression restores PCA sensitivity to sliding in trp-4 mutants

We tested if PCA mechanosensation, compromised in trp-4 mutants, can be rescued by cell-specific expression of TRP-4. We created a rescue line using a 289 bp region of the eat-4 promoter (52), which drives gene expression in two neurons in the tail—PCA and HOA (Fig. 5D). We performed brain-wide imaging of the rescue line during mating and quantified PCA activity in response to relative sliding between mating partners. In the rescue line, PCA showed wild type-like responses to changes in the sliding direction (Fig. 5E). PCA activity increased when the male slid backwards relative to the hermaphrodite and it decreased when the male switched to sliding forwards. We conclude that expression of TRP-4 in PCA is sufficient to restore PCA's mechanosensory role in monitoring relative movement between mating partners.

Discussion

Our results show that both PEZO-1 and TRP-4 play important roles in C. elegans mating. Mutations in both genes reduce mating efficiency by altering the performance of multiple motifs of mating. Multiple behavioral phenotypes exhibited by the mutants are consistent with the broad expression of pezo-1 and trp-4 throughout the male nervous system. Both genes are expressed in neurons that participate in many different motifs of mating. For example, pezo-1 is strongly expressed in neurons that contribute to two nonoverlapping mating motifs: the PVV interneuron, which was previously shown to be required for turning behavior, and the PCB sensory neuron, which is involved in vulva detection.

The behavioral phenotypes of pezo-1 and trp-4 partially overlap. This is also consistent with the broad expression patterns of both pezo-1 and trp-4. Even when the two genes are expressed in different neurons, the neurons themselves might contribute to the same behavioral motifs. For example, both PVV (which expresses pezo-1) and A-type ray neurons (which express trp-4) have been implicated in turning (40, 43).

In the case of PEZO-1, we were unable to fully dissect mechanistic links between mutant alleles and observed behavioral phenotypes. In the case of TRP-4, however, we were able to identify its key contribution to PCA's ability to monitor sliding between the male and hermaphrodite, which is used to regulate switching between two behavioral motifs—scanning and stopping at the vulva.

Our results suggest that PEZO-1 that has a mutation in its pore domain might retain some of its function. Mutants with complete deletion of pezo-1 (pezo-1(av240)) demonstrate fewer ejaculation events, successful turns, and vulva contacts than a partial deletion, while also causing more spurious pausing, “pass vulva” events, and “loss of contact” events than the pezo-1(sy1113) mutants. Consistent with this, a larger deletion of pezo-1 has a more severe phenotype on a neuronal level: pezo-1(av240) males show more events of spurious activation of the circuit involved in vulva detection. In addition, pezo-1(sy1113) has a less severe egg-laying phenotype compared to pezo-1(av240), a result consistent with Bai et al. 2020 (26), where a less severe egg-laying phenotype was reported for the “STOP-IN” allele in the pore domain. These results are surprising because previous electrophysiological studies of mutant piezo channels showed the key role of the pore domain in determining ion-conducting properties (17, 65–67). In a recent C. elegans study, Hughes et al. (28) showed that mutations affecting the C-terminus of PEZO-1 had a weaker effect on the defecation frequency but a stronger effect on the egg-laying rate compared to mutations at the 5’ end of the gene. We cannot rule out completely that pezo-1(av240) phenotypes might be affected by another genome feature in the pezo-1 locus, which might have been altered by the large deletion. However, given that the nonpore containing region of the human and mouse Piezo1 has been demonstrated previously to be sufficient for mechanotransduction (22, 66), it is plausible that C. elegans PEZO-1 with the C-terminal deletion preserves some of its function (68).

Our results provided further evidence for a mechanosensory role of PCA in male mating behavior and suggested that its function relies on TRP-4 as the key mechanotransducer (Fig. 5F). Previous recordings from PCA in freely moving males during mating revealed that PCA plays distinct roles in copulation (43, 51) and in monitoring the relative sliding between the male and the hermaphrodite (43). We show that trp-4 is expressed in PCA. In trp-4 mutants, PCA does not become active when the male slides backward relative to the hermaphrodite. Moreover, trp-4 mutants pause backward scanning away from the vulva, which recapitulates the phenotype caused by PCA ablation. Cell-specific TRP-4 expression in the PCA neuron restores its ability to monitor sliding between mating partners. We suggest that initiation of backward sliding of the male tail relative to the hermaphrodite activates the TRP-4 channel, which in turn activates PCA. This activation of PCA provides glutamatergic inhibition to the neurons involved in vulva detection, which is required for persistent scanning (43, 58).

PCA has been implicated in multiple motifs of mating. In addition to the monitoring of backward sliding, PCA has been demonstrated to play roles in copulation (43, 51), and previous ablation studies indicated its contribution to vulva detection (40, 61). Whether these other roles of PCA require TRP-4 remains to be studied.

Many pezo-1 and trp-4 mutant phenotypes are incompletely penetrant. For example, PCB, which expresses pezo-1, shows nearly normal activity in both pezo-1 mutant alleles; A-type ray neurons R2A and R6A, which express trp-4, retain their activation by the hermaphrodite contact in trp-4 mutants. The incomplete penetrance of the phenotypes might be due to additional, yet uncharacterized components that may contribute to activation of these neurons in response to mechanical as well as chemical stimuli from the hermaphrodite. Furthermore, many sensory neurons in the posterior brain of C. elegans males are connected to each other, a property that is thought to enable recurrent excitation. It is plausible that even though mutant PEZO-1 or TRP-4 might be incapable of activating a neuron in response to a relevant mechanical stimulus from a hermaphrodite, the neuron itself might still be activated by other sensory neurons, which are tuned to correlated inputs from the mating partner.

Supplementary Material

pgac213_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank WormBase: Davis P, Zarowiecki M, Arnaboldi V, Becerra A, Cain S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Cho J, da Veiga Beltrame E, Diamantakis S, Gao S, Grigoriadis D, Grove CA, Harris TW, Kishore R, Le T, Lee RYN, Luypaert M, Müller HM, Nakamura C, Nuin P, Paulini M, Quinton-Tulloch M, Raciti D, Rodgers FH, Russell M, Schindelman G, Singh A, Stickland T, Van Auken K, Wang Q, Williams G, Wright AJ, Yook K, Berriman M, Howe KL, Schedl T, Stein L, Sternberg PW. WormBase in 2022-data, processes, and tools for analyzing Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2022 Apr 4;220(4):iyac003. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac003. PMID: 35134929; for genome information, CGC for providing strains, Ian Kimbell for help with data collecting, Xiaofei Bai for providing AG570 pezo-1(av240), Shawn Xu for sharing a plasmid containing trp-4, and Tsui-Fen Chou for providing Cas9 protein.

Notes

Competing Interest: The authors declare no competing interest.

Contributor Information

Katherine I Brugman, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Vladislav Susoy, Department of Physics and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Allyson J Whittaker, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Wilber Palma, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Stephanie Nava, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Aravinthan D T Samuel, Department of Physics and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Paul W Sternberg, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH R01-NS113119 (P.W.S. and A.D.T.S.). K.B. was supported by NIH-Training Grant T32GM007616.

Authors' Contributions

K.B., V.S., and P.W. designed the project. K.B., V.S., and A.W. performed the experiments. K.B., W.P. and S.N. created essential reagents. K.B. and V.S. collected and analyzed the data. K.B., V.S., A.S., and P.W wrote the manuscript.

Data Availability

All data are included in the manuscript and/or Supplementary Material.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. Voglis G, Tavernarakis N. 2005. Mechanotransduction in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Kamkin A Kiseleva IMechanosensitivity in Cells and Tissues. Moscow: Academia (Moscow). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Qiu X, Müller U. 2018. mechanically gated ion channels in mammalian hair cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 12:100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Booth IR, Blount P. 2012. The MscS and MscL families of mechanosensitive channels act as microbial emergency release valves. J Bacteriol. 194(18):4802–4809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Montell C. 2005. The TRP superfamily of cation channels. Sci Signal. 2005(272):re3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gillespie PG, Walker RG. 2001. Molecular basis of mechanosensory transduction. Nature. 413(6852):194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schafer WR. 2015. Mechanosensory Molecules and Circuits in C. Elegans. Pflüg Arch-Eur J Physiol. 467(1):39–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li W, Feng Z, Sternberg PW, Xu XSAC. 2006. Elegans stretch receptor neuron revealed by a mechanosensitive TRP channel homologue. Nature. 440(7084):684–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Liu T, Kim K, Li C, Barr MM. 2007. FMRFamide-like neuropeptides and mechanosensory touch receptor neurons regulate male sexual turning behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 27(27):7174–7182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Coste B, et al. 2010. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 330(6000):55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kim SE, Coste B, Chadha A, Cook B, Patapoutian A. 2012. The role of Drosophila Piezo in mechanical nociception. Nature. 483(7388):209–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kamajaya A, Kaiser JT, Lee J, Reid M, Rees DC. 2014. The structure of a conserved piezo channel domain reveals a topologically distinct β sandwich fold. Structure. 22(10):1520–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Prole DL, Taylor CW. 2013. Identification and analysis of putative homologues of mechanosensitive channels in pathogenic protozoa. PLoS One. 8(6):e66068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Faucherre A, Nargeot J, Mangoni ME, Jopling C. 2013. Piezo2b regulates vertebrate light touch response. J Neurosci. 33(43):17089–17094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang Z,et al. 2019. Genetic analysis of a piezo—like protein suppressing systemic movement of plant viruses in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ge J, et al. 2015. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature. 527(7576):64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Saotome K, et al. 2018. Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature. 554(7693):481–486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wang L, et al. 2019. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature. 573(7773):225–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Faucherre A, Kissa K, Nargeot J, Mangoni ME, Jopling C. 2014. Piezo1 plays a role in erythrocyte volume homeostasis. Haematologica. 99(1):70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ranade SS, et al. 2014. Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 111(28):10347–10352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ranade SS, et al. 2014. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in Mice. Nature. 516(7529):121–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Eijkelkamp N, et al. 2013. A Role for Piezo2 in EPAC1-dependent mechanical allodynia. Nat Commun. 4(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bae C, Gnanasambandam R, Nicolai C, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA. 2013. Xerocytosis is caused by mutations that alter the kinetics of the mechanosensitive channel PIEZO1. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 110(12):E1162–E1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bae C, Gottlieb PA, Sachs F. 2013. Human PIEZO1: removing inactivation. Biophys J. 105(4):880–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Albuisson J, et al. 2013. Dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis linked to gain-of-function mutations in mechanically activated PIEZO1 ion channels. Nat Commun. 4(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zarychanski R, et al. 2012. Mutations in the mechanotransduction protein PIEZO1 are associated with hereditary xerocytosis. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 120(9):1908–1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bai X, et al. 2020. Caenorhabditis elegans PIEZO channel coordinates multiple reproductive tissues to govern ovulation. Elife. 9:e53603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Millet JR, Romero LO, Lee J, Bell B, Vásquez VC. 2021. Elegans PEZO-1 is a mechanosensitive ion channel involved in food sensation. J Gen Physiol. 154(1):e202112960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hughes K, et al. 2022. Distinct mechanoreceptor Pezo-1 isoforms modulate food intake in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 (Bethesda). 12(3):jkab429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gaudet R. 2008. TRP channels entering the structural era. J Physiol. 586(15):3565–3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kang L, et al. 2010. Elegans TRP family protein TRP-4 Is a pore-forming subunit of a native mechanotransduction channel. Neuron. 67(3):381–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Caterina MJ, et al. 1997. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the painpPathway. Nature. 389(6653):816–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. McKemy DD, Neuhausser WM, Julius D. 2002. Identification of a cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in thermosensation. Nature. 416(6876):52–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Story GM, et al. 2003. ANKTM1, a TRP-like channel expressed in nociceptive neurons, is activated by cold temperatures. Cell. 112(6):819–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Corey DP, et al. 2004. TRPA1 Is a candidate for the mechanosensitive transduction channel of vertebrate hair cells. Nature. 432(7018):723–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Liman ER, Corey DP, Dulac C. 1999. TRP2: a candidate transduction channel for mammalian pheromone sensory signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 96(10):5791–5796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hodgkin J. 1983. Male phenotypes and Mmting efficiency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 103(1):43–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hodgkin J, Horvitz HR, Brenner S. 1979. Nondisjunction mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 91(1):67–94. 10.1093/genetics/91.1.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kimble J, Hirsh D. 1979. The postembryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 70(2):396–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Anderson JL, Morran LT, Phillips PC. 2010. Outcrossing and the maintenance of males within C. Elegans populations. J Hered. 101(suppl_1):S62–S74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu KS, Sternberg PW. 1995. Sensory regulation of male mating behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron. 14(1):79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77(1):71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Garcia LR, Mehta P, Sternberg PW. 2001. Regulation of distinct muscle behaviors controls theC. Elegansmale's copulatory spicules during mating. Cell. 107(6):777–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Susoy V, et al. 2021. Natural sensory context drives diverse brain-wide activity during C. Elegans mating. Cell. 184(20):5122–5137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Sulston JE, Albertson DG, Thomson JN. 1980. The Caenorhabditis elegans male: postembryonic development of nongonadal structures. Dev Biol. 78(2):542–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bae Y-K, Barr MM. 2008. Sensory roles of neuronal cilia: cilia development, morphogenesis, and function in C. Elegans. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr. 13:5959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Barr MM, et al. 2001. The Caenorhabditis elegans autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease gene homologs Lov-1 and Pkd-2 Act in the same pathway. Curr Biol. 11(17):1341–1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nigro EA, Boletta A. 2021. Role of the polycystins as mechanosensors of extracellular stiffness. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol. 320(5):F693–F705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Friedland AE,et al. 2013. Heritable genome editing in C. Elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Methods. 10(8):741–743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Arribere JA, et al. 2014. Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 198(3):837–846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lee RY, Sawin ER, Chalfie M, Horvitz HR, Avery L. 1999. EAT-4, a homolog of a mammalian sodium-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter, is necessary for glutamatergic neurotransmission in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 19(1):159–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. LeBoeuf B, Correa P, Jee C, García LR. 2014. Caenorhabditis elegans male sensory-motor neurons and dopaminergic support cells couple ejaculation and post-ejaculatory behaviors. Elife. 3:e02938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Serrano-Saiz E, et al. 2013. Modular control of glutamatergic neuronal identity in C. Elegans by distinct homeodomain proteins. Cell. 155(3):659–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Serrano-Saiz E, Oren-Suissa M, Bayer EA, Hobert O. 2017. Sexually dimorphic differentiation of a C. Eleganshub neuron Is cell autonomously controlled by a conserved transcription factor. Curr Biol. 27(2):199–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Venkatachalam V, et al. 2016. Pan-neuronal imaging in roaming Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 113(8):E1082–E1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Wolff C, et al. 2018. Multi-view light-sheet imaging and tracking with the MaMuT software reveals the cell lineage of a direct developing arthropod limb. Elife. 7:e34410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Schindelin J, et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9(7):676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Orfanidis SJ. 1995. Introduction to Signal Processing; Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Correa PA, Gruninger T, García LR. 2015. DOP-2 D2-like receptor regulates UNC-7 innexins to attenuate recurrent sensory motor neurons during C. Elegans copulation. J Neurosci. 35(27):9990–10004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Koo PK, Bian X, Sherlekar AL, Bunkers MR, Lints R. 2011. The robustness of Caenorhabditis elegans male mating behavior depends on the distributed properties of ray sensory neurons and their output through core and male-specific targets. J Neurosci. 31(20):7497–7510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Serrano-Saiz E, et al. 2017. A neurotransmitter atlas of the Caenorhabditis elegans male nervous system reveals sexually dimorphic neurotransmitter usage. Genetics. 206(3):1251–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Liu Y, et al. 2011. A cholinergic-regulated circuit coordinates the maintenance and bi-Stable states of a sensory-motor behavior during Caenorhabditis elegans male copulation. PLos Genet. 7(3):e1001326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wang H, Park H, Liu J, Sternberg PW. 2018. An efficient genome editing strategy to generate putative null mutants inCaenorhabditis elegans using CRISPR/Cas9. G3. Genes Genomes Genet. 8(11):3607–3616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Jarrell TA, et al. 2012. The connectome of a mecision-Making neural network. Science. 337(6093):437–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Cook SJ, et al. 2019. Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes. Nature. 571(7763):63–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Zheng W, Gracheva EO, Bagriantsev SN. 2019. A hydrophobic gate in the inner pore helix Is the major determinant of inactivation in mechanosensitive piezo channels. Elife. 8:e44003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Zhao Q, et al. 2016. cIon permeation and mechanotransduction mechanisms of mechanosensitive pezo channels. Neuron. 89(6):1248–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Coste B, et al. 2015. Piezo1 Ion channel pore properties are dictated by c-terminal region. Nat Commun. 6(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Brugman KI. 2020. Caltech. [accessed date September 26, 2022] https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechTHESIS:05312020-153151158 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

pgac213_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in the manuscript and/or Supplementary Material.


Articles from PNAS Nexus are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES