Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Aug 21;109(5):576–585. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13845

Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and impaired kidney function—A Danish general population study with 11 years follow‐up

Morten K Larsen 1,2,, Vibe Skov 1, Lasse Kjær 1, Natascha A Møller‐Palacino 1, Rasmus K Pedersen 3, Morten Andersen 3, Johnny T Ottesen 3, Sabrina Cordua 4, Henrik E Poulsen 2,5,6, Morten Dahl 2,7, Trine A Knudsen 1,2, Christina Schjellerup Eickhardt‐Dalbøge 1,2, Steffen Koschmieder 8, Kasper M Pedersen 2,9, Yunus Çolak 2,9,10, Stig E Bojesen 2,9, Børge G Nordestgaard 2,9, Thomas Stiehl 3,11, Hans C Hasselbalch 1,2, Christina Ellervik 2,12,13
PMCID: PMC9804367  PMID: 36054308

Abstract

The myeloproliferative neoplasms are associated with chronic kidney disease but whether clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is associated with impaired kidney function is unknown. In the Danish General Suburban Population Study (N = 19 958) from 2010 to 2013, 645 individuals were positive for JAK2V617F (N = 613) or CALR (N = 32) mutations. Mutation‐positive individuals without haematological malignancy were defined as having CHIP (N = 629). We used multiple and inverse probability weighted (IPW)‐adjusted linear regression analysis to estimate adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ml/min/1.73 m2) by mutation status, variant allele frequency (VAF%), blood cell counts, and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We performed 11‐year longitudinal follow‐up of eGFR in all individuals. Compared to CHIP‐negative individuals, the mean differences in eGFR were −5.6 (−10.3, −0.8, p = .02) for CALR, −11.9 (−21.4, −2.4, p = 0.01) for CALR type 2, and −10.1 (−18.1, −2.2, p = .01) for CALR with VAF ≥ 1%. The IPW‐adjusted linear regression analyses showed similar results. NLR was negatively associated with eGFR. Individuals with CALR type 2 had a worse 11‐year longitudinal follow‐up on eGFR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals (p = .004). In conclusion, individuals with CALR mutations, especially CALR type 2, had impaired kidney function compared to CHIP‐negative individuals as measured by a lower eGFR at baseline and during 11‐year follow‐up.

Keywords: CALR, CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, eGFR, epidemiology, impaired kidney function, JAK2V617F, population studies

1. INTRODUCTION

The Philadelphia‐chromosome negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) cover essential thrombocythaemia (ET), polycythaemia vera (PV) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). 1 , 2 MPNs are caused by acquired somatic driver mutations in the haematopoietic stem cells, including JAK2V617F, CALR and MPL mutations. 3 , 4 , 5

In contrast, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) constitutes an age‐dependent acquisition of leukaemia‐associated mutations in peripheral blood, typically with a variant allele frequency (VAF) >2%, 6 but without the presence of a haematological malignancy. 7 , 8 , 9 However, the clinical impact of clones <2% is largely unknown. Clonal haematopoiesis (CH) and CHIP are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), 10 , 11 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 12 autoimmune vasculitis, 13 haematological and non‐haematological malignancies. 14 , 15

MPN is associated with several chronic inflammatory‐mediated diseases 16 , 17 and a progressive reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). 18 In addition, in patients with MPN, moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with thrombosis, 19 , 20 disease severity 20 and reduced survival. 21 CKD in MPN may be caused by an underlying glomerulonephritis 22 such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, mesangial sclerosis and hypercellularity and renal interstitial extramedullary haematopoiesis. 23 , 24 , 25 Clonal myelopoiesis has just recently been associated with CKD in the UK Biobank using whole exome sequencing but without measurement of CALR mutations. 26 Although only supported by a single case‐report, CALR may be associated with MPN nephropathy, 23 as calreticulin is involved in fibrosis. 27

We, therefore, hypothesised that CHIP mutations, including the JAK2V617F or CALR mutations, is associated with impaired kidney function in the Danish General Suburban Population Study (GESUS).

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study population

From 2010 to 2013, the GESUS study enrolled 19 958 individuals age ≥20 years who consented to research and return of results critical for health care. 9 GESUS was approved by the regional ethical committee (SJ‐114, SJ‐452), the Danish Data Protection Agency (REG‐50‐2015) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. The health examination included anthropometric, haematological and biochemical measurements, and a detailed questionnaire as previously described. 28

2.2. Measurement of JAK2V617F and CALR mutation

In GESUS, molecular screening was performed using a multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay as previously described. 9 Briefly, DNA from four individuals were pooled and evaluated for both JAK2V617F and CALR type 1 and type 2. Both assays were multiplexed with wild‐type. If mutation‐positive, the four samples were re‐analysed separately for either JAK2V617F or CALR to identify the positive sample(s) and quantify the mutant VAF (%). The sensitivity of the assays was 0.009% for JAK2V617F and 0.01% for CALR types 1 and 2. 9 Thus, CHIP was defined as the presence of JAK2V617F or CALR, irrespective of the VAF, and absence of haematological disease at study entry. Among 645 mutation‐positive individuals, 16 were diagnosed with MPN disease (ET = 4, PV = 10, PMF = 1, PreMF = 1) at the time of study entry. Hence, 629 individuals were eligible for inclusion and considered CHIP positive, including 599 with JAK2V617F and 30 with CALR (Figure S1). Currently, there is an ongoing clinical follow‐up of CHIP‐positive individuals.

2.3. Blood samples

Non‐fasting blood samples were drawn, and pre‐analytically managed according to institutional guidelines at the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Naestved Hospital, Denmark. 28 Haematological blood cell counts were analysed from fresh EDTA whole blood using Sysmex XE‐5000 (Sysmex Corporation). A composite dichotomous variable for elevated blood cell counts in at least one cell type was defined according to regional laboratory reference values and depending on sex: haemoglobin concentration >10.5 mmol/L (male) or >9.5 mmol/L (female), haematocrit >0.50 (male) or >0.46 (female), erythrocytes >5.7 × 1012/L (male) or >5.2 × 1012/L (female), thrombocytes >390 × 109/L, leukocytes >8.8 × 109/L, neutrophils >7.0 × 109/L, monocytes >0.7 × 109/L, eosinophils ≥0.5 × 109/L, basophils ≥0.1 × 109/L and lymphocytes >3.5 × 109/L. Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated as proxies for chronic inflammation. 29 , 30

Biochemical variables (plasma creatinine [μmol/L], high‐sensitive C‐reactive protein [hsCRP; mg/L], cholesterol [mmol/L]) were analysed using Cobas‐600 (Roche Diagnostics). We excluded individuals with a hsCRP ≥10 mg/L (N = 857) in the regression analysis to exclude individuals with potential infections. Plasma creatinine was measured using a multistep enzymatic assay with sarcosine as the primary intermediate metabolite, and subsequently oxidised by sarcosine oxidase. 31 , 32 Renal function was assessed by eGFR according to the eGFR EPI‐CKD (ml/min/1.73 m2) formula by Levey 33 based on plasma creatinine (μmol/L), age, sex, and race.

2.4. Comorbidities

Information on self‐reported health was obtained through questionaries at baseline. Smoking status was categorised as never, previous, or current smoker. Blood pressure was assessed during the examination. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from weight (kg)/height (cm2) and classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/cm2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/cm2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/cm2) and obese (≥30 kg/cm2). Hypertension and dyslipidaemia were defined as use of antihypertensive or antilipidemic medication, respectively. Ischemic heart disease (IHD), a history of acute myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease was self‐reported and validated through the Danish National Patient Registry 34 using the International Classification of Diseases version 8 and 10 (ICD‐8: 410‐414 and ICD‐10: DI20‐DI25). These data were used as prevalent data to assess the validity of self‐reported myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease.

2.5. Follow‐up of eGFR

Among all 19 942 individuals, a longitudinal follow‐up on plasma creatinine to calculate eGFR was obtained from study entry in GESUS until December 2021 using data from the regional laboratory system. Any incident diagnosis of CKD among individuals with a CALR mutation (ICD‐10: N00‐N06, N11‐N19) was obtained from study entry in GESUS until June 2021 by reviewing electronic medical records (Figure S1).

2.6. Statistics

We used Stata SE/14 (STATA Corp.), Rstudio 4.0.3, R package (ggplot2), and GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Inc.). A two‐sided p < .05 was considered as statistically significant. Summary statistics were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). hsCRP was logarithmically transformed to obtain geometric mean (SD). Pearson's χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. An unpaired Student's t‐test was used for continuous variables with equal variance between groups, whereas unequal variance between groups qualified a Welch's correction. For continuous variables only, age and sex‐adjusted means (95% confidence interval [CI]) and p values were obtained using regression analysis.

We investigated if CHIP mutations were associated with increased NLR and PLR by multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, cholesterol and hsCRP (<10 mg/L).

We investigated if CHIP mutations and elevated blood cell counts were associated negatively with eGFR by multiple linear regression analysis with and without inverse probability weighting (IPW). IPW‐adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to obtain mean (95% CI) outcome differences by balancing confounding variables between individuals with or without CHIP, and individuals with elevated versus normal blood cell counts. The analyses were stratified by CHIP mutation type (JAK2V617F and CALR), subtype (CALR type 1 and type 2), and VAF (<1% and ≥1%). All regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, NLR, PLR, cholesterol and hsCRP (<10 mg/L). The regression analyses for elevated blood cell counts were not adjusted for NLR or PLR. The IPW‐adjusted multiple regression analysis for CALR was not adjusted for PLR, since we were unable to balance PLR to CHIP‐negative individuals.

We also investigated if increased NLR associated negatively with eGFR by multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L) and PLR. To visualise the distribution of eGFR on NLR, a two‐dimensional density contour plot was applied.

Finally, we compared eGFR longitudinally in all individuals. We calculated an annual mean eGFR for each year of follow‐up if participants had more than one value per year. We used repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with both follow‐up time and age as underlying timescale with the addition of a random subject effect to account for repeated measures for each individual. In addition, we analysed interactions between CHIP mutation type and follow‐up time or age on reduction in eGFR.

3. RESULTS

Individuals with CHIP versus CHIP‐negative were older (p = 4.4 × 10−14) and had a higher systolic blood pressure (p = .0005). The proportion of CVD were also higher among individuals with CHIP (Table 1). In addition, those with CHIP versus CHIP‐negative had higher myeloid blood cell counts (Tables 1 and S1–S3), NLR (Figure S2) and PLR (Figure S3).

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics by mutation status in the Danish General Suburban Population Study

CHIP‐negative CHIP
Characteristics N %/Mean (SD) N %/Mean (SD) p Value
Number of participants 19 313 96.8 629 3.2 NA
Sex
Women 10 566 54.7 285 45.3 3.2 × 10−6
Men 8747 45.3 344 54.7
Age (years) 19 313 56 (13.6) 597 60 (12.9) 4.4 × 10−14
BMI (kg/m2)
<18.5 193 1 5 0.8 .2
18.5–24.9 7392 38.4 230 36.7
25–29.9 7656 39.8 274 43.7
≥30 3990 20.8 118 18.8
Smoking
Never smoker 8486 43.9 260 41.3 .4
Former smoker 7384 38.2 246 39.1
Current smoker 3 443 17.8 123 19.6
Systolic pressure (mmHg) 19 281 141 (21.4) 629 144 (22.2) .0005
Diastolic pressure (mmHg) 19 289 85 (11.2) 629 86 (11.4) .3
CVD
Ischemic heart disease 1471 7.6 61 9.7 .05
Hypertension 4340 22.5 190 30.2 5.2 × 10−6
Hyperlipidaemia 2778 14.4 120 19.1 .001
Laboratory test
VAF (%) 629 1.2 (5.1) NA
Leukocytes (×109/L) 19 267 7.3 (1.9) 627 7.6 (2.0) .00002
Neutrophils (×109/L) 19 067 4.1 (1.3) 621 4.4 (1.4) 8.9 × 10−6*
Eosinophils (×109/L) 19 075 0.19 (0.1) 622 0.21 (0.1) .002
Basophils (×109/L) 19 075 0.04 (0.4) 622 0.04 (0.03) .3*
Lymphocytes (×109/L) 19 080 2.3 (0.7) 622 2.3 (0.8) .7*
Monocytes (×109/L) 19 078 0.56 (0.2) 622 0.59 (0.2) .0001*
Thrombocytes (×109/L) 19 258 250 (57.3) 627 281 (99.5) 4.4 × 10−14*
Erythrocytes (×1012/L) 19 267 4.6 (0.7) 627 4.7 (0.4) .0002*
Haemoglobin (mmol/L) 19 266 8.7 (0.8) 627 8.8 (0.8) .0001
Haematocrit (ratio) 19 267 0.43 (0.03) 627 0.43 (0.04) .00002*
hsCRP (mg/L) 19 275 1.43 (3.0) 628 1.30 (2.8) .02*
Creatinine (μmol/L) 19 283 76.4 (20.0) 628 78.0 (17.0) .02*
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 19 283 5.5 (1.0) 628 5.4 (1.1) .3
NLR 19 066 1.9 (0.9) 621 2.1 (1.0) .0008*
PLR 19 072 116 (42.5) 622 131 (68.0) 1.2 × 10−7*

Note: p Values obtained using χ 2 test for categorical data and independent t‐test for continous data or independent t‐test with Welch's correction *.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; NA, not applicable; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; PLR, thrombocyte/lymphocyte ratio; VAF, variant allele frequency.

In the multiple linear regression analysis, eGFR was not different in individuals with CHIP (p = .6) or JAK2V617F (p = 1.0) compared to CHIP‐negative individuals (Figure 1). However, eGFR in individuals with CALR was reduced compared to CHIP‐negative individuals with a mean (95% CI) difference of −5.6 (−10.3, −0.8) ml/min/1.73 m2, p = .02 (Figure 1). When stratifying by CALR mutation subtype, only CALR type 2 had reduced eGFR with a mean (95% CI) difference of −11.9 (−21.4, −2.4) ml/min/1.73 m2, p = .01 (Figure 1). In the IPW‐adjusted linear regression analysis (Figure 2), results were similar to the multiple linear regression analysis; however, due to the low prevalence of the CALR mutations we could not stratify by CALR type 1 and CALR type 2.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Adjusted mean (95% CI) difference in eGFR using linear regression analysis. CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. CALR, calreticulin mutation includes type 1 and type 2 mutations; CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; JAK2V617F, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Adjusted mean (95% CI) difference in eGFR using inverse probability weighted regression analysis. CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. The estimate for CALR is without thrombocyte‐to‐lymphocyte adjustment with a mean (95% CI) of 87.6 (87.4, 87.9) for the mutation‐negative participants. CALR, calreticulin mutation; CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; JAK2V617F, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617

Individuals with CALR mutations and a VAF ≥1% had a reduced eGFR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals with a mean (95% CI) difference of −10.1 (−18.1, −2.2) ml/min/1.73m2, p = .01 (Figure 3). However, when stratifying by CALR mutation subtype and VAF only those with a CALR type 2 and a VAF ≥1% had a reduced eGFR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals with a mean (95% CI) difference of −25.0 (−42.8, −7.2), p = .0006 (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Adjusted mean (95% CI) difference in eGFR stratified by mutation type, subtype, and VAF% using linear regression analysis. CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR stratified by variant allele frequency (VAF%) if <1% or ≥1%. CALR, calreticulin mutation includes type 1 and type 2 mutations; CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; JAK2V617F, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617

Individuals with elevated versus normal blood cell counts had a reduced eGFR with a mean (95% CI) difference of −0.6 (−1.0, −0.2) ml/min/1.73m2, p = .007 (Figure 1). Also, we observed that NLR was negatively associated with eGFR in the general population with an adjusted β coefficient (95% CI) of −1.2 (−1.5, −1.0), p = 5.6 × 10−18 (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Scatterplot with linear regression line of eGFR on NLR. (A) The dark solid line represents the regression line (unadjusted) whereas the grey shading represents the 95% CI of the regression line. The 2D density contour plot was used to visualise the distribution of eGFR on NLR due to large dataset. (B) Density plot of eGFR was used to visualise the distribution for individuals without CHIP (black), JAK2V617F positive individuals (dark grey), and CALR positive individuals (light grey). The β coefficients are adjusted for age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, total cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L) and PLR. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NLR, neutrophils‐to‐lymphocyte ratio

During 11 years of follow‐up, the combined repeated measures ANOVA for the different CHIP mutation types had a more rapid decline in eGFR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals (Figure 5), p < 2.2 × 10−6. Both follow‐up time and age showed a significant interaction with CHIP mutation types on eGFR reduction, p = .005 and p = 8.3 × 10−5, respectively (Figures 5 and S4). In the stratified analysis, only CALR mutations and CALR type 2 showed significant interaction with follow‐up time on eGFR reduction compared to CHIP‐negative individuals. Also, individuals with CALR type 2 showed significant interaction with follow‐up time and had a more rapid decline in eGFR compared to individuals with CALR type 1 (Figure 5). The annual mean eGFR in individuals with CALR type 2 reached CKD cut‐off of 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 only after 7 years of follow‐up, corresponding to an average annual decline of 2 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year. Only one individual, with CALR type 1, was diagnosed with CKD during this follow‐up period.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Longitudinal follow‐up on eGFR. (A and B) Mean eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) by follow‐up in years with and without standard error. Longitudinal data was grouped by CHIP mutation type using grey‐colour scale gradient. (C) Change in eGFR by each follow‐up year grouped by CHIP mutation type and illustrated as a heatmap with double gradient from green to red. (D) Repeated‐measures ANOVA with interaction between CHIP mutation types and follow‐up time on reduction in eGFR. *ANOVA with random subject effect adjusted for age, sex, and follow‐up time (years). **ANOVA with random subject effect adjusted for age and sex with interaction between CALR type and follow‐up time (years) on eGFR. CALR, calreticulin; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; JAK2V617F, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617

4. DISCUSSION

In the GESUS study, individuals with CALR mutations, particularly CALR type 2, had lower eGFR than CHIP‐negative individuals. Furthermore, those individuals with CALR mutations and VAF ≥1% had lower eGFR than CHIP‐negative individuals. However, in individuals with CHIP overall, JAK2V617F and JAK2V617F stratified by VAF, eGFR was not reduced. Increased NLR was negatively associated with eGFR. During 11 years of follow‐up individuals with CALR mutations and CALR type 2 had a more rapid decline in eGFR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals and individuals with CALR type 1, respectively. The findings for CALR are novel findings.

Although the mean eGFR at baseline in individuals with CALR type 2 was reduced more than 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to CHIP‐negative individuals, it did not reach the CKD cut‐off of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. 35 However, the annual mean eGFR in individuals with CALR type 2 reached CKD cut‐off only after 7 years of follow‐up, corresponding to an average annual decline of 2 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year. The reduction of eGFR in individuals with CALR mutations cannot only be explained by an age‐related decline, which on average is 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year by the CKD‐EPI formula 36 since we observed no significant difference in age between CALR type 1 and type 2.

The clinical impact of CALR type 1 and 2 is different between ET 37 and PMF, 38 with CALR type 2 exhibiting the most unfavourable phenotype in PMF patients. 38 Prior evidence suggests that CALR may be associated with fibrotic diseases through the TGF‐β signalling pathway 27 , 39 , 40 and that the extent of circulating calreticulin (CALR) in myelofibrosis patients seem to correlate with disease severity. 41 Although only supported by a single case‐report, CALR may be associated with MPN nephropathy, 23 as calreticulin is involved in fibrosis. 27

We observed that NLR was negatively associated with eGFR, and that individuals with the CALR mutation have an increased NLR compared to CHIP‐negative individuals. This may indicate that a hyperproliferative and chronic inflammatory drive of the myeloid compartment may contribute to a reduced eGFR. This finding is supported by previous evidence that: patients with CALR positive MPN have aberrant IL‐6 signalling 42 and that IL‐6 is correlated with NLR. 29 Although individuals with elevated versus normal blood cell counts had lower eGFR, the magnitude of the difference was negligible and not of clinical importance. Thus, elevated blood cell counts are not a good indicator for impaired kidney function.

Despite the impaired kidney function among individuals with CALR type 2, no individuals with CALR type 2 and only one individual with type 1 was diagnosed with CKD during follow‐up. This may indicate that impaired kidney function among CALR positive individuals is potentially underdiagnosed. Also, it may indicate that not only do aberrant blood cell counts precede the MPN‐diagnosis 43 but also that the development of MPN‐related nephropathy could be facilitated through a chronic inflammatory state as reflected by an increased NLR, which is negatively associated with eGFR, in our analysis. This is in part supported by the proportion of moderate to severe CKD among MPN patients at the time of diagnosis, 16 but also by the observation that neutrophilia associate with kidney dysfunction. 20

Individuals with CHIP and the JAK2V617F mutation did not associate with reduced eGFR when compared to CHIP‐negative individuals. This observation may be explained by the lower allele burden at study entry for the JAK2V617F positive individuals than the CALR positive individuals. Furthermore, it may suggest that a threshold of the JAK2V617F malignant clone is required to initiate, sustain and propagate a reduction in eGFR as observed in some MPN patients. 18 , 20 Interestingly, we also observed a lower eGFR in individuals with the CALR mutations and a VAF ≥1% indicating that both the mutation type and VAF is of importance for the impaired kidney function.

Most recently, clonal haematopoiesis with and without prevalent myeloid malignancy was associated with CKD. 26 Interestingly, CHIP JAK2 and CHIP TET2 were only associated with a reduced cystatin‐C calculated eGFR, but not with creatinine calculated eGFR. 26 Similarly, in our study we did not observe an association between JAK2V617F and creatinine calculated eGFR, but we did not measure cystatin‐C, as this kidney biomarker is not routine in Denmark. Thus, we cannot exclude that a cystatin‐C based eGFR would have been a more sensitive biomarker for impaired kidney function in JAK2V617F in our study.

Several strengths and limitations are relevant to emphasise. The strengths were that despite the very low prevalence of CALR mutations in the general population, we were able to detect lower eGFR in both the traditional multiple linear regression and IPW‐adjusted analysis. Furthermore, the findings were consistent in both the cross‐sectional and longitudinal study with CALR mutations and CALR type 2 individuals having a lower eGFR than CHIP‐negative individuals and individuals with CALR type 1, respectively. Finally, the longitudinal eGFR study were real‐life heterogeneous data with more measurements in hospitalised patients than in non‐hospitalised patients and with different indications of eGFR measurements during follow‐up. Renal biopsies were not available to investigate the prevalence of histopathological characteristics associated with MPN‐related glomerulopathy. 23 , 24 , 25 Although, the CHIP definition in some studies is defined as the absence of haematological malignancy with a VAF larger than 2%, 6 we defined CHIP as the absence of haematological malignancy with the presence of the somatic mutations JAK2V617F and CALR, irrespective of the VAF for two main reasons: first, the VAF cut‐off of 2% is arbitrary reflecting analytical capabilities across different platforms. Second, little is known about the clinical impact of clones <2%. Further studies are required to validate if our findings are generalizable to other well‐defined CHIP‐cohorts derived from a large general population study, with CHIP defined as the presence of leukaemia‐associated mutations and the absence of a haematological malignancy.

In conclusion, the CALR mutation, particularly CALR type 2, was associated with impaired kidney function at baseline. In individuals with CALR mutations, a VAF ≥1% also associated with impaired kidney function. Individuals with both CALR mutations and CALR type 2 had a faster decline in eGFR during 11 years of follow‐up compared to CHIP‐negative individuals and individuals with CALR type 1. Furthermore, we observed that individuals with CHIP had increased NLR. NLR was negatively associated with eGFR.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Christina Ellervik and Morten K. Larsen collected GESUS baseline data. Hans C. Hasselbalch, Christina Ellervik, Thomas Stiehl, Vibe Skov, Lasse Kjær and Morten K. Larsen designed the study. Morten Dahl extracted laboratory values for follow‐up. Morten K. Larsen performed statistics with supervision by Christina Ellervik. Morten K. Larsen made tables and figures. Hans C. Hasselbalch, Christina Ellervik, Thomas Stiehl, Vibe Skov, Lasse Kjær and Morten K. Larsen interpreted the results. Morten K. Larsen wrote the paper. All authors contributed substantially to revision and interpretation. All authors approved the final version.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Steffen Koschmieder discloses research funding from Novartis, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Janssen/Geron, and AOP Pharma; advisory board honoraria from Pfizer, Incyte, Ariad, Novartis, AOP Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Geron, Janssen, CTI, Roche, Bayer, Sanofi and Abbvie; patent für BET inhibitor at RWTH Aachen University; honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Celgene, Geron, Janssen, Pfizer, Incyte, Ariad, Shire, Roche, AOP Pharma, Abbvie; and other financial support (e.g., travel support) from Alexion, Novartis, BMS, Incyte, Ariad, AOP Pharma, Baxalta, CTI, Pfizer, Sanofi, Celgene, Shire, Janssen, Geron, Abbvie, Karthos. Yunus Çolak discloses personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehring‐Ingelheim and Sanofi Genzyme outside the submitted work. Hans C. Hasselbalch discloses research funding from Novartis and AOP Orphan. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Figure S1 – Flowchart of the individuals from the General Suburban Study included in the cross‐sectional study (dataset 1) and the longitudinal follow‐up among CHIP CALR positive individuals (dataset 2).

Figure S2. Adjusted mean (95%CI) in NLR in participants with CHIP.

Adjusted mean (95%CI) was estimated from multiple regression analysis comparing mutation‐negative participants with CHIP, JAK2V617F, JAK2V617F < 1%, JAK2V617F ≥ 1%, CALR. Adjustment: age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, total cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L). CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. CHIP: Clonal Haematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential. JAK2V617F: The Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617 (JAK2V617F). CALR: Calreticulin mutation. NLR: Neutrophils‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio.

Figure S3. Adjusted mean (95%CI) in PLR in participants with CHIP.

Adjusted mean (95%CI) was estimated from multiple regression analysis comparing mutation‐negative participants with CHIP, JAK2V617F, JAK2V617F < 1%, JAK2V617F ≥ 1%, CALR. Adjustment: age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, total cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L). CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. CHIP: Clonal Haematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential. JAK2V617F: The Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617 (JAK2V617F). CALR: Calreticulin mutation. PLR: Thrombocyte‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio

Table S1 – Baseline characteristics by mutation subtype in the General Suburban Population Study

Table S2 – Adjusted baseline characteristics by mutation subtype in the General Suburban Population Study

Table S3 – Baseline characteristics by the CALR mutation in the General Suburban Population Study

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to convey our gratefulness to all staff and participants in the General Suburban Population Study. In addition, the authors would like to convey our gratitude to Medical and Research Secretary Mette Grymer Jensen for her important logistical and organisational role. This work was supported by grants from: the Region Zealand Research Foundation, Manufacturer Einar Willumsens Memorial Foundation, Anders Hasselbalch's Foundation Fighting Leukemia, Carpenter Joergen Holm and Wife Elisa F. Hansen's Memorial Foundation, Else and Mogens Wedell‐Wedellborgs Foundation, the Hoejmosegaard Scholarship, Eva and Henry Fraenkels Memorial Foundation, Dagmar Marshalls Foundation, Candys Foundation, A.V. Lykfeldt and Wife's Scholarship, and Aase and Ejnar Danielsen's Foundation. GESUS was funded by the Region Zealand Research Foundation, Naestved Hospital Foundation, Naestved Municipality, Johan and Lise Boserup Foundation, TrygFonden, Johannes Fog's Foundation, Region Zealand, Naestved Hospital, The National Board of Health, The Local Government Denmark Foundation. Thomas Stiehl obtained The Lundbeck Foundation Fellowship: Personalized prediction of blood cancer progression using clinical data and mathematical modeling (R335‐2019‐2020) under which Morten K. Larsen is funded.

Larsen MK, Skov V, Kjær L, et al. Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and impaired kidney function—A Danish general population study with 11 years follow‐up. Eur J Haematol. 2022;109(5):576‐585. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13845

Thomas Stiehl, Hans C. Hasselbalch and Christina Ellervik contributed equally to this study.

This study has been partly presented as an oral presentation at the EHA2021 Virtual Congress in June 2021. Larsen MK, Ellervik C, Stiehl T, et al. S159 clonal hematopoiesis, elevated blood cell counts, and decreased renal function – A general population study. HemaSphere. 2021;5(S2): EHA2021. Virtual Congress Abstract Book:35.

Funding information A.V. Lykfeldt and Wife's Scholarship; Aase and Ejnar Danielsen's Foundation; Anders Hasselbalch's Foundation Fighting Leukemia; Candys Foundation; Carpenter Joergen Holm and Wife Elisa F. Hansen's Memorial Foundation; Dagmar Marshalls Fond; Else and Mogens Wedell‐Wedellborgs Foundation; Eva and Henry Fraenkels Memorial Foundation; Johan and Lise Boserup Foundation; Johannes Fog's Foundation; Manufacturer Einar Willumsens Memorial Foundation; Naestved Hospital; Naestved Hospital Foundation; Naestved Municipality; Region Zealand; The Hoejmosegaard Scholarship; The Local Government Denmark Foundation; The National Board of Health; The Region Zealand Research Foundation; TrygFonden; The Lundbeck Foundation Fellowship

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Due to the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union, data from GESUS cannot be shared publicly. For queries about data access, contact Dr Christina Ellervik.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Spivak JL. Myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22):2168‐2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Campbell PJ, Green AR. The myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(23):2452‐2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nangalia J, Green AR. Myeloproliferative neoplasms: from origins to outcomes. Blood. 2017;130(23):2475‐2483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vainchenker W, Kralovics R. Genetic basis and molecular pathophysiology of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2017;129(6):667‐679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Grinfeld J, Nangalia J, Green AR. Molecular determinants of pathogenesis and clinical phenotype in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica. 2017;102(1):7‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Steensma DP. Clinical consequences of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3404‐3410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, et al. Age‐related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2488‐2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cordua S, Kjaer L, Skov V, et al. Early detection of myeloproliferative neoplasms in a Danish general population study. Leukemia. 2021;35(9):2706‐2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cordua S, Kjaer L, Skov V, Pallisgaard N, Hasselbalch HC, Ellervik C. Prevalence and phenotypes of JAK2 V617F and calreticulin mutations in a Danish general population. Blood. 2019;134(5):469‐479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):111‐121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mas‐Peiro S, Hoffmann J, Fichtlscherer S, et al. Clonal haematopoiesis in patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(8):933‐939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Miller PG, Qiao D, Rojas‐Quintero J, et al. Association of clonal hematopoiesis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Blood. 2022;139(3):357‐368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Arends CM, Weiss M, Christen F, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody‐associated vasculitis. Haematologica. 2020;105(6):e264‐e267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Warren JT, Link DC. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk for hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2020;136(14):1599‐1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jaiswal S. Clonal hematopoiesis and nonhematologic disorders. Blood. 2020;136(14):1606‐1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Frederiksen H, Szepligeti S, Bak M, Ghanima W, Hasselbalch HC, Christiansen CF. Vascular diseases in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms ‐ impact of comorbidity. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:955‐967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hasselbalch H, Bjørn M. MPNs as inflammatory diseases: the evidence, consequences, and perspectives. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:102476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Christensen A, Møller J, Hasselbalch H. Chronic kidney disease in patients with the Philadelphia‐negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leuk Res. 2014;38(4):490‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krecak I, Holik H, Martina MP, Zekanovic I, Coha B, Gveric‐Krecak V. Chronic kidney disease could be a risk factor for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Int J Hematol. 2020;112(3):377‐384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gecht J, Tsoukakis I, Kricheldorf K, et al. Kidney dysfunction is associated with thrombosis and disease severity in myeloproliferative neoplasms: implications from the German study group for MPN bioregistry. Cancers. 2021;13(16):4086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lucijanic M, Galusic D, Krecak I, et al. Reduced renal function strongly affects survival and thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis. Ann Hematol. 2020;99(12):2779‐2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Said SM, Leung N, Sethi S, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasms cause glomerulopathy. Kidney Int. 2011;80(7):753‐759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Maruyama K, Nakagawa N, Suzuki A, et al. Novel detection of CALR‐mutated cells in myeloproliferative neoplasm‐related glomerulopathy with interstitial extramedullary hematopoiesis: a case report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(6):844‐848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Person F, Meyer SC, Hopfer H, Menter T. Renal post‐mortem findings in myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Virchows Arch. 2021;479(5):1013‐1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Buttner‐Herold M, Sticht C, Wiech T, Porubsky S. Renal disease associated with myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasia. Histopathology. 2021;78(5):738‐748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Dawoud AAZ, Gilbert RD, Tapper WJ, Cross NCP. Clonal myelopoiesis promotes adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Leukemia. 2022;36:507‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lu A, Pallero MA, Owusu BY, et al. Calreticulin is important for the development of renal fibrosis and dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy. Matrix Biol Plus. 2020;8:100034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bergholdt HK, Bathum L, Kvetny J, et al. Study design, participation and characteristics of the Danish general suburban population study. Dan Med J. 2013;60(9):A4693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Adamstein NH, MacFadyen JG, Rose LM, et al. The neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and incident atherosclerotic events: analyses from five contemporary randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(9):896‐903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Erre GL, Paliogiannis P, Castagna F, et al. Meta‐analysis of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49(1):e13037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Fossati P, Prencipe L, Berti G. Enzymic creatinine assay: a new colorimetric method based on hydrogen peroxide measurement. Clin Chem. 1983;29(8):1494‐1496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Guder WG, Hoffmann GE, Hubbuch A, Poppe WA, Siedel J, Price CP. Multicentre evaluation of an enzymatic method for creatinine determination using a sensitive colour reagent. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1986;24(11):889‐902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604‐612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449‐490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kalantar‐Zadeh K, Jafar TH, Nitsch D, Neuen BL, Perkovic V. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):786‐802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Waas T, Schulz A, Lotz J, et al. Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate and determinants of its age dependent loss in a German population‐based study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tefferi A, Wassie EA, Guglielmelli P, et al. Type 1 versus type 2 calreticulin mutations in essential thrombocythemia: a collaborative study of 1027 patients. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(8):E121‐E124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. CALR and ASXL1 mutations‐based molecular prognostication in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 570 patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(7):1494‐1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Klein J, Jupp S, Moulos P, et al. The KUPKB: a novel web application to access multiomics data on kidney disease. FASEB J. 2012;26(5):2145‐2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kypreou KP, Kavvadas P, Karamessinis P, et al. Altered expression of calreticulin during the development of fibrosis. Proteomics. 2008;8(12):2407‐2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sollazzo D, Forte D, Polverelli N, et al. Circulating calreticulin is increased in myelofibrosis: correlation with interleukin‐6 plasma levels, bone marrow fibrosis, and splenomegaly. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5860657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Balliu M, Calabresi L, Bartalucci N, et al. Activated IL‐6 signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of, and is a novel therapeutic target for, CALR‐mutated MPNs. Blood Adv. 2021;5(8):2184‐2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Enblom A, Lindskog E, Hasselbalch H, et al. High rate of abnormal blood values and vascular complications before diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(5):344‐347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 – Flowchart of the individuals from the General Suburban Study included in the cross‐sectional study (dataset 1) and the longitudinal follow‐up among CHIP CALR positive individuals (dataset 2).

Figure S2. Adjusted mean (95%CI) in NLR in participants with CHIP.

Adjusted mean (95%CI) was estimated from multiple regression analysis comparing mutation‐negative participants with CHIP, JAK2V617F, JAK2V617F < 1%, JAK2V617F ≥ 1%, CALR. Adjustment: age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, total cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L). CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. CHIP: Clonal Haematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential. JAK2V617F: The Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617 (JAK2V617F). CALR: Calreticulin mutation. NLR: Neutrophils‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio.

Figure S3. Adjusted mean (95%CI) in PLR in participants with CHIP.

Adjusted mean (95%CI) was estimated from multiple regression analysis comparing mutation‐negative participants with CHIP, JAK2V617F, JAK2V617F < 1%, JAK2V617F ≥ 1%, CALR. Adjustment: age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, IHD, total cholesterol, hsCRP (<10 mg/L). CHIP includes JAK2V617F and CALR, CALR includes CALR type 1 and CALR type 2. CHIP: Clonal Haematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential. JAK2V617F: The Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) valine‐to‐phenylalanine substitution at codon 617 (JAK2V617F). CALR: Calreticulin mutation. PLR: Thrombocyte‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio

Table S1 – Baseline characteristics by mutation subtype in the General Suburban Population Study

Table S2 – Adjusted baseline characteristics by mutation subtype in the General Suburban Population Study

Table S3 – Baseline characteristics by the CALR mutation in the General Suburban Population Study

Data Availability Statement

Due to the General Data Protection Regulation in the European Union, data from GESUS cannot be shared publicly. For queries about data access, contact Dr Christina Ellervik.


Articles from European Journal of Haematology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES