Skip to main content
World Journal of Emergency Medicine logoLink to World Journal of Emergency Medicine
. 2022;13(6):448–452. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.093

Early changes in white blood cell, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels in children with severe multiple trauma

Cai-fang Xu 1,2, Ming-chao Huo 1, Jin-hui Huang 1, Chun-feng Liu 1, Wei Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC9807391  PMID: 36636564

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To analyze early changes in white blood cells (WBCs), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in children with multiple trauma, before secondary inflammation develops.

METHODS:

This single-center retrospective study collected data from patients with blunt traumatic injury admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). According to the prognostic outcome of 28 d after admission to the PICU, patients were divided into survival group (n=141) and non-survival group (n=36). Characteristics between the two groups were compared. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the capacity of different biomarkers as predictors of mortality.

RESULTS:

The percentages of children with elevated WBC, CRP, and PCT levels were 81.36%, 31.07%, and 95.48%, respectively. Patients in the non-survival group presented a statistically significantly higher injury severity score (ISS) than those in the survival group: 37.17±16.11 vs. 22.23±11.24 (t=6.47, P<0.01). WBCs were also higher in non-survival group than in the survival group ([18.70±8.42]×109/L vs. [15.89±6.98] ×109/L, t=2.065, P=0.040). There was no significant difference between the survival and non-survival groups in PCT or CRP. The areas under the ROC curves of PCT, WBC and ISS for predicting 28-day mortality were 0.548 (P=0.376), 0.607 (P=0.047) and 0.799 (P<0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Secondary to multiple trauma, PCT levels increased in more patients, even if their WBC and CRP levels remained unchanged. However, early rising WBC and ISS were superior to PCT at predicting the mortality of multiple trauma patients in the PICU.

Keywords: Pediatric, Procalcitonin, Injury severity score, Multiple trauma

INTRODUCTION

Injury is one of the leading causes of childhood mortality, according to data published by the World Health Organization (WHO).[1] Motor vehicle crashes are the most common cause of injury-related deaths, followed by falls, both in developed countries and developing countries.[2-5] After injury, injured cells/tissues release an alarmin, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), causing a local pro-inflammatory reaction. The local production of alarmins could lead to systemic inflammation,[6,7] resulting in many bimolecular changes after injury, including white blood cell (WBC), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), fibrinogen (FIB), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT).[8-12] Several previous studies have revealed that PCT rises faster than CRP and has a longer half-life (24 h) than IL-6 (14 h) and TNF-α (9 h).[10,13]

PCT is produced by thyroid C-cells, lung and intestinal neuroendocrine cells, with a very low level in the healthy individuals (<0.05 ng/mL).[14] The synthesis of PCT can be stimulated after the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria identified by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells.[15] DAMPs, produced by damaged tissues, are similar to PAMPs. As a result, when trauma occurs, DAMPs from injured tissues can work as PAMPs to activate innate immune and inflammatory processes leading to elevated PCT levels.[6] There have been numerous studies on PCT in various types of traumatic injuries. According to some studies in adults, admission or baseline PCT was not meaningful to prognosis after trauma, and postponing PCT detection was recommended.[16] Others affirmed the early value of PCT in traumatic patients.[17,18] In addition, limited evidence is available in pediatric populations. We designed this study to describe the changes of PCT in pediatric patients with multiple trauma within 24 h of onset of trauma, analyze the association among PCT, CRP, ISS and GCS, and estimate the predictive ability of PCT. We assumed that post-traumatic changes in PCT could predict adverse outcomes, yet secondary inflammation was induced.

METHODS

Study design

This retrospective study analyzed the data from patients with injuries primarily due to motor vehicle accidents and falls who were admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, between January 2014 and December 2018. Ethical board approval and informed consent were obtained. All data were anonymised.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with the following were included: age between 1 month and 14 years old; injury mechanisms with traffic accident, falling, or crush without open injury; admission time within 24 h from initial injury.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who were post-surgery; patients died within 6 h after admission; patients with underlying diseases, including genetic metabolic diseases, hepatic disease, other chronic organ dysfunction or detected infectious disease.

Data collection

Age, gender, onset time, involved site(s), systemic manifestations, blood test, imaging examination, mechanical ventilation (MV), diagnostics and outcome were collected.

The main biomarkers including PCT, CRP, WBC, Neut%, platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HB) were tested simultaneously within 30 min after the patients were admitted to the PICU. The severity of injury was evaluated by the injury severity score (ISS). The injuries were classified as brain, face, chest, abdominal, limbs, and skin, according to the ISS. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was used to evaluate the neurological status of children. ISS and GCS scores were assessed within 2 h after admission. WBC>10.0×109/L, CRP>8.0 mg/L, and PCT>0.1 ng/mL were regarded as positive results. The diagnosis criteria of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) were defined as activated partial thromboplasting time (APTT)>60 s, prothrombin time (PT)>18 s, or international normalized ratio (INR)>1.6.[19] According to the prognosis outcome on the 28th day after admission to the PICU, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival groups. The primary endpoint of this research was the 28-day mortality of the children after trauma, and the secondary endpoints were other severe complications, including respiratory failure, shock, TIC and multiple organ dysfunction (MODS).

Statistical analysis

Discrete variables and continuous variables were expressed as counts (percentages) and means ± standard deviations (or medians and quartiles for abnormally distributed variables), respectively. To analyze the difference between two groups, the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables, and the Chi-square was used for categorical variables. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the capacity of different biomarkers as predictors of mortality. All tests were two-tailed, and a P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM Corp., USA).

RESULTS

Demographics and clinical manifestations of all patients

During the four-year study period, a total of 284 pediatric patients with blunt trauma were admitted to our PICU, of whom 216 were admitted within 24 h of onset, meeting the inclusion criteria. There were 39 patients excluded from this study: 30 patients were post operation; 6 patients died within 6 h; and 3 patients had underlying diseases. Ultimately, 177 patients were enrolled in this study. A total of 118 children were injured in traffic accidents, 56 children were injured in falls, and 3 children sustained crush injuries. After 28 d of trauma, 36 patients died, with a mortality rate of 20.34%, among whom 21 patients died due to severe central nervous system injury. Eight patients died due to hemorrhoea, while 3 patients died of MODS. In addition, secondary infection caused 3 deaths and one patient died of a suspected pulmonary embolism. A total of 71 (40.11%) patients had severe brain injury with a low GCS score (≤8). Forty-four (24.86%) patients underwent respiratory failure, while 18 (10.17%) patients experienced shock. Besides, 22 (12.43%) patients were diagnosed with TIC (Table 1).

Table 1.

General characteristics of the 177 included pediatric patients

graphic file with name WJEM-13-448-g001.jpg

In the 177 patients, the percentages of children with increased WBC, CRP, and PCT were 81.36%, 31.07%, and 95.48%, respectively. The most common primary injury was head injury (146 cases, 82.49%), followed by chest (106 cases, 59.89%) and extremities (59 cases, 33.33%). The levels of PCT were determined in patients with different injured regions, significant differences were found between the groups with and without injured region in abdomen, chest, extremities and face regions. But the PCT levels were not significant difference between the head injury and non-head injury patients, as well as in the surface injury and non-surface injury patients (Table 2).

Table 2.

PCT in different injured regions

graphic file with name WJEM-13-448-g002.jpg

Characteristics of patients in the survival and non-survival groups

According to the prognostic outcome on the 28th day after admission to the PICU, patients were divided into survival group (n=141) and non-survival group (n=36). As shown in Table 3, patients in the non-survival group presented a significantly higher ISS than those in the survival group: 37.17±16.11 vs. 22.23±11.24 (t=6.47, P<0.01). WBCs were also higher in the non-survival group than those in the survival group ([18.70±8.42]×109/L vs. [15.89±6.98]×109/L, t=2.065, P=0.040). The differences in PCT and CRP were not statistically significant between the survival and non-survival groups (P>0.05).

Table 3.

Comparison of general characteristics in survival group and non-survival group

graphic file with name WJEM-13-448-g003.jpg

The prediction of prognosis

ROC curves were used to predict mortality with ISS, WBC, CRP, and PCT. The areas under the ROC curves for CRP and PCT were 0.439 (P=0.262) and 0.548 (P=0.376), respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for WBC and ISS were 0.607 (P=0.047) and 0.799 (P<0.01), with statistically significant (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of ISS, WBC, CRP, and PCT for predicting 28-day mortality. WBC: white blood cell; CRP: C-reactive protein; PCT: procalcitonin; ISS: Injury Severity Score.

DISCUSSION

In our study, we described the early changes in PCT compared with other biomarkers, to predict major complications and outcomes in children with multiple traumas. The effects of PCT on predicting the complications of sepsis and MODS in adults following traumatic injury have been investigated in many studies,[10,20-25] but in multi-trauma pediatric patients, its role has not yet been established. Considering the post-traumatic infection, the onset time of all of the patients enrolled in this research was within the initial 24 h of injury, and open trauma patients were excluded, in accordance with a previous research.[23] After trauma occurred, physiological responses were triggered, increased PCT levels were observed in 95.48% of the patients, while only 31.07% of the children were found to have elevated CRP level. PCT was more sensitive than CRP on trauma patients, which was in agreement with other studies.[18,23] In this study, we analyzed the correlation between ISS and PCT. It showed a good relationship between ISS and PCT (r=0.423, P<0.01), which is consistent with previous studies, indicating that the more serious the trauma is, the higher the PCT level is.[18,26] However, PCT showed little difference in survival group and non-survival group. Furthermore, based on the ROC curve analysis, the predictive ability of PCT was not statistically significant.

There are several limitations in this study. First, the serum markers were measured at a single time point after trauma, so a prospective study with dynamic determination of PCT in pediatric traumatic patients should be carried out in the future. A previous research suggested that surgery, massive transfusion, and intensive care might influence the PCT concentration,[27] but in our study, we only excluded the post-surgery patients, and all the patients were under intensive care. A secondary peak of PCT was found in the infected group, but not the non-infected group,[28] which could be a good biomarker to predict outcome. However, the significance of the early PCT changes cannot be overlooked.

CONCLUSION

Secondary to multiple trauma, PCT levels increased in more patients, even if their WBC and CRP levels remained unchanged. However, early rising WBC and ISS were better than PCT at predicting the mortality of multiple trauma patients in the PICU.

Footnotes

Funding: This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270726), Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (20170541023), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771621).

Ethical approval: The Medicine Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of the China Medical University approved this study (2017TS261k), and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Contributors: WX and CFX developed the idea of the study; CFX designed and wrote the manuscript; MCH and JHH collected the data; CFL discussed and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Grajda A, Kułaga Z, Gurzkowska B, GóźdźM, Wojtyło M, Litwin M. Trends in external causes of child and adolescent mortality in Poland,1999-2012. Int J Public Health. 2017;62(1):117–26. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0908-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DeGeorge KC, Neltner CE, Neltner BT. Prevention of unintentional childhood injury. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(7):411–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Z, Wang DZ, Zhang Y, Zheng WL, Jiang GH. The epidemiological features of injury reported by hospital 0-14 children in Tianjin 2014. Chin J Dis Control Prev. 2018;22(8):813-6–821. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ye PP, Deng X, Gao X, Wang Y, Er YL, Ji CR, et al. Trend and current characteristics of road traffic injury in children based on data from the National Injury Surveillance System in China from 2006 to 2013. Chin J Epidemiol. 2015;36(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Houlton AY, Manglick P, Soundappan SSV, Douglass C, Wicks S, Holland AJA, et al. Observational study of falls in children from windows and balconies:what has changed? J Paediatr Child Health. 2021;57(3):425–30. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pugin J. How tissue injury alarms the immune system and causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lord JM, Midwinter MJ, Chen YF, Belli A, Brohi K, Kovacs EJ, et al. The systemic immune response to trauma:an overview of pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1455–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60687-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi YK, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7. doi: 10.1038/nature08780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rourke C, Curry N, Khan S, Taylor R, Raza I, Davenport R, et al. Fibrinogen levels during trauma hemorrhage, response to replacement therapy, and association with patient outcomes. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(7):1342–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.AlRawahi AN, AlHinai FA, Doig CJ, Ball CG, Dixon E, Xiao ZW, et al. The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin measurements in critically injured patients:a systematic review. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2669-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang LD, Liu HB, Li YN, Ma HM, Liu YB, Wang MY. Correlation analysis between plasma D-dimer levels and orthopedic trauma severity. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125(17):3133–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hayakawa M, Maekawa K, Kushimoto S, Kato H, Sasaki J, Ogura H, et al. High D-dimer levels predict a poor outcome in patients with severe trauma, even with high fibrinogen levels on arrival:a multicenter retrospective study. Shock. 2016;45(3):308–14. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cong S, Ma TG, Di X, Tian C, Zhao M, Wang K. Diagnostic value of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 in sepsis:a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06064-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aloisio E, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Procalcitonin:between evidence and critical issues. Clin Chimica Acta. 2019;496:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maruna P, NedelníkováK, Gürlich R. Physiology and genetics of procalcitonin. Physiol Res. 2000;49(1):S57–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jensen JU, Heslet L, Jensen TH, Espersen K, Steffensen P, Tvede M. Procalcitonin increase in early identification of critically ill patients at high risk of mortality. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(10):2596–602. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239116.01855.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li Y, Chen L, Fang WG, Chen HH. Application value of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in the evaluation of traumatic shock. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(6):4586–92. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meisner M, Adina H, Schmidt J. Correlation of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to inflammation, complications, and outcome during the intensive care unit course of multiple-trauma patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(1):R1. doi: 10.1186/cc3910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song JC, Yang LK, Zhao W, Zhu F, Wang G, Chen YP, et al. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of trauma-induced hypercoagulopathy. Mil Med Res. 2021;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00317-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prkno A, Wacker C, Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients with severe sepsis and septic shock—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(6):R291. doi: 10.1186/cc13157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Assicot M, Bohuon C, Gendrel D, Raymond J, Carsin H, Guilbaud J. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet. 1993;341(8844):515–8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90277-N. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brunkhorst FM, Wegscheider K, Forycki ZF, Brunkhorst R. Procalcitonin for early diagnosis and differentiation of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(2):S148–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02900728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Castelli GP, Pognani C, Cita M, Paladini R. Procalcitonin as a prognostic and diagnostic tool for septic complications after major trauma. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(6):1845–9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819ffd5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ciriello V, Gudipati S, Stavrou PZ, Kanakaris NK, Bellamy MC, Giannoudis PV. Biomarkers predicting sepsis in polytrauma patients:current evidence. Injury. 2013;44(12):1680–92. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Benoist JF, Mimoz O, Assicot M, Edouard A. Serum procalcitonin, but not C-reactive protein, identifies sepsis in trauma patients. Clin Chem. 1998;44((8 Pt 1)):1778–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wanner GA, Keel M, Steckholzer U, Beier W, Stocker R, Ertel W. Relationship between procalcitonin plasma levels and severity of injury, sepsis, organ failure, and mortality in injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(4):950–7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200004000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maier M, Wutzler S, Lehnert M, Szermutzky M, Wyen H, Bingold T, et al. Serum procalcitonin levels in patients with multiple injuries including visceral trauma. J Trauma. 2009;66(1):243–9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817c966f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sakran JV, Michetti CP, Sheridan MJ, Richmond R, Waked T, Aldaghlas T, et al. The utility of procalcitonin in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2):413–8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825ff5b7. discussion418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

RESOURCES