Abstract
Background
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are known to be a risk of drug‐induced pneumonitis. However, there are few reports on the relationship between ILAs and immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related interstitial lung disease (ICI‐ILD). We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of ILAs in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving ICIs.
Methods
We defined ILAs as nondependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone, including ground‐glass or diffuse centrilobular nodularities, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and nonemphysematous cysts. Early‐onset ICI‐ILD was defined as developing within 3 months after the initiation of ICI administration.
Results
Of 264 patients with advanced NSCLC, 57 patients (21.6%) had ILAs (43 fibrotic and 14 nonfibrotic ILAs). The difference between the incidence of ICI‐ILD in patients with or without ILAs was not significant. Of 193 patients treated by ICI monotherapy, 18 (9.3%) developed early‐onset ICI‐ILD. Among patients receiving ICI monotherapy, the incidence of early‐onset ICI‐ILD was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without nonfibrotic ILAs.
Conclusion
The presence of nonfibrotic ILAs is a significant risk for early‐onset ICI‐ILD in patients with NSCLC undergoing ICI monotherapy. Clinicians should be aware of ILAs, especially nonfibrotic ILAs, before administering ICIs to lung cancer patients.
Keywords: ICI‐ILD, ILA, NSCLC, PD‐1 inhibitor
We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). The incidence of early‐onset ICI‐ related interstitial lung disease (ICI‐ILD) was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without nonfibrotic ILAs. The presence of nonfibrotic ILAs is a significant risk for early‐onset ICI‐ILD in patients with NSCLC undergoing ICI monotherapy.
INTRODUCTION
The immune‐checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is the latest therapeutic breakthrough in several types of advanced tumors such as lung cancer, melanoma, head and neck tumors, bladder cancer, and lymphoma. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 Safety is a major concern as the number of patients receiving these new drugs increases. Although ICIs provide an overall favorable risk‐to‐benefit profile, they are known to cause unique toxicities named immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), due to their mechanisms of action. Although irAEs are typically manageable, uncommon fatal irAEs have been reported, which tend to occur early in ICI treatment. Clinicians should recognize and manage these types of immune‐mediated events early on, as they can be severe or fatal. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) induced by ICI treatment has been observed to be a clinically serious and fatal toxicity. 6 , 7 The majority of episodes of ILD occur within 3 months of the induction of immunotherapy, and the onset tends to be particularly early in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 6 , 7 , 8 Some studies have found that the risk of ICI‐related ILD (ICI‐ILD) was associated with pre‐existing ILD. 9 However, ICI‐ILD is also frequently clinically developed in patients without pre‐existing ILD.
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are specific findings on computed tomography (CT) that may be compatible with ILD in patients without clinical manifestations. ILAs that occur with normal aging are increasingly recognized to be common features on CT scans of the elderly. With the increasing use of CT for various purposes, ILAs will increasingly be observed on CT scans. These abnormalities are risk factors for increased mortality and complications from surgery and chemotherapy. Thus, these changes on chest CT scans have prognostic value and should be reported. 10 , 11 , 12
ILAs seen in patients before they undergo treatment for cancer have been associated with cancer‐related mortality. 11 , 13 The exact reason for increased mortality is unclear, but the risks of lung injury due to ILAs and cancer therapy have been speculated. 11 However, results of the studies on the association of ILAs and lung cancer treatments remain unclear. To our knowledge, only two reports have examined the relationship between pre‐existing ILAs and ICI‐ILDs. 14 , 15 Thus, we retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of ILAs on the incidence, subcategories, and onset of ICI‐ILD in patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy at our hospital.
METHODS
Study design
We retrospectively screened patients with pathologically confirmed advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had been treated with ICIs at our institution between February 2016 and March 2021. There were no pre‐existing ILDs among patients who received ICI treatment. First‐line treatment was defined as either primary chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Prior treatment with molecular targeted drugs were not counted in the treatment line. PD‐L1 expression by tumor cells on preparations of the archived biopsy specimens was assessed by the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent). This study was performed in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kurume University Hospital (IRB No 20100).
Evaluation of high‐resolution CT (HRCT) findings
We investigated the presence of abnormal findings, which included pre‐existing ILAs, on the HRCT scans of the study patients. ILAs were defined based on the report of Hatabu et al, 11 as follows: nondependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone, including ground‐glass or diffuse centrilobular nodularities, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and nonemphysematous cysts. These types of ILAs were classified into two broad subcategories as fibrotic and nonfibrotic ILAs.
As previous reports and a position paper from the Fleischner Society, 11 , 16 fibrotic ILA was defined by the presence of pulmonary parenchymal architectural distortion (e.g., traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing) consistent with a fibrotic lung disease (definite fibrosis), which is not limited to those whose imaging pattern is consistent with a usual interstitial pneumonia or probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. Nonfibrotic ILA was defined as ILA not included in fibrotic ILA.
A CT system was used to obtain HRCT data (1–10 mm slice thickness), which were obtained at the end of inspiration with the patient in the supine position. HRCT was used which was taken closest before ICI administration. The HRCT scans were reviewed by two independent pulmonologists. Final decisions were made by consent of two independent pulmonologists.
Diagnosis of ICI‐induced ILD
ICI‐ILD was diagnosed as follows: (1) occurring during treatment with an ICI, (2) new ground‐glass attenuation (GGA) or consolidations in the bilateral lung fields of CT scan, (3) exclusion of pulmonary infection, and (4) exclusion of heart failure. 13 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 Pulmonary infections were ruled out by sputum culture and antibiotic efficacy, and heart failure was excluded by clinical examination and echocardiography. The radiographic patterns of the ILD were classified according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) international multidisciplinary classification of interstitial pneumonias. 20 ILD was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Early‐onset ICI‐ILD was defined as ILD developing within 3 months after the start of immunotherapy.
Statistical analysis
The Pearson χ2 test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparison of the two groups. Risk factors for ICI‐ILD were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Multivariate analysis was performed using fibrotic and nonfibrotic ILD as covariates to evaluate which ILD finding was an independent risk factor for ICI‐ILD. A two‐tailed p‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP version 16.0 software (SAS Institute Inc.).
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
A total of 264 patients were enrolled in this study. Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the patients. The median age of patients was 70 years (63–75 years). Male patients (74.2%) were predominant. Many patients (76.5%) had a smoking history. Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 62.1 and 26.9%, of the cases, respectively. A driver mutation was harbored in 17.4% of patients, and an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in 15.5%, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene was 1.5%, and a rearrangement during transfection fusion was 0.4%. All patients with harbored EGFR and ALK mutations had been previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), respectively. PD‐L1 tumor proportion scores of ≥50%, 1%–49%, and <1% were seen in 27.7, 29.5, and 22.3% of patients, respectively. HRCT revealed ILAs in 57 (21.6%) patients, of whom 16.3 and 5.3% had fibrotic ILAs and nonfibrotic ILAs, respectively. Figure 1a shows examples of the CT scans of patients with ILAs. A total of 73.1% were treated by ICI monotherapy and 26.9% were treated by a combination of an ICI and chemotherapy. The median follow‐up term was 8.8 months (0.2–61.3 months) for the ICI monotherapy group and 10.7 months (0.4–29.6 months) for the combined group, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Patient characteristics
| Variables | N = 264 (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| No. | % | |
| Age | ||
| Median | 70 | |
| Range | 63–75 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 196 | 74.2 |
| Female | 68 | 25.8 |
| Smoking status | ||
| Past or current | 202 | 76.5 |
| Never | 62 | 23.5 |
| Histology | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 164 | 62.1 |
| Squamous | 71 | 26.9 |
| NSCLC | 26 | 9.8 |
| LCNEC | 3 | 1.1 |
| ILA | 57 | 21.6 |
| Fibrotic ILAs | 43 | 16.3 |
| Nonfibrotic ILAs | 14 | 5.3 |
| PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (%) | ||
| ≥50 | 73 | 27.7 |
| 1–49 | 78 | 29.5 |
| <1 | 59 | 22.3 |
| Not tested | 54 | 20.5 |
| Driver mutation | ||
| EGFR mutation | 41 | 15.5 |
| EML4‐ALK fusion | 4 | 1.5 |
| RET fusion | 1 | 0.4 |
| Negative | 218 | 82.6 |
| Prior molecular targeted drugs | ||
| EGFR‐TKI | 41 | 15.5 |
| ALK‐TKI | 4 | 1.5 |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
| Treatment | ||
| ICI monotherapy | 193 | 73.1 |
| Combination therapy | 71 | 26.9 |
| Line of ICI therapy | ||
| 1 | 111 | 42 |
| 2,3 | 118 | 44.7 |
| ≥4 | 35 | 13.3 |
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, EML4‐ALK, echinoderm microtubule‐associated protein‐like 4 ‐ anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ICI, immune‐checkpoint inhibitors, ILA, interstitial lung abnormalities, ILD, interstitial lung disease, LCNEC, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer, PD‐L1, programmed death‐ligand 1, RET, rearranged during transfection, TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
FIGURE 1.
(a) Chest computed tomography images of interstitial lung abnormalities. (a, b) Patients with nonfibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities. (c, d) Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities. (b) Flow diagram of the study population. In total, 264 patients were enrolled. Of the 264 patients, 57 had interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs); 14 had fibrotic ILAs and 43 had nonfibrotic ILAs. There were 51 patients treated with a programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) inhibitor, five treated with a programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitor, one patient was treated with both a PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitor. Of the 57 ILA patients, seven developed immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced interstitial lung disease (ICI‐ILD); four had fibrotic ILAs and three had nonfibrotic ILAs. There were six patients treated with a PD‐1 inhibitor and one treated with a PD‐L1 inhibitor. Of the seven ILA patients with ICI‐ILD, 4 had early‐onset disease; three cases had fibrotic and one had nonfibrotic ILAs. There were three patients treated with a PD‐1 inhibitor and one treated with a PD‐L1 inhibitor
Proportions and characteristics of patients with and without ICI‐ILD
Table 2 shows the prevalence of ICI‐ILD in the 264 study patients. Of the 264 patients, 25 (9.5%) who received ICI monotherapy and seven (2.7%) patients who received a combination of ICI therapy and chemotherapy developed ICI‐ILD. The differences between the baseline characteristics of study patients with and without ICI‐ILD were not significant.
TABLE 2.
Characteristics of patients with and without ICI‐ILD
| All patients | ICI‐ILD + n = 32 | ICI‐ILD‐n = 232 | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.334 | ||
| Male | 26 | 170 | |
| Female | 6 | 62 | |
| Smoking status | 0.263 | ||
| Past or current | 27 | 175 | |
| Never | 5 | 57 | |
| PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (%) | 0.377 | ||
| ≥50 | 13 | 60 | |
| 1–49 | 8 | 70 | |
| <1 | 6 | 53 | |
| Not tested | 5 | 49 | |
| Prior thoracic radiation therapy | 0.786 | ||
| + | 7 | 46 | |
| − | 25 | 186 | |
| Prior molecular targeted drugs | |||
| EGFR‐TKI | 3 | 38 | 0.305 |
| ALK‐TKI | 1 | 3 | 0.427 |
| ILA | 7 | 50 | 0.967 |
| Fibrotic ILAs | 4 | 39 | 0.536 |
| Nonfibrotic ILAs | 3 | 11 | 0.273 |
| Treatment | 0.495 | ||
| ICI monotherapy | 25 | 168 | |
| Combination therapy | 7 | 64 |
Figure 1b shows a flow diagram of the various categories of patients with/without various iterations of ILA, ILD, ICI‐ILD, and fibrotic and nonfibrotic disease, and numbers of patients in each category within the study population. Of the 264 patients, 32 (12.1%) developed ICI‐ILD. Among the 32 patients with ICI‐ILD, seven (21.9%) had ILAs, four (12.5%) had fibrotic ILAs, and three (9.3%) had nonfibrotic ILAs.
Figure 2a shows examples of HRCT scans of patents with ILAs who developed ILD after ICI monotherapy. Figure 2b shows the time to the onset of ICI‐ILD after the start of immunotherapy. Seven (2.7%) of 264 patients underwent thoracic radiation therapy before the occurrence of ICI‐ILD. The difference between the proportion of patients with and without ILA who developed ICI‐ILD was not significant (p = 0.967).
FIGURE 2.
(a) A patient with nonfibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities leading to immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related interstitial lung disease. The patient was a 67‐year‐old man with squamous cell carcinoma. (a)–(c) Chest computed tomography (CT) scans before the administration of immunotherapy. The scans show nonfibrotic subpleural interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs). (d)–(f) Chest CT scans 2 months after the initiation of nivolumab monotherapy. CT showed consolidations in both peripheral lungs fields. The shadows are predominantly distributed in the right lower lobe. (b) Graph of the onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced interstitial lung disease in study patients. There were 32 patients who developed immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related interstitial lung disease; seven patients had ILAs and 25 did not have ILAs. Early onset cases accounted for 57.1% of the patients with ILAs and 64% of the patients without ILAs
Proportion and characteristics of patients with early‐onset ICI‐ILD
Table 3 shows that 21 (8.0%) of 264 patients developed early‐onset ICI‐ILD. Among the 21 patients with early‐onset ICI‐ILD, four (19.0%) had ILAs; one patient (4.8%) had fibrotic ILAs and three (14.3%) had nonfibrotic ILAs. Eighteen (9.3%) of 193 patients who received ICI monotherapy and three (4.2%) of 71 patients who received ICI and chemotherapy developed early‐onset ICI‐ILD. Seven patients (2.7%) underwent thoracic radiation therapy before the occurrence of early‐onset ICI‐ILD. Differences between the baseline characteristics of patients with and without early‐onset ICI‐ILD were not significant. The difference between the proportions of patients with and without ILA who developed early‐onset ICI‐ILD was not significant (p = 0.765).
TABLE 3.
Characteristics of patients with and without early‐onset ICI‐ILD
| All patients | Early‐onset ICI‐ILD (+) N = 21 | Early‐onset ICI‐ILD (−) N = 243 | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.464 | ||
| Male | 17 | 179 | |
| Female | 4 | 64 | |
| Smoking status | 0.300 | ||
| Past or current | 18 | 184 | |
| Never | 3 | 59 | |
| PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (%) | 0.201 | ||
| ≥50 | 10 | 63 | |
| 1–49 | 5 | 73 | |
| <1 | 3 | 56 | |
| Not tested | 3 | 51 | |
| Prior thoracic radiation therapy | 0.114 | ||
| + | 7 | 46 | |
| − | 14 | 197 | |
| Prior molecular targeted drugs | |||
| EGFR‐TKI | 0 | 41 | 0.041 |
| ALK‐TKI | 0 | 4 | 0.554 |
| ILA | 4 | 53 | 0.768 |
| Fibrotic ILAs | 1 | 42 | 0.136 |
| Nonfibrotic ILAs | 3 | 11 | 0.056 |
| Treatment | 0.174 | ||
| ICI monotherapy | 18 | 175 | |
| Combination therapy | 3 | 68 |
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, ICI, immune‐checkpoint inhibitors, ILAs, interstitial lung abnormalities, ILD, interstitial lung disease, PD‐L1, programmed death‐ligand 1, TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Proportions and characteristics of patients with/without early‐onset ICI‐ILD who received ICI monotherapy
Table 4 shows the proportion of patients with early‐onset ICI‐ILD among the 193 patients who received ICI monotherapy. Of the 193 patients, 18 (9.3%) developed early‐onset ICI‐ILD. Among the patients with early‐onset ICI‐ILD, three (16.7%) had ILAs, one (5.6%) had fibrotic ILAs, and two patients (11.1%) had nonfibrotic ILAs. Seven (3.6%) patients underwent thoracic radiation therapy before the occurrence of ICI‐ILD. ICI‐ILD did not develop in patients who had previously received molecularly‐targeted drugs. The differences between the baseline characteristics of patients with and without early‐onset ICI‐ILD were not significant. The difference between the proportions of patients with and without ILAs who developed early onset ICI‐ILD was not significant (p = 0.694). In contrast, the incidence of early‐onset ICI‐ILD was significantly higher in patients with nonfibrotic ILAs than in patients with fibrotic ILAs (p = 0.040).
TABLE 4.
Characteristics of patients with and without early‐onset ICI‐ILD who received ICI monotherapy
| ICI monotherapy | Early‐onset ICI‐ILD (+) N = 18 | Early‐onset ICI‐ILD (−) N = 175 | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.324 | ||
| Male | 15 | 127 | |
| Female | 3 | 48 | |
| Smoking status | 0.398 | ||
| Past or current | 15 | 130 | |
| Never | 3 | 45 | |
| PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (%) | 0.341 | ||
| ≥50 | 9 | 52 | |
| 1–49 | 4 | 44 | |
| <1 | 2 | 36 | |
| Not tested | 3 | 43 | |
| Prior thoracic radiation therapy | 0.101 | ||
| + | 7 | 38 | |
| − | 11 | 137 | |
| Prior molecular targeted drugs | |||
| EGFR‐TKI | 0 | 39 | 0.025 |
| ALK‐TKI | 0 | 3 | 0.576 |
| ILA | 3 | 36 | 0.694 |
| Fibrotic ILAs | 1 | 32 | 0.172 |
| Nonfibrotic ILAs | 2 | 4 | 0.040 |
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, ICI, immune‐checkpoint inhibitors, ILAs, interstitial lung abnormalities, ILD, interstitial lung disease, PD‐L1, programmed death‐ligand 1, TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
DISCUSSION
This study revealed that the presence of pre‐existing nonfibrotic ILAs was an independent risk factor of early‐onset ICI‐ILD induced by ICI monotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the relationship between a subcategory of ILAs and the onset time of ICI‐ILD. In the present study, ILAs accounted for 21.6% (57/264) of study patients. Fibrotic ILAs accounted for 16.3% and nonfibrotic ILAs accounted for 5.3% of the study patients. Before administering ICIs to patients with ILAs, we should estimate their risk of developing ICI‐ILD. Estimating the risk of ICI‐ILD is especially important for patients with nonfibrotic ILAs.
Previous studies determined that the presence of GGAs, not including fibrotic area, was a risk for conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy‐related ILD. 13 , 14 , 21 We also found that the presence of nonfibrotic ILAs was an independent risk factor for early‐onset ICI‐ILD. GGA reflects inflammation by lymphocytes in the interstitium, and ICIs exert antitumor effects via activation of lymphocytes. 13 , 14 , 21 These results may explain why GGAs were involved with ICI‐ILD. 13 , 14 , 21
Nonfibrotic ILAs are known to have a better prognosis compared to fibrotic ILAs because fibrotic ILAs are associated with risk of progression on CT imaging and death. 16 For this reason, nonfibrotic ILAs are less emphasized than fibrotic ILAs in clinical practice. However, nonfibrotic ILAs were significantly associated with the risk of developing early onset ICI‐ILD in this study, while fibrotic ILAs were not. Since ICI‐ILDs are sometimes fatal, it is important to be careful about the presence of nonfibrotic ILAs in patients treated with cancer immunotherapy.
This study found that the combination of an ICI and chemotherapy did not lead to early‐onset ICI‐ILD, even in patients with nonfibrotic disease. This is the first report on the combination of ICI and chemotherapy, as previous reports have only focused on ICI monotherapy. 14 , 15 The combination of ICI and chemotherapy may be less likely to result in ICI‐ILD, even in patients with pre‐existing ILAs, compared to ICI monotherapy alone. We previously reported that the incidence of irAEs, especially pneumonitis, during the first 3 months after the start of treatment was significantly higher in patients receiving ICI monotherapy than in the patients receiving a combination of ICI and chemotherapy. 22
The mechanism by which chemotherapy suppresses the development of ICI‐ILD remains unclear. The reduced rate of ICI‐ILD might be accounted for by the steroids administered during chemotherapy. Steroids are the most common basic treatment for ICI‐ILD. In addition, the myelosuppression induced by chemotherapy could suppress inflammation through the regulation of soluble immune mediators.
In older individuals (>60 years of age) the prevalence of ILAs has been reported to be 4%–9% of smokers and 2%–7% of nonsmokers. 10 However, in patients with lung cancer, the prevalence of ILAs has been reported to be 14%–22%. 13 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 In this study, 57 patients (21.6%) had ILAs, which is consistent with the prevalence reported in previous studies. 13 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Based on the above, just as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other ILDs, 26 , 27 , 28 patients with ILAs may be prone to complications from lung cancer. Additionally, the presence of nonfibrotic ILAs was seen in 5.3% of all of our study patients (264 patients). Nonfibrotic ILAs account for 24.6% of the total ILAs. Other studies have reported that the presence of nonfibrotic ILAs accounted for 53.8% to 67.6% of all the patients with ILAs, 13 , 14 results that are much higher than observed in our study. It should be noted that lung cancer tends to be a complication of ILAs, and it includes nonfibrotic ILA, which is a risk for ICI‐ILD.
Male and smoking history have been reported as clinical risk factors for ILA. 11 In this study, being male was not associated with ILA, but smoking history was significantly associated with ILA (Table S2). Smoking history was also significantly associated with both fibrotic and nonfibrotic ILA. In addition, smoking history was not associated with ICI‐ILD. Although smoking history is not directly related to ICI‐ILD, it is involved in the development of ILA. Therefore, the presence of ILA should be confirmed at the start of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients with smoking history.
The present study had some limitations. First, ICI‐ILD was not diagnosed by histopathological examinations. Second, this study was a retrospective single‐center study. Third, patients included in our study received heterogeneous regimens. Fourth, the number of ILA patient was small within the ICI‐ILD group. A prospective multicenter study is warranted to validate the present findings. In conclusion, the presence of nonfibrotic ILAs was a significant risk factor for early‐onset ICI‐ILD in patients about to undergo ICI monotherapy. The presence of ILAs is more likely to be associated with lung cancer then the absence of ILAs, and early‐onset ICI‐ILD can interfere with the treatment of lung cancer and can be life‐threatening. Clinicians should bear in mind the possible presence of ILAs, especially nonfibrotic ILAs, in patients with lung cancer, before they decide to administer ICIs.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
KA reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Pfizer and Chugai Pharmaceutical. NM reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical and Chugai Pharmaceutical. TT reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis and Chugai Pharmaceutical. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Supporting information
Table S1. Treatments administered to patients
Table S2. Characteristic of patients about gender and smoking history between patients with and without ILA, with and without fibrotic ILA, with and without nonfibrotic ILA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank the participating patients for their contributions to this study.
Murata D, Azuma K, Matama G, Zaizen Y, Matsuo N, Murotani K, et al. Clinical significance of interstitial lung abnormalities and immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced interstitial lung disease in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2023;14(1):73–80. 10.1111/1759-7714.14718
REFERENCES
- 1. Reck M, Rodríguez‐Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD‐L1‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa150309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC, Gutierrez M, et al. PD‐1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:311–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rosenberg JE, Hoffman‐Censits J, Powles T, van der Heijden MS, Balar AV, Necchi A, et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum‐based chemotherapy: a single‐arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1909–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67. 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Delaunay M, Cadranel J, Lusque A, Meyer N, Gounaut V, Moro‐Sibilot D, et al. Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors associated with interstitial lung disease in cancer patients. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700050. 10.1183/13993003.00050-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, Chandra S, Menzer C, Ye F, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1721–8. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Naidoo J, Wang X, Woo KM, Iyriboz T, Halpenny D, Cunningham J, et al. Pneumonitis in patients treated with anti‐programmed death‐1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:709–17. 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yamaguchi T, Shimizu J, Hasegawa T, Horio Y, Inaba Y, Yatabe Y, et al. Pre‐existing pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for anti‐PD‐1‐related pneumonitis in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lung Cancer. 2018;125:212–7. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kanai O, Kim YH, Demura Y, Kanai M, Ito T, Fujita K, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in non‐small cell lung cancer with preexisting interstitial lung disease. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9:847–55. 10.1111/1759-7714.12759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hatabu H, Hunninghake GM, Richeldi L, Brown KK, Wells AU, Remy‐Jardin M, et al. Interstitial lung abnormalities detected incidentally on CT: a position paper from the Fleischner society. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:726–37. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30168-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hatabu H, Hunninghake GM, Lynch DA, et al. Interstitial lung abnormality: recognition and perspectives. Radiology. 2019;291:1–3. 10.1148/radiol.2018181684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Putman RK, Hatabu H, Araki T, Gudmundsson G, Gao W, Nishino M, et al. Association between interstitial lung abnormalities and all‐cause mortality. JAMA. 2016;315:672–81. 10.1001/jama.2016.0518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nakanishi Y, Masuda T, Yamaguchi K, Sakamoto S, Horimasu Y, Nakashima T, et al. Pre‐existing interstitial lung abnormalities are risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced interstitial lung disease in non‐small cell lung cancer. Respir Investig. 2019;57:451–9. 10.1016/j.resinv.2019.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shimoji K, Masuda T, Yamaguchi K, Sakamoto S, Horimasu Y, Nakashima T, et al. Association of preexisting interstitial lung abnormalities with immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced interstitial lung disease among patients with nonlung cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2022906–e06. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Putman RK, Gudmundsson G, Axelsson GT, Hida T, Honda O, Araki T, et al. Imaging patterns are associated with interstitial lung abnormality progression and mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:175–83. 10.1164/rccm.201809-1652OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Camus P, Fanton A, Bonniaud P, Camus C, Foucher P. Interstitial lung disease induced by drugs and radiation. Respiration. 2004;71:301–26. 10.1159/000079633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nishino M, Sholl LM, Hodi FS, Hatabu H, Ramaiya NH. Anti‐PD‐1‐related pneumonitis during cancer immunotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:288–90. 10.1056/NEJMc150519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nishino M, Chambers ES, Chong CR, Ramaiya NH, Gray SW, Marcoux JP, et al. Anti‐PD‐1 inhibitor‐related pneumonitis in non‐small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4:289–93. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nishino M, Nikhil HR, Mark MA, et al. PD‐1 Inhibitor‐related pneumonitis in advanced cancer patients: radiographic patterns and clinical course. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;25:6051–60. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Raghu G, Remy‐Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:e44–68. 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Masuda T, Hirano C, Horimasu Y, Nakashima T, Miyamoto S, Iwamoto H, et al. The extent of ground‐glass attenuation is a risk factor of chemotherapy‐related exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;81:131–9. 10.1007/s00280-017-3476-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Matsuo N, Azuma K, Kinoshita T, et al. Comparative incidence of immune‐related adverse events and hyperprogressive disease in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors with and without chemotherapy. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39:1150–8. 10.1007/s10637-021-01069-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhu S, Fu Y, Zhu B, Zhang B, Wang J. Pneumonitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: from clinical data to translational investigation. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1785. 10.3389/fonc.2020.01785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Iwasawa T, Okudela K, Takemura T, Fukuda T, Matsushita S, Baba T, et al. Computer‐aided quantification of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with lung cancer: relationship to disease‐free survival. Radiology. 2019;292:489–98. 10.1148/radiol.2019182466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nishino M, Cardarella S, Dahlberg SE, Araki T, Lydon C, Jackman DM, et al. Interstitial lung abnormalities in treatment‐naïve advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients are associated with shorter survival. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:998–1004. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 638–58. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ozawa Y, Suda T, Naito T, et al. Cumulative incidence of and predictive factors for lung cancer in IPF. Respirology. 2009;14:723–8. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01547.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hubbard R, Venn A, Lewis S, et al. Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Population‐based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:5–8. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9906062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Treatments administered to patients
Table S2. Characteristic of patients about gender and smoking history between patients with and without ILA, with and without fibrotic ILA, with and without nonfibrotic ILA.