Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Nov 20;145(1):145–147. doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02518-0

Genetic alterations of TP53 and OTX2 indicate increased risk of relapse in WNT medulloblastomas: “it’s a numbers game”—implications for WNT medulloblastoma dose-reduction clinical trials

Nicholas G Gottardo 1,2,
PMCID: PMC9807471  PMID: 36403175

Goschzik and colleagues [3] identified TP53 mutation and OTX2 gain as independent prognostic markers in WNT medulloblastoma patients. Findings were derived from 191 (of which 120 were clinically annotated) pediatric and adult retrospective WNT medulloblastoma cases in the German HIT-2000 trial and HIT registries. Based on these findings, the authors propose TP53 mutation and OTX2 gain as biomarkers to identify WNT patients at higher risk of relapse, which in their series comprised 58.1% of patients. The authors should be commended on gathering the largest WNT medulloblastoma cohort to date; however, the retrospective nature and heterogeneous treatments limit the interpretation.

These findings are important because no molecular biomarkers to refine stratification for WNT medulloblastoma exist. Overall survival (OS) of > 90% [1, 2, 4, 5] (Table 1) for WNT medulloblastoma has led to dose-reduction trials to try to limit long-term toxicity (Children’s Oncology Group (COG) ACNS1422 NCT02724579; SJMB12 NCT01878617; SIOP-PNET5 NCT02066220). Given relapsed WNT medulloblastoma is essentially incurable [6, 8], excluding patients with TP53 mutation and/or OTX2 gain would have important clinical implications.

Table 1.

Survival and relapse pattern of WNT medulloblastoma patients by different cooperative groups and case series

Treatment approach 5-year event free survival 5-year overall survival Relapse type n (%)
Local Distant Combined Total

St Jude SJMB03

Phase III (n = 46) [2]

&100% 100% 0 0 0 0

COG ACNS0331

Phase III (n = 64) [5]

93.3% NR 4 (100%) 0 0

4

4/64 (6%)

COG ACNS0332

Phase III (n = 14) [4]

92.9% 100% NR NR 1 (100%)

1

1/14 (7%)

HIT-SIOP-PNET4

Phase III (n = 58) [1, 8]

91% NR 2 (25%) 4 (50%) 2 (25%)

8

8/58 (14%)

MAGIC & Int.CC cohorts (retrospective) (n = 101) [9] NR

90%* vs 97%# DC

86%* vs 94%# VC

NR NR NR NR
MAGIC & Int.CC cohorts (retrospective) (n = 93) [6] &84% 92.9% 3 (20%) 12 (80%) 0

15

15/93 (16%)

Present series

(retrospective) (n = 120) [3]

&68%* vs 93%#

&72%@ vs 93%^

88%* vs 94%#

82%@ vs 97%^

3 (27%) 6 (55%) 2 (18%)

11

11/120 (9%)

DC discovery cohort (n = 66), VC validation cohort (n = 35), NR not reported, MAGIC Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium, Int.CC International Collaborating Centers

&Progression free survival

*TP53 mutated

#TP53 wildtype

@OTX2 gain

^No OTX2 gain

Previously, Zhukova et al. reported no significant difference in OS for TP53 mutated versus wildtype WNT patients [9]. A recent study however reinvigorated interest in the prognostic relevance of TP53 mutations in WNT medulloblastoma, reporting that four of five (80%) relapsed patients had TP53 mutations [7]. Goschzik and colleagues identified TP53 mutations in 16.1% (30/186) of WNT samples and support these findings, with six of eleven (54.5%) patients who relapsed harboring a TP53 mutation (Table 2) [3]. The novel finding of OTX2 oncogene gain in 42/108 (39%) WNT medulloblastomas was identified using molecular inversion probe (MIP) array technology and was associated with significantly worse progression free survival (PFS) and OS [3]. Overall, all 11 patients who relapsed harbored either a TP53 mutation (3/11 (27%)) or OTX2 gain [(5/11 (45%)) or both (3/11 (27%)] (Table 2). A sub-analysis of an “average-risk pure” cohort to mimic current dose-reduction clinical trial inclusion criteria resulted in the loss of statistical significance for survival outcomes of TP53-mutated patients. However, OTX2 gain remained a significant indicator of OS and PFS, reinforcing the potential validity of this putative novel prognostic biomarker. Approximately 10% of medulloblastoma patients are WNT, with up to 18% (average 11%) of these harboring TP53 mutations (Table 2). Such small patient numbers in TP53-mutated WNT cohorts suggest that both positive and negative results should be interpreted with caution. The statistical significance of findings represents the measure of confidence in the results, how likely or unlikely those results would have been observed by chance rather than because of a causative relationship; the p value per se neither confirms nor negates the data itself.

Table 2.

Characteristics of WNT medulloblastoma patients by cooperative group clinical trial or case series

Characteristic SJMB03 [2] (n = 53) ACNS-0331 [5] (n = 64) ACNS-0332 [4] (n = 14) HIT-SIOP-PNET4 [1, 8] (n = 58) MAGIC & Int.CC [9] (n = 101) MAGIC and Int.CC [6] (n = 93) UKCCSG, Int.CC and ICGC [7] (n = 29) Present study [3] (n = 191)
No. of TP53 mutations (%) 4/49 (8%)

1/37

(3%)

1/9 (11%) NR 18/101 (18%) 9/86* (10%)

3/24 (13%)$

4/5 (80%)@

30/186 (16%)
No. of OTX2 amp/gain (%) 0 0 0 NA NA NR NR 42/108 (39%)
Molecular technique used DNAm, WES, GEP DNAm, WES DNAm, WES iFISH, CTNNB1 SS nanoString, TP53 SS DNAm, GEP DNAm, WES, TPS DNAm, TPS, SS, MIP
Total no. of relapses 0 4 1 8 NR 15 5 11
No. of relapses with TP53 mutation 0 0 0 NR NR 3/15 (20%) 4/5 (80%) 6/11 (54.5%)
No. of relapses with OTX2amp/gain^ 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA/NR 8/11^ (873%)

NR not reported, NA not assessed, Amp amplification, UKCCSG United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group, MAGIC Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium, Int.CC International Collaborating Centers, ICGC International Cancer Genome Consortium, iFISH interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, SS Sanger sequencing, DNAm DNA methylation profiling, GEP gene expression profiling, WES whole exome sequencing, MIP molecular inversion probe arrays, TPS targeted panel sequencing

*17p loss (TP53 mutation surrogate)

$Diagnostic WNT cohort

@Relapsed WNT cohort

However, some results of the current study appear inconsistent with recent prospective clinical trials [2, 4, 5]. In SJMB03 (where 8% of WNT patients were TP53 mutated), 5-year PFS and OS were 100% [2]. In COG ACNS0331, only 3% (1/37) of the 64 WNT patients had a TP53 mutation and 5-year EFS was 93.3%, with only 4 local failures [5], while in ACNS0332, 11% (1/9) had a TP53 mutation and only one patient relapsed (Tables 1 and 2) [4]. Notably, no TP53 mutations were identified in three of the four relapsed patients on ACNS0331 tested, nor the one relapsed patient from ACNS0332 (data provided by COG). One potential reason for this discrepancy may be due to the different therapies employed, negating TP53 as a prognostic biomarker, as previously hypothesized [6]. None of the three studies [2, 4, 5 and data provided by COG] identified OTX2 amplification/gain in WNT patients; however, MIP array technology was not utilized for any of these. Since copy number variations can be extracted from whole exome sequencing and DNA methylation profiling, the retrospective series which utilized these techniques could be re-examined [6, 7]. Moreover, for independent validation of the OTX2 gain findings [3], additional analysis using MIP array could be considered in the SJMB03, ACNS0331 and ACNS0332 clinical trials cohorts. If confirmed, the feasibility of incorporating MIP into clinical practice must be evaluated.

In summary, combined with Richardson and colleagues’ report [7], these hypothesis-generating findings should be pursued further. Crucially, it will be important for the current front-line WNT dose-reduction trials to assess the two proposed biomarkers in diagnostic samples (and matched relapse samples, where available) from enrolled patients. A pooled analysis from these trials may also be required, which could additionally identify more biomarkers into the future.

Acknowledgement

NGG is supported by a Perth Children's Hospital Foundation Stan Perron Chair in Paediatric Oncology and Haematology.

Data availability statement

All presented data are published and publicly available or linked to the publications.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Clifford SC, Lannering B, Schwalbe EC, Hicks D, O'Toole K, Nicholson SL, et al. Biomarker-driven stratification of disease-risk in non-metastatic medulloblastoma: results from the multi-center HIT-SIOP-PNET4 clinical trial. Oncotarget. 2015;6:38827–38839. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gajjar A, Robinson GW, Smith KS, Lin T, Merchant TE, Chintagumpala M, et al. Outcomes by clinical and molecular features in children with medulloblastoma treated with risk-adapted therapy: results of an international phase III trial (SJMB03) J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:822–835. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goschzik T, Mynarek M, Doerner E, Schenk A, Spier I, Warmuth-Metz M, et al. Genetic alterations of TP53 and OTX2 indicate increased risk of relapse in WNT medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02505-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leary SES, Packer RJ, Li Y, Billups CA, Smith KS, Jaju A, et al. Efficacy of carboplatin and isotretinoin in children with high-risk medulloblastoma: a randomized clinical trial from the Children's Oncology Group. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1313–1321. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Michalski JM, Janss AJ, Vezina LG, Smith KS, Billups CA, Burger PC, et al. Children's Oncology Group Phase III trial of reduced-dose and reduced-volume radiotherapy with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2685–2697. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nobre L, Zapotocky M, Kahn S, Fukuota K, Fonseca A, McKeown T, et al. Pattern of relapse and treatment response in WNT-activated medulloblastoma. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1:100038. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richardson S, Hill RM, Kui C, Lindsey JC, Grabovksa Y, Keeling C, et al. Emergence and maintenance of actionable genetic drivers at medulloblastoma relapse. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:153–165. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sabel M, Fleischhack G, Tippelt S, Gustafsson G, Doz F, Kortmann R, et al. Relapse patterns and outcome after relapse in standard risk medulloblastoma: a report from the HIT-SIOP-PNET4 study. J Neurooncol. 2016;129:515–524. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2202-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhukova N, Ramaswamy V, Remke M, Pfaff E, Shih DJ, Martin DC, et al. Subgroup-specific prognostic implications of TP53 mutation in medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2927–2935. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All presented data are published and publicly available or linked to the publications.


Articles from Acta Neuropathologica are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES