Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr 27;19(2):507–517. doi: 10.1002/alz.12677

Modifying effects of race and ethnicity and APOE on the association of physical activity with risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

Song-Yi Park 1, Veronica Wendy Setiawan 2, Lon R White 3,4, Anna H Wu 2, Iona Cheng 5, Christopher A Haiman 2, Lynne R Wilkens 1, Loїc Le Marchand 1, Unhee Lim 1
PMCID: PMC9810117  NIHMSID: NIHMS1856886  PMID: 35476309

Abstract

Introduction:

We investigated whether the protective association of physical activity with risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) has genetic or behavioral variations.

Methods:

In the Multiethnic Cohort, we analyzed moderate or vigorous physical activity (MVPA) reported at ages 45 to 75 among 88,047 participants in relation to 13,039 incident diagnoses of late-onset ADRD identified in Medicare claims (1999 to 2014), by five racial and ethnic groups, hours sitting, and in a subset (16%), apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype.

Results:

MVPA was inversely associated with ADRD (hazard ratio for ≥14 vs <2.5 hours/week: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 0.90 in men; 0.88, 5% CI: 0.81 to 0.95 in women). The association was inverse in all racial and ethnic groups except Black participants (P-heterogeneity = 0.52), but stronger in individuals with lower levels of sitting duration or those who do not carry the APOE e4 risk allele.

Discussion:

The different effects of physical activity by sitting duration and APOE genotype warrant further research.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, physical activity, prospective studies, race and ethnicity, sitting

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Dementia affects around 50 million people worldwide, imposing substantial health care costs, productivity loss, and caregiving burden.1 In the United States, 5.8 million adults 65 years of age or older live with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder in this country’s aging population.2 The amyloid beta (Aβ) deposits and neurofibrillary tangles associated with Alzheimer’s pathology are also found at autopsy in the majority of other dementia cases that are diagnosed for vascular, Lewy body, frontotemporal, or non-specific pathology. Therefore, Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are generally studied collectively.36 Given the lack of effective prophylactic and clinical treatments for ADRD,2,7 identification and better understanding of lifestyle factors and cardiometabolic disorders that contribute to the risk of ADRD are of critical importance for the prevention and management of the disease.810

Physical activity, in particular, has been consistently associated with a reduced risk of developing ADRD in observational studies.1113 In a meta-analysis of 44 prospective cohort studies, physical activity performed for at least 1 hour twice per week was associated with a 23% decrease in all-cause dementia risk and a 32% decrease in AD risk.11 However, a recent meta-analysis observed a null association when excluding cases diagnosed within 10 years of physical activity assessment and attributed the inverse association to decreased physical activity due to latent dementia among pre-clinical cases.14 In addition, the results of randomized-controlled interventions of exercise and AD have been inconsistent. Although some interventions resulted in improved cognition among both cognitively healthy older adults and patients with AD,15,16 evidence for the effect of single-component physical activity interventions on preventing cognitive decline is largely insufficient.17 Some have suggested that multiple types of exercise were more effective in improving cognitive functions, and in women more than in men.15 Results from observational studies can help guide the design of future interventions that target at-risk populations. Most studies to date on physical activity and AD or dementia involved a single racial or ethnic population (non-Hispanic White or Asian) and did not allow for comparisons by race and ethnicity. Furthermore, previous studies rarely accounted for sedentary behavior, which by itself may have independent metabolic effects, and thus, should be examined in tandem with moderate or vigorous physical activity (MVPA).18 In addition, the protective effect of physical activity may moderate the predominant genetic risk for AD conveyed by the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype that has been associated with a 2-fold risk with each e4 risk allele.19,20

In the current study, we investigated the association between physical activity and incident ADRD in the population-based Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). Using the MEC-Medicare linkage data, we examined whether physical activity assessed at middle to old age was associated with risk of ADRD later in life and whether the associations varied by race and ethnicity, sedentary behavior, and APOE genotypes, as well as the follow-up duration between the MVPA assessment and ADRD diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and body weight status.

2 |. METHODS

2.1 |. Study population

More than 215,000 adults 45 to 75 years of age entered the MEC by completing a comprehensive questionnaire including physical activity assessment in 1993 to 1996.21 The participants consisted primarily of five racial and ethnic groups—Black, Japanese American, Latino, Native Hawaiia and White—living in Hawaii and California. The majority of the MEC Latino participants were of Mexican descent: 35% were born in Mexico and 45% were born in United States; among those who were US-born, 66% had a parent born in Mexico. The institutional review boards of the University of Hawaii and the University of Southern California approved the study. These boards considered that informed consent was implied by the return of the baseline questionnaire that was mailed to potential participants along with a cover letter explaining the study. In addition to annual linkage to Hawaii and California death registries and the National Death Index, the cohort has been linked to the Medicare administrative data for 1999 to 2014.22 For the current study, the analyses were restricted to the MEC participants who were Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries (n = 123,186), for whom claims data are available. Medicare surveillance started at the age the participant enrolled in Medicare FFS or in 1999, whichever came later. We excluded participants who were not from the five main racial and ethnic groups (n = 7511), who were enrolled in Medicare at ages younger than 65 likely due to an early onset disability (n = 4707), and who were enrolled in Medicare FFS for fewer than 2 years (n = 6426). In addition, in order to remove prevalent cases of ADRD to study "diagnostic incidence" for the association with physical activity, we excluded those with a disease claim within the first 2 years after the start of Medicare surveillance (n = 2106) and those who reported AD on the MEC questionnaire at 5-year follow-up (1998 to 2002; n = 221). Finally, we excluded those who had missing information on daily sitting or physical activity (n = 6825) and missing covariates on education, marital status, medical history, weight and height, cigarette smoking, and diet (n = 7343). As a result, a total of 88,047 were included in the analysis. This analytic population had characteristics that were similar to all cohort members ≥65 years of age at the start of Medicare surveillance (n = 110,968) in terms of age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), education, and smoking status (Table S1).

2.2 |. Assessment of physical activity

On the baseline questionnaire at cohort entry (1993 to 1996), participants reported their average weekly or daily time spent in physical activity, sitting, and sleeping during the previous year.23,24 Three specific categories of physical activity were included: moderate activity (such as housework, brisk walking, golfing, bowling, bicycling on level ground, or gardening), vigorous or strenuous sports (such as jogging, bicycling on hills, tennis, racquetball, swimming laps, or aerobics), and vigorous work (such as moving heavy furniture, loading or unloading trucks, shoveling, weight lifting, or equivalent manual labor). Each activity type was reported in eight duration categories: never, 0.5 to 1, 2 to 3, 4 to 6, 7 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, and ≥31 hours per week. Total hours of MVPA per week were calculated as the sum of the midpoints of the categories and used as the physical activity exposure of main interest. Five specific types of sitting activities were queried for: sitting in car or bus, sitting at work, watching TV, sitting at meals, and other sitting activities such as reading, playing cards, or sewing. For each type of sitting activity, participants selected one of seven categories for duration: never, <1, 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, 7 to 10, and ≥11 hours per day. Total daily sitting hours were calculated as the sum of the midpoints of the categories. Sleep duration including naps was asked using six categories: <5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and ≥10 hours per day. Light physical activity was calculated by subtracting the total time spent in MVPA, sitting and sleeping from 24 hours. We also examined metabolic equivalents (METs) for total activities and MET-hours for MVPA per day. In a validation study, the correlation for total energy expenditure based on the MEC physical activity questionnaire and the objective method of doubly labeled water was reasonable for METs (r = 0.29).25 The same information on physical activity was collected at a 10-year follow-up survey (2003 to 2008), except that moderate activity was separated into questions on recreational (brisk walking, golfing, bicycling on level ground, gardening, dancing, or softball) and work (housework, yard work, restaurant work, sales work, or equivalent moderate physical activity) activities.

2.3 |. Covariates

In addition to physical activity questions, the baseline questionnaire collected information on demographic characteristics, education, medical history, weight and height, smoking, and dietary habits using a validated, quantitative food frequency questionnaire (QFFQ) with more than 180 food items.21,26 The Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) was calculated as a measure of overall diet quality as described previously.27

We compiled genotyping array data available from over 20 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in the MEC,28 which were then imputed using the Haplotype Reference Consortium. As a result, of the 88,047 participants in the current analysis, 14,332 participants (1973 ADRD cases, or 16%) had APOE genotype data, following quality control filtering and imputation (Supplemental Digital Content). The APOE genotype, encoding the isoforms of apolipoprotein E, was determined based on two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs429358 and rs7412), for the alleles, e2 (T/T; Cys112, Cys158), e3 (T/C; Cys112, Arg158), and e4 (C/C; Arg112, Arg158).29

2.4 |. Outcomes

The diagnostic incidence of ADRD during the Medicare linkage period (1999 to 2014) was the primary outcome of interest. A diagnosis of ADRD was identified among FFS beneficiaries based on the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes in the claims data: for AD, 331.0; for ADRD, 331.1, 331.11, 331.19, 331.2, 331.7, 331.82, 332.0 and 331.0 (Parkinsonism), 290.0, 290.10, 290.11, 290.12, 290.13, 290.20, 290.21, 290.3, 290.40, 290.41, 290.42, 290.43, 290.9, 294.0, 294.10, 294.11, 294.20, 294.21, 294.8, and 797. For the definition of ADRD, we combined the approaches used by Medicare (ie, excluding alcohol-induced dementia [291.2], Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease [046], drug-induced [292.82], Huntington disease [333.4]) and by Goodman et al. (ie, including Lewy body dementia [331.82, 331.0, 332.0], idiopathic dementia [290.9], and unspecified dementia [294.20, 294.21]).30

2.5 |. Statistical analysis

Cox proportional hazards models with age as the time metric were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ADRD for men and women separately. For the current analysis, the follow-up for case ascertainment began 2 years from the start of Medicare surveillance or from January 1, 1999, whichever came later, to account for the minimum enrollment period of 2 years on Medicare. The follow-up ended at the earliest of the following dates: claim’s date of service for AD/ADRD, date of death, or Dec 31, 2014. MVPA and total sitting variables were categorized into quintiles based on the distributions in the entire study population. The lowest quintile for MVPA (<2.5 hours per week) was set as a reference group. This cutoff value, 150 minutes per week, is the minimum recommendation for moderate-intensity physical activity for American adults.31 The tests for a linear trend were performed by modeling sex- and race- and ethnicity-specific median values within the quintile categories as a continuous variable. The proportional hazards assumption was verified by the Schoenfeld residuals method.32

Sex-specific models included age at cohort entry and age at start of Medicare surveillance as covariates and race and ethnicity as a strata variable. Models were further adjusted for covariates from the baseline questionnaire, including education (years), marital status (married, not married), history of hypertension (yes, no), history of heart disease (yes, no), history of stroke (yes, no), history of diabetes (yes, no), smoking status (never, former, current), pack-years of cigarette smoking, BMI (kg/m2), total sitting hours, alcohol consumption (g/day), and HEI-2015 score, as well as Medicare usage, as defined by the average number of inpatient claims (<1, ≥1 per year) and outpatient claims (<1, ≥1 per year). The models for total sitting were mutually adjusted for MVPA. We considered sleeping hours and total energy intake as covariates, but did not retain them in the final model, since they did not affect the main associations. Because the association was similar in men and women, we combined men and women for subgroup analysis with adjustment for sex as a strata variable.

We ran the multivariate models stratified by race and ethnicity, BMI, sitting time, age at cohort entry, follow-up time, and age at ADRD claim. For the 16% of the participants with APOE genotype data available, the models were run by APOE e4 carrier status (carriers of one to two copies of the e4 allele vs non-carriers). This subset with APOE e4 carrier status, compared to the full sample, included proportionally more men, Blacks, Native Hawaiians, and smokers and overweight and more educated participants (Table S1). Heterogeneity of the main association across subgroups was tested by Wald statistics for cross-product terms between the trend variables for physical activity and the subgroup variable in the combined data, except for the subgroups by APOE e4 carrier status, for which the indicator variable for ≥2.5 or <2.5 hours per week of MVPA was used instead of the trend variable.

We repeated the analysis in the 41,746 men and women with physical activity and covariate data from the 10-year follow-up survey and without prior ADRD. The outcome was incident ADRD (3885 cases) based on claims after the 10-year follow-up (from 2003 to 2008 through 2014). All statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3 |. RESULTS

During a mean Medicare surveillance of 10.4 years (range: 2 to 16), 13,039 incident cases of ADRD were identified among 88,047 eligible participants. Table 1 provides the characteristics of participants at cohort entry by levels of MVPA. Men and women who were more physically active were more likely to be Native Hawaiian or White, to have lower BMI, to have a greater intake of alcohol and total energy, to have a higher HEI-2015 score, to be former smokers, and to be married, whereas they were less likely to have history of hypertension, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, or to make inpatient Medicare claims.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics by physical activity at cohort entry (1993 to 1996) in the Multiethnic Cohort

Moderate/vigorous activity (hours/week)
All <2.5 2.5 to <5 5 to <7 7 to <14 ≥14
Men, n 39,676 6938 6811 7248 9733 8946
Age at cohort entry, mean ± SD 59.8 ± 8.1 60.4 ± 7.8 60.2 ± 8.2 59.8 ± 8.1 58.9 ± 8.0 59.8 ± 8.3
Age at Medicare surveillance start, mean ± SD 69.7 ± 4.8 69.9 ± 4.8 70.0 ± 5.0 69.8 ± 4.8 69.2 ± 4.5 69.8 ± 4.9
Race/ethnicity (%)
 Black 9.8 15.1 12.0 9.6 7.5 6.6
 Japanese American 34.6 29.5 34.1 39.5 34.2 35.2
 Latinoa 20.1 31.2 21.6 17.1 17.5 15.4
 Native Hawaiian 7.0 5.16. 6.2 6.4 8.1 8.6
 White 28.5 19.1 26.0 27.4 32.7 34.2
Education (years), mean ± SD 13.7 ± 3.2 12.6 ± 3.7 13.7 ± 3.1 14.0 ± 3.0 14.2 ± 3.0 13.9 ± 2.9
Married (%) 79.0 75.3 79.0 80.9 80.4 78.8
History of hypertension (%) 38.0 42.8 41.0 39.3 34.8 34.5
History of heart disease (%) 8.8 10.6 9.2 9.2 7.9 8.0
History of stroke (%) 2.2 3.5 2.5 2.2 1.6 1.6
History of diabetes (%) 10.3 15.0 10.9 9.5 8.8 8.2
Medicare usage
 ≥1 inpatient claim/year (%) 3.7 4.9 3.7 3.9 3.3 3.0
 ≥1 outpatient claim/year (%) 51.3 51.1 51.8 51.6 51.3 50.8
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.5 ± 3.9 27.2 ± 4.3 26.7 ± 4.0 26.5 ± 3.9 26.4 ± 3.7 26.1 ± 3.6
Smoking status (%)
 Never 32.0 30.9 32.8 32.2 32.6 31.7
 Former 52.1 49.5 51.0 53.1 52.9 53.3
 Current 15.8 19.5 16.2 14.7 14.5 15.0
Pack-years among ever smokers, mean ± SD 20.4 ± 16.3 21.0 ± 16.8 20.5 ± 16.5 20.3 ± 16.4 19.3 ± 15.7 21.0 ± 16.3
Sitting hours, mean ± SD 8.1 ± 3.5 7.8 ± 3.9 8.4 ± 3.6 8.4 ± 3.4 8.4 ± 3.4 7.4 ± 3.0
Sleeping hours, mean ± SD 7.0 ± 1.1 7.0 ± 1.2 7.0 ± 1.1 7.0 ± 1.1 7.1 ± 1.1 7.1 ± 1.1
Alcohol intake (g/day), mean ± SD 14.5 ± 30.5 13.7 ± 35.3 13.5 ± 30.7 13.9 ± 29.6 14.7 ± 28.2 16.1 ± 29.6
Total energy intake (kcal/day), mean ± SD 2402 ± 1067 2324 ± 1141 2304 ± 1043 2296 ± 1006 2451 ± 1062 2568 ± 1057
Healthy Eating Index-2015, mean ± SD 65.9 ± 10.4 63.5 ± 10.4 65.2 ± 10.2 66.0 ± 10.4 66.8 ± 10.2 67.1 ± 10.3
Women, n 48,371 8579 11,213 10,059 9605 8915
Age at cohort entry, mean ± SD 59.5 ± 8.1 59.8 ± 7.9 59.7 ± 8.2 59.5 ± 8.1 58.7 ± 8.1 59.9 ± 8.0
Age at Medicare surveillance start, mean ± SD 69.6 ± 4.7 69.6 ± 4.8 69.7 ± 4.9 69.6 ± 4.8 69.2 ± 4.6 69.7 ± 4.7
Race/ethnicity (%)
 Black 14.6 18.9 18.4 14.4 11.4 9.5
 Japanese American 33.1 27.6 36.2 36.3 32.4 31.7
 Latinoa 17.4 32.4 16.3 14.9 12.5 12.5
 Native Hawaiian 7.4 5.7 7.3 7.4 8.3 8.2
 White 27.4 15.5 21.8 27.0 35.3 38.0
Education (years), mean ± SD 13.5 ± 3.1 12.1 ± 3.8 13.4 ± 3.0 13.8 ± 2.8 14.1 ± 2.8 13.9 ± 2.7
Married (%) 61.8 52.8 59.7 64.0 64.1 67.9
History of hypertension (%) 35.8 41.7 38.6 35.8 31.7 31.3
History of heart disease (%) 5.6 8.7 5.7 4.9 4.2 4.6
History of stroke (%) 1.7 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.4
History of diabetes (%) 8.9 12.7 9.8 8.2 6.8 6.9
Medicare usage
 ≥1 inpatient claim/y (%) 3.5 4.4 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.9
 ≥1 outpatient claim/y (%) 62.7 62.6 61.5 63.6 62.4 63.7
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.0 ± 5.3 27.3 ± 5.7 26.3 ± 5.5 25.8 ± 5.0 25.4 ± 5.0 25.1 ± 4.8
Smoking status (%)
 Never 57.6 61.7 58.7 57.6 55.2 54.5
 Former 29.4 26.4 27.8 29.3 32.2 31.3
 Current 13.0 11.9 13.5 13.0 12.6 14.1
Pack-years among ever smokers, mean ± SD 15.5 ± 14.4 14.5 ± 14.2 15.1 ± 14.1 15.1 ± 14.2 15.2 ± 14.0 17.4 ± 15.3
Sitting hours, mean ± SD 8.2 ± 3.6 7.6 ± 4.0 8.4 ± 3.7 8.6 ± 3.5 8.5 ± 3.4 7.6 ± 3.1
Sleeping hours, mean ± SD 7.0 ± 1.1 6.9 ± 1.2 6.9 ± 1.1 7.0 ± 1.1 7.0 ± 1.1 7.0 ± 1.1
Alcohol intake (g/day), mean ± SD 4.5 ± 14.6 3.3 ± 14.0 3.7 ± 12.8 4.4 ± 14.8 5.5 ± 16.2 5.6 ± 15.2
Total energy intake (kcal/day), mean ± SD 1958 ± 918 1972 ± 1030 1924 ± 928 1913 ± 867 1973 ± 886 2023 ± 876
Healthy Eating Index-2015, mean ± SD 69.4 ± 10.4 66.8 ± 10.4 68.4 ± 10.3 69.9 ± 10.3 70.8 ± 10.2 71.0 ± 10.2
a

The majority of the MEC Latino participants were of Mexican descent.

The associations of physical activity in different intensities with risk of ADRD are shown in Table 2. MVPA showed the strongest association with a decreased risk of ADRD in both men and women: HR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76–0.90) for the highest versus lowest quintile, P-trend <0.001 in men and HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81–0.95), P-trend = 0.004 in women. The associations did not differ between men and women (P-heterogeneity by sex = 0.52). After disaggregating physical activity levels, moderate activity had stronger associations than did vigorous sports or work activities in both men and women. We repeated the analysis using METs for total activities (accounting for light and sedentary activities, as well as MVPA and sleep) versus MET hours only for MVPA and similarly observed a stronger inverse association for the latter (data not shown). In a sensitivity analysis excluding 1927 cases claimed within the first 3 years of follow-up, the association between MVPA and ADRD risk remained similar (Table S2).

TABLE 2.

Physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

Men
Women
Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a P-heterogeneity by sex
Moderate/vigorous activity
 <2.5 hours/week 1078 1.00 (ref) 1482 1.00 (ref)
 2.5 to <5 hours/week 1015 0.96 (0.88–1.05) 1863 0.96 (0.89–1.03)
 5 to <7 hours/week 935 0.83 (0.75–0.90) 1517 0.88 (0.82–0.95)
 7 to <14 hours/week 1223 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 1336 0.89 (0.83–0.96)
 ≥14 hours/week 1195 0.83 (0.76–0.90) 1395 0.88 (0.81–0.95)
P-trend <0.001 0.004 0.52
Moderate activity
 ≤1 hour/week 1431 1.00 (ref) 1556 1.00 (ref)
 2–3 hours/week 1384 0.96 (0.89–1.03) 2097 0.96 (0.90–1.03)
 4–6 hours/week 1037 0.82 (0.75–0.89) 1639 0.90 (0.84–0.97)
 7–10 hours/week 689 0.90 (0.82–0.99) 970 0.90 (0.83–0.98)
 ≥11 hours/week 879 0.84 (0.77–0.92) 1299 0.89 (0.83–0.96)
P-trend <0.001 0.02 0.09
Vigorous sports activity
 Never 3475 1.00 (ref) 5682 1.00 (ref)
 0.5–1 hour/week 916 1.00 (0.93–1.08) 924 1.01 (0.94–1.08)
 2–3 hours/week 491 1.03 (0.94–1.14) 451 0.86 (0.78–0.95)
 ≥4 hours/week 472 0.96 (0.87–1.06) 340 0.95 (0.85–1.06)
P-trend 0.60 0.03 0.12
Vigorous work activity
 Never 2702 1.00 (ref) 6014 1.00 (ref)
 0.5–1 hour/week 1189 0.92 (0.86–0.99) 781 0.94 (0.87–1.01)
 2–3 hours/week 702 1.01 (0.93–1.10) 323 1.09 (0.97–1.22)
 ≥4 hours/week 720 0.94 (0.87–1.03) 197 0.99 (0.86–1.15)
P-trend 0.36 0.86 0.71
a

Adjusted for age at cohort entry, age at Medicare surveillance start, race/ethnicity, education, history of hypertension, history of heart disease, history of stroke, history of diabetes, Medicare usage (in-patient and out-patient claims separately, number per year), marital status, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, body mass index, total sitting hours, alcohol consumption, and Healthy Eating Index-2015.

In the analysis for sedentary behaviors (Table 3), total sitting time was not associated with ADRD risk in either men or women. In men, there was no significant association for specific sedentary behaviors. In women, although total sitting was not associated with the risk, sitting in a car or bus (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.21, for ≥3 vs <1 hour/day, P-heterogeneity by sex = 0.14) and sitting to watch TV (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02–1.24, for ≥5 vs <1 hour/day, P-heterogeneity by sex = 0.07) were related to increased risk, whereas sitting at work was associated with decreased risk of ADRD (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.92, for ≥7 vs 0 hours/day, P-heterogeneity by sex = 0.08).

TABLE 3.

Sedentary behaviors and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

Men
Women
Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a P-heterogeneity by sex
Total sitting
 <5 hours/day 1184 1.00 (ref) 1600 1.00 (ref)
 5 to <7 hours/day 1300 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 1790 1.04 (0.97–1.11)
 7 to <9 hours/day 1160 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 1593 0.99 (0.92–1.06)
 9 to <12 hours/day 1128 0.94 (0.86–1.02) 1599 1.00 (0.94–1.08)
 ≥12 hours/day 674 0.96 (0.87–1.06) 1011 1.01 (0.93–1.09)
P-trend 0.19 0.84 0.58
Sitting in car or bus
 <1 hour/day 3230 1.00 (ref) 4836 1.00 (ref)
 1–2 hours/day 1650 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 2052 1.06 (1.00–1.11)
 ≥3 hours/day 414 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 471 1.10 (1.00–1.21)
P-trend 0.96 0.01 0.14
Sitting at work
 Never 2132 1.00 (ref) 3441 1.00 (ref)
 >0–2 hours/day 1485 0.97 (0.91–1.04) 1686 0.95 (0.89–1.01)
 3–4 hours/day 619 0.92 (0.84–1.01) 619 0.90 (0.82–0.98)
 5–6 hours/day 524 0.90 (0.81–0.99) 591 0.88 (0.81–0.97)
 ≥7 hours/day 210 0.96 (0.83–1.11) 316 0.82 (0.72–0.92)
P-trend 0.06 <0.001 0.08
Sitting to watch TV
 <1 hour/day 644 1.00 (ref) 871 1.00 (ref)
 1–2 hours/day 2059 0.99 (0.90–1.08) 2757 1.01 (0.94–1.09)
 3–4 hours/day 2061 0.96 (0.88–1.05) 2961 1.03 (0.95–1.11)
 ≥5 hours/day 592 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 879 1.13 (1.02–1.24)
P-trend 0.87 0.02 0.07
a

Adjusted for age at cohort entry, age at Medicare surveillance start, race/ethnicity, education, history of hypertension, history of heart disease, history of stroke, history of diabetes, Medicare usage (in-patient and out-patient claims separately, number per year), marital status, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, body mass index, moderate or vigorous physical activity, alcohol consumption, and Healthy Eating Index-2015.

In race- and ethnicity-specific analyses with men and women combined (Table 4), an inverse trend in the MVPA-ADRD association was significant in Japanese American (P-trend <0.001) and White (P = 0.007) groups and consistent, albeit not reaching statistical significance in Latino (P = 0.14) and Native Hawaiian (P = 0.23) groups. However, in Blacks, no suggestion of association was observed across MVPA levels (P-heterogeneity across racial and ethnic groups = 0.52). When restricting analyses to Black participants without the e4 allele, an inverse association was suggested (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.67–1.11, for ≥2.5 vs <2.5 hours/week of MVPA). For total sitting time, no significant association with ADRD risk was found in any racial and ethnic group. When accounting for deaths from other causes than ADRD as a competing risk, the association between MVPA and ADRD was attenuated but still significant (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.97, for the highest vs lowest quintile, P-trend = 0.02), whereas no substantial change was found for total sitting time (Table S3).

TABLE 4.

Physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias by race/ethnicity

Black
Japanese American
Latino
Native Hawaiian
White
P-heterogeneity by ethnicity
Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a
Moderate/vigorous activity
 <2.5 hours/week 566 1.00 (ref) 737 1.00 (ref) 699 1.00 (ref) 116 1.00 (ref) 442 1.00 (ref)
 2.5 to <5 hours/week 616 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 1002 0.91 (0.83–1.00) 468 1.05 (0.93–1.18) 167 1.00 (0.78–1.27) 625 0.90 (0.79–1.01)
 5 to <7 hours/week 416 0.95 (0.84–1.09) 894 0.78 (0.71–0.86) 379 1.03(0.90–1.17) 130 0.71(0.55–0.9217) 633 0.82 (0.73–0.93)
 7 to <14 hours/week 371 1.02 (0.89–1.17) 922 0.87 (0.79–0.96) 309 0.91 (0.79–1.04) 164 0.80 (0.62–1.02) 793 0.81 (0.72–0.92)
 ≥14 hours/week 298 0.99 (0.86–1.15) 966 0.79 (0.72–0.87) 270 0.93 (0.81–1.0) 173 0.81 (0.64–1.04) 883 0.81 (0.72–0.91)
P-trend 0.99 <0.001 0.14 0.23 0.007 0.52
Total sitting
 <5 hours/day 463 1.00 (ref) 895 1.00 (ref) 699 1.00 (ref) 168 1.00 (ref) 559 1.00 (ref)
 5 to <7 hours/day 516 1.11 (0.98–1.26) 1135 1.00 (0.91–1.09) 495 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 173 1.10 (0.89–1.36) 771 0.99 (0.89–1.10)
 7 to <9 hours/day 450 1.02 (0.90–1.16) 1005 0.96 (0.87–1.05) 342 0.86 (0.75–0.98) 1352 0.84 (0.67–1.06) 821 0.97 (0.87–1.08)
 9 to <12 hours/day 486 1.10 (0.96–1.25) 958 0.98 (0.90–1.08) 339 0.92 (0.80–1.05) 16439 0.93 (0.75–1.16) 780 0.93 (0.84–1.04)
 ≥12 hours/day 352 1.04 (0.90–1.20) 528 0.93 (0.83–1.03) 250 1.09 (0.94–1.26) 110 0.86 (0.67–1.1026) 445 1.01 (0.89–1.15)
P-trend 0.61 0.21 0.94 0.12 0.70 0.45
a

Adjusted for age at cohort entry, age at Medicare surveillance start, sex, education, history of hypertension, history of heart disease, history of stroke, history of diabetes, Medicare usage (in-patient and out-patient claims separately, number per year), marital status, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and Healthy Eating Index-2015. For moderate/vigorous activity, further adjusted for total sitting. For total sitting, further adjusted for moderate/vigorous activity.

Participants with less total sitting time showed a stronger inverse association of MVPA (P-trend <0.001 for ≤6 hours/day and 0.81 for ≥10 hours/day; P-heterogeneity = 0.04) (Table 5). The similar joint analysis was performed for each sedentary behavior and none of the heterogeneity tests was significant (data not shown). In analyses by APOE e4 carrier status (Table 6), a decrease in ADRD risk was found in all non-carriers with ≥2.5 hours per week of MVPA, whereas no association was found among carriers (P-heterogeneity = 0.02).

TABLE 5.

Moderate or vigorous physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias by sitting time

Moderate/vigorous Activity Total sitting hours (hours/day)
P-heterogeneity by sitting time
≤6
>6 to <10
≥10
Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a
<2.5 hours/week 1297 1.00 (ref) 684 1.00 (ref) 579 1.00 (ref)
2.5 to <5 hours/week 1191 0.96 (0.89–1.04) 965 1.00 (0.90–1.10) 722 0.92 (0.82–1.03)
5 to <7 hours/week 863 0.83 (0.76–0.91) 919 0.93 (0.84–1.03) 670 0.82 (0.73–0.92)
7 to <14 hours/week 876 0.84 (0.77–0.92) 970 0.95 (0.86–1.05) 713 0.90 (0.80–1.01)
≥14 hours/week 989 0.79 (0.73–0.87) 1035 0.90 (0.81–0.99) 566 0.92 (0.82–1.04)
P-trend <0.001 0.04 0.81 0.04
a

Adjusted for age at cohort entry, age at Medicare surveillance start, sex, race/ethnicity, education, history of hypertension, history of heart disease, history of stroke, history of diabetes, Medicare usage (in-patient and out-patient claims separately, number per year), marital status, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, body mass index, alcohol consumption and Healthy Eating Index-2015.

TABLE 6.

Moderate or vigorous physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias by no. of APOE e4

Moderate/vigorous activity All with APOE genotype data
No. of APOE e4
P- heterogeneity by APOE
0
1, 2
Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a Cases HR (95% CI)a
<2.5 hours/week 350 1.00 (ref) 243 1.00 (ref) 107 1.00 (ref)
2.5 to <5 hours/week 431 0.97 (0.84–1.12) 262 0.87 (0.73–1.04) 169 1.14 (0.89–1.46)
5 to <7 hours/week 352 0.81 (0.69–0.94) 230 0.75 (0.62–0.90) 122 0.91 (0.69–1.19)
7 to <14 hours/week 422 0.91 (0.79–1.06) 255 0.79 (0.66–0.95) 167 1.13 (0.88–1.45)
≥14 hours/week 418 0.86 (0.74–1.00) 264 0.76 (0.64–0.92) 154 1.04 (0.80–1.35)
P-trend 0.23 0.07 0.69 0.02
a

Adjusted for age at cohort entry, age at Medicare surveillance start, sex, race/ethnicity, education, history of hypertension, history of heart disease, history of stroke, history of diabetes, Medicare usage (in-patient and out-patient claims separately, number per year), marital status, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, body mass index, total sitting hours, alcohol consumption, and Healthy Eating Index-2015.

No heterogeneity in the association between MVPA and ADRD was found across BMI levels (Table S4, P-heterogeneity = 0.73), age at cohort entry (Table S5, <65 vs ≥65 years, P-heterogeneity = 0.11), or age at ADRD diagnosis (Table S6, <75 vs ≥75 years, P-heterogeneity = 0.87). The inverse association was found for the cases with ≥10 years (P-trend = 0.001) as well as for those with <10 years (P-trend <0.001) between the physical activity assessment and ADRD diagnosis (Table S7, P-heterogeneity <0.001). When MVPA was examined at the 10-year follow-up and subsequent ADRD risk in a subset (Table S8), the inverse association for MVPA was stronger than that for MVPA assessed at cohort entry. In addition, the inverse association was found for sports as well as work activities in both men and women.

4 |. DISCUSSION

In this population-based prospective study, we replicated the association between higher physical activity and a lower risk of ADRD, providing rare evidence of the important protective relationship in an ethnically diverse population. In the combined data, ≥5 hours weekly (or about ≥40 minutes daily) of MVPA reported at middle or older ages was associated with an ≈15% lower risk of subsequent ADRD, independent of a number of potential confounding factors including sitting duration. We observed that the inverse MVPA-ADRD association was significant or suggestive among all racial and ethnic groups apart from Black participants. In addition, our large data analysis suggests modifying effects by exposures to sedentary behaviors or predominant genetic susceptibility to AD. The risk reduction from MVPA was greater among individuals with a shorter, compared to longer, sitting duration and those who do not carry the APOE e4 risk allele. On the other hand, we found similarly protective associations of MVPA by BMI levels, age at diagnosis, or age cohorts.

Our findings are consistent with those of previous prospective studies showing an inverse association between physical activity and AD or dementia.11,3336 In particular, our results contradict the recent meta-analysis that attributed the inverse association to decreased physical activity due to latent dementia among pre-clinical cases.14 The mean duration between the physical activity assessment (1993 to 1996) and the Medicare claim (1999 to 2014) in the MEC was 15.0 (± 3.8) years. For most of the ADRD cases (86%), physical activity was assessed ≥10 years before the Medicare claim and the inverse association was observed when restricting the analysis to those cases. In addition, removing the cases within the first 3 years of follow-up from the analysis did not change the inverse association.

Although our results, overall and in White and Japanese American groups, are consistent with previous reports based respectively on White and East Asian populations in Japan and China,11,3336 we found some suggestion of racial and ethnic differences. A risk reduction was observed in White and Japanese American groups with statistical significance and in Native Hawaiian group with a non-linear trend; however, no association was found in Black and Latino groups for any physical activity level. In the MEC, Black participants tended to be less physically active (mean MVPA: 6.8 hours/week) than the other racial and ethnic groups (mean MVPA range: 7.5 to 10.5 hours/week) and as reported in previous studies,37 had the highest risk of ADRD. It is conceivable that Black adults need higher levels of physical activity to counter their susceptibility to ADRD. Although Black participants, as well as Native Hawaiian participants, had higher BMI levels, our effect modification analysis by BMI categories and our stratified analysis limited to non-obese participants show no differential associations and do not support BMI as the source of the ethnically heterogeneous association. On the other hand, a higher frequency of APOE e4 risk allele was observed in Black participants, and our stratified analysis among Black participants without e4 allele suggested an inverse association between MVPA and ADRD, which warrants further studies with a larger sample size. We also speculate that the lack of significant association in Black and Latino participants might be attributed to potential modifying effects of unmeasured social determinants of health as a result of structural racism and inequities, concurrent or experienced over the life course.38,39

Although total sitting time was not associated with ADRD risk in our study, there was a suggestion that the association might vary by type of sedentary activities. Among women, an inverse association was found for sitting at work, whereas the risk was increased with longer sitting time to watch TV. Nonetheless, the risk reduction by MVPA was greater in individuals with shorter total sitting hours. This finding suggests that MVPA may be particularly beneficial for ADRD prevention among less-sedentary people, which is consistent with some previous reports that longer sedentary time eliminates the benefits of physical exercises on individual’s cognitive health.40,41

One of the main challenges in ADRD research is that accurate diagnosis of AD through imaging and biomarker analysis is often not feasible. Considering this limitation and the common occurrence of mixed-etiology dementia involving AD pathology, we analyzed the physical activity association with ADRD broadly but also examined the association by the predominant genetic risk factor for AD in the APOE gene. We found that the association is likely limited to non-carriers of the e4 risk allele. Such a gene-behavioral interaction was suggested42 but has not been corroborated, for example, for a change in cognitive function in a combined analysis of three European cohorts (n = ≈7200, with 26% as e4 carriers)43 or in a physical activity intervention (n = 54, with 43% as e4 carriers),44 which might have been due to some study-specific issues, such as cohort heterogeneity, limited sample sizes, and inadequate follow-up for cognitive assessments. Our finding supports further research that physical activity and other factors may have different associations with the risk of ADRD by the predominant effect of the APOE genotype status.

This study has several strengths including the prospective design, a large number of participants and cases over a long-term follow-up, racial and ethnic diversity, and the availability of the APOE genotype data and many potential confounders for adjustment. Our study also has several limitations to consider when interpreting the findings. The ADRD case definition was based solely on Medicare claims data, which may not have fully captured incident cases. The under-detection of cases might occur more often for those with mild symptoms than for severe dementia and yield potentially different risk factor associations compared with those obtained using criterion-standard evaluation.45 However, Medicare claims have been largely concordant with clinical diagnoses of dementia in an Alzheimer disease registry.46,47 Indeed, our rate estimates are similar as in clinical studies.48 It is unlikely that the potential under-detection of ADRD based on Medicare-based ascertainment affected our large prospectively cohort data differently across physical activity levels. The robust association estimates in various subgroup analyses also support this point. Although the physical activity questionnaire used in the MEC was validated in reference to doubly labeled water and found to have reasonable validity,25 it might not have captured the activities relevant to ADRD comprehensively.11,49 In addition, even though we observed that the inverse physical activity association was driven more by moderate activities rather than by vigorous sports or work activities, this may have been because moderate intensity is the primary type of physical activity in our mature adult population and may not preclude a stronger protective effect of vigorous physical activity to mitigate cognitive decline and ADRD risks. Finally, despite the large sample size, statistical power might still be limited for some of the subgroups, including for the joint analysis of race and ethnicity and APOE genotype on the MVPA-ADRD association.

In summary, our study confirms that higher physical activity levels at middle to old age are associated with a lower risk of ADRD in later life and suggests similarities of the association across racial and ethnic groups and differences by APOE e4 and sitting duration.

Supplementary Material

Suppl

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT.

1. Systematic Review:

Evidence from observational studies consistently showed a protective association of physical activity with risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) but has lacked consideration of racial and ethnic diversity and potential modifying factors.

2. Interpretation:

We found that ≥5 hours weekly (or ≥40 minutes daily) of moderate or vigorous physical activity (MVPA) reported at middle or older ages was associated with an ≈15% lower risk of subsequent ADRD. The inverse MVPA-ADRD association was observed for most racial and ethnic groups, but stronger in individuals with lower levels of sitting duration or those who do not carry the apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 risk allele.

3. Future Directions:

Further research should assess physical activity interventions in the context of sedentary behaviors and the APOE status.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute and a supplement from the National Institute of Aging at the U.S. National Institutes of Health to the Multiethnic Cohort Study (U01 CA164973; CA164973 08S1). The funding organizations played no role in the design and conduct, the management and analysis of the data, the interpretation of results, or the preparation of the article.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of the article at the publisher’s website.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization. Dementia. World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alzheimer’s Association. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:391–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kapasi A, DeCarli C, Schneider JA. Impact of multiple pathologies on the threshold for clinically overt dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;134:171–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.De Reuck J, Deramecourt V, Cordonnier C, et al. The incidence of postmortem neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology in mixed dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2016;366:164–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology. 2007;69:2197–2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barker WW, Luis CA, Kashuba A, et al. Relative frequencies of Alzheimer disease, Lewy body, vascular and frontotemporal dementia, and hippocampal sclerosis in the State of Florida Brain Bank. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002;16:203–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MM, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2016;388:505–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anstey KJ, Ee N, Eramudugolla R, Jagger C, Peters R. A systematic review of meta-analyses that evaluate risk factors for dementia to evaluate the quantity, quality, and global representativeness of evidence. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70:S165–S186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;390:2673–2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arab L, Sabbagh MN. Are certain lifestyle habits associated with lower Alzheimer’s disease risk? J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:785–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee J The relationship between physical activity and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Gerontol Nurs. 2018;44:22–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stephen R, Hongisto K, Solomon A, Lönnroos E. Physical activity and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:glw251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gronek P, Balko S, Gronek J, et al. Physical activity and Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. Aging Dis. 2019;10:1282–1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A, Pentti J, et al. Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: an individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;365:l1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barha CK, Davis JC, Falck RS, Nagamatsu LS, Liu-Ambrose T. Sex differences in exercise efficacy to improve cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in older humans. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2017;46:71–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Du Z, Li Y, Li J, Zhou C, Li F, Yang X. Physical activity can improve cognition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1593–1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brasure M, Desai P, Davila H, et al. Physical activity interventions in preventing cognitive decline and Alzheimer-type dementia: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu W, Wang HF, Wan Y, Tan CC, Yu JT, Tan L. Leisure time physical activity and dementia risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thibeau S, McFall GP, Camicioli R, Dixon RA. Physical activity and mobility differentially predict nondemented executive function trajectories: Do sex and APOE moderate these associations? Gerontology. 2019;65:640–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fenesi B, Fang H, Kovacevic A, Oremus M, Raina P, Heisz JJ. Physical exercise moderates the relationship of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and dementia risk: a population-based study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56:297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Setiawan VW, Virnig BA, Porcel J, et al. Linking data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study to Medicare data: linkage results and application to chronic disease research. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181:917–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim Y, Wilkens LR, Park SY, Goodman MT, Monroe KR, Kolonel LN. Association between various sedentary behaviours and all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1040–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park SY, Wilkens LR, Haiman CA, Le Marchand L. Physical activity and colorectal cancer risk by sex, race/ethnicity, and subsite: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019;12:315–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilkens LR, Murphy SP, Jardack P, White KK, Kolonel LN, Arab L. Validation of a physical activity questionnaire against the doubly-labeled water standard among a multiethnic population. FASEB J. 2011;25:978.9. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, et al. Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:358–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Panizza CE, Shvetsov YB, Harmon BE, et al. Testing the predictive validity of the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in the Multiethnic Cohort: is the score associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality? Nutrients. 2018;10:E452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park SL, Cheng I, Haiman CA. Genome-wide association studies of cancer in diverse populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27:405–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Holtzman DM, Herz J, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein E receptors: normal biology and roles in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goodman RA, Lochner KA, Thambisetty M, Wingo TS, Posner SF, Ling SM. Prevalence of dementia subtypes in United States Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2011–2013. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:28–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320:2020–2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–526. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zotcheva E, Bergh S, Selbæk G, et al. Midlife physical activity, psychological distress, and dementia risk: The HUNT study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66:825–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Najar J, Ostling S, Gudmundsson P, et al. Cognitive and physical activity and dementia: a 44-year longitudinal population study of women. Neurology. 2019;92:e1322–e1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu Y, Mitsuhashi T, Yamakawa M, et al. Physical activity and incident dementia in older Japanese adults: the Okayama study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34:1429–1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu W, Ding D, Zhao Q, et al. Medium-to-high late-life physical activity is associated with lower risk of incident dementia: the Shanghai Aging Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73:751–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mehta KM, Yeo GW. Systematic review of dementia prevalence and incidence in United States race/ethnic populations. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:72–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williams DR, Mohammed SA, Leavell J, Collins C. Race, socioeconomic status, and health: complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:69–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gee GC, Ford CL. Structural racism and health inequities: old issues, new directions. Du Bois Rev. 2011;8:115–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Voss MW, Carr LJ, Clark R, Weng T. Revenge of the "sit" II: Does lifestyle impact neuronal and cognitive health through distinct mechanisms associated with sedentary behavior and physical activity? Ment Health Phys Act. 2014;7:9–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yan S, Fu W, Wang C, et al. Association between sedentary behavior and the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bates K Gene-environment interactions in considering physical activity for the prevention of dementia. AIMS Mol Sci. 2015;2:359–381. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stringa N, van Schoor NM, Milaneschi Y, et al. Physical activity as moderator of the association between APOE and cognitive decline in older adults: results from three longitudinal cohort studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75:1880–1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Etnier JL, Karper WB, Labban JD, et al. The physical activity and Alzheimer’s disease (PAAD) study: cognitive outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52:175–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Power MC, Gianattasio KZ, Ciarleglio A. Implications of the use of algorithmic diagnoses or Medicare claims to ascertain dementia. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54:462–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Taylor DH Jr, Fillenbaum GG, Ezell. The accuracy of Medicare claims data in identifying Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:929–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Taylor DH Jr., Ostbye T, Langa KM, Weir D, Plassman BL. The accuracy of Medicare claims as an epidemiological tool: the case of dementia revisited. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17:807–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lim U, Wang S, Park SY, et al. Risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia by sex and race/ethnicity: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2021; Advance online publication 10.1002/alz.12528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Dupre C, Bongue B, Helmer C, et al. Physical activity types and risk of dementia in community-dwelling older people: the Three-City cohort. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl

RESOURCES