Skip to main content
BMJ Open Access logoLink to BMJ Open Access
. 2022 Nov 11;33(1):123–125. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003899

Quality management program in epithelial ovarian cancer: proposal in a Latin American country

Daniel Sanabria 1, Maria Camila Fernández 1, Natalia Hurtado 2, Adriana Ramos 1, Juliana Rodriguez 1,
PMCID: PMC9811080  PMID: 36368711

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological neoplasm and the ninth most common in women. Worldwide, by 2020, 313 959 cases had been diagnosed, and 207 252 women had died from this disease. For Latin America and the Caribbean, age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of 14.9 and 7.6 per 100 000 women per year were reported, respectively.1 Approximately 75% of patients will have advanced disease at diagnosis. When possible, the standard treatment is primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy. The use of maintenance therapies has also been suggested in different clinical settings.2 Complete tumor resection has proven to be the most important prognostic factor for survival in these patients.3

Quality of surgical care is a major component of the multidisciplinary management of the disease.4 Implementation of a quality program allows for reduction in morbidity and costs.5 Different organizations promote improvement in the care of ovarian neoplasms. For instance, the European Society for Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) certification for advanced ovarian cancer surgery is an award attributed to institutions which can offer patients the specific skills, experience, organization, and dedication that are required to achieve optimal levels of surgical care. The ESGO certification is based on the completion of 10 quality indicators and a scoring system.6 Currently, there are more than 60 accredited centers in Europe and Asia.7

In Latin America, non-medical barriers to cytoreductive surgery have been identified: low surgeon expertise, limitations on access, and/or inadequate resources.8 In Colombia, care is predominantly decentralized. There are no centers of excellence in ovarian cancer. In 2018, the project “Center for clinical care in epithelial ovarian cancer” was created at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, a private institution. The objectives of the center are to form an interdisciplinary working group specialized in the comprehensive management of epithelial ovarian cancer, to create protocols for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, to meet international quality indicators, and to reduce costs associated with treatment. The inclusion criteria are: patients older than 18 years and younger than 75 years, histopathological confirmation of epithelial cancer of the ovary and/or fallopian tube, and stages I/IVA susceptible to management of cytoreductive surgery and intravenous chemotherapy.

The center has four phases of the process: diagnosis, surgical management, clinical oncologic process, and follow-up (Figure 1). A standardized protocol has been designed for each of these phases. There is the participation of a multidisciplinary team made up of 20 specialties, state-of-the-art technology, and infrastructure. The center has quality indicators adapted and aligned with international standards9 (Table 1). Active work has also been done on educating women and strengthening their support networks, through patient-focused symposiums (Figure 2). Currently this program is in the self-evaluation phase and is waiting to complete the accreditation by the Joint Commission International.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the process of the clinical care center

Table 1.

Quality indicators in the ovarian cancer program

Quality indicators Goal
Patient care
Proportion of patients with complete surgical resection in upfront debulking or interval debulking surgery >65%
Proportion of patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis 60 min before starting cytoreductive surgery 100%
Proportion of patients receiving pharmacological anti-thrombotic prophylaxis within 24 hours of cytoreduction 100%
Proportion of patients who presented operative site infection during the 30 days after the procedure <5%
Proportion of patients who start adjuvant chemotherapy within 42 days after debulking surgery 100%
Proportion of patients who completed the EORTC-QLQC30 quality of life questionnaire before starting cancer treatment 100%
Proportion of patients who completed the EORTC-QLQC30 quality of life questionnaire after completing cancer treatment 100%
Infrastructure
Number of cytoreductive surgeries performed per surgeon per year >100
Minimum required: >20
Surgeries supervised or performed by surgeons operating on at least 20 patients a year 95%
Rate of primary debulking surgeries ≥50%
Surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist specifically dedicated to gynecological cancer management Yes
Center participating in clinical trials in gynecologic oncology Yes
Treatment planned and reviewed at a multidisciplinary team meeting ≥90%
Required pre-operative workup ≥95%
Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative management Yes
Minimum required elements in operative reports 90%
Minimum required elements in pathology reports >90%
Structured prospective reporting of post-operative complications 100%

Adapted from Fotopolou et al.9 Quality indicators for advanced ovarian cancer surgery from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO): 2020 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:436–40.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Patient symposium, May 2022.

Ovarian cancer care is challenging, especially in developing countries. The introduction of quality programs and management centralization of this condition will improve not only care, but clinically relevant outcomes in our population.

Footnotes

Twitter: @danielsanabrias

Contributors: Study design: DS, JR. Data acquisition: JR, MCF, AR, NH. Manuscript writing: DS, JR. Manuscript review: DS, JR, MCF, AR, NH.

Funding: This study was funded by AstraZeneca sponsorship Nintex 372.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

References

  • 1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) . Globocan: ovary, 2020. Available: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/25-Ovary-fact-sheet.pdf [Accessed 6 May 2022].
  • 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) . NCCN guidelines version 3.2022, ovarian cancer. Available: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf [Accessed 6 Jul 2022].
  • 3. Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1248–59. 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Querleu D, Planchamp F, Chiva L, et al. European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology quality indicators for advanced ovarian cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26:1354–63. 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Harter P, Muallem ZM, Buhrmann C, et al. Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:615–9. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. European Society for Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) . ESGO Accreditation & Certifications. Available: https://esgo.org/ovarian-cancer-surgery-accreditation/ [Accessed 16 Jul 2022].
  • 7. European Society for Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) . ESGO Centre Accreditations. For Gynecological Oncology Training and Surgery. Available: https://esgo.org/explore/esgo-accreditation/ [Accessed 20 Jul 2022].
  • 8. Paulino E, Nogueira Rodrigues A, Strasser-Weippl K, et al. Barriers to primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in Latin America. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017;27:1645–9. 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fotopoulou C, Concin N, Planchamp F, et al. Quality indicators for advanced ovarian cancer surgery from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO): 2020 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:436–40. 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES