Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2022 Dec 13;58(99):13728–13730. doi: 10.1039/d2cc06128g

Validation of a Post-Radiolabeling Bioconjugation Strategy for Radioactive Rare Earth Complexes with Minimal Structural Footprint

Raphael Lengacher a, Alexia G Cosby a, Dariusz Śmiłowicz a, Eszter Boros a
PMCID: PMC9811989  NIHMSID: NIHMS1858462  PMID: 36426996

Abstract

The nine-coordinate aza-macrocycle DO3Apic-NO2 and its kinetically inert rare earth complexes [M(DO3A-pic-NO2)] (M= La, Tb, Eu, Lu, Y) can be readily bioconjugated to surface accessible thioles on peptides and proteins with a minimal structural footprint. All complexes express thioconjugation rate constants in the same order of magnitude (k = 0.3 h−1) with the exception of Sc (k = 0.89 h−1). Coupling to peptides and biologics with accessible cysteines also enables post-radiochelation bioconjugation at room temperature to afford injection-ready radiopharmaceuticals as demonstrated by formation of [177Lu][Lu(DO3Apic-NO2)] and [86Y][Y(DO3Apic-NO2)], followed by post-labeling conjugation to a cysteine-functionalized peptide targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen. The 86Y-labeled construct efficiently localizes in target tumors with no significant off-target accumulation as evidenced by positron emission tomography, biodistribution studies and metabolite analysis.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1858462-f0004.jpg


Emerging radioactive rare earth isotopes such as 177Lu (β(max) = 501 keV, t1/2 = 6.64 d), 86Y (β+(max) = 4.2 MeV, t1/2 = 14.7 h), and 44/47Sc (44Sc: β+(max) = 2.6 MeV, t1/2 = 3.97 h; 47Sc: β(max) = 600 keV, t1/2 = 3.35 d) offer promising avenues for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals.1 Additionally, their stable isotopologues are well suited for the introduction of spin-tags (Gd)24 and luminescence markers (Tb, Eu, Sm).5 However, on their own, they possess no ability to localize in specific tissues of interest and must therefore be appended to targeting vectors that enable accumulation in sites of interest. Biological targeting vectors such as peptides, monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, or affibodies are of specific interest due to their high target specificity; a plethora of bioconjugated radionuclides have been reported and several have been approved for routine clinical use.6

However, the incorporation of these isotopes into thermally sensitive biomolecules can be challenging. The most common approach is the incorporation of a chelator in a first step, followed by coordination to the desired radiometal in a second, penultimate step.710 This works well for chelator-radionuclide pairs that form readily and rapidly at room temperature. Such systems frequently exhibit poor long-term kinetic inertness which can lead to loss of the radiometal in vivo prior to deposition in the target tissue. Alternatively, more kinetically inert systems can be employed but because these require temperatures above 40°C for efficient radiolabeling, compatibility with the thermally sensitive nature of biologics is diminished (Figure S2).11, 12 A possible solution is to employ post-labeling bioconjugation strategies, which involves pre-formation of a thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert radiochemical complex at elevated temperature, followed by its conjugation to the targeting vector under comparatively mild conditions. This requires (1) bioconjugation reactions with fast kinetics, to minimize radioactive decay during the radiosynthetic process and (2) the functionalization of the biomolecule with the corresponding bioconjugation partner prior to the actual bioconjugation reaction. While this approach has been successfully validated using a metal-chelate functionalized tetrazine and trans-cyclooctene appended antibodies, the limited long-term stability and hydrophobicity of tetrazines can pose challenges.13

Here, we address these shortcomings by bioconjugation of kinetically inert rare earth complexes that do not require prior functionalization of the targeting vector and retain a minimal structural footprint and high complex hydrophilicity. To this end, we explored the selective thioreactivity of nitropyridine and nitropicolinate lanthanide complexes inspired by the 8-coordinate DO3A-pyr-NO2 system established by Butler and Parker.1417 We proposed that this reaction was well suited for a post-labeling conjugation strategy to append kinetically inert, radioactive, rare earth complexes to reactive, native thiols present on peptides and biologics. We validated this hypothesis by synthesis and characterization of select rare earth complexes of the 9-coordinate chelator DO3A-pic-NO2 and profile their reactivity for thioconjugation, radiochemical labeling efficiency and subsequent, direct in vivo administration for targeted PET imaging.

The chemical synthesis of DO3A-pic-NO2 was adapted from literature procedures for nitropicolinate-functionalized chelators.4, 15, 18 Chelation of DO3A-pic-NO2 was conducted using M3+ salt (M = La, Eu, Tb, Lu, Y, Sc) to produce [M(DO3A-pic-NO2)].

Next, we probed the kinetics of thioether formation using thiol ethyl thioglycolate (HS-R1, HSEtCOOEt) at 1:1 complex to thiol ratio (Figure 2A). Thioether formation was monitored a characteristic shift in the UV absorbance from 300 nm to 280 nm (Figure S5).15 We observed no significant difference for the conjugation rate among different rare earth complexes probed, with the exception of [Sc(DO3A-pic-NO2)] (k = 0.89 h−1, t1/2 = 1.1 h), all k-values fall into the same range and order of magnitude of 0.3 h−1 (t1/2 = 3.3 h) (Figure 2B, Table S1). Characterization of the photophysical properties of [Tb(DO3A-pic-NO2)] and [Tb(DO3A-pic-SEtCOOEt)] was also conducted (Table S2) to affirm no inner sphere hydration of the corresponding coordination complexes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A: Reaction scheme of the thioconjugation between [M(DO3A-pic-NO2)] and HS-R1-3, resulting in the formation of [M(DO3A-pic-SR1-3)] complexes characterized in this work at r.t. in ammonium bicarbonate buffer at pH 7.5. B: Plot of k-values [h−1] versus ionic radii [Å] of the employed M3+ ions demonstrating that ligand and corresponding complexes exhibit comparable reaction rates except for M=Sc.

To probe the scope of reactivity, we also tested conjugation to cysteine thioles using a cysteine-functionalized tetra-peptide HS-Cys-PSMA (HS-R2) and bovine serum albumin (HS-R3, BSA), which possesses a single, reactive cysteine residue, Cys34. Both biomolecules were conjugated successfully as indicated by chromatographic and mass spectrometric analysis (Figures S4, S13S15).

Next, we tested DO3A-pic-NO2 for radiochemical applications with 177Lu and 86Y using a post-radiolabeling conjugation approach (Figure 3A). Quantitative labeling was achieved for 0.25 - 0.5 nmol of DO3A-pic-NO2 (25 mM NH4OAc buffer at pH = 5.5) in 15 min at 80°C (Figure 3B), producing an apparent molar activity of 0.248 mCi/nmol for 177Lu and 0.022 mCi/nmol for 86Y (Figure S8). Complex identity was confirmed by coinjection with the isolated natLu/ natY species (Figure S9).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

A: Reaction scheme for the radiolabeling of DO3A-pic-NO2 and subsequent thioconjugation. B: RadioHPLC monitoring of the reaction progress for the formation of [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] at = 2 and 10 hours – urine metabolite analysis indicates that the complex is stable in vivo. C: Coronal PET image of [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] 90 minutes post-injection shows target tumor uptake (yellow arrow) while PSMA-non-expressing tumor shows no uptake. D: Selective tumor uptake of [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] is further affirmed by 2 h p.i. biodistribution analysis (pink) while [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-NO2)] shows rapid clearance and no accumulation in off-target organs (grey bars).

Freshly prepared solutions of [177Lu][Lu(DO3A-pic-NO2)] and [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-NO2)] were cooled to room temperature and incubated with 6-30 equivalents of cysteine functionalized PSMA targeting peptide HS-Cys-PSMA (HS-R2, see Supporting Information). The reaction was conducted at pH 7.5 and 37°C in presence of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP,1.25 eq.) to prevent the formation of disulfide bonds (Figure 3A). The reaction achieved 69% conversion after 4 h (Figures S12, S14) for [177Lu][Lu(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] and 54% conversion after 10 h (Figure 3B) for [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)]. To demonstrate the feasibility of a direct bioconjugation to injection approach, [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] containing unreacted [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-NO2)] was administered without further purification to mice bearing bilateral xenografts with or without PSMA expression. PET imaging at 90 min post injection (Figure 3C) and biodistribution analysis at 2 h (Figure 3D) showed rapid, renal clearance, statistically significant target tumor uptake (6.1% ID/g, Figure 3D, pink bars) and no notable off-target accumulation indicative of radiometal dissociation. Analysis of urine metabolites showed presence of [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-S-Cys-PSMA)] (Figure 3B, bottom trace). A corresponding control biodistribution experiment with [86Y][Y(DO3A-pic-NO2)] showed low accumulation in all analyzed organs and no target-specific accumulation in the tumor (0.2% ID/g, Figure 3D, grey bars), demonstrating that the post-labeling conjugation approach produced a functional, targeted imaging agent with high kinetic inertness and efficacy. Of note, all 177Lu and 86Y labeled complexes retained high solubility in aqueous media and did not require formulation with organic co-solvents.

Conclusively, the [M(DO3A-NO2)] platform allows for the post-radiolabeling bioconjugation to cysteine residues at 37°C, enabling efficient labeling of targeting vectors with a kinetically inert radiochemical 86Y/177Lu-complex for targeted in vivo imaging and therapy applications.

Supplementary Material

SI

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Summary of the work presented in this article in context of prior art. [M(DO3A-pic-NO2)] can be readily radiolabeled and subsequently conjugated to cysteine residues of peptides/proteins at pH 7 and 37 °C, producing ready-to-inject radiopharmaceuticals.

Acknowledgments

All authors have contributed to the manuscript. There are no conflicts to declare. The authors acknowledge funding sources, specifically the NIH for a NIBIB R21 Trailblazer award (R21EB030071-01A1) and the National Science Foundation for an NSF CAREER (CHE 1942434). Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: chemical synthesis, characterization, and relevant experimental details for radiolabeling and animal work are provided.

References

  • 1.Kostelnik TI and Orvig C, Chem. Rev, 2019, 119, 902–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mitsumori LM, Bhargava P, Essig M and Maki JH, Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2014, 23, 51–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giese EC, Clin Med Rep, 2018, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Regueiro-Figueroa M, Bensenane B, Ruscsák E, Esteban-Gómez D, Charbonnière LJ, Tircsó G, Tóth I, Blas A. d., Rodríguez-Blas T and Platas-Iglesias C, Inorg. Chem, 2011, 50, 4125–4141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adewuyi JA, Schley ND and Ung G, Inorg. Chem. Front, 2022, 9, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vugts DJ and van Dongen GAMS, in Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, eds. Lewis JS, Windhorst AD and Zeglis BM, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98947-1_9, pp. 163–179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rossin R, Renart Verkerk P, van den Bosch SM, Vulders RCM, Verel I, Lub J and Robillard MS, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2010, 49, 3375–3378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adumeau P, Carnazza KE, Brand C, Carlin SD, Reiner T, Agnew BJ, Lewis JS and Zeglis BM, Theranostics, 2016, 6, 2267–2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meyer J-P, Houghton JL, Kozlowski P, Abdel-Atti D, Reiner T, Pillarsetty NVK, Scholz WW, Zeglis BM and Lewis JS, Bioconjug. Chem, 2016, 27, 298–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van Duijnhoven SMJ, Rossin R, van den Bosch SM, Wheatcroft MP, Hudson PJ and Robillard MS, J. Nucl. Med, 2015, 56, 1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chakravarty R, Chakraborty S, Sarma HD, Nair KVV, Rajeswari A and Dash A, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm, 2016, 59, 354–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Majkowska-Pilip A and Bilewicz A, J. Inorg. Biochem, 2011, 105, 313–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Z, Cai H, Hassink M, Blackman ML, Brown RCD, Conti PS and Fox JM, Chem. Commun, 2010, 46, 8043–8045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Starck M, Fradgley JD, Di Vita S, Mosely JA, Pal R and Parker D, Bioconjug. Chem, 2020, 31, 229–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gempf KL, Butler SJ, Funk AM and Parker D, Chem. Commun, 2013, 49, 9104–9106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herath ID, Breen C, Hewitt SH, Berki TR, Kassir AF, Dodson C, Judd M, Jabar S, Cox N, Otting G and Butler SJ, Chem. Eur. J, 2021, 27, 13009–13023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cosby AG, Woods JJ, Nawrocki P, Sørensen TJ, Wilson JJ and Boros E, Chem. Sci, 2021, 12, 9442–9451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shah A, Roux A, Starck M, Mosely JA, Stevens M, Norman DG, Hunter RI, El Mkami H, Smith GM, Parker D and Lovett JE, Inorg. Chem, 2019, 58, 3015–3025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES