Due to a production error, the legends of Figures 2–8 were not implemented correctly.
Figure 2 Legend reads as “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for YC vs. OC. (A) Purine metabolism; (B) Pentose and glucuronate interconversions (C) Arginine and proline metabolism.” The correct legend for Figure 2 is “'Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for YC vs. AC.”
Figure 3 Legend reads as “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for AC vs. OC. a: Fructose and mannose metabolism.” The correct legend for Figure 3 is “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for YC vs. OC”.
Figure 4 Legend reads as “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for YC vs. YT.” The correct legend for Figure 4 is “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for AC vs. OC. a: Fructose and mannose metabolism”.
Figure 5 Legend reads as “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for AC vs. AT.” The correct legend for Figure 5 is “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for YC vs. YT”.
Figure 6 Legend reads as “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for OC vs. OT.” The correct legend for Figure 6 is “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for AC vs. AT”.
Figure 7 Legend reads as “Muscle metabolomes changes in ageing rats. Metabolite concentrations in muscle specimens are depicted graphically and subjected to quantitative analysis. Box and whiskers plots with 95% confidence intervals are presented for quantified amino acids. Analysis was performed using one-way Anova with Tukey’s post hoc analysis. *p < 0.05.” The correct legend for Figure 7 is “Biochemical pathway analysis of metabolites profiled for OC vs. OT”.
Figure 8 Legend reads as “Significant metabolic changes after tocotrienol-rich fraction treatment.” The correct legend for Figure 8 is “Muscle metabolomes changes in ageing rats. Metabolite concentrations in muscle specimens are depicted graphically and subjected to quantitative analysis. Box and whiskers plots with 95% confidence intervals are presented for quantified amino acids. Analysis was performed using one-way Anova with Tukey’s post hoc analysis. *p < 0.05”.
The publisher apologizes for the mistake. The original article has been updated.