Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Dec 19;62(1):22–34. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00363

Arginine Methylation of the PGC-1α C-Terminus Is Temperature-Dependent

Meryl Mendoza , Mariel Mendoza , Tiffany Lubrino , Sidney Briski , Immaculeta Osuji , Janielle Cuala , Brendan Ly , Ivan Ocegueda , Harvey Peralta , Benjamin A Garcia §, Cecilia I Zurita-Lopez ∥,*
PMCID: PMC9813912  PMID: 36535003

Abstract

graphic file with name bi2c00363_0009.jpg

We set out to determine whether the C-terminus (amino acids 481–798) of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1α, UniProt Q9UBK2), a regulatory metabolic protein involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, and respiration, is an arginine methyltransferase substrate. Arginine methylation by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) alters protein function and thus contributes to various cellular processes. In addition to confirming methylation of the C-terminus by PRMT1 as described in the literature, we have identified methylation by another member of the PRMT family, PRMT7. We performed in vitro methylation reactions using recombinant mammalian PRMT7 and PRMT1 at 37, 30, 21, 18, and 4 °C. Various fragments of PGC-1α corresponding to the C-terminus were used as substrates, and the methylation reactions were analyzed by fluorography and mass spectrometry to determine the extent of methylation throughout the substrates, the location of the methylated PGC-1α arginine residues, and finally, whether temperature affects the deposition of methyl groups. We also employed two prediction programs, PRmePRed and MePred-RF, to search for putative methyltransferase sites. Methylation reactions show that arginine residues R548 and R753 in PGC-1α are methylated at or below 30 °C by PRMT7, while methylation by PRMT1 was detected at these same residues at 30 °C. Computational approaches yielded additional putative methylarginine sites, indicating that since PGC-1α is an intrinsically disordered protein, additional methylated arginine residues have yet to be experimentally verified. We conclude that temperature affects the extent of arginine methylation, with more methylation by PRMT7 occurring below physiological temperature, uncovering an additional control point for PGC-1α.

Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1α) is a transcriptional coactivator capable of forming complexes with transcription factors such as NRF-1, NRF-2, PPARα, PPARδ, PPARγ, ERRα, and TR.1 It has regulatory functions in lipid metabolism, mitochondrial biogenesis, remodeling of muscle tissue, and more recently inflammatory response pathways.24 Initially, PGC-1α was identified as a thermoregulator, whose expression was induced upon exposure to cold temperatures (4–24 °C).5 However, PGC-1α is now implicated in diseases such as type 2 diabetes and obesity,6,7 cancer,8,9 and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s10 and Huntington’s11 disease. Given its various functions and significance, how this protein is regulated is the subject of intense investigation.

According to PhosphoSitePlus, PGC-1α is not only heavily phosphorylated but also post-translationally modified with ubiquitin, acetyl, and methyl groups.12 With respect to methylation, human PGC-1α becomes methylated at arginine residues 665, 667, and 669 (within RS and E regions of the C-terminus) at 30 °C by protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1).13 PRMT1 is the most active member of a family of nine PRMT enzymes that methylate arginine residues.14,15 Arginine methylation at 665, 667, and 669 by PRMT1 was found to decrease the expression of the ERRα promoter, which is important for mitochondrial biogenesis.13 In addition, this same study found additional methylation within the C-terminus; however, the exact arginine residues and the methyltransferase(s) responsible for this methylation were not identified.13 Since PRMT1 is one of nine members of this family of cellular regulators,16 we hypothesized that there are other PRMTs that contribute to the regulation of PGC-1α via arginine methylation, in particular PRMT7. Of the nine mammalian protein arginine methyltransferases, PRMT1 (and not CARM1/PRMT4) methylates PGC-1α.13 PRMT1 and CARM1/PRMT4 are the most active methyltransferases that produce ADMA. In addition, to our knowledge, there is no evidence of SDMA in PGC-1α, and thus we focused on PRMT7.

PRMT7 is a unique member of the methyltransferase family. Not only is it larger than the rest of the family members, but it is also the only known type III enzyme, capable of solely producing ω-monomethylated arginine (ω-MMA) residues.1719 Moreover, it preferentially methylates arginine residues found in RXR motifs (where R represents arginine, and X represents any amino acid). PRMT7 shows the greatest activity when substrates contain RXRXR motifs as seen in histone H2B.18,20 PGC-1α contains various RXR motifs. Finally, PRMT7 is also sensitive to temperature.17,20

We set out to determine whether the canonical isoform of PGC-1α (UniProt Q9UBK2) is a substrate for PRMT7. Since previous work by Teyssier et al. shows that PGC-1α is methylated in the C-terminus, we focused on this portion of the protein (amino acids 481–798). In vitro methylation reactions were performed where the C-terminus of PGC-1α was incubated with recombinant mammalian PRMT7 enzyme. Fluorography assays and mass spectrometry were used to assess arginine methylation. We also employed computational methylation prediction programs to search for additional putative methylated arginine residues. Our in vitro findings demonstrate that both PRMT1 and PRMT7 methylate arginine residues at temperatures at or below 30 °C. In addition to demonstrating that PGC-1α is a substrate for PRMT7, we also identified novel methylated arginine residues by PRMT1. Our in silico studies indicate that PGC-1α is capable of receiving additional methyl groups at arginine residues, perhaps by additional members of the methyltransferase family, but whose exact conditions remain to be discovered. Our results provide novel insights into the regulation of this protein.

Materials and Methods

Protein Expression and Purification

Wild-type constructs of PRMT1 and a PGC-1α plasmid known as G1 were transformed from DH5α to BL21 Escherichia coli cells. For a list of the PGC-1α constructs used, including their amino acid sequences, see Table S1. All constructs were streaked on ampicillin (Amp) plates (100 mg/mL) and were bacterially expressed as described previously with the exception of PRMT7.21 To optimize protein expression for active PRMT7, a starter culture was selected from a single colony and used to inoculate 25 mL of YT medium (Amp 100 mg/mL) and incubated in a 37 °C shaker for 10–12 h.22 This culture (20 mL) was transferred to 450 mL of Terrific broth, 4 mL of 50% glycerol, and 50 mL of 10 × buffering salt (2.31 g KH2PO4, 16.4 KH2PO4·3H2O for 100 mL) in a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask. The samples were incubated for approximately 4–5 h at a 37 °C until the optimum density (OD) reached an absorbance of 0.6–0.8 and induced with a final concentration of 1.0 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) overnight at 16 °C.

The cells were harvested in centrifuge bottles and spun at 6000g for 8 min at 4 °C. The pellet was dissolved and collected with 25 mL of 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer and spun down again at 5000g for 5 min at 4 °C. Once expressed, all proteins were purified. Briefly, the pellet was thawed and dissolved in 8 mL of 1 × PBS in the presence of 80 μL of 1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The GST-proteins were released via bacterial cell sonication with seven cycles of 20 s pulses with a 1-min break in between each pulse. Following sonication, the samples were centrifuged at 23,000g for 50 min at 4 °C. An additional 80 μL of 1 M PMSF was added to prevent protein degradation.

GST-PRMT7 was purified as per the manufacturer’s specifications using glutathione Superflow Agarose (PierceTM Glutathione Superflow Agarose Thermo Scientific Protocol). Briefly, the protein extraction was added to the prepared agarose and mixed on a rotator for 2 h at 4 °C. The solution was centrifuged for 2 min at 700g and was washed four times with 2 resin-bed volumes of equilibration buffer (125 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM sodium chloride; pH 8.0). The GST-tagged proteins were eluted with 1 resin-bed volume of elution buffer (125 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM reduced glutathione; pH 8.0) and mixed slowly for 10 min. The sample was spun for 2 min at 700g at 4 °C. Eluent fractions were stored at −80 °C. With respect to GST-PRMT7 expression and purification, the samples were immediately used for methylation reactions to minimize protein degradation and subsequent loss of enzymatic activity. Protein concentration was determined as previously described via TCA Lowry assay using bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1 mg/mL as a standard.23

In Vitro Methylation Reactions

An enzyme, either PRMT1 or PRMT7, was incubated with either bacterially expressed construct of PGC-1α: G1 (amino acids 566–640); the C-terminus of PGC-1α (AbCam, amino acids 481–798, His tag C-terminus); or a fragment of the C-terminus PGC-1α (Creative Biomart, amino acids 573–767, His tagged C-terminus) in the presence of 0.5 μM S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-3H]methionine and of 50 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 10 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 h at various temperatures ranging from 4 to 37 °C in a final volume of 30 μL. For fluorography, the reactions were immediately quenched with 4 × loading dye (100 μL of 2-mercaptoethanol per 950 μL of Laemmli sample buffer; BioRad), resolved via a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate poly(acrylamide) gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained with Coomassie Blue. Next, the gel was incubated with enhance (PerkinElmer) for an hour and placed in a 10% glycerol solution for an additional hour on a nutator. The gel was then dried and exposed on film at −80 °C for various lengths of time. The film was developed with a developer and fixer solution (GBX Developer and Fixer, M&S Dental, New York).

Nonradioactive in vitro methylation reactions were carried out in a similar way except that reactions were incubated in the presence of a final concentration of 3.2 mM S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) (New England Biolabs, Inc.). These samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry.

In-Gel Digestion and Peptide Extraction for Mass Spectrometry Analyses of Methylated PGC-1α Products

Nonradioactive methylation reactions were resolved via 12% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue as described above. After destaining, the gel bands of interest were sliced out and diced into 1 mm slices on a clean glass plate and placed in a microcentrifuge tube. The gel slices were rinsed with 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), then destained completely in 50% acetonitrile/100 mM ABC for 1 h on a nutator and further dried on a speed vacuum concentrator (speed vac). Samples were reduced with 10 mM DTT in 100 mM ABC for 1 h at 56 °C, then were alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM ABC for 45 min in the dark. After alkylation, the gel slices were washed with 100 mM ABC, dehydrated with 100% acetonitrile, and dried by speed vacuum. The slices were then incubated with 12.5 ng/μL trypsin diluted in 100 mM ABC with enough volume to completely cover them, placed on ice for 20 min, then left on the bench overnight.

After overnight trypsin digestion, peptides were extracted from the gel slices via a series of hydration and dehydration steps using ABC and acetonitrile solutions. Briefly, gel slices were rinsed with 100 mM ABC for 45 min and the supernatant was collected. Next, gel slices were dehydrated with a 50:45:5 ratio of acetonitrile, water, and acetic acid for 15 min to inactivate trypsin and rehydrate with 100 mM ABC for 15 min. After a subsequent round of hydration, dehydration, and hydration, the gel slices were dehydrated with 100% acetonitrile until the gel slices became white. All of the supernatant collected from the extraction was pooled and dried in a speed vac. The samples were then desalted using a C18 column as previously described.24

Dried samples were resuspended in buffer A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water) and loaded into a Nano-LC system (EASY-nLC 1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled online with an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a home-packed capillary column (200 mm length, 75 μm inner diameter) containing reverse-phase ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ resin (3 μm particle size, Dr. Maisch Gmbh) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. A gradient of 20 min was set from 5 to 35% buffer B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile), then 35–98% buffer B in 12 min. Full scan mass range of m/z 250–1100 was analyzed in the Orbitrap at 120,000 resolution and 5.0 × 105 AGC target value. MS/MS was performed in the Orbitrap at 30,000 resolution in the normal mode using data-dependent acquisition. The HCD collision energy, AGC target, and maximum injection time were set to 27, 5.0 × 104, and 50 ms, respectively. Dynamic exclusion (20 s) was enabled. Every sample was injected once into Orbitrap Fusion.

Mass Spectrometry Data Processing and Analysis

MS raw files of proteome analyzed by Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software against a modified Fasta file that only includes the proteins used for the in vitro reactions: PRMT1 (Uniprot ID Q99873), PRMT7 (Uniprot ID Q9NVM4), and the truncated PGC-1α. Additionally, the database that included common contaminants was used for the first search. Trypsin was specified as the digesting enzyme with two missed cleaves allowed. The search included fixed modifications of carbamidomethyl cysteine and variable modifications of methionine oxidation, N-terminal acetylation, methyl (KR), and dimethyl (KR).

In addition, an initial screen of methylation reactions was carried out and analyzed by mass spectrometry at the Mass Spectrometry Facility at UC Irvine. Briefly, nonradioactive in vitro methylation reactions with either PRMT7 or PRMT1 and PGC-1α fragments (C-term, Creative Biomart) were incubated with AdoMet for 1 h at temperatures 37, 30, 21, 18, and 16 °C. Samples were then quenched with 2 × loading dye, resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE, and then stained as described above. Methylated PGC-1α bands and controls with PGC-1α, PRMT1, and PRMT7 alone were submitted to UC Irvine Mass Spectrometry Facility for analyses. Raw files for all MS proteome work have been deposited to the Chorus repository (https://chorusproject.org/pages/index.html) under project number 1765.

Methylation Predication Programs

To search for putative methylated arginine residues computationally, the full-length Fasta amino acid sequence for PGC-1α (UniProt Q9UBK2) was imputed into PRmePRed25 and MePred-RF26 arginine prediction programs. Settings for PRmePRed: window size 19 amino acids and a 0.5 support vector machine (SVM) threshold. Settings for MePred-RF: window size 11 amino acids and a 0.5 random forest (RF) threshold. The putative arginine residues with overlapping arginine residues in PGC-1α on a Venn diagram were created using Canva (canva.com).

Results and Discussion

PGC-1α has various protein partners and is found in tissues with high energy demands that are rich in mitochondria such as muscle, liver, heart, and pancreas.2730 To investigate this protein, we set out to determine whether PGC-1α is methylated at the C-terminus by PRMT7, which is also widely expressed in tissues.31 We focused on the C-terminal portion of this protein because to date, it is the only portion found to be methylated at arginine residues.8,13

PGC-1α is asymmetrically dimethylated by PRMT1 at arginine residues 665, 667, and 669. This modification is an activating mark that promotes the expression of target genes important for mitochondrial biogenesis.13 Although PRMT1 methylates PGC-1α, knockdown does not completely abolish all arginine methylation in the C-terminus of PGC-1α purified from COS7 cells.13 We searched for evidence of PGC-1α being methylated or associating with any other PRMT family member. We found two studies where PRMT5 modulates the expression of PGC-1α in hepatocytes,32,33 and three studies where PRMT5 expression is increased during muscle plasticity.3436 In addition, another study found that the expression of PRMT7 increases the expression of PGC-1α.37 Since to date there is no evidence of PGC-1α receiving an SDMA mark (catalyzed by PRMT5), we reasoned that in addition to PRMT1, PRMT7 may also methylate PGC-1α. Moreover, PGC-1α contains four RXR regions, three RXRXR regions, and one RXRXRXR arginine-rich region within the C-terminus (Figure 1A), which could be potential sites for PRMT7 methylation. The amino acid sequence of PGC-1α (UniProt Q9UBK2) is shown in Figure 1A, where the C-terminus is in boldface and the methylated arginine residues verified experimentally in this study are identified in red. PGC-1α contains an RS domain (rich in arginine and serine residues, aa 565–598 and 617–631), an acidic E region (rich in glutamic acid residues, aa 632–676), and an RNA binding domain (RBD) which is a common PRMT substrate also known as an RNA recognition motif (RRM) (aa 677–753).38,39Figure 1B emphasizes the C-terminus of PGC-1α, highlighting various post-translational modifications (PTMs) identified to date.12,40,41

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Full-length human PGC-1α protein sequence (UniProt Q9UBK2; MW 91 kDa), C-terminus in boldface (amino acids 481–798, predicted MW 38 kDa), methylated arginine residues confirmed experimentally in this study: R548 and R753 (red), additional (previously confirmed) methylated arginine residues R665, R667, and R669 (blue).13 Four RXR, three RXRXR, and one RXRXRXR arginine-rich regions are underlined. (B) Map of PGC-1α with identified PTMs located in the C-terminus. PTMs were identified using the following databases: dbPTM40 and PhosphoSitePlus.12 Created using Illustrator for Biological Sequences (IBS).41

In vitro methylation reactions were carried out using portions of the C-terminus corresponding to PGC-1α as substrates. We included a small peptide (∼40 aa) as a substrate that corresponds to amino acids 551–590, a portion of PGC-1α that contains 11 arginine residues many of which are part of an RXR motif (for peptide sequence and a list of all substrates, see Table S1). To screen for methylation, purified recombinant GST-PRMT1 was used to methylate this small peptide as well as a bacterially expressed GST construct of PGC-1α known as G1. Figure 2 shows that PRMT1 can methylate the small peptide (Figure 2A) and G1 construct (Figure 2B) at 37 °C. PRMT7 is able to methylate the PGC-1α GST-G1 construct at 22 °C (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Methylation of a peptide corresponding to PGC-1α sequence VSPPKSLFSQRPQRMRSRSRSFSRHRSCSRSPYSRSRSRS (aa 551–590; ∼4.7 kDa). Recombinant GST-PRMT1 (4 μg) was incubated with peptide (5 μg) in the presence of 0.5 μM S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-3H]methionine for 1 h at 37 °C with 9 μL of 10 × HEPES buffer in a final volume of 90 μL as described in the Materials and Methods section. The samples were then resolved on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel (lower panel). The radioactive methylation reactions were exposed on film as described in the Materials and Methods section for 3 weeks (upper panel). (B) Methylation of G1 corresponding to PGC-1α sequence (aa 532–640; ∼38 kDa). Recombinant GST-PRMT1 (7 μg) was incubated with G1 (7.6 μg) in the presence of 0.5 μM S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-3H]methionine for 1 h at 37 °C with 3 μL of 10 × HEPES buffer in a final volume of 30 μL as described in the Materials and Methods section. The samples were then resolved on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel (lower panel). The radioactive methylation reactions were exposed on film as described in the Materials and Methods section for 5 days (upper panel). (C) Recombinant GST-PRMT7 (5 μg) was incubated with GST-G1 (5 μg) in the presence of 0.5 μM S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-3H]methionine for 20 h at 22 °C with 4 μL of 10 × HEPES buffer in a final volume of 40 μL as described in the Materials and Methods section. The samples were then resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel (lower panel). The radioactive methylation reactions were exposed on film as described in the Materials and Methods section for 1 month (upper panel). The GST-G1 construct is 108 amino acids long or approximately 11 kDa. The GST has a molecular weight of approximately 27 kDa, making G1 approximately 38 kDa.13

Since our fluorographs show that PRMT7 methylates the C-terminal region of PGC-1α, we decided to investigate whether temperature affects methylation in this region. PGC-1α is highly induced in brown fat and skeletal muscle in mice kept at 4 °C.5 It is a cold-inducible coactivator associated with adaptive thermogenesis, an important component of energy homeostasis.2,42 More recently, PRMT7 has also shown sensitivity to temperature. It is most active below room temperature with less than 10% activity at 37 °C in vitro.17,20,43 Moreover, unlike other members of the PRMT family, PRMT7 (and PGC-1α) is relatively tolerant to low temperatures and sensitive to high temperatures.18,27 We performed in vitro methylation reactions using commercially purchased constructs corresponding to the C-terminus of PGC-1α and incubated the reactions at the following six temperatures: 37, 30, 21, 18, 16, and 4 °C. Figure 3A,B shows representative SDS-PAGE gels where reactions were performed at 37 and 18 °C (for panels of methylation reactions performed at other temperatures, see the Supporting Information). To specifically localize arginine methylation, we excised the gel bands corresponding to the methylated substrate and performed LC-MS/MS analyses. Figure 3C shows a representative spectrum of a fragmented species corresponding to residues 532–548 of PGC-1α. The mass spectrum is one of three fragments denoting methylarginine R548 detected in this same region (for additional spectra, see the Supporting Information).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Arginine methylation of PGC-1α (2 μg) (573–767) at (A) 37 °C and (B) 18 °C by 2 μg of either PRMT1 or PRMT7. Substrate was mixed with 32 mM AdoMet in 50 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT in a final volume of 150 μL master mix. Aliquots were then incubated at 37, 30, 21, 18, 16, and 4 °C for 1 h followed by the addition of enzyme. The samples were then quenched with 4 × loading dye and resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel as described in the Materials and Methods section. (C) Detection of methylated arginine peptide fragment (sequence SLFNVSPSCSSFNSPCR) corresponding to PGC-1α by mass spectrometry. Isolation of this 2+ charge species is denoted by a green peak (980.43652 m/z, monoisotopic mass 1960.97; calculated mass 1831.8102 without methyl group or carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues (57.02145 Da) due to iodoacetamide). The table shows the fragmentation patterns of the b and y ions. Red and blue colors indicate fragments identified.

Methylated peptide fragments obtained after cutting out SDS-PAGE bands that correspond to PGC-1α were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Over 20 samples corresponding to methylation reactions and including controls (gel background) were analyzed and summarized in Table 1. Specifically, monomethylation is detected at residues R548 and R753 by PRMT1 at 30 °C, at R548 at 21 °C and at residue R753 at 4 °C. Monomethylation is detected at residues R548 and R753 by PRMT7 at 30 °C, and at R548 at 18 °C. Methylation reaction controls, where both PRMT1 and PRMT7 are incubated without the substrate PGC-1α, are methylated regardless of temperature, indicating that temperature affects the PGC-1α substrate and does not hinder the enzyme’s ability to automethylate. This is consistent with studies that show the stability of PRMTs at nonphysiological temperatures.44 Methylation of PGC-1α by both PRMT1 and PRMT7 is greater at temperatures at or below 30 °C.

Table 1. Mass Spectrometry Analyses of Human PGC-1α Methylated at Different Arginine Residues by Two Methyltransferase Enzymes (PRMT1 and PRMT7)a.

graphic file with name bi2c00363_0008.jpg

a

In vitro methylation reactions were carried out with either recombinant PRMT1 or PRMT7 and PGC-1α (amino acids 481–798) at six different temperatures (37, 30, 21, 18, 16, or 4 °C). Analysis of the controls also revealed automethylation of PRMT7 and PRMT1.

Of the 47 arginine residues located in the C-terminus of the PGC-1α, two methylated arginine residues were identified. Surprisingly, none of the methylated arginine residues fall within the RS regions (565–598 and 617–631). Moreover, only R753 falls within the RRM domain (676–755). Greater methylation at RXR motifs was expected. However, PRMT7 preferentially methylates RXR motifs with adjacent basic residues such as lysine.18 The RXR motifs of PGC-1α may not get methylated because they may not contain enough basic residues to accommodate the two acidic amino acids (Asp-147 and Glu-149) located within the PRMT7 enzyme active site necessary for its substrate preference.17 Regardless, an initial screen of methylated arginine residues carried out by an ABI-Sciex 5800 MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry revealed methylated sites in PGC-1α. Specifically, a truncated portion of the C-terminus of PGC-1α (aa 573–767) was methylated by PRMT7 (or PRMT1) at 37, 30, 21, 18, and 16 °C. Although the exact arginine residue(s) could not be identified, and this preliminary screen did not return a high confidence score for all values, some of the data suggest that further arginine methylation within amino acid residues 626–677 (containing several RXR motifs) may be possible (Table S2). We reasoned that at its sequence, which contains multiple RXR motifs, there are additional methylated arginine residues yet to be identified in PGC-1α. Thus, we next explored whether PGC-1α would become methylated by other PRMTs using methylation predication algorithms.

Recently, there has been an increased effort to use computational and machine learning techniques based on support vector machines (SVMs) or random forest (RF) algorithms to predict possible methylation sites based on a protein’s sequence and/or structure. These include programs such as PRmePRed25 and MePred-RF26 which are validated, useful for uncovering putative methylated arginine sites, easy to use, and readily available online. The full-length sequence of PGC-1α was inputted into each of these programs with the expectation that they would confirm methylation of the residues identified experimentally and find novel sites. We note that when only the C-terminus was also inputted into each of these programs, they yielded identical results (data not shown). Figure 4A shows a map of the C-terminus of PGC-1α. The numbers above and below the map show the positions of the predicted methylated arginine sites corresponding to PRmePRed, and MePred-RF methylation prediction programs. PRmePRed uses an SVM-based algorithm, while Me-PredRF uses an RF-based algorithm. Figure 4B lists the RF and SVM prediction scores assigned to each R-site by MePred-RF. A high prediction score indicates a high confidence in the result. The Venn diagram in Figure 4C shows that the SVM algorithm used by PRmePRed predicted the most arginine methylation sites with 36 putative arginine methylation sites, while the RF algorithm used by Me-PredRF was more stringent and predicted only 9 putative arginine methylation sites. Only PRmePRed validated the methylation of R548. None of the algorithms confirmed the methylation of R753. However, we note that these prediction programs do not account for the effects of temperature changes or methylation by different members of the PRMT family. Moreover, both identified novel potential sites.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Identification of methylation sites in full-length PGC-1α (UniProt Q9UBK2) using PRmePRed and MePred-RF computational prediction programs. (A) In silico analysis of putative methylation sites in the C-terminus of PGC-1α by PRmePRed (upper methyl groups) and MePred-RF (lower methyl groups); figure created using Illustrator for Biological Sequences (IBS).41 (B) RF and SVM scores predicted by the PRmePRed and MePred-RF programs. (C) Venn diagram of the common methylated arginine sites in the middle, predicted by corresponding programs.

Accuracy among computational PTM prediction programs is the subject of active investigation and beyond the scope of this work. Despite this, we speculate here about the different results from the two arginine prediction programs. Although both programs use stringent datasets for developing predictor statistics, the initial dataset used for these machine learning algorithms establishes initial parameters and was different for each: MePred-RF employed 2351 total entries (180 positive sequences for arginine methylation), while PRmePRed employed 6837 total entries (1298 positive sequences for arginine methylation). Since the list of experimentally verified methylated arginine residues continues to grow, sequences among the datasets listed as “negative for arginine methylation” may now contain potential sites that could be methylated but that had not been identified or have yet to be identified as methylated arginine sites. Moreover, each of these prediction programs places different values on chemical properties such as charge, hydrophilicity, isoelectric point, and structure within the sequence windows and among the overall protein. For example, whether the arginine residues are solvent-exposed, or whether they are located within a particular secondary structure of the protein aid in making the predictions. Structural, evolutionary, and/or disorder information is not always available. We note here that only PRmePRed validated two (R665 and R669) of the three previously identified arginine methylation sites: R665, R667, and R669.13 This may be due to the inherently disordered nature of PGC-1α. Despite this, both programs are useful to screen putative substrates and test biological hypotheses. In addition, each of these programs builds upon the work of Daily et al., who built a predictor for methylation by taking into account intrinsic disorder.45 Thus, we pursued our investigation of PGC-1α by considering the postulate that PTMs preferentially occur in intrinsically disordered regions.

Thus far, we identified two methylated arginine residues deposited by two different PRMTs: R548, and R570 by PRMT1 and PRMT7, in vitro. We also identified potential arginine residues: R566, R568, R570, R580, R585, R589, R598, R625, and R630, in silico, by two independent methylation prediction programs. We next studied the structure of PGC-1α to map the methylated arginine residues so that we may determine possible insights into the function of arginine methylation. To date, a crystal structure of the full-length PGC-1α has not been solved, as determined from Protein Data Bank searches. In addition, PGC-1α has been characterized as an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP).46

IDPs contain flexible regions that facilitate protein–protein interactions and promote access to various PTMs.47 In reviewing the many PTMs located on the C-terminus of PGC-1α (Figure 1B) and given its physiological role as a master metabolic regulator, we next analyzed whether arginine methylation sites in PGC-1α are located at intrinsically disordered regions that may affect accessibility. To further understand the function of arginine methylation, we analyzed PGC-1α using PONDR predictor of natural disordered regions.48Figure 5 shows a graph of PGC-1α created by PONDR, which determined that PGC-1α contains 18 disordered regions. Specifically, there are 361 disordered residues and a stretch of 71 amino acids (224–294) as the longest disordered region. With respect to the C-terminus, PGC-1α contains the following disordered regions: 473–500, 509–523, 551–576, 578–590, 619–634, 662–681, 689–696. The methylated amino acid residue R570 identified in this study in vitro, as well as those previously identified by Teyssier et al., (R665, R667, and R669), fall within these disordered regions. IDPs are also known to interact with binding partners with high specificity, but modest affinity.49 Considering its largely unstructured nature, we postulate that PGC-1α is most likely sampling its structure to expose sequences that allow for PTMs such as arginine methylation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

PGC-1α is an intrinsically disordered protein with several methylated arginine residues. PONDR IDP graph showing the disordered and ordered regions of PGC-1α.

The intrinsically disordered nature of PGC-1α has failed to yield a crystal structure of the full-length protein. Nevertheless, a putative structure can be obtained via AlphaFold (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/entry/Q9UBK2).50,51 AlphaFold produces a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT) between 0 and 100. The structure for PGC-1α determined by AlphaFold yields very few portions of this protein at high confidence. Moreover, all of the methylated arginine residues identified in vitro and in silico by this study contain confidence scores below 50, which correlate with disorder. Given the highly conserved nature of PGC-1α in mammals, a sequence alignment is shown in Figure 6A,52,53 a putative structure of the C-terminus of PGC-1α was modeled using Phyre-254 and PyMOL (PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC), with arginine residues shown in red (Figure 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Sequence alignment of the C-terminus of PGC-1α (480–798). Arginine residues confirmed in this study in vitro: R548 and R753, shown in red and highlighted in yellow. All other arginine residues are shown in red and boldface. Multiple sequence alignments were generated using Clustal O (1.2.4), percent identity matrix shown below the alignment. (B) Molecular model of the C terminus with methylated arginine groups identified in this study highlighted in red. (C) Magnified portion of the C-terminus containing only the RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain with methylated arginine 753 highlighted in red. Figures for (B) and (C) were generated using Phyre-2 and PyMOL. The Phyre-2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction, and analysis was used to obtain the model and was then imported into PyMOL for structure annotation.54

PGC-1α contains an RNA recognition motif (RRM). RRMs are one of the most common RNA binding domains, responsible for binding to RNA and abundant in intrinsically disordered regions.55 We modeled solely the RRM domain of PGC-1α (Figure 6C). Although PGC-1α contains very little structure in the C-terminus, this domain adopts a β1α1β2β3α2β4 topology forming two α-helices against an antiparallel β-sheet consistent with an RRM motif.56 The overall flexibility of its C-terminus is consistent with its physiological role as a master regulator and provides a possible explanation for its tissue-specific signaling and responsiveness to temperature changes.

Conclusions

Tissue-specific, PGC-1α is found wherever energy is needed. Thus, it is expressed in highly oxidative tissues that are rich in mitochondria including embryonic brown adipose tissue, heart, skeletal muscle cells, kidney, and brain.5,5761 According to the tissue where it is expressed, PGC-1α activity is induced by increased energy demand during fasting,62 temperature changes,5,63 calorie restriction,64 and exercise.6567 Several tissue-specific PGC-1α isoforms have been identified, including muscle, liver, and central nervous system (CNS-PGC-1α).66,6870 In addition to transcription, PGC-1α is also regulated by post-translational modifications.

We set out to determine whether PGC-1α is methylated at arginine residues by PRMT7. Both PGC-1α and PRMT7 are highly expressed in skeletal muscle and deletion of PRMT7 gene causes a decrease in PGC-1α expression.37 PRMT7 methylates RXR motifs and has greater activity at or below room temperature. Although we expected to see greater methylation of PGC-1α since it contains many RXR motifs, after performing several in vitro methylation reactions and analyses by mass spectrometry, our data show that PGC-1α is methylated at arginine residue 548 and 753 by both PRMT1 and PRMT7 at temperatures at or below 30 °C. Physiological studies that include a temperature dependence may reveal direct interaction between PRMT7 and PGC-1α. We also used computational prediction programs PRmePRed, and MePred-RF to anticipate additional arginine methylation sites. PRmePRed predicted R548 as a site; however, neither program predicted methylation of R753 or R667, a methylated arginine residues previously verified experimentally.13 Computational prediction programs rely on experimental results, often MS-based proteomics, as the basis for their algorithms.25 While it is possible that some of these predicted arginine sites can be further verified experimentally using other members of the PRMT family, the fact that experimental data is lacking for PGC-1α as an intrinsically disordered protein operating at variable temperatures, may explain why computational predicted residues were not similarly detected experimentally. Additionally, while both of these computational prediction programs used stringent datasets, they may have assigned a disproportionate weight to positive flanking residues that are known to affect substrate binding and catalysis by PRMT active site.71 In preparation for this manuscript, we have discovered that a new prediction program that addresses overfitting by early stopping is now available.72

The exact role of temperature-dependent arginine methylation of PGC-1α by PRMT7 remains unclear. As an IDP, PGC-1α has many protein partners, which affect its function as a master regulator. In principle, colder temperatures inhibit the rate of chemical reactions. However, the disordered nature of PGC-1α may allow for exposure of specific arginine residues at lower temperatures making them amenable to methylation by PRMT7. This type of plasticity has been observed in other IDPs allowing them to adopt different conformations based on temperature, pH, salinity, etc.73 In addition, PGC-1α may have specific binding partners with Tudor domains that recognize methylated arginine residues at low temperatures.74 Moreover, PGC-1α is methylated at the C-terminus within the RNA recognition motif. It is possible that arginine methylation will disrupt protein–ligand binding with RNA polymerase II, RNA processing factors, or other proteins involved in splicing.75 To understand the physiological consequence of these modifications, in vivo experiments conducted at varying temperatures are underway.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. Stallcup at the University of Southern California for providing the cDNA encoding the E. coli PGC-1α construct GST-G1. Technical assistance was provided by Protein Mass Spectrometrist Ben Katz, and Director Felix Grun, Mass Spectrometry Facility, UC Irvine. The authors thank Jonathan Lowenson and Poula Mansour for suggestions on improving this manuscript. They also thank Basir Sayed, Laboratory Equipment Maintenance Specialist, Analytical Core Facility, Rinker Campus, Chapman University for MS analyses.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00363.

  • List of amino acid sequences of PGC-1α constructs (Table S1); methylation reactions of PGC-1α at various temperatures (Figure S1); and list of peptide sequences analyzed by mass spectrometry (Table S2) (PDF)

Accession Codes

PRMT1, accession AAH62964, PRMT7, accession NP_663379, AND PGC-1α or PPARGC1A UniProt Q9UBK2

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NIGMS SC2GM118202-01 Award. RISE BS-to-PhD Fellowship R25 (GM061331) for Meryl Mendoza, NIH MBRS-RISE M.S. to Ph.D. (GM61331) for Mariel Mendoza and B.L., and NIH MARC U*STAR Program Fellowship (GM008228) for Meryl Mendoza, J.C., and I.O. Support from the Center for Undergraduate Excellence at Chapman University for S.B. and T.L. is also acknowledged.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

bi2c00363_si_001.pdf (282.9KB, pdf)

References

  1. Lin J.; Handschin C.; Spiegelman B. M. Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab. 2005, 1, 361–370. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Puigserver P. Tissue-specific regulation of metabolic pathways through the transcriptional coactivator PGC1-alpha. Int. J. Obes. 2005, 29, S5–S9. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lustig Y.; Ruas J. L.; Estall J. L.; Lo J. C.; Devarakonda S.; Laznik D.; Choi J. H.; Ono H.; Olsen J. V.; Spiegelman B. M. Separation of the gluconeogenic and mitochondrial functions of PGC-1{alpha} through S6 kinase. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 1232–1244. 10.1101/gad.2054711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh S. P.; Huck O.; Abraham N. G.; Amar S. Correction: Kavain Reduces Porphyromonas gingivalis-Induced Adipocyte Inflammation: Role of PGC-1alpha Signaling. J. Immunol. 2021, 201, 1491–1499. 10.4049/jimmunol.2100846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Puigserver P.; Wu Z.; Park C. W.; Graves R.; Wright M.; Spiegelman B. M. A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell 1998, 92, 829–839. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharabi K.; Lin H.; Tavares C. D. J.; Dominy J. E.; Camporez J. P.; Perry R. J.; Schilling R.; Rines A. K.; Lee J.; Hickey M.; Bennion M.; Palmer M.; Nag P. P.; Bittker J. A.; Perez J.; Jedrychowski M. P.; Ozcan U.; Gygi S. P.; Kamenecka T. M.; Shulman G. I.; Schreiber S. L.; Griffin P. R.; Puigserver P. Selective Chemical Inhibition of PGC-1alpha Gluconeogenic Activity Ameliorates Type 2 Diabetes. Cell 2017, 169, 148–160.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liang H.; Ward W. F. PGC-1alpha: a key regulator of energy metabolism. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2006, 30, 145–151. 10.1152/advan.00052.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Luo X.; Liao C.; Quan J.; Cheng C.; Zhao X.; Bode A. M.; Cao Y. Posttranslational regulation of PGC-1α and its implication in cancer metabolism. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 1475–1483. 10.1002/ijc.32253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bost F.; Kaminski L. The metabolic modulator PGC-1α in cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 9, 198–211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Piccinin E.; Sardanelli A. M.; Seibel P.; Moschetta A.; Cocco T.; Villani G. PGC-1s in the Spotlight with Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3487 10.3390/ijms22073487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weydt P.; Pineda V. V.; Torrence A. E.; Libby R. T.; Satterfield T. F.; Lazarowski E. R.; Gilbert M. L.; Morton G. J.; Bammler T. K.; Strand A. D.; Cui L.; Beyer R. P.; Easley C. N.; Smith A. C.; Krainc D.; Luquet S.; Sweet I. R.; Schwartz M. W.; La Spada A. R. Thermoregulatory and metabolic defects in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice implicate PGC-1alpha in Huntington’s disease neurodegeneration. Cell Metab. 2006, 4, 349–362. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hornbeck P. V.; Zhang B.; Murray B.; Kornhauser J. M.; Latham V.; Skrzypek E. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D512–D520. 10.1093/nar/gku1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Teyssier C.; Ma H.; Emter R.; Kralli A.; Stallcup M. R. Activation of nuclear receptor coactivator PGC-1alpha by arginine methylation. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 1466–1473. 10.1101/gad.1295005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Blanc R. S.; Richard S. Arginine Methylation: The Coming of Age. Mol. Cell 2017, 65, 8–24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tang J.; Frankel A.; Cook R. J.; Kim S.; Paik W. K.; Williams K. R.; Clarke S.; Herschman H. R. PRMT1 is the predominant type I protein arginine methyltransferase in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 7723–7730. 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Larsen S. C.; Sylvestersen K. B.; Mund A.; Lyon D.; Mullari M.; Madsen M. V.; Daniel J. A.; Jensen L. J.; Nielsen M. L. Proteome-wide analysis of arginine monomethylation reveals widespread occurrence in human cells. Sci. Signal 2016, 9, rs9 10.1126/scisignal.aaf7329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng Y.; Hadjikyriacou A.; Clarke S. G. Substrate specificity of human protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7): the importance of acidic residues in the double E loop. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 32604–32616. 10.1074/jbc.M114.609271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Feng Y.; Maity R.; Whitelegge J. P.; Hadjikyriacou A.; Li Z.; Zurita-Lopez C.; Al-Hadid Q.; Clark A. T.; Bedford M. T.; Masson J. Y.; Clarke S. G. Mammalian protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) specifically targets RXR sites in lysine- and arginine-rich regions. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 37010–37025. 10.1074/jbc.M113.525345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jain K.; Jin C. Y.; Clarke S. G. Epigenetic control via allosteric regulation of mammalian protein arginine methyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114, 10101–10106. 10.1073/pnas.1706978114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jain K.; Clarke S. G. PRMT7 as a unique member of the protein arginine methyltransferase family: A review. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 665, 36–45. 10.1016/j.abb.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zurita-Lopez C. I.; Sandberg T.; Kelly R.; Clarke S. G. Human protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) is a type III enzyme forming omega-NG-monomethylated arginine residues. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 7859–7870. 10.1074/jbc.M111.336271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kulkarni C.; Kinzer-Ursem T. L.; Tirrell D. A. Selective functionalization of the protein N terminus with N-myristoyl transferase for bioconjugation in cell lysate. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 1958–1962. 10.1002/cbic.201300453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lowry O. H.; Rosebrough N. J.; Farr A. L.; Randall R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rappsilber J.; Mann M.; Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1896–906. 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar P.; Joy J.; Pandey A.; Gupta D. PRmePRed: A protein arginine methylation prediction tool. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0183318 10.1371/journal.pone.0183318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wei L.; Xing P.; Shi G.; Ji Z.; Zou Q. Fast Prediction of Protein Methylation Sites Using a Sequence-Based Feature Selection Technique. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2019, 16, 1264–1273. 10.1109/TCBB.2017.2670558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernandez-Marcos P. J.; Auwerx J. Regulation of PGC-1alpha, a nodal regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 884S–890S. 10.3945/ajcn.110.001917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wenz T. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and PGC-1alpha under cellular stress. Mitochondrion 2013, 13, 134–142. 10.1016/j.mito.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cantó C.; Auwerx J. Clking on PGC-1alpha to inhibit gluconeogenesis. Cell Metab. 2010, 11, 6–7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rowe G. C.; Jiang A.; Arany Z. PGC-1 coactivators in cardiac development and disease. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 825–838. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Uhlén M.; Fagerberg L.; Hallström B. M.; Lindskog C.; Oksvold P.; Mardinoglu A.; Sivertsson Å.; Kampf C.; Sjöstedt E.; Asplund A.; Olsson I.; Edlund K.; Lundberg E.; Navani S.; Szigyarto C. A.; Odeberg J.; Djureinovic D.; Takanen J. O.; Hober S.; Alm T.; Edqvist P. H.; Berling H.; Tegel H.; Mulder J.; Rockberg J.; Nilsson P.; Schwenk J. M.; Hamsten M.; von Feilitzen K.; Forsberg M.; Persson L.; Johansson F.; Zwahlen M.; von Heijne G.; Nielsen J.; Pontén F. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419 10.1126/science.1260419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang L.; Liu J.; Zhang X. O.; Sibley K.; Najjar S. M.; Lee M. M.; Wu Q. Inhibition of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 enhances hepatic mitochondrial biogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 10884–10894. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kanno Y.; Inajima J.; Kato S.; Matsumoto M.; Tokumoto C.; Kure Y.; Inouye Y. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is a novel coactivator of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 459, 143–147. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vanlieshout T. L.; Stouth D. W.; Tajik T.; Ljubicic V. Exercise-induced Protein Arginine Methyltransferase Expression in Skeletal Muscle. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 2018, 50, 447–457. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shen N. Y.; Ng S. Y.; Toepp S. L.; Ljubicic V. Protein arginine methyltransferase expression and activity during myogenesis. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, BSR20171533 10.1042/BSR20171533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stouth D. W.; Manta A.; Ljubicic V. Protein arginine methyltransferase expression, localization, and activity during disuse-induced skeletal muscle plasticity. Am. J. Physiol.: Cell Physiol. 2018, 314, C177–C190. 10.1152/ajpcell.00174.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeong H. J.; Lee H. J.; Vuong T. A.; Choi K. S.; Choi D.; Koo S. H.; Cho S. C.; Cho H.; Kang J. S. Prmt7 Deficiency Causes Reduced Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Metabolism and Age-Related Obesity. Diabetes 2016, 65, 1868–1882. 10.2337/db15-1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Blackwell E.; Ceman S. Arginine methylation of RNA-binding proteins regulates cell function and differentiation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2012, 79, 163–175. 10.1002/mrd.22024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Al-Hamashi A. A.; Diaz K.; Huang R. Non-Histone Arginine Methylation by Protein Arginine Methyltransferases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2020, 21, 699–712. 10.2174/1389203721666200507091952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang K. Y.; Lee T. Y.; Kao H. J.; Ma C. T.; Lee C. C.; Lin T. H.; Chang W. C.; Huang H. D. dbPTM in 2019: exploring disease association and cross-talk of post-translational modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D298–D308. 10.1093/nar/gky1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu W.; Xie Y.; Ma J.; Luo X.; Nie P.; Zuo Z.; Lahrmann U.; Zhao Q.; Zheng Y.; Zhao Y.; Xue Y.; Ren J. IBS: an illustrator for the presentation and visualization of biological sequences. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3359–3361. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Himms-Hagen J. Role of thermogenesis in the regulation of energy balance in relation to obesity. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1989, 67, 394–401. 10.1139/y89-063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hadjikyriacou A.; Clarke S. G. Caenorhabditis elegans PRMT-7 and PRMT-9 Are Evolutionarily Conserved Protein Arginine Methyltransferases with Distinct Substrate Specificities. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 2612–2626. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cura V.; Troffer-Charlier N.; Lambert M. A.; Bonnefond L.; Cavarelli J. Cloning, expression, purification and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of mouse protein arginine methyltransferase 7. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. F: Struct. Biol. Commun. 2014, 70, 80–86. 10.1107/S2053230X13032871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Daily K. M.Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Modifications: Building an SVM Predictor for Methylation, 2005 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology; Radivojac P., Ed.; 2005; pp 1–7.
  46. Adamovich Y.; Shlomai A.; Tsvetkov P.; Umansky K. B.; Reuven N.; Estall J. L.; Spiegelman B. M.; Shaul Y. The protein level of PGC-1alpha, a key metabolic regulator, is controlled by NADH-NQO1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 2603–2613. 10.1128/MCB.01672-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Dunker A. K.; Brown C. J.; Lawson C. J. D.; Iakoucheva-Sebat L. M.; Vucetic S.; Obradovic Z. The Protein Trinity: Structure/Function Relationships That Include Intrinsic Disorder. Sci. World J. 2002, 2, 49–50. 10.1100/tsw.2002.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Romero P.; Obradovic Z.; Dunker A. K. Natively disordered proteins: functions and predictions. Appl. Bioinf. 2004, 3, 105–113. 10.2165/00822942-200403020-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wright P. E.; Dyson H. J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 18–29. 10.1038/nrm3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Varadi M.; Anyango S.; Deshpande M.; Nair S.; Natassia C.; Yordanova G.; Yuan D.; Stroe O.; Wood G.; Laydon A.; Zidek A.; Green T.; Tunyasuvunakool K.; Petersen S.; Jumper J.; Clancy E.; Green R.; Vora A.; Lutfi M.; Figurnov M.; Cowie A.; Hobbs N.; Kohli P.; Kleywegt G.; Birney E.; Hassabis D.; Velankar S. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D439–D444. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jumper J.; Evans R.; Pritzel A.; Green T.; Figurnov M.; Ronneberger O.; Tunyasuvunakool K.; Bates R.; Zidek A.; Potapenko A.; Bridgland A.; Meyer C.; Kohl S. A. A.; Ballard A. J.; Cowie A.; Romera-Paredes B.; Nikolov S.; Jain R.; Adler J.; Back T.; Petersen S.; Reiman D.; Clancy E.; Zielinski M.; Steinegger M.; Pacholska M.; Berghammer T.; Bodenstein S.; Silver D.; Vinyals O.; Senior A. W.; Kavukcuoglu K.; Kohli P.; Hassabis D. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Di Tommaso P.; Moretti S.; Xenarios I.; Orobitg M.; Montanyola A.; Chang J. M.; Taly J. F.; Notredame C. T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W13–W17. 10.1093/nar/gkr245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Notredame C.; Higgins D. G.; Heringa J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 302, 205–217. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kelley L. A.; Mezulis S.; Yates C. M.; Wass M. N.; Sternberg M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Corley M.; Burns M. C.; Yeo G. W. How RNA-Binding Proteins Interact with RNA: Molecules and Mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 9–29. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Cléry A.; Blatter M.; Allain F. H. RNA recognition motifs: boring? Not quite. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 290–298. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tritos N. A.; Mastaitis J. W.; Kokkotou E. G.; Puigserver P.; Spiegelman B. M.; Maratos-Flier E. Characterization of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor coactivator 1 alpha (PGC 1alpha) expression in the murine brain. Brain Res. 2003, 961, 255–260. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03961-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu Z.; Puigserver P.; Andersson U.; Zhang C.; Adelmant G.; Mootha V.; Troy A.; Cinti S.; Lowell B.; Scarpulla R. C.; Spiegelman B. M. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell 1999, 98, 115–124. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80611-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yoon J. C.; Puigserver P.; Chen G.; Donovan J.; Wu Z.; Rhee J.; Adelmant G.; Stafford J.; Kahn C. R.; Granner D. K.; Newgard C. B.; Spiegelman B. M. Control of hepatic gluconeogenesis through the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Nature 2001, 413, 131–138. 10.1038/35093050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lehman J. J.; Barger P. M.; Kovacs A.; Saffitz J. E.; Medeiros D. M.; Kelly D. P. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 promotes cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 106, 847–856. 10.1172/JCI10268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lin J.; Wu H.; Tarr P. T.; Zhang C. Y.; Wu Z.; Boss O.; Michael L. F.; Puigserver P.; Isotani E.; Olson E. N.; Lowell B. B.; Bassel-Duby R.; Spiegelman B. M. Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1 alpha drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature 2002, 418, 797–801. 10.1038/nature00904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Teng C. T.; Li Y.; Stockton P.; Foley J. Fasting induces the expression of PGC-1alpha and ERR isoforms in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) of the mouse kidney. PLoS One 2011, 6, e26961 10.1371/journal.pone.0026961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Puigserver P.; Spiegelman B. M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha): transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr. Rev. 2003, 24, 78–90. 10.1210/er.2002-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Anderson R. M.; Barger J. L.; Edwards M. G.; Braun K. H.; O’Connor C. E.; Prolla T. A.; Weindruch R. Dynamic regulation of PGC-1alpha localization and turnover implicates mitochondrial adaptation in calorie restriction and the stress response. Aging Cell 2008, 7, 101–111. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00357.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Salamon A.; Torok R.; Sumegi E.; Boros F.; Pesei Z. G.; Fort Molnar M.; Veres G.; Zadori D.; Vecsei L.; Klivenyi P. The effect of physical stimuli on the expression level of key elements in mitochondrial biogenesis. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 698, 13–18. 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ruas J. L.; White J. P.; Rao R. R.; Kleiner S.; Brannan K. T.; Harrison B. C.; Greene N. P.; Wu J.; Estall J. L.; Irving B. A.; Lanza I. R.; Rasbach K. A.; Okutsu M.; Nair K. S.; Yan Z.; Leinwand L. A.; Spiegelman B. M. A PGC-1alpha isoform induced by resistance training regulates skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell 2012, 151, 1319–1331. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wen X.; Wu J.; Chang J. S.; Zhang P.; Wang J.; Zhang Y.; Gettys T. W.; Zhang Y. Effect of exercise intensity on isoform-specific expressions of NT-PGC-1 alpha mRNA in mouse skeletal muscle. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 402175 10.1155/2014/402175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Martinez-Redondo V.; Pettersson A. T.; Ruas J. L. The hitchhiker’s guide to PGC-1alpha isoform structure and biological functions. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1969–1977. 10.1007/s00125-015-3671-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Chang J. S.; Fernand V.; Zhang Y.; Shin J.; Jun H.-J.; Joshi Y.; Gettys T. W. NT-PGC-1alpha protein is sufficient to link beta3-adrenergic receptor activation to transcriptional and physiological components of adaptive thermogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 9100–9111. 10.1074/jbc.M111.320200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Soyal S. M.; Felder T. K.; Auer S.; Hahne P.; Oberkofler H.; Witting A.; Paulmichl M.; Landwehrmeyer G. B.; Weydt P.; Patsch W.; A greatly extended PPARGC1A genomic locus encodes several new brain-specific isoforms and influences Huntington disease age of onset. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 3461–3473. 10.1093/hmg/dds177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Osborne T. C.; Obianyo O.; Zhang X.; Cheng X.; Thompson P. R. Protein arginine methyltransferase 1: positively charged residues in substrate peptides distal to the site of methylation are important for substrate binding and catalysis. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 13370–13381. 10.1021/bi701558t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhao J.; Jiang H.; Zou G.; Lin Q.; Wang Q.; Liu J.; Ma L. CNNArginineMe: A CNN structure for training models for predicting arginine methylation sites based on the One-Hot encoding of peptide sequence. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 1036862 10.3389/fgene.2022.1036862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wetzler D. E.; Fuchs Wightman F.; Bucci H. A.; Rinaldi J.; Caramelo J. J.; Iusem N. D.; Ricardi M. M. Conformational plasticity of the intrinsically disordered protein ASR1 modulates its function as a drought stress-responsive gene. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0202808 10.1371/journal.pone.0202808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Gayatri S.; Bedford M. T. Readers of histone methylarginine marks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gene Regul. Mech. 2014, 1839, 702–710. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Monsalve M.; Wu Z.; Adelmant G.; Puigserver P.; Fan M.; Spiegelman B. M. Direct coupling of transcription and mRNA processing through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 307–316. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

bi2c00363_si_001.pdf (282.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES