Abstract
The valorization of carbon oxides on metal/metal oxide catalysts has been extensively investigated because of its ecological and economical relevance. However, the ambiguity surrounding the active sites in such catalysts hampers their rational development. Here, in situ infrared spectroscopy in combination with isotope labeling revealed that CO molecules adsorbed on Ti3+ and Cu+ interfacial sites in Cu/TiO2 gave two disparate carbonyl peaks. Monitoring each of these peaks under various conditions enabled tracking the adsorption of CO, CO2, H2, and H2O molecules on the surface. At room temperature, CO was initially adsorbed on the oxygen vacancies to produce a high frequency CO peak, Ti3+−CO. Competitive adsorption of water molecules on the oxygen vacancies eventually promoted CO migration to copper sites to produce a low-frequency CO peak. In comparison, the presence of gaseous CO2 inhibits such migration by competitive adsorption on the copper sites. At temperatures necessary to drive CO2 and CO hydrogenation reactions, oxygen vacancies can still bind CO molecules, and H2 spilled-over from copper also competed for adsorption on such sites. Our spectroscopic observations demonstrate the existence of bifunctional active sites in which the metal sites catalyze CO2 dissociation whereas oxygen vacancies bind and activate CO molecules.
Subject terms: Surface spectroscopy, Energy, Materials for energy and catalysis, Catalytic mechanisms, Heterogeneous catalysis
The conversion of carbon oxides to products such as fuels is of high industrial relevance, but uncertainties regarding the catalytic mechanisms remain. Here, the authors use in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) to follow CO, CO2, H2 and H2O molecules as they bind to a Cu/TiO2 surface, finding metallic copper sites serve as CO2 dissociation sites, whereas Cu+ and oxygen vacancies bind CO molecules for further reductions.
Introduction
The hydrogenation of carbon oxides (COx, including CO2 and CO) to various useful products, such as fuels, has been extensively studied on the surface of various heterogeneous catalysts, to solve both environmental and energy problems1,2. Copper-based catalysts, for instance, demonstrated the ability to efficiently catalyze such hydrogenation reactions. Some of these catalysts have been already implemented in industry, as in the reverse water-gas shift reaction and methanol synthesis2,3. Despite the extensive research, there are substantial uncertainties on the mechanism and the role of active sites in COx hydrogenation that hamper the rational development of such catalysts. Proposed mechanisms for these reactions are either of dissociative nature, in which COx species partially or totally lose oxygen then hydrogenate to products, or of associative nature, in which hydrogen atoms bind to COx to form various intermediate species4–11. Heated debate arises regarding (i) active sites that mediate these reaction steps and (ii) possible reasons behind the synergetic effects between the metal and the support. To account for the synergetic effects, for instance, formation of more active sites at metal/metal oxide interface, such as metals alloys4,5, oxygen vacancies12,13, and interfacial Lewis acidic sites14–16, were discussed. Other groups, however, proposed bifunctional mechanisms17, in which metal and support coordinate tasks in the reaction.
As a “flagship” of the reducible supports since the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) was reported, TiO2 attracted extensive research to explore its role in catalysis18,19. A common feature in a part of this research is that TiO2 support significantly enhances the activity and the selectivity of metal catalysts in reactions that involve carbon monoxide, either as a reactant (in CO hydrogenation)16,20,21 or as an intermediate (in CO2 hydrogenation)22–24. Mechanistic investigations pioneered by Somorjai and co-workers highlighted the role of Lewis acidic interfacial sites, generated at the metal–titania interface, in facilitating C−O bond dissociation during carbon oxides transformation15,16. These interfacial sites are produced from oxygen transfer from the metal oxides to the metal sites25–30 and were reported in different catalytic systems such as in Pt/CeO2 (Pt+ and Ce3+)28, Pt/TiO2 (Pt+ and Ti3+)29, Cu/CeO2 (Cu+ and Ce3+)30, and Cu/ TiO2 (Cu+ and Ti3+)31.
In the COx hydrogenation reactions, CO is not only a reactant or intermediate but also a probe32,33 for distinguishing binding sites when combined with in situ infrared spectroscopy. This provides a unique opportunity to deduce information on the reaction mechanism and active sites. The ability of CO to identify surface sites and to assess their activity was widely implemented in CO oxidation, to develop catalysts for automotive emissions control34–36, however, it is less explored in COx hydrogenation. In the current study, in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was employed to follow CO molecules as they bind to two disparate surface sites on Cu/TiO2 at room temperature. The behavior of both sites was tracked, via monitoring carbonyl peak intensity and position, as isotopically labeled 13CO2 molecules dissociate and H2O is introduced, and as conditions are changed to in situ hydrogenation conditions. Examining the disparities in their behavior under these conditions revealed novel information that dictated an assignment different from what was proposed previously in the literature. Such observations and discussion provide insights on the bi-functional role played by the metal sites and the interface during COx hydrogenation reaction.
Result and discussion
Characterization of Cu/TiO2 catalysts
Highly dispersed copper sites were prepared on a TiO2 surface following our published procedure37, as described in the methods section. The presence of copper sites was confirmed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), CO adsorption, and UV–vis spectroscopy.
The chemical states of copper sites on the Cu/TiO2 sample were investigated by examining the Cu 2p and Cu LMM regions in the X-ray photoelectron and X-ray-excited Auger electron spectra, respectively (Fig. 1). The catalyst was examined after hydrogen pre-treatment at 300 °C for 1 h (sample denoted as Cu/TiO2–H2), and after the reduced sample was annealed under Ar flow at 300 °C for 1 h (sample denoted as Cu/TiO2–H2–Ar). The XPS spectrum in the Cu 2p region indicates that Cu0 and Cu+ are the main species in the hydrogen-treated sample (Fig. 1a). This is evident from the presence of Cu0 and/or Cu+ peaks at 932.2 eV (Cu 2p3/2) and 952.0 eV (Cu 2p1/2), and the absence of Cu2+ satellite peaks that typically emerge in between those two peaks. It is difficult to distinguish between Cu0 and Cu+ species based only on the XPS spectrum in the Cu 2p region38. Nonetheless, the Cu LMM region showed the characteristic peak for Cu0 at 918.8 eV (Fig. 1c; in kinetic energy)39,40, and the amount of Cu0 was estimated to be around 37% from spectral fitting (Fig. S1).
Fig. 1. Copper X-ray photoelectron and X-ray-excited Auger electron spectra.

Cu 2p X-ray photoelectron spectra (a, b) and Cu LMM X-ray-excited Auger electron spectra (c, d) of: a, c Cu/TiO2–H2, after the catalyst was pretreated at 300 °C under hydrogen for 1 h; b, d Cu/TiO2–H2–Ar, hydrogen reduced sample was further treated at 300 °C under Ar.
Annealing the sample at 300 °C under Ar caused the copper speciation to shift more toward the cationic species, as the Cu2+ and Cu+satellite peaks38,40 became more discernable (Fig. 1b). Cu2+ was also detected in the Cu LMM region at 917.8 eV39, along with Cu+ and Cu0 (Fig. 1d). Peak deconvolutions indicate that Cu2+ is a minor component with around 10% peak area (Fig. S1), which is consistent with the small Cu2+ satellite peak in the XPS spectra. Note that in pure CuO, the intensity of the satellite peak is typically ∼0.5 of the main Cu 2p3/2 peak40. The increase in the amount of oxidized species after annealing under Ar flow indicates that the TiO2 support is likely reduced with copper metal to produce oxygen vacancies, as will be discussed in detail later.
To further probe the different copper sites, CO adsorption was conducted since the IR signals of surface carbonyls strongly depend on the oxidation states of the metal. The hydrogen-treated Cu/TiO2 sample was loaded in the in situ diffuse reflectance cell in air and purged with CO for 15 min at room temperature. Subsequently, gaseous CO was purged by flowing Ar prior to spectrum collection. Two carbonyl peaks at 2106 and 2058 cm−1 are present in the spectrum (Fig. S2) for CO adsorbed on surface Cu+ and Cu0 sites37,41, respectively, whereas on pure TiO2 no strong carbonyl bands were observed under the same conditions. Diffuse reflectance UV–Vis spectra were also collected for the Cu/TiO2 sample and pure TiO2 (Fig. S3). Unlike pure TiO2 that shows adsorption only in the UV region, the Cu/TiO2 sample possesses absorption in the visible region between 400 and 500 nm, due to TiIV−O−CuI metal-to-metal charge-transfer42, and ∼600–800 nm for the d-d transition of Cu2+,37.
Binding sites and source of the unprompted CO
In order to probe surface sites responsible for COx binding, the Cu/TiO2 sample was pretreated in a Harrick Praying Mantis IR cell at various temperatures (100–400 °C) under constant Ar flow. After the sample was cooled down to room temperature under Ar, the IR cell was closed and the Cu/TiO2 surface was monitored with in situ DRIFTS. Despite the repeated washing for TiO2 with H2O2 (see the methods section), there was always a slow and spontaneous CO formation on the surface of the pretreated Cu/TiO2 sample at room temperature, as indicated by the carbonyl peaks associated with surface-adsorbed CO (Fig. 2). The CO molecules could be produced from adventitious carbon on the surface of Cu/TiO243. However, in our study, it is likely produced from the recombination of surface oxygen and carbon species that have been formed during the pretreatment step. Heating the sample in this step should trigger decomposition of carbonate-like species on TiO244,45, to produce carbon oxides which in turn dissociate46–52 on copper to form surface adsorbed oxygen and carbon, as suggested by the change in initial carbonate regions when the pretreatment temperature was increased, Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. DRIFTS spectra of Cu/TiO2 after activation at different temperatures.

Carbonyl (a–e) and the corresponding carbonate (f–j) regions of Cu/TiO2 as a function of time (10 min between spectra) after pre-treatment under Ar flow at (a, f) 100 °C, (b, g) 150 °C, (c, h) 200 °C, (d, i) 300 °C, and (e, j) 400 °C. Spectra were collected after the samples are cooled to room temperature. The carbonyl region demonstrates the change in intensity and position of two distinct CO binding sites, low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF), on Cu+ and Ti3+, respectively. The corresponding carbonate region indicates the surface adsorbed water at 1620 cm−1.
At low temperatures pretreatments, 100 and 150 °C, a small fraction of adsorbed water was removed and only a low frequency (LF) CO peak was observed on Cu/TiO2, Fig. 2a, b. On Cu/TiO2 pretreated at 200 °C and higher, however, more water was removed from the surface and two distinct CO peaks were observed, the LF peak and another CO peak located at a higher frequency (HF), (Fig. 2c–e). Interestingly, the initial peak positions for both the HF and LF peaks showed a strong dependence on pretreatment temperatures. The onset peak position for both peaks is blue-shifted with the increase in the pretreatment temperature. Furthermore, with time after a given pretreatment, the HF peak initially increased in intensity and then decayed at the same wavenumber, whereas the LF peak appeared later and underwent similar changes in peak intensity but red-shifted until it fully decayed. For instance, in the sample pretreated at 300 °C, the HF peak appeared at ∼2130 cm−1 (νCO). The intensity of this peak increased gradually and then decreased while the LF peak started to emerge at ∼2118 cm−1 (Fig. 2d). The LF peak slowly shifted to 2111 cm−1 before its disappearance.
Both CO peaks showed different sensitivity to the residual adsorbed water that remained on the surface after different temperature pretreatments. Comparing the IR regions of surface adsorbed water, either molecularly adsorbed at ∼1620 cm−1 (Fig. 2f–j) or dissociatively adsorbed as hydroxyls at 3700–3000 cm−1 (Fig. S4)53,54 indicates that the HF CO peak emerges at lower water coverage compared to the LF peak, as can be seen from the initial spectra in h–j in comparison to f and g in Fig. 2. This difference in sensitivity toward the residual water as a Lewis base indicates that the HF site is more Lewis acidic than the LF site. Furthermore, water eventually re-accumulated on the sample surface with the extended time of data collection (up to a few hours in some experiments). The source of this water is the trace amount of adsorbed water that usually exists on the cold inner surfaces of the sample cell walls, a common issue in DRIFTS and other surface studies54,55. In each experiment, the re-adsorption of water on the sample (Fig. 2h–j) was accompanied by the movement of the CO from the HF to LF sites (Fig. 2c–e). This indicates that the re-adsorbed water will eventually replace CO, since H2O is a stronger Lewis base, on the HF site prompting CO migration to the less acidic LF site. More discussion is presented in “Water adsorption” section.
The above observations indicate the presence of two disparate CO adsorption sites (HF and LF sites) on the Cu/TiO2 surface. For metal catalysts supported on reducible metal oxides, it’s well documented that thermal treatment under an oxygen-deficient atmosphere triggers oxygen transfer from the metal oxides to the metal sites at the interfacial region25–30. Such interactions generate acidic interfacial sites as demonstrated in Pt/CeO2 (Pt+ and Ce3+)28, Pt/TiO2 (Pt+ and Ti3+)29, and Cu/CeO2 (Cu+ and Ce3+)30. Similarly, thermal treatment of Cu/TiO2 samples under inert gas flow leads to the formation of Cu+ and Ti3+ sites at the Cu/TiO2 interface31. Such Lewis acidic sites at the interfaces can bind to Lewis basic molecules such as H2O and CO. In the case of CO, the metal cations that possess partially filled d-shell can back-bond to CO, resulting in IR stretch bands lower than 2143 cm−1, where the IR band of gaseous CO locates56. In accordance with the above discussion, the LF CO peak (2118–2111 cm−1) observed in the spectra shown in Fig. 2 can be attributed to the carbonyl stretching mode of CO adsorbed on the surface Cu+ sites31,43. The adsorption site corresponding to the HF CO band (e.g., 2131 cm−1 on Cu/TiO2 pretreated at 400 °C), however, is more acidic since it required higher pre-treatment temperatures and was more sensitive to water adsorption. More importantly, no progressive redshift was observed in the HF CO peak over time, suggesting that it is associated with a single adsorption site. For these reasons and based on previous theoretical57 and experimental58–62 studies, the observed HF peak can be assigned to CO adsorbed on oxygen vacancies (Ti3+). Rigorous pre-treatment conditions (e.g., prolonged treatment at 450 °C under ultra-high vacuum) were often needed to create such CO adsorption sites on pure TiO2 surfaces58–62. In the present study, thermal treatment at 200 °C under Ar was sufficient to create oxygen vacancies on TiO2, due to the presence of surface Cu sites which facilitates the formation of such sites. It is worth mentioning that multiple studies demonstrated that metals supported on reducible metal oxides facilitates the formation of oxygen vacancies which get stabilized via metal/metal oxide Schottky junction27,63,64.
Isotope studies using 13CO2
To probe the roles of oxygen vacancies and surface Cu+ sites in CO2 dissociation, we carried out isotope labeling experiments where different amounts of 13CO2 were introduced into the IR cell after Cu/TiO2 was thermally treated at 300 °C and cooled down to room temperature under Ar. Formation of both CO isotopes, 12CO from surface carbon residues and 13CO from gaseous 13CO2, on the HF/LF sites was monitored as a function of time and as the amount of 13CO2 admitted was increased (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. 13CO2 isotope labeling experiment.
DRIFTS spectra of surface-adsorbed CO as a function of time on Cu/TiO2 samples pretreated at 300 °C under Ar flow. Different amounts of 13CO2 were present in the IR cell: a 0 bar, b 0.1 bar, and c 1 bar. To the right, the corresponding integrated CO peak areas are plotted as a function of wavenumber and time.
The presence of a relatively small amount of 13CO2 (0.1 bar) led to the formation of 13CO on Cu/TiO2, as indicated by the appearance of the HF peak at 2082 cm−1 (Fig. 3b). The evolution of this peak follows the same pattern as the 12CO HF peak at 2130 cm−1, which gradually decayed while the LF peak started to develop. Both CO isotopes followed almost identical behavior in evolution, in terms of preferential adsorption on the HF sites and their migration to the LF sites. Increasing the pressure of 13CO2 to 1 bar resulted in more surface-adsorbed 13CO (Fig. 3c). In the spectra collected immediately after the introduction of 13CO2, the intensity of the 13CO HF peak at 2082 cm−1 is significantly greater than that of the 12CO HF peak. This is likely because the amount of 13CO produced from gaseous 13CO2 is much larger than that of 12CO produced from surface carbon. The increase in the onset relative amount of 13CO as the amount of injected 13CO2 increased confirms the occurring of dissociation, whereas the relentless formation of 12CO and its displacement to 13CO from their binding sites supports that each of the CO isotopes originates from two opposing reactions on the catalyst as discussed earlier.
The presence of gaseous 13CO2 inhibited the migration of CO adsorbed on oxygen vacancies (the HF peak) to surface Cu+ sites (the LF peak), as shown by the comparison in Fig. 3. In the absence of gaseous 13CO2 (Fig. 3a), the LF peak shifted from 2118 to 2111 cm−1, and its maximum integrated area was slightly greater than that of the HF peak. Introducing a small amount of 13CO2 (0.1 bar, Fig. 3b) significantly reduced the amount of CO adsorbed on the surface Cu+ sites, as shown by the relatively small integrated areas of the LF peaks (both 12CO and 13CO). Further increasing the amount of gaseous 13CO2 led to a nearly complete absence of the LF peak and slow decay of the HF peak (Fig. 3c). These results suggest that the gaseous 13CO2 competes with both CO isotopes during adsorption on the Cu+ sites but not on the Ti3+ sites. This is further supported by previous studies demonstrating that CO2 became strongly adsorbed as carbonates on oxidized copper sites46,65,66.
Water adsorption
As an omnipresent Lewis base, water molecules bind to the interfacial acidic sites on the surface of the Cu/TiO2 catalyst. Since Ti3+ is a stronger Lewis acid than Cu+ and H2O is a stronger Lewis base than CO, the activation temperature required to desorb water from the Ti3+ was higher and CO was preferably adsorbed on such site compared to Cu+. On Cu/TiO2 samples with adsorbed CO, readsorption of water will replace any adsorbed CO on the Ti3+ sites then Cu+ sites, as discussed in “Binding sites and source of the unprompted CO” section.
The role of water was further confirmed by purposely introducing water vapor in the middle of the rise of the HF CO peak. Spectra were collected for a Cu/TiO2 sample at room temperature under continuous Ar flow after pretreatment at 300 °C. During the rise of the HF, Ar flow was bypassed to flow above degassed water for 3 s then the Ar was switched back to the dry flow. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the decay of the HF peak and the rise/decay of the LF peak occurred immediately after water introduction, in less than two minutes as compared to a few hours in the absence of dosed water. The decay in the CO peaks was accompanied also by a rapid rise in the molecularly adsorbed water at 1620 cm−1 and hydroxyl peak at 3695 cm−1 (Fig. 4a, c). The latter peak is attributed to water healing oxygen vacancies in the vicinity of copper sites. Multiple studies54,67,68 have shown that this hydroxyl peak (peak at 3695 cm−1) is for Ti4+-OH peaks that was previously reactive defect site (Ti3+) but was filled with dissociatively adsorbed water.
Fig. 4. DRIFTS spectra upon introduction of water vapor.

Changes in the a hydroxyl, b carbonyl, and c water regions in the DRIFTS spectra of Cu/TiO2 before (blue, collected every 10 min) and after (red, collected every 33 s) the introduction of water vapor into the IR cell.
H2 admission
In our study, introducing hydrogen at room temperature to activated Cu/TiO2 either before or during the rise of CO on the HF site did not interrupt the behavior of surface adsorbed CO, either during the rise of CO on the HF site or its transition to the LF site. Such behavior could be attributed to the inactivity of copper toward hydrogen at room temperature69,70.
After pretreatment at 300 °C under H2 flow, only the LF CO peak was observed in the DRIFTS spectra upon CO injection. However, upon a second pretreatment under Ar, both HF and LF CO peaks appeared (spectra not shown here for brevity). Likely, hydrogenic species formed on the HF binding site upon hydrogen pretreatment is responsible for the absence of the HF CO peak. In line with these observations, CO adsorption on Cu/TiO2 studies showed that the appearance of the HF peak required the application of delicate pretreatment conditions71,72, however, in such studies the HF site was assigned to different binding sites. Thermal pretreatment with hydrogen precluded the formation of the HF peak, and re-oxidation with N2O could not retrieve it71. When the H2 pretreatment was followed with an evacuation step at the same reduction temperature, the HF peak was observed with even an enhanced intensity71,72. This intriguing behavior could be attributed to the competitive adsorption of CO and H2 on surface oxygen vacancies. This behavior was demonstrated previously, with different characterization tools, over Pt/TiO229 and Rh/TiO273–76 catalysts. In such studies, it was concluded that the metal site facilitates the reduction of the titania support to produce hydrogenic species, which inhibited CO adsorption on titania.
To further investigate the role of the HF and LF CO binding sites in carbon oxides hydrogenation, those two peaks were monitored as the H2 gas is co-adsorbed and as the temperature is increased to the reaction temperature. When the sample was purged with a mixture of Ar and CO at room temperature, only the LF CO peak was observed (Fig. 5a, b). As the temperature increased, the CO peak shifted gradually from the LF sites to the HF sites. Moreover, when Ar flow in the gas mixture was replaced with an equal amount of hydrogen, the HF CO adsorption peak was not affected until the temperature reached 200 °C. At such temperature (and higher), a red-shift and a rapid decrease in the peak intensity were observed as H2 was admitted (Fig. 5c), for H2 and CO coadsorption at 275 °C. Starting at 275 °C and above, the production of methane gas was observed. The CO peak intensity and position were partially retrieved again when H2 and CO flow was switched back to Ar and CO flow. Such cyclic changes in HF peak occurred whenever the flow was switched back and forth between Ar + CO and H2 + CO. The observed ability of the HF site (Ti3+) to maintain CO binding at high temperatures and to interact with both H2 and CO at different temperatures strongly suggests that such sites are the active centers in CO hydrogenation over Cu/TiO2.
Fig. 5. DRIFTS spectra for high-temperature CO and CO-H2 adsorption.
a CO adsorption peaks under continuous CO flow over Cu/TiO2 and as the temperature increases. The spectra were collected 10 min. after reaching the desired temperature. b Peak areas for the HF and LF CO peaks that were deconvoluted from a. c CO adsorption peaks at 275 °C under continuous CO flow over Cu/TiO2, and as the flow was switched back and forth between Ar + CO and H2 + CO.
CO2 dissociation and carbon oxides chemical conversion
The observed disparities between the surface binding sites confirm the existence of bi-functional catalytic sites that can work collaboratively to catalyze CO2 hydrogenation. Such bifunctionality enables heterogeneous catalysts to efficiently catalyze CO2 conversion to higher hydrogenated products with one-pot synthesis77,78. As discussed earlier, the introduction and dissociation of CO2 affected only the LF site and the produced CO accumulated on the HF sites (Fig. 6). Such observations confirm the role of the metal sites in the dissociative adsorption of CO2. Multiple studies have demonstrated that CO2 dissociation, a key step in CO2 chemical conversion, takes place spontaneously on pure copper metal46–50. It is worth mentioning that accumulation of the produced oxygen poisons the copper metal surface50,79, which can be regenerated with hydrogen, based on redox mechanism80 in reverse water gas shift reaction. Moreover, studies of COx hydrogenation have demonstrated that surface copper sites can protect oxygen vacancies, the proposed active sites, from healing when CO2 is introduced to a feed mixture of CO and H212.
Fig. 6. Schematic of competitive adsorption of CO with H2O and CO2.

H2O competes with CO on oxygen vacancies while CO2 adsorbs on copper sites.
The HF site demonstrated a higher affinity to bind CO even at high temperatures. This suggests that the oxygen vacancies will stabilize the CO produced from CO2 dissociation occurring on the neighboring metal sites. And since hydrogenic species compete with CO on such sites upon H2 introduction, it can be concluded that oxygen vacancies activate both molecules for the reaction. Calculations and experimental observation in multiple studies have confirmed such role of the oxygen vacancies during the conversion of syngas (or a mixture of syngas and CO2) to methanol on reducible metal oxides and copper supported on reducible metal oxides12,13,63,81,82.
The observed strong adsorption of water molecules on the acidic interfacial sites, which displace CO from HF binding sites, highlights the detrimental role of water on the interfacial active sites during the hydrogenation reaction. This is in line with the previous observations that water produced during CO2 hydrogenation deactivates the Cu/metal oxide catalysts, and for this reason, CAMERE (Carbon dioxide hydrogenation to form methanol via a reverse-water gas shift reaction) process was implemented to minimize water percentage in the reaction mixture11. In such process CO2 was reduced first to CO then the CO was fed to another reactor for further reaction.
Conclusion
We have employed in situ DRIFTS to investigate surface sites responsible for COx hydrogenation on Cu/TiO2. Introducing 13CO2 at room temperature to a thermally activated Cu/TiO2 catalyst produces a mixture of 13CO and 12CO that likely originated from 13CO2 spontaneous dissociation and carbon residue oxidation, respectively. The ratio of 13CO/12CO isotopes increased as the introduced amount of 13CO2 was increased, however, with time 12CO eventually displaced 13CO on the catalyst surface.
Interfacial sites in Cu/TiO2 catalyst gave rise to two distinct CO binding sites, Cu+ and Ti3+. The Cu+-CO spanned the range 2118–2111 cm−1 whereases the Ti3+-CO (CO on oxygen vacancies) gave rise to a carbonyl peak at a single wavenumber in the range 2126–2131 cm−1, depending on the activation temperature employed. Being more acidic, the HF site (Ti3+) required a higher temperature (200 °C or higher) to relinquish adsorbed atmospheric water and showed more affinity to CO than the LF site (Cu+). Likewise, water re-adsorption on the surface that already contains adsorbed CO prompted the migration of CO from the oxygen vacancies to the neighboring Cu+ sites. CO2 admission, on the other hand, suppressed the LF CO peak area and limited the CO migration from the oxygen vacancies.
Hydrogenic species, formed from H2 spill-over during pretreatment, prevented the formation of the CO HF peak at room temperature. However, this did not prevent the formation of the LF CO peak. Furthermore, the HF sites demonstrated the ability to interact with both CO and H2 at high temperatures necessary to form methane.
On the Cu/TiO2 surface, the adsorption of CO was affected by the presence of other molecules in the hydrogenation reaction mixture, including CO2, CO, H2, and H2O. The observed disparities of carbonyl signals suggest the existence of bifunctional catalytic sites, in which metallic copper sites serve as CO2 dissociation sites, whereas the Cu+ and the oxygen vacancies bind the produced CO molecules for further reductions.
Methods
The Cu/TiO2 catalyst was prepared via a simple precipitation method using CuCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.995%), P25 (TiO2, obtained from Evonik), and ammonia (aq, BDH, ACS grade). To remove surface organic contaminants, 300 mg TiO2 was washed with 30 mL of 1:3 by volume solution of 30% H2O2 (aq, J.T. Baker, CMOS grade) in Milli-Q water, using sonication to disperse the powder and centrifugation to retrieve it. A 10 mL solution of ammonia was added to 30 mL of the washed TiO2 suspension before adding 10 mg of CuCl2 under constant stirring. The resulting Cu/TiO2 was separated by centrifugation, washed with Milli-Q water, and vacuum dried at room temperature overnight. Prior to infrared studies, the synthesized Cu/TiO2 was annealed under a flow of H2 for 3 h at 300 °C in a tube furnace.
Additional pre-treatment of powder samples was done in a Harrick Praying Mantis diffuse reflectance IR cell attached to a Thermo Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer. The catalyst in powder form was compressed in the sample holder and purged with Ar (99.999%) prior to thermal treatment at the desired temperature for 1 h under Ar flow (400 mL/min). The sample was then cooled down to room temperature under continuous Ar flow before the IR cell was closed and spectra were collected. In the isotope experiments, specific amounts of gaseous 13CO2 were introduced into the IR cell by using a syringe or flowing 13CO2 briefly to produce desired pressure. Water vapor was introduced into the IR cell by using a bubbler with Ar flow. Typically, IR spectra were collected every 10 min, unless otherwise mentioned. UV–Visible spectra were obtained on a Cary 50 Bio spectrophotometer. A Barrelino diffuse reflectance probe was used to collect UV–Visible spectra of powder samples using BaSO4 as a standard. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) investigations were performed with a KRATOS Axis Supra. Monochromated Al Kα was used for the excitation of the photo and Auger electrons. The binding energy scale was referenced to the C1s at 285 eV. A glove bag was used to ensure that the hydrogen-treated sample is always kept under a dry atmosphere of Ar during loading in the XPS instrument.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under grants 1705528 and 2102655. The authors thank Professor N. Aaron Deskins for his insightful discussions.
Author contributions
E.S and G.L. conceived the idea and planned the research. E.S. carried out the experiments. E.S. and G.L. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
Any relevant data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-022-00650-2.
References
- 1.Li W, et al. A short review of recent advances in CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over heterogeneous catalysts. RSC Adv. 2018;8:7651–7669. doi: 10.1039/C7RA13546G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang W, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3703–3727. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15008a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dang S, et al. A review of research progress on heterogeneous catalysts for methanol synthesis from carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Catal. Today. 2019;330:61–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Appel AM, et al. Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in biochemical and chemical catalysis of CO2 fixation. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:6621–6658. doi: 10.1021/cr300463y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nakamura J, et al. Comment on “Active sites for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on Cu/ZnO catalysts”. Science. 2017;357:eaan8074. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fujita S-II, et al. Mechanism of the reverse water gas shift reaction over Cu/ZnO catalyst 1. J. Catal. 1992;225:220–225. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90223-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ernst K-H, Campbell CT, Moretti G. Kinetics of the reverse water-gas shift reaction over Cu(110) J. Catal. 1992;134:66–74. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90210-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ginés MJL, Marchi AJ, Apesteguía CR. Kinetic study of the reverse water-gas shift reaction over CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1997;154:155–171. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00369-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weatherbee GD, Bartholomew CH. Hydrogenation of CO2 on group VIII metals: II. Kinetics and mechanism of CO2 hydrogenation on nickel. J. Catal. 1982;77:460–472. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(82)90186-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kattel S, Ramírez PJ, Chen JG, Rodriguez JA, Liu P. Active sites for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on Cu/ZnO catalysts. Science. 2017;355:1296 LP–1291299. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Joo OS, et al. Carbon dioxide hydrogenation to form methanol via a reverse-water-gas- shift reaction (the CAMERE process) Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999;38:1808–1812. doi: 10.1021/ie9806848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kurtz M, et al. Active sites on oxide surfaces: ZnO-catalyzed synthesis of methanol from CO and H 2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:2790–2794. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.French SA, et al. From CO2 to methanol by hybrid QM/MM embedding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:4437. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011203)40:23<4437::AID-ANIE4437>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johnson GR, Bell AT. Effects of Lewis acidity of metal oxide promoters on the activity and selectivity of Co-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts. J. Catal. 2016;338:250–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.03.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Borodko Y, Somorjai GA. Catalytic hydrogenation of carbon oxides—a 10-year perspective. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1999;186:355–362. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00154-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boffa AB, Lin C, Bell AT, Somorjai GA. Lewis acidity as an explanation for oxide promotion of metals: implications of its importance and limits for catalytic reactions. Catal. Lett. 1994;27:243–249. doi: 10.1007/BF00813909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu X-MM, et al. Recent advances in catalysts for methanol synthesis via hydrogenation of CO and CO2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003;42:6518–6530. doi: 10.1021/ie020979s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haller GL, Resasco DE. Metal–support interaction: group VIII Metals and reducible oxides. Adv. Catal. 1989;36:173–235. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tauster SJ, Fung SC, Garten RL. Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on TiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978;100:170–175. doi: 10.1021/ja00469a029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang Y, et al. Ru/TiO2 catalysts with size-dependent metal/support interaction for tunable reactivity in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal. 2020;10:12967–12975. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02780. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Komaya T, et al. Effects of dispersion and metal-metal oxide interactions on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Ru/TiO2 and TiO2-promoted Ru/SiO2. J. Catal. 1994;150:400–406. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1994.1358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mateo D, Albero J, García H. Titanium-Perovskite-supported RuO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic CO2 methanation. Joule. 2019;3:1949–1962. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abe T, Tanizawa M, Watanabe K, Taguchi A. CO2 methanation property of Ru nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 prepared by a polygonal barrel-sputtering method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009;2:315–321. doi: 10.1039/b817740f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thampi KR, Kiwi J, Grätzel M. Methanation and photo-methanation of carbon dioxide at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Nature. 1987;327:506–508. doi: 10.1038/327506a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boccuzzi, F., Chiorino, A., Tsubota, S. & Haruta, M. FTIR study of carbon monoxide oxidation and scrambling at room temperature over gold supported on ZnO and TiO2. 2. J. Phys. Chem.100, 3625–3631 (1996).
- 26.Boronat M, Concepción P, Corma A, Concepcio P, Corma A. Unravelling the nature of Gold surface sites by combining IR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. Implications in catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009;113:16772–16784. doi: 10.1021/jp905157r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ruiz Puigdollers A, et al. Increasing oxide reducibility: the role of metal/oxide interfaces in the formation of oxygen vacancies. ACS Catal. 2017;7:6493–6513. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vayssilov GN, et al. Support nanostructure boosts oxygen transfer to catalytically active platinum nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:310–315. doi: 10.1038/nmat2976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bonneviot L, Haller GL. EPR characterization of Ti3+ ions at the metal-support interface in Pt /TiO2 catalysts. J. Catal. 1988;113:96–105. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(88)90240-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen A, et al. Structure of the catalytically active copper–ceria interfacial perimeter. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:334–341. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0226-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu L, Zhao C, Li Y. Spontaneous dissociation of CO2 to CO on defective surface of Cu(I)/TiO 2- x nanoparticles at room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:7904–7912. doi: 10.1021/jp300932b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lamberti C, Zecchina A, Groppo E, Bordiga S. Probing the surfaces of heterogeneous catalysts by in situ IR spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:4951–5001. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00117a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vimont A, Thibault-Starzyk F, Daturi M. Analysing and understanding the active site by IR spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:4928–4950. doi: 10.1039/b919543m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Green IX, Tang W, Neurock M, Yates JT. Spectroscopic observation of dual catalytic sites during oxidation of CO on a Au/TiO 2 catalyst. Science. 2011;333:736–739. doi: 10.1126/science.1207272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ding K, et al. Identification of active sites in CO oxidation and water-gas shift over supported Pt catalysts. Science. 2015;350:189–192. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.DeRita L, et al. Structural evolution of atomically dispersed Pt catalysts dictates reactivity. Nat. Mater. 2019;18:746–751. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0349-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu C, Iyemperumal SK, Deskins NA, Li G. Photocatalytic CO 2 reduction by highly dispersed Cu sites on TiO 2. J. Photonics Energy. 2016;7:012004. doi: 10.1117/1.JPE.7.012004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lee SY, Mettlach N, Nguyen N, Sun YM, White JM. Copper oxide reduction through vacuum annealing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003;206:102–109. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01239-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Poulston S, Parlett PM, Stone P, Bowker M. Surface oxidation and reduction of CuO and Cu2O studied using XPS and XAES. Surf. Interface Anal. 1996;24:811–820. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199611)24:12<811::AID-SIA191>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Biesinger MC. Advanced analysis of copper X-ray photoelectron spectra. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017;49:1325–1334. doi: 10.1002/sia.6239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hadjiivanov K, Venkov T, Knözinger H. FTIR spectroscopic study of CO adsorption on Cu/SiO2: formation of new types of copper carbonyls. Catal. Lett. 2001;75:55–59. doi: 10.1023/A:1016759123842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lin W, Frei H. Anchored metal-to-metal charge-transfer chromophores in a mesoporous silicate sieve for visible-light activation of titanium centers. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:4929–4935. doi: 10.1021/jp040677z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang CC, Yu YH, Van Der Linden B, Wu JCS, Mul G. Artificial photosynthesis over crystalline TiO2-based catalysts: Fact or fiction? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:8398–8406. doi: 10.1021/ja101318k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Song A, Skibinski ES, Debenedetti WJI, Ortoll-bloch AG, Hines MA. Nanoscale solvation leads to spontaneous formation of a bicarbonate monolayer on rutile (110) under ambient conditions: implications for CO2 photoreduction. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:9326–9333. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Balajka J, et al. High-affinity adsorption leads to molecularly ordered interfaces on TiO2 in air and solution. Science. 2018;361:786–789. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hadden RA, Vandervell HD, Waugh KC, Webb G. The adsorption and decomposition of carbon dioxide on polycrystalline copper. Catal. Lett. 1988;1:27–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00765350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hagman B, et al. Steps control the dissociation of CO2 on Cu(100) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:12974–12979. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bönicke IA, Kirstein W, Thieme F. A study on CO2 dissociation on a stepped (332) copper surface. Surf. Sci. 1994;307–309:177–181. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90390-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schneider, T. & Hirschwald, W. Interaction of carbon dioxide with clean and oxygenated Cu (110) surfaces. Catal. Lett.14, 197–205 (1992).
- 50.Eren B, Weatherup RS, Liakakos N, Somorjai GA, Salmeron M. Dissociative carbon dioxide adsorption and morphological changes on Cu(100) and Cu(111) at ambient pressures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:8207–8211. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Andreoni W, Varma CM. Binding and dissociation of CO on transition-metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B. 1981;23:437–444. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jagannathan K, Srinivasan A, Hegde MS, Rao CNR. Interaction of carbon monoxide with transition metal surfaces. Surf. Sci. 1980;99:309–319. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90395-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Green IX, Tang W, Neurock M, Yates JT. Low-temperature catalytic H2 oxidation over Au nanoparticle/TiO2 dual perimeter sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:10186–10189. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kipreos MD, Foster M. Water interactions on the surface of 50 nm rutile TiO2 nanoparticles using in situ DRIFTS. Surf. Sci. 2018;677:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2018.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Berman A. Water vapor in vacuum systems. Vacuum. 1996;47:327–332. doi: 10.1016/0042-207X(95)00246-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lupinetti, A. J., Strauss, S. H. & Frenking, G. Nonclassical metal carbonyls. Prog. Inorg. Chem.49, 1–112 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 57.Lustemberg PG, Scherlis DA. Monoxide carbon frequency shift as a tool for the characterization of TiO 2 surfaces: Insights from first principles spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2013;138:124702. doi: 10.1063/1.4796199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Odenbrand CUI, et al. Characterization of silica-titania mixed oxides preparation of silica-titania mixed oxides. J. Catal. 1990;3:541–553. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Busca G, Saussey H, Saur O, Lavalley JC, Lorenzelli V. FT-IR characterization of the surface acidity of different titanium dioxide anatase preparations. Appl. Catal. 1985;14:245–260. doi: 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)84358-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liao LF, Lien CF, Shieh DL, Chen MT, Lin JL. FTIR study of adsorption and photoassisted oxygen isotopic exchange of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonate, and formate on TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:11240–11245. doi: 10.1021/jp0211988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Petrik NG, Kimmel GA. Adsorption geometry of CO versus coverage on TiO2(110) from s- and p-polarized infrared spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:3425–3430. doi: 10.1021/jz301413v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim K. FT-IR spectroscopic characterization of oxidized and reduced titania. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1990;11:396–399. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Frost JC. Junction effect interactions in methanol synthesis catalysts. Nature. 1988;334:577–580. doi: 10.1038/334577a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen J, et al. Synergy between defects, photoexcited electrons, and supported single atom catalysts for CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 2018;8:10464–10478. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schneider, T. & Hirschwald, W. Interaction of carbon dioxide with clean and oxygenated Cu(110) surfaces. Catal. Lett.14, 197–205 (1992).
- 66.Fu SS, Somorjai GA. Interactions of O2, CO, CO2, and D2 with the stepped Cu(311) crystal face: comparison to Cu(110) Surf. Sci. 1992;262:68–76. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90460-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Henderson MA. An HREELS and TPD study of water on TiO2(110): the extent of molecular versus dissociative adsorption. Surf. Sci. 1996;355:151–166. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)01357-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang R, et al. Photogeneration of highly amphiphilic TiO2 surfaces. Adv. Mater. 1998;10:135–138. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199801)10:2<135::AID-ADMA135>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mikovksy RJ, Boudart M, Taylor HS. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange on copper, silver, gold and alloy surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954;76:3814–3819. doi: 10.1021/ja01643a067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kwan T. Rate of hydrogen adsorption on reduced copper. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1950;23:73–75. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.23.73. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Coloma F, Marquez F, Rochester CH, Anderson JA. Determination of the nature and reactivity of copper sites in Cu-TiO2 catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000;2:5320–5327. doi: 10.1039/b005331g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Boccuzzi F, Baricco M, Guglielminotti E. Surface characterization of Cu-Ti systems: an IR study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1993;70–71:147–152. doi: 10.1016/0169-4332(93)90416-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Apple TM, Dybowski C. Effect of coadsorption of CO on the adsorption of H2 on Rh TiO2. J. Catal. 1981;71:316–319. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(81)90234-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.DeCanio SJ, Miller JB, Michel JB, Dybowski C. Electron spin resonance and nuclear magnetic resonance study of the reduction of Rh/TiO2 systems at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. 1983;87:4619–4622. doi: 10.1021/j100246a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Conesa JC, Malet P, Munuera G, Sanz J, Soria J. Magnetic resonance studies of hydrogen-reduced rhodium/titanium dioxide catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. 1984;88:2986–2992. doi: 10.1021/j150658a013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sanz J, et al. Influence of the hydrogen uptake by the support on metal-support interactions in catalysts. Comparison of the rhodium/titanium dioxide and rhodium/strontium titanate (SrTiO3) systems. J. Phys. Chem. 1985;89:5427–5433. doi: 10.1021/j100271a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rao H, Schmidt LC, Bonin J, Robert M. Visible-light-driven methane formation from CO2 with a molecular iron catalyst. Nature. 2017;548:74–77. doi: 10.1038/nature23016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rao H, Lim CH, Bonin J, Miyake GM, Robert M. Visible-light-driven conversion of CO2 to CH4 with an organic sensitizer and an iron porphyrin catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:17830–17834. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Solymosi F. The bonding, structure and reactions of CO2 adsorbed on clean and promoted metal surfaces. J. Mol. Catal. 1991;65:337–358. doi: 10.1016/0304-5102(91)85070-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kim SS, Lee HH, Hong SC. A study on the effect of support’s reducibility on the reverse water-gas shift reaction over Pt catalysts. Appl. Catal. A. 2012;423–424:100–107. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Boudart M. Submitted as a letter to the editor of catalysis letters. Catal. Lett. 1992;13:153–154. doi: 10.1007/BF00770958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Polarz S, et al. On the role of oxygen defects in the catalytic performance of zinc oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:2965–2969. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Any relevant data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.


