Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Jan 6;13:331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27511-9

Effects of the long-term influence of bisphenol A and bisphenol S on the population of nitrergic neurons in the enteric nervous system of the mouse stomach

Krystyna Makowska 1,, Jarosław Całka 2, Sławomir Gonkowski 2
PMCID: PMC9822927  PMID: 36609592

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disruptor commonly used in the production of plastics. Due to its relatively well-known harmful effects on living organisms, BPA is often replaced by its various analogues. One of them is bisphenol S (BPS), widely used in the plastics industry. Until recently, BPS was considered completely safe, but currently, it is known that it is not safe for various internal organs. However, knowledge about the influence of BPS on the nervous system is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of two doses of BPA and BPS on the enteric nitrergic neurons in the CD1 strain mouse stomach using the double-immunofluorescence technique. The study found that both substances studied increased the number of nitrergic neurons, although changes under the impact of BPS were less visible than those induced by BPA. Therefore, the obtained results, for the first time, clearly indicate that BPS is not safe for the innervation of the gastrointestinal tract.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Environmental sciences, Natural hazards

Introduction

Bisphenols are a group of substances widely used in the chemical industry to produce polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, and therefore they are present in various everyday objects, including bottles, thermal paper, and food can linings1,2. Until recently, bisphenol A (BPA) was the most commonly utilised substance in industry from the group of bisphenols3,4. However, it has been shown that BPA, mainly due to its estrogenic properties, has a strong negative influence on living organisms35. Therefore, numerous countries have introduced restrictions on the use of BPA, and this substance has been replaced by its analogues, especially in products which have contact with food and/or items intended for children68. One BPA analogue that is gaining increasing popularity is bisphenol S (BPS). Until recently, BPS was considered completely safe for living organisms. However, recent studies have shown that since this substance, similarly to BPA, stimulates estrogenic receptors, it may negatively impact a wide range of physiological processes912 and even promote the progression of cancers13,14. Notwithstanding the constantly evolving knowledge on the impact of BPS on human and animal organisms, there is a lack of information regarding many aspects of this impact. One of the gaps in information concerns the influence of BPS on the enteric nervous system (ENS), although bisphenols most often enter living organisms via the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and ENS is one of the first barriers against toxic substances15.

The structure of the ENS differs depending on the animal species as well as the part of the GI tract studied1620. In the mouse stomach, it is formed with two kinds of intramural ganglia: (1) myenteric ganglia (MG) situated between the longitudinal and circular muscle fibres, which are interconnected with a dense neuronal fibre network to form myenteric plexus and (2) submucous ganglia located in the submucosal layer, near the gastric mucosa19,20.

The ENS is characterised by significant variability in terms of the synthesis of neuromediators and/or neuromodulators. Enteric neurons may synthetize several dozen active substances, and the main reaction of the ENS to pathological stimuli (including the intoxication) involves changes in neuronal neurochemical characterisation, which means fluctuations in the expression (and release) of neuroactive factors21,22.

Among the neuronal factors produced by enteric neurons, the gaseous neurotransmitter nitric oxide (NO) is one of the most important factors in the regulation of gastrointestinal functions23. It is known that nitrergic neurons occur in the ENS of many species, including humans20,2427. The number of these neurons differs depending on animal species, the segment of the GI tract and the type of enteric ganglia studied20,2529. Moreover, in most cases, including the mouse stomach, the population of nitrergic enteric neurons is relatively numerous20,2831.

Previous investigations have shown that NO is one of the most important inhibitory factors in the ENS and takes part in the regulation of several important functions of the GI tract23. In addition to the relaxation of the gastrointestinal smooth muscles and intramural and mesenteric vessels, which makes this neurotransmitter involved in the motility and intestinal blood flow regulations3235, NO is also involved in the inhibition of the secretion processes in the stomach and intestines26,28,36.

Although there have been many studies on the role of NO in the ENS, some aspects of its activity are still not clear. Although it is suggested increasingly often in recent studies that this neurotransmitter is involved in the pathological and neuroprotective processes in the intestines, knowledge on this topic is still rather scarce and incomplete27,28,37.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare, for the first time, the influence of long-term exposure to BPA and BPS on the population of nitrergic neurons in the stomach, which are responsible for storage, mixing and partial digestion of the food and whose proper functioning largely determines metabolism and absorption of toxins entering the living organism orally as well as the appropriate digestion of all food ingredients15.

Thus, the hypothesis proposed by the authors was that BPS (like BPA) also adversely affects the ENS, which is the first barrier that these toxins must overcome when entering the living organism via the gastrointestinal tract, and nNOS expression will significantly change as a result of the neuroplasticity of the nitrergic neurons.

Results

In the present study, perikaryons positive to nNOS were observed in both the myenteric and submucous ganglia of the gastric ENS in all groups of animals (Figs. 1, 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution pattern of nerve cells immunoreactive to protein gene-product 9.5 (PGP 9.5)—used as a pan-neuronal marker and neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the myenteric plexus (MG) of the mouse stomach under physiological conditions (C) and after administration of bisphenol A in a lower (AI) and higher dose (AII) and bisphenol S in a lower (SI) and higher dose (SII). The pictures are the result of the overlap of both stainings. The arrows are pointing to neurons immunoreactive for both—PGP 9.5 and nNOS.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution pattern of nerve cells immunoreactive to protein gene-product 9.5 (PGP 9.5)—used as a pan-neuronal marker and neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the submucous plexus (SG) of the mouse stomach under physiological conditions (C) and after administration of bisphenol A in a lower (AI) and higher dose (AII) and bisphenol S in a lower (SI) and higher dose (SII). The pictures are the result of the overlap of both stainings. The arrows are pointing to neurons immunoreactive for both—PGP 9.5 and nNOS.

In the control animals, the number of nNOS-positive neurons was up to 32.4 ± 0.566% and 30.58 ± 0.88% of all cells labelled with PGP 9.5 in the MG and SG, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

The number of neurons positive for a neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the MG (myenteric plexus) and SG (submucous plexus) in the control group (C) and all of the experimental groups (AI, AII, SI, SII).

C AI AII SI SII
MG 32.4 ± 0.566a 38.36 ± 0.813a.b 44.86 ± 0.735a.c 34.44 ± 0.6a.b 35.02 ± 0.885a.c
SG 30.58 ± 0.88a 38.49 ± 0.771a.b 38.14 ± 0.565a.c 31.36 ± 1.092b 34.02 ± 0.946a.c

Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between group C and every experimental group were marked with a, between the AI group and SI group were marked with b, and between the AII group and SII group were marked with c.

Both bisphenols used in the present study change the number of nNOS-positive neuronal cells in the MG and SG in the mouse stomach (Table 1). The degree of observed changes differs depending on the type of bisphenol studied, the type of enteric ganglion and the dose of substances.

In the case of BPA, the variations in the number of nNOS—immunoreactive neurons compared to the control group were most visible (Table 1). In the animals of the AI group, the percentage of perikaryons containing nNOS increased to 38.36 ± 0.813% (Fig. 1) and 38.49 ± 0.771% (Fig. 2) in the MG and SG, respectively. Interestingly, exposure to a higher dose of BPA (group AII) did not cause further growth of the number of nNOS-positive neurons in the SG, where the percentage of such neuronal cells was very similar to the results from the AI group and amounted to 38.14 ± 0.565% (Table 1). Contrary to SG, the percentage of nitrergic neurons in the MG under the impact of higher doses of BPA (group AII) was clearly higher than values noted after administration of lower dosages of BPA (group AI) and amounted to 44.86 ± 0.735% of all cells containing PGP 9.5 (Fig. 1).

Exposure to BPS also caused changes in the percentage of nNOS-positive enteric neuronal cells, but changes were less than those noted under the impact of BPA (Table 1). As in the case of BPA, BPS-induced changes also depended on both the dose of the substance and the type of enteric ganglion studied. The administration of a lower dose of BPS (SI group) led to a slight increase in the population of nNOS-positive neurons in the MG, where such neurons achieved all PGP 9.5—immunoreactive cells 34.44 ± 0.6% (Fig. 1). In turn, in the SG of animals treated with lower doses of BPS, the percentage of nitrergic neurons amounted to 31.36 ± 1092% of all neuronal cells labelled with PGP 9.5, and this value did not differ statistically significantly from that observed in control animals (Table 1). The fluctuations in a population of nNOS-immunoreactive perikaryons were more visible in the group of mice treated with a higher dose of BPS (SII group). In this group, the percentage of nitrergic neurons reached 35.02 ± 0.885% and 34.02 ± 0.946% in the MG and SG, respectively (Table 1).

Discussion

During the present study, a relatively large population of nitrergic neurons in both types of enteric ganglia of the mouse stomach were noted under physiological conditions. These observations are in agreement with previous studies describing the nitrergic innervation in the ENS within the whole GI tract in many species, including humans20,26,28,30,3840. Although the population of nNOS-immunoreactive neurons and nerve fibres in the gastric ENS in mammals has been previously well described30,4042, it should be emphasised that the knowledge concerning the distribution of these nervous structures in the mouse stomach is rather scarce19,42.

The high amount of nitrergic neurons in the gastric ENS found in both the current study and previous studies is justified by the very important role of this neurotransmitter in the functioning of the GI tract. It is well known that NO is one of the most important inhibitory factors occurring in the ENS23,4349. First of all, NO is known for its role in smooth muscle relaxation, local and systemic blood flow regulation and anti-inflammatory processes in the GI tract3235. Moreover, the small size of this gaseous neurotransmitter allows it to pass through the cell membrane and manage the functions of the gastric and intestinal endocrine cells. In this way, NO can regulate the production of gastrin and affect stomach acid release50.

Nitric oxide is basically involved in the regulation of all gastric functions, such as storage, mixing and ingesting of the alimentary content. Moreover, previous studies have reported that NO plays some protective functions in the GI tract32,35,51. The gastroprotective role of this neurotransmitter has been noted in many pathological states, including inflammatory processes, chemically induced mucosal damage or intoxication5257. However, it is known that NO not only can take part in anti-inflammatory processes but can also induce inflammation responses mostly because of its cytotoxic properties55.

Furthermore, in the mammal GI tract, according to the suggestions of previous findings, NO can have some neuroprotective role in the ENS27,28,37,56. Concerning these NO properties, it can be concluded that changes in the population of nNOS-positive neurons observed during the present study were connected with the neuroprotective functions of this neurotransmitter activated under the influence of both bisphenols studied.

Previous studies have relatively well documented the harmful effects of BPA, which causes changes in many systems and organs. Because of its similarities to oestrogen, BPA can combine with this hormone receptors, which are ubiquitous in the organisms of animals and humans3,4. Thus, BPA affects the reproductive, immune, gastrointestinal and nervous systems3,4,28,57 and, as a strong endocrine disruptor, it can lead to obesity, diabetes or hypertension4,58. It can also damage some parenchymatous organs like the liver or kidneys and even lead to their failure4,59. Several studies have also described the impact of BPA on the ENS and have shown many bisphenol-induced changes in the chemical coding of neurons and nerve fibres in the ENS of many parts of the GI tract28,6062, which has also been confirmed in the present study, in which the influence of BPA on the enteric neurons in mouse has been described for the first time. Moreover, the impact of BPA on the enteric nitrergic neurons is generally similar in pigs63 and in mice (this study), which could suggest that BPA may affect the production of NO in the ENS regardless of mammal species, and similar effects may be expected in the case of the human GI tract.

Interestingly, the present research has also confirmed that not only BPA, but also BPS in a dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. may affect the number of nitrergic neurons in the ENS. The BPS-induced changes noted in this study were indeed less pronounced than those observed under the influence of BPA, but they were clearly visible, and their character (an increase in the number of neurons immunoreactive to nNOS) was similar under the impact of both bisphenols. It should be pointed out that, until recently, BPS (unlike bisphenol A) was considered safe for living organisms. For this reason, BPA has often been replaced by BPS in the production of plastics, especially in the case of items that come into contact with food or are intended for children.

Currently, an increasing number of studies have shown that BPS acts on living organisms similar to BPA, and its estrogenic effects may be even higher than the effects shown by BPA64. Moreover, some studies have shown that BPS may also show cytotoxic, genotoxic, neurotoxic, and immunotoxic responses65,66.

Despite these studies, BPS is even today often considered a good substitute for BPA in the production of plastics, and knowledge of the harmful effects of this substance is relatively scarce. One of the completely unknown aspects of the impact of BPS on a living organism is its effect on the ENS. The results obtained in the present study have shown for the first time that BPS may change the number of enteric nitrergic neurons. The present research found some statistically significant changes between groups of animals under the impact of BPS compared to those noted after BPA administration, which definitely shows that BPA has a stronger effect on the ENS in the mouse stomach. That is incompatible with some previous studies reporting that BPS shows a similar, or even stronger, effect than BPA on some parts of the living organism, such as the endocrine system67. However, both substances noticeably influenced the population of nitrergic neurons, and that observation is probably due to the structural similarities of these substances64, which show comparable influence not only in the term of estrogenic effects, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and/or immunotoxicity1214,64,68,69 but also regarding the impact on the ENS.

This may be all the more important as BPS is used instead of BPA, mainly in objects that come into contact with nourishment, and it first affects the digestive tract and ENS after entering the body with food.

It should be pointed out that the mechanisms of toxicity noted in the present study are not obvious. One of the possible reasons for the higher amount of enteric nitrergic neurons under the influence of bisphenols compared to the control animals may be connected with the above-mentioned neuroprotective properties of NO. On the other hand, the observed changes can also be associated with the relaxing effect of bisphenols on the gastrointestinal tissue69 because, as is well known, NO is involved in the relaxation mechanism of smooth muscles in the GI tract, including the stomach34,35. The next reason for the observed changes may be connected with the fact that BPA can modulate the number of calcium ions in neurons57. In turn, changes in calcium ions can lead to an increase in the synthesis of NO, which is connected with the cytotoxic properties of this gaseous factor in the cell as a free radical55. Thus, the observed increase in the number of nitrergic neurons during the present study may be a sign of some subclinical inflammatory changes in the stomach tissue.

The present study has also shown that even doses of BPA and BPS corresponding to the established NOAEL of BPA for mice may influence the number of enteric nitrergic neurons. It has been reported that bisphenols can lead to some long-term dysfunctions or even organ failure and cancer development3,4. Because of these properties during the present investigation, BPA and BPS have been given to the experimental animals for 3 months. Therefore, the intoxication effects observed in the study are probably caused by long-term exposure to these toxins. This particularly concerns small doses of bisphenols, which should not cause any changes in the organism after a short time of exposure.

To sum up, the obtained results have shown for the first time that not only BPA but also BPS may affect the number of nitrergic neurons in the ENS of the mouse stomach. Moreover, these changes have been noted under the impact of 5 mg/kg b.w. of bisphenols studied, which is the established NOAEL dose of BPA for mice. The present study strongly suggests that BPS, although until recently it was considered completely safe, is not really safe for living organisms. In turn, similarities in changes caused by BPS with those noted under the impact of BPA suggest comparable influences of both bisphenols on the enteric neurons. Although changes in the enteric nitrergic neurons noted in the present investigation may be connected with proinflammatory, cytotoxic and/or neurotoxic properties of bisphenols, the exact mechanisms of these changes are not quite clear, and clarification of all aspects connected with BPS-induced changes in the ENS requires further comprehensive research.

Materials and methods

Animals and treatment

This study was performed on 35 adult mice (CD1 strain) of both genders and 30 g body weight. At the age of 3 months, animals were included in the study and, for the next 3 months of the investigation, were kept under standard laboratory conditions, including constant temperature (22 ± 20 °C) and humidity (55 ± 10%), 12:12 h light–dark cycle and access to water and food ad libitum. All procedures associated with the experiment have received the approval of the instructions of the Local Ethical Committee in Olsztyn (Decision No. 46/2019).

The animals were divided into five groups, with seven animals in each. The first group consisted of control mice (C group) without any experimental manipulations, and animals from the other four groups (groups AI, AII, SI and SII) were treated with BPA or BPS, given in the drinking water for 3 months in two doses: 5 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) or 50 mg/kg b.w. as presented in Table 2. The doses were adjusted to the amount of drinking water with the assumption that a mouse drinks about 2 ml/10 g b.w. per day70.

Table 2.

Description of groups (dose and type of administrated substance) of animals used in the study. BPA bisphenol A, BPS bisphenol S, C control, b.w. body weight.

Group C AI AII SI SII
Substance X BPA BPA BPS BPS
Dose X 5 mg/kg b.w. 50 mg/kg b.w. 5 mg/kg b.w. 50 mg/kg b.w.

Based on previous studies, the dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. is a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for BPA in mice, and the dose of 50 mg/kg b.w. is the lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) for BPA in mouse7173. To compare the impact of both bisphenols, BPA and BPS were given in the same doses. The method of bisphenol administration was typical for this kind of experiment and was based on previous studies68,74. In order to give correct doses of bisphenols, according to the body weight, the animals were weighed once a week.

Double-labelling immunofluorescence technique

After a period of 3 months, all animals were sacrificed (by decapitation). Immediately after the decapitation, whole stomachs were collected. The collected tissues were post-fixed by immersion with 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) overnight, rinsed in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4, at 4 °C) for the next 3 days, put into an 18% phosphate-buffered sucrose solution and stored at 4 °C for at least 3 weeks. The tissues were then frozen at − 22 °C, cut into 10-μm-thick sections using a microtome (Microm, HM 525, Walldorf, Germany) and fixed on glass slides.

Afterwards, slides with fragments of the stomachs underwent the standard double labelling immunofluorescence technique as described previously by Gonkowski et al.38. For this purpose, two types of primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal antibody directed towards protein gene-product 9.5 (PGP 9.5, Biogenesis, UK, catalogue no 7863-2004, working dilution 1:1000, used here as a pan-neuronal marker) and rabbit polyclonal antibody towards neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, MercMillipore, DEU, catalogue no AB5380, working dilution 1:600, used here as a marker of nitrergic neurons). For the visualisation of “primary antibody–antigen” complexes, species-specific secondary antibodies were conjugated with appropriate fluorochromes (Alexa fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG and Alexa fluor 546 donkey anti-rabbit IgG, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, working dilution 1:1000) were used. The scheme of labelling used during the present study is presented in Fig. 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The scheme of labelling used during the present study. PBS phosphate buffered saline, nNOS neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase.

During the present investigation, routine specificity tests of antibodies such as pre-absorption, omission and replacement of primary antibodies by non-immune sera were performed, and the results of these tests allowed to completely eliminate the nonspecific stainings.

Labelled fragments of the stomach were analysed with an Olympus BX51 microscope with epifluorescence and appropriate filter sets connected with an Olympus XM10 camera. To determine the percentage of nNOS-positive neurons, at least 500 cells immunoreactive to PGP-9.5 in the particular type of enteric ganglia from each animal were investigated for the occurrence of nNOS. The number of PGP-9.5-positive cells was regarded as 100%. For this purpose, only perikaryons with a clearly visible nucleus were accepted. The obtained results were pooled and presented as mean ± SEM. To avoid double counting the same neuronal cells, the fragments of stomachs included in the investigation were located at least 100 µm apart.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, the Anova test (Statistica 13, StatSoft, Inc., Cracow, Poland) was used, and the differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Guidelines declaration statement

All experimental protocols were approved by the Local Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments in Olsztyn working at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, according to Act for the Protection of Animals for Scientific or Educational Purposes of 15 January 2015 (Official Gazette 2015, No. 266), applicable in the Republic of Poland (based on the consent No. 28/2013/N from May 22nd, 2013). During this experiment, all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and European and Polish regulations. Moreover, the study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Acknowledgements

Project financially supported by the Minister of Education and Science under the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2023, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12.000.000 PLN and by the National Science Centre in Poland (Grant No. 2018/31/N/NZ7/01252).

Author contributions

Conceptualization, K.M. and S.G.; Data curation, K.M. and S.G.; Formal analysis, K.M.; Funding acquisition, K.M.; Investigation, K.M. and S.G.; Methodology, K.M.; Supervision, S.G.; Visualization, K.M.; Writing—original draft, K.M.; Writing—review and editing, J.C. and S.G.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Becerra V, Odermatt J. Detection and quantification of traces of bisphenol A and bisphenol S in paper samples using analytical pyrolysis-GC/MS. Analyst. 2012;137:2250–2259. doi: 10.1039/c2an15961a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liao C, Liu F, Kannan K. Bisphenol s, a new bisphenol analogue, in paper products and currency bills and its association with bisphenol a residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:6515–6522. doi: 10.1021/es300876n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Suzuki K, Ishikawa K, Sugiyama K, Furuta H, Nishimura F. Content and release of bisphenol A from polycarbonate dental products. Dent. Mater. J. 2000;19:389–395. doi: 10.4012/dmj.19.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) Reprod. Toxicol. 2007;24:139–177. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bloom MS, Mok-Lin E, Fujimoto VY. Bisphenol A and ovarian steroidogenesis. Fertil. Steril. 2016;106:857–863. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aloisi AM, Della Seta D, Rendo C, Ceccarelli I, Scaramuzzino A, Farabollini F. Exposure to the estrogenic pollutant bisphenol A affects pain behavior induced by subcutaneous formalin injection in male and female rats. Brain Res. 2002;937:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02446-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Braniste V, Jouault A, Gaultier E, Polizzi A, Buisson-Brenac C, Leveque M, Martin PG, Theodorou V, Fioramonti J, Houdeau E. Impact of oral bisphenol A at reference doses on intestinal barrier function and sex differences after perinatal exposure in rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:448–453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907697107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caporossi L, Papaleo B. Bisphenol A and metabolic diseases: Challenges for occupational medicine. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017;14:E959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.GramecSkledar D, PeterlinMašič L. Bisphenol A and its analogs: Do their metabolites have endocrine activity? Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016;47:182–199. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Usman A, Ahmad M. From BPA to its analogues: Is it a safe journey? Chemosphere. 2016;158:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rosenfeld CS. Neuroendocrine disruption in animal models due to exposure to bisphenol A analogues. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2017;47:123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li J, Wang Y, Li N, He Y, Xiao H, Fang D, Chen C. Toxic effects of bisphenol a and bisphenol S on Chlorella pyrenoidosa under single and combined action. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19(7):4245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu S, He B, Li H. Bisphenol S promotes the progression of prostate cancer by regulating the expression of COL1A1 and COL1A2. Toxicology. 2022;8:153178. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhao C, Yong T, Zhang Y, Xiao Y, Jin Y, Zheng C, Nirasawa T, Cai Z. Breast cancer proliferation and deterioration-associated metabolic heterogeneity changes induced by exposure of bisphenol S, a widespread replacement of bisphenol A. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;414:125391. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu W, Fu D, Zhang X, Chai J, Tian S, Han J. Development and validation of a new artificial gastric digestive system. Food Res. Int. 2019;122:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Makowska K, Gonkowski S. Age and sex-dependent differences in the neurochemical characterization of calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunoreactive (CGRP-LI) nervous structures in the porcine descending colon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(5):1024. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Palus K, Makowska K, Całka J. Alterations in galanin-like immunoreactivity in the enteric nervous system of the porcine stomach following acrylamide supplementation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(13):3345. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wojtkiewicz J, Równiak M, Crayton R, Majewski M, Gonkowski S. Chemical coding of zinc-enriched neurons in the intramural ganglia of the porcine jejunum. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;350:215–223. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1486-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.D'Autréaux F, Margolis KG, Roberts J, Stevanovic K, Mawe G, Li Z, Karamooz N, Ahuja A, Morikawa Y, Cserjesi P, Setlick W, Gershon MD. Expression level of Hand2 affects specification of enteric neurons and gastrointestinal function in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):576–587. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sang Q, Young HM. Chemical coding of neurons in the myenteric plexus and external muscle of the small and large intestine of the mouse. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;284:39–53. doi: 10.1007/s004410050565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Makowska K. Chemically induced inflammation and nerve damage affect the distribution of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-like immunoreactive (VIP-LI) nervous structures in the descending colon of the domestic pig. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2018;30:e13439. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vasina V, Barbara G, Talamonti L, Stanghellini V, Corinaldesi R, Tonini M, de Ponti F, de Giorgio R. Enteric neuroplasticity evoked by inflammation. Auton. Neurosci. 2006;126–127:264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Furness JB. The Enteric Nervous System. Blackwell Publishing; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pidsudko Z, Wasowicz K, Kaleczyc J, Majewski M, Lakomy M. Proliferative enteropathy (PPE)-induced changes in the expression of DBH, VAChT and NOS in the neurons of intramural ganglia of the porcine ileum. Vet. Med. 2008;53:533–542. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shah V, Lyford G, Gores G, Farrugia G. Nitric oxide in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:903–913. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schleiffer R, Raul F. Nitric oxide and the digestive system in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1997;118A:965–974. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9629(97)00026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuwahara A, Kuramoto H, Kadowaki M. 5-HT activates nitric oxide-generating neurons to stimulate chloride secretion in Guinea pig distal colon. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;275:G829–G834. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.275.4.G829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Szymanska K, Calka J, Gonkowski S. Nitric oxide as an active substance in the enteric neurons of the porcine digestive tract in physiological conditions and under intoxication with bisphenol A (BPA) Nitric Oxide. 2018;80:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2018.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rychlik A, Gonkowski S, Nowicki M, Calka J. Inflammatory bowel disease affects density of nitrergic nerve fibers in the mucosal layer of the canine gastrointestinal tract. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2017;81(2):129–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schemann M, Schaaf C, Mäder M. Neurochemical coding of enteric neurons in the guinea pig stomach. J. Comp. Neurol. 1995;353(2):161–178. doi: 10.1002/cne.903530202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baker C, Ahmed M, Cheng K, Arciero E, Bhave S, Ho WLN, Goldstein AM, Hotta R. Hypoganglionosis in the gastric antrum causes delayed gastric emptying. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020;32(5):e13766. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Verbeure W, van Goor H, Mori H, van Beek AP, Tack J, van Dijk PR. The role of gasotransmitters in gut peptide actions. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:720703. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.720703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pique JM, Whittle BJ, Esplugues JV. The vasodilator role of endogenous nitric oxide in the rat gastric microcirculation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1989;174(2–3):293–296. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90324-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tack J, Demedts I, Meulemans A, Schuurkes J, Janssens J. Role of nitric oxide in the gastric accommodation reflex and in meal induced satiety in humans. Gut. 2002;51(2):219–224. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.2.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Berg A, Redeen S, Ericson AC, Sjöstrand SE. Nitric oxide-an endogenous inhibitor of gastric acid secretion in isolated human gastric glands. BMC Gastroenterol. 2004;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-4-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kochar NI, Chandewal AV, Bakal RL, Kochar PN. Nitric oxide and the gastrointestinal tract. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2011;7:31–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lin Z, Sandgren K, Ekblad E. Increased expression of nitric oxide synthase in cultured neurons from adult rat colonic submucous ganglia. Auton. Neurosci. 2004;114(1–2):29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gonkowski S, Kamińska B, Landowski P, Całka J. Immunohistochemical distribution of cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide-like immunoreactive (CART-LI) nerve fibers and various degree of co-localization with other neuronal factors in the circular muscle layer of human descending colon. Histol. Histopathol. 2013;28(7):851–858. doi: 10.14670/HH-28.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.De Fontgalland D, Wattchow DA, Costa M, Brookes SJ. Immunohistochemical characterization of the innervation of human colonic mesenteric and submucosal blood vessels. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2008;20(11):1212–1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li CG, Rand MJ. Nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediate non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic inhibitory transmission to smooth muscle of the rat gastric fundus. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1990;191(3):303–309. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(90)94162-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pimont S, Bruley Des Varannes S, Le Neel JC, Aubert P, Galmiche JP, Neunlist M. Neurochemical coding of myenteric neurones in the human gastric fundus. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2003;15(6):655–662. doi: 10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grozdanovic Z, Baumgarten HG, Brüning G. Histochemistry of NADPH-diaphorase, a marker for neuronal nitric oxide synthase, in the peripheral autonomic nervous system of the mouse. Neuroscience. 1992;48(1):225–235. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90351-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Costa M, Spencer NJ, Brookes SJH. The role of enteric inhibitory neurons in intestinal motility. Auton. Neurosci. 2021;235:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lanas A. Role of nitric oxide in the gastrointestinal tract. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2008;10(Suppl 2):S4. doi: 10.1186/ar2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wallace JL. Nitric oxide in the gastrointestinal tract: Opportunities for drug development. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019;176(2):147–154. doi: 10.1111/bph.14527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhou J, Zhang R, Lv P, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Yang J, Yang B. Acyclic cucurbit[n]urils-based supramolecular encapsulation for enhancing the protective effect of capsaicin on gastric mucosa and reducing irritation. Int. J. Pharm. 2022;626:122190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Timmermans JP, Barbiers M, Scheuermann DW, Stach W, Adriaensen D, Mayer B, De Groodt-Lasseel MH. Distribution pattern, neurochemical features and projections of nitrergic neurons in the pig small intestine. Ann. Anat. 1994;176(6):515–525. doi: 10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80387-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Daniel EE, Haugh C, Woskowska Z, Cipris S, Jury J, Fox-Threlkeld JET. Role of nitric oxide-related inhibition in intestinal function: Relation to vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:31–39. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1994.266.1.G31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schemann M, Neunlist M. The human enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2004;16:55–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-3150.2004.00476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bilski J, Konturek SJ. Role of nitric oxide in gastroduodenal alkaline secretion. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1994;45(4):541–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barrachina D, Calatayud S, Moreno L, Martínez-Cuesta A, Whittle BJ, Esplugues JV. Nitric oxide and sensory afferent neurones modulate the protective effects of low-dose endotoxin on rat gastric mucosal damage. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1995;280(3):339–342. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00286-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stroff T, Lambrecht N, Peskar BM. Nitric oxide as mediator of the gastroprotection by cholecystokinin-8 and pentagastrin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994;260(1):R1–R2. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T, Majka J, Szlachcic A, Nauert C, Slomiany B. Nitric oxide in gastroprotection by aluminium-containing antacids. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1992;229(2–3):155–162. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90550-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lambrecht N, Trautmann M, Korolkiewicz R, Liszkay M, Peskar BM. Role of eicosanoids, nitric oxide, and afferent neurons in antacid induced protection in the rat stomach. Gut. 1993;34(3):329–337. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rivera LR, Poole DP, Thacker M, Furness JB. The involvement of nitric oxide synthase neurons in enteric neuropathies. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2011;23(11):980–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rychlik A, Gonkowski S, Kaczmar E, Obremski K, Calka J, Makowska K. The T2 toxin produced by Fusarium spp. impacts porcine duodenal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)-positive nervous structures—The preliminary study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(14):5118. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang H, Zhao P, Huang Q, Chi Y, Dong S, Fan J. Bisphenol-A induces neurodegeneration through disturbance of intracellular calcium homeostasis in human embryonic stem cells-derived cortical neurons. Chemosphere. 2019;229:618–630. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sheehan DM. Activity of environmentally relevant low doses of endocrine disruptors and the bisphenol A controversy: Initial results confirmed. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 2000;224(2):57–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Konieczna A, Rutkowska A, Rachoń D. Health risk of exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2015;66:5–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Makowska K, Szymańska K, Całka J, Gonkowski S. The influence of bisphenol A (BPA) on the occurrence of selected active substances in neuregulin 1 (NRG1)-positive enteric neurons in the porcine large intestine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(19):10308. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Makowska K, Gonkowski S. Bisphenol A (BPA) affects the enteric nervous system in the porcine stomach. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(12):2445. doi: 10.3390/ani10122445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Szymańska K, Makowska K, Całka J, Gonkowski S. The endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA) affects the enteric neurons immunoreactive to neuregulin 1 (NRG1) in the enteric nervous system of the porcine large intestine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(22):8743. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gonkowski I, Gonkowski S, Dzika E, Wojtkiewicz J. Changes in the population size of calbindin D-28k-immunoreactive enteric neurons in the porcine caecum under the influence of bisphenol A: A preliminary study. Toxics. 2020;9(1):1. doi: 10.3390/toxics9010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Thoene M, Dzika E, Gonkowski S, Wojtkiewicz J. Bisphenol S in food causes hormonal and obesogenic effects comparable to or worse than bisphenol A: A literature review. Nutrients. 2020;12(2):532. doi: 10.3390/nu12020532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Winkler J, Liu P, Phong K, Hinrichs JH, Ataii N, Williams K, Hadler-Olsen E, Samson S, Gartner ZJ, Fisher S, Werb Z. Bisphenol A replacement chemicals, BPF and BPS, induce protumorigenic changes in human mammary gland organoid morphology and proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2022;119(11):e2115308119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115308119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Qiu W, Chen B, Greer JB, Magnuson JT, Xiong Y, Zhong H, Andrzejczyk NE, Zheng C, Schlenk D. Transcriptomic responses of bisphenol S Predict involvement of immune function in the cardiotoxicity of early life-stage zebrafish (Danio rerio) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(5):2869–2877. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jin H, Zhu J, Chen Z, Hong Y, Cai Z. Occurrence and partitioning of bisphenol analogues in adults' blood from China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(2):812–820. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rezg R, Abot A, Mornagui B, Aydi S, Knauf C. Effects of bisphenol S on hypothalamic neuropeptides regulating feeding behavior and apelin/APJ system in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;161:459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sarkar K, Tarafder P, Paul G. Bisphenol A inhibits duodenal movement ex vivo of rat through nitric oxide-mediated soluble guanylyl cyclase and α-adrenergic signaling pathways. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2016;36(1):131–139. doi: 10.1002/jat.3154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Beauchamp GK, Tordoff MG. Food intake, water intake, and drinking spout side preference of 28 mouse strains. Behav. Genet. 2002;32(6):435–443. doi: 10.1023/a:1020884312053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tyl RW, Myers CB, Marr MC, Thomas BF, Keimowitz AR, Brine DR, Veselica MM, Fail PA, Chang TY, Seely JC, Joiner RL, Butala JH, Dimond SS, Cagen SZ, Shiotsuka RN, Stropp GD, Waechter JM. Three generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD Sprague–Dawley rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2002;68:121–146. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/68.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Choi CW, Jeong JY, Hwang MS, Jung KK, Lee KH, Lee HM. Establishment of the Korean tolerable daily intake of bisphenol a based on risk assessments by an expert committee. Toxicol. Res. 2010;26:285–291. doi: 10.5487/TR.2010.26.4.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zielinska, M., Wojnowska-Baryla, I. & Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Bisphenol A Removal from Water and Wastewater (Springer International Publishing, ISBN: 978-3-319-92361-1, 2018).
  • 74.Dobrzynska MM, Gajowik A, Jankowska-Steifer EA, Radzikowska J, Tyrkiel EJ. Reproductive and developmental F1 toxicity following exposure of pubescent F0 male mice to bisphenol A alone and in a combination with X-rays irradiation. Toxicology. 2018;410:142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES