Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Jan 6;13:285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27351-z

Antiplasmodial activity, structure–activity relationship and studies on the action of novel benzimidazole derivatives

Nerea Escala 1, Laura M Pineda 2, Michelle G Ng 2, Lorena M Coronado 2, Carmenza Spadafora 2,, Esther del Olmo 1,
PMCID: PMC9822940  PMID: 36609676

Abstract

Malaria cases and deaths keep being excessively high every year. Some inroads gained in the last two decades have been eroded especially due to the surge of resistance to most antimalarials. The search for new molecules that can replace the ones currently in use cannot stop. In this report, the synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives guided by structure–activity parameters is presented. Thirty-six molecules obtained are analyzed according to their activity against P. falciparum HB3 strain based on the type of substituent on rings A and B, their electron donor/withdrawing, as well as their dimension/spatial properties. There is a preference for electron donating groups on ring A, such as Me in position 5, or better, 5, 6-diMe. Ring B must be of the pyridine type such as picolinamide, other modifications are generally not favorable. Two molecules, 1 and 33 displayed antiplasmodial activity in the high nanomolar range against the chloroquine sensitive strain, with selectivity indexes above 10. Activity results of 1, 12 and 16 on a chloroquine resistance strain indicated an activity close to chloroquine for compound 1. Analysis of some of their effect on the parasites seem to suggest that 1 and 33 affect only the parasite and use a route other than interference with hemozoin biocrystallization, the route used by chloroquine and most antimalarials.

Subject terms: Chemical biology, Drug discovery

Introduction

Malaria is a potentially mortal febrile disease that is caused by protozoa of the genus Plasmodium. The parasite is transmitted by the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito1. Malaria is a preventable and treatable disease; however, it continues to be a global health problem, and according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 report2, 241 million cases were reported in 2020, being the African continent the region with the highest global malaria burden2. Since 2021, the WHO recommends the use of the RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (Mosquirix™) among children living in regions with moderate to high Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) transmission3, although the efficacy of this vaccine is of only 28.3% in approximately 4 years4. The best existing treatment is the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), artemether–lumefantrine, artesunate–amodiaquine, artesunate–mefloquine, artesunate–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. A sixth ACT (artesunate–pyronaridine) has recently been included5. However, in the last year’s antimalarial drug resistances to ACT have appeared, with a mutation in the Kelch13 gene strongly related to artemisinin resistances, and the Greater Mekong subregion is the most affected, presenting a new threat for the management of malaria6. Recently, the same resistance has also been identified in Rwanda, which to date had not been reported in the African continent7. The need for new antimalarials is a pressing task.

The benzimidazole skeleton (BZ) plays an important role in the medicinal chemistry field. Substitutions in different positions of the molecule provide compounds with a wide variety of applications such as antihypertensive8, antidiabetic9, antitumoral10, antimicrobial11 or anti-inflammatory12, among others.

In the last 5 years several research groups have worked on the synthesis of BZ derivatives with potential antimalarial activity. On the one hand, 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole derivatives exhibited a good activity in vitro against P. falciparum with IC50 values of the most potent compounds ranging from 18 nM to 1.30 µM1316. The inclusion of a spacer between the BZ nucleus and the aromatic fragment in C-2 give the molecules the possibility to adopt different conformations. In this way, Attram et al. included an amino group in C-2, obtaining in vitro fast-acting anti-Plasmodium compounds with a hit compound which showed an IC50 of 79 nM against the chloroquine-sensitive strain NF54 and 335 nM against the multi-resistant strain K117. The introduction of an acrylonitrile group as a linker also showed good Pf inhibitory activity of BZ derivatives, with an IC50 value for the best compound of 0.69 and 3.41 μM in 3D7 and RKL9 strains, respectively18.

Substitutions in the N-1 position of BZ provides good antiplasmodial derivatives. Thus, some research groups have synthetized N-1 aryl, hetaryl or alkyl derivatives obtaining interesting results, with activities ranging from 6.4 nM to 1.5 μM for most active compounds1923.

Tricyclic derivatives such as pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole seem to be a good alternative for malaria treatment, providing compounds with submicromolar IC50 values, and reductions of parasitemia above 95%2428. The bioactivity of Schiff bases attached to BZ nucleus is described in previous literature; based on it, the antimalarial activity of some novel derivatives has been evaluated recently, exhibiting favorable results in vitro29 and with some derivatives displaying IC50 values ranging from 26.9 to 28.3 µg/mL. More recently, Aragon et al.30 described the antiplasmodial activity of some metal-based Schiff bases-BZ with EC50 values ranging from 12.8 to 18.3 µg/mL.

Furthermore, the obtaining of derivatives related to the antiallergic drug astemizole3133 or lerisetron34, showed congeners with good IC50 values, from 47 nM to 1.7 μM against NF54 and K1 strains; moreover, derivatives related to some natural products, as carvacrol, showed activity values of 0.48 – 1.76 μg/mL35. Ferroquine, a ferrocenyl-chloroquine in phase 2b studies, led to Baartzes et al. to the obtaining and evaluation of ferrocenyl and neutral and cationic iridium (III) and rhodium (III) aminoquinoline-benzimidazole hybrids36,37 and 2(2-pyridyl)benzimidazole38. In the same sense, iridium(III), rhodium(III) and ruthenium (II) BZ-complexes were also tested against Pf39. Organometallic-BZ complexes exhibited IC50 values in the low submicromolar range (0.12–5.17 μM).

Bearing these facts in mind, in the present study we explore the in vitro activity of some BZ derivatives against Pf. These compounds bear an amide spacer between the BZ nucleus and the heterocyclic fragment (ring B). The amide fragment allows the molecules the possibility of adopting an exocyclic tautomerization, which could contribute to establish an additional interaction with its target and perhaps increase the activity of the compounds. The introduction of electron donor or acceptor groups on ring A would allow, on the one hand, to enhance (or not) the formation of the exocyclic tautomer and, on the other hand, to increase the BZ size to fit better with the target, or establish an additional bond as could happen with the methoxy group (an additional hydrogen bond could be established) thus increasing the activity. Regarding ring B, the convenience of medium-sized (pyridine) or larger (quinoline, isoquinoline) heterocycles has been explored. Even the presence of certain substituents (type and position) on the pyridine ring. Additionally, the cytotoxicity against the Vero cell line for most active compounds is described, and the corresponding selectivity index (SI) calculated. A set of mechanistic studies were included for some compounds with good activities but inadequate selectivity and they were compared in head-to-head experiments with the lead compounds BZ 1 and 33 to obtain clues on the possible differentiation between them in terms of their action on the parasites.

Results and discussion

Chemical synthesis

To obtain the 2-arylcarbamidoBZ derivatives, the corresponding 2-amino-1H-benzimidazole intermediate (AI) should be previously synthesized. The procedure to obtain AI 1–5 is indicated in a Escala et al. previous work40. Here we indicate as an example compound AI-6 obtaining, solutions of the 4-nitro-1,2-phenylendiamine and cyanogen bromide in aqueous methanol (50% v/v) were prepared separately. Then, the solutions were mixed and maintained with continuous magnetic stirring at room temperature for 48 h41, to provide AI-6 in 95% yield. The coupling of intermediates AI-1/AI-6 with different acids in the presence of 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (DCI) as catalyst at room temperature for 16 h, allowed us to obtain BZ 1 to 29 and BZ 33 to 36 with yields ranging from 27 to 69%, (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Procedure for the synthesis of 2-amidobenzimidazole derivatives.

BZ 30 was obtained by the reduction of 29 under H2 atmosphere with a yield of 85%. BZ 31 was synthetized by coupling 30 with 2-(Boc-amino)decanoic acid and DCI in 32% yield. The procedure for obtaining 2-(Boc-amino)decanoic acid is indicated in Valderas et al42. Boc deprotection of 31 with trifluoroacetic acid provided the corresponding free amino derivative 32 in 76%.

All the compounds obtained (intermediate and final) were properly characterized according to their physicochemical properties. For experimental details, description of synthesized intermediates and characterization of the most active final compounds see the Experimental: Chemistry section; for the rest of the compounds see Supplementary Information.

Antiplasmodial activity

In vitro activity of BZ. All BZ derivatives were tested at 10 μM against the HB3 strain of Pf, and for those compounds with a percentage of growth inhibition (% GI) higher than 50%, the IC50 values were determined. In addition, their cytotoxicity on epithelial Vero cell cultures was evaluated to calculate their selectivity indexes (SI), Table 1. An index of 10 or above is expected for a lead compound.

Table 1.

Growth inhibition, IC50 cytotoxicity and selectivity index of 2-amidobenzimidazole derivatives in HB3 P. falciparum parasites.

R1 R2 GIa (%) IC50 (μM) Cytotoxicityb CC50 (μM) SI
1 5-CH3 pyridin-2-yl 93.5 0.98 14.8 14.5
2 5-CH3 pyridin-3-yl 0.0 nc nc nc
3 5-CH3 pyridin-4-yl 0.0 nc nc nc
4 5-CH3 3-methylpyridin-2-yl 92.4 2.5 6.8 2.8
5 5-CH3 5-methylpyridin-2-yl 100.0 1.5 4.5 1.6
6 5-CH3 5-butylpyridin-2-yl 90.9 2.4 6.6 2.7
7 5-CH3 5-phenylpyridin-2-yl 57.5 7.8 19.5 2.5
8 5-CH3 5-cyanopyridin-2-yl 37.4 nc nc nc
9 5-CH3 quinolin-2-yl 73.1 14.1 63.0 4.5
10 5-CH3 quinolin-4-yl 60.5 nc nc nc
11 5-CH3 isoquinolin-1-yl 0.0 nc nc nc
12 5-Cl pyridin-2-yl 91.4 1.8 15.4 8.7
13 5-Cl 3-methylpyridin-2-yl 87.3 2.8 8.6 3.0
14 5-Cl 3-chloropyridin-2-yl 11.9 nc nc nc
15 5-Cl 4-methoxypyridin-2-yl 89.8 1.5 2.0 1.4
16 5-Cl 5-methylpyridin-2-yl 85.6 2.4 7.2 3.0
17 5-Cl 5-butylpyridin-2-yl 89.7 3.5 3.4 1.0
18 5-Cl 5-phenylpyridin-2-yl 99.2 2.3 0.6 0.3
19 5-Cl 6-methylpyridin-2-yl 28.0 nc nc nc
20 5-Cl quinoline-2-yl 25.9 nc nc nc
21 5-Cl quinolin -3-yl 0.0 nc nc nc
22 5-Cl quinolin -4-yl 88.9 2.3 16.1 6.9
23 5-Cl isoquinolin-1-yl 53.7 nc nc nc
24 5-Cl 6-methoxy-quinolin-2-yl 22.3 nc nc nc
25 5-OCH3 pyridin-2-yl 50.9 nc nc nc
26 5-OCH3 5-methylpyridin-2-yl 93.5 3.3 11.1 3.4
27 5-OCH3 5-butylpyridin-2-yl 100.0 1.2 8.5 7.4
28 5-OCH3 5-phenylpyridin-2-yl 72.7 4.4 14.6 3.3
29 5-NO2 pyridin-2-yl 96.0 5.1 13.9 2.7
30 5-NH2 pyridin-2-yl 0.0 nc nc nc
31 5-NHCOC9H18(NHBoc)c pyridin-2-yl 71.8 8.5 26.8 3.16
32 5-NHCOC9H18(NH2)d pyridin-2-yl 72.3 6.8 16.41 2.43
33 5,6-diCH3 pyridin-2-yl 100.0 0.85 13.2 15.4
34 5,6-diCH3 5-butylpyridin-2-yl 74.2 3.4 3.2 1.0
35 5,6-diCH3 5-phenylpyridin-2-yl 64.7 7.3 9.7 1.3
36 5,6-diCl pyridin-2-yl 81.9 2.4 11.8 5.0
Chloroquine 100.0 0.028 nc nc

nc not calculated.

aGrowth inhibition percentage (%) at 10 μM, bcytotoxicity tested in Vero cells, c2-(Boc-amino)decanamido, d2-amino-decanamido.

Significant values are in bold.

In Table 1 compounds are organized first according to the substituent on ring A, and then by ring B complexity (general structure: Fig. 2). Ring A displays electron donating groups, EDG, (5-CH3, 5-OCH3, 5-NH2, 5-NHCOR, or 5,6-diCH3) or electron withdrawing, EWG, (5-Cl, 5-NO2 or 5,6-diCl) in the BZ system, while ring B heterocycle can be a pyridine with the nitrogen in ortho, meta or para position, a quinoline or an isoquinoline. In addition, the presence of certain substituents (methyl, butyl, chloro, cyano, phenyl) on the pyridine ring has been explored, as well as its position.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

General structure of 2-amidobenzimidazole derivatives.

Eleven derivatives (BZ 1 to 11) displaying a methyl group on C-5 BZ were obtained. Compounds 1, 2, 3 showed in ring B a pyridine fragment with the nitrogen in 2′ (ortho), 3′(meta) or 4′(para) position. As observed in the results for antiplasmodial activity (Table 1) there is a clear preference for the ortho position since the picolinamide 1 reduced by 93.5% the growth of Pf, while the nicotinamide 2, or the isonicotinamide 3 were inactive. BZ 1 showed an IC50 equal to 0.98 µM and an SI of 14.5. Then, the presence of certain substituents on the picolinamide fragment, their position (C-3′ or 5′) and electronical character (EWD, EDG) were explored, as well as the convenience of bulky fragments (quinoline, isoquinoline). EDG as methyl in C-3′ (IC50 = 2.5 µM for 4) and specially in C-5´ (IC50 = 1.5 µM for 5) are favorable, therefore new fragments in position C-5′ (Bu, Phe, CN) were introduced. The butyl derivative 6 with IC50 equal to 2.4 µM was slightly less potent than 5, and the EWG 5-cyano 8 was inactive, electron rich fragments as the phenyl 7 were less potent than 5 (IC50 = 7.8 µµM). Of the bulkier groups (9, 10 and 11) only the quinolin-2-yl 9 showed IC50 = 14.1 µM. These modifications, along with new others were introduced in combination with 5-Cl in ring A (BZ 12 to 24). The effect of a methyl group in C-3´ (compound 13) was similar to that of BZ 4 with IC50 = 2.8 µM and SI = 3.0, and an EWG as chloro (14) in that position was not suitable for the activity with only 11.9% GI of Pf. The combination 5-Cl/5′-Me (BZ 16) was less efficient than the 5-Me/5′-Me (5), and the 5-Cl/6′-Me (19) was inactive. A methoxy group in position 4′ (BZ 15) was introduced as EDG, which turned out to be the most potent compound of this group with IC50 = 1.5 µM, however, the picolinamide 12, with a slightly lower activity, showed a higher SI of 8.7. In this case, of the bulkier fragments 20 to 24, the quinolin-4-yl 22 showed good growth inhibitory effect with IC50 = 2.3 µM and SI = 6.9. Four derivatives with 5-OMe were synthesized (25 to 28); here the 5′-butylpyridin-2-yl 27 was the most potent with IC50 = 1.2 µM and SI = 7.4.

The 5-NO2/pyridin-2-yl 29 displayed moderate Pf inhibitory effect with IC50 = 5.1 µM. The activity was lost by reduction of the nitro group to an amino (BZ 30), and recovered by modification to a long chain amide derivative, compounds 31 and 32.

Disubstitution on ring A (5,6-diMe or (5,6-diCl) combined with pyridin-2-yl, 5-butylpyridin-2-yl, or 5-phenylpyridin-2-yl (BZ 33 to 36) indicated that EDG associated with pyridin-2-yl (33) was an excellent combination, with IC50 = 0.85 µM and SI = 15.4, which is thirty times less active than the reference compound, chloroquine.

In general, and after the results showed in Table 1 we can state that the best association are EDG´s (one or two) in ring A combined with pyridine-2-yl in ring B.

Cellular effect studies

The integrity of the plasma membrane under the action of certain antiplasmodial compounds was assessed through the use of two methodologies. First, the absorption of propidium iodide, to which intact membranes are impermeable, was measured. Second, the presence of heme in the culture media, which indicates a leakage of the contents of the erythrocyte or its complete lysis (hemolysis), was analyzed. None of them showed any significant hemolysis action, however, some permeation in the membrane, although not significant, is caused by BZ 5, 16 and 26, while BZ 1 and 33 are the best in keeping the membrane well preserved (Fig. 3). This result is in agreement with the lower toxicity exhibited by the two latter with respect to the other three compounds.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Membrane integrity tests. BZ 1, 5, 16, 26 and 33 were tested in triplicates in two independent experiments. (a) Incorporation of propidium iodide (PI) was analyzed through fluorometry after 3 h incubation with the compounds. (b) Hemolysis was measured by light absorbance 24 h after exposure to the compounds. One-way ANOVA with Turkey´s comparison was used for analysis of significance. ****p < 0.001.

Also, the intracellular production of oxygen reactive species (ROS) was monitored for the same antiplasmodial compounds. The level of ROS production was compared between the samples and that of the untreated parasites. Three compounds, BZ 5, 16 and 26, showed no significant difference at any point. However, samples BZ 1 and 33 caused an early significant decrease in the natural level of ROS produced by Pf infection, which tapers off by t = 9 h (Fig. 4). This could explain why the latter, again, are the ones that are more effective in generating harm with the least toxicity given that they cause a transient shortage of oxidative reactions, which seem to last only enough to affect the parasite but not the epithelial Vero cells tested for cytotoxicity. This would point to the conformation of such molecules targeting a specific molecule or process of the parasite.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of selected benzimidazole derivatives on ROS production. Five potent compounds were incubated with P. falciparum-infected cultures and the production of reactive oxygen species was measured through fluorometry at 0.5, 6 and 9 h after their addition at 1 µM. As positive control, a sample containing hydrogen peroxide at 200 μM was added. Samples were measured in triplicates. One-way ANOVA with Turkey´s comparison was used to measure significance with respect to the untreated control at each different time point. n = 2. (a) BZ 1, (b) BZ 5, (c) BZ 16, (d) BZ 26 and (e) BZ 33. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, another common hallmark of programed cell death, were analyzed in the samples that had promising activities toward P. falciparum cultures. The results of adding 1 µM of each compound can be seen in Fig. 5. While four of the compounds tested do not show a significant departure from what happens to the mitochondrial membrane in the untreated controls, BZ 26 shows an effect from t = 6 h onward (Fig. 5), shifting toward the damaging effect of the positive control, which could perhaps be due to an additional interaction between the oxygen of the methoxy group attached to ring A with its specific target. Noteworthy, the two best antiplasmodial compounds, BZ 1 and BZ 33 do not show a difference with the untreated control up to t = 6 h, but there is a changing tendency at t = 9 h, that could suggest that only at that time those two compounds could start reaching the mitochondria. This could probably be explained by the presence of the unsubstituted picolinamide fragment, therefore more polar and less soluble in the membrane, making it harder or slower to permeate into the erythrocyte and then into the parasite, with respect to the other three.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Changes to mitochondrial membrane potential caused by antiplasmodial compounds. Fluorometry was used to measure the effects on the mitochondria of P. falciparum parasites caused by treatment with compounds that show activity against their growth in culture. A membrane disruptor (CCCP) was added as a positive control and untreated cultures were used as the negative one. All compounds were tested at 1 µM in triplicates, n = 3. (a) BZ 1, (b) BZ 5, (c) BZ 16, (d) BZ 26 and (e) BZ 33. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Finally, the interference of the BZ derivatives with hemozoin biocrystallization was measured in the two most promising samples (BZ 1 and 33) together with one sample that was not selective towards Pf (BZ 16) Fig. 6. The mechanism used by Pf to prevent intoxication with free heme once hemoglobin is degraded is to form hemozoin crystals that capture heme. Mefloquine and other common antimalarials interfere with this pathway, resulting in the death of the parasite. All the compounds tested here seem to interfere, but at a low level, with this process, but it clearly is not the main target of BZ 1 and BZ 33 against the parasite, given that a non-selective compound as BZ 16 gives the same, small level of disruption of the process as the other two. To explore a possible mechanism of action, three derivatives with different level of activities against Pf HB33 (BZ 1, 12 and 16) were also tested against Pf HB7G8, a strain that has developed chloroquine resistance (Table 2).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Influence in the biocrystallization of hemozoin in P. falciparum. Compounds 1, 16 and 33 were added to Pf cultures and the amount of hemozoin produced was analyzed after 36 h. Mefloquine (MQ) was used as a positive control. The experiment was performed in triplicates and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05.

Table 2.

Growth inhibition, IC50, cytotoxicity and selectivity index of 2-amidobenzimidazole derivatives in 7G8 P. falciparum parasites.

R1 R2 7G8 Pf IC50 (µM) Cytotoxicitya CC50 (μM) SI
1 5-CH3 pyridin-2-yl 0.95 14.8 15.6
12 5-Cl pyridin-2-yl 3.60 15.4 4.2
16 5-Cl 5-methylpyridin-2-yl 2.60 7.2 2.7
CQ* 0.23 nc nc

acytotoxicity tested in Vero cells.

Table 2 shows that two of the compounds tested (1 and 16), unlike CQ, did not show an increase in their IC50 when confronted with a strain that has developed ways to detoxify from CQ, suggesting that some derivatives, as these two, might be targeting another pathway than CQ. On the other hand, the concentration of BZ 12 has to be doubled, with respect to Pf HB3, to achieve 50% killing in Pf 7G8, aligning with the notion that other BZ derivatives share a mechanism of action that participates at some point in the one used by chloroquine, possibly related with disturbing the ability of the parasite to synthetize hemozoin.

Significant values are in bold.

ADME-toxicity profiles and physicochemical properties

In silico studies were performed through SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/) and admetSAR (http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn/admetsar2) online free servers to analyze the druggability and toxicity risks of most active compounds (Table 3). The most active BZs fulfill Lipinski’s Rule of Five and the Rule of Three of lead-likeness with MW values in the range of 252.27 and 286.72 g/mol, clogP values between 2.52 and 3.17, three H-bond acceptors for BZ 1, 5, 16 and 33 and four for BZ 26, and H-donors in all of them equal to 2.

Table 3.

ADMET properties of most active compounds against Pf.

Properties BZ
1 5 16 26 33
MW 252.27 266.30 286.72 282.30 266.30
H-Aa 3 3 3 4 3
H-Da 2 2 2 2 2
Log P 2.52 2.83 3.17 2.53 2.83
Rotatable bonds 2 2 2 3 2
TPSA 70.67 70.67 70.67 79.90 70.67
Drug-likeness Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lead-likeness Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Log S  − 4.23  − 4.24  − 4.81  − 4.00  − 4.13
HIA High High High High High
BBB Yes Yes Yes No Yes
PPB 76.4 100.0 100 100 73.3
P-g substrate Yes No No Yes Yes
Mutagenic Yes No No No No
Tumorigenic No No No No No

MW molecular weight, Log P lipophilicity, PSA topological polar surface area Å2, Log S aqueous solubility, HIA human intestinal absorption %, BBB blood–brain barrier, PPB plasma protein binding %.

aH-A Acceptor, H–D Donor.

Other properties as solubility, with values from − 4.81 to − 4.00 and topological polar surface area with 70.67 values for 1, 5, 16 and 33 and 79.90 for BZ 26 are favorable. Very good intestinal absorption, and blood brain barrier penetration with potential access to the central nervous system are shown in compounds 1, 5, 16 and 33. This trait is especially necessary in their potential use to treat cerebral malaria, and is not predicted for BZ 26, suggesting that the latter compound would work better in other manifestations of the infection. Plasma protein binding levels from 73.3 to 100% were predicted, which ensures a good distribution of the drug. None of the compounds showed mutagenic values except 1, oddly enough given that compound 5, which is structurally very similar, is not mutagenic. None of the compounds seem to be tumorigenic.

Conclusions

A series of benzimidazole derivatives were synthetized and a structure–activity analysis performed, with the aim of improving their antiplasmodial activity. Some of the derivatives displayed IC50s in the mid nanomolar range but were highly toxic. A number of mechanistic studies were conducted with a number of derivatives that had shown activity against the parasites, to try to understand the different response of the two best compound, BZ 1 and 33, which showed high nanomolar activity with a good SI against P. falciparum parasites. Thus, for comparison reasons, these two lead compounds with nanomolar activity and selectivity index > 10 were analyzed together with other few molecules that were very active but, at the same time, toxic. None of the molecules showed a potent hemolytic activity; however, some of them caused harm to the membrane, which is an undesirable effect, that was diminished for BZ 1 and BZ 33. In the production of reactive oxygen species and their effects on the potential of the mitochondrial membrane, BZ 1 and BZ 33 seem to differ from the other compounds tested, although in the interference with hemozoin crystallization they do not. These results, together, hint at a mechanism of action used by BZ 1 and BZ 33 that differ from the other compounds tested. This seems to be confirmed for 1, when it made no difference to its IC50 to have it tested against a CQ-resistant strain. Compounds 1 and 33 displayed a methyl as electron donor group in ring A (one for 1 and two for 33) and a non-substituted picolinamide fragment in ring B. These are characteristics that should be considered when trying to optimize their activity, which can be considered very good, given that the chloroquine activity differs from 1 and 33 only by some tenths of nano molarity and they seem to act through a different route than the signature antimalarial.

Experimental

Chemistry

General experimental procedures

All commercial chemicals (Aldrich, Alpha, Fischer, SDS) were used as purchased and solvents (Fischer, SDS, Scharlau) purified by the standard procedures prior to use43. Reactions were monitored by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) (Kieselgel 60 F254 precoated plates, E. Merck, Germany), the spots were detected by exposure to UV light at λ 254 nm, and colorization with 10% ninhydrin spray, and further heating of the plate. Melting points (mp) were determined with Mel-Temp apparatus in open capillaries and were uncorrected. Separations by flash column chromatography were performed on Merck 60 silica gel (0.063–0.2 mesh). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz, Varian Mercury 400 MHz (400 MHz for 1H, 100 MHz for 13C) or Varian Mercury 200 MHz (200 MHz for 1H, 500 MHz for 13C). The spectra were measured either in CDCl3, methanol-d6 or DMSO-d6, using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard, chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm and coupling constants (J) in Hertz. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained by electron spray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) technique (5 kV) on a QSTAR XL mass spectrometer.

General procedures for the preparation of active compounds

Procedure for obtaining intermediate amino compounds, AIs 1–6

The obtaining process was the same as that described in Escala40; solutions of 1.00 g (6.53 mmol) 4-nitro-1,2-phenylendiamine and cyanogen bromide 1.04 g (9.80 mmol) in aqueous methanol (50% v/v) were prepared separately. The solutions were then mixed in an Erlenmeyer flask and maintained with continuous magnetic stirring at room temperature for 48 h, obtaining 1.10 g (6.20 mmol) 95%41.

5-Nitro-1H-benzimidazol-2-amine AI 6, orange solid; mp: 231 ºC; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ 8.10 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (dd, J = 8.4 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 153.90, 143.45, 136.39, 131.10, 118.91, 111.06, 106.89; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C7H7N4O2 [MS + H]+, 179.0491; found, 179.0410.

AIs 15 were described in Escala40.

Coupling of intermediate amines with the corresponding acids. BZ 4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16, 18, 22, 26, 27, 33 and 36

The protocol described in Escala et al.40 was applied. To a solution of the corresponding acid (1.3 mmol) in dry DMF (1 mL), DCI (1.3 mmol) was added, and the mixture maintained at room temperature for 1 h. Then, the corresponding 2-aminobenzimidazole intermediate (1.0 mmol) was added and the mixture maintained at room temperature with magnetic stirring for 16 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using ethyl acetate as eluent. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed in vacuo in a rotary evaporator and the obtained solid was purified by silica gel chromatography using ethyl acetate as eluent. Reaction yields ranged between 30–69%.

3-Methyl-N-(5-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 4, a dark pink solid; mp: 173 °C; yield: 63%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.00 (brs, 2H), 8.40 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J = 7.6 and 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (brs, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 8.0 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.77 (s, 3H), 2.45 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.0, 146.3, 146.0, 144.8, 141.2, 137.8, 136.7, 132.7, 131.8, 126.9, 123.4, 117.1, 110.8, 21.6, 20.5; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C15H15N4O [MS + H]+, 267.1240; found, 267.1236.

5-Methyl-N-(5-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 5, a white solid; mp: 256 °C; yield: 55%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 8.60 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (dd, J = 7.6 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (dd, J = 8.4 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 163.6, 149.6, 146.3, 145.9, 138.8, 138.3, 137.3, 132.9, 130.8, 123.1, 122.7, 114.3, 114.1, 21.7, 18.5; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C15H15N4O [MS + H]+, 267.1240; found, 267.1236.

5-Butyl-N-(5-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 6, a dark yellow solid, mp: 245 °C; yield: 52%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.43 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.0 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (brs, 1H), 7.04 (brd, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 1.63 (m, 2Η), 1.37 (m, 2H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.9, 148.9, 146.1, 145.7, 142.7, 137.1 (2C), 132.8, 131.9, 123.6, 122.5, 117.2, 116.8, 32.9, 32.7, 22.2, 21.6, 13.8; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C18H21N4O [MS + H]+, 309.1710; found, 309.1700.

N-(5-Chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-3-methylpicolinamide 13, an orange solid; mp: 180 °C; yield: 47%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 11.52 (brs, 2H), 8.38 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 7.2 and 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J = 8.4 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 165.0, 146.9, 146.9, 146.2, 140.7, 138.5, 134.6, 133.8, 126.7, 125.5, 121.3, 115.4, 114.2, 19.2; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C14H12N4OCl [MS + H]+, 287.0694; found, 287.0688.

N-(5-Chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-4-methoxypicolinamide 15, a light pink; mp: 245 °C; yield: 53%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 8.54 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (dd, J = 5.6 and 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dd, J = 8.4 and 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 166.9, 163.1, 150.6, 150.0, 146.7, 139.5, 135.5, 125.8, 121.7, 114.0 (2C), 113.5, 109.0, 56.0; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C14H12N4O2Cl [MS + H]+, 303.0643; found, 303.0638.

N-(5-Chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-5-methylpicolinamide 16, an orange solid; mp: 201 °C; yield: 69%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.46 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (dd, J = 8.0 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.4 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.0, 149.3, 147.0, 145.0, 138.4, 138.0, 137.2, 134.8, 125.8, 122.8, 122.5, 114.8 (2C), 18.7; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C14H12N4OCl [MS + H]+, 287.0694; found, 287.0688.

N-(5-Chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-5-phenylpicolinamide 18, a white solid; mp: 214 °C; yield: 39%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 9.05 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (dd, J = 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (dd, J = 8.6 and 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (m, 3H), 7.50 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (dd, J = 8.4 and 2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 163.2, 148.6, 147.0, 146.8, 140.1, 139.9, 139.1, 135.9, 135.9, 129.3 (2C), 129.1, 127.3 (2C), 125.6, 123.0, 121.5, 116.2, 114.8; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C19H14N4OCl [MS + H]+, 349.0851; found, 349.0845.

N-(5-Chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)quinoline-4-carboxamide 22, a yellow solid; mp: 262 °C; yield: 50%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 9.04 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (dd, J = 8.8 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (dd, J = 8.8 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (ddd, J = 8.8; 8.4 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (ddd, J = 8.8; 8.4 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dd, J = 8.4 and 2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 168.1, 150.6, 148.6, 148.3, 141.0, 137.3, 134.3, 130.5, 129.9, 128.2, 125.8 (2C), 124.4, 122.2, 120.5, 115.5, 114.2; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C17H12N4OCl [MS + H]+, 323.0694; found, 323.0888.

N-(5-Methoxy-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-5-methylpicolinamide 26, a light yellow solid; mp: 213 °C; yield: 30%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.47 (s, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (brs, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.44 (3H, s); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.0, 155.7, 149.5, 145.7, 145.1, 138.3, 137.9, 136.5, 128.3, 122.5, 112.5, 111.9, 98.0, 55.9, 18.7; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C15H15N4O2 [MS + H]+, 283.1190; found, 283.1141.

5-Butyl-N-(5-methoxy-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 27, a dark yellow solid; mp: 129 °C; yield: 49%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.84 (brs, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.0 and 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (brs, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.8 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 2.64 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.31 (m, 2H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.8, 156.2, 148.7, 146.1, 145.6, 142.7, 137.2 (2C), 129.5, 122.6, 116.5, 111.2, 99.2, 55.8, 32.9, 32.8, 22.2, 13.8; HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C18H21N4O2 [MS + H]+, 325.1659; found, 325.1652.

N-(5,6-Dimethyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 33, a yellow solid; mp: 221 °C; yield: 49%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.0 (brs, 2H, D2O), 8.59 (dd, J = 4.8 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (ddd, J = 8.0; 7.2 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (dd, J = 7.2 and 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (brs, 2H), 2.35 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.5, 148.7, 148.0, 145.5, 137.7, 137.1 (2C), 131.0 (2C), 127.3, 122.7, 115.2 (2C), 20.3 (2C); HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C15H15N4O [MS + H]+, 267.1240; found, 267.1235.

N-(5,6-Dichloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 36, a yellow solid; mp: 281 °C; yield: 46%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 12.60 (brs, 1H), 11.52 (brs, 1H), 8.77 (dd, J = 4.8 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (dd, J = 8.0 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (ddd, J = 8.0; 7.2 and 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (ddd, J = 7.2; 4.8 and 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ 163.5, 149.1, 148.1, 147.8, 138.5, 132.4 (2C), 128.0, 123.9 (2C), 123.0, 118.4 (2C); HRMS (m/z): [M]+ calcd. for C13H9N4OCl2 [MS + H]+, 307.0148; found, 307.0145.

BZs N-(5-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 1, N-(5-chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)picolinamide 12 were described in Escala40.

Biology

Parasites and cultures

The chloroquine-sensitive strain HB3 and chloroquine-resistance 7G8 strain HB3 of P. falciparum were used throughout. Infected erythrocytes were kept in culture using the protocol established by Haynes et al.44, basically utilizing human O+ erythrocytes kept in an RPMI medium supplemented with glutamine and 10% human serum incubated in an atmosphere of 90% N2, 5% O2 and 5% CO2.

Hemolysis assay

Tests were performed in 96-well plates as described previously by Costa-Lotufo et al. The negative control contained only red blood cells in RPMI medium. All compounds were tested at 10 µM. A positive control, 20 µL of 0.1% Triton X-100 added to culture media, inducing 100% hemolysis, was used. Samples and controls were incubated at 37 °C. After 24 h, they were centrifuged collecting the supernatant which was read at 415 nm in a spectrophotometer.

Propidium iodide (PI) incorporation assay

Manufacturer’s instructions (BD PharmingenTM) were followed. Briefly, 200 µL of parasite culture at 2% parasitemia or uninfected erythrocytes, at 2% hematocrit, were incubated with each compound for 3 h at 37 °C. Untreated samples were cultured in the same plate. After incubation, 2 µL of Propidium Iodide was added and incubated for 15 min at RT while protected from light. Fluorescence was read in a fluorometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485/20 and 645/40 nm, respectively.

Mitochondrial membrane potential (Dy) measurements

The membrane potential was measured in a flow cytometer after staining P. falciparum cultures with the DiOC6(3) dye at 10 nM (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C in the dark. Following incubation, cells were washed and resuspended using 200 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and analyzed immediately after. The mitochondrial membrane disrupter, CCCP (50 µM), incubated for 1 h, was used as a positive control. The fluorescence intensity of stained cells was calculated using FCS Express 4 (De Novo Software, Glendale, CA, USA). As negative control, uninfected red blood cells were used and their signal was subtracted from that of the infected red blood cells.

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in P. falciparum

Intracellular ROS formation was measured in a fluorimeter using the CM-H2DCFDA reactive dye from Molecular Probes® (Eugene OR, USA). Hydrogen peroxide was used as a positive control at a final concentration of 200 µM. The level of ROS present was inferred through the amount of oxidized DCF45.

In vitro β-hemozoin formation

The hemozoin polymerization assay was developed on the basis of the differential solubility of hemozoin and heme and was first used by Pandey et al. to quantify the amount of production of hemozoin by Pf parasites46. Using the methodology described by Tripathi et al.47, schizonts and late trophozoites at a parasitemia of 2–4% were used to obtain a parasite lysate. After overnight incubation with the samples, the absorbance of the final hemozoin pellet dissolved in NaOH was measured at 405 nm. Supernatants of soluble heme and hemozoin pellets were taken from washing steps and precipitated with concentrated (6 M) HCl. Pellets obtained were measured in a Fourier transformed infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) (Bruker, Germany) in attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode, at RT. The Beer-Lambert equation was used to calculate the final amount of hemozoin.

Ethics statement

Human blood used in this study was collected from a pool of volunteers who signed informed consents. This protocol was approved by the bioethical committee of The Gorgas Memorial Institute of Health Sciences in Panama for this study through note 221/CBI/ICGES/21. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

EO thanks to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the Financial support (grant MINECO: RETOS, AGL2016-79813- C2-2R), and the Ministery of Environment: Endowment for Water, Protected Areas and Wildlife, Panama, (012-37). CS acknowledges partial funding for this work by the Endowment for Water, Protected Areas and Wildlife from the Ministry of Environment of Panama (Desarrollo de un Banco de Microorganismos (BIOBANCO) Panamá). CS and LMC were partially funded by the National System of Investigation of Panama (SNI023-2022) and (SNI60-2022), respectively.

Author contributions

E.O. initiated the project and designed the compounds. N.E. did synthesis, purification and characterization of the compounds obtained, under the supervision of E.O. C.S. designed the biological protocols. L.M.P. and M.G.N. performed bioscreens, antiplasmodial and cytotoxic bioassays. L.M.C. performed mechanistic studies. N.E., E.O. and C.S. wrote the manuscript. C.S. conceptualized and supervised the biological studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

All the information required to reproduce the experiments (chemistry, activity assays and cellular activities) is included in the manuscript, and the rest in the Supplementary Material.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Carmenza Spadafora, Email: cspadafora@indicasat.org.pa.

Esther del Olmo, Email: olmo@usal.es.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-27351-z.

References

  • 1.Ashley EA, Pyae Phyo A, Woodrow CJ. Malaria. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1608–1621. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30324-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Malaria Report. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2021 (2021). Accessed 10 December 2022.
  • 3.WHO recommends groundbreaking malaria vaccine for children at risk. https://www.who.int/news/item/06-10-2021-who-recommends-groundbreaking-malaria-vaccine-for-children-at-risk (2021). Accessed 10 December 2022.
  • 4.Olotu A, Fegan G, Wambua J, Nyangweso G, Leach A, Lievens M, Kaslow DC, Njuguna P, Marsh K, Bejon P. Seven-year efficacy of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine among young African children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guideline for Malaria. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/guidelines-for-malaria (2021). Accessed 10 December 2022.
  • 6.Menard D, Dondorp A. Antimalarial drug resistance: A threat to malaria elimination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Uwimana A, Penkunas MJ, Nisingizwe MP, Uyizeye D, Hakizimana D, Musanabaganwa C, Musabyimana JP, Ngwije A, Turate I, Mbituyumuremyi A, Murindahabi M, Condo J. Expanding home-based management of malaria to all age groups in Rwanda: Analysis of acceptability and facility-level time-series data. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018;112(11):513–521. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vyas VK, Ghate M. Substituted benzimidazole derivatives as angiotensin II -AT1 receptor antagonist: A review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2010;10(14):1366–1384. doi: 10.2174/138955710793564151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gaba M, Singh S, Mohan C. Benzimidazole: An emerging scaffold for analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;76:494–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shrivastava N, Naim MJ, Alam MJ, Nawaz F, Ahmed S, Alam O. Benzimidazole scaffold as anticancer agent: Synthetic approaches and structure-activity relationship. Arch. Pharm. 2017 doi: 10.1002/ardp.201700040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bansal Y, Kaur M, Bansal G. Antimicrobial potential of benzimidazole derived molecules. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2019;19(8):624–646. doi: 10.2174/1389557517666171101104024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Veerasamy R, Roy A, Karanakaran R, Rajak H. Structure-activity relationship analysis of benzimidazoles as emerging anti-inflammatory agents: An overview. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(7):633. doi: 10.3390/ph14070663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.L'abbate FP, Müller R, Openshaw R, Combrinck JM, de Villiers KA, Hunter R, Egan TJ. Hemozoin inhibiting 2-phenylbenzimidazoles active against malaria parasites. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;159:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doganc F, Celik I, Eren G, Kaiser M, Brun R, Goker H. Synthesis, in vitro antiprotozoal activity, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies of some new monocationic guanidinobenzimidazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021;221:113545. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Openshaw R, Maepa K, Benjamin SJ, Wainwright L, Combrinck JM, Hunter R, Egan TJ. A diverse range of hemozoin inhibiting scaffolds act on Plasmodium falciparum as heme complexes. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7(2):362–376. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Purwono B, Nurohmah BA, Fathurrohman PZ, Syahri J. Some 2-arylbenzimidazole derivatives as an antimalarial agent: Synthesis, activity assay, molecular docking and pharmacological evaluation. Rasayan J. Chem. 2021;14(1):94–100. doi: 10.31788/RJC.2021.1416088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Attram HD, Wittlin S, Chibale K. Incorporation of an intramolecular hydrogen bonding motif in the side chain of antimalarial benzimidazoles. Med. Chem. Comm. 2019 doi: 10.1039/c8md00608c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sharma K, Shrivastava A, Mehra RN, Deora GS, Alam MM, Zaman MS, Akhter M. Synthesis of novel benzimidazole acrylonitriles for inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum growth by dual target inhibition. Arch. Pharm. 2017 doi: 10.1002/ardp.201700251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Raphemot R, Eubanks AL, Toro-Moreno M, Geiger RA, Hughes PF, Lu KY, Haystead TAJ, Derbyshire ER. Plasmodium PK9 inhibitors promote growth of liver-stage parasites. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018;26(3):411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jacobs L, de Kock C, Taylor D, Pelly SC, Blackie MAL. Synthesis of five libraries of 6,5-fused heterocycles to establish the importance of the heterocyclic core for antiplasmodial activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018;26(21):5730–5741. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oduselu GO, Ajani OO, Ajamma YU, Brors B, Adebiyi E. Homology modelling and molecular docking studies of selected substituted benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)benzimidamide scaffolds on Plasmodium falciparum adenylosuccinate lyase receptor. Bioinform. Biol. Insights. 2019;13:1–10. doi: 10.1177/1177932219865533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Devine SM, Challis MP, Kigotho JK, Siddiqui G, De Paoli A, MacRaild CA, Avery VM, Creek DJ, Norton RS, Scammells PJ. Discovery and development of 2-aminobenzimidazoles as potent antimalarials. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021;221:113518. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dziwornu GA, Coertzen D, Leshabane M, Korkor CM, Cloete CK, Njoroge M, Gibhard L, Lawrence N, Reader J, van der Watt M, Wittlin S, Birkholtz LM, Chibale K. Antimalarial benzimidazole derivatives incorporating phenolic Mannich base side chains inhibit microtubule and hemozoin Formation: Structure–activity relationship and in vivo oral efficacy studies. J. Med. Chem. 2021;64(8):5198–5215. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ndakala AJ, Gessner RK, Gitari PW, October N, White KL, Hudson A, Fakorede F, Shackleford DM, Kaiser M, Yeates C, Charman SA, Chibale K. Antimalarial pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54(13):4581–4589. doi: 10.1021/jm200227r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singh K, Okombo J, Brunschwig C, Ndubi F, Barnard L, Wilkinson C, Njogu PM, Njoroge M, Laing L, Machado M, Prudêncio M, Reader J, Botha M, Nondaba S, Birkholtz LM, Lauterbach S, Churchyard A, Coetzer TL, Burrows JN, Yeates C, Denti P, Wiesner L, Egan TJ, Wittlin S, Chibale K. Antimalarial pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles: Lead optimization, parasite life cycle stage profile, mechanistic evaluation, killing kinetics, and in vivo oral efficacy in a mouse model. J. Med. Chem. 2017;60(4):1432–1448. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mayoka G, Njoroge M, Okombo J, Gibhard L, Sanches-Vaz M, Fontinha D, Birkholtz LM, Reader J, van der Watt M, Coetzer TL, Lauterbach S, Churchyard A, Bezuidenhout B, Egan TJ, Yeates CL, Wittlin S, Prudêncio M, Chibale K. Structure-activity relationship studies and Plasmodium life cycle profiling identifies pan-active N-aryl-3-trifluoromethyl pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles which are efficacious in an in vivo mouse model of malaria. J. Med. Chem. 2018;62(2):1022–1035. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Okombo J, Brunschwig C, Singh K, Dziwornu GA, Barnard L, Njoroge M, Wittlin S, Chibale K. Antimalarial pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole derivatives with Mannich base side chains: Synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and reactive metabolite trapping studies. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019;5(3):372–384. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leshabane M, Dziwornu GA, Coertzen D, Reader J, Moyo P, van der Watt M, Chisanga K, Nsanzubuhoro C, Ferger R, Erlank E, Venter N, Koekemoer L, Chibale K, Birkholtz LM. Benzimidazole derivatives are potent against multiple life cycle stages of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7(7):1945–1955. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fonkui TY, Ikhile MI, Njobeh PB, Ndinteh DT. Benzimidazole Schiff base derivatives: Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity. BMC Chem. Biol. 2019;13(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13065-019-0642-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aragón-Muriel A, Liscano Y, Upegui Y, Robledo SM, Ramírez-Apan MT, Morales-Morales D, Oñate-Garzón J, Polo-Cerón D. In vitro evaluation of the potential pharmacological activity and molecular targets of new benzimidazole-based Schiff base metal complexes. Antibiotics. 2021;10(6):728. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tian J, Vandermosten L, Peigneur S, Moreels L, Rozenski J, Tytgat J, Herdewijn P, Van den Steen PE, de Jonghe S. Astemizole analogues with reduced hERG inhibition as potent antimalarial compounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017;25(24):6332–6344. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar M, Okombo J, Mambwe D, Taylor D, Lawrence N, Reader J, van der Watt M, Fontinha D, Sanches-Vaz M, Bezuidenhout BC, Lauterbach S, Liebenberg D, Birkholtz LM, Coetzer TL, Prudêncio M, Egan TJ, Wittlin S, Chibale K. Multistage antiplasmodium activity of astemizole analogues and inhibition of hemozoin formation as a contributor to their mode of action. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018;5(2):303–315. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mambwe D, Kumar M, Ferger R, Taylor D, Njoroge M, Coertzen D, Reader J, van der Watt M, Birkholtz LM, Chibale K. Structure–activity relationship studies reveal new astemizole analogues active against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2021;12(8):1333–1341. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mueller R, Reddy V, Nchinda AT, Mebrahtu F, Taylor D, Lawrence N, Tanner L, Barnabe M, Eyermann CJ, Zou B, Kondreddi RR, Lakshminarayana SB, Rottmann M, Street LJ, Chibale K. Lerisetron analogues with antimalarial properties: Synthesis, structure-activity relationship studies, and biological assessment. ACS Omega. 2020;5(12):6967–6982. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bhoi RT, Rajput JD, Bendre RS. An efficient synthesis of rearranged new biologically active benzimidazoles derived from 2-formyl carvacrol. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2022;48:401–422. doi: 10.1007/s11164-021-04601-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baartzes N, Stringer T, Seldon R, Warner DF, Taylor D, Wittlin S, Chibale K, Smith GS. Bioisosteric ferrocenyl aminoquinoline-benzimidazole hybrids: Antimicrobial evaluation and mechanistic insights. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;15(180):121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.06.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baartzes N, Jordaan A, Warner DF, Combrinck J, Taylor D, Chibale K, Smith GS. Antimicrobial evaluation of neutral and cationic iridium(III) and rhodium(III) aminoquinoline-benzimidazole hybrid complexes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;206:112694. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jordaan L, Ndlovu MT, Mkhize S, Ngubane S, Loots L, Duffy S, Avery VM, Chellan P. Investigating the antiplasmodial activity of substitutedcyclopentadienyl rhodium and iridium complexes of 2-(2-pyridyl)benzimidazole. J. Organomet. Chem. 2022;962:122273. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2022.122273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rylands L, Welsh A, Maepa K, Stringer T, Taylor D, Chibale K, Smith GS. Structure-activity relationship studies of antiplasmodial cyclometallated ruthenium(II), rhodium(III) and iridium(III) complexes of 2-phenylbenzimidazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;161:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Escala N, Valderas-García E, Álvarez-Bardón M, Gómez C, de Agüero V, López-Pérez JL, Rojo-Vázquez FA, San Feliciano A, Martínez-Valladares M, Balaña-Fouce R, del Olmo E. Further and new target-based benzimidazole anthelmintics active against Teladorsagia circumcincta. J. Mol. Struct. 2022;1269:133735. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bansal Y, Kaur M, Silakari O. Benzimidazole–ibuprofen/mesalamine conjugates: Potential candidates for multifactorial diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;89:671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Valderas-García E, de la Vega J, Álvarez-Bardón M, Castilla-Gómez de Agüero V, Escarcena R, López-Pérez JL, Rojo-Vázquez FA, San Feliciano A, del Olmo E, Balaña-Fouce R, Martínez-Valladares M. Anthelmintic activity of aminoalcohol and diamine derivatives against the gastrointestinal nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta. Vet. Parasitol. 2021;296:109496. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Armarego WLF. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. 8. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Haynes JD, Diggs CL, Hines FA, Desjardins RE. Culture of human malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 1976;263(5580):767–769. doi: 10.1038/263767a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jakubowski W, Bartosz G. 2,7-dichlorofluorescin oxidation and reactive oxygen species: What does it measure? Cell Biol. Int. 2000;24(10):757–760. doi: 10.1006/cbir.2000.0556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pandey A, Singh N, Tekwani B, Puri S, Chauhan V. Assay of β-hematin formation by malaria parasite. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999;20(1–2):203–207. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(99)00021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tripathi AK, Khan SI, Walker LA, Tekwani BL. Spectrophotometric determination of de novo hemozoin/β-hematin formation in an in vitro assay. Anal. Biochem. 2004;325:85–91. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All the information required to reproduce the experiments (chemistry, activity assays and cellular activities) is included in the manuscript, and the rest in the Supplementary Material.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES