Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Biotechnology logoLink to BMC Biotechnology
. 2023 Jan 7;23:1. doi: 10.1186/s12896-022-00771-5

Efficient expression of fusion human epidermal growth factor in tobacco chloroplasts

Yunpeng Wang 1, Jieying Fan 1, Zhengyi Wei 1,2,✉, Shaochen Xing 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9824920  PMID: 36611158

Abstract

Background

Chloroplast transformation is a robust technology for the expression of recombinant proteins. Various types of pharmaceutical proteins including growth factors have been reported in chloroplasts via chloroplast transformation approach at high expression levels. However, high expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in chloroplasts with the technology is still unavailable.

Results

The present work explored the high-level expression of recombinant EGF, a protein widely applied in many clinical therapies, in tobacco chloroplasts. In this work, homoplastic transgenic plants expressing fusion protein GFP-EGF, which was composed of GFP and EGF via a linker, were generated. The expression of GFP-EGF was confirmed by the combination of green fluorescent observation and Western blotting. The achieved accumulation of the recombinant fusion GFP-EGF was 10.21 ± 0.27% of total soluble proteins (1.57 ± 0.05 g kg− 1 of fresh leaf). The chloroplast-derived GFP-EGF was capable of increasing the cell viability of the NSLC cell line A549 and enhancing the phosphorylation level of the EGF receptor in the A549 cells.

Conclusion

The expression of recombinant EGF in tobacco chloroplasts via chloroplast transformation method was achieved at considerable accumulation level. The attempt gives a good example for the application of chloroplast transformation technology in recombinant pharmaceutical protein production.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12896-022-00771-5.

Keywords: EGF, Chloroplast transformation, Tobacco, GFP, Molecular farming

Background

Epidermal growth factor (EGF), which has multiple biological activities, plays essential roles in various physiological and pathological processes in vertebrates [1, 2]. EGF can be utilized in the treatments of numerous kinds of wounds [3, 4]. Recombinant EGF (rEGF) is reported to be expressed in various of expression platforms including prokaryotic [5, 6, 7, 8] and eukaryotic[9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22] systems. Plants, the large family of multicellular eukaryotes, are considered as efficient expression platforms for the expression of recombinant proteins [23, 24]. The plant expression platforms have many merits compared to other platforms, such as lower cost; easier scaling-up; easier storage; easier to find employees with professional skills and experiences in plant culture, harvesting and processing; sufficient post-translational modifications and less risks of biosecurity. There have been numerous reviews summarized in the field [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]. Many types of recombinant proteins, including industrial proteins (e.g., cellulase) [42, 43], biopolymers (e.g., spidroin) [44], and pharmaceutical proteins (e.g., EGF) [25] have been reported to be successfully expressed in plants.

The successful expression of EGF has been reported in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum and N. benthamiana) [9, 10, 15, 19, 45, 46], tomato [12], soybean [16], potato [47], rice [20, 48], and saffron [21]. The strategies for the expression of EGF in plants were either transient or stable. The transient methods reported used either plant-virus-based vectors [9, 46] or mini-Ti vectors [15]. The stable expression of EGF in plants adopted both nuclear [9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 20, 21, 45, 46, 47, 48] and chloroplast [10, 19, 49] transformation. The expression levels varied from 0.001% to 7.8% of total soluble proteins (TSP). Chloroplasts transformation has been proven to be a powerful expression strategy for recombinant protein expression by numerous of advantages compared to nuclear transformation: (1) High expression level due to large numbers of transgenes; (2) Site-specific integration of exogenous genes via site-specific homologous recombination; (3) Multiple genes transformation at the same time; (4) Regulation of exogenous genes in polycistron strategy and (5) Maternal inheritance of transgenes in many plant species for avoiding the gene flow risks. Details on these advantages have been illustrated by Lössl and Waheed [50] and other reviews [51, 52, 53, 54]. Many proteins have been successfully expressed in plant plastids and summarized in previous reviews [41, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64]. Up to date, there have been three reports that presented the expression of EGF in plant chloroplasts. Wirth et al. explored the expression status of EGF in tobacco chloroplasts, with the results suggesting that the expression of EGF could only be detectable when fused with the 186 aa of the N-terminal β-glucuronidase (GUS) [10]. Interestingly, the accumulation of EGF was higher in the dark than in the light. Nevertheless, the maximum of the expression obtained by this method was 0.1 ng g− 1 of fresh leaf. Morgenfeld et al. found it is beneficial to the accumulation of recombinant EGF in chloroplast when it was targeted to the thylakoid lumen by using a signal peptide (Str) [19]. However, the translocation from stroma to thylakoid lumen altered the solubility of EGF, and it was detectable only in insoluble fraction. In the recent report [49], Wang et al. achieved free rEGF in tobacco chloroplasts with the accumulation around 0.124% to 0.165% TSP of fresh biomass. Moreover, the native biological activity of rEGF from plant chloroplasts was demanstrated in this work.

As mentioned above, high level of EGF expression in chloroplast is not reported. In this paper, we reported the efficient expression of EGF in chloroplasts in a fusion status. In this work, the green fluorescent protein was adopted as a stabilizer with its C-terminal fusing to the N-terminal of EGF. The fusion showed a high expression level in tobacco chloroplasts and exhibited a similar activity accordant with its commercial counterpart.

Results

Vector construction

A tobacco chloroplast transformation vector pWYP21404 was constructed (Fig. 1A). The expression cassette Prrn-T7-g10-smGFP-EGF-attP-RBS-aadA-attB-Trps16 was flanked by the sequences of 16S-trnI and trnA-23S at its 3’ and 5’ terminal respectively. The fusion gene smGFP-EGF and selectable gene aadA were organized in the same cistron in the cassette. The genes smGFP and EGF were fused together with a linker [(GSSSS)3-DDDDK] coding sequence, which was designed for the cleavage of the two parts of the fusion protein in the future. The promoter Prrn was employed to launch transcription of the foreign genes and the terminator Trps16 was adopted to stop the transcription. The 5’ UTR of the g10 gene of the T7 phage (T7-g10) was employed to enhance the expression of the fusion protein. The φ31 integrase recognize sites attP and attB were placed at the 3’ and 5’ terminals of aadA respectively for the future removal of the selectable gene from the recombinant chloroplast genome. An RBS sequence was placed between attP and aadA to help the translation of the aadA mRNA.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

The structure construct pWYP21404 and the integration of tobacco chloroplast genome. A Expression cassette of the foreign genes. smGFP, the soluble, modified green fluorescent protein encoding sequence; linker, the linker peptide [(GSSSS)3-DDDDK] coding sequence; EGF, the epidermal growth factor encoding gene; aadA, the aminoglycoside adenyltransferase coding gene. Prrn, the promoter of the rrn opren of tobacco chloroplast genome; T7-g10, 5’ UTR of the T7 phage g10 gene; Trps16, the terminator of the tobacco plastid gene rps16. RBS, the ribosomal binding site of tobacco plastid rbcL gene; attP, attB, phage and bacterial recognize sites of the φ31 integrase. 16Srrn and 23Srrn, the ribosome 16 S rRNA and 23 S rRNA genes of tobacco chloroplast genome respectively; trnI and trnA, the transfer RNA of isoleucine and alanine encoding genes of tobacco chloroplast genome respectively. B The wild-type structure of flanking the target site (Nsi I) of the tobacco chloroplast. The restriction enzymes BamH I and Kpn I were used to digest the DNA for southern blotting analysis; the short, thick line indicates the probe used in DNA for southern blotting analysis. C The structure of the recombinant tobacco chloroplast genome

Generation of transplastomic tobacco plants and the inheritance of foreign genes

Spectinomycin resistant tobacco shoots were regenerated from the bombarded leaf pieces on the selectable medium with spectinomycin supplemented (Fig. 2A, B). The emission of green fluorescence from the transplastomic plant under UV light indicated the successful integration of the heterologous genes (Fig. 2D), and wild type phenotype was observed under normal light (Fig. 2C). The emission of green fluorescence from transplastomic protoplasts was also observed (Fig. 2E–H). The T1 generation seedlings grew normally on media either with or without spectinomycin and emitted green fluorescence upon the exposure with UV light (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Whereas, the wild-type seedlings were bleached on the spectinomycin-containing medium and emitted red fluorescence of chlorophyll in UV light on medium without spectinomycin supplemented (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). These results suggested the inheritance of the foreign genes from transgenic plants to their progenies. The results from Southern blotting showed that a recombinant specific band of approximately 4.1 kb in transplastomic plants was detected but an approximately 2.4 kb-band was found in the wild-type plant (Fig. 1B, C), which supported the concept that the detected transplastomic plants #1, 2 and 4, were homoplasmic (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Generation of transplastomic tobacco and the expression of GFP in tobacco plants. A resistant shoot regenerated for explants on selectable medium. B A transplastomic plant grew on selectable medium. C A transplastomic plant in soil in natural light. D A transplastomic plant in UV light. E–H A transplastomic protoplast observed by laser confocal fluorescent microscope

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Southern blotting analysis and expression of GFP-EGF in tobacco plants. A Southern blotting used the probe indicated in Fig. 1, five micrograms of DNAs for each were digested by Bam HI/Kpn I and used. GFP, the GEP standard protein; wt, wild-type plant; 1–4, transplastomic plants. B, C The SDS-PAGE and the Western blotting analysis of the GFP-EGF expression. Wt, wild-type plant; 1–4, transplastomic plants. D, E The Expression level of GFP-EGF in transplastomic tobacco plants. Six tests were repeated for each line, and the data were shown as mean ± SD. Average, the average expression of the 10 tested lines; line1-line10, different transplastomic tobacco lines

Expression of GFP-EGF

The expression of the fusion protein was determined by green fluorescence observation with the combination of SDS-PAGE analysis and Western blotting analysis. The transgenic plants showed green fluorescence emission both in planta and in vitro (Fig. 2D, Additional file 1: Figs. S1, S2), which provided strong evidences for the expression of GFP-EGF fusion. The coomassie brilliant blue stained SDS-PAGE gel showed an additional protein band with large amount protein with a molecular weight of about 35.6 kDa, which fit to the expected molecular weight of GFP-FGF. (Fig. 3B). The result from Western blotting analysis also showed a specific band of the same molecular weight (Fig. 3C). The expression of GFP-EGF was further quantified by ELISA. The average expression level was 10.21 ± 0.27% TSP, namely, an average expression of 1.57 ± 0.05 g kg− 1 of fresh leaf (Fig. 3D, E).

Biological activity of GFP-EGF

The cell viability test was performed on NSLC cell line A549 to primarily assess the bioactivity of the fusion protein GFP-EGF. The cell viability was much higher in the GFP-EGF treatments compared with the blank controls and the wild-type TSP controls, which was similar to the standard product (Fig. 4A). These data suggested that the GFP-EGF derived from tobacco chloroplasts was capable of conducting the biological activity of promoting the proliferation of cancer cells. Further investigation suggested that the treatment of GFP-EGF enhanced the phosphorylation level of EGFR in A549 cells (Fig. 4B), which subsequently promoted the cell proliferation. The combined data showed that GFP-EGF could play the role of natural EGF in cancer cells by mediating the phosphorylation of EGFR.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Biological activity of GFP-EGF. Cell viability (A) and the phosphorylation of EGFR (B) in A549 cells treated by GFP-EGF. Wt, treatments with TSP of wild-type plant; PBS, the blank treatments; EGF, treatments of standard EGF; GFP-EGF treatments with TSP of transplastomic plant. **, ##, p < 0.05, compared to wt and PBS respectively

Discussion

Although the expression of EGF has been reported in various plant species, the expression level remains different and unsteady among the data available. The first attempt of expression EGF in tobacco achieved only a maximum expression level of 0.001% TSP [45], and the efforts subsequently differed from the expression strategies. In tobacco, there were several reports showed different expression levels of EGF [9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 45, 49], and highest expression level achieved was 6.24% TSP [15]. The accumulation of EGF in transgenic tomato was reported to be 3.78 ng g−1 in fruit [12] and 6.7 ± 3.1 to 129.0 ± 36.7 µg g-1 of dry weight (DW) in soybean seed [16]. In transgenic rice, EGF could occupy 1.8% TSP in normal cells, and in hypoxic transgenic seedlings, 7.8% TSP could be achieved [48]. Here, our data showed that 10.21 ± 0.27% TSP of GFP-EGF fusion protein was achieved in tobacco chloroplast, which is much higher than the previous reports.

Although chloroplast transformation strategy has been reported for the expression of EGF [10, 19, 49], the merit of the technology, i.e., high expression of recombinant protein, was not embodied in these efforts. EGF is an acidic protein with an isoelectric point of 4.6 which is stable in acidic environment. However, the chloroplast stroma is alkaline (in the light) or neutral (in the dark), which might be caused by the instability of EGF that affected the accumulation of EGF in chloroplasts stroma due to its natural properties. Therefore, the accumulation of EGF in the dark was higher than that in the light [10], same situation happened in the higher accumulation of EGF in the chloroplast thylakoid lumen [19], and although the accumlation of free rEGF in our previous work[73] was relatively higher, it was still insufficient for commercialization. Actually, the accumulation of EGF was higher in the subcellular locations with lower pH environments as mentioned above, e.g., the vacuole [15]. Thus, other strategies should be adopted to address the instability of EGF in chloroplast stroma. The status of EGF in expression host cells also affected the accumulation level. Several attempts have been examined to improve EGF accumulation. The data reported showed that, the free EGF in plant cells often achieved lower accumulation, but the GUS [10], Zera [20], cMyc-tag [48], or chloroplast thylakoid lumen target transit peptide [19] fusion helped to improve the accumulation. In this study, the GFP was adopted to stabilize EGF in chloroplast stroma due to its excellent stability in many occasions [65]. By combining with codon optimization, the expression level presented here was up to 10.21 ± 0.27% TSP (1.57 ± 0.05 g kg− 1 of fresh leaf), which gave a good example for the promising application of chloroplast transformation for rEGF production.

Conclusion

The high expression of rEGF with biological activity in tobacco chloroplasts via chloroplast transformation method was achieved, and the expression level was demonstrated to be 10.21 ± 0.27% TSP. These give a good example for the application of chloroplast transformation technology in recombinant pharmaceutical protein production.

Methods

Plant material and cultivation

Germination of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petite Havana) seeds and seedling culture was performed as described previously [66]. Leaves of two-week-old seedlings were collected for chloroplast transformation.

Vector construction

An expression cassette was designed and artificially synthesized (Fig. 1A). The epidermal growth factor (EGF, NCBI accession No.: M26695) encoding gene (EGF) was codon-optimized accordant with the codon usage bias of tobacco chloroplast and fused to the 3’ end of GFP encoding gene (smGFP, NCBI accession No.: U70495) by a linker [(GSSSS)3-DDDDK] coding sequence. The fusion gene GFP-EGF was placed downstream of the promoter of rrn operon of tobacco chloroplast genome (Prrn) and the 5’ UTR of the g10 gene of the T7 phage (T7-g10) [67, 68], which was used to enhance the expression level. The selectable marker gene, aadA, was placed at the 3’ end of the fusion gene smGFP-EGF followed by a ribosomal binding site (RBS) of the rbcL gene from tobacco chloroplast genome. A φ31 integrase recognition site, attP, was inserted between the gene smGFP-EGF and the RBS, which was designed for the later removal of aadA gene from the recombinant chloroplast genome by combining the other integrase recognize site, attB. The attB sequence was at the 3’ end of the aadA gene and followed a terminator Trps16, the terminator of tobacco chloroplast rps16 gene. The cassette was amplified by PCR method with high-fidelity DNA polymerase and inserted into the Nsi I site between the genes of trnI and trnA in the 16 S-trnI-trnA-23 S fragment from the tobacco chloroplast genome [69] with an In-Fusion® HD Cloning Kit (ClonTech Laboratories, Inc., USA) to form the expression vector pWYP21404.

Chloroplast transformation and generation of transplastomic tobacco plants

Young leaves of tobacco seedlings were used as explants for chloroplast transformation. The chloroplast transformation, plant regeneration, and homoplasmic selection were conducted according to the previous protocols [66]. The homoplasmic selection was performed for 3 to 4 rounds until the homoplasy was achieved. The homoplasmic lines were picked out by green fluorescence observation combined with Southern blotting analysis. The homoplasmic lines were transferred to soil and cultured in a greenhouse, seeds were collected for further investigations.

Identification of homoplasmic transplastomic tobacco lines

The regenerated spectinomycin resistant plantlets were placed under the 365 nm UV light to observe the emission of green fluorescence. The lines with strong green fluorescent emission from 3- or 4-round selection were selected for further Southern blotting analysis. The total DNAs from transplastomic and wild-type plants were extracted for the Southern blotting analysis. The DNA samples (5 µg for each) were digested by restriction enzymes Bam HI and Kpn I. The DNA electrophoresis, transference to membrane, hybridization, and signal detection were carried out following the previously described protocols [66], using a DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit I (Roche, Switzerland). A 988 bp of DNA fragment flanking the genes trnI and trnA (Fig. 1B) was adopted as hybridization probe. The probe was amplified from tobacco chloroplast genome by using the primers NtprobF (5’- AATGGAGCACCTAACAACGCATCTTC -3’) and NtprobR (5’- TAATGCGTTCCACTTATTGAACA GGG -3’).

Expression analysis of GFP-EGF in tobacco chloroplasts

T1 seeds were germinated as described above and cultured on media with or without spectinomycin supplemented for observation of the inheritance of the foreign genes. The green fluorescence emission observation was performed for the visible investigation of the expression of the fusion protein GFP-EGF in transplastomic plants. The transgenic plants (seedlings) were exposed under UV light and a digital camera was adopted to take the pictures of fluorescents. Protoplasts were also isolated from transgenic plants for the in vitro green fluorescence observation by laser confocal fluorescence microscope methods followed the procedures reported previously [70].

TSPs were extracted from both transplastomic and wild-type plants followed the previous protocol described [71] for the further expression analyses of the GFP-EGF fusion. Fifteen micrograms of TSPs for each were used to carry out the SDS-PAGE analysis with a 12% separate gel and, the gel was later stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250. Western blotting was conducted according to the procedure described previously [66] by using the monoclonal antibody against GFP (rabbit derived) and the horse radish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (goat derived). The expression level was quantified by the ELISA method conducted in the sandwich way with a pair of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against GFP. The above analyses adopted a standard GFP as positive controls and wild-type TSPs as negative controls.

Activity assessment of GFP-EGF

The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549 (purchased for National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai) was adopted to assess the biological activity of the fusion protein GFP-EGF. Cell culture was carried out as described by Zhang et al. [72].

The cell viability test was firstly performed. Briefly, A549 cells (1 × 105 ml− 1) were cultured in 96-well plates with 100 µL medium per well. The media contained 25 nmol l− 1 of EGF standard, TSP form transplastomic tobacco (containing 25 nmol l− 1 of GFP-EGF), TSP from wild-type tobacco (the same amount to the transgenic) or without supplement. The volumes were adjusted to 150 µl by using PBS. Cells were cultured for 24 h and detected with the thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. Twelve wells were repeated for each treatment.

Phosphorylation of EGF receptor (EGFR) was further tested. The treatments were performed as followed: (1), the A549 cells with a density of 5 × 105 ml− 1 were cultured in petri dishes (φ = 10 cm) for 14 h; (2), the medium was then replaced by fresh medium containing 25 nmol l− 1 of EGF standard or GFP-EGF (in the form of TSP mixture); (3), the cells were cultured for more 24 h. At the end of treatments, the TSPs of the cells were extracted and Western blotting was performed following the protocols described previously [73] to test the phosphorylation level of EGFR in cells. The PBS buffer was adopted the blank control. The antibodies against EGFR and phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR) were used. GADPH was employed as the internal reference.

Supplementary Information

12896_2022_771_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.8MB, docx)

Additional file 1. Supplementary Materials.

12896_2022_771_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22.5KB, docx)

Additional file 2. Table S1. Cell viability. Table S2. Expression of GFP-EGF.

Additional file 3. Raw Data. (371.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jing Siyuan from College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University for the help of cell culture and activity assessment.

Author contributions

YW and JF performed the research and analyzed the data, ZW designed the research and prepared the manuscript, YW and SX provided fund supporting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was financial supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant number: KYJF2021ZR106), Agricultural Innovation Project of Jilin Province (Grant number: XGC2017TD004).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study were included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The plant material tobacco was kindly provided by Prof. Peter Nixon from Imperial College London, and the material is allowed to be used in any ordinary experiments. All the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing of interests

The authors declared that there was no conflict of interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Zhengyi Wei, Email: weizy80@163.com.

Shaochen Xing, Email: xingsc64@163.com.

References

  • 1.Nanba D, Toki F, Barrandon Y, Higashiyama S. Recent advances in the epidermal growth factor receptor/ligand system biology on skin homeostasis and keratinocyte stem cell regulation. J Dermatol Sci. 2013;72(2):81–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caussa JE, Vila EH. Epidermal growth factor, innovation and safety. Med Clínica (Eng Ed) 2015;145(7):305–12. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berlanga J, Fernández JI, López E, López PA, del Río A, Valenzuela C, Baldomero J, Muzio V, Raíces M, Silva R, et al. Heberprot-P: a novel product for treating advanced diabetic foot ulcer. MEDICC Rev. 2013;15(1):11–5. doi: 10.37757/MR2013V15.N1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hardwicke J, Schmaljohann D, Boyce D, Thomas D. Epidermal growth factor therapy and wound healing — past, present and future perspectives. Surgeon. 2008;6(3):172–7. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu W, Cao P, Lei H, Zhang S. High-level expression and purification of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) with SUMO fusion. Mol Biotechnol. 2010;44(3):198–203. doi: 10.1007/s12033-009-9226-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma Y, Yu J, Lin J, Wu S, Li S, Wang J. High efficient expression, purification, and functional characterization of native human epidermal growth factor in Escherichia coli. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3758941. doi: 10.1155/2016/3758941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Su H, Chen J, Chen P. Production of recombinant human epidermal growth factor in Bacillus subtilis. J Taiwan Inst Chem E. 2020;106:86–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei D, DingJi S, Hui Z, Hui Z, Liang R, GuoHong P, Ren-Bao G, SuJuan C, MuLan L. Expression of human epidermal growth factor gene in cyanobacteria. J Integr Plant Biol. 2001;43(12):1260–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wirth S, Calamante G, Mentaberry A, Bussmann L, Lattanzi M, Barañao L, Bravo-Almonacid F. Expression of active human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) in tobacco plants by integrative and non-integrative systems. Mol Breed. 2004;13(1):23–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wirth S, Segretin ME, Mentaberry A, Bravo-Almonacid F. Accumulation of hEGF and hEGF–fusion proteins in chloroplast-transformed tobacco plants is higher in the dark than in the light. J Biotechnol. 2006;125(2):159–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bai JY, Zeng L, Hu YL, Li YF, Lin ZP, Shang SC, Shi YS. Expression and characteristic of synthetic human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) in transgenic tobacco plants. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29(12):2007–12. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9438-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhi Q, Zhang F, Chai M, Yu X, Sun M. Success expression of human epidermal growth factor in transgenic tomato. Chin Pharmacol Bull. 2007;23(5):692. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang L, Chengwu X, Degang Z. Genetic transformation of tobacco with human epidermal growth factor gene. Mol Plant Breeding. 2008;6(3):465–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parsons J, Wirth S, Dominguez M, Bravo-Almonacid F, Giulietti A, Talou JR. Production of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) by in vitro cultures of Nicotiana tabacum: effect of tissue differentiation and sodium nitroprusside addition. Int J Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;6:131–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thomas DR, Walmsley AM. Improved expression of recombinant plant-made hEGF. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33(11):1801–14. doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1658-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.He Y, Schmidt MA, Erwin C, Guo J, Sun R, Pendarvis K, Warner BW, Herman EM. Transgenic soybean production of bioactive human epidermal growth factor (EGF) PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang YP, Huang F, Wang C. Efficient expression of epidermal growth factor in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CC400. Appl Biochem Micro + 2017;53(5):513–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanittinan O, Oo Y, Chaotham C, Rattanapisit K, Shanmugaraj B, Phoolcharoen W. Expression optimization, purification and in vitro characterization of human epidermal growth factor produced in Nicotiana benthamiana. Biotechnol Rep (Amsterdam Netherlands) 2020;28:e00524. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morgenfeld MM, Vater CF, Alfano EF, Boccardo NA, Bravo-Almonacid FF. Translocation from the chloroplast stroma into the thylakoid lumen allows expression of recombinant epidermal growth factor in transplastomic tobacco plants. Transgenic Res. 2020;29(3):295–305. doi: 10.1007/s11248-020-00199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torrent M, Llompart B, Lasserre-Ramassamy S, Llop-Tous I, Bastida M, Marzabal P, Westerholm-Parvinen A, Saloheimo M, Heifetz PB, Ludevid MD. Eukaryotic protein production in designed storage organelles. BMC Biol. 2009;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou T, Wang L, Wang W, Feng X, Yang J. The study on transformation of human epidermal growth factor in safflower. J Northwest A&F Univ-Natl Sci Edn. 2013;41(12):162–6.
  • 22.Negahdari B, Shahosseini Z, Baniasadi V. Production of human epidermal growth factor using adenoviral based system. Res Pharm Sci. 2016;11(1):43–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abiri R, Valdiani A, Maziah M, Shaharuddin NA, Sahebi M, Yusof ZNB, Atabaki N, Talei D. A critical review of the concept of transgenic plants: insights into pharmaceutical biotechnology and molecular farming. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2015;18:21–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zagorskaya AA, Deineko EV. Plant-expression systems: a new stage in production of biopharmaceutical preparations. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2021;68(1):17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Monreal-Escalante E, Ramos-Vega A, Angulo C, Bañuelos-Hernández B. Plant-based vaccines: Antigen Design, Diversity, and strategies for high Level production. Vaccines. 2022;10(1):100. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Santoni M, Gecchele E, Zampieri R, Avesani L. Plant-based systems for vaccine production. In: Vaccine design. Springer; 2022:95–115. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Liu H, Timko MP. Improving protein quantity and quality—the Next Level of Plant Molecular Farming. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1326. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen Q. Development of plant-made monoclonal antibodies against viral infections. Curr Opin Virol. 2022;52:148–60. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mirzaee M, Osmani Z, Frébortová J, Frébort I. Recent advances in molecular farming using monocot plants. Biotechnol Adv. 2022;107913. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Kumar M, Kumari N, Thakur N, Bhatia SK, Saratale GD, Ghodake G, Mistry BM, Alavilli H, Kishor D, Du X. A comprehensive overview on the production of vaccines in plant-based expression Systems and the scope of Plant Biotechnology to Combat against SARS-CoV-2 Virus Pandemics. Plants. 2021;10(6):1213. doi: 10.3390/plants10061213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nosaki S, Hoshikawa K, Ezura H, Miura K. Transient protein expression systems in plants and their applications. Plant Biotechnol. 2021;38(3):297–304. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.0610a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zagorskaya A, Deineko E. Plant-expression Systems: a New Stage in production of Biopharmaceutical Preparations. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2021;68(1):17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.LeBlanc Z, Waterhouse P, Bally J: Plant-based vaccines: The way ahead? Viruses 2020;13(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Shanmugaraj B, Bulaon I, Phoolcharoen CJ. Plant molecular farming: a viable platform for recombinant biopharmaceutical production. Plants. 2020;9(7):842. doi: 10.3390/plants9070842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shim B-S, Hong K-J, Maharjan PM, Choe S. Plant factory: New resource for the productivity and diversity of human and veterinary vaccines. Clin Experimental Vaccine Res. 2019;8(2):136–9. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2019.8.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Niknejad A. Plant-based expression systems for protein and antimicrobial peptide production. Nova Biologica Reperta. 2018;5(3):262–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kawaka F, Ngetich A. Plants as expression systems for recombinant proteins. Asian J Biology. 2017;3(3):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Holaskova E, Galuszka P, Frebort I, Oz MT. Antimicrobial peptide production and plant-based expression systems for medical and agricultural biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(6):1005–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sack M, Hofbauer A, Fischer R, Stoger E. The increasing value of plant-made proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;32:163–70. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ahmad K. Molecular farming: strategies, expression systems and bio-safety considerations. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2014;50(1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hefferon K. Plant virus expression vector development: new perspectives. BioMed research international 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Espinoza-Sánchez EA, Torres-Castillo JA, Rascón-Cruz Q, Zavala-García F, Sinagawa-García SR. Production and characterization of fungal β-glucosidase and bacterial cellulases by tobacco chloroplast transformation. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2016;10(2):61–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang CH, Huang TL, Liu YC, Chen TC, Lin SM, Shaw SY, Chang CC. Overexpression of a multifunctional beta-glucosidase gene from thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus in transgenic tobacco could facilitate glucose release and its use as a reporter. Transgenic Res. 2020;29(5–6):511–27. doi: 10.1007/s11248-020-00212-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Whittall DR, Baker KV, Breitling R, Takano E. Host systems for the production of recombinant spider silk. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;39(6):560–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Higo K, Saito Y, Higo H. Expression of a chemically synthesized gene for human epidermal growth factor under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1993;57(9):1477–81. doi: 10.1271/bbb.57.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hanittinan O, Oo Y, Chaotham C, Rattanapisit K, Shanmugaraj B, Phoolcharoen W. Expression optimization, purification and in vitro characterization of human epidermal growth factor produced in Nicotiana benthamiana. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;28:e00524. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salmanian AH, Gushchin A, Medvedeva T, Noori-Daloii MR, Domansky N. Synthesis and expression of the gene for human epidermal growth factor in transgenic potato plants. Biotechnol Lett. 1996;18(9):1095–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu C, Kuo W, Chang C, Kuo J, Tsai Y, Yu S, Wu H, Chen P. The modified rice αAmy8 promoter confers high-level foreign gene expression in a novel hypoxia-inducible expression system in transgenic rice seedlings. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;85(1–2):147–61. doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang Y, Fan J, Ahmad N, Xin W, Wei Z, Xing S. Successful production of human epidermal growth factor in tobacco chloroplasts in a biologically active conformation. Growth Factors. 2022:1–12. 10.1080/08977194.2022.2150187 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Lössl AG, Waheed MT. Chloroplast-derived vaccines against human diseases: achievements, challenges and scopes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(5):527–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Siddiqui A, Wei Z, Boehm M, Ahmad N. Engineering microalgae through chloroplast transformation to produce high-value industrial products. Biotechnol Appl Bioc. 2020;67(1):30–40. doi: 10.1002/bab.1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jin S, Daniell H. The engineered chloroplast genome just got smarter. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(10):622–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saumya S, Aberami JA, Sankar PD. Plastid transformation – a greener and cleaner technique for overexpression of proteins. Res J PharmTech. 2019;12(10):5083. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yu Y, Yu P, Chang W, Yu K, Lin C. Plastid transformation: how does it work? Can it be applied to crops? What can it offer? Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):4854. doi: 10.3390/ijms21144854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schmidt JA, Richter LV, Condoluci LA, Ahner BA. Mitigation of deleterious phenotypes in chloroplast-engineered plants accumulating high levels of foreign proteins. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01893-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bock R. Engineering chloroplasts for high-level constitutive or inducible transgene expression. Chloroplast Biotechnol. 2021;77–94. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 57.Ahmad N, Mehmood MA, Malik S. Recombinant protein production in microalgae: emerging trends. Protein Pept Lett. 2020;27(2):105–10. doi: 10.2174/0929866526666191014124855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Khan MS, Mustafa G, Joyia FA. Technical advances in Chloroplast Biotechnology. In: Transgenic crops-emerging Trends and Future Perspectives. IntechOpen; 2019.
  • 59.Occhialini A, Piatek AA, Pfotenhauer AC, Frazier TP, Stewart CN, Jr, Lenaghan SC. MoChlo: a versatile, modular cloning toolbox for chloroplast biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(3):943–57. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Taunt HN, Stoffels L, Purton S. Green biologics: the algal chloroplast as a platform for making biopharmaceuticals. Bioengineered. 2018;9(1):48–54. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2017.1377867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dyo YM, Purton S. The algal chloroplast as a synthetic biology platform for production of therapeutic proteins. Microbiology. 2018;164(2):113–21. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Adem M, Beyene D, Feyissa T. Recent achievements obtained by chloroplast transformation. Plant Methods. 2017;13(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0179-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shamriz S, Ofoghi H. Outlook in the application of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast as a platform for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Genet Eng. 2016;32(1–2):92–106. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2017.1307673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Daniell H, Lin C-S, Yu M, Chang W-J. Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):1–29. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chiu W, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H, Sheen J. Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Bio. 1996;6(3):325–30. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00483-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y, Wei Z, Zhang Y, Lin C, Zhong X, Wang Y, Ma J, Ma J, Xing S. Chloroplast-expressed MSI-99 in tobacco improves disease resistance and displays inhibitory effect against rice blast fungus. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(3):4628–41. doi: 10.3390/ijms16034628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.William Studier F, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Dubendorff JW. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 185: Academic Press; 1990: pp. 60–89. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 68.Waheed MT, Thönes N, Müller M, Hassan SW, Razavi NM, Lössl E, Kaul H-P, Lössl AG. Transplastomic expression of a modified human papillomavirus L1 protein leading to the assembly of capsomeres in tobacco: a step towards cost-effective second-generation vaccines. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(2):271–82. doi: 10.1007/s11248-010-9415-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang Y, Wei Z, Zhong X, Lin C, Cai Y, Ma J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Xing S. Stable expression of basic fibroblast growth factor in chloroplasts of tobacco. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;17(1):19. doi: 10.3390/ijms17010019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wei Z, Liu Y, Lin C, Wang Y, Dong Y, Xing S. Transformation of alfalfa chloroplasts and expression of green fluorescent protein in a forage crop. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33(12):2487–94. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0709-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wei Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Fan M, Zhong X, Xu N, Lin F, Xing S. Production of bioactive recombinant bovine chymosin in Tobacco plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.Zhang J, Song Y, Liang Y, Zou H, Zuo P, Mi Y, Jing S, Li T, Wang Y, Li D, et al. Cucurbitacin IIa interferes with EGFR-MAPK signaling pathway leads to proliferation inhibition in A549cells - ScienceDirect. Food Chem Toxicol: Int J Publ British Indust Biol Res Assoc. 132:110654. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 73.Jing S, Wu Z, Zhang T, Zhang J, Wei Z. In vitro antitumor effect of cucurbitacin E on human lung cancer cell line and its molecular mechanism. Chin J Nat Medicines. 2020;18(7):483–90. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(20)30058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12896_2022_771_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.8MB, docx)

Additional file 1. Supplementary Materials.

12896_2022_771_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22.5KB, docx)

Additional file 2. Table S1. Cell viability. Table S2. Expression of GFP-EGF.

Additional file 3. Raw Data. (371.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study were included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Articles from BMC Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES