Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2022 Oct-Dec;17(4):488–496. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v17i4.11275

Possible Correlation between Giardia duodenalis Genotypes and Fecal Calprotectin in Children with Diarrhea

Hanan M Abou-Seri 1, Asmaa Ibrahim 2,*, Fatima Zahran 1
PMCID: PMC9825697  PMID: 36694565

Abstract

Background:

Giardiasis is one of the leading causes of diarrhea, particularly among children under the age of five in developing countries. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is an important biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of inflammtory bowel disease, but other diagnoses should be considered in light of its elevation. We aimed to evaluate FC level in patients diagnosed with giardiasis and elucidate a possible correlation between Giardia genotypes and FC levels.

Methods:

Overall, 120 fecal samples were collected from children aged 4–12 years and tested for giardiasis by light microscopy. Out of which, 50 samples were enrolled within two groups: group I “cases” and group II “controls” and then subjected to PCR amplification, sequencing of the beta-giardin (bg) gene of the parasite, and FC evaluation.

Results:

Assemblage B was identified in 75%, and assemblage A in 25% of samples. FC levels were statistically elevated in “group I” in comparison to “group II”. Likewise, there was a statistically significant difference between FC levels in patients infected with assemblage A and assemblage B with a mean of 114 μg/gm and 202 μg/gm, respectively.

Conclusion:

The study highlighted the possible association between Giardia genotype B and elevated FC levels, further detailed studies are necessary to clarify these finding.

Keywords: Giardia duodenalis, Genotypes, Fecal calprotectin, Diarrhea, Egypt

Introduction

Giardia duodenalis (syn. G. lamblia and G. intestinalis) is a widespread intestinal parasite of humans and mammals, and is considered as one of the most common parasitic infection with 200 million people infected worldwide posing a serious public health threat (1). Eight assemblages have been identified in G. duodenalis, including assemblages A–H, each of which has a distinct host range (1,2). Most targeted genes for molecular studies of G. duodenalis depended upon the analysis of glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), beta-giardine (bg), small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA), and triosphate isomerase (tpi) genes have shown that the majority of human infections are caused by the two main genetic assemblages A and B (2). A small number of infections with assemblage E have also been reported (3). Genomic analysis of assemblage A and B isolates have indicated a substantial discrepancy between the two groups suggesting that assemblage “A” and “B” Giardia isolates are distinct Giardia species (4).

The quest for associations between certain assemblages and well-defined patterns of symptoms has evolved secondarily to the development of tools dissecting the molecular biology of various Giardia isolates and the understanding of symptoms spectrum associated with giardiasis (5). The possibility of a link between G. duodenalis assemblages and virulence, as evidenced by the likelihood of causing diarrhea and other clinical symptoms, has yielded inconclusive results (6). Nevertheless, differences in assemblage A and B isolates pathogenicity were demonstrated in mice in vivo studies (7).

Since the parasite was first identified, Giardia pathogenicity has been debated. At the peak of infection, Giardia trophozoites induce pathophysiological processes that result in malabsorptive diarrheal disease. It induces various symptoms ranging from asymptomatic carriage to chronic diarrheal disease (8,9). The mechanisms underlying clinical giardiasis consequences are still unknown, but recent research indicates that Giardia strain variability, microbiota composition, co-infecting enteropathogens, host genetically determined mucosal immune responses, immune modulation, and host nutritional status are all important factors (9).

Furthermore, some human studies and experimental evidence indicated that giardiasis might cause pro-inflammatory intestinal responses (10). In adults and even in children, FC, a protein known to be present in stool in neutrophil-mediated intestinal mucosal inflammation, is commonly used as a surrogate marker for intestinal inflammation (10,11). It is suggested as a marker for primary screening and follow-up of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The cut-off value of 50 ng/ml was used to differentiate between IBD and other diarrheal causes (12). However, elevated FC levels have been also identified in infectious diarrhea, including some intestinal parasitic diseases, which correlates with the clinical severity of infectious diarrhea (13). FC level in infectious diarrhea is significantly higher than those shown in irritable bowel syndrome, which has values consistent with the healthy controls (14,15).

The exact cause of elevated FC levels in only some giardiasis cases, whereas other patients may have low levels, is not yet evident. Additionally, there is no apparent correlation between the level of FC and Giardia genotypes. To fill some of the above-mentioned knowledge gaps, this study aimed to assess the level of FC in patients diagnosed with giardiasis in comparison to the control group and to elucidate a potential correlation between FC levels and G. duodenalis genotypes reported.

Methods

Study design and samples collection

Overall, 120 fecal samples were collected from children aged 4–12 years during the period from October 2019 to March 2020 and tested for giardiasis by light microscopy. Fifty fecal samples only were enrolled within the two studied groups. Group I (cases) included 30 children suffering from diarrhea with or without other gastrointestinal manifestations, their stool examination was positive for G. duodenalis by light microscopy. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and those receiving anti-inflammatory, antibiotics, or antidiarrheal medications were excluded from the study. Group II (controls) included 20 children of similar social and environmental backgrounds with no known abdominal symptoms and negative fecal samples by light microscopy for G. duodenalis.

Both groups were selected from Ain shams University's Hospitals outpatients' clinics and samples were transferred to Ain Shams University's Faculty of Medicine's Parasitology Diagnostic Unit. Any associated enteric parasites were excluded by direct microscopic examination and Modified Zeihl Neelson (MZN) stain. Stool samples were sent to a microbiology laboratory to perform stool culture to exclude bacterial causes. Any sample with associated bacterial or parasitic infections other than giardiasis was excluded from the study. Collected samples were stored at – 20 °C without adding any preservatives for further analysis.

Ethical Approval

In accordance with informed consent, privacy and confidentiality of patients sampled and analyzed anonymously during the study, all participants were enrolled.

Molecular genotyping

Following the manufacturer's instructions, genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® Stool mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). DNA extracts were quantified using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop; Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) to contain at least one ng of DNA/μL and kept at – 20 °C until further usage. For molecular identification of G. duodenalis, a 511-bp fragment of the bg gene was amplified using nPCR Lalle et al. (16) and Caccio et al. (17). Positive (known G. duodenalis PCR-positive sample) and negative (no DNA template) controls were routinely integrated in all PCR runs. Secondary PCR products were analyzed using 2% agarose gel (Vivantis) electrophoresis stained with SYBR stain (Invitrogen, Auckland, New Zealand).

Among the positive samples detected by PCR, twelve samples were sequenced using Applied Biosystems 3500XL (Life Technologies, USA) on an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Acquired sequences were visually inspected using Geneious 9.0.5 software program for quality control and presence of double peaks. Using the BLAST tool, consensus sequences were compared to those previously deposited at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) for assemblages and sub-assemblages assignment (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast).

Quantitative FC ELISA test

The assessment of FC was conducted using the PhiCal Calprotectin ELISA Kit (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany). The stool sample was processed, and different dilutions from the stool extract were obtained according to the manufacturers' instructions. The optical density of all the kit standards was calculated, and a standard curve was obtained. The values for each sample were plotted on that curve, and the ELISA test was performed in duplicate. A result below 50 ug/gm was considered negative as reported by the manufacturer (18).

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the statistical package of social science (IMB SPSS) version 11.5 (Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analysis. The data both qualitative and quantitative were presented. When applicable, the Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare groups. P-value was statistically significant if the P<0.05. Diagnostic yield (specificity and sensitivity) of the utilized diagnostic tests were conducted.

Results

Overall, 30 G. duodenalis positive fecal samples were enrolled as cases (Group I), and 20 samples were as controls (Group II). Microscopic examination and stool culture showed no other parasitic or bacterial infection in any stool sample. The mean age of group I was (6.53 ± 2.240), and the mean age of group II was (7.85 ± 2.540) yr. Group I included 17/30 (56.7%) boys and 13/30 (43.3%) girls, group II included 12/20 boys (60%) as well as 8/20 girls (40%). A non-significant correlation was found between sex and age distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). The main presentation of group I was diarrhea, 10 of them suffered from diarrhea less than two weeks (acute diarrhea), while 20 presented with diarrhea more than two weeks (chronic diarrhea). PCR was done for all samples in both groups (Group I & Group II). Group II was confirmed to be negative for giardiasis by PCR. While in-group I, among the 30 microscopy Giardia positive samples, 24 generated the expected products (511 bp).

Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis

Among the 24 positive samples by PCR, 12 were randomly selected for genotyping. Out of the twelve bg sequences analyzed, three were assigned to assemblage A and nine to assemblage B. Correlation between Giardia assemblage and patient data demonstrated that assemblage B showed higher incidence in female (55%) and was associated with chronic diarrhea. In contrast, assemblage A patients were presented with acute diarrhea (Table 1).

Table 1:

Data of the twelve G. duodenalis patients isolates

Sample N Sex Age (yr) Fecal calprotectin Type of Diarrhea Assemblage
1 Female 6 193 Chronic B
2 Female 5 190 Chronic B
8 Female 4 195 Chronic B
9 Male 10 230 Chronic B
14 Male 6 210 Chronic B
15 Female 6 187 Chronic B
17 Male 8 110 Acute A
21 Male 5 205 Chronic B
22 Female 4 115 Acute A
23 Male 6 220 Chronic B
27 Female 5 190 Chronic B
30 Male 4 118 Acute A

Among the sequenced samples, neither A+B mixed infections nor host-specific assemblages of feline, canine, nor livestock (C–F) origin were identified. Genetic heterogeneity was more evident at the subtype level in assemblage B. One of the three A sequences was identical to a previously described reference sequence (GenBank accession number AY072723), while the other two varied by three to four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with X85958. There were 4–7 SNPs in the nine B sequences, some of which coincided to polymorphic (double peaks) positions with AY072725 (Table 2).

Table 2:

Genotypic characterization of G. duodenalis patients isolates

Isolate Genbank accession no Assemblage Reference sequence SNP
L58 MT641254 A X85958 4
L78 MT641255 A X85958 3
L89 MT641256 AII AY072723 -
L13 MT641257 B AY072725 5
L16 MT641258 B AY072725 4
L43 MT641259 B AY072725 5
L49 MT641260 B AY072725 5
L53 MT641261 B AY072725 6
L57 MT641262 B AY072725 7
L59 MT641263 B AY072725 5
L69 MT641264 B AY072725 4
L83 MT641265 B AY072725 6

SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphisms

FC level Evaluation

FC was tested among enrolled samples within the two groups; a level lower than 50 μg/gm was considered negative. FC means level was 164.03 (37.67) and 48.45 (17.06) μg/gm in group I and group II, respectively, with a statistically significant correlation (P<0.05). The cut-off level of FC for predicting giardiasis was perceived to be 92 μg/gm using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. This cut-off level could predict cases diagnosed by giardiasis using microscopy with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In contrast, patients diagnosed with nPCR showed 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, 76.9% NPV, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.893 (Table 3 and Fig. 1). The uppermost level of FC in group I in this study was 230 μg/gm. FC level was elevated in chronic cases with a mean of (186.9 μg/gm) than in acute cases of diarrhea with a mean of (118.3 μg/gm) (P>0.05). Moreover, there was a difference between FC in patients infected with assemblage A and assemblage B with a mean of 114 μg/gm and 202 μg/gm, respectively.

Table 3:

Receiver operator characteristic curves and predictive value of fecal calprotectin for diagnosis of giardiasis

Variable Microscopy n PCR
Cut off value (ug/gm) 92 92
Sensitivity 100% 80%
Specificity 100% 100%
PPV 100% 100%
NPV 100% 76.9%
AUC 1.000 0.893

PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive values; AUC: Area under the curve

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to demonstrate the ability of fecal calprotectin (FCP) to predict giardiasis as diagnosed by microscopy (A) and nPCR (B)

Discussion

High FC level is an indicator of inflammation of the intestinal mucosa resulting from neutrophil migration toward the intestinal tract. It correlates to the degree of intestinal inflammation (19). It is mainly used as a marker of IBD but can also be elevated in some cases of bacterial and viral enteritis (20, 21). The gastrointestinal tract symptoms caused by intestinal parasitic infections can correlate with inflammatory bowel symptoms, which lead to difficulties with its diagnosis and treatment (12). There are only few studies that evaluate the relationship between intestinal inflammatory markers and parasitic infections, and the evidence regarding the importance of FC in parasitic infections is conflicting (11, 15, 22, 23). However, there might be a link between FC levels and severe infections caused by intestinal parasites such as Schistosoma mansoni and G. intestinalis (11, 15).

G. duodenalis is an essential protozoan parasite that causes intestinal manifestations. Some researchers discussed the possibility of Giardia infection to cause an inflammatory response resulting in the elevation of FC levels (24). In contrast, others indicate a less role of pathogenicity attributed to giardiasis (25). Unfortunately, there is a lack of research that correlates FC elevation with the genotypes of Giardia. Moreover, there is a lack of reference ranges for FC levels obtained specifically in giardiasis patients (24). Thus, one of the aims of the present work was to highlight a possible correlation between the level of FC and Giardia genotypes.

The present study included 30 Giardia-positive cases and 20 Giardia-negative controls by light microscopic examination. Out of the 30 Giardia-positive samples, 24 (80%) were confirmed using bg nPCR. The sensitivity of PCR in detecting G. duodenalis is known to be higher than that of conventional microscopy (26). The discrepancy between PCR amplification of DNA and some positive microscopy samples in the current study could be attributed to the presence of inhibitors in stool samples, cyst quantity and quality, sample storage conditions, DNA extraction technique, number of copies of the target genes, and primer and cycling conditions selection (27). Twelve Giardia positive samples were genotyped at the bg locus and two genetically distinct assemblages A and B of Giardia infections were detected. Assemblage B was predominant (9/12 or 75%) in comparison to assemblage A (3/12 or 25%), indicating that the transmission of human giardiasis in the current study was primarily anthroponotic. Our results were closely related to assemblage B distributions previously reported in Egypt (28, 29), and in contrast to other studies in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Yemen where assemblage A was predominant (3032).

Attempts to ascribe clinical variability and pathogenicity based on assemblage designation have been inconclusive, despite genetic divergence (10). Few studies have found an association between symptomatic assemblage B infection and asymptomatic assemblage A infection (30, 33). While strong correlation of persistent diarrhea with assemblage B and intermittent diarrhea with assemblage A was described in some reports (34). Similar findings were also found in our results as cases presented with chronic diarrhea were infected with assemblage B, while assemblage A cases were presented with acute diarrhea.

In the present study, the FC levels were elevated in Giardia positive cases (Group I) exceeding 50 ug/gm, with a significant difference between this group and the control group (Group II). In agreement, G. duodenalis could raise the FC level (11). Moreover, an increased FC level was reported in a case of chronic giardiasis attributed it to the inflammatory response caused by the chronic exposure to infection (24). In contrast, there was a non-significant association between the presence of G. duodenalis in stool and high FC (35). In this study, the cut-off value of FC was 92 μg/gm with an uppermost level reaching 230 μg/gm, which is lower than the cut-off value demonstrated by IBD in other studies. Jha et al., (36) reported a cut-off value of 188 μg/gm as a predictor for differentiating inflammatory bowel syndrome from ulcerative colitis. With an uppermost level reaching 3000 μg/gm in case of active ulcerative colitis. This difference between the cut value in Giardia infection and IBD may be attributed to the degree and extent of mucosal inflammation caused by different diseases. FC level is considered the only marker that can significantly differentiate between different endoscopic grades of infections (36).

In this study, the FC level (92 μg/gm) had a higher sensitivity for predicting G. duodenalis infection by microscopy than nPCR, while the specificity was the same using both techniques. The discrepancy might be since microscopy detected more Giardia-positive cases than PCR in our results. Our results also showed that FC levels were higher in patients with chronic diarrhea (186.9 μg/gm). In agreement, FC could be used to screen patients newly referred for chronic diarrhea (37). The mean FC level in assemblage B patients (202 μg/gm) was higher than assemblage A patients (114 μg/gm) indicating a possible higher pathogenic role for assemblage B. Similarly, assemblage B is considered more virulent in recent reports and more common in outbreaks (3). Likewise, the parasite genotype might determine the degree of intestinal inflammation and that G. duodenalis assemblage B can cause a high degree of mucosal damage associated with infiltration of inflammatory cells (38, 39). Assemblage B might cause more duodenal inflammation in adults with elevated FC levels as well (11). Elevated FC level in this study could be attributed to the degree of intestinal inflammation as most patients had more prolonged exposure to infection-causing chronic diarrhea. Moreover, it may be due to Giardia genotyping, as genotype B was more evident.

Conclusion

This study highlighted a possible correlation between the elevated FC levels and Giardia assemblage B and the usability of FC with an estimated Cut-off value for assessing gastrointestinal tract infection caused by giardiasis. However, an accurate estimation of giardiasis long-term effect on child growth is a complex task, due to the number of potential factors that should be considered. Extensive comparative genomics studies on several assemblages A and B isolates are required to ascertain strain-specific pathogenicity.

Footnotes

Funding

None

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol. 2013; 43: 943–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011; 24: 110–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xiao L, Feng Y. Molecular epidemiologic tools for waterborne pathogens Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2017; 8–9:14–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Franzén O, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Castro E, et al. Draft genome sequencing of Giardia intestinalis assemblage B isolate GS: is human Giardiasis caused by two different species? PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(8):e1000560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Puebla LJ, Núñez FA, Fernández YA, et al. Correlation of Giardia duodenalis assemblages with clinical and epidemiological data in Cuban children. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;23:7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Choy SH, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MA, et al. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Giardia Infection among Indigenous Communities in Rural Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Singer SM. Host immunity and pathogen strain contribute to intestinal disaccharidase impairment following a gut infection. J Immunol. 2011;187:3769–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cotton JA, Beatty JK, Buret AG. Host-parasite interactions and pathophysiology in Giardia infections. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:925–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Robertson LJ, Hanevik K, Escobedo AA, et al. Giardiasis—Why do the symptoms sometimes never stop?. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26:75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bartelt LA, Sartor RB. Advances in understanding Giardia: determinants and mechanisms of chronic sequelae. F1000Prime Rep. 2015;7:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hanevik K, Hausken T, Morken MH, et al. Persisting symptoms and duodenal inflammation related to Giardia duodenalis infection. J Infect. 2007;55(6):524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kolho KL, Alfthan H. Concentration of fecal calprotectin in 11,255 children aged 0–18 years. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(9):1024–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salman YJ, Ali CHE, Abdul-Razaq AA. Fecal Calprotectin among patients infected with some protozoan infections.Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6(6): 3258–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jeong SJ. The role of fecal calprotectin in pediatric disease. Korean J Pediatr. 2019;62(8):287–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bustinduy AL, Sousa-Figueiredo JC, Adriko M, et al. Fecal occult blood and fecal calprotectin as point-of-care markers of intestinal morbidity in Ugandan children with Schistosoma mansoni infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(11):e2542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lalle M, Pozio E, Capelli G, et al. Genetic heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of Giardia duodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int J Parasitol. 2005; 35 (2): 207–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Caccio SM, De Giacomo M, Pozio E. Sequence analysis of the beta-giardin gene and development of a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay to genotype Giardia duodenalis cysts from human faecal samples. Int J Parasitol. 2002; 32 (8): 1023–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mumolo MG, Bertani L, Ceccarelli L, et al. From bench to bedside: Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical setting. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(33):3681–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.D'Angelo F, Felley C, Frossard J L. Calprotectin in Daily Practice: Where Do We Stand in 2017?. Digestion. 2017; 95: 293–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carroccio A, Iacono G, Cottone M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin assay in distinguishing organic causes of chronic diarrhea from irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study in adults and children. Clin Chem. 2003;49 (6 Pt 1):861–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen CC, Huang JL, Chang CJ, et al. Fecal Calprotectin as a correlative marker in clinical severity of infectious diarrhea and usefulness in evaluating bacterial or viral pathogens in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012; 55(5): 541–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Opintan JA, Newman MJ, Ayeh-Kumi PF, et al. Pediatric diarrhea in southern Ghana: etiology and association with intestinal inflammation and malnutrition. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(4):936–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kohli A, Bushen OY, Pinkerton RC, et al. Giardia duodenalis assemblage, clinical presentation and markers of intestinal inflammation in Brazilian children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(7):718–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Melissa Shapiro M, Shah N, Sehgal S. Severely Elevated Fecal Calprotectin in A Pediatric Patient with Persistent Giardiasis. Acad J Gastroenterol & Hepatol. 2021; 2(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Roxström-Lindquist K, Palm D, Reiner D, et al. Giardia immunity--an update. Trends Parasitol. 2006; 22(1):26–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adeyemo FE, Singh G, Reddy P, et al. Methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia: from microscopy to nucleic acid-based tools in clinical and environmental regimes. Acta Trop. 2018; 184:15–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wilke H, Robertson LJ. Preservation of Giardia cysts in stool samples for subsequent PCR analysis. J Microbiol Methods. 2009; 78(3): 292–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Foronda P, Bargues MD, Abreu-Acosta N, et al. Identification of genotypes Giardia intestinalis of human isolates in Egypt. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:1177–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taha S, Abd Al Aal Z, Saleh Z, et al. Giardia intestinalis assemblages among Egyptian symptomatic children: Prevalence and seasonal distribution in Cairo, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2018; 48:661–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Al-Mohammed HI. Genotypes of Giardia intestinalis clinical isolates of gastrointestinal symptomatic and asymptomatic Saudi children. Parasitol Res. 2011; 108:1375–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sarkari B, Ashrafmansori A, Hatam GR, et al. Genotyping of Giardia lamblia isolates from human in southern Iran. Trop Biomed. 2012; 29:366–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Al-Yousefi NA, Mahdy MA, Xiao L, et al. Molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis in Yemen. Exp Parasitol. 2013; 134 (2):141–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aydin AF, Besirbellioglu BA, Avci IY, et al. Classification of Giardia duodenalis parasites in Turkey into Groups A and B using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004; 50:147–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Homan W, Mank T. Human giardiasis: genotype linked differences in clinical symptomatology. Int J Parasitol. 2001; 31:822–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.George CM, Burrowes V, Perin J, et al. Enteric Infections in Young Children are Associated with Environmental Enteropathy and Impaired Growth. Trop Med Int Health. 2018; 23(1):26–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jha AK, Chaudhary M, Dayal VM, et al. Optimal cut-off value of fecal calprotectin for the evaluation of ulcerative colitis: An unsolved issue?. JGH Open. 2018;2(5):207–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Banerjee A, Srinivas M, Eyre R, et al. Faecal Calprotectin for differentiating between irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease: a useful screen in daily gastroenterology practice. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015; 6(1): 20–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Campbell DI, McPhail G, Lunn PG, et al. Intestinal inflammation measured by fecal neopterin in Gambian children with enteropathy: association with growth failure, Giardia lamblia, and intestinal permeability. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004; 39(2):153–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cotton JA, Motta JP, Schenck LP, et al. Giardia duodenalis infection reduces granulocyte infiltration in an in vivo model of bacterial toxin-induced colitis and attenuates inflammation in human intestinal tissue. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES