Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Sep 18;37(11):3722–3728. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16937

Artificial chordae for mitral valve repair

Igor Vendramin 1, Aldo D Milano 2, Angela Pucci 3, Andrea Lechiancole 1, Sandro Sponga 1, Uberto Bortolotti 1,, Ugolino Livi 1
PMCID: PMC9826337  PMID: 36116053

Abstract

Background

Mitral valve repair using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to replace mitral chordae tendineae is a well‐established procedure. However, the incidence of neo‐chordae failure causing recurrent mitral regurgitation is not well defined.

Methods

We have reviewed the reported cases of complications after mitral valve repair related to the use of neo‐chordae. This study was mainly carried out through PubMed, Medline, and Google Chrome websites.

Results

We have identified a total of 26 patients presenting with rupture of polytetrafluoroethylene neo‐chordae, mostly being described as isolated cases. Few other cases of recurrent mitral regurgitation with hemolysis were found, where reoperation was not caused by neo‐chordal failure but most likely by technical errors. At pathological investigation the findings were substantially similar in all reported cases. The neo‐chordae retained their length and pliability, became covered with host tissue and rupture was mainly related to suture size. Mild calcification was observed not interfering with chordal function; chordal infection did never occur.

Conclusions

The use of artificial neo‐chordae provides excellent late results with durable mitral valve repair stability. Chordal rupture may occur late postoperatively leading to reoperation because of recurrent mitral regurgitation. Despite its rarity, this potential complication should not be overlooked during follow‐up of patients after mitral valve repair using artificial neo‐chordae.

Keywords: cardiovascular pathology, valve repair/replacement

1. INTRODUCTION

Mitral valve repair (MVr) is the gold standard treatment for patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Based on Alain Carpentier's experience and further expanding the principles of the “French correction,” MVr has become an increasingly frequent and reproducible procedure. 1 Various techniques and subsequent modifications have been adopted to increase the quality and improve the long‐term outcome and durability of MVr in patients with MR. Among these, the use of artificial neo‐chordae, made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) sutures (Gore‐Tex, WL Gore and Associates, Inc.), is recognized as a fundamental tool to be used during MVr particularly in the most complex cases. 2 , 3 However, some dismal complications have been observed which might be underestimated due to their substantial rarity and an intrinsic difficulty in identifying them from large patient series. Indeed, the real incidence of such complications is unclear and since they may cause significant clinical problems, they should elicit a special attention. This article describes the cases of ePTFE neo‐chordae failure reviewing the incidence and causes of this complication.

2. METHODS

We have performed a research on PubMed, Medline, and Google Chrome to identify articles in the English literature reporting complications related to the use of ePTFE neo‐chordae after MVr. Cases described in textbooks or abstracts were excluded as those mentioned in large series with scarce or any clinical and/or pathological details. Further data were obtained analyzing the reference sections of pertinent articles and the archives of the journals on the CTSNet website.

We have entered in the search various terms, alone or in combination, such as MVr, mitral chordal rupture, chordal replacement, artificial neo‐chordae, ePTFE sutures, recurrent MR, ePTFE chordal rupture, ePTFE chordal calcification, ePTFE‐related complications, pathology of ePTFE neo‐chordae. Papers on the use of left ventricular transapical off‐pump chordal implantation have not been considered.

For this study, approval by local Ethical Committees was not required as well as informed consent, since patient data were treated anonymously.

3. BACKGROUND

The concept of replacing diseased mitral valve chordae was proposed in the 1960' using various suture materials without being followed by consistent clinical applications. 4 This idea was revitalized by the work of Robert WM Frater and associates, at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, who pioneered the use of autologous and bovine pericardium to replace elongated or ruptured mitral and tricuspid valve chordae, both experimentally and clinically. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Such neo‐chordae showed various degrees of fibrosis and retraction, and although it was demonstrated that replacement of chordae tendineae of the atrioventricular valves was feasible and reproducible, the need for a more durable material as chordal substitute became evident.

ePTFE was tested as material to construct mitral valve neo‐chordae, 9 demonstrating great physical, chemical, mechanical, and thermal properties, high flexibility, and tensile strength with consequent resistance to fatigue. 10 ePTFE sutures, made of microporous, nonabsorbable monofilament were considered as ideal material to be used for MVr and were initially tested in sheep showing that the new chordae in a short time became covered by host tissue. 9 Furthermore, it was also demonstrated that ePTFE chordae maintained their original length, pliability, and bending properties. 11 , 12 Based on such experimental evidence the clinical application of this technique was started with excellent early results. 13

4. RESULTS

This review has identified a series of articles reporting complications following the use of artificial neo‐chordae for MVr. In some cases, ePTFE sutures were directly responsible for repair failure while in others their contribution was often marginal being failures related to a surgical mistake in many cases. Most of these complications are described in single Case Reports while some of them can be extrapolated from large series.

4.1. ePTFE chordal rupture

Table 1 summarizes the cases of early and late chordal rupture. The first case of rupture of artificial mitral chordae was described by Yeo et al., 14 although the suture material was not specified it is very likely that such chordae were made of ePTFE. The first patient with histological evaluation of the ruptured neo‐chordae was reported by Butany et al., 15 followed by 12 further cases. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 In this group there were eight males and six females, with an age range from 44 to 84 years (median, 64 years). Chordal rupture occurred early, 2, 4, and 4 months after MVr, in three cases, 14 , 18 , 20 while in the remaining 11 it was observed from 1.4 to 14 years (median, 11 years). At reoperation, a second MVr was reported only in two cases, 14 , 16 while in all other patients, mitral valve replacement was performed, associated to tricuspid annuloplasty in two and aortic valve replacement in one. 16 , 19 , 21 Rupture occurred in chordae attached to the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) in 11 cases and to the posterior leaflet in one; in this last case a CV‐4 suture was used while in the others a CV‐5 suture was employed in 9, a CV‐4 in one and a CV‐3 in one. For two patients, incomplete data were available; 13 , 15 histologic findings were reported in seven cases with ultrastructural data in 3. 20 , 21 , 25

Table 1.

Data of patients with ruptured ePTFE neo‐chordae after MVR.

Author Sex, age ePTFE sutures size and site Reoperation Interval (years) Findings
Yeo et al. 14 M, 44 NA MVr 0.4 Chordae rupture, hemolysis, histology NA
Butany et al. 15 F,76 NA MVR 14 Chordae rupture, Ca++, no inflammatory cells
Coutinho et al. 16 M, 68 CV‐5 anterior mitral leaflet (AML) MVr, new chordae 6 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, pannus formation, collagen infiltration
F, 67 CV‐5, AML MVR, TAP 11 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, Ca++, fibrosis, no inflammatory cells
Farivar et al. 17 M, 57 NA, AML MVR 11 AML chordae rupture, thickening, histology NA
Yamashita et al. 18 F, 60 CV‐3a, CV‐5 AML MVR 1.4 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, histology NA
M, 78 CV‐3a, CV‐5 AML MVR 0.2 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, histology NA
Bortolotti et al. 19 M, 51 CV‐5, AML, PML MVR, AVR 11 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, fibrosis, minimal Ca++
Castillo et al. 20 M, 55 CV‐5a CV3b AML, CV‐3 PML MVR 0.4 CV‐3 and CV‐5 chordal loops rupture, fibroblast ingrowth
Kudo et al. 21 F, 60 CV‐5 AML MVR, TAP 3 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, inflammatory cells, no Ca++
Mori et al. 22 M, 65 CV‐5 AML MVR 10 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, histology NA
Nakaoka et al. 23 M, 63 CV‐5 AML MVR 7 AML CV‐5 chordae rupture, hemolysis, histology NA
Luthra et al. 24 F, 84 CV‐4 PML MVR 12 PML CV‐4 chordae rupture, Ca++, histology NA
Luthra et al. 25 F, 76 CV‐4 AML MVR 6 AML CV‐4 chordae rupture, Ca++ infiltration at fracture point

Abbreviations: AML, anterior mitral leaflet; ePTFE, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; F, female; M, male; MVr, mitral valve repair; MVR, mitral valve replacement; NA, not available; PML, posterior mitral leaflet; TAP, tricuspid annuloplasty.

a

Anchoring loop to papillary muscle tip.

b

Loop‐in‐loop technique.

Other cases of ePTFE chordal rupture have been observed in large series of patients undergoing MVr but without providing specific patient information. Lam et al., analyzing the incidence of hemolytic anemia after MVr, reported neo‐chordae rupture as cause of recurrent MR among 32 patients of their series; 26 the incidence of this complication was not specified and this issue not commented. Tabata et al., in 700 patients with MVr found that three required reoperation 4, 7, and 84 months due to ruptured neo‐chordae; 27 in all cases rupture had occurred at their middle portion. David et al., in analyzing their experience spanning two decades observed only two cases of ruptured neo‐chordae as cause of recurrent MR and reoperation. 28

Recently, Mutsuga et al., reported a total of 16 ePTFE chordal ruptures which caused recurrent MR in seven patients. 29 In five the neo‐chordae were attached to the PML and in two to the AML, but the total number of ruptured chordae was similar (8 vs. 7); except in one case sutures were size CV‐5. Most importantly, suture rupture was identified as a predictor of risk of reoperation at univariate analysis. 29

4.2. ePTFE‐related complications without rupture

As shown in Table 2, five patients have been reported in whom reoperation was required after MVr, the cause being referred to the presence of unbroken ePTFE neo‐chordae. 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 There were 4 males and one female aged 49–74 years (median, 63). In all of them, the neo‐chordae had been attached to the AML but only in two cases the chordal size (CV‐4 and CV‐5) was specified. 30 , 32 The indication for reoperation was hemolysis in three patients and recurrent MR in two. At reoperation, calcification of ePTFE chordae was found in two cases 31 , 32 and absence of chordal endothelialization in one. 33 In one patient the neo‐chordae were found to be too long at reoperation 30 while in another patient two pairs of chordae attached to the AML had been incorrectly inserted at initial repair; 34 in this patient, reoperated because of early severe hemolysis, two pairs of neo‐chordae were overlapping each other with AML retraction causing relevant MR. 34 In the reported cases reoperation occurred 0.2 months to 7 years, while in one case reoperation was only indicated as “early.” 34 In one patient a second MVr was performed while in all others the mitral valve was replaced.

Table 2.

Data of patients without rupture of ePTFE chordae requiring reoperation after MVr.

Author Sex, Age ePTFE sutures size and site Reoperation Cause Interval (years) Findings
Kihara et al. 30 M, 49 CV‐4, AML MVr Hemolysis 0.4 Chordae too long
Di Gioia et al. 31 M, 49 NA, AML MVR Recurrent MR 7 Chordae fibrosis, Ca++, no inflammatory cells
Fukunaga et al. 32 F, 63 CV‐5, AML MVR Recurrent MR 7 Chordae calcification and sclerosis
LI et al. 33 M, 74 NA, AML MVR Hemolysis 0.2 Absence of chordae endothelialization
Ceresa et al. 34 M, 65 NA, AML MVR Hemolysis NA Incorrect chordae placement

Abbreviations: AML, anterior mitral leaflet; ePTFE, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; F, female; M, male; MR, mitral regurgitation; MVr, mitral valve repair; MVR, mitral valve replacement; NA, not available; PML, posterior mitral leaflet.

In all these cases either recurrent MR or hemolytic anemia were considered related to the presence of ePTFE sutures.

4.3. Pathology of failing ePTFE chordae

Information on the pathologic changes in implanted neo‐chordae can be obtained from few specific articles 35 , 36 , 37 and from scattered individual case reports; 15 , 19 , 29 , 31 , 32 furthermore, in three cases also ultrastructural studies with electron microscopy of the explanted ePTFE chordae have been performed. 20 , 21 , 25

From the available data, it appears that changes in ePTFE neo‐chordae are quite common among all studies. In fact, rupture of ePTFE chordae generally has occurred at their mid‐point or at one of their extremities. Detachment of a neo‐chorda from a papillary muscle tip of from its insertion on a leaflet has been exceedingly rare. 35

From gross appearance, ePTFE neo‐chordae are generally well preserved, they maintain their flexibility and original length and with time may be difficult to differentiate from natural chordae tendineae (Figure 1A). At the attachment site on the free margin of the mitral leaflets they become incorporated by the host reaction although suture knots may still be visible (Figure 1B). Depending on the time of function they get progressively covered, usually starting from the leaflet attachment and then progressing towards their midline. Complete absence of neo‐endothelialization is extremely rare and observed usually only in early explants. 33 , 35 , 38 Late postoperatively, neo‐chordae have been found to have an increased thickness with at times some calcific infiltrates, extensive calcification being very uncommon. 32

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Gross appearance of the anterior mitral leaflet excised at reoperation because of late expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) neo‐chordae rupture. Remnant of an artificial chorda (AC) is barely recognizable from the natural chordae (NC) (arrows). (B) Arrows indicate the suture knots, fixing the artificial chordae to the free margin of the anterior mitral leaflet, which are still visible despite the host tissue reaction.

Histologically, the host tissue covering the sutures was mainly formed by collagen while the microporous structure of ePTFE became often filled by plasmaprotein insudation which could convey calcium deposition (Figure 2). Inflammatory cells were rarely seen and considered as a foreign body reaction process; 21 in particular no cases of endocarditis on artificial neo‐chordae have been reported.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Histologic section of a ruptured expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) chorda remnant that is partially covered by collagenous tissue which infiltrates the fibers of the chorda (arrow). (Hematoxylin—eosin staining; original magnification 20x). (B) Higher magnification of the dense, acellular or pauci‐cellular connective tissue at the periphery of the ePTFE chorda. (Hematoxylin—eosin staining; original magnification 40x).

At the site of rupture disruption of the chord architecture was described and confirmed, as all other findings, at electron microscopy.

5. COMMENT

The use of ePTFE neo‐chordae in MVr procedures provides excellent long‐term results in term of repair durability and survival. 27 , 28 , 39 The incidence of recurrent MR after MVr with the use of neo‐chordae is low and generally ascribed to progression of the mitral degenerative disease or incomplete initial repair. Reoperation due to intrinsic failure of ePTFE chordae is quite uncommon, as confirmed by the present review.

Postoperative rupture is the major complication related to the use of neo‐chordae and it is generally reported as isolated cases or may be found as rare cause of reoperation in large patient series with extended follow‐up. David et al., reviewing their 25‐year experience of MVr with chordal replacement using ePTFE sutures in over 600 patients, reported 35 reoperations, only two of them being related to neo‐chordal rupture. 28 Hata et al., during a follow‐up of more than 20 years, did not observe instances of rupture or degeneration of neo‐chordae in reoperated patients. 3 Similar results are reported by Salvador et al., in over 600 patients with a freedom from reoperation of 92% at 15 years, with no cases of ePTFE chordae failure. 40

We have identified a total of 26 cases of rupture of artificial neo‐chordae. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 However, the real incidence of this complication is difficult to verify since in some reports the number of cases is not specified or the pairs of chordae implanted in each patient is extremely variable. We have estimated that in the present series of patients over 60 ePTFE neo‐chordae rupture have been reported; however, it is not always clear how many neo‐chordae were implanted at initial MVr. Furthermore, from a single Gore‐Tex suture a pair of neo‐chordae is obtained but in most articles the term “neo‐chorda” or “pair of neochordae“ is often used indifferently.

In some patients, recurrent MR presented with hemolytic anemia which is a well‐recognized consequence of a failing MVr. 26 The degree of hemolysis depends on the regurgitant jet velocity and some distinct patterns of flow disturbance have been associated to shear stresses. 14 In some cases, hemolysis was considered the result of blood cell trauma by the contact of the regurgitant jet with the mitral prosthetic ring or the uncovered neo‐chordae. 33 In two cases it was considered the consequence of excessive chordae length or incorrect insertion, 30 , 34 but in such cases it was an evident technical mistake.

ePTFE chordal strength much depends from the size of the sutures used for MVr. In the reported cases, CV‐5 sutures were more prone to rupture compared to CV‐4 or CV‐3 ones. Sizing of ePTFE sutures differs from that of other traditional suturing material commonly used; Gore‐Tex CV‐5 corresponds to 4/0 and CV‐6 to 5/0 polypropylene monofilament sutures, which should be considered when selecting the type of neo‐chorda. 41 In some papers, both sizing criteria are indifferently used and this may generate some confusion. Furthermore, incorrect suture handling, using clips, forceps or other instruments, may have weakened the neo‐chorda favoring rupture regardless from its initial size. 29 A point that it is important to emphasize is that instrumental manipulation of ePTFE sutures during the repair must therefore be avoided since this it is, probably, the only other aspect in which the surgeons can act to decrease the possibility of this complication to happen.

Different techniques of neo‐chordae length sizing have been used, most of which have been demonstrated to be equally effective. In this study, chordal rupture did not appear to be related to any specific technique and indeed this complication involved also use of premeasured chordal loops. 18 , 20 Neo‐chordae rupture occurred only in one suture inserted to the PML; 22 this is likely to be due to the fact that ePTFE sutures have been mostly used to repair AML prolapse. The growing experience with nonresectional approaches in MVr will certainly increase the number of ePTFE chordae inserted to the PML and their durability in this position will have to be tested with time. 42

A recent experimental study has shown that suboptimal MVr can be caused by alterations in chordal forces and leaflet stresses, being increasingly relevant as more complex prolapse forms were considered being worst when simulating implantation of a single neo‐chorda. 43 Use of multiple chordae was associated to less errors in neo‐chordae length tuning and a suboptimal suture length significantly altered chordal forces and leaflet stresses, possibly influencing the long‐term outcome of MVr. Other have suggested that use of a greater number of chordae would provide a more durable MVr. 39

Unfortunately, in this study, limited information on the pathological features of failing ePTFE chordae could be found. However, in most cases uniform data were reported, indicating that even after many years neo‐chordae maintain their initial size and flexibility becoming covered with host tissue rendering them unrecognizable from native chordae tendineae. At the site of rupture, ePTFE showed signs of structural deterioration owing to friction and traction forces, expression of fatigue‐induced lesions; 19 , 20 nevertheless, due to the rare cases of suture fracture reported, ePTFE seems to maintain its structural integrity in most cases for many years. 15 It has been postulated that chordal calcification may lead to subsequent rupture. 29 Small calcific deposits within neo‐chordae structure, probably favored by plasmaprotein insudation, have been occasionally observed and interestingly, only in one case diffuse neo‐chordae calcification without rupture was considered responsible for MVr failure. 32 Inflammatory infiltrates were seldom found and no cases of chordal endocarditis have been reported, indicating resistance of ePTFE sutures to infection.

6. STUDY LIMITATIONS

This study has some limitations. Most complications related to the use of ePTFE neo‐chordae for MVr have been found in the description of isolated cases; in large series of patients undergoing MVr the cause of recurrent MR was not always specified which renders the real incidence of neo‐chordal failure difficult to establish. Nevertheless, even if extremely rare, considering the extensive use of ePTFE sutures to treat MR through over three decades, neo‐chordae rupture might be still underestimated. Furthermore, incomplete data in each reported case may allow only some speculations on the real influence of specific surgical techniques, suture sizes and site of implant on early and long‐term fate of MVr.

7. CONCLUSIONS

ePTFE sutures are excellent substitutes for ruptured or elongated mitral valve chordae causing prolapse of both AML and PML. Recurrent MR may be ascribed to neo‐chordae failure in an extremely limited number of cases although the real incidence of this complication is unknown and probably underestimated. Increasing the number of neo‐chordae, a correct length sizing and the use of thicker sutures seem to be prerequisites for a more durable MVr. Patients having MVr with implant of ePTFE neo‐chordae should benefit from continuous follow‐up and echocardiographic assessment of repair stability.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Open Access Funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Udine within the CRUI‐CARE Agreement.

Vendramin I, Milano AD, Pucci A, et al. Artificial chordae for mitral valve repair. J Card Surg. 2022;37:3722‐3728. 10.1111/jocs.16937

Review of early and late complications

REFERENCES

  • 1. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery – “the French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323‐337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J. Chordal replacement with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for mitral valve repair: a 25‐year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1635‐1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hata H, Fujita T, Shimahara I, Sato S, Ishibashi‐Ueda H, Kobayashi J. A 25‐year study of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in mitral valve repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:463‐469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bortolotti U, Milano AD, Frater RWM. Mitral valve repair with artificial chordae: a review of its history, technical details, long‐term follow‐up, and pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:684‐691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frater RWM, Berghuis J, Brown AL, Ellis FH. The experimental and clinical use of autogenous pericardium for the replacement and extension of mitral and tricuspid valve cusps and chordae. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1965;6:214‐228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Frater RWM, Gabbay S, Shore D, Factor S, Strom J. Reproducible replacement of elongated or ruptured mitral valve chordae. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;35:14‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bortolotti U, Gallo JI, Gabbay S, Factor SM, Sisto D, Frater RWM. Replacement of mitral valve chordae with autologous pericardium in dogs. Surgeon. 1984;32:15‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gabbay S, Bortolotti U, Factor S, Shore DF, Frater RWM. Calcification of implanted xenograft pericardium. Influence of site and function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;87:782‐787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vetter HO, Burach JH, Factor SM, et al. Replacement of chordae tendineae of the mitral valve using the new expanded PTFE suture. In: Bodnar E, Yacoub M, eds. Biologic and Bioprosthetic Valves. Yorke Medical Books; 1986:772‐785. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hertweck SP, von Fraunhofer JA, Masterson BJ. Tensile characteristics of PTFE sutures. Biomaterials. 1888;9:457‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zussa C, Frater RWM, Polesel E, Galloni M, Valfrè C. Artificial mitral valve chordae: experimental and clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:367‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Revuelta JM, Garcia‐Rinaldi R, Gaite L, Val F, Garijo F. Generation of chordae tendineae with polytetrafluoroethylene stents. Results of mitral valve chordal replacement in sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:98‐103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. David TE, Bos J, Rakowski H. Mitral valve repair by replacement of chordae tendineae with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:495‐501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yeo TC, Freeman WK, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA. Mechanisms of hemolysis after mitral valve repair: assessment by serial echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:717‐723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Butany J, Collins MJ, David TE. Ruptured synthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene chordae tendineae. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2004;13:182‐184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Coutinho GF, Carvalho L, Antunes MJ. Acute mitral regurgitation due to rupture of ePTFE neo‐chordae. J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:278‐281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Farivar RS, Sherman SK, Cohn LH. Late rupture of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae after mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cradiovasc Surg. 2009;137:504‐506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yamashita MH, Skarsgard PL. Intermediate and early rupture of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae after mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:341‐343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bortolotti U, Celiento M, Pratali S, Anastasio G, Pucci A. Recurrent mitral regurgitation due to ruptured artificial chordae: case report and review of the literature. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21:440‐443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Castillio JG, Anyanwu AC, El‐Eshmawi A, Gordon RE, Adams DH. Early rupture of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neochord after complex mitral valve repair; an electron microscopic analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:e29‐e31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kudo M, Yozu R, Okamoto K. Recurrent mitral regurgitation due to ruptured ePTFE neochordae after mitral valve repair by the loop technique: report of case. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20(suppl):746‐749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mori M, Pang PYK, Hashim SW. Rupture of GORE‐TEX neochordae 10 years after mitral valve repair. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:E343‐E345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nakaoka Y, Kubokawa SI, Yamashina S, et al. Late rupture of artificial neochordae associated with hemolytic anemia. J Cardiol Cases. 2017;16:123‐125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Luthra S, Ismail A, Tsang G. Calcific degeneration and late fracture of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neochords after mitral valve repair. JTCVS Tech. 2020;1:34‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Luthra S, Eissa A, Malvindi PG, Tsang GM. Calcification of Gore‐Tex neochord after mitral repair: electron microscopy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114:e1‐e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lam BK, Cosgrove DM, III , Bhudia SK, Gillinov AM. Hemolysis after mitral valve repair: mechanisms and treatment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:191‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tabata M, Kasegawa H, Fukui T, Shimizu A, Sato Y, Takanashi S. Long‐term outcomes of artificial chordal replacement with tourniquet technique in mitral valve repair: a single‐center experience of 700 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2033‐2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. David TE, David CM, Lafreniere‐Roula M, Manlhiot C. Long‐term outcome of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160:385‐394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mutsuga M, Narita Y, Tokuda Y, et al. Predictors of failure of mitral valve repair using artificial chordae. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113:1136‐1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Khiara S, Kasegawa H, Kobayashi N, et al. Severe hemolysis due to artificial chordae displacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997;6:69‐70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. di Gioia CRT, Brancaccio G, Sinatra R, Gallo P. Long‐term histologic features of synthetic chordal replacement for mitral valve repair: a case report. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001;10:87‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fukunaga S, Tomoeda H, Ueda T, Mori R, Aoyagi S, Kato S. Recurrent mitral regurgitation due to calcified synthetic chordae. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:955‐957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li J, Duan QJ. Severe hemolytic anemia and acute renal failure after mitral valve repair associated with non‐endothelialization of artificial chordae tendineae: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:303. 10.1186/s13019-021-01686-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ceresa F, Rubino AS, Zito C, Patanè F. Haemolytic anemia due to early failure of mitral valve repair with artificial neochordae: a technical error. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2022;3:111‐113. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Minatoya K, Okabayashi H, Shimada I, et al. Pathologic aspects of polytetrafluoroethylene sutures in human heart. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:883‐887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Minatoya K, Kabayashi J, Sasako Y, Ishibashi‐Ueda H, Yutani C, Kitamura S. Long‐term pathological changes of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) suture in the human heart. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:139‐142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Privitera S, Butany J, Silversides C, Leask R, David TE. Artificial chordae tendineae: long‐term changes. J Cardiac Surg. 2005;20:90‐92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Maurer I, Bernhard A. PTFE sutures for mitral valve reconstruction–histological findings in man. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;39:73‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pawale A, McCarthy PM. Late calcific fractures of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae: blending techniques and a greater number of neochordae for durable mitral repair. JTCVS Techniques. 2020;1:39‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Salvador L, Mirone S, Bianchini R, et al. A 20‐year experience with mitral valve repair with artificial chordae in 608 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1280‐1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. The Perfect Close. WL Gore Medical; 2015.
  • 42. Dreyfus GD, Dulguerov F, Marcacci C, et al. Respect when you can, resect when you should: a realistic approach to posterior leaflet mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1956‐1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sturla F, Votta E, Onorati F, et al. Biomechanical drawbacks of different techniques of mitral neochordal implantation: when an apparently optimal repair can fail. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;250:1303‐1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cardiac Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES