Skip to main content
Communications Chemistry logoLink to Communications Chemistry
. 2023 Jan 9;6:7. doi: 10.1038/s42004-022-00796-z

Branching mechanism of photoswitching in an Fe(II) polypyridyl complex explained by full singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics

Tamás Rozgonyi 1, György Vankó 1, Mátyás Pápai 1,
PMCID: PMC9829715  PMID: 36697805

Abstract

It has long been known that irradiation with visible light converts Fe(II) polypyridines from their low-spin (singlet) to high-spin (quintet) state, yet mechanistic interpretation of the photorelaxation remains controversial. Herein, we simulate the full singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics of the [Fe(terpy)2]2+ (terpy = 2,2’:6’,2”-terpyridine) complex in full dimension, in order to clarify the complex photodynamics. Importantly, we report a branching mechanism involving two sequential processes: a dominant 3MLCT→3MC(3T2g)→3MC(3T1g)→5MC, and a minor 3MLCT→3MC(3T2g)→5MC component. (MLCT = metal-to-ligand charge transfer, MC = metal-centered). While the direct 3MLCT→5MC mechanism is considered as a relevant alternative, we show that it could only be operative, and thus lead to competing pathways, in the absence of 3MC states. The quintet state is populated on the sub-picosecond timescale involving non-exponential dynamics and coherent Fe-N breathing oscillations. The results are in agreement with the available time-resolved experimental data on Fe(II) polypyridines, and fully describe the photorelaxation dynamics.

Subject terms: Photochemistry, Theoretical chemistry, Coordination chemistry


The description of full singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics is challenging due to the need for simultaneous treatment of disparate spin states, as well as multidimensional dynamics. Here the authors report a branching mechanism for the Fe(II) polypyridine complex [Fe(terpy)2]2+ by full-dimensional simulation of singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics, showing that the quintet (5MC) state is populated on the sub-ps timescale by two sequential 3MLCT→3MC→5MC pathways involving the two 3MC components 3T1g and 3T2g.

Introduction

Ultrafast experiments1,2 utilising femtosecond optical and X-ray pulses have been extensively used to resolve the dynamics of excited-state molecules. However, the complexity of the time-resolved data and its analysis can be very high—especially in complicated cases such as transition-metal complexes—which often leads to ambiguities and contradictions in mechanistic interpretations. This is showcased by the light-induced low-spin→high-spin transition in Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes, which have attracted grand attention due to its potential importance in cutting-edge technologies, e.g., molecular data storage3,4. From femtosecond transient optical absorption5 (TOAS), X-ray absorption6,7 and X-ray emission spectroscopy8,9 (XES) investigations, it is known that irradiation of the prototypical [Fe(bipy)3]2+ complex (bipy = 2,2’-bipyridine) by visible light promotes the system from the low-spin ground state (1GS) into singlet metal-to-ligand charge transfer states (1MLCT), which in turn leads to conversion into the quintet high-spin state in <200 fs; this timescale is very similar for [Fe(terpy)2]2+ (terpy = 2,2’:6’,2”-terpyridine), another important member of the polypyridine family, as observed by TOAS10. On the other hand, it is still not clear according to which of the following two mechanisms is the high-spin state populated: i) a direct 3MLCT→5MC one, or ii) via a sequential 1,3MLCT→3MC→5MC pathway with a triplet metal-centred intermediate (3MC). While high time-resolution TOAS data5 is claimed to support the direct mechanism, XES8,9, owing to its sensitivity to the transition-metal spin state, clearly detects the involvement of a 3MC state in the photorelaxation and thus indicates that the sequential pathway has to be operative. Furthermore, branching of the two mechanisms was proposed by a UV photoemission study11.

Theory has a great potential to rationalise ultrafast experiments and provide complementary insights. However, the description of full singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics is extremely challenging due to the simultaneous treatment of disparate spin states, as well as multidimensional dynamics. For the description of the light-induced low-spin→high-spin dynamics in Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes, theoretical models have so far been limited to either the application of Fermi’s golden rule1214, or quantum dynamics in exceedingly reduced dimensions14,15. While these studies do deliver valuable mechanistic insights, the limitations of the utilised theories (e.g., neglecting nuclear motion12,13 or using less accurate electronic structure descriptions15) and large uncertainties in the calculated intersystem crossing (ISC) rates13 do not allow to lift the controversies in the experimental observations.

Here, we simulate the full singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics of a Fe(II) polypyridine by full-dimensional spin-vibronic trajectory surface hopping. Importantly, we herein achieve the so far highest complexity in terms of nuclear dimensionality and electronic states, including all the 3N − 6 nuclear coordinates as well as all accessible spin states in the simulation. We select the [Fe(terpy)2]2+ complex (Fig. 1a), the principal molecule of our investigations across the years1619, as a suitable representant of the Fe(II) polypyridines. Crucially, we present clear evidence that the sub-ps conversion to the quintet state occurs via the sequential pathway, with branching through the two 3MC components, 3T1g and 3T2g (which differ in whether the 3dx2y2 or 3dz2 eg* orbital is singly occupied); note that for simplicity, we use here octahedral notations. In addition, in agreement with a recent combined X-ray scattering/spectroscopy experiment9, we observe non-exponential dynamics and coherent oscillations along the Fe-N breathing mode.

Fig. 1. Diabatic potentials of [Fe(terpy)2]2+ along two normal modes.

Fig. 1

The two panels show the potential energy surfaces along the a Fe-N breathing and b antisymmetric Fe-Neq stretching normal modes. The utilised normal mode coordinates are dimensionless (mass-frequency-scaled normal mode coordinates). Also shown is the molecular structure of the [Fe(terpy)2]2+ complex with “ax" and “eq" denoting the axial and equatorial nitrogen positions, respectively, as well as the 1GS→1MLCT excitation process (ΔE = 2.36 eV).

Results and discussion

The diabatic potential energy curves along the Fe-N breathing mode, the most dominant normal mode of [Fe(terpy)2]2+ connecting the 1GS (low-spin, LS) and 5MC (high-spin, HS) states, are displayed in Fig. 1a. This represents a dimension along which the electronic transitions can be best interpreted, yet we need to take other modes into account that can couple the excited states. The potentials along one of such coupling modes, with antisymmetric Fe-N bond stretching character, are displayed in Fig. 1b. The simulation produces relaxation trajectories on the potential energy hypersurface that involves all possible modes, and the presented results are obtained as average trajectories and populations from the numerous time-dependent runs. The excitation process occurs from 1GS predominantly to the lowest-lying optically bright 1MLCT states with a minor 1MC component, as extracted from the simulated electronic populations at t = 0 fs. In Fig. 2a, we present the time-dependent diabatic excited-state populations as obtained by the full-dimensional dynamics simulations (solid lines; the utilised diabatisation procedure is described in Supplementary Note 1.). We note that the ground-state population is negligible for the present analysis, and is thus not shown here but discussed in the Supplementary Information, see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figure 1. From Fig. 2a, we observe a very fast (~50 fs) 1MLCT→3MLCT ISC, consistent with known photophysics of transition-metal complexes with singlet ground state10,2023. Afterwards, the 3MC, and subsequently, the 5MC states are populated, to which latter state the conversion is nearly complete in ~500 fs. Importantly, the simulated dynamics shown in Fig. 2a (decay of MLCT states, participation of 3MC states, quintet population rise) are in very good overall agreement with the results of the most extensive time-resolved XES study on [Fe(bipy)3]2+,9 which substantiates the accuracy of our results.

Fig. 2. Simulated excited-state population dynamics of [Fe(terpy)2]2+.

Fig. 2

a Full simulation, the orange, and yellow dotted quintet population curves were obtained by decreasing the 3MLCT-5MC SOCs to zero and enlarging them by 10×, respectively, while retaining all other parameters. b 3MC states excluded. The overall excited-state population is normalised to unity. The contribution of the ground-state population is small throughout the simulated dynamics (~10% and 0% at 1.5 ps for a and b, respectively), see Supplementary Figure 1.

The quintet population rise (red curve in Fig. 2a) is clearly non-exponential, comprised of two apparent components, for ~0−250 fs and ~250−500 fs. Interestingly, we observe a very similar quintet population rise for the 0−250 fs region when excluding all 3MC states, as for the unrestrained simulation, see Fig. 2b; this seemingly assigns the 0−250 fs quintet component to the direct 3MLCT→5MC transition (note that the quintet population here follows an exponential growth). However, we find that this direct 3MLCT→5MC transition could only be operative in the absence of the 3MC states. This is revealed by repeating the full simulation at varying 3MLCT-5MC spin-orbit coupling (SOC) strength: the quintet population dynamics are found to be insensitive of decreasing the 3MLCT-5MC SOC to zero, or increasing it by an order of magnitude, see the dotted lines in Fig. 2a. Importantly, this finding also shows that the sequential pathway via the 3MC states dominates the mechanism, even in the case of enhanced 3MLCT-5MC coupling strength, due to e.g., nuclear distortions13. Therefore, we here conclude that the direct 3MLCT→5MC process has a negligible role in the photorelaxation.

This result is rather stunning in the view of some of the so-far established mechanisms5, and compelled us to explore further mechanistic intricacies of the photorelaxation, in particular, the involvement of 3MC states. In Fig. 3, we present more detailed excited-state population dynamics, unweaving the two 3MC components: the lower-energy 3T1g and the higher-energy 3T2g, focusing on the timescale on which the ISC dynamics occur (0–500 fs). We can now identify that the quintet state is populated via a branching mechanism involving the two 3MC components: a faster 3MLCT→3MC(3T2g)→5MC and a somewhat slower 3MLCT→3MC(3T2g)→3MC(3T1g)→5MC process. Analysis of the diabatic populations along a representative set of individual trajectories confirms this mechanism with the 3MLCT→3MC(3T2g)→3MC(3T1g)→5MC component being dominant (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Figures 35). We note that in principle there exists a third possible pathway, 3MLCT→3MC(3T1g)→5MC, which we indeed observed (see Supplementary Figure 5) but its weight is so low that this channel is negligible.

Fig. 3. Simulated excited-state population dynamics of [Fe(terpy)2]2+ for early times t ≤ 500 fs.

Fig. 3

The 3MC population is decomposed to the 3T1g and 3T2g components.

A key component of our simulated dynamics is the non-exponential nature of the quintet population rise shown in Figs. 2a and 3. This is due to dynamics via the 3MC states, which is in line with the interpretation of ballistic dynamics observed experimentally9; note that without the 3MC, no such ballistic dynamics are observed, see Fig. 2b. The driving force for this non-exponential behaviour is the nuclear dynamics in the 3MC states, dominated by the impulsive expansion of the Fe-N bonds (see Fig. 4). These structural dynamics drive the molecule toward the intersection of the 3MC-5MC PESs, at which efficient ISC occurs owing to direct 3MC-5MC SOC. This also explains why the direct pathway is not operative in the presence of 3MC states: the nuclear dynamics on the steep 3MC surface promptly move the molecule away from the region where the 3MLCT→5MC transition could be possible via large energetic overlap.

Fig. 4. Average trajectories along Fe-Nax and Fe-Neq and the simulated difference X-ray scattering signal ΔS.

Fig. 4

Nax and Neq denote the axial and equatorial N atoms, see Fig. 1a. ΔS is referenced to t = 0 fs, at q = 0.5 Å−1, which is characteristic for Fe(II) polypyridines.

The 3MC and 5MC populations exhibit oscillations with a ~300 fs period (which corresponds to the breathing mode), as seen in Fig. 2a. We find that this is a consequence of population transfer between 3T1g, the lower 3MC component, and the 5MC states (see Supplementary Figure 2). Its origin can be identified by Fig. 4, which displays the time evolution of the average Fe-N bond lengths (black and blue curves). We assign these oscillations to the coherent nuclear dynamics along the breathing motion, which is activated in the MC states. In agreement with the time-resolved X-ray scattering experiment9, we find that the structural Fe-N variations are slightly delayed with respect to the 1,3MLCT→3MC electronic population dynamics. The reason for this is that only the MC states can launch the ballistic Fe-N expansion, which first have to be populated from the MLCT states. We interpret the large increase in Fe-N bond lengths in the MC states, as driving force of the vibrational coherence. Our coherent oscillations are consistent with various time-resolved experiments5,7,9,24, however, in contrast to the experimental observations, we do not observe decoherence (damping). This is due to the absence of vibrational cooling (i.e., a solvent) in our theoretical model, which clearly cannot affect the low-spin→high-spin (quintet) process that is several times faster. The lack of the inclusion of damping is causing the only relevant difference from experiments, as in the latter only the first hump of the population oscillation is seen due to decoherence. Finally, we calculated the transient X-ray scattering data from the simulated evolution of the molecular structure. In agreement with a series of ultrafast studies on transition-metal complexes9,2527, we find that the coherent oscillations are directly observable by X-ray scattering, see the simulated difference signal displayed in yellow in Fig. 4.

Conclusion

In the present work, we revealed the branching mechanism of Fe(II) polypyridine complexes by full-dimensional simulation of the entire singlet-triplet-quintet dynamics of [Fe(terpy)2]2+. We found that the quintet high-spin state is populated on the sub-ps timescale by two sequential pathways involving the two 3MC components 3T1g and 3T2g. Importantly, we observe non-exponential population dynamics and coherent oscillations, which emphasises the essence of explicit dynamics frameworks. These results are consistent with various experimental time-resolved data, offer decision to a decade-long debate, and demonstrate the power of our theoretical dynamics approach to complement and interpret ultrafast experiments.

Methods

Our dynamics methodology is based on full-dimensional trajectory surface hopping (TSH) in conjunction with a linear vibronic coupling (LVC) model28,29. We follow a hybrid approach30, recently developed by one of us, based on the combination of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) PESs and multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) SOCs; in Supplementary Note 3 (see also Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, as well as Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7), we validate this hybrid methodology in terms of the correspondence of the DFT/TD-DFT vs CASPT2 states. Further methodological details are described below and under Supplementary Methods.

Quantum chemistry

The LVC potentials are based on B3LYP*/TZVP; the hybrid B3LYP* exchange-correlation functional was selected for its known accuracy for excited-state energetics of Fe(II) complexes16,19,3032. Two-electron integrals were approximated by the resolution of identity (RI-J)33 and chain-of-spheres (COSX)34 methods. For TD-DFT caclulations, we used the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA)35. The singlet and triplet excited states were calculated using singlet restricted Kohn-Sham (RKS) referenced TD-DFT, while for the quintet states the reference was calculated by quintet unrestricted DFT; in Supplementary Note 4 (see also Supplementary Figures 811), by benchmarking against reference CASPT2 calculations, we show that the utilised DFT/TD-DFT methodology delivers reasonably accurate excited-state energetics. We note that solvent effects on the excitation energies are rather small, ~0.02 eV or below, as found at the FC geometry using a conductor-like polarisable continuum model (C-PCM)36 for water. All DFT/TD-DFT calculations we carried out using the ORCA5.037,38 software.

The SOC matrix was calculated by complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) /CASPT2 calculations. We used an active space consisting of 10 electrons correlated on the following 16 orbitals: three 3d-t2g (dxy, dxz, dyz) and two 3d-eg* (dx2y2, dz2) type Fe-based orbitals, an additional set of three 4d-t2g and two 4d-eg* orbitals, two Fe-N σ-bonding 3d-eg orbitals, and four dominantly ligand-based (terpy-π*) orbitals that are required to access the MLCT states. We used atomic natural orbital relativistic correlation consistent (ANO-RCC) basis sets3941 with the following contractions: (7s6p5d4f3g2h) for Fe, (4s3p1d) for N, (3s2p) for C, and (2s) for H atoms. In the CASPT2 computations, we employed an imaginary level shift of 0.2 a.u. and a standard IPEA shift of 0.25 a.u. For CASPT2, we froze the core orbitals; in addition for CASSCF, we also froze the semi-core Fe-3s and Fe-3pz orbitals, which were required to construct the 10e16o active space.

The CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations were performed at the CASPT2(10e,12o) ground-state (1GS) minimum resulting from a 2D PES scan along the Fe-Nax bond length and the NNN angle16. We utilised C2 point group symmetry with the symmetry axis z defined by the Fe-Nax bonds. All CASSCF calculations were carried out with state averaging (equal weights) over 20 states (for each spin multiplicity singlet/triplet/quintet and C2 state symmetry A/B) with the exception of triplet A, for which we had to use 30 roots to maintain the active space. The CASPT2 calculations were carried out in multistate (MS-CASPT2) mode using 10 states for each spin multiplicity/C2 state symmetry. The SOC matrix elements were calculated by a spin-orbit state interaction (SO-SI) method42,43 utilising MS-CASPT2 energies, CASSCF wave functions, and a one-electron effective mean-field SOC Hamiltonian44. Scalar relativistic effects were taken into account using the Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) Hamiltonian45,46. All CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations were carried out using the OpenMolcas20.1047,48 software.

TSH dynamics

The TSH methodology is based on Tully’s fewest switches49 a three-step propagator technique50, and local diabatisation51. The simulations utilise the diagonal electronic basis, which is obtained by diagonalisation of the LVC potential matrix defined in Supplementary Equations 1 and 2 in Supplementary Methods. We used a time step of 0.5 fs and 0.005 fs for the nuclear and electronic propagation, respectively. 1000 initial conditions were sampled from a ground-state Wigner distribution, which were filtered using a stochastic algorithm accounting for conditions of the excitation process, i.e., excitation energies and oscillator strengths. We utilised a 0.1 eV wide energy window centred at 2.358 eV, which is the excitation energy of the lowest-lying optically-active 1MLCT state at the FC geometry. This process resulted in 716 selected initial conditions, from which we propagated the corresponding trajectories for 1.5 ps time duration. We used the energy-based method of Granucci et al.52 to correct electronic decoherence effects utilising a decoherence parameter of 0.1 a.u. The number of trajectories (716) ensured convergence of the simulated excited-state dynamics. The difference X-ray scattering signal ΔS(t) = S(t) − S(0) was calculated by evaluating the Debye equation53 for each structure and averaging over all trajectories. The TSH dynamics simulations were performed using the SHARC2.1 software5456.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (4.9MB, pdf)
42004_2022_796_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15.9KB, docx)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (25.7KB, zip)
Supplementary Data 2 (1.5MB, zip)

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the presented results has received funding from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund under grant numbers NKFIH PD 134976 and 2018-1.2.1-NKP-2018-00012, and the Government of Hungary and the European Regional Development Fund under Grant No. VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2017-00015.  M.P. acknowledges support from the János Bolyai Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Guest access to the central HPC cluster of the Technical University of Denmark is acknowledged57. The authors are grateful to Dániel Buzsáki for his comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

G.V. conceived the project. M.P. developed the theoretical model. T.R. and M.P. carried out the simulations and analysed the obtained data. M.P. wrote the manuscript with critical feedback from all authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communication Chemistry thanks Patrick Zobel and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

Numerical parameters of the utilised model (Supplementary Data 1), as well as initial geometries, velocities (given in atomic units), and initial state indices corresponding to the adiabatic/spin-diabatic electronic basis (Supplementary Data 2) are provided in supplementary data files. Further data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-022-00796-z.

References

  • 1.Chergui M. Ultrafast photophysics of transition metal complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48:801–808. doi: 10.1021/ar500358q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gaffney KJ. Capturing photochemical and photophysical transformations in iron complexes with ultrafast X-ray spectroscopy and scattering. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:8010–8025. doi: 10.1039/D1SC01864G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kahn O, Martinez CJ. Spin-transition polymers: from molecular materials toward memory devices. Science. 1998;279:44–48. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5347.44. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bousseksou A, Molnár G, Matouzenko G. Switching of molecular spin states in inorganic complexes by temperature, pressure, magnetic field and light: towards molecular devices. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004;2004:4353–4369. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200400571. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Auböck G, Chergui M. Sub-50-fs photoinduced spin crossover in [Fe(bpy)3]2+ Nat. Chem. 2015;7:629–633. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bressler C, et al. Femtosecond XANES study of the light-induced spin crossover dynamics in an iron(ii) complex. Science. 2009;323:489–492. doi: 10.1126/science.1165733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lemke HT, et al. Coherent structural trapping through wave packet dispersion during photoinduced spin state switching. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15342. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang W, et al. Tracking excited-state charge and spin dynamics in iron coordination complexes. Nature. 2014;509:345–348. doi: 10.1038/nature13252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kjær KS, et al. Finding intersections between electronic excited state potential energy surfaces with simultaneous ultrafast x-ray scattering and spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:5749–5760. doi: 10.1039/C8SC04023K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Y, et al. Towards longer-lived metal-to-ligand charge transfer states of iron(II) complexes: an N-heterocyclic carbene approach. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:6412–6414. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43833c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moguilevski A, et al. Ultrafast spin crossover in [Fe(bpy)3]2+: revealing two competing mechanisms by extreme ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem. 2017;18:465–469. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201601396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sousa, C. et al. Ultrafast deactivation mechanism of the excited singlet in the light-induced spin crossover of [Fe(2,2’-bipyridine)3]2+. Chem. Eur. J.19, 17541–17551 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Sousa C, Llunell M, Domingo A, de Graaf C. Theoretical evidence for the direct 3MLCT-HS deactivation in the light-induced spin crossover of Fe(II)-polypyridyl complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:2351–2355. doi: 10.1039/C7CP08098K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alías-Rodríguez, M., Huix-Rotllant, M. & de Graaf, C. Quantum dynamics simulations of the thermal and light-induced high-spin to low-spin relaxation in Fe(bpy)3 and Fe(mtz)6. Faraday Discuss. 237, 93–107 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Baker W, van Veenendaal M. Theory of ultrafast photoinduced low-to-high spin crossover in divalent iron systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104:014407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pápai M, Vankó G, de Graaf C, Rozgonyi T. Theoretical investigation of the electronic structure of Fe(II) complexes at spin-state transitions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013;9:509–519. doi: 10.1021/ct300932n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vankó G, et al. Detailed characterization of a nanosecond-lived excited state: X-ray and theoretical investigation of the quintet state in photoexcited [Fe(terpy)2]2+ J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:5888–5902. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.March AM, et al. Probing transient valence orbital changes with picosecond valence-to-core X-ray emission spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:2620–2626. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sárosiné Szemes D, Keszthelyi T, Papp M, Varga L, Vankó G. Quantum-chemistry-aided ligand engineering for potential molecular switches: changing barriers to tune excited state lifetimes. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:11831–11834. doi: 10.1039/D0CC04467A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cannizzo A, et al. Broadband femtosecond fluorescence spectroscopy of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:3174–3176. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pápai M, Vankó G, Rozgonyi T, Penfold TJ. High efficiency iron photosensitiser explained with quantum wavepacket dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:2009–2014. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Atkins AJ, González L. Trajectory surface-hopping dynamics including intersystem crossing in [Ru(bpy)3]2+ J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:3840–3845. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fumanal M, Plasser F, Mai S, Daniel C, Gindensperger E. Interstate vibronic coupling constants between electronic excited states for complex molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2018;148:124119. doi: 10.1063/1.5022760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Consani C, et al. Vibrational coherences and relaxation in the high-spin state of aqueous [Fe(bpy)3]2+ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:7184–7187. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Katayama T, et al. Tracking multiple components of a nuclear wavepacket in photoexcited Cu(I)-phenanthroline complex using ultrafast x-ray spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3606. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11499-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Haldrup K, et al. Ultrafast X-ray scattering measurements of coherent structural dynamics on the ground-state potential energy surface of a diplatinum molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:063001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.063001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kunnus K, et al. Vibrational wavepacket dynamics in fe carbene photosensitizer determined with femtosecond X-ray emission and scattering. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:634. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14468-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Köppel, H., Domcke, W. & Cederbaum, L. S. Multimode Molecular Dynamics Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation, 59–246 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1984).
  • 29.Zobel JP, Heindl M, Plasser F, Mai S, González L. Surface hopping dynamics on vibronic coupling models. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54:3760–3771. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pápai M. Towards simulation of Fe(II) low-spin→high-spin photoswitching by synergistic spin-vibronic dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022;18:1329–1339. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leshchev D, et al. Tracking the picosecond deactivation dynamics of a photoexcited iron carbene complex by time-resolved X-ray scattering. Chem. Sci. 2018;9:405–414. doi: 10.1039/C7SC02815F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pápai M. Photoinduced low-spin→high-spin mechanism of an octahedral Fe(II) complex revealed by synergistic spin-vibronic dynamics. Inorg. Chem. 2021;60:13950–13954. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neese F. An improvement of the resolution of the identity approximation for the formation of the coulomb matrix. J. Comput. Chem. 2003;24:1740–1747. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Neese F, Wennmohs F, Hansen A, Becker U. Efficient, approximate and parallel Hartree-Fock and hybrid DFT calculations. a ‘chain-of-spheres’ algorithm for the Hartree-Fock exchange. Chem. Phys. 2009;356:98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hirata S, Head-Gordon M. Time-dependent density functional theory within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999;314:291 – 299. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01149-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cossi M, Rega N, Scalmani G, Barone V. Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the c-pcm solvation model. J. Comput. Chem. 2003;24:669–681. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Neese F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012;2:73–78. doi: 10.1002/wcms.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Neese F, Wennmohs F, Becker U, Riplinger C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152:224108. doi: 10.1063/5.0004608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Widmark PO, Malmqvist PÅ, Roos BO. Density matrix averaged atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets for correlated molecular wave functions. Theor. Chim. Acta. 1990;77:291–306. doi: 10.1007/BF01120130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Roos BO, Lindh R, Malmqvist P-Å, Veryazov V, Widmark P-O. Main group atoms and dimers studied with a new relativistic ANO basis set. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2004;108:2851–2858. doi: 10.1021/jp031064+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Roos BO, Lindh R, Malmqvist P-Å, Veryazov V, Widmark P-O. New relativistic ANO basis sets for transition metal atoms. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2005;109:6575–6579. doi: 10.1021/jp0581126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Malmqvist PÅ, Roos BO, Schimmelpfennig B. The restricted active space (RAS) state interaction approach with spin-orbit coupling. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002;357:230–240. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00498-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roos BO, Malmqvist P-Å. Relativistic quantum chemistry: the multiconfigurational approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004;6:2919–2927. doi: 10.1039/b401472n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heß BA, Marian CM, Wahlgren U, Gropen O. A mean-field spin-orbit method applicable to correlated wavefunctions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996;251:365–371. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00119-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Douglas M, Kroll NM. Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium. Ann. Phys. 1974;82:89–155. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90333-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hess BA. Relativistic electronic-structure calculations employing a two-component no-pair formalism with external-field projection operators. Phys. Rev. A. 1986;33:3742–3748. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fdez. Galván I, et al. OpenMolcas: from source code to insight. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15:5925–5964. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aquilante F, et al. Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]Molcas. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152:214117. doi: 10.1063/5.0004835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tully JC. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;93:1061–1071. doi: 10.1063/1.459170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mai S, Marquetand P, González L. A general method to describe intersystem crossing dynamics in trajectory surface hopping. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2015;115:1215–1231. doi: 10.1002/qua.24891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Granucci G, Persico M. Direct semiclassical simulation of photochemical processes with semiempirical wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 2001;114:10608. doi: 10.1063/1.1376633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Granucci Giovanni, Persico Maurizio, Zoccante Alberto. Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;133(13):134111. doi: 10.1063/1.3489004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dohn AO, et al. On the calculation of x-ray scattering signals from pairwise radial distribution functions. J. Phys. B:. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2015;48:244010. doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/48/24/244010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mai, S. et al. SHARC2.1: Surface Hopping Including Arbitrary Couplings - Program Package for Non-Adiabatic Dynamics, sharc-md.org (2019).
  • 55.Richter M, Marquetand P, González-Vázquez J, Sola I, González L. Sharc: ab initio molecular dynamics with surface hopping in the adiabatic representation including arbitrary couplings. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:1253–1258. doi: 10.1021/ct1007394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mai S, Marquetand P, González L. Nonadiabatic dynamics: the SHARC approach. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018;8:e1370. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.DTU Computing Center: DTU Computing Center resources. 10.48714/DTU.HPC.0001 (2022).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (4.9MB, pdf)
42004_2022_796_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15.9KB, docx)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (25.7KB, zip)
Supplementary Data 2 (1.5MB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Numerical parameters of the utilised model (Supplementary Data 1), as well as initial geometries, velocities (given in atomic units), and initial state indices corresponding to the adiabatic/spin-diabatic electronic basis (Supplementary Data 2) are provided in supplementary data files. Further data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Communications Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES