Abstract
Cell differentiation involves profound changes in global gene expression that often has to occur in coordination with cell cycle exit. Because cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 reportedly regulates proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the subependymal neurogenic niche of the adult mouse brain, but can also have effects on gene expression, we decided to molecularly analyze its role in adult neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis. At the cell level, we show that p27 restricts residual cyclin-dependent kinase activity after mitogen withdrawal to antagonize cycling, but it is not essential for cell cycle exit. By integrating genome-wide gene expression and chromatin accessibility data, we find that p27 is coincidentally necessary to repress many genes involved in the transit from multipotentiality to differentiation, including those coding for neural progenitor transcription factors SOX2, OLIG2 and ASCL1. Our data reveal both a direct association of p27 with regulatory sequences in the three genes and an additional hierarchical relationship where p27 repression of Sox2 leads to reduced levels of its downstream targets Olig2 and Ascl1. In vivo, p27 is also required for the regulation of the proper level of SOX2 necessary for neuroblasts and oligodendroglial progenitor cells to timely exit cell cycle in a lineage-dependent manner.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00018-022-04676-6.
Keywords: Adult neural progenitors, Adult neuroblasts, Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Neural differentiation, ATAC-Seq, RNA-Seq
Introduction
Mammalian stem and progenitor cells are hierarchically organized to produce appropriate numbers of specialized progeny during development and adult tissue renewal. In the subependymal zone (SEZ) of the adult mouse brain, astrocyte-like neural stem cells (NSCs) generate transit-amplifying neural progenitor cells (NPCs) which rapidly divide 3–4 times before they give rise to neuroblasts. After at least an extra division during their migration to the olfactory bulb (OB), neuroblasts exit the cell cycle and differentiate as interneurons [1, 2]. To a lesser extent, NPCs can also give rise to oligodendroglial progenitor cells (OPCs) that turn into corpus callosum (CC) oligodendrocytes [3], as well as to some striatal and CC astrocytes [4]. The generation of progeny in this germinal niche follows, therefore, an orderly program of progressive cell fate specification.
Cell fate decisions are dictated and sustained by master transcription factors (TFs), chromatin regulators and associated networks, but these programs need to act in concert with cell cycle progression and exit, a coordination that is still poorly understood [5]. Members of the Cip/Kip family of cyclin-dependent kinases (CKIs) have been implicated in cell cycle control in the SEZ lineage. Previous analyses have shown that p21Cip1 regulates self-renewal of subependymal NSCs [6–8], whereas p27kip1 (encoded by the Cdkn1b gene) appears to act as a cell cycle inhibitor of adult NPCs [9, 10]. Interestingly, these Cip–Kip CKIs can act beyond cell cycle control, displaying roles in gene expression. In the SEZ, p21 has been shown to transcriptionally regulate Bmp2 and Sox2 gene expression [7, 8]. Although a similar role for p27 has not been investigated, p27 promotes the differentiation of fetal cortical NPCs through stabilization of the TF neurogenin 2 [11] and can repress Sox2 gene expression in embryonic stem and pituitary cells [12, 13]. A non-canonical role of p27 on the transcriptional regulation of specific genes in adult subependymal NPCs could potentially be a mechanism to timely coordinate cell cycle exit with the implementation of expression programs required to drive differentiation of the different cell lineages [14]. However, a comprehensive analysis of p27 actions on gene expression in a somatic cell system has not been performed.
Here, we have analyzed the gene expression and regulatory landscapes modulated by p27 during the transition from NPC proliferation to differentiation in neuronal and oligodendroglial subependymal lineages. We show that p27 participates in timing cell cycle exit through CDK inhibition, and when absent, residual levels of CDK activity allow the cells to engage in extra cell cycles even in the absence of mitogens. Furthermore, using an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin followed by sequencing (ATAC-seq) [15] together with RNA deep sequencing (RNA-seq), we characterize global expression and chromatin changes that require p27 during differentiation. With this approach, we have uncovered a p27-dependent repression of Sox2, Olig2 and Ascl1 genes at the onset of differentiation. Our data reveal a direct association of p27 with regulatory sequences in these three genes and an additional hierarchical relationship where p27 repression of the Sox2 gene leads to reduced levels of SOX2-downstream targets Olig2 and Ascl1. In vivo analyses in p27-deficient mice with normal and reduced levels of SOX2 indicate that p27 regulates NPC cycling rate in a SOX2-independent manner, whereas the repressive action of p27 in Sox2 expression is required for the regulated cell cycle exit of neuroblasts and OPCs. Thus, p27 determines timely cell cycle exit through the regulation of SOX2 levels in both oligodendrocyte and neuron adult lineages.
Results
p27 regulates gene expression programs beyond cell cycle at the onset of differentiation
Neurogenesis at the murine SEZ is very active with thousands of neuroblasts born every day [1], but cell cycle exit is not synchronous, making it difficult to assess the temporal resolution of cell-specific global changes. Nevertheless, differentiation can be recapitulated in vitro following mitogen withdrawal (Fig. 1a). Under these conditions, NSC/NPCs stop dividing after 24 h (2 + 1 DIV) and initiate differentiation [16]. Comparative analysis of proliferating 5-day grown neurosphere cells and 2 + 1 DIV cells by ATAC-seq and RNA-seq revealed a great number of differentially accessible (DA) promoters, either closed or open, and differentially expressed (DE) genes, either up- or downregulated, at this “onset of differentiation” (Fig. 1b). The majority of DA promoters in DE genes became closed at 2 + 1 DIV (Fig. 1d), indicating predominant gene repression when cells stop dividing and initiate differentiation. Apart from Closed + DOWN genes, we also found a significant number of Closed + UP genes, likely representing a dynamic transition from accessible to repressed chromatin at cell cycle exit, as chromatin accessibility precedes transcription. We next used the LISA bioinformatic tool [17] for integrative modeling of publicly accessible data on MNase-seq (micrococcal nuclease digestion with deep sequencing, for chromatin accessibility) and ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation with deep sequencing, for DNA-associated proteins) in order to identify transcription factors (TF) with significant association to Closed genes. Interestingly, we found several of the strongest regulatory TFs to be known partners of p27 [14] (Table S1). Moreover, motif discovery analysis in Closed + DOWN gene promoters with HOMER [18] also revealed enrichment of consensus binding motifs for reported p27 TF partners, such as E2F4, MYOD or ETS1 (Fig. 1d). Because p27 levels sharply increased at 2 + 1 DIV, when cells stopped proliferation and became Ki67-negative, and remained elevated in differentiated cells (Fig. 1e–g), the data together suggested a putative generalized repressive transcriptional role of p27 at the onset of differentiation.
Cdkn1b mutant mice (p27KO) are larger in size and exhibit hyperplasia in all organs [19–21]. Reported analyses at the single cell level in the developing CNS have indicated that fetal progenitors without p27 undergo one or two extra rounds of cell division before they stop cycling and differentiate, but the underlying mechanism for such a complex cell behavior has not been elucidated [22–24]. In line with the role of p27 in cycling regulation, we detected higher proportions of EdU-incorporating cells at 2 + 1 DIV (mean ± s.e.m.: 9.1 ± 2.0, n = 5, vs. a wild-type value of 2.2 ± 0.4, n = 6, p value = 0.0015). Because the decision to reenter the cell cycle is reportedly controlled by the residual level of CDK2 activity at the point of mitotic exit [25, 26], we took advantage of the CDK2 reporter CSII-EF-DHB-mVenus, composed of the C-terminal CDK2 phosphorylation domain of the human DNA helicase B fused to the yellow fluorescent protein mVenus [26]. The reporter is primarily found in the nucleus during mitosis and in newly generated cells, but it translocates to the cytoplasm upon phosphorylation by CDK2 during G1/S transition. Quantitative image analysis of the mVenus cytoplasm/nucleus (C/N) ratio in cells transduced with the reporter (Fig. 2a) indicated that p27-deficient cells that were in G0/G1 (C/N < 0.95) displayed higher cytosolic fluorescence than controls at 2 + 1 DIV, reflecting increased CDK2 activity (Fig. 2b,c). Moreover, cytosolic fluorescence and the proportion of Ki67+ cells in p27KO cultures deprived of mitogens could be reduced to wild-type levels by treatment with a pharmacological CDK1/2 inhibitor (Fig. 2b–d). This result indicated that p27-dependent inhibition of CDK2 at cell cycle exit restricts cell cycle progression and suggested that effects of p27 in cell cycle gene expression may be also dependent on CDK activity. Interestingly, although p27-deficient NPCs are overall capable of engaging extra cell divisions, they eventually stop proliferating and fully differentiate by 2 + 5 DIV, but with a bias toward higher proportions of neurons and oligodendrocytes, but not astrocytes (Fig. 2e). This population-specific effect suggested that the role of p27 could go beyond the cell cycle to affect differentiation through specific actions on gene expression, in line with our global analysis.
To test the potential role of p27 in gene expression, we applied the same combinatorial ATAC/RNA-seq approach to cultures obtained from p27KO mice. The number of changes during the differentiation process was remarkably smaller in the absence of p27 resulting in an 85% reduction in the number of genes with changes in either expression or accessibility (Fig. 2f). Intersection of the lists of genes with simultaneous accessibility and mRNA level changes in both genotypes indicated that 88% of the changes in DE genes showing Closed chromatin in the WT process were lost in the absence of p27 (Fig. 2g, h). Gene ontology (GO) analysis identified categories of genes related to “cell cycle control” in the Closed + DOWN group, whereas most genes in the Closed + UP group were related to “neuronal differentiation/neurogenesis” (Fig. 2i). Our analyses suggested that repression of cell cycle-related genes after mitogen withdrawal is subsequently followed by repression of other genes to allow timely differentiation and that repression of both sets of genes is p27-dependent.
p27 negatively regulates a SOX2-Olig2/Ascl1 axis at cell cycle exit
To address the possibility that p27 was regulating NSC/NPC differentiation through the modulation of a transcriptional landscape, we next sought to identify the network of differentiation-driving transcriptional regulators acting under the control of p27. We analyzed the list of genes with decreased promoter accessibility at differentiation in wild-type and p27KO cells (Fig. 3a) with the LISA tool in order to find TFs already reported in the literature to bind those genes (Fig. 3b) and with the HOMER tool to detect the presence of TF binding sites in their promoters (Fig. 3c). Comparative analysis of the LISA results in wild type vs p27KO revealed that the three most relevant regulatory TFs were ASCL1, OLIG2 and SOX2 (Fig. 3b; Table S2). This result was corroborated by HOMER, which found binding sites for 49 TFs likely controlling the differentiation in both genotypes but also for a group of 21 TFs that were more prominently acting when p27 was absent. The protein–protein interaction network of these 21 p27KO-specific TFs placed ASCL1, OLIG2 and SOX2 at the core of the network (Fig. 3c). Taken together, the data suggested that p27 is required at the onset of differentiation to restrict the presence of SOX2, OLIG2 and ASCL1 in a subset of repressed genes.
Identifying SOX2, OLIG2 and ASCL1 as the most prominent TFs potentially involved in the altered differentiation of p27KO cells led us to investigate whether p27 could be acting as a regulator of the corresponding genes. SOX2 is expressed by NSCs and NPCs [27, 28]. ASCL1 is expressed by activated NSCs and by NPCs for both oligodendrocytes and neurons, whereas the presence of OLIG2 in a few NPCs renders them oligodendrogenic [29–31]. Around 40% of all cells in a proliferating culture are SOX2+OLIG2+ASCL1+, but this percentage becomes reduced at 2 + 1 DIV to around 20% (37.3 ± 1.7% at 2 DIV vs 19.5 ± 2.7% at 2 + 1 DIV, n = 9, p value = 0.0015) (Fig. 3d), in inverse correlation with the increasing levels of p27 (Figs. 1e,f; 3e). In agreement with a repressive action of p27, we scored a significantly higher proportion of cells with increased levels of ASCL1, OLIG2 and SOX2 in differentiating p27KO cells that could be restored to wild-type levels by transduction of a p27 cDNA (Fig. 3f, g).
We next set up to evaluate direct physical interaction of p27 with regulatory regions in their coding genes under proliferative and differentiative conditions. Highly conserved regulatory regions in the Sox2 gene include a core promoter [32] and a number of enhancers organized in Sox2-regulatory regions (SRR), where SRR1 contains enhancers (N) 2 and 3 and SRR2 contains N1, 4 and 5 [33, 34] and is active in the adult SEZ [33]. As for Olig2 and Ascl1, the in silico analysis of the 2 kb sequence upstream of their transcription initiation site combining Genomatix and EPD tools revealed the presence of several putative binding sites for E2F4 and ETS1 TFs, some of them clustered in the proximal promoter (− 1 kb) (Fig. 4a). Therefore, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with anti-p27 antibodies in wild-type cultures to detect the binding of p27 to several of these regulatory regions (Sox2: [− 460, − 345], Sox2 SRR2: [+ 4042, + 4133], Olig2: [− 637, − 546] and [− 147, − 58], and Ascl1: [− 906, − 784] and [− 523, − 432]). In proliferative cells we could detect binding of p27 to the Sox2 proximal promoter and the SRR2 enhancer and to the proximal promoters of Olig2 and Ascl1 (ratio p27-IP over NRA control ranging between 1.82 and 3.70). At the onset of differentiation, when p27 levels increased abruptly, the presence of p27 in the SRR2 enhancer as well as to all the tested regulatory regions in Olig2 and Ascl1 promoters was strengthened two–threefold (Fig. 4a). The results on the Sox2 promoter and SRR2 enhancer were confirmed by means of specific luciferase reporters: The activities of Sox2prom[− 1907, + 6]-luc and SRR2[+ 3641/ + 4023]-luc) [35] constructs were higher in proliferating mutant cells, dropped or increased upon differentiation, respectively, and could both be repressed by reintroduction of p27 (Fig. 4b).
Interestingly, the levels of OLIG2 and ASCL1 quantitatively correlated with those of SOX2 at the single cell level (Fig. 4c), suggesting the possibility that p27 could also be exerting its transcriptional repression effect on Olig2 and Ascl1 indirectly through its control of Sox2. Indeed, when we performed ChIP with anti-SOX2 antibodies, we could detect strong binding to the proximal promoters of both TFs (Olig2 [− 188, − 94] and Ascl1 [− 522, − 432]) (Fig. 4d). Consistently, overexpression of Sox2 by viral delivery of a Cre-recombinase to cultures obtained from R26-loxP-STOP-loxP-Sox2-GFP mice [36] resulted in increased proportions of ASCL1+OLIG2+ cells without effects on proliferation (Fig. 4e–g). The hierarchical relationship of SOX2 over Olig2 and Ascl1 suggested the possibility that the increase in the proportion of ASCL1+OLIG2+ NPCs resulting from a lack of p27 could be rescued by lowering SOX2 levels. Indeed, reduction in SOX2 protein levels, following nucleofection of a specific Sox2 shRNA in p27-deficient cultures, rescued the proportion of OLIG2+ASCL1+ NPCs as efficiently as reintroducing p27 (Fig. 4h, i). Our data together indicated that p27 can potentially act as a repressive regulator of the Sox2, Olig2 and Ascl1 genes through physical binding but, functionally, its direct repressive action on the Sox2 gene is sufficient to reduce the downstream expression of Ascl1 and Olig2.
Regulation of Sox2 by p27 is required for timely cell cycle exit in adult neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis in a cell context-dependent manner
Next, we decided to test the uncovered regulation of these three TFs by p27 and its functional consequences in the intact SEZ. In postnatal mice, p27 reportedly exhibits a generalized expression in migrating neuroblasts and in young OB neurons with a caudallow–rostralhigh gradient [37], but distribution of the protein in the adult was so far unknown. Analysis with antibodies specific to p27 in young adult (2-month-old) mice indicated that the protein is barely detectable in adult GFAP+ NSCs and shows low and variable levels in ASCL1+ NPCs, while a strong signal is detected in DCX+ cells (Fig. 5a, b), suggesting that p27 levels increase with lineage progression and is maximal in neuroblasts, in line with our in vitro data.
Adult Cdkn1b mutant mice have larger bodies [19], and we could also observe enlarged SEZs (volume, in μm3 × 106 ± s.e.m.: 21.3 ± 1.8 vs a wild-type value of 15.3 ± 0.9, n = 3, p value = 0.0411) and OBs (6.0 ± 0.1 vs a wild-type value of 4.7 ± 0.1, n = 3, p value = 0.0007). Consistent with this, SEZ homogenates showed a 40% increase in cell yield (Fig. 5c); however, when we scored specific cell populations by flow cytometry [38, 39], we found that the increase in NSCs (CD24−/lowGLAST+CD9high cells) was within the range of the generalized hyperplasia of the tissue, whereas NPCs (GLAST−CD24−/lowEGFR+ cells) were significantly overrepresented with an increase of 70% in Cdkn1b mutant mice (Fig. 5c). In agreement with this, 2-month-old mice intraperitoneally injected with 7 pulses of BrdU, one every 2 h, during the 12 h period preceding euthanasia, evidenced that overall BrdU incorporation rate doubled in p27KO mice (Fig. 5d), whereas GFAP+ cells exhibited a normal BrdU-labeling rate ****(percentage of GFAP+ that were BrdU+ ± s.e.m.: 8.9 ± 2.0 vs. a wild-type value of 10.2 ± 1.6, n = 3, p value = 0.5980). The data confirmed that p27 is a specific regulator of NPC cycling, as previously reported [9, 10]. Regarding cell progeny output, we found higher proportions of BrdU+ label-retaining cells (LRCs) in the OB glomerular layer and in the CC of mice injected with 7 pulses of BrdU four weeks before euthanasia (Fig. 5e). The increase in the density of LRCs in the CC correlated with more OLIG2+ cells that were also positive for PSA-NCAM (characteristic of oligodendroglia generated in the SEZ [3]) (Fig. 5f, g). Therefore, p27 limits both neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis in the adult brain.
Increased production of neurons and oligodendrocytes in the absence of p27 could be the result of an enlarged population of proliferating NPCs in the SEZ. However, our data indicated that p27 negatively regulates the levels of TFs SOX2, ASCL1 and OLIG2, largely by transcriptional repression of the Sox2 gene. Analysis of the SOX2 protein by quantitative image analysis in immunostained SEZ sections revealed higher levels per cell and increased proportions of SOX2high cells also in vivo (Fig. 5h, i). In contrast to the culture situation, OLIG2 is restricted to a minority (around 2%) of ASCL1+SOX2+ NPCs that behave as OPCs and specifically generate oligodendrocytes in vivo [3, 29]. Analyses of these OLIG2+ASCL1+ cells in p27KO mice revealed increased levels of SOX2 per cell (Fig. 6a) and higher proportions of OPCs that, furthermore, proliferated more actively as shown by increased BrdU incorporation rate after a 1-h chase (Fig. 6b–d). As with regard to the neuronal lineage, doublecortin (DCX)+ early neuroblasts generated from NPCs can proliferate once or twice as they retain EGFR and are sensitive to mitogens before they exit cell cycle as late nondividing EGFR− neuroblasts that constitute, by far, the largest population in the SEZ neurogenic niche [2, 38]. We found that DCX+ neuroblasts in wild-type mice had very low or undetectable levels of SOX2 and ASCL1 [40, 41] together with high levels of p27 (Fig. 5a, b), whereas SOX2 and ASCL1 levels remained abnormally high in p27KO neuroblasts (Fig. 6e, f). Although the absence of p27 also resulted in increased proportions of neuroblasts in the SEZ, it did not alter their proliferation rate, as determined by a 1-h chase after a single injection of BrdU (Fig. 6g, h). The results together indicated that, in vivo: (1) p27 regulates the cycling of NPCs, including those of oligodendrocytes, but not of neuroblasts, and (2) p27 restricts the levels of SOX2 in both OPCs and neuroblasts.
Because of the dual action of p27, we next decided to test whether increased levels of SOX2 played a role in the p27KO phenotype by analyzing p27KO;Sox2 heterozygous [42] compound double mutant mice. Overall, heterozygous levels of SOX2 did not reduce the increased proportion of Ki67+ proliferating cells resulting from the deletion of p27, indicating that cell cycle regulation in NPCs is SOX2-independent (Fig. 6i). SOX2 effects in neural cells are dosage-sensitive, but also context-dependent [43], and therefore, we decided to analyze oligodendrogenesis and neurogenesis separately. In the postnatal forebrain, SOX2 is needed for the expansion of OPCs during developmental and induced myelination and its levels increase at the onset of differentiation and regulate the production and maturation of myelinating oligodendrocytes [43]. Reduced SOX2 levels in a p27-null background did not restore the increased production of oligodendrocytes; on the contrary, we detected more newly generated oligodendrocytes, as reflected in higher numbers of EdU+-LRCs in the CC of the compound mutants injected with the nucleoside four weeks before their analysis (Fig. 6j). Our data indicated that p27 regulates the cycling of OPCs, but the timing of cell cycle exit for differentiation into oligodendrocytes is determined by the level of SOX2.
We next evaluated effects of p27 and SOX2 in neurogenesis. In fetal NPCs, SOX2 typically suppresses premature neurogenesis, likely by counteracting the activity of proneural bHLH TFs [44, 45]. In the adult brain, SOX2 also maintains proliferative NPCs undifferentiated, and if SOX2 levels are reduced below 50%, the NPC pool is depleted, resulting in impaired neurogenesis [41]. In contrast to the oligodendrogenic lineage, SOX2 levels are drastically downregulated at the neuroblast stage, concomitant with a dramatic increase in p27, as shown before. Compound p27KO; Sox2± mice still displayed an increased number of DCX+ neuroblasts (Fig. 6k), but, interestingly, a dosage reduction in SOX2 levels restored p27KO increased numbers of newly generated OB neurons to WT levels (Fig. 6l). The data reveal a need for p27-dependent repression of stemness TF SOX2 for neuroblasts to timely abandon their last cell cycle before they differentiate into OB neurons. The data together indicate that the regulation of SOX2 dosage by the level of p27 in neuroblasts and OPCs determines cell cycle withdrawal timing and the balance between progenitor cell population expansion and production of specialized cell types.
Discussion
Arrest of the cell cycle has to be properly coordinated with a switch in gene expression from an undifferentiated to a committed cell-specific profile [5]. We have approached this issue with a combined analysis of the cell state-defining transcriptome and the cell capacity-defining epigenome at the cell transition between mitogen-driven proliferation and mitogen-withdrawal differentiation in the presence and in the absence of the cell cycle inhibitor p27. We provide evidence that increased levels of p27 in response to lack of mitogenic stimulation limit CDK2 activity, therefore restricting cell cycle reentry. Concurrently, p27 repression of Sox2 expression acts as a timer for cell cycle arrest for differentiation. Our data indicate that p27 acts as a cell cycle break for NPCs and that Sox2 upregulation in the absence of p27 contributes to the exuberant neurogenic phenotype of Cdkn1b null mice by delaying cell cycle exit of committed neuroblasts. A previous report in adult mice with a N-terminal truncated p27 also indicated an increased proportion of proliferating NPCs but reduced olfactory neurogenesis [9], which could be explained by these non-canonical actions of the CKI. During oligodendrogenesis, p27 regulates OPC cycling [23, 46–49] and then increases during differentiation to enhance expression of the myelin basic protein gene [50]. In line with this, we show that precise coordination of p27 and SOX2 levels plays a role in the balance between OPC expansion and oligodendrocyte production. Our results explain how cell cycle exit and the onset of differentiation can be coordinated in the adult SEZ through a mechanism based on a dual p27 action on CDK inhibition and gene expression.
SOX2 belongs to the SOXB1 subfamily, which also includes SOX1 and SOX3 [27, 28]. Although SOX2 is widely known as a pluripotency-sustaining transcription factor in ES cells, it plays a very prominent role in neurogenesis, from specification of the neuroectodermal lineage to maintenance of neural competence [51] in a highly dose-dependent manner [40, 52]. Reduction in SOX2 levels limits self-renewal and multipotentiality and promotes NPC cell cycle exit and premature differentiation. In contrast, overexpression of SOX2 not only inhibits the differentiation of multipotential NPCs into neurons and glial cells during fetal development [44, 45], but can also convert cells of other lineages into NSCs [53]. Reported dosage effects of SOX2 indicate that its levels are finely regulated [7, 41, 54, 55], but its transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation are still far from understood. Here we show that increased levels of SOX2 as a result of impaired transcriptional regulation by p27 have a clear impact on the neurogenic and oligodendrogenic outputs. Our data sustain the concept that SOX2 effects are remarkably dosage-dependent and indicate that the cell context is also essential to explain SOX2 actions. Some target genes of SOX2 have been identified in NPCs, including Egfr, TLX (Nr2e1) and NeuroD1 [56–58]. Here we report that SOX2 can directly bind regulatory regions of the Ascl1 and Olig2 genes and that their expression directly correlates with SOX2 levels. All these genes are known to regulate the undifferentiated state of NPCs and/or their activity. In addition, some SOX2 target genes encode secreted proteins with direct paracrine and autocrine effects on NSC/NPCs [59] consistent with the idea that SOX2 is a master regulator of expression programs within these cells. Genome-wide binding profile analysis of SOX2 and SOX3 in ES cells, both naïve and specified to NPCs, and in cells differentiated to neurons has revealed an ordered, sequential binding to enhancers associated with a common set of neural genes needed throughout the neurogenic process [60]. Although SOX2 and SOX3 are thought to act redundantly in many contexts, this latter report suggested that SOX2 acts as a pioneer factor that binds neural enhancers for future activation by SOX3, establishing neural competence. Among the silent genes that are pre-bound by SOX2 in ES cells that are later occupied and activated by SOX3 during neural lineage development are Ascl1 and Olig2 [60].
A direct role of SOXB1 proteins in cell cycle progression has never been demonstrated, although actions of these regulators in sustaining the undifferentiated state appear linked to a cycling state [44, 45]. We have been able to evaluate the effect of an increased dose of SOX2, and our data also indicate that SOX2 does not play a direct role in cell cycling, but it has to be silenced in neuroblasts to allow their cell cycle exit for differentiation. It has been shown that E2F3a and E2F3b play antagonistic roles in the balance between activation (E2F3b through recruitment of RNA polymerase) and repression (E2F3a together with Rb pocket protein p107) of the Sox2 gene to achieve a correct dosage in proliferating NPCs [61]. Modulation of Sox2 expression by cell cycle-related proteins converts Sox2 into a key gene involved in coordinating cycling and broad developmental potential.
Materials and methods
Animals and in vivo manipulations
Cdkn1b mice (p27KO) [19] were obtained from Jackson Laboratory and maintained on a C57BL/6 J background. Cdkn1b−/−;Sox2± mice [62], their control littermates (Cdkn1b+/+;Sox2+/+, Cdkn1b−/−;Sox2+/+) and Rosa26R-loxP-STOP-loxP-Sox2-GFP mice (for Sox2 overexpression) [36] were maintained on mixed backgrounds. Animals were genotyped by PCR of DNA extracted from ear punch using specific primers (wild-type F: GATGGACGCCAGACAAGC; wild-type R: CTCCTGCCATTCGTATCTGC; Cdkn1b F: CTTGGGTGGAGAGGCTATTC; Cdkn1b R: AGGTGAGATGACAGGAGAT) or done by Transnetyx. Housing and experiments were carried out following protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad de Valencia (CEEA: A1403250608615) (Spain) and by the Animal Ethics Committee and the UK Home Office (PPL 70/8560) at the Francis Crick Institute (London, UK).
Tissue preparation and immunohistochemistry
BrdU administration regimes have been previously detailed [63]. Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 50 mg of BrdU (Sigma, B5002) per kg of body weight every 2 h for 12 consecutive hours (7 injections in total) and euthanized either immediately or 28 days later or with just one injection one hour before euthanasia. EdU (Life Technologies, E10187) was administered i.p. at 30 mg/kg every 12 h for 3 consecutive days (6 injections in total) and mice were euthanized 28 days after the last injection. Mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 100 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (PB). For ASCL1 immunodetection, no more than 40 ml of PFA were infused. Brains were dissected out, vibratome-sectioned at 40 μm and serially collected. For immunohistochemistry, sections were washed in PBS and blocked at room temperature (RT) for 1 h in PBS (0.9% NaCl in PB) with 0.2% Triton X-100 supplemented with 10% FBS and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (1:100 mouse anti-ASCL1, BD 556604; 1:800 rat anti-BrdU, Abcam ab6326; 1:400 chicken anti-DCX, Abcam ab153668; 1:300 goat anti-DCX, Santa Cruz sc-8066; 1:800 chicken anti-GFAP, Millipore AB5541; 1:300 rabbit anti-Ki67, Abcam ab15580; 1:500 rabbit anti-OLIG2, Millipore AB9610; 1:200 rabbit anti-p27, Cell Signaling 3686; 1:700 mouse anti-PSA-NCAM, Millipore MAB5324; 1:600 goat anti-SOX2, R&D AF2018). For BrdU detection, sections were pre-incubated in 2 N HCl for 20 min at 37 °C and neutralized in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5). Detections were performed with 1:800 fluorescent secondary antibodies (AF488 donkey anti-chicken, Jackson ImmunoResearch 703-545-155; AF488 donkey anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-547-003; AF647 donkey anti-goat, Molecular Probes A21447; Cy3 donkey anti-chicken, Jackson ImmunoResearch 703-165-155; Cy3 donkey anti-mouse, Jackson ImmunoResearch 715-165-151; Cy3 donkey anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-165-152; Cy3 donkey anti-rat, Jackson ImmunoResearch 712-165-153). EdU detection was carried out using the Click-iT™ Plus EdU Alexa Fluor™ 555 Imaging Kit (ThermoFisher, C10638). Nuclei were counterstained with 1 µg/ml of DAPI and sections were mounted with Fluorsave (Calbiochem). Immunostained series containing 5 coronal sections of the anterior horn of the lateral ventricles (Bregma anteroposterior AP coordinates + 1.10, + 0.74, + 0.38, + 0.02 and − 0.34 mm) were imaged in an Olympus FV10i confocal microscope (Olympus) for SEZ and CC analyses. Cell populations were manually counted using the Olympus and ImageJ/Fiji software, and data were obtained as a percentage of positive cells relative to a subpopulation or to total DAPI labeled cells in the lateral ventricle wall. Between 5 and 10 coronal sections in the medial OB (Bregma AP coordinates + 5 to + 4 mm) were analyzed in neurogenesis studies.
Neurosphere cultures, differentiation and immunocytochemistry
Methods for SEZ-derived neurosphere NSC cultures and assessment have been previously described in detail [16, 68]. For proliferation assays, NSCs were grown in neurosphere control medium containing 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Invitrogen, 53003-018) and 10 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor (FGF) (Sigma, F0291). Importantly, for bulk differentiation assays on secondary neurospheres, 40,000 cells/cm2 were seeded for 2 days (2 DIV) in Matrigel®-coated coverslips and in control medium with FGF. Then, mitogens were removed and cells were grown in control medium supplemented with 2% FBS. Differentiating cultures were analyzed 24 h (2 + 1 DIV) or 5 days (2 + 5 DIV) after mitogen withdrawal (see Fig. 1a). For immunocytochemistry, cultures were fixed with 2% PFA in PB for 15 min, blocked (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 10% FBS) and incubated with primary (overnight at 4 °C) and secondary (1 h at room temperature) antibodies (1:100 mouse anti-ASCL1, BD 556604; 1:100 mouse anti-ASCL1, Guillemot lab; 1:800 rat anti-BrdU, Abcam ab6326; 1:800 chicken anti-GFAP, Millipore AB5541; 1:300 rabbit anti-Ki67, Abcam ab15580; 1:300 mouse anti-O4, Hybridoma Bank rip; 1:500 rabbit anti-OLIG2, Millipore AB9610; 1:200 rabbit anti-p27, Cell Signaling 3686; 1:200 mouse anti-p27, Cell Signaling 3698; 1:600 goat anti-SOX2, R&D AF2018; 1:300 rabbit anti-ßIII-TUBULIN, Sigma T2200; 1:800 AF488 donkey anti-mouse, Molecular Probes A21202; 1:800 AF488 donkey anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-547-003; 1:800 AF647 donkey anti-goat, Molecular Probes A21447; 1:1000 biotin horse anti-mouse, Vector Laboratories BA-2000; 1:2000 Cy3-streptavidin, Jackson ImmunoResearch 016-160-084; 1:800 Cy3 donkey anti-chicken, Jackson ImmunoResearch 703-165-155; 1:800 Cy3 donkey anti-mouse, Jackson ImmunoResearch 715-165-151; 1:800 Cy3 donkey anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-165-152; 1:800 Cy3 donkey anti-rat, Jackson ImmunoResearch 712-165-153). DAPI (1 µg/ml) was used to counterstain nuclei. 10 µM EdU was administered for 1 h prior to fixation and detected using the Click-iT™ Plus EdU Alexa Fluor™ 555 Imaging Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, C10638) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For CDK2 inhibition, 2 DIV differentiated cells were treated with 1 µM CDK1/2 inhibitor III (Millipore, 217714) in control medium supplemented with 2% FBS for 24 h. An appropriate dilution of DMSO was used as vehicle.
Flow cytometry
Characterization of NSC and NPC populations in the adult SEZ was performed as previously described [38, 39]. Roughly, SEZ tissue was dissected, minced and enzymatically digested using the neural tissue dissociation kit (T) (Miltenyi, 130–093-231) in a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with heaters (Miltenyi). After trypsin inhibition, digested pieces were mechanically dissociated, the cell suspension was filtered through a 40 μm and treated with the Dead Cell Removal Kit (Miltenyi, cat no. 130-090-101) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Finally, the eluted living fraction was pelleted (300×g, 10 min) and incubated with the specific cocktail of primary antibodies [38, 39] (1:300 CD24-PerCP-Cy5.5, BD 562360; 1:100 CD31-BUV395, BD 740239; 1:200 CD45-BUV395, BD 565967; 1:20 CD9-Vio770, Miltenyi 130-102-384; 1:20 GLAST-PE, Miltenyi 130-095-821; 1:30 O4-Biotin, Miltenyi 130-095-895; 1:200 Ter119-BUV395, BD 563827; 1:300 AF488 EGF complex, Molecular Probes E13345) and reagents (DAPI, 50 µg/ml) at 4 °C for 30 min. Labeled samples were analyzed using a LSR-Fortessa cytometer (Becton Dickinson) with 350, 488, 561 and 640 nm lasers.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
ChIP was performed as previously described [64]. WT neurospheres (3 DIV) and 2 + 1 DIV differentiated cells were cross-linked and chromatin isolated. Chromatin was sheared to an average size of 200–500 bp using a Bioruptor sonicator (Diagenode, UCD-200) and then pre-cleared with 10 µl of protein G magnetic beads (Dynabeads®, 10003D) for 3 h at 4 °C with rotation. 5% of pre-cleared chromatin was reserved as input. 5–10 µg of antibody (rabbit anti-p27, Santa Cruz sc-528; goat anti-SOX2, R&D AF2018) or non-related antibody (NRA: Neu (C-18) (rabbit anti-NEU, Santa Cruz sc-284) and Rock2 (N-19) (goat anti-ROCK2, Santa Cruz sc-1852) for p27 and SOX2 immunoprecipitations, respectively) were added and incubated overnight at 4 °C on a rotation wheel. Bound chromatin was retrieved with 20 µl protein G beads for 3 h at 4 °C, washed and submitted to cross-link reversal and protein digestion. Finally, DNA was purified using MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, 28004) following manufacturer’s instructions. ChIP enriched DNA was analyzed by real-time PCR using SYBR green primers (prAscl1[− 906/− 784]-F: TAACCCTGAGTGCCTTCCTG; prAscl1[− 906/− 784]-R: GGAGTCATGAACAGGATAGGTTG;; prAscl1[− 523/− 432]-F: CTGCGGAGAGAAGAAAGGGG; prAscl1[− 523/− 432]-R: TCAGGGAAGGGTTTAGGCAG; prOlig2[− 637/− 546]-F: CTGCAGCAACTGCCACTAAG;; prOlig2[− 637/− 546]-R: CTGTGACCATTTGTGGTTGC; prOlig2[− 147/− 58]-F: TTCATTGAGCGGAATTAGCC; prOlig2[− 147/− 58]-: CGGGAACAATGTGCTTTTC; prSox2[− 460/− 345]-F: ATGAGCGCAGAAACAATGGCA; prSox2[− 460/− 345]-R: ACATAAGGGTGGATGGGGCG; SRR2[+ 4042/ + 4133]-F: AAGAATTTCCCGGGCTCG; SRR2[+ 4042/ + 4133]-R: CCTATGTGTGAGCAAGAACTGTCG;). The reaction conditions were optimized for each primer pair in order to get a single-peak melting curve. The IP and its NRA counterpart were amplified at several dilutions and only considered positive results (Ct of IP < Ct of NRA) if observed in at least two different dilutions. The comparative Ct method was used to calculate fold enrichment levels relative to NRA after normalizing each one to their input.
Transfection and viral infection of NSCs
For restoration of p27 and SOX2 levels in Cdkn1b−/− cultures, NSCs were transfected using the Amaxa NSC Nucleofector Kit (Lonza, VPG-1004) as previously described [16] with either 7.5 μg of pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1-p27-Flag (p27 full-length construct) or 7.5 μg of empty pMSCVpuro (Clontech, 634401) and pSUPER.retro mSox2.3 (shRNASox2 target sequence: 5ʹ-CGAGATAAACATGGCAATCAA-3ʹ), respectively. Cdkn1b+/+ cultures were used as control. Nucleofected cells were plated on differentiative conditions and processed for immunocytochemistry at 2 and 2 + 1 DIV. For overexpression of Sox2, Rosa26R-loxP-STOP-loxP-Sox2-GFP NSC cultures were infected with Ad-GFP and Ad-CMV-iCre (Vector Biolabs) following the protocol described in [65]. Shortly, 30,000 individual NSCs were infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 500 in complete medium. After 24 h, viruses were washed, and cells were plated in fresh medium and grown for 5 more days. After passage, Cre-infected (Sox2OE) and control GFP-infected (Sox2+/+) cultures were plated on differentiative conditions and analyzed at 2 and 2 + 1 DIV. The 30% brightest cells in both conditions were considered as SOX2high. In order to study CDK2 activity, Cdkn1b+/+ and Cdkn1b−/− cultures were infected with the lentiviral particles carrying the CSII-EF-DHB-mVenus construct [26] as previously described [66]. Infected neurospheres were cultured for 5 days in fresh complete medium, split and differentiated according to the experimental procedure.
Cloning and luciferase assay
Murine Sox2 proximal promoter (positions − 1907 to + 6 relative to the transcription initiation site) [32] was retrieved by PCR from C57B6/J genomic DNA with specific primers containing restriction-site target sequences (prSox2[− 1907/ + 6]-luc-F: AAAAAACTCGAGAAACTTAAGGAGAACCTGGGG; prSox2[− 1907/ + 6]-luc-R: CCACCAAAGCTTAACAAGTTAATAGACAACCATCCA) and cloned into a pGL3-Enhancer vector (Promega). The correct sequence was checked by Sanger sequencing. Cdkn1b+/+ and Cdkn1b−/− cells were nucleofected (see “Transfection and viral infection of NSCs”) with 7.5 μg pCDNA3.1 or pCDNA3.1-p27-Flag, 0.5 μg of pMAX-GFP and 2 μg of the corresponding reporter construct (prSox2[− 1907/ + 6]-luc; SRR2[+ 3641/ + 4023]-luc, kindly provided by Dr. Okuda [35], driving the expression of the firefly luciferase and a Renilla luciferase plasmid in a 1:20 ratio. After electroporation, NSCs were plated on either proliferative or differentiative conditions. Cells were lysed after 72 h (2 + 1 DIV for differentiations) using the Dual Luciferase Reporter kit (Promega, E1960) and luciferase activity was measured using a Victor3 (Perkin Elmer) reader. Ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase was calculated and represented as arbitrary units (a.u.).
Imaging and bioimage analysis
Images were acquired with an Olympus FV10i confocal microscope (Olympus). For in vitro experiments, laser settings were first established on WT/control samples at the first time point (e.g., 2 DIV) and kept throughout the whole experiment. Random fields were imaged at the focal plane showing both the highest number of cells on focus and the most intense signal. 2 + 5 DIV differentiation samples were imaged using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni-U microscope (Nikon) with a Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera (Andor). Bioimage analysis was performed using the Fiji open-source software package [67]. ImageJ Macro Language scripts were developed to perform unbiased automatic analysis of the in vitro experiments: (1) nuclear signal of EdU, Ki67, SOX2, OLIG2 and ASLC1) was quantified with our previously developed “Cell proliferation HCS” tool [68]. A minimum of 500 cells per culture were scored in all conditions; (2) CDK2 activity was analyzed by a custom workflow (see Fig. 2a; full script available at https://github.com/paucabar/DHB-Venus) that obtains a binary mask for each cell in both DAPI and CSII-EF-DHB-mVenus images. After that, nuclear particles of non-infected cells (mVenus−) are discarded and touching or clumped cells are separated by Voronoi partition. Only cytoplasm mVenus-positive (mVenus+) mask is obtained after operating (XOR) with the whole cell and nuclear masks. Finally, nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) binary masks are redirected to the original grayscale image to retrieve the mVenus signal. Cells with no mVenus C mask or with a C/N ratio (mean gray value) lower than 0.65 were classified as G0/G1 cells. Residual CDK2 activity was scored as the integrated intensity of the mVenus+ C masks of cells in G0/G1. A minimum of 250 cells per culture were scored in all conditions. For in vivo experiments, laser settings were first established on WT tissue and similar regions of interest (ROI) were acquired in an Olympus FV10i confocal microscope. Maximal projection images were generated and the mean gray intensities of nuclear markers (ASCL1, OLIG2, SOX2) were measured with Fiji software. Intensities were represented as frequency histograms normalized to the maximum count in each comparison.
RNA- and ATAC-seq
3 DIV proliferating neurospheres and NPs at 2 + 1 DIV were harvested for RNA and chromatin extraction. For ATAC sequencing 50,000 cells were centrifuged (500×g, 5 min, 4 °C), washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630). Nuclei were pelleted (500×g, 10 min, 4 °C) and tagmented with the Nextera DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, FC-121-1030) for 1 h at 37 °C. After transposition, DNA was purified with the MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, 28004) and amplified and barcoded with the NEBNext high-fidelity 2 × PCR master mix (New England Labs, M0541) following manufacturer’s instructions. The amplified library was then purified with XP AMPure Beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). Library fragments were analyzed and quantified with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were sequenced on an Hiseq4000 (Illumina) to achieve an average of 25 million reads per sample in the Advanced Sequencing Facility (ASF) at the Francis Crick Institute. For bulk RNA sequencing, samples were lysed with the QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen, 79306) and RNA was extracted with the miRNeasy micro kit (Qiagen, 217084) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was assessed using the Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit (Agilent Technologies). cDNA was generated using Ovation RNA-seq System V2 (Tecan, 7102-A01), libraries were constructed using Ovation Ultralow System V2 (Tecan, 0344NB-A01) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were quantified using the TapeStation (Agilent), pooled in equimolar proportions and sequenced on an Hiseq4000 (Illumina) to achieve an average of 25 million reads per sample.
Bioinformatic analyses
ATAC sequencing
Paired-end sequencing files were analyzed with FastQC, summarized with MultiQC and visually inspected for major quality issues. We used Cutadapt to clip the Nextera 3ʹ R1 and R2 adapters and then Trimmomatic to trim low-quality portions and filter reads shorter than 20 bases. Then, a second round of quality control with FastQC and MultiQC was performed to make sure the outputs were in line with the expected results. High-quality reads were then mapped to the mouse genome with Bowtie2, using the Mus musculus GRCm38 (mm10) genome as reference and allowing mate dovetailing. Duplicates were marked on BAM files with MarkDuplicates from Picard tools, insert sizes were calculated with the CollectInsertSizeMetrics tool from SAMtools, and then, peak calling was performed with MACS2, choosing narrow peaks, no model and 0.05 FDR as options. The resulting narrow-peak BED files were manually loaded into the IGV genome browser alongside their corresponding ATAC-seq coverage tracks generated with the bamCoverage function from DeepTools for visual inspection. Biological replicates of each sample were merged and used to generate average metagene plots and per-gene accessibility heatmaps around transcription start site (TSS) genomic coordinates of mouse protein-coding genes with ngsplot. MACS2 narrow-peak files and the corresponding BAM alignment files they were derived from were used as input for differential peak calling with DiffBind. An FDR threshold of 0.05 was chosen for peak differential detection between comparisons. Peaks that were significantly more or less concentrated in one sample compared to its control were considered open and closed, respectively. In order to associate both differential (open and closed) and non-differential peaks to their genomic contexts, we used ChIPseeker with the Gencode M18 mouse GTF annotation. Upstream and downstream regions of 3 Kb were allowed, as well as a flanking gene distance option of 5 Kb. We focused on peaks associated with 5ʹ and promoter regions, as determined by the ChIPseeker annotation, for downstream analysis. In the cases where there was more than one promoter peak associated with the same gene, we kept either the one that was closest to the TSS or the largest overlapping one. Differential promoter peak coordinates were used as input for the DNA motif analysis tool HOMER, with the findMotifsGenome.pl Perl script and the size given option, which instructs the algorithm to look for motifs in all the peak, not just in the region around the center of the peak.
RNA sequencing
Raw sequencing files were aligned to the Ensembl mouse transcriptome using STAR, and then, RSEM was used to count raw reads per gene. Genes with less than 1 count per million (CPM) in at least 4 of the samples were discarded. Genomic coverage tracks were generated from BAM alignment files with the bamCoverage function from DeepTools, choosing RPKM normalization. Coverage tracks were loaded into the genome browser IGV for visual inspection. Differential expression analysis between samples was done with DESeq2, and an FDR threshold of 0.05 was used to discriminate between up- or downregulated genes. Similarly to ATAC-seq samples, the biological replicates of each RNA-seq sample were merged and used as input for ngsplot to generate average metagene plots and per-gene mRNA amount heatmaps around transcription start site (TSS) genomic coordinates of protein-coding genes.
Integration between ATAC-seq and RNA-seq
The tabular outputs of DiffBind (ATAC-seq) and DESeq2 (RNA-seq) were loaded in R for further processing. We combined both matrices and labeled every gene with its corresponding differential accessibility (DA) and differential expression (DE) analysis results, i.e., DA Closed, Open or Unchanged, and DE UP, DOWN or Unchanged). For downstream functional analysis, we focused on only genes with significant differences in both modalities simultaneously: Closed_UP, Closed_DOWN, Open_UP and Open_DOWN. Functional enrichment analysis of differential genes was carried out using STRING, Mousemine, GOrilla, REVIGO, Panther, Enrichr, Appyter and the ClusterProfiler R package. The AnimalTF and UNIPROT databases were used to extract information about mouse TFs and TF families. The Epigenetic Landscape In Silico deletion Analysis (LISA) tool [17] was used to discover associations between our target gene lists and regulatory TFs and chromatin factors based on the Cistrome DNase and ChIP-seq database (CistromeDB). Density scatterplots, Venn diagrams and violin plots were generated in R with custom code.
Statistical analysis
All statistical tests were performed using the GraphPad Prism Software (v9.4). Data were analyzed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Analyses of significant differences between means for variables displaying normal distribution were carried out using the unpaired or paired two-tailed Student t test for two variables or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test for more than two groups. Similarly, variables that did not follow a normal distribution were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test, when appropriate. Two-way ANOVA was used in frequency distribution analyses. Relative values (normalized values and percentages) were first normalized by using a log or arcsin transformation, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m) unless otherwise stated. The number of experiments carried out with independent cultures/animals (n) is either shown as dots in the graphs or listed in the Figure Legends. Statistical significance in the violin plot was assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test as implemented in the ggpubr R package (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001).
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank M. J. Palop for help with the mouse colonies and acknowledge the support of the Servicio Central de Soporte a la Investigación Experimental (SCSIE-UVEG). We would also like to thank Dr. F. Guillemot (Francis Crick Institute, London) for providing the ASCL1 antibody and Drs. Jesus Gil (Imperial College, London), Anxo Vidal (Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases, Santiago de Compostela), Akihiko Okuda (Research Center for Genomic Medicine, Saitama) and Tobias Meyer (Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford) for generously providing DNA constructs.
Author contributions
AD-M, JMM-R, OB, SR-F, RL-B and IF were involved in conceptualization; AD-M, JMM-R, VM-A, SR-F and GB were responsible for methodology; AJ-P and PC-B carried out formal analysis; AD-M, JMM-R, VM-A, SR-F, PC-B, GB, AP-V, EP and MK performed the investigation; VM-A and RL-B contributed to resources; AJ-P curated the data; IF, JMM-R and AD-M wrote the original draft; AD-M, JMM-R, SR-F, AJ-P, VM-A, IF and RL-B participated in writing—reviewing and editing; AD-M, JMM-R and AJ-P took part in visualization; IF carried out supervision and project administration; and IF and RL-B acquired the funding.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This work was supported by Grants PID2020-117937GB-I00, RED2018-102723-T, CB06/05/0086 (CIBERNED) and RD16/0011/0017 (RETIC Tercel) from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Prometeo 2021/028 from Generalitat Valenciana to I.F. and core funding from the Francis Crick Institute (FC001107, from Cancer Research UK, the UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome) and an NIH Grant (R01-EB016629) to R.L-B. P.C-B. was recipient of a MICINN’s FPI pre-doctoral contract and A.D-M. and G. B. were recipients of FPU pre-doctoral contracts from Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD). A.D-M.’s stay at R.L-B.’s laboratory was supported by a MECD’s grant included in the FPU program.
Availability of data and materials
RNA-seq and ATAC-seq datasets have been deposited in GEO under accession number GEO: GSE196329.
Declarations
Competing financial interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Ethics approval
All experimental procedures complied with official European guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals (Directive 2010/63/UE) and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad de Valencia (CEEA: A1403250608615) (Spain) and by the Animal Ethics Committee and the UK Home Office (PPL 70/8560) at the Francis Crick Institute (London, UK).
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ana Domingo-Muelas, Jose Manuel Morante-Redolat and Verónica Moncho-Amor contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Obernier K, Alvarez-Buylla A. Neural stem cells: origin, heterogeneity and regulation in the adult mammalian brain. Development. 2019;146(4):dev156059. doi: 10.1242/dev.156059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ponti G, Obernier K, Guinto C, Jose L, Bonfanti L, Alvarez-Buylla A. Cell cycle and lineage progression of neural progenitors in the ventricular-subventricular zones of adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E1045–1054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219563110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Menn B, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Yaschine C, Gonzalez-Perez O, Rowitch D, Alvarez-Buylla A. Origin of oligodendrocytes in the subventricular zone of the adult brain. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7907–7918. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1299-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sohn J, Orosco L, Guo F, Chung SH, Bannerman P, Mills Ko E, et al. The subventricular zone continues to generate corpus callosum and rostral migratory stream astroglia in normal adult mice. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3756–3763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3454-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hardwick LJ, Ali FR, Azzarelli R, Philpott A. Cell cycle regulation of proliferation versus differentiation in the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;359:187–200. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1895-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kippin TE, Martens DJ, van der Kooy D. p21 loss compromises the relative quiescence of forebrain stem cell proliferation leading to exhaustion of their proliferation capacity. Genes Dev. 2005;19:756–767. doi: 10.1101/gad.1272305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marques-Torrejon MA, Porlan E, Banito A, Gomez-Ibarlucea E, Lopez-Contreras AJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 controls adult neural stem cell expansion by regulating Sox2 gene expression. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Porlan E, Morante-Redolat JM, Marques-Torrejon MA, Andreu-Agullo C, Carneiro C, Gomez-Ibarlucea E, et al. Transcriptional repression of Bmp2 by p21(Waf1/Cip1) links quiescence to neural stem cell maintenance. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1567–1575. doi: 10.1038/nn.3545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doetsch F, Verdugo JM, Caille I, Alvarez-Buylla A, Chao MV, Casaccia-Bonnefil P. Lack of the cell-cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 results in selective increase of transit-amplifying cells for adult neurogenesis. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2255–2264. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-06-02255.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gil-Perotin S, Haines JD, Kaur J, Marin-Husstege M, Spinetta MJ, Kim KH, et al. Roles of p53 and p27(Kip1) in the regulation of neurogenesis in the murine adult subventricular zone. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34:1040–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07836.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nguyen L, Besson A, Heng JI, Schuurmans C, Teboul L, Parras C, et al. p27kip1 independently promotes neuronal differentiation and migration in the cerebral cortex. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1511–1524. doi: 10.1101/gad.377106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li H, Collado M, Villasante A, Matheu A, Lynch CJ, Canamero M, et al. p27(Kip1) directly represses Sox2 during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:845–852. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moncho-Amor V, Chakravarty P, Galichet C, Matheu A, Lovell-Badge R, Rizzoti K. SOX2 is required independently in both stem and differentiated cells for pituitary tumorigenesis in p27-null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(7):e2017115118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017115118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bachs O, Gallastegui E, Orlando S, Bigas A, Morante-Redolat JM, Serratosa J, et al. Role of p27(Kip1) as a transcriptional regulator. Oncotarget. 2018;9:26259–26278. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1213–1218. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Belenguer G, Domingo-Muelas A, Ferron SR, Morante-Redolat JM, Farinas I. Isolation, culture and analysis of adult subependymal neural stem cells. Differentiation. 2016;91:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qin Q, Fan J, Zheng R, Wan C, Mei S, Wu Q, et al. Lisa: inferring transcriptional regulators through integrative modeling of public chromatin accessibility and ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 2020;21:32. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-1934-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–589. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fero ML, Rivkin M, Tasch M, Porter P, Carow CE, Firpo E, et al. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27(Kip1)-deficient mice. Cell. 1996;85:733–744. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kiyokawa H, Kineman RD, Manova-Todorova KO, Soares VC, Hoffman ES, Ono M, et al. Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27(Kip1) Cell. 1996;85:721–732. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakayama K, Ishida N, Shirane M, Inomata A, Inoue T, Shishido N, et al. Mice lacking p27(Kip1) display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell. 1996;85:707–720. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Defoe DM, Rao H, Harris DJ, 3rd, Moore PD, Brocher J, Harrison TA. A non-canonical role for p27Kip1 in restricting proliferation of corneal endothelial cells during development. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0226725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Durand B, Fero ML, Roberts JM, Raff MC. p27Kip1 alters the response of cells to mitogen and is part of a cell-intrinsic timer that arrests the cell cycle and initiates differentiation. Curr Biol. 1998;8:431–440. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Raff M. Intracellular developmental timers. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:431–435. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2007.72.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Overton KW, Spencer SL, Noderer WL, Meyer T, Wang CL. Basal p21 controls population heterogeneity in cycling and quiescent cell cycle states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E4386–4393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409797111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Spencer SL, Cappell SD, Tsai FC, Overton KW, Wang CL, Meyer T. The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit. Cell. 2013;155:369–383. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reiprich S, Wegner M. From CNS stem cells to neurons and glia: Sox for everyone. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;359:111–124. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1909-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sarkar A, Hochedlinger K. The sox family of transcription factors: versatile regulators of stem and progenitor cell fate. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Colak D, Mori T, Brill MS, Pfeifer A, Falk S, Deng C, et al. Adult neurogenesis requires Smad4-mediated bone morphogenic protein signaling in stem cells. J Neurosci. 2008;28:434–446. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4374-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hack MA, Saghatelyan A, de Chevigny A, Pfeifer A, Ashery-Padan R, Lledo PM, et al. Neuronal fate determinants of adult olfactory bulb neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:865–872. doi: 10.1038/nn1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parras CM, Galli R, Britz O, Soares S, Galichet C, Battiste J, et al. Mash1 specifies neurons and oligodendrocytes in the postnatal brain. EMBO J. 2004;23:4495–4505. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wiebe MS, Wilder PJ, Kelly D, Rizzino A. Isolation, characterization, and differential expression of the murine Sox-2 promoter. Gene. 2000;246:383–393. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miyagi S, Nishimoto M, Saito T, Ninomiya M, Sawamoto K, Okano H, et al. The Sox2 regulatory region 2 functions as a neural stem cell-specific enhancer in the telencephalon. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:13374–13381. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512669200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zappone MV, Galli R, Catena R, Meani N, De Biasi S, Mattei E, et al. Sox2 regulatory sequences direct expression of a (beta)-geo transgene to telencephalic neural stem cells and precursors of the mouse embryo, revealing regionalization of gene expression in CNS stem cells. Development. 2000;127:2367–2382. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.11.2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tomioka M, Nishimoto M, Miyagi S, Katayanagi T, Fukui N, Niwa H, et al. Identification of Sox-2 regulatory region which is under the control of Oct-3/4-Sox-2 complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3202–3213. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu Y, Futtner C, Rock JR, Xu X, Whitworth W, Hogan BL, et al. Evidence that SOX2 overexpression is oncogenic in the lung. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li X, Tang X, Jablonska B, Aguirre A, Gallo V, Luskin MB. p27(KIP1) regulates neurogenesis in the rostral migratory stream and olfactory bulb of the postnatal mouse. J Neurosci. 2009;29:2902–2914. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4051-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Belenguer G, Duart-Abadia P, Domingo-Muelas A, Morante-Redolat JM, Farinas I. Cell population analysis of the adult murine subependymal neurogenic lineage by flow cytometry. STAR Protoc. 2021;2:100425. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Belenguer G, Duart-Abadia P, Jordan-Pla A, Domingo-Muelas A, Blasco-Chamarro L, Ferron SR, et al. Adult neural stem cells are alerted by systemic inflammation through TNF-alpha receptor signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:285 e289–299 e289. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baser A, Skabkin M, Kleber S, Dang Y, Gulculer Balta GS, Kalamakis G, et al. Onset of differentiation is post-transcriptionally controlled in adult neural stem cells. Nature. 2019;566:100–104. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0888-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ferri AL, Cavallaro M, Braida D, Di Cristofano A, Canta A, Vezzani A, et al. Sox2 deficiency causes neurodegeneration and impaired neurogenesis in the adult mouse brain. Development. 2004;131:3805–3819. doi: 10.1242/dev.01204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH, Perez L, Vivian N, Lovell-Badge R. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev. 2003;17:126–140. doi: 10.1101/gad.224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang S, Zhu X, Gui X, Croteau C, Song L, Xu J, et al. sox2 is essential for oligodendroglial proliferation and differentiation during postnatal brain myelination and CNS remyelination. J Neurosci. 2018;38:1802–1820. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1291-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bylund M, Andersson E, Novitch BG, Muhr J. Vertebrate neurogenesis is counteracted by Sox1-3 activity. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1162–1168. doi: 10.1038/nn1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Graham V, Khudyakov J, Ellis P, Pevny L. SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity. Neuron. 2003;39:749–765. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00497-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Hardy RJ, Teng KK, Levine JM, Koff A, Chao MV. Loss of p27Kip1 function results in increased proliferative capacity of oligodendrocyte progenitors but unaltered timing of differentiation. Development. 1999;126:4027–4037. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.18.4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Casaccia-Bonnefil P, Tikoo R, Kiyokawa H, Friedrich V, Jr, Chao MV, Koff A. Oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation is perturbed in the absence of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2335–2346. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.18.2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gao FB, Durand B, Raff M. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells count time but not cell divisions before differentiation. Curr Biol. 1997;7:152–155. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Larocque D, Galarneau A, Liu HN, Scott M, Almazan G, Richard S. Protection of p27(Kip1) mRNA by quaking RNA binding proteins promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:27–33. doi: 10.1038/nn1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Miskimins R, Srinivasan R, Marin-Husstege M, Miskimins WK, Casaccia-Bonnefil P. p27(Kip1) enhances myelin basic protein gene promoter activity. J Neurosci Res. 2002;67:100–105. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang S, Cui W. Sox2, a key factor in the regulation of pluripotency and neural differentiation. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:305–311. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hutton SR, Pevny LH. SOX2 expression levels distinguish between neural progenitor populations of the developing dorsal telencephalon. Dev Biol. 2011;352:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ring KL, Tong LM, Balestra ME, Javier R, Andrews-Zwilling Y, Li G, et al. Direct reprogramming of mouse and human fibroblasts into multipotent neural stem cells with a single factor. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cavallaro M, Mariani J, Lancini C, Latorre E, Caccia R, Gullo F, et al. Impaired generation of mature neurons by neural stem cells from hypomorphic Sox2 mutants. Development. 2008;135:541–557. doi: 10.1242/dev.010801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taranova OV, Magness ST, Fagan BM, Wu Y, Surzenko N, Hutton SR, et al. SOX2 is a dose-dependent regulator of retinal neural progenitor competence. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1187–1202. doi: 10.1101/gad.1407906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hu Q, Zhang L, Wen J, Wang S, Li M, Feng R, et al. The EGF receptor-sox2-EGF receptor feedback loop positively regulates the self-renewal of neural precursor cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28:279–286. doi: 10.1002/stem.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kuwabara T, Hsieh J, Muotri A, Yeo G, Warashina M, Lie DC, et al. Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1097–1105. doi: 10.1038/nn.2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shimozaki K, Zhang CL, Suh H, Denli AM, Evans RM, Gage FH. SRY-box-containing gene 2 regulation of nuclear receptor tailless (Tlx) transcription in adult neural stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:5969–5978. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.290403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Favaro R, Valotta M, Ferri AL, Latorre E, Mariani J, Giachino C, et al. Hippocampal development and neural stem cell maintenance require Sox2-dependent regulation of Shh. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1248–1256. doi: 10.1038/nn.2397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bergsland M, Ramskold D, Zaouter C, Klum S, Sandberg R, Muhr J. Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2453–2464. doi: 10.1101/gad.176008.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Julian LM, Vandenbosch R, Pakenham CA, Andrusiak MG, Nguyen AP, McClellan KA, et al. Opposing regulation of Sox2 by cell-cycle effectors E2f3a and E2f3b in neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:440–452. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.D'Amour KA, Gage FH. Genetic and functional differences between multipotent neural and pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(Suppl 1):11866–11872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834200100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ferron SR, Andreu-Agullo C, Mira H, Sanchez P, Marques-Torrejon MA, Farinas I. A combined ex/in vivo assay to detect effects of exogenously added factors in neural stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:849–859. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Strogantsev R, Krueger F, Yamazawa K, Shi H, Gould P, Goldman-Roberts M, et al. Allele-specific binding of ZFP57 in the epigenetic regulation of imprinted and non-imprinted monoallelic expression. Genome Biol. 2015;16:112. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0672-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hawley SP, Wills MK, Jones N. Adenovirus-mediated genetic removal of signaling molecules in cultured primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J Vis Exp. 2010 doi: 10.3791/2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Porlan E, Marti-Prado B, Morante-Redolat JM, Consiglio A, Delgado AC, Kypta R, et al. MT5-MMP regulates adult neural stem cell functional quiescence through the cleavage of N-cadherin. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:629–638. doi: 10.1038/ncb2993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Carrillo-Barbera P, Morante-Redolat JM, Pertusa JF. Cell proliferation high-content screening on adherent cell cultures. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;2040:299–329. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9686-5_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq and ATAC-seq datasets have been deposited in GEO under accession number GEO: GSE196329.