Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2023 Jan 5;29:e938826-1–e938826-10. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938826

Biomarkers of Activity-Dependent Plasticity and Persistent Enhancement of Synaptic Transmission in Alzheimer Disease: A Review of the Current Status

Marcin Warpechowski 1,A,D,E,F,, Jędrzej Warpechowski 2,A,E,F, Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik 3,A,E,F, Barbara Mroczko 3,4,A,E,F
PMCID: PMC9832729  PMID: 36600577

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a chronic and heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder characterized by complex pathological processes involving neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and synaptic dysfunction. Understanding the exact neurobiological mechanisms underlying AD pathology may help to provide a biomarker for early diagnosis or at least for assessment of vulnerability to dementia development. Neural plasticity is defined as a capability of the brain to respond to alterations including aging, injury, or learning, with a crucial role of synaptic elements. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are important in regulating synaptic connections between neural cells in functional plasticity. Synaptic loss and impairment of the brain’s plasticity in AD leads to cognitive impairment, and one of important roles of synaptic biomarkers is monitoring synaptic dysfunction, response to treatment, and predicting future development of AD. Synaptic biomarkers are undoubtedly very promising in developing novel approach to AD treatment and control, especially in the era of aging of societies, which is one of the most common risk factor of AD. Implementing a widespread measurement of synaptic biomarkers of AD will probably be crucial in early diagnosis of AD, early therapeutic intervention, monitoring progression of the disease, or response to treatment. One of the most important challenges is finding a biomarker whose blood concentration correlates with its level in the central nervous system (CNS). This review aims to present the current status of biomarkers of activity-dependent plasticity and persistent enhancement of synaptic transmission in Alzheimer disease.

Keywords: Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Cerebrospinal Fluid

Background – Characteristic of Alzheimer Disease

Alzheimer disease (AD) is one of the most common age-related neurodegenerative diseases, clinically characterized by gradual loss of memory and cognitive functions [1]. AD is a heterogeneous disease with composite etiology [2], with a crucial role of disorders of amyloid-beta (aβ) and tau protein [3]. Recent scientific reports suggest that synaptic dysfunction is also involved in the pathogenesis of AD [4]. Progression of AD is likely to occur years prior to the first signs, symptoms, and clinical diagnosis [5]. It can be divided based on age at development of the first symptoms: early-onset AD (EOAD) for people age <65 years old and late-onset AD (LOAD) (most common) for people age >65 years [6]. Currently, the incidence of AD is increasing, probably due to the aging of society [7].

A potential explanation of AD pathogenesis is provided by a number of hypotheses [8]. The amyloid-beta theory [9] focusses on accumulation of excessive amounts of Aβ (particularly Aβ42), which results in synapse loss, and neuronal cell death [10]. The role of NMDA receptors in AD is highly probable because of the finding of glutamatergic neurons in AD-affected tissues and their role in mediating synaptic plasticity through long-term potentiation (LTP) [1113]. Long-standing activation of NMDA receptors results in a process called “excitotoxicity”, eventually leading to neurodegeneration [14]. A high concentration of Ca2+ ions leads to loss of learning abilities and memory functions in AD because of suppression of synaptic functions, synaptotoxicity, and atrophy [12]. The tau protein hypothesis was first proposed in 1986, citing phosphorylation of tau as a likely contributor to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles in AD [15], leading to the starvation of neural cells by disturbing transport structures [16].

Synaptic Plasticity in Aging and Alzheimer Disease

Neural plasticity is the ability of the brain to perform structural and functional modification as a response to new experience, injury, or aging [17]. Architectural plasticity is described as the rise of new synaptic connections and removal of old ones, as well as the enlargement of synapses, often because of learning processes [18]. LTP includes the long-lasting strengthening of synaptic connections between neurons, which is decisive in the formation of long-term memory [19]. Long-term depression (LTD) weakens the efficacy of synaptic strengthening using several mechanisms to effectively use strengthening of synaptic connections by LTP [20]. Functional plasticity consists of LTP and LTD, and refers to the brain’s ability to adjust to loss or damage of its tissue by transferring previously performed functions by destroyed areas to undamaged regions, and occurs by growing new nerve endings by axons of undamaged neurons to reconnect links of neural cells destroyed by injury in a process called axonal sprouting [21].

Aging is undoubtedly linked with decreased ability of learning and memory [22]. Impairment of brain functions is associated with deficiency in elicitation of LTP and shorter duration of maintenance of LTP, which are important for generation of new connections between neural cells [23]. Reduction in grey and white matter of the brain, cellular aging, and environmental factor also contribute to impairment of neural plasticity and predispose to neurodegenerative diseases [24].

AD involves loss of synaptic connections between neurons without the ability of remaining synapses to alter in response to new stimuli, which is one of the most essential mechanisms of AD dementia [25]. Maintaining plasticity of the brain in AD is crucial to reducing cognitive symptoms and slowing AD progression, which will certainly reduce the cost of medical care and allow most patients to have improved quality of life [26].

This review aims to present the current status of biomarkers of activity-dependent plasticity and persistent enhancement of synaptic transmission in Alzheimer disease.

Markers of Plasticity in the Development of AD

Research efforts are currently directed to the search for and analysis of biomarkers reflecting synaptic pathology in the cerebrospinal fluid to improve the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders in the early stage of the disease and to monitor clinical progression. There are pre- and postsynaptic markers that can regulate the functioning of cells of the central nervous system.

Fluid Synaptic Biomarkers in Dementia

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an intermediate cytoskeletal protein released by activated astrocytes during pathological states of the CNS, including trauma, ischemia, and neurodegeneration [27,28].

Elevated levels of GFAP in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were observed in AD [29]. Higher plasma levels of GFAP were observed in EOAD in comparison to LOAD [30]. Moreover, an increased CSF level of GFAP was also found to correlate with results of MMSE, being a promising follow-up marker in future studies [31]. Measurement of GFAP upon autopsy in temporal, occipital, and parietal cortices showed a correlation between a high level of GFAP in these regions and weak cognitive performance later in life [32]. A 2019 observational study also drew similar conclusions [31]. Higher levels of GFAP among adults with symptomatic AD were associated with poorer verbal episodic memory [33]. The elevation of GFAP in AD might be explained by astrogliosis (abnormal increase in the number of astrocytes), which is related to worse cognitive performance [34].

Neurogranin

Neurogranin (Ng) is a postsynaptic protein with highest expression in associative cortical areas of the brain [35]. It is essential in memory, learning, synaptic plasticity, and LTP [36]. Its level was found to be lower in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of AD patients in a postmortem study, with lower level among EOAD individuals, suggesting a link with synaptic loss and neurodegeneration [37].

Increased Ng concentration in CSF was identified among patients diagnosed with AD [38], with similar results in larger studies [3941]. Additionally, elevated levels of Ng were correlated with future cognitive decline in prodromal AD [40], but other study using plasma neuronal-derived exosomes (NDEs) found decreased Ng levels years before the onset of AD dementia [42]. A meta-analysis of 13 high-quality evidence studies suggest that CSF Ng can predict a decline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in people with Aβ+ mild cognitive impairment (Aβ+ MCI), and moderate-quality evidence supports prediction of decline in memory and executive function [43]. The distinction in Ng expression between MCI and AD was studied in a meta-analysis [44] in which analysis of 9 studies including a total of 801 AD patients and 734 individuals with MCI without progression to AD presented higher levels of CSF Ng in AD compared to MCI. Comparison between stable MCI patients and MCI who progressed to AD (MCI-AD) also showed higher Ng CSF in MCI-AD individuals [44].

Synaptic Proteins

Synaptotagmin-1

Synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1) is a presynaptic vesicle protein that participates in quick Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release [45]. Syt1’s role is considered to be a Ca2+ sensor due to its 2 C2 (C2A, C2B) domains, which interact with Ca2+ and phospholipids [45,46], and other proteins that are soluble N-ethylenimine sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), including syntaxin-1, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25), and synaptobrevin-2, to form a tight SNAREs complex, which is crucial in forming membrane fusion between synaptic vesicle and plasma membranes [47]. Research conducted on animal models demonstrated its essential role in control of synaptic plasticity [48].

High concentrations of Syt1 in CSF were discovered in individuals with MCI and dementia caused by AD [49]. Blood neuro-exosomal Syt1 in combination with other synaptic proteins were found useful in predicting the occurrence of AD, even 5 to 7 years before cognitive impairment [50].

Synaptosomal-Associated Protein 25

Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) belongs to the SNAREs complex, which is involved in exocytosis of neurotransmitters during synaptic transmission [51]. Its exact action is to mediate the apposition of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic membrane, which leads to Ca2+ fusion, through assembly with other synaptic proteins [51]. Research in mice proved that SNAP-25 takes part in controlling long-term synaptic plasticity and synaptic transmission [52].

Decreased expression of SNAP-25 was discovered in a postmortem study of brains of AD patients [53], whereas higher concentrations were discovered in CSF of AD patients in comparison to the control group [5457]. SNAP-25 appears to be a promising biomarker due to its good results in the differentiation of dementia and MCI caused by AD from controls, as well as various clinical stages of AD, but with no correlation with MMSE score [56].

Growth-Associated Binding Protein 43

Growth-associated binding protein 43 (GAP-43) is an axonal phosphoprotein linked with the elongation of axons and guidance of the growth cone [58]. GAP-43 has a major role in synaptic plasticity because of its role in synaptogenesis [59], growth of presynaptic terminals [60], formation and regeneration of axons [61], and induction of LTP [62].

Several postmortem brain studies revealed decreased expression of GAP-43 in the frontal cortex and regional increase in the hippocampus among AD patients [6365]. GAP-43 was increased in CSF in preclinical AD [6667] and may be of great relevance in developing future diagnostic approaches for AD.

Neuronal Pentraxins

Neuronal pentraxins (NPTX) belong to a subfamily of pentraxins and consist of neuronal pentraxin 1 (NPTX1), neuronal pentraxin 2 (NPTX2), and neuronal pentraxin receptor (NPTXR) [68]. They are located in the synaptic cleft and are responsible for synaptogenesis [69], elimination of synapse [70], clearance of synaptic debris [71], and outgrowth of neurons [72].

Recent studies suggest that regulation of synaptic plasticity by NPTX occurs through neuronal activity, as low activity of neurons evokes NPTX1 [73], which contributes to apoptotic cell death of mature neurons [74]. In contrast, NPTX2 [73] is stimulated by high neuronal activity [72] by maintaining homeostasis of synaptic plasticity [72].

NPTXR is a receptor of NPTX1 and NPTX2 and recruits other NPTXR and NPTX2 [75]. The role of NPTXR in synaptic plasticity is stabilization of NPTX1 and NPTX2 at synapses [76] and clustering to α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptor (AMPAR), which has a major impact on synaptic transmission [77]. Moreover, NPTXR is likely to recruit AMPAR into glutamatergic synapses, which is crucial for LTP [77].

Expression of NPTX2 was found to be lower in brains of AD individuals, and its CSF levels is correlated with cognitive status and volume of the hippocampus, which suggests its promising role as an informative biomarker [78] for identification of patients with AD who are most likely to respond to anti-amyloid therapy, as its level is likely to be independent of Aβ load in asymptomatic AD [78]. It is even considered to be a good biomarker for prediction of cognitive decline in AD, as higher concentrations of NPTX2 correspond to decreased medial temporal lobe atrophy and substantially less decline of cognitive functions during 24-month follow-up [79].

NPTXR level in CSF of people with AD was found to be decreased in some studies [8083]. It was also reported that NPTXR can predict AD progression treatment response [80,81]. A relationship between NPTXR and Aβ load was also found in a positron emission tomography (PET) study [82].

Fluid Biomarkers Modulating Synaptic Plasticity

Tau Protein

Tau protein is a microtubule-associated protein with a physiological role in stabilization of neuronal microtubules [84]. However, in certain conditions, tau protein can undergo modifications, including phosphorylation, which generates toxic aggregates, finally leading to neurodegeneration [84]. Tau protein impairs synaptic plasticity by inducing neuroinflammation through astroglial and microglial activation [85], which eventually leads to synaptic loss. In addition, some researchers suggest that hyperphosphorylation of tau lowers its affinity to microtubules, resulting in localization of tau in dendrites and presynaptic terminals [86], which impairs motility of synaptic vesicles, contributing to synaptic dysfunction [87,88].

The level of tau protein in the CSF was found to play a role in cortical plasticity among AD patients [89,90]. Tau deposition in the temporal lobe was correlated with its concentration in CSF, with a better prediction of cognitive performance in comparison to Aβ deposition in all regions of the brain [91]. Koch et al found that high levels of total tau (t-tau) in CSF were associated with impaired cortical plasticity of brains of AD patients with APOE4 (measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)), but no similar relationship was found in patients with apolipoprotein 3 (APOE3) [92]. The correlation between level of tau protein and neuropsychological test performance may differentiate between MCI and AD individuals [93], but a notable overlap between AD patients and controls complicates its usefulness [93].

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin with high expression in the hippocampus [94]; it is crucial in memory formation [95], synaptic and hippocampal plasticity, and structural integrity of the brain [96].

Plasma level of BDNF was significantly higher in early stages of probable AD compared to patients with severe AD and healthy controls, and was significantly correlated with MMSE score [97], which might be related to its role in degradation of excessive amounts of Aβ or compensatory repair mechanism [98], but that study is quite old and contained only 30 AD individuals and 10 controls. More studies presented decrease in BDNF in AD and MCI individuals [99104]. Additionally, there is a report of no association in BDNF serum levels among AD, amnestic MCI, and controls with BDNF gene polymorphism [105]. Decrease in serum BDNF in amnestic MCI patients was positively correlated with score on Auditory Verbal Learning Tests, reflecting episodic memory [100]. Moreover, low levels of BDNF might occur before neuronal injury in AD measured with reduction of hippocampus, as AD and MCI patients presented lower levels of BDNF in comparison to controls [101]. A recent study reported a relationship between disease-modifying effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the lateral parietal cortex of AD individuals and increased levels of BDNF, improvement of visual recognition memory functions, and clock-drawing test scores [106]. In that study, 15 AD patients underwent rTMS, which consisted of 10 sessions during 2 weeks [106]. One week before rTMS, all patients underwent neuropsychiatric testing, MRI screening, and blood sample collection. After 2 weeks, the same examinations were conducted after rTMS [106]. Two weeks after the rTM intervention, a significant improvement in WMS-Visual Reproduction Test Recognition and Clock-Drawing Test scores was observed, which were correlated with the increase in BDNF level [106]. Forlenza et al [107] revealed that decreased level of BDNF in CSF was a predictor of progression from MCI to AD, which may suggest involvement of BDNF in neurodegeneration in AD.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a protein encoded by the VEGF-A gene [108]. Its physiological function is involved in the growth of blood vessels, delivery of oxygen and glucose, regulation of permeability, and vasodilatation of blood vessels [108,109]. VEGF was found to be a positive factor in the preservation of cognitive functions among older people, as it maintains cognitive abilities [110], participates in promotion of neurogenesis [111], and improvement of synaptic plasticity [112]. Modification of VEGF signaling through amyloid is believed to have a strong effect on cognition in AD, which was found in postmortem research on AD patients [113]. Exogenous administration of VEGF improved memory impairment and a reduced amyloid load and hyperphosphorylated tau in AD mice [114].

High availability of VEGF was found to be neuroprotective in preclinical AD [114]. However, 2 other studies [115,116] did not find this relationship due to a lack of significant statistical differences between AD patients and healthy controls [115] and higher levels of VEGF among AD individuals [116]. Larger studies have produced different results because they found less cognitive decline among AD patients with higher VEGF levels in CSF [117118]. Additionally, interactions of VEGF, Aβ42, and t-tau were reported to be useful in predicting memory decline among AD individuals [117].

D-Amino Acids

D-amino acids (D-serine, D-aspartate) participate in excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission via N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptor (NMDAR) [119]. NMDAR signaling is important for synaptic plasticity and survival of neural cells, but over-transmission in the NMDAR signaling pathway leads to cell death and is believed to cause progression of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [120]. High levels of D-aspartate in preclinical murine AD models accelerated brain aging and cognitive decline [121123]. D-amino acids have been considered a promising biomarker in AD due to finding a 5-fold increase of D-serine in patients with probable AD in comparison to healthy controls [124], but other research did not find differences between AD patients and elderly controls [125].

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids

Several studies support a link between proper diet, cognitive disorder, and AD [126129]. Diet including food rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), like fish, whole grains, fresh fruits, and vegetables, was connected with a lower risk of cognitive decline than a diet rich in processed food, saturated fats, added sugars, and refined grains [130]. PUFAs include omega-3 fatty acids: α-linolenic acid (ALA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) [130]. Omega-6 fatty acids include linoleic acid (LA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) [131]. LA, ALA, and precursors omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs cannot be synthesized by the human body and must be supplemented with diet [132,133]. Elevated concentrations of ARA in neuronal membranes were reported to improve synaptic functions because of the increased fluidity index of brain cells in the treated group, but no improvement of immediate memory was discovered among AD patients [133, 134].

Omega 3 PUFAs have been studied as a potential biomarker of cognitive abilities [135137]. However, administration of high doses of DHA did not slow progression of brain atrophy in patients with mild and moderate AD during a 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [138]. Interestingly, a study conducted on a larger group of patients found a positive association between the same dose (2000 mg/day) of DHA and increase in hippocampal volume in MCI patients after 1 year of supplementation [139]. Increased phagocytosis of Aβ by monocytes in flow cytometry was discovered after administration of a drink containing 1000 mg DHA and the same quantity of EPA in MCI and pre-MCI subjects [139]. In addition to DHA and EPA, it also included vitamin D and Resveratrol [136]. Transthyretin (TTR) is also a promising biomarker of plasticity because of its ability to reduce plaque formation, as it binds Aβ [140]. A randomized controlled clinical trial revealed increase of plasma TTR concentration after supplementation of n-3 fatty acids after 6 months among individuals with AD, but the utility of TTR as a biomarker of synaptic plasticity is unknown [136].

Amyloid-Beta Peptides

Amyloid-beta peptides (Aβ) are involved in the pathogenesis of AD [141]. Continuing progression of Aβ leads to cognitive decay and memory dysfunction due to its overaccumulation in the form of senile plaques as well as its oligomers, which exert synaptotoxic activity [141]. Intriguingly, a low physiological concentration of Aβ was found to be crucial for proper neurotrophy, neuroprotection [142], and positive modulation of synaptic plasticity and memory [143]. The exact mechanism of synaptic dysfunction by Aβ peptides is unclear [144]. It is generally believed that pathological amounts of Aβ peptides lead to indirect overstimulation of extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (eNMDARs), resulting in abnormal dysregulation of calcium ions, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and subsequent impairment of synaptic transmission [144]. Excessive amounts of Aβ peptides disturb NMDAR-dependent LTP and facilitate NMDA-dependent LTD, which is responsible for synaptic dysfunction [145]. Further studies revealed that Aβ peptides can activate NMDAR, leading to abnormal secretion of glutamate into the synaptic cleft and contributing to synaptic dysfunction by inhibition of LTP [146]. Moreover, pathological amounts of Aβ peptides disrupt uptake of glutamate, enhancing LTD [147].

Aβ peptides are present in various forms, which are composed of a different number of amino acids (from 39 to 43). The most common subtype is Aβ40, but with less tendency to aggregate [148], in comparison to Aβ42, which is responsible for neuronal dysfunction in AD [149]. Aβ oligomers correlate with cognitive decline [150] and can be found decades before the onset of AD [151]. However, studies on the usefulness of plasma Aβ as a cognitive change biomarker have produced contradictory results, as some studies found low baseline plasma Aβ levels to be linked with higher probability of cognitive impairment [152154], whereas others associate high levels of plasma Aβ with increased risk of conversion to MCI or AD [155,156] or report no association [157,158]. All described biomarkers are also summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary.

Marker Changes in the AD Role in AD References
GFAP Increase Association with early Aβ pathology [165] [2933]
Ng Increase Involved in synaptic plasticity through LTP mediated by calcium-calmodulin pathway [166] [3844]
Decrease [37]
Syt1 Increase Enhancement of synaptic connections neurons and LTP [167] [49,50]
SNAP-25 Increase Role in regulation of synaptic transmission [168] [5457]
Decrease [53]
GAP-43 Increase Synaptic sprouting [58] Hippocampus [6367]
Decrease Frontal cortex [64,65]
NPTX2 Decrease Regulation of synaptic remodeling [169] [78]
Increase [79]
NPTXR Decrease [8083]
Tau Increase Stabilization of microtubules in axons and dendrites [86] [9193]
BDNF Increase Regulation of neuronal survival and plasticity [170] [97,106]
Decrease [99104,107]
No association [105]
VEGF Increase Neuroprotective factor [109] [114,117,118]
No association [115,116]
D-serine Increase Promotion of neuronal survival and prevention from neurodegeneration [119] [124]
No association [125]
TTR Increase Neurogenesis, regeneration of neurons [136] [136]
Increase Neurodegeneration in excessive Mount [152] [155,156]
Decrease [152154]
No association [157,158]

GFAP – glial fibrillary acidic protein; Ng – neurogranin; Syt1 – synaptophysin 1; SNAP-25 – synaptosomal-associated protein 25; GAP-43 – growth-associated binding protein 43; NPTX1 – neuronal pentraxin 1; NPTX2 – neuronal pentraxin 2; NPTXR – neuronal pentraxin receptor; BDNF – brain-derived neurotrophic factor; VEGF – vascular endothielial growth factor; TTR – transthyretin; Aβ – amyloid-beta.

Future Developments

One of the difficulties in implementing blood biomarkers in AD is slow-progressing character of the disease, which complicates determination of the exact degree of blood brain barrier (BBB) loss. The description of BBB dysfunction might be helpful in future development of blood synaptic biomarkers [159]. Another challenge is the probable need to prepare new standardized protocols for analysis and preparation of samples [160], as blood is a complex fluid with several potentially confounding variables.

A study found no significant correlation between blood and CSF levels of Aβ [161], whereas serum Aβ levels were higher in AD patients compared to controls, especially in individuals with familial AD [162]. However, the entanglement of various confounding factors makes reproducibility of results difficult and complicates the role of Aβ as a potential plasma biomarker [160]. Research on correlations between concentration of tau protein in plasma and CSF also produced insignificant results [163].

A recently developed method using neuronal-derived exosomes (NDEs) enables quantification of some synaptic proteins from plasma, including Syt1, Ng, ad GAP-43, with promising results in differentiating between healthy controls and AD patients. However, to fully prove its usefulness, further studies with larger samples are needed [164].

Conclusions

This review has presented an update on the current status of biomarkers of activity-dependent plasticity and persistent enhancement of synaptic transmission in AD. Biomarkers of synaptic plasticity in AD could be used to monitor disease progression or response to treatment. These biomarkers could have an increasing role in routine clinical practice because of the rising incidence of AD in a global aging population. Therefore, the identification and clinical application of diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment response biomarkers of synaptic plasticity should focus on their widespread clinical applications.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared

Financial support: None declared

References

  • 1.Hebert LE, Beckett LA, Evans DA, et al. Age-specific incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in a community population. JAMA. 1995;273(17):1354–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Badhwar AP, Peggy McFall G, et al. A multiomics approach to heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: focused review and roadmap. Brain. 2020;143(5):1315–31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bloom GS. Amyloid-β and tau: The trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(4):505–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tönnies E, Trushina E. Oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1105–21. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGrowder DA, Miller F, Vaz K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: Current evidence and future perspectives. Brain Sci. 2021;11(2):215. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Van Giau V, Senanarong V, Bagyinszky E, et al. Identification of a novel mutation in APP gene in a Thai subject with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:3015–23. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S180174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Molinuevo JL, Ayton S, Batrla R, et al. Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers. Acta Neuropathologica. 2018;136(6):821–53. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1932-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kocahan S, Do an Z. Mechanisms of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and prevention: the brain, neural pathology, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, Tau protein and other risk factors. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2017;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2017.15.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Masters CL, Selkoe DJ. Biochemistry of amyloid β-protein and amyloid deposits in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. 2012;2(6):a006262. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sheng M, Sabatini BL, Südhof TC. Synapses and Alzheimer’s disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. 2012;4(5):a005777. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Danysz W, Parsons CG. Alzheimer’s disease, β-amyloid, glutamate, NMDA receptors and memantine – searching for the connections. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(2):324–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02057.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wenk GL, Parsons CG, Danysz W. Potential role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors as executors of neurodegeneration resulting from diverse insults: focus on memantine. Behav Pharmacol. 2006;17(5–6):411–24. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200609000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Decker H, Jürgensen S, Adrover MF, et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are required for synaptic targeting of Alzheimer’s toxic amyloid-β peptide oligomers. J Neurochem. 2010;115(6):1520–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Butterfield DA, Pocernich CB. The glutamatergic system and Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs. 2003;17(9):641–52. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317090-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cárdenas AM, Ardiles AO, Barraza N, et al. Role of tau protein in neuronal damage in Alzheimer’s disease and Down syndrome. Arch Med Res. 2012;43(8):645–54. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Behl C. Brain aging and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease: Many open questions. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(Suppl 1):S3–9. doi: 10.1017/S104161021200052X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harris KM. Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9(3):343–48. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fauth M, Tetzlaff C. Opposing effects of neuronal activity on structural plasticity. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:75. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smolen P. A model of late long-term potentiation simulates aspects of memory maintenance. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(5):445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma T, Klann E. Amyloid β: Linking synaptic plasticity failure to memory disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2012;120(Suppl 1):140–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07506.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Von Bernhardi R, Eugenín-Von Bernhardi L, Eugenín J. What is neural plasticity? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1015:1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62817-2_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Foster TC. Challenges and opportunities in characterizing cognitive aging across species. Front Aging Neurosci. 2012;4:6. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burgdorf J, Xlei Zhang, Weiss C, et al. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor modulator GLYX-13 enhances learning and memory, in young adult and learning impaired aging rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(4):698–706. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mattson MP, Arumugam TV. Hallmarks of brain aging: Adaptive and pathological modification by metabolic states. Cell Metab. 2018;27(6):1176–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: Synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30(4):572–80. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Belleville S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, et al. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults: Evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(5–6):486–99. doi: 10.1159/000096316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2015;7(2):a020420. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilhelmsson U, Faiz M, De Pablo Y, et al. Astrocytes negatively regulate neurogenesis through the Jagged1-mediated notch pathway. Stem Cells. 2012;30(10):2320–29. doi: 10.1002/stem.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jesse S, Steinacker P, Cepek L, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and Protein S-100B: Different concentration pattern of glial proteins in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17(3):541–51. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elahi FM, Casaletto KB, La Joie R, et al. Plasma biomarkers of astrocytic and neuronal dysfunction in early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheime’s Dement. 2020;16(4):681–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oeckl P, Halbgebauer S, Anderl-Straub S, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum is increased in Alzheimer’s disease and correlates with cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(2):481–88. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kashon ML, Ross GW, O’Callaghan JP, et al. Associations of cortical astrogliosis with cognitive performance and dementia status. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;6(6):595–604. doi: 10.3233/jad-2004-6604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Betcher BM, Olson KE, Carlson NE, et al. Astrogliosis and episodic memory in late life: higher GFAP is related to worse memory and white matter microstructure in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2021;103:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Middeldorp J, Hol EM. GFAP in health and disease. Progr Neurobiol. 2011;93(3):421–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Westerbotn M, Högskola S, Winblad B, Institutet K. Well-Being in nonagenarians and the impact of objective health Beijing multi-dimensional longitudinal study on aging view project Pernilla Hillerås Röda Korsets Högskola. [Accessed January 7, 2022]; Published online 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Díez-Guerra FJ. Neurogranin, a link between calcium/calmodulin and protein kinase C signaling in synaptic plasticity. IUBMB Life. 2010;62(8):597–606. doi: 10.1002/iub.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Davidsson P, Blennow K. Neurochemical dissection of synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998;10(1):11–23. doi: 10.1017/s1041610298005110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thorsell A, Bjerke M, Gobom J, et al. Neurogranin in cerebrospinal fluid as a marker of synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2010;1362:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kvartsberg H, Duits FH, Ingelsson M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of the synaptic protein neurogranin correlates with cognitive decline in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(10):1180–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kvartsberg H, Portelius E, Andreasson U, et al. Characterization of the postsynaptic protein neurogranin in paired cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples from Alzheimer’s disease patients and healthy controls. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0124-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hellwig K, Kvartsberg H, Portelius E, et al. Neurogranin and YKL-40: Independent markers of synaptic degeneration and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0161-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goetzl EJ, Kapogiannis D, Schwartz JB, et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2016;30(12):4141–48. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600816R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yoong SQ, Lu J, Xing H, et al. The prognostic utility of CSF neurogranin in predicting future cognitive decline in the Alzheimer’s disease continuum: A systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;72:101491. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mavroudis IA, Petridis F, Chatzikonstantinou S, et al. A meta-analysis on CSF neurogranin levels for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(9):1639–46. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01326-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fernández-Chacón R, Königstorfer A, Gerber SH, et al. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability. Nature. 2001;410(6824):41–49. doi: 10.1038/35065004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rhee JS, Li LY, Shin OH, et al. Augmenting neurotransmitter release by enhancing the apparent Ca2+ affinity of synaptotagmin 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(51):18664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509153102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rizo J. Mechanism of neurotransmitter release coming into focus. Protein Sci. 2018;27(8):1364–91. doi: 10.1002/pro.3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.De Jong APH, Meijer M, Saarloos I, et al. Phosphorylation of synaptotagmin-1 controls a postpriming step in PKC-dependent presynaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(18):5095–100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522927113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Öhrfelt A, Brinkmalm A, Dumurgier J, et al. The pre-synaptic vesicle protein synaptotagmin is a novel biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0208-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jia L, Zhu M, Kong C, et al. Blood neuro-exosomal synaptic proteins predict Alzheimer’s disease at the asymptomatic stage. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(1):49–60. doi: 10.1002/alz.12166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Antonucci F, Corradini I, Fossati G, et al. SNAP-25, a known presynaptic protein with emerging postsynaptic functions. Fronti Synaptic Neurosci. 2016;8:7. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Irfan M, Gopaul KR, Miry O, et al. SNAP-25 isoforms differentially regulate synaptic transmission and long-term synaptic plasticity at central synapses. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42833-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bereczki E, Francis PT, Howlett D, et al. Synaptic proteins predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(11):1149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brinkmalm A, Brinkmalm G, Honer WG, et al. SNAP-25 is a promising novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarker for synapse degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2014;9:53. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-9-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sutphen CL, McCue L, Herries EM, et al. Longitudinal decreases in multiple cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neuronal injury in symptomatic late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(7):869–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Öhrfelt A, Brinkmalm A, Dumurgier J, et al. A Novel ELISA for the measurement of cerebrospinal fluid SNAP-25 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 2019;420:136–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nilsson J, Ashton NJ, Benedet AL, et al. Quantification of SNAP-25 with mass spectrometry and Simoa: A method comparison in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01021-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Benowitz LI, Routtenberg A. GAP-43: An intrinsic determinant of neuronal development and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(2):84–91. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10072-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Neve RL, Coopersmith R, McPhie DL, et al. The neuronal growth-associated protein GAP-43 interacts with Rabaptin-5 and participates in endocytosis. Neurosci. 1998;18(19):7757. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-07757.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lin LH, Bock S, Carpenter K, Rose M, et al. Synthesis and transport of GAP-43 in entorhinal cortex neurons and perforant pathway during lesion-induced sprouting and reactive synaptogenesis. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1992;14(1–2):147–53. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(92)90024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Snipes GJ, Chan SY, McGuire CB, et al. Evidence for the coidentification of GAP-43, a growth-associated protein, and F1, a plasticity-associated protein. J Neurosci. 1987;7(12):4066. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-12-04066.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Son H, Davis PJ, Carpenter DO. Time course and involvement of protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of F1/GAP-43 in area CA3 after mossy fiber stimulation. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1997;17(2):171–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1026361711588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Davidsson P, Blennow K. Neurochemical dissection of synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998;10(1):11–23. doi: 10.1017/s1041610298005110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bogdanovic N, Davidsson P, Volkmann I, et al. Growth-associated protein GAP-43 in the frontal cortex and in the hippocampus in Alzheimer’s disease: An immunohistochemical and quantitative study. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2000;107(4):463–78. doi: 10.1007/s007020070088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rekart JL, Quinn B, Mesulam MM, et al. Subfield-specific increase in brain growth protein in postmortem hippocampus of Alzheimer’s patients. Neuroscience. 2004;126(3):579–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Remnestål J, Just D, Mitsios N, et al. CSF profiling of the human brain enriched proteome reveals associations of neuromodulin and neurogranin to Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2016;10(12):1242–53. doi: 10.1002/prca.201500150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Andersson A, Remnestål J, Nellgård B, et al. Development of parallel reaction monitoring assays for cerebrospinal fluid proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;494:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gómez de San José N, Massa F, Halbgebauer S, et al. Neuronal pentraxins as biomarkers of synaptic activity: from physiological functions to pathological changes in neurodegeneration. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2022;129(2):207–30. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02411-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Farhy-Tselnicker I, van Casteren ACM, Lee A, et al. Astrocyte-secreted glypican 4 regulates release of neuronal Pentraxin 1 from axons to induce functional synapse formation. Neuron. 2017;96(2):428–45e13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cho RW, Park JM, Wolff SBE, et al. mGluR1/5-dependent long-term depression requires the regulated ectodomain cleavage of neuronal pentraxin NPR by TACE. Neuron. 2008;57(6):858–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dodds DC, Omeis IA, Cushman SJ, et al. Neuronal pentraxin receptor, a novel putative integral membrane pentraxin that interacts with neuronal pentraxin 1 and 2 and taipoxin-associated calcium-binding protein 49. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(34):21488–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tsui CC, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, et al. Narp, a novel member of the pentraxin family, promotes neurite outgrowth and is dynamically regulated by neuronal activity. J Neurosci. 1996;16(8):2463–78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-08-02463.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Figueiro-Silva J, Gruart A, Clayton KB, et al. Neuronal Pentraxin 1 negatively regulates excitatory synapse density and synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2015;35(14):5504–21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2548-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.DeGregorio-Rocasolano N, Gasull T, Trullas R. Overexpression of neuronal pentraxin 1 is involved in neuronal death evoked by low K(+) in cerebellar granule cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(1):796–803. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007967200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kirkpatrick LL, Matzuk MM, Dodds DC, et al. Biochemical interactions of the neuronal pentraxins. Neuronal pentraxin (NP) receptor binds to taipoxin and taipoxin-associated calcium-binding protein 49 via NP1 and NP2. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(23):17786–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002254200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bjartmar L, Huberman AD, Ullian EM, et al. Neuronal pentraxins mediate synaptic refinement in the developing visual system. J Neurosci. 2006;26(23):6269–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4212-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lee SJ, Wei M, Zhang C, et al. Presynaptic neuronal pentraxin receptor organizes excitatory and inhibitory synapses. J Neurosci. 2017;37(5):1062–80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2768-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Xiao MF, Xu D, Craig MT, et al. NPTX2 and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. eLife. 2017;6:1–27. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Swanson A, Willette AA. Neuronal Pentraxin 2 predicts medial temporal atrophy and memory decline across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;58:201–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.07.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lim B, Sando SB, Grøntvedt GR, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neuronal pentraxin receptor as a biomarker of long-term progression of Alzheimer’s disease: A 24-month follow-up study. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;93:97e1–97.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Begcevic I, Tsolaki M, Brinc D, et al. Neuronal pentraxin receptor-1 is a new cerebrospinal fluid biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease progression. F1000Res. 2018;7:1012. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15095.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lim B, Fowler C, Li QX, et al. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid neuronal pentraxin receptor is associated with PET-Aβ load and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ in a pilot study of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2020;731:135078. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dulewicz M, Kulczyńska-Przybik A, Słowik A, et al. Neurogranin and neuronal pentraxin receptor as synaptic dysfunction biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4575. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Avila J, Lucas JJ, Pérez M, Hernández F. Role of tau protein in both physiological and pathological conditions. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(2):361–84. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shi Y, Yamada K, Liddelow SA, et al. ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mousemodel of tauopathy. Nature. 2017;549(7673):523–27. doi: 10.1038/nature24016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT. The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2014;82(4):756–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.McInnes J, Wierda K, Snellinx A, et al. Synaptogyrin-3 mediates presynaptic dysfunction induced by tau. Neuron. 2018;97(4):823–835e80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhou L, McInnes J, Wierda K, et al. Tau association with synaptic vesicles causes presynaptic dysfunction. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15295. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Koch G, Esposito Z, Kusayanagi H, et al. CSF tau levels influence cortical plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(1):181–86. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Koch G, Di Lorenzo F, Del Olmo MF, et al. Reversal of LTP-like cortical plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease patients with tau-related faster clinical progression. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(2):605–16. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Brier MR, Gordon B, Friedrichsen K, et al. Tau and Ab imaging, CSF measures, and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(338):338ra66. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Koch G, Di Lorenzo F, Loizzo S, et al. CSF tau is associated with impaired cortical plasticity, cognitive decline and astrocyte survival only in APOE4-positive Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14204-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, et al. Association of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(5):557–66. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Murer MG, Yan Q, Raisman-Vozari R. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the control human brain, and in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;63(1):71–124. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Allen SJ, Watson J, Dawbarn D. The neurotrophins and their role in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2011;9(4):559–73. doi: 10.2174/157015911798376190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tyler WJ, Alonso M, Bramham CR, et al. From acquisition to consolidation: On the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning. Learn Mem. 2002;9(5):224–37. doi: 10.1101/lm.51202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Laske C, Stransky E, Leyhe T, et al. Stage-dependent BDNF serum concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2006;113(9):1217–24. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0397-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jiao SS, Shen LL, Zhu C, et al. Braind-derived neurotrophic factor protects against tau-related degeneration of Alzheimer’s diesease. Translational Psychiatry. 2016;6(10):e907. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yasutake C, Kuroda K, Yanagawa T, et al. Serum BDNF, TNF-alpha and IL-1beta levels in dementia patients: Comparison between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;256(7):402–6. doi: 10.1007/s00406-006-0652-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yu H, Zhang Z, Shi Y, et al. Association study of the decreased serum BDNF concentrations in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and the Val66Met polymorphism in Chinese Han. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(7):1104–11. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Borba EM, Duarte JA, Bristot G, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor serum levels and hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer Disease. Dementia Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2016;6(3):559–67. doi: 10.1159/000450601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Gezen-Ak D, Dursun E, Hana asi H, et al. BDNF, TNFα, HSP90, CFH, and IL-10 serum levels in patients with early or late onset Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(1):185–95. doi: 10.3233/JAD-130497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ventriglia M, Zanardini R, Bonomini C, et al. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in different neurological diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:901082. doi: 10.1155/2013/901082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Coelho FGDM, Vital TM, Stein AM, et al. Acute aerobic exercise increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in elderly with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39(2):401–8. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sonali N, Tripathi M, Sagar R, Vivekanandhan S. Val66Met polymorphism and BDNF levels in Alzheimer’s disease patients in North Indian population. Int J Neurosci. 2013;123(6):409–16. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2012.762515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Velioglu HA, Hanoglu L, Bayraktaroglu Z, et al. Left lateral parietal rTMS improves cognition and modulates resting brain connectivity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Possible role of BDNF and oxidative stress. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021;180:107410. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Teixeira AL, et al. Lower cerebrospinal fluid concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor predicts progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuromolecular Med. 2015;17(3):326–32. doi: 10.1007/s12017-015-8361-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Tubi MA, Kothapalli D, Hapenney M, et al. Regional relationships between CSF VEGF levels and Alzheimer’s disease brain biomarkers and cognition. Neurobiol Aging. 2021;105:241–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lange C, Storkebaum E, De Almodóvar CR, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor: A neurovascular target in neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):439–54. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cao L, Jiao X, Zuzga DS, et al. VEGF links hippocampal activity with neurogenesis, learning and memory. Nat Genet. 2004;36(8):827–35. doi: 10.1038/ng1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Fournier NM, Lee B, Banasr M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor regulates adult hippocampal cell proliferation through MEK/ERK- and PI3K/Akt-dependent signaling. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63(4):642–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Licht T, Goshen I, Avital A, et al. Reversible modulations of neuronal plasticity by VEGF. Proc Natil Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(12):5081–86. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007640108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yang SP, Bae DG, Kang HJ, et al. Co-accumulation of vascular endothelial growth factor with β-amyloid in the brain of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25(3):283–90. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Religa P, Cao R, Religa D, et al. VEGF significantly restores impaired memory behavior in Alzheimer’s mice by improvement of vascular survival. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):2053. doi: 10.1038/srep02053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chakraborty A, Chatterjee M, Twaalfhoven H, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor remains unchanged in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0385-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Tarkowski E, Issa R, Sjögren M, et al. Increased intrathecal levels of the angiogenic factors VEGF and TGF-β in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(2):237–43. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00285-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hohman TJ, Bell SP, Jefferson AL. The Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in neurodegeneration and cognitive decline: Exploring interactions with biomarkers of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurology. 2015;72(5):520–29. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Paterson RW, Bartlett JW, Blennow K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers including trefoil factor 3 are associated with neurodegeneration in amyloid-positive individuals. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4(7):e419. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Piubelli L, Murtas G, Rabattoni V, et al. The role of D-amino acids in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):475–92. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wang R, Reddy PH. Role of glutamate and NMDA receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1041–48. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cristino L, Luongo L, Squillace M, et al. D-Aspartate oxidase influences glutamatergic system homeostasis in mammalian brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(5):1890–902. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Errico F, Nisticò R, Napolitano F, et al. Persistent increase of d-aspartate in d-aspartate oxidase mutant mice induces a precocious hippocampal age-dependent synaptic plasticity and spatial memory decay. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(11):2061–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Punzo D, Errico F, Cristino L, et al. Age-related changes in d-aspartate oxidase promoter methylation control extracellular d-aspartate levels and prevent precocious cell death during brain aging. J Neurosci. 2016;36(10):3064–78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3881-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Madeira C, Lourenco MV, Vargas-Lopes C, et al. d-serine levels in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for novel biomarker development. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5(5):e561. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Biemans EALM, Verhoeven-Duif NM, Gerrits J, et al. CSF d-serine concentrations are similar in Alzheimer’s disease, other dementias, and elderly controls. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;42:213–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hill E, Goodwill AM, Gorelik A, et al. Diet and biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;76:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Yusufov M, Weyandt LL, Piryatinsky I. Alzheimer’s disease and diet: A systematic review. Int J Neurosci. 2016;127(2):161–75. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2016.1155572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bartochowski Z, Conway J, Wallach Y, et al. Dietary interventions to prevent or delay Alzheimer’s disease: What the evidence shows. Curr Nutr Rep. 2020;9(3):210–25. doi: 10.1007/s13668-020-00333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.van de Rest O, Berendsen AAM, Haveman-Nies A, et al. Dietary patterns, cognitive decline, and dementia: A systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(2):154–68. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Talaei M, Koh WP, Yuan JM, et al. DASH dietary pattern, mediation by mineral intakes, and the risk of coronary artery disease and stroke mortality. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(5):e011054. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Luchtman DW, Song C. Cognitive enhancement by omega-3 fatty acids from child-hood to old age: Findings from animal and clinical studies. Neuropharmacology. 2013;64:550–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yehuda S, Rabinovitz S, Carasso RL, et al. The role of polyunsaturated fatty acids in restoring the aging neuronal membrane. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(5):843–53. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00074-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Phillips MA, Childs CE, Calder PC, et al. No effect of Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognition and mood in individuals with cognitive impairment and probable Alzheimer’s disease: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10):24600–13. doi: 10.3390/ijms161024600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Andrieu S, Guyonnet S, Coley N, et al. Effect of long-term omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with or without multidomain intervention on cognitive function in elderly adults with memory complaints (MAPT): A randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(5):377–89. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fiala M, Halder RC, Sagong B, et al. ω-3 Supplementation increases amyloid-β phagocytosis and resolvin D1 in patients with minor cognitive impairment. FASEB J. 2015;29(7):2681–89. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-264218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Faxén-Irving G, Freund-Levi Y, Eriksdotter-Jönhagen M, et al. Effects on transthyretin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by DHA-Rich n – 3 fatty acid supplementation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: The OmegAD Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;36(1):1–6. doi: 10.3233/JAD-121828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lacalle-Aurioles M, Mateos-Pérez JM, Guzmán-De-Villoria JA, et al. Cerebral blood flow is an earlier indicator of perfusion abnormalities than cerebral blood volume in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34(4):654–59. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee LK, Shahar S, Chin AV, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid-concentrated fish oil supplementation in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI): A 12-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacology. 2012;225(3):605–12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2848-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Yurko-Mauro K, McCarthy D, Rom D, et al. Beneficial effects of docosahexaenoic acid on cognition in age-related cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(6):456–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Marteinsdottir I, Horrobin DF, Stenfors C, et al. Changes in dietary fatty acids alter phospholipid fatty acid composition in selected regions of rat brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1998;22(6):1007–21. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(98)00052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ. Aβ Oligomers – a decade of discovery. J Neurochem. 2007;101(5):1172–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cárdenas-Aguayo MCSL. [Accessed January 12, 2022];Neurochemistry. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Puzzo D, Arancio O. Amyloid-β peptide: Dr. Jekyll or Mr Hyde? J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S111–20. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Palop JJ, Mucke L. Amyloid-β induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: From synapses toward neural networks. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(7):812–18. doi: 10.1038/nn.2583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Shankar GM, Bloodgood BL, Townsend M, et al. Natural oligomers of the Alzheimer amyloid-beta protein induce reversible synapse loss by modulating an NMDA-type glutamate receptor-dependent signaling pathway. J Neurosci. 2007;27(11):2866–75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4970-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Sperling RA, Dickerson BC, Pihlajamaki M, et al. Functional alterations in memory networks in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuromolecular Med. 2010;12(1):27–43. doi: 10.1007/s12017-009-8109-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Li S, Jin M, Koeglsperger T, et al. Soluble Aβ oligomers inhibit long-term potentiation through a mechanism involving excessive activation of extrasynaptic NR2B-containing NMDA receptors. J Neurosci. 2011;31(18):6627–38. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0203-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Vandersteen A, Hubin E, Sarroukh R, et al. A comparative analysis of the aggregation behavior of amyloid-β peptide variants. FEBS Lett. 2012;586(23):4088–93. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Jarrett JT, Lansbury PT. Seeding “one-dimensional crystallization” of amyloid: A pathogenic mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease and scrapie? Cell. 1993;73(6):1055–58. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90635-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ono K, Condron MM, Teplow DB. Structure–neurotoxicity relationships of amyloid β-protein oligomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(35):14745–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905127106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Lesné SE, Sherman MA, Grant M, et al. Brain amyloid-β oligomers in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2013;136(5):1383–98. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Rembach A, Faux NG, Watt AD, et al. Changes in plasma amyloid beta in a longitudinal study of aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Shah NS, Vidal JS, Masaki K, et al. Midlife blood pressure, plasma β amyloid and the risk for Alzheimer’s disease: The Honolulu Asia Aging Study. Hypertension. 2012;59(4):780–86. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.178962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Chouraki V, Beiser A, Younkin L, et al. Plasma amyloid β and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(3):249–57e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kaffashian S, Tzourio C, Soumaré A, et al. Association of plasma b-amyloid with MRI markers of structural brain aging the 3-City Dijon study. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(10):2663–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Stillman CM, Lopez OL, Becker JT, et al. Physical activity predicts reduced plasma β amyloid in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(5):284–91. doi: 10.1002/acn3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Lövheim H, Elgh F, Johansson A, et al. Plasma concentrations of free amyloid β cannot predict the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(7):778–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Donohue MC, Moghadam SH, Roe AD, et al. Longitudinal plasma amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(9):1069–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Henriksen K, O’Bryant SE, Hampel H, et al. The future of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(1):115–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.O’Bryant SE, Mielke MM, Rissman RA, et al. Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: Current state of the science and a novel collaborative paradigm for advancing from discovery to clinic. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(1):45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Zetterberg H. Applying fluid biomarkers to Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017;313(1):C3–C10. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00007.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Lista S, O’Bryant SE, Blennow K, et al. Biomarkers in sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(2):291–317. doi: 10.3233/JAD-143006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Deters KD, Risacher SL, Kim S, et al. Plasma tau association with brain atrophy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(4):1245–54. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Goetzl EJ, Kapogiannis D, Schwartz JB, et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2016;30(12):4141–48. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600816R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Pereira JB, Janelidze S, Smith R, et al. Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2021;144(11):3505–16. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Xiang Y, Xin J, Le W, et al. Neurogranin: A potential biomarker of neurological and mental diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:584743. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.584743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Kikuma K, Li X, Kim D, Sutter D, et al. Extended synaptotagmin localizes to presynaptic ER and promotes neurotransmission and synaptic growth in drosophila. Genetics. 2017;207(3):993–1006. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Sharma L, Sharma A, Kumar D, et al. Promising protein biomarkers in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Metabolic Brain Dis. 2022;37(6):1727–44. doi: 10.1007/s11011-021-00847-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Cummings DM, Benway TA, Ho H, et al. Neuronal and peripheral pentraxins modify glutamate release and may interact in blood–brain barrier failure. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(6):3437–48. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.O’Bryant SE, Hobson V, Hall JR, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Di. 2009;17(2):337–41. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES