Skip to main content
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives logoLink to Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
. 2023 Jan 11;11(1):e01045. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1045

A humanized anti‐cocaine mAb antagonizes the cardiovascular effects of cocaine in rats

Sheryl E Koch 1, Jordan A Marckel 2, Jack Rubinstein 1, Andrew B Norman 2,
PMCID: PMC9834608  PMID: 36631960

Abstract

The recombinant monoclonal anti‐cocaine antibody, h2E2, sequesters cocaine in plasma increasing concentrations more than 10‐fold. The increased levels of cocaine in the plasma could have detrimental peripheral effects, particularly on the cardiovascular system. We investigated the duration and magnitude of the effect of cocaine on the rat heart, and if h2E2 could antagonize that effect. Echocardiography was used to evaluate cardiac function under isoflurane anesthesia, while a tail‐cuff was used to measure blood pressure. Cocaine was delivered intravenously and the rats were continuously monitored for a total of 45 min. Echocardiography measurements were recorded every 5 min and blood pressure measurements were recorded throughout the duration of the experiment using 30‐s cycles. ECG recordings were taken simultaneously with the echocardiography measurements. An increase in ejection fraction was seen after the cocaine push with the maximum change occurring at 25 min. Treatment with h2E2 1 h before the cocaine push did not have any effect on cardiac parameters. Subsequent cocaine treatment had no effect on the ejection fraction, indicating that the antibody‐bound cocaine does not affect the heart. This antagonism of cocaine's effects was greatly decreased after 1 week and entirely absent after 1 month. Cocaine in the presence of h2E2 is pharmacologically inert and h2E2 may have additional clinical utility for reversing cocaine effects on the cardiovascular system.

Keywords: cocaine, humanized monoclonal antibody, cardiology, echocardiography, translational studies


An increase in ejection fraction was seen after the cocaine push with the maximum change occurring at 25 min. Treatment with h2E2 1 h before the cocaine push did not have any effect on cardiac parameters. Subsequent cocaine treatment had no effect on the ejection fraction, indicating that the antibody‐bound cocaine does not affect the heart. Cocaine in the presence of h2E2 is pharmacologically inert and h2E2 may have additional clinical utility for reversing cocaine effects on the cardiovascular system.

graphic file with name PRP2-11-e01045-g004.jpg


Abbreviations

CO

cardiac output (ml/min)

ECG

electrocardiogram

EF

ejection fraction (%)

FS

fractional shortening

HR

heart rate (bpm)

LV

left ventricular

mAb h2E2

humanized anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody

SV

stroke volume

1. INTRODUCTION

Traditional pharmacotherapeutic approaches for cocaine addiction have targeted the dopaminergic neurotransmission in the brain, through which cocaine exerts its effects. There is no pharmacological treatment approved for cocaine abuse, despite the testing of agents that target nearly all aspects of the dopaminergic system. 1

Immunotherapy provides a potential alternative to traditional small‐molecule therapies. Anti‐cocaine antibodies bind to cocaine and form a complex too large to cross the blood–brain barrier. Previously, antibodies have been raised through active immunization using a cocaine vaccine. 2 , 3 , 4 Importantly, recent clinical studies have demonstrated that a cocaine vaccine generating anti‐cocaine antibodies decreased cocaine use in cocaine abusers. 5 , 6 , 7 Despite efforts to improve these vaccines, the response to the vaccine is slow to develop and unpredictable with regard to antibody titers, affinities, and specificities, causing efficacy to vary between individuals. 5 , 7 , 8 , 9

Passive immunization, entailing the injection of an anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody (mAb), has a number of potential advantages. 2 , 10 With passive immunization, immediate immunity is conferred via injection of a well‐characterized mAb with known high affinity and specificity for cocaine. Our group developed a unique anti‐cocaine mAb, 2E2, which had a fully human sequence heavy (H) chain and Fc region but also had a murine lambda light (L) chain. This mAb passed key safety and efficacy milestones in animal studies that established the feasibility of this immunotherapeutic approach. 11 , 12 Subsequently, a reengineered version of 2E2, h2E2, was generated which has a human lamda light chain constant region replacing the murine constant region. This reengineered recombinant protein has met a series of pre‐clinical milestones necessary for transitioning to clinical development.

In addition to the drug abuse‐related risks, cocaine use has significant effects on cardiovascular function in humans and has been associated with the development of chest pain, myocardial ischemia and in rare cases cardiac death. 13 , 14 Interestingly, h2E2 in vivo produces a 10–20‐fold increase in plasma cocaine 15 and cocaethylene 16 concentrations in mice and rats. The high affinity of h2E2 for cocaethylene and norcocaine has been established in previous studies. 15 As h2E2 produces a dramatic decrease in brain cocaine concentrations, it is assumed that the increased plasma cocaine levels 17 , 18 are due to h2E2‐bound cocaine that is pharmacologically inert and a decreased free cocaine concentration. It is possible that the increased plasma cocaine concentration, increasing the circulation time of cocaine and the 92% decrease in cocaine excretion into the urine could have increased direct effects on the cardiovascular system. 19 There are concerns that the sequestration of cocaine by h2E2 may exacerbate the peripheral effects of cocaine. The objective of this study was to determine the dose‐dependent duration and magnitude of effects of cocaine administration in the presence and absence of mAb h2E2 on echocardiographic variables in an in vivo rat model. We hypothesize that the cocaine‐induced responses will be decreased in the presence of h2E2 as our models indicate that the cocaine is bound to h2E2 and is pharmacologically inert.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Animals

All animal procedures were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Cincinnati and in accordance with the 8th Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 20 The Sprague–Dawley (225–300 g) rats used in this study were purchased from Harlan Laboratories. Animals were maintained in the UC Laboratory Animal Medicine vivarium for a minimum of 1 week prior to surgery. The rats had indwelling catheters surgically implanted 19 and were allowed to recover for 7 days before echocardiography. After surgery, the rats were housed individually on a 14/10‐h light/dark cycle with unrestricted access to food and water.

2.2. Echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed as previously described using the Vevo 2100 with a MS250 transducer. 21 Briefly, the rats were anesthetized with 2.0% isoflurane and baseline echocardiography images were recorded. Images were also taken at the time of the cocaine push, as well as at 1, 3, and 5 min. Subsequent images were taken at 5 min intervals for a total of 45 min (Figure 1A,B). Parasternal long‐axis (PSLAX) images were recorded and then analyzed on a separate workstation. From the M‐mode images, left ventricular cavity size for systole and diastole (LV Vol;s and LV Vol;d) were measured. Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and the echocardiographic calculation for fractional shortening (FS), ejection fraction (EF), and cardiac output (CO) were obtained using the VevoStrain software (Version 3.1.1, VisualSonics). Each rat served as its own control and changes from baseline were calculated for the subsequent time points and the average was calculated for each experimental group.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematics of the experimental design. (A) Echocardiography schematic for the saline and cocaine, 1 week post‐h2E2, and 1‐month post‐h2E2 groups. Measurements were taken at baseline, cocaine push, 1, 3, 5 min, and at 5‐min intervals for a total of 45 min. (B) Echocardiography schematic for the vehicle and h2E2 groups. Measurements were taken at baseline, cocaine push, 1, 3, 5 min, and at 5‐min intervals for a total of 45 min. (C) Schematic showing the timeline of the rat procedures.

2.3. Experimental design

As described in Figure 1C, the experimental procedure was the same for each rat and consisted of catheter surgery (day −7), cocaine push (day 1), cocaine + vehicle (day 3), cocaine + h2E2 (day 5), 1 week post‐pre‐treatment with h2E2 (cocaine push), and 1‐month post‐pre‐treatment with h2E2 (cocaine push). As previously determined, the equimolar h2E2 antibody dose of 360 mg/kg or vehicle (PBS, pH 7.0) was injected 1 h prior to cocaine push to allow for proper circulation throughout the animal. 19

2.4. h2E2 preparation and h2E2 concentration protocol

Norman et al. 15 describe the generation of h2E2. The h2E2 used in the study was manufactured by Catalent PharmaSolutions Inc. at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. To deliver the equimolar dose of 360 mg/kg, it was necessary to concentrate the antibody. The antibody was concentrated to 100 mg/ml using the Amicon® Pro Purification System (MilliporeSigma) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

2.5. Blood pressure measurements

Prior to echocardiography, the anesthetized rats were subjected to noninvasive tail‐cuff (Kent Scientific, CODA Standard [Kent Scientific Corporation]) blood pressure (BP) measurements as indicated by manufacturer's guidelines. Measurements were taken before baseline and then at 30‐s cycles for the remainder of the experiment. Systolic and diastolic BP were determined.

2.6. Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed with SigmaPlot v.13 (Systat Software, Inc.). All data were tested for normality and equal variance. Statistical significance between multiple groups was assessed by analysis of variance using a two‐factor mixed design with repeated measures as appropriate. Although significance was indicated, post hoc testing was performed using the Holm‐Sidak method for comparing individual means and correcting for family‐wise error (SigmaPlot v.13.0; Systat Software, Inc.). Data are presented as means ± SEM, and differences were regarded as significant at p‐value of 0.05 or less.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Determination of cocaine HCl dose‐response curve

Initial dose‐ranging studies determined the effect of cocaine‐HCl on cardiac parameters. The doses investigated were (in mg/kg): 0.56, 1.12, 1.68, 2.24, 3.36, and 4.48. Treatment with the higher cocaine doses of 3.36 and 4.48 mg/kg produced a reaction similar to overdose in the rats and was not pursued further. The echocardiography images for the remaining doses were analyzed and the measured changes in EF were 5.97% ± 2.59%, 7.64% ± 1.06%, 8.24% ± 0.83%, and 8.06% ± 0.95%, respectively (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Determination of optimal cocaine dose based on echocardiographic parameters. Individual rats were injected with four different doses of cocaine‐HCl, 0.56 mg/kg (n = 6), 1.12 mg/kg (n = 8), 1.68 mg/kg (n = 17), and 2.24 mg/kg (n = 5). The change in ejection fraction (EF) was measured for each dose at baseline, cocaine push, 1, 3, 5 min, and at 5‐min intervals for a total of 45 min. Values are average ± SEM.

3.2. Cocaine‐induced changes in echocardiography parameters that were blunted by h2E2 pretreatment

The echocardiography parameters of EF (Figure 3A), LV Vol;s (Figure 3B), HR (Figure 3C), and CO (Figure 3D) were evaluated for rats injected with saline, coc + veh, and coc + h2E2 over the course of the experiment. The saline injection did not result in a change in EF or systolic volume. However, there was a delayed decrease in HR and CO, likely due to the well‐documented anesthetic effect of isoflurane on the rat heart over time. 22 , 23 , 24 Cocaine administration resulted in an initial drop in EF (−9.39% ± 2.71%, p < .001), followed by an increase in EF, with the peak value at 25 min after injection (9.48% ± 0.0.54%, p < .001). Inversely proportional changes in left ventricular systolic volume were also observed. Cocaine produced an immediate decrease in HR that did not fully return to baseline. Similarly, cocaine caused a decrease in CO, which normalized over time. Administration of h2E2 had no detectable effect on cardiovascular measurements 1‐h, 1‐week, or 1‐month post‐injection (Table 1). Crucially, immediate pretreatment with the h2E2 antibody significantly blunted the effect of cocaine on EF, systolic volume, HR, and CO.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Echocardiography measurements for saline (n = 8), Coc + veh (n = 13) and Coc + h2E2 (n = 13). (A) Change in ejection fraction (% EF). (B) Change in systolic volume. (C) Change in heart rate (HR, bpm). (D) Change in cardiac output (CO, ml/min). Values are average ± SEM. *p < .05 for Coc + veh compared to saline and Coc + h2E2.

TABLE 1.

The effect of h2E2 on the cardiovascular effects of cocaine in rats was measured by echocardiography

Baseline Coc + veh n = 13 Coc + h2E2 n = 13 Coc + 1 wk n = 11 Coc + 1 mos n = 12
Heart rate (BPM) 342.30 ± 6.82 340.83 ± 5.24 332.90 ± 4.11 331.57 ± 5.21
Volume, s (μl) 128.42 ± 7.03 120.45 ± 6.08 125.56 ± 5.74 146.92 ± 7.07
Volume, d (μl) 337.14 ± 9.45 319.78 ± 12.38 332.93 ± 11.94 370.14 ± 17.64
Stroke volume (μl) 208.71 ± 6.54 199.33 ± 10.83 207.36 ± 9.34 223.23 ± 11.31
Ejection fraction (%) 62.04 ± 1.53 62.14 ± 1.70 62.22 ± 1.32 60.23 ± 0.67
Fractional shortening (%) 34.86 ± 1.15 34.88 ± 1.28 34.89 ± 0.99 33.49 ± 0.51
Cardiac output (ml/min) 71.45 ± 2.67 67.79 ± 3.56 68.97 ± 3.20 73.68 ± 3.47
Weight (g) 294.77 ± 5.17 295.85 ± 4.68 324.00 ± 4.07 366.75 ± 4.73

Abbreviations: Coc, cocaine; d, diastolic; mos, month; s, systolic; veh, the h2E2 vehicle; wk, week.

3.3. Long‐term effects of h2E2 pretreatment on cocaine‐induced changes in cardiac function

A comparison of the immediate antibody effect (coc + h2E2) and that of 1‐week pretreatment (coc + 1week) results in an increased inotropy from 10–35 min (Figure 4A) and subsequent decreased systolic volume (Figure 4B). However, this increase is significantly less than that observed with coc + veh from 10–30 min for the EF and at 20 and 25 min for systolic volume. Pretreatment with an antibody 1 month prior to cocaine did not significantly blunt the increased inotropy (Figure 4A) or inverse decrease in systolic (Figure 4B). The initial drop in HR was blocked by h2E2, even at 1‐week post‐injection (Figure 4C). h2E2 similarly antagonized the increase in CO, however, this effect was mitigated at 1 week and 1‐month post‐injection (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Echocardiography measurements for all experimental groups. The groups are coc + h2E2 (n = 13), h2E2 + 1 week (n = 11) and h2E2 + 1 month (n = 12). (A) Change in ejection fraction (% EF). (B) Change in systolic volume. (C) Change in heart rate (HR, bpm). (D) Change in cardiac output (CO, ml/min). Values are average ± SEM. § p < .05 for h2E2 + 1month compared to Coc + h2E2 and h2E2 + 1week. p < .05 for Coc + h2E2 compared to h2E2 + 1 week and h2E2 + 1 month. # p < .05 for Coc + h2E2 compared to h2E2 + 1month.

3.4. Cocaine‐induced changes in the cardiac electrical parameters

ST‐segment elevation was noted in the vehicle group consistent with the development of active ischemia, likely through macro and microvascular vasospasm secondary to the direct effect of cocaine on the vasculature (Figure 5, left). The effect was observed almost immediately after cocaine administration with resolution within a minute. There were no significant changes to the ST segments noted in the h2E2 groups (Figure 5, right).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

ECG recordings from Coc + veh and Coc + h2E2. ECG recordings are shown at baseline, push, push +1 s, push +3 s and 1 min after push.

3.5. Cocaine‐induced vasoconstriction was blocked by h2E2 pretreatment

We measured the BP at baseline and recovery (Figure 6A). Immediately following the cocaine push, the BP was no longer able to be determined by the tail cuff. Therefore, we counted the number of cycles that passed before readings returned (Figure 6B). The recovery values are an average of the first 10 cycles after the tail‐cuff measurements resume.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Blood pressure. Blood pressure measurements via tail‐cuff at baseline and recovery from cocaine push for coc + veh (n = 15) and coc + h2E2 (n = 12). (A) Absolute BP measurements for baseline and recovery. (B) The number of cycles that passed before the BP measurements resumed. Values are average ± SEM. p < .01 for Coc + h2E2 compared to Coc + veh.

4. DISCUSSION

The goal of the current study was to address concerns that an increased concentration of cocaine in the plasma, facilitated by h2E2 binding will cause an adverse effect on the heart. We set out to determine what the effect of cocaine was on the rat heart, if h2E2 could antagonize that effect and if there was indeed a negative effect on cardiovascular function. Our preliminary studies included different doses of cocaine to investigate which, if any, echocardiography parameters are influenced by cocaine. We began with the same dose used in our self‐administration studies, 0.56 mg/kg cocaine HCl. 25 Our initial cocaine‐HCl dose did not demonstrate a decreased EF, however, this dose did increase the EF, though the results were inconsistent with large deviations. Doubling the dose to 1.12 mg/kg had similar results, with a great deal of variability. The dose of 1.68 mg/kg gave the most consistent and reproducible results. To verify that higher doses would not be more effective, we also used 2.24, 3.36, and 4.48 mg/kg. The very high doses of 3.36 and 4.48 mg/kg resulted in shallow breathing and decreased EF, similar to overdose in humans. 26 Based on our previous studies, using the standard practice of equimolar concentrations of antibody and cocaine, and knowing that each antibody can bind two cocaine molecules, 19 we opted for the dose of 1.68 mg/kg.

The effect of cocaine on the cardiovascular system is via direct and indirect routes. It has been shown that at low doses, the effect is mostly indirect through the stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity by inhibiting the reuptake and stimulating the outflow of catecholamines, specifically norepinephrine and dopamine. 14 At higher doses, cocaine acts directly as an anesthetic and antiarrhythmic agent by blocking sodium, potassium, and calcium currents. 13 , 14 Finally, cocaine causes vasoconstriction by increasing the release of endothelin‐I (vasoconstrictor) and inhibiting nitric oxide (vasodilator) production. 14

We observed an initial severe drop in EF with cocaine administration, consistent with the standard physiological effect of cocaine as previously published. 14 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 However, this effect lasted for less than 3 min and by 5 min, we saw an increased EF with a peak around 25 min after the cocaine injection. The increase in EF is likely due to a secondary sympathetic stimulation by higher levels of norepinephrine. 31 Pretreatment with h2E2 blocked both the initial decrease and subsequent increase in EF. Furthermore, h2E2 treatment alone did not cause any adverse effects on the cardiovascular system, as evidenced by a comparison of the echocardiographic baseline measurements. Likewise, the T‐wave inversion we observed that has been previously reported to occur with cocaine treatment 32 was mitigated by h2E2. Furthermore, pretreatment with h2E2 demonstrated no adverse effects on the ECG. Lastly, the vasoconstriction caused by cocaine was not evident in rats pretreated with h2E2, as there was no delay in BP readings. After 1 week, most of the inhibition by h2E2 was no longer measurable, though the initial decrease in EF did not occur and the EF increase was slightly lower than cocaine + vehicle. The clearing of h2E2 from the rat system is evident after 1 month since the cardiovascular parameters are similar to those of cocaine with only vehicle. The ability of h2E2 to antagonize the cardiovascular effects of cocaine in vivo predicts that h2E2 will be effective in the treatment of cocaine use disorder.

In summary, cocaine is pharmacologically inert in the presence of equimolar concentrations of h2E2 cocaine binding sites, and there is no evidence of an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular effects of cocaine in the presence of h2E2 despite elevated plasma cocaine concentrations. Indeed, the h2E2 antagonism of cocaine's cardiovascular effects may provide an additional clinical indication for h2E2 as a treatment for any cardiovascular toxicity of cocaine.

4.1. Limitations

This study was limited to investigating the possible cardiovascular effects of treatment with h2E2 on rats. As the study was designed to be preclinical, overdosing and combined alcohol and cocaine consumption was not considered. The study investigated only short‐term effects and as such the animals in the study were only observed via echocardiography until the heart function, as measured by EF, returned to baseline values. Future studies will investigate the long‐term effects of h2E2 on the rat heart using self‐administration to simulate chronic cocaine use, including post‐treatment to prevent cocaine overdose. Due to the longitudinal nature of this study, it was not feasible to complete any terminal experiments. Therefore, additional planned studies will include invasive catheterization measurements and investigating levels of cardiac biomarkers.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors participated in the research design and contributed to drafting the manuscript. SEK and JAM conducted experiments and performed data analysis. SEK, JR, and ABN contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse. [Grant U01DA050330] (to A.B.N.).

DISCLOURE

ABN is a coinventor on a series of patents on the matter and use of the h2E2 monoclonal antibody. All other authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

These studies were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Michelle Nieman for performing the catheter surgeries.

Koch SE, Marckel JA, Rubinstein J, Norman AB. A humanized anti‐cocaine mAb antagonizes the cardiovascular effects of cocaine in rats. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023;11:e01045. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1045

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Vocci F, Ling W. Medications development: successes and challenges. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;108(1):94‐108. doi: 10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2005.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kosten T, Owens SM. Immunotherapy for the treatment of drug abuse. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;108(1):76‐85. doi: 10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2005.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Orson FM, Kinsey BM, Singh RAK, Wu Y, Kosten TR. Vaccines for cocaine abuse. Hum Vaccin. 2009;5(4):194‐199. doi: 10.4161/HV.5.4.7457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shen XY, Orson FM, Kosten TR. Vaccines against drug abuse. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(1):60‐70. doi: 10.1038/CLPT.2011.281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kosten TR, Domingo CB, Shorter D, et al. Vaccine for cocaine dependence: a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled efficacy trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;140:42‐47. doi: 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2014.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Martell BA, Mitchell E, Poling J, Gonsai K, Kosten TR. Vaccine pharmacotherapy for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(2):158‐164. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOPSYCH.2005.04.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Martell BA, Orson FM, Poling J, et al. Cocaine vaccine for the treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone‐maintained patients: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled efficacy trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(10):1116‐1123. doi: 10.1001/ARCHGENPSYCHIATRY.2009.128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hicks MJ, Kaminsky SM, De BP, et al. Fate of systemically administered cocaine in nonhuman primates treated with the dAd5GNE anticocaine vaccine. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2014;25(1):40‐49. doi: 10.1089/HUMC.2013.231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Maoz A, Hicks MJ, Vallabhjosula S, et al. Adenovirus capsid‐based anti‐cocaine vaccine prevents cocaine from binding to the nonhuman primate CNS dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(11):2170‐2178. doi: 10.1038/NPP.2013.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Norman AB, Ball WJ. Predicting the clinical efficacy and potential adverse effects of a humanized anticocaine monoclonal antibody. Immunotherapy. 2012;4(3):335‐343. doi: 10.2217/IMT.12.19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Norman AB, Norman MK, Buesing WR, Tabet MR, Tsibulsky VL, Ball WJ. The effect of a chimeric human/murine anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody on cocaine self‐administration in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;328(3):873‐881. doi: 10.1124/JPET.108.146407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Norman AB, Tabet MR, Norman MK, Buesing WR, Pesce AJ, Ball WJ. A chimeric human/murine anticocaine monoclonal antibody inhibits the distribution of cocaine to the brain in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320(1):145‐153. doi: 10.1124/JPET.106.111781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Havakuk O, Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. The cardiovascular effects of cocaine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):101‐113. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Schwartz BG, Rezkalla S, Kloner RA. Cardiovascular effects of cocaine. Circulation. 2010;122(24):2558‐2569. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Norman AB, Gooden FCT, Tabet MR, Ball WJ. A recombinant humanized anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody inhibits the distribution of cocaine to the brain in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(7):1125‐1131. doi: 10.1124/DMD.114.057034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wetzel HN, Tabet MR, Ball WJ, Norman AB. The effects of a humanized recombinant anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody on the disposition of cocaethylene in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014;23(2):387‐390. doi: 10.1016/J.INTIMP.2014.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Turner ME, Wetzel HN, Zinani DB, Crutchfield CA, Norman AB. Effects of a recombinant humanized anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody on the metabolism and distribution of cocaine in vitro and in mice. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022;10(5):e01009. doi: 10.1002/PRP2.1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wetzel HN, Zhang T, Norman AB. A mathematical model of a recombinant humanized anti‐cocaine monoclonal antibody's effects on cocaine pharmacokinetics in mice. Life Sci. 2017;184:81‐86. doi: 10.1016/J.LFS.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marckel JA, Wetzel HN, Amlal S, Amlal H, Norman AB. A recombinant humanized anticocaine monoclonal antibody alters the urinary clearance of cocaine and its metabolites in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2019;47(3):184‐188. doi: 10.1124/dmd.118.083857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Committee . Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals: eighth edition. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The National Academies Press. 2011:118. doi: 10.2307/1525495 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Koch SE, Gao X, Haar L, et al. Probenecid: novel use as a non‐injurious positive inotrope acting via cardiac TRPV2 stimulation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(1):134‐144. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Constantinides C, Mean R, Janssen BJ. Effects of isoflurane anesthesia on the cardiovascular function of the C57BL/6 mouse. ILAR J. 2011;52(3):e21‐e31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wu J, Bu L, Gong H, et al. Effects of heart rate and anesthetic timing on high‐resolution echocardiographic assessment under isoflurane anesthesia in mice. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(12):1771‐1778. doi: 10.7863/JUM.2010.29.12.1771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yang CF, Yu‐Chih Chen M, Chen TI, Cheng CF. Dose‐dependent effects of isoflurane on cardiovascular function in rats. Tzu chi Med J. 2014;26(3):119‐122. doi: 10.1016/J.TCMJ.2014.07.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Norman AB, Norman MK, Tabet MR, Tsibulsky VL, Pesce AJ. Competitive dopamine receptor antagonists increase the equiactive cocaine concentration during self‐administration. Synapse. 2011;65(5):404‐411. doi: 10.1002/SYN.20858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kaye S, Darke S. Non‐fatal cocaine overdose among injecting and non‐injecting cocaine users in Sydney, Australia. Addiction. 2004;99(10):1315‐1322. doi: 10.1111/J.1360-0443.2004.00875.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Grubb AF, Greene SJ, Fudim M, Dewald T, Mentz RJ. Drugs of abuse and heart failure. J Card Fail. 2021;27(11):1260‐1275. doi: 10.1016/J.CARDFAIL.2021.05.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hale SL, Alker KJ, Rezkalla SH, Eisenhauer AC, Kloner RA. Nifedipine protects the heart from the acute deleterious effects of cocaine if administered before but not after cocaine. Circulation. 1991;83(4):1437‐1443. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.83.4.1437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kloner RA, Hale S, Alker K, Rezkalla S. The effects of acute and chronic cocaine use on the heart. Circulation. 1992;85(2):407‐419. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.85.2.407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pitts WR, Vongpatanasin W, Cigarroa JE, David Hillis L, Lange RA. Effects of the intracoronary infusion of cocaine on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in humans. Circulation. 1998;97(13):1270‐1273. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.13.1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Foulon P, De Backer D. The hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine: far more than an increase in blood pressure! Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(Suppl 1):S25. doi: 10.21037/ATM.2018.09.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Elkattawy S, Alyacoub R, Al‐Nassarei A, Younes I, Ayad S, Habib M. Cocaine induced heart failure: report and literature review. J Community Hosp Inter Med Perspect. 2021;11(4):547‐550. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1926614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Pharmacology Research & Perspectives are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES