Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2023 Jan 11;378(1871):20220024. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0024

Molecular elements: novel approaches for molecular building

Ruowen Wang 1,3,4, Xueqiang Wang 2,3, Sitao Xie 2,3, Yanyan Zhang 1, Dingkun Ji 1, Xiaobing Zhang 3, Cheng Cui 3,4, Jianhui Jiang 3, Weihong Tan 1,2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC9835600  PMID: 36633277

Abstract

Classically, a molecular element (ME) is a pure substance composed of two or more atoms of the same element. However, MEs, in the context of this review, can be any molecules as elements bonded together into the backbone of synthetic oligonucleotides (ONs) with designed sequences and functions, including natural A, T, C, G, U, and unnatural bases. The use of MEs can facilitate the synthesis of designer molecules and smart materials. In particular, we discuss the landmarks associated with DNA structure and related technologies, as well as the extensive application of ONs, the ideal type of molecules for intervention therapy aimed at correcting disease-causing genetic errors (indels). It is herein concluded that the discovery of ON therapeutics and the fabrication of designer molecules or nanostructures depend on the ME concept that we previously published. Accordingly, ME will be our focal point as we discuss related research directions and perspectives in making molecules and materials.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reactivity and mechanism in chemical and synthetic biology’.

Keywords: molecular element, oligonucleotide, nucleic acid therapeutics, aptamer, unnatural base

1. Introduction

DNA is the molecular foundation of the biological system as it is the genetic information carrier stored in the nucleus [1]. Compared with other biomacromolecules, such as proteins and polysaccharides, the structure of DNA is much simpler since it is composed of only four types of units. The evolution of DNA structure and biology is the central part of science, having produced many revolutionary technologies changing the lifestyle of human beings (figure 1). Although DNA was discovered as a natural chemical from living systems by Miescher in 1869 [2], the ring structures of ATCG bases were not identified by Levene and Tipson until 1932 [3,4]. The role of DNA as a gene information carrier in the cell was proposed by Oswald Avery in 1944 for the first time [5,6]. Shortly after the establishment of A = T and C = G base-pairing rules by Chargaff [7], Watson and Crick discovered the double-helix structure of DNA inspired by Franklin's X-ray crystallography of DNA in 1953 [811]. The start of molecular biology signalled a breakthrough in genomics and thereafter spurred landmark discoveries in science and technological advances (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Landmarks associated with DNA structure and technologies. (Online version in colour.)

Molecular biology, as a new field, started from the discovery of the DNA duplex structure, which had not been fully established until Crick et al. enunciated their ‘Central Dogma’ [12,13] and deciphered the genetic code [14]. In the words of Crick, nearly ‘all aspects of life are engineered at the molecular level, and without understanding molecules, we can only have a very sketchy understanding of life itself’ (see https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/sc/feature/biographical-overview). Indeed, Crick's opinion is supported by ever more scientific discoveries. For example, the discovery of DNA polymerase by Kornberg [15,16] led to the establishment of enzymatic synthesis technology [17] and DNA sequencing [18,19] upon which modern biotechnology is based. DNA sequencing initiated by Sanger enables gene sequencing accessible to the general public. With genetic information, we can understand diseases at the molecular level and find cures.

Designable nucleic acids are unique probes for biological studies. Many structure–function studies have resulted in the efficient preparation of oligonucleotides (ONs) ever since Khorana managed to chemically synthesize a gene in the laboratory for the first time [20,21]. Aided by ON synthesis technology, the Dickerson and Rich groups reported the crystal structures of A-, B- and Z-DNA fragments [22,23], which is important because the helical structure of DNA is variable under different environments and closely related to biological properties. Beyond biotechnology, ONs prepared by DNA synthesizers have been extensively applied in materials science [24], nanotechnology [2527], information technology [28,29] and clinical diagnosis and therapies [30]. Accordingly, many different functionalities have been designed and incorporated into nucleic acids to meet specific requirements [31,32].

2. Unnatural DNA bases: bottom-up elements

The fundamental role of DNA and its quite simple structure has long evoked curiosity. For instance, to investigate if ATCG could be replaced by other functionalities, the Benner group designed unnatural bases with close similarity to ATCG bases and realized enzymatic incorporation of unnatural bases into RNA with high accuracy [33,34]. To determine if hydrogen bonding is necessary for DNA base-pairing, the Kool group found that well-designed aromatic functionalities could work as a pair of hydrophobic bases stabilizing the DNA duplex [35,36]. They also designed a series of size-expanded bases from which more thermodynamically stable DNA duplexes were prepared, such as xDNA and yDNA [3739]. We have designed and synthesized the most size-expanded unnatural base by fusion of an azobenzene with a natural T base to give base zT, which is capable of specific base-pairing with natural A through hydrogen bonding [40]. Unnatural base-pairing was also introduced to the duplex by replacing hydrogen bonding with metal-mediated bonding [41,42]. The Romesberg group designed and synthesized more than a thousand hydrophobic bases out of which they screened some unnatural bases that function in a manner similar to that of ATCG bases in the cell system following ‘Central Dogma’ [4346].

The incorporation of unnatural bases into nucleic acids provides a unique insight into DNA biology and function. In order to distinguish natural AT(U)GC bases from unnatural bases, Benner proposed unnatural bases as DNA's new alphabets [33]. Encouraged by the discovery of Benner's unnatural bases in the 1980s, a few groups have since made major contributions to this field [4754]. In fact, more than 100 unnatural bases have been reported with base-pairing properties, enough to fill the elemental table (figure 2). Several recently published reviews have described the progress in this field, which we are not discussing in detail here [48,5557].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

List of base alphabets expressed in periodic table style. (Online version in colour.)

It is exciting, but challenging, to reconstruct a life system in a bottom-up approach with unnatural bases. On the other hand, unnatural bases may find unique applications in biotechnology and biomedicine [58]. The Hirao group has created high-affinity DNA aptamers with unnatural bases, which specifically bind to target proteins with improved biostability [59,60]. Our collaboration with the Benner group resulted in the generation of aptamers that selectively bind liver cancer cells. These aptamers evolved from a six-letter DNA library with unnatural bases Z and P [6163]. It has been demonstrated that DNA is a unique data storage device for information technology (IT) [64]. Accordingly, unnatural bases may find unique functions in IT as data storage and read-out systems. Simpler than cellular systems, the addition of a base ‘byte’ would multiply the capacity of data storage.

3. Molecular elements: concept and the significance

The convenience of building ON molecules by automated synthesis has inspired applications of ONs in basic research and clinical medicine. To produce such ONs, nucleoside phosphoramidites, first identified in 1981 [65,66], allow sequential addition of new bases to the DNA chain. More than 1000 phosphoramidites have been reported [6771], providing infinite possibilities for all kinds of technical nucleic acids, or TcNA, available for functionalization within the scope of the periodic table of elements shown in figure 2. However, the rational design of small molecules with specialized functionalities calls for the development of better guidance to address the demand for new nucleic acid-based materials and nucleic acid-based therapeutics, leading to the expansion of TcNA applications. Accordingly, in 2017, we introduced the concept of the molecular element (ME) [40], which we describe below.

From the structure of a single-stranded DNA (figure 3a), it is obvious that the backbone of the molecule is uniform and that every unit differs from others by base moieties. Hence, the sugar–phosphate–sugar backbone may be abstracted as the ‘bond’ of nucleic acids and the base moiety as the ‘element’. Adenine pairs with thymine, and cytosine pairs with guanine. Based on this simplified DNA single-strand structure, we propose the ME concept.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Structure of a single-strand DNA sequence (a), the concept of molecular elements (b), and a brief introduction of the automated synthesis (c). (Online version in colour.)

A ME can be any molecule with special functions, including both natural A, T, C, G, U and unnatural bases (figure 3b). MEs are converted to corresponding phosphoramidites by organic synthesis as elementary substances for construction of TcNAs. As shown in figure 3b, from phosphoramidites, an individual ME is bonded together into the backbone of ONs during automated synthesis step-by-step in a programmable approach with up to 99.9% yield (figure 3c). As demonstrated by nature, the sequences of four MEs, A, T, C and G, store huge genetic information and biological functions. The discovery of more functional MEs will lead to the construction of TcNAs with infinite functions, and people can build their dream molecules as easily as shopping in a molecular supermarket.

Through the programmable assembly of functional moieties onto the DNA backbone, TcNAs can be turned into diagnostic probes, catalytic molecules or therapeutic molecules. Examples of such conjugates include lipid-, polymer- or nanoparticle-DNA. MEs can also guide the construction of nanodevices with diverse functions. More to the point, the confluence of ME and TcNA offers these merits: (i) simple and efficient design of molecular-level constructs in that all MEs are bonded in sequence through the same phosphoramidite chemistry; (ii) infinite molecular properties since the properties of TcNAs are determined by the incorporated MEs and their sequences; and (iii) rational design of TcNAs realized under the ME framework in future when more underlying disciplines are discovered.

4. Engineering technical nucleic acids

The progress in nucleic acid preparations, including both chemical and biological synthesis, has allowed researchers to use nucleic acids as unique tools. TcNAs can be prepared by automated synthesis, and the sequences are programmable. Furthermore, the structure can be readily modified through the incorporation of functional moieties. Commercially available TcNAs have been extensively explored in medicine, chemistry, physics, materials science and even information technology. DNA nanotechnology, DNA-based advanced materials and nucleic acid therapeutics have emerged as the frontiers in interdisciplinary fields (figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Extensive applications of TcNAs as derivative molecules of DNA beyond ‘Central Dogma’. (Online version in colour.)

Programmable sequence and specific A-T and C-G base-pairing modality afford researchers the opportunity to construct designer molecules or nano-scaled devices. For example, aptamers are generated from a library of ONs binding to targets with high affinity and specificity, many of which have been developed as therapeutic molecules for clinical applications [7277]. Molecular beacons, single-stranded ONs with hairpin-loop conformation, are also used in a variety of formats, such as in vitro RNA and DNA monitoring, biosensors and real-time monitoring of gene expression in living systems [7881]. DNAzymes are also single-stranded ONs capable of catalysing chemical reactions as enzymes; DNAzymes have received attention for bioimaging and biosensor development [8284]. A molecular nanomotor can be constructed by a single-stranded ON, which is fuelled by the hybridization of DNA [8587]. Hybridization and dehydration between base-pairing are processes which, under programmable control, have been used to prepare intellectual hydrogels, soft nanomotor devices and biomimetic DNA nanostructures [8894].

DNA has had a remarkable impact on nanoscience and nanotechnology with the most predictable interactions of all molecules. Through specific base-pairing, programmed TcNAs can assemble structural motifs and then connect them, fabricating nano-scaled structures in a bottom-up approach [9597]. DNA nanotechnology presents the advantages of chemical diversity, highly programmable synthesis and precisely controllable structure, as demonstrated by DNA origami and DNA-mediated nanoparticle assembly [98100]. When more MEs are introduced into TcNAs besides natural ATCG, more powerful nanodevices can be engineered with functional TcNAs.

5. Nucleic acid therapeutics

We are entering an era in which a vast amount of gene sequencing information is available to medical researchers able to take advantage of the completed human genome project, the breakthrough in DNA sequencing technology and large-scale studies of genetic variation.

Originally, molecular medicine involved the application of genetic knowledge to the practice of therapy. Today, a major mission of molecular medicine is to identify pathogenic genetic mutations and develop molecular interventions. Indeed, a major challenge in molecular medicine involves the discovery of molecular therapeutics against disease-causing genetic mutations.

In 1978, it was discovered that the expression of proteins could be disturbed by an exogenous ON complementary to the target gene [101], and the mechanisms of RNA interference were addressed by Mello and Fire in 1998 [102]. Biological experiments have unequivocally verified that both antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and small interference RNA (siRNA) are powerful and efficient molecular interventions of target genes [30,102105].

However, it took almost 20 years until the first siRNA was approved for clinical treatment of rare diseases in 2018 [106]. It was a long scientific trek marked by trial and error and continuous structural optimization for therapeutic nucleic acids [31,32,107111]. Chemically modified ONs have been extensively studied for the development of therapeutic antisense and siRNA because modifications were found to dramatically improve the drug-like properties of ONs, such as cellular uptake, biostability, target specificity and binding affinity. Simple structure, programmable synthesis and ready functionalization are the prominent properties of TcNA, which will benefit clinical applications. However, major challenges arise from the difficulty in delivering TcNA therapeutics to their target tissues. Many efforts have contributed to the development of delivery systems for TcNAs.

Recently, we demonstrated that the structure of ONs can be optimized by incorporating functional MEs using a programmable approach [112]. For delivery systems, these innovations include our lipid nanoparticle (LNP), as well as viral and polymeric delivery systems [113118]. LNP is the most prominent system, which has been successfully used in the formulation of the first approved siRNA. The formulation of LNP suitable for clinical applications is challenging because the complicated system involves a huge number of chemicals being used as the components. To handle such difficulties, artificial intelligence technology has been applied to the fabrication of LNP [119,120].

6. Future directions

(a) . The development of novel molecular elements

Targeted delivery of TcNA therapeutics is very important, as has been demonstrated by the GalNAc platform applied in siRNA functionalization [118]. The development of targeting-ME could enhance the accumulation of TcNA in target tissues and thus improve efficacy. We recently developed a series of microenvironment-targeting MEs and demonstrated that the tumor-specific delivery of ASO is achievable using MEs. Different diseases may vary from each other with a characteristic microenvironment [121123], which can be used in the design and development of novel MEs.

Pseudouridine (Ψ) is an isomer of the nucleoside uridine in which the uracil is attached via a carbon–carbon instead of a nitrogen–carbon glycosidic bond. Its incorporation into messenger RNA (mRNA) enhances translation efficiency [124,125] This ME has been used as an important tool for the development of mRNA therapeutics. Recently, we demonstrated that the structure of ONs can be optimized by incorporating functionalities in a programmable approach [112]. DNA structure is predictable owing to specific base-pairing through hydrogen bonding. While the interaction of TcNA with a serum protein is weak and uncontrollable, the introduction of hydrophobic or cationic functionalities may alter the binding affinity, and change the fate of TcNA in blood circulation [126]. The development of such assembling MEs may provide a sheltering function for TcNAs in the circulatory system.

(b) . Correlations between the sequences of molecular elements and functions

Studies in the structural modification of TcNA have increased through the years. Indeed, over past decades, ON modification has largely broadened the functions and applications of TcNAs and contributed to the clinical success of therapeutic nucleic acids. The advent of phosphoramidite chemistry, as previously noted, has accelerated the functionalization of ONs with modified nucleobases, phosphate-protecting groups and modified sugars [31,32,108,110114]. Mother Nature has exhibited the power of sequence with four MEs, A, T, C and G, since one single-base mutation results in quite different biological morphology. It will be even more striking and significant to find out how ME sequences change biological properties and discover the existence of synergism between drug payloads and MEs. The discovery of latent principles may provide guidance for molecular design of TcNAs and lead to further breakthroughs.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Authors' contributions

R.W.: project administration, writing—original draft; X.W.: writing—original draft; S.X.: data curation; Y.Z.: data curation; D.J.: data curation, writing—original draft; X.Z.: validation; C.C.: writing—original draft; J.J.: writing—review and editing; W.T.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant no. 2021YFA0909400) and the National Science Foundation of China (grant nos t2188102 and 21877079).

References

  • 1.Milstein JN, Meiners JC. 2011. On the role of DNA biomechanics in the regulation of gene expression. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 1673-1681. ( 10.1098/rsif.2011.0371) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dahm R. 2005. Friedrich Miescher and the discovery of DNA. Dev. Biol. 278, 274-288. ( 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levene PA, Tipson RS. 1935. The ring structure of thymidine. Science 81, 98. ( 10.1126/science.81.2091.98.a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Levene PA, Tipson RS. 1931. The ring structure of adenosine. Science 74, 521. ( 10.1126/science.74.1925.521.a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Avery OT, Macleod CM, McCarty M. 1944. Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types: induction of transformation by a desoxyribonucleic acid fraction isolated from pneumococcus type III. J. Exp. Med. 79, 137-158. ( 10.1084/jem.79.2.137) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Portin P. 2014. The birth and development of the DNA theory of inheritance: sixty years since the discovery of the structure of DNA. J. Genet. 93, 293-302. ( 10.1007/s12041-014-0337-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chargaff E. 1950. Chemical specificity of nucleic acids and mechanism of their enzymatic degradation. Experientia 6, 201-209. ( 10.1007/BF02173653) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Franklin RE, Gosling RG. 1953. Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature 171, 740-741. ( 10.1038/171740a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Franklin RE, Gosling RG. 1953. Evidence for 2-chain helix in crystalline structure of sodium deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172, 156-157. ( 10.1038/172156a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Watson JD, Crick FH. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737-738. ( 10.1038/171737a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Watson JD, Crick FH. 1953. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171, 964-967. ( 10.1038/171964b0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crick F. 1970. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227, 561-563. ( 10.1038/227561a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crick FH. 1958. On protein synthesis. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 12, 138-163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Crick FH, Barnett L, Brenner S, Watts-Tobin RJ. 1961. General nature of the genetic code for proteins. Nature 192, 1227-1232. ( 10.1038/1921227a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kornberg A, Zimmerman SB, Kornberg SR, Josse J. 1959. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. Influence of bacteriophage T2 on the synthetic pathway in host cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 45, 772-785. ( 10.1073/pnas.45.6.772) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kornberg A. 1960. Biologic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. Science 131, 1503-1508. ( 10.1126/science.131.3412.1503) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mullis K, Faloona F, Scharf S, Saiki R, Horn G, Erlich H. 1986. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 51, 263-273. ( 10.1101/SQB.1986.051.01.032) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467. ( 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shendure J, Balasubramanian S, Church GM, Gilbert W, Rogers J, Schloss JA, Waterston RH. 2017. DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature 550, 345-353. ( 10.1038/nature24286) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khorana HG, Buchi H, Caruthers MH, Chang SH, Gupta NK, Kumar A, Ohtsuka E, Sgaramella V, Weber H. 1968. Progress in the total synthesis of the gene for ala-tRNA. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 33, 35-44. ( 10.1101/SQB.1968.033.01.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khorana HG. 1979. Total synthesis of a gene. Science 203, 614-625. ( 10.1126/science.366749) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang AH, Quigley GJ, Kolpak FJ, Crawford JL, van Boom JH, van der Marel G, Rich A. 1979. Molecular structure of a left-handed double helical DNA fragment at atomic resolution. Nature 282, 680-686. ( 10.1038/282680a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wing R, Drew H, Takano T, Broka C, Tanaka S, Itakura K, Dickerson RE. 1980. Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA. Nature 287, 755-758. ( 10.1038/287755a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tian Y, et al. 2020. Ordered three-dimensional nanomaterials using DNA-prescribed and valence-controlled material voxels. Nat. Mater. 19, 789-796. ( 10.1038/s41563-019-0550-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rotaru A, Gothelf KV. 2010. DNA nanotechnology: steps towards automated synthesis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 760-761. ( 10.1038/nnano.2010.211) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Service RF. 2011. DNA nanotechnology. DNA nanotechnology grows up. Science 332, 1140-1, 1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Turberfield AJ. 2011. DNA nanotechnology: geometrical self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 3, 580-581. ( 10.1038/nchem.1097) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meiser LC, Nguyen BH, Chen YJ, Nivala J, Strauss K, Ceze L, Grass RN. 2022. Synthetic DNA applications in information technology. Nat. Commun. 13, 352. ( 10.1038/s41467-021-27846-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bhattarai-Kline S, Lear SK, Shipman SL. 2021. One-step data storage in cellular DNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 232-233. ( 10.1038/s41589-021-00737-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kulkarni JA, Witzigmann D, Thomson SB, Chen S, Leavitt BR, Cullis PR, van der Meel R. 2021. The current landscape of nucleic acid therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 630-643. ( 10.1038/s41565-021-00898-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khvorova A, Watts JK. 2017. The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 238-248. ( 10.1038/nbt.3765) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shen X, Corey DR. 2018. Chemistry, mechanism and clinical status of antisense oligonucleotides and duplex RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 1584-1600. ( 10.1093/nar/gkx1239) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Piccirilli JA, Krauch T, Moroney SE, Benner SA. 1990. Enzymatic incorporation of a new base pair into DNA and RNA extends the genetic alphabet. Nature 343, 33-37. ( 10.1038/343033a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hoshika S, et al. 2019. Hachimoji DNA and RNA: a genetic system with eight building blocks. Science 363, 884-887. ( 10.1126/science.aat0971) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guckian KM, Krugh TR, Kool ET. 1998. Solution structure of a DNA duplex containing a replicable difluorotoluene-adenine pair. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 954-959. ( 10.1038/2930) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guckian KM, Kool ET. 1997. Highly precise shape mimicry by a difluorotoluene deoxynucleoside, a replication-competent substitute for thymidine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 36, 2825-2828. ( 10.1002/anie.199728251) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu H, Gao J, Lynch SR, Saito YD, Maynard L, Kool ET. 2003. A four-base paired genetic helix with expanded size. Science 302, 868-871. ( 10.1126/science.1088334) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu H, Gao J, Kool ET. 2005. Helix-forming properties of size-expanded DNA, an alternative four-base genetic form. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1396-1402. ( 10.1021/ja046305l) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu H, He K, Kool ET. 2004. yDNA: a new geometry for size-expanded base pairs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 5834-5836. ( 10.1002/anie.200461036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang R, Jin C, Zhu X, Zhou L, Xuan W, Liu Y, Liu Q, Tan W. 2017. Artificial base zT as functional “element” for constructing photoresponsive DNA nanomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9104-9107. ( 10.1021/jacs.7b02865) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tanaka K, Tengeiji A, Kato T, Toyama N, Shionoya M. 2003. A discrete self-assembled metal array in artificial DNA. Science 299, 1212-1213. ( 10.1126/science.1080587) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Johannsen S, Megger N, Bohme D, Sigel RK, Muller J. 2010. Solution structure of a DNA double helix with consecutive metal-mediated base pairs. Nat. Chem. 2, 229-234. ( 10.1038/nchem.512) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Manandhar M, Chun E, Romesberg FE. 2021. Genetic code expansion: inception, development, commercialization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4859-4878. ( 10.1021/jacs.0c11938) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hashimoto K, Fischer EC, Romesberg FE. 2021. Efforts toward further integration of an unnatural base pair into the biology of a semisynthetic organism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 8603-8607. ( 10.1021/jacs.1c03860) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang Y, Ptacin JL, Fischer EC, Aerni HR, Caffaro CE, San Jose K, Feldman AW, Turner CR, Romesberg FE. 2017. A semi-synthetic organism that stores and retrieves increased genetic information. Nature 551, 644-647. ( 10.1038/nature24659) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Malyshev DA, Dhami K, Lavergne T, Chen T, Dai N, Foster JM, Correa IR Jr, Romesberg FE. 2014. A semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic alphabet. Nature 509, 385-388. ( 10.1038/nature13314) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hirao I, Kimoto M, Mitsui T, Fujiwara T, Kawai R, Sato A, Harada Y, Yokoyama S. 2006. An unnatural hydrophobic base pair system: site-specific incorporation of nucleotide analogs into DNA and RNA. Nat. Methods 3, 729-735. ( 10.1038/nmeth915) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Marx A, Betz K. 2020. The structural basis for processing of unnatural base pairs by DNA polymerases. Chemistry 26, 3446-3463. ( 10.1002/chem.201903525) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bag SS, Talukdar S, Matsumoto K, Kundu R. 2013. Triazolyl donor/acceptor chromophore decorated unnatural nucleosides and oligonucleotides with duplex stability comparable to that of a natural adenine/thymine pair. J. Org. Chem. 78, 278-291. ( 10.1021/jo302033f) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jissy AK, Datta A. 2014. Design and applications of noncanonical DNA base pairs. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 154-166. ( 10.1021/jz402352d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kimoto M, Yamashige R, Matsunaga K, Yokoyama S, Hirao I. 2013. Generation of high-affinity DNA aptamers using an expanded genetic alphabet. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 453-457. ( 10.1038/nbt.2556) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morihiro K, Moriyama Y, Nemoto Y, Osumi H, Okamoto A. 2021. anti-syn unnatural base pair enables alphabet-expanded DNA self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 14 207-14 217. ( 10.1021/jacs.1c05393) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ochoa S, Milam VT. 2020. Modified nucleic acids: expanding the capabilities of functional oligonucleotides. Molecules 25, 4659. ( 10.3390/molecules25204659) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Okamura H, Trinh GH, Dong Z, Masaki Y, Seio K, Nagatsugi F. 2022. Selective and stable base pairing by alkynylated nucleosides featuring a spatially-separated recognition interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 3042-3055. ( 10.1093/nar/gkac140) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hamashima K, Kimoto M, Hirao I. 2018. Creation of unnatural base pairs for genetic alphabet expansion toward synthetic xenobiology. Curr. Opin Chem. Biol. 46, 108-114. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.07.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Malyshev DA, Romesberg FE. 2015. The expanded genetic alphabet. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 11 930-11 944. ( 10.1002/anie.201502890) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kimoto M, Hirao I. 2020. Genetic alphabet expansion technology by creating unnatural base pairs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 7602-7626. ( 10.1039/D0CS00457J) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shao Q, Chen T, Sheng K, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Romesberg FE. 2020. Selection of aptamers with large hydrophobic 2'-substituents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2125-2128. ( 10.1021/jacs.9b10538) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kimoto M, Nakamura M, Hirao I. 2016. Post-ExSELEX stabilization of an unnatural-base DNA aptamer targeting VEGF165 toward pharmaceutical applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7487-7494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Matsunaga KI, Kimoto M, Hirao I. 2017. High-affinity DNA aptamer generation targeting von Willebrand factor A1-domain by genetic alphabet expansion for systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment using two types of libraries composed of five different bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 324-334. ( 10.1021/jacs.6b10767) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sefah K, et al. 2014. In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1449-1454. ( 10.1073/pnas.1311778111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang L, Wan S, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Fu T, Liu Q, Cao Z, Qiu L, Tan W. 2017. Molecular elucidation of disease biomarkers at the interface of chemistry and biology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2532-2540. ( 10.1021/jacs.6b10646) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang L, et al. 2015. Evolution of functional six-nucleotide DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6734-6737. ( 10.1021/jacs.5b02251) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Church GM, Gao Y, Kosuri S. 2012. Next-generation digital information storage in DNA. Science 337, 1628. ( 10.1126/science.1226355) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Beaucage SL, Caruthers MH. 1981. Deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites: a new class of key intermediates for deoxypolynucleotide synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 22, 1859-1862. ( 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)90461-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Caruthers MH, et al. 1983. Deoxyoligonucleotide synthesis via the phosphoramidite method. Gene Amplif. Anal. 3, 1-26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gao F, Zhou J, Sun Y, Yang C, Zhang S, Wang R, Tan W. 2021. Programmable repurposing of existing drugs as pharmaceutical elements for the construction of aptamer-drug conjugates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 9457-9463. ( 10.1021/acsami.0c18846) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Abdullah R, et al. 2019. Artificial sandwich base for monitoring single-nucleobase changes and charge-transfer rates in DNA. Anal. Chem. 91, 2074-2078. ( 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04513) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang R, Zhu G, Mei L, Xie Y, Ma H, Ye M, Qing FL, Tan W. 2014. Automated modular synthesis of aptamer-drug conjugates for targeted drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 2731-2734. ( 10.1021/ja4117395) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jin C, Fu T, Wang R, Liu H, Zou J, Zhao Z, Ye M, Zhang X, Tan W. 2017. Fluorinated molecular beacons as functional DNA nanomolecules for cellular imaging. Chem. Sci. 8, 7082-7086. ( 10.1039/C7SC02819A) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li X, et al. 2018. Cross-linked aptamer-lipid micelles for excellent stability and specificity in target-cell recognition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 11 589-11 593. ( 10.1002/anie.201804682) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shangguan D, Tang Z, Mallikaratchy P, Xiao Z, Tan W. 2007. Optimization and modifications of aptamers selected from live cancer cell lines. Chembiochem 8, 603-606. ( 10.1002/cbic.200600532) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shangguan D, Li Y, Tang Z, Cao ZC, Chen HW, Mallikaratchy P, Sefah K, Yang CJ, Tan W. 2006. Aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11 838-11 843. ( 10.1073/pnas.0602615103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.de Almeida CEB, Alves LN, Rocha HF, Cabral-Neto JB, Missailidis S. 2017. Aptamer delivery of siRNA, radiopharmaceutics and chemotherapy agents in cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 525, 334-342. ( 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.086) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang R, et al. 2016. Using modified aptamers for site specific protein-aptamer conjugations. Chem. Sci. 7, 2157-2161. ( 10.1039/C5SC02631H) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rosenberg JE, et al. 2014. A phase II trial of AS1411 (a novel nucleolin-targeted DNA aptamer) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest. New Drugs. 32, 178-187. ( 10.1007/s10637-013-0045-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ng EW, Shima DT, Calias P, Cunningham ET Jr, Guyer DR, Adamis AP. 2006. Pegaptanib, a targeted anti-VEGF aptamer for ocular vascular disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 123-132. ( 10.1038/nrd1955) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kong RM, Zhang XB, Zhang LL, Huang Y, Lu DQ, Tan W, Shen GL, Yu RQ. 2011. Molecular beacon-based junction probes for efficient detection of nucleic acids via a true target-triggered enzymatic recycling amplification. Anal. Chem. 83, 14-17. ( 10.1021/ac1025072) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Qiu L, Wu C, You M, Han D, Chen T, Zhu G, Jiang J, Yu R, Tan W. 2013. A targeted, self-delivered, and photocontrolled molecular beacon for mRNA detection in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12 952-12 955. ( 10.1021/ja406252w) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yao G, Tan W. 2004. Molecular-beacon-based array for sensitive DNA analysis. Anal. Biochem. 331, 216-223. ( 10.1016/j.ab.2003.12.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang P, Beck T, Tan W. 2001. Design of a molecular beacon DNA probe with two fluorophores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40, 402-405. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fan H, Zhao Z, Yan G, Zhang X, Yang C, Meng H, Chen Z, Liu H, Tan W. 2015. A smart DNAzyme-MnO(2) nanosystem for efficient gene silencing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 4801-4805. ( 10.1002/anie.201411417) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lu LM, Zhang XB, Kong RM, Yang B, Tan W. 2011. A ligation-triggered DNAzyme cascade for amplified fluorescence detection of biological small molecules with zero-background signal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11 686-11 691. ( 10.1021/ja203693b) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lake RJ, Yang Z, Zhang J, Lu Y. 2019. DNAzymes as activity-based sensors for metal ions: recent applications, demonstrated advantages, current challenges, and future directions. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 3275-3286. ( 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00419) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kang H, Liu H, Phillips JA, Cao Z, Kim Y, Chen Y, Yang Z, Li J, Tan W. 2009. Single-DNA molecule nanomotor regulated by photons. Nano Lett. 9, 2690-2696. ( 10.1021/nl9011694) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li JJ, Tan W. 2003. A real-time assay for DNA sticky-end pairing using molecular beacons. Anal. Biochem. 312, 251-254. ( 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00375-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.You M, Chen Y, Zhang X, Liu H, Wang R, Wang K, Williams KR, Tan W. 2012. An autonomous and controllable light-driven DNA walking device. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 2457-2460. ( 10.1002/anie.201107733) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li J, Mo L, Lu CH, Fu T, Yang HH, Tan W. 2016. Functional nucleic acid-based hydrogels for bioanalytical and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 1410-1431. ( 10.1039/C5CS00586H) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li F, Lyu D, Liu S, Guo W. 2020. DNA hydrogels and microgels for biosensing and biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 32, e1806538. ( 10.1002/adma.201806538) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kahn JS, Hu Y, Willner I. 2017. Stimuli-responsive DNA-based hydrogels: from basic principles to applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 680-690. ( 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00542) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Culver HR, Clegg JR, Peppas NA. 2017. Analyte-responsive hydrogels: intelligent materials for biosensing and drug delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 170-178. ( 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00533) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rangnekar A, LaBean TH. 2014. Building DNA nanostructures for molecular computation, templated assembly, and biological applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1778-1788. ( 10.1021/ar500023b) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Jen AK, Schulten K, Baneyx F. 2003. Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nat. Mater. 2, 577-585. ( 10.1038/nmat964) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Dai X, Li Q, Aldalbahi A, Wang L, Fan C, Liu X. 2020. DNA-based fabrication for nanoelectronics. Nano Lett. 20, 5604-5615. ( 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02511) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sun W. 2017. DNA nanotechnology: DNA robots that sort cargoes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1120. ( 10.1038/nnano.2017.236) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hu Q, Li H, Wang L, Gu H, Fan C. 2019. DNA nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery systems. Chem. Rev. 119, 6459-6506. ( 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00663) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Madsen M, Gothelf KV. 2019. Chemistries for DNA nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 119, 6384-6458. ( 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00570) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Prabhu VM, Hudson SD. 2009. Nanoparticle assembly: DNA provides control. Nat. Mater. 8, 365-366. ( 10.1038/nmat2436) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chou LY, Zagorovsky K, Chan WC. 2014. DNA assembly of nanoparticle superstructures for controlled biological delivery and elimination. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 148-155. ( 10.1038/nnano.2013.309) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hong F, Zhang F, Liu Y, Yan H. 2017. DNA origami: scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev. 117, 12 584-12 640. ( 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00825) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zamecnik PC, Stephenson ML. 1978. Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 280-284. ( 10.1073/pnas.75.1.280) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. 1998. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806-811. ( 10.1038/35888) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Heinrich J, Mathur S, Matskevich AA, Moelling K. 2009. Oligonucleotide-mediated retroviral RNase H activation leads to reduced HIV-1 titer in patient-derived plasma. AIDS 23, 213-221. ( 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831c5480) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Silva AC, Lobo DD, Martins IM, Lopes SM, Henriques C, Duarte SP, Dodart JC, Nobre RJ, Pereira de Almeida L. 2020. Antisense oligonucleotide therapeutics in neurodegenerative diseases: the case of polyglutamine disorders. Brain 143, 407-429. ( 10.1093/brain/awz328) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wittrup A, Lieberman J. 2015. Knocking down disease: a progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 543-552. ( 10.1038/nrg3978) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Milani P, Mussinelli R, Perlini S, Palladini G, Obici L. 2019. An evaluation of patisiran: a viable treatment option for transthyretin-related hereditary amyloidosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20, 2223-2228. ( 10.1080/14656566.2019.1671352) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Foster DJ, et al. 2018. Advanced siRNA designs further improve in vivo performance of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates. Mol. Ther. 26, 708-717. ( 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.12.021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Goga A, Stoffel M. 2022. Therapeutic RNA-silencing oligonucleotides in metabolic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 417-439. ( 10.1038/s41573-022-00407-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hyjek-Skladanowska M, Vickers TA, Napiorkowska A, Anderson BA, Tanowitz M, Crooke ST, Liang XH, Seth PP, Nowotny M. 2020. Origins of the increased affinity of phosphorothioate-modified therapeutic nucleic acids for proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7456-7468. ( 10.1021/jacs.9b13524) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Juliano R, Alam MR, Dixit V, Kang H. 2008. Mechanisms and strategies for effective delivery of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 4158-4171. ( 10.1093/nar/gkn342) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kumar P, et al. 2020. Chimeric siRNAs with chemically modified pentofuranose and hexopyranose nucleotides: altritol-nucleotide (ANA) containing GalNAc-siRNA conjugates: in vitro and in vivo RNAi activity and resistance to 5'-exonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 4028-4040. ( 10.1093/nar/gkaa125) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Yang C, et al. 2022. Programmable manipulation of oligonucleotide-albumin interaction for elongated circulation time. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 3083-3095. ( 10.1093/nar/gkac156) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Baumer S, et al. 2015. Antibody-mediated delivery of anti-KRAS-siRNA in vivo overcomes therapy resistance in colon cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1383-1394. ( 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Brown CR, et al. 2020. Investigating the pharmacodynamic durability of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 11 827-11 844. ( 10.1093/nar/gkaa670) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dammes N, Goldsmith M, Ramishetti S, Dearling JLJ, Veiga N, Packard AB, Peer D. 2021. Conformation-sensitive targeting of lipid nanoparticles for RNA therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1030-1038. ( 10.1038/s41565-021-00928-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.McNamara JO II, Andrechek ER, Wang Y, Viles KD, Rempel RE, Gilboa E, Sullenger BA, Giangrande PH. 2006. Cell type-specific delivery of siRNAs with aptamer-siRNA chimeras. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1005-1015. ( 10.1038/nbt1223) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Roberts TC, Langer R, Wood MJA. 2020. Advances in oligonucleotide drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 673-694. ( 10.1038/s41573-020-0075-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Springer AD, Dowdy SF. 2018. GalNAc-siRNA conjugates: leading the way for delivery of RNAi therapeutics. Nucleic Acid Ther. 28, 109-118. ( 10.1089/nat.2018.0736) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Harrison PJ, Wieslander H, Sabirsh A, Karlsson J, Malmsjo V, Hellander A, Wahlby C, Spjuth O. 2021. Deep-learning models for lipid nanoparticle-based drug delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 16, 1097-1110. ( 10.2217/nnm-2020-0461) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Adir O, Poley M, Chen G, Froim S, Krinsky N, Shklover J, Shainsky-Roitman J, Lammers T, Schroeder A. 2020. Integrating artificial intelligence and nanotechnology for precision cancer medicine. Adv. Mater. 32, e1901989. ( 10.1002/adma.201901989) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Semenza GL. 2012. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell 148, 399-408. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Petrova V, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Melino G, Amelio I. 2018. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Oncogenesis 7, 10. ( 10.1038/s41389-017-0011-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Bhandari V, et al. 2019. Molecular landmarks of tumor hypoxia across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 51, 308-318. ( 10.1038/s41588-018-0318-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kariko K, Muramatsu H, Welsh FA, Ludwig J, Kato H, Akira S, Weissman D. 2008. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol. Ther. 16, 1833-1840. ( 10.1038/mt.2008.200) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Anderson BR, Muramatsu H, Nallagatla SR, Bevilacqua PC, Sansing LH, Weissman D, Kariko K. 2010. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA enhances translation by diminishing PKR activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 5884-5892. ( 10.1093/nar/gkq347) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang R, Wang C, Cao Y, Zhu Z, Yang C, Chen J, Qing FL, Tan W. 2014. Trifluoromethylated nucleic acid analogues capable of self-assembly through hydrophobic interactions. Chem. Sci. 5, 4076-4081. ( 10.1039/C4SC01162G) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES