Abstract
Targeting live cell organelles is essential to image, understand, and control specific biochemical processes. Typically, fluorescent probes with distinct structural scaffolds are used to target specific cell organelles. Here, we have designed a modular one-step synthetic strategy using a common reaction intermediate to develop new lysosomal, mitochondrial, and nucleus-targeting pH-activable fluorescent probes that are all based on a single boron dipyrromethane analog. The divergent cell organelle targeting was achieved by synthesizing probes with specific functional group changes to the central scaffold resulting in differential fluorescence and pKa. Specifically, we show that the functional group transformation of the same scaffold influences cellular localization and specificity of pH-activable fluorescent probes in live primary microglial cells with pKa’s ranging from ~3.2–6.0. We introduce a structure-organelle-relationship (SOR) framework to target nuclei (NucShine), lysosomes (LysoShine), and mitochondria (MitoShine) in live microglia. This work will result in future applications of SOR beyond imaging to target and control organelle-specific biochemical processes in disease-specific models.
Keywords: structure organelle relationship, pH-activable fluorescent probes, microglia organelle targeting, lysosome
Graphical Abstract
How can a common synthetic intermediate be transformed by different functional groups to target different cell organelles? We evaluated the Structure-Organelle-Relationship (SOR) of pH-activable fluorescent probes synthesized from the same synthetic intermediate to target nuclei, lysosomes, and mitochondria in live microglial cells.

Fluorescent organic materials have proven to be extremely useful for biological and biomedical science.[1a] Specifically, high-sensitivity fluorescent imaging of cellular organelles with enhanced spatial resolution has allowed the direct visualization of dynamic cellular processes.[1b] These include imaging lysosomes,[2a–b] mitochondria,[2c] Golgi apparatus,[2d] nucleus,[2e] among many others, and fluorescent probes are useful to track their abundance, localization, and function in cells. In addition, lysosomal and mitochondrial crosstalk is critical for cells, and its dysfunction leads to diseases, including neurodegeneration.[2f] Often, imaging of cell organelles, irrespective of pH-activable property, involves specific fluorescent probes having different scaffolds that are prepared separately by multistep synthesis. In that context, a conceptual divergent synthetic strategy delivering a distinct organelle targeting from the same basic scaffold has remained elusive. Notably, if we could achieve the structure-organelle-relationship (SOR) of the same basic fluorescent scaffold, it would be beneficial in understanding the disease specific biological processes.
Microglia are the immune cells in the brain that phagocytose extracellular material such as misfolded proteins and cell debris into their lysosomes for degradation.[3a,3b] It is hypothesized that a defect in microglial lysosomal function may contribute to neurodegeneration during later stages of Alzheimer’s disease.[3d] Additionally, microglia also release dysfunctional mitochondria into their environment that exacerbates neuroinflammation.[3e] Thus, they are an excellent model for examining phagocytosis as well as lysosomal and mitochondrial activity ex vivo and in vivo.[3c] It is, therefore, vital to develop pH-activable chemical probes that can be used to study and target lysosomes and mitochondria to further investigate such cellular processes.[3c] Fortunately, we can exploit the lysosomal acidic environment of pH 4.5 – 5.5[2a,4a] to develop pH-activable fluorescent probes to visualize, track, and investigate lysosomal processes in live and fixed cells as well as in vivo.[3c] For targeting mitochondria, we can exploit the negatively charged inner membrane of mitochondria to design a fluorescent probe with a positively charged functional group.[4b] Importantly, the maintenance of a particular alkaline matrix (pH ~8) by pumping out protons dictates the normal physiological function of mitochondria.[4c] However, during disease pathogenesis, impaired mitochondria undergo mitophagic elimination through lysosomal fusion.[2e] Moreover, understanding the crosstalk between mitochondria and lysosomes using targeted fluorescent probes is important for the investigation of cellular processes leading to disease pathogenesis.[4d] If mitochondrial targeting fluorescent probe has acidic pH-activable property, then such fluorescent probes could be useful to track mitochondrial fusion with acidic lysosomes.
The rational design of pH-activable florescent probes should satisfy several parameters: (i) ability to emit high fluorescence at lysosomal acidic pH and negligible fluorescence at cytosolic neutral pH, (ii) cellular permeability and uptake, (iii) non-specific binding to other cellular components, and (iv) good solubility. Several pH-activable fluorescent probes contain rhodamine,[5a] coumarin,[5b] napthalimide,[4b] cyanine[4e–f] and 4,4-difluoro boron dipyrromethane (known as BODIPY) based scaffolds.[5c] The widely used are BODIPY-based scaffolds[5d] due to a variety of synthetic routes to introduce diverse functionalities[6a–b] for desired photophysical and spectroscopic properties. However, this process is not robust and minor changes in the substituents can significantly affect spectroscopic properties. Furthermore, if we can develop a synthetic strategy that could furnish divergent cell organelle targeting fluorescent probes showing SOR, it would not only reduce the chemical burden but also afford a convenient synthesis of fluorescent probes from a single synthetic intermediate.
Representative fluorescent probes with different chemical scaffolds that specifically target nucleus (Hoescht 33258),[2g] lysosome (PhagoGreen)[6b] or mitochondria (MitoTracker Green™)[2f] are shown in Figure 1. Here, we report a new modular design strategy for developing ratiometric BODIPY-based fluorescent probes targeting lysosomes, mitochondria and the nucleus that are highly fluorescent at acidic pH levels compared to cytosolic pH levels (Figure 1). These organelle targeting pH-activable fluorescent probes are cell-permeable and non-toxic to the cells. During the course of the present study, we identified an interesting synthetic intermediate compound 10 that is an excellent nucleus targeting fluorescent probe. One of the most common starting materials to prepare BODIPY probes is 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole (Scheme S1, compound 1) that exists as a liquid at room temperature. We used ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate (Scheme S1, compound 2) that is solid at room temperature, easy to handle, well-tolerated under reaction conditions, and it is still underrepresented in the literature to prepare boron dipyrromethene scaffold (Scheme S1, compound 3).[6c] The additional functional group on the pyrrole ring system can serve as a handle for late-stage functionalization. Substitutions of BODIPY have significant effects on the excitation/emission property of a fluorescent probe but have only been studied at the 1,3,5,7-positions in scaffold 3, using compound 1 but not compound 2 (Scheme S1).
Figure 1.
Our strategy to prepare cell organelle targeting probes in one synthetic scheme with a common scaffold.
Previous reports suggest that N,N-dimethylaniline functional group can be used to prepare pH-activable probes. Urano and Kobayashi et al.[7a] and Kikuchi et al.[7b] independently reported -NMe2 containing probe with pKa 4.3 and 4.5, respectively. Therefore, we strategically designed compound 5 to be synthesized in two steps (see Scheme S2) using ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate (2) and 4-(N,N-dimethylamine) benzaldehyde (4). Interestingly, the compound 5 showed maximum fluorescence less than pH of 2.0 (Figure S1) that was significantly different from similar probes with NMe2 functional group (pKa of 4.3 and 4.5) reported in the literature.[7a–b] This suggests that the ethylester functional group played a role in the pH-sensitive property of compound 5. Notably, the Knoevenagel condensation between a methyl group at position 3 or 5 of BODIPY scaffold and substituted benzaldehyde was used to introduce extended conjugation to fine-tune the pH-sensitive property towards bathochromic (red) fluorescence shift. Specifically, compound 5 was reacted with 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde or 4-hydroxy 3-nitro benzaldehyde using piperidine, acetic acid as additives, and anhydrous toluene as a solvent under reflux condition to obtain expected conjugated pro ducts 6a-b (Scheme S2).[7c,d] However, 6a-b were sparingly soluble in an aqueous medium and 6a did not generate a fluorescence spectrum as solubility was affected by pH buffers. Compound 6b was soluble in a mixture of DMSO:acetonitrile and showed pH-sensitivity with significant fluorescence at pH less than 6 (Figure S2) due to the presence of a nitro group at ortho-position to the hydroxyl group.[7e] However, the poor aqueous solubility of these compounds does not warrant its use in primary cells and for future in vivo applications.
To overcome these challenges, we designed another synthetic route to achieve a facile and modular synthesis of pH-activable fluorescent probes targeting lysosomes, mitochondria and the nucleus (Scheme 1a). Herein, we envisioned preparing an important synthetic intermediate that can be transformed into different organelle targeting probes in one step. Using the common synthetic intermediate, we installed functional groups that target a specific cell organelle individually. For example, we planned to synthesize pH-responsive lysosome targeting probes, using morpholine as a lysosome-targeting moiety.[1a,5c,8a–b] The BODIPY fluorophore can be fine-tuned by the photo-induced electron transfer (PET) mechanism of the lone pair electrons of a nitrogen atom in the morpholine as well as secondary amine functional group (Scheme 1b). A similar mechanism can be envisioned when the diethylamine group is present. The high fluorescence for probes without amine functionality can be due to the resonating effect from ethylester and amide groups in acidic conditions. We started the synthesis of designed pH-responsive probes by the reaction of compound 2 with 4-nitro benzaldehyde (compound 7) afforded compound 8 as a brownish-black solid. The nitro compound 8 was reduced successfully into amine-containing compound 9 using Pd/C in ethanol:CH2Cl2 solvent mixture. Next, compound 9 readily reacted with bromo acetyl bromide to give 10 with excellent yields. The–CH2Br handle provides easy access to substitute with an amine functional group-containing reactant to get the final product. We used diethylamine and 2-aminoethyl morpholine substrate to synthesize compounds 11 (LysoShine 1) and 12 (LysoShine 2), respectively. We noticed that–CH2Br in intermediate 10 could serve as a useful synthon to introduce another targeting moiety such as cationic triphenylphosphine for mitochondria targeting. Therefore, we prepared a mitochondrial probe (compound 13) also using intermediate 10 when reacted with triphenylphosphine under the inert condition and named compound 13 as MitoShine.
Scheme 1.
(a) Synthetic route for the synthesis of pH-activable NucShine (10), LysoShine probes (11 and 12) and MitoShine (13) probe; (b) A plausible response mechanism of the pH-activable probe (representative example).
Next, we investigated the absorption and fluorescent properties of LysoShine 1, LysoShine 2, and MitoShine (Figure 2). The LysoShine 1 in different pH solutions of phosphate buffer (1% DMSO in 1M PBS) has an absorption centered around 500 nm and emission maximum at 505 nm with 480 nm excitation. LysoShine 1 is highly fluorescent at pH 4 compared to reduced fluorescence that gradually decreased from pH 5 to 7 (pKa of 5.4, Figure 2). On the other hand, LysoShine 2 (max. absorption 500 nm, max. emission 512 nm, excitation 480 nm) showed better pH-sensitivity with a gradual increase for pH less than 6 (pKa of 6.0). We tested the mitochondrial targeting property of MitoShine (max. absorption 505 nm, max. emission 535 nm, excitation 480 nm). Interestingly, MitoShine showed significantly higher fluorescence at pH 4 compared to other pH values (Figure 2) with a pKa of 4.4 suggesting possible use to image mitochondria-lysosome crosstalk. We also tested the photophysical property of the important synthetic intermediate compound 10 (absorption maximum 505 nm, max, emission 510 nm at excitation 480 nm, pKa 3.2, Figure S3). Unlike compounds 6a-b, LysoShine 1 and 2, MitoShine maintains its solubility upon addition of pH solutions (final DMSO concentration 1%), so we considered it as compatible for further biological experiments with cells.
Figure 2.
Absorption and fluorescence spectrum of compound LysoShine 1, LysoShine 2, MitoShine at different pH solutions and their pKa values. Spectrum recorded at room temperature in PBS buffer at varying pH with 1% (v/v) of DMSO, in all cases probe concentration = 10 μM (DMSO stock).
Next, we performed a series of experiments with BV2 microglial cell line and with microglia isolated from mouse brains towards applications in biological systems. First, we performed MTT assay with 1, 5, and 10 μM concentrations of the probes at 24 hours with BV2 microglia to measure their effect on metabolic activity (Figure S4). All the compounds maintained 80% or higher cellular metabolic activity except for MitoShine, which maintained a high cellular metabolic activity at 1 μM but only 10% activity at 5 μM or higher concentrations. We also assessed the cytotoxicity of the probes on these cells using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay that measures the levels of LDH released by dying cells into the cell culture medium. In a 2 hour assay, LysoShine 1 and 2 did not show any cytotoxicity at any tested doses. Contrarily, MitoShine showed no cytotoxicity at 1 and 5 μM, but showed less than 10% cytotoxicity at 10 μM (Figure S5a). With 24 hours treatment, LysoShine 1 and 2 showed less than 10% cytotoxicity at all the tested doses compared to MitoShine that showed around 20% cytotoxicity at higher doses of 5 μM and 10 μM (Figure S5b). Therefore, the lower metabolic activity of the cells at higher concentrations of MitoShine for 24 hours may lead to cytotoxicity. For a fluorescent probe, it is essential to have high cell permeability. So, we also checked the uptake efficiency of synthesized probes. With 2 hours treatment, almost all probes showed uptake efficiency around 80% or higher at all doses except for MitoShine that showed 30% of uptake at 10 μM (Figure S6). With this important information (fluorescent property, cytotoxicity and uptake efficiency), we next focused on the cell imaging experiments and flow cytometry analysis to test these pH-activable probes in primary microglia. Notably, compound 10 is one of the important intermediates and found to be cell permeable (Figure S6) as well as non-cytotoxic (Figure S4) to BV2 cells. Interestingly, compound 10 has–CH2Br functional group while MitoTracker Green has a–CH2Cl functional group.
Whereas previously reported microglia-specific probes have a–CH2Cl group.[7f] So, it would be interesting to test the behavior of compound 10 inside the cell. First, we checked the localization of compound 10, which showed high fluorescence at pH less than 3 (Figure S3). Intriguingly, we observed bright green puncta in the confocal imaging that localized with nuclear dye DAPI (Figure S8). For targeting nuclei, DAPI and Hoechst dyes are the most widely used dyes and only a few novel nuclear targeting probes have been reported due to challenges such as poor target efficiency, membrane impermeability, etc.[2f–g] The compound 10 (named NucShine) satisfies these requirements and may potentially be used as a new nucleus-targeting probe. These observations motivated us to explore how transforming one functional group to another impacts the cell organelle targeting ability of these pH-activable probes in primary mouse microglia.
We performed flow cytometry analysis to evaluate the intensity of the fluorescent signals of the probes in primary mouse microglia (Figure 3a) for future cell sorting applications. The cells treated with the fluorescent probes at 10 μM for 2 hours showed increased green fluorescence compared to the cells treated with the vehicle only (unstained control) thereby clearly discriminating between the probe-treated and untreated cells (Figure 3b–d). LysoShine 1 showed higher fluorescent intensity than LysoShine 2 within the cells (Figure 3). Furthermore, we were able to identify over 95% of the live cells that are LysoShine+LysoTracker+ and around 87% of live cell subset that was MitoShine+MitoLite+ (Figure S7). The ability to identify the probe-specific individual cells also demonstrates the possibility of sorting the cell subsets for downstream analysis.
Figure 3.
(a) Schematic for flow cytometry analysis in live cells. (b-d) Fluorescence of LysoShine 1, LysoShine 2, and MitoShine upon uptake by primary mouse microglia (live cells). Modal on y-axis corresponds to a percentage of the maximum count. (e) Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values for each probe. US Ctrl is unstained control. Gating strategy and flow plots with commercial dyes are in the supporting information.
Next, to confirm the localization of the fluorescent probes within the lysosomal organelles, we performed confocal imaging of the probes with primary microglia (Figure 4a). The green fluorescent signal of LysoShine 1 and LysoShine 2 appeared as several bright puncta around the nuclei as well as in the cytosolic regions of the cells. The localization of the probes into the intracellular acidic organelles was confirmed by co-staining with the commercially available LysoTracker Red DND-99 dye (Figure 4b–c). We obtained similar fluorescence in BV2 microglia (Figure S9). The LysoShine probes clearly localized with the LysoTracker dye within the acidic lysosomes and not with DAPI-labeled nuclei.
Figure 4.
(a) Experimental design for fluorescence imaging of primary mouse microglial cells with (b) LysoShine 1 and (c) LysoShine 2 (green). The localization of the compounds in the lysosomal acidic compartments is shown with the LysoTracker dye (red). Nuclear DNA is stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars represent 200 μm.
The localization of the mitochondrial probe, MitoShine, was similarly evaluated in primary microglia with confocal imaging. The cells showed a bright green fluorescent signal and the green puncta with MitoShine within the cells clearly localized with MitoLite, a commercial mitochondrial dye (Figure S10a). However, we observed several other regions (green puncta) labeled with MitoShine that did not overlap with MitoLite (Figure S10b) suggesting that the MitoShine probe may also be localized in other organelles in addition to mitochondria. Interestingly, in a separate experiment, we observed an overlap of the MitoShine probe with LysoTracker, an acidic lysosomal dye (Figure S10c).
We asked if MitoShine could be used to label mitochondria for future studies involving mitochondrial transport and recycling as a means to dynamically monitor organelle quality[4d] or identify mitophagic elimination through lysosomal fusion.[2e] We therefore treated the primary microglia with MitoShine for 2 hours and later with both LysoTracker and MitoLite at the same time. Confocal imaging demonstrated the localization of MitoShine in both mitochondrial as well as in lysosomal organelles (Figure 5). In addition, overlapping both channels of LysoTracker and MitoLite dyes indicates the merging of mitochondria and lysosomes in these cells (Figure S11) suggesting the possible use of MitoShine for mitochondrial-lysosomal fusion processes for future biological applications.
Figure 5.
Fluorescence imaging of primary mouse microglial cells with MitoShine. Localization of the compound was observed in mitochondria (magenta, MitoLite dye) as well as in the acidic lysosomal organelles (red, LysoTracker dye). (a) Magnified image with nuclear DNA stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar 50 μm.
In summary, we developed a modular synthetic strategy for pH-activable fluorescent BODIPY probes to achieve divergent targeting of cellular organelles and tested them in primary cells. The probes are available for future in vivo biological use. Specifically, we show SOR of a synthetic intermediate with bromomethyl functional group targeting nucleus and its transformation into lysosomal and mitochondrial probes. The synthesized fluorescent probes have high fluorescence at acidic lysosomal pH compared to cytosolic neutral pH. The pH-activable property of fluorescent probes was utilized for targeting lysosomes and mitochondria in primary mouse microglial cells. Furthermore, the synthetic intermediate and the probes with the free amine group can also be used for several bioconjugation reactions, including to target a protein of interest such as the Aβ(1–42) peptide[3c,8c] in order to investigate the target-specific microglial uptake towards specific cellular organelles. Further derivatization of pH-activable probes and biological applications will be explored in the future.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by Purdue Research Foundation award, Purdue Integrative Data Science Institute award, NIH NCATS ASPIRE Design Challenge awards and the United States Department of Defense USAMRAA award # W81XWH2010665 to Gaurav Chopra. Additional support, in part by, the Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Eli Lilly and Company, the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute grant # UL1TR002529 from NCATS, and the Purdue University Center for Cancer Research funded by NIH grant # P30 CA023168 are also acknowledged. Schematic diagrams were created with BioRender.com
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
References
- [1].(a) Zhang J, Campbell RE, Ting AY and Tsien RY, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2002, 3, 906–918; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kowada T, Maeda H. and Kikuchi K, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2015, 44, 4953–4972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].(a) Han J. and Burgess K, Chem. Rev, 2010, 110, 2709–2728; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hou JT, Ren WX, Li K, Seo J, Sharma A, Yu XQ, Kim JS, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2017, 46, 2076–90; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sarkar AR, Heo CH, Xu L, Lee HW, Si HY, Byun JW, Kim HM, Chem. Sci, 2016, 7, 766–73; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (2d) Fan L, Wang X, Ge J, Li F, Zhang C, Lin B, Shuang S. and Dong C, Chem. Commun, 2019, 55, 6685–88; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (2e) Gao P, Pan W, Li N. and Tang B. Chem. Sci, 2019, 10, 6035–6071; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (2f) Deus CM, Yambire KF, Oliveira PJ, Raimundo N, Trends Mol. Med, 2020, 26, 71–88; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (2g) Bucevičius J, Lukinavičius G. and Gerasimaitė R, Chemosensors 2018, 6, 18. [Google Scholar]
- [3].(a) Gordon S, Immunity, 2016, 44, 463–475; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (3b) Xu H. and Ren D, Annu. Rev. Physiol, 2015, 77, 57–80; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (3c) Prakash P, Jethava KP, Korte N, Izquierdo P, Favuzzi E, Rose IVL, Guttenplan KA, Manchanda P, Dutta S, Rochet C, Fishell G, Liddelow S, Attwell D. and Chopra G, Chem Sci., 2021, 12(32):10901–10918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (3d) Paresce DM, Chung H. and Maxfield FR, J. Biol. Chem, 1997, 272, 29390–7; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (3e) Joshi AU, Minhas PS, Liddelow SA, Haileselassie B, Andreasson KI, Dorn GW and Mochly-Rosen D, Nat. Neurosci, 2019, 22, 1635–1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].(a) Lawrence RE and Zoncu R, Nat. Cell Biol, 2019, 21, 133–142; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu X, Wang L, Bing T, Zhang N. and Shangguan D, ACS Appl. Bio Mater, 2019, 2, 1368–1375; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lee MH, Park N, Yi C, Han JH, Hong JH, Kim KP, Kang DH, Sessler JL, Kang C. and Kim JS, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2014, 136, 14136–14142; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Sánchez MI, Vida Y, Pérez-Inestrosa E, Mascareñas JL, Vázquez ME, Sugiura A. and Martínez-Costas J, Sci. Rep, 2020, 10, 3528; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Mu H, Miki K, Harada H, Tanaka K, Nogita K, and Ohe K, ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1, 123–129; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Cooper ME, Gregory S, Adie E, and Kalinka S, J. Fluoresc, 2002, 12, 425–429. [Google Scholar]
- [5].(a) Zhang Y, Xia S, Fang M, Mazi W, Zeng Y, Johnston T, Pap A, Luck RL and Liu H, Chem. Commun, 2018, 54, 7625–7628; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cao D, Liu Z, Verwilst P, Koo S, Jangjili P, Kim JS and Lin W, Chem. Rev, 2019, 119, 10403–10519; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhu JL, Xu Z, Yang Y. and Xu L, Chem. Commun, 2019, 6629–6671; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lu H, MacK J, Yang Y. and Shen Z, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2014, 43, 4778–4823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].(a) Boens N, Leen V. and Dehaen W, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2012, 41, 1130–1172; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Vázquez-Romero A, Kielland N, Arévalo MJ, Preciado S, Mellanby RJ, Feng Y, Lavilla R. and Vendrell M, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2013, 135, 16018–16021; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Didukh NO, Yakubovskyi VP, Zatsikha YV, Rohde GT, Nemykin VN and Kovtun YP, J. Org. Chem, 2019, 84, 2133–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].(a) Urano Y, Asanuma D, Hama Y, Koyama Y, Barrett T, Kamiya M, Nagano T, Watanabe T, Hasegawa A, Choyke PL and Kobayashi H, Nat. Med, 2009, 15, 104–109; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kowada T, Kikuta J, Kubo A, Ishii M, Maeda H, Mizukami S. and Kikuchi K, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2011, 133, 17772–17776; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Xiong H, Kos P, Yan Y, Zhou K, Miller JB, Elkassih S. and Siegwart DJ, Bioconjugate Chem., 2016, 27, 1737–1744; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chua MH, Kim T, Lim ZL, Gopalakrishna TY, Ni Y, Xu J, Kim D. and Wu J, Chem. - A Eur. J, 2018, 24, 2232–2241; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Grossi M, Morgunova M, Cheung S, Scholz D, Conroy E, Terrile M, Panarella A, Simpson JC, Gallagher WM and O’Shea DF, Nat. Commun, 2016, 7, 1–13; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Leong C, Lee SC, Ock J, Li X, See P, Park SJ, Ginhoux F, Yun SW, Chang YT, Chem. Commun 2014, 50(9), 1089–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].(a) Shen SL, Chen XP, Zhang XF, Miao JY and Zhao BX, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3, 919–925; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen TH, Zhang S, Jaishi M, Adhikari R, Bi J, Fang M, Xia S, Zhang Y, Luck RL, Pati R, Lee HM, Luo FT, Tiwari A. and Liu H, ACS Appl. Bio Mater, 2018, 1, 549–560; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Prakash P, Lantz TC, Jethava KP, Chopra G, Methods Protoc. 2019, 2 (2), 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






