Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2023 Jan 9;11:e14647. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14647

Integrated omics analysis reveals the immunologic characteristics of cystic Peyer’s patches in the cecum of Bactrian camels

Xiao shan Wang 1, Pei xuan Li 1, Bao shan Wang 1, Wang dong Zhang 1, Wen hui Wang 1,
Editor: Francois van der Westhuizen
PMCID: PMC9835693  PMID: 36643630

Abstract

Bactrian camels have specific mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) throughout the large intestine, with species-unique cystic Peyer’s patches (PPS) as the main type of tissue. However, detailed information about the molecular characteristics of PPS remains unclear. This study applied a transcriptomic analysis, untargeted metabolomics, and 16S rDNA sequencing to compare the significant differences between PPS and the adjacent normal intestine tissues (NPPS) during the healthy stage of three young Bactrian camels. The results showed that samples from PPS could be easily differentiated from the NPPS samples based on gene expression profile, metabolites, and microbial composition, separately indicated using dimension reduction methods. A total of 7,568 up-regulated and 1,266 down-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected, and an enrichment analysis found 994 DEGs that participated in immune-related functions, and a co-occurance network analysis identified nine hub genes (BTK, P2RX7, Pax5, DSG1, PTPN2, DOCK11, TBX21, IL10, and HLA-DOB) during multiple immunologic processes. Further, PPS and NPPS both had a similar pattern of most compounds among all profiles of metabolites, and only 113 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) were identified, with 101 of these being down-regulated. Deoxycholic acid (DCA; VIP = 37.96, log2FC = −2.97, P = 0), cholic acid (CA; VIP = 13.10, log2FC = −2.10, P = 0.01), and lithocholic acid (LCA; VIP = 12.94, log2FC = −1.63, P = 0.01) were the highest contributors to the significant dissimilarities between groups. PPS had significantly lower species richness (Chao1), while Firmicutes (35.92% ± 19.39%), Bacteroidetes (31.73% ± 6.24%), and Proteobacteria (13.96% ± 16.21%) were the main phyla across all samples. The LEfSe analysis showed that Lysinibacillus, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Candidatus_Stoquefichus, Mailhella, Alistipes, and Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005 were biomarkers of the NPPS group, while Escherichia_Shigella, Synergistes, Pyramidobacter, Odoribacter, Methanobrevibacter, Cloacibacillus, Fusobacterium, and Parabacteroides were significantly higher in the PPS group. In the Procrustes analysis, the transcriptome changes between groups showed no significant correlations with metabolites or microbial communities, whereas the alteration of metabolites significantly correlated with the alteration of the microbial community. In the co-occurrence network, seven DEMs (M403T65-neg, M329T119-neg, M309T38-neg, M277T42-2-neg, M473T27-neg, M747T38-1-pos, and M482t187-pos) and 14 genera (e.g., Akkermansia, Candidatus-Stoquefichus, Caproiciproducens, and Erysipelatoclostridium) clustered much more tightly, suggesting dense interactions. The results of this study provide new insights into the understanding of the immune microenvironment of the cystic PPS in the cecum of Bactrian camels.

Keywords: Bactrian camels, Transcriptomic, Metabolomics, Microbial communities, Peyer’s patches

Introduction

Camels are highly adapted to the desert ecosystem of extreme temperatures, scarce vegetation, and limited food and water resources, and have a relatively high resistance to a wide range of pathogens (Hussen & Schuberth, 2021). In China, the two-humped Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus), belonging to the subfamily Camelinae, is mainly distributed in arid or semiarid areas like the Gobi desert (Khomeiri & Yam, 2015), where camel milk and meat are important to the local economy. Bactrian camels have evolved a special gastrointestinal system for resource conservation and a unique mucosal immune system formation to fight against harsh environmental conditions (ZhaXi et al., 2014). It is well known that the tight regulation of intestinal immune responses is pivotal for individual functional maintenance (Peterson & Artis, 2014). Peyer’s patches (PPS) are specialized mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), forming a central part of the inductive site of the mucosal immune system; PPS take and trap gut macromolecules and microorganisms (Jung, Hugot & Barreau, 2010). Therefore, the characterization of mucosal immune mechanisms is important to an understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of effective vaccines against gastrointestinal infections. However, a comprehensive understanding of the PPS in the two-humped camel immune system is still unexplored.

A previous study reported four distinct types of PPS in Bactrian camels: nodular, faviform, cup-shaped, and cystic, with the nodular and cystic PPS types unique to Bactrian camels (Qi et al., 2011). Previously, we reported the structure and distribution of the MALT throughout the large intestine of Bactrian camels using anatomical and histological methods and observed that the shape of PPS gradually changed from “scrotiform” to “faviform” along the large intestine with the unique scrotiform, or cystic, as the primary PPS type observed in the ileocecal orifice (ZhaXi et al., 2014). The cecum has been suggested as the leading inductive site for mucosal immune responses in the large intestine of the Bactrian camel (Wang et al., 2022). Previous studies have applied the whole transcriptome to research regional PPS heterogeneity in rats and pigs and both studies reported the distinctive gene expression patterns of PPS in different intestinal locations (Maroilley et al., 2018; Phillips et al., 2021). Using transcriptomic sequencing, researchers have also revealed the common regulatory patterns of all follicular cells isolated from PPS and immunized peripheral lymph nodes, and also found that the up-regulation or down-regulation of genes was attenuated substantially between the different groups (Georgiev et al., 2018). Nevertheless, there is still an incomplete understanding of the basic gene expression patterns of PPS in the cecum of Bactrian camels during a steady state.

Symbiotic flora densely colonizes the mammalian gastrointestinal mucosal surface, which stimulates the host’s immune responses. A large and diverse number of microorganisms, including commensal bacteria and pathogenic bacteria, have been found in the gastrointestinal tract (Lin et al., 2021), for example, Lactobacillus, a probiotic species that enhances the barrier function of the intestinal epithelium (Livingston et al., 2010), and Salmonella, a kind of pathogenic taxa that diminishes the tight junctions of the epithelium, leading to bacterial invasion (Zhang et al., 2014). Generally, gut microbiota effects host growth, infection prevention, immune regulation, metabolism, and intestinal health. Previous studies have mainly focused on evaluating the impact of bacterial flora on animal development and nutrition. For instance, He et al. (2019b) found that the diversity and stability of gut microbial communities increased with the age of Bactrian camels, and the community compositions differed by age. Recently, more research has been devoted to revealing the internal interactions between gut taxa and intestinal mucosa. By comparing commensal microbial composition differences between the aggregated lymphoid nodule area (ALNA) and the ileal PPS, we previously observed that the host’s intestinal microenvironment is selective for the symbiotic bacteria colonizing the corresponding sites, which could impact the physiological functions of the site (Zhang et al., 2020). However, it is still unknown if there are associations between colonized flora and the gut-expressed genes in PPS.

Since the symbiotic interaction between gut microbiota and the host is reflected in specific metabolic signatures, metabolomics approaches are expected to help unveil the gut microbial-host co-metabolites (Nicholson et al., 2012). A previous study found that microbial metabolism provides the nutrients needed for the everyday activities of the host, including vitamins and short-chain fatty acids (Rowland et al., 2018). A separate study found that changes to the co-metabolism of bile acids, choline, and purines has been associated with host obesity (Palau-Rodriguez et al., 2015). The intestinal microbiota can metabolize some drugs into specific metabolites and alter the systematic bioavailability of other drugs (Zhang, Zhang & Wang, 2018). The composition and variation of metabolites in PPS are not yet understood.

This study uses integrated approaches to deeply research the specific immunologic environment of PPS in the cecum of Bactrian camels. Three clinically healthy Bactrian camels were randomly selected from large camel groups; PPS and NPPS samples from the cecum were collected, separately. Transcriptomic sequencing, non-targeted metabolomics, and 16S barcoding sequencing strategies were used to analyze gene expression patterns, the composition of metabolites, and the diversity of the symbiotic microbial community. A correlation analysis of differentially expressed genes, metabolites, and bacterial taxa provides new insights into the immunologic characteristics of PPS in Bactrian camels.

Materials & Methods

Ethics approval

The Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the College of Veterinary Medicine of Gansu Agricultural University approved all experimental procedures (Approval No: GSAU-AEW-2020-0010). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

Sample collection

Three clinically healthy Bactrian camels (4–5 years old, two females and one male) were randomly selected among the camel group. All the camel specimens were brought from the slaughterhouse in Minqin County, Gansu province; the animals did not suffer starvation before being anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg) and exsanguinated. After opening the abdominal cavity, the ileocecal orifice and cecum were separated from the large intestine. The samples collected for subsequent transcriptomic sequencing were gently washed with sterilized saline to remove the residue, except for the samples collected for the detection of microbiota and metabolites. Under a sterile operation, five cystic Peyer’s patches (PPS) and five adjacent normal intestine tissues (NPPS) from the cecum of each camel were randomly selected before the capsule contents of PPS and the mucus of the NPPS were collected. The PPS contents from a single camel were mixed as a single biological sample; the mucus of NPPS was mixed and treated as a single control. Finally, three biological PPS samples (PPS-1, PPS-2, and PPS-3) and three NPPS samples (NPPS-1, NPPS-2, and NPPS-3) were collected and put into the 2.5 ml cryopreserved tubes, which were immediately sent to Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) in dry ice for all the subsequent experiments.

Transcriptomic sequencing and analyzing

Total RNA was extracted from each tissue using the Trizol reagent kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RNA quality, quantity, and integrity were determined using RNase-free agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, mRNA was enriched with synthetic oligo (dT) and fragmented using a fragmentation buffer. The cDNA was generated by reverse transcription from enriched mRNA by random primers, and DNA polymerase I, RNase H, dNTP, and buffer were used to synthesize the second-strand cDNA. The QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) was used for cDNA purification, followed by end repair, adding poly (A), and sequencing adapter ligation. The final products were size-selected by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500.

The raw data were first filtered by Fastp v0.18.0. Reads containing adapters, reads containing more than 10% of unknown nucleotides (N), and reads containing more than 50% low quality (Q-value ≤ 20) bases were all removed. Then, the remaining short, high-qualified reads were aligned to the reference genome of Bactrian camels (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/10741?genome_assembly_id=212083) using HISAT v2.2.4 with default parameters. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled using StringTie v1.3.1 in a reference-based approach and the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) for all assembled transcripts were calculated by RSEM. DESeq2 was applied to analyze the differential expressed genes (DEGs) between two groups. The gene was considered significant between groups when the false discovery rate (FDR) was lower than 0.5 and the absolute fold change (|FC|) was higher than 1. The EnrichR was used to conduct GO (http://www.geneontology.org/) and KEGG (http://www.kegg.jp) functional enrichment analyses. The correlation coefficient between samples was calculated to evaluate the repeatability among samples; the closer the correlation coefficient is to 1, the better the consistency between two parallel experiments. DEGs related to specific immune-related functions were selected with a local script by searching the annotated keyword “immune”.

The transcriptomic data are publicly available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under Bioproject accession No.: PRJNA860310.

Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry-based (LC-MS) non-targeted metabolomics detection and analysis

The Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) conducted the LC/MS-based non-targeted metabolomics experiments and data analysis according to the methods described by Du et al. (2020). A total of 100 mg of each sample was first homogenized with one mL pre-cooling methanol-acetonitrile-water (2:2:1, v/v) solution three times (6.0 M/S, 20 s) by a Geno-grinder 2000 (SPEX) and spun down for 30 min (5, 40 kHz). After resting for 60 min (−20 °C), each sample was centrifuged at 13,000 g for 15 min (4 °C), and the supernatant was concentrated using a Termovap Sample Concentrator (DC-24; Shanghai, China). Then, the dry residue was redissolved by adding 100 µL acetonitrile-water (1:1, v/v), homogenized three times (6.0 M/S, 20 s), and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 15 min (4 °C) to obtain the final supernatant. The chromatographic separation of metabolites was performed using a UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), comprising an Agilent 1290 Infinity HILIC and an accurate-mass 6600 TOF-LC–MS (AB SCIEX Foster City, CA, USA) with a dual electrospray ionization (ESI) source in both positive (POS) and negative (NEG) ion mode. Baseline filtering, peak recognition, integration, retention time correction, and peak alignment were conducted for data preprocessing. After detecting the characteristic peak by mapping the MS and MS/MS mass spectrometry with the metabolic-specific database, the metabolites were identified, further normalized with Pareto scaling, and log-transformed.

Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis

Total genomic DNA from each biological sample was extracted using a Magen Hipure Stool DNA kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The bacterial V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA genes was amplified using the 341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAAT) universal prokaryotic primers (He et al., 2019a) with the addition of an 8bp unique barcode and the required Illumina adapters. Samples were amplified in triplicate and replicate PCR reactions for each piece were pooled and purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea CA, USA). A single composite sample for sequencing was prepared by combining approximately equal amounts of PCR products from each sample. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (in PE250 mode) at the Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

FASTP was applied for raw data filtration. The paired-end clean data were then merged by FLASH v1.2.11 and analyzed according to the QIIME v1.9.1 pipeline. FASTP was also used for data quality control, and UCHIME was used for chimeric removal. The qualified sequences were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of ≥97% similarity by UPARSE v9.2.64. The sequence with the highest abundance was selected as a representative sequence within each OTU cluster. Five microbial diversity indices were calculated: Goods_coverage, Chao1, phylogenetic distance (PD), Shannon, and Simpson indices. Four distance matrices were used to describe the dissimilarities among samples: Bray-Curtis, Jaccard, Weighted Unifrac, and Unweighted Unifrac distances based PCoA.

The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing data are publicly available under Bioproject accession No.: PRJNA860311.

Statistical analyses

The Wilcoxon test determined significant differences in the alpha indices of the groups. Significant differences in the microbial communities of the groups were determined using the Anosim and Adnois non-parametric multivariate statistical tests with a P < 0.05 significance threshold. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was conducted to identify significant differences in the abundant taxa between the groups based on the Wilcoxon tests, with an LDA score of 4.0 and a P-value of 0.05. The Procrustes analysis was conducted using the Vegan R package to compare the congruence between: the transcriptomic profile and the microbiome, the transcriptomic profile and metabolism, and the microbiome and metabolism based on the goodness of fit (m2) P-value calculated by the Procrustes test and further verified by the Mantel test. The co-occurrence network was constructed using Cytoscape v3.9.0 and visualized using Gephi (https://github.com/gephi/gephi). Within the network, each connected edge represents a strong (|r| > 0.8) and significant (P < 0.01) Spearman’s correlation (Li et al., 2015).

Results

Expression pattern between cystic Peyer’s patches (PPS) and the adjacent normal intestine tissues (NPPS)

To reveal the expression characteristics of the specific PPS of Bactrian camels, a high-throughput transcriptomic analysis of six samples from the cystic PPS and the adjacent NPPS of the cecum was performed. After data preprocessing and qualification, including data trimming, error removal, and quality control, 369,086,900 high-quality reads were obtained for reference genome alignment, and 330,364,407 were successfully mapped (average overall alignment rate ≈ 89.94%) and used for gene assembly. The correlation analysis among samples was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient, suggesting that representatives from the same group showed consistency and biological repeatability (Fig. S1). The PCA plot showed that samples from PPS were separated from the NPPS group, while the PPS group was clustered more tightly (Fig. 1A). A Venn diagram was drawn to show the unique and overlapping genes between the two groups (Fig. 1B). A total of 9,257 genes were shared between PPS and NPPS, while 3,910 and 174 genes were specific to PPS and NPPS, respectively. Each 20 most highly-expressed genes in both PPS and NPPS genes are listed in Table 1, with five of these overlapping in the PPS and NPPS groups. Three housekeeping genes (RPL0, RRPL10, and RPS2), eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1), and the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR), which transports IgA into mucosal secretions, all performed their regular functions in intestinal immune responses in the cecum of Bactrian camels. PPS had a higher expression of genes related to cellular immune functions like JCHAIN, immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 5 (IGLL5), IgG1 heavy chain (IGHG1), Immunoglobulin heavy G2 chain (IGHG2), T cell lineage-specific genes related to the cluster of differentiation (CD74), and Beta2-microglobulin (B2M).

Figure 1. Comparison of gene expression profiles between the PPS and NPPS groups.

Figure 1

(A) The PCA shows the global gene expression level distinctions between the PPS and NPPS groups. The red circle represents samples from the PPS group, and the blue triangle represents samples from the NPPS group. (B) Venn diagram shows that 9,257 genes are overlapped by two groups, while 3,910 genes are unique to the PPS group and 174 genes are unique to the NPPS group. (C) The volcano plot shows the distribution of differentially expressed genes. The red dots represent the genes significantly up-regulated, while the blue dots represent the genes significantly down-regulated. The gray dots represent the genes with no significant differences between groups. (D) Heat map analysis shows the upregulated or down-regulated gene clusters originated from different samples.

Table 1. Highly expressed genes in the NPPS and PPS groups.

Gene id Symbol Description FPKM (mean ± sd, n = 3)
a. Highly expressed genes in NPPS
ncbi_105064770 EEF1A1 Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 6883.46 ± 1117.13
ncbi_105066579 CA2 Carbonic anhydrase 2 5074.88 ± 299.37
ncbi_105076271 KRT8 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 8 4357.19 ± 453.29
ncbi_105075644 IFITM1 Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1-like 3692.05 ± 438.86
ncbi_5309936 MT-ND4L NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L 2920.09 ± 1018.35
ncbi_105065567 ACTG1 Hypothetical protein Y1Q_0007443 2518.12 ± 322.97
ncbi_105080560 RPLP0 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 2461.30 ± 430.10
ncbi_105074600 LGALS3 Galectin-3 2343.55 ± 113.83
ncbi_105065683 TSPAN1 Tetraspanin-1 isoform X1 2315.68 ± 109.17
ncbi_105076062 RPL10 60S ribosomal protein L10 2312.69 ± 406.26
ncbi_105075423 PIGR Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor 2271.58 ± 221.32
ncbi_105069768 RPLP2 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2 isoform X1 2121.37 ± 206.99
ncbi_105079514 SLC25A6 ADP/ATP translocase 3, partial 2071.78 ± 366.85
ncbi_105064863 RPS2 rCG34378, isoform CRA_i 2055.23 ± 312.69
ncbi_105084062 UBB Polyubiquitin-B isoform X3 2019.68 ± 276.77
ncbi_105062636 RPS11 40S ribosomal protein S11 1970.82 ± 185.05
ncbi_105074446 RPS5 40S ribosomal protein S5 isoform X1 1923.70 ± 333.84
ncbi_105079327 KRT19 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19-like 1860.59 ± 247.02
ncbi_105065829 CA4 Carbonic anhydrase 4 1686.31 ± 63.05
ncbi_105067478 RPL32 60S ribosomal protein L32 1655.82 ± 279.68
b. Highly expressed genes in PPS
ncbi_105064770 EEF1A1 Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 12228.77 ± 263.54
ncbi_105080402 JCHAIN Immunoglobulin J chain 5640.98 ± 673.26
ncbi_105077755 TMSB4 AAH16732.2 TMSB4X protein, partial 3544.59 ± 22.53
ncbi_105061888 RPS6 40S ribosomal protein S6 3519.17 ± 114.93
MSTRG.7185 IGLL5 Immunoglobulin lambda light chain precursor, partial 3501.49 ± 334.60
ncbi_105076977 B2M beta-2-microglobulin 3299.10 ± 101.06
ncbi_105066126 TPT1 Hypothetical protein FD755_015622 3161.59 ± 187.74
MSTRG.14532 IGHG1 Ig gamma-3 chain C region 3142.37 ± 791.50
ncbi_105074299 CD74 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen gamma chain isoform X1 2867.34 ± 214.82
ncbi_105079710 RPS3A 40S ribosomal protein S3a 2676.10 ± 54.07
ncbi_105066093 RPL7 60S ribosomal protein L7 2650.52 ± 41.00
ncbi_105073278 RPL23 60S ribosomal protein L23 2619.79 ± 182.23
ncbi_105064200 RPS10 40S ribosomal protein S10 2429.74 ± 79.79
ncbi_105075339 RPS24 40S ribosomal protein S24 isoform e 2401.06 ± 70.66
ncbi_105064250 HLA-DRA Mamu class II histocompatibility antigen, DR alpha chain 2387.51 ± 202.75
ncbi_105076062 RPL10 60S ribosomal protein L10 2317.63 ± 131.41
MSTRG.14534 IGHG2 Ig gamma-3 chain C region, partial 2316.47 ± 594.10
ncbi_105080560 RPLP0 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 2274.07 ± 150.11
ncbi_105075423 PIGR Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor 2262.23 ± 672.86
ncbi_105064863 RPS2 rCG34378, isoform CRA_i 2228.79 ± 88.34

Notes.

FPKM stands for Fragments Per Kilobase Million.

A total of 13,341 genes were selected for the analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on a stringent FDR cutoff < 0.05 and log2 (FC) > 1. A total of 7,568 up-regulated DEGs and 1,266 down-regulated DEGs were obtained by comparing PPS to the NPPS group (Fig. 1C). A hierarchical clustering heatmap of all DEGs showed the strength of different clustering patterns between groups (Fig. 1D). Of the selected 8,834 DEGs, 8,081 DEGs had annotations. The up-regulation of genes with a high fold-change was primarily related to immunomodulation, inflammation, and lipid homeostasis. For example, the CD5 antigen-like precursor (CD5L), V-set pre-B cell surrogate light chains (VPREB1, VPREB3), Fc receptor-like 1 (FCRL1), chemokine CXC ligand 13 protein (CXCL13), zymogen granule protein 16 homolog B (ZG16B), and probable G-protein coupled receptor 174 (GPR174) were all highly up-regulated in PPS. Conversely, the down-regulation of DEGs with a high fold-change was related to multiple functions, including transmembrane protein or aquaporin (e.g., growth/differentiation factor 1 (GDF1), fatty acid-binding protein 6 gene (Fabp6), Aquaporin 8 (AQP8), transmembrane protein domain-containing 1 (DCST1), and transmembrane protein 182 (TMEM182); Table 2).

Table 2. Top 20 differentially expressed genes in the NPPS and PPS groups.

Gene id NPPS (mean, n = 3) PPS (mean, n = 3) log2 (FC) FDR Symbol Description
a. Top 20 significantly up-regulated genes
ncbi_105069346 0.00 65.33 16.00 0.00 VPREB3 Pre-B lymphocyte protein 3
ncbi_105067880 0.00 23.88 14.54 0.00 HPGDS Hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase
ncbi_105077409 0.00 21.95 14.42 0.00 FAM162B Protein FAM162B, partial
ncbi_105065046 0.00 20.76 14.34 0.00 UPK1A Uroplakin-1a
ncbi_105064835 0.00 20.31 14.31 0.00 ZG16B Zymogen granule protein 16 homolog B
ncbi_105070503 0.00 18.89 14.21 0.00 FCRL1 Fc receptor-like protein 1
MSTRG.7218 0.00 18.42 14.17 0.00 VPREB1 Immunoglobulin omega chain-like protein
ncbi_105062175 0.00 16.36 14.00 0.00 AICDA Single-stranded DNA cytosine deaminase
ncbi_105064162 0.00 16.34 14.00 0.00 PI16 Peptidase inhibitor 16 isoform X1
ncbi_105082488 0.00 16.07 13.97 0.00 CD5L CD5 antigen-like
ncbi_105080423 0.00 12.41 13.60 0.00 CXCL13 C-X-C motif chemokine 13
ncbi_105065182 0.00 11.08 13.44 0.00 P2RX5 Purinergic receptor P2X5 isoform A-like protein
ncbi_105074929 0.00 10.90 13.41 0.00 SHISA3 Protein shisa-3 homolog
ncbi_105075614 0.00 9.66 13.24 0.00 TMEM273 Putative uncharacterized protein C10orf128 homolog isoform X1
ncbi_105065499 0.00 9.08 13.15 0.00 GPR174 Probable G-protein coupled receptor 174
ncbi_105065255 0.00 8.98 13.13 0.00 EBF1 Transcription factor COE1 isoform X2
ncbi_105062978 0.00 8.30 13.02 0.00 ZCCHC12 Zinc finger CCHC domain-containing protein 12
ncbi_105082277 0.00 8.16 12.99 0.00 ICOS Inducible T-cell costimulator
ncbi_105075434 0.00 7.58 12.89 0.00 FAM72A Protein FAM72A isoform X1
ncbi_105070211 0.00 7.45 12.86 0.00 Clic6 Chloride intracellular channel protein 6, partial
b. Top 20 significantly down-regulated genes
ncbi_105065706 0.80 0.00 −9.65 0.00 Gng13 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-13 isoform X1
ncbi_105082589 0.71 0.00 −9.48 0.00 GDF1 Embryonic growth/differentiation factor 1
ncbi_105065237 0.40 0.00 −8.63 0.00 FABP6 Gastrotropin
ncbi_105075917 0.28 0.00 −8.11 0.00 C10orf120 Uncharacterized protein C10orf120 homolog isoform X1
ncbi_105075380 3.31 0.01 −7.96 0.00 PLA2G12B Group XIIB secretory phospholipase A2-like protein isoform X1
ncbi_105062243 0.20 0.00 −7.62 0.00 GSG1 Germ cell-specific gene 1 protein isoform X1
ncbi_105074886 0.19 0.00 −7.54 0.00 CA7 Carbonic anhydrase 7
ncbi_105073757 483.70 2.63 −7.52 0.00 AQP8 Aquaporin-8
ncbi_105063539 0.15 0.00 −7.20 0.04 OTOS Otospiralin
ncbi_105066926 0.13 0.00 −7.02 0.00 Olfr1020 Olfactory receptor 1020-like
ncbi_105072225 0.12 0.00 −6.91 0.00 TMEM182 Transmembrane protein 182
ncbi_105068165 0.10 0.00 −6.59 0.00 DCST1 DC-STAMP domain-containing protein 1
ncbi_105070817 0.09 0.00 −6.54 0.00 KLHDC7B Kelch domain-containing protein 7B
ncbi_105072747 1437.36 15.84 −6.50 0.00 GUCA2B Guanylate cyclase activator 2B
ncbi_105073399 74.80 0.91 −6.36 0.00 Cysrt1 Cysteine-rich tail protein 1
ncbi_105073400 0.08 0.00 −6.32 0.03 Fam166a Protein FAM166A
ncbi_105070897 2.24 0.03 −6.07 0.00 Pla2g2c Putative inactive group IIC secretory phospholipase A2
ncbi_105064944 0.43 0.01 −6.00 0.00 ZXDB Zinc finger X-linked protein ZXDB-like
ncbi_105072270 0.38 0.01 −5.82 0.00 NT5DC4 5′-nucleotidase domain-containing protein 4-like
ncbi_105082294 0.05 0.00 −5.64 0.01 MPP4 MAGUK p55 subfamily member 4

The enrichment analysis for gene ontology was performed to identify over-represented biological functions and classes from statistically significant DEGs. A GO functional enrichment analysis was categorized in terms of biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). A total of 1,861 secondary classifications of BP, 192 secondary categories of CC, and 163 secondary types of MF (FDR < 0.05) were significantly enriched. Most DEGs were significantly enriched in the metabolic process (GO: 0008152, RF = 0.486), the nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO: 0006807, RF = 0.493), and the cellular metabolic process (GO: 0044237, RF = 0.489; Fig. 2A). Notably, positive regulation of the immune system process (GO: 0002684, RF = 0.648) and regulation of the immune system process (GO: 0002682, RF = 0.628) seemed to be most affected by group formation, indicated by a high RF value. A KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted to visualize specific functions, with 85 KO items significantly enriched (FDR < 0.05). According to the enrichment degree indicated by the rich factor, the enriched pathways mainly included mismatch repair, DNA replication, nucleotide excision repair, and intestinal immune network for IgA production (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the specific immune system-related pathways, including the detected intestinal immune network for IgA production (containing 66 up-regulated DEGs and three down-regulated DEGs), Th1/Th2/Th17 cell differentiation (containing 178 up-regulated DEGs and 12 down-regulated DEGs), the T cell receptor signaling pathway (containing 85 up-regulated DEGs and six down-regulated DEGs), and antigen processing and presentation (containing 70 up-regulated DEGs) were significantly enriched (Table S1).

Figure 2. Bubble diagram of the Top 30 GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched by differentially expressed genes.

Figure 2

Bubble diagram of the Top30 ranked GO terms (A) or Top30 ranked KEGG pathways (B) of the DEGs. The vertical axis indicates the specific terms, and the horizontal axis indicates the enrichment factor. The size of each dot indicates the number of genes in the GO term or KEGG pathway.

The GO functional annotation identified 994 DEGs, including 890 up-regulated DEGs and 104 down-regulated DEGs, which participated in multiple immune-related functions (Table S2). A co-occurrence network analysis was performed to find the hub genes (most connected nodes within a network) in regulating the immunologic process (Table S3). The results showed that the differentially expressed genes, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), P2X purinoceptor 7 (P2X7R), paired box protein (Pax-5), desmoglein-1 (DSG1), Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 12 (PTPN12), dedicator of cytokinesis protein 11 (DOCK11), T-box transcription factor protein 21 (TBX21), interleukin-10 (IL10), and HLA class II histocompatibility antigen DO beta chain (HLA-DOB), were hubs owning the biggest nodes’ degrees (226) within the network.

The composition of specific metabolites

To better understand the intestinal immunity of Bactrian camels, LC/MS-based non-targeted metabolomics were applied to assess the composition of the differential metabolites in the gut between Peyer’s patches (PPS) and the adjacent normal intestine tissues (NPPS). A total of 18,514 metabolites were detected, including 11,394 positive ions and 7,120 negative ions, with 1,280 positive and 698 negative named ions identified. The partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used for visualizing the global metabolic profiles of the groups. The PLS-DA found significant differences between the NPPS and PPS samples with 44.1% variation in PLS1 and 36.3% variation in PLS2 (Fig. 3); large variation was also observed within the PPS group. These results indicated that NPPS samples had similar metabolite compositions, but samples from the PPS group showed more individual differences.

Figure 3. Partial lease square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) analysis for visualization of groups’ global metabolic profiles among NPPS and PPS samples.

Figure 3

To compare the significant differences in the composition of metabolites between PPS and NPPS samples, differentially expressed metabolites (DEM) were screened out in both ion-positive and ion-negative modes based on a VIP (variable important in the projection) ≥1 in PLS-DA and a P < 0.05 in the t-test. Among the 1,978 total compounds, 113 DEMs were identified—12 up-regulated (∼10.62%) and 101 down-regulated DEMs (∼89.38%; Table S4). Compared with the results of the transcriptome, the DEMs were mostly down-regulated. The hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) showed that the PPS group had a large number of compounds like Telmisartan, 2-piperidone, 1-Stearoyl-sn-glycerol 3-phosphocholine, and Deoxycarnitine, while the NPPS group accumulated significant-high 5-GLC tricin, Iselin, Agnuside, and Phenylbenzimidazolesulfonic acid. Deoxycholic acid (DCA; VIP = 37.96, log2FC = −2.97, P = 0.00), cholic acid (CA; VIP = 13.10, log2FC = −2.10, P = 0.01), and lithocholic acid (LCA; VIP = 12.94, log2FC = −1.63, P = 0.01) were the top contributors to the significant dissimilarities between the PPS and NPPS groups. These results indicated that the PPS and NPPS had similar overall metabolic profiles, but DEMs were mostly lower in PPS.

Microbial communities varied among samples

A total of 592,024 qualified tags of six samples were obtained (98,671 per sample), and each sample was rarified to 93,469 tags for sample pre-normalization, followed by OTU clustering and community diversity analysis. The rarefaction curve of goods coverage, Chao1, and Shannon all reached saturation, indicating that the number of tags fit the microbial community complexity, which was enough for the subsequent analysis (Fig. S2). The Wilcoxon test found no significant difference in species diversity (Shannon and Simpson, all P > 0.05) between groups, while species richness (Chao1) was significantly lower (P = 0.049) in PPS (923.30 ± 47.56) than in NPPS (1104.11 ± 70.74; Table 3). A PCoA analysis based on four metrics (Bray-Curtis, Jaccard, weighted UniFrac, and unweighted UniFrac distances) revealed that samples from the different groups showed distinct patterns (Fig. S3). NPPS tended to cluster more tightly within the group, but samples from PPS were more dispersed, resulting in no significant differences between groups in anosim and adnois tests (all P > 0.05; Table S5).

Table 3. Differences in the four alpha diversity indexes between PPS and NPPS were examined by Kruskal-Wallis.

Alpha indices PPS NPPS Kruskal-Wallis
Shannon 5.13 ± 0.51 6.36 ± 0.85 P = 0.275
Simpson 0.89 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.06 P = 0.375
Chao1 923.3 ± 47.56 1104.11 ± 70.74 P = 0.049
PD 104.64 ± 14.07 105.9 ± 6.69 P = 0.827

Notes.

Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). P < 0.05 represented significant difference.

Firmicutes (35.92% ± 19.39%), Bacteroidetes (31.73% ± 6.24%), and Proteobacteria (13.96% ± 16.21%) were the three main phyla across all samples, but the relative abundance varied (Fig. S4A). At the genus level, Lysinibacillus (11.19% ± 14.81%), Escherichia/Shigella (8.48% ± 16.49%), Bacteroides (7.22% ± 3.10%), Synergistes (4.18% ± 5.15%), and Rikenellaceae_RC9 (3.53% ± 2.78%) had high abundance levels in the samples; samples from the same group showed similar compositions (Fig. S4B). The Venn diagram revealed that PPS and NPPS shared 19 phyla, while PPS had two unique phyla, Crenarchaeota and Chloroflexi (Fig. S5A). PPS and NPPS shared 75 families and 123 genera, while eight families and 23 genera were PPS group-specific, and nine families and 28 genera were NPPS group-specific (Figs. S5B and S5C); the unshared taxa all had low abundance levels in the samples.

A LEfSe analysis was conducted to identify the significantly different phyla (Fig. 4A), families (Fig. 4B), and genera between the different groups (Fig. 4C), with the identified indicator groups shown in a bar chart (Figs. 4D4F). At the phylum level, the abundance levels of Synerdistetes, Lentisphaerae, and Euryarchaeota in PPS were significantly higher than in NPPS, while Firmicutes was considerably higher in the NPPS group. At the family level, Planococcaceae, Rikenellaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, Barnesiellaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae were significantly enriched in NPPS, while Synergistaceae, F082, Enterobacteriaceae, Marinifilaceae, Methanobacteriaceae, and Fusobacteriaceae were indicator features in the PPS group. At the genus level, Lysinibacillus, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Candidatus_Stoquefichus, Mailhella, Alistipes, and Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005 were biomarkers of the NPPS group, while Escherichia/Shigella, Synergistes, Pyramidobacter, Odoribacter, Methanobrevibacter, Cloacibacillus, Fusobacterium, and Parabacteroides were significantly higher in the PPS group.

Figure 4. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis of the differentially abundant taxa in PPS and NPPS groups.

Figure 4

Differentially abundant phyla (A), families (B), and genera (C) between NPPS (red) and PPS (green). The listed taxa are both statistically significant (P < 0.05) and had an LDA score ≥ 4.0. The bar chart shows the different abundance of biomarkers in each sample at the phylum level (D), at the family level (E), and at the genus level (F) corresponding to the identified taxa in (A) through (C).

Relationships among expressed genes, metabolites, and microbial taxa

A Procrustes analysis was used to find potential correlations among changes in the whole gene expression profiles, bacterial communities, and gut metabolites within all samples from different groups. The results showed that metabolic profiles were significantly correlated with bacterial communities (P < 0.05; Fig. 5A), indicating that changes in whole bacterial composition might alter the metabolic profile. However, gene expression had no significant associations with metabolites (Fig. 5B) or gut microbiota (Fig. 5C), indicating a change in gut metabolites or microbiota had no apparent effect on gene expression among samples during the steady stage. A Procrustes analysis was again used to find patterns in the changes among the profiles of DEGs, DEMs, and the differentially abundant taxa (DAT). DEGs still showed no significant correlation with DEMs (Fig. 5D) or DAT (Fig. 5E) (P > 0.05). In contrast, DEMs had significant associations with DAT using the Mantel test (P = 0.01) with the Procrustes test still showing no significance between DEMs and DAT (P = 0.262; Fig. 5F). Taken together, the transcriptome changes between groups showed no significant correlations with metabolites or microbial communities. In contrast, microbial community alterations were significantly correlated with the alteration of metabolites.

Figure 5. Relationships among the transcriptomic profiles, microbial community structure, and metabolic profiles by Procrustes analysis and Mantel test.

Figure 5

Relationship between the whole metabolic profiles and the microbial community structures (A), the relationship between the metabolic profiles and the transcriptomic profiles (B), the relationship between the transcriptomic profiles and the microbial community structures (C), the relationship between the differentially expressed gene (DEGs) and the differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) (D), the relationship between the DEGs and the differentially abundant taxa (DAT) (E), and the relationship between DAMs and the DATs (F). The correlation is considered significant when P < 0.05.

To better understand the highly-correlated associations between identified genera and DEMs, the co-occurrence network was constructed based on |r| ≥ 0.9 and P < 0.01, and only interactions between genus and DEM were shown (Fig. 6), resulting in 120 negative and 208 positive associations within 69 taxa and 90 DEMs (41 positive ions and 49 negative ions). Within the network, seven DEMs (M403T65-neg, M329T119-neg, M309T38-neg, M277T42-2-neg, M473T27-neg, M747T38-1-pos, and M482t187-pos) and 14 genera (Ruminococcaceae-UCG013, Peptococcus, Ruminococcus-1, Candidatus Stoquefichus, Prevotellaceae-UCG004, Ruminococcaceae-UCG009, dgA-11-gut-group, Sphaerochaeta, Ruminiclostridium-1, Erysipelatoclostridium, Akkermansia, Pygmaiobacter, Caproiciproducens, and Rikenellaceae-RC9-gut-group) clustered much more tightly, producing 97 total associations, suggesting dense interactions.

Figure 6. Co-occurrence network summarizing the highly correlated associations between identified genera and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs).

Figure 6

A connection indicates a strong (|r| > 0.90) and significant (P < 0.01) Spearman’s correlations and only interactions between genus and DEMs are shown. Red lines indicate negative correlations, while green lines indicate positive correlations. The size of each node is proportional to the number of connections: The thickness of each edge is proportional to the value of the Spearman correlation.

Discussion

Peyer’s patches (PPS) are secondary immune organoids in the intestinal mucosa and are mainly present along the intestine in nodular, faviform, cup-shaped, or cystic forms. Our previous study suggested that cystic PPS in the small intestine are unique to Bactrian camels (Qi et al., 2011) and further reported the distribution of cystic PPS in the cecum of Bactrian camels (ZhaXi et al., 2014). This study integrated transcriptome, untargeted metabolome, and 16S rDNA sequencing to expand the understanding of the immunological microenvironment of cystic PPS in the cecum of healthy Bactrian camels.

The mucosal immune cells (e.g., T cells or B cells) frequently located in the surface epithelium along the intestine are immune active (Brandtzaeg, 2009). The immune-related PIGR gene was found to be highly co-expressed by both the PPS and NPPS groups (Table 1); PIGR was shown to have the dual role of transporting locally-produced dimeric IgA across mucosal epithelia and serving as the precursor of secretory component a glycoprotein that enhances the immune functions of SIgA (Johansen & Kaetzel, 2011). The annotated DEGs with a high fold-change that were up-regulated in the PPS group were primarily related to immune regulation and lipid homeostasis (Table 2). For example, the CD5L gene has been reported as a key protein in regulating the immune homeostasis and inflammation (Alonso-Hearn et al., 2019). The VPREB1 and VPREB3 genes correlate with expressing B-cell progenitor populations (Giladi et al., 2018). The FCRL1 gene has been shown to promote activation and function of B cell (Zhao et al., 2019). The GPR174 gene participates in the calcium signaling of T cells (Trebak & Kinet, 2019), and the ZG16B gene regulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and enhances immunosuppressive activity (Escudero-Paniagua et al., 2020). The NPPS group had significantly higher expressions of genes related to multiple functions, including aquaporin (e.g., AQP8 (Lv et al., 2022)) or regulating cell growth and differentiation (e.g., GDF1 Rankin et al., 2000).

The systematic functional analysis of DEGs reflected the functional specialization of the cystic PPS, and a GO enrichment analysis detected their potential functions. Nine hub DEGs (BTK, P2RX7, Pax5, DSG1, PTPN2, DOCK11, TBX21, IL10, and HLA-DOB) were all up-regulated and showed significant interactions between 994 immune-related DEGs (Table S3). Recent research suggested that BTK could support normal intestinal IgA development to maintain gut mucosal immunity in response to commensals (Bonami et al., 2022). Pax5 encodes the B-cell lineage-specific activator protein, which affects B-cell differentiation at the early stages (Arseneau et al., 2009). DOCK11 regulates B-cell activation during immunization (Sakamoto & Maruyama, 2020). TBX21 is known as a regulator of immune cell development and function (Stolarczyk, Lord & Howard, 2014), while IL-10 has been shown to modulate inflammatory responses and is particularly important in maintaining intestinal microbe-immune homeostasis (Neumann, Scheffold & Rutz, 2019). Therefore, the nine hubs identified in this study, including the genes (e.g., P2RX7, DSG1, and PTPN2) with uncertain roles, might be essential in regulating the PPS immune microenvironment in the cecum of Bactrian camels. A KEGG enrichment analysis further found that the immune system-related pathways were enriched mainly by the significant up-regulated DEGs, suggesting the immunological pathways actively take place in PPS.

The intestine is the main locus of direct interaction between the immune system and the vast number of microorganisms that play a pivotal role in guiding the maturation of the mucosal immune system and shaping systemic immunity. The gut contains metabolites produced and synthesized by the gut microbiota and host cells, which affect the stability of the intestinal microenvironment (Rooks & Garrett, 2016). The current omics revolution offers an unprecedented opportunity to explore the detailed composition and variations between different tissues. As expected, there were significant differences between the PPS and NPPS groups in this study, though higher heterogeneity was found in the PPS group (Fig. 3). Approximately 88% of DEMs were downregulated in PPS, with DCA, CA, and LCA identified as the three top contributors to group differentiation (Table S4). Previous studies suggest that only 1–2% of bile acids can be delivered from the liver to the intestine and further transformed for host utilization (Sagar et al., 2015). CA is a primary bile acid, while DCA and LCA are microbial-modified secondary bile acids that are involved in lipid absorption in the host intestine (Gérard, 2013). PA was significantly higher in PPS; a previous study confirmed that a high concentration of PA could stimulate intestinal IgA antibody production through direct or indirect pathways (Kunisawa et al., 2014).

The microbial communities of all samples were examined using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. PPS samples could be differentiated from NPPS samples, but PPS samples showed a higher dispersion within the group (Fig. S3). These results were the same as the results from the untargeted metabolism analysis. The intestinal immune system often nourishes prosperous bacterial communities and establishes advanced symbiotic relationships (Sutherland & Fagarasan, 2012). Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the three main phyla across all the samples in this study, which is consistent with our previous study that found that these phyla dominantly colonized on the surface of the different mucosal immune inductive sites of the gastrointestinal tract in Bactrian camels (Zhang et al., 2020). Proteobacteria is conducive to the homeostasis of the anaerobic environment of the GI tract gut (Moon et al., 2018), while the ratio of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes impacts gut dysbiosis (Grigor’eva, 2020). In this study, the PPS group had a higher abundance of Escherichia_Shigella, Synergistes, Pyramidobacter, Odoribacter, Methanobrevibacter, Cloacibacillus, Fusobacterium, and Parabacteroides compared with the NPPS group. Previous studies have found that Escherichia_Shigella and Fusobacterium have virulence factors and might trigger pro-inflammatory activities to promote intestinal inflammation (Dai et al., 2021; Kostic et al., 2013). Synergistes and Pyramidobacter belong to the Synergistetes phylum and have been reported to degrade toxic matter such as pyridinediols or fluoroacetate (Allison et al., 1992; Davis et al., 2012). A high abundance of the butyrate-producing genus Odoribacter has been suggested to be health-promoting (Fei & Zhao, 2013), but no significant difference in butyrate-related metabolites was found between groups in this study, which might due to the relatively low abundance of the biomarkers. The methanogenic Euryarchaeote, Methanobrevibacter, a group of acetogenesis and sulfate-reducing anaerobes, is pro-inflammatory (Bang et al., 2014) and has been shown to regulate the expression of adhesion-like proteins in proximity to the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (Samuel et al., 2007). The mucin-degrading genus Cloacibacillus might be important in regulating the gut environment (Mu et al., 2019), and the genus Parabacteroides can produce antagonistic substances to defend against the invasion of exogenous microorganisms (Nakano et al., 2006). The results of this study indicated that the microbiota in PPS were not all beneficial to the immune response of the gut, but the synergistic effects of these biomarkers might form a stable microenvironment in PPS. Host gut immunity helps maintain gut-microbe symbiosis and suppresses gut dysbiosis. In this study, PPS exhibited a significantly lower species richness, reflected by Chao1, compared with NPPS (Table 3), indicating that the immune microenvironment in PPS might have a stricter selective pressure on symbiotic flora than the normal fragments of the intestine.

A correlation analysis among all samples was conducted to identify the interactions among the expressed genes, gut metabolites, and gut microbiota. The results showed that the alteration of gene expression profiles had no significant correlation with gut metabolites or symbiotic taxa composition, while gut microbiota had significant correlations with gut metabolites (Fig. 5), indicating that the metabolites of intestinal tissues in the present study might mainly derive from the gut taxa. The different gene profiles had no apparent correlations with varying profiles of gut metabolites or gut taxa among PPS samples or the adjacent intestinal tissues. A co-occurrence network analysis found a small group of dense connections containing seven gut metabolites and 14 gut genera, which produced significant correlations among all of the samples in healthy Bactrian camels (Fig. 6). Among the 14 gut genera identified, most were reported to be host friendly. For instance, Akkermansia was an important genus in this study; Akkermansia can conduct mucin degradation in the intestine and has been suggested as a biomarker for a healthy intestine (Derrien, Belzer & Vos, 2017). Yang et al. (2021) found that the up-regulation of Candidatus Stoquefichus and Akkermansia might inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines. Caproiciproducens is an acid-producing bacterium, which could improve host immunity by producing more caproic acid (Zhang et al., 2019). Whereas, the genera Peptococcus and Erysipelatoclostridium were reported as pathogens (Cai et al., 2019; Cai et al., 2022). In the study network, the genus Erysipelatoclostridium mainly showed negative correlations with the metabolites within the module. This study found that in healthy Bactrian camels, probiotics and pathogens co-exist and have positive or negative effects on gut metabolites.

Conclusions

This study used multiple omics strategies to identify the immunological characteristics of species-unique Peyer’s patches (PPS) in the cecum of healthy Bactrian camels. Samples from PPS were distinguishable from the NPPS group based on gene expression data, untargeted metabolomics data, and microbial community compositions. Changes in expressed genes had no significant associations with gut metabolites or microbial community changes among different samples, whereas alteration of gut taxa directly led to changes in metabolites. As expected, the PPS group expressed more immune-related genes and an enrichment analysis revealed that nine hubs (e.g., BTK, P2RX7, and Pax5) were key genes participating in multiple immunologic processes. Further, an untargeted metabolism analysis indicated that PPS and NPPS had a similar composition of most compounds, but 88% of DEMs were decreased in PPS, with CA, DCA, and LCA primary or secondary bile acids identified as the top contributors to group differentiation. PPS had a significantly lower species richness and the biomarker taxa contained both probiotics and pathogens, which might have a synergistic relationship that underlies the immunological microenvironment in cystic PPS. This research provides new insights into the understanding of cystic PPS in the cecum of Bactrian camels.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. Differential expressed genes enriched in the specific immune-related pathways by KEGG enrichment analysis.

The specific immune system-related pathways in this study contained the detected intestinal immune network for IgA production, theTh1/Th2/Th17 cell differentiation, the T cell receptor signaling pathway, and the antigen processing and presentation.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-1
Table S2. Differential expressed genes in multiple immune-related functions by GO enrichment analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-2
Table S3. Detailed topological information in the co-occurrence network calculated by Cytoscape v3.9.0.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-3
Table S4. Information of 113 differential abundant metabolites.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-4
Table S5. The significant difference between NPPS and PPS by the Adnois and Anosim tests.

The permutation test is applied for Adnois and Anosim tests under a reduced model. Statistic R in Anosim represents a scaled contrast between the among- and within-group ranks. The R2 in Adonis represents the interpretation of differentiation between groups. P < 0.05 represented a significant difference between groups.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-5
Figure S1. Correlation analysis among samples evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-6
Figure S2. The rarefaction curves of three alpha indices.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-7
Figure S3. PCoA analysis of all samples based on four distance metrics.

(A) Bray-Curtis PCoA, (B) Jaccard PCoA, (C) weighted UniFrac PCoA, and (D) unweighted UniFrac PCoA.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-8
Figure S4. The clustered heatmap analysis of the main taxa among samples.

(A) high abundant phyla and (B) high abundant genera accross samples.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-9
Figure S5. The Venn diagram shows the overlapped or unique taxa between PPS and NPPS.

(A) based on the phylum level, (B) based on the family level, and (C) based on the genus level.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-10
Data S1. The raw information of the untargeted metabolism.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-11

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31960693; 31760723). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xiao shan Wang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Pei xuan Li performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Bao shan Wang performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Wang dong Zhang analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Wen hui Wang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the College of Veterinary Medicine of Gansu Agricultural University approved all experimental procedures (Approval No: GSAU-AEW-2020-0010).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The transcriptomic data are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA): PRJNA860310. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing data are available at the SRA: PRJNA860311. The data of untargeted metabolism is available in the Supplemental File.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at NCBI: PRJNA860310 and PRJNA860311. The data of untargeted metabolism is available in the Supplemental File.

References

  • Allison et al. (1992).Allison MJ, Mayberry WR, Mcsweeney CS, Stahl DA. Synergistes jonesii, gen. nov. sp. nov.: a rumen bacterium that degrades toxic pyridinediols. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 1992;15:522–529. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80111-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Alonso-Hearn et al. (2019).Alonso-Hearn M, Canive M, Blanco-Vazquez C, Torremocha R, Balseiro A, Amado J, Varela-Martinez E, Ramos R, Jugo BM, Casais R. RNA-Seq analysis of ileocecal valve and peripheral blood from Holstein cattle infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis revealed dysregulation of the CXCL8/IL8 signaling pathway. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arseneau et al. (2009).Arseneau JR, Laflamme M, Lewis SM, Maïcas E, Ouellette RJ. Multiple isoforms of PAX5 are expressed in both lymphomas and normal B-cells. British Journal of Haematology. 2009;147:328–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bang et al. (2014).Bang C, Weidenbach K, Gutsmann T, Heine H, Schmitz RA. The intestinal archaea Methanosphaera stadtmanae and Methanobrevibacter smithii activate human dendritic cells. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e99411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonami et al. (2022).Bonami RH, Thurman CE, Verma S, Westlake CS, Nyhoff LE, Barron BB, Reboldi A, Kendall PL. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase supports gut mucosal immunity and commensal microbiome recognition in autoimmune arthritis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13:748284. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.748284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandtzaeg (2009).Brandtzaeg P. Mucosal immunity: induction, dissemination, and effector functions. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2009;70:505–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai et al. (2019).Cai H, Su S, Li Y, Zhu Z, Guo J, Zhu Y, Guo S, Qian D, Duan J. Danshen can interact with intestinal bacteria from normal and chronic renal failure rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2019;109:1758–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai et al. (2022).Cai S, Yang Y, Kong Y, Guo Q, Xu Y, Xing P, Sun Y, Qian J, Xu R, Xie L. Gut bacteria erysipelatoclostridium and its related metabolite ptilosteroid a could predict radiation-induced intestinal injury. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10:862598–862598. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.862598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dai et al. (2021).Dai L, Tang Y, Zhou W, Dang Y, Sun Q, Tang Z, Zhu M, Ji G. Gut microbiota and related metabolites were disturbed in ulcerative colitis and partly restored after mesalamine treatment. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;11:620724. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.620724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis et al. (2012).Davis CK, Webb RI, Sly LI, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Isolation and survey of novel fluoroacetate-degrading bacteria belonging to the phylum Synergistetes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012;80:671–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Derrien, Belzer & Vos (2017).Derrien M, Belzer C, De Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017;106:171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Du et al. (2020).Du X, Zhang J, Schramm K-W, Huang Q, Tian M, Zhang X, Nan B, Shen H. Persistence and reversibility of arsenic-induced gut microbiome and metabolome shifts in rats after 30-days recovery duration. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Escudero-Paniagua et al. (2020).Escudero-Paniagua B, Bartolomé RA, Rodríguez S, De los Ríos V, Pintado L, Jaén M, Lafarga M, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Casal JI. PAUF/ZG16B promotes colorectal cancer progression through alterations of the mitotic functions and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41:203–213. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fei & Zhao (2013).Fei N, Zhao L. An opportunistic pathogen isolated from the gut of an obese human causes obesity in germfree mice. The ISME Journal. 2013;7:880–884. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Georgiev et al. (2018).Georgiev H, Ravens I, Papadogianni G, Halle S, Malissen B, Loots GG, Förster R, Bernhardt G. Shared and unique features distinguishing follicular T helper and regulatory cells of peripheral lymph node and Peyer’s patches. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;9:714. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gérard (2013).Gérard P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens. 2013;3:14–24. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Giladi et al. (2018).Giladi A, Paul F, Herzog Y, Lubling Y, Weiner A, Yofe I, Jaitin D, Cabezas-Wallscheid N, Dress R, Ginhoux F. Single-cell characterization of haematopoietic progenitors and their trajectories in homeostasis and perturbed haematopoiesis. Nature Cell Biology. 2018;20:836–846. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0121-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grigor’eva (2020).Grigor’eva IN. Gallstone disease, obesity and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio as a possible biomarker of gut dysbiosis. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2020;11:13. doi: 10.3390/jpm11010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • He et al. (2019b).He J, Hai L, Orgoldol K, Yi L, Ming L, Guo F, Li G, Ji R. High-throughput sequencing reveals the gut microbiome of the bactrian camel in different ages. Current Microbiology. 2019b;76:810–817. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01689-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • He et al. (2019a).He C, Wang H, Liao W-D, Peng C, Shu X, Zhu X, Zhu Z-H. Characteristics of mucosa-associated gut microbiota during treatment in Crohn’s disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2019a;25:2204–2216. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i18.2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hussen & Schuberth (2021).Hussen J, Schuberth H-J. Recent advances in camel immunology. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;11:614150. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.614150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johansen & Kaetzel (2011).Johansen F-E, Kaetzel C. Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and IgA transport: new advances in environmental factors that stimulate pIgR expression and its role in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunology. 2011;4:598–602. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jung, Hugot & Barreau (2010).Jung C, Hugot J-P, Barreau F. Peyer’s patches: the immune sensors of the intestine. International Journal of Inflammation. 2010;2010:823710. doi: 10.4061/2010/823710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khomeiri & Yam (2015).Khomeiri M, Yam BAZ. Introduction to Camel origin, history, raising, characteristics, and wool, hair, and skin: a review. Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Management. 2015;4:496–508. [Google Scholar]
  • Kostic et al. (2013).Kostic AD, Chun E, Robertson L, Glickman JN, Gallini CA, Michaud M, Clancy TE, Chung DC, Lochhead P, Hold GL. Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host & Microbe. 2013;14:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kunisawa et al. (2014).Kunisawa J, Hashimoto E, Inoue A, Nagasawa R, Suzuki Y, Ishikawa I, Shikata S, Arita M, Aoki J, Kiyono H. Regulation of intestinal IgA responses by dietary palmitic acid and its metabolism. The Journal of Immunology. 2014;193:1666–1671. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2015).Li B, Yang Y, Ma L, Ju F, Guo F, Tiedje JM, Zhang T. Metagenomic and network analysis reveal wide distribution and co-occurrence of environmental antibiotic resistance genes. The ISME Journal. 2015;9:2490–2502. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2021).Lin L, Du Y, Song J, Wang W, Yang C. Imaging commensal microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2021;54:2076–2087. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Livingston et al. (2010).Livingston M, Loach D, Wilson M, Tannock GW, Baird M. Gut commensal Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23 stimulates an immunoregulatory response. Immunology and Cell Biology. 2010;88:99–102. doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lv et al. (2022).Lv H, Li Y, Xue C, Dong N, Bi C, Shan A. Aquaporin: targets for dietary nutrients to regulate intestinal health. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2022;106:167–180. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maroilley et al. (2018).Maroilley T, Berri M, Lemonnier G, Esquerré D, Chevaleyre C, Melo S, Meurens F, Coville J-L, Leplat JJ, Rau A. Immunome differences between porcine ileal and jejunal Peyer’s patches revealed by global transcriptome sequencing of gut-associated lymphoid tissues. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27019-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moon et al. (2018).Moon CD, Young W, Maclean PH, Cookson AL, Bermingham EN. Metagenomic insights into the roles of Proteobacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats. Microbiologyopen. 2018;7:e00677. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mu et al. (2019).Mu C, Bian G, Su Y, Zhu W. Differential effects of breed and nursing on early-life colonic microbiota and immune status as revealed in a cross-fostering piglet model. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2019;85:e02510–02518. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02510-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakano et al. (2006).Nakano V, Ignacio A, Fernandes MR, Fukugaiti MH, Avila-Campos MJ. Intestinal Bacteroides and Parabacteroides species producing antagonistic substances. Microbiology. 2006;1:61–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Neumann, Scheffold & Rutz (2019).Neumann C, Scheffold A, Rutz S. Seminars in immunology. vol. 44. Academic Press; 2019. Functions and regulation of T cell-derived interleukin-10; p. 101344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nicholson et al. (2012).Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, Pettersson S. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science. 2012;336:1262–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.1223813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Palau-Rodriguez et al. (2015).Palau-Rodriguez M, Tulipani S, Queipo-Ortuno MIsabel, Urpi-Sarda M, Tinahones FJ, Andres-Lacueva C. Metabolomic insights into the intricate gut microbial–host interaction in the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1151. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterson & Artis (2014).Peterson LW, Artis D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;14:141–153. doi: 10.1038/nri3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips et al. (2021).Phillips CL, Welch BA, Garrett MR, Grayson BE. Regional heterogeneity in rat Peyer’s patches through whole transcriptome analysis. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2021;246:513–522. doi: 10.1177/1535370220973014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Qi et al. (2011).Qi S-S, Wang W-H, Gao Q, Xu X-H, He W-H, Zhaxi Y-P, Tai L-F. Age-related changes in the anatomical characteristics of Peyer’s patches in small intestine of Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2011;43:1219–1223. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9829-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rankin et al. (2000).Rankin CT, Bunton T, Lawler AM, Lee S-J. Regulation of left–right patterning in mice by growth/differentiation factor-1. Nature Genetics. 2000;24:262–265. doi: 10.1038/73472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rooks & Garrett (2016).Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2016;16:341–352. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rowland et al. (2018).Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I, Tuohy K. Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. European Journal of Nutrition. 2018;57:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sagar et al. (2015).Sagar N, Cree I, Covington J, Arasaradnam R. The interplay of the gut microbiome, bile acids, and volatile organic compounds. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2015;2015:398585–398585. doi: 10.1155/2015/398585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sakamoto & Maruyama (2020).Sakamoto A, Maruyama M. Contribution of DOCK11 to the expansion of antigen-specific populations among germinal center B cells. Immunohorizons. 2020;4:520–529. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2000048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Samuel et al. (2007).Samuel BS, Hansen EE, Manchester JK, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Fulton R, Latreille P, Kim K, Wilson RK, Gordon JI. Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:10643–10648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704189104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stolarczyk, Lord & Howard (2014).Stolarczyk E, Lord GM, Howard JK. The immune cell transcription factor T-bet: a novel metabolic regulator. Adipocyte. 2014;3:58–62. doi: 10.4161/adip.26220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sutherland & Fagarasan (2012).Sutherland DB, Fagarasan S. IgA synthesis: a form of functional immune adaptation extending beyond gut. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2012;24:261–268. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Trebak & Kinet (2019).Trebak M, Kinet J-P. Calcium signalling in T cells. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2019;19:154–169. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0110-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2022).Wang X, Zhaxi Y, Li P, Wang W. The distribution of SIgA and IgG antibody-secreting cells in the large intestine of Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) Folia Morphologica. 2022;81:963–970. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2021).Yang X, He Z, Hu R, Yan J, Zhang Q, Li B, Yuan X, Zhang H, He J, Wu S. Dietary β-carotene on postpartum uterine recovery in mice: crosstalk between gut microbiota and inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:744425. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2019).Zhang W-J, Su W-W, Li P-B, Rao H-Y, Lin Q-W, Zeng X, Chen T-B, Yan Z-H, Liu H, Yao H-L. Naoxintong capsule inhibits the development of cardiovascular pathological changes in bama minipig through improving gut microbiota. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019;10:1128. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2014).Zhang YG, Wu S, Xia Y, Sun J. Salmonella-infected crypt-derived intestinal organoid culture system for host–bacterial interactions. Physiological Reports. 2014;2:e12147. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2020).Zhang W-D, Yao W-L, He W-H, Li J-F, Wu X-P, Chen Z-H, Liu L, Wang W-H. Bacterial community analysis on the different mucosal immune inductive sites of gastrointestinal tract in Bactrian camels. PLOS ONE. 2020;15:e0239987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, Zhang & Wang (2018).Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang R. Gut microbiota modulates drug pharmacokinetics. Drug Metabolism Reviews. 2018;50:357–368. doi: 10.1080/03602532.2018.1497647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2019).Zhao X, Xie H, Zhao M, Ahsan A, Li X, Wang F, Yi J, Yang Z, Wu C, Raman I. Fc receptor–like 1 intrinsically recruits c-Abl to enhance B cell activation and function. Science Advances. 2019;5:eaaw0315. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ZhaXi et al. (2014).ZhaXi Y, Wang W, Zhang W, Gao Q, Guo M, Jia S. Morphologic observation of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in the large intestine of bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) The Anatomical Record. 2014;297:1292–1301. doi: 10.1002/ar.22939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Differential expressed genes enriched in the specific immune-related pathways by KEGG enrichment analysis.

The specific immune system-related pathways in this study contained the detected intestinal immune network for IgA production, theTh1/Th2/Th17 cell differentiation, the T cell receptor signaling pathway, and the antigen processing and presentation.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-1
Table S2. Differential expressed genes in multiple immune-related functions by GO enrichment analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-2
Table S3. Detailed topological information in the co-occurrence network calculated by Cytoscape v3.9.0.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-3
Table S4. Information of 113 differential abundant metabolites.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-4
Table S5. The significant difference between NPPS and PPS by the Adnois and Anosim tests.

The permutation test is applied for Adnois and Anosim tests under a reduced model. Statistic R in Anosim represents a scaled contrast between the among- and within-group ranks. The R2 in Adonis represents the interpretation of differentiation between groups. P < 0.05 represented a significant difference between groups.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-5
Figure S1. Correlation analysis among samples evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-6
Figure S2. The rarefaction curves of three alpha indices.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-7
Figure S3. PCoA analysis of all samples based on four distance metrics.

(A) Bray-Curtis PCoA, (B) Jaccard PCoA, (C) weighted UniFrac PCoA, and (D) unweighted UniFrac PCoA.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-8
Figure S4. The clustered heatmap analysis of the main taxa among samples.

(A) high abundant phyla and (B) high abundant genera accross samples.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-9
Figure S5. The Venn diagram shows the overlapped or unique taxa between PPS and NPPS.

(A) based on the phylum level, (B) based on the family level, and (C) based on the genus level.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-10
Data S1. The raw information of the untargeted metabolism.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14647/supp-11

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at NCBI: PRJNA860310 and PRJNA860311. The data of untargeted metabolism is available in the Supplemental File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES