Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2022 Nov 3;8(11):mgen000882. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000882

Genetic diversity and variation in antimicrobial-resistance determinants of non-serotype 2 Streptococcus suis isolates from healthy pigs

Nattinee Kittiwan 1,2,3, Jessica K Calland 4, Evangelos Mourkas 5, Matthew D Hitchings 6, Susan Murray 6,, Pakpoom Tadee 1,2, Phacharaporn Tadee 7, Kwanjit Duangsonk 8, Guillaume Meric 9,, Samuel K Sheppard 5,10, Prapas Patchanee 1,2,*, Ben Pascoe 2,5,9,11,*
PMCID: PMC9836093  PMID: 36326658

Abstract

Streptococcus suis is a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in South-East Asia, with frequent zoonotic transfer to humans associated with close contact with pigs. A small number of invasive lineages are responsible for endemic infection in the swine industry, causing considerable global economic losses. A lack of surveillance and a rising trend in clinical treatment failure has raised concerns of growing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among invasive S. suis . Gene flow between healthy and disease isolates is poorly understood and, in this study, we sample and sequence a collection of isolates predominantly from healthy pigs in Chiang Mai province, Northern Thailand. Pangenome characterization identified extensive genetic diversity and frequent AMR carriage in isolates from healthy pigs. Multiple AMR genes were identified, conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, lincosamides, tetracycline and macrolides. All isolates were non-susceptible to three or more different antimicrobial classes, and 75 % of non-serotype 2 isolates were non-susceptible to six or more classes (compared to 37.5 % of serotype 2 isolates). AMR genes were found on integrative and conjugative elements previously observed in other species, suggesting a mobile gene pool that can be accessed by invasive disease isolates. This article contains data hosted by Microreact.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, gene pool transmission, meningitis, One Health, Streptococcus suis

Data Summary

Short read data are available from the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) SRA (Sequence Read Archive), associated with BioProject PRJNA418954 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA418954). Assembled genomes and supplementary material are available from FigShare: doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13385465 [1].

Impact Statement.

The zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis causes respiratory and systemic disease in pigs and is among the most common causative agents of human clinical bacterial meningitis in South-East Asia, particularly in China, Thailand and Vietnam. We collected isolates from healthy farmed pigs in Northern Thailand, representing a source population from which invasive isolates have recently emerged. Pangenome characterization of the isolates revealed increased genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), suggesting that One Health approaches may be beneficial in tackling the increase in AMR.

Introduction

More than half of the world’s pork meat is produced in South-East Asia, and China alone is home to nearly half of the world’s livestock pigs. Technological improvements contributed to commercialization of pork production in the early part of the 20th century and the numbers of farmed swine rapidly expanded from ~400 million (in 1961) to an estimated 1 billion swine reared for meat in 2018 [2]. This massive increase in agricultural intensification has brought significant challenges in animal welfare, including infection control. Among the most common infections to Asian herds is a systemic disease caused by Streptococcus suis [3]. Initial infection through the nasopharynx can lead to septicaemia with arthritis, endocarditis, meningitis and sudden death among the symptoms [4–6]. S. suis infections accounted for a loss of over US$11 million (£10 million; £1=$1.1) to the pork industry in Thailand alone in 2019 [7]. This expanded niche for S. suis has provided opportunities for zoonotic infections, which are frequently reported worldwide following increased exposure to pigs, often in farm workers, slaughterhouse workers and butchers [6, 8, 9]. However, in South-East Asia, particularly in Thailand, Vietnam and China where there is a tradition of consuming raw pork dishes, S. suis infection is one of the most common causative agents of clinical bacterial meningitis [10, 11].

Human zoonotic S. suis infections predominantly arise from a single virulent lineage, thought to have first emerged in the 1920s alongside the intensification of the pork production industry. However, no consistent genome differences between pig and human disease isolates have been observed [12]. This may be related to the fact that isolates from healthy (asymptomatic) pigs have not been well studied. It has been observed that disease-associated isolates have fewer genes overall (smaller genomes), but more genes that encode putative virulence factors [13, 14]. Serotyping of the S. suis capsular polysaccharides is often used in epidemiological studies, with 29  S . suis sensu stricto serotypes described to date [15, 16]. S. suis serotype 2 is the most virulent and is frequently isolated from diseased pigs and human clinical cases [17, 18]; however, non-serotype 2 isolates (often isolated from healthy pigs) represent an extensive reservoir of genetic diversity [19–22].

Widespread use of antimicrobial drugs in the pig production industry has driven an increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [23, 24]. Imprudent use of colistin in pork production as a growth enhancer (since the 1970s) encouraged the development of resistance in Escherichia coli (and other Gram-negative bacteria), which has diminished the effectiveness of antibiotics used in human medicine [25–27]. Furthermore, there is a rising trend in multi-drug resistant zoonotic pathogens, which pose a significant public-health threat [28–30]. Regulation of veterinary use of antibiotics is difficult in low- and middle-income countries, which consequently have some of the highest AMR levels in the world [31]. For example, in Thailand alone, infections with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are estimated to cause up to 38 000 human deaths each year [32]. A lack of surveillance and a rise in clinical treatment failure has raised concerns of growing AMR among invasive S. suis [33].

Most studies have focussed on a few important S. suis clones that are responsible for the majority of human infection cases, such as the serotype 2 (most common in Asia) and serotype 9 (most common in Europe) groups. Given the frequent homologous recombination between Streptococcus species, and following a One Health approach to disease surveillance, we aimed to characterize the genetic diversity of non-serotype 2  S . suis isolates in this study. We sampled and sequenced a collection of isolates from healthy pigs in Chiang Mai province, Northern Thailand. Pangenome comparisons with a selection of archived, invasive serotype 2 isolates identified increased genetic diversity and more frequent AMR carriage in isolates from healthy pigs. AMR genes were found on integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) previously observed in other species, suggesting a mobile gene pool that can be accessed by invasive disease-causing isolates.

Methods

Ethics

This study was carried out according to guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals [34].

Sample collection

Samples were collected between March and November 2015, with a total of 760 tonsil swab samples collected from 111 pig farms in 25 districts of Chiang Mai province, Thailand. All swab samples were kept in Stuart transport medium (Oxoid) and transported to the laboratory at 4 °C within 24 h of collection. Livestock pigs were swabbed, and S. suis identified in 138 samples (18.2 %). Of the 138  S . suis isolates obtained from healthy pigs, only 1 isolate (0.7 %) was confirmed as S. suis serotype 9. Meanwhile, all the remaining 137 isolates (99.3 %) were negative to serotypes 1/2, 1, 2, 7, 9 and 14 by PCR identification and classified as non-serotype 2 strains. Among 138 strains, 25 strains were randomly selected for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In addition, 11 isolates were selected from laboratory archives and sequenced for comparison. These included additional non-serotype isolates from healthy pigs (n=3) collected at an earlier date, from different farms; and serotype 2 isolates from healthy pigs (n=4) and infected pigs (n=2) submitted to the Veterinary Research and Development Center (Upper Northern Region), Thailand, collected between 2010 and 2013. Finally, two serotype 2 clinical isolates (n=2) were also included for comparison – cultured from the blood of meningitis patients collected at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (in 2010).

Bacterial identification and growth

Tonsil swab samples were inoculated onto 5 % sheep blood agar plates (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. S. suis isolates were identified by biochemical characterization [35], and small (approximately 1 mm in diameter) transparent α-haemolysis and non-haemolysis colonies of Gram-positive cocci with negative catalase test were selected for further screening. Criteria for presumptive identification of S. suis included no growth on 6.5 % NaCl agar, a negative Voges-Proskauer (VP) test, and production of acid in trehalose, lactose, sucrose, salicin and inulin broths, but no acid production in glycerol, sorbitol and mannitol. A multiplex PCR using primers specific to the 16S rRNA gene was used to confirm the identification of S. suis and capsular gene types 1 or 14, 2 or 1/2, 7, and 9, which are the most prevalent serotypes recovered from diseased pigs, as described in Table S1 (available with the online version of this article) [36–38].

Antimicrobial-susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial-susceptibility tests were performed using the disc diffusion method in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [39]. Eighteen antibiotic drugs from nine antibiotic groups were tested, including aminoglycoside (gentamicin, 10 µg; and kanamycin, 30 µg), lincosamides (lincomycin, 10 µg; and clindamycin, 2 µg), macrolides (erythromycin, 15 µg), tetracyclines (tetracycline, 30 µg; doxycycline, 30 µg; and oxytetracycline, 30 µg), oxazolidinone (linezolid, 30 µg), phenicols (chloramphenicol, 30 µg; and florfenicol 30 µg), β-lactams (ampicillin, 10 µg; penicillin G, 10 units; amoxicillin, 10 µg; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 30 µg; and ceftiofur, 30 µg), fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin, 5 µg) and folate inhibitors (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, 1.25/23.75 µg) (Oxoid). Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a positive control and diameter breakpoints were assessed according to the guidelines described in Table 1 [39–46]. Fisher’s exact tests were performed using SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM) to determine the difference of antimicrobial susceptibility between S. suis serotype 2 and non-serotype 2 isolates. The association between AMR phenotype and genotype was tested by Fisher’s exact test. Statistically significant associations were shown as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results were considered statistically significant when a two-tailed P value was ≤0.05.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial-susceptibility test results by disc diffusion method of 36 S.suis, grouped by serotype

Susceptible (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R) phenotypes are indicated. An asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance by Fisher's exact test; P value < 0.05.

Antibiotic agent

Zone of inhibition (mm)

S. suis (%) (n=36)

Serotype 2 (%) (n=8)

Non-serotype 2 (%) (n=28)

P value

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

GEN†

≥16

13–15

≤12

30.6

38.8

30.6

0

37.5

62.5

39.3

39.3

21.4

0.076

KAN‡

≥18

14–17

≤13

0

11.1

88.9

0

25

75

0

7.1

92.9

>0.999

LIN§

≥19

16–18

≤15

0

0

100

0

0

100

0

0

100

>0.999

CLI||

≥19

16–18

≤15

2.8

0

97.2

12.5

0

87.5

0

0

100

0.222

ERY||

≥21

16–20

≤15

16.7

13.9

69.4

12.5

0

87.5

17.8

14.3

67.9

>0.999

TET||

≥28

25–27

≤24

2.8

5.6

91.7

0

0

100

3.6

7.1

89.3

>0.999

DOX||

≥28

25–27

≤24

0

8.3

91.7

0

0

100

0

10.7

89.3

>0.999

OTC§

≥26

16–25

≤15

5.6

11.1

83.3

0

0

100

7.1

14.3

78.6

>0.999

LZD||

≥21

100

0

0

100

0

0

100

0

0

>0.999

CHL||

≥21

18–20

≤17

44.4

47.2

8.3

0

100

0

57.1

32.1

10.7

0.005*

FLO¶

≥22

19–21

≤18

72.2

22.2

5.6

75

25

0

71.4

21.4

7.1

>0.999

AMP†

≥24

23–17

≤16

80.6

13.9

5.6

100

0

0

75

17.9

7.1

0.309

PEN‡

≥26

13–25

≤12

30.6

66.7

2.8

87.5

12.5

0

14.3

82.1

3.6

0.001*

AMX#

≥24

15–23

≤14

83.3

13.9

2.8

100

0

0

78.6

17.9

3.6

0.302

AMC††

≥18

14–17

≤13

97.2

2.8

0

100

0

0

96.4

3.6

0

>0.999

CTF

≥21

18–20

≤17

94.4

5.6

0

100

0

0

92.9

7.1

0

>0.999

ENR‡

≥23

19–22

≤18

58.3

30.6

11.1

62.5

37.5

0

57.1

28.6

14.3

>0.999

SXT||

≥19

16–18

≤15

72.2

5.6

22.2

87.5

0

12.5

67.9

7.1

25

0.397

Interpretative criteria according to: †CLSI 2017; ‡EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) and CLSI 2013; §CLSI 2008; ||CLSI 2020; ¶CLSI 2018; #Howe and Andrews 2012 [46]; and ††CLSI 2002 guidelines.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Twenty-five S. suis isolates from pigs with no clinical signs of S. suis infection (healthy pigs) were randomly selected for sequencing from the 138 recovered samples. Our collection was augmented with two archived isolates derived from tissue samples of pigs with clinical signs of S. suis infection (diseased pigs) that were submitted to the Veterinary Research and Development Center (Upper Northern Region) of the National Institute of Animal Health (Thailand), and a further nine isolates from the Faculty of Medicine at Chiang Mai University (Thailand). In total, our collection included 32 healthy pigs, 2 diseased pigs and 2 human clinical samples cultured from the blood of meningitis patients. All strains were cultured in Todd–Hewitt-broth at 37 °C for 18–24 h, and genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit (QIAgen). WGS using a multiplex sequencing approach was performed on an MiSeq genome sequencer (Illumina) using Nextera XT libraries and third-generation MiSeq reagent kits. Paired-end short reads of 300 bp were filtered, trimmed and assembled de novo with SPAdes version 3.7 [47], using the -careful command. The mean number of contiguous sequences (contigs) in 36  S . suis genomes was 160, for a mean total assembled sequence size of 2.22 Mbp. The mean N50 contig length (L50) was 66 810 and the mean G+C content was 41.3 mol%. Short-read data are available in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) SRA (Sequence Read Archive), associated with BioProject PRJNA418954. Assembled genomes and supplementary material are available from FigShare (10.6084 /m9.figshare.13385465; individual accession numbers and assembled genome statistics are in Table S2).

Population structure and phylogeny

Isolate genomes were uploaded to pubMLST and sequence typed in silico, according to the seven gene multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme [48]. Many of our non-serotype 2 isolate genomes could not be typed and were allocated novel MLST sequence types (27 of 36; Table S2); two isolates remained unassigned to a sequence type. A multisequence alignment was created from concatenated gene sequences of all core genes (found in >95 % isolates) from the reference genome, BM407 [49], using mafft [50] on a gene-by-gene basis [51] (size 1 202 840 bp; FigShare: doi: 10.6084 /m9.figshare.13385465). Maximum-likelihood phylogenies were reconstructed with iq-tree (version 1.6.8) using the GTR+F+I+G4 substitution model and ultra-fast bootstrapping (1 000 bootstraps) [52]; and visualized on Microreact [53]: https://microreact.org/project/Ssuis-ns2.

Accessory genome characterization

All unique genes present in at least one isolate (the pangenome) were identified by automated annotation using prokka (version 1.13; default parameters) followed by pirate (version 1.0.4; default parameters), a pangenome tool that allows for orthologue gene clustering in bacteria [54, 55]. We defined genes in pirate using a wide range of amino acid percentage sequence identity thresholds for Markov cluster algorithm clustering [46, 51, 56–61]. The pangenome of all 36 isolates contained 5 004 genes, of which 1 348 genes were shared by all isolates (>95 %) and defined the core genome (Table S3). Pairwise core and accessory genome distances were compared using PopPUNK (version 1.1.4; using the -easy run option) [62], which uses pairwise nucleotide kmer comparisons to distinguish shared sequence and gene content to identify accessory genome divergence in relation to the core genome. A two-component Gaussian mixture model was used to build a network to define clusters (components, 41; density, 0.0579; transitivity, 0.9518; score, 0.8967).

Identification of AMR, virulence and plasmid genes

The accessory genome of each isolate was characterized, including detection of putative virulence factors, AMR genes, and known plasmid genes using abricate (version 0.9.8) (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) and the VFDB (Virulence Factor Database), NCBI AMRfinder Plus, CARD (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database), ResFinder, and PlasmidFinder databases (10th September 2019 update; Tables S4–S6) [56, 63–68]. Results were similar between all three AMR databases, and we report results from the curated NCBI AMRfinder Plus database of 1 726 resistance genes covering 15 antimicrobial agent types; including genes associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, colistin, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, glycopeptides, MLSB (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B), nitroimidazole, oxazolidinones, phenicols, rifampicin, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and trimethoprim. A threshold of 70 % identity, over 50 % gene length (default settings) was used for reporting a match between a gene in the NCBI AMRfinder Plus database and the input genome. ICEs were detected using nucleotide comparisons with known ICEs in the PlasmidFinder and mob-suite databases. Individual mobile genes were identified with PlasmidFinder, while mob-suite (version 2.1.0; default parameters) compares sequences to all plasmid sequences in the NCBI repository (Table S7).

Asian context collection

For greater context, all Asian genomes shared publicly on the pubMLST S. suis database (n=112) were downloaded for comparison with our dataset. Genomes were predominantly of Chinese origin (n=96), with some additional genomes from Thailand (n=14). A phylogeny was reconstructed for these genomes alongside out collection using iq-tree, as previously described for our collected isolates. All genomes were screened for AMR genes using NCBI’s AMRfinder Plus (Table S8).

Results

Samples

All S. suis samples collected from healthy pigs in Chiang Mai province in Thailand were identified by PCR (Table S1) as non-serotype 2 isolates. From the 138 isolates we collected, 25 were randomly selected for WGS. An additional 11 isolates from laboratory archives, previously collected from Chiang Mai, were added to the dataset to include representative isolates from pig disease and invasive human infection. In total, the dataset used consisted of 36 isolates, of which 8 isolates (22.2 %) were serotype 2, including isolates from human clinical cases (n=2), diseased pigs (n=2) and healthy pigs (n=4), and 28 isolates (77.8 %) of non-serotype 2  S . suis from healthy pigs (Fig. 1a, Table S2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(a) Isolates were collected as part of a survey of healthy pigs in Chiang Mai province, Thailand. (b) Population structure of selected sequenced isolates compared with other serotype 2 genomes from the same region. All core genes (present in ≥95 % of isolates) from the reference genome (1348 genes) were used to build a gene-by-gene alignment (n=36; 1 202 840 bp). A maximum-likelihood phylogeny was reconstructed with iq-tree, using a GTR model and ultrafast bootstrapping (1000 bootstraps; version 1.6.8) [52, 120]. Bar, genetic distance of 0.01. Leaves are coloured by disease status and host: samples from healthy pigs are green; diseased pigs are yellow; and samples from human clinical cases are red. Serotype 2 isolates are shaded in blue, with common sequence types annotated. The presence of AMR genes, known plasmids and virulence genes identified using abricate and NCBI, PlasmidFinder and VFDB (Virulence Factor Database) are indicated by coloured blocks. Interactive visualization is available on Microreact: https://microreact.org/project/Ssuis-ns2 [53].

Core and accessory genome characterization

Non-serotype 2 isolates were not responsible for disease in either pigs or humans. A maximum-likelihood phylogeny reconstructed from a concatenated gene-by-gene core genome alignment (1348 genes) revealed a highly structured population (Fig. 1b). Serotype 2 isolates clustered together, including the previously described sequence types ST-1, ST-28, ST-104, ST-105 and a novel sequence type designated ST-1939. Non-serotype 2 isolates clustered into 17 sequence types, all of which were novel sequence types uploaded to pubMLST (Table S2). Pairwise average nucleotide identity comparisons suggested that non-serotype 2 isolates (75.1 % identical) were more diverse than serotype 2 isolates (98.1 % identical) in the core genome (Fig. 2a,b). This was supported by (pairwise) clustering of the core and accessory genome using PopPUNK [62], which identified divergence in the accessory genomes of the serotype 2 isolates (Fig. 2c). Together, the pangenome of all 36 isolates comprised 5004 gene clusters, with 1348 core genes present in at least 95 % of isolates representing ~27 % of the pangenome; or ~68 % of the average S. suis genome (1993 ORFs in BM407; Fig. 2d, Table S3). Typically, invasive serotype 2 isolates have smaller genomes but contain more virulence-related genes [12]. In our dataset, this was also true with serotype 2 isolates having smaller genomes on average (Table S2), and the virulence associated pilB gene was found in 75 % (n=3 of 4) of invasive isolates, but only 7 % of isolates from healthy pigs (n=2 of 28) (Fig. 1b, Table S4).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(a) Heatmap of pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI). Highly similar pairwise comparisons are coloured in red to blue for the most dissimilar isolates. The cluster of serotype 2 isolates is boxed. (b) Summary of pairwise comparisons between serotype 2 and non-serotype 2 isolates. (c) PopPUNK pairwise accessory distances visualized with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) clustering in microreact: https://microreact.org/project/Ssuis-ns2 [53]. (d) Visualization of the pangenome (pirate) with Phandango, including estimation of the core (gene present in 95 % or more isolates) and accessory genome composition [55, 121].

Widespread AMR determinants in S. suis isolates from healthy pigs

We scanned all 36 genomes for known determinants of AMR through nucleotide comparisons (≥70 % sequence identity, over 50 % gene length) with three AMR gene databases (NCBI AMRfinder Plus, CARD and Resfinder) [56, 64–66, 68]. Results were similar between all databases, and we report results from the curated AMRfinder database, where we identified 18 resistance genes from seven different antimicrobial classes (Fig. 1b, Table S5). Loci conferring putative resistance to aminoglycosides [aadE, ant(6)-Ia, aph(3’)-III and spw], macrolides [erm(A), erm(B), erm(T), mef(A) and msr(D)], lincosamides [lsa(E), lnu(B) and lnu(C)], tetracyclines [tet(W), tet(L) and tet(O)], oxazolidinone (optrA), nucleoside (sat4) and chloramphenicol (catA8) were found in 32 isolates (89 %). On average, fewer antibiotic-resistance genes were identified in the serotype 2 isolates (five genes) compared to non-serotype 2 isolates (18 genes; Table S5). All 18 of the resistance genes were detected in the non-serotype 2 isolates from healthy pigs, but only 5 of the potential AMR genes spw, lsa(E), erm(B), lnu(B) and tet(O) were found in the eight serotype 2 isolates, including tet(O), which was present in all serotype 2 isolates. At least one AMR gene from three or more antimicrobial classes was found in 21 out of 36 isolates (58 %), and only one out of these was a S. suis serotype 2 isolate (id8860_SUI_H132_53).

Evidence of mobility of AMR genes among S. suis from healthy pigs

Comparison of nucleotide sequences from all the genomes with the PlasmidFinder database [67] identified loci on six putative ICEs, including pLFE1, pBM407, pAMbeta, Col440II, pLW043 and pCW7 (Fig. 1b, Table S6). All putative ICEs were identified in non-serotype 2 isolates (39 %; 11 of 28). Two of these ICEs have previously been characterized in invasive S. suis , pBM407 (accession no. FM252033) and pAMbeta (accession no. AE002565.1). The pBM407 plasmid described in S. suis contained AMR genes conferring resistance to tetracycline [tet(O), tet(L)], chloramphenicol (acetyltransferase), erythromycin [erm(B)] and a dihydrofolate reductase [49]. However, plasmids from two different isolates with variation in gene content hint at an underlying diversity – and this potential composite architecture was evidenced in our study by differences in the AMR gene complement [49]. All serotype 2 isolates contain the tetO locus, and 75 % (6 of 8) contain the ermB locus, which are often found on pBM407 ICEs, but no other pBM407 genes were identified by this method (Table S6). Additional plasmids not previously described in S. suis were also identified using mob-suite, which compares genome sequences with all described plasmids in the NCBI database (Table S7) [69, 70].

Widespread AMR in non-serotype 2 isolates

Disc diffusion assays were used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to 18 antimicrobial agents, from nine antimicrobial categories. Most isolates were highly susceptible to linezolid (100 %; n=36), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (97 %; n=35), ceftiofur (94 %; n=34), amoxicillin (83 %; n=30) and ampicillin (81 %; n=29). High levels of resistance were observed against lincomycin (100 %; n=36), clindamycin (97 %; n=35), tetracycline (92 %; n=33), doxycycline (92 %; n=33), kanamycin (89 %; n=32), oxytetracycline (83 %; n=30), erythromycin (69 %; n=25) and gentamicin (31 %; n=11) (Table 1). Despite relatively low numbers of isolates, there was a statistically significant difference in antimicrobial susceptibility between S. suis serotype 2 and non-serotype 2 isolates for chloramphenicol (P value 0.005) and penicillin G (P value 0.001) using Fisher’s exact test (Table 1). Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is defined as an isolate that is non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent from three different antimicrobial categories [71]. All 36  S . suis isolates were non-susceptible to three or more antibiotic classes (Fig. 3a, Table 1). Most (87.5 %; 7 of 8) serotype 2 isolates were non-susceptible to four and five antimicrobial categories; while three quarters (21 of 28) of non-serotype 2 isolates were non-susceptible to six, seven and eight antimicrobial categories (46.4, 25 and 3.6 %, respectively; Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(a) Distribution of AMR patterns (black blocks indicate presence of AMR genes) summarized alongside their corresponding phenotypic resistance outcomes (red blocks indicate phenotypic resistance). Predicted (blue) and phenotypic (red) MDR is also indicated. (b) Summary of the number of different antimicrobial classes to which each isolate demonstrated phenotypic resistance. Isolates resistant to three or more different antimicrobial classes were characterized as having MDR. AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

Diverse AMR profiles in S. suis isolates from healthy pigs

Increased diversity in the core, accessory and plasmid content of non-serotype 2 isolates was associated with increased AMR conferred by 21 different AMR gene profiles (A–U; Fig. 3a, Table 2). The most common AMR gene pattern included the erm(B) and tet(O) genes (13.9 %), followed by aadE/erm(B)/tet(O) and ant(6)-Ia/erm(B)/mef(A)/msr(D)/tet(W) gene patterns (8.3 %). All putative resistance genes were absent in four non-serotype 2 strains (11.1 %). Non-serotype 2 isolates demonstrated greater variation in AMR gene content, with only three resistance gene patterns (B, C and P) found exclusively in serotype 2 isolates.

Table 2.

AMR gene patterns of 36 S. suis isolates

Pattern

AMR gene pattern

Strain

Frequency

A

spw

FH57

1 (2.8 %)

B

tet(O)

DP-T2NE* , †, DP-T2N* ,

2 (5.6 %)

C

erm(B)/tet(O)

H219-53†,‡,TSK11-2†, TSK16- 2†, TP12-2†, TP12-3†

5 (13.9 %)

D

aadE/erm(B)/tet(O)

FH11, FH12, FH52

3 (8.3 %)

E

ant(6)-Ia/erm(B)/tet(O)

THD10-6

1 (2.8 %)

F

erm(B)/erm(T)/tet(W)

FH13

1 (2.8 %)

G

spw/erm(B)/tet(O)

FH25

1 (2.8 %)

H

aph(3')-IIIa/erm(B)/sat4/tet(O)

FH20

1 (2.8 %)

I

ant(6)-Ia/spw/erm(B)/tet(O)

FH51

1 (2.8 %)

J

ant(6)-Ia/mef(A)/msr(D)/tet(W)

FH16, FH17

2 (5.6 %)

K

erm(A)/erm(B)/optrA/tet(O)

TJ21-2S

1 (2.8 %)

L

aph(3')-IIIa/ant(6)-Ia/erm(B)/sat4/tet(O)

FH9, FH10

2 (5.6 %)

M

aph(3')-IIIa/ant(6)-Ia/lsa(E)/lnu(B)/erm(B)

FH1, FH2

2 (5.6 %)

N

ant(6)-Ia/erm(B)/mef(A)/msr(D)/tet(W)

FH19, FH42, FH43

3 (8.3 %)

O

erm(A)/erm(B)/optrA/catA8/tet(O)

FH33

1 (2.8 %)

P

spw/lsa(E)/lnu(B)/erm(B)/tet(O)

H132-53†,‡

1 (2.8 %)

Q

ant(6)-Ia/lnu(C)/erm(B)/mef(A)/mrd(D)/tet(O)

FH24

1 (2.8 %)

R

ant(6)-Ia/lsa(E)/lnu(B)/erm(B)/tet(O)/tet(L)

FH15§

1 (2.8 %)

S

ant(6)-Ia/spw/lsa(E)/lnu(B)/erm(B)/tet(O)

FH50

1 (2.8 %)

T

ant(6)-Ia/aadE/spw/lsa(E)/lnu(B)/erm(B)/erm(T)/mef(A)/tet(O)/tet(L)

T13-1N

1 (2.8 %)

U

No resistance genes found

FH4-1, FH4-2, FH4-3, FH56

4 (11.1 %)

Total

36 (100 %)

*S. suis from diseased pigs.

S. suis serotype 2.

S. suis from the human case.

§S. suis serotype 9.

Phenotypic and genotypic concordance in AMR

When we compared phenotypic non-susceptibility (zones of inhibition) with the presence of specific AMR genes, often there was no clear correlation (Table 3, Fig. 4). The strongest link between phenotype and AMR gene was observed for erythromycin resistance and the presence of erm(B) (OR=32.5, P=0.002), and 72.2 % of erythromycin-resistant isolates contained the erm(B) gene (Table 3). There were not enough resistant isolates to properly assess the correlation between the presence of genes linked to resistance to chloramphenicol (n=1) and florfenicol (n=1), and none of the isolates were resistant to the first-generation oxazolidinone, linezolid, despite identification of the corresponding optrA resistance gene (Table 3). The presence of AMR determinants did not equally contribute to resistance. In many cases, the accumulation of AMR genes provided increased resistance (and smaller zones of inhibition). Accumulation of tetracycline and macrolide determinants led to more extensive resistance profiles (Fig. 4). Although not identified in this study, point mutations will also play a significant role in conferring AMR.

Table 3.

Concordance of AMR phenotype and genotypes

Presence of resistance genes (G+) and number of phenotypically non-susceptible isolates (P+) are indicated. An asterisk indicates statistical significance by Fisher’s exact test; P value <0.05.

Antimicrobial agent

AMR gene

Characterization of phenotypic and genotypic resistance (n=36)

Concordance of phenotypic and genotypic resistance

P+/G+

P−/G+

P+/G−

P−/G−

OR (95 % CI)

P value

GEN

ant(6)-Ia

8 (22.2 %)

7 (19.4 %)

16 (44.4 %)

5 (13.9 %)

0.36 (0.08–1.42)

0.175

aph(3')-IIIa

5 (13.9 %)

24 (66.7 %)

7 (19.4 %)

0.06 (0.01–0.46)

0.010*

aadE

3 (8.3 %)

1 (2.8 %)

21 (58.3 %)

11 (30.6 %)

1.57 (0.21–22.1)

>0.999

spw

3 (8.3 %)

3 (8.3 %)

21 (58.3 %)

9 (25 %)

0.43 (0.09–2.17)

0.378

KAN

ant(6)-Ia

15 (41.7 %)

21 (58.3 %)

0.71 (0.04–14.4)

>0.999

aph(3')-IIIa

5 (13.9 %)

31 (86.1 %)

0.16 (0.01–3.64)

0.294

aadE

4 (11.1 %)

32 (88.9 %)

0.12 (0.01–2.94)

0.249

spw

6 (16.7 %)

30 (83.3 %)

0.2 (0.01–4.40)

0.338

LIN, CLI

lsa(E)

6 (16.7 %)

30 (83.3 %)

0.20 (0.01–4.40)

0.338

lnu(B)

6 (16.7 %)

30 (83.3 %)

0.20 (0.01–4.40)

0.338

lnu(C)

1 (2.8 %)

35 (97.2 %)

0.03 (0–1.06)

0.104

ERY

erm(A)

2 (5.6 %)

28 (77.8 %)

6 (16.7 %)

0.43 (0.04–7.16)

0.476

erm(B)

26 (72.2 %)

1 (2.8 %)

4 (11.1 %)

5 (13.9 %)

32.5 (3.79–390)

0.002*

erm(T)

2 (5.6 %)

28 (77.8 %)

6 (16.7 %)

0.43 (0.04–7.16)

0.476

mef(A)

6 (16.7 %)

1 (2.8 %)

24 (66.7 %)

5 (13.9 %)

1.25 (0.16–16.95)

>0.999

msr(D)

5 (13.9 %)

1 (2.8 %)

25 (69.4 %)

5 (13.9 %)

1 (0.12–13.92)

>0.999

TET

tet(O)

23 (63.9 %)

12 (33.3 %)

1 (2.8 %)

1.91 (0.09–37.78)

>0.999

tet(W)

6 (16.7 %)

29 (80.6 %)

1 (2.8 %)

0.21 (0.01–4.55)

0.347

tet(L)

2 (5.6 %)

33 (91.7 %)

1 (2.8 %)

0.06 (0–1.70)

0.158

DOX

tet(O)

23 (63.9 %)

13 (36.1 %)

1.80 (0.09–34.88)

>0.999

tet(W)

6 (16.7 %)

30 (83.3 %)

0.20 (0.01–4.40)

0.338

tet(L)

2 (5.6 %)

34 (94.4 %)

0.06 (0–1.65)

0.154

OTC

tet(O)

23 (63.9 %)

11 (30.6 %)

2 (5.6 %)

4.18 (0.43–62.74)

0.278

tet(W)

6 (16.7 %)

28 (77.8 %)

2 (5.6 %)

0.43 (0.04–7.16)

0.478

tet(L)

2 (5.6 %)

32 (88.9 %)

2 (5.6 %)

0.12 (0.01–2.65)

0.230

LZD

optrA

2 (5.6 %)

34 (94.4 %)

17 (0.61–326.5)

0.154

CHL

catA8

1 (2.8 %)

19 (52.8 %)

16 (44.4 %)

0.84 (0.04–16.91)

>0.999

FLO

catA8

1 (2.8 %)

9 (25 %)

26 (72.2 %)

2.89 (0.14–56.62)

0.473

GEN, Gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; LIN, lincomycin; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; TET, tetracycline; DOX, doxycycline; OTC, oxytetracycline; LZD, linezolid; CHL, chloramphenicol; FLO, florfenicol.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The effect of each AMR gene on phenotypic resistance diffusion diameters for aminoglycosides, lincosamides, tetracyclines, phenicols, oxazolidinone and macrolide. Zones of inhibition are shown for each AMR profile found in our dataset. Clinical breakpoints of resistance are indicated in red.

Asian context

For broader context, we compared our isolate genomes to all Asian isolate genomes shared publicly on pubMLST. While most public genomes were from Chinese pigs, it was clear that beyond the more studied serotype 2 isolates there remans a largely uncharacterized, diverse reservoir of S. suis diversity. Two separate clades of non-serotype 2 isolates can be observed in a maximum-likelihood phylogeny of the 112 publicly shared genomes and our collection (Fig. 5a, Table S8). While all isolates in our collection were predicted (and phenotypically) to have MDR, a large proportion of the publicly available Chinese isolates contained AMR determinants for even more drug classes. Overall, the Chinese isolates contained a greater number, and even more diverse collection of AMR genes (Fig. 5b, c).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(a) Population structure of our Thai dataset compared to all public genomes from Asia in pubMLST (n=146; June 2022). All core genes (present in ≥95 % of isolates) from the reference genome BM407 (accession no. NC_012926.1) were used to build a gene-by-gene alignment. A maximum-likelihood phylogeny was reconstructed with iq-tree, using a GTR model and ultrafast bootstrapping (1000 bootstraps; version 1.6.8) [52, 120]. Bar, genetic distance of 0.01. Leaves are coloured by country of origin: Chinese isolates in pink; publicly available Thai isolates in light purple; and Thai isolates from this study in dark purple. Serotype 2 isolates are shaded in blue, with common sequence types (represented by two or more isolates) annotated. The presence of AMR genes identified using abricate and NCBI AMRfinder are indicated by black squares and increasing number of AMR genes by deeper red colour for each isolate. Interactive visualization is available on Microreact: https://microreact.org/project/ssuis-ns2-context [53]. (b) Smmary of the number of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes (ARG) contained, per isolate in Chinese (grey shading) and Thai (purple shading) serotype 2 and non-serotype 2 isolates. (c) Proportion of isolates that contain at least one ARG from each antimcrobial class.

Discussion

S. suis were cultured and identified from 18.2 % of pigs swabbed in this study (138 of 760 samples), which is within the range previously reported for the prevalence in farmed pigs and slaughterhouses in the same area of Thailand [72, 73]. This level of prevalence was significantly lower than the S. suis prevalence previously reported in pigs from other provinces in Northern Thailand, such as Lampang (64.8 %) and Phayao (61.4 %) [33]. These and other studies in Northern Thailand reported a high prevalence of serotype 2 (5.6–43 %) and serotype 7 (8.2–14.3 %) isolates [72, 74]. However, in this study, we mainly identified non-serotype 2 isolates, with only a single isolate typed as serotype 9 and no serotype 2 isolates identified during this survey. This variation is likely due to differences in sampling, as we prioritized collection from healthy pigs. Invasive disease isolates have shown biogeographical variation, with competition and serotype replacement noted among virulent S. suis serotypes [17, 57, 75]. Serotype 9 is most common in diseased pigs from Europe and has a low pathogenic potential in humans, despite a rare case of serotype 9 infection in humans recently being reported in Thailand [9, 76].

Difficulties in capsule serotyping S. suis (sensu lato) isolates, where previously typed S. suis isolates are now designated as other Streptococcus species, hint at an ambiguous species designation and within-species diversity [77, 78]. This is further supported by characterization of divergent S. suis isolates by WGS [19]. The extent to which these represent stable lineages is unclear, with the rate of lineage turnover in S. suis seldom investigated [57, 79]. We identified increased variation in the core and accessory genomes of non-serotype 2 isolates (Figs 1 and 2). Serotype 2 isolates are typically found to have smaller genomes than non-invasive isolates and are often isolated from disease cases [12, 19]. Our collection of mostly non-invasive non-serotype 2 isolates had consistently larger genomes (with more genes; Table S2) than the S. suis reference genome (BM407 : 2 170 810 bp) and other invasive isolates (Table S2). Despite smaller genomes, these invasive isolates also tend to carry more virulence-related genes and all serotype 2 isolates in our collection carried the pilB gene, which is associated with the brain cell invasion required to cause meningitis in humans and pigs [80]. It has been suggested that this reduction in genome size may be due to gene loss, including core metabolism genes for nutrients that can be scavenged from the host; and a streamlining of functional/redundant elements [13, 81].

A plug-and-play theory of bacterial accessory genomes [82–84], where diversity in bacterial phenotypes can be conferred by a mobile pool of genes that are readily gained and lost, enables the acquisition of rapid adaptive genomic changes that can be spread through the population via recombination [58]. Host switching and zoonotic infection complicate analyses of gene flow and attribution of AMR elements [85, 86]. Here, we focus primarily on a potential reservoir of infection and characterize variation in the gene pool from which invasive disease isolates may have arisen. Where resistance is conferred by a single (or few) nucleotide substitution(s), it is impossible to tell from sequence data whether horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or point mutation was responsible [87, 88]. For other classes of antibiotics, the literature provides clear evidence for HGT of genes [27, 58, 89, 90]. For example, the pBM407 plasmid characterized in the pBM407 S. suis reference genome mobilizes tet(O), tet(L), erm(B), cat and dfr genes between isolates [49, 91]. Including additional putative tetracycline-resistance genes, our analyses identified 18 accessory genes associated with resistance to seven antimicrobial classes.

We identified genes with described roles in resistance to aminoglycosides, macrolides, lincosamides, tetracycline, nucleoside, oxazolidinones and phenicols. Most isolates were predicted to have MDR (80.6 %; containing AMR determinants to three or more antibiotic classes). The most common AMR genes identified were associated with resistance to macrolides and tetracycline. More than 80 % of isolates contained at least one gene predicted to confer macrolide resistance [92]. The presence of erm(B) and mef(A) genes are consistent with previous studies, where erm(B) is strongly linked with macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance and presented in 59–90 % of macrolide-resistant S. suis isolates from pigs [59, 93, 94]. The resistant gene erm(T) has been detected in Streptococcus agalactiae , Streptococcus pyogenes and other erythromycin-resistant isolates of group D streptococci [59, 95, 96], our identification of erm(T) in this study suggests potential within-genus HGT.

The most common tetracycline-resistance gene detected was tet(O) in over half of the isolates (63.9 %) (Table 3). An alternative ribosomal protein, tet(M), is also often associated with tetracycline resistance in S. suis [92, 97], but was not observed among our isolates. In addition, we detected tet(L) and tet(W) genes, which have not often been reported in S. suis, among non-serotype 2 isolates from healthy pigs. Corresponding phenotypic resistance to tetracycline was reported in over 90 % of isolates, which is consistent with global data reporting widespread resistance to tetracycline and macrolides, likely related to the prophylactic use in agriculture [60, 94, 96, 98]. AMR may play a role in increasing numbers of treatment failures [17, 96, 99], and in our study, despite widespread MDR, we observed phenotypic susceptibility to all three of the recommended antimicrobials used to treat clinical S. suis meningitis (penicillin, ceftiofur and ceftriaxone) [8, 61]. However, some β-lactam resistant isolates (18–27 %) were found among the non-clinical strains of S. suis [60, 96, 100] and β-lactam usage in pig production should be closely monitored, especially where there is prophylactic use in healthy pigs.

We report widespread phenotypic resistance, even in the absence of a predictive resistance element (Fig. 3). Given the enhanced genetic diversity and lack of clear characterization of this disease reservoir, it is possible that additional resistance elements have yet to be fully described. A recent study by Hadjirin et al. identified more than 20 novel S. suis AMR determinants, including point mutations that have not been included in this study [101]. The authors also note poorer corelation between genotype and phenotype for fluoroquinolones and phenicols, complex interactions between AMR determinants – with some AMR genes able to confer resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobial. Even in the absence of direct antimicrobial selective pressure, broad spectrum use of antibiotics acts on all bacterial species in the microbiome; and this bystander effect can confer resistance on bacterial species that are not the target of the antimicrobial treatment [51, 102]. Enrofloxacin is widely used to treat other types of bacterial infection in the respiratory and digestive systems of livestock animals, and in our collection more than 40 % of isolates were resistant to this antibiotic [96, 103]. Spectinomycin is often used in pig production and other livestock animals combined with lincomycin [104, 105]. Clusters of AMR genes [aadE-spw-lsa(E)-lnu(B)] have been identified in staphylococci and enterococci associated with lincosamide resistance [106, 107]. We identified this combination of spectinomycin and lincosamide resistance in one serotype 2 isolate and two non-serotype 2 isolates from healthy pigs. Individually, we identified spectinomycin and lincosamide resistance genes in a small number of isolates, as has previously been reported for invasive S. suis isolates [97, 108].

The plasmid-borne chloramphenicol-resistance gene, catA8 [109, 110], and the optrA gene that confers transferable combined resistance to oxazolidinones (linezolid) and phenicols (chloramphenicol and florfenicol) [111–113], are reported here for the first time, to our knowledge, for S. suis in Thailand. Although phenotypic susceptibility was recorded to linezolid, the isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. Recently, optrA has been found in oxazolidinone-resistant S. suis isolates in China [114–116]. This is further evidence of the unintended effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, such as the oxazolidinones linezolid and tedizolid, which are highly effective against Gram-positive bacteria [117] but rarely used in the pig production industry. However, florfenicol has been used in livestock animals for therapeutic purposes and there is documented transfer of plasmids carrying optrA between different Gram-positive bacteria [118]. Twenty-one different resistance gene patterns were observed, with erm(B) and tet(O) found together in 62.5 % (5 of 8) of serotype 2 isolates, as previously observed [108]. Most non-serotype 2 isolates possessed AMR genes to at least three antimicrobial classes (up to seven; 22/28, 78.6 %). Several genetic elements, including ICEs carrying AMR genes such as optrA, erm(B), tet(M), tet(O) and tet(W), have been reported in S. suis [49, 108]; however, plasmid elements were found only in non-serotype 2 isolates in this study.

In line with other studies, we also observed differences in the extent of AMR between countries. Isolates from China were more extensively drug resistant than isolates from Chiang Mai and Thailand. Differences have previously been observed between the UK and Canada, potentially linked to differences in veterinary antimicrobial usage [119]. Genome comparisons between Chinese and Thai isolates also highlight separate reservoir gene pools, with long branches of non-invasive isolates (Fig. 5). This hints at large, uncharacterized reservoirs of diversity in healthy pigs around the world.

Conclusion

We collected isolates from 760 healthy pigs reared in the pork industry in Northern Thailand. Through comparison of 36 whole-genome sequences, we identified increased genetic diversity in these non-serotype 2 carriage isolates, from which the more invasive and pathogenic serotype 2 isolates emerge. Corresponding diversity was also seen in the breadth and diversity of AMR determinants that conferred increased phenotypic non-susceptibility. This genetically diverse reservoir of S. suis pose a public-health risk with the potential for gene flow to more invasive isolates, broadening their spectrum of AMR. Extensive phenotypic resistance is observed to antimicrobials that are not typically used to treat this infection. This can be partly explained by the co-occurrence of resistance genes on ICEs. However, little phenotypic resistance was observed to β-lactams, which remain the prescribed antimicrobial for S. suis infection in Thailand. Continued surveillance and more stringent control of antimicrobial usage within the pork industry will be necessary to monitor a growing AMR threat in S. suis.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1
Supplementary material 2
Supplementary material 3
Supplementary material 4
Supplementary material 5
Supplementary material 6
Supplementary material 7
Supplementary material 8

Funding information

This research work was partially supported by Chiang Mai University (Thailand) and the National Science and Technology Development Agency (P-13-50155). All high-performance computing was performed in collaboration with Medical Research Council (MRC) CLIMB, funded by the MRC (MR/L015080/1 and MR/T030062/1). Collaborative visits between UK and Thai partners were supported by a Newton Fund Researcher Links travel grant. The funders played no role in study design nor implementation.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the technicians, scientists and non-technical staff of the Veterinary Research and Development Center (Upper Northern Region), Lampang, Thailand, and Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK, for their cooperation and support.

Author contributions

N.K.: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; drafted manuscript. J.K.C.: analysis and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. E.M.: analysis and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. M.D.H.: acquisition and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. S.M.: acquisition and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. Pa.T: acquisition and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. Ph.T.: acquisition and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. K.D.: acquisition and interpretation of data; revised manuscript. G.M.: interpretation of data; revised manuscript. S.K.S.: interpretation of data; revised manuscript. P.P.: conceptualized and designed work; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; drafted manuscript. B.P.: conceptualized and designed work; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; drafted manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

This study was carried out according to guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. The study protocol was approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine’s Animal Care and Use Committee, University of Chiang Mai (protocol number S24/2559).

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AMR, antimicrobial resistance; CI, confidence interval; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; HGT, horizontal gene transfer; ICE, integrative and conjugative element; MDR, multi-drug resistance; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; OR, odds ratio; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.

All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Eight supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Nattinee K, Jessica KC, Evangelos M, Matthew DH, Susan M, et al. 2022. Genetic diversity and variation in antimicrobial-resistance determinants of non-serotype 2 sstreptococcus suis isolates from healthy pigs. FigShare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Gilbert M, Nicolas G, Cinardi G, Van Boeckel TP, Vanwambeke SO, et al. Global distribution data for cattle, buffaloes, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens and ducks in 2010. Sci Data. 2018;5:180227. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.VanderWaal K, Deen J. Global trends in infectious diseases of swine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:11495–11500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806068115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gottschalk M, Segura M. Diseases of Swine. 2019. Streptococcosis; pp. 934–950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Segura M. Streptococcus suis research: progress and challenges. Pathogens. 2020;9:E707. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dutkiewicz J, Sroka J, Zając V, Wasiński B, Cisak E, et al. Streptococcus suis: a re-emerging pathogen associated with occupational exposure to pigs or pork products. Part I – epidemiology. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24:683–695. doi: 10.26444/aaem/79813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rayanakorn A, Ademi Z, Liew D, Lee LH. PIN65 estimating the lifetime economic burden of Streptococcus suis and its productivity impact in Thailand. Value Health. 2020;23:S179. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van Samkar A, Brouwer MC, Schultsz C, van der Ende A, van de Beek D. Streptococcus suis meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goyette-Desjardins G, Auger J-P, Xu J, Segura M, Gottschalk M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014;3:e45. doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takeuchi D, Kerdsin A, Akeda Y, Chiranairadul P, Loetthong P, et al. Impact of a food safety campaign on Streptococcus suis infection in humans in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1370–1377. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rayanakorn A, Katip W, Goh BH, Oberdorfer P, Lee LH. Clinical manifestations and risk factors of Streptococcus suis mortality among northern Thai population: retrospective 13-year cohort study. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3955–3965. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S233326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weinert LA, Chaudhuri RR, Wang J, Peters SE, Corander J, et al. Genomic signatures of human and animal disease in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . Nat Commun. 2015;6:6740. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murray GGR, Charlesworth J, Miller EL, Casey MJ, Lloyd CT, et al. Genome reduction is associated with bacterial pathogenicity across different scales of temporal and ecological divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:1570–1579. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weinert LA, Chaudhuri RR, Wang J, Peters SE, Corander J, et al. Publisher correction: genomic signatures of human and animal disease in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . Nat Commun. 2019;10:5326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13138-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Segura M, Calzas C, Grenier D, Gottschalk M. Initial steps of the pathogenesis of the infection caused by Streptococcus suis: fighting against nonspecific defenses. FEBS Lett. 2016;590:3772–3799. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Athey TBT, Teatero S, Lacouture S, Takamatsu D, Gottschalk M, et al. Determining Streptococcus suis serotype from short-read whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:162. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0782-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hughes JM, Wilson ME, Wertheim HFL, Nghia HDT, Taylor W, et al. Streptococcus suis: an emerging human pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:617–625. doi: 10.1086/596763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Okura M, Osaki M, Nomoto R, Arai S, Osawa R, et al. Current taxonomical situation of Streptococcus suis . Pathogens. 2016;5:E45. doi: 10.3390/pathogens5030045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baig A, Weinert LA, Peters SE, Howell KJ, Chaudhuri RR, et al. Whole genome investigation of a divergent clade of the pathogen Streptococcus suis . Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1191. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stevens MJA, Spoerry Serrano N, Cernela N, Schmitt S, Schrenzel J, et al. Massive diversity in whole-genome sequences of Streptococcus suis strains from infected pigs in Switzerland. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e01656-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01656-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang A, Yang M, Hu P, Wu J, Chen B, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Streptococcus suis reveals significant genomic diversity among different serotypes. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:523. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Okura M, Maruyama F, Ota A, Tanaka T, Matoba Y, et al. Genotypic diversity of Streptococcus suis and the S. suis-like bacterium Streptococcus ruminantium in ruminants. Vet Res. 2019;50:94. doi: 10.1186/s13567-019-0708-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.World Health Organization WHO Guidelines on Use of Medically Important Antimicrobials in Food-Producing Animals: web annex A: evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Delannoy S, Le Devendec L, Jouy E, Fach P, Drider D, et al. Characterization of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from diseased pigs in France. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2278. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi L-X, Zhang R, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–168. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Patchanee P, Chokesajjawatee N, Santiyanont P, Chuammitri P, Deeudom M, et al. Multiple clones of colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica carrying mcr-1 plasmids in meat products and patients in Northern Thailand. bioRxiv. 2020:415869. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.08.415869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Patchanee P, Tanamai P, Tadee P, Hitchings MD, Calland JK, et al. Whole-genome characterisation of multidrug resistant monophasic variants of Salmonella typhimurium from pig production in Thailand. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9700. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prasertsee T, Chuammitri P, Deeudom M, Chokesajjawatee N, Santiyanont P, et al. Core genome sequence analysis to characterize Salmonella enterica serovar Rissen ST469 from a swine production chain. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;304:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tadee P, Patchanee P, Pascoe B, Sheppard SK, Meunsene D, et al. Occurrence and sequence type of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella spp. circulating in antibiotic-free organic pig farms of Northern-Thailand. Thai J Vet Med. 2021;51:311–319. doi: 10.14456/tjvm.2021.39. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nguyen NT, Nguyen HM, Nguyen CV, Nguyen TV, Nguyen MT, et al. Use of colistin and other critical antimicrobials on pig and chicken farms in southern Vietnam and its association with resistance in commensal Escherichia coli bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:3727–3735. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00337-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pumart P PT, Thamlikitkul V, Riewpaiboon A, Prakongsai P, Limwattananon S. Health and economic impacts of antimicrobial resistance in Thailand. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;6:352–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pathanasophon P, Worarach A, Narongsak W, Yuwapanichsampan S, Nuangmek A, et al. Prevalence of Streptococcus suis in tonsils of slaughtered pigs in Lampang and Phayao provinces, Thailand 2009-2010. J Trop Med. 2013;36:8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. London: Wolfe Publishing; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wisselink HJ, Joosten JJ, Smith HE. Multiplex PCR assays for simultaneous detection of six major serotypes and two virulence-associated phenotypes of Streptococcus suis in tonsillar specimens from pigs. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2922–2929. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2922-2929.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marois C, Bougeard S, Gottschalk M, Kobisch M. Multiplex PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus suis species and serotypes 2 and 1/2 in tonsils of live and dead pigs. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3169–3175. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3169-3175.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wisselink HJ, Smith HE, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Peperkamp K, Vecht U. Distribution of capsular types and production of muramidase-released protein (MRP) and extracellular factor (EF) of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased pigs in seven European countries. Vet Microbiol. 2000;74:237–248. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, approved standard, 11th edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012. p. 76. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100-S27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, approved standard, 3rd edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100-S30. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 4th edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, approved standard, 2nd edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rosco Diagnostica NEO-SENSITABS Veterinary Practice According to CLSI Breakpoints. Taastrup: Rosco Diagnostica; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Howe RA, Andrews JM, BSAC Working Party on Susceptibility Testing BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 11) J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2783–2784. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.King SJ, Leigh JA, Heath PJ, Luque I, Tarradas C, et al. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the pig pathogen Streptococcus suis: identification of virulent clones and potential capsular serotype exchange. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3671–3680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3671-3680.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Holden MTG, Hauser H, Sanders M, Ngo TH, Cherevach I, et al. Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . PLoS One. 2009;4:e6072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Morley VJ, Woods RJ, Read AF. Bystander selection for antimicrobial resistance: implications for patient health. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27:864–877. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000093. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bayliss SC, Thorpe HA, Coyle NM, Sheppard SK, Feil EJ. PIRATE: a fast and scalable pangenomics toolbox for clustering diverged orthologues in bacteria. Gigascience. 2019;8:giz119. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hadjirin NF, Miller EL, Murray GGR, Yen PLK, Phuc HD, et al. Linking phenotype, genotype and ecology: antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . bioRxiv. 2020::078493. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.05.078493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Redondo-Salvo S, Fernández-López R, Ruiz R, Vielva L, de Toro M, et al. Pathways for horizontal gene transfer in bacteria revealed by a global map of their plasmids. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3602. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17278-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang C, Zhang Z, Song L, Fan X, Wen F, et al. Antimicrobial resistance profile and genotypic characteristics of Streptococcus suis capsular type 2 isolated from clinical carrier sows and diseased pigs in China. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:284303. doi: 10.1155/2015/284303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Soares TCS, Paes AC, Megid J, Ribolla PEM, Paduan K, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from clinically healthy swine in Brazil. Can J Vet Res. 2014;78:145–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Seitz M, Valentin-Weigand P, Willenborg J. In: How to Overcome the Antibiotic Crisis. Stadler M, Dersch P, editors. Cham: Springer; 2016. Use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine as exemplified by the swine pathogen Streptococcus suis ; pp. 103–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lees JA, Harris SR, Tonkin-Hill G, Gladstone RA, Lo SW, et al. Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK. Genome Res. 2019;29:304–316. doi: 10.1101/gr.241455.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Frye JG, Haendiges J, et al. AMRFinderPlus and the reference gene catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91456-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Florensa AF, Kaas RS, Clausen P, Aytan-Aktug D, Aarestrup FM. ResFinder - an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microb Genom. 2022;8:000748. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sayers EW, Agarwala R, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D23–D28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genom. 2018;4:000206. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Robertson J, Bessonov K, Schonfeld J, Nash JHE. Universal whole-sequence-based plasmid typing and its utility to prediction of host range and epidemiological surveillance. Microb Genom. 2020;6:000435. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sweeney MT, Lubbers BV, Schwarz S, Watts JL. Applying definitions for multidrug resistance, extensive drug resistance and pandrug resistance to clinically significant livestock and companion animal bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:1460–1463. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Padungtod P, Tharavichitkul P, Junya S, Chaisowong W, Kadohira M, et al. Incidence and presence of virulence factors of Streptococcus suis infection in slaughtered pigs from Chiang Mai, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41:1454–1461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kongkaew S, Wongsawan K, Pansumdang C, Takam S, Yano T, et al. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from pigs tonsil swabs. Kasetsart Vet. 2012;22:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thongkamkoon P, Kiatyingangsulee T, Gottschalk M. Serotypes of Streptococcus suis isolated from healthy pigs in Phayao Province, Thailand. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2354-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Flores JL, Higgins R, D’Allaire S, Charette R, Boudreau M, et al. Distribution of the different capsular types of Streptococcus suis in nineteen swine nurseries. Can Vet J. 1993;34:170–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kerdsin A, Hatrongjit R, Gottschalk M, Takeuchi D, Hamada S, et al. Emergence of Streptococcus suis serotype 9 infection in humans. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50:545–546. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Prüfer TL, Rohde J, Verspohl J, Rohde M, de Greeff A, et al. Molecular typing of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased and healthy pigs between 1996-2016. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hatrongjit R, Fittipaldi N, Gottschalk M, Kerdsin A. Tools for molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus suis . Pathogens. 2020;9:E81. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9020081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Calland JK, Pascoe B, Bayliss SC, Mourkas E, Berthenet E, et al. Quantifying bacterial evolution in the wild: a birthday problem for Campylobacter lineages. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Maisey HC, Hensler M, Nizet V, Doran KS. Group B streptococcal pilus proteins contribute to adherence to and invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:1464–1467. doi: 10.1128/JB.01153-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Weinert LA, Welch JJ. Why might bacterial pathogens have small genomes? Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32:936–947. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.McInerney JO, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17040. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sheppard SK, Guttman DS, Fitzgerald JR. Population genomics of bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:549–565. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0032-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Young JPW. Bacteria are smartphones and mobile genes are apps. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:931–932. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Dearlove BL, Cody AJ, Pascoe B, Méric G, Wilson DJ, et al. Rapid host switching in generalist Campylobacter strains erodes the signal for tracing human infections. ISME J. 2016;10:721–729. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mourkas E, Florez-Cuadrado D, Pascoe B, Calland JK, Bayliss SC, et al. Gene pool transmission of multidrug resistance among Campylobacter from livestock, sewage and human disease. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:4597–4613. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhao S, Tyson GH, Chen Y, Li C, Mukherjee S, et al. Whole-genome sequencing analysis accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:459–466. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02873-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Florez-Cuadrado D, Ugarte-Ruiz M, Meric G, Quesada A, Porrero MC, et al. Genome comparison of erythromycin resistant Campylobacter from turkeys identifies hosts and pathways for horizontal spread of erm(B) genes. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2240. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang R, van Dorp L, Shaw LP, Bradley P, Wang Q, et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1179. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03205-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hoa NT, Chieu TTB, Nghia HDT, Mai NTH, Anh PH, et al. The antimicrobial resistance patterns and associated determinants in Streptococcus suis isolated from humans in southern Vietnam, 1997–2008. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Palmieri C, Varaldo PE, Facinelli B. Streptococcus suis, an emerging drug-resistant animal and human pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:235. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Martel A, Baele M, Devriese LA, Goossens H, Wisselink HJ, et al. Prevalence and mechanism of resistance against macrolides and lincosamides in Streptococcus suis isolates. Vet Microbiol. 2001;83:287–297. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00426-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tan M-F, Tan J, Zeng Y-B, Li H-Q, Yang Q, et al. Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes of Streptococcus suis isolated from clinically healthy pigs from 2017 to 2019 in Jiangxi Province, China. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130:797–806. doi: 10.1111/jam.14831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chen L, Song Y, Wei Z, He H, Zhang A, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility, tetracycline and erythromycin resistance genes, and multilocus sequence typing of Streptococcus suis isolates from diseased pigs in China. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:583–587. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yongkiettrakul S, Maneerat K, Arechanajan B, Malila Y, Srimanote P, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs, asymptomatic pigs, and human patients in Thailand. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1732-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bojarska A, Molska E, Janas K, Skoczyńska A, Stefaniuk E, et al. Streptococcus suis in invasive human infections in Poland: clonality and determinants of virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:917–925. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2616-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mourkas E, Taylor AJ, Méric G, Bayliss SC, Pascoe B, et al. Agricultural intensification and the evolution of host specialism in the enteric pathogen Campylobacter jejuni . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:11018–11028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917168117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gurung M, Tamang MD, Moon DC, Kim S-R, Jeong J-H, et al. Molecular basis of resistance to selected antimicrobial agents in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2332–2336. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00123-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Segura M, Aragon V, Brockmeier SL, Gebhart C, Greeff A de, et al. Update on Streptococcus suis research and prevention in the era of antimicrobial restriction: 4th International Workshop on S. suis . Pathogens. 2020;9:E374. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hadjirin NF, Miller EL, Murray GGR, Yen PLK, Phuc HD, et al. A comprehensive portrait of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . bioRxiv. 2021:078493. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.05.078493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tedijanto C, Olesen SW, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. Estimating the proportion of bystander selection for antibiotic resistance among potentially pathogenic bacterial flora. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E11988–E11995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810840115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lakkitjaroen N, Kaewmongkol S, Metheenukul P, Karnchanabanthoeng A, Satchasataporn K, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from slaughter pigs in northern Thailand. Kasetsart J. 2011;45:78–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang B, Wang Y, Xie X, Diao Z, Xie K, et al. Quantitative analysis of spectinomycin and lincomycin in poultry eggs by accelerated solvent extraction coupled with gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Foods. 2020;9:E651. doi: 10.3390/foods9050651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bosman AL, Loest D, Carson CA, Agunos A, Collineau L, et al. Developing Canadian defined daily doses for animals: a metric to quantify antimicrobial use. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:220. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li X-S, Dong W-C, Wang X-M, Hu G-Z, Wang Y-B, et al. Presence and genetic environment of pleuromutilin-lincosamide-streptogramin A resistance gene lsa(E) in enterococci of human and swine origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1424–1426. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Huang K, Zhang Q, Song Y, Zhang Z, Zhang A, et al. Characterization of spectinomycin resistance in Streptococcus suis leads to two novel insights into drug resistance formation and dissemination mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:6390–6392. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01157-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Athey TBT, Teatero S, Takamatsu D, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, et al. Population structure and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Streptococcus suis serotype 2 sequence type 25 strains. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.McHugh MP, Parcell BJ, Pettigrew KA, Toner G, Khatamzas E, et al. Presence of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in multiple lineages and plasmids of Enterococcus faecalis revealed by long read sequencing. Microbiology. 2022;168:001137. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yan H, Yu R, Li D, Shi L, Schwarz S, et al. A novel multiresistance gene cluster located on a plasmid-borne transposon in Listeria monocytogenes . J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:868–872. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhou W, Gao S, Xu H, Zhang Z, Chen F, et al. Distribution of the optrA gene in Enterococcus isolates at a tertiary care hospital in China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;17:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Brenciani A, Morroni G, Vincenzi C, Manso E, Mingoia M, et al. Detection in Italy of two clinical Enterococcus faecium isolates carrying both the oxazolidinone and phenicol resistance gene optrA and a silent multiresistance gene cfr. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1118–1119. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bender JK, Cattoir V, Hegstad K, Sadowy E, Coque TM, et al. Update on prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin in enterococci in Europe: towards a common nomenclature. Drug Resist Updat. 2018;40:25–39. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Huang J, Sun J, Wu Y, Chen L, Duan D, et al. Identification and pathogenicity of an XDR Streptococcus suis isolate that harbours the phenicol-oxazolidinone resistance genes optrA and cfr, and the bacitracin resistance locus bcrABDR. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;54:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Huang J, Chen L, Wu Z, Wang L. Retrospective analysis of genome sequences revealed the wide dissemination of optrA in Gram-positive bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:614–616. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Du F, Lv X, Duan D, Wang L, Huang J. Characterization of a linezolid-and vancomycin-resistant Streptococcus suis isolate that harbours optrA and vanG operons. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2026. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sztanke K, Pasternak K, Sztanke M, editors. Oxazolidinones – a new class of broad-spectrum chemotherapeutics. Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med. 2004;59:335–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang Y, Lv Y, Cai J, Schwarz S, Cui L, et al. A novel gene, optrA, that confers transferable resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols and its presence in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium of human and animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2182–2190. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hadjirin NF, Miller EL, Murray GGR, Yen PLK, Phuc HD, et al. Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis . BMC Biol. 2021;19:191. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hadfield J, Croucher NJ, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM, et al. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:292–293. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Nattinee K, Jessica KC, Evangelos M, Matthew DH, Susan M, et al. 2022. Genetic diversity and variation in antimicrobial-resistance determinants of non-serotype 2 sstreptococcus suis isolates from healthy pigs. FigShare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1
Supplementary material 2
Supplementary material 3
Supplementary material 4
Supplementary material 5
Supplementary material 6
Supplementary material 7
Supplementary material 8

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES