Abstract
Purpose:
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a relatively common health problem, impacting around 25 million women globally. This study details the development of a multidisciplinary women's CPP clinic at a major U.S. academic medical center, and examines associations between mood, pain symptoms, and trauma history.
Materials and Methods:
Data were collected from 96 subjects, including self-report measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Brief Trauma Questionnaire), pain intensity ratings, psychiatric diagnoses, and relevant medical history.
Results:
Most subjects reported at least one traumatic experience. Nearly half of subjects met criteria for an anxiety disorder and/or a depressive disorder. Most subjects were diagnosed with pelvic floor dysfunction, and more than half were referred to physical therapy. Women with abdominal/pelvic surgery history reported more traumatic experiences than women without surgical history. Women with a history of sexual abuse reported trying more medications and seeking care from a greater number of providers. Many reported pain duration of >2 years.
Conclusions:
Study findings related to mental health and trauma support a multidisciplinary CPP approach that includes a clinical health psychology component. Future research may investigate the therapeutic processes that apply to this population to identify targeted efficacious interventions.
Keywords: chronic pelvic pain, multidisciplinary treatment, women's health, trauma, depression, anxiety
Introduction
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a relatively common health problem and impacts the lives of around 25 million women globally. CPP affects all genders, although research shows that most CPP cases occur in females.1 Worldwide incidence rates of female CPP vary considerably, ranging from 6% to 39%.2,3 This variability stems from a lack of consensus regarding defining criteria, including location, duration, and etiology.4 Problems defining criteria thus create challenges in understanding the causes and in developing a comprehensive treatment model.3
CPP is broadly defined as a persistent (>6 months), noncyclic pain located in the pelvic or abdominal region.5 CPP often co-occurs with other medical concerns, although associations vary and tend to form syndromes rather than definitive causal pathways. In females, these comorbid conditions include irritable bowel syndrome,2 bladder pain syndrome, endometriosis,6 pelvic adhesions, interstitial cystitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease.7
In addition to medical comorbidities, psychosocial factors are often linked to CPP. CPP is associated with increased workplace absenteeism and decreased productivity.8,9 Sleep, household activities, work, and sexual relations are the most common areas of impairment.10 Many women with CPP report dyspareunia (fear of and actual pain before, during, and after intercourse).11 Women of reproductive age may avoid or put off family-building efforts to prevent an exacerbation of pain, which in turn may cause long-term emotional and interpersonal repercussions.12
CPP patients often exhibit associated mood symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances.13 A study of CPP patients (60.1% female) found that 95.2% of patients met criteria for at least one mental health condition, including higher rates of somatoform, depressive, and anxiety disorders than in the general population.14 In one study comparing women diagnosed with CPP and controls, the prevalence of anxiety (73% vs. 37%) and depression (40% vs. 30%) were higher among CPP patients; higher anxiety and depression were associated with lower quality of life.15
Nearly one in three women worldwide have been subjected to physical and/or sexual violence; these data were collected between 2000 and 2018 from 161 countries.16 Women in the United States report an 8.0% lifetime prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).17 Higher rates of reproductive and sexual trauma, as well as other forms of abuse, are observed in higher rates among CPP patients than in the general population18–20; furthermore, higher rates of PTSD are reported by CPP patients.21 One study found that almost 47% of female CPP patients reported having a sexual or physical abuse history, and ∼31% screened positive for PTSD.21 Similarly, in a multidisciplinary CPP clinic, ∼45% of CPP patients had a history of abuse, with the majority (73%) reporting sexual abuse.10 Adult sexual abuse has been found to increase the likelihood of severe pain-related disability and the risk of depression in women with CPP.22
Owing to the interdependent nature of the physiological and psychosocial components of CPP, a comprehensive treatment approach, including both psychotherapy and medical treatment, is preferable. Reduction of pain alone does not improve mood symptoms in CPP patients.23,24 In fact, previous research has suggested that multidisciplinary approaches (when compared with isolated medical treatments) are associated with better pain management, improved general health outcomes, and decreased mental health symptoms.10,23
A Cochrane review in 2000 found evidence supporting multimodal treatments for CPP in women; the studies examined included hormonal treatments, physical therapy, psychotherapy, diet, and environmental factors.25 Myofascial physical therapy is also associated with reduced pain intensity.26,27 A 2017 article assessing the rationale for multidisciplinary treatment of CPP similarly cited pharmacology, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and interventional pain management procedures (e.g., nerve blocks, pelvic floor trigger point injections, pelvic floor botulinum toxin injections, and neuromodulation) as common elements of a successful multidisciplinary treatment program.28
The purpose of this study is to (1) detail the development of a multidisciplinary women's CPP clinic at a major U.S. academic medical center, (2) characterize patient anxiety, depression, and trauma at initial appointment, and (3) examine correlations between mood, pain and pain-related medical care, and trauma history.
Materials and Methods
Participants and procedures
Data were collected from 96 women who sought care at this CPP Clinic between May 2019 and August 2020. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 83 years (mean [M] = 35.34, standard deviation [SD] = 13.91). Patient race was predominantly White (88.5% White [n = 85], 5.2% Black [n = 5], and 6.3% Other [n = 6]). Patients were primarily married or partnered (69.8% married or partnered [n = 67], 26% single or divorced [n = 25], and 4.2% unknown [n = 4]).
The CPP Clinic at (the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics) operates through the department of obstetrics and gynecology. Referrals originate from primary care physicians or specialists in obstetrics/gynecology, urogynecology, or gastroenterology. Women frequently wait several months for an initial consultation and travel a considerable distance to this clinic due to limited treatment options elsewhere. A clinic visit includes multiple same-day services, with OB-GYN and physical therapy examinations, as well as diagnostic testing. Treatment recommendations may include pain medications, hormonal treatments, surgical interventions, pelvic floor physical therapy, or referrals to treat underlying contributing conditions.
In May 2019, the CPP Clinic was expanded to include two health psychologists, per request from clinic physicians after noting high rates of patient depression and anxiety. They also cited treatment complexity caused by trauma history, including sexual abuse or violence. Thus, a health psychology component was developed and added as a required aspect of the initial clinic visit for all patients. This requirement was explained to patients by clinic staff at the time of appointment scheduling.
The health psychology session was scheduled for 60 minutes and included a diagnostic clinical interview (with specific focus on psychiatric and pain histories), completion of self-report measures (anxiety, depression, and trauma), and collaborative treatment planning. Although the health psychologists reviewed pain scores before and often during clinical interviews with patients, these data were previously collected by the clinic obstetrician-gynecologist as part of standard medical symptom review protocol.
Many patients presented to first clinic visit with a regimen of pain, psychiatric, or hormonal medications already in place. These data were recorded in the medical chart by either the obstetrician-gynecologist (pain and hormonal medication) or the health psychologist (psychiatric medication). Approximately 6 months after the launch of the new clinic format, sessions were decreased to 30 minutes to offer more focused patient care. The new format abbreviated the clinical interview while behavioral interventions (e.g., mindfulness exercises and cognitive reframing) were added to enhance patient coping skills.
When significant mental health concerns such as anxiety, depression, or PTSD were identified, a referral for outpatient psychotherapeutic services was suggested and could include follow-up care with the health psychologist, referral to an external mental health care provider, or continued treatment with the patient's established clinician. Patients who scheduled follow-up appointments with the CPP medical team were also offered the option to meet with the health psychologist for further treatment. Follow-up visits focused on reinforcement of cognitive-behavioral pain coping strategies. Cognitive-behavioral interventions included identification and reframing of maladaptive automatic thoughts about the pain experience, with corresponding behavioral activation and intervention (e.g., teaching of relaxation techniques). Psychoeducation regarding the role of movement in pain management was discussed in the context of behavioral activation strategies.
Patient responses from the self-report measures were recorded in the hospital's electronic medical record (EMR) system. In preparation for later data extraction and analyses, research approval for nonhuman subjects research was sought and obtained from the University Institutional Review Board. A secure database was created outside of the EMR that included demographic data, scores from the self-report measures, pain assessments, psychiatric diagnoses, and relevant medical history.
Measures
Clinical interview
The interview included an assessment of relationship, reproductive, medical, substance use, psychiatric, and social histories, as well as a discussion of current and predicted life stressors. An extensive history of pelvic pain was also conducted, which included etiology, pain source, location, triggers, diagnoses, treatments, coping strategies, and emotional supports/resources.
Trauma
The Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ) is a self-administered 10-item questionnaire.29 The BTQ is sensitive to Criterion A of the PTSD diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and adequate criterion validity has been demonstrated.30 The BTQ not only assesses exposure to car accidents, natural disasters, and life-threatening illness, but also identifies unwanted sexual contact and physical abuse.
Depressive symptoms
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-report measure of depression based on the diagnostic criteria. The PHQ-9 is considered a reliable and valid measure of depressive symptom severity.31 Categories indicate severity ranging from minimal (0–4), mild (5–9), moderate (10–14), moderately severe (15–19), and severe (20–27) depression.31
Anxiety
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a self-report measure of anxiety,32 which has been used with perinatal women and CPP patients.14,33 Categories indicate severity ranging from minimal (0–4), mild (5–9), moderate (10–14), and severe (15–21) anxiety.32
Statistical analyses
Data were cleaned and examined for outliers, normality, skewness, and kurtosis before analyses. Descriptive characteristics of the sample are reported with frequencies, means, and SDs. Bivariate correlations indicate the associations between two continuous variables. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare between patients reporting a history of sexual abuse and those who did not in terms of pain duration, intensity, and other continuous variables of interest.
Results
Characteristics of the sample in terms of gynecological and other medical diagnoses are reported in Table 1. The average depressive and anxiety symptom scores were in the mild range. Across categories of severity, about one-quarter of the sample was experiencing minimal depression (27.4%), with the majority reporting mild or greater severity. Similar findings were observed with anxiety, with 24.2% reporting minimal anxiety, and most of the sample reporting mild or greater levels of anxiety. Most of the sample (74.2%) was diagnosed with at least one mental health condition.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the Sample
| Mean (SD) | |
|---|---|
| PHQ-9, Total | 8.10 (5.56) |
| Minimal depression, 0–4, n (%) | 26 (27.4) |
| Mild depression, 5–9, n (%) | 32 (33.7) |
| Moderate depression, 10–14, n (%) | 16 (16.8) |
| Moderately severe depression, 15–19, n (%) | 11 (11.6) |
| Severe depression, 20–27, n (%) | 3 (3.2) |
| BTQ, Total | 2.11 (2.10) |
| GAD-7, Total | 8.29 (5.25) |
| Minimal anxiety, 0–4, n (%) | 23 (24.2) |
| Mild anxiety, 5–9, n (%) | 33 (34.7) |
| Moderate anxiety, 10–14, n (%) | 20 (21.1) |
| Severe anxiety, 15–21, n (%) | 13 (13.7) |
| Pain duration, months | 52.24 (44.12) |
| Deep pain with intercourse | 6.18 (3.44) |
| Pelvic pain after intercourse | 3.86 (3.26) |
| Muscle/joint pain | 3.83 (3.25) |
| Pain with urination | 1.40 (2.41) |
| Pain with sitting | 3.60 (3.20) |
| Medications tried | 2.09 (1.96) |
| Treatments tried | 2.17 (2.20) |
| Providers seen | 2.43 (1.43) |
| n (%) | |
| BTQ | |
| War-related trauma | 0 (0) |
| Serious accident | 29 (32.6) |
| Natural disaster | 16 (18) |
| Life-threatening illness | 6 (6.8) |
| Physical punishment as a child | 26 (29.2) |
| Physical assault as an adult | 18 (20.2) |
| Unwanted sexual contact: | 34 (38.2) |
| Serious injury | 18 (20.2) |
| Violent death of close other | 20 (22.5) |
| Serious injury to close other | 21 (23.6) |
| Reported 1+ traumas | 67 (75.3) |
| Mental health diagnosis | 69 (74.2) |
| Trauma stressor-related disorders | 9 (9.5) |
| Anxiety disorders | 47 (49.5) |
| Depressive disorders | 44 (46.8) |
| Abdominal/pelvic surgical procedures | 38 (40) |
| Vaginismus | 4 (4.2) |
| Vulvovaginitis | 13 (13.7) |
| Vulvodynia | 23 (24.2) |
| Dysmenorrhea | 12 (12.6) |
| Dyspareunia | 59 (62.1) |
| Endometriosis | 9 (9.5) |
| Constipation | 21 (22.1) |
| Pelvic floor dysfunction | 70 (73.7) |
| Referred for physical therapy | 54 (57.4) |
Six participants declined to complete the PHQ-9, BTQ, and GAD-7 measures.
BTQ, Brief Trauma Questionnaire; GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; SD, standard deviation.
Comparisons were conducted to examine the relationship between history of abdominal or pelvic surgery and depression, anxiety, and trauma history. Women with a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery reported more traumatic experiences (M = 2.76, SD = 2.50) than women with no such surgical history (M = 1.71, SD = 1.71), t(52.13) = −2.17, p = 0.035.
Bivariate correlations were examined between measures and are displayed in Table 2. Number of traumatic experiences was related to muscle and/or joint pain and pain with sitting. Number of traumas related to number of medications tried for pain. Depressive symptoms related to muscle and/or joint pain and pain with sitting.
Table 2.
Correlations Between Pain and Mental Health Variables
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pain duration | |||||||||||
| 2. Deep pain with intercourse | 0.21 | ||||||||||
| 3. Pelvic pain lasting hours or days after intercourse | 0.19 | 0.56a | |||||||||
| 4. Muscle/joint pain | 0.29b | 0.00 | 0.27b | ||||||||
| 5. Pain with urination | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.37c | |||||||
| 6. Pain with sitting | –0.12 | –0.15 | 0.31b | 0.58a | 0.31b | ||||||
| 7. Medications tried | 0.32b | 0.14 | 0.34c | 0.32b | 0.01 | 0.31b | |||||
| 8. Treatments tried | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.36c | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.62a | ||||
| 9. Providers seen | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.43a | 0.36c | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.61a | 0.070a | |||
| 10. GAD-7, Total | –0.03 | –0.04 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.01 | –0.13 | –0.13 | –0.00 | ||
| 11. PHQ-9, Total | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.51a | 0.22 | 0.28b | 0.15 | 0.04b | 0.21 | 0.70a | |
| 12. Traumas, Total | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.33c | 0.17 | 0.34c | 0.32b | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
p < 0.001.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Traumas, total number of traumas, as measured by the BTQ.
Finally, mood and pain ratings were compared among women who had a history of sexual abuse and those who did not. No differences were observed in any of the pain intensity ratings (ps > 0.05) or pain duration (p > 0.05). Women with a history of sexual abuse reported trying more medications to manage pain symptoms (M = 3.05, SD = 2.01) than women without this history (M = 1.63, SD = 1.79), t(60) = −2.63, p = 0.006. Significant differences were observed in the number of treatments tried for CPP [t(60) = −2.34, p = 0.02] between women with a sexual abuse history (M = 3.0, SD = 2.37) and women without (M = 1.66, SD = 2.01). Finally, women with a sexual abuse history reported seeing more providers to treat CPP (M = 3.05, SD = 1.5) than women without (M = 2.17, SD = 1.29), and this difference was statistically significant [t(61) = −2.42, p = 0.02].
Discussion
This study describes the development of a multidisciplinary CPP specialty care clinic and details patient mental health, trauma, and pain variables. Study findings illustrate the complexities of CPP and emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary treatment to address both mental and physical health concerns.
Findings in context
Patients described pain locations and triggers (Table 1) similar to previous research linking pain to comorbid pelvic region disorders,6,7,34 especially dyspareunia.11 The most intense pain reported was deep pain during intercourse. Most women in this study were diagnosed with pelvic floor dysfunction, and more than half were referred to physical therapy (PT). Average CPP duration aligns with prior research showing pain duration of 1–5 years,1 which supports the need for behavioral health interventions.
Previous research indicates a relation between CPP and sexual trauma.10,20 This study did not observe a significant relation between history of sexual trauma and either pain intensity or duration, aligning with some prior work,35,36 but not others.37 Women with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgeries reported more traumatic experiences than women without surgical history, a finding that is deserving of further investigation. The correlation between trauma and general poor health outcomes has been repeatedly demonstrated in the literature.7,22,34
Furthermore, one study identified that women with a history of childhood abuse reported more chronic physical symptoms, medical visits, emergency room visits, prescriptions, and PTSD symptoms than those without a history of childhood abuse.38 However, there are no identified factors in the literature that more thoroughly describe the etiology of the relationship between CPP, trauma, and health care utilization. It has been hypothesized that development of PTSD may impede individuals' ability to utilize health care effectively, with challenges related to avoidance of trauma-related stimuli and hypervigilance symptoms that may impede individuals' ability to access or utilize health care in an effective way,19 although this has not been demonstrated empirically.
Findings correspond with previously shown high rates of comorbidity between CPP and psychiatric disorders.13,14,39,40 Most (74.2%) patients had a documented mental health diagnosis, including approximately half with an anxiety and/or depressive disorder. Symptoms were in the mild range. Depressive symptoms related to higher muscle/joint pain and pain with sitting, whereas anxiety was not related to pain intensity. Given years of CPP, it may be the case that coping is initially characterized by future-oriented anxiety but later evolves into depression due to lack of adequate treatment, pain relief, and hope for a cure.
Clinical lessons learned/future directions
The clinical response to this multidisciplinary model was positive, although suggestions for improvement may be made. The health psychology session was originally scheduled for 60 minutes to allow for diagnostic assessment, but the reduced 30-minute session, with its emphasis on coping skills and provision of resources, proved to be a better fit.
An adjustment of clinic flow may be warranted, wherein consultation between providers may be lengthened to increase information-sharing and improve treatment planning. Because PT assessment and treatment can be physically uncomfortable and triggering for women with sexual trauma history, meeting with the health psychologist before PT might increase the use of in vivo coping strategies.
It was expected that CPP clinic patients would request follow-up health psychology care, but this prediction did not prove accurate. Many patients traveled to this clinic from quite a distance, making regularly scheduled on-site psychotherapeutic care less convenient. Telehealth for return visits may address this concern, however. Many patients had established treatment before visiting the CPP clinic. Although this care model required that all new patients meet with a psychologist, assessment of patient needs before the clinic visit might allow better flexibility and choice.
Both the existing literature and this project support a multidisciplinary treatment approach from the clinician perspective. Assessment of the patient perspective and implementation outcomes are warranted in future research. Further research examining the role of psychological factors and utilization of health care services would likely refine the care model. In addition, research examining the impact of a brief session with a health psychologist may provide insights on the treatment outcomes related to brief integrated care interventions. Determining the impact of catastrophizing, perceived disability, cognitive flexibility, and emotional resilience on the utilization and response to treatment could enhance the interventions employed. Distinguishing between sexual and nonsexual traumas could also prove useful in assessing the impact of psychological factors on CPP (e.g., duration, intensity, and functional impairment).
Conclusions
The present findings introduce the development of a multidisciplinary CPP clinic in an academic medical center. Data indicate that there was a high prevalence of mental health diagnoses, suggesting a need for clinical health psychology. Most women reported at least one past trauma, which related to health care utilization and pain severity. The importance of trauma among women with CPP has been underscored in prior literature, with particular emphasis on sexual trauma. Future research may investigate the therapeutic processes that apply to this population to identify targeted efficacious interventions. Pain reported with intercourse has important implications for sexual functioning and intimate relationships, which can be addressed by health psychologists.
This study points to the importance of integrating across health care disciplines to improve patient care, particularly among populations with chronic and unmanaged pain. Providing psychoeducation about the potential benefits of multidisciplinary care can be viewed as an important part of the health psychologist's role. In summary, this study identifies trauma and mental health variables as key measurable components affecting women with CPP, underscoring the importance of integrated psychological care within specialty clinics.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to those who played a critical role in this clinic and/or research endeavor, including Nicole Dietrich, BS; Emilie Sommers, MA; Eugenia Mazur, MD; Amy S. Little, PT, DPT, WCS, CLT; Melissa Kroemer; Abbey J. Hardy-Fairbanks, MD; and Rihana Al-Ghalayini, BSN, RN.
Authors' Contributions
S.A.P. and K.E.F. conducted all psychological evaluations and extracted the data from the EMR. E.B.K.T. and M.S.S. prepared data for analyses and conducted data analyses. E.B.K.T., M.S.S., K.E.F., and S.A.P. prepared the article. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final version of this article.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was used to conduct this research. Publication fee will be paid using internal discretionary funds.
References
- 1. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. Chronic pelvic pain in the community: Symptoms, investigations, and diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1149–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: An updated review. Pain Physician 2014;17:E141–E147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Williams RE, Hartmann KE, Steege JF. Documenting the current definitions of chronic pelvic pain: Implications for research. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:686–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Leserman J, Zolnoun D, Meltzer-Brody S, Lamvu G, Steege JF. Identification of diagnostic subtypes of chronic pelvic pain and how subtypes differ in health status and trauma history. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:554–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Am Fam Physician 2016;93:380–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tirlapur S, Kuhrt K, Chaliha C, Ball E, Meads C, Khan K. The “evil twin syndrome” in chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review of prevalence studies of bladder pain syndrome and endometriosis. Int J Surg 2013;11:233–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Haggerty CL, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, et al. Predictors of chronic pelvic pain in an urban population of women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Dis 2005;32:293–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: Prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:321–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Armour M, Lawson K, Wood A, Smith CA, Abbott J. The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: A national online survey. PLoS One 2019;14:e0223316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Miller-Matero LR, Saulino C, Clark S, Bugenski M, Eshelman A, Eisenstein D. When treating the pain is not enough: A multidisciplinary approach for chronic pelvic pain. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:349–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Peters KM, Killinger KA, Carrico DJ, Ibrahim IA, Diokno AC, Graziottin A. Sexual function and sexual distress in women with interstitial cystitis: A case-control study. Urology 2007;70:543–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. ter Kuile MM, Weijenborg PTM, Spinhoven P. Sexual functioning in women with chronic pelvic pain: The role of anxiety and depression. J Sex Med 2010;7:1901–1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Ouyang C, Rapkin A. Chronic pelvic pain in women: A review. JAMA 2021;325:2381–2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Brünahl C, Dybowski C, Albrecht R, et al. Mental disorders in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). J Psychosom Res 2017;98:19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Romão APMS, Gorayeb R, Romão GS, et al. High levels of anxiety and depression have a negative effect on quality of life of women with chronic pelvic pain. Int J Clin Pract 2009;63:707–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Perrin M, Vandeleur CL, Castelao E, et al. Determinants of the development of post-traumatic stress disorder, in the general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014;49:447–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Goldstein RB, Smith SM, Chou SP, et al. The epidemiology of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016;51:1137–1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lorençatto C, Petta CA, Navarro MJ, Bahamondes L, Matos A. Depression in women with endometriosis with and without chronic pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:88–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Walker EA, Katon WJ, Neraas K, Jemelka RP, Massoth D. Dissociation in women with chronic pelvic pain. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:534–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Krantz TE, Andrews N, Petersen TR, et al. Adverse Childhood experiences among gynecology patients with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:1087–1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Meltzer-Brody S, Leserman J, Zolnoun D, Steege J, Green E, Teich A. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:902–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. As-Sanie S, Clevenger LA, Geisser ME, Williams DA, Roth RS. History of abuse and its relationship to pain experience and depression in women with chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:317..e1–317.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Milburn A, Reiter RC, Rhomberg AT. Multidisciplinary approach to chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993;20:643–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cagnacci A, Della Vecchia E, Xholli A. Chronic pelvic pain improvement: Impact on quality of life and mood. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019;35:502–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Stones W, Cheong YC, Howard FM, Singh S. Interventions for treating chronic pelvic pain in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD000387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fitzgerald MP, Anderson RU, Potts J, et al. Randomized multicenter feasibility trial of myofascial physical therapy for the treatment of urological chronic pelvic pain syndromes. J Urol 2013;189(1 SUPPL):S75–S85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Grinberg K, Weissman-Fogel I, Lowenstein L, Abramov L, Granot M. How does myofascial physical therapy attenuate pain in chronic pelvic pain syndrome? Pain Res Manag 2019;2019:6091257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hwang SK. Advances in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: A multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Mo Med 2017;114:47–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Schnurr PP, Vielhauer MJ, Weathers F, Findler MN. Brief trauma questionnaire. White River Junction, VT: National Center for PTSD, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Schnurr PP, Spiro A, Vielhauer MJ, Findler MN, Hamblen JL. Trauma in the lives of older men: Findings from the normative aging study. J Clin Geropsychology 2002;8:175–187. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhong QY, Gelaye B, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Diagnostic validity of the generalized anxiety disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among pregnant women. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dydyk AM, Gupta N. Chronic pelvic pain. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Toomey TC, Hernandez JT, Gittelman DF, Hulka JF. Relationship of sexual and physical abuse to pain and psychological assessment variables in chronic pelvic pain patients. Pain 1993;53:105–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Poleshuck EL, Dworkin RH, Howard FM, et al. Contributions of physical and sexual abuse to women's experiences with chronic pelvic pain. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol 2005;50:91–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Randolph ME, Reddy DM. Sexual functioning in women with chronic pelvic pain: The impact of depression, support, and abuse. J Sex Res 2006;43:38–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Farley M, Patsalides BM. Physical symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, and healthcare utilization of women with and without childhood physical and sexual abuse. Psychol Rep 2001;89:595–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Osório FL, Carvalho ACF, Donadon MF, Moreno AL, Polli-Neto O. Chronic pelvic pain, psychiatric disorders and early emotional traumas: Results of a cross sectional case-control study. World J Psychiatry 2016;6:339–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bryant C, Cockburn R, Plante AF, Chia A. The psychological profile of women presenting to a multidisciplinary clinic for chronic pelvic pain: High levels of psychological dysfunction and implications for practice. J Pain Res 2016;9:1049–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
