Abstract
Escherichia coli bloodstream infections are typically attributed to a limited number of lineages that carry virulence factors associated with invasiveness. In Nigeria, the identity of circulating clones is largely unknown and surveillance of their antimicrobial resistance has been limited. We verified and whole-genome sequenced 68 2016–2018 bloodstream E. coli isolates from three sentinel sites in South-Western Nigeria and susceptibility tested 67 of them. Resistance to antimicrobials commonly used in Nigeria was high, with 67 (100 %), 62 (92.5 %), 53 (79.1 %) and 37 (55.2 %) showing resistance to trimethoprim, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides, respectively. Thirty-five (51 %) isolates carried extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes and 32 (91 %) of these were multidrug resistant. All the isolates were susceptible to carbapenems and colistin. The strain set included globally disseminated high-risk clones from sequence type (ST)12 (2), ST131 (12) and ST648 (4). Twenty-three (33.8 %) of the isolates clustered within two clades. The first of these consisted of ST131 strains, comprising O16:H5 and O25:H4 sub-lineages. The second was an ST10–ST167 complex clade comprising strains carrying O-antigen and capsular genes of likely Klebsiella origin, identical to those of avian pathogenic E. coli Sanji, and serotyped in silico as O89, O101 or ONovel32, depending on the tool used. Four temporally associated ST90 strains from one sentinel were closely related enough to suggest that at least some of them represented a retrospectively detected outbreak cluster. Our data implicate a broad repertoire of E. coli isolates associated with bloodstream infections in South-West Nigeria. Continued genomic surveillance is valuable for tracking clones of importance and for outbreak identification.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, cpsACP, Escherichia coli, genomic surveillance, Nigeria, ST131
Data Summary
Phylogenetic tree, clinical data and epidemiological data were visualized using Microreact (https://microreact.org/project/hmj3KwxS1dmmFPCKFx6qeA-invasive-escherichia-coli-sw-nigeria-2016-2018). All the sequence data have been deposited in the ENA (European Nucleotide Archive) under the project ID PRJEB29739 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB29739). Accession numbers can be found in Table S1, available with the online version of this article. Genome assemblies can be found in Pathogenwatch using the following links (https://pathogen.watch/collection/aku4gm6a16gq-bloodstream-escherichia-coli-in-south-west-nigerian-hospitals-20; https://pathogen.watch/collection/0f6pm7vqfzjs-bloodstream-escherichia-coli-in-south-west-nigerian-hospitals-20; and https://pathogen.watch/collection/423wubi6peru-bloodstream-escherichia-coli-in-south-west-nigerian-hospitals-20).
Impact Statement.
Escherichia coli bloodstream infections are serious and potentially fatal. Managing and containing these infections is improved when health systems have information about which lineages prevail in specific locations, what disease-causing attributes they have, and which drugs can be used to eliminate them. Very little data along these lines are available in Nigeria. We tested the antimicrobial susceptibility of 68 bloodstream E. coli isolates from three Nigerian hospitals and used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify and characterize lineages of concern. Globally disseminated, high-risk lineages were detected among the isolates, one of the most abundant being sequence type 131, which has been reported from around the world. We additionally identified much less well known genetically related strains with surface features that are likely to have been acquired from Klebsiella bacteria and require further characterization. A retrospectively detected outbreak caused by a less-abundant lineage was also uncovered using the sequence data. These and other lineages carried a broad repertoire of antimicrobial-resistance genes, including those conferring resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporin drugs that are critical for managing these infections in Nigeria. Overall, the study demonstrated the utility and value of WGS for identifying important lineages and possible outbreaks due to E. coli in Nigeria.
Introduction
Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) are the most commonly recovered bacterial isolates from infections in the blood, urine, meninges, prostate and other normally sterile sites [1–3]. Although typically initially acquired within the gastrointestinal tract (and less commonly via the genital route), these strains of E. coli differ from commensal and diarrhoeagenic E. coli in possession of factors associated with systemic virulence [4, 5], allowing them to survive in different extra-intestinal niches. Some of the virulence genes associated with ExPEC include adhesins (fim, pap, sfa, afa), invasins (ibeA), iron acquisition genes (ybt, iro, iuc), toxins (clb, cnf, hly, SPATE genes) and protectins (traT, ompT, kpsMT), among others [4, 5]. ExPEC also often have K, O and H antigens that make them recognizable to E. coli experts and, in some instances, assist them in evading immune responses. Virulence and antimicrobial-resistance (AMR) determinants, as well as negative frequency-dependent selection, likely influence the stability of the most dominant ExPEC groups, which are often multiply resistant [6], thereby sustaining the occurrence of extra-intestinal diseases globally. In Africa, available data reveal that there is an upward trend in the prevalence of globally dominant ExPEC lineages in humans [7] and animals [8], painting a grim picture for disease and AMR.
Robust surveillance is urgently needed to tackle AMR in a more responsive and consistent manner within each country. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has helped to provide a clearer picture on the epidemiology of infectious diseases caused by ExPEC and has identified a number of pandemic clones. Incorporation of WGS in existing epidemiological frameworks of national public-health institutes is critical for providing genomic context for prospective surveillance and for designing and implementing AMR-eliminating strategies.
Although studies conducted in Africa and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have shown the abundance of E. coli in infections from normally sterile sites [9, 10], these studies are few and far between, so that ExPEC and their AMR epidemiology are poorly understood [7, 11]. In Nigeria, there is sparse molecular information on ExPEC, but a few studies point to likely clonal expansion of resistant lineages and local presence of pandemic clones of concern [12–16]. These studies provide valuable information but represent an insufficient picture of ExPEC clones in Nigeria, with little data available from the South. To extend the body of knowledge on genomic epidemiology of ExPEC in South-Western Nigeria, including AMR patterns and mechanisms, we leveraged on our recently established genomic surveillance of bacterial AMR efforts by characterizing the genomes of bloodstream isolates from tertiary hospitals in South-West Nigeria.
Methods
Species validation and antimicrobial-susceptibility tests (ASTs)
Sentinel hospital laboratories referred anonymized clinical data and bloodstream E. coli isolates collected between the years 2016 and 2018 to our National Reference Laboratory, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria for verification of isolate identity and ASTs. Isolate identity and ASTs were achieved using the VITEK 2 instrument. Drugs tested include amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefuroxime (CXM), cefuroxime axetil (CXMA), cefepime (FEP), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefoperazone/sulbactam (SFP), nitrofurantoin (NIT), nalidixic acid (NAL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ertapenem (ERT), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Resistance profiles were generated from VITEK 2 AST data. Antibiotic-susceptibility results were interpreted in line with the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) 2019 standards [17]. Minimum inhibitory concentration values were converted to Reisistant-Intermiediate-SSensitive (RIS) designations and the bug-drug combination table was generated using the AMR R package (v1.4.0; https://github.com/msberends/AMR) [18].
Biofilm assay
Following Wakimoto et al’s (2004) procedure [19], we sub-cultured bloodstream E. coli isolates overnight in LB broth at 37 °C with shaking at 160 r.p.m. Afterwards, we measured 190 µl Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 0.45 % glucose using a pipette into each well of a 96-well plate [different plates were used for each time point (3, 6, 12, 24 h)]. Five microlitres of each isolate was inoculated in triplicate per time point into a 96-well plate from the stock plate and incubated at 37 °C without shaking until each time point was reached. Absorbance at 595 nm was measured on completion of the time point.
We pipetted spent media out of the 96-well plates. Each well was washed with PBS three times, fixed (10 mins, 200 µl 75% ethanol), dried and stained with 195 µl 0.5% crystal violet for 5 min. This was followed by washing and drying of the plates. We added 200 µl 95% ethanol to each well, allowed the wells to stand for 20 min at room temperature, and determined absorbance with an ELISA plate reader at 570 nm. Biofilm index was defined using the mean of the values for the absorbance at 570 and 595 nm, and was calculated by dividing the absorbance values for each strain at a given time point by the absorbance values of the negative control at the given time point [20]. Enteroaggregative E. coli strain 042 was used as a positive control, while E. coli K-12 DH5α was used as negative control. The magnitude of biofilm formed by different genetically defined subgroups of isolates was compared using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test at P <0.05.
Haemolysis test
Overnight LB cultures of the isolates were spotted onto the surface of blood agar. α-Haemolysis and β-haemolysis is indicated by a green colouration and a clear zone around bacterial colonies, respectively. Uropathogenic E. coli isolate ATCC 11175 and stx-deleted E. coli O157 isolate ATCC 7000728 were used as controls.
DNA extraction, library preparation and WGS
Genomic DNA was extracted following the protocol outlined in a previous report [21]. Briefly, the Wizard DNA extraction kit (Promega) was used in the extraction of genomic DNA of all isolates. A dsDNA broad range quantification assay was used in the quantification of DNA extracts (Invitrogen). DNA libraries were prepared and sequenced using the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA library kit (New England Biolabs) and HiSeq X10 instrument (Illumina), respectively.
Genome assembly and speciation
Raw sequence reads were assembled using the GHRU (Global Health Research Unit) for genomic surveillance of antimicrobial resistance pipeline (https://gitlab.com/cgps/ghru/pipelines/assembly), which is summarily explained by the GHRU de novo assembly protocol [22]. Speciation was possible using BactInspector (v0.1.3; https://gitlab.com/antunderwood/bactinspector/), implemented within the GHRU pipeline.
SNP analysis and phylogenetic tree generation
The complete chromosome sequence of E. coli strain EC958 (accession no. GCF_000285655.3) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000285655.3/) was used to infer a whole-genome alignment of the sequence reads and identify SNP positions, which were, in turn, used to infer a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree as per the GHRU mapping-based phylogeny protocol [22], which summarizes the steps implemented within the GHRU SNP phylogeny pipeline (https://gitlab.com/cgps/ghru/pipelines/snp_phylogeny).
Isolates that clustered closely within the phylogenetic tree, belonged to the same sequence type (ST), and shared similar resistance profiles, plasmid profiles, geography and dates of isolation, were investigated further for clues on potential outbreaks. We selected the closest reference genome to the outbreak isolates using BactInspector, aligned the likely outbreak isolates (ST90) to the reference genome of E. coli strain D3 (accession no. NZ_CP010140.1; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_001900635.1/), used Gubbins [23] to mask recombinant regions, and calculated pairwise SNP distances from the pseudo-genome alignment using FastaDist (v0.0.7; https://gitlab.com/antunderwood/fastadist), SNP-dists (v0.8.2; https://github.com/tseemann/snp-dists) and/or the R package harrietr (v0.2.4; https://github.com/andersgs/harrietr). The adegenet R package (v2.1.5; https://github.com/thibautjombart/adegenet/) was used to generate a pseudogenome alignment in DNA.bin format (one of the input files accepted by harrietr) from a pseudogenome alignment file. Phylogenetic tree, epidemiological data and in silico data were visualized in the web-based viewers Microreact [24] and the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [25].
AMR gene, virulence gene and plasmid replicon prediction
The program srst2 (v0.2.0; https://github.com/katholt/srst2/) [26] and the ARGannot database (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/katholt/srst2/master/data/ARGannot_r3.fasta) were used to screen raw sequence reads for the presence of acquired resistance genes. We also validated the report/output by utilizing the GHRU AMR Pipeline (https://gitlab.com/cgps/ghru/pipelines/dsl2/pipelines/amr_prediction), as explained in this protocol [22]. ampC1 and ampC2 were excluded from downstream analysis and visualization as they are β-lactamase genes present in almost all E. coli isolates and are unlikely to confer antibiotic resistance in E. coli [27]. An overall plot of resistance determinants was constructed using the upset function from the UpSetR package (v1.4.0) [28]. Plots of AMR genes stratified by ST and sentinel site were constructed using the ggupset package (v0.3.0). Association between virulence genes and phylogroups of E. coli was determined using the fisher_test function from the rstatix package (v0.7.0). The calculation is based on single genes (including those that make up an operon), not operons. The associations were corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method offered by rstatix. Bar plots were visualized using the ggplot function from the Tidyverse package (v1.3.1) in R.
The raw reads were screened for virulence genes with the GHRU pipeline, which utilizes ariba [29] and the VFDB database [30]. Plasmid replicon types were determined with same GHRU pipeline but using the PlasmidFinder database instead [31].
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiling
Following the Achtman MLST scheme [32], multilocus STs were determined using the srst2 program. We confirmed the results by using the GHRU MLST pipeline, which also implements the Achtman scheme. as summarized in the aforementioned GHRU protocol [22].
In silico serotyping, phylogroup determination and fimH typing
The O- and H- serotypes of E. coli were determined using the srst2 program and the EcOH database (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/katholt/srst2/master/data/EcOH.fasta). This result was cross-checked using ECTyper (v1.0.0; https://github.com/phac-nml/ecoli_serotyping) and SerotypeFinder (https://bitbucket.org/genomicepidemiology/serotypefinder/src/master/). SerotypeFinder utilizes kma [33] and blast+ [34] to predict E. coli serotypes from the alignment of raw and assembled reads, respectively, against the SerotypeFinder database. Because the srst2-predicted O serotype Onovel32 was predicted differently by the in silico tools ECTyper and SerotypeFinder as O89 and O101, respectively, these O antigen gene clusters were extracted from their respective databases (srst2, ECTyper, SerotypeFinder) and were aligned using muscle with default settings within mega x (v10.2.6) [35]. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was recreated from the alignment using mega x.
E. coli genomes were assigned into phylogroups using ClermonTyping (v20.03) [36], and were subtyped based on fimH alleles, using the FimTyper command-line tool (https://bitbucket.org/genomicepidemiology/fimtyper/src/master/) [37].
Concordance
The agreement between phenotypic and genotypic AMR was determined for β-lactams, cephalosporins, amikacin/kanamycin/gentamicin, trimethoprim and the quinolones. Metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives were determined using the R script (https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2050300, first used in a previous report), which utilizes the epi.tests function within the epiR package (v2.0.26) for each antimicrobial tested. Here, ‘sensitive’ and ‘intermediate’ values were combined, taking cognizance of the arguments for and against the use of the term intermediate in clinical settings [38].
Genome annotation, comparative genomics and gene location prediction
Functional annotation of Onovel32 clade genomes was performed using Bakta v1.0.4 [39] . Genomes were compared and visualized using Artemis v18.1.0 [40], Artemis Comparison Tool v18.1.0 [41] and Clinker v0.0.21 [42]. The mlplasmid web tool [43] was used to predict whether clinically relevant virulence genes were borne on plasmids or on chromosomes.
Results
Epidemiology and species identification
Three hospital laboratories in South-West Nigeria submitted retrospective bloodstream E. coli isolates with clinical and epidemiological data between the years 2016 and 2018. Available data showed that isolates were collected from patients aged 1 day to 71 years (male=20, female=24 – of those for which gender information is available; median age=37 years), with 17 (25 %) of the isolates recovered from children under 28 days old (range 1–20 days, median 9 days), who would be characterized as neonates. The isolates were submitted from the University College Hospital (UCH; n=22), Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) Teaching Hospitals Complex (n=18) and Osun State University Teaching Hospital (until recently known as Ladoke Akintola University) (LAU; n=28).
Of the 68 bloodstream isolates confirmed as E. coli by WGS, 48 (70.6 %) and 64 (94.1 %) were correctly identified as E. coli by the sentinel biochemical testing and reference laboratory VITEK 2, respectively. E. coli isolates were often misidentified as Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=8) or Citrobacter freundii (n=6) at the sentinel laboratories, while the VITEK 2 system misidentified E. coli as K. pneumoniae (n=3) or Enterobacter aerogenes (n=1).
Phylogroups, serotypes, STs and FimH types of E. coli bloodstream isolates
E. coli sent from all three hospital sentinel laboratories spanned all E. coli phylogroups, with 18, 15, 19, 8, 2, 1 and 5 E. coli genomes classified within phylogroups A, B1, B2, C, D, E and F, respectively. The most common STs among the 33 identified include: ST131 (n=12), ST156 (n=5), and 4 each of ST10, ST167 ST410, ST648 and ST90. These seven STs accounted for 54 % of the E. coli isolates. Of these, only STs 131 and 167 were found across the three sentinel sites (Fig. 1, Table S1). Diverse lineages were recovered from all three sentinel sites (OAU=10 STs, LAU=18 STs, UCH=15 STs) (Fig. 1). While ST131 genomes made up 63% of genomes within phylogroup B2 (the second most common phylogroup), ST10 and ST167 genomes accounted for 44% of genomes within phylogroup A (the most common phylogroup).
While none of the isolates were submitted as suspected outbreak strains, four isolates recovered from LAU within 1 month (January 2017) were typed as ST90, serotype O8:H9, and carried the same plasmid profile (IncFI; IncFIA; IncFIB_AP001918; IncQ1), AMR gene profile, and similar but not identical resistance profile (Table S1). These four isolates were resistant to trimethoprim, the quinolones, gentamicin, cefuroxime axetil and ampicillin (Table S1). Comparison of pairwise SNP differences revealed that two of the four isolates were identical, while the other two isolates differed from these by 11 SNPs and 72 SNPs. The current literature supports a clustering threshold between the range of 0 to 17 SNPs for suspected outbreak-related E. coli blood isolates [44–46]. Although these isolates were correctly identified within this sentinel site, the cluster was only recognized retrospectively, likely due to different β-lactam resistance profiles.
ST131 was the most common ST detected and the 12 isolates belonging to this ST clustered into two distinct lineages defined by serotype H5 (n=5; O16:H5) and the serotype H4 lineage (n=7; O25:H4) and, henceforth, are referred to as the ST131 lineage 1 and ST131 lineage 2, respectively (Fig. 1).
A total of 38 unique serotypes and 25 O-groups were identified. Of note, Onovel32 was the most common O-type identified by srst2, which established the O-type as novel and identified it in 11 isolates belonging to phylogroup A. These ONovel:32 strains belonged to ST10 or ST167, or were single or double locus variants of these STs. They included six ONovel32:H10 isolates, as well as three H21 and one H4 flagellin-encoding strains. Along with one ONT:H10 strain that also belonged to ST10, they formed a distinct clade on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). Strains belonging to this cluster were submitted from all three hospitals. Two of them were originally misclassified as K. pneumoniae by VITEK 2 at the reference laboratory level. Irrespective of whether the ST90 clade is discounted, the ONovel:32 clade and the ST131 clade were the most abundant. Together they accounted for 32.4% of the isolates and both clades were found in all three hospitals (Fig. 1).
A total of 20 unique FimH types were identified in 82% of ExPEC isolates (n=56/68), including fimH54 (n=10), fimH30 (n=8), fimH24 (n=5) and fimH41 (n=5) – the four most common FimH types observed. ST131 isolates carried fimH30 (n=7, ST131 lineage 2) and fimH41 (n=5, ST131 lineage 1) types, corresponding to the two unique ST131 lineages. Nine of the Onovel32 isolates belonged to the fimH54 type [ST10 (n=4), ST167 (n=4), ST44 (n=1); no fimH type was observed in the remaining two, that is, ST617 and ST1284 isolates] (Table S1). Overall, no fimH type was observed in isolates belonging to ST12 (n=2), ST648 (n=4) and six other STs (STs 46, 181*, 315, 617, 1284, 1808).
Virulence factor profiles of the bloodstream E. coli isolates
Diverse virulence genes were observed among the ExPEC genomes: 159 virulence-associated genes (VAGs) were found at least once in the 68 bloodstream isolate genomes (Table S2). Enterobactin genes (entB, entC, entE_1, entS) and ferrienterobactin precursors and proteins [fep operon genes (ABCDEG) and fes_1] were found in more than 95% of the isolates. The outer membrane hemin receptor (chu), siderophores (fyuA, irp, ybt), intimin-like adhesin (fdeC), haemolysin (hly), aerobactin (iuc), polysialic acid transport protein kpsM_1, pyelonephritis-associated pili pap, SPATE genes (sat, vat) and plasmid-encoded Shigella enterotoxin senB were more abundant and significantly more associated with phylogroup B2 than with phylogroups A, B1 and C (Fisher’s exact test, P <0.05; Fig. 2a). Fig. 2(b) shows that a wide range of biofilm-forming capacities were seen in the subset of isolates tested, with moderate or strong biofilm-formers being most common in phylogroups B1 and B2 as well as the ST90 outbreak strain-containing phylogroup C. No significant difference in biofilm-formation between the phylogroups was observed.
Phylogroup B2 isolates, comprised largely of ST131 strains, carried the highest number of VAGs (n=86). Thirty-four VAGs were significantly more common in ST131 isolates (n=12) than in non-ST131 isolates (n=56). Of these, the genes encoding the outer membrane haem receptor (chu), yersiniabactin (ybt) and pyelonephritis-associated pili (pap) were found in more than 84% of the ST131 genomes (Fisher’s exact Test, P <0.05; Fig. 3a). However, six VAGs were significantly more common in non-ST131 isolates than in ST131 isolates, including two genes (gspK and gspL) present in more than 85 % of the non-ST131 isolates, but in only about 50 % of ST131 isolates. The VAGs entD, espL1, espX1 and espL5 were absent in ST131 isolates but were present in at least 32 % of non-ST131 isolates, notably phylogroup A ONovel32 strains (Fig. 3a).
Both lineages of ST131 share common VAGs, including adhesins, yersiniabactin, aerobactin, enterotoxin and transport-associated genes, but some genes were only seen, or predominantly seen, in one of the two lineages. For example, the haemolysin (hly) carried by two isolates within ST131 lineage 2 were absent in ST131 lineage 1. Also, two isolates within ST131 lineage 2 carried the cytotoxic necrotizing factor cnf1 (Fig. 3a, b). The median pairwise distance between isolates in ST131 lineage 1 is 2857.5 SNPs (range: 0–2866), while the median pairwise distance between isolates within ST131 lineage 2 is 499 SNPs (range: 0–827). The inter-clade SNP distance is 13 619 (range: 12900–14146) (Fig. S1). The two lineages of ST131 clade share 4116 core genes. On the one hand, isolates within the ST131 lineage 1 carried 121 accessory genes, including: mobile elements (IS110 family transposase ISEc21, insertion sequence IS5376 putative ATP-binding protein, insC-1, insB1, insCD1, ykfF, yjhR_2, ybcK, ybcQ, umuD_2, rrrD), and genes involved in multi-drug efflux (emrE), DNA binding (arcA, argR_2), amino acid binding (argI_2), ATP binding (htpG_2, idnK), PTS permease activity (frvA, frvB, sgcA_1), SOS response (umuC_4, essD_2). On the other hand, isolates within the ST131 lineage 2 carried 284 accessory genes, including: prophage protein genes (gpFI_2), mobile elements (IS4 family transposase ISEc13, IS200/IS605 family transposase IS200C, Tn3 family transposase, intE_2, insN2, intS, nohB, pine, rrQ, rzpD, ydfD, ynfO), and genes involved in structural molecule activity (flg, fli). A greater proportion of hypothetical genes were identified in lineage 2 (~71%; n=202/284) than lineage 1 (~39%; n=47/121).
None of the ONovel32 clade isolates carried α-haemolysin or pyelonephritis-associated pili, which were present in ST131 and some of the other lineages. However, some VAGs were predominant among or restricted to ONovel32 strains (Fig. 4a, b). These include the esp4L type III secretion effector. We also searched independently for type III secretion systems and identified a cluster 97.5 % identical to E. coli type III secretion system 2, previously associated with virulence in septicaemic E. coli [47], in all esp4L-positive and one esp4L-negative Onovel32 isolate (GI8584164). esp4L was more common among these isolates than other phylogroup A strains, as well as multiple genes encoding capsular modification enzymes. All the ONovel32 strains and one associated ONT strain carried a ugd gene. The only other isolates in this collection with this gene were three isolates belonging to the globally disseminated high risk clone ST648 [48], known to possess biofilm-associated features that enhance pathogen emergence and persistence in both the human body and the environment. The ugd gene is associated with hypermucoviscosity and invasive virulence and the ONovel32 allele is 96 % identical to that from K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044, a hypervirulent K. pneumoniae isolate [49], and Klebsiella variicola (accession no. CP079802.1) capsular cluster ugd genes. Six of the ONovel:32 strains (but not the ONT:H10 strain in the same clade) carried cpsACP, a chromosomally borne gene, which is predicted to encode a phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PAP2 Pfam 01569) family gene. PAP2 phosphatases replace phosphate groups on lipid A with amine groups, resulting in a positively charged lipid A that confers resistance to cationic peptides [50]. PAP2 phosphatases have been known to be transmitted horizontally solitarily or as part of capsular clusters [51]. A blast search revealed that the ONovel32 PAP2 allele is 99.6 % identical to endogenous PAP2 genes from K. variicola (accession no. CP079802.1). As shown in Fig. 5, depicting the region for ONovel32 ST1284 strain OAU-VOA-056, cpsACP is located within a capsular gene cluster identical to a K. variicola cluster and flanked by a 5´ IS3 transposase and a 3´ IS1 protein InsB-encoding gene. At the opposite end of the cluster is the ugd gene. The cluster shows G+C content and other base-pattern signatures that depart from the E. coli flanking sequence (Fig. 5a, b).
To determine whether the cluster is indeed novel, we genoserotyped the strains using two alternatives to srst2. As shown in Table S1, every non-ONovel32 strain received the same O-type designation from all three tools (including ONovel14 and ONovel27, which were returned as untypeable by the other two tools). However, ECTyper typed the srst2-designated ONovel32 isolates as O89 strains and CGE SerotypeFinder called them as O101 strains. O89- and O101-confering clusters are remarkably similar to one another [52]. Therefore, we retrieved the ONovel32, O89 and O101 antigen gene sequences from the EcOH, ECTyper and SerotypeFinder databases, respectively, and generated a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree from the muscle-generated alignment using mega x. The results show that the nearest neighbours to ONovel32 clusters defined by srst2 are O101 clusters from ECTyper (Fig. S4). However, the O89- and O101-conferring clusters do not resolve into separate clades and, therefore, the serotype of strains bearing either cluster cannot be predicted with complete confidence. Interestingly, a systematic literature search revealed that an ST167 ONovel32 strain (strain Sanji, referred to as O89-like, O89b) has previously caused a colibacillosis outbreak in pheasants in China [53]. Pairwise alignment of that strain’s O-antigen cluster (GenBank accession no. CP011061.1) with that of ONovel32 strain G18484079 revealed that they are virtually identical and point to the likelihood that these ExPEC strains, like many other ExPEC lineages, have avian pathogenic potential. Zeng et al. identified a number of other ST167, ST617, ST10, ST1284 and other strains carrying this O-antigen cluster [53]. Interestingly, according to Zeng et al., strain Sanji genoserotyped as O89b but immunoserotyped as O6. O101 is known to be expressed, O89 has been previously reported as containing a complete but unexpressed O-antigen cluster, and Sanji’s O89b remains unevaluated phenotypically [54]. Observing that ONovel:32/O101/O89b cluster isolates from our own study, some of which were originally misclassified as Klebsiella , showed mucoidity upon plate culture, we sought to determine whether these strains had distinctive colonization-associated capacities. The median biofilm A 570 at 6 h was 0.178 for phylogroup A strains lacking cpsACP and 0.216 for those with the gene (Fig. 2), but these differences were not significant. All the isolates were also negative in the string test for hypermucoviscosity in Klebsiella [55].
Resistance profiles and concordance with predicted AMR
Susceptibility testing of 67 out of the 68 isolates showed that, of the 16 antibiotics tested, resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (n=67; 100 %), ampicillin (n=62; 92.5 %), nalidixic acid (n=57; 85.1 %) and ciprofloxacin (n=53; 79.1 %) was commonly observed (Fig. 6a, b, Table S2). However, resistance to cefoperazone/sulbactam (n=3; 4.5 %) was less common. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, ertapenem and meropenem (Table S3, Fig. S2a and S2b). One blaCTX-M-15 -positive isolate from LAU (ST11025, B1, O51:H12) was categorized as showing intermediate to imipenem but did not carry any carbapenemase-producing gene. Resistance profiles were remarkably similar among the three sentinels (Fig. 6b). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole among isolates belonging to all 33 STs could be explained by the possession of dfrA (n=54/67) and dfrB (n=2/67) genes. Ciprofloxacin resistance (23 STs) was largely attributable to mutation in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of gyrA (D87N, S83L), parC (E84A, E84G, E84K, S57T, S80I) and/or parE (E460D, I355T, I529L, I529L, I464F, L416F, L445H, S458A, S458T), with or without the presence of plasmid quinolone-resistance genes [qnrS, qnrVC4, qepA, aac-(6’)-Ib-cr]. About 45 % (n=24/53) of isolates phenotypically resistant to ciprofloxacin carried a combination of aac(6’)-lb-cr5 gene and mutation in the QRDRs (gyrA, parC and parE) (Fig. 7a, b). The most common quinolone-resistance gene profile observed is the ‘gyrA_D87N, gyrA_S83L, parC_S80I, parE_S458A’, as observed in a quarter (n=14/53) of isolates showing phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin.
Ampicillin resistance among isolates belonging to 29 STs (n=62) could be explained by the carriage of a range of β-lactamase genes including blaTEM-1 (36/62 of isolates), blaTEM-40 (3 isolates), blaTEM-84 (2 isolates), blaTEM-135 (2 isolates) or blaOXA-2 (co-occurring with blaTEM-90 ; 1 isolate). Extended-spectrum β-lactam resistance likely resulted from blaCTX-M-15 (33 isolates), blaCTX-M-27 (1 isolate), blaVEB-1 (1 isolate) and/or blaCMY-42 (2 isolates) (Fig. S2a, b) co-occurring largely with the plasmids Inc types FIB_AP001918, FIA, IncFI, IncQ1, IncFII_p and the col plasmid Col156.
Of the five drug classes tested, the highest concordance between phenotypic resistance and predicted AMR was observed for trimethoprim (100 % concordance, TP=67/67, sensitivity=100 %, specificity=not available) and the lowest concordance for drugs within the aminoglycoside class (concordance=55.22 %, TP=37/67, sensitivity=100 %, specificity=0 %) (Table S3a). The genes predicted to confer resistance to antibiotics belonging to the aforementioned drug classes can be found in Table S3(b).
Multidrug resistance (MDR)
We observed a total of 23 resistance profiles (Table S1) with the profiles in many cases associated with specific STs (Table S1). Fifty-nine (88.06 %) of the isolates were resistant to at least one agent within at least three classes of antibiotics, fitting the MDR definition of the international AMR community [56] (Table S1). Isolates belonging to the most frequent STs form the bulk of bloodstream isolates carrying extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes or mutations in the QRDRs (gyrA, parC, parE), and the plasmid-mediated quinolone-resistance gene aac(6’)-lb-cr, as well as genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim. Carbapenemase genes were conspicuously absent, in agreement with the AMR phenotype. Almost all isolates carrying ESBL genes (n=32/34) are multidrug resistant. About 30 % of these showed the most frequent resistance profile (RP-1) (Fig. S3). Furthermore, multidrug-resistant bloodstream isolates do not carry the same resistance determinants and plasmid replicons, apart from gyrA/parC/parE mutations (Fig. S3).
Resistance-gene profiles differed significantly between the two ST131 clades (Fig. 3c). Unlike ST131 lineage 1 isolates, ST131 lineage 2 isolates did not carry any β-lactamase gene besides ampC. All but one of ST131 lineage 2 isolates carried the ESBL gene blaCTX-M-15 (Fig. 3c). Within the ST131 lineage 1, two isolates did not carry genes conferring resistance/reduced susceptibility to the aminoglycosides, phenicols, macrolides and quaternary ammonium compounds. Furthermore, the absence of the Col156, IncB_O_K_Z and IncFI plasmids in these two isolates seem to have been compensated by the possession of IncFIA, IncFII_p and IncI1 plasmids, noted to have been absent in the other three ST131 isolates within the ST131 lineage 1.
All the ONovel32 strains (but not the co-clustering ONT strain) carried one ESBL gene, blaCTX-M-15 , and these strains also carried IncF plasmids, common among phylogroup A strains (Table S1). Every one of them carried the most common four resistance-conferring mutations in the QRDRs (gyrA_D87N, gyrA_S83L, parC_S80I, parE_S458A) and seven, including the ONT strain, carried qepA4. Four ONovel32 isolates additionally carried aac-(6’)-Ib-cr, conferring aminoglycoside and ciprofloxacin resistance, as well as horizontally transmitted genes conferring resistance to trimethoprim, chloramphenicol and tetracyclines were common (https://microreact.org/project/hmj3KwxS1dmmFPCKFx6qeA-invasive-escherichia-coli-sw-nigeria-2016-2018, Table S1).
Common to both the ST131 and the ONovel:32 clades is the high prevalence of qacEdelta1 (n=9 and 8, respectively) conferring resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds, commonly used for disinfecting hospital surfaces and associated with class 1 integrons. Altogether, these clades comprised 17 (42.50 %) of 40 E. coli isolates carrying this gene.
Discussion
This study characterized 68 bloodstream E. coli isolates as an important first step in understanding their epidemiology within South-West Nigeria. In this small collection, we identified multiple clones of pandemic importance, and found two predominant clades. One of these, comprising two ST131 lineages, is globally disseminated and this study illustrates its importance in Nigerian health facilities. The second predominant clade does not feature in present discourse on international ExPEC clones, and represents strains belonging to ST10, ST167 and related STs, which predominantly encode O-antigen genes recently reported from avian pathogenic E. coli in China. In addition to these prominent clades, we identified strains belonging to major pandemic ExPEC lineages, including ST12, ST73 and ST648, and their single locus variants. ST69, ST95 and ST405 lineages were not detected but our sample is not very large and, therefore, our findings are insufficient to rule them epidemiologically insignificant in our setting. In the UK and some high-income countries, ST69, ST73, ST95 and ST131 lineages have attained sufficient population stability independent of the acquisition of AMR genes [6, 57]. We additionally identified in the collection five ST90/410 strains, all from a single facility. Two ST90 isolates are identical, differ from a third by only 11 SNPs and likely represent an outbreak. Our findings add to information that is chronicling ExPEC lineages of importance within Nigeria [14–16, 58, 59], other parts of Africa [16, 60] and other LMICs [16, 61].
Among ST131, we found both globally disseminated lineages within our isolate collection. The majority of haemolytic and pap gene-bearing phylogroup B2 strains belonged to this ST. Biofilm formation among these strains was common and associated with the kpsD gene, a known contributor to biofilm formation [62]. The ST10, ST167 and related strains that comprised the ONovel32/O101/O89b clade were distinguished by the presence of one of two variations of a capsular island that has been well described in Klebsiella with biofilm formation among them being more pronounced among strains carrying the cpsACP-containing portion of the island. While the virulence of ST131 has been well described, features of this clade that cause it to predominate remain unknown, and further studies are required to understand its pathogenicity and selective success in our setting.
O101 and O89 gene clusters are highly similar and not resolvable phylogenetically, and include the ONovel32 cluster found in this study. While the O89 cluster is reputed to be intact but not expressed, O89b, which is essentially identical to the cluster found in this study, has been found in the genome of O-antigen-expressing avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC)strains [53]. The O89/O101 antigen gene cluster (as well as O8 and O9) is thought to have been transferred from Klebsiella to E. coli via horizontal gene transfer [63], and requires better characterization in the E. coli background in order to produce a correct and congruent output from existing in silico serotyping tools. The O101:H10 fimH54 clone has been reported to carry ESBL genes and the gyrA/parC mutations [64], which confe resistance to last linantibiotics commonly used in our setting. O89b strain Sanji is extensively drug resistant and the ONovel32/O89b/O101 strains in this study had multiple AMR gene profiles.
High levels of phenotypic resistance to antibiotics within the antifolate (trimethoprim, co-trimoxazole), quinolone (nalidixic acid), fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin), cephalosporin (cefuroxime axetil) and the aminoglycoside (gentamicin) classes observed among bloodstream isolates in this study corroborates reports from previous studies [12, 58, 59], and poses a serious concern for clinical therapeutics. In silico data confirm the abundance of genes conferring resistance, with many isolates carrying more than one gene conferring resistance to a specific antimicrobial or class. Before the turn of the millennium, resistance to many of the aforementioned antimicrobials was rare in Africa. However, steady increase in the availability and use of these agents in the empiric treatment of ExPEC-related infections has inevitably selected for AMR. The increased rate of fluoroquinolone resistance in diarrhoeagenic E. coli and other Enterobacterales , for instance, coincided with increased fluoroquinolone use in Nigeria [65] and other parts of Africa [7, 66]. While findings from a study conducted in Nigeria more than a decade ago [13] concluded that nalidixic acid was still an effective antimicrobial, we observed in this study that resistance to nalidixic acid is now common. Similarly, cephalosporin resistance emerged and expanded much more in Africa than in other parts of the world, as these agents became the drug of choice for treating multidrug-resistant pathogens [66].
Fluoroquinolone resistance has also been previously associated with the presence of ESBL genes, because ESBL genes are often borne on transferable large plasmids that co-host some of the PMQR genes [67]. We observed the co-carriage of ESBL and fluoroquinolone-resistance genes in more than a quarter of the ExPEC isolates, and particularly in over-represented lineages.
We find that both predominant lineages we have highlighted in this report show multiple resistance. This has important implications for patients with life-threatening bloodstream infections and provides a plausible explanation for their evolutionary success in our setting. Resistance to antimicrobials used intensively in Nigeria (trimethoprim, aminopenicillins and ciprofloxacin) was rife, and resistance to the agents most frequently used empirically when blood stream infections are suspected – second- and third-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycosides – was also worryingly common. While none of these clades showed carbapenem or colistin resistance, these reserve antimicrobial classes are out of the reach of most patients attending the three hospitals from which the strains were obtained.
Next-generation sequencing has emerged as a promising complement to clinical bacteriology as it provides answers to medical conundrums, as well as a more robust picture of the epidemiology of infectious diseases. It can also reveal, as in this case, circulation of hitherto unrecognized clones of concern. Although its integration into clinical diagnosis and patient care gaining ground in many parts of the world, its adoption in LMICs (and the rest of the globe) is still hindered by lack of infrastructure, cost of implementing WGS, limited bioinformatics expertise and as yet mildly inaccurate prediction of AMR [68, 69]. In our study, we observed perfect concordance (100 %) with phenotypic AST data for trimethoprim, but not for the cephalosporins, the quinolones or the aminoglycosides. Therefore, this shows that further understanding of resistance mechanisms and routine AMR database update are needed to enhance the feasibility of gradual and sustained integration of WGS into routine diagnosis.
Another advantage of next-generation sequencing is its potential in rapid detection of outbreaks either retrospectively as is more common, or potentially (but not yet achievable in our own system) in real-time. We report a likely retrospective ST90 outbreak in LAU, which was not detected using traditional diagnostic methods in the sentinel laboratories. ST90 strains have variously been highlighted for their zoonotic potential and association with device-related hospital outbreaks [70–72], and their epidemiology in our setting remains to be understood; ST90, and related ST410, were only seen at one facility and the representation of ST90 at this facility may have been amplified by an outbreak. The adoption of genomic surveillance in diagnostic laboratories within Nigeria will ensure that outbreaks of this and other clones can be detected in real time, while definite tracking and containment of the spread of such clones will be achieved before lives are lost.
This study has a few limitations. Blood culture is infrequently performed in Nigerian hospitals and, until recently, most isolates were not archived. Therefore, these isolates represent but a fraction of the ExPEC likely to have infected patients in the three hospitals and may not be representative. Our short-read data makes it impossible to accurately determine whether the resistance genes are located on the bacterial chromosome or plasmids (or other mobile genetic elements). In future, we will incorporate long-read sequencing into our prospective surveillance efforts in order to correctly identify plasmid-borne AMR genes.
In conclusion, this study has provided hospital-specific information on the population structure of ExPEC lineages needed to track pandemic lineages and guide infection disease control practices in line with Nigeria’s national action plan on AMR.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This work was supported by Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding from the National Institute of Health Research (grant number 16_136_111) and the Wellcome Trust grant number 206194. I.N.O. was an African Research Leader supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID 23 concordat agreement that is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union, and is presently a Calestous Juma Science Leadership Fellow supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in the content, crafting nor submission of this paper.
Acknowledgements
We thank Damilola Q. Olaoye, Chinenye Ekemezie, Ifeoluwa Akintayo and Ifeoluwa Komolafe for excellent technical assistance.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: D.M.A., I.N.O., C.I. Data curation: Ay.O.A., A.O.O., A.U. Formal analysis: Ay.O.A., A.U., O.S.B., I.N.O. Funding acquisition: D.M.A., Aa.O.A., I.N.O. Investigation: Ay.O.A., A.E., A.O.O., E.E.O., O.S.B., Aa.O.A, I.N.O. Methodology: Ay.O.A, Aa.O. A., A.O.O., E.E.O., O.S.B., V.O.O., Ad.T.A., Ab.T.A., A.U., S.A., M.A., D.M.A., I.N.O. Project administration: A.E., C.I., Aa.O.A., I.N.O. Resources: A.U., S.A., V.O.O., Ad.T.A., Ab.T.A., D.M.A., I.N.O. Software: Ay.O.A., S.A., A.U. Supervision: Aa.O.A., A.U., S.A., C.I., D.M.A., I.N.O. Validation: all authors. Visualization: Ay.O.A., I.N.O. Writing – original draft: Ay.O A. Writing – review and editing: all authors.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
Isolates were obtained as part of AMR surveillance coordinated by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) in line with Nigeria’s national action plan. WGS of blood isolates from surveillance sentinels is performed by the Global Health Research Unit for Genomic Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance under a memorandum of understanding with NCDC. Ethical approval for using these isolates for research was obtained from the University of Ibadan, UCH and the OAU Teaching Hospitals Complex ethics committees. Respective Institutional Review Board (IRB) registration numbers are UI/EC/15/093 and ERC/2017/05/06.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: AMR, antimicrobial resistance; AST, antimicrobial-susceptibility test; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; ExPEC, extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli; GHRU, Global Health Research Unit; IRB, Institutional Review Board; LAU, Ladoke Akintola University; LMICs, low- and middle-income countries; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; OAU, Obafemi Awolowo University; QRDR, quinolone resistance determining region; UCH, University College Hospital; VAG, virulence-associated gene; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Four supplementary figures and four supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.de Kraker MEA, Jarlier V, Monen JCM, Heuer OE, van de Sande N, et al. The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European antimicrobial resistance surveillance system. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:860–868. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Manges AR, Geum HM, Guo A, Edens TJ, Fibke CD, et al. Global extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) lineages. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32:e00135-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00135-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johnson JR, Russo TA. Molecular epidemiology of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli . EcoSal Plus. 2018;8:ESP-0004-2017. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0004-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sarowska J, Futoma-Koloch B, Jama-Kmiecik A, Frej-Madrzak M, Ksiazczyk M, et al. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McNally A, Kallonen T, Connor C, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM, et al. Diversification of colonization factors in a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli lineage evolving under negative frequency-dependent selection. mBio. 2019;10:e00644-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00644-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chattaway MA, Aboderin AO, Fashae K, Okoro CK, Opintan JA, et al. Fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric bacteria in sub-Saharan Africa: clones, implications and research needs. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:558. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alonso CA, Zarazaga M, Ben Sallem R, Jouini A, Ben Slama K, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli in husbandry animals: the African perspective. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;64:318–334. doi: 10.1111/lam.12724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Khairy RM, Mohamed ES, Abdel Ghany HM, Abdelrahim SS. Phylogenic classification and virulence genes profiles of uropathogenic E. coli and diarrhegenic E. coli strains isolated from community acquired infections. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0222441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Forson AO, Tsidi WB, Nana-Adjei D, Quarchie MN, Obeng-Nkrumah N. Escherichia coli bacteriuria in pregnant women in Ghana: antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence factors. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:901. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3989-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huynh B-T, Padget M, Garin B, Herindrainy P, Kermorvant-Duchemin E, et al. Burden of bacterial resistance among neonatal infections in low income countries: how convincing is the epidemiological evidence? BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0843-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seni J, Peirano G, Okon KO, Jibrin YB, Mohammed A, et al. The population structure of clinical extra-intestinal Escherichia coli in a teaching hospital from Nigeria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;92:46–49. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okonko IO, Donbraye-Emmanuel OB, Ijandipe LA, Ogun AA, Adedeji AO, et al. Antibiotics sensitivity and resistance patterns of uropathogens to nitrofurantoin and nalidixic acid in pregnant women with urinary tract infections in Ibadan, Nigeria. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2009;4:105–109. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ogbolu DO, Piddock LJV, Webber MA. Opening Pandora’s box: high-level resistance to antibiotics of last resort in Gram-negative bacteria from Nigeria. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;21:211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duru C, Olanipekun G, Odili V, Kocmich N, Rezac A, et al. Molecular characterization of invasive Enterobacteriaceae from pediatric patients in central and Northwestern Nigeria. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sands K, Carvalho MJ, Portal E, Thomson K, Dyer C, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause neonatal sepsis in seven low- and middle-income countries. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:512–523. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00870-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, a CLSI Supplement for Global Application, M100, 28th edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Berends MS, Luz CF, Friedrich AW, Sinha BNM, Albers CJ, et al. AMR – an R package for working with antimicrobial resistance data. bioRxiv. 2019:810622 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wakimoto N, Nishi J, Sheikh J, Nataro JP, Sarantuya J, et al. Quantitative biofilm assay using a microtiter plate to screen for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli . Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:687–690. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Naves P, del Prado G, Huelves L, Gracia M, Ruiz V, et al. Measurement of biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Escherichia coli is method-dependent. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:585–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Afolayan AO, Oaikhena AO, Aboderin AO, Olabisi OF, Amupitan AA, et al. Clones and clusters of antimicrobial-resistant Klebsiella from Southwestern Nigeria. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:S308–S315. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Underwood A. GHRU (Genomic Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance) Retrospective 1 Bioinformatics Methods v.4. 2020. [ January 9; 2022 ]. https://www.protocols.io/view/ghru-genomic-surveillance-of-antimicrobial-resista-bpn6mmhe accessed.
- 23.Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000093. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven L-A, Schultz MB, Pope BJ, et al. SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med. 2014;6:006627. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ingle DJ, Levine MM, Kotloff KL, Holt KE, Robins-Browne RM. Dynamics of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal Escherichia coli from children in community settings in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:1063–1073. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0217-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Conway JR, Lex A, Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2938–2940. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hunt M, Mather AE, Sánchez-Busó L, Page AJ, Parkhill J, et al. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom. 2017;3:e000131. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, Yao Z, Sun L, et al. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D325–D328. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:1136–1151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05172.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Clausen P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:307. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beghain J, Bridier-Nahmias A, Le Nagard H, Denamur E, Clermont O. ClermonTyping: an easy-to-use and accurate in silico method for Escherichia genus strain phylotyping. Microb Genom. 2018;4:000192. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roer L, Tchesnokova V, Allesøe R, Muradova M, Chattopadhyay S, et al. Development of a web tool for Escherichia coli subtyping based on fimH Alleles. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2538–2543. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00737-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kahlmeter G, Giske CG, Kirn TJ, Sharp SE. Point-counterpoint: differences between the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations for reporting antimicrobial susceptibility results. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57:e01129-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01129-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom. 2021;7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream M-A, Barrell BG, et al. ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3422–3423. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2473–2475. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arredondo-Alonso S, Rogers MRC, Braat JC, Verschuuren TD, Top J, et al. Mmlplasmids: a user-friendly tool to predict plasmid- and chromosome-derived sequences for single species. Microb Genom. 2018;4:000224. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Roer L, Hansen F, Thomsen MCF, Knudsen JD, Hansen DS, et al. WGS-based surveillance of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from bloodstream infections in Denmark. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:1922–1929. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schürch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL, Goering RV. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene-based approaches. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:350–354. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ludden C, Coll F, Gouliouris T, Restif O, Blane B, et al. Defining nosocomial transmission of Escherichia coli and antimicrobial resistance genes: a genomic surveillance study. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e472–e480. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00117-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ideses D, Gophna U, Paitan Y, Chaudhuri RR, Pallen MJ, et al. A degenerate type III secretion system from septicemic Escherichia coli contributes to pathogenesis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:8164–8171. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.23.8164-8171.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schaufler K, Semmler T, Wieler LH, Trott DJ, Pitout J, et al. Genomic and functional analysis of emerging virulent and multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli lineage sequence type 648. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00243-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00243-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fang CT, Chuang YP, Shun CT, Chang SC, Wang JT. A novel virulence gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing primary liver abscess and septic metastatic complications. J Exp Med. 2004;199:697–705. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Touzé T, Tran AX, Hankins JV, Mengin-Lecreulx D, Trent MS. Periplasmic phosphorylation of lipid A is linked to the synthesis of undecaprenyl phosphate. Mol Microbiol. 2008;67:264–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06044.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Forde BM, Zowawi HM, Harris PNA, Roberts L, Ibrahim E, et al. Discovery of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance in a highly virulent Escherichia coli lineage. mSphere. 2018;3:e00486-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00486-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yassine I, Lefèvre S, Hansen EE, Ruckly C, Carle I, et al. Population structure analysis and laboratory monitoring of Shigella by core-genome multilocus sequence typing. Nat Commun. 2022;13:131. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zeng X, Chi X, Ho BT, Moon D, Lambert C, et al. Comparative genome analysis of an extensively drug-resistant isolate of avian sequence type 167 Escherichia coli strain Sanji with novel in silico serotype O89b:H9. mSystems. 2019;4:e00242-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00242-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu B, Furevi A, Perepelov AV, Guo X, Cao H, et al. Structure and genetics of Escherichia coli O antigens. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020;44:655–683. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuz028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hagiya H, Watanabe N, Maki M, Murase T, Otsuka F. Clinical utility of string test as a screening method for hypermucoviscosity-phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae . Acute Med Surg. 2014;1:245–246. doi: 10.1002/ams2.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kallonen T, Brodrick HJ, Harris SR, Corander J, Brown NM, et al. Systematic longitudinal survey of invasive Escherichia coli in England demonstrates a stable population structure only transiently disturbed by the emergence of ST131. Genome Res. 2017;27:1437–1449. doi: 10.1101/gr.216606.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Aboderin OA, Abdu A-R, Odetoyin BW, Lamikanra A. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains from urinary tract infections. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:1268–1273. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31138-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Onanuga A, Mahindroo J, Singh S, Taneja N. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:144. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.144.18182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tegha G, Ciccone EJ, Krysiak R, Kaphatika J, Chikaonda T, et al. Genomic epidemiology of Escherichia coli isolates from a tertiary referral center in Lilongwe, Malawi. Microb Genom. 2020;7:000490. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.22.106062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lim C, Takahashi E, Hongsuwan M, Wuthiekanun V, Thamlikitkul V, et al. Epidemiology and burden of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in a developing country. Elife. 2016;5:e18082. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Russo TA, Wenderoth S, Carlino UB, Merrick JM, Lesse AJ. Identification, genomic organization, and analysis of the group III capsular polysaccharide genes kpsD, kpsM, kpsT, and kpsE from an extraintestinal isolate of Escherichia coli (CP9, O4/K54/H5) J Bacteriol. 1998;180:338–349. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.2.338-349.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nanayakkara BS, O’Brien CL, Gordon DM. Diversity and distribution of Klebsiella capsules in Escherichia coli . Environ Microbiol Rep. 2019;11:107–117. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Royer G, Darty MM, Clermont O, Condamine B, Laouenan C, et al. Phylogroup stability contrasts with high within sequence type complex dynamics of Escherichia coli bloodstream infection isolates over a 12-year period. Genome Med. 2021;13:77. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00892-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lamikanra A, Crowe JL, Lijek RS, Odetoyin BW, Wain J, et al. Rapid evolution of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in Nigeria is temporally associated with fluoroquinolone use. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:312. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Musicha P, Cornick JE, Bar-Zeev N, French N, Masesa C, et al. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infection isolates at a large urban hospital in Malawi (1998-2016): a surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:1042–1052. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30394-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rawat D, Nair D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Gram negative bacteria. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2:263–274. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mitchell SL, Simner PJ. Next-generation sequencing in clinical microbiology: are we there yet? Clin Lab Med. 2019;39:405–418. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rossen JWA, Friedrich AW, Moran-Gilad J, ESCMID Study Group for Genomic and Molecular Diagnostics (ESGMD) Practical issues in implementing whole-genome-sequencing in routine diagnostic microbiology. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Borges CA, Tarlton NJ, Riley LW. Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and backyard chickens share sequence types, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and resistance genes with human extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli . Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019;16:813–822. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gauthier L, Dortet L, Cotellon G, Creton E, Cuzon G, et al. Diversity of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli isolates in France in 2012-2013. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e00266-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00266-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sartori L, Fernandes MR, Ienne S, de Souza TA, Gregory L, et al. Draft genome sequences of two fluoroquinolone-resistant CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli ST90 (ST23 complex) isolated from a calf and a dairy cow in South America. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;11:145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.