Skip to main content
AoB Plants logoLink to AoB Plants
. 2022 Dec 17;15(1):plac060. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plac060

Genetic diversity and phylogeographic patterns of the dioecious palm Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica: the role of mountain ranges and possible refugia

Eric J Fuchs 1,2,3, Alfredo Cascante-Marín 4,5, Ruth Madrigal-Brenes 6,7,8, Mauricio Quesada 9,10,11,
Editor: Christopher Oakley
PMCID: PMC9840212  PMID: 36654989

Abstract

Gene flow connects populations and is necessary to sustain effective population sizes, and genetic diversity. In the Lower Central American (LCA) region, the complex topographic and climatic history have produced a wide variety of habitats resulting in high biodiversity. Phylogeographic studies of plants from this area are scarce, and to date none have been conducted on palms. We used SSR and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers to study the genetic diversity and structure of populations of the understory palm Chamaedorea tepejilote in Costa Rica. We found that populations of C. tepejilote have moderate to high nuclear simple sequence repeat (SSR) genetic diversity, likely due to large population sizes and its outcrossing mating system. Habitat loss and fragmentation may have contributed to increased genetic structure within slopes. High-elevation mountain ranges appeared to be a significant barrier for gene flow among populations in the Caribbean and Pacific slopes; however, ranges are permeable through low-elevation passes. In contrast, most populations had a single distinct cpDNA haplotype, supporting the hypothesis of several isolated populations that experienced decline that likely resulted in eroded cytoplasmic genetic diversity within populations. The haplotype network and Bayesian analysis linked populations in the Caribbean and the southern Pacific coast, suggesting that gene flow between Pacific and Caribbean populations may have occurred through the southern extreme of the Talamanca Mountain range in Panama, a colonization pathway not previously suggested for LCA plants. This is one of the first phylogeographic studies conducted on tropical palms in the LCA region and the first in the genus Chamaedorea, which sheds light on possible gene flow and dispersal patterns of C. tepejilote in Costa Rica. Our results also highlight the importance of mountain ranges on shaping gene flow patterns of Neotropical plants.

Keywords: Chloroplast DNA, gene flow, Lower Central America, microsatellites, Talamanca Mountain range


This is one of the first phylogeographic studies on tropical palms in Lower Central America (LCA) and the first in the genus Chamaedorea. It gives insight on gene flow and dispersal patterns of Chamaedorea tepejilotein Costa Rica. Chamaedorea tepejilotepopulations contain moderate to high nuclear genetic diversity and very minimal chloroplast DNA diversity. High-elevation mountain ranges appear to be a barrier for gene flow between populations on the Caribbean and Pacific slopes of Costa Rica, although low-elevation passages are permeable. Gene flow between Pacific and Caribbean populations may have occurred through Panama, a colonization pathway not previously considered for LCA plants.

Introduction

The importance of gene flow on the magnitude and distribution of genetic diversity of plant species is widely recognized (Frankham 1995, 2005; Couvet 2002). Gene flow connects populations over long distances and increases effective population sizes, ameliorating the eroding effects of genetic drift on diversity (Booy et al. 2000; Couvet 2002). Gene flow also maintains genetic variability within populations and understanding how this genetic diversity is geographically structured provides valuable information on how different landscape components such as habitat availability (Dick and Heuertz 2008), habitat fragmentation (Fuchs et al. 2003; Fuchs and Hamrick 2011; Aguilar et al. 2019), urban development (Delaney et al. 2010), and topographic barriers (Antonelli 2017) shape gene dispersal patterns among plant populations. Gene flow patterns directly influence effective population sizes, the connectivity of populations and the likelihood of local extinction (Lande 1988; Schemske et al. 1994; Hanski and Gilpin 1997). Estimates of historical and contemporary levels of gene flow are essential for designing conservation strategies that maximize diversity and connectivity among populations (Ellstrand 1992; Newton et al. 1999).

The Talamanca Mountain range in the Lower Central American region (LCA) is a biologically and topographically complex area and several studies recognize it as a world biodiversity hotspot for plants (Bagley et al. 2014; Brummitt et al. 2021). The biodiversity of this region increased after the formation of the Central American Isthmus (Gabb 2007; Montes et al. 2012; Bacon et al. 2015; O’Dea et al. 2016) which served as a land bridge and allowed for the exchange of the North and South American biotas (Bagley et al. 2014). Many plant species of southern and northern origin of the continent have only recently colonized this area (Gentry 1982), and their populations may have experienced demographic shifts during the climatic fluctuations of the late Pleistocene and early Holocene (Hooghiemstra et al. 1992). The uplifting of the Talamanca Mountain range around 15 My ago, the highest elevation (3860 m) of the Central American Isthmus, created a complex topography with abrupt elevation, humidity and temperature gradients, which resulted in high environmental heterogeneity and a large availability of ecological niches that likely promoted speciation. Furthermore, the Talamanca Mountain range extends from the south-eastern to north-western part of the LCA separating the Pacific and Caribbean lowlands; this also suggests the potential role of the Talamanca Mountain range as a barrier to gene dispersal between populations on both slopes. Therefore, the LCA provides a good opportunity to study genetic structure and phylogeographic patterns for plant populations aiming to identify patterns of species colonization and the factors that influence contemporary gene flow and population genetic structuring, as well as the resilience of plant populations to future climate changes.

The few phylogeographic studies conducted on plants from the LCA have primarily focused on tree species (but see Trapnell et al. 2019) and suggest that many populations survived glaciations in refugia. According to multiple authors (Brown 1987; Poelchau and Hamrick 2013), species may have survived in lowland refugia due to increased precipitation and more land cover during glacial eras; these refugia likely supported large populations and high genetic diversity. Conversely, species may have retreated into mid-elevation refugia, leading to a decline in population sizes and insularization (Brown 1987; Dick and Heuertz 2008; Jones et al. 2013). This likely resulted in a reduction in genetic diversity within refugia and an increase in genetic structure. A common denominator of most studies conducted on tropical trees is that mountain ranges play a predominant role in limiting gene flow and structuring genetic diversity (Chase et al. 1995; Aide and Rivera 1998; Cavers et al. 2003; Dick et al. 2003; Novick et al. 2003; Dick and Heuertz 2008; Poelchau and Hamrick 2011). In the tropics, strong habitat selection restricts the ability of plants to disperse to high mountains (Janzen 1967). This creates a significant physiological barrier for gene flow (Ghalambor et al. 2006), thereby structuring lineages across mountain ranges (Avise 2000).

Because the genetic structure of plant populations is strongly dependent on life history traits (Hamrick and Loveless 1987; Hamrick and Godt 1996; Poelchau and Hamrick 2011), more studies on different plant taxa are needed to understand the factors that shape the genetic structure and phylogeographic patterns of plants from the LCA. Palms are distinctive elements of tropical forests (Henderson et al. 2019) and are regarded as keystone resources for tropical habitat biota (Terborgh 1986). Palms are also a locally abundant plant guild, and their generation time is shorter compared to trees (Oyama 1990), so they are likely to respond differently to climate and landscape changes. Studies on the geographic distribution of genetic diversity of palms have been predominantly conducted in South America (Souza and Martins 2004; Trénel et al. 2008; de Lima et al. 2014; Escobar et al. 2018, 2021; Souza et al. 2018) and these studies have shown that genetic structure is strongly influenced by habitat availability, dispersal limitation and topographic barriers. The genus Chamaedorea is the largest palm genus in the Neotropics (Goaverts et al. 2020) with more than 100 dioecious species. The Talamanca Mountain range in LCA (Costa Rica and Western Panama) is believed to be a secondary centre of diversity for the genus, while the primary centre is located in southern Mexico and Guatemala in the northern part of Central America (Hodel 1992; Henderson et al. 2019). To date, no studies have been conducted on the genetic diversity or phylogeography of Chamaedorea palm species in the LCA.

The main objective of this study is to analyse the genetic diversity and structure of populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote in Costa Rica, using nuclear microsatellites (SSRs), and describe phylogeographic patterns using maternally inherited chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers. We propose the following hypotheses: (i) previous research on C. tepejilote populations in southern Mexico has demonstrated that gene flow frequently occurs over great distances (Luna et al. 2005, 2007); therefore, we hypothesize high levels of genetic diversity and limited genetic structure among populations. However, (ii) we expect that the Talamanca Mountain range acts as the main barrier to gene flow between populations from the Pacific and Caribbean slopes. (iii) We hypothesize that during the Pleistocene glaciations, Costa Rican populations of C. tepejilote likely maintained large populations in lowland forest refugia, as suggested by Poelchau and Hamrick (2011). Consequently, we hypothesize relatively high haplotype diversity and low phylogeographic structure in lowland populations, with structure determined primarily by high mountain ranges acting as barriers to gene flow. In contrast, if populations retreated into multiple refugia, we expect to find low haplotypic diversity within populations and high levels of genetic structure due to isolation and drift (Brown 1987; Dick and Heuertz 2008; Jones et al. 2013).

Methods

Study species

Chamaedorea tepejilote is a dioecious palm species distributed from Mexico to Colombia. This palm develops a single erect stem 5-m high with three to six pinnate leaves per stem, branched, racemose inflorescences with several rachillae, small (<5 mm), greenish to yellow, scented flowers, dry-powdery pollen and black fruits at maturity (Hodel 1992). It is an ambophylous species (Ríos et al. 2013), pollinated by thrips (Thysanoptera) and wind, with fruits dispersed by birds and mammals (Hodel 1992). The centre of origin of C. tepejilote is believed to be Mexico (Hodel 1992). Populations of C. tepejilote in Mexico have been shown to have a stem length growth of 6–12 cm per year, with 2.3 new leaves produced each year (Oyama 1990). Although generation time is still undetermined, plants below 1 m in height are rarely reproductive. Chamaedorea tepejilote is a common component of the understory vegetation and is frequently found along streams or riparian habitats within mature forests, from sea level up to 1600 m a.s.l. (Mont et al. 1994). This species has economic importance due to its ornamental and medicinal properties, and male inflorescences are consumed as food in some Central American countries (Mont et al. 1994; Pérez et al. 2008; Robles and Carranza 2013). Deforestation and urbanization have likely reduced populations found within natural habitats, reducing effective population sizes, and increasing isolation among populations (Luna et al. 2007).

Population sampling

We collected leaf tissue from 15–22 individuals in each of 13 populations in Costa Rica (Table 1; Fig. 1B). We selected sampling sites in mature continuous forests that had not been disturbed for at least 40 years and had at least 30 adult C. tepejilote. Most populations were located within National Parks or Forest Reserves and had reproductive individuals, as we always found seedlings and juveniles during collections. Young leaves were selected from mature individuals that were separated by at least 10 m from each other. Leaves were finely cut and placed in 50-mL Falcon tubes with silica powder (Sigma-Aldrich; 70-230 mesh, 63–200 μm). Silica was replaced at least twice before DNA extraction to ensure proper tissue dehydration. Nuclear and plastid DNA were extracted using the modified CTAB protocol from Doyle and Doyle (1990).

Table 1.

Genetic diversity estimates for 13 Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) populations in Costa Rica. N: sample size; Ar: allelic richness; HO: observed heterozygosity; HE: expected heterozygosity; FIS: inbreeding coefficient. Mean values ± (SE).

Population Code Latitude/longitude Elevation (m) N Ar H O H E F IS
Buenos Aires BA 8.988611
–83.19302
180 15 6.20 (0.95) 0.766 (0.05) 0.670 (0.06) –0.169*
Bribri BRI 9.609722
–82.90139
55 19 4.86 (1.01) 0.521 (0.10) 0.556 (0.09) 0.0290
Carara CAR 9.775400
–84.60507
28 15 7.00 (0.95) 0.766 (0.06) 0.716 (0.05) –0.076
Cervantes CER 10.873333
–85.39284
666 15 6.00 (0.90) 0.640 (0.10) 0.634 (0.08) 0.080
Golfito GLF 8.656953
–83.17691
96 16 6.19 (0.86) 0.737 (0.07) 0.706 (0.05) –0.058
Limón LIM 9.983333
–83.06222
46 17 5.13 (1.06) 0.635 (0.11) 0.573 (0.10) –0.108
Monteverde MTV 10.308333
–84.79417
1500 22 6.32 (0.72) 0.706 (0.06) 0.725 (0.04) 0.030
Rodeo ROD 9.907316
–84.27458
1008 17 5.23 (0.88) 0.629 (0.07) 0.641 (0.06) 0.025
San Vito SVT 8.785277
–82.95917
1210 16 7.35 (0.87) 0.675 (0.06) 0.748 (0.05) 0.103
Tirimbina TIR 10.417297
–82.95917
200 21 5.94 (0.98) 0.600 (0.10) 0.605 (0.09) 0.048
Tortuguero TRG 10.574871
–83.57705
17 18 4.48 (0.83) 0.583 (0.11) 0.553 (0.09) –0.054
Volcán Tenorio VTN 10.700555
–84.99694
770 16 5.97 (0.94) 0.593 (0.09) 0.613 (0.08) –0.001

*Significant P < 0.01 based on 1000 bootstrap values.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Discriminant analysis of principal components for 12 populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica. Axes show the percentage of the variation explained. Each population is coded based on clusters defined by STRUCTURE K = 5 (C). Centroid labels have a small nudge to improve readability. (B) Map of Costa Rica showing populations (dots) of C. tepejilote (Arecaceae) sampled and the most likely barrier found by the Monmonier algorithm (arrows). CUR population (clear dot) had only three samples and could not be included in the barrier calculation. (C) Bayesian assignment performed by STRUCTURE for 12 populations in Costa Rica for K = 2 and K = 5 clusters. Each vertical bar represents an individual and is divided proportionally to the probability of assignment of each individual to each genetic cluster. Refer to Table 1 for population codes. Shades in panels A and B are the same as in K = 5..

Microsatellites

To analyse the genetic diversity and structure of C. tepejilote we used 10 SSR loci developed exclusively for C. tepejilote and used the sequences and PCR amplification protocols detailed in Fuchs et al. (2020). Amplification products were visualized in an ABI-3500 Sanger sequencer at Escuela de Biología at Universidad de Costa Rica, and genotyped using GeneMarker version 2.4.2 in the Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica (LANASE) at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) visual computer cluster. We tested for the presence of null alleles or allelic dropout with Microchecker v2.2.3.

Genetic diversity and structure statistics were estimated using the adegenet (Jombart 2008; Jombart and Ahmed 2011), poppr (Kamvar et al. 2014), mmod (Winter 2012) and hierfstat (Goudet 2005) libraries from the R statistical language (R Development Core Team 2020). We only found three C. tepejilote plants at CUR; therefore, this population was excluded from microsatellite analyses, since allele frequencies are not accurately estimated with only three individuals. We estimated allelic and heterozygosity diversity measures and used Nei’s GST to estimate genetic structure among populations. To test the hypothesis that mountain ranges play a key role in shaping population structure, we performed an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), using Pacific and Caribbean slopes as the regional strata. The AMOVA analysis implemented in the poppr package was used, using 9999 permutations to test the significance of phi-statistics. Pairwise GST values were used to construct an unrooted tree based on the neighbour-joining (NJ) algorithm using the ape (Paradis and Schliep 2019) library in R. Isolation by distance (IBD) was tested using a Mantel correlation between pairwise GST and Euclidean distances (5000 permutations). We assessed the significance of all statistics by bootstrapping samples 1000 times among populations. To identify possible geographic barriers to gene flow, we used the Monmonier algorithm (Monmonier 1973) in the adegenet package using Nei’s pairwise GST values and default thresholds. We also visualized similarity among individuals using the discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) implemented in adegenet. We retained 70 PCs as suggested by cross-validation with 999 replicates.

The Bayesian clustering algorithm implemented in STRUCTURE (Falush et al. 2003) was also used to determine the best configuration of samples into K clusters based on similarity in allele frequencies, and possible admixture among clusters. We used the admixture model with correlated allele frequencies, with 50 000 MCMC chains and a burnin of 10 000 chains. We estimated the likelihood of each configuration for K between 2 and 8, using 15 replicates for each K value. StructureHarvester v0.6.94 (Earl and VonHoldt 2012) was used to determine the most likely number of K clusters. As recommended by Janes et al. (2017) and the STRUCTURE manual (Pritchard and Wen 2003), we also plotted the average across all iterations of the estimated likelihood of K for each value of K and selected the optimal K at the point at which the plot curvature plateaus. We used CLUMPP version 1.1.2 to process all the runs for the most likely K using the greedy algorithm and produce assignment bar graphs for individuals and populations using the pophelper library (Francis 2017) in R.

Chloroplast DNA

To describe the phylogeographic structure of C. tepejilote, we used two cpDNA sequences as plastid markers, the rps16–trnQ and the ndhG–ndhI intergenic spacers using primers developed by Scarcelli et al. (2011). Sequences were amplified using the TopTaq Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, North Carolina [NC], USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were conducted in 12.5 mL with 25 ng of DNA. The initial denaturation (94 °C/3 min) was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C/30 s), annealing (58 °C for ndhG–ndhI and 62 °C for rps16–trnQ/30 s), an elongation period of 1 min at 72 °C and a final elongation step (72 °C/10 min). Amplification was checked on agarose gels. PCR products were cleaned and sequenced in forward and reverse directions at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea).

Forward and reverse sequences were assembled using Geneious X in the graphic cluster at LANASE. Alignments were checked by hand to resolve discrepancies and consensus sequences were extracted. We aligned sequences separately using MAFFT 7.475 and trimmed sequences of both genes, so they would be of the same size. We then concatenated sequences for rps16–trnQ and ndhG–ndhI and realigned them using MAFFT again. Sequences were imported into DNAsp version 6.12.01 and molecular and haplotype diversity was estimated. We also extracted haplotypes into a new Nexus file, which was imported into PopArt v. 1.7 to construct a median-joining haplotype network and plot haplotype frequency onto a map of Costa Rica. We also used DNAsp version 6.12.01 to estimate within and among population divergence using the GST estimate of Nei and the NST estimate proposed by Lynch and Crease (1990) that take allele origin into account. We also estimated Tajima’s D and Fu’s F, to test for neutrality and demographic change. Haplotypes were also analysed by means of an AMOVA using Arlequin 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010) to test if structure was primarily determined by mountain ranges. We compared haplotypes among Pacific and Caribbean slopes ϕCT) and the proportion of genetic variability among populations ϕST). We used 35 000 permutations and the proportion of differences as a distance measure in Arlequin.

We used the Bayesian clustering algorithm implemented in BAPS 6 (Corander et al. 2004) to infer the genetic structure from cpDNA haplotypes. We used the linked loci procedure with default values to test for different configurations from K = 1 to K = 20. We performed an admixture analysis on the results, using five as the minimum population size, and 5000 iterations per reference.

Ecological niche modelling

To determine biogeographic barriers of the study species according to topography, we used ecological niche modelling (ENM) as implemented in the wallace 1.9.0 library (Kass et al. 2020) in R. With wallace we downloaded all the locations of C. tepejilote from GBIF (www.gbif.org), filtered duplicate locations and registries without location information. We also eliminated records that were clearly outside the described distribution of the species and most likely represent registry errors (e.g. samples in the Atlantic or Africa). We also performed a spatial thinning to keep only samples that were separated by at least 5 km from each other. To determine the most suitable habitat we initially used the 19 environmental variables available from WorldClim v. 1.4 data set with a 30 arcmin resolution and eliminated variables 8, 9, 10 and 11 which were strongly correlated among them (r > 0.9). We modelled species distribution using the Maxent algorithm, which is based on presence–absence data (Phillips et al. 2006). We tested linear, quadratic and hinge feature class models, as well as regularization multipliers between 1 and 3, with a step value of 1 and included clamping in the model. K-fold cross-validation was used and data were randomly split into four groups to validate the model. We chose the model with the lowest omission rate of the training set and higher Area under the curve (AUC) values. Model suitability predictions were visualized using the clog-clog transformation.

Results

Genetic diversity and structure using SSRs

All 10 SSR loci were polymorphic with an average allelic richness of 5.80 ± 0.243 alleles. The mean observed and expected heterozygosities were HO = 0.655 ± 0.071 and HE = 0.645 ± 0.062, respectively. Diversity estimates were consistently high across all populations (HE = 0.553–0.748; Table 1). Only the BA population had a significant excess of heterozygotes (FIS = −0.169), while all other inbreeding coefficients were not statistically different from zero.

We found significant genetic structure among all populations GST=0.144, P < 0.001) using SSR markers. The AMOVA found significant genetic structure among Pacific and Caribbean slopes ϕCT=0.178; P < 0.001; seeSupporting Information—Table S1), and significant differences in allele frequencies among populations within slopes ϕSC=0.191; P < 0.001; seeSupporting Information—Table S1). We did not find significant evidence of IBD rM=0.040, P = 0.333). If we estimated the distance between populations taking elevation into account, the Mantel correlation coefficient increased in magnitude, however it was still not statistically significant rM=0.222, P=0.08).

Discriminant analysis of principal components grouped populations on the southern and central Pacific coast (ROD, CAR, GLF, BA, SVT), while all the Caribbean populations (TRG, TIR, VTN, CER, BRI, LIM) formed another group, and MTV as the most distant population on DAPC space (Fig. 1A), indicating greater differences in this population, but still linked to Pacific populations. StructureHarvester grouped individuals into K=2 clusters separating populations in the Pacific and Caribbean slopes (Fig. 1B), but the likelihood curve suggested K = 5 [seeSupporting Information—Fig. S1], which assigned individuals into a similar configuration as that suggested by DAPC and the NJ tree [seeSupporting Information—Fig. S2]. The Monmonier’s algorithm found a barrier separating Pacific from Caribbean populations (Fig. 1C). The barrier found by the algorithm corresponds with the main mountain ranges that dissect the country into two different climatic and topographic regions.

cpDNA diversity

We successfully sequenced 70 individuals from 13 populations. Sequences for the rps16–trnQ and the ndhG–ndhI intergenic spacers were 902 bp and 1066 bp long, respectively. Concatenated sequences had 10 segregating sites and nucleotide diversity was π=0.00123±0.00006 and θW=2.075±0.431. All 70 sequences could be grouped into 11 different haplotypes, including gaps and indels as variants. Haplotype diversity or the probability that two randomly chosen molecules are different was h=0.887±0.018. Tajima’s D = 0.38517 (P > 0.10) and Fu’s F = 0.012 (P > 0.10), which suggests neutrality and no evidence of recent demographic changes. Nearly all populations were composed of a single haplotype (except in ROD and BRI) and the haplotype network (Fig. 2) shows that most haplotypes are separated by a single mutation, except for haplotype I, which is separated by two mutations from haplotype VI. Haplotypes IV and VI are the most common haplotypes. Haplotype IV is distributed among central Pacific populations (CAR, ROD and CUR), while haplotype VI is present in populations in the southern part of Costa Rica, on both the Pacific and Caribbean slopes. An interesting result of the network topology is that the two northern populations CER and VTN are linked to haplotype VI which is mostly found in the southern coast of Costa Rica. Haplotype genetic structure was significantly more pronounced GST=0.9323, P<0.001 and NST=0.9697, P<0.0001) than the genetic structure estimated using microsatellites. Genetic structure estimated using an AMOVA was also high and statistically significant ΦST=0.967, P<0.0001), since very few haplotypes are shared among populations; however, we did not find significant differences in allele frequencies among populations in the Pacific and Caribbean slopes ϕCT=0.087, P>0.05; seeSupporting Information—Table S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Median-joining haplotype network for populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica. Circle sizes reflect the frequency of the haplotype. (B) Map of Costa Rica showing the distribution of C. tepejilote haplotypes in each sampled population.

BAPS found that K=5 is the most likely number of clusters to group haplotypes (Fig. 3). The program did not find evidence of admixture and all sequenced individuals were assigned to a single cluster. BAPS placed CER and MTV populations into separate clusters; while another cluster is composed of the northern Caribbean populations (TIR, TRG). Central Pacific populations CAR, CUR and ROD were clustered into another group, while the remaining populations are in a major cluster formed by populations from the southern Caribbean (LIM, BRI) and southern Pacific coast (SVT, GLF, BA) of the country (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Population genetic structure based on cpDNA using Bayesian assignment inferred with BAPS (K = 5) for individuals of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) from 13 populations in Costa Rica.

Ecological niche modelling

The Hinge model had the highest AUC value (average AUC = 0.859). The predicted distribution model showed that C. tepejilote habitat suitability was lower in dry forest lowlands in the north-western pacific region of the country and at high elevations along the Talamanca Mountain range (Fig. 4). In Costa Rica, most suitable habitats for C. tepejilote are located at intermediate elevations, but humid lowlands are also apt for this palm species. This species is unable to inhabit at high elevations in montane forests; therefore, mountain ranges likely act as barriers for this species.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Ecological niche modelling predictions for habitat suitability of C. tepejilote (Arecaceae) in the LCA region, constructed using the GBIF occurrences and the Maxent algorithm. Cooler colours suggest higher habitat suitability.

Discussion

We found moderate to high levels of microsatellite genetic diversity in the palm C. tepejilote, as expected for a widely distributed and obligately outcrossing dioecious plant species. We found significant genetic structure among populations of this palm species in Costa Rica, with mountain ranges acting as predominant barriers to gene flow, likely due to the inability of palms to withstand environmental conditions at high elevations. In contrast, plastid markers had almost no within population genetic diversity but a significant phylogeographic structure, congruent with the hypothesis that populations may have resided into multiple refugia, experiencing isolation and drift. Our analyses revealed that haplotypes found on the southern Caribbean and southern Pacific coasts are closely related, indicating that gene flow may have occurred through the southernmost extent of the Talamanca Mountain range; a dispersal pattern not previously proposed for LCA plants. This is the first phylogeographic study on tropical palms in the LCA, a region with high palm diversity.

Microsatellites

We found moderate to high levels of genetic diversity in C. tepejilote, using SSR markers, as we originally hypothesized for a widespread outcrossing species. Genetic diversity of palms has been predominantly studied in commercial or edible species such as oil-producing palms or date palms (e.g. Conte et al. 2003; Hayati et al. 2004; Huda et al. 2018; El Kadri et al. 2019; Gan et al. 2021). Although still relatively scant, most studies of genetic diversity on understory palms found comparable levels of genetic diversity, for example, Cibrian-Jaramillo et al. (2009) found for C. ernesti-augusti an average heterozygosity of HE = 0.67 (CI 95 % ± 0.06) and HO = 0.39 (CI 95 % ± 0.049); while Lanes et al. (2016), using nine microsatellite loci in Acrocomia aculeata, found average heterozygosity values (HO = 0.527, HE = 0.678) similar to those found in this study for C. tepejilote. The heterozygosity levels estimated in our study for C. tepejilote match those expected for a widespread outcrossing species and are higher than those observed for short-lived perennials (Nybom 2004). Previous studies conducted in Mexico and Belize in species from the genus Chamaedorea posit that large effective populations and ample levels of gene flow are the main causal factors for the observed levels of gene diversity (Luna et al. 2007; Cibrian-Jaramillo et al. 2009; Peñaloza-Ramírez et al. 2016). Chamaedorea tepejilote is a common species in the understory of tropical wet forests (Hodel 1992) and can be found in a wide range of locations and elevations (Oyama 1990). Our ENM results show that this species can live in a large part of the LCA territory. This likely maintains large effective population sizes, which reduce the effects of drift and maintain high levels of genetic diversity (Hamrick 1982; Hamrick et al. 1992). Greater genetic diversity is also expected in obligate outcrossing plants, such as dioecious species, which are not subjected to the inbreeding effects related to increasing homozygosity caused by selfing and geitonogamy (Glémin et al. 2006). The latter is supported by the lack of inbreeding observed in all studied populations of C. tepejilote.

Our findings indicate that the genetic structure of C. tepejilote populations estimated using SSRs can be attributed primarily to isolation between the Caribbean and Pacific slopes and secondarily to limited gene flow within slopes. A significant component structuring the studied populations of C. tepejilote are topographic barriers. Mountain ranges in Costa Rica divide the country from north-west to south-east, punctuated by small intermediate low-elevation passes among mountains, which are more common in the northern part of the country (Gabb 2007). The distribution of palm species is strongly determined by habitat characteristics such as temperature, humidity and precipitation (Eiserhardt et al. 2011) and on a continental scale, palm density and diversity are greater at lower elevations (Svenning 2001). Thus, climatic conditions found at high elevations are likely to act as a physiological barrier for lowland tropical species, particularly palms (Janzen 1967). In Costa Rica, palm density declines with increasing elevation (Lieberman et al. 1996) and they rarely occur above 2200 m a.s.l. (Hodel 1992). For Chamaedorea, climatic conditions at high elevations and at mountain passes impose a physiological barrier that limits population establishment and gene flow. Similar results have been shown for palm species in South America, where the Andean mountains act as an important barrier for mid-elevation palm species (Trénel et al. 2008). Thus, our results support our initial hypothesis that the Talamanca Mountain range would act as a barrier to gene flow between populations from the Pacific and Caribbean slopes.

We initially expected low levels of genetic structure among populations on the same slope estimated with SSR markers due to high levels of gene flow previously observed in other Chamaedorea species (Luna et al. 2005, 2007). However, our results contradict our initial predictions, as we found significant genetic structure among populations within the Caribbean and Pacific slopes. Chamaedorea tepejilote is pollinated both by wind and thrips (Ríos et al. 2013), which have been previously proposed as short-distance pollen dispersers (Cibrian-Jaramillo et al. 2009). Limited pollen dispersal may restrict gene flow among populations, resulting in significant differences in allele frequencies. We propose that the observed levels of genetic structure are also likely the result of recent changes in the landscape, as habitat loss and fragmentation may limit gene flow among populations, resulting in significant structure within slopes. Chamadorea tepejilote can establish large populations in old secondary forests and riparian habitats and is often found in protected areas along rivers (Ley-López and Avalos 2017). However, the recent decline in habitat availability due to forest fragmentation (Montero et al. 2021) may have reduced connectivity and gene flow between populations, resulting in increased population structure (Cristóbal-Pérez et al. 2021). Carvalho et al. (2015) and Peñaloza-Ramírez et al. (2016) found similar results for understory tropical palms, indicating that genetic differentiation is likely caused by recent habitat loss and fragmentation, and that these changes in landscape have a significant influence on genetic structure but not on intrapopulation variation. For two species of Andean Chamaedorea, Svenning (1998) found that their abundances increased in human-disturbed forests, suggesting that fragmentation may not necessarily reduce population sizes and that intrapopulation genetic diversity may be maintained. Genetic structure may be strongly influenced by landscape environmental features that, in conjunction with local adaptation (Brancalion et al. 2018; Coelho et al. 2020), may have a significant impact on the development of genetic structure among populations.

Chloroplast DNA

Contrary to our initial expectations, we found little to no haplotypic diversity within populations. However, structure among populations was significantly greater for cpDNA markers than for SSRs, and our data did not support the hypothesis that mountains acted as barriers to gene flow. We originally hypothesized that during glacial oscillations, C. tepejilote may have survived in lowland refugia (Poelchau and Hamrick 2012) as these sites may have received enough precipitation and experienced less severe temperatures during the drier glacial periods of the Pleistocene (Hillesheim et al. 2005; Piperno 2006). These refugia would have maintained effective population sizes large enough to sustain high levels of genetic diversity (Petit et al. 2003), resulting in greater haplotype diversity in lowland populations. However, our cpDNA results did not support this hypothesis because haplotypic diversity within populations was almost non-existent, and populations were fixed for different haplotypes. Our analyses revealed significant phylogeographic structure (NST > GST for cytoplasmic markers), indicating that when populations were isolated, drift and mutation were more likely to influence structure than gene flow (Pons and Petit 1996). Our results do not support the hypothesis of a large lowland refugium; rather, as proposed by Brown (1987), our data indicate that several lowland and mid-elevation sites may have supported C. tepejilote populations during drier glacial periods, as previously suggested for other LCA plant species (Dick et al. 2003; Dick and Heuertz 2008; Jones et al. 2013). Alternatively, individuals of C. tepejilote may have persisted in fragments of humid riparian habitats that sustained vegetation during colder and drier periods (Meave and Kellman 1994). As with many other palm species, C. tepejilote is sensitive to drier environments, and during climate change, populations may have receded into smaller, isolated fragments of riparian habitat with enough humidity to sustain viable populations. Reduced population size and isolation may have increased the effects of drift, resulting in the fixation of distinct haplotypes among populations.

Our cpDNA analysis also showed that haplotypes are shared between Caribbean populations and populations found on the southern Pacific coast of Costa Rica (Figs 2 and 3), suggesting that gene flow may have occurred between these sites. In the southern part of Costa Rica, gene flow may have occurred south of the Talamanca Mountain range. When the Talamanca Mountain range reaches Panama, elevations drop significantly and habitat suitability for C. tepejilote extends along the Central Volcanic Chain of Panamá until the Darien depression (Fig. 4). It is likely that genes moved between the southern Caribbean coast and the southern Pacific coast through Panama. To our knowledge, this dispersal pattern has not previously been suggested for other plant species in LCA.

The elevation barrier imposed by high mountains, such as the Talamanca Mountain range with elevations over 3000 m a.s.l., has been considered a difficult barrier to overcome for animal and plant species that inhabit both sides of the cordillera (García-Rodríguez et al. 2021). Our SSR results show significant differences in allele frequencies between populations on both slopes [seeSupporting Information—Table S1]. These differences, however, were not observed for cpDNA markers. These results may be related to differences in pollen and seed dispersal in C. tepejilote, as well as differences in the mode of inheritance of SSR and cpDNA markers. Gene flow estimated using SSRs accounts for both seed and pollen dispersal, whereas cpDNA markers are uniparentally inherited and only reflect gene flow via seed dispersal. Our results suggest that mountain ranges may limit gene flow for thrips and wind. There is little information about the natural dispersal ability of thrips; however, studies in crops suggest that adult thrips dispersal is limited (Parker et al. 1991; Nyasani et al. 2017). Seed dispersal in Chamaedorea species occurs through frugivorous birds (Wheelwright et al. 1984), which are capable of overcoming topographic barriers moving between slopes and transporting seeds over long distances (Powell and Bjork 1994, 2004). Birds may disperse seeds through mountain passes or at the southern end of the Talamanca Mountain range, where lower elevations allow birds to move between slopes, reducing the structure between the Pacific and Caribbean populations. Additionally, dioecious species such as C. tepejilote may also have localized seed dispersal because only females can effectively disperse propagules, and dispersal occurs frequently in the vicinity of females, a phenomenon known as ‘seed-shadow handicap’ (Heilbuth et al. 2001; Barot et al. 2004). This would decrease local diversity and increase genetic structure among populations, especially for maternally inherited markers, as shown by our cpDNA results. Our results show that although mountain passes seem to be higher in the tropics (Janzen 1967), some species may simply go around them if they are given enough time or habitat is available on the outskirts of their range. Connectivity across the continental divide has important implications for conservation efforts, which should also consider low-elevation mountain passes as important conduits for gene flow. In these mountain passes, gene flow contributes to maintaining genetic diversity. However, a significant number of these mountain passes have lost habitat due to deforestation (Sader and Joyce 1988). Given the impending changes in precipitation and temperature brought on by climate change, it may be crucial to prioritize the conservation of these sites in order to maintain connectivity among populations.

We conclude that C. tepejilote is a widespread species in Costa Rica, with high levels of intrapopulation genetic diversity estimated using nuclear markers. Genetic structure patterns suggest that contemporary gene flow across the mountain ranges is restricted and the prevalent climatic conditions at high elevations represent a significant physiological barrier for this species. Our results also suggest that habitat loss and landscape changes have the potential to increase genetic structure if this species becomes isolated into small populations. During the dry cycles of the Pleistocene, riparian habitats and forest fragments may have played an important role as refugia for understory palms. Further research on the phylogeographic of LCA plants should focus on these areas to understand how these sites may have maintained high diversity with different life history traits and their potential as reservoirs of genetic diversity for tropical species.

Supporting Information

The following additional information is available in the online version of this article—

Figure S1. Structure Harvester results for different values of K. (A) Delta K value estimated by the Evanno method. (B) Mean (± SD) of the estimated log of the probability of the data given K (Ln Pr(X|K)) estimated by the STRUCTURE program for 15 replicate runs for each K value. Red dots indicate the optimal K selected by each method.

Figure S2. Neighbour-joining tree based on pairwise GST values among 12 populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica. See Table 1 for population abbreviations. Text color is based on K = 5 cluster assignment by STRUCTURE in Fig. 1.

Table S1. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for SSR markers for populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica, grouped in two regions: Pacific and Caribbean slopes.

Table S2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) using cpDNA haplotypes for populations of Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) in Costa Rica, grouped into two regions: Pacific and Caribbean slopes.

plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S1
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S2
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S1
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S2

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: G. Barrantes and C. Oakley for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript, G. Sanchez-Montoya, S. Carvajal and M. Rodríguez for lab assistance. We would also like to thank the reviewers that contributed to significantly improve previous versions of this manuscript.

Evolution & Diversity. Chief Editor: Jeremy Beaulieu

Contributor Information

Eric J Fuchs, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro Montes de Oca 11501-2060, Costa Rica; Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, México; Laboratorio Binacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, UNAM-UCR, México–, Costa Rica.

Alfredo Cascante-Marín, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro Montes de Oca 11501-2060, Costa Rica; Laboratorio Binacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, UNAM-UCR, México–, Costa Rica.

Ruth Madrigal-Brenes, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro Montes de Oca 11501-2060, Costa Rica; Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, México; Laboratorio Binacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, UNAM-UCR, México–, Costa Rica.

Mauricio Quesada, Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, México; Laboratorio Binacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, UNAM-UCR, México–, Costa Rica; Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, México.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from Vicerrectoría de Investigación at Universidad de Costa Rica: 111-B9-205, 111-B7-046. And partially funded by grants from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)–Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT): # IV200418, IA207618, IN200418, IN219021, IN224920; Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER)–Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT): 291333; CONACyT–National Repositories: 271432; CONACYT-UNAM–UAGro to LANASE: 2019-LN299033, 2020- LN314852, 2021-LN 315810 and Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnologıa para el Desarrollo RED CYTED-SEPODI: 417RT0527.

Contributions by the Authors:

EJF, ACM, and MQ conceived the project. EJF and ACM collected samples. RMB performed laboratory analyses. EJF analyzed data and wrote the first draft. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Data Availability

The data sets generated during the current study are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7337953.

Literature Cited

  1. Aguilar R, Cristóbal‐Pérez EJ, Balvino‐Olvera FJ, Aguilar‐Aguilar M, Aguirre‐Acosta N, Ashworth L, Lobo JA, Martén‐Rodríguez S, Fuchs EJ, Sanchez‐Montoya G, et al. 2019. Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: a global synthesis. Ecology Letters 22:1163–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aide TM, Rivera E.. 1998. Geographic patterns of genetic diversity in Poulsenia armata (Moraceae): implications for the theory of Pleistocene refugia and the importance of riparian forest. Journal of Biogeography 25:695–705. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonelli A. 2017. Biogeography: drivers of bioregionalization. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avise JC. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bacon CD, Silvestro D, Jaramillo C, Smith BT, Chakrabarty P, Antonelli A.. 2015. Biological evidence supports an early and complex emergence of the Isthmus of Panama. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:6110–6115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagley JC, Johnson JB, Johnson JB.. 2014. Phylogeography and biogeography of the lower Central American Neotropics: diversification between two continents and between two seas. Biological Reviews 89:767–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barot S, Gignoux J, Gignoux J.. 2004. How do sessile dioecious species cope with their males? Theoretical Population Biology 66:163–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Booy G, Hendriks RJJ, Smulders MJM, Van Groenendael JM, Vosman B.. 2000. Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plant Biology 2:379–395. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brancalion PHS, Oliveira GCX, Zucchi MI, Novello M, van Melis J, Zocchi SS, Chazdon RL, Rodrigues RR.. 2018. Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation favor range expansion of a Neotropical palm. Ecology and Evolution 8:7462–7475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown KS. 1987. Areas where humid tropical forest probably persisted. In: Whitmore TC, Prance GT, eds. Biogeography and Quaternary history in Tropical America. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 44–45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brummitt N, Araújo AC, Harris T.. 2021. Areas of plant diversity—what do we know? Plants, People, Planet 3:33–44. [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho C da S, Ribeiro MC, Côrtes MC, Galetti M, Collevatti RG.. 2015. Contemporary and historic factors influence differently genetic differentiation and diversity in a tropical palm. Heredity 115:216–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cavers S, Navarro C, Lowe AJ.. 2003. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography reveals colonization history of a Neotropical tree, Cedrela odorata L., in Mesoamerica. Molecular Ecology 12:1451–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chase MR, Boshier DH, Bawa KS.. 1995. Population genetics of Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae), a Neotropical tree. 1. Genetic variation in natural populations. American Journal of Botany 82:468–475. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cibrian-Jaramillo A, Bacon C, Garwood N, Bateman R, Thomas M, Russell S, Bailey CD, Hahn W, Bridgewater S, DeSalle R.. 2009. Population genetics of the understory fishtail palm Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti in Belize: high genetic connectivity with local differentiation. BMC Genetics 10:65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Coelho GM, Santos AS, Menezes IPP, Tarazi R, Souza FMO, Silva MGCPC, Gaiotto FA.. 2020. Genetic structure among morphotypes of the endangered Brazilian palm Euterpe edulis Mart (Arecaceae). Ecology and Evolution 10:6039–6048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Conte R, Nodari RO, Vencovsky R, Reis M.. 2003. Genetic diversity and recruitment of the tropical palm, Euterpe edulis Mart., in a natural population from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Heredity 91:401–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpää MJ.. 2004. BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 20:2363–2369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Couvet D. 2002. Deleterious effects of restricted gene flow in fragmented populations. Conservation Biology 16:369–376. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cristóbal-Pérez EJ, Fuchs EJ, Martén-Rodríguez S, Quesada M.. 2021. Habitat fragmentation negatively affects effective gene flow via pollen, and male and female fitness in the dioecious tree, Spondias purpurea (Anacardiaceae). Biological Conservation 256:109007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Delaney KS, Riley SPD, Fisher RN.. 2010. A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS One 5:e12767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dick CW, Abdul-Salim K, Bermingham E.. 2003. Molecular systematic analysis reveals cryptic Tertiary diversification of a widespread Tropical Rain Forest tree. The American Naturalist 162:691–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dick CW, Heuertz M.. 2008. The complex biogeographic history of a widespread tropical tree species. Evolution 62:2760–2774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL.. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15. [Google Scholar]
  25. Earl DA, VonHoldt BM.. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4:359–361. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eiserhardt WL, Svenning J-C, Kissling WD, Balslev H.. 2011. Geographical ecology of the palms (Arecaceae): determinants of diversity and distributions across spatial scales. Annals of Botany 108:1391–1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. El Kadri N, Mimoun MB, Hormaza JI.. 2019. Genetic diversity of Tunisian male date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) genotypes using morphological descriptors and molecular markers. Scientia Horticulturae 253:24–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ellstrand NC. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77. [Google Scholar]
  29. Escobar S, Helmstetter AJ, Jarvie S, Montúfar R, Balslev H, Couvreur TLP.. 2021. Pleistocene climatic fluctuations promoted alternative evolutionary histories in Phytelephas aequatorialis, an endemic palm from western Ecuador. Journal of Biogeography 48:1023–1037. [Google Scholar]
  30. Escobar S, Pintaud J-C, Balslev H, Bernal R, Moraes Ramírez M, Millán B, Montúfar R.. 2018. Genetic structuring in a Neotropical palm analyzed through an Andean orogenesis-scenario. Ecology and Evolution 8:8030–8042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL.. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecxular Ecology Resources 10:564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK.. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Francis RM. 2017. pophelper: an R package and web app to analyse and visualise population structure. Molecular Ecology Resources 17:27–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Frankham R. 1995. Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 29:305–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Frankham R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation 126:131–140. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuchs EJ, Cascante-Marín A, Madrigal-Brenes R, Harvey N, Quesada M.. 2020. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites for the neotropical dioecious palm Chamaedorea tepejilote (Arecaceae) and cross-amplification in other Chamaedorea species. Molecular Biology Reports 47:6385–6391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuchs EJ, Hamrick JL.. 2011. Mating system and pollen flow between remnant populations of the endangered tropical tree, Guaiacum sanctum (Zygophyllaceae). Conservation Genetics 12:175–185. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fuchs EJ, Lobo JA, Quesada M.. 2003. Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata. Conservation Biology 17:149–157. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gabb WM. 2007. On the geology of the Republic of Costa Rica. Revista Geológica de América Central 37:103–118. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gan ST, Teo CJ, Manirasa S, Wong WC, Wong CK.. 2021. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) field genebank: a step towards molecular-assisted germplasm conservation. PLoS One 16:e0255418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. García-Rodríguez A, Guarnizo CE, Crawford AJ, Garda AA, Costa GC.. 2021. Idiosyncratic responses to drivers of genetic differentiation in the complex landscapes of Isthmian Central America. Heredity 126:251–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gentry AH. 1982. Neotropical floristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69:557–593. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ghalambor CK, Huey RB, Martin PR, Tewksbury JJ, Wang G.. 2006. Are mountain passes higher in the tropics? Janzen’s hypothesis revisited. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:5–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Glémin S, Bazin E, Charlesworth D.. 2006. Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 273:3011–3019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goaverts R, Dransfield J, Zona S, Hodel DR, Henderson A.. 2020. World checklist of Arecaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ (25 February 2020).
  46. Goudet J. 2005. HIERFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5:184–186. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hamrick JL. 1982. Plant population genetics and evolution. American Journal of Botany 69:1685–1693. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW.. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 351:1291–1298. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL.. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6:95–124. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hamrick JL, Loveless MD.. 1987. Associations between the breeding system and the genetic-structure of tropical tree populations. American Journal of Botany 74:642–642. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds). 1997. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hayati A, Wickneswari R, Maizura I, Rajanaidu N.. 2004. Genetic diversity of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) germplasm collections from Africa: implications for improvement and conservation of genetic resources. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108:1274–1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Heilbuth JC, Ilves KL, Otto SP.. 2001. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55:880–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Henderson A, Galeano G, Bernal R.. 2019. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hillesheim MB, Hodell DA, Leyden BW, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Anselmetti FS, Ariztegui D, Buck DG, Guilderson TP, Rosenmeier MF, et al. 2005. Climate change in lowland Central America during the late deglacial and early Holocene. Journal of Quaternary Science 20:363–376. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hodel DR. 1992. Chamaedorea palms, the species and their cultivation. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hooghiemstra H, Cleef AM, Noldus CW, Kappelle M.. 1992. Upper Quaternary vegetation dynamics and palaeoclimatology of the La Chonta bog area (Cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica). Journal of Quaternary Science 7:205–225. [Google Scholar]
  58. Huda MN, Hasan M, Abdullah HM, Sarker U.. 2018. Spatial distribution and genetic diversity of wild date palm (Phoenix sylvestris) growing in coastal Bangladesh. Tree Genetics & Genomes 15:3. [Google Scholar]
  59. Janes JK, Miller JM, Dupuis JR, Malenfant RM, Gorrell JC, Cullingham CI, Andrew RL.. 2017. The K = 2 conundrum. Molecular Ecology 26:3594–3602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Janzen DH. 1967. Why mountain passes are higher in the Tropics. The American Naturalist 101:233–249. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jombart T. 2008. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jombart T, Ahmed I.. 2011. adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jones FA, Cerón-Souza I, Hardesty BD, Dick CW.. 2013. Genetic evidence of Quaternary demographic changes in four rain forest tree species sampled across the Isthmus of Panama. Journal of Biogeography 40:720–731. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ.. 2014. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kass JM, Pinilla-Buitrago GE, Vilela B, Aiello-Lammens ME, Muscarella R, Merow C, Anderson RP.. 2020. Wallace: A modular platform for reproducible modeling of species niches and distributions. R package version 1.9.0
  66. Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lanes ECM, Motoike SY, Kuki KN, Resende MDV, Caixeta ET.. 2016. Mating system and genetic composition of the macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata): implications for breeding and genetic conservation programs. Journal of Heredity 107:527–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ley-López JM, Avalos G.. 2017. Propagation of the palm flora in a Lowland Tropical Rainforest in Costa Rica: fruit collection and germination patterns. Tropical Conservation Science 10:1–12. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lieberman D, Lieberman M, Peralta R, Hartshorn GS.. 1996. Tropical forest structure and composition on a large-scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 84:137–152. [Google Scholar]
  70. de Lima NE, Lima-Ribeiro MS, Tinoco CF, Terribile LC, Collevatti RG.. 2014. Phylogeography and ecological niche modeling, coupled with the fossil pollen record, unravel the demographic history of a Neotropical swamp palm through the Quaternary. Journal of Biogeography 41:673–686. [Google Scholar]
  71. Luna R, Epperson BK, Oyama K.. 2005. Spatial genetic structure of two sympatric Neotropical palms with contrasting life histories. Heredity 95:298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Luna R, Epperson BK, Oyama K.. 2007. High levels of genetic variability and inbreeding in two Neotropical dioecious palms with contrasting life histories. Heredity 99:466–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lynch M, Crease TJ.. 1990. The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 7:377–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Meave J, Kellman M.. 1994. Maintenance of rain forest diversity in riparian forests of tropical savannas: implications for species conservation during Pleistocene drought. Journal of Biogeography 21:121–135. [Google Scholar]
  75. Monmonier MS. 1973. Maximum-difference barriers: an alternative numerical regionalization method. Geographical Analysis 5:245–261. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mont JJC, Gallardo NR, Johnson DV.. 1994. The pacaya palm (Chamaedorea tepejilote; Arecaceae). Economic Botany 48:68–75. [Google Scholar]
  77. Montero A, Marull J, Tello E, Cattaneo C, Coll F, Pons M, Infante-Amate J, Urrego-Mesa A, Fernández-Landa A, Vargas M.. 2021. The impacts of agricultural and urban land-use changes on plant and bird biodiversity in Costa Rica (1986–2014). Regional Environmental Change 21:48. [Google Scholar]
  78. Montes C, Cardona A, McFadden R, Morón SE, Silva CA, Restrepo-Moreno S, Ramírez DA, Hoyos N, Wilson J, Farris D, et al. 2012. Evidence for middle Eocene and younger land emergence in central Panama: implications for isthmus closure. GSA Bulletin 124:780–799. [Google Scholar]
  79. Newton AC, Allnutt TR, Gillies ACM, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA.. 1999. Molecular phylogeography, intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:140–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Novick RR, Dick CW, Lemes MR, Navarro C, Caccone A, Bermingham E.. 2003. Genetic structure of Mesoamerican populations of Big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) inferred from microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology 12:2885–2893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Nyasani J, Subramanian S, Orindi B, Poehling H, Meyhöfer R.. 2017. Short range dispersal of western flower thrips in field-grown French beans in Kenya. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 37:79–88. [Google Scholar]
  82. Nybom H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants: DNA-markers and plant genetic diversity. Molecular Ecology 13:1143–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. O’Dea A, Lessios HA, Coates AG, Eytan RI, Restrepo-Moreno SA, Cione AL, Collins LS, de Queiroz A, Farris DW, Norris RD, et al. 2016. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Science Advances 2:e1600883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Oyama K. 1990. Variation in growth and reproduction in the Neotropical dioecious palm Chamaedorea tepejilote. Journal of Ecology 78:648–663. [Google Scholar]
  85. Paradis E, Schliep K.. 2019. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35:526–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Parker BL, Skinner M, Trevor L.. 1991. Towards understanding Thysanoptera. General Technical Report NE-147. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  87. Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, Aguilar-Amezquita B, Núñez-Farfán J, Pérez-Nasser N, Albarrán-Lara AL, Oyama K.. 2016. Consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic structure of Chamaedorea alternans (Arecaceae) palm populations in the tropical rain forests of Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87:990–1001. [Google Scholar]
  88. Pérez GC, Zavala SM, Ventura RE, Pérez GS, Ponce MH.. 2008. Evaluation of anti-tussive activity of Chamaedorea tepejilote. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 120:138–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu J-L, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, et al. 2003. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563–1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE.. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259. [Google Scholar]
  91. Piperno DR. 2006. Quaternary environmental history and agricultural impact on vegetation in Central America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 93:274–296. [Google Scholar]
  92. Poelchau MF, Hamrick JL.. 2011. Comparative phylogeography of three common Neotropical tree species. Journal of Biogeography 40:618–631. [Google Scholar]
  93. Poelchau MF, Hamrick JL.. 2012. Differential effects of landscape-level environmental features on genetic structure in three codistributed tree species in Central America. Molecular Ecology 21:4970–4982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Poelchau MF, Hamrick JL.. 2013. Palaeodistribution modelling does not support disjunct Pleistocene refugia in several Central American plant taxa. Journal of Biogeography 40:662–675. [Google Scholar]
  95. Pons O, Petit RJ.. 1996. Measuring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered versus unordered alleles. Genetics 144:1237–1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Powell VNG, Bjork R.. 1994. Implications of intratropical migration on reserve design: a case study using Pharomachrus mocinno. Conservation Biology 9:354–362. [Google Scholar]
  97. Powell VNG, Bjork R.. 2004. Habitat linkages and the conservation of tropical biodiversity as indicated by seasonal migrations of three-wattled bellbirds. Conservation Biology 18:500–509. [Google Scholar]
  98. Pritchard JK, Wen W.. 2003. Documentation for STRUCTURE software: version 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://web.stanford.edu/group/pritchardlab/software/structure2_1.html. November, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  99. R Development Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ríos LD, Fuchs EJ, Hodel DR, Cascante-Marín A.. 2013. Neither insects nor wind: ambophily in dioecious Chamaedorea palms (Arecaceae). Plant Biology 16:702–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Robles DJR, Carranza ERS.. 2013. Hypoglycemic activity of Chamaedorea tepejilote Liebm. (pacaya). Revista Cubana de Plantas Medicinales 18:27–33. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sader S, Joyce A.. 1988. Deforestation rates and trends in Costa Rica, 1940 to 1983. Biotropica 20:11–19. [Google Scholar]
  103. Scarcelli N, Barnaud A, Eiserhardt W, Treier UA, Seveno M, d'Anfray A, Vigouroux Y, Pintaud J-C.. 2011. A set of 100 chloroplast DNA primer pairs to study population genetics and phylogeny in monocotyledons. PLoS One 6:e19954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG.. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584585–584606. [Google Scholar]
  105. Souza AF, Martins FR.. 2004. Microsite specialization and spatial distribution of Geonoma brevispatha, a clonal palm in south-eastern Brazil. Ecological Research 19:521–532. [Google Scholar]
  106. Souza MCP, Moura F, Silva JV, Almeida C.. 2018. Phylogeography of the palm Syagrus coronata (Martius) Beccari (Arecaceae): distribution in the “Caatinga” and Atlantic Forest domains. Brazilian Journal of Botany 41:849–857. [Google Scholar]
  107. Svenning J-C. 1998. The effect of land-use on the local distribution of palm species in an Andean rain forest fragment in northwestern Ecuador. Biodiversity & Conservation 7:1529–1537. [Google Scholar]
  108. Svenning J-C. 2001. On the role of microenvironmental heterogeneity in the ecology and diversification of Neotropical rain-forest palms (Arecaceae). The Botanical Review 67:1–53. [Google Scholar]
  109. Terborgh J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA, eds. Conservation biology: an evolutionary–ecological perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 330–344. [Google Scholar]
  110. Trapnell DW, Hamrick JL, Smallwood PA, Kartzinel TR, Ishibashi CD, Quigley CTC.. 2019. Phylogeography of the Neotropical epiphytic orchid Brassavola nodosa: evidence for a secondary contact zone in northwestern Costa Rica. Heredity 123:662–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Trénel P, Hansen MM, Normand S, Borchsenius F.. 2008. Landscape genetics, historical isolation and cross-Andean gene flow in the wax palm, Ceroxylon echinulatum (Arecaceae). Molecular Ecology 17:3528–3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wheelwright NT, Haber WA, Murray KG, Guindon C.. 1984. Tropical fruit-eating birds and their food plants: a survey of a Costa Rican lower montane forest. Biotropica 16:173–192. [Google Scholar]
  113. Winter DJ. 2012. mmod: an R library for the calculation of population differentiation statistics. Molecular Ecology Resources 12:1158–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S1
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S2
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S1
plac060_suppl_Supplementary_Table_S2

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated during the current study are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7337953.


Articles from AoB Plants are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES