Skip to main content
Veterinary Research Forum logoLink to Veterinary Research Forum
. 2022 Dec 15;13(4):597–601. doi: 10.30466/vrf.2021.523112.3128

The profile of inflammatory factors in dairy calves with Cryptosporidium infection

Mostafa Meshkat 1, Bahar Shemshadi 1,*, Kumarss Amini 2
PMCID: PMC9840795  PMID: 36686872

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the detection and identification of Cryptosporidium species via molecular techniques and evaluate the serum concentrations of inflammatory factors in Cryptosporidium species. The fecal samples (n = 256) were collected from pre-weaned (≤ 2.00 months) calves and the positive samples were identified utilizing Ziehl-Neelsen staining. Nested species-specific multiplex PCR (nssm-PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were used to identify the species and sub-species. The serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were also assessed. The results revealed that 10.54% of samples were positive. The results of Nested-PCR showed that 92.59% of the samples were positive for C. parvum while 7.41% were positive for C. andersoni. The results of RFLP confirmed 92.59% of the samples for C. parvum, 3.70% for C. muris / C. andersoni, and 3.70% for C. muris. The serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were significantly higher in the infected calves compared to those in healthy calves. However, the serum concentration of IFN-γ was significantly higher in the calves infected with C. parvum while the serum concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly higher in those infected with C. andersoni. In conclusion, C. parvum was prevalent in the region and the calves demonstrated inflammatory responses to Cryptosporidium species.

Key Words: Calves, Cryptosporidium parvum, Inflammatory responses, RFLP

Introduction

Cryptosporidium genus belongs to opportunistic protozoans of Apicomplexa phylum and causes infection in gastrointestinal and respiratory systems of certain mammalians.1 Cryptosporidiosis is commonly transmitted by the consumption of contaminated feed sources.2 Species of Cryptosporidium parvum, C. bovis, C. andersoni, and C. ryanae have been detected in bovine cryptosporidiosis.3 The C. parvum mainly causes infection, diarrhea, progressive dehydration, weight loss, delayed growth, and occasional death in pre-weaned calves.4 Innate and adaptive immunities have important roles in protecting body against cryptosporidiosis.5 Cytokines are the main compounds of the immune system, which play an important role in signal transduction between cells and regulate the immune responses.6 Interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tissue necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) are involved in the inflammatory responses.7 Interleukin-12 (IL-12) promotes antiparasitic, antimicrobial, and antitumor activity of the macrophages and natural killer cells.8,9

Different methods have been employed for detection of Cryptosporidium. Microscopic method is the most common method for the identification of Cryptosporidium using the stool samples.10 Herein, modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining technique was used for the detection of intestinal cryptosporidiosis. Molecular techniques have further sensitivity compared to microscopy methods. Molecular methods are used for genotyping and subtyping of Cryptosporidium.11 The amplification of small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) with Nested-PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) are sensitive molecular techniques for the detection of Cryptosporidium DNA in the host’s fecal and environmental samples and are utilized in Cryptosporidium genotyping.12 Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a technique for the detection and quantification of Cryptosporidium in both fecal and environmental samples, specifically for human pathogenic species C. parvum and C. hominis.13 Knowing Information about the inflammatory responses in the infections with Cryptosporidium species may help to control and prepare agents for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis. Thus, the present study was conducted to identify Cryptosporidium species with molecular tools in infected calves and investigate their relations with inflammatory factors.

Materials and Methods

Ethical standard. All the procedures were approved by Ethical Committee of Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (Tehran-Iran) and with Ethical number (IAUSR, 1398, 407).

Sampling and identification of Cryptosporidium oocytes. The fecal samples (n = 256) were collected from rectum of pre-weaned (≤ 2 months) calves from all over Semnan province (Iran) from April to September 2019. Table 1 represents the studied farms. The samples were stored in sterile plastic containers at 4.00 °C until microscopic examination and genomic DNA extraction.

Table 1.

The studied regions in the current study and number of positive samples in different methods

Regions/Farms No. of animals No. of infected animals
Microscopy Nested-PCR
Varesh Dibaj 17 2 2
Abir Abad 15 0 0
Ebrahim Mazhari 13 2 2
Ahmad Azizi 14 1 1*
Ali Khorasani 15 1 1
Gholamhossein Jaberzadeh 16 2 2
Hossein Azizian 19 3 3
Mohammad Tehrani 12 1 1*
Verkian 17 2 2
Vamerzan 12 1 1
Gol Narges 16 2 2
Ali Darabian 17 1 1
Mohammad Aminian 13 2 2
Haji Abad Golshan 14 1 1
Sharifieh 13 2 2
Abolfazl Alinezhad 19 2 2
Mohammad Reza Ardakani 14 2 2

* Asterisk shows positive samples for C. andersoni.

Ziehl-Neelsen staining. Hot and cold procedures were used for ZN staining of the fecal smears as reported by Rekha et al.14

DNA extraction. To extract oocyte DNA, QIAGEN QIAamp 180 - 220 DNA stool mini kit (QIAGEN, Düsseldorf, Germany) was employed.

Nested species-specific multiplex PCR (nssm-PCR). Nested-PCR technique for identification of Cryptosporidium species was conducted with specific primers (Table 2) with a product size of 1370 bp as reported by Thomson et al.15 In the first step, the reagents were 2.50 µL DNA template, 0.20 µmol of primer, 200 µmol of dNTP mix, 1.50 µmol of MgCl2, 2.50 µL of PCR buffer, and 2.50 µL of Taq DNA polymerase. Thermal program was performed under 95.00 °C for 5 min and 30 thermal cycles, under 94.00 °C for 60 sec, under 72.00 °C for 60 sec, and the final step was carried out under 72.00 °C for 5 min. In the second step, all the conditions were similar to those in the first one and 1.00 µL of the first PCR product was used as a pattern for the second step following dilution in a ratio of 100 to 1. In this step, the second primers were used and a piece with a length of 241 - 840 base primer were replicated and included C. andersoni, C. ryanae, C. parvum, and C. bovis. Standard species were employed as the positive control while the negative control did not have any pattern DNA.

Table 2.

Primers sets for different species of Cryptosporidium isolated with Nssm-PCR and 18S rRNA in Nested-PCR for RFLP

Primer pair Sequence 5' - 3' Fragment size Species detected
AL1687 (EF) AL1691 (ER) TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG
CCCATTTCTTCGAAACAGGA
1,370 Genus-specific external
AL1598 (IF) AL3032 (IR) GAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA
840 Genus-specific internal
CaF AL3032 (IR) GCAAATTACCCAATCCTGAC
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA
625 C. andersoi
Cr AL 3032 (IR) TGTTAATTTTTATATCAATTCTACGG
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA
415 C. ryanae
Cph F AL3032 (IR) AGAGTGCTTAAAGCAGGCATA
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA
305 C.parvum
CbF AL3032 (IR) CTTCTTATTCCTTCTAGAATAAAAATG
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA
241 C.bovis
18s rRNA internal (primer 1) TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG
CCCATTTCCTTCGAAACAGGA
868 -
18s rRNA external (Primer 2) 5'-GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG
AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACC TCCA
864 -

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). To identify sub-species, RFLP technique was performed on 18S rRNA.16 In the next step, genomic DNA was extracted and 18S rRNA was replicated with Nested-PCR. To replicate 845 nucleotides fragment, 18S rRNA was used as reported by Xiao et al.16 Table 2 depicts the internal and external primer sequences.

Inflammatory responses. The blood samples (5.00 mL) were collected from the calves on the same day as the fecal sampling was carried out. They were investigated for the serum concentrations of IL-1β (detection ratio of 6.25 - 4,000 pg mL-1), IL-6 (detection ratio of 2.74 - 2,000 pg mL-1), IL-12 (detection ratio of 6.25 - 400 pg mL-1), TNF-α (detection ratio of 0.10 - 30 ng mL-1), and IFN-γ (detection ratio of 0.11 - 30.00 ng mL-1) with bovine specific ELISA kits produced by Ray Biotech Co. (Norcross, USA).

Statistical analysis. The data regarding molecular and microscopy parts were analyzed with SPSS Software (version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) for the mean and frequencies. The calves were divided into three groups, namely healthy, infected with C. parvum, and infected with C. andersoni groups. The data were compared via Kruskal-Wallis procedure and the agreement between the methods was investigated with Kappa coefficient.

Results

Microscopic findings. Microscopy results showed that 10.54% of the samples were positive in ZN staining (Table 1).

The results of Nested-PCR. The results of Nested-PCR confirmed microscopy results (Kappa coefficient = 1.00, p = 0.000) and also showed that 92.59% of samples and 7.41% of samples were positive for C. parvum (303 bp) and C. andersoni, respectively (625 bp; Fig. 1A). The findings for each region are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A) The results of Nested-PCR in the positive samples. The first column (marker), + column (positive column), - column (negative control), columns 1 - 12 show the positive samples for C. parvum. B) The results of PCR-RFLP under VspI enzyme. The first column (marker), + column (positive column), - column (negative control), columns 1 - 12 show the positive samples for C. parvum bovine with genotype A gene sub-species. C) The results of PCR-RFLP under SspI enzyme. Columns 1 - 2 show the positive samples for C. muris/C. andersoni sub-species. D) The results of PCR-RFLP under Dde enzyme. Columns 1 - 2 show the positive samples for C. muris sub-species

The investigation of species with PCR-RFLP. The results of RFLP confirmed previous results (Kappa coefficient = 1.00, p = 0.000) and showed that 25 samples were identified with VSP enzyme (104 and 628 bp), which implicate the presence of bovine C. parvum and genotype A gene sub-species (Fig. 2). Our findings also revealed that Ssp I enzyme showed bands in 385 and 448 bp regions, which implicate the presence of C. muris/C. andersoni sub-species (Fig. 2C). Figure 2D represents bands at 156, 186, and 224 bp regions confirming C. muris sub-species.

Fig. 2.

The serum concentration of inflammatory cytokines

Fig. 2

abc Different letters show significant differences among the groups at p < 0.05.

Serum concentrations of inflammatory factors. Figure 2 demonstrates the serum concentrations of the inflammatory cytokines. As could be seen, the serum concentrations of cytokines were significantly higher in the infected calves compared to those of non-infected ones. The results confirmed the inflammatory responses in the infected calves. However, the serum concentration IFN-γ was significantly higher in the calves infected with C. parvum compared to that in the calves infected with C. andersoni (p < 0.05). The serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher in the calves infected with C. andersoni compared to those in the calves infected with C. parvum (p < 0.05).

Discussion

Microscopy results showed that some samples were positive for cryptosporidiosis. Studies have reported a prevalence rate of 3.40% to 96.60% for C. parvum in pre-weaned calves.4 The disagreement between our findings and those of others could be attributed to the age of calves and applied diagnostic techniques. Fayer et al. reported that claves show different levels of sensitivity to crypto-sporidiosis in different ages.17 Their results indicated that Nested-PCR (Kappa coefficient = 1.00, p = 0.000) and RFLP techniques (Kappa coefficient = 1.00, p = 0.000) have the best agreement with microscopy techniques.

The results of Nested-PCR showed that most samples belonged to C. parvum and C. andersoni species. In the current study, the samples were collected from pre-weaned calves and C. parvum was detected as the most prevalent species. Our results showed that C. parvum is the most prevalent species in young calves. In addition, the RFLP results confirmed Nested-PCR technique results and separated C. muris from C. andersoni. The RFLP produces restriction patterns that are used for identification of sub-species.18 Accordingly, different methods have confirmed the higher prevalence of infection with C. parvum in Iran.

The serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were significantly higher in the calves infected with Cryptosporidium. The serum concentration and expression of IL-1β are higher in the diseases and suppress appetite and increase temperature and inflammation.19 Beheshtipour and Raeeszadeh reported an increase in the serum concentration of IL-1β in calves infected with diarrhea syndrome.20 TNF-α and IL-1β increase the migration of leukocytes to the infection site.8 The results here revealed that TNF-α concentration was higher in the calves infected with C. andersoni. The increase in IL-6 is a prognostic marker in neonatal calf diarrhea.7 The increase in concentrations of IFN-γ and IL-12 could be attributed to the response of the marker to T lymphocytes and natural killer as an immune response. The serum concentration of IFN-γ was significantly higher in the calves infected with C. parvum.

Overall, microscopy results demonstrated a low rate of infection in the pre-weaned calves, which was also confirmed by molecular methods. The highest prevalence belonged to C. parvum followed by C. andersoni. The calves infected with C. andersoni showed higher concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α while the serum concentration of IFN-γ was higher in the calves infected with C. parvum. The major limitation of the current research was the rather small size of positive samples. Nevertheless, this study opens a window for future studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to appreciate Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran for its supports.

References

  • 1.Yildirim A, Adanir R, Inci A, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of bovine Cryptosporidium species in the Mediterranean and Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;69:101425. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Díaz P, Varcasia A, Pipia AP, et al. Molecular characterization and risk factor analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves from Italy. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(10):3081–3090. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-6000-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Imre K, Lobo LM, Matos O, et al. Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium isolates from pre-weaned calves in Romania: is there an actual risk of zoonotic infections? Vet Parasitol. 2011;181(2-4):321–324. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leitch GJ, He Q. Cryptosporidiosis - an overview. J Biomed Res. 2012;25(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delirezh N, Norian R, Azadmehr A. Changes in some pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines produced by bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells following foot and mouth disease vaccination. Arch Razi Inst. 2016;71(3):199–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kongara K, Dukkipati V, Tai HM, et al. Differential transcription of selected cytokine and neuroactive ligand-receptor genes in peripheral leukocytes from calves in response to cautery disbudding. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(7):1187. doi: 10.3390/ani10071187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aboelsoued D, Hendaw SHM, Abo-Aziza FAM, et al. Copro-microscopical and immunological diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in Egyptian buffalo-calves with special reference to their cytokine profiles. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(3):654–660. doi: 10.1007/s12639-020-01244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Canals A, Pasquali P, Zarlenga DS, et al. Local ileal cytokine responses in cattle during a primary infection with Cryptosporidium parvum. J Parasitol. 1998;84(1):125–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clavel A, Arnal AC, Sánchez EC, et al. Evaluation of the optimal number of faecal specimens in the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in AIDS and immunocompetent patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14(1):46–49. doi: 10.1007/BF02112618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thompson RCA, Ash A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;40:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Feng Y, Ortega Y, He G, et al. Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144(1-2):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bouzid M, Elwin K, Nader JL, et al. Novel real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of human infective Cryptosporidium species. Virulence. 2016;7(4):395–399. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1149670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rekha KM, Puttalakshmamma GC, D’Souza E. Comparison of different diagnostic techniques for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovines. Vet World. 2016;9(2):211–215. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.211-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thomson S, Innes EA, Nicholas N, et al. A Multiplex PCR test to identify four common cattle–adapted Cryptosporidium species. Parasitol Open. 2019;5: e1 . [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiao L, Fayer R, Ryan U, et al. Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health. Clin Microbiol Rev . 2004;17(1):72–97. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.72-97.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fayer R, Santín M, Trout JM. Cryptosporidium ryanae n sp (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus) Vet Parasitol. 2008;156(3-4):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xiao L, Morgan UM, Limor J, et al. Genetic diversity within Cryptosporidium parvum and related Cryptosporidium species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(8):3386–3391. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.8.3386-3391.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kasimanickam RK, Kasimanickam VR, Olsen JR, et al. Associations among serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, metabolic mediators, body condition, and uterine disease in postpartum dairy cows. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:103. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beheshtipour J, Raeeszadeh M. Evaluation of inter-leukin-10 and pro-inflammatory cytokine profile in calves naturally infected with neonatal calf diarrhea syndrome. Arch Razi Inst. 2020;75(2):213–218. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2018.124058.1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary Research Forum are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

RESOURCES