Skip to main content
Concussion logoLink to Concussion
. 2022 Dec 6;7(2):CNC98. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2022-0004

Tau as a fluid biomarker of concussion and neurodegeneration

Iftakher Hossain 1,2,3,4,*, Kaj Blennow 5,6, Jussi P Posti 1,2,3, Henrik Zetterberg 5,6,7,8,9
PMCID: PMC9841393  PMID: 36687115

Abstract

Concussion is predominant among the vast number of traumatic brain injuries that occur worldwide. Difficulties in timely identification, whether concussion led to neuronal injury or not, diagnosis and the lack of prognostic tools for adequate management could lead this type of brain injury to progressive neurodegenerative diseases. Tau has been extensively studied in recent years, particularly in repetitive mild traumatic brain injuries and sports-related concussions. Tauopathies, the group of neurodegenerative diseases, have also been studied with advanced functional imaging. Nevertheless, neurodegenerative diseases, such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, are still conclusively diagnosed at autopsy. Here, we discuss the diagnostic dilemma and the relationship between concussion and neurodegenerative diseases and review the literature on tau as a promising biomarker for concussion.

Keywords: : chronic traumatic encephalopathy, concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, Tau

Concussion: diagnostic dilemma

More than 90% of patients who sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI) are classified in the mild end of the spectrum, including injuries referred to as concussion [1,2], which is common, for example, in contact sports [3,4]. Currently, there is no internationally agreed definition of concussion. It has been reported that mild TBI (mTBI) and concussion should be considered as distinct entities [5]. Concussion was defined as “a complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain, induced by traumatic biomechanical forces”. On the other hand, the current American Academy of Neurology guidelines for sports concussion do not distinguish between concussion and mTBI [6], defining concussion as “a clinical syndrome of biomechanically induced alteration of brain function, typically affecting memory and orientation, which may involve loss of consciousness”. In general, concussion does not cause gross pathology, such as hemorrhage, or other abnormalities on structural brain imaging [7]. Therefore, concussion usually does not cause loss of consciousness, but cause many other complaints such as dizziness, nausea, decreased attention and concentration, memory problems and headache [1,8]. mTBI and concussion are relatively similar, and the two terms are used inter-changeably in the literature. A key research and clinical question is whether the external trauma to the head, except for the symptoms linked to the clinical concussion entity, also lead to injury of neuronal or other types of brain cells (e.g., astrocytes) or structures (e.g., capillaries).

There is also no clear pathologic definition or criteria to distinguish concussion from other types of TBI, and the injuries leading to concussion are biomechanically similar to other types of TBI. TBI with biomechanical forces to the brain causes a neurometabolic cascade that affects the brain function [9–11]. The disrupted neurometabolic state can last for days and the consequences of these cascades of TBI have been described as evolving phenomena [12].

Although many patients have good recovery within weeks or months following mTBI, 5–30% of patients with mTBI suffer from neurologic, cognitive, and/or neuropsychiatric symptoms for one year post-injury or longer [1,13–15]. All of these persistent symptoms or findings are known as post-concussion syndrome (PCS), which could be defined as a collection of post-traumatic symptoms [16,17]. Even though the risk of developing PCS could be predisposed by injury mechanisms, pre-injury mental health, and socioeconomic factors, it is unclear why PCS appears, perseveres, or resolves [18,19]. Given that the standard tool for assessing acute TBI, head computed tomography (CT), is not sensitive enough to detect microbleeds and traumatic axonal injury [20], clinicians are lacking an objective test to predict the outcome of patients with mTBI or concussion. This could be helpful in stratifying the group of patients who might need observation, further treatment, follow-up and rehabilitation [21,22].

Concussion & neurodegenerative disease

Although current literature does not generally associate neurodegenerative disease development with patients who have sustained a single mTBI [23–26], research suggests that repeated mTBIs or concussions are associated with a higher risk of neurodegenerative disease years later, particularly in those patients who do not fully recover between mTBIs [27,28]. Patients with repetitive injuries have a slower recovery after mTBI, which also increases the risk for future injury [29]. Patients with repetitive mTBI typically have persistent PCS [2], increased risk for early onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) [30], and being vulnerable to develop chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [31,32]. Among all contact sports, boxing remains the sport in which repetitive concussion is the most common, and also intrinsic to the basic principle of the sport. Furthermore, American football, ice hockey, rugby, and martial arts are other contact sports where professional participation increases the risk for repetitive concussion. For example, research conducted on Olympic boxers, Swedish ice hockey players, and retired American football players reported a significantly higher risk for memory loss and persistent cognitive impairment in players with more than one concussion compared with players without any reported concussion [29,33,34]. Additionally, blast induced concussion is common among military personnel who have been deployed to different war zones.

CTE refers to a chronic and progressive brain disorder, usually associated with either one major brain trauma or repeated milder trauma, and is characterized by various neurocognitive, psychiatric and neurological dysfunctions, such as dementia, depression, memory loss, inhibition and aggressiveness, as well as parkinsonian symptoms [19,35,36]. However, the pathology of CTE might start earlier than originally thought as signs of CTE have been found in the autopsies of adolescent athletes with repeated mTBIs [37]. mTBI could trigger the tau pathology associated with AD and CTE [38,39]. Additional features of CTE include axonal injury and neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and in a proportion of cases TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology [38,39]. Although phosphorylation of tau is a physiological phenomenon, hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of tau into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is common after TBI and other brain injuries [19]. Notably, formation of NFTs is a key feature of a group of neurodegenerative diseases known as tauopathies, including AD and CTE. Each of these neurodegenerative diseases has its unique presentation of phosphorylated tau (P-tau) species [19,39–41]. In case of AD, NFTs exhibit a progressive spread throughout all cortical areas [42–44]. On the other hand, CTE is characterized by abnormal tau pathology concentrated around small blood vessels in the depth of sulci within the cortex, especially, at the interface between white and grey matter [37,45,46]. The molecular structures of tau filaments found in AD and CTE differ from each other [29]. Studies of patients with mTBI have reported that NFTs accumulate primarily in the deep sulci of the frontal and temporal cortices and along the cortical blood vessels of individuals with CTE, and contributed significantly to the long-term development of neurodegeneration [45–48]. However, it is important to note that there are no prospective, longitudinal or epidemiological studies that provide enough evidence that CTE pathology is as progressive as other neurodegenerative diseases, for example, AD. It has been reported that a single injury of any severity could cause CTE and it could begin shortly, days, weeks, months, years or decades after exposure to neurotrauma [45]. Interestingly, it has been studied that many people with the neuropathology of CTE do not appear to have progressive tauopathy and some people with the neuropathology of CTE do not show any clinical signs or symptoms that are accountable to that pathology [49]. It has recently been demonstrated that CTE pathology could be present in people who have not sustained sub-concussive blows to the head, or multiple concussions [50].

Using an objective test, like body-fluid biomarkers, to identify the group of patients with incomplete recovery, and to ensure the appropriate management, could possibly assist to reduce the occurrence of CTE. In the following sections of this brief review, we review the literature published on one of the most promising candidate biomarkers for concussion, tau, known as a neurodegenerative biomarker. Finally, we discuss the importance of fluid biomarker development for CTE.

Tau & concussion

Tau, a microtubule-associated protein, with a molecular weight of 48–67 kDa, abundant in unmyelinated cortical axons [39,51,52], serves as a structural element in the axonal cytoskeleton of the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) [53,54]. Though tau is predominantly expressed in the brain, extracranial sources exist, for example, liver, kidney and testis [55]. Earlier research interest in TBI biomarkers has focused primarily on total tau (T-tau), but P-tau and cleaved tau (C-tau) have also been studied. Tau is elevated in CSF and plasma following TBI [4,19,52].

CSF tau

Increased CSF tau concentrations have been observed in patients with TBI, and admission CSF tau concentrations were correlated with long-term outcome among these patients [56,57]. A study of CSF samples of Olympic boxers 1–6 days after bouts compared with CSF samples of healthy controls reported significant elevation of tau in the boxers' CSF [58]. Increased concentrations of CSF tau were also found in Olympic boxers after a bout, which did not necessarily correlate with the number of hits to the head [59]. Another study on college football players found a similar result, with no correlation between the number of mTBIs or concussions and the concentrations of tau, although increased plasma tau concentrations were observed after training [60]. In chronic neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, CSF T-tau concentrations correlate poorly with plasma T-tau concentrations [61], but in acute TBI, the correlation is likely tighter, depending on the severity of injury and thus increase of T-tau from neurons to both CSF and plasma. Tau elevations following TBI could stay much longer in CSF (weeks) compared with blood (days) [29].

Plasma tau

Since the concentrations are very low in the peripheral blood in health and disease, and therefore cannot be accurately measured by most immunoassays, the availability of ultrasensitive Single molecule array (Simoa) technology allows for the adequate quantification of T-tau in both plasma and serum [62,63]. Several studies have reported increased concentration of plasma T-tau in the context of TBI. Persistent high tau concentrations have been reported after TBI, but generally tau concentrations peak between 12–24 hours [34,64,65]. The current literature suggests that increase of tau following TBI could follow both an acute and chronic course. While the initial increase in tau concentrations indicates acute neuronal injury, the secondary increase most possibly reflects secondary pathology associated with chronic neurodegenerative processes [39,66]. Additionally, tau concentrations in blood increase with age [67,68] and a distinct temporal profile and substantially higher T-tau concentrations have recently been reported in female athletes with concussion, compared with their male counterparts [69]. Significant correlations between serum tau concentrations and neurological outcome has been reported in resuscitated cardiac arrest patients [65]. Plasma T-tau concentrations were increased 1 h after injury compared with the pre-season concentrations, and predicted return-to-play (RTP) time with significant accuracy in studies of professional ice hockey players with concussion [70,71]. Another study in concussed athletes reported that plasma T-tau concentrations at 6 h after injury significantly correlated with RTP time [72]. Increased plasma tau concentrations have been reported in military personnel exposed to blast injuries in the preceding 18 months [73]. Higher exosomal tau concentrations have also been reported to be associated with chronic symptoms in military personnel after mTBI [74]. In another study including TBIs of all severities, plasma T-tau concentrations could discriminate mTBI from controls when the samples were collected within 24 hours after injury [75]. Serum tau concentrations were also reported as a significant outcome predictor following TBI [76]. It has been recently studied that acute plasma P-tau concentrations and the P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed T-tau concentrations for the outcome prediction of TBI [64]. Nevertheless, plasma T-tau concentrations at admission were unable to discriminate between incomplete and complete recovery in case of single and uncomplicated mTBI [63]. Contradictory results have been reported regarding the use of C-tau as a fluid biomarker as an acute biochemical diagnostic tool of mTBI [77–79].

CTE & abnormal tau pathology

In a recent post-mortem study, the brains of deceased American football players were examined [80]. At the autopsy, CTE was diagnosed in 88% of the subjects, and the severity of the condition was significantly higher in subjects who played professional football than in subjects who only played in high school. Another alarming finding of this study is that the majority of the subjects with CTE findings had PCS and later clinical signs of dementia [80]. This suggests that repeated mTBIs or concussions earlier in life could predispose to neuropathology later in life. Utilizing positron emission tomography (PET) ligands for tau in the brain to explore the molecular pathology of CTE, it was found that retired National Football League players with a history of concussion had higher overall signals of tau deposition compared with those without concussion [81]. In a recent study [82], young patients with symptomatic repetitive sports-related concussions were found to have increased tau aggregation at longer time points after injury. To detect abnormal tau pathology, dual PET tracers in combination with biomarkers (CSF and plasma tau), neuropsychological evaluation, and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance (3T MR) scanning were used in this study [82]. These abovementioned studies and the current literature support the idea that tau pathology might have a mechanistic link to cognitive symptoms in case of repeated concussion [83,84], and the reported tau aggregation could be progressive [38], which ultimately play the critical role in the disease mechanism of neurodegenerative disorders such as CTE.

Conclusion

Although the current studies showed several promising aspects of tau as a CSF and blood biomarker of concussion, there is still insufficient evidence to support the clinical validity for the bench-to-bedside application of this neurodegenerative biomarker [79].

Future perspective

Since most of the current biomarker studies focused on the short-term consequences of mTBI, further large cohort studies should examine the long-term effects of repeated concussions, not only in high-impact contact sports, but also in mTBIs that are not sports-related. Moreover, brain-derived exosomes may represent new diagnostic tools in the coming future [41]. Novel assays measuring CNS-specific forms of tau (i.e., assays that do not measure peripheral, so-called big tau) are under development, and will be interesting to examine in the context of acute and chronic TBI.

Executive summary.

  • In the current literature, there is no internationally agreed definition of concussion, and the two terms concussion and mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) are used inter-changeably.

  • A significant portion of patients with mTBI suffer from post-concussion syndrome 1 year post-injury or longer and patients with repetitive mTBI or concussion are more at risk to develop persistent post-concussion syndrome.

  • Early onset of neurodegenerative diseases has been reported for the players participating in various contact sports, notably in boxing, where repetitive concussion is common.

  • Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), known as a chronic and progressive disorder of brain, is associated with neurofibrillary tangle accumulation in the brain reflecting abnormal tau pathology and a proportion of cases show TDP-43 pathology. Nevertheless, there is no class one evidence stating that CTE is as progressive as other neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, people with no history of multiple concussions have been also reported for CTE pathology.

  • Body fluid biomarkers could help to stratify those patients better who are at risk of incomplete recovery. Tau, an axonal biomarker, has been extensively studied recent years in the field of mTBI and sports concussion.

  • Recent studies combining advanced imaging and CSF and plasma tau reported the concept that tau pathology might have a mechanistic link to cognitive symptoms in case of repeated concussion. In addition, progressive tau aggregation might play a vital role in the disease mechanism of neurodegenerative diseases.

  • Further large cohort studies implementing novel assays measuring CNS-specific forms of tau should examine the long-term effects of repeated concussions.

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation (IH), The Paulo Foundation (IH), Academy of Finland (#17379, JPP), Government's Special Financial Transfer tied to academic research in Health Sciences (Finland) (JPP), Maire Taponen Foundation sr (JPP), Wallenberg Scholarship, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-71320), and grants from the Swedish and European Research Councils (HZ), and grants from the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986) (KB), The Finnish Medical Foundation (IH). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Open access

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest

  • 1.Sharp DJ, Jenkins PO. Concussion is confusing us all. Pract. Neurol. 15, 172–186 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tenovuo O, Diaz-Arrastia R, Goldstein LE, Sharp DJ, Van Der Naalt J, Zasler ND. Assessing the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury—Time for a Change? J. Clin. Med. 10, 1–12 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • A recent important publication providing the latest thoughts about the severity classification of traumatic rain injury.
  • 3.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Gustafsson B et al. Neurochemical Aftermath of Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Neurol. 73, 1308–1315 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zetterberg H, Morris HR, Hardy J, Blennow K. Update on fluid biomarkers for concussion. Concussion 1 (3),Concussion (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • One of the most cited studies in the field of concussion biomarkers.
  • 5.McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br. J. Sports Med. 250–258 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S et al. Summary of evidence-based guideline update: evaluation and management of concussion in sports. Neurology 80, 2250–2257 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blennow K, Hardy J, Zetterberg H. The neuropathology and neurobiology of traumatic brain injury. Neuron 76, 886–899 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • One of the important publications shedding light on the pathophysiology of concussion.
  • 8.Signoretti S, Lazzarino G, Tavazzi B, Vagnozzi R. The pathophysiology of concussion. PM R 3, 359–68 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giza CC, Hovda DA. The neurometabolic cascade of concussion. J Athl Train 36 (3), 228–235 (2001). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giza CC, Hovda DA. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 75, S24–S33 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Gustafsson B et al. Neurochemical Aftermath of Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Neurol. 73, 1308 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ng SY, Lee AYW. Traumatic Brain Injuries: Pathophysiology and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13, 528 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy JD et al. Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Rehabil. Med. Suppl. 43(Suppl. ),61–75 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B, Steyerberg EW, Murray GD, Maas AI. Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol. 9, 543–554 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saatman KE, Duhaime AC, Bullock R et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J. Neurotrauma 719–738 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ponsford J, Draper K, Schönberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 14, 233–242 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J et al. Longitudinal Follow-Up of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcome at Two, Five, and Ten Years Post-Injury. J. Neurotrauma 31, 64–77 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Polinder S, Cnossen MC, Real RGL et al. A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Neurol. 9, 1113 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shahim P, Gill JM, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Fluid Biomarkers for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Semin. Neurol. 40, 411–419 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Important study for the better understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
  • 20.Topal NB, Hakyemez B, Erdogan C et al. MR imaging in the detection of diffuse axonal injury with mild traumatic brain injury. Neurol. Res. 30, 974–978 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, InTBIR Participants and Investigators, H. et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet. Neurol. 16, 987–1048 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • One of the most important publications for the future direction of traumatic brain injury research.
  • 22.Mondello S, Sorinola A, Czeiter E et al. Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Adults Presenting to Emergency Departments with Mild Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurotrauma 38, 1086–1106 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • One of the most important and current meta-analysis studies for traumatic brain injury biomarkers.
  • 23.McCrory P, Feddermann-Demont N, Dvoøák J et al. What is the definition of sports-related concussion: a systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 51, 877–887 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Manley G, Gardner AJ, Schneider KJ et al. A systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion. Br. J. Sports Med. 51, 969–977 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carson A. Concussion, dementia and CTE: are we getting it very wrong? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 88, 462–464 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lobue C, Lobue C, Schaffert J et al. Clinical and neuropsychological profile of patients with dementia and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 91, 586–592 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Bailes J et al. Association between recurrent concussion and late-life cognitive impairment in retired professional football players. Neurosurgery 57, 719–726 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cruz-Haces M, Tang J, Acosta G, Fernandez J, Shi R. Pathological correlations between traumatic brain injury and chronic neurodegenerative diseases. Transl. Neurodegener. 2017 61 6, 1–10 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ledreux A, Pryhoda MK, Gorgens K et al. Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Sports-Related Concussions: Biological Mechanisms and Exosomal Biomarkers. Front. Neurosci. 14, 761 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ramos-Cejudo J, Wisniewski T, Marmar C et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer's Disease: The Cerebrovascular Link. EBioMedicine 28, 21–30 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Katsumoto A, Takeuchi H, Tanaka F. Tau Pathology in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and Alzheimer's Disease: Similarities and Differences. Front. Neurol. 10, 980 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lucke-Wold BP, Turner RC, Logsdon AF, Bailes JE, Huber JD, Rosen CL. Linking Traumatic Brain Injury to Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Identification of Potential Mechanisms Leading to Neurofibrillary Tangle Development. 31, 1129–1138 (2014). https://home.liebertpub.com/neu [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neselius S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K et al. Olympic boxing is associated with elevated levels of the neuronal protein tau in plasma. Brain Inj. 27, 425–433 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Wilson DH et al. Blood Biomarkers for Brain Injury in Concussed Professional Ice Hockey Players. JAMA Neurol. 71, 684 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Armstrong RA, McKee AC, Alvarez VE, Cairns NJ. Clustering of tau-immunoreactive pathology in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J. Neural Transm. 2016 1242 124, 185–192 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Asken BM, Sullan MJ, Snyder AR et al. Factors Influencing Clinical Correlates of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE): a Review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2016 264 26, 340–363 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tagge CA, Fisher AM, Minaeva OV et al. Concussion, microvascular injury, and early tauopathy in young athletes after impact head injury and an impact concussion mouse model. Brain 141, 422–458 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Edwards G, Zhao J, Dash PK, Soto C, Moreno-Gonzalez I. Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Tau Aggregation and Spreading. J. Neurotrauma 37, 80–92 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Castellani RJ, Perry G, Tabaton M. Tau biology, tauopathy, traumatic brain injury, and diagnostic challenges. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 67, 447–467 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Crunkhorn S. Targeting tau in traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 424 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vaughn MN, Winston CN, Levin N, Rissman RA, Risbrough VB. Developing biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury: promise and progress of CNS-derived exosomes. Front. Neurol. 12, 2661 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Metaxas A, Kempf SJ. Neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease: elucidation of the molecular mechanism by immunohistochemistry and tau protein phospho-proteomics. Neural Regen. Res. 11, 1579 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Raj A, Kuceyeski A, Weiner M. A network diffusion model of disease progression in dementia. Neuron 73, 1204–1215 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Furman JL, Vaquer-Alicea J, White CL, Cairns NJ, Nelson PT, Diamond MI. Widespread tau seeding activity at early Braak stages. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 1331 133, 91–100 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Omalu B. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Concussion 28, 38–49 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McKee AC, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW et al. The first NINDS/NIBIB consensus meeting to define neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 75–86 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Washington PM, Villapol S, Burns MP. Polypathology and dementia after brain trauma: does brain injury trigger distinct neurodegenerative diseases, or should it be classified together as traumatic encephalopathy? Exp. Neurol. 275, 381 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alosco ML, Mez J, Tripodis Y et al. Age of first exposure to tackle football and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Ann. Neurol. 83, 886–901 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Iverson GL, Keene CD, Perry G, Castellani RJ. The need to separate chronic traumatic encephalopathy neuropathology from clinical features. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 61, 17–28 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Iverson GL, Luoto TM, Karhunen PJ, Castellani RJ. Mild chronic traumatic encephalopathy neuropathology in people with no known participation in contact sports or history of repetitive neurotrauma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 78, 615–625 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • An important study exploring chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
  • 51.Hanes J, Zilka N, Bartkova M, Caletkova M, Dobrota D, Novak M. Rat tau proteome consists of six tau isoforms: implication for animal models of human tauopathies. J. Neurochem. 108, 1167–1176 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zetterberg H, Smith DH, Blennow K. Biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 201–210 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Olivera A, Lejbman N, Jeromin A et al. Peripheral Total Tau in Military Personnel Who Sustain Traumatic Brain Injuries During Deployment. JAMA Neurol. 72, 1109 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rubenstein R, Chang B, Davies P, Wagner AK, Robertson CS, Wang KKW. A novel, ultrasensitive Assay for Tau: potential for assessing traumatic brain injury in tissues and biofluids. J. Neurotrauma 32, 342–352 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Morris M, Maeda S, Vossel K, Mucke L. The Many Faces of Tau. Neuron 70, 410–426 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ost M, Nylén K, Csajbok L et al. Initial CSF total tau correlates with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurology 67, 1600–1604 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Franz G, Beer R, Kampfl A et al. Amyloid beta 1–42 and tau in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology 60, 1457–1461 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Neselius S, Brisby H, Theodorsson A, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Marcusson J. CSF-biomarkers in Olympic boxing: diagnosis and effects of repetitive head trauma. PLOS ONE 7, e33606 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zetterberg H, Hietala MA, Jonsson M et al. Neurochemical aftermath of amateur boxing. Arch. Neurol. 63, 1277–1280 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kawata K, Liu CY, Merkel SF, Ramirez SH, Tierney RT, Langford D. Blood biomarkers for brain injury: what are we measuring? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 460–473 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Janelidze S et al. Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 87, 1827–1835 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kuhle J, Barro C, Andreasson U et al. Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 54, 1655–1661 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hossain I, Mohammadian M, Takala RSK et al. Admission levels of total tau and β-amyloid isoforms 1–40 and 1–42 in predicting the outcome of mild traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurol. 11, 325 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rubenstein R, Chang B, Yue JK et al. Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau–Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. JAMA Neurol. 74, 1063 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Randall J, Mörtberg E, Provuncher GK et al. Tau proteins in serum predict neurological outcome after hypoxic brain injury from cardiac arrest: results of a pilot study. Resuscitation 84, 351–356 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Walker A, Chapin B, Abisambra J, DeKosky ST. Association between single moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and long-term tauopathy in humans and preclinical animal models: a systematic narrative review of the literature. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 1–20 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Blomberg M, Jensen M, Basun H, Lannfelt L, Wahlund LO. Cerebrospinal fluid tau levels increase with age in healthy individuals. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 12, 127–132 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chiu MJ, Fan LY, Chen TF, Chen YF, Chieh JJ, Horng HE. Plasma tau levels in cognitively normal middle-aged and older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 51 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mondello S, Guedes VA, Lai C, Jeromin A, Bazarian JJ, Gill JM. Sex Differences in Circulating T-Tau Trajectories After Sports-Concussion and Correlation With Outcome. Front. Neurol. 11, 651 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Wilson DH et al. Blood Biomarkers for Brain Injury in Concussed Professional Ice Hockey Players. JAMA Neurol. 71, 684 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shahim P, Tegner Y, Marklund N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Neurofilament light and tau as blood biomarkers for sports-related concussion. Neurology 90, E1780–E1788 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gill J, Merchant-Borna K, Jeromin A, Livingston W, Bazarian J. Acute plasma tau relates to prolonged return to play after concussion. Neurology 88, 595 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Olivera A, Lejbman N, Jeromin A et al. Peripheral Total Tau in Military Personnel Who Sustain Traumatic Brain Injuries During Deployment. JAMA Neurol. 72, 1109–1116 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gill J, Mustapic M, Diaz-Arrastia R et al. Higher exosomal tau, amyloid-beta 42 and IL-10 are associated with mild TBIs and chronic symptoms in military personnel. Brain Inj. 32, 1277–1284 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bogoslovsky T, Wilson D, Chen Y et al. Increases of plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau, and amyloid β up to 90 days after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 34, 66–73 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liliang PC, Liang CL, Weng HC et al. τ Proteins in Serum Predict Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Surg. Res. 160, 302–307 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bazarian JJ, Zemlan FP, Mookerjee S, Stigbrand T. Serum S-100B and cleaved-tau are poor predictors of long-term outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain injury. 20, 759–765 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Forouzan A, Motamed H, Delirrooyfard A, Zallaghi S. Serum cleaved tau protein and clinical outcome in patients with minor head trauma. Open Access Emerg. Med. 12, 7 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mondello S, Sorinola A, Czeiter E et al. Blood-based protein biomarkers for the management of traumatic brain injuries in adults presenting to emergency departments with mild brain injury: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma 38, 1086–1106 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Kiernan PT et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in players of American football. JAMA 318, 360–370 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Small GW, Kepe V, Siddarth P et al. PET scanning of brain tau in retired national football league players: preliminary findings. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 21, 138–144 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Marklund N, Vedung F, Lubberink M et al. Tau aggregation and increased neuroinflammation in athletes after sports-related concussions and in traumatic brain injury patients - A PET/MR study. NeuroImage. Clin. 30, 102665 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • A recent important study experimenting the relationship between tau aggregation and neuroinflammation following sports concussion.
  • 83.Mckee AC, Abdolmohammadi B, Stein TD. The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 158, 297–307 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Takahata K, Kimura Y, Sahara N et al. PET-detectable tau pathology correlates with long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain 142, 3265–3279 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Concussion are provided here courtesy of Future Science Group

RESOURCES