Cohort-guided insights into gene–environment interactions in autism spectrum disorders

Abstract

Prospective birth cohorts offer unprecedented opportunities to investigate the pathogenesis of complex disorders such as autism, in which gene–environment interactions must be appreciated in a temporal context. This Perspective article considers the history of autism research, including missteps that reflected an incomplete understanding of the epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders, the effects of advocacy and philanthropy on the trajectory of scientific inquiry, and the current and future roles of prospective birth cohort research in illuminating the pathology of these and other complex disorders wherein exposures during gestation might not manifest until later in life.

In this Perspective article, Lipkin et al. consider the contribution of cohort studies to our understanding of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and debate the promise and potential challenges of such studies for dissecting the causes of ASDs and developing interventional strategies.

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are characterized by impairments in social skills and communication and the presence of repetitive behaviours. Affecting approximately 1 in 50 children, ASDs are four times more common in boys than in girls¹. As there are no objective laboratory tests for ASDs, diagnosis requires expert clinical assessment. This situation impedes early identification of ASDs at a time when the brain is highly plastic and amenable to positive reinforcement exercises that can mitigate their presentation². The social and economic burdens of ASD for those with these disorders, their families and their communities are lifelong and substantial. Accordingly, understanding the pathophysiology of ASD is an urgent unmet clinical need, as are developing methods for early diagnosis and treatment and ways to support those with ASD as they navigate their life course. Figure 1 shows a timeline of seminal events in the history of biomedical research in autism.

Fig. 1. Timeline of contributions to autism research.

Although initially characterized as psychosis^74–76, from the 1970s onwards autism was reframed as a developmental disorder with a heritable component^15,77–81. Various exposures were subsequently identified as contributing to the risk of autism spectrum disorder, the understanding of which continues to evolve^{5,16,17,19,20,25,82–89}. Special projects initiated and supported by The National Alliance for Autism Research and Cure Autism Now include the Autism Tissue Program brain bank, the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange and the High-Risk Baby Siblings Consortium.

In this Perspective article, we consider how cohort studies have contributed to our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of ASDs, place cohort research into the context of complementary work conducted in animal models, and speculate on the promise and potential challenges of cohort research for dissecting the causes of ASDs and developing interventional strategies for these and other chronic disorders.

Changes in reported prevalence

The public perception of autism and its pathogenesis has been strongly affected by changes in its reported prevalence. In the 1960s and 1970s, worldwide autism prevalence estimates ranged from 0.04 to 2.00 cases per 1,000 of the population³. These rates rose tenfold in the 1980s and 1990s. A lack of clarity on the basis for these prevalence estimates prompted a search for environmental factors that had been introduced into paediatric care at around the time of this increase. Two came to the fore: vaccines and acetaminophen (paracetamol).

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which contains a mixture of three live attenuated viruses, was licensed in 1971. This vaccine is administered in two doses, the first given at 9–15 months of age and the second between 15 months and 6 years of age. Killed bacterial vaccines, including diphtheria toxin, pertussis bacteria and tetanus toxin (DPT vaccine), that were first introduced in the 1950s also came to attention because they contained the preservative thimerosal (ethyl mercury), which raised the concern that even the low levels of mercury present in DPT vaccine doses (which were given at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 15–18 months and 4–6 years of age) might be neurotoxic. In 1980, epidemiologists at the US Centers for Disease Control reported a link between the use of salicylates for fever management in paediatric patients and Reye syndrome, a fatal hepatic encephalopathy⁴, which led to the substitution of acetaminophen for salicylates. In each of these instances, temporal associations between the introduction of a vaccine or treatment and the apparent increase in the prevalence of autism (a condition that was only rarely diagnosed before the age of 2 years) led to popular concerns that there was a causal link. No causal relationships have been found, despite intensive investigation. Nonetheless, spurious links between ASDs and the MMR vaccine⁵ or the vaccine preservative thimerosal⁶ continue to have a profound effect on public acceptance and uptake of MMR and DPT^7,8 — as well as other vaccines, including polio and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines⁹.

Prevalence is very challenging to estimate accurately for complex syndromes such as autism, in which changes over time in diagnostic criteria and in access to specialists with the expertise required to diagnose the condition can result in large changes in case ascertainment that mimic or obscure bona fide changes in prevalence. One analysis attributed 33% of the increase in reported ASD prevalence among children born in Denmark during the period 1980–1991 to changes in diagnostic criteria alone, 42% to increased case ascertainment alone and 60% to the combination of changes in diagnostic criteria and increased case ascertainment¹⁰. This analysis not only suggested that such artefacts played an important role in the increased prevalence of ASDs but also confirmed that a substantial part of the increase could not be explained by them.

Philanthropy and parental advocacy

It is difficult to overstate the importance of philanthropy and parental advocacy in the course of autism research and treatment (Fig. 1). An influential early advocate was Bernard Rimland, a clinical psychologist and father of a son with autism, who rejected the psychogenic hypothesis. Rimland founded the Autism Society of America, the Autism Research Institute and the Defeat Autism Now Foundation. He also served as the technical adviser on the film Rain Man, in which Dustin Hoffman’s portrayal of a man with Asperger syndrome brought attention to ASDs. Cure Autism Now and the National Alliance for Autism Research were private foundations initiated by parents to support peer-reviewed research projects and physician training programmes. Each foundation recruited strong scientific advisory boards and funded investigators who would not otherwise have had the resources to begin autism research. Cure Autism Now also focused on the collection of clinical materials to enable genetic analyses (Autism Genetic Research Exchange). These two organizations were subsequently assimilated into the Autism Speaks Foundation established by the Chief Executive Officer of NBC Universal, grandparent of an affected child, who leveraged his considerable influence to promote funding for autism research and treatment programmes. Amongst those programmes is the Baby Sibs Research Consortium, which was founded in 2003 to expedite the discovery of insights into the diagnosis and biology of ASDs by conducting prospective studies of the siblings of children with autism (who have a 20-fold increased risk of themselves receiving a diagnosis of ASD). The largest organization to date is the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI), which was established by mathematicians Jim and Marilyn Simons to support basic and clinical research into the neuroscience of autism. This organization has provided more than US $200 million to more than 150 investigators worldwide since 2007, including funding to study the immunopathology of disease in the Norwegian Autism Birth Cohort (ABC).

Prospective birth cohorts

The pathogenesis of ASD in most individuals is unknown. The first description of autism as a rare disorder in 1943 suggested a role for socially distant caregivers — the ‘refrigerator parent’ hypothesis¹¹. Although not unchallenged, this model remained dominant until the 1970s, when an increased risk of autism was reported in children with congenital rubella¹² and other researchers reported finding evidence of heritability in a study of monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs in which at least one twin had autism¹³. In this study, the concordance rate for autism was 36% in monozygotic twins, whereas none of the dizygotic twins were concordant for this disease¹³. For comparison purposes, a meta-analysis published in 2016 found heritability estimates for ASDs ranging from 38% to 90%¹⁴. The reasons for the variation in heritability estimates remain unclear.

This substantial heritability has sometimes been misinterpreted to imply that environmental contributions to ASDs are minimal. However, these data are also consistent with genetic vulnerability to shared environmental exposures. This distinction can be illustrated by comparison with phenylketonuria, in which virtually all affected individuals have the genetic cause but the disease manifests only in response to a specific (but ubiquitous) nutritional exposure that can, however, be eliminated from the diet. Thus, the heritability of phenylketonuria approaches 100% and the phenotype is ubiquitous without intervention, and abrogating exposure to a specific environmental factor is key to its prevention. Therefore, the existence of seminal papers suggesting contributions of genetic, nutritional, immunological and toxic environmental factors to ASDs^15–20 does not eliminate the social environment as having a critical role in neural development. Importantly, 50–70% of children with ASD have comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)²¹, and Romanian infants confined to institutions early in life who had only minimal contact with caregivers developed behaviours consistent with ADHD²². Epigenetic analyses indicate that the ADHD-like behaviours in these children might be associated with altered DNA methylation patterns versus those of children raised in family settings²³. Of note, genetic and environmental models of ASD pathogenesis are not mutually exclusive. Specific genetic defects, such as those that occur in patients with fragile X syndrome or are caused by gestational exposure to antiepileptic medications or thalidomide, are sufficient to induce behaviours associated with autism. In the majority of patients with ASDs, no links to a specific genetic or environmental factor can be identified. However, genetic vulnerability and environmental triggers almost certainly act together to cause ASD in some individuals.

The observation that maternal use of anticonvulsants²⁴ or thalidomide¹⁹ and rubella infection^12,25 during pregnancy are all associated with an increased risk of autism suggested the presence of windows of developmental vulnerability to ASDs prior to birth. Rigorous testing of this hypothesis requires the recruitment of population-based birth cohorts in which biological samples and environmental exposure data are collected at multiple time points during gestation. These early data then need to be combined with data on development, social determinants and phenotypes collected during gestation and across childhood. Taken together, birth cohorts can (at least in theory) be used to analyse omics data and environmental exposures, and determine which developmentally sensitive periods are most relevant. Some birth cohorts include almost all individuals with ASDs among population samples of >100,000 individuals and enable longitudinal follow-up of the children with ASDs. These cohorts can be used to analyse the relationships between genomic findings, environmental exposures and sensitive developmental periods. All existing cohorts, however, have limitations. The ABC (nested within the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBA)) is arguably the largest such cohort and has most, although not all, of the features required for such analyses. Yet it is still subject to selection bias; only 40% of the pregnant women approached chose to participate.

Although population-based birth cohorts are potentially the most informative, other cohort designs (for example, those focused on children resulting from subsequent pregnancies in mothers of a child with ASD) can provide complementary data. Table 1 presents one exemplar for each of six types of cohort study, and notes the typical features of each design as used in ASD research^26–30. Given the variety of characteristics among cohort studies that share the same basic design and the large number of cohort studies now established, ‘typical’ as used here does not imply uniformity. Presentation of all current ASD cohorts and in-depth analysis of the differences between them are beyond the scope of this paper. Accordingly, we focus on how these six cohort designs offer complementary data with respect to three gestational exposures linked to ASD: maternal folate intake, maternal immune response and preterm birth.

Table 1.

Types of cohort studies of autism spectrum disorder

Study exemplar and details	Representativeness of participants	Phenotypic data (non-biological)	Blood samplesb	Exposure data	Intergenerationalc
MARBLES (prospective) in 463 baby siblings of children with ASD, of whom 64 developed ASD	Over-represents strong genetic transmission Under-represents de novo germline mutations Under-represents weak genetic transmission	Multiple direct intensive assessment	Maternal: pre-conception, first, second and third trimester Child: cord blood, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postnatal Younger sibling: cord blood, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months postnatal	Questionnaires, health records, blood samples	No
MINERVA iCARE pure registry (historical with concurrent follow-up) in 5,766,794 participants including 30,902 with ASD	Only treated patients are identified in registries	Registry diagnosis only	None	Linkage to multiple population registries	Yes
iPSYCHa registry plus (historical with concurrent follow-up) in 1,472,762 participants including 16,146 with ASD	Only treated patients are identified in registries	Registry diagnosis only	Heel stick (baby at birth)	Heel stick, linkage to multiple population registries	Yes
ABC MoBAa population-based birth cohort (prospective) in 114,552 participants including 750 with ASD	Highly representative with four complementary methods of case ascertainment	Registry diagnosis with verification, systematic chart review, intensive direct assessment, multiple follow-up questionnaires	Mother: prenatal and postnatal Father: prenatal Child: birth, infancy, childhood	Blood samples, linkages to multiple population registries, questionnaires, health records with systematic review	Yes
ALSPAC hybrid, (prospective) in 13,868 participants (not known how many with ASD)	Highly representative for traits; multiple follow-up assessments	Extensive and multiple follow-up assessments	Repeated maternal blood samples during pregnancy	Blood samples, questionnaires	Limited
LBW exposure-based cohort (prospective) in 1,105 participants including 14 with ASD	Representative children with ASD among preterm infants	Extensive and follow-up assessments	Birth, infancy, childhood	Biological samples, questionnaires, record review, neonatal cranial ultrasonography, brain scans	No

ABC MoBA, Autism Birth Cohort substudy of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study; ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Children and Parents; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; iCARE, International Collaboration for Autism Registry Epidemiology; LBW, low birth weight; MARBLES, Markers of Autism Risk in Babies – Learning Early Signs; MINERVA, Multigenerational Familial and Environmental Risk for Autism. ^aFor ongoing studies, patient numbers reflect recruitment at the time the cited paper was published. ^bBiospecimen collections (maternal urine, hair, saliva, placenta, vaginal secretions) not shown. ^cIncludes data from grandparents.

Folate and folic acid

The ABC study was the first to show specifically that maternal folic acid supplementation is associated with a reduced risk of language delay³¹ and ASD in offspring¹⁷. Although these initial findings were based on early data in a subset of individuals, the same associations have now been found in subsequent larger studies, in both this and other cohorts³². A study conducted in California had previously suggested that increased maternal folate intake overall was associated with a reduced risk of ASD in offspring³³. However, the Norwegian study was distinctive in several ways. Perhaps the most important is that, unlike many countries (including the USA and UK), Norway does not fortify foods with folic acid. Accordingly, the folate levels of women who did and did not take supplements during gestation were markedly different. A related strength of the ABC study is that supplementation usually involved small doses, such as 400 μg of folic acid included in a multivitamin pill. This factor is relevant because some studies suggest that high levels of synthetic folic acid (as opposed to natural folate in foods) might have adverse effects^34,35. Further analysis of data from a study of baby siblings of children with an ASD, which examined the effect of folic acid supplementation on the risk of ASD recurrence in high-risk families, showed that supplementation in the first month of pregnancy halved the risk of autism³⁶. Complementary evidence has also been provided by registry studies that demonstrates an increased risk of ASD associated with short interpregnancy intervals^37,38. One potential explanation for this finding is that folate depleted during pregnancy might not be fully restored by the start of a subsequent pregnancy.

Folate is fundamental to brain development. For example, folate is a critical donor of the methyl groups used in DNA and histone methylation. Although early gestation and/or periconception have been identified as sensitive periods with regard to the effects of folic acid supplementation, the epigenetic activity of folate might extend the period of folate-dependent vulnerability to ASD. Animal studies suggest that maternal early life exposure to either low or high levels of folate, including the mother’s own gestational exposure (which is when her oocytes are developing) as well as paternal lifetime exposure to folic acid deficiency and supplementation, all pose a theoretical risk to offspring by altering DNA and histone methylation patterns^39,40. The findings of several birth cohort studies that the characteristics of a child’s maternal grandmother (such as smoking during pregnancy) are linked to the child’s risk of autistic traits and autism^41–43 might be tied to this intergenerational mechanism.

Immune dysregulation

Activation of dysregulated maternal immune responses during pregnancy has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders. We set aside the question of whether the observed immune dysregulation is due to infection, medication, fever, autoimmunity or genetic or other factors. Instead, we consider the evidence that certain kinds of immune dysregulation could be involved in the pathogenesis of ASD and/or be an early indicator of heightened risk of ASD.

Robust evidence for immune dysregulation in mothers midway through their pregnancy and in neonatal cord blood has been developed in the ABC substudy of the MoBA cohort in Norway, which was designed to interrogate biological processes occurring at multiple points in pregnancy. Immune profiling of blood samples collected from mothers at 17–21 weeks of pregnancy and cord blood samples collected at birth found differences consistent with systemic inflammation in a wide range of analytes in samples from both boys and girls with ASDs²⁰. The number of elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules associated with ASD and the mean effect sizes of these elevations were larger in girls than in boys. These effects of systemic inflammation, and the difference in effect sizes between girls and boys, were most pronounced in mid-gestation²⁰. Previous research examining immune signatures associated with ASD was limited: only a few studies had examined maternal immune molecules in mid-gestation^44–46 and a handful had examined immune molecules in dried blood spots^47–51. Most of these studies examined only a small number of analytes, and although most had controlled for sex, sex-specific differences were not detailed^44–51.

The strength of these findings in the ABC study prompted further scrutiny of the biomarker potential of immune signatures in maternal mid-gestation and cord blood samples. Five predictive models were built for girls and boys in relation to each sample type, and tested in 80% of the ABC population. Model validation was conducted in test sets composed of the remaining 20%²⁰. The predictive models were able to distinguish children with ASD from control children without ASD among both boys and girls in the two sample types: model average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.848 in mid-gestation and 0.846 in cord blood for boys, and 0.965 in mid-gestation and 0.917 in cord blood for girls²⁰. Ultimately this work might result in the development of early biomarker(s) for ASD⁵². As yet, other cohorts have produced only limited complementary data, but we expect that additional data will be reported in the near future.

Preterm birth

Although infant survival following preterm birth has improved exponentially over the past 40 years, prematurity is not benign. Indeed, linked registry studies provided the first evidence of an association between preterm birth and ASD^53–55. The association is particularly strong in brain imaging studies conducted during infancy, which reveal evidence of structural abnormalities, including ventricular enlargement and brain volume overgrowth^56,57. The addition of genetic analyses and fetal imaging to studies in pregnant women at high risk of premature delivery might ultimately help to untangle the factors underlying these associations. An example of such a study that measures autistic traits is the population-based prospective Generation R cohort study⁵⁸, which aims to identify early environmental and genetic causes of normal and abnormal growth, development and health in participants monitored from fetal life until young adulthood.

Animal models

Animal models cannot fully reproduce the complex spectrum of behavioural and social deficits that occur in people with ASDs. Nonetheless, features such as repetitive movements and impaired social interaction can be used to investigate the plausible possibility that genetic, microbial, immune, toxic and nutritional factors contribute to the risk of ASD, and to explore mechanisms of ASD pathogenesis and potential interventions. The majority of animal models use genetically modified mice, in which overexpression or knockdown of specific genes has been used to assess their contributions and those of associated pathways to development and behaviour. Some animal models focus on the environmental exposures implicated in ASD by epidemiological research. We highlight some examples of these animal models; however, readers will find more details in recent reviews^59,60.

Gestational exposure to thalidomide and valproic acid are both associated with an increased risk of autism^19,61. Accordingly, rodent models were established to dissect the developmental consequences of exposure to these agents. In studies of pregnant rats, exposure to thalidomide resulted in auditory hypersensitivity in offspring⁶². Auditory hypersensitivity is common in individuals with autism, in whom this feature has been linked to electrophysiological abnormalities in the primary auditory cortex⁶³. Gestational exposure of rats to valproic acid resulted in reduced social interaction and exploratory activity reminiscent of features described in autism, accompanied by reduced numbers of myelinated axons and aberrant myelin sheath ultrastructure in the corpus callosum⁶⁴. These histopathological findings are consistent with corpus callosum abnormalities reported in individuals with autism and with conceptual models of the disorder that focus on impaired brain connectivity⁶⁵.

Rodent and primate models of gestational exposure to bacteria and viruses and their gene products, as well as cytokines and antibodies, have also been established^66–69. Influenza virus infection in pregnant mice resulted in offspring with deficient prepulse inhibition of their acoustic startle response, as well as deficits in exploratory behaviours and social interaction. These findings did not reflect a direct effect of exposure to this infectious virus because they could be reproduced by exposure to the viral mimic, synthetic double-stranded RNA polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), or to the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (refs. ^66,70). Other researchers found additional support for an indirect, immune-mediated mechanism of behavioural deficits in the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to bacterial superantigens⁷¹ and mitigation of the behavioural deficits in animals gestationally exposed to anti-inflammatory drug treatment following immune stimulation with poly I:C⁶⁸. Animal models have also been used to examine the role of the gastrointestinal microbiome in ASD pathogenesis. Intestinal dendritic cells from pregnant mice colonized with segmented filamentous bacteria secrete cytokines that promote the differentiation of intestinal T helper 17 cells, which results in inflammation in their offspring as well as cortical and behavioural abnormalities⁷².

Germ-free mice colonized with microbiota from human donors with autism show autistic behaviours and have reduced levels of two GABA agonists, 5-aminovaleric acid and taurine, in their brain and faeces. The autistic behaviours of these mice normalized when these two GABA agonists were provided through oral supplementation⁷³. The extent to which the results of these individual studies can be replicated and the fidelity of animal models in reproducing the cardinal features of autism are unclear. Nonetheless, in concert, they confirm that gestational exposures to toxins and inflammation can result in neurodevelopmental damage that culminates in social deficits and/or neurodiversity (the term neurodiversity acknowledges that not all differences are deficits).

Conclusions

For millennia, philosophers and theologians have debated the relative importance of nature and nurture as determinants of biology and behaviour. With the advent of prospective birth cohorts, we have an opportunity to move from abstract discussions to rigorous dissection of the interactions of genetic and environmental factors in health and disease. Several important points that must be considered in the design of future prospective cohorts are highlighted in the following paragraphs.

The effect of an environmental factor could vary according to when (for example, in which trimester of gestation) and to whom (for instance, mother, father or grandparent) it is introduced; thus, our ability to identify its consequences depends, at minimum, on whether we have data that bracket critical intervals. Several windows exist during development wherein the absence of a nutrient (such as folate), lack of social interaction or the presence of toxins (such as alcohol, heavy metals, anticonvulsant drugs and by-products of infection) can profoundly influence brain structure and function. The effect of those same factors might be qualitatively or quantitatively different at a different time. For example, lead intoxication in children can result in cognitive dysfunction, whereas in adults it is more commonly associated with peripheral neuropathy.

The value of a specific cohort as a resource is determined by the size and composition of its population, the onset and frequency of collection of data and samples, the types of data and samples collected, the duration of follow-up and the commitment of cohort members to continued engagement with the project. In the Norwegian ABC, the parental questionnaire completion rate was 95% at the 18-month time point but decreased to 61% at the 36-month time point⁷⁴. Fortunately, the National Patient Registry (NPR) allowed us to identify additional individuals with ASDs who were not found through questionnaire responses, either because parents did not respond or diagnosis was delayed. Without the NPR we would not have been able to use the gestational questionnaires and patient samples that were required to find links between outcomes and exposures. A thoughtful experimental design should limit participant fatigue and maximize retention by reducing the frequency and complexity of data and sample collection.

The validity and generalizability of findings from individual cohorts must be tested against those from other cohorts. Such comparisons can be challenging, not only because of differences in methods of case ascertainment and sampling, but also because genetic and environmental factors can vary. For example, in the ABC, the strength of the mitigating effect of folic acid supplements on the risk of autism was considerably increased with respect to some other studies because foods are not supplemented with folate in Norway. As another example, cytokine levels in plasma samples stored at ultra-low temperatures differ from those in whole blood collected on filter paper and stored at room temperature. Findings that remain consistent across cohorts despite differences in sampling methods are considered particularly robust; however, failures to replicate findings across different cohorts must be considered in this context. Although DNA, serum and plasma samples are readily collected and their storage at −20 °C is adequate for genetic analyses or serology, the materials required for transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics are more labile. In the ABC, we stored plasma and RNA samples at −80 °C and learned to our chagrin that this was insufficient to maintain their quality for use in some assays. Accordingly, at least a portion of each sample should be stored at −140 °C for future use, including with platforms that do not yet exist. We also did not collect faecal or vaginal samples in the ABC that could have been used in microbiome studies. However, sample biobanking is resource-intensive and expensive. Therefore, despite our best efforts to future-proof data collection, regret for opportunities missed can be anticipated as laboratory methods continually evolve and require different sample types or management.

Ethical challenges will almost certainly emerge as population-based cohort research reveals links between health outcomes and genetic as well as environmental factors. In some instances, ASD biomarkers might be found that enable early intervention to prevent or ameliorate the condition. In other situations, the information found might only predict an individual’s risk of ASD. Leadership teams should consider whether and how such sensitive data will be released to cohort participants, and should include ethicists who can appropriately manage its communication.

Finally, the future of cohort research will almost certainly entail the use of machine learning methods for integrating genetic, epigenetic and multiomics datasets across populations in meta-analyses. In concert, these approaches aim to generate important insights into the pathology of a wide range of acute and chronic diseases and might lead to biomarkers for early diagnosis of individuals at risk, as well as new methods for mitigating risk. In this new era of ASD research, investigators will have an opportunity to use birth cohorts to embrace the complexity of interactions of genetic and environmental factors in a temporal context.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to researching data for the article, writing the manuscript, discussions of its content and review or editing the manuscript before submission.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Neurology thanks Catherine Lord and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.