Skip to main content
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
. 2023 Jan 9;21:847–855. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.004

Molecular epidemiology and genomic insights into the transmission of carbapenem-resistant NDM-producing Escherichia coli

Juan Xu a,1, Hao Guo b,1, Lirong Li b, Fang He b,
PMCID: PMC9842800  PMID: 36698971

Abstract

Escherichia coli is a leading cause of nosocomial infections. Carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC), which has been frequently isolated in recent years because of the widespread use of carbapenems, poses a significant challenge to clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, a total of 27 CREC strains were identified from a set of 795 E. coli isolates collected over a two-year period from a tertiary hospital in China. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that 17 strains carried the blaNDM-5 gene, 5 strains carried the blaNDM-1 gene, 1 strain carried the blaNDM-7 gene, and the remaining 4 strains carried the blaKPC-2 gene. All 23 NDM-producing E. coli strains were resistant to all antibiotics except tigecycline, colistin, and cefiderocol. Nine different sequence types (STs) were identified, with ST410 and ST167 being the most prevalent. All of the blaNDM genes were located on conjugatable plasmids. We identified five different plasmid replicon types ranging in size from 20 kb to 200 kb, with the IncX3-type plasmid, 46 kb in size, being a key factor in facilitating the horizontal transmission of the blaNDM gene in E. coli. The structure surrounding the blaNDM gene was relatively conserved and mainly contained the following structures: IS3000-ISAbal25-IS5-blaNDM-bleMBL-trpF-dsbC-IS26. However, the plasmid backbone structure was highly variable, which indicates that the blaNDM gene has already spread horizontally among different types of plasmids. In addition, we discovered two copies of the blaNDM-5 gene in a single plasmid (pEC29-NDM-5), with an identical structure around the gene and the complete sequence of the class 1 integron. Our findings detail the prevalence of CREC in a tertiary hospital in China, and the emergence of multiple copies of the blaNDM-5 gene on a single plasmid needs our attention.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, Carbapenem-resistant, NDM, Plasmid, Whole-genome sequencing

Graphical Abstract

ga1

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli, a member of the Enterobacterales family, is one of the most common conditional pathogens. It carries a variety of virulence factors, such as fimbriae, capsules, toxins, and lipopolysaccharide. Numerous infections, including acute gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, abdominal infections, and bloodstream infections, can be caused by E. coli. Antibiotics such as β-lactams are used as part of the standard treatment for such infections. One of the important antibacterial agents used in the clinical treatment of severe bacterial infections is carbapenems, a class of β-lactam antibiotics with strong antibacterial activity, a broad antibacterial spectrum, and low toxicity. Unfortunately, the extensive use of these medicines has led to an increase in antibiotic resistance.

The main mechanism by which Enterobacterales achieve carbapenem resistance is through the production of carbapenemases [1], [2], [3]. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) has been the most commonly detected carbapenemase in E. coli [4], [5]. NDM is an Ambler class B β-lactamase, which is the most common type of carbapenemase, and NDM confers resistance to nearly all β-lactams except aztreonam [3], [6]. Isolates producing the NDM enzyme have been detected worldwide. The NDM producing E. coli strains frequently carrying extended spectrum lactamases (ESBLs), which are also resistant to aztreonam [7]. Furthermore, E. coli isolates capable of producing carbapenemases frequently showed higher rates of resistance to other antibiotics, such as aminoglycosides and quinolones, which severely limits clinical treatment options [8].

Although there have been reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains worldwide, most research on the topic focuses on carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. In contrast, carbapenem-resistant E. coli is isolated less frequently in the clinical settings, and the strains isolated in different regions differ in terms of resistance phenotypes and clonal distribution to varying degrees [15]. To better understand the molecular epidemiological traits and transmission dynamics of carbapenem-resistant E. coli in a tertiary hospital in China, 795 E. coli strains were collected between January 2016 and December 2017. The carbapenem-resistant strains were identified by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and then subjected to whole-genome sequencing. The antimicrobial resistance genes, epidemiological characteristics, and transmission dynamics of strains with NDM-carrying plasmids were further investigated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial isolation

Between January 2016 and December 2017 in a tertiary hospital in China, 795 E. coli strains were isolated from various types of samples. Duplicate strains were those that came from different samples on the same patient or samples taken from the same patient at various times; only the first strain was utilized for further study. All of the isolates were identified using the BD Bruker MALDI-Type system and then tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using the BD Phoenix system for primary screening.

2.2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for carbapenem-resistant strains

Carbapenem-resistant strains collected after primary screening were further subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard broth microdilution tests following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The following antimicrobial agents: ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefoxitin, aztreonam, fosfomycin, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, colistin, tigecycline and cefiderocol were used for testing. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using breakpoints approved by the CLSI [16]. For tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) detection, standard broth microdilution tests were adopted using fresh (<12 h) Mueller-Hinton broth (Cation-adjusted, Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England). Cefiderocol MICs were determined in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control. As there are no CLSI breakpoints for tigecycline, the FDA standard was adopted (https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/tigecycline-injection-products). The interpretation of the colistin MIC followed the EUCAST guidelines (Breakpoints for 2021, https://eucast.org/).

2.3. Whole-genome sequencing

Isolates confirmed to be resistant to carbapenems were sent for whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and a long-read MinION sequencer (Nanopore, Oxford, UK). Unicycler (v0.4.7) was used in conservative mode to assemble both short Illumina reads and long MinION reads in a hybrid manner. Pilon was used to create complete circular contigs that were then repeatedly corrected using Illumina reads until no change was found [17]. The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) server automatically generated annotations for the entire genome sequence.

2.4. Genomic characterizations and phylogenetic analysis of blaNDM-positive strains

The BacWGSTdb 2.0 server was used to analyse the multilocus sequence typing (MLST), acquired antibiotic resistance genes, and plasmid replicons of the blaNDM-positive strains [18], [19], [20]. The phylogenetic relationship between blaNDM-positive strains was initially analysed using the BacWGSTdb server with core genome MLST (cgMLST) approaches. The phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor joining (NJ)/unweighted pair group method with the arithmetic mean (UPGMA) phylogeny method (MAFFT version 7) [21], which is based on a core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) strategy. The maximum parsimony algorithm was used to create a phylogenetic tree from the resulting SNPs after recombination regions were removed [22].

2.5. PFGE analysis

Genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme XbaI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and DNA fragments were then separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose III (Sangon, Shanghai, China) with 0.5 × TBE (45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1.0 mM EDTA; pH 8.0) buffer using a CHEF apparatus (CHEF Mapper XA, Bio-Rad, USA) at 14 °C and 6 V/cm and with alternate pulses at a 120° angle in a 5- to 35-s pulse time gradient for 22 h. BioNumerics 7.0 (Applied Maths, Austin, TX, USA) software was used to analyse the PFGE results.

2.6. Conjugation experiment and S1-PFGE

blaNDM-positive E. coli strains were used as donors, and the sodium azide-resistant E. coli strain J53 was used as the recipient. Transconjugants were selected on MH agar plates supplemented with imipenem (4 mg/L) and sodium azide (150 mg/L). E. coli J53 transconjugants were identified using the VITEK MS system, and the blaNDM gene was further confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing. The conjugation efficiency was measured and calculated following the protocol in https://openwetware.org/wiki/conjugation. S1-PFGE was conducted following the protocol of Barton et al. [23].

2.7. Characterization of the NDM-bearing plasmid and the genetic background of blaNDM

Circular comparisons of the blaNDM-carrying plasmid were performed using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) based on concentric rings [24]. By using ISfinder, the insertion elements (ISs) found on the plasmids were predicted [25]. The comparison of the genetic location and background of blaNDM between different plasmids was performed using EasyFig 2.2.3 [26].

2.8. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The genome sequences of the blaNDM-carrying E. coli isolates were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA608094.

3. Results

3.1. Strains and clinical metadata

In total, 795 E. coli clinical strains were collected during the study period. Of the patients, 39.5 % (314/795) were male and 60.5 % (481/795) were female. Children made up 1.8 % of the population (14/795), while adults, who were mostly middle-aged and elderly patients over the age of 45 years, made up 98.2 % of the population (781/795). Most of the specimens (541/795, 67.9 %) were urine specimens, followed by sputum (88/795, 11.0 %), pus (58/795, 7.2 %), blood (46/795, 5.7 %), wound secretion (24/795, 3.0 %), ascites, bile, and cerebrospinal fluid specimens. The main sample collection departments were as follows: rehabilitation (284/795, 35.7 %), urology (162/795, 20.3 %), gynecology (62/795, 7.7 %), neurology (35/795, 4.3 %), neurosurgery (32/795, 4.0 %), oncology (31/795, 3.9 %), and the intensive care unit (22/795, 2.8 %).

Table 1 shows the resistance rates of the 795 E. coli isolates to the 16 antimicrobial agents. These strains were most resistant to piperacillin (637/795, 80.1 %), followed by sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (431/795, 54.2 %) and cefotaxime (408/795, 51.3 %); however, the strains were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, and amikacin.

Table 1.

Susceptibility of the 795 Escherichia coli clinical strains to 16 antimicrobial agents.

Antimicrobial agent Susceptible
Intermediate
Resistant
number (%) number (%) number (%)
piperacillin 147 18.5 11 1.4 637 80.1
sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 363 45.7 1 0.1 431 54.2
cefotaxime 383 48.2 4 0.5 408 51.3
ciprofloxacin 418 52.6 24 3.0 353 44.4
cefepime 411 51.7 40 5.0 344 43.3
levofloxacin 435 54.7 20 2.5 340 42.8
gentamicin 458 57.6 3 0.4 334 42.0
aztreonam 511 64.3 54 6.8 230 28.9
ampicillin/sulbactam 351 44.1 238 29.9 206 26.0
chloramphenicol 567 71.3 42 5.3 186 23.4
ceftazidime 576 72.5 61 7.7 158 19.8
amoxicillin/clavulanate 581 73.1 132 16.6 82 10.3
piperacillin/tazobactam 718 90.3 13 1.6 64 8.1
amikacin 754 94.8 4 0.5 37 4.7
imipenem 766 96.4 2 0.2 27 3.4
meropenem 766 96.4 2 0.2 27 3.4

3.2. Clinical data of carbapenem-resistant E. coli strains

From the initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27 carbapenem-resistant E. coli strains were identified. According to whole-genome sequencing, four strains carried blaKPC-2, five strains carried blaNDM-1, seventeen strains carried blaNDM-5, and one strain carried blaNDM-7. The predominant carbapenemase gene present in these strains was blaNDM, with the blaNDM-5 subtype being the majority. Table 2 displays the clinical data about these 23 blaNDM-positive E. coli strains. The specimens came from urine (17 cases), sputum (3 cases), wounds (2 cases), and pharyngeal swabs (1 case). Twelve men and eleven women, with a mean age of 55.5 ± 19.4 years, made up the patient population. The oldest patient was 89 years old, and the youngest was 21. According to the distribution by ward, there were 15 strains (65.3 %) from the department of rehabilitation, four strains (17.4 %) from the department of neurosurgery, two strains (8.7 %) from the intensive care unit, one strain (4.3 %) from the department of oncology, and one strain (4.3 %) from the department of internal medicine. Most of these patients were initially admitted to the hospital for a variety of underlying diseases, and information from their medical records revealed that most of them had histories of multiple hospitalizations, transfers, invasive operations, and the administration of various antimicrobial agents while they were in the hospital.

Table 2.

Clinical metadata of the 23 blaNDM-carrying E. coli strains.

Strain NDM
sub-type
Patient gender Patient age Department Clinical diagnosis Separation time Specimen type
EC3 blaNDM-5 male 60 rehabilitation intracranial injury 2016–01–22 sputum
EC4 blaNDM-5 male 42 neurosurgery intracranial injury 2016–02–26 urine
EC5 blaNDM-5 male 35 rehabilitation intracranial injury 2016–03–18 wound
EC7 blaNDM-5 female 73 rehabilitation spinal membrane tumor 2016–04–26 urine
EC8 blaNDM-1 female 61 rehabilitation multiple injuries 2016–07–18 urine
EC9 blaNDM-1 female 59 rehabilitation meningioma 2016–07–28 urine
EC10 blaNDM-1 female 70 rehabilitation cerebral hemorrhage 2016–07–25 urine
EC11 blaNDM-1 female 75 rehabilitation intracranial hemorrhage 2016–07–24 urine
EC12 blaNDM-5 male 56 neurosurgery cerebral hemorrhage 2016–08–09 urine
EC13 blaNDM-5 male 43 rehabilitation post-operative aortic coarctation 2016–09–28 urine
EC14 blaNDM-1 female 25 rehabilitation post-traumatic brain injury 2016–11–16 wound
EC15 blaNDM-5 male 21 ICU multiple injuries 2016–12–01 urine
EC18 blaNDM-5 male 44 neurosurgery cranial injury 2016–12–20 urine
EC19 blaNDM-5 female 80 rehabilitation cerebral infarction 2017–05–28 urine
EC20 blaNDM-5 female 67 rehabilitation carbon monoxide poisoning delayed encephalopathy 2017–06–22 pharyngeal swabs
EC21 blaNDM-5 female 33 rehabilitation intracranial injury 2017–07–07 urine
EC22 blaNDM-5 male 89 oncology pulmonary malignancy 2017–07–11 sputum
EC24 blaNDM-5 male 68 rehabilitation intracranial hemorrhage 2017–08–17 urine
EC25 blaNDM-7 male 57 internal medicine pulmonary Infection 2017–08–17 urine
EC26 blaNDM-5 female 58 neurosurgery post-traumatic brain injury syndrome 2017–09–06 urine
EC27 blaNDM-5 female 58 ICU cardiac arrest 2017–10–16 urine
EC29 blaNDM-5 male 22 rehabilitation intracranial injury 2017–11–21 urine
EC31 blaNDM-5 male 81 rehabilitation cerebral infarction 2017–12–06 sputum

The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blaNDM-positive strains are presented in Table S1. All strains were multidrug-resistant, with 100% resistance to ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefoxitin, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; 95.6 % resistance to fosfomycin and gentamicin; and 82.6 % resistance to amikacin; however, the strains were completely sensitive to tigecycline, colistin, and cefiderocol.

3.3. PFGE analysis of blaNDM-positive strains

Utilizing the BioNumerics program, the PFGE results of the blaNDM-positive strains were analysed [27]. Three clonal groups with high homology (number of band differences<3) were found and designated the type I, type II, and type III clonal groups (Fig. 1). The type I clonal group strains EC12, EC15, and EC18 were found in the neurosurgery department and the intensive care unit (ICU); the type II clonal group strains EC19, EC20, EC24, EC25, and EC27 were found in the rehabilitation department, the internal medicine department, and the ICU; and the type III clonal group strains EC9 and EC10 were found in the rehabilitation department. The relationships between the other strains were more distant.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PFGE results of 23 blaNDM-positive E. coli strains analysed by the BioNumerics program. Three clonal groups were identified and categorized as type I, type II, and type III clonal groups based on their high homology (number of band differences<3).

3.4. Genomic characterization of blaNDM-positive strains

Illumina and Nanopore sequencing were used to obtain the complete genome sequences of the 23 blaNDM-positive strains. Table S2 provides a summary of the genomic characterization of these strains. These strains' chromosomes ranged in size from 4.6 Mbp to 5.0 Mbp, contained 4600–5200 CDS, and had a GC content of approximately 50 %. A total of nine different ST types were identified, including ST410 (EC27, EC25, EC19, EC20, EC24), ST167 (EC11, EC31, EC22, EC29), ST6388 (EC12, EC15, EC18), ST744 (EC3, EC13, EC7), ST224 (EC9, EC10), ST10 (EC26, EC4), ST359 (EC21, EC14), ST1193 (EC8), and ST361 (EC5). The most prevalent ST type among them was ST410, followed by ST167.

3.5. Phylogenetic analysis of blaNDM-positive strains

The phylogenetic tree created using the cgMLST strategy is displayed in Fig. 2. These strains were grouped into clusters, and strains from the same cluster were further separated into branches, each with a different number of allelic differences between strains. There was only one allele that separated the three ST410 strains (EC19, EC20, and EC24), one separated the three ST6388 strains (EC12, EC15, and EC18), and the two ST224 strains (EC9, EC10) had the same alleles.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of 23 blaNDM-positive E. coli strains created using the cgMLST strategy. The distance between each circle depicts clonal relationships between different isolates. Each sequence type is indicated by the color of the circle. The numbers enclosed in square brackets denote the number of isolates from each sequence type.

In Fig. 3, a phylogenetic tree was created using the core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) strategy, and the 23 blaNDM-positive strains could be divided into several evolutionary branches. We discovered that the MLST and cgSNP typing results were highly congruent, and the cgSNP phylogenetic tree identified strains with the same sequence type that were topologically aggregated. These strains carried multiple ARGs, including the β-lactam resistance genes blaCMY-42, blaCTX-M, blaNDM-1, blaNDM-5, blaNDM-7, blaOXA-1, blaSHV-12 and blaTEM-1B; the aminoglycoside resistance genes aac(3)-lld, aac(3)-iva, aac(6′)-lb-cr, aadA, aph(3″)-lb, aph(3′)-la, aph(6)-ld, armA and rmtB; the fluoroquinolone resistance genes qnrS1, oqxA and oqxB; the chloramphenicol resistance genes catA, catB and floR; the tetracycline resistance genes tet(A) and tet(B); the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrA17; the sulfonamide resistance genes sul1 and sul2; the fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3; and the macrolide resistance gene mph(A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree created using the cgSNP strategy. Antimicrobial resistance gene and sequence type analyses were performed using WGS data from 23 blaNDM-positive bacteria. The antimicrobial resistance gene is presented in cells by various colors; however, the gene is absent in cells that are blank. Each circle color designates a specific sequence type.

3.6. Characterization of the blaNDM-bearing plasmid

In accordance with the findings of the S1-PFGE (Fig. S1), whole-genome sequencing revealed that the blaNDM gene was located on plasmids in all 23 blaNDM-positive E. coli strains, with plasmid sizes ranging from 24,665 to 168,756 bp (Table 3). The IncX3 (n = 19), IncFIA (n = 1), IncX3/IncFIB (n = 1), IncL/M (n = 1), and IncA/C2 (n = 1) plasmid replicons were among the five plasmid replicons in plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene. The IncX3-type, with plasmid sizes ranging from 24,665 to 61,845 bp, was the most prevalent plasmid replicon harboring the blaNDM gene. Additionally, we discovered instances when a single plasmid included two plasmid replicons (e.g., EC22). All plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene could be successfully conjugated into E. coli J53, and the conjugation efficiency ranged from 3.99 × 10−5 to 8.81 × 10−8 (Table 3). Overall, IncX3-type plasmids had a higher conjugation efficiency than IncL/M-, IncA/C2-, and IncFIA-type plasmids, indicating that they can be horizontally transferred more easily. The MICs of 23 E. coli J53 transconjugants of blaNDM to 15 antimicrobial agents are presented in Table S3. The strains were all resistant to carbapenems, and some transconjugants also developed resistance to other antimicrobial agents (e.g., amikacin and fosfomycin). This indicates that the plasmid can also carry additional ARGs or that more resistance plasmids entered the transconjugants during the conjugation.

Table 3.

Genomic characterizations of blaNDM-carrying plasmids and their conjugation efficiency.

Strains NDM
sub-type
Size(bp) GC % Plasmid replicons Conjugation efficiency
EC18 blaNDM-5 24,665 49.1 % IncX3 5.43 × 10−6
EC12 blaNDM-5 24,944 49.1 % IncX3 1.63 × 10−6
EC15 blaNDM-5 24,944 49.1 % IncX3 4.00 × 10−7
EC19 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 1.45 × 10−7
EC20 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 3.57 × 10−7
EC21 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 2.92 × 10−6
EC24 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 1.05 × 10−6
EC25 blaNDM-7 46,161 46.6 % IncX3 3.99 × 10−5
EC26 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 3.65 × 10−7
EC27 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 5.38 × 10−5
EC5 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 8.14 × 10−6
EC7 blaNDM-5 46,161 46.7 % IncX3 4.62 × 10−6
EC4 blaNDM-5 46,164 46.7 % IncX3 1.14 × 10−7
EC13 blaNDM-5 47,499 46.6 % IncX3 1.27 × 10−6
EC3 blaNDM-5 48,290 47.0 % IncX3 7.66 × 10−7
EC31 blaNDM-5 48,521 47.0 % IncX3 4.17 × 10−7
EC11 blaNDM-1 49,849 48.6 % IncX3 1.51 × 10−6
EC10 blaNDM-1 61,845 49.0 % IncX3 2.12 × 10−6
EC9 blaNDM-1 61,845 49.0 % IncX3 4.50 × 10−5
EC14 blaNDM-1 118,444 51.3 % IncL/M 8.81 × 10−8
EC29 blaNDM-5 147,459 53.1 % IncFIA 3.68 × 10−8
EC22 blaNDM-5 168,221 50.1 % IncX3/IncFIB 4.35 × 10−7
EC8 blaNDM-1 168,756 51.1 % IncA/C2 6.47 × 10−8

3.7. Genetic background of blaNDM

Plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene contain additional elements, including antibiotic resistance genes, mobile elements, conjugation-associated elements, and plasmid stability-associated genes. Table 3 shows that the GC content of the blaNDM-carrying plasmids with different plasmid replicons. The IncX3 plasmid had the lowest GC content (46–49 %) compared to the IncFIA, IncL/M, and IncA/C2 plasmids, while IncFIA was the plasmid replicon type with the highest GC content (53.1 %). In addition, IncX3-type plasmids were found to carry the following subtypes of blaNDM in this study: blaNDM-1, blaNDM-5 and blaNDM-7. Fig. 4 compares the sequences of IncX3 plasmids of various sizes, and the IncX3 plasmid backbone structure is highly conserved and carries only the blaNDM gene for antibiotic resistance (except for a few plasmids that also carry blaSHV-12). Fig. 5 compares the sequences of the plasmids IncA/C2, IncL/M, IncX3/IncFIB, and IncFIA. These plasmids are significantly larger (>100 kb) than IncX3 plasmids and there are very few structural similarities between them other than the antibiotic resistance gene region. In addition to blaNDM, these large plasmids also contain a wide range of other antibiotic resistance genes, including aminoglycoside resistance genes (aac(6′)-lb, aadA2, rmtB), β-lactam resistance genes (blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaSHV-12, blaTEM-1B), sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1), trimethoprim resistance genes (dfrA12), tetracycline resistance genes (tet(A)) and macrolide resistance genes (mph(A)). Despite being broad host plasmids, IncL/M-, IncA/C2-, and IncFIA-type plasmids have larger plasmid structures, but they are less effectively conjugated.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Plasmid backbone comparisons of IncX3 plasmids with various sizes. Plasmid information is presented in Table 3. Antibiotic resistance genes, ISs and conjugation-associated elements are indicated in black.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Plasmid backbone comparisons of the IncA/C2, IncL/M, IncX3/IncFIB, and IncFIA plasmids.

To compare the differences in the surroundings of the blaNDM gene on different plasmids, the structures of the representative plasmids of different replicon types were compared, as shown in Fig. 6. The structure surrounding the blaNDM gene is relatively conserved and mainly contains the following structures: IS3000-ISAbal25-IS5-blaNDM-bleMBL-trpF-dsbC-IS26. However, the plasmid backbone structure is highly variable. In addition, we discovered two copies of the blaNDM-5 gene in the pEC29-NDM-5 plasmid, with an identical structure around the gene and the complete sequence of the class 1 integron.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Alignment of genetic surroundings of the blaNDM gene on different plasmids. The CDS coding region is indicated by yellow arrows, while blaNDM is indicated by red arrows.

4. Discussion

In China, members of the family Enterobacterales are the most prevalent clinical pathogens, with E. coli continuously being the most common [28], [29]. According to the bacterial resistance surveillance data of CHINET, the isolation rate of carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC) is increasing yearly, from 0.3 % in 2005 to 2.0 % in 2021. Most of these strains are multidrug-resistance or extensively drug resistance, and they can spread resistance genes between strains via plasmids, making infection treatment difficult and morbidity and mortality rates high; furthermore, this spread poses a serious challenge to anti-infection treatment and infection control worldwide. In this study, 795 E. coli strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in China over a period of two years were analysed and a total of 27 CREC strains were identified. The resistance gene screen revealed that 17 strains carried the blaNDM-5 gene, 5 strains carried the blaNDM-1 gene, 1 strain carried the blaNDM-7 gene, and the remaining 4 strains carried the blaKPC-2 gene, indicating that the production of NDM-type carbapenemases is the main mechanism of carbapenem resistance in E. coli, with the NDM-5 subtype being the most common.

All 23 NDM-producing E. coli strains were multidrug-resistant and they carried multiple antimicrobial resistance genes, the majority of which were located on plasmids; these strains also showed resistance to all antibiotics except tigecycline, colistin, and cefiderocol. According to our findings, tigecycline, colistin, and cefiderocol can be used to treat infections caused by CREC. Notably, CREC strains carrying both the plasmid-mediated carbapenem resistance gene blaNDM and the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 or the tigecycline resistance gene tet(X4) have been identified, so it is critical to pay close attention to clinical CREC transmission when in combination with other resistance genes [30], [31], [32].

Prolonged hospitalization, an immunocompromised status, older age along with severe underlying disease, prolonged use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and invasive procedures such as deep venous cannulation and tracheotomy have all been identified as risk factors for CRE colonization and infection [33]. All CREC-positive patients in this study were initially admitted to the hospital with a variety of underlying conditions, including intracranial injury, cerebral hemorrhage, and cerebral infarction in more than half of the patients. The vast majority of these strains (20/23, 86.96%) were isolated from urinary and respiratory specimens, which may be related to the fact that most patients with CREC infections are critically ill and frequently receive treatment measures such as catheters and mechanical ventilation. Notably, five of the 23 blaNDM-positive strains in this study were isolated from individuals under the age of 35 who were admitted for intracranial trauma or injury and later acquired a carbapenem-resistant E. coli infection following necessary surgical treatment (e.g., traumatic brain surgery).

According to previous studies, NDM-producing E. coli cover a wide range of sequence types, with ST167 being found in several countries (Korea, India, South Africa, Japan, USA and Switzerland) [34], [35]. A multicentre study in China found that ST167 was the most common clonal lineage of NDM-producing E. coli, followed by ST410 [15]. Our findings revealed that among the 23 strains of NDM-producing E. coli, there were nine different sequence types, with ST410 being the most abundant, followed by ST167. Our PFGE and phylogenetic analysis results indicate a hospital epidemic of a nosocomial clone of NDM-5-producing E. coli ST410, which warrants further investigation. Furthermore, our findings indicated that the PFGE, cgSNP, and cgMLST results were consistent, but the resolution of cgSNP and cgMLST was higher than that of PFGE.

All plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene, including those containing the blaNDM-1, blaNDM-5, and blaNDM-7 genes, were successfully conjugated into E. coli J53. The S1-PFGE results revealed that the blaNDM gene, which was carried by all 23 strains of NDM-producing E. coli, was located on the plasmid. Whole-genome sequencing revealed a variety of plasmid replicon types carrying the blaNDM gene, including IncX3, IncFIA, IncX3/IncFIB, IncL/M, and IncA/C2; this result indicated that multiple types of plasmids can mediate horizontal transmission of the blaNDM gene, with IncX3 being the most common. The fact that IncX3-type plasmids had a higher conjugation efficiency than other plasmids may be the reason why they serve as the dominant plasmid for the spread of the blaNDM gene in E. coli. The blaNDM-carrying plasmid is made up of a backbone region that encodes essential proteins for plasmid replication, transfer, and virulence and a variable region that contains antimicrobial resistance genes. Whole-genome sequencing of the blaNDM-carrying plasmid revealed that the GC content of the variable region sequence was significantly higher than that of the backbone region, indicating that the region is of exogenous origin and that the variable region carrying the blaNDM gene can be transferred.

Furthermore, we identified two copies of the blaNDM-5 gene in the pEC29-NDM-5 plasmid, with identical structures around the gene and the complete sequence of the class 1 integron. The result of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of cefiderocol indicated that the MIC was 4 mg/L, which is higher than isolates carrying the single copy of blaNDM-5 gene. Simner et al. also discovered that increased copy number of blaNDM-5 is associated with progressive development of cefiderocol resistance in E. coli during therapy [36]. The emergence of multiple copies of the blaNDM-5 plasmid and strains may thus pose a threat to cefiderocol use and this phenomenon should be taken seriously.

5. Conclusions

Our findings revealed the main mechanism of carbapenem resistance in E. coli is the production of NDM-type carbapenemase, with the NDM-5 being the most prevalent. The blaNDM genes are all located on conjugative plasmids ranging in size from 20 kb to 200 kb, with the IncX3-type plasmid being a key factor in the horizontal transmission of blaNDM. The blaNDM gene is more likely to spread horizontally between different plasmids because of the highly variable nature of the plasmid backbone structure, but the structure surrounding the blaNDM gene is relatively conserved. The emergence of two copies of the blaNDM-5 gene on a single plasmid poses a threat to the use of the novel siderophore cephalosporin.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172314) and the Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology plan (2022KY022 and 2023KY484).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

HF designed the experiments. XJ and GH performed the experiments and were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. LLR analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital. Written informed consent from the patients was exempted by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital because the present study only focused on bacteria.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.004.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (24.1KB, docx)

.

Supplementary material

mmc2.docx (17.9KB, docx)

.

Supplementary material

mmc3.docx (24.5KB, docx)

.

Supplementary material

mmc4.jpg (2.1MB, jpg)

.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript. Interested readers can contact the corresponding author for further information.

References

  • 1.Dortet L., Poirel L., Nordmann P. Worldwide dissemination of the NDM-type carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacteria. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/249856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee C.R., Lee J.H., Park K.S., Kim Y.B., Jeong B.C., Lee S.H. Global dissemination of carbapenemase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae: epidemiology, genetic context, treatment options, and detection methods. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:895. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Duin D., Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2017;8:460–469. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson A.P., Woodford N. Global spread of antibiotic resistance: the example of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-mediated carbapenem resistance. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:499–513. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.052555-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rahman M., Shukla S.K., Prasad K.N., Ovejero C.M., Pati B.K., Tripathi A., et al. Prevalence and molecular characterisation of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamases NDM-1, NDM-5, NDM-6 and NDM-7 in multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from India. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;44:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moellering R.C., Jr. NDM-1--a cause for worldwide concern. New Engl J Med. 2010;363:2377–2379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun L., Xu J., He F. Draft genome sequence of an NDM-5, CTX-M-15 and OXA-1 co-producing Escherichia coli ST167 clinical strain isolated from a urine sample. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;14:284–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu J., He F. Characterization of a NDM-7 carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli ST410 clinical strain isolated from a urinary tract infection in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1555–1564. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S206211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pitout J.D., Nordmann P., Poirel L. Carbapenemase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae, a key pathogen set for global nosocomial dominance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5873–5884. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01019-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paczosa M.K., Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev: MMBR. 2016;80:629–661. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iovleva A., Doi Y. Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37:303–315. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Logan L.K., Weinstein R.A. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis. 2017;215 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw282. (S28-s36) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lou T., Du X., Zhang P., Shi Q., Han X., Lan P., et al. Risk factors for infection and mortality caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a large multicentre case-control and cohort study. J Infect. 2022;84:637–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang M., Earley M., Chen L., Hanson B.M., Yu Y., Liu Z., et al. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:401–412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00399-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang R., Liu L., Zhou H., Chan E.W., Li J., Fang Y., et al. Nationwide surveillance of clinical carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains in China. EBioMedicine. 2017;19:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.C.L.S.I. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100, 2021. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 31th ed. 2021.
  • 17.Walker B.J., Abeel T., Shea T., Priest M., Abouelliel A., Sakthikumar S., et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLOS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruan Z., Feng Y. BacWGSTdb, a database for genotyping and source tracking bacterial pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D682–D687. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feng Y., Zou S., Chen H., Yu Y., Ruan Z. BacWGSTdb 2.0: a one-stop repository for bacterial whole-genome sequence typing and source tracking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ruan Z., Yu Y., Feng Y. The global dissemination of bacterial infections necessitates the study of reverse genomic epidemiology. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21:741–750. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jia H., Chen Y., Wang J., Xie X., Ruan Z. Emerging challenges of whole-genome-sequencing-powered epidemiological surveillance of globally distributed clonal groups of bacterial infections, giving Acinetobacter baumannii ST195 as an example. Int J Med Microbiol. 2019;309 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.151339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Barton B.M., Harding G.P., Zuccarelli A.J. A general method for detecting and sizing large plasmids. Anal Biochem. 1995;226:235–240. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alikhan N.F., Petty N.K., Ben Zakour N.L., Beatson S.A. BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011;12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Siguier P., Perochon J., Lestrade L., Mahillon J., Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sullivan M.J., Petty N.K., Beatson S.A. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.He F., Fu Y., Chen Q., Ruan Z., Hua X., Zhou H., et al. Tigecycline susceptibility and the role of efflux pumps in tigecycline resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLOS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu F., Wang M., Zhu D., Wang F. CHINET efforts to control antimicrobial resistance in China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;21:76–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu F., Zhu D., Wang F., Wang M. Current status and trends of antibacterial resistance in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy657. (S128-s34) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Han H., Liu W., Cui X., Cheng X., Jiang X. Co-existence of mcr-1 and bla (NDM-5) in an Escherichia coli strain isolated from the pharmaceutical industry, WWTP. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:851–854. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S245047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sulian O., Ageevets V., Lazareva I., Gostev V., Popov D., Vostrikova T., et al. Co-production of MCR-1 and NDM-1 by Escherichia coli sequence type 31 isolated from a newborn in Moscow, Russia. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:4–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang W., Lu X., Chen S., Liu Y., Peng D., Wang Z., et al. Molecular epidemiology and population genomics of tet(X4), bla(NDM) or mcr-1 positive Escherichia coli from migratory birds in southeast coast of China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;244 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.da Silva K.E., Maciel W.G., Sacchi F.P.C., Carvalhaes C.G., Rodrigues-Costa F., da Silva A.C.R., et al. Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: watch out for surgery. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:547–553. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Peterhans S., Stevens M.J.A., Nüesch-Inderbinen M., Schmitt S., Stephan R., Zurfluh K. First report of a bla(NDM-5)-harbouring Escherichia coli ST167 isolated from a wound infection in a dog in Switzerland. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;15:226–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nukui Y., Ayibieke A., Taniguchi M., Aiso Y., Shibuya Y., Sonobe K., et al. Whole-genome analysis of EC129, an NDM-5-, CTX-M-14-, OXA-10- and MCR-1-co-producing Escherichia coli ST167 strain isolated from Japan. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:148–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Simner P.J., Mostafa H.H., Bergman Y., Ante M., Tekle T., Adebayo A., et al. Progressive development of cefiderocol resistance in escherichia coli during therapy is associated with increased blaNDM-5 copy number and gene expression. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (24.1KB, docx)

Supplementary material

mmc2.docx (17.9KB, docx)

Supplementary material

mmc3.docx (24.5KB, docx)

Supplementary material

mmc4.jpg (2.1MB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript. Interested readers can contact the corresponding author for further information.


Articles from Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology

RESOURCES