Skip to main content
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):182–187. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.7031

Effects of storage duration of suspended red blood cells before intraoperative infusion on coagulation indexes, routine blood examination and immune function in patients with gastrointestinal tumors

Xiaofei Lan 1,, Yan Chen 2, Qihua Bi 3, Weihong Xu 4, Jun Huang 5
PMCID: PMC9842986  PMID: 36694766

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effect of storage duration of suspended red blood cells (SRBC) before intraoperative infusion on coagulation indexes, routine blood examination and immune function in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) tumors.

Methods:

We divided clinical data of one hundred patients with GI tumors who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital into two different groups according to the storage duration of SRBC use for intraoperative infusion. The short-term group (n=50) had patients with SRBC storage durations shorter than two weeks, and the long-term group (n=50) had patients with storage durations longer than two weeks. We compared the coagulation, immune function, routine blood profile, electrolyte levels and adverse reactions assessment results between the two groups.

Results:

Compared with before transfusions, the levels of fibrinogen (FIB) and activated partial prothrombin time (APTT) after blood transfusions were higher than those before transfusion (P<0.05). The levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HCT) in the two groups after blood transfusions were also higher than those before transfusion (P<0.05). However, the levels of CD4+ decreased and those of CD8+ increased in both groups after the blood transfusions. In addition, the levels of CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the short-term group were higher than those of the long-term group (P<0.05) while the CD8+ levels were lower than that of the long-term group (P<0.05). After the blood transfusions, the potassium ion (K+) levels in the two groups increased, and those in the long-term group were higher than in the short-term group (P<0.05). The sodium ion (Na+) levels in the two groups increased after the transfusions, and the short-term group had higher levels than the long-term group (P<0.05). Finally, the incidence of adverse reactions in the short-term group (4.00%) was lower than that in the long-term group (18.00%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

Intraoperative infusion of SRBC with storage duration longer than two weeks increases the risk of perioperative adverse transfusion reactions, which implies that the storage duration of SRBC should be strictly controlled in clinical practice to reduce the risk of blood transfusion.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal neoplasms, Suspended red blood cells, Storage duration; Coagulation index, Routine blood test

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) tumors are characterized by the presence of an abdominal mass, intestinal obstruction and bloody stools. Early surgical resection of tumors is an effective treatment.1 Radical resection is the first treatment choice, but it renders patients prone to anemia due to massive bleeding, malnutrition and other factors. Intraoperative blood transfusions help prevent postoperative anemia,2 and suspended red blood cells (SRBC) intraoperative infusions are usually preferred to treat blood losses during surgery. Studies have shown that the SRBC storage duration may affect the function and morphology of its cells, altering the oxygen carrying capacity of erythrocytes.3,4

Moreover, SRBC may induce a variety of biological, biochemical and physical changes during storage, weakening the efficacy of blood transfusions and increasing the adverse reaction risks including the risk of non-hemolytic fever or multiple organ failure.3,4 The cell membrane structure and membrane elasticity of SRBC change and they release bioactive cell vesicles during low-temperature storage. These changes of SRBC membrane may induce transfusion reactions and negative posttransfusion outcomes.5

Thus clarifying the impact of different SRBC storage durations on the coagulation function and electrolyte levels in transfused patients is important.6,7 For this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with GI tumors who received surgical treatment, and discussed the effect of SRBC storage durations on their coagulation indexes, routine blood profile and immune function results to provide a reference for related surgical blood transfusions.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected clinical data of one hundred patients with GI tumors who underwent surgery in our hospital from February 2018 to February 2022. The short-term group included 50 patients with intraoperative SRBC infusion after a storage duration shorter than two weeks (26 men and 24 women, aged 37-74 years, mean age at 56.76 ± 8.86 years); the long-term group included 50 patients with SRBC storage durations before the intraoperative infusion longer than two weeks (30 men and 20 women, aged 37-71 years, mean age at 58.18 ± 7.12 years). The general data on gender and age were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients received enteral and parenteral nutritional support supplemented with glucose and vitamins one day after the operation, and all clinical effects were recorded.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with early stage GI tumors diagnosed by clinic pathology undergoing successful radical tumor resection

  • Patients with intraoperative blood loss ≥800 mL and infused SRBC

  • Patients without fever or infections and with normal electrolyte, coagulation function indexes, routine blood levels and immune function indexes before the blood transfusion

  • Patients with complete clinical data

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with immune or blood disorders diseases or with other malignant tumors

  • Patients with severe heart, lung, kidney or other functional organ damages

  • Patients who had received systemic chemotherapy, immunosuppressant’s or glucocorticoids before the operation

  • Patients with a history of prior blood transfusion

  • Patients with incomplete immune profile results

Ethical Approval:

The medical ethics committee of our hospital approved this study (Approval number 2018-C-53, Date: 2018-07-27).

Observational indicators:

(1) Coagulation function indexes [fibrinogen (FIB), prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT): 3-ml fasting venous blood samples were collected and analyzed in a BC-20 automatic blood cell analyzer (Shenzhen Mind ray Biomedical Electronics). (2) Routine blood levels [hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), platelet count (PLT)]: 3-ml fasting venous blood samples were collected and analyzed using a Shenzhen Mind ray CAL8000 blood analysis line system. (3) Immune function indexes [CD4 cells (CD4+), CD8 cells (CD8+)]: 3-ml fasting venous blood samples were collected and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3000 rpm (centrifugation radius, 12.5cm), the sera were separated and analyzed by flow cytometry (Taizhou Huamai Medical Instrument) to calculate CD4+/CD8+ counts (the test kits used were purchased from Shanghai enzyme Biotechnology). (4) Levels of electrolytes [calcium ion (Ca2+), potassium ion (K+), sodium ion (Na+)]: 3-ml fasting venous blood samples were collected and analyzed in an hc-9886 electrolyte analyzer (Shenzhen Hangchuang Medical Equipment). (5) Adverse reactions: treating physicians recorded the occurrence of non-hemolytic fever and allergic transfusion reactions in the patients.

Statistical Analysis:

We analyzed the data using the SPSS 26.0 statistical software using α=0.05 as a test standard. All measurement data are presented as mean plus standard deviations (χ̄±S) and compared using t-tests. The counting data are presented as numbers and percentages n, (%) and tested applying a χ2 test.

RESULTS

There were no signifiwcant differences in FIB, PT and APTT between the short-term and long-term groups, whether before or after blood transfusions (P>0.05). Compared with before blood transfusion, the levels of FIB and APTT after blood transfusion in each group were higher than those before transfusion, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); however, the PT counts were similar before and after blood transfusions in each group (P>0.05). Table-I

Table-I.

Comparison of coagulation function indexes between the two groups (χ̅±S)

Group n FIB (g/L) PT (s) APTT (s)

Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion
Short-term group 50 1.61±0.34 2.90±0.54a 14.96±2.63 15.46±2.81 33.06±4.16 38.41±5.38a
Long-term group 50 1.63±0.36 2.85±0.51a 14.80±2.57 15.69±2.76 33.29±4.20 38.71±5.42a
t - -0.286 0.476 0.308 -0.413 -0.275 -0.278
p - 0.776 0.635 0.759 0.681 0.784 0.782

Note:

a

indicates a comparison with the same group before the blood transfusion, p <0.05.

The levels of Hb, HCT and PLT at the same time points were all similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The PLT levels before and after the transfusions were similar in both groups (P>0.05). However, the levels of Hb and HCT after the blood transfusions were higher than those before the transfusions (P<0.05). Table-II

Table-II.

Comparison of routine blood profile results between the two groups (χ̅±S)

Group n Hb (g/L) HCT (%) PLT (×109/L)

Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion
Short-term group 50 64.28±5.74 92.37±8.29a 20.94±2.33 25.96±3.12a 202.14±26.35 196.24±24.18
Long-term group 50 64.71±5.70 91.68±8.16a 20.80±2.30 25.70±3.06a 203.81±26.26 198.48±24.60
t - -0.376 0.419 0.302 0.421 -0.317 -0.459
p - 0.708 0.676 0.763 0.675 0.752 0.647

Note:

a

indicates a comparison with the same group before the blood transfusion, p <0.05.

Before blood transfusions, there were no significant differences in levels of CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+ between the two groups (P>0.05). However, compared with before transfusions, the CD4+ levels after transfusion decreased while the CD8+ levels increased in each group. In addition, after the transfusions, the levels of CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the long-term group were lower than those in the short-term group, while the CD8+ levels in the long-term group were higher than those in the short-term group (P<0.05). Table-III

Table-III.

Comparison of immune function results between the two groups (χ̅±S).

Group n CD4+ (%) CD8+ (%) CD4+/CD8+

Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion
Short-term group 50 35.25±5.30 32.28±5.62 31.32±2.71 34.31±2.94a 1.13±0.18 0.94±0.13
Long-term group 50 35.57±5.32 28.25±5.11 31.50±2.74 37.16±3.05a 1.12±0.17 0.76±0.11
t - -0.301 3.752 -0.330 -4.757 0.286 7.474
p - 0.764 <0.001 0.742 <0.001 0.776 <0.001

Note:

a

indicates a comparison with the same group before the blood transfusion, p <0.05.

Before blood transfusions, there were no significant differences in levels of Ca2+, K+, and Na- between the two groups (P>0.05). After the transfusions, the levels of Ca2+ decreased in both groups, but there were no significant differences in Ca2+ levels between the two groups after transfusion (P>0.05). The level of K+ in both groups increased, and the long-term group had higher levels than the short-term group (P<0.05). The Na+ level in both groups increased, and the short-term group displayed higher levels than the long-term group (P<0.05. Table-IV.

Table-IV.

Comparison of electrolyte levels between the two groups (mEq/L,χ̅±S)

Group n Ca2+ K+ Na+

Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion Before blood transfusion 24 hours after blood transfusion
Short-term group 50 2.17±0.21 1.63±0.36a 4.08±0.67 4.49±0.51a 128.24±2.34 137.25±3.69a
Long-term group 50 2.19±0.22 1.66±0.34a 4.13±0.64 4.82±0.54a 128.50±2.38 133.38±3.28a
t - -0.465 -0.428 -0.382 -3.142 -0.551 5.543
p - 0.643 0.669 0.704 0.002 0.583 <0.001

Note:

a

indicates a comparison with the same group before the blood transfusion, p <0.05.

The incidence of adverse reactions in the short-term group (4.00%) was lower than that in the long-term group (18.00%) with a significant difference between them (P<0.05. Table-V

Table-V.

Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups (n%).

Group n Non hemolytic fever Allergic transfusion reaction Incidence rate
Short-term group 50 1 (2.00) 1 (2.00) 2 (4.00)
Long-term group 50 5 (10.00) 4 (8.00) 9 (18.00)
χ2 - 5.005
p - 0.025

DISCUSSION

GI tumor is one of the five most common cancers in both men and women which accounts for 26% of the global cancer incidence.8,9 Surgical resections of GI tumors in patients who meet the surgical indications have a good therapeutic effect. However, it is reported that the surgical treatment cause large tissue traumas and intraoperative blood losses, which may lead to anemia, malnutrition and poor immunity.10 Blood transfusion is an effective means to improve the immune regulation and coagulation functions.11,12 SRBC infusions are a main type of blood transfusions, which can quickly correct and prevent anemia, and have different effects on the patients’ inflammatory reactions, coagulation functions and electrolyte levels.13 Studies show that SRBC are prone to storage damage from red blood cell morphology and hydrodynamic changes that induce changes in the cell membrane and biochemistry during low-temperature storage.14, 15 Different storage durations have different effects on the coagulation and immune functions.14,15 In our study, we studied data of patients with GI cancer undergoing radical resection of GI tumors to explore the effects of SRBC storage duration on coagulation indexes routine blood tests and immune function results, to obtain a preliminary reference for optimizing the storage duration of SRBC.

Ichikawa et al16 and Riccio et al17 found that with the extension of storage periods, SRBC are prone to storage damage, changes in red blood cell-related biomechanics, reduced blood transfusion efficiency, which can seriously cause respiratory distress and other problems. Hashemi Tayer et al. also found that during long-term low-temperature storage, the coagulation function of SRBC stocks is impacted by released cytokines such as interleukin and soluble human leukocyte antigen, which can increase the risk of adverse transfusion reactions such as non-hemolytic fever.18 We found supporting evidence with the FIB, APTT, Hb and HCT values of patients in the two groups increasing after the blood transfusions compared with the values before the procedure. Our results also indicate that the storage duration of SRBC has different effects on their functionality, and that SRBC age during storage, probably releasing cell vesicles rich in phosphatidylserine and promoting coagulation. Cell vesicles can increase thrombin in plasma and activate the coagulation system through proteins in the cytoskeleton, probably explaining how SRBC affect coagulation (a promising research direction in the clinic.19, 20

CD4+ is an immune marker expressed mainly by helper T cells. It can assemble with the non-polypeptide region of MHC Class-II molecules, participate in the process of antigen recognition, direct the body against pathogenic microorganisms, and help fight infections.21 The surface antigens of lymphocytes are produced during cell differentiation. The specific antigens on the surface of a cell membrane can be detected by specific monoclonal antibodies. As a subgroup of T lymphocytes, CD8+ cells can further differentiate and proliferate into effector cells after activation. Increases in CD8+ values indicate immune function disorders and cellular immunity inhibition.22,23 Study has reported that the storage duration had no significant effect on the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in erythrocyte suspension.24 However, our results showed that after blood transfusions, the levels of CD4+ decreased and those of CD8+ increased in both groups, and that the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was larger in the short-term group than that in the long-term group, suggesting that the SRBC stored for more than two weeks had a more negative impact on the immune function of patients with GI tumors than SRBC stored for less than two weeks. Further studies should be conducted to explain the conflicting results of these studies.

After blood transfusions, we found that the K+ levels in both groups increased, and the long-term group had higher levels than the short-term group, which may be due to the exosmosis of intracellular K+ caused by long-term storage and the increase of K+ in the supernatant of SRBC solution.25 The Na+ levels in both groups increased, and the short-term group had higher levels than the long-term group, which may be related to hemolysis of stored SRBC.26 In addition, our study also showed that the incidence of adverse reactions in the short-term group (4.00%) was lower than that in the long-term group (18.00%), which was similar with the study results of Fan et al27 and Robinson et al.28

Limitations:

This is a single center study, and we only studied patients with GI tumor surgery. Follow-up studies should address SRBC transfusions under different circumstances in prospective and multi center studies.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative infusion of SRBC with storage durations longer than two weeks in patients with GI tumors may increase the risk of adverse transfusion reactions such as allergic transfusion and non-hemolytic fever, which implies that the storage duration of SRBC should be strictly controlled in clinical practice to reduce the risk of blood transfusion.

Authors’ contributions:

XL conceived and designed the study.

YC, QB, WX and JH collected the data and performed the analysis.

XL was involved in the writing of the manuscript and is responsible for the integrity of the study.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Li C, Li L, Shi J. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in early diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):203–207. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.707. doi:10.12669/pjms.36.2.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ma L, Zhang H. Machine learning algorithm of ultrasound-mediated intestinal function recovery and nursing efficacy analysis of lower gastrointestinal malignant tumor after surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(6):1662–1666. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.6-WIT.4866. doi:10.12669/pjms.37.6-WIT.4866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhong R, Han D, Wu X, Wang H, Li W, He Z, et al. An Evaluation of Morphological Changes and Deformability of Suspended Red Blood Cells Prepared Using Whole Blood with Different Hemoglobin Levels of Tibetans. Transfus Med Hemotherapy. 2021;48(4):210–219. doi: 10.1159/000513319. doi:10.1159/000513319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chien W, Gompper G, Fedosov DA. Effect of cytosol viscosity on the flow behavior of red blood cell suspensions in microvessels. Microcirc N Y N 1994. 2021;28(2):e12668. doi: 10.1111/micc.12668. doi:10.1111/micc.12668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Almizraq R, Tchir JD, Holovati JL, Acker JP. Storage of red blood cells affects membrane composition, microvesiculation, and in vitro quality. Transfusion. 2013;53(10):2258–67. doi: 10.1111/trf.12080. doi:10.1111/trf.12080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Geiss L, Amaral do MCF, Frisbie J, Goldstein DL, Krane CM. Postfreeze viability of erythrocytes from Dryophytes chrysoscelis. J Exp Zool Part Ecol Integr Physiol. 2019;331(5):308–313. doi: 10.1002/jez.2262. doi:10.1002/jez.2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Norris PJ, Schechtman K, Inglis HC, Adelman A, Heitman JW, Vilardi R, et al. Influence of blood storage age on immune and coagulation parameters in critically ill transfused patients. Transfusion (Paris) 2019;59(4):1223–1232. doi: 10.1111/trf.15250. doi:10.1111/trf.15250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dizdar Ö, Kılıçkap S. Yalcin S, Philip P, editors. (2019). Global Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Cancers In: (eds) Textbook of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Springer Cham. https: [DOI]
  • 9.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global cancer observatory:cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, France. 2020. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today .
  • 10.Nakanishi K, Kanda M, Kodera Y. Long-lasting discussion:Adverse effects of intraoperative blood loss and allogeneic transfusion on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 14;25(22):2743–2751. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2743. doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang X, Ning L, Hu Y, Zhao S, Li Z, Li L, et al. Prognostic Factors for Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Radical Resection:Shandong Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group, Study 1201. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(8):2812–2821. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08244-9. doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08244-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fields AC, Saadat LV, Scully RE, Davids JS, Goldberg JE, Bleday R, et al. Local Excision Versus Radical Resection for 1- to 2-cm Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Rectum:A National Cancer Database Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(4):417–421. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001210. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Irving A, Higgins A, Ady B, Bellomo R, Cooper DJ, French C, et al. Fresh Red Cells for Transfusion in Critically Ill Adults:An Economic Evaluation of the Standard Issue Transfusion Versus Fresher Red-Cell Use in Intensive Care (TRANSFUSE) Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(7):e572–e579. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003781. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shastry S, Shivhare A, Murugesan M, Baliga PB. Red cell storage lesion and the effect of buffy-coat reduction on the biochemical parameters. Transfus Apher Sci Off J World Apher Assoc Off J Eur Soc Haemapheresis. 2019;58(2):179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.01.003. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2019.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yoshida T, Prudent M, D'alessandro A. Red blood cell storage lesion:causes and potential clinical consequences. Blood Transfus Trasfus Sangue. 2019;17(1):27–52. doi: 10.2450/2019.0217-18. doi:10.2450/2019.0217-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ichikawa J, Koshino I, Arashiki N, Nakamura F, Komori M. Storage-Related Changes in Autologous Whole Blood and Irradiated Allogeneic Red Blood Cells and Their Ex Vivo Effects on Deformability, Indices, and Density of Circulating Erythrocytes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(3):855–861. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.016. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Riccio DA, Zhu H, Foster MW, Huang B, Hofmann CL, Palmer GM, et al. Renitrosylation of banked human red blood cells improves deformability and reduces adhesivity. Transfusion. 2015 Oct;55(10):2452–63. doi: 10.1111/trf.13189. doi:10.1111/trf.13189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hashemi Tayer A, Amirizadeh N, Ahmadinejad M, Nikougoftar M, Deyhim MR, Zolfaghari S. Procoagulant Activity of Red Bslood Cell-Derived Microvesicles during Red Cell Storage. Transfus Med Hemotherapy Off Organ Dtsch Ges Transfusionsmedizin Immunhamatologie. 2019;46(4):224–230. doi: 10.1159/000494367. doi:10.1159/000494367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bebesi T, Kitka D, Gaál A, Szigyártó IC, Deák R, Beke-Somfai T, et al. Storage conditions determine the characteristics of red blood cell derived extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04915-7. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-04915-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Himbert S, Qadri SM, Sheffield WP, Schubert P, D'Alessandro A, Rheinstädter MC. Blood bank storage of red blood cells increases RBC cytoplasmic membrane order and bending rigidity. PloS One. 2021;16(11):e0259267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259267. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Park S, Anderson NL, Canaria DA, Olson MR. Granzyme-Producing CD4 T Cells in Cancer and Autoimmune Disease. Immuno Horizons. 2021;5(12):909–917. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100017. doi:10.4049/immunohorizons.2100017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He Y, Fu L, Li Y, Wang W, Gong M, Zhang J, et al. Gut microbial metabolites facilitate anticancer therapy efficacy by modulating cytotoxic CD8+T cell immunity. Cell Metab. 2021;33(5):988–100ss0e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.002. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hossain MA, Liu G, Dai B, Si Y, Yang Q, Wazir J, et al. Reinvigorating exhausted CD8+cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment and current strategies in cancer immunotherapy. Med Res Rev. 2021;41(1):156–201. doi: 10.1002/med.21727. doi:10.1002/med.21727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Salih Haldun BAL, Kumaş LT, Heper Y, Budak F, Goral G, Can FE, et al. Impact of Storage Period on CD4+/CD8+ T Lymphocyte Ratio in Erythrocyte Suspensions. Turk J Immunol. 2020;8(2):44–49. doi:10.25002/tji.2020.1242. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reilly M, Bruno CD, Prudencio TM, Ciccarelli N, Guerrelli D, Nair R, et al. Potential Consequences of the Red Blood Cell Storage Lesion on Cardiac Electrophysiology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(21):e017748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017748. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.017748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lanteri MC, Kanias T, Keating S, Stone M, GuoY,Page GP, et al. Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during red blood cell storage:results of recall phase of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study. Transfusion (Paris) 2019;59(1):79–88. doi: 10.1111/trf.14987. doi:10.1111/trf.14987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan F, Yu Y, Sun L, Wang S, Wang R, Zhang L, et al. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Toxicity by Supernatant of Long Term-Stored Red Blood Cells in Vitro. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(3):1230–1240. doi: 10.1159/000489073. doi:10.1159/000489073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robinson SD, Janssen C, Fretz EB, Berry B, Chase AJ, Siega AD, et al. Red blood cell storage duration and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):876–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.018. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Professional Medical Publications

RESOURCES