Skip to main content
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2022 Oct 31;32(12):1622–1631. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2208.08044

DsLCYB Directionally Modulated β-Carotene of the Green Alga Dunaliella salina under Red Light Stress

Yanhong Lan 1, Yao Song 1, Yihan Guo 1, Dairong Qiao 1, Yi Cao 1,*, Hui Xu 1,*
PMCID: PMC9843872  PMID: 36384973

Abstract

Carotenoids, which are natural pigments found abundantly in wide-ranging species, have diverse functions and high industrial potential. The carotenoid biosynthesis pathway is very complex and has multiple branches, while the accumulation of certain metabolites often affects other metabolites in this pathway. The DsLCYB gene that encodes lycopene cyclase was selected in this study to evaluate β-carotene production and the accumulation of β-carotene in the alga Dunaliella salina. Compared with the wild type, the transgenic algal species overexpressed the DsLCYB gene, resulting in a significant enhancement of the total carotenoid content, with the total amount reaching 8.46 mg/g for an increase of up to 1.26-fold. Interestingly, the production of α-carotene in the transformant was not significantly reduced. This result indicated that the regulation of DsLCYB on the metabolic flux distribution of carotenoid biosynthesis is directional. Moreover, the effects of different light-quality conditions on β-carotene production in D. salina strains were investigated. The results showed that the carotenoid components of β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin were 1.8-fold and 1.23-fold higher than that in the wild type under red light stress, respectively. This suggests that the accumulation of β-carotene under red light conditions is potentially more profitable.

Keywords: β-Carotene, lycopene β cyclase, carotenoid, Dunaliella salina, transgene

Introduction

‘Carotenoids’ is a general term for a class of valuable, natural fat-soluble pigments that are distributed widely in bacteria, fungi, algae [1-4], and photosynthetic plants. In humans, however, carotenoids can only be obtained from food. Studies to elucidate the regulation of carotenoid composition in model species and accumulate target components are critical because carotenoids have important physiological functions, including an antioxidant role, immune regulation, and prevention of cardiovascular disease, certain types of cancer, eye-related diseases, and light-induced skin damage [5].

Carotenoids are divided into two major classes: xanthophylls, which contain oxygen, and carotenes, which mainly consist of hydrocarbons and no oxygen. β-Carotene, the most important and effective vitamin A precursor among the carotenes, plays a vital role in human health, protecting against age-related degenerative diseases, cardiovascular disease, vitamin A deficiency (VAD), and certain cancers [6, 7]. β-Carotene is catalyzed directly by β-carotene hydroxylase (BCH) to generate β-cryptoxanthin, an antioxidant that may help prevent free radical damage to biomolecules including lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids [8, 9]. Studies in animal models and humans have also shown that β-cryptoxanthin derived from food has better in vitro bioavailability than α-carotene and β-carotene. Zeaxanthin, a direct product of cryptoxanthin, is a new type of oil-soluble natural pigment, which often coexists with lutein, β-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin in nature to form a carotenoid mixture. Zeaxanthin prevents the oxidation of lipids and vitamins in food and prolongs the preservation period of food, making it an ideal natural food preservative [10, 11]. Recognition of the importance of the rich variety and functional diversity of carotenoids has resulted in increased demand and focus on how to improve the production of natural carotenoids.

The accumulation of certain metabolites often affects the composition of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. The cyclization reaction of lycopene converts lycopene into α-carotene and β-carotene and is an essential reaction for the production of β-carotene, which has important physiological functions in algae [12, 13]. The lycopene β cyclase (LCYB) gene is related directly to the production of β-carotene, and therefore it is necessary to study this enzyme. It has been reported that modification of the LCYB gene affects the accumulation of its metabolites and the response to abiotic stress in some photosynthetic plants. For example, in transgenic sweet potatoes, IbLCYB2 was shown to enhance abiotic stress tolerance and carotenoid content, including α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, and zeaxanthin [14]. Heterologous overexpression of DcLCYB1 in carrots was reported to increase Nicotiana tabacum fitness through positive regulation of the carotenoid, gibberellin, and chlorophyll pathways, with higher β-carotene levels reflecting increased xanthophyll production [15]. The accumulation of β-carotene in potato tubers was also shown to be regulated by StLCYB expression, while in tobacco, overexpression of NtLCYB led to increased accumulation of β-carotene, violaxanthin, lutein, and neoxanthin [16]. The LCYB gene has been cloned from Dunaliella species [17], although its functional characterization in the carotenoid metabolic pathway has not been studied.

Carotenoids are an important photosynthetic pigment related to the photosynthetic system. Their synthesis is a highly complex process and is stimulated by conditions that hinder cell division such as light, high temperatures, low nitrogen concentrations, or any event that produces high concentrations of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) [18-20]. Among these factors, light promotes the accumulation of carotenoids in photosynthetic organisms, and is divided into different qualities and intensities according to wavelength and density [21]. In lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Banchu Red Fire’ and ‘Red Cross’), the carotenoid content was shown to be increased significantly under blue light (BL) stress [22, 23]. Huang et al. also reported that light-regulated changes in carotenoid metabolism during grapefruit ripening, with treatment of red light (RL) transmission causing 62%higher total carotenoid content than natural light [24]. Fu et al. showed that shading promoted the accumulation of carotenoids in tea, especially α-carotenoids and β-carotene [25]. A small number of studies have investigated the effect of different light qualities on carotenoid levels in photosynthetic organisms. In this regard, the unicellular alga D. salina is an ideal model organism for studying the production of natural carotenoids, as it has the advantages of rapid growth and no cell wall structure. In this study, we functionally identified and overexpressed DsLCYB to investigate whether it enhanced the accumulation of carotenoids and altered carotenoid composition in D. salina under light stress.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Growth Conditions

D. salina (also named FACHB-435) was obtained from the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China), and was passaged and preserved by our laboratory [26]. D. salina was cultivated in liquid DeWalnés medium containing 1.5 M NaCl [26, 27] and then grown with shaking [28] under different light conditions including black light (BL), 80 μmol (photons)/m2/s, red light (RL), 80 μmol/m2/s, and white light (WL, 80 μmol/m2/s) using SuperFlux LED, at 26 ± 1°C and 16/8 h (light/dark). When the number of algal cells under RL was about 2×106 cells/ml, this was considered as the initial sampling time point (0 h). According to previous experimental results in our laboratory, the pigment content begins to show significant differences under different light conditions at this time. The algal cells were collected after 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, with 3 biological replicates obtained at each experimental time point. All the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at -80°C.

Gene Expression Analysis

The total RNA of each sample was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) [29]. Reverse transcription was performed with the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan), while RT-qPCR was performed on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA) with SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara) using TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa). The specific primers are listed in Table S1, with the β-tubulin gene used as an internal reference. Three independent biological and technical replicates of each sample were subjected to RT-qPCR analysis.

Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis of DsLCYB

The 30 identified LCYB protein sequences from the 30 species were aligned using two multiple alignment methods (ClustalW and MUSCLE). The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA7 software [30]. Bootstrap (BS) values were inferred from 1000 replicates. The radial tree was drawn using FigTree v1.3.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree), and the MEME online program (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/intro.htmL) was used to identify conserved motifs in the full-length identified LCYB proteins [31]. To visualize the conserved motifs, the sequences were analyzed with WEB LOGO programs (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu).

Heterologous Expression of DsLCYB in E. coli BL21 (DE3) Cells

The full-length CDS of DsLCYB was amplified by PCR (primers shown in Table S2) using synthetic cDNA as the template, and then inserted into the pET-28a (+) plasmid (P0023, Miaoling Bioscience & Technology Co., Ltd., China) and further transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells. The transformed E. coli-pET-28a(+)-DsLCYB cells were grown separately at 37°C in LB medium containing kanamycin until the OD600 reached 0.5~0.6. Isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was then added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM. Cultivation was continued at 16°C and 180 rpm/min for 24 h. The cells were harvested and re-suspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl and then disrupted by ultra-sonication, followed by centrifugation to obtain the supernatant. The recombinant proteins were purified by loading them onto a Ni-Sepharose 6FF column (GE Healthcare, USA). His-tagged target proteins were eluted with imidazole at concentrations ranging from 50 to 300 mM in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer. The purity and molecular weight of R-DsLCYB were determined using 7% (W V1) sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), with the protein bands visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.

Construction of Transgenic Algae

Because D. salina cells are sensitive to chloramphenicol, the modified pGreen0029-Cmr vector was used as the D. salina transformation vector [26]. To obtain pGreen-0029-Cmr-DsLCYB-overexpressing strains, the full-length CDS of DsLCYB was amplified by PCR (primers shown in Table S2) and then inserted into the modified pGreen0029-Cmr vector. D. salina transformation was performed according to the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method of Claudia et al. [32], with slight modifications [26].

(1) The liquid algae cells in the log phase were collected and cultured for 7~10 days in DeWalne’s medium with a final concentration of 0.5 M NaCl and 5% agar until the algae grew well. This culture was used for the later Pseudomonas transformation experiments.

(2) The obtained vector pGreen-0029-Cmr-DsLCYB-oe and empty vector pGreen-0029-Cmr were transformed into Pseudomonas GV3101 according to the transformation instructions. A single colony of Pseudomonas was then re-inoculated into 5 ml of fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) resistant (rifampicin + chloramphenicol + gentamicin) medium, and shaken at 28 ° to OD600≈0.5.

(3) 5 μl of acetosyringone (100 mg/ml) was added to 5 ml of Pseudomonas culture solution in step (2), and cultured at 28°C for 3~4 h.

(4) 500 μl of the bacterial solution in the above step (3) was drawn and spread evenly on the algal plate in step (1), and cultivated in the dark at 25°C for 2 days.

(5) Step (4); the culture plate was washed with fresh medium containing chloramphenicol (400 μg/ml) and cefotaxime (100 μg/ml), with the algal fluid then collected by centrifugation at 5,000 ×g for 3 min. The algal cells were resuspended again in a fresh medium containing the same resistance concentration, and finally, the resistance screening was performed again on the solid plate for 7~10 days. The single algal colonies were picked for screening and expanded culture.

Measurement of Total Carotenoid and Chlorophyll Content

The total carotenoid and chlorophyll contents were monitored at regular intervals by measuring optical density at OD654 in 80% (v/v) acetone using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV 2550, Shimadzu, Japan) [33]. An algal liquid OD654≈0.3 under RL conditions was taken as the initial sample collection time point, and then a certain volume of algal cells was collected under the three light conditions, followed by the addition 80% acetone solution and resuspension of the algal cells by vortex shaking. The extraction was carried out in the dark for about 30 min until the algal cells were completely decolorized to an off-white color, followed by centrifugation to draw off the supernatant and dilution of the sample with 80% acetone. The absorbance values were measured using a UV spectrophotometer at 470, 647, and 663 nm, with 80% acetone used as the blank control. Finally, the data were processed according to the reported formulas for carotenoids and photosynthetic pigments [34].

Ca=12.21×A6632.81×A646 (1)
Cb=20.13×A6465.03×A663 (2)
Car=1000×A4703.27×Ca104×Cb229 (3)
unit pigment content = Cx×V×Dilution factorFW (4)

In formula: Cx-Pigment concentration/mg·L-1; V- Extract volume/ml; FW- fresh weight/g.

Carotenoid Components in the DsLCYB Transplastomic and Wild-Type Strain

To examine the effect of DsLCYB overexpression on the distribution of carotenoid components in D. salina, the algae cells with significant accumulation of carotenoids and a total amount that reached a maximum OD654≈0.6 were collected. All samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The carotenoid composition (α-carotene, lutein, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin, and violaxanthin) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [35-37]. For HPLC analysis, the collected dry sample was dissolved in 200 μl of acetonitrile: methanol (20:80) solution containing 0.1% BHT. A 20 μl aliquot was then injected and separated on a YMC carotenoid S-3 um (150*4.6 mM) column at 40°C and a flow rate of 1 ml/min, with MeOH as mobile phase A and MeOH/MTBE/H2O (20: 75: 5, v/v) as mobile phase B.

Cell Morphology, Growing Analysis in the DsLCYB Transplastomic and Wild-Type Strain

The cell morphology of the wild-type and DsLCYB-oe1-transformed strain was observed by light microscopy (Leica, Germany). Finally, we studied the effect of the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant on the growth of D. salina. The initial number of algal cells in each experimental group was the same, with culture growth monitored at regular intervals under different light conditions for 14 days by measuring the optical density at OD654 using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV 2550, Shimadzu).

Statistical Analysis

The obtained experimental data were plotted with GraphPad Prism7 software. Then, statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test in a two-tailed analysis. p-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**) and <0.001 (***) were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Sequence Analysis and Relative Expression of DsLCYB in the D. salina Wild-Type Strain and Transformants

A 1,794 bp, full-length cDNA of LCYB from D. salina was isolated by PCR amplification technology. The full-length cDNA of the LCYB gene was designated DsLCYB. The ORF encoded a polypeptide of 597 amino acid residues with a predicted relative molecular mass of 65.69 kDa (Fig. S1). The analysis of the conserved domains showed that the DsLCYB protein contained the typical domains of the LCYB protein family, such as a dinucleotide-binding signature, an LCY-specific motif, cyclase motifs I and II, a charged region, two predicted TM helices, and three β-LCY CAD regions (catalytic activity domain) (Fig. S2). Phylogenetic analysis suggested that higher plants and eukaryotic green algae share a common ancestor and that DsLCYB clustered with green algae (Fig. S3A). To further study the conserved domains, MEME [31] was used to identify the motifs of 31 LCYB proteins, with the top 10 conserved motifs then screened out. Three motifs, motif 1, motif 3, and motif 7- were annotated as the NADB domain and cyclase motifs (Fig. S3B). The LCYBs from the same clade usually have similar conserved domains or motif compositions, indicating that the functions of these proteins were similar.

The DsLCYB gene fragment was successfully inserted into the linearized vector pGreen-0029-Cmr (Fig. 1A), with three overexpression strains (DsLCYB-oe1, DsLCYB-oe2, DsLCYB-oe3) obtained after screening for 7~10 days with chloramphenicol at a concentration of 400 μg/ml (Fig. 1B). We next quantified and compared the expression levels of DsLCYB in the D. salina transformants with that of the wild-type strain, in which the transcription level of DsLCYB was 1, and which was also used as the negative control. Meanwhile, the DsLCYB-oe1, DsLCYB-oe2, and DsLCYB-oe3 transformants showed significant increases in LCYB transcript levels, reaching 5.2-, 3.5-, and 4.4-fold higher than that of the wild-type strain, respectively (Fig. 1C). For the following analyses, we selected the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant that grew rapidly at higher antibiotic concentrations and with the best transformation effect. The regularity of the response to DsLCYB of the wild type and overexpressing lines under different light stress was determined using RT-qPCR. The results showed that the transcript level of DsLCYB was higher in the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant strain than that of the wild-type strain under different lighting stress. The expression of DsLCYB was induced strongly by WL, and RL, and peaked at 48 h (2.22-fold, and 5.50-fold, respectively). However, there was no significant change for 48 h under BL conditions. It was presumed that this time had the greatest impact on carotenoid synthesis (Fig. 1D). To further characterize the catalytic properties of DsLCYB, the gene was heterologously expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing DsLCYB recombinant plasmid was induced by IPTG overnight, broken by ultrasound, and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography to obtain the purified recombinant protein DsLCYB. The results of SDS-PAGE detection showed that the positions of the purified recombinant protein band were consistent with the predicted molecular weight of the fusion protein (the size of the fusion tag was about 20 kDa), and that the protein band was single, with no obvious foreign bands around, and a purity that met the requirements of subsequent experiments (Fig. 1E).

Fig. 1. Relative transcription level analysis and heterologous expression of DsLCYB (A) Vector maps of pGreen-0029-Cmr and pGreen-0029-Cmr-DsLCYB constructed for overexpression in D. salina.

Fig. 1

(B) Screening of the wild-type and transformed lines for resistance using chloramphenicol (400 μg/ml). (C) Gene expression level of DsLCYB in the wild-type and DsLCYB transplastomic under the same physiological conditions. (D) Gene expression level of DsLCYB in the wild-type and overexpressed strain was measured by RT-qPCR under different lighting conditions, with the β- tubulin gene was used as an internal reference. (E) The SDS-PAGE of purified DsLCYB recombinant protein. The arrow pointed the target protein band; Lane M, protein marker (kDa). WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the student's test. Error bars indicate standard error. p values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

Carotenoid Content and Components of D. salina Wild-Type Strain and Transformants under Different Light Conditions

We successfully obtained a DsLCYB-oe1 transgenic strain to determine whether DsLCYB promoted the accumulation of β-carotene and affected the proportional distribution of the main components. First, we measured carotenoid production in the wild-type strain and DsLCYB-oe1 transformant within 72 h of light stress and showed that the accumulation of carotenoids reached a peak at 48 h (Fig. S4). In the wild-type strain, the highest carotenoid was produced at about 4.22, 7.14, and 3.48 mg/g of light culture, respectively. In comparison, the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant produced carotenoid at 5.16, 8.46, and 3.92 mg/g of culture under the same conditions, respectively. Therefore, the total carotenoid production in the transformant tended to be higher than that in the wild-type strain (up to 1.22-, 1.21-, and 1.12-fold higher, respectively). Moreover, compared with WL and BL stresses, the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant significantly increased total carotenoid production (1.67- and 2.2-fold, respectively) under RL (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, carotenoid composition measured by HPLC showed that the contents of β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin in the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant were increased significantly compared with those in the wild type (2.5-3.3 μg/g (1.5-1.8 fold) and 0.36-0.47 μg/g (1.1-1.3 fold), respectively Figs. 2B, 2C). However, there were no significant changes in the content of zeaxanthin and lutein (Figs. 2D and 2E). In addition, xanthophyll only decreased significantly under BL conditions (Fig. 2F). These results showed that overexpression of DsLCYB promoted the accumulation of carotenoids in D. salina.

Fig. 2. The content of total carotenoids and components in D. salina were measured by spectrophotometer and HPLC respectively.

Fig. 2

(A) Content of total carotenoids. (B) β-carotene, (C) β-cryptoxanthin, (D) zeaxanthin, (E) α- carotene, and (F) xanthophyll. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the student's test. Error bars indicate standard error. p values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

Expression Analysis of Carotenoid Biosynthesis Pathway and Responsive Genes

To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of carotenoid biosynthesis, the expression levels of the upstream genes of carotenoid synthesis (DsGPPS, DsPSY, DsPDS, DsZDS, DsCRTISO), lycopene cyclase (DsLCYB, DsLCYE), α-carotenoid downstream gene (DsCYP), and β-carotene downstream gene (DsBCH) were detected by RT-qPCR. DsGGPS, DsPDS, and DsZDS were upregulated significantly in the transgenic D. salina overexpressing DsLCYB-oe1 under different light conditions. DsPSY and DsCRTISO were induced to become upregulated under WL and RL stresses. Regarding the two enzymes involved in the cyclization of lycopene, DsLCYB was upregulated significantly in the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant (Fig. 1A), whereas DsLCYE was downregulated significantly at the same time. These changes affected the metabolic flow of carotenoids and the accumulation of downstream products. The downstream of carotenoid genes encoding DsBCH and DsCYP were upregulated significantly in the transgenic line only under RL compared to that observed in control plants (Figs. 3A and B).

Fig. 3. Brief schematic of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in algae and transcriptional levels of genes involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis in DsLCYB-oe1 over-expressing transformant under different lighting conditions.

Fig. 3

Gene expression level of DsGGPS; DsPSY; DsPDS; DsZDS; DsCRTISO; DsBCH; DsLCYE; DsCYP were measured by RT-qPCR, and β-tubulin was set as control. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the student's test. Error bars indicate standard error. p values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically. GGPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; CRTISO, carotene isomerase; BCH, β-carotene hydroxylase; LCYB, lycopene β-cyclase; LCYE, lycopene ε-cyclase; CYP, cytochrome P450. Genes are marked up-regulated in red and downregulated are marked in blue.

Growth and Photosynthesis Analysis in the DsLCYB Transplastomic

Previous results showed that carotenoids accumulated abundantly in the DsLCYB-oe1 overexpressor, and it was hypothesized that the increase in plant biomass may be due to these additional disturbances that are related directly to the structure-function in the photosynthetic apparatus. Therefore, we evaluated the cell morphology and growth parameters in these lines.

First, cell morphology was observed by light microscopy in the wild-type and transformed algae. Compared with the wild type, no changes in the morphological structure of the cells were observed in the overexpression system (Figs. 4A, 4B). In contrast, cell debris was present in the transformation system, indicating that some algal cells were broken after transformation without affecting cell morphology, thereby not affecting the growth of living algal cells (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4. Morphology and growth analysis of D. salina.

Fig. 4

The morphology of wild-type and transformant was shown by electron microscopy images of algal cells in the logarithmic phase (A, B). Bars = 100 μm. (A) Cell morphology of wild-type D. salina (B) Cell morphology of DsLCYB-oe1 overexpressor (C) Growth curves of wild-type and transformant under different light culture conditions using a Neubauer hemocytometer for 14 d. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light.

We then investigated the effect of the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant on the growth of D. salina. The initial number of algal cells in each experimental group was the same, and the growth curves of the different algal strains were then monitored under different light conditions for 14 days. Growth was measured in terms of cell numbers using a Neubauer hemocytometer. In the wild-type strain culture, the algal cell density increased from the initial density of 1 × 105 cells/ml to 7 × 106 cells/ml 12 days post-inoculation. However, in the DsLCYB-oe1 culture, algal cell density reached a plateau at 14 days post-inoculation at a cell density of 7 × 106 cells/ml (Fig. 4C).

Finally, the results showed that the contents of total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b reached the highest at 48 h (Fig. S5). The content of total chlorophyll in the wild-type and transformed line under RL was significantly higher (32.5 mg/g) than that observed under WL (19.2 mg/g) and BL (14.4 mg/g) conditions. Meanwhile, the data analysis showed that the chlorophyll content of the DsLCYB-oe1 transformed line followed an increasing trend, which was 1.25-1.28, 1.07-1.12, and 1.09-1.11-fold higher than that of control plants under light stress treatments, respectively. The percentage content of chlorophyll and chlorophyll a/b at 48 h was increased significantly in the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant compared with that in the wild type (Figs. 5A and 5B).

Fig. 5. Content chlorophyll of D. salina in the wild-type and overexpression strain were measured by spectrophotometer at 48 h under different lighting conditions.

Fig. 5

(A) The total chlorophyll content. (B) The chlorophyll a/b content percentage of total chlorophyll content. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the student's test. Error bars indicate standard error. p values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

Discussion

β-Carotene, a precursor of vitamin A, has important physiological functions and effectively prevents damage caused by oxidative stress, methotrexate-induced oxidative damage, and apoptosis [38, 39]. An ideal model organism, D. salina, has been shown to accumulate a large amount of β-carotene under stress caused by environmental factors [18-20]. The efficient production of β-carotene by microalgae is a promising breeding goal. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of β-carotene metabolism and biosynthesis will allow researchers to develop more efficient ways to increase β-carotene content for industrial production applications.

The regulation of DsLCYB on metabolic flux distribution of carotenoid biosynthesis is directional. In photosynthetic organisms, the biosynthetic pathway of carotenoids is divided into two main metabolic branches regulated by LCYE and LCYB, which produce α- and β-carotene, respectively [12, 40]. In the current study, the overexpression of the DsLCYB gene in transgenic algae enhanced the conversion of lycopene to the β-carotene metabolic branch, thereby increasing the yields of β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin in the transformants. Significantly, the content of the important product, xanthophyll, in the α-branch, was found to be insignificantly reduced in DsLCYB-oe1 algae under BL conditions, while there was no significant change in α-carotenoid content. In contrast, researchers have reported that key lycopene cyclases (α and β cyclases) in the carotenoid synthesis pathway altered carbon flow in the branch of α- and β-carotene in higher photosynthetic plants [41]. It has also been reported that LCYB is transformed in some photosynthetic organisms (wheat [42], Daucus carota [15], sweet potato [14], and tobacco [43]), with overexpression improving carotenoid content (α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin), photosynthetic efficiency, and abiotic stress tolerance. The directional regulation of the metabolic influx to α- or β-carotene was also demonstrated in other lower microalgae. The overexpression of the LCYE gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii increased the content of lutein but did not inhibit the production of β-carotene [44]. These results indicated that the regulation of the carotenoid metabolic cyclases (α and β cyclases) in lower microalgae can be orientated towards accumulation of α- or β-branched metabolites, and that microalgae are beneficial for the targeted and rapid production of specific carotenoid products. Furthermore, the upregulation of the DsLCYB gene accelerated metabolic flux to the β-carotene metabolic branch in the transformants. This resulted in upregulation of upstream and downstream genes involved in carotenoid synthesis, with the exception of DsCYP. Therefore, we showed that β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin content increased significantly (1.13-2.41-fold, 1.12-1.38-fold, respectively)(Figs. 2B and 2C), which was consistent with accelerated carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation of additional carotenoids.

The photosynthetic efficiency of photosynthetic organisms affects the carotenoid synthesis. A study by Ryu et al. [45] showed that carotenoid biosynthesis in cyanobacteria was related to photosynthesis. Research carried out by Busch et al. [46] demonstrated that the chlorophyll content of tobacco leaves could be influenced by the overexpression of NtPSY, with the ratio of chlorophyll to carotenoids being altered. The chlorophyll-to-carotenoids mole ratio was also analyzed in the current study, and was calculated by using the average content of carotenoids and chlorophyll shown in Figs. 2A and 5A. This showed that extra chlorophyll accumulated in D. salina, with the mole ratio of chlorophyll to carotenoids varying significantly in the transgenic line, (3.64 in the DsLCYB-oe1 transformant, and 4.07 in the control group). This suggested that chlorophyll content, which correlates with photosynthesis, was involved in the adaption to the impact caused by overexpression. The content per algal cell was also analyzed in the current study, and was calculated by using the average content of carotenoids and cell density shown in Figs. 2A and 4C. The results showed that the content of carotenoids in each algal cell varied significantly between the transgenic line and wild type (0.89 pg/cell in DsLCYB-oe1 overexpressor, and 0.62 pg/cell in the control group) at 48 h under red stress. This suggested that carotenoid production increased due to an increase in unit cell yield.

In conclusion, DsLCYB was cloned and analyzed for functional characterization from D. salina. Our results showed that its overexpression significantly increased carotenoid content and improved photosynthesis in D. salina. Significantly, overexpression of DsLCYB promoted the flow of carotenoid metabolism to the β-branch of the pathway leading to accumulation of β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin, thereby changing the ratio of carotenoid components without having negative effects on their growth and lutein content. These studies provide a basis for regulating the directional changes of carotenoid synthesis and carotenoid composition ratio at the transcriptional level and accordingly have major industrial significance.

Relative Transcription Level Analysis and Heterologous Expression of DsLCYB

(A) Vector maps of pGreen-0029-Cmr and pGreen-0029-Cmr-DsLCYB constructed for overexpression in D. salina. (B) Screening of the wild-type and transformed lines for resistance using chloramphenicol (400 μg/ml). (C) Gene expression level of DsLCYB in the wild-type and DsLCYB transplastomic under the same physiological conditions. (D) Gene expression levels of DsLCYB in the wild-type and overexpressed strains were measured by RT-qPCR under different lighting conditions, with the β-tubulin gene used as an internal reference. (E) The SDS-PAGE of purified DsLCYB recombinant protein. The arrow indicates the target protein band; Lane M, protein marker (kDa). WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by Student's t-test. Error bars indicate standard error. p-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and < 0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

The Content of Total Carotenoids and Components in D. salina were Measured by Spectrophotometer and HPLC Respectively

(A) Content of total carotenoids. (B) β-carotene, (C) β-cryptoxanthin, (D) zeaxanthin, (E) α-carotene, and (F) xanthophyll. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the Student's t-test. Error bars indicate standard error. p-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

Brief Schematic of the Carotenoid Biosynthesis Pathway in Algae and Transcriptional Levels of Genes Involved in the Carotenoid Biosynthesis in DsLCYB-oe1 Overexpressing Transformant under Different Lighting Conditions

Gene expression levels of DsGGPS; DsPSY; DsPDS; DsZDS; DsCRTISO; DsBCH; DsLCYE; DsCYP were measured by RT-qPCR, and β-tubulin was set as control. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the Student's t-test. Error bars indicate standard error. p-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically. GGPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; CRTISO, carotene isomerase; BCH, β-carotene hydroxylase; LCYB, lycopene β-cyclase; LCYE, lycopene ε-cyclase; CYP, cytochrome P450. Genes are marked upregulated in red and downregulated are marked in blue.

Morphology and Growth Analysis of D. salina

The morphology of wild type and transformant was shown by electron microscopy images of algal cells in the logarithmic phase (A, B). Bars = 100 μm. (A) Cell morphology of wild-type D. salina (B) Cell morphology of DsLCYB-oe1 overexpressor (C) Growth curves of wild type and transformant under different light culture conditions using a Neubauer hemocytometer for 14 days. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light.

Content Chlorophyll of D. salina in the Wild-type and Overexpression Strain Were Measured by Spectrophotometer at 48 h under Different Lighting Conditions

(A) The total chlorophyll content. (B) The chlorophyll a/b content percentage of total chlorophyll content. WL: white light, RL: red light, BL: blue light. The significant difference between the two groups was obtained by the Student's t-test. Error bars indicate standard error. p-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were considered to be significant statistically.

Supplemental Materials

Supplementary data for this paper are available on-line only at http://jmb.or.kr.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171473, 32071479, 31670078), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2018SCUH0072); Sichuan Science and Technology Bureau (2020YFH0076), Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2019-YF05-02317-SN, 2020-GH02-00037-HZ)." with "This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171473, 32071479, 32271535, 31670078), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2018SCUH0072); Sichuan Science and Technology Bureau (2021YJ0024, 2022NSFSC0243, 2022NSFSC0119), Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2020-GH02-00037-HZ).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hirschberg J. Carotenoid biosynthesis in flowering plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:210–218. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00163-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fraser PD, Bramley PM. The biosynthesis and nutritional uses of carotenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004;43:228–265. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takaichi S. Carotenoids in algae: distributions, biosynthesis, and functions. Mar. Drugs. 2011;9:1101–1118. doi: 10.3390/md9061101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu C, Hu B, Cheng Y, Guo Y, Yao W, Qian H. Carotenoids from fungi and microalgae: a review on their recent production, extraction, and developments. Bioresour. Technol. 2021;337:125398. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fiedor J, Burda K. Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients. 2014;6:466–488. doi: 10.3390/nu6020466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leo MA, Lieber CS. Alcohol, vitamin a, and beta-carotene: adverse interactions, including hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:1071–1085. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grune T, Lietz G, Palou A, Ross AC, Stahl W, Tang G, et al. β-carotene is an important vitamin a source for humans. J. Nutr. 2010;140:2268s–2285s. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.119024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burri BJ. Beta-cryptoxanthin as a source of vitamin A. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2015;95:1786–94. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fukushima Y, Taguchi C, Kishimoto Y, Kondo K. Japanese carotenoid database with α- and β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, lycopene, and fucoxanthin and intake in adult women. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2021;7:1–12. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenhauer B, Natoli S, Liew G, Flood VM. Lutein and zeaxanthin-food sources, bioavailability and dietary variety in agerelated macular degeneration protection. Nutrients. 2017;9:120. doi: 10.3390/nu9020120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Demmig-Adams B, López-Pozo M, Stewart JJ, Adams WW., 3rd Zeaxanthin and lutein: Photoprotectors, anti-inflammatories, and brain food. Molecules. 2020;25:3607. doi: 10.3390/molecules25163607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cuttriss AJ, Chubb AC, Alawady A, Grimm B, Pogson BJ. Regulation of lutein biosynthesis and prolamellar body formation in arabidopsis. Funct. Plant Biol. 2007;34:663–672. doi: 10.1071/FP07034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cazzonelli CI, Cuttriss AJ, Cossetto SB, Pye W, Crisp P, Whelan J, et al. Regulation of carotenoid composition and shoot branching in arabidopsis by a chromatin modifying histone methyltransferase, sdg8. Plant Cell. 2009;21:39–53. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kang C, Zhai H, Xue L, Zhao N, He S, Liu Q. A lycopene β-cyclase gene, iblcyb2, enhances carotenoid contents and abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic sweet potato. Plant Sci. 2018;272:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moreno JC, Cerda A, Simpson K, Lopez-Diaz I, Carrera E, Handford M, et al. Increased nicotiana tabacum fitness through positive regulation of carotenoid, gibberellin and chlorophyll pathways promoted by Daucus carota lycopene-cyclase (dclcyb1) expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2016;67:2325–2338. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Song X, Zhu WJ, Tang RM, Cai J, Yang Q. Over-expression of stlcyb increases β-carotene accumulation in potato tubers. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2016;10:95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11816-016-0390-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liang MH, Lu Y, Chen HH, Jiang JG. The salt-regulated element in the promoter of lycopene β-cyclase gene confers a salt regulatory pattern in carotenogenesis of Dunaliella bardawil. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;19:982–989. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lamers PP, Janssen M, De Vos RC, Bino RJ, Wijffels RH. Carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in nitrogen-starved Dunaliella salina, a unicellular green mi-croalga. J. Biotechol. 2012;162:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fazeli MR, Tofighi H, Samadi N, Jamalifar H. Effects of salinity on beta-carotene production by Dunaliella tertiolecta dccbc26 isolated from the urmia salt lake, north of Iran. Bioresour. Technol. 2007;97:2453–2456. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borowitzka MA, Borowitzka LJ, Kessly D. Effects of salinity increase on carotenoid accumulation in the green alga Dunaliella salina. J. Appl. Phycol. 1990;2:111–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00023372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Llorente B, Martinez-Garcia JF, Stange C, Rodriguez-Concepcion M. Illu-minating colors: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation by light. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017;37:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qian L, Kubota C. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009;67:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hashida SN, Yoshihara T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. Hortscience. 2010;45:414–415. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.12.1809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang X, Hu L, Kong W, Yang C, Xi W. Red light-transmittance bagging promotes carotenoid accumulation of grapefruit during ripening. Commun. Biol. 2022;5:303. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03270-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen Y, Zhou B, Li J, Tang H, Zeng L, Chen Q, et al. Effects of long-term non-pruning on main quality constituents in 'Dancong' tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves based on proteomics and metabolomics analysis. Foods. 2021;10:2649. doi: 10.3390/foods10112649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang Z, Cao X, Zhang Y, Jiang J, Qiao D, Xu H, et al. Two splice variants of the dsmek1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (mapkk) are involved in salt stress regulation in Dunaliella salina in different ways. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2020;13:147. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01786-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Priyanka S, Kirubagaran R, Leema J. Optimization of algal culture medium for zeaxanthin production by Dunaliella tertiolecta: an rsm based approach. Curr. Sci. 2020;119 doi: 10.18520/cs/v119/i12/1997-2005. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v119/i12/1997-2005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goyal A. Osmoregulation in Dunaliella, Part II: Photosynthesis and starch contribute carbon for glycerol synthesis during a salt stress in Dunaliella tertiolecta. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007;45:705–710. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rio DC, Ares M, Jr, Hannon GJ, Nilsen TW. Purification of RNA using TRIzol (TRI reagent) Cold Spring Harb Protocol. 2010;2010:pdb.prot5439. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. Mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. Meme suite: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W202–208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Norzagaray-Valenzuela CD, Germán-Báez LJ, Valdez-Flores MA, Hernández-Verdugo S, Shelton LM, Valdez-Ortiz A. Establishment of an efficient genetic transformation method in Dunaliella tertiolecta mediated by agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2018;150:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mechela A, Schwenkert S, Soll J. A brief history of thylakoid biogenesis. Open Biol. 2019;9:180237. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy-sciencedirect. BBA-Bioenerg. 1989;975:384–394. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Irakli MN, Samanidou VF, Papadoyannis IN. Development and validation of an HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of tocopherols, tocotrienols and carotenoids in cere-als after solid-phase extraction. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2011;34:1375–1382. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201100077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Escudero-Gilete ML, Vicario IM, Heredia FJ. Study of the influence of carotenoid structure and individual carotenoids in the qualitative and quantitative attributes of orange juice colour. Food Res. Int. 2010;43:1289–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rasmussen HM, Muzhingi T, Eggert EMR, Johnson EJ. Lutein, zeaxanthin, meso-zeaxanthin content in egg yolk and their absence in fish and seafood. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2012;27:139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2012.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vardi N, Parlakpinar H, Ozturk F, Ates B, Gul M, Cetin A. Potent protective effect of apricot and -carotene on methotrexateinduced intestinal oxidative damage in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46:3015–3022. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vardi N, Parlakpinar H, Ates B. The protective effects of prunus arme-niaca l (apricot) against methotrexate-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis in rat kidney. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2013;69:371–381. doi: 10.1007/s13105-012-0219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cazzonelli CI, Cuttriss AJ, Cossetto SB, Pye W, Crisp P, Whelan J, et al. Regulation of carotenoid composition and shoot branching in arabidopsis by a chromatin modifying histone methyltransferase, sdg8. Plant Cell. 2009;21:39–53. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bohne F, Linden H. Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in response to light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1579:26–34. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4781(02)00500-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zeng J, Wang C, Chen X, Zang M, Yuan C, Wang X, et al. The lycopene β-cyclase plays a significant role in provitamin a biosynthesis in wheat endosperm. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0514-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen X, Han H, Jiang P, Nie L, Bao H, Fan P, et al. Transformation of b-lycopene cyclase genes from Salicornia europaea and arabidopsis conferred salt tolerance in ara-bidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52:909–921. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tokunaga S, Morimoto D, Koyama T, Kubo Y, Shiroi M, Ohara K, et al. Enhanced lutein production in chlamydomonas reinhardtii by overexpression of the lycopene ep-silon cyclase gene. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021;193:1967–1978. doi: 10.1007/s12010-021-03524-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ryu JY, Song JY, Chung Y, Park YM, Chow WS, Park YI. Transcript accumulation of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 during the dark-to-light transition is mediated by photosynthetic electron transport. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010;4:149–155. doi: 10.1007/s11816-010-0130-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Busch M, Seuter A, Hain R. Functional analysis of the early steps of carotenoid biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2002;128:439–453. doi: 10.1104/pp.010573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data for this paper are available on-line only at http://jmb.or.kr.


Articles from Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology

RESOURCES