Abstract
Deuterated water (2H2O) is a widely used tracer of carbohydrate biosynthesis in both preclinical and clinical settings, but the significant kinetic isotope effects (KIE) of 2H can distort metabolic information and mediate toxicity. 18O‐water (H2 18O) has no significant KIE and is incorporated into specific carbohydrate oxygens via well‐defined mechanisms, but to date it has not been evaluated in any animal model. Mice were given H2 18O during overnight feeding and 18O‐enrichments of liver glycogen, triglyceride glycerol (TG), and blood glucose were quantified by 13C NMR and mass spectrometry (MS). Enrichment of oxygens 5 and 6 relative to body water informed indirect pathway contributions from the Krebs cycle and triose phosphate sources. Compared with mice fed normal chow (NC), mice whose NC was supplemented with a fructose/glucose mix (i.e., a high sugar [HS] diet) had significantly higher indirect pathway contributions from triose phosphate sources, consistent with fructose glycogenesis. Blood glucose and liver TG 18O‐enrichments were quantified by MS. Blood glucose 18O‐enrichment was significantly higher for HS versus NC mice and was consistent with gluconeogenic fructose metabolism. TG 18O‐enrichment was extensive for both NC and HS mice, indicating a high turnover of liver triglyceride, independent of diet. Thus H2 18O informs hepatic carbohydrate biosynthesis in similar detail to 2H2O but without KIE‐associated risks.
Keywords: fructose, gluconeogenesis, glycogenesis, isotope shift, triose phosphates
18O‐enrichment of liver glycogen, triglyceride glycerol, and blood glucose of mice given 18O‐water during overnight feeding was quantified by 13C NMR and MS. Glycogen 18O‐enrichment of oxygens 3, 5, and 6 from isotope‐shifted 13C signals informed indirect pathway contributions from different sources. Glucose 18O‐enrichment by LC–MS/MS yielded an all‐oxygens average, while GC–MS provided average estimates of oxygens 2–5, 2–4, and 4–6, evaluating gluconeogenesis. Triglyceride glycerol 18O‐enrichment, measured by GC–MS, indicated high liver turnover rates.

Abbreviations used
- 2H2O
water enriched with deuterium
- DBS
dried blood spot
- GC–MS
gas chromatography mass spectrometry
- H2 18O
water enriched with oxygen‐18
- HS
chow supplemented with fructose/glucose mix (i.e., a high sugar diet)
- KIE
kinetic isotope effects
- LC–MS/MS
liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
- MAG
monoacetone glucose
- NC
normal chow
- TAMAG
3,5,6‐tri‐O‐[1‐13C]acetyl monoacetone glucose
1. INTRODUCTION
Water enriched with 3H or 2H has been widely used for the study of biosynthetic activities in whole organisms, including the endogenous synthesis of glucose and glycogen. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 An important advantage of this approach over methods involving 13C‐labeled substrates is that labeled water rapidly distributes throughout the entire organism, thereby providing constant precursor enrichment for all tissues that can be easily measured from blood, saliva, or urine. Moreover, for both glucose and glycogen, the incorporation of water hydrogen into certain product positions is independent of precursor sources, while the enrichment of other positions is specific to a particular precursor source. 4 , 6 , 7 Thus, this approach provides precise estimates of fractional synthetic or turnover rates of glucose or glycogen irrespective of the available precursors, while at the same time resolving the contributions of different precursors to the overall synthesis rate. The principal uncertainties associated with the use of hydrogen isotopes in this manner include significant discrimination against enrichment of certain product positions because of strong kinetic isotope effects (KIE). 8 Discrimination of 2H incorporation from water into position 2 of glycogen has been observed in both mice and fish. 9 , 10 Nevertheless, methods for quantifying positional 2H‐enrichments of glucose and glycogen have been developed for both mass spectrometry (MS) 11 , 12 and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. 7 , 13 , 14 , 15
The oxygens of water also undergo exchanges and/or additions with precursors of glucose and glycogen synthesis, hence in the presence of 18O‐enriched water (H2 18O), the hexose oxygens become enriched with 18O (Figure 1). In contrast to hydrogen isotopes, the much smaller relative mass difference between 18O and 16O means the absence of significant isotope discrimination because of KIE. We recently demonstrated 18O‐incorporation from H2 18O into the oxygens of glucose‐6‐phosphate in hemolysate preparations that was in accordance with known exchange mechanisms acting at the triose and hexose phosphate levels. 16 These measurements were performed by 13C NMR analysis of the monoacetone glucose derivative and quantification of the isotope‐shifted 18O‐signals. The objective of the present study was to translate this approach into animal models and test the applicability of H2 18O as a tracer for hepatic carbohydrate biosynthesis. Because the 18O‐enrichment levels achievable in vivo are typically less than in vitro, we sought to increase the sensitivity of our 13C NMR measurements through a novel glucose derivative: 3,5,6‐tri‐O‐[1‐13C]acetyl monoacetone glucose (TAMAG). For this derivative, the number of 13C reporter nuclei for oxygens 3, 5, and 6 is amplified by a factor of nearly 100 over the background 13C level.
FIGURE 1.

Incorporation of 18O from water into carbohydrate precursor metabolites at the level of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and triose phosphates. Exchange of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) with aldolase results in the incorporation of 18O into position 2 (shown in blue). DHAP derived from fructose via the aldolase‐mediated cleavage of fructose‐1‐phosphate will also have 18O incorporated into this position (not shown). Exchange of DHAP with glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate (Gly‐3‐P) mediated by triose phosphate isomerase and conversion of the triose phosphates to fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphate (Fru‐1,6‐P2) results in 18O incorporation into positions 2 and 5. The reversible hydration of Gly‐3‐P to form an acetal (Gly‐3‐P‐OH) results in the incorporation of 18O into position 1 of Gly‐3‐P (shown in red). Exchange of Gly‐3‐P and DHAP via triose phosphate isomerase and subsequent conversion to Fru‐1,6‐P2 via aldolase results in 18O incorporation into positions 4 and 3. Addition of water to PEP via enolase incorporates 18O into position 3 of Gly‐3‐P (shown in green). Triose phosphate isomerase exchange and aldolase generate Fru‐1,6‐P2 enriched in positions 1 and 6. The position 2 oxygen of fructose‐6‐phosphate (Fru‐6‐P) can undergo additional exchange with water via anomerization (shown in gray). Likewise, the position 1 oxygen of both glucose‐6‐phosphate (Glc‐6‐P) and glucose can be exchanged with water via anomerization (also shown in gray)
2. METHODS
2.1. Materials
D‐glucose was obtained from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). [2‐18O]glucose (> 90% enrichment), [5‐18O]glucose (> 90% enrichment), and [6‐18O]glucose (> 90% enrichment) were obtained from Omicron Biochemicals, Inc. (South Bend, IN, USA). [U‐13C6, U‐2H7]glucose (99% and 97%–98% enriched, respectively) was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc. (Andover, MA, USA) and purchased through Tracertec (Madrid, Spain). 18O‐water at 97% enrichment was obtained from Sercon Ltd (Crewe, UK). Acetonitrile (LC–MS grade) and water (LC–MS grade) were acquired from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA), while ethanol (absolute [UV‐IR‐HPLC PAI]) was acquired from Fisher Chemical (Waltham, MA, USA). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride was obtained from Acros Organics from Thermo Fisher Scientific (NJ, USA). Propionic anhydride and pyridine were procured from Sigma Aldrich and Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively. Silylation reagent (MTBSTFA + 1% TBDMCS) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
2.2. Animal studies
Animal studies were approved by the University of Coimbra Ethics Committee on Animal Studies and the Portuguese National Authority for Animal Health (approval code 0421/000/000/2013). All animal procedures were accomplished in full accordance with Portuguese National Authority for Animal Health guidelines and European regulations (European Union Directive 2010/63/EU). Adult male C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River Labs (Barcelona, Spain) and housed at the University of Coimbra Biotech Bioterium, where they were maintained in a controlled environment, with a 12‐h light/12‐h dark cycle. Following delivery to the Bioterium, the mice were acclimatized for 2 weeks, with free access to water and standard chow. After the acclimatization period, eight mice were fed a normal chow (NC) diet and eight mice were fed a NC diet supplemented with drinking water containing a 55/45 fructose/glucose mixture at a concentration of 30% w/v (i.e., a high sugar [HS] diet) for 3 days. On the evening of the final day, a bolus of 97%‐enriched H2 18O (8/100 g body weight) containing 9 mg/ml NaCl was administered with two intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections 2 h apart and the drinking water was enriched to 10% with H2 18O. Mice were euthanized the next morning and biological fluids and tissues were collected. Arterial blood was collected and immediately centrifuged at 2000 × g for 5 min at 4°C and plasma was isolated and stored at −80°C for further experimental analysis, including for the analysis of body water 18O‐enrichment. Liver and other tissues, including adipose tissue depots, were freeze‐clamped and stored at −80°C until further processing.
2.3. Liver glycogen and triglyceride purification
Frozen liver powder from each animal (approximately 500 mg) was treated with methanol (4.6 ml/g) and methyl tert‐butyl ether (15.4 ml/g) for lipid extraction. Glycogen was extracted from the pellet by treatment with 30% potassium hydroxide (10 ml/g) at 70°C for 1 h. The mixture was treated with 8 ml/g 6% Na2SO4 and glycogen was precipitated with 50 ml/g ethanol. After centrifugation, the solid residue was resuspended in water and the pH was adjusted to 8. After drying, the pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of 0.05 M acetate buffer, pH 4.5. For glucose quantification, 100 μl of each sample was collected prior to glycogen digestion. To the remaining glycogen, 200 U of amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger (59.9 U/mg; Fluka, NC, USA) dissolved in the acetate buffer was added and incubated for 5 h at 55°C. After collection of 100 μl for glycogen quantification, the supernatant was deproteinized and evaporated. Glycogen was quantified by analyzing the glucose in both 100‐μl aliquots using a Miura 200 (ISE, S.r.l, Rome, Italy). Triglycerides were purified from the evaporated organic fraction with solid‐phase extraction as previously described. 17 The triglycerides were then transesterified with sodium methoxide in methanol 18 and the aqueous fraction containing glycerol was evaporated.
2.4. Blood sampling and processing
Blood was harvested without anticoagulants. A few microliters of blood was placed on 903 Protein Saver Snap Apart Card filter paper (Whatman, GE Healthcare Ltd, Cardiff, UK), which was then dried at room temperature and stored in a desiccator 19 with the dried blood spots (DBSs) subjected to gas chromatography MS (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem MS (LC–MS/MS) analyses. The remaining blood was centrifuged at 2862 × g for 5 min at 4°C to eliminate the cell debris. The sample was then deproteinized by the addition of 1.5 ml of ice‐cold 0.3 M ZnSO4 followed by 1.5 ml of ice‐cold 0.15 M Ba (OH)2 per ml of whole blood, with the resulting insoluble material precipitated by centrifugation. The supernatant was desalted by passage through a mixed‐bed ion exchange resin (5 ml of Amberlite and 2.5 ml of Dowex‐WX 8–200) followed by 15 ml of distilled water. The eluate pH was adjusted to 7 and lyophilized.
2.5. Determination of 18O body water enrichment
Plasma and urine samples were diluted 100‐fold to a final volume of 1 ml with water (LC–MS grade from VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). The enrichment of 18O‐water within these samples was determined with a model LWIA‐24d liquid water isotope analyzer (Los Gatos Research Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).
2.6. Derivatization of glucose to TAMAG
Glucose from both liver glycogen and blood extracts was derivatized to TAMAG. Each lyophilized extract was vigorously mixed with 5 ml of acetone containing 4% sulfuric acid (v/v) for 8 h. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature to yield diacetone glucose. The acetonation reaction was quenched by adding 5 ml of water and the pH was adjusted to 2 with 1 M Na2CO3. The newly formed diacetone glucose was hydrolyzed to monoacetone glucose (MAG) by incubation at 40°C for 5 h. The solution pH was then increased to 8 with 1 M Na2CO3 and the samples were dried by rotary evaporation under vacuum. The MAG fraction in the residue was extracted with 4 ml of boiling ethyl acetate. Following evaporation of ethyl acetate, MAG was further purified by solid‐phase extraction using 500 mg of Discovery DSC‐18 column, eluted with 10% acetonitrile. For conversion of MAG to TAMAG, up to 2 mg of MAG was resuspended in 180 μl of dichloromethane and 9 μl of triethylamine. A 10.2‐μl portion of [1,1`‐13C2]acetic anhydride (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., MA, USA) was added with continuous stirring at 25°C overnight. Removal of solvent and purification was performed by silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate‐hexane (1:7) elution. The evaporated residue was dissolved in deuterated acetone for 13C NMR analysis.
2.7. 13C NMR spectroscopy and data analysis
Proton‐decoupled 13C NMR spectra of TAMAG prepared from liver glycogen and blood glucose were acquired at 25°C with a Bruker Avance III 800 MHz NMR spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) operating at 201.16 MHz for 13C. A 5‐mm TXI cryoprobe was utilized to record 13C NMR data. 13C NMR spectra were obtained with a 45‐degree pulse, an acquisition time of 2.5 s, and an interpulse delay of 0.5 s. The number of acquisitions ranged from 2000 to 3000. All spectra were analyzed with ACD/NMR Processor 12 spectral analysis software (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). The relative areas of 18O‐isotopic‐shifted and parent 13C signals were calculated by peak fitting. Positional 18O‐enrichment (%) was calculated as follows:
Excess 18O‐enrichment for each position was estimated by subtracting the background abundance (0.204%) from the measured positional enrichment.
The indirect pathway contributions to glycogen synthesis resolved into precursors entering at the levels of the Krebs cycle and triose phosphate pools were estimated from the 18O‐enrichments of glycogen oxygens 5, 6, and body water as follows:
2.8. LC–MS/MS of DBSs and data analysis
To each 6‐mm DBS punch in a 1.5‐ml Eppendorf centrifuge tube, 50 μl of 2% acetonitrile containing 30 μM [U‐13C6, U‐2H7]glucose as an internal standard was added. To this, 450 μl of ethanol was added and the tube was placed in an ultrasonic bath for 45 min. Following a 5‐min centrifugation at 14,100 × g, the supernatant was evaporated. Samples were reconstituted in 50 μl of H2O and sonicated using a cup‐horn sonicator for 2 min (40% amplitude with 1‐s pulses and 1‐s pauses). The samples were further cleaned by solid‐phase extraction using 100‐μl C18 pipette tips from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The tips were wetted with 40 μl of 50% acetonitrile and equilibrated with 120 μl of 2% acetonitrile. Fifty microliters of each sample was applied to the C18 tip and the flow‐through was collected. The tip was then washed with 50 μl of 2% acetonitrile, which was collected in the same tube as the sample. The final volume consisted of 100 μl for an injection volume of 1 μl. Standard solutions and mixtures of glucose analytes were prepared in 2% acetonitrile, and calibration curves were constructed for unlabeled glucose and [2‐18O]‐, [5‐18O]‐, and [6‐18O]glucose with working ranges spanning 15–240 μM for unlabeled glucose and 0.4–15 μM for the 18O‐enriched glucoses. Each standard was spiked with the same amount of internal standard (30 μM [U‐13C6,U‐2H7]glucose), final concentration 15 pmol/μl.
Samples were analyzed on an LC Nexera system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion‐trap 4000 QTrap mass spectrometer operated by Analyst 1.6.3 (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). The injector was a CTC‐xt (PAL System, CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland). Chromatographic separation was performed with a Luna Amino 100 Å, 3‐μm, 150 × 2.0 mm column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) with a 4 × 2.0 mm NH2 guard‐column (Phenomenex). The flow rate was set to 150 μl/min and the mobile phases A and B were water and acetonitrile, respectively.
The LC was programmed as follows: 80%–30% of B (0–9 min), 30%–20% of B (9–10 min), 20% of B (10–11 min), and 20%–5% of B (11–12 min). The ionization source ESI Turbo V was operated in the negative mode set to an ion spray voltage of 4500 V, 35 psi for nebulizer gas 1, 0 psi for the nebulizer gas 2, 30 psi for the curtain gas, and a temperature of 450°C. All molecules were analyzed by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) settings Q1 and Q3 at unit resolution, the entrance potential at −4 eV, and the collision gas was at −3 psi. The MRM detection window was set to 1235 ms and the target scan time to 60 ms. The collision energy was set at −14 eV and declustering potential at −50 eV for all transitions. This method has been previously validated for analysis of [U‐13C]‐ and [6,6‐2H]glucose enrichments in DBSs of rats administered with these tracers. 19
Peak area ratios were calculated from integrated peak areas of the analyte and internal standard on MultiQuant 2.1.1 (AB Sciex). Quantification was performed for glucose M + 0, M + 2, M + 4, and M + 6, by monitoring the sum of the transitions of each glucose species (Table S1). Enrichment of glucose M + 2 was corrected for background isotope contributions using data from the glucose M calibration curve.
Fractional 18O enrichment (FE) was calculated for each glucose species as follows:
Average fractional enrichment was calculated for each sample as follows:
where the M + 4 and M + 6 signals are assumed to represent glucose molecules containing two and three 18O, respectively.
The fraction of plasma glucose derived from gluconeogenesis was calculated for each sample as follows:
2.9. GC–MS of DBSs and data analysis
A 6.5‐mm diameter circle from the DBS was placed in an Eppendorf tube, to which 40 μl of water was added, followed by 400 μl of ethanol. The solution was agitated for 45 min at room temperature then centrifuged at 9300 × g for 5 min with a benchtop Eppendorf centrifuge. The supernatant was then transferred to 0.5‐ml Reacti‐therm V‐vials and thoroughly dried. For derivatization of glucose to the aldonitrile pentapropionate, the dried extract was reconstituted in 50 μl of hydroxylamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg/ml) and agitated with a micro stir bar at 90°C for 1.5 h. One hundred microliters of propionic anhydride was then added to each vial and agitated for 30 min at 70°C. 20 After derivatization, the samples were dried under N2 and reconstituted in 100 μl of ethyl acetate. The samples were analyzed with an ISQ Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer and Trace 1310 Gas Chromatograph (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following parameters: start temperature of 80°C with a hold time of 1 min followed by 20°C per min ramp up to 280°C, and a 5‐min bakeout at 280°C. The transfer line and ion source temperature were maintained at 280 and 230°C, respectively. The solvent delay on GC–MS was set to 10 min and an m/z filter of 40–600 m/z was used. The retention time of the derivative was 11.5 min. Hard ionization at 70 eV produced the following fragments: m/z 284.11 containing positions 2, 3, and 4 of the original glucose; m/z 370.15 containing positions 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the original glucose; m/z 259.11 containing positions 4, 5, and 6 of the original glucose; and m/z 173.00 containing positions 5 and 6 of the original glucose. Individual isotopologues were identified and quantified by area using their known m/z ions. The isotopic 18O ratio for a given fragment ion was calculated as the ratio of the intensity of each mass isotopologue to the sum of all mass isotopologues. The isotopologue distribution pattern was then corrected for natural abundance using Isotopomer Network Compartment Analysis software. 21 The average 18O‐enrichment per position for a given fragment was calculated from the excess M + 2 and M + 4 enrichments and gluconeogenic fractions were calculated as described for the LC–MS/MS data.
Glycerol obtained from triglyceride transesterification was dissolved in 50 μl of pyridine and incubated at 30°C for 30 min in a Reacti‐Therm vial. Fifty microliters of MTBSTFA + 1% TBDMS reagent was added to the vial and incubated at 60°C for 1 h. The reaction solution was transferred into a sample vial and GC–MS analysis was performed using the same instrument as for the glucose aldonitrile pentapropionate derivative. The following parameters were used for GC–MS analysis of glycerol 3‐TBDMS derivative: the initial oven temperature of GC was 60°C for 1 min followed by a ramp of 10°C/min up to 325°C and finally a hold time of 5 min. 22 The isotopic 18O and natural abundance correction was performed as for the glucose aldonitrile pentapropionate fragments.
All comparisons of 18O enrichments between different glucose‐6‐phosphate positions and between diets were evaluated by the Mann–Whitney test. The significance level was set as two‐sided with α = 0.05.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Analysis of glycogen 18O‐enrichment by 13C NMR
Both groups of mice had similar liver glycogen content (146 ± 27 μmol/g wet weight NC and 117 ± 34 μmol/g wet weight HS) and the 18O‐enrichment levels of plasma water were also similar (4.75% ± 0.32% NC and 4.95% ± 0.51% HS). The TAMAG derivatives of liver glycogen presented intense and narrow signals for the 13C‐enriched carboxyls bound to oxygens 3, 5, and 6 of the TAMAG hexose moiety with well‐resolved 18O‐shifted signals (chemical shift distance between 16O and 18O signals of 2.65, 2.47, and 2.47 Hz, respectively) (Figure 2A). The positional 18O‐enrichments estimated from these signals are shown in Figure 2B. Excess 18O‐enrichments ranged from 1.5% to 3.0%, and were not uniformly distributed among positions 3, 5, and 6 for either of the NC or HS groups. Within each group, position 5 enrichment was significantly higher compared with both 6 and 3, while enrichment of position 6 was significantly higher than that of 3. Between each group, position 5 enrichment of the HS group was significantly higher compared with NC and the difference between position 5 and 6 enrichments was significantly higher for HS compared with NC diet (0.12 ± 0.10 NC vs. 0.65 ± 0.16 HS, p = 0.0002). The sources of hepatic glycogen synthesis as calculated from the 18O‐enrichments of positions 5, 6, and plasma water are shown in Figure 2C. HS mice had significantly higher fractions of glycogen derived via the indirect pathway that was sustained by significant increases in the contributions of substrates entering at the level of triose phosphates.
FIGURE 2.

Enrichment of liver glycogen of mice administered with H2 18O as measured by 13C NMR spectroscopy of the TAMAG derivative and sources of glycogen estimated from 18O‐enrichments of positions 5, 6, and body water. (A) Representative 13C signals of the 13C‐enriched reporter acetyl carboxyls bound to oxygens 3, 5, and 6 of the hexose moiety with the upfield 18O‐shifted signals; (B) Boxplot showing 18O excess enrichments of glycogen positions 3, 5, and 6 for mice fed normal chow (NC) and NC supplemented with sugar (i.e., a high sugar [HS] diet); and (C) Estimates of the fractional contributions of triose phosphate sources, Krebs cycle sources, and direct pathway plus pre‐existing glycogen for NC and HS mice (mean ± standard deviation). For both (B) and (C), *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test). TAMAG, 3,5,6‐tri‐O‐[1‐13C]acetyl monoacetone glucose
3.2. Blood glucose analysis by GC–MS, LC–MS/MS, and 13C NMR
TAMAG derivatives prepared from blood glucose yielded 18O‐shifted signals with poorer signal‐to‐noise ratios compared with those prepared from glycogen because of the lower quantities of the analyte. The 18O‐enrichment distributions in positions 3, 5, and 6 resemble those seen in glycogen, with position 5 being more highly enriched than either 6 or 3 (Figure S1). The 18O‐enrichment values were also more dispersed compared with those of liver glycogen, therefore the differences in positional 18O‐enrichments within and between the groups were less well defined. Overall, the enrichment levels of plasma glucose were systematically higher compared with those of glycogen. This may in part be explained by incomplete turnover of liver glycogen during the overnight feeding period, leading to dilution of the 18O‐enrichments by pre‐existing unlabeled glycogen.
MS data acquired from DBSs of NC and HS mice are summarized in Figure 3. For the LC–MS/MS data gathered from the entire glucose molecule, the expected M + 2 contribution was accompanied by progressively lower amounts of M + 4 and M + 6 signals representing glucose molecules containing two and three 18O, respectively. These observations reflect the fact that 18O‐enrichment of a particular precursor site occurs independently of all other sites, hence leading to the possibility of multiple 18O‐enriched glucose molecules. The GC–MS data from various glucose fragments (Figure 3B–E) also featured detectable M + 4 signals, representing the presence of two 18O, alongside the expected M + 2 signals. The fragmentation procedure generated lesser amounts of the 5–6 fragment compared with the other three (data not shown) and this probably contributed to the higher uncertainty in 18O‐enrichment quantification for this fragment compared with the others. Table 1 shows the calculated average fractional 18O‐enrichments from the GC–MS and LC–MS/MS data. For NC mice, the LC–MS/MS and GC–MS fragmentation data gave highly consistent estimates, but the 5–6 fragment data had much higher variance compared with the others. For both NC and HS mice, the average enrichment of the six glucose oxygens estimated by LC–MS/MS was significantly lower compared with that of oxygens 2–4 and 4–6 estimated by GC–MS and was also significantly lower than that of oxygens 2–5 for HS mice. The average 18O‐enrichment estimates from the 5–6 fragment did not show a statistical difference between NC and HS, nor did they differ from the LC–MS/MS determinations for either condition, presumably because of the high variance in 5–6 18O‐enrichment data.
FIGURE 3.

Blood glucose mass isotopomer distributions (mean ± standard deviation) dried blood spots analysis following 18O‐administration to mice fed normal chow (NC) and NC supplemented with sugar (i.e., a high sugar [HS] diet). (A) Schematic overview of precursor and fragments obtained from LC–MS/MS analysis of glucose with representation of unlabeled glucose precursor (m/z 179) that originates two fragments with m/z 89 and positional information obtained from GC–MS fragment analysis of glucose aldonitrile pentapropionate derivatives with representation of unlabeled glucose fragments m/z 173, 259, 284, and 370. Pr – propionate group (C3H5O). (B–F) Analysis of dried blood spots by (B) LC–MS/MS of all six glucose oxygens and (C) GC–MS of derivatized glucose fragments containing Oxygens 2–5, (D) Oxygens 2–4, (E) Oxygens 4–6, and (F) Oxygens 5–6. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test). GC–MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
TABLE 1.
Mean 18O‐enrichment of selected plasma glucose oxygens as measured by LC–MS/MS transitions representing oxygens 1–6, and GC–MS fragments representing oxygens 2–5, 2–4, 4–6, and 5–6 for a group of eight mice fed NC and a second group of eight mice fed a HS diet. Data are normalized to the number of oxygens in each glucose species. Also shown is the plasma water 18O‐enrichment for both groups and estimates of the gluconeogenic contribution to blood glucose appearance calculated from the ratio of mean 18O‐enrichment for each group of glucose oxygens to that of body water (bold text). The values shown are means ± standard deviation
| Experimental group | Mean plasma glucose 18O‐enrichment for selected oxygens (%) | Plasma water 18O‐enrichment (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraction of blood glucose derived from gluconeogenesis (%) | ||||||
| LC–MS/MS | GC–MS | GC–MS | GC–MS | GC–MS | ||
| All 6 oxygens | Oxygens 2, 3, 4, 5 | Oxygens 2, 3, 4 | Oxygens 4, 5, 6 | Oxygens 5, 6 | ||
| NC | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 † | 3.0 ± 0.2 †† , † | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 4.9 ± 0.3 |
| 51 ± 5 | 55 ± 8 | 57 ± 8 | 60 ± 9 † | 58 ± 29 | ||
| HS | 3.0 ± 0.5 $ | 3.4 ± 0.4 # , † | 3.4 ± 0.4 # , † | 3.5 ± 0.4 # , † | 4.2 ± 1.9 | 4.7 ± 0.5 |
| 63 ± 14 $ | 73 ± 12 $ | 73 ± 13 $ | 75 ± 13 $ , † | 93 ± 54 | ||
Abbreviations: GC–MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry; HS, high sugar; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry; NC, normal chow.
p ≤ 0.05 compared with NC (Mann–Whitney test).
p ≤ 0.01 compared with NC (Mann–Whitney test).
p ≤ 0.05 compared with LC–MS/MS (Mann–Whitney test).
p ≤ 0.01 compared with LC–MS/MS (Mann–Whitney test).
Estimates of the gluconeogenic fraction of plasma glucose based on the ratio of average 18O‐enrichment to that of body water showed significantly higher values for HS compared with NC diet, with the exception of the values obtained by GC–MS analysis of the 5–6 fragment (Table 1, bold numbers). Within each diet, the gluconeogenic fraction estimated by LC–MS/MS was significantly lower than that estimated by GC–MS for oxygens 4–6, and for the HS diet, it tended to be lower compared with the estimates from GC–MS analysis of oxygens 2–4 and 2–5 (p = 0.065 for each fragment).
3.3. Liver triglyceride glycerol 18O‐enrichment analysis by GC–MS
The average 18O‐enrichment of liver triglyceride glycerol oxygens as measured by GC–MS of three different fragments is shown in Table 2. Overall, the average glycerol 18O‐enrichment levels tended to be systematically higher compared with those measured in plasma glucose and indicate a high turnover rate of hepatic triglyceride glycerol during the overnight interval. Unlike plasma glucose, the average glycerol 18O‐enrichment levels did not significantly differ between NC and HS mice for any of the fragments studied. However, the distribution of 18O‐enrichment among the three glycerol oxygens was less even for HS compared with NC mice, as seen by a significantly higher enrichment of the 1–2 (2–3) compared with the 1 (3) fragments.
TABLE 2.
Mean 18O‐enrichment of liver triglyceride glycerol oxygens as measured by GC–MS fragments representing oxygen 1 or 3, oxygen 1–2 or 2–3, and oxygen 1–3 for a group of eight mice fed NC and a second group of eight mice fed a HS diet. Also shown are estimates of fractional triglyceride glycerol turnover obtained from the ratio of the mean 18O‐enrichment of oxygens 1, 2, and 3 relative to that of body water. The values shown are means ± standard deviation
| Experimental group | Mean liver triglyceride glycerol 18O‐enrichment (%) | Fractional glycerol turnover (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC–MS | GC–MS | GC–MS | ||
| Oxygen 1 (3) | Oxygens 1, 2 (2, 3) | Oxygens 1, 2, 3 | ||
| NC | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 77 ± 8 |
|
HS |
3.1 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.5 $ | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 70 ± 7 |
Abbreviations: GC–MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry; HS, high sugar; NC, normal chow.
p = 0.016 compared with HS oxygen 1 (3) (Mann–Whitney test).
4. DISCUSSION
18O‐enriched water was administered to mice and the incorporation of 18O into synthesized glucose and glycogen was analyzed by 13C NMR, LC–MS/MS, and GC–MS. H2 18O presents some advantages over 2H2O for metabolic studies, the most important of which is an absence of significant isotope effects associated with 18O metabolism compared with 2H. KIE associated with 2H not only confound modeling of metabolite enrichment data but also induce significant toxic effects, and even death, when body water 2H‐enrichment exceeds 30%. 23 With 18O, no adverse effects were found for mice that breathed 90% 18O2 for three generations with the third generation also drinking H2 18O enriched to 90%. 24
Following administration, H2 18O is diluted by water (including water generated by respiration) and additionally by respiratory CO2 and exchange of its oxygens with those of water, while 2H2O is diluted by water alone. This provides the basis for estimating whole‐body respiration by measuring the differential dilution of ingested 2H2O and H2 18O. 25 In mice, daily CO2 production represents about 20% of the total oxygen content of body water. 26 Therefore, compared with the dilution of 2H following administration of a 2H2O bolus, the same quantity of H2 18O would be expected to be additionally diluted by ~20%. This may explain the observed body water enrichment of ~5%, despite administering a bolus of ~8/100 ml of body water H2 18O coupled with a maintenance enrichment of 10% in the drinking water.
Under these conditions, excess 18O‐enrichment levels of plasma glucose and liver glycogen were in the range of 1.5%–4.0%. For the isotope‐shifted 13C NMR measurement of 18O‐enrichment, these values are at the limit of precise quantification, even with the 13C‐enriched TAMAG derivative. TAMAGs prepared from glycogen had superior signal‐to‐noise ratios over those obtained from glucose and for this reason demonstrated more consistent and statistically significant differences in excess 18O‐enrichment between positions 3, 5, and 6. Because hepatic glucose‐6‐phosphate is the precursor for glycogen as well as the bulk of endogenously generated glucose, it is expected that plasma glucose and glycogen should have concordant 18O‐enrichment patterns (although absolute 18O‐enrichment levels of the two metabolites could have systematic differences because of the slower turnover rate of liver glycogen compared with plasma glucose). The 18O‐enrichment distributions in positions 5 and 6 of liver glycogen relative to that of body water yielded information on indirect pathway contributions and sources that are in reasonable agreement with previously published 2H enrichments of the same positions for mice fed NC and HS diets over a 6‐week period. 27 The elevated contribution of triose‐P precursors in HS mice reflects the glycogenic metabolism of the fructose component present in their diet.
For analysis of blood glucose 18O‐enrichment, 13C NMR analysis of the largest possible quantity of blood that could be harvested posteuthanization from each mouse (~1.0 ml) was limited by the quality of the spectra and signal‐to‐noise ratios of the 18O‐shifted signals. For LC–MS/MS and GC–MS analyses of glucose recovered from DBSs representing a few microliters of whole blood, signal limitation was not a factor, with the exception of the GC–MS fragment containing glucose oxygens 5 and 6. GC–MS analysis of the pentapropionyl aldonitrile glucose derivative yielded data from several fragments representing oxygens 2–6 of glucose. Although an early study demonstrated the analysis of 18O enrichments from various 18O‐glucose standards via pentaacetyl glucose, 28 we chose pentapropionyl aldonitrile based on our past experience with preparation and analysis of this derivative and the fact that it generated the expected fragmentation data with our 18O‐glucose standards (data not shown). Oxygen 2 of glucose‐6‐phosphate can become enriched by the anomerization of fructose‐6‐phosphate, an exchange process that is independent of gluconeogenesis, while oxygen 1 enrichment can be modified by glucose anomerization in vivo as well as in vitro. 29 On this basis, the exclusion of glucose oxygen 1 and 2 enrichment information would be expected to provide a better assessment of gluconeogenic activity. Nevertheless, for NC mice, the average 18O‐enrichment of all six oxygens measured by LC–MS/MS was highly consistent with the average enrichments of each of the four glucose fragments measured by GC–MS. However, for HS mice, the average 18O‐enrichment determined by LC–MS/MS was consistently lower compared with those measured with GC–MS. This may in part be explained by fructose gluconeogenesis in HS, resulting in 18O‐enrichment of oxygens 2–5 but not oxygens 1 and 6. Moreover, glucose oxygen 1 enrichment could have undergone depletion poststudy by spontaneous exchange with water via anomerization.
Blood glucose analysis revealed that gluconeogenesis also accounted for a substantial fraction of postprandial circulating glucose for both the NC and HS groups. This has also been previously reported in rats that were studied under similar postprandial conditions with high sucrose and NC diets, 30 as well as in fasted rats that were given an intraperitoneal glucose load, 31 and following protein meals supplemented with different mixtures of glucose and fructose in overnight‐fasted healthy humans. 32 There was a significantly increased gluconeogenic contribution to postprandial glucose levels for HS compared with NC mice, consistent with the gluconeogenic conversion of fructose to glucose. In the study conducted by Barosa et al., the postprandial gluconeogenic fraction was significantly higher in healthy subjects following a protein meal supplemented with high fructose (55% fructose/45% glucose) compared with a meal supplemented with 5% fructose and 95% glucose. 32 However, in rats whose NC was supplemented with sucrose in the drinking water, the total gluconeogenic contribution was not significantly different from rats fed NC alone, but the sources of gluconeogenic carbons were significantly shifted from anaplerotic precursors to those entering at the triose phosphate level, which include fructose. 30
The triglyceride glycerol is derived from dihydroxyacetone phosphate via glycerol‐3‐phosphate (Figure 1), but following recovery via transesterification and derivatization for GC–MS analysis, the identity of positions 1 and 3 are no longer retained. Hence, enrichments of positions 1 (3) reflect the average enrichment of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) positions 1 and 3, while position 2 enrichment translates to DHAP position 2. Because 18O‐enrichment of the three DHAP oxygens is independent of its formation from glycolysis or gluconeogenesis, the 18O‐enrichment distribution of glycerol does not inform the contributions of glycolysis and glyceroneogenesis to glycerol‐3‐phosphate formation. Instead, we found that the 18O‐enrichment distribution was weighted more towards position 2 compared with positions 1 and 3 when NC was supplemented by sugar. This observation is consistent with a high contribution of fructose carbons to glycerol‐3‐phosphate synthesis, where position 2 of the DHAP precursor is quantitatively enriched from 18O‐water via aldolase, while DHAP position 3 is not enriched. In mice fed NC supplemented with a 50/50 mix of 13C‐enriched fructose and glucose, the fructose component accounted for over half of the newly synthesized triglyceride glycerol, while fractional triglyceride glycerol turnover as measured with 2H2O showed a wide variability, ranging from 20% to 80% with a mean of ~40%. 17 By comparison, the 18O‐enrichment measurements yielded turnover rates of ~70%, with no detectable differences between NC and HS. This difference may reflect a higher degree of 18O‐equilibration between body water and triose‐P precursors compared with that of 2H, in particular during the conversion of fructose to glycerol‐3‐phosphate. If so, then H2 18O may provide a more precise estimate of triglyceride glycerol turnover compared with 2H2O. H2 18O has also been used to measure the turnover of the acyl moieties of membrane phospholipids of peritoneal exudate cells in culture based on carboxyl and water oxygen exchange. 33 However, for the triglycerides in the current study, 18O‐enrichments of the fatty acyl oxygens were assumed to have undergone extensive exchange with those of the reagents during transesterification, hence analysis of the fatty acyl 18O‐enrichments was not performed.
There are some important limitations to the use of H2 18O for in vivo measurements of carbohydrate metabolism compared with 2H2O. Not only is the current cost of H2 18O much higher than that of 2H2O, but the reliable quantification of 18O‐shifted 13C signals requires higher field NMR instruments (800 MHz) compared with those required for quantifying 2H signals of derivatized glucose (≥ 500 MHz). While there is no toxicity associated with any level of body 18O‐water enrichment, there are limitations to the extent to which 18O‐body water enrichment can be acutely increased by gavage, infusion, or i.p. injection of H2 18O. This is particularly relevant when applying H2 18O to studies of endogenous glucose sources during fasting, where the interval between labeled water administration and sampling of blood glucose may be only a few hours.
In conclusion, 18O‐enrichment of gluconeogenic precursors at the level of triose phosphates was inferred from NMR and MS analyses of liver glycogen and plasma glucose. Positional enrichment distributions, as measured from 18O isotope‐shifted 13C NMR signals, were in accordance with the known enzymatic and nonenzymatic mechanisms for 18O‐exchange between water and triose‐phosphate oxygens and yielded estimates of indirect pathway contributions from the Krebs cycle and triose phosphate sources to glycogenesis. For the analysis of blood glucose 18O‐enrichments, the NMR measurement was limited by low signal‐to‐noise ratios for the small 18O isotope‐shifted carbon signals. Both GC–MS and LC–MS/MS provided robust quantification of blood glucose 18O‐enrichment from a few microliters of dried blood, with GC–MS providing partial resolution of 18O‐positional enrichments through analysis of glucose fragments (Figure 3). For LC–MS/MS, the transitions chosen for observation did not provide positional 18O information. However, if [3‐18O]‐ and [4‐18O]glucose standards become commercially available for formulating isotope calibration curves, then other observed LC–MS/MS transitions that read the glucose 3–6 oxygens can be exploited to provide more precise estimates of gluconeogenesis and substrate contributions.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
JGJ, MC, GDB, and MEM designed the experiments. MC, JGJ GDB, IV, RM, AG, AT, VMM, and MEM conducted the experiments. MEM, BM, JGJ, and AG provided facilities to perform the experiments and provided materials and instrumentation to perform the experiments and analyze samples. Results were discussed and analyzed by MC, JGJ, RM, and MEM. The manuscript was written by MC, JGJ, RM, and MEM. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Supporting information
Table S1: Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions (m/z for Q1 and Q3) of the LC–MS/MS data acquisition method for glucose and 18O labelled glucoses.
Figure S1: Box‐plot showing 18O excess enrichments of plasma glucose positions 3, 5 and 6 as measured by 13C NMR spectroscopy of the TAMAG derivative for mice fed normal chow (NC) and chow supplemented with sugar (HS). * p ≤ 0.05 (Mann–Whitney test).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology‐European Comission (research grant FCT‐FEDER‐02/SAICT/2017/028147). Structural funding for the Center for Neurosciences and Cell Biology and the UC‐NMR facility is supported in part by FEDER – European Regional Development Fund – through the COMPETE Programme, Centro 2020 Regional Operational Programme, and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through grants UIDB/04539/2020, UIDP/04539/2020, LA/P/0058/2020, POCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐007440, REEQ/481/QUI/2006, RECI/QEQ‐QFI/0168/2012, CENTRO‐07‐CT62‐FEDER‐002012, and Rede Nacional de Ressonância Magnética Nuclear. The National Mass Spectrometry Network (RNEM) provided funding under the contract POCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐402‐022125 (ref.: ROTEIRO/0028/2013). MC was supported by PhD fellowship PD/BD/135178/2017, co‐financed by the European Social Fund (ESF) through the POCH ‐ Programa Operacional do Capital Humano and national funds via FCT. GDB was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Grant Agreement No. 722619 (project FOIE GRAS) and Grant Agreement No. 734719 (mtFOIE GRAS). This work was supported by funding from National Institutes of Health (R01‐DK105346, R01‐DK132254, P41‐GM122698, and 5U2C‐DK119889). A portion of this work was performed in the McKnight Brain Institute at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory's Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy (AMRIS) Facility, which is supported by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement DMR‐1644779. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Coelho M, Mahar R, Belew GD, et al. Enrichment of hepatic glycogen and plasma glucose from H₂18O informs gluconeogenic and indirect pathway fluxes in naturally feeding mice. NMR in Biomedicine. 2023;36(2):e4837. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4837
Funding information
Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology‐European Comission; Research Grant: FCT‐FEDER‐02/SAICT/2017/028147, UIDB/0453972020, UIDP/04539/2020, LA/P/0058/2020, POCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐007440, REEQ/481/QUI/2006, RECI/QEQ‐QFI/0168/2012, CENTRO‐07‐CT62‐FEDER‐402‐022125, PD/BD/135178/2017; Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Grant Agreement No. 722619 (Project FOIE GRAS) and Grant Agreement No. 734719 (mtFOIE GRAS);
The National Mass Spectrometry Network (RNEM); Contract: POCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐402‐022125 (ref.: ROTEIRO/0028/2013);
National Institutes of Health; NIH, Grant Numbers: R01‐DK105346, R01‐DK132254, P41‐GM122698, and 5U2C‐DK119889; National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement DMR‐1644779.
Margarida Coelho and Rohit Mahar are joint first authors.
Funding information Marie Skłodowska‐Curie, Grant/Award Numbers: 722619, 734719; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Numbers: 5U2C‐DK119889, P41‐GM122698, R01‐DK132254, R01‐DK105346; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology‐European Comission, Grant/Award Numbers: FCT‐FEDER‐02/SAICT/2017/028147, UIDP/04539/2020, LA/P/0058/2020, POCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐007440, REEQ/481/QUI/2006, RECI/QEQ‐QFI/0168/2012, CENTRO‐07‐CT62‐FEDER‐002012, PD/BD/135178/2017; European Regional Development Fund; European Social Fund; National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: DMR‐1644779
REFERENCES
- 1. Postle AD, Bloxham DP. The use of tritiated water to measure absolute rates of hepatic glycogen synthesis. Biochem J. 1980;192(1):65‐73. doi: 10.1042/bj1920065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Landau BR, Wahren J, Chandramouli V, Schumann WC, Ekberg K, Kalhan SC. Use of 2H2O for estimating rates of gluconeogenesis. Application to the fasted state. J Clin Investig. 1995;95(1):172‐178. doi: 10.1172/JCI117635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rognstad R, Clark G, Katz J. Glucose synthesis in tritiated water. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47(2):383‐388. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03703.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Soares AF, Viega FJ, Carvalho RA, Jones JG. Quantifying hepatic glycogen synthesis by direct and indirect pathways in rats under normal ad libitum feeding conditions. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(1):1‐5. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jones JG, Fagulha A, Barosa C, et al. Noninvasive analysis of hepatic glycogen kinetics before and after breakfast with deuterated water and acetaminophen. Diabetes. 2006;55(8):2294‐2300. doi: 10.2337/db06-0304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Landau BR, Wahren J, Chandramouli V, Schumann WC, Ekberg K, Kalhan SC. Contributions of gluconeogenesis to glucose production in the fasted state. J Clin Investig. 1996;98(2):378‐385. doi: 10.1172/JCI118803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jones JG, Solomon MA, Cole SM, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. An integrated 2H and 13C NMR study of gluconeogenesis and TCA cycle flux in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281:E848‐E851. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.4.E848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Martins FO, Rito J, Jarak I, et al. Disposition of U‐(2)H7 glucose into hepatic glycogen in rat and in seabass. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2013;166(2):316‐322. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Viegas I, Rito J, Jarak I, et al. Hepatic glycogen synthesis in farmed European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) is dominated by indirect pathway fluxes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2012;163(1):22‐29. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jarak I, Barosa C, Martins FO, et al. Sources of hepatic glycogen synthesis in mice fed with glucose or fructose as the sole dietary carbohydrate. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(1):639‐644. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G. Measuring deuterium enrichment of glucose hydrogen atoms by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2011;83(8):3211‐3216. doi: 10.1021/ac200012p [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chacko SK, Sunehag AL, Sharma S, Sauer PJJ, Haymond MW. Measurement of gluconeogenesis using glucose fragments and mass spectrometry after ingestion of deuterium oxide. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(4):944‐951. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00752.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kunert O, Stingl H, Rosian E, et al. Measurement of fractional whole‐body gluconeogenesis in humans from blood samples using H‐2 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Diabetes. 2003;52(10):2475‐2482. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.10.2475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ribeiro A, Caldeira MM, Carvalheiro M, et al. Simple measurement of gluconeogenesis by direct H‐2 NMR analysis of menthol glucuronide enrichment from (H2O)‐H‐2. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(2):429‐434. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jones JG, Carvalho RA, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. Quantitation of gluconeogenesis by (2)H nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of plasma glucose following ingestion of (2)H(2)O. Anal Biochem. 2000;277(1):121‐126. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Coelho M, Barosa C, Tavares L, Jones JG. Metabolic incorporation of (H2O)‐O‐18 into specific glucose‐6‐phosphate oxygens by red‐blood‐cell lysates as observed by(13)C isotope‐shifted NMR signals. NMR Biomed. 2020;33(11):e4395. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Silva JCP, Marques C, Martins FO, et al. Determining contributions of exogenous glucose and fructose to de novo fatty acid and glycerol synthesis in liver and adipose tissue. Metab Eng. 2019;56:69‐76. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Suter B, Grob K, Pacciarelli B. Determination of fat content and fatty acid composition through 1‐min transesterification in the food sample principles. Z Lebensm‐Unters‐Forsch A. 1997;204(4):252‐258. doi: 10.1007/s002170050073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Coelho M, Mendes VM, Lima IS, et al. Direct analysis of 6,6‐H‐2(2) glucose and U‐C‐13(6) glucose dry blood spot enrichments by LC‐MS/MS. J Chromatogr B. 2016;1022:242‐248. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ragavan M, McLeod MA, Giacalone AG, Merritt ME. Hyperpolarized dihydroxyacetone is a sensitive probe of hepatic gluconeogenic state. Metabolites. 2021;11(7):441. doi: 10.3390/metabo11070441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Young JD. INCA: a computational platform for isotopically non‐stationary metabolic flux analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1333‐1335. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mahar R, Chang MC, Merritt ME. Measuring NQO1 bioactivation using [(2)H7]glucose. Cancers. 2021;13(16):4165. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kushner DJ, Baker A, Dunstall TG. Pharmacological uses and perspectives of heavy water and deuterated compounds. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1999;77(2):79‐88. doi: 10.1139/y99-005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wolf D, Cohen H, Meshorer A, Wasserman I, Samual D. The effect of 18O on the growth and reproduction in mice. Paper presented at: Stable isotopes: Proceedings of the Third International Conference; 1978. New York, NY.
- 25. Lifson N, McClintock R. Theory of use of turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. J Theor Biol. 1966;12(1):46‐74. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90185-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Junghans P, Gors S, Langhammer M, Metges CC. Breath water‐based doubly labelled water method for the noninvasive determination of CO2 production and energy expenditure in mice. Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2018;54(6):561‐572. doi: 10.1080/10256016.2018.1531855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. DiNunzio G, Belew GD, Torres AN, et al. Determining the contribution of a high‐fructose corn syrup formulation to hepatic glycogen synthesis during ad‐libitum feeding in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69820-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Caprioli RM, Seifert WEJ. Direct analysis of 18O in glucose by mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973;297:213‐219. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(73)90067-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Risley JM, Vanetten RL. O‐18 isotope effect in C‐13 nuclear magnetic‐resonance spectroscopy. 6. Kinetics of oxygen exchange at the anomeric carbon atom of D‐glucose and D‐erythrose using the oxygen‐18 isotope effect in carbon‐13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1982;21(25):6360‐6365. doi: 10.1021/bi00268a007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Delgado TC, Martins FO, Carvalho F, et al. 2H enrichment distribution of hepatic glycogen from 2H2O reveals the contribution of dietary fructose to glycogen synthesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;304(4):E384‐E391. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00185.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Delgado TC, Barosa C, Nunes PM, Cerdan S, Geraldes CFGC, Jones JG. Resolving the sources of plasma glucose excursions following a glucose tolerance test in the rat with deuterated water and U‐C‐13 glucose. Plos One. 2012;7(3):e34042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Barosa C, Ribeiro RT, Andrade R, Raposo JF, Jones JG. Effects of meal fructose/glucose composition on postprandial glucose appearance and hepatic glycogen synthesis in healthy subjects. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):596. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kuwae T, Schmid PC, Johnson SB, Schmid HH. Differential turnover of phospholipid acyl groups in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(9):5002‐5007. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)34075-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1: Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions (m/z for Q1 and Q3) of the LC–MS/MS data acquisition method for glucose and 18O labelled glucoses.
Figure S1: Box‐plot showing 18O excess enrichments of plasma glucose positions 3, 5 and 6 as measured by 13C NMR spectroscopy of the TAMAG derivative for mice fed normal chow (NC) and chow supplemented with sugar (HS). * p ≤ 0.05 (Mann–Whitney test).
