Abstract
This study compared the relative risks of heat days on mortalities by vulnerable groups (elderly, single-person households, less-educated) in the past decade (1999–2008) and the recent decade (2009–2018) in four cities, Seoul, Incheon, Daegu, and Gwangju, in Korea. It has been known that the health impacts of heatwaves have gradually decreased over time due to socio-economic development, climate adaptation, and acclimatization. Contrary to general perception, we found that the recent relative risk of mortality caused by heat days has increased among vulnerable groups. It may associate with recent increasing trends of severe heat days due to climate change. The increasing relative risk was more significant in single-person households and less-educated groups than in the elderly. It implies that the impacts of climate change-induced severe heat days have been and will be concentrated on vulnerable groups. It suggests that social polarization and social isolation should be addressed to reduce heatwave impacts. Furthermore, this study shows the necessity of customized heatwave policies, which consider the characteristics of vulnerable groups.
Subject terms: Health policy, Climate-change adaptation, Climate-change impacts, Climate-change policy, Sustainability
Introduction
The association between heatwave and the risks of disease and death has been proven in numerous studies1–6. The intensity and duration of heatwaves in the future are predicted to increase due to climate change7. The heatwave-related socioeconomic damages such as cases of illness, mortality, and health cost (socioeconomic cost) are also predicted to increase8,9. Understanding and adapting to climate change is a difficult predicament ahead of humanity. Many studies have investigated health regarding heatwaves and contributed to developing measures to effectively reduce its effects on human health. Previous studies explored concerns, including identifying heatwave-vulnerable groups10–14, the difference in threshold temperature concerning vulnerable groups and health indicators6, and the spatial difference in risks3,15.
Several studies have focused on the time-dependent variation in the effects of a heatwave. The relationship between heatwave and human health has continuously varied with time. This is a critical aspect of future risks assessment of climate change, the selection of vulnerable groups and regions, and the analysis of the impact prediction effects11,16. According to Gasparrini et al., time-dependent variation was observed for the risk of heatwave-related mortality in 272 regions across seven countries17. During 1985–2012, the risk of heatwave-related mortality decreased in the United States, Japan, and Spain. Chung et al. also report a fall in the risk of heatwaves in Japan compared to the past18. Lee et al. addressed that the risk of heatwaves decreased in several cities in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. In South Korea, 2018 heatwaves recorded the historical worst since 1994 events19. Nevertheless, excess mortality in 2018 due to heatwave was significantly reduced compared to 199420.
Many factors could induce the time-dependent variation in the risk of heatwaves. The influencing factors reported by previous studies included improved healthcare resources such as the number of hospital beds21, the increase in evasive actions in consideration of the risk of heatwaves22,23, the use of such adaptive strategies as air conditioners24–26, and the policy effects on the heatwave warning system27,28. Many policies have been implemented to reduce damage from heatwaves in Korea since 2008. For example, services such as Heatwave warning system and emergency text message, service to make a phone call to the elderly, heat-related illness surveillance system, 119 heatwave ambulance, and the hot environment management guidelines have been implemented after 2008. The Korea Meteorological Administration has been making impact forecasts since 2019. Notably, the current data suggest that the provision of relevant risk information can effectively elicit evasive actions and enhance risk perception23,29–31.
The time-dependent variation in the risk of heatwaves has not yet been examined across vulnerable groups. Previous studies reported that the relatively vulnerable socioeconomic groups from heatwaves include the elderly, outdoor workers, individuals with chronic disease, low-income, and single-person household individuals10–14. The lack of change or increase in the time-dependent variation for the risk of heatwaves in vulnerable groups would imply that they are still facing difficulties with the perception of the risk of heatwaves and the performance of evasive actions. The relevant data can help improve heatwave-related policies. However, it is difficult to find a study on the temporal change of heatwave risk for vulnerable groups.
This study compared the differences in the risk of mortality caused by heat days between the past decade (1999–2008) and the recent decade (2009–2018) in four cities in South Korea. Heatwave is defined differently depending on the country and the region. The Korea Meteorological Administration issues a heatwave warning when the maximum temperature is expected to exceed 33 °C for two consecutive days. However, it is known that the impacts of high temperatures appear before that6. Therefore, in this study, the ranges of high temperatures were divided into Mild, Moderate, and Severe heat days from the threshold temperature which is the number of deaths began to increase. And the health impacts of each heat event were analyzed. The time-dependent variation in the risk of mortality caused by heat days in each vulnerable group (elderly, single-person households, and less-educated) was also analyzed.
Study period and sites
This study analyzed the heterogeneous relative risk of heat-related mortality by time, vulnerable groups, and regions. We used two time periods, the past decade, 1999 to 2008, and the recent decade, 2009 to 2018. In South Korea, many heatwave-related policies have been implemented since 2008. For example, the heatwave warning system service and the emergency disaster text message service were initiated in 2008. Moreover, the automated-phone warning service for the elderly upon heatwave began in 2009. Thus, this study compared the risks of heatwave before and after 2008.
The study sites were the following four cities: Seoul, Incheon, Daegu, and Gwangju. Among these metropolitan cities in Korea, these are cities with high population (Seoul, Incheon) or high frequency of heatwaves (Gwangju, Daegu). Busan, Korea's second city, was excluded from the study because the relationship between ambient temperature and excess mortality was unclear in the previous study20. Table 1 shows the socioeconomic and climatic characteristics of the study sites. Especially, Seoul is the most densely populated city in South Korea and a megacity. The city with the most recent highest elderly percentage was Daegu (11.6%), and with the most prominently increased percentage than before was Seoul (increased from 6.5% to 11.3%). The percentage of low-income individuals was high in Gwangju and Daegu compared to Seoul and Incheon, and the percentage of single-person households was also high in Gwangju and Daegu.
Table 1.
Group | Period | Seoul | Incheon | Gwangju | Daegu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population(million) | 1999–2018 | 9.77 | 2.96 | 1.46 | 2.46 |
Elderly (%) | 1999–2008 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 7.0 |
2009–2018 | 11.3 | 9.4 | 10.4 | 11.6 | |
Low-income (%) | 2009–2018 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 4.9 | 4.3 |
Single-person (%) | 2010–2018 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 10.4 | 9.3 |
Average of Tmax (°C) | 1999–2008 | 28.5 | 27.8 | 29.2 | 29.7 |
2009–2018 | 29.5 | 27.6 | 30.4 | 30.9 | |
Average of Rh (%) | 1999–2018 | 72.1 | 77.9 | 74.8 | 69.7 |
2009–2018 | 69.2 | 82.7 | 76.6 | 67.8 |
*Tmax: maximum temperature; Rh: relative humidity.
**Source of data: Statistics Korea32.
Gwangju and Daegu have a higher maximum temperature (Tmax) in summer (June to August; JJA) than Seoul and Incheon. The average Tmax of Daegu is 30.9 °C, the highest among the study cities. Incheon showed lower Tmax than other metropolitan cities. Relative humidity (Rh) decreased in Seoul and Daegu, and increased from 77.9% to 82.7% in Incheon (Table 1).
Except for Incheon, the three cities showed an increase in mean Tmax by approximately 1 °C between these two decades. In addition, the Tmax kernel density significantly shifted to the right. Incheon showed no significant change in the Tmax kernel density (Fig. 1).
Materials and methods
Data source and study population
The mortality data were obtained from the Microdata Integrated Service of Statistics Korea. The data contained information regarding the date and cause of death, city-level location of death, age at the time of death, occupation, and marital status. Total mortality was aggregated excluding external causes of death (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes A-R).
Socioeconomic classification of the deceased
This study defined vulnerable groups as elderly, single-person household, and less-educated groups. These groups were considered as vulnerable groups because it is well known that they are relatively strongly affected by heat waves in previous studies10,14. The elderly were defined as individuals aged 65 years or above. The single-person household was defined as individuals aged 20 years or above at the time of death in the following status: unmarried, unknown marital status, divorced, or bereaved. The less-educated group was defined as the level of education at or below middle school graduation. The percentage of the elderly, single-person households, and less-educated group were 69.7%, 49.4%, and 65.8% of total mortality during the summer, respectively (The detailed number of deaths according to socio-economic conditions can be found as Supplementary Table S1).
Ethical approval
This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of South Korea (Confirmation number P01-202107-22-007). As this was an observational study without intervention and de-identified statistical data was used, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the same IRB committee. All methods were carried out in accordance with Korean government’s guideline for health and medical data utilization.
Weather data
The maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax, Tmin) and relative humidity (Rh) were obtained from the automated synoptic observing system (ASOS) of each metropolitan city, provided by the Korea Meteorological Administration33. In this study, heat days were defined as three types: Mild, Moderate, and Severe heat days. Mild heat days have Tmax in the 60th–90th percentile range. Moderate and Severe heat days have Tmax in the 90th–99th and 99th or more percentile ranges, respectively.
Statistical analysis
A distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) which is proposed by Gasparrini was used to analyze the relative risk of heat-related mortality34. We implemented the DLNM 2.4.735 using dlnm package in R software version 4.1.1.
Here, denotes the expected daily death counts on day t, which follows the Poisson distribution. is the cross-basis of temperature and lag time l. the lag time was determined through AIC (Akaike information criterion) test (Table S2 and Figure S1). The is the average Rh on day t, is the precipitation on day t, is the day of the year on day t, and is the sequential serial number of the date on day t. The serial number was used to adjust long-term trends in mortality. The weekday is a dummy variable for weekdays. NS denotes natural spline function.
The association between temperature and mortality was analyzed for each city, population group, and period (the past decade and the recent decade). Percent changes of relative risk (RR) per 1 °C were calculated for three temperature ranges (Mild, Moderate, and Severe heat days). The percent change of RR was calculated by the following formula.
Here, RR1 and RRn are the first and the last of each temperature range, respectively.
Results
Figure 2 shows the temporal change in the association between temperature and mortality for the vulnerable groups. The health impacts of high temperature began to appear at the 60th percentile of the Tmax in summer. In all cities, the recent RR for all ages decreased compared to the past RR (All), but the recent RR of the vulnerable group increased in Seoul, Incheon, and Gwangju (elderly, single person household, and less-educated). In Daegu, the recent RR decreased compared to the past in all cases.
Recently, the RR of the vulnerable groups (elderly, single, and less-educated) increased in Seoul and Incheon. For single-person households and less-educated in Seoul, the RR increased in Mild to Severe heat days, but the RR of the elderly increased rapidly only at a severe temperature range. In Incheon, the recent RR has increased compared to the past among the elderly, single-person households, and less-educated groups. In Gwangju, the RR of single-person households increased slightly compared to the past. The RR of the less-educated group is increasing rapidly in the severe temperature range.
Table 2 quantifies the % rate of change in RR. In an All group, RR increased relatively rapidly in Moderate and Severe heat days, whereas RR decreased in all other cities compared to the past.
Table 2.
‘–’ indicates the absence of the 99th percentile temperatures in the past (1999–2008).
Bold values mean that RR was increased statistically significantly.
In the elderly group of Seoul, RR increased by 7.05% (4.74 ~ 9.69) in the Severe heat days, and this value is 2.52% points higher than the RR in the Moderate heat days in the past. Incheon's RRs increased by 1.35% (0.51 ~ 2.24), 2.21% (0.88 ~ 3.70), and 3.00% (0.77 ~ 5.69) in Mild, Moderate, and Severe heat days, respectively, which were higher than in the past.
In 2009–2018, the RRs of single-person households in Seoul were increased by 1.89% (1.38 ~ 2.40), 3.38% (2.46 to 4.35), and 5.83% (3.81 ~ 8.13) in all three temperature ranges, respectively. In Incheon, the recent RRs increased by 1.38% (0.40 ~ 2.43), 2.61% (1.04 ~ 4.42), and 3.89% (1.18 ~ 7.25) in three temperature ranges, respectively. The increasing trends of relative risk are significantly higher than past. The increase rate of RR in Incheon was 2.27% point higher in the Moderate heat days and 3.77% point higher in the Severe heat days than in the past. The result of Gwangju shows that the RR of single-person households was slightly higher than in the past. The RRs were 0.94% (− 0.24 ~ 2.21), 1.19% (− 0.40 ~ 3.05), and 1.32% (− 0.51 ~ 3.63) in each range, respectively. The risk was in an increasing pattern with temperature, although it involves a high degree of uncertainty because the lower bound of 95% confidence interval was negative.
The less-educated group clearly showed an increase in RR recently compared to the past in Seoul. In the recent period, the RR increased by 2.91% (2.04 ~ 3.84) per 1 °C in the Moderate heat days, whereas in the past period, the RR increased by 2.11% (0.94 ~ 3.40). In the recent Severe heat days, RR increased rapidly by 4.49% (2.65 ~ 6.57). Recently in Incheon, although it was not statistically significant in the 95% significance interval, there was a pattern of increasing RR compared to the past. For example, in the Severe heat days, RR increased by 2.23% (− 1.1 ~ 6.65). In Gwangju, the recent RR increased by 2.97% (-0.93 ~ 8.16) in the same temperature range.
Discussion
Under the climate change in the future, there is a possibility that heat events that we have not experienced so far will appear36. It is well known that negative outcomes increase dramatically when unusual heat events occur, for examples, the 2003 European heatwave37, the 1994 and 2018 heatwaves in Korea20, and the 1995 Chicago heatwave38. We found that negative outcomes caused by heatwaves can be reduced by various policies and socioeconomic development, but the negative outcomes of vulnerable groups such as single-person households and low-educated groups have increased rapidly during the Severe heat days, contrary to our expectations. It means that if the heatwave response policy is focused on the elderly in terms of age and does not fully consider socioeconomic conditions, negative health effects under future climate change may be concentrated on these vulnerable groups.
In order to reduce negative outcomes from heatwaves in socio-economically vulnerable groups, effective warning dissemination and communication, social risk avoidance systems (e.g., guidelines on work intensity levels) is required. In addition, more effective measures that can induce heat protection behaviors in vulnerable groups are needed. Several previous studies27,28 showed that heatwave warning systems contributed to reducing human casualties. Heatwave warning system and emergency text message service have been implemented in Korea since 2008. This system is expected to contribute to reducing the scale of human casualties caused by the 2018 heat wave compared to the 1994 heatwave20. However, this study shows the possibility that the risk communication through the warning system is not sufficient to induce heat protection behavior in socially isolated and less-educated groups. Vulnerable groups have difficulty obtaining information about the risk of heatwaves39 and lack awareness of the risk of heatwaves23. Low-education and low-income groups are less likely to have personal heat protection measures40. Therefore, it is necessary to understand which behavioral patterns of these vulnerable groups are causing risk in extreme heat waves and to develop policies that can disconnect the risk-generation process.
By the way, the less-education group used in this study can be regarded as a proxy variable for low-income group. Table 3 shows the relative wage index by education level. When the income of high school graduates is regarded as 100, it can be seen that the income increases as the level of education increases. Vulnerability in the less-educated group may be due to low income.
Table 3.
Less than middle school | High school | College | University |
---|---|---|---|
72.1% | 100.0% | 113.0% | 152.9% |
OECD 41.
The relative wage index is converted by taking the average wage of high school graduates as 100 (adult population aged 25–64).
The Tmax in Incheon in the summer was lower than in the past, while the Tmax has risen in the other three cities. Nevertheless, the relative risk of vulnerable groups has risen recently in Incheon. As a result of comparing the number of days with weather phenomena for the Tmax and the Tmin in each city, the number of days with a Tmin of 25 °C or higher (the criterion of tropical nights in Korea) increased significantly in Incheon. In Table 4, the p90days and the p99days of Incheon decreased or did not change, while in other cities they increased. In Incheon, Tmin25days increased by 297%. Incheon is located on the coast, the average Rh is higher than that of other cities and the Rh has increased compared to the past (Table 1). Rh and Tmin affect health as much as Tmax, they are meteorological factors used in predicting the impact of heatwaves in the United Kingdom, France, and the United States42–44. Therefore, an increase in relative risk in Incheon could be related to an increase in the Tmin and Rh.
Table 4.
p90dyas: number of days when the Tmax is above 90 percentile of Tmax (1999–2018).
p99dyas: number of days when the Tmax is above 99 percentile of Tmax (1999–2018).
Tmin25days: number of days when the temperature does not fall under 25 °C during the day.
Daegu has the highest proportion of the elderly among the study regions, and the proportion of low-income groups is 1.5 times that of Incheon. The average Tmax is also the highest (Table 1). Table 5 shows the number of doctors per 1,000 population and life expectancy in each city. The ratio of doctors and life expectancy are the highest in Seoul. Daegu's ratio of doctors is 2.2, the second lowest after Incheon, and its life expectancy is the lowest among all regions. However, in the vulnerable groups, the RR decreased significantly compared to the past. The interest in heatwave response was high in Daegu, the city where the heatwave warning service system was first installed in Korea. Seminars and conferences related to heatwave are held annually by the government and Non-governmental organizations. The results of Daegu's analysis show that policy responses can reduce the impact of heatwaves despite the magnitude of hazards and exposure.
Table 5.
Seoul | Incheon | Gwangju | Daegu | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of doctor per population (1,000 people) | 3.6 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
Life expectancy | 83.4 | 81.7 | 81.8 | 81.6 |
Conclusion
Many studies have shown that relative risk of heatwaves has generally decreased over time with adaptation, response policies, and socio-economic developments17–20. We also have found that the risks recently decreased in all age groups. According to Korea Power Exchange, the air conditioner supply rate in South Korea increased from 0.29 per household in 2000 to 0.60 in 2009 to 0.97 in 201945. The life expectancy increased from 76.0 years in 2000 to 82.7 years in 201846, implying that the individual health status and healthcare conditions have continued to improve47. Heatwave policies which have been implemented since 2008 may have contributed to reducing risks.
However, we have found that the risk of death from heat waves has increased in the socio-economically vulnerable group. The trend of increase was also seen in the elderly aged 65 and over. Increases of risks were more evident in single-person households. The single-person households in Korea have continuously increased from 23.6% of the total population in 2010 to 30.4% in 202048. The increase in single-person households is not limited to Korea. According to Ortiz-Ospina, single-person households have approximately doubled in the past 50 years, and single-person households have continued to increase in many countries around the world49. This suggests that the socially isolated heat wave vulnerable population would increase in the future.
The high temperature-related risks in vulnerable groups tended to increase rapidly on Severe heat days. If the intensity and frequency of heat waves increase due to future climate change, the damage might be more concentrated in socio-economically vulnerable people. The risks of vulnerable groups have not increased in all cities with a high percentage of vulnerable groups or frequent heatwaves. Although it has unfavorable conditions in terms of heatwaves and the ratio of vulnerable groups, the risk has greatly decreased in Daegu, which has long been interested in heatwaves and aggressively implemented countermeasure policies. This suggests that interest and response policies for heatwaves play an important role in reducing damage.
This study suggests that efforts to resolve social polarization and social isolation will be a challenge to reduce future heatwave damage. The time-dependent increasing RR variation for the less-educated and single-person household groups indicated a benefit would arise from more customized heatwave warnings and impacts forecasting systems.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on the findings of the research project KEI 2021-034(R), which was conducted by the Korea Environment Institute (KEI) and funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMI (Project No. KMI2021-00411).
Author contributions
J.P.: Writing; Methodology; Visualization. Y.C.: Conceptualization; Review and editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMI (KMI2021-00411).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the MicroData Integrated Service (https://mdis.kostat.go.kr, South Korea) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, Koreans can download data by subscribing to the MicroData Integrated Service. A foreigner who is included as a joint researcher with Korean researchers when applying for data use can download the data. In addition, researchers and students belonging to an institution among foreigners residing in Korea with an alien registration card can download this data.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-28018-z.
References
- 1.Chung JY, et al. Ambient temperature and mortality: An international study in four capital cities of East Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;408(2):390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gao J, et al. Impact of extreme high temperature on mortality and regional level definition of heat wave: A multi-city study in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015;505:535–544. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lowe R, et al. Evaluating the performance of a climate-driven mortality model during heat waves and cold spells in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(2):1279–1294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120201279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gasparrini A, et al. Mortality risk attributable to high and low ambient temperature: A multicountry observational study. Lancet. 2015;386(9991):369–375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anderson GB, Oleson KW, Jones B, Peng RD. Projected trends in high-mortality heatwaves under different scenarios of climate, population, and adaptation in 82 US communities. Clim. Change. 2018;146:455–470. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1779-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chae Y, Park J. Analysis on effectiveness of impact based heatwave warning considering severity and likelihood of health impacts in Seoul, Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(5):2380. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press (2021).
- 8.Ballester J, Robine JM, Herrmann FR, Rodó X. Long-term projections and acclimatization scenarios of temperature-related mortality in Europe. Nat. Commun. 2011;2(1):358. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gasparrini A, et al. Projections of temperature-related excess mortality under climate change scenarios. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e360–e367. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yardley J, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP. Heat health planning: The importance of social and community factors. Glob. Environ. Change. 2011;21(2):670–679. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ha J, Kim H. Changes in the association between summer temperature and mortality in Seoul, South Korea. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2013;57(4):535–544. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0580-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kwon BY, et al. Vulnerabilities to temperature effects on acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions in South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(11):14571–14588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heo S, et al. Long-term changes in the heat–mortality relationship according to heterogeneous regional climate: A time-series study in South Korea. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Park J, Chae Y, Choi SH. Analysis of mortality change rate from temperature in summer by age, occupation, household type, and chronic diseases in 229 Korean municipalities from 2007–2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(9):1561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim J, Song KJ, Hong KJ, Ro YS. Trend of outbreak of thermal illness patients based on temperature 2002–2013 in Korea. Climate. 2017;5(4):94. doi: 10.3390/cli5040094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bobb JF, Peng RD, Bell ML, Dominici F. Heat-related mortality and adaptation to heat in the United States. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2014;122(8):811–816. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gasparrini A, et al. Temporal variation in heat-mortality associations: A multicountry study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015;123(11):1200–1207. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chung Y, et al. Changing susceptibility to non-optimum temperatures in Japan, 1972–2012: The role of climate, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2018;126(5):57002. doi: 10.1289/EHP2546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee W, et al. Temporal changes in mortality attributed to heat extremes for 57 cities in Northeast Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;616–617:703–709. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park J, Chae Y. Analysis of heat-related illness and excess mortality by heat waves in South Korea in 2018. J. Korean Geogr. Soc. 2020;55(4):391–408. doi: 10.22776/KGS.2020.55.4.391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang J, et al. Heatwave and mortality in 31 major Chinese cities: Definition, vulnerability and implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;649:695–702. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gómez-Martín MB, Armesto-López XA, Martínez-Ibarra E. The Spanish tourist sector facing extreme climate events: A case study of domestic tourism in the heat wave of 2003. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2014;58(5):781–797. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0659-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takahashi N, et al. Community trial on heat related-illness prevention behaviors and knowledge for the elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(3):3188–3214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120303188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anderson BG, Bell ML. Weather-related mortality: How heat, cold, and heat waves affect mortality in the United States. Epidemiology. 2009;20(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318190ee08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ostro B, Rauch S, Green R, Malig B, Basu R. The effects of temperature and use of air conditioning on hospitalizations. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010;172(9):1053–1061. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Viguié V, et al. Early adaptation to heat waves and future reduction of air-conditioning energy use in Paris. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15(7):075006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6a24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ebi KL, Teisberg TJ, Kalkstein LS, Robinson L, Weiher RF. Heat watch/warning systems save lives: Estimated costs and benefits for Philadelphia 1995–98. Bull. Amer. Meteor. 2004;85(8):1067–1074. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-85-8-1067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fouillet A, et al. Has the impact of heat waves on mortality changed in France since the European heat wave of summer 2003? A study of the 2006 heat wave. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37(2):309–317. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thomas, M. An oral history heat wave. http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/July-2015/1995-Chicago-heat-wave (2015).
- 30.Nitschke M, et al. Evaluation of a heat warning system in Adelaide, South Australia, using case-series analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e012125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Weyrich P, Scolobig A, Bresch DN, Patt A. Effects of impact-based warnings and behavioral recommendations for 481 extreme weather events. Weather Clim. Soc. 2018;10(4):781–796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Statistics Korea. Korean Statistical Information Service. https://kosis.kr (2022).
- 33.KMA. Open MET Data Portal. https://data.kma.go.kr (2021).
- 34.Gasparrini A. Distributed lag linear and non-linear models in R: The package dlnm. J. Stat. Softw. 2011;43(8):1–20. doi: 10.18637/jss.v043.i08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gasparrini. dlnm (version 2.4.7). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dlnm/index.html (2021).
- 36.Shin J, Olson R, An SI. Projected heat wave characteristics over the Korean Peninsula during the twenty-first Century. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2018;54:53–61. doi: 10.1007/s13143-017-0059-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Robine J-M, et al. Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. C.R. Biol. 2008;331(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Semenza JC, et al. Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;335(2):84–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607113350203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Messeri A, et al. Heat stress perception among native and migrant workers in Italian industries-case studies from the construction and agricultural sectors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(7):1090. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khare S, et al. Heat protection behaviour in the UK: Results of an online survey after the 2013 heatwave. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:878. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2181-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.OECD, Education at a Glance, https://index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1531 (2022).
- 42.Casanueva A, et al. Overview of existing heat-health warning systems in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(15):2657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laaidi, A., Ung, A., Wagner, V., Beaudeau, P. & Pascal, M. The French Heat and Health Watch Warning System: Principles, Fundamentals and Assessment. Saint-Maurice: Institut de veille sanitaire (2013).
- 44.NWS. Heat-Health related Alert System. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/ministry/publications/reports/heat_warning_information_system/ heat_warning_information_system.aspx (2020).
- 45.Korea Power Exchange. 2019 Home appliance distribution status survey. https://www.kpx.or.kr/www/downloadBbsFile.do?atchmnflNo=32268 (2021).
- 46.Kindicator. Life expectancy. http://www.index.go.kr/unify/idx-info.do?idxCd=8016 (2021).
- 47.KOSIS. Statistics of single-person households. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1YL21161&conn_path=I2.
- 48.OECD. OECD health statistics 2021. https://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm (2021).
- 49.Ortiz-Ospina, E. The rise of living alone: How one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world. https://ourworldindata.org/living-alone (2019).
- 50.KOSIS. Number of doctor per population.https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_2KAAC01_OECD (2021).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the MicroData Integrated Service (https://mdis.kostat.go.kr, South Korea) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, Koreans can download data by subscribing to the MicroData Integrated Service. A foreigner who is included as a joint researcher with Korean researchers when applying for data use can download the data. In addition, researchers and students belonging to an institution among foreigners residing in Korea with an alien registration card can download this data.