Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2023 Jan 4;13:1071868. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1071868

Research progress of natural silk fibroin and the application for drug delivery in chemotherapies

Bin Yu 1,, Yanli Li 1,2,, Yuxian Lin 3, Yuanying Zhu 1, Teng Hao 1, Yan Wu 1, Zheng Sun 1, Xin Yang 4,*, Hui Xu 1,*
PMCID: PMC9845586  PMID: 36686706

Abstract

Silk fibroin has been widely used in biological fields due to its biocompatibility, mechanical properties, biodegradability, and safety. Recently, silk fibroin as a drug carrier was developed rapidly and achieved remarkable progress in cancer treatment. The silk fibroin-based delivery system could effectively kill tumor cells without significant side effects and drug resistance. However, few studies have been reported on silk fibroin delivery systems for antitumor therapy. The advancement of silk fibroin-based drug delivery systems research and its applications in cancer therapy are highlighted in this study. The properties, applications, private opinions, and future prospects of silk fibroin carriers are discussed to understand better the development of anti-cancer drug delivery systems, which may also contribute to advancing silk fibroin innovation.

Keywords: silk fibroin, drug carrier, drug delivery system, cytotoxic agents, chemotherapy

1 Introduction

Cancer remains the leading cause of death in humans. According to the “Global Cancer Statistics 2020’’ report, the average cancer morbidity and mortality have increased to 201.0/100,000 and 100.7/100,000 worldwide (Cao et al., 2021). Besides, according to estimates by the World Health Organization, the number of new cancer cases worldwide will exceed 27 million by 2040, with 1 in 5 people who have cancer, with an incidence rate of about 20% and a mortality rate of close to 11% (Sung et al., 2021). Hence, cancer seriously threaten human health. Various cancer treatment methods, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, have been developed up to this point. However, limitations remain in overcoming tumor recurrence and metastasis. Moreover, there are other problems with these methods. For example, surgery is invasive; radiotherapy lacks specificity; chemotherapy fails to protect normal cells; and immunotherapy is less effective (Tulay et al., 2018; Nuvola et al., 2022). Therefore, the greatest challenge that has to be solved immediately now is to treat tumors effectively and safely, improve patient prognosis, and extend patient survival time.

Cytotoxic drugs are well-known anti-tumor drugs, such as cytarabine, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. It has a very strong killing effect on tumor cells but will also kill normal cells in the human body (Al Alawi et al., 2020). This is especially obvious for the increase of toxic and side effects and the decline of quality of life in the later stage of patients. Therefore, reducing their inhibition and killing effects on normal cells and improving their targeting and therapeutic effects on tumor cells are the focus of current research. In recent years, research on drug preparation oriented to precise drug delivery is expected to solve the problem of cytotoxic drugs. It is of great value to develop new pharmaceutical strategies for tumor treatment, and the establishment and application of new drug delivery systems are exceptionally prominent for improving cytotoxic drug problems (Mazzaferro et al., 2013). For cytotoxic drugs, the new delivery systems can maintain or even increase the therapeutic efficacy and reduce toxic and side effects. Moreover, the targeted drug delivery system can accurately target tumor cells and improve bioavailability and selectivity, becoming one of the possible directions for cytotoxic drugs to be used for tumor treatment (Hitchcock et al., 2020).

Synthetic and natural polymers are primarily used as a carrier for drug delivery, including polylactic acid (PLA), lactic acid glycolic acid copolymer (PLGA), silk fibroin, chitosan, and corn protein (Estey et al., 2006; Pascoli et al., 2018). In general, natural polymer materials have good biocompatibility and biodegradability and are feasible to be a carrier for constructing nano-drug delivery systems (Mathur and Gupta, 2010; Mohammed et al., 2017). Silk fibroin, a medical material approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has been widely used in the postoperative suture, tissue regeneration, and drug delivery system (Yucel et al., 2014). On the basis of the advantages of excellent mechanical properties and good biocompatibility and biodegradability, drug loaded nanoparticles can be prepared by using silk fibroin to acquire various biological functions (Qi et al., 2017). However, there are no anti-tumor nanomedicine with silk fibroin as drug carrier on the market yet. Currently, only albumin and silk fibroin are close in characteristics and categories among the anti-tumor nanomedicine approved for marketing, providing some reference and basis for the clinical transformation of silk fibroin in the future nanomedicine. Some of approved anti-tumor nanomedicines are shown in Table 1. Herein the structure, properties, applications and preparation of silk fibroin nanoparticles were introduced to get better understanding of silk fibroin and its application in anti-tumor drug delivery system. The research progress and achievements of silk fibroin as a carrier material of drug delivery system in tumor drug therapy in the past decade were also summarized and discussed. Finally, we further analyzed the current problems and future application prospects of silk fibroin and put forward some personal ideas.

TABLE 1.

Some approved anti-tumor nanomedicines.

Types Active pharmaceutic ingredient Trademark Types of tumor First approval
Liposome Doxorubicin Doxil/Caelix Ovarian cancer, metastatic breast cancer, Kaposi sarcoma United States 1995
Doxorubicin Mycoet Breast cancer United States 1996
Daunorubicin DaunoXome Kaposi sarcoma United States 1996
Leurocristine Onco-TCS Non-Hodgkin lymphoma United States 1996
Paclitaxel Lipusu Ovarian cancer, metastatic gastric cancer China 2003
Mifamurtide MEPACT Osteosarcoma Europe 2009
Vincristine Marqibo Leukemia United States 2012
Paclitaxe PICN Metastatic breast cancer India 2014
Irinotecan Onivyde Metastatic pancreatic cancer United States 2015
China 2022
Paclitaxe DHP107 Advanced gastric cancer Korea 2016
Cytarabine/daunorubicin VYXEOS Acute myeloid leukaemia United States 2017
Mitoxantrone DuoEnDa Peripheral T-cell lymphoma China 2022
Polymer micelles Paclitaxel Genexol-PM Breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer Korea 2006
Docetaxel Nanoxel M Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck Korea 2012
Paclitaxel Paclical Oophoroma Russia 2015
Paclitaxel Non-small cell lung cancer China 2021
Nanoparticles Albumin-paclitaxel Abraxane Metastatic breast cancer United States 2005
Doxorubicin Transdrug Hepatocellular carcinoma
NanoTherm Recurrent glioblastoma Europe 2010
Hensify Locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma Europe 2019
Microsphere 90Y SIR-Spheres Metastatic colorectal cancer liver China 2022
Goserellin Breast cancer China 2022

2 Major characteristics of silk fibroin

2.1 The chemical structure

Silk fibroin is the main component of silk, accounting for about 75% of the total weight of silk. Silk fibroin consists of two leading chains, a heavy (H-) chain (390 kDa) and a light (L-) chain (26 kDa), which are linked by disulfide bonds to form the HL complex (Figure 1A) (Holland et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2021). P25 (25 kDa) is a glycoprotein, including ASN linked oligosaccharide chain, which is hydrophobically linked to H-L complex (Tanaka et al., 1999). Three structural protein subsets (heavy chain, light chain, and glycoprotein P25) comprise silk fibroin with a molecular ratio of 6:6:1 (Koh et al., 2015). Among them, the H- chain of silk fibroin has amphiphilic properties, including hydrophobic and hydrophilic blocks (Gholipourmalekabadi et al., 2020). The hydrophilic region is short and non-repetitive, but the hydrophobic region has repetitive sequences. It can be folded into a β-sheet to generate a crystal structure, so silk fibroin can be considered a hydrophobic glycoprotein and is insoluble in water (Bini et al., 2004).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Schematic diagram of the silk structure. (A) heavy chain (i.e., N-terminus, β-sheets, Amorphous and C-terminus). and light chain which linked via disulphide bonds. (B) silkworm thread, fibril overall structure and silk fibroin polypeptide chains. Notes: Sun, W., Gregory, D.A., Tomeh, M.A., Zhao, X., 2021. Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 1499. Reprinted with permission from references. Copyright 2021, MDPI.

Silk fibroin has two main crystal structures, including silk I and silk II (Figure 1B). Silk I is a metastable crystal structure containing bound water molecules and is intermediate between α-helix and β-fold. Silk I is hydrophilic and thermodynamically unstable. Silk II is the most stable state and is an antiparallel β-folded lamellar structure due to strong hydrogen bonds between adjacent peptide blocks, resulting in increased mechanical properties, including stiffness and tensile strength (Sun et al., 2021). On the contrary, silk II is hydrophobic and thermodynamically stable. Besides, the water solubility of silk fibroin was significantly related to the crystalline state and environmental pH value. Because silk I is more soluble than silk II, and the methods of transforming insoluble silk II into silk I can increase the water solubility of silk fibroin (Pham and Tiyaboonchai, 2020). Similarly, silk I can also be converted into silk II by changing solution conditions and ambient temperatures, such as temperature, pH, methanol, and potassium chloride, which can induce this conversion (Rusa et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Huot et al., 2015; Ming et al., 2015; Gregory et al., 2016). Due to the role of hydrogen bonds, it is relatively challenging to convert silk II to silk I, and it can only be converted after LiBr, strong acid or urea is used to break the hydrogen bonds (Chen et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2016). The theoretical isoelectric point pI of silk fibroin is 4.53. When the environmental pH is near the isoelectric point, the water solubility of silk fibroin will decrease (Lammel et al., 2010). Based on silk fibroin’s water solubility, organic solvents can be reduced during the preparation, thus reducing the impact on the encapsulated drugs. Nowadays, this technique is widely used for biomaterial engineering applications, including the silk fibroin nanoparticles based on transformation from silk I with a random coil and α-helix structure to the highly ordered β-sheet structure of silk II (Ma et al., 2020). Moreover, the regenerated silk fibroin solution has a small amount of unstable silk III in the air/water interface, which is a triple helical crystal structure (Valluzzi et al., 1999; Pham et al., 2019).

2.2 Biocompatibility and safety

As a kind of natural fiber, the medical use of silk as a wound suture can be traced back hundreds of years. Nowadays, biocompatible and safety are the main concern for silk fibroin used as a drug delivery carrier. Degummed silk and regenerated silk fibroin are considered biological materials suitable for animal cell culture, which has been confirmed for a long time (Minoura et al., 1995; Lazaris et al., 2002). Wang et al. used a vacuum ultraviolet-ozone activation method to wrap silk fibroin on the surface of MgZnCa alloy as a protective barrier and then implanted it in cells and rabbits to evaluate the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of MgZnCa alloy (Wang et al., 2019a). The tests showed that this silk fibroin-coated MgZnCa had improved biocompatibility with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. According to another study about the stents made of silk implanted in mice, almost no inflammation and immune response were found after 1 year of feeding (Wang et al., 2008). Silk fibroin is a natural high-purity protein secreted and synthesized by endothelial cells on the inner wall of silkworm silk gland. The body can absorb its final degradation product, and its molecular weight can also be adjusted by modifying the composition of silk fibroin to meet the requirements of different biological environments (Guo et al., 2021). Therefore, it has good biocompatibility.

Some researchers have discussed the safety and effectiveness of microparticle scaffold prepared from silk fibroin for bone void filling (Deshpande et al., 2022). In vitro and vivo studies showed that this scaffold was biocompatible through cytotoxicity, immunogenicity, genotoxicity, systemic toxicity, and implantation. At the same time, compared with commercial calcium-based bone gap fillers, microparticle scaffold prepared from silk fibroin is non-toxic for bone gap filling and contributes to the good healing of fracture defects. In addition, the effectiveness and safety of engineered silk fibroin and collagen tissue have been evaluated in patients with bone defects. The results showed that it is safe and effective and suggested that a larger sample of randomized controlled trials can be carried out in the next stage (Sharafat-Vaziri et al., 2020). The latest study reported that inhalable ciprofloxacin hydrochloride microparticles (CMs) based on silk fibroin and mannitol (Lin et al., 2021). A series of in vitro and in vivo performance evaluation tests demonstrated that CMs did not affect lung function nor induce the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in the lungs. CMs, thus would be a promising pulmonary drug delivery system for the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. All these findings revealed that silk fibroin is a kind of natural polymer material that has a prominent advantage in the application of drug carriers due to its excellent biocompatibility and biosafety.

2.3 Mechanical properties and biodegradability

Four secondary structures of silk fibroin exist, including β-sheet, random coil, α-helix, and β-turn (Choi et al., 2018). Among them, the β-sheet structure in the crystalline region of silk fibroin is the main factor that plays a vital role in the excellent flexibility and tensile resistance of silk, and the toughness is higher than other synthetic fibers, such as carbon fiber, collagen (Gosline et al., 1999; Cheng et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2018; Blamires et al., 2020). Although natural silk fibroin has good mechanical properties, the biological materials made of silk fibroin, such as scaffolds, are made by regenerating silk fibroin solution. However, these scaffolds are highly fragile because the regenerated silk fibroin lacks appropriate secondary and hierarchical structures (Altman et al., 2002). In order to deal with the problem of poor mechanical properties of regenerated silk fibroin, some technology methods are used to manipulate the regeneration process to improve its mechanical capabilities, such as porogen and 3D bioprinting technology (Nazarov et al., 2004; Floren et al., 2016).

When exogenous substances enter the body, they generally cause immunogenic reactions. However, after degumming, silk fibroin does not contain sericin, so it will not produce immunogenicity (Florczak et al., 2021). Some studies have found that pure sericin can be used as a material with good biocompatibility, so the coexistence of silk fibroin and sericin may lead to an immune response (Chirila et al., 2013). On the contrary, silk fibroin is a polymer that enzymes can degrade, and its degradation products also do not have immunogenicity (Cao and Wang, 2009). Although these views are not consistent, they allow people to achieve different purposes of use by regulating the structure and performance of silk fibroin. It can be degraded by enzymes such as α-chymotrypsin, protease XIV and collagenase IA (Sun et al., 2021). Furthermore, its degradation rate is affected by the material’s microstructure, and the degradation rate is the random structure part, silk I structure, and silk II structure in the material from fast to slow (Umuhoza et al., 2020). Lee et al. investigated the degradation behavior of silk fibroin membranes in vitro and in vivo. They found that they were degraded in phosphate-buffered saline, medium and proteinase K solution (Lee et al., 2012). In protease K solution, 80% of this membrane was degraded within 10 days. Meanwhile, another study found also confirmed that, more importantly, its degradation products were also non-toxic and harmless (Lu et al., 2011). Some scholars synthesized silk fibroin hydrogels through a chemical cross-linking reaction of silk fibroin (Wu et al., 2020). By γ-ray irradiation at different doses, the chemically cross-linked silk fibroin exhibited better elasticity and better biodegradability and biocompatibility than the logistically cross-linked hydrogels. In the assay of cell proliferation, the study also evaluated the cell viability of human mesenchymal stem cells on freeze-dried silk fibroin hydrogel scaffolds. No significant cytotoxicity to human mesenchymal stem cells was observed.

3 Applications in drug delivery system

Due to the unique properties mentioned above, silk fibroin has been widely used as carrier material for various drug delivery systems. In fact, silk fibroin is usually prepared into diverse structural forms with disparate properties to adapt to various drug delivery systems, including hydrogels, porous scaffolds, rods, fibers, and nanoparticles (Zhao et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the drugs loaded could be the first-line drugs used in the clinic such as doxorubicin, and dexamethasone sodium, as well as some Chinese medicine monomers such as quercetin, curcumin (Kim et al., 2014). Since carrier forms of silk fibroin are various, the objects of action and diseases are also different. Therefore, the application of more detailed structural types of silk fibroin is shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

The application of silk fibroin as drug carrier.

Delivery system Loaded drug Other excipients Application Subject References
Porous scaffolds TiO2 Tissue engineering Mice and NIH 3T3 cells Kim et al. (2014)
Discs Griffithsin HIV Rhesus macaques Crakes et al. (2020)
Films Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) Vaccine Wistar rats Stinson et al. (2020)
Porous scaffolds Irisin Calcium silicate, sodium alginate Bone regeneration Bone marrow stem cells and SD rats Xin et al. (2019)
Hydrogels Betamethasone Tyramine-gellan gum Rheumatoid arthritis New Zealand white rabbits and chondrogenic primary cells Oliveira et al. (2020)
Porous scaffolds Sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol, magnesium hydroxide Antibiosis Hu02 cells Eivazzadeh-Keihan et al. (2020)
Hydrogels Dexamethasone sodium phosphate Chitosan L929 fibroblast cells Akrami-Hasan-Kohal et al. (2021)
Porous scaffolds Quercetin Hydroxyapatite Osteogenesis Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and SD rats Song et al. (2018)
liposome Basic fibroblast growth factor Liposome Deep second-degree scald Mice and NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells Xu et al. (2017)
Nanoparticle Celecoxib or curcumin Osteoarthritis Human articular chondrocytes Crivelli et al. (2019)
Films Poly ethylene glycol (PEG) Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) Limbal epithelial stem cells and rabbits Li et al. (2017)
Porous scaffolds Dental pulp stem cells Hydroxyapatite Dental pulp regeneration Nude mice Zhang et al. (2019)
Liposome Doxorubicin Liposome Cancer MCF-7 cells, MDA-MB231 cells and L929 fibroblasts Suyamud et al. (2021)
Scaffolds Stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 Nano-hydroxyapatite Bone regeneration Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Shen et al. (2016)
Films An antimicrobial peptide (Cys-KR12) Wound healing Monocytes (Raw264.7) Song et al. (2016)
Hydrogels Bioink, graphene oxide Tissue engineering Kim et al. (2021)
Microneedle Composite insulin - Diabetes Mice Zhu et al. (2020)
Microneedle Melatonin Proline, melatonin Insomnia Rats Qi et al. (2021)
Scaffolds Gelatin  Bone tissue engineering Rats and mesenchymal stem cell Luetchford et al. (2020)
Microcapsules Plasmid DNA NIH 3T3 cell and mice Li et al. (2014)
Scaffolds Usnic acid Wound healing Mice Zha et al. (2021)
Nanofiber Cationic peptide Chitosan Wound healing Hu02 human foreskin fibroblast cells Khosravimelal et al. (2021)
Discs Curcumin Poly(lactic acid) Cancer human cervical cancer cells Patwa et al. (2018)

Nanoparticles based on silk fibroin are the most widely used and studied due to the simple and diverse processing technics and the improved in vivo ADME properties steming from the ideal size. The small size usually allows nanoparticles to penetrate tiny capillaries, thereby enhancing the cellular uptake of encapsulated therapeutic molecules (Mathur and Gupta, 2010; Zhao et al., 2015). Moreover, silk fibroin-based nanoparticles may deliver anti-cancer agents to tumor sites and thus have great potential for targeted drug delivery systems. Farokhi et al. also discussed the application of silk fibroin as electrospun nanofibers in the drug delivery system. For example, antibiotics, vitamins, and growth factors have been delivered using silk fibroin electrospun nanofibers as carrier materials and achieved remarkable results (Farokhi et al., 2020). In recent years, silk fibroin as a drug delivery carrier material has made significant development in the field of medicine, including HIV (Crakes et al., 2020), vaccine (Stinson et al., 2020), bone regeneration (Xin et al., 2019), rheumatoid arthritis (Oliveira et al., 2020).

We know that nanoparticles are a common structural form. As a new biomaterial, it is more and more widely used in the medical field. It has significant advantages, such as prolonging the half-life of drugs, reducing the dosage and frequency of administration, enhancing the curative effect, reducing the toxicity of drugs, increasing the accumulation of drugs in tissues, and realizing diversified routes of Administration (Chen et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2020a; Zhao et al., 2021). The preparation of silk fibroin nanoparticles has become a current hotspot. The desolvation method is the most common method to prepare silk fibroin drug-loaded nanoparticles. It is the process of spontaneously forming insoluble nanoparticles after mixing an aqueous silk fibroin solution with a water-miscible organic solvent. At the same time, in order to meet the requirements of silk fibroin nanoparticles for different purposes, most drugs are connected with silk fibroin through physical adsorption or chemical crosslinking to prepare nanoparticles (Montalbán et al., 2018). However, chemical modification is required to connect silk fibroin with other carrier materials when preparing composite carriers before drug loading.

Zhang et al. added 5.0% regenerated silk fibroin solution into water-miscible organic solvents such as acetone and ethanol, the organic solvent volume accounted for at least 70% of the final volume, and silk fibroin was suspended in the mixture of water and organic solvent to form Tiny spherical particles with good crystallinity, nanoparticles spontaneously aggregate to produce slow sedimentation, and finally the sediment can be collected and purified from the mixture by centrifugation and filtration to obtain particles with a particle size ranging from 35 to 125 nm (Zhang et al., 2007). Some scholars used electrospraying to prepare silk fibroin nanoparticles and connected them to the syringe through the nozzle of the high-voltage electrostatic generator, and fixed the whole assembly to the microinjection pump (Qu et al., 2014). Silk fibroin solution was differentiated into droplets under a high-voltage electrostatic field, and then the resulting droplets were continuously collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, it was freeze-dried in a lyophilizer for 48 h. In order to separate the nano-sized particles, the lyophilized products were suspended in deionized water, then centrifuged, and lyophilized again to obtain silk fibroin nanoparticles (59–75 nm). In addition, we also summarize and describe other standard preparation methods, and their advantages and disadvantages are also shown in Table 3. In these methods, we also find that the size of silk fibroin nanoparticles ranges from 20 nm to 20 μm (Florczak et al., 2021).

TABLE 3.

Common preparation methods for nanoparticles of silk fibroin.

Methods Advantages Disadvantages Particle size References
Desolvation Mild conditions; simple operation; controllable volume Particles are easy to polymerize; low drug retention and loading capacity; organic solvents are not easy to elute; cumbersome washing steps 35–125 nm Zhang et al. (2007)
Electrospraying No organic solvent; size controllable nanoparticles; high drug loading and encapsulation efficiency; high purity and excellent monodispersity High cost; complex operation 59–75 nm Qu et al. (2014)
Spray-freeze-drying or Spray-drying No organic solvent; size controllable nanoparticles; uniform appearance; high drug loading and encapsulation efficiency Freeze drying agent is required; high cost ∼5 μm Kim et al. (2015)
PVA blend film Mild conditions; simple operation; no organic solvent Polymer residues; silk II should be induced after post treatment 300 nm–20 μm Wang et al. (2010)
Supercritical fluid No organic solvent; size controllable nanoparticles; high drug loading and encapsulation efficiency High cost; complex operation ∼50 nm Zhao et al. (2012)
Laminar jet break-up No organic solvent; mild conditions; high drug loading and encapsulation efficiency Big particle size; silk II should be induced after post treatment 30–440 μm Wenk et al. (2008)
Capillary microdot Nanoparticles are small and controllable Silk II should be induced after post treatment 20–130 nm Gupta et al. (2009)
Microemulsion Nanoparticle size controllable Residual organic solvent 167–169 nm Myung et al. (2020)
Ball milling Simple operation; easy to scale up Wide size distribution; grinding impurities; May reduce silk II content 0.2–4 μm Rajkhowa et al. (2008)
Salting out Simple operation; high yield; no organic solvent; sustainable protein activity Hydrophobic drugs are not easy to be embedded; salting-out agent residue; complicated washing steps 486 nm–2 μm Lammel et al. (2010)
Crosslinking reaction Simple operation; controllable volume Complex operation; residual organic solvent 0.3–1 μm Pham et al. (2019)

4 Drug delivery system for chemotherapy of silk fibroin

As mentioned above, the recent main antitumor treatment methods mainly include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages (Gao et al., 2014; Gao and Lo, 2018; Kaushik et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2019; Boreel et al., 2021). Nevertheless, most patients choose drugs for tumor treatment, such as cytotoxic drugs, but some patients also choose targeted drugs, traditional Chinese medicine decoction, and so on (Jiang et al., 2021; Spiliopoulou et al., 2021; Cortés et al., 2022). However, many anticancer drugs potentially cause toxicity in patients, resulting in high drug resistance and poor prognosis quality of life (Chen et al., 2016; Bakos et al., 2018; Messina et al., 2019; Abravan et al., 2020). A novel cancer therapy strategy is urgently needed. Drug delivery systems are becoming hotspots since they could reduce adverse reactions, and improve efficacy and safety, especially in cytotoxic drugs. There seem two primary reasons. First, the advent of albumin-paclitaxel, paclitaxel is a cytotoxic drug, and albumin-paclitaxel as a nano-drug has been successfully marketed and used in clinical practice, which has extensively promoted the development and progress of drug delivery systems (Lv et al., 2021). Secondly, cytotoxic drugs have serious side effects, and some drugs even have problems such as poor water solubility and short half-life, which limit their application (Newell and Sausville, 2016). In order to further solve the use of cytotoxic drugs during chemotherapy, the application of biomaterials in drug delivery systems is an emerging technology (Mancipe Castro et al., 2021). Drug delivery systems prepared by loading cytotoxic drugs with biomaterials can reduce these problems, improve their therapeutic effects, and expand their clinical applications (Al-Mansoori et al., 2021). Therefore, we believe that cytotoxic drugs will gradually become the focus of drug delivery systems. Additionally, drug carrier materials are a determinant in delivery systems. PLA or PLGA was used to build drug delivery systems in many studies and approved by FDA for drug injection. Although various nanocarrier systems are available in the market, a gap exists in drug delivery systems based on different carriers (Aggarwal et al., 2006).

Nanotechnology can be applied to the delivery of drugs, providing a new way of cancer treatment. In the past decade, it has been found that materials that can be used as drug carriers include polyurethane functionalized starch (Desai et al., 2021), ferritin(He et al., 2019), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) (Li et al., 2019), cyclodextrin (Kang et al., 2019), and silk fibroin (Kapoor and Kundu, 2016; Melke et al., 2016). Among them, silk fibroin, a typical natural biomaterial, exhibits versatile properties through tuning the secondary conformations and hierarchical microstructures (Ma et al., 2020). Silk fibroin can be prepared into various drug delivery systems to meet the different requirements of cancer treatment (Wani and Veerabhadrappa, 2018; Xu et al., 2019; Zuluaga-Vélez et al., 2021). In addition, it also has shown promising potential as a carrier in tissue repair (Gholipourmalekabadi et al., 2020), bone defects (Hong et al., 2020a), myocardial infarction (Chen et al., 2018b), nerve repair (Fernández-García et al., 2016), colitis (Diez-Echave et al., 2021), infections (Hassani Besheli et al., 2017), acute pancreatitis (Hassanzadeh et al., 2021), osteoporosis (Wang et al., 2018), and cancers (Xie et al., 2016). At present, silk fibroin has been studied and analyzed in the field of tumor as a carrier material for drug delivery.

4.1 Breast cancer

Docetaxel can be used to treat breast cancer. However, low water solubility and systemic toxicity seriously hinder its clinical application. Researchers prepared docetaxel-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles and analyzed their potential antitumor activity against breast cancer cell lines (Al Saqr et al., 2021). The diameter of these nanoparticles was 178–198 nm, with net negative surface charge and encapsulation efficiency ranging from 56% to 72%. In vitro release study showed that the nano-formulation had a biphasic release curve and could release the drug for 72 h. In vitro cell study revealed that compared with free drugs, the nano-formulation significantly increased the cytotoxic potential of breast cancer cell lines and enhanced the uptake of docetaxel by breast cancer cells (Figure 2). Furthermore, the accumulation of cells treated with nano-formulation in the G2/M phase was significantly higher than that of cells treated with free docetaxel. Compared with free docetaxel, the nano-formulation loaded with docetaxel has excellent antitumor activity on breast cancer cells. The results also emphasized the feasibility of using silk fibroin-made nanoparticles as a non-toxic and biocompatible delivery carrier to enhance breast cancer treatment. At the same time, silk fibroin has good biocompatibility and can be used as composite materials with other biological materials for drug delivery systems and targeted formulation development. Arumugam et al. made silk fibroin, cellulose acetate, and gold and silver nanoparticles (CA/SF/Au-Ag) into composite nanofibers. They explored their toxicity to MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells (Arumugam et al., 2021). The study found that CA/SF/Au-Ag nanoparticles have a high inhibitory effect on breast cancer cells, with an IC50 value of 17.54 μg/ml. It also indicated that the targeted nanoparticles were relatively highly inhibitory on breast cancer cells with a lower IC50 than the other three groups. In the activity assay on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, CA/SF/Au-Ag composite nanofibers exhibited excellent bioactivity compared with other groups. In total, this active targeting nanofiber has a high inhibitory effect on tumor cells with a low IC50. However, due to the lack of in vivo studies, it is difficult to determine the composite nanofibers’ active targeting and in vivo antitumor efficacy. Contemporarily, it has been used to build a nano-formulation loading rosmarinic acid, and the activity on breast cancer and cervical cancer cell lines was investigated (Fuster et al., 2021). The results showed that the nano-formulation could inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines. Consequently, based on the above results, a silk fibroin-based nanoparticle delivery system can enhance the antitumor potential of anti-breast cancer drugs.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

In vitro cytotoxicity of DXL-loaded SF-NPs against breast cancer cell lines. (A) MCF-7 and (B) MDAMB-231 cells were incubated with different concentrations of free DXL, SF-NPs, or DXL-loaded SF-NPs for different incubation times Notes: Al Saqr, A., Wani, S.U.D., Gangadharappa, H.V., Aldawsari, M.F., Khafagy, E.S., Lila, A.S.A., 2021. Enhanced cytotoxic activity of docetaxel-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles against breast cancer cells. Polymers 13: 1416. Reprinted with permission from references. Copyright 2021, MDPI.

4.2 Liver cancer

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is an effective method for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Some scholars successfully prepared sodium alginate-modified silk fibroin microsphere embolic agent by emulsion crosslinking method, loaded with adriamycin hydrochloride, and studied its toxicity to liver cancer cells (Chen et al., 2020). The results showed that: firstly, the microspheres had smooth surfaces as well as good sphericity, and the swelling rate of the microspheres could meet the requirements of an arterial embolic agent, also included the sensitivity to pH and temperature; secondly, the microspheres had good blood compatibility; thirdly, cytotoxicity test showed that microspheres could promote the proliferation of fibroblasts and HUVEC; Finally, the drug loading and release ability of the microspheres were proved by the controlled release curve of adriamycin hydrochloride. This study showed that sodium alginate-modified silk fibroin microspheres could be a potential biodegradable arterial embolization agent to treat liver cancer. Some scholars also successfully prepared the complex of silk fibroin and adenovirus by taking advantage of the excellent biocompatibility of silk fibroin, loaded growth inhibitor 4 and interleukin 24, and analyzed its effect on liver cancer cells (Qu et al., 2019). The preparation and characterization of this complex are shown in Figure 3. The results showed that the constructed complex could effectively mediate the expression of target gene ING4 in SMMC-7721 cells and the secretion of target gene IL-24 in SMMC-7721 cells, thereby inducing apoptosis of hepatoma SMMC-7721 cells. Besides, the viability of SMMC-7721 and L-02 cells infected with the complex was also assessed. It was found that the growth of SMMC-7721 cells was significantly inhibited but that the growth and proliferation of L-02 cells were not affected. The complex constructed in this study showed improved infection efficiency and enhanced suppressive effects on human hepatoma carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells, potentially reducing the dose of adenovirus and maintaining high infection efficiency and tumor inhibition. Currently, most researchers tend to make silk fibroin and other biological materials into a complex and then load drugs or others for anti-liver cancer research. The latest research on silk fibroin might be a drug delivery carrier material for liver cancer.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Synthesis and characteristics of CASF. (A) Schematic diagram of CASF synthesis. (B) Zeta potential of CASF at PEI/ASF weight ratios of 0%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%. (C) 1 H-NMR spectra of PEI, ASF and CASF in D2O. Abbreviations: CASF, cationic Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin; PEI, polyethylenimine; ASF, Antheraea pernyi silk fifibroin; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance. Notes: Qu, J., Wang, W., Feng, Y., Niu, L., Li, M., Yang, J., Xie, Y., 2019. Cationic Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin-modified adenovirus-mediated ING4 and IL-24 dual gene coexpression vector suppresses the growth of hepatoma carcinoma cells. International Journal of NanoMedicine 2019:14 9745-9761' Originally published by and used with permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd.

4.3 Lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in terms of morbidity and death, thus choosing the right therapy is crucial (Mottaghitalab et al., 2015). In recent years, silk fibroin as a carrier material to load anti-cancer drugs to treat lung cancer has also become a hot research direction. In 2014, Qu et al. used silk fibroin loaded with cisplatin to prepare a controlled-release preparation to conduct research on lung cancer cell toxicity (Qu et al., 2014). It was found that cisplatin in the nanoparticles could be released slowly and continuously for more than 15 days. Meanwhile, in vitro, anti-cancer experiments showed that silk fibroin-nanoparticles loaded with cisplatin were easily internalized by A549 lung cancer cells, transferred cisplatin to cancer cells, and then triggered apoptosis. However, these particles were not easy to be internalized by L929 mouse fibroblasts, so their inhibitory effect on the growth of normal cells was weak. The silk fibroin nanoparticles loaded with cisplatin showed a sustained and effective killing effect on tumor cells, but the inhibitory effect on normal cells was weak. This research provided a new method for preparing cisplatin-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles and offered a new carrier system for the clinical treatment of lung cancer and other tumors. Mottaghitalab et al. also used silk fibroin as a drug carrier to load gemcitabine into a targeted nano-formulation. They explored its therapeutic effect on lung cancer in the rat model (Mottaghitalab et al., 2017). Compared with the untargeted silk fibroin nano-formulation and the control group, the gemcitabine-targeted nano-formulation showed higher cytotoxicity, cell uptake and accumulation in lung tissue. Besides, nano-formulation targeting gemcitabine had higher potential in the treatment of induced lung tumors. In histological and radiological analysis, higher survival, lower mortality and no signs of metastasis were also observed in those animals treated with targeted agents. This study proposes an effective anti-cancer drug delivery system for targeted lung cancer. As its loaded drug, gemcitabine is limited in clinical use because it is cytotoxic. The preparation of nano-targeted formulation with silk fibroin helps to expand its use, improve the therapeutic effect, and reduce its toxic and side effects. The system may be used in the treatment of malignant lung cancer in the future. Moreover, this actively targeted nano-formulation shows a higher therapeutic effect, more aggregation effect and lower mortality in the study. This is a characteristic and advantage that untargeted nano-formulation does not have, and it also shows the advantages and potential of actively targeted nano-formulation. More interestingly, Wang et al. even found that silk fibroin peptide had a significant inhibitory effect on H460 lung cancer cells, induced the cells to arrest in the S phase, and then promoted apoptosis (Wang et al., 2019b). Silk fibroin peptide may become a new type of therapeutic agent for lung cancer treatment.

4.4 Gastric cancer

Silk fibroin has also been studied and analyzed in gastric cancer nano-formulations as a drug delivery carrier material. Some researchers prepared nano-formulation from silk fibroin and paclitaxel to explore their effects on human gastric cancer cell lines BGC-823 and SGC-7901 (Wu et al., 2013). In vitro cytotoxicity study, when paclitaxel was incorporated into the nano-formulation, paclitaxel could maintain its pharmacological activity, and silk fibroin had no cytotoxicity to cells. The antitumor effect of paclitaxel silk fibroin nano-formulation in vivo was evaluated on the transplanted tumor model of gastric cancer in nude mice. Compared with systemic administration, local administration of paclitaxel silk fibroin nanoparticles showed excellent antitumor efficacy by delaying tumor growth and reducing tumor weight (Figure 4). In addition, the organs of rats treated with nanoparticles did not show apparent toxicity, indicating that silk fibroin nanoparticles were safe in vivo. Another researcher loaded 5-fluorouracil on the composite made of cyclic pentapeptide and silk fibroin to prepare targeted nanoparticles and investigated its tumor progress on the rat model of gastric cancer (Mao et al., 2018). These results also clarified that silk fibroin-based nano-formulation had ideal active tumor-targeting properties and significantly reduced tumor burden. Crgdfk was conjugated with silk fibroin polypeptide to make the nanoparticles of 5-fluorouracil targeted. In this study, this preparation method makes the prepared nanoparticles have targeted characteristics, and 5-fluorouracil can reach more tumor cells to give full play to the antitumor effect. At the same time, the rat organs treated with silk fibroin nano preparation did not show apparent toxicity, which proved that it had good biocompatibility and safety in vivo. In this study, nano preparations with active targeting showed obvious advantages, and the efficacy was more effective when combined with photodynamic therapy. In 2020, Zhang et al. prepared silk fibroin into a hydrogel loaded with gambogic acid to prepare a nano-formulation and studied its antitumor activity in the animal model of gastric cancer (Zhang et al., 2020a). The results showed that the antitumor activity of the hydrogel combined with gambogic acid nano-formulations was higher than that of the hydrogel loaded with gambogic acid and free gambogic acid. The free gambogic acid group had almost no antitumor effect. There was no significant change in body weight in each group, and the white blood cell and hemoglobin counts decreased slightly. The hydrogel delivery system prepared by silk fibroin as a drug carrier showed little systemic toxicity. It was considered a new strategy to improve the efficacy of anti-gastric cancer.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Antitumor efficacies of PTX-SF-NPs for systemic and focal treatment in human gastric cancer BGC-823 nude mice xenograft model. (A) Relative tumor volumes during treatment. (B) Absolute tumor weights on Day 14. (C) H&E staining of tumors Notes: Wu, P., Liu, Q., Li, R., Wang, J., Zhen, X., Yue, G., Wang, H., Cui, F., Wu, F., Yang, M., Qian, X., Yu, L., Jiang, X., Liu, B., 2013. Facile preparation of paclitaxel loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles for enhanced antitumor efficacy by locoregional drug delivery. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 5, 12638–12645 Reprinted with permission from references. Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society.

4.5 Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor. Its survival rate is extremely low, and its prognosis is still very poor. Hence, novel treatment strategies to combat this deadly disease are urgently needed. Some researchers used silk fibroin as a carrier material to load triptolide and triptorubin to prepare nanoparticle preparations and evaluated its effect on human pancreatic cancer cells (Ding et al., 2017). The results showed that the silk fibroin nano-formulation of triptolide could produce a synergistic inhibitory effect on the growth of MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells, and the growth inhibitory effect of the combination of the two drugs is synergistic rather than additive. It also further suggested that this novel combination may provide a potential treatment for pancreatic cancer. However, there are few studies on silk fibroin related to pancreatic cancer. The effect of silk fibroin as a drug delivery carrier material in the treatment of pancreatic cancer needs further research to confirm. In order to further clarify the application of silk fibroin in drug delivery systems for tumor treatment, we summarized the details and results of silk fibroin as a carrier material for drug delivery systems in different tumor treatment research in the past decade (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

The related research on silk fibroin as a carrier for drug delivery systems in cancer.

Delivery system Anti-cancer agent Other excipients Size Applica-tion Major findings References
Nanoparticle Curcumin 155–170 nm Cancer ↑ efficacy and cytotoxicity against neuroblastoma cells Montalbán et al. (2018)
Nanoparticle Doxorubicin Tween-80 100–200 nm Gliobla-stoma ↑ sustained drug release behavior of the loaded drug (doxorubicin) Pandey et al. (2020)
Nanoparticle Curcumin <100 nm Colon cancer ↑ anti-cancer efficacy nanoparticles was improved, ↓ cytotoxicity of normal cells at a concentration of ∼10 μg/ml Xie et al. (2017)
Hydrogels Salinomycin and paclitaxel 120 nm Cancer This might become a novel and powerful locoregional tumor treatment regimen in the future Wu et al. (2018)
Porous scaffolds Cisplatin 6 mm Gastric cancer ↑ long-term efficacy and bioactivity of the injectable hydrogel system in vitro for sustained drug delivery application Gangrade and Mandal, (2020)
Nanoparticle Fingolimod Heptapeptide, selenium 120 nm Thyroid cancer ↑ permeability and retention of the tumor area; ↑ biocompatibility Zou et al. (2021)
Nanoparticle Doxorubicin Indocyanine green, MnO2 139.6 nm Cancer ↑ tumor inhibition. ↓ systemic toxicity, ↓ adverse effect Yang et al. (2019)
Nanoparticle Disulfiram ZnO 259.36 nm Breast cancer ↑ tumor targeting, ↑ half-life, ↑ retention time in the body Zhao et al. (2020)
Nanoparticle Indocyanine green 165.9 nm Breast cancer and cervical cancer ↑ stability of the drug, ↑ affinity Chen et al. (2018a)
Nanoparticle 5-fluorouracil PEG <50 nm Colorec-tal cancer ↑ biocompatibility in the HT-29 cells Hudiță et al. (2021)
Nanoparticle Indocyanine green Proanthocyanidins 120.1 nm Glioma ↑ blood circulation time ↑ tissue distribution ZhuGe et al. (2019)
Hydrogel Biliverdin Glioma ↑ retention time, also protects biliverdin from enzyme-mediated metabolism and ↑ its lifespan Yao et al. (2020)
Nanoparticle Doxorubicin 130 nm Cancer The magnetic tumor-targeting ability broadens the range of biomedical applications of silk fibroin Tian et al. (2014)
Scaffolds Doxorubicin Breast cancer This natural silk based 3D distribution system of cell culture can easily be exploited as high throughput screening system for cancer drug discovery and development Subia et al. (2015)
Rods Anastrozole 1.0–1.5 mm Breast cancer ↑ viability of silk reservoir rod technology as a long-term sustained, near zero-order release dosage form Yucel et al. (2014)
Nanoparticle 5-fluorouracil or curcumin 217 ± 0.4 nm Breast cancer Showing the future potential of nanoparticle-loaded binary drugs in the treatment of breast cancer Li et al. (2016)
Fiber Curcumin <100 nm Cancer ↑ intracellular uptake, ↑ anti-cancer effect, ↓ toxicity to normal cells Xie et al. (2016)
Hydrogel 200 nm Cancer Displayed desired in vivo biocompatibility; these hydrogels would spontaneously acquire conformation change which allowed these hydrogels to serve as a biomimetic platform for modulation of encapsulated cell fate and suppression of cancer formation Yan et al. (2016)
Nanoparticle Cisplatin Mannitol 5 μm Lung cancer Demonstrating cell compatibility with A549 human lung epithelial cell line Kim et al. (2015)
Nanoparticle Paclitaxel iRGD-EGFR  18 ± 19.7 nm Cancer ↑ tumor targeting, ↑ anti-cancer effect, ↓ tumor growth and tumor volumes Bian et al. (2016)
Nanoparticle Doxorubicin Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 220 nm Breast cancer ↓ tumor growth, ↑ intracellular uptake, ↑ cell apoptosis Chen et al. (2021)
Hydrogel Iron oxide nanocubes - - Hepatoc-ellular carcino-ma The ferrimagnetic silk fibroin hydrogel with remote hyperthermia performance under an alternating magnetic field, resulting in the effective magnetic hyperthermia of deep tumors Qian et al. (2020)
Nanoparticle Alpha mangostin - 300 nm Cancer ↑ solubility, ↑ sustained release, ↓ hematotoxicity, ↑ anti-cancer effect Pham et al. (2019)
Nanofiber Diethyldithioc-arbamate Polyethylene oxide 1,202 nm Cancer ↑ biocompatibility, ↑ anti-cancer activity El Fawal et al. (2021)
Nanoparticle Gemcitabine SP5-52 peptide 105–302 nm Lung Cancer ↑ targeting, ↑ survival rate, ↓ mortality, no sign of metastasis Mottaghitalab et al. (2017)
Nanoparticle Tamoxifen 186.1 ± 5.9 nm Breast cancer Tamoxifen release from Nanoparticle exhibited a biphasic release profile with an initial burst release within the first 6 h and sustained release for 48 h, ↑ anti-cancer activity Moin et al. (2021)

5 Prospects and conclusion

Over the past decade, silk fibroin has played an increasingly important role in drug delivery systems as a carrier material, which has aroused the extensive interest of researchers. As described in this article, silk fibroin-based nanocomplexes have been extensively studied in drug delivery and tumor therapy. Furthermore, the researchers have got some positive results in both in vitro and in vivo tests, a breakthrough in nanomedicine. By using cell or animal models, the nanocomposites prepared by silk fibroin as a carrier material have been studied in a variety of tumor diseases, such as breast cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, thyroid cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and glioma. The results have found that: 1) the use of fibroin nanoparticles as a non-toxic, biocompatible delivery carrier to enhance the feasibility of tumor treatment effects that have a little inhibitory effect on normal cells; 2) the fibroin can be prepared with other materials into a composite carrier (such as: cellulose acetate, gold and silver nanoparticles, adenovirus, gelatin, etc.), among them, the scaffold of silk fibroin loaded with amino acid modified adenovirus can stimulate the formation of vascular network and thus accelerate the regeneration of dermal tissue, and the composite nanofibers made of silk fibres have a high inhibitory effect on tumor cells (Wang et al., 2019c); 3) the surface of silk fibroin can be properly modified to meet different needs. For example, the sustained-release behavior of adriamycin can be enhanced by modifying the surface of silk fibroin with Tween 80 as surfactant; 4) silk fibroin can be prepared into nanocarriers with stimulation response, which can be triggered by the changes of pH value, ultraviolet, near infrared, ultrasonic and magnetic field, to accurately release the drug at the tumor site and enhance the curative effect; 5) the composite nanoparticles prepared from silk fibroin can also significantly improve the tumor inhibition effect through the combination of photothermal therapy (PTT)/tumor-specific photodynamic therapy (PDT)/chemotherapy, with minimal systemic toxicity or adverse reactions; 6) the combination with specifically targeted ligands (such as antibody, growth factor, transferrin, polypeptide, polysaccharide, etc.) helps to enhance the targeting of drug delivery, reduce the toxic and side effects of drugs, and strengthen tumor inhibitory effect in drug delivery system.

The targeted drug delivery system based on silk fibroin will significantly promote the treatment and development of tumors in the future, mainly due to the modifiability of the silk fibroin structure. The structure of it contains active amino and carboxyl groups, which researchers can chemically modify to increase the material’s functionality. It has certain biological activity, and SP5-52 peptide sequence (SVSVGMKPSPRP) can target the cell surface of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Mottaghitalab et al., 2017). NSCLC cells can increase anticancer accumulation 5.7-fold in tumorigenic lung tissue compared to non-targeted vectors. The SP5-52 peptide was synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis on Rink amide MBHA resin. SP5-52 peptide was linked to the surface of silk fibroin nanoparticles with Hatu and diea as coupling reagents to obtain SP5-52 peptide modified nanoparticles. The results indicated that the silk fibroin nanoparticles targeting gemcitabine have a higher potential in treating induced lung tumors than the control group. The results of histopathology and radiological analysis showed that higher survival rate, lower mortality rate, and no signs of metastasis were also observed in those animals treated with SP5-52 peptide modified silk fibroin@gemcitabine. This study proposed an effective anticancer drug delivery system for specifically targeting induced lung tumors, which can be used to treat malignant lung cancer in the future. In addition to SP5-52 peptide, RGD tumor targeting peptide (Arginine-Glycine-Aspartate) (Rodriguez-Nogales et al., 2016), folic acid(Subia et al., 2014), chondroitin sulfate (Gou et al., 2019b), hyaluronic acid (Ziadlou et al., 2021) can modify silk fibroin for targeted delivery of drugs. Moreover, PEG can also modify silk fibroin, thereby extending the circulation time of drugs in vivo (Zhang et al., 2020b). Therefore, this kind of silk fibroin nano drug delivery system that actively targets tumors is also the focus of current and later research.

The application of silk fibroin in disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention has gradually developed, but it loaded anti-cancer drugs to prepare new drug delivery systems is a challenge for clinic use. Most cell and animal studies are short-term observations and lack long-term safety assessment, including survival analysis and toxic and side effects evaluation. In addition, the maximum allowable dose of silk fibroin, drugs, and other materials in animals seems to be an essential reference index for clinical use. Moreover, for the preparation of silk fibroin nanoparticles, whether the size and shape of particles will affect the distribution and accumulation of drugs in tumor tissues to affect the therapeutic effect remains to be further explored and analyzed. Fortunately, silk fibroin-related products such as Seri®, Surgical Scaffold, Surusil®, SofsilkTM and SickVoice® are on the market, indicating that silk fibroin, as a new medical polymer material that has attracted much attention in recent years, has gone from basic research to clinical application. However, how to transfer the new drug delivery system based on silk fibroin loaded drugs from the laboratory to the clinic for further research and analysis, which first needs to be solved is the mass production of silk fibroin.

Although silk can be obtained through silkworm breeding, this production method has the problems of low yield, long time-consuming and low efficiency. Mehreen et al. believed that the cost of silk obtained from cocoon was low, which could reduce the overall production cost on a larger industrial scale, so as to obtain silk fibroin. However, this does not take into account other factors in the actual upload (Mehreen et al., 2021). At the same time, many reviews did not put forward views on the problems and solutions in the industrial production of silk fibroin, which is a key issue to promote the application of it (Florczak et al., 2014; Wani and Veerbhadrappa, 2018; Florczak et al., 2021; Chis et al., 2022). Based on this, this manuscript puts forward some views on this issue. For production enterprises, their production technology (such as the extraction, preparation, separation and purification of silk fibroin) and the quality control and batch release requirements in GMP mass production have great challenges. At the same time, there are problems such as product quality detection (how to detect the safety, biocompatibility and biodegradability of silk fibroin). These are urgent needs to be solved. Although the laboratory can extract and prepare silk fibroin by itself, few reports on the industrialized production of mature silk fibroin. There is no pharmacopoeia standard or influential industry standard in developed countries to include this variety. In addition, due to the heterogeneity of silk. There are significant differences in amino acid sequence, morphology and manufacturing process between the source materials; therefore, the results of their preclinical characteristics cannot be directly transformed between these studies (Florczak et al., 2020). Consequently, there may be a long time for the transformation, development, and commercialization of the silk fibroin-based drug delivery system. The fact that silk fibroin cannot be mass-produced and quality inspected is also the main reason why it has been difficult to achieve breakthroughs in drug delivery systems since it was approved by the FDA (Florczak et al., 2021). At present, in addition to obtaining silk fibroin from silk, spider silk can also be obtained by breeding spiders and further processed to obtain silk fibroin(Salehi et al., 2020). However, it is also difficult to industrialize and commercialize large-scale production, because spiders are carnivores, putting several spiders together will cause them to bite each other. They have a variety of silk glands, and different glands produce different silk properties (Rising and Johansson, 2015). Hence, it is difficult to collect silk with a single performance. At the same time, the secretion of spider silk from artificially reared spiders has dropped significantly, and the quality has also dropped significantly (Liu et al., 2021). There exist many ways to obtain spider silk, but the problem of quantity and quality is still difficult to solve properly, such as microbial pathway (Wu et al., 2017), animal pathway (Liebsch et al., 2018), plant pathway (Scheller et al., 2001) and electrospinning (Belbéoch et al., 2021). Therefore, the acquisition of silk fibroin is mainly obtained by breeding silkworms and harvesting cocoons.

However, we found that albumin is one of the preferred carrier materials for antitumor drug nanoparticles (Kunde and Wairkar, 2022). Albumin is a natural macromolecular material of protein. Human serum albumin has high stability, good biocompatibility and biodegradability, no immunogenicity and can be modified structurally (Hong et al., 2020b). It is worth noting that the fundamental properties of silk fibroin are similar to albumin, and it also has the internal stimulation response of pH/lysosomal enzyme/GSH/ROS. It has a wide range of sources, and the acquisition cost is much lower than that of albumin from human blood. Therefore, we believe that the successful experience of albumin as a drug carrier is worthy of reference and learning for silk fibroin. On the other hand, silk fibroin from different sources is different (Lehmann et al., 2022). The slow degradation of silk II crystal structure also makes silk fibroin unsuitable for the situation that silk fibroin needs to be quickly and thoroughly removed from the body, which may be an obstacle to the application of silk fibroin in drug delivery system (Hu et al., 2020b). Transgenic silk fibroin can achieve quality consistency (Gou et al., 2019a). It can also change the degradation rate of silk fibroin by adjusting the molecular structure. It has also been studied as a drug delivery carrier material, which is a promising and potential solution strategy (Xia et al., 2011; Hofer et al., 2012; Zheng and Zuo, 2021). When a safe and mass production method of silk fibroin is found and applied, the new anti-cancer drug delivery system mediated by silk fibroin will change greatly and be used in clinic.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Professor Qiang Lv of Soochow University and Dr. Muhammad Sohail of Yantai University for his professional advice.

Funding Statement

The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2019ZD24, ZR2019MB054), Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (No. 2018GSF119010), and the Science and Technology Project of TCM in Shandong Province (No. 2020M190).

Author contributions

BY and YL reviewed recent literatures and drafted the present review. HX provided expert analysis and insights into the synthesis of characteristics, application, and the cancers’ study of silk fibroin. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Abravan A., Faivre-Finn C., Kennedy J., McWilliam A., van Herk M. (2020). Radiotherapy-related lymphopenia affects overall survival in patients with lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 15, 1624–1635. 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal B. B., Ichikawa H., Garodia P., Weerasinghe P., Sethi G., Bhatt I. D., et al. (2006). From traditional ayurvedic medicine to modern medicine: Identification of therapeutic targets for suppression of inflammation and cancer. Expert Opin. Ther. targets 10, 87–118. 10.1517/14728222.10.1.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akrami-Hasan-Kohal M., Eskandari M., Solouk A. (2021). Silk fibroin hydrogel/dexamethasone sodium phosphate loaded chitosan nanoparticles as a potential drug delivery system. Colloids surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 205, 111892. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al Alawi L., Soteriades E. S., Paulo M. S., Östlundh L., Grivna M., Al Maskari F., et al. (2020). Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in healthcare settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 9, 242. 10.1186/s13643-020-01494-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al Saqr A., Wani S. U. D., Gangadharappa H. V., Aldawsari M. F., Khafagy E. S., Lila A. S. A. (2021). Enhanced cytotoxic activity of docetaxel-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles against breast cancer cells. Polymers 13, 1416. 10.3390/polym13091416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Mansoori L., Elsinga P., Goda S. K. (2021). Bio-vehicles of cytotoxic drugs for delivery to tumor specific targets for cancer precision therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 144, 112260. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Altman G. H., Horan R. L., Lu H. H., Moreau J., Martin I., Richmond J. C., et al. (2002). Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. Biomaterials 23, 4131–4141. 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00156-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arumugam M., Murugesan B., Pandiyan N., Chinnalagu D. K., Rangasamy G., Mahalingam S., et al. (2021). Ornamental morphology of ionic liquid functionalized ternary doped N, P, F and N, B, F-reduced graphene oxide and their prevention activities of bacterial biofilm-associated with orthopedic implantation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 123, 1122–1132. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakos O., Lawson C., Rouleau S., Tai L. H. (2018). Combining surgery and immunotherapy: Turning an immunosuppressive effect into a therapeutic opportunity. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 86. 10.1186/s40425-018-0398-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Belbéoch C., Lejeune J., Vroman P., Salaün F. (2021). Silkworm and spider silk electrospinning: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 1737–1763. 10.1007/s10311-020-01147-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bian X., Wu P., Sha H., Qian H., Wang Q., Cheng L., et al. (2016). Anti-EGFR-iRGD recombinant protein conjugated silk fibroin nanoparticles for enhanced tumor targeting and antitumor efficiency. Onco Targets Ther. 9, 3153–3162. 10.2147/OTT.S100678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bini E., Knight D. P., Kaplan D. L. (2004). Mapping domain structures in silks from insects and spiders related to protein assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 335, 27–40. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blamires S. J., Spicer P. T., Flanagan P. J. (2020). Spider silk biomimetics programs to inform the development of new wearable technologies. Front. Mater. 7. 10.3389/fmats.2020.00029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boreel D. F., Span P. N., Heskamp S., Adema G. J., Bussink J. (2021). Targeting oxidative phosphorylation to increase the efficacy of radio- and immune-combination therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 2970–2978. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cao W., Chen H. D., Yu Y. W., Li N., Chen W. Q. (2021). Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: A secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin. Med. J. Engl. 134, 783–791. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao Y., Wang B. (2009). Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 1514–1524. 10.3390/ijms10041514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen B. Q., Kankala R. K., He G. Y., Yang D. Y., Li G. P., Wang P., et al. (2018). Supercritical fluid-Assisted fabrication of indocyanine green-encapsulated silk fibroin nanoparticles for dual-triggered cancer therapy. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 4, 3487–3497. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen G., Wei R., Huang X., Wang F., Chen Z. (2020). Synthesis and assessment of sodium alginate-modified silk fibroin microspheres as potential hepatic arterial embolization agent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 155, 1450–1459. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen J., Ding J., Xu W., Sun T., Xiao H., Zhuang X., et al. (2017). Correction to receptor and microenvironment dual-recognizable nanogel for targeted chemotherapy of highly metastatic malignancy. Nano Lett. 17, 5180. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen J., Zhan Y., Wang Y., Han D., Tao B., Luo Z., et al. (2018b). Chitosan/silk fibroin modified nanofibrous patches with mesenchymal stem cells prevent heart remodeling post-myocardial infarction in rats. Acta Biomater. 80, 154–168. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen X., Deng L., Jiang X., Wu T. (2016). Chinese herbal medicine for oesophageal cancer. Cochrane database Syst. Rev., Cd004520. 10.1002/14651858.CD004520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen X., Shao Z., Knight D. P., Vollrath F. (2007). Conformation transition kinetics of Bombyx mori silk protein. Proteins 68, 223–231. 10.1002/prot.21414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen Y., Wu H., Yang T., Zhou G., Chen Y., Wang J., et al. (2021). Biomimetic nucleation of metal-organic frameworks on silk fibroin nanoparticles for designing core-shell-structured pH-responsive anticancer drug carriers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 47371–47381. 10.1021/acsami.1c13405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheng Y., Koh L. D., Li D., Ji B., Han M. Y., Zhang Y. W. (2014). On the strength of β-sheet crystallites of Bombyx mori silk fibroin. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140305. 10.1098/rsif.2014.0305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chirila T. V., Suzuki S., Bray L. J., Barnett N. L., Harkin D. G. (2013). Evaluation of silk sericin as a biomaterial: In vitro growth of human corneal limbal epithelial cells on Bombyx mori sericin membranes. Prog. biomaterials 2, 14. 10.1186/2194-0517-2-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chis A. A., Arseniu A. M., Morgovan C., Dobrea C. M., Frum A., Juncan A. M., et al. (2022). Biopolymeric prodrug systems as potential antineoplastic Therapy. Pharmaceutics 14, 1773. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi M., Choi D., Hong J. (2018). Multilayered controlled drug release silk fibroin nanofilm by manipulating secondary structure. Biomacromolecules 19, 3096–3103. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cortés J., Kim S. B., Chung W. P., Im S. A., Park Y. H., Hegg R., et al. (2022). Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1143–1154. 10.1056/NEJMoa2115022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Crakes K. R., Herrera C., Morgan J. L., Olstad K., Hessell A. J., Ziprin P., et al. (2020). Efficacy of silk fibroin biomaterial vehicle for in vivo mucosal delivery of Griffithsin and protection against HIV and SHIV infection ex vivo . J. Int. AIDS Soc. 23, e25628. 10.1002/jia2.25628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Crivelli B., Bari E., Perteghella S., Catenacci L., Sorrenti M., Mocchi M., et al. (2019). Silk fibroin nanoparticles for celecoxib and curcumin delivery: ROS-scavenging and anti-inflammatory activities in an in vitro model of osteoarthritis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 137, 37–45. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Desai S. K., Mondal D., Bera S. (2021). Polyurethane-functionalized starch nanocrystals as anti-tuberculosis drug carrier. Sci. Rep. 11, 8331. 10.1038/s41598-021-86767-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Deshpande R., Shukla S., Kale A., Deshmukh N., Nisal A., Venugopalan P. (2022). Silk fibroin microparticle scaffold for use in bone void filling: Safety and efficacy studies. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 8, 1226–1238. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Diez-Echave P., Ruiz-Malagón A. J., Molina-Tijeras J. A., Hidalgo-García L., Vezza T., Cenis-Cifuentes L., et al. (2021). Silk fibroin nanoparticles enhance quercetin immunomodulatory properties in DSS-induced mouse colitis. Int. J. Pharm. 606, 120935. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ding B., Wahid M. A., Wang Z., Xie C., Thakkar A., Prabhu S., et al. (2017). Triptolide and celastrol loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles show synergistic effect against human pancreatic cancer cells. Nanoscale 9, 11739–11753. 10.1039/c7nr03016a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Eivazzadeh-Keihan R., Khalili F., Aliabadi H. A. M., Maleki A., Madanchi H., Ziabari E. Z., et al. (2020). Alginate hydrogel-polyvinyl alcohol/silk fibroin/magnesium hydroxide nanorods: A novel scaffold with biological and antibacterial activity and improved mechanical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 162, 1959–1971. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. El Fawal G., Abu-Serie M. M., Mo X., Wang H. (2021). Diethyldithiocarbamate/silk fibroin/polyethylene oxide nanofibrous for cancer therapy: Fabrication, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 193, 293–299. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Estey T., Kang J., Schwendeman S. P., Carpenter J. F. (2006). BSA degradation under acidic conditions: A model for protein instability during release from PLGA delivery systems. J. Pharm. Sci. 95, 1626–1639. 10.1002/jps.20625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Farokhi M., Mottaghitalab F., Reis R. L., Ramakrishna S., Kundu S. C. (2020). Functionalized silk fibroin nanofibers as drug carriers: Advantages and challenges. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 321, 324–347. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fernández-García L., Marí-Buyé N., Barios J. A., Madurga R., Elices M., Pérez-Rigueiro J., et al. (2016). Safety and tolerability of silk fibroin hydrogels implanted into the mouse brain. Acta Biomater. 45, 262–275. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Florczak A., Deptuch T., Kucharczyk K., Dams-Kozlowska H. (2021). Systemic and local silk-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Cancers 13, 5389. 10.3390/cancers13215389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Florczak A., Grzechowiak I., Deptuch T., Kucharczyk K., Kaminska A., Dams-Kozlowska H. (2020). Silk particles as carriers of therapeutic molecules for cancer treatment. Mater. (Basel) 13, 4946. 10.3390/ma13214946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Florczak A., Mackiewicz A., Dams-Kozlowska H. (2014). Functionalized spider silk spheres as drug carriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules 15, 2971–2981. 10.1021/bm500591p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Floren M., Migliaresi C., Motta A. (2016). Processing techniques and applications of silk hydrogels in bioengineering. J. Funct. biomaterials 7, 26. 10.3390/jfb7030026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fuster M. G., Carissimi G., Montalbán M. G., Víllora G. (2021). Antitumor activity of rosmarinic acid-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles on HeLa and MCF-7 Cells. Polymers 13, 3169. 10.3390/polym13183169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gangrade A., Mandal B. B. (2020). Drug delivery of anticancer drugs from injectable 3D porous silk scaffold for prevention of gastric cancer growth and recurrence. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 6, 6195–6206. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gao D., Lo P. C. (2018). Polymeric micelles encapsulating pH-responsive doxorubicin prodrug and glutathione-activated zinc(II) phthalocyanine for combined chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 282, 46–61. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gao Y., Xie J., Chen H., Gu S., Zhao R., Shao J., et al. (2014). Nanotechnology-based intelligent drug design for cancer metastasis treatment. Biotechnol. Adv. 32, 761–777. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gholipourmalekabadi M., Sapru S., Samadikuchaksaraei A., Reis R. L., Kaplan D. L., Kundu S. C. (2020). Silk fibroin for skin injury repair: Where do things stand? Adv. drug Deliv. Rev. 153, 28–53. 10.1016/j.addr.2019.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gosline J. M., Guerette P. A., Ortlepp C. S., Savage K. N. (1999). The mechanical design of spider silks: From fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3295–3303. 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gou S., Huang Y., Sung J., Xiao B., Merlin D. (2019a). Silk fibroin-based nanotherapeutics: Application in the treatment of colonic diseases. Nanomedicine (Lond) 14, 2373–2378. 10.2217/nnm-2019-0058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gou S., Huang Y., Wan Y., Ma Y., Zhou X., Tong X., et al. (2019b). Multi-bioresponsive silk fibroin-based nanoparticles with on-demand cytoplasmic drug release capacity for CD44-targeted alleviation of ulcerative colitis. Biomaterials 212, 39–54. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gregory D. A., Zhang Y., Smith P. J., Zhao X., Ebbens S. J. (2016). Reactive inkjet printing of biocompatible enzyme powered silk micro-rockets. Small 12, 4048–4055. 10.1002/smll.201600921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Guo X., Lin N., Lu S., Zhang F., Zuo B. (2021). Preparation and biocompatibility characterization of silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4, 1369–1380. 10.1021/acsabm.0c01239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gupta V., Aseh A., Ríos C. N., Aggarwal B. B., Mathur A. B. (2009). Fabrication and characterization of silk fibroin-derived curcumin nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Int. J. nanomedicine 4, 115–122. 10.2147/ijn.s5581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hassani Besheli N., Mottaghitalab F., Eslami M., Gholami M., Kundu S. C., Kaplan D. L., et al. (2017). Sustainable release of vancomycin from silk fibroin nanoparticles for treating severe bone infection in rat tibia osteomyelitis model. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 5128–5138. 10.1021/acsami.6b14912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hassanzadeh P., Arbabi E., Rostami F. (2021). Coating of ferulic acid-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles with neutrophil membranes: A promising strategy against the acute pancreatitis. Life Sci. 270, 119128. 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. He J., Fan K., Yan X. (2019). Ferritin drug carrier (FDC) for tumor targeting therapy. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 311-312, 288–300. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hitchcock J., White A. L., Hondow N., Hughes T. A., Dupont H., Biggs S., et al. (2020). Metal-shell nanocapsules for the delivery of cancer drugs. J. colloid interface Sci. 567, 171–180. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hofer M., Winter G., Myschik J. (2012). Recombinant spider silk particles for controlled delivery of protein drugs. Biomaterials 33, 1554–1562. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Holland C., Numata K., Rnjak-Kovacina J., Seib F. P. (2019). The biomedical use of silk: Past, present, future. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, e1800465. 10.1002/adhm.201800465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hong H., Seo Y. B., Kim D. Y., Lee J. S., Lee Y. J., Lee H., et al. (2020a). Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 232, 119679. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hong S., Choi D. W., Kim H. N., Park C. G., Lee W., Park H. H. (2020b). Protein-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics 12, 604. 10.3390/pharmaceutics12070604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hu J., Wang M., Xiao X., Zhang B., Xie Q., Xu X., et al. (2020a). A novel long-acting azathioprine polyhydroxyalkanoate nanoparticle enhances treatment efficacy for systemic lupus erythematosus with reduced side effects. Nanoscale 12, 10799–10808. 10.1039/d0nr01308k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hu L., Han Y., Ling S., Huang Y., Yao J., Shao Z., et al. (2020b). Direct Observation of Native Silk fibroin conformation in silk gland of bombyx mori silkworm. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 6, 1874–1879. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hudiță A., Radu I. C., Zaharia C., Ion A. C., Ginghină O., Gălățeanu B., et al. (2021). Bio- and hemo-compatible silk fibroin PEGylated nanocarriers for 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: In vitro studies. Pharmaceutics 13, 755. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Huot A., Lefèvre T., Rioux-Dubé J. F., Paquet-Mercier F., Nault A. P., Auger M., et al. (2015). Effect of mechanical deformation on the structure of regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin films as revealed using Raman and infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 69, 689–698. 10.1366/14-07776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Jiang H., Li M., Du K., Ma C., Cheng Y., Wang S., et al. (2021). Traditional Chinese medicine for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: Taohong siwu decoction. Chin. Med. 16, 129. 10.1186/s13020-021-00539-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kang E. J., Baek Y. M., Hahm E., Lee S. H., Pham X. H., Noh M. S., et al. (2019). Functionalized β-cyclodextrin immobilized on Ag-embedded silica nanoparticles as a drug carrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 315. 10.3390/ijms20020315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kapoor S., Kundu S. C. (2016). Silk protein-based hydrogels: Promising advanced materials for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 31, 17–32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kaushik I., Ramachandran S., Srivastava S. K. (2019). CRISPR-Cas9: A multifaceted therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 96, 4–12. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Khosravimelal S., Chizari M., Farhadihosseinabadi B., Moosazadeh M. M., Gholipourmalekabadi M. (2021). Fabrication and characterization of an antibacterial chitosan/silk fibroin electrospun nanofiber loaded with a cationic peptide for wound-dressing application. J. Mater Sci. Mater Med. 32, 114. 10.1007/s10856-021-06542-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim J. H., Sheikh F. A., Ju H. W., Park H. J., Moon B. M., Lee O. J., et al. (2014). 3D silk fibroin scaffold incorporating titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticle (NPs) for tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 68, 158–168. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kim S. H., Hong H., Ajiteru O., Sultan M. T., Lee Y. J., Lee J. S., et al. (2021). 3D bioprinted silk fibroin hydrogels for tissue engineering. Nat. Protoc. 16, 5484–5532. 10.1038/s41596-021-00622-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kim S. Y., Naskar D., Kundu S. C., Bishop D. P., Doble P. A., Boddy A. V., et al. (2015). Formulation of biologically-inspired silk-based drug carriers for pulmonary delivery targeted for lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 5, 11878. 10.1038/srep11878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Koh L.-D., Cheng Y., Teng C.-P., Khin Y.-W., Loh X.-J., Tee S.-Y., et al. (2015). Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 46, 86–110. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kunde S. S., Wairkar S. (2022). Targeted delivery of albumin nanoparticles for breast cancer: A review. Colloids surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 213, 112422. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lammel A. S., Hu X., Park S. H., Kaplan D. L., Scheibel T. R. (2010). Controlling silk fibroin particle features for drug delivery. Biomaterials 31, 4583–4591. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lazaris A., Arcidiacono S., Huang Y., Zhou J. F., Duguay F., Chretien N., et al. (2002). Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 295, 472–476. 10.1126/science.1065780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lee O. J., Lee J. M., Kim J. H., Kim J., Kweon H., Jo Y. Y., et al. (2012). Biodegradation behavior of silk fibroin membranes in repairing tympanic membrane perforations. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 100, 2018–2026. 10.1002/jbm.a.33308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lehmann T., Vaughn A. E., Seal S., Liechty K. W., Zgheib C. (2022). Silk fibroin-based therapeutics for impaired wound healing. Pharmaceutics 14, 651. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Li H., Tian J., Wu A., Wang J., Ge C., Sun Z. (2016). Self-assembled silk fibroin nanoparticles loaded with binary drugs in the treatment of breast carcinoma. Int. J. nanomedicine 11, 4373–4380. 10.2147/IJN.S108633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Li L., Puhl S., Meinel L., Germershaus O. (2014). Silk fibroin layer-by-layer microcapsules for localized gene delivery. Biomaterials 35, 7929–7939. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Li W., Cao Z., Liu R., Liu L., Li H., Li X., et al. (2019). AuNPs as an important inorganic nanoparticle applied in drug carrier systems. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 47, 4222–4233. 10.1080/21691401.2019.1687501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Li Y., Yang Y., Yang L., Zeng Y., Gao X., Xu H. (2017). Poly(ethylene glycol)-modified silk fibroin membrane as a carrier for limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation in a rabbit LSCD model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8, 256. 10.1186/s13287-017-0707-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Liebsch C., Bucan V., Menger B., Köhne F., Waldmann K. H., Vaslaitis D., et al. (2018). Preliminary investigations of spider silk in wounds in vivo - implications for an innovative wound dressing. Burns 44, 1829–1838. 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lin L., Zhou Y., Quan G., Pan X., Wu C. (2021). The rough inhalable ciprofloxacin hydrochloride microparticles based on silk fibroin for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis therapy with good biocompatibility. Int. J. Pharm. 607, 120974. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Liu H., Li X., Zhou G., Fan H., Fan Y. (2011). Electrospun sulfated silk fibroin nanofibrous scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32, 3784–3793. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Liu Y., Huang W., Meng M., Chen M., Cao C. (2021). Progress in the application of spider silk protein in medicine. J. biomaterials Appl. 36, 859–871. 10.1177/08853282211003850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lu Q., Zhang B., Li M., Zuo B., Kaplan D. L., Huang Y., et al. (2011). Degradation mechanism and control of silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 12, 1080–1086. 10.1021/bm101422j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Luetchford K. A., Chaudhuri J. B., De Bank P. A. (2020). Silk fibroin/gelatin microcarriers as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 106, 110116. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Luo Q., Zhang L., Luo C., Jiang M. (2019). Emerging strategies in cancer therapy combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 454, 191–203. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Lv Z. D., Song H. M., Niu Z. H., Nie G., Zheng S., Xu Y. Y., et al. (2021). Efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel compared to docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 11, 760655. 10.3389/fonc.2021.760655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ma Y., Canup B. S. B., Tong X., Dai F., Xiao B. (2020). Multi-responsive silk fibroin-based nanoparticles for drug delivery. Front. Chem. 8, 585077. 10.3389/fchem.2020.585077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Mancipe Castro L. M., García A. J., Guldberg R. E. (2021). Biomaterial strategies for improved intra-articular drug delivery. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 109, 426–436. 10.1002/jbm.a.37074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mao B., Liu C., Zheng W., Li X., Ge R., Shen H., et al. (2018). Cyclic cRGDfk peptide and chlorin e6 functionalized silk fibroin nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 161, 306–320. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mathur A. B., Gupta V. (2010). Silk fibroin-derived nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nanomedicine (Lond) 5, 807–820. 10.2217/nnm.10.51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mazzaferro S., Bouchemal K., Ponchel G. (2013). Oral delivery of anticancer drugs III: Formulation using drug delivery systems. Drug Discov. today 18, 99–104. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mehreen E., Shaukat A., Hafiz M. T., Rabia M., Muhammad F. B. (2021). Sericin and fibroin nanoparticles—natural product for cancer therapy: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomaterials 70, 256–269. 10.1080/00914037.2019.1706515 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Melke J., Midha S., Ghosh S., Ito K., Hofmann S. (2016). Silk fibroin as biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 31, 1–16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Messina C., Merz V., Frisinghelli M., Trentin C., Grego E., Veccia A., et al. (2019). Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected bile duct cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 143, 124–129. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Ming J., Pan F., Zuo B. (2015). Influence factors analysis on the formation of silk I structure. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 75, 398–401. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Minoura N., Aiba S., Higuchi M., Gotoh Y., Tsukada M., Imai Y. (1995). Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin. Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun. 208, 511–516. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mohammed M. A., Syeda J. T. M., Wasan K. M., Wasan E. K. (2017). An Overview of chitosan nanoparticles and its application in non-parenteral drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 9, 53. 10.3390/pharmaceutics9040053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Moin A., Wani S. U. D., Osmani R. A., Abu Lila A. S., Khafagy E. S., Arab H. H., et al. (2021). Formulation, characterization, and cellular toxicity assessment of tamoxifen-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles in breast cancer. Drug Deliv. 28, 1626–1636. 10.1080/10717544.2021.1958106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Montalbán M. G., Coburn J. M., Lozano-Pérez A. A., Cenis J. L., Víllora G., Kaplan D. L. (2018). Production of curcumin-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Nanomater. (Basel) 8, 126. 10.3390/nano8020126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Mottaghitalab F., Farokhi M., Shokrgozar M. A., Atyabi F., Hosseinkhani H. (2015). Silk fibroin nanoparticle as a novel drug delivery system. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 206, 161–176. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Mottaghitalab F., Kiani M., Farokhi M., Kundu S. C., Reis R. L., Gholami M., et al. (2017). Targeted delivery system based on gemcitabine-loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles for lung cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 31600–31611. 10.1021/acsami.7b10408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Myung S. J., Kim H. S., Kim Y. (2020). Fluorescent silk fibroin nanoparticles prepared using a reverse microemulsion. Macromol. Res. 16 (7), 604–608. 10.1007/bf03218567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Nazarov R., Jin H. J., Kaplan D. L. (2004). Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5, 718–726. 10.1021/bm034327e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Newell H., Sausville E. (2016). Cytotoxic drugs: Past, present and future. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 77, 1. 10.1007/s00280-015-2917-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Nuvola G., Rizzo A., Mollica V., Massari F. (2022). The dilemma of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in urothelial carcinoma: Will immunotherapy solve the problem? Immunotherapy 14, 171–174. 10.2217/imt-2021-0324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Oliveira I. M., Gonçalves C., Shin M. E., Lee S., Reis R. L., Khang G., et al. (2020). Anti-inflammatory properties of injectable betamethasone-loaded tyramine-modified gellan gum/silk fibroin hydrogels. Biomolecules 10, 1456. 10.3390/biom10101456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pandey V., Haider T., Chandak A. R., Chakraborty A., Banerjee S., Soni V. (2020). Surface modified silk fibroin nanoparticles for improved delivery of doxorubicin: Development, characterization, in-vitro studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164, 2018–2027. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pascoli M., de Lima R., Fraceto L. F. (2018). Zein nanoparticles and strategies to improve colloidal stability: A mini-review. Front. Chem. 6, 6. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Patwa R., Soundararajan N., Mulchandani N., Bhasney S. M., Shah M., Kumar S., et al. (2018). Silk nano-discs: A natural material for cancer therapy. Biopolymers 109, e23231. 10.1002/bip.23231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Pham D. T., Saelim N., Tiyaboonchai W. (2019). Alpha mangostin loaded crosslinked silk fibroin-based nanoparticles for cancer chemotherapy. Colloids surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 181, 705–713. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Pham D. T., Tiyaboonchai W. (2020). Fibroin nanoparticles: A promising drug delivery system. Drug Deliv. 27, 431–448. 10.1080/10717544.2020.1736208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Qi Y., Wang H., Wei K., Yang Y., Zheng R. Y., Kim I. S., et al. (2017). A review of structure construction of silk fibroin biomaterials from single structures to multi-level structures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 237. 10.3390/ijms18030237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Qi Z., Cao J., Tao X., Wu X., Kundu S. C., Lu S. (2021). Silk fibroin microneedle patches for the treatment of insomnia. Pharmaceutics 13, 2198. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Qian K. Y., Song Y., Yan X., Dong L., Xue J., Xu Y., et al. (2020). Injectable ferrimagnetic silk fibroin hydrogel for magnetic hyperthermia ablation of deep tumor. Biomaterials 259, 120299. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Qu J., Liu Y., Yu Y., Li J., Luo J., Li M. (2014). Silk fibroin nanoparticles prepared by electrospray as controlled release carriers of cisplatin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 44, 166–174. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Qu J., Wang W., Feng Y., Niu L., Li M., Yang J., et al. (2019). Cationic antheraea pernyi silk fibroin-modified adenovirus-mediated ING4 and IL-24 dual gene coexpression vector suppresses the growth of hepatoma carcinoma cells. Int. J. nanomedicine 14, 9745–9761. 10.2147/IJN.S230693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rajkhowa R., Wang L., Wang X. (2008). Ultra-fine silk powder preparation through rotary and ball milling. Powder Technol. 185, 87–95. 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.01.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rising A., Johansson J. (2015). Toward spinning artificial spider silk. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 309–315. 10.1038/nchembio.1789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Rodriguez-Nogales A., Algieri F., De Matteis L., Lozano-Perez A. A., Garrido-Mesa J., Vezza T., et al. (2016). Intestinal anti-inflammatory effects of RGD-functionalized silk fibroin nanoparticles in trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced experimental colitis in rats. Int. J. nanomedicine 11, 5945–5958. 10.2147/IJN.S116479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Rusa C. C., Bridges C., Ha S.-W., Tonelli A. E. (2005). Conformational changes induced in Bombyx mori silk fibroin by cyclodextrin inclusion complexation. Macromolecules 38, 5640–5646. 10.1021/ma050340a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Salehi S., Koeck K., Scheibel T. (2020). Spider silk for tissue engineering applications. Molecules 25, 737. 10.3390/molecules25030737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Scheller J., Gührs K. H., Grosse F., Conrad U. (2001). Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 573–577. 10.1038/89335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sharafat-Vaziri A., Khorasani S., Darzi M., Saffarian Z., Alizadeh Z., Tahmasebi M. N., et al. (2020). Safety and efficacy of engineered tissue composed of silk fibroin/collagen and autologous chondrocytes in two patients with cartilage defects: A pilot clinical trial study. Knee 27, 1300–1309. 10.1016/j.knee.2020.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Shen X., Zhang Y., Gu Y., Xu Y., Liu Y., Li B., et al. (2016). Sequential and sustained release of SDF-1 and BMP-2 from silk fibroin-nanohydroxyapatite scaffold for the enhancement of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 106, 205–216. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Song D. W., Kim S. H., Kim H. H., Lee K. H., Ki C. S., Park Y. H. (2016). Multi-biofunction of antimicrobial peptide-immobilized silk fibroin nanofiber membrane: Implications for wound healing. Acta Biomater. 39, 146–155. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Song J. E., Tripathy N., Lee D. H., Park J. H., Khang G. (2018). Quercetin inlaid silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite scaffold promotes enhanced osteogenesis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 32955–32964. 10.1021/acsami.8b08119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Spiliopoulou P., Hinsley S., McNeish I. A., Roxburgh P., Glasspool R. (2021). Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide in relapsed ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 31, 1037–1044. 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Stinson J. A., Palmer C. R., Miller D. P., Li A. B., Lightner K., Jost H., et al. (2020). Thin silk fibroin films as a dried format for temperature stabilization of inactivated polio vaccine. Vaccine 38, 1652–1660. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Subia B., Chandra S., Talukdar S., Kundu S. C. (2014). Folate conjugated silk fibroin nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 6, 203–214. 10.1039/c3ib40184g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Subia B., Dey T., Sharma S., Kundu S. C. (2015). Target specific delivery of anticancer drug in silk fibroin based 3D distribution model of bone-breast cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2269–2279. 10.1021/am506094c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sun W., Gregory D. A., Tomeh M. A., Zhao X. (2021). Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1499. 10.3390/ijms22031499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., et al. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA a cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Suyamud C., Phetdee C., Jaimalai T., Prangkio P. (2021). Silk fibroin-coated liposomes as biomimetic nanocarrier for long-term release delivery system in cancer therapy. Molecules 26, 4936. 10.3390/molecules26164936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Tanaka K., Inoue S., Mizuno S. (1999). Hydrophobic interaction of P25, containing Asn-linked oligosaccharide chains, with the H-L complex of silk fibroin produced by Bombyx mori . Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29, 269–276. 10.1016/s0965-1748(98)00135-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tian Y., Jiang X., Chen X., Shao Z., Yang W. (2014). Doxorubicin-loaded magnetic silk fibroin nanoparticles for targeted therapy of multidrug-resistant cancer. Adv. Mater. 26, 7393–7398. 10.1002/adma.201403562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Tulay P., Galam N., Adali T. (2018). The wonders of silk fibroin biomaterials in the treatment of breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. gene Expr. 28, 129–134. 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2018021331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Umuhoza D., Yang F., Long D., Hao Z., Dai J., Zhao A. (2020). Strategies for tuning the biodegradation of silk fibroin-based materials for tissue engineering applications. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 6, 1290–1310. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Valluzzi R., He S. J., Gido S. P., Kaplan D. (1999). Bombyx mori silk fibroin liquid crystallinity and crystallization at aqueous fibroin-organic solvent interfaces. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24, 227–236. 10.1016/s0141-8130(99)00005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wang C., Fang H., Qi X., Hang C., Sun Y., Peng Z., et al. (2019a). Silk fibroin film-coated MgZnCa alloy with enhanced in vitro and in vivo performance prepared using surface activation. Acta Biomater. 91, 99–111. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang D., Steffi C., Wang Z., Kong C. H., Lim P. N., Shi Z., et al. (2018). Beta-cyclodextrin modified mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles/silk fibroin hybrid nanofibers as an implantable estradiol delivery system for the potential treatment of osteoporosis. Nanoscale 10, 18341–18353. 10.1039/c8nr05268a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wang M. S., Du Y. B., Huang H. M., Zhu Z. L., Du S. S., Chen S. Y., et al. (2019b). Silk fibroin peptide suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human lung cancer cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 40, 522–529. 10.1038/s41401-018-0048-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wang W., Yu Y., Jiang Y., Qu J., Niu L., Yang J., et al. (2019c). Silk fibroin scaffolds loaded with angiogenic genes in adenovirus vectors for tissue regeneration. J. tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 13, 715–728. 10.1002/term.2819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang X., Yucel T., Lu Q., Hu X., Kaplan D. L. (2010). Silk nanospheres and microspheres from silk/pva blend films for drug delivery. Biomaterials 31, 1025–1035. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wang Y., Rudym D. D., Walsh A., Abrahamsen L., Kim H. J., Kim H. S., et al. (2008). In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials 29, 3415–3428. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wani S. U. D., Veerabhadrappa G. H. (2018). Silk fibroin based drug delivery applications: Promises and challenges. Curr. Drug Targets 19, 1177–1190. 10.2174/1389450119666171227205525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wenk E., Wandrey A. J., Merkle H. P., Meinel L. (2008). Silk fibroin spheres as a platform for controlled drug delivery. J. Control. release official J. Control. Release Soc. 132, 26–34. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wu H. C., Quan D. N., Tsao C. Y., Liu Y., Terrell J. L., Luo X., et al. (2017). Conferring biological activity to native spider silk: A biofunctionalized protein-based microfiber. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114, 83–95. 10.1002/bit.26065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wu N., Yu H., Sun M., Li Z., Zhao F., Ao Y., et al. (2020). Investigation on the structure and mechanical properties of highly tunable elastomeric silk fibroin hydrogels cross-linked by γ-ray radiation. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 3, 721–734. 10.1021/acsabm.9b01062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wu P., Liu Q., Li R., Wang J., Zhen X., Yue G., et al. (2013). Facile preparation of paclitaxel loaded silk fibroin nanoparticles for enhanced antitumor efficacy by locoregional drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 12638–12645. 10.1021/am403992b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wu P., Liu Q., Wang Q., Qian H., Yu L., Liu B., et al. (2018). Novel silk fibroin nanoparticles incorporated silk fibroin hydrogel for inhibition of cancer stem cells and tumor growth. Int. J. Nanomedicine 13, 5405–5418. 10.2147/IJN.S166104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Xia X. X., Xu Q., Hu X., Qin G., Kaplan D. L. (2011). Tunable self-assembly of genetically engineered silk-elastin-like protein polymers. Biomacromolecules 12, 3844–3850. 10.1021/bm201165h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Xie M., Fan D., Chen Y., Zhao Z., He X., Li G., et al. (2016). An implantable and controlled drug-release silk fibroin nanofibrous matrix to advance the treatment of solid tumour cancers. Biomaterials 103, 33–43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Xie M., Fan D., Li Y., He X., Chen X., Chen Y., et al. (2017). Supercritical carbon dioxide-developed silk fibroin nanoplatform for smart colon cancer therapy. Int. J. nanomedicine 12, 7751–7761. 10.2147/IJN.S145012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Xin X., Wu J., Zheng A., Jiao D., Liu Y., Cao L., et al. (2019). Delivery vehicle of muscle-derived irisin based on silk/calcium silicate/sodium alginate composite scaffold for bone regeneration. Int. J. nanomedicine 14, 1451–1467. 10.2147/IJN.S193544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Xu H. L., Chen P. P., ZhuGe D. L., Zhu Q. Y., Jin B. H., Shen B. X., et al. (2017). Liposomes with silk fibroin hydrogel core to stabilize bFGF and promote the wound healing of mice with deep second-degree scald. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1700344. 10.1002/adhm.201700344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Xu Z., Shi L., Yang M., Zhu L. (2019). Preparation and biomedical applications of silk fibroin-nanoparticles composites with enhanced properties - a review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 95, 302–311. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Yan L. P., Silva-Correia J., Ribeiro V. P., Miranda-Gonçalves V., Correia C., da Silva Morais A., et al. (2016). Tumor growth suppression induced by biomimetic silk fibroin hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 6, 31037. 10.1038/srep31037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yang R., Hou M., Gao Y., Lu S., Zhang L., Xu Z., et al. (2019). Biomineralization-inspired crystallization of manganese oxide on silk fibroin nanoparticles for in vivo MR/fluorescence imaging-assisted Tri-modal therapy of cancer. Theranostics 9, 6314–6333. 10.7150/thno.36252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Yao Q., Lan Q. H., Jiang X., Du C. C., Zhai Y. Y., Shen X., et al. (2020). Bioinspired biliverdin/silk fibroin hydrogel for antiglioma photothermal therapy and wound healing. Theranostics 10, 11719–11736. 10.7150/thno.47682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Yucel T., Lovett M. L., Giangregorio R., Coonahan E., Kaplan D. L. (2014). Silk fibroin rods for sustained delivery of breast cancer therapeutics. Biomaterials 35, 8613–8620. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zha X., Xiong X., Chen C., Li Y., Zhang L., Xie H., et al. (2021). Usnic-acid-functionalized silk fibroin composite scaffolds for cutaneous wounds healing. Macromol. Biosci. 21, e2000361. 10.1002/mabi.202000361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhang D., Chu Y., Qian H., Qian L., Shao J., Xu Q., et al. (2020a). Antitumor activity of thermosensitive hydrogels packaging gambogic acid nanoparticles and tumor-penetrating peptide iRGD against gastric cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 15, 735–747. 10.2147/IJN.S231448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Zhang W., Zheng Y., Liu H., Zhu X., Gu Y., Lan Y., et al. (2019). A non-invasive monitoring of USPIO labeled silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite scaffold loaded DPSCs for dental pulp regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 103, 109736. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zhang Y.-Q., Shen W.-D., Xiang R.-L., Zhuge L.-J., Gao W.-J., Wang W.-B. (2007). Formation of silk fibroin nanoparticles in water-miscible organic solvent and their characterization. J. Nanoparticle Res. 9, 885–900. 10.1007/s11051-006-9162-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhang Y., Cao Y., Zhang L., Zhao H., Ni T., Liu Y., et al. (2020b). Fabrication of an injectable BMSC-laden double network hydrogel based on silk fibroin/PEG for cartilage repair. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 5845–5848. 10.1039/d0tb01017k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Zhao M., Zhu T., Chen J., Cui Y., Zhang X., Lee R. J., et al. (2021). PLGA/PCADK composite microspheres containing hyaluronic acid-chitosan siRNA nanoparticles: A rational design for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 596, 120204. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Zhao Y. Z., Lin M. T., Lan Q. H., Zhai Y. Y., Xu H. L., Xiao J., et al. (2020). Silk fibroin-modified disulfiram/zinc oxide nanocomposites for pH triggered release of Zn(2+) and synergistic antitumor efficacy. Mol. Pharm. 17, 3857–3869. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Zhao Z., Chen A., Li Y., Hu J., Liu X., Li J., et al. (2012). Fabrication of silk fibroin nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. J. Nanoparticle Res. 14, 736. 10.1007/s11051-012-0736-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Zhao Z., Li Y., Xie M. B. (2015). Silk fibroin-based nanoparticles for drug delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 4880–4903. 10.3390/ijms16034880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Zheng H., Zuo B. (2021). Functional silk fibroin hydrogels: Preparation, properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 1238–1258. 10.1039/d0tb02099k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Zheng Z., Guo S., Liu Y., Wu J., Li G., Liu M., et al. (2016). Lithium-free processing of silk fibroin. J. biomaterials Appl. 31, 450–463. 10.1177/0885328216653259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zhu M., Liu Y., Jiang F., Cao J., Kundu S. C., Lu S. (2020). Combined silk fibroin microneedles for insulin delivery. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng. 6, 3422–3429. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. ZhuGe D. L., Wang L. F., Chen R., Li X. Z., Huang Z. W., Yao Q., et al. (2019). Cross-linked nanoparticles of silk fibroin with proanthocyanidins as a promising vehicle of indocyanine green for photo-thermal therapy of glioma. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 47, 4293–4304. 10.1080/21691401.2019.1699819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Ziadlou R., Rotman S., Teuschl A., Salzer E., Barbero A., Martin I., et al. (2021). Optimization of hyaluronic acid-tyramine/silk-fibroin composite hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering and delivery of anti-inflammatory and anabolic drugs. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, Mater. Biol. Appl. 120, 111701. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Zou X., Jiang Z., Li L., Huang Z. (2021). Selenium nanoparticles coated with pH responsive silk fibroin complex for fingolimod release and enhanced targeting in thyroid cancer. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 49, 83–95. 10.1080/21691401.2021.1871620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Zuluaga-Vélez A., Quintero-Martinez A., Orozco L. M., Sepúlveda-Arias J. C. (2021). Silk fibroin nanocomposites as tissue engineering scaffolds - a systematic review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 141, 111924. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES