Skip to main content
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice logoLink to Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
. 2022 Oct 21;10(1):55–63. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13589

Primary Palliative Care in Huntington's Disease

Madaline B Harrison 1,, Dana L Morrissey 1, W Alex Dalrymple 1, Anelyssa D'Abreu 1, Farrah N Daly 2
PMCID: PMC9847290  PMID: 36698999

ABSTRACT

Background

Palliative care practices, including communication about patient‐centered goals of care and advance care planning (ACP), have the potential to enhance care throughout the course of Huntington's disease (HD) and related disorders. The goal of our project was to develop a pilot program that integrates primary palliative care practices with interdisciplinary care for HD.

Objectives

(1) To train HD team members to facilitate goals of care and ACP conversations at all stages of HD; (2) To create materials for care planning in HD focused on patient‐centered goals of care and health‐related quality of life; and (3) To modify clinic workflow to include goals of care and ACP discussions.

Methods

We defined planning domains to expand care planning beyond end‐of‐life concerns. We created a patient and family guide to advance care planning in HD. We conducted VitalTalk communications training with the HD team. We modified the interdisciplinary clinic workflow to include ACP and developed an EMR template for documentation.

Results

After communication training, more team members felt well prepared to discuss serious news (12.5% to 50%) and manage difficult conversations (25% to 62.5%). The proportion of clinic visits including advance care planning discussions increased from 12.5% to 30.6% during the pilot phase.

Conclusions

Provision of primary palliative care for HD in an interdisciplinary clinic is feasible. Integration of palliative care practices into HD specialty care requires additional training and modification of clinic operations.

Keywords: Huntington's disease, interdisciplinary care, neurodegenerative disease, palliative care


Palliative care seeks to improve the quality of life of patients and families facing life‐threatening illness through the prevention and relief of suffering. 1 Palliative care is not limited by life expectancy or prognosis and can improve outcomes when delivered prior to the terminal stage of an illness. 2 , 3 However, many patients receive palliative care late or not at all. 4 Less than half of older adult or chronically ill individuals have completed advance directives regarding their wishes for care. 5

The emerging field of neuropalliative care has focused attention on the potential value of palliative care for neurodegenerative disease including movement disorders such as Parkinson's and Huntington's disease (HD). 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 There is a clear consensus that provision of this care represents an unmet need. 7 , 8 , 11 , 15 Over 15 years ago, a multidisciplinary task force sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation recommended incorporation of end‐of‐life care discussions into routine HD care and presented principles to guide end‐of‐life care. 15 However, in two recent surveys of patients with HD, only 31.3% of 242 surveyed in the Netherlands, and 38.2% of 503 in the US, had specific plans such as advance directives in place for end‐of‐life care. 16 , 17 , 18

Specific models for delivery of palliative care to populations with neurologic disease vary, depending on local resources and availability of specialized palliative or neuropalliative expertise. 7 , 10 , 19 The primary palliative care approach was proposed in part to address an anticipated shortage of palliative care specialists. 20 , 21 , 22 In primary palliative care, practitioners incorporate core palliative care skills into their own practice, involving subspecialty palliative care clinicians for more complex issues when needed. 22

Core palliative care practices include symptom management, involvement of patients, families and care partners in the unit of care, and intentional communication about complex decisions. 23 Specialty care for HD shares several features with palliative care. In both, an interdisciplinary team combines expertise in symptom management with a focus on patient, family, and care partner support. 11 Although there is overlap between palliative care practices and care provided by HD specialists, most clinicians who are not formally trained in palliative care lack specific training in the communication skills needed for effective conversations about goals of care. 24 , 25 , 26 , 27

We have developed a novel primary palliative care program for HD that incorporates palliative care practices into an existing interdisciplinary HD clinic, using specific communication skills to support patient‐centered goals of care and quality of life, and to address advance care planning throughout the illness, not just at the end of life. 22 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 Our goal in this pilot program was to integrate primary palliative care practices with interdisciplinary care for HD through the following objectives: (1) To train HD team members to facilitate goals of care and advance care planning conversations at all stages of HD; (2) To create materials for care planning in HD focused on patient‐centered goals of care and health‐related quality of life; (3) To modify clinic workflow to include goals of care and advance care planning discussions.

Methods

The project team consisted of the HD program director, a movement disorders neurologist (MH); the HD program coordinator, a social worker (DM); and a neuropalliative care consultant (FD). To identify existing practices and recommendations on provision of palliative care in HD, we performed Medline searches using the following terms: Huntington's disease AND palliative care, Huntington's disease AND end of life care, and a PubMed search for Huntington's disease AND palliative care. Of the references identified, we focused on descriptions of specific programs, studies identifying utilization of palliative care or hospice services and reports assessing gaps in end‐of‐life care. In addition, we reviewed selected references on palliative care, particularly those describing neuropalliative care.

Previous reviews and surveys have identified HD patient and care partner needs for education, support and resources. 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 Patient concerns were solicited directly in the HD Quality of Life Project, in which research teams from eight HD specialty clinics surveyed over 500 patients about health‐related quality of life, including end‐of‐life planning. 17 , 18 , 37 , 38 Four areas of concern were identified: legal planning, financial planning, preferences for hospice care, and preferences for care at the time of death. To extend advance care planning into stages of HD prior to the end‐of‐life, we incorporated these into three planning domains: personal goals and priorities; medical care; and resources and family support (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Advance care planning domains

Personal Goals/Priorities Medical Care Resources
  • Personal sources of support

  • Symptom management

  • Financial resources: POA, disability, insurance, estate planning

  • Occupational and recreational goals

  • Care planning education

  • Counseling, pastoral care

  • Engagement with family and community

  • Advance directives, health care POA

  • In‐home and respite care

  • Preferences for long‐term care

  • Options for long‐term in‐home or facility care

  • Community resources, benefit programs

Note: In this model of advance care planning, personal goals and priorities provide the foundation for decision‐making. At each stage of Huntington's disease, these priorities can guide choices regarding medical care and resources to support the goals and values of the individual and care partners.

We used functional stages based on the Total Functional Capacity score from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale to define representative care planning issues in early, middle and late stages of HD. 39 , 40 While the dominant symptoms and rate of progression in HD can vary between individuals, specific changes in function define each stage. To guide advance care planning, we identified milestones that signal transitions between HD stages. Table 2 outlines functional changes that indicate a transition to the next stage and includes examples of care planning issues. In addition to the specific motor and cognitive changes listed, mood changes (apathy, depression, irritability, disinhibition and others) can occur at any stage of the illness. 41 , 42

TABLE 2.

Care planning IN HD by stage

Stages Milestones Functional Changes Goals/Priorities Medical Care Resources
EARLY
  • Clear motor symptoms

  • Mild chorea, incoordination

  • Identification of sources of support

  • Treat mood/motor symptoms

  • Establish financial POA

  • Clinical diagnosis

  • Mild cognitive changes

  • Plans for delegation of household and finance management

  • Establish health care POA, advance directives

  • Financial planning

  • Independent or requires only minor assistance

  • Modifications at work

MIDDLE
  • Increasing disability:

  • No longer able to work or drive safely

  • Support for family and community engagement

  • Treat mood/motor symptoms

  • Social Security disability insurance

  • Development of dysphagia, worsening chorea, balance and cognition

  • No longer able to perform household tasks

  • Quality of life/meaning and resilience

  • Modifications for safety: PT, OT, SLP

  • Community resources

  • Some assistance needed with basic activities; may have increased need for supervision

  • Sources of emotional support

  • Planning for increased care needs, site of care: home vs LTC

LATE
  • Assistance needed for all activities

  • Limited communication

  • Engagement of end‐of‐life resources such as hospice

  • Treat mood/motor symptoms

  • Site of care: home vs LTC

  • Increased motor dysfunction due to chorea and other motor symptoms (rigidity, dystonia and bradykinesia)

  • Increased risk of aspiration and weight loss

  • Support for family/care partners to prepare for end‐of‐life

  • Adaptations to prevent injury

  • Specialty palliative or hospice care

  • Increased cognitive dysfunction

  • Requires assistance to walk, or wheelchair

  • Addressing anticipated loss and other emotional needs

  • Modify routine to reduce behavioral issues

  • Increased behavioral symptoms

  • Consultation with subspecialty primary care

Note: In this table, the milestones that indicate transition into each stage are listed, including common symptoms and functional changes. Examples from each of the three care planning domains are given for each stage.

Next, we identified three specific steps needed to incorporate advance care planning into our existing interdisciplinary care: (1) communication skills training; (2) education for patient and caregivers focused on care decisions in HD; and (3) modifications in clinic workflow.

(1) Communication skills. We used resources from two programs with demonstrated effectiveness in clinical trials: VitalTalk and the Serious Illness Conversation Project. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 To equip the entire team with these skills, a VitalTalk Faculty member conducted a half day communication training session using standardized patients to demonstrate evidence‐based strategies for delivering serious news, responding to emotion, defining goals, and mapping a care plan. In consultation with a health services researcher, we developed a pre/post self‐evaluation survey using the Qualtrics Online Survey Software in order to assess the effectiveness of the communication skills training. 43 Participants completed the survey following the training session. 44 In addition, we held formal debriefing sessions facilitated by the neuropalliative care consultant (FD) at one and 6 months following the training.

(2) Education for patient and caregivers. We created an introductory guide for patients and families to identify specific advance care planning issues in HD and provide links to additional resources (Fig. 1). We also developed a basic information sheet with treatment definitions to clarify the terms used in advance care planning. Both of these were revised based on patient and care partner feedback. Table SS1 lists the materials we developed for patients and care partners as well as selections from existing palliative care resources that provide additional information on care decisions and communicating goals and priorities.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Comprehensive care planning in HD. This guide to care planning in HD was developed for use by patients and care partners in the advance care planning process.

(3) Modifications in clinic workflow. We identified changes in clinic workflow needed in order to include advance care planning. These included revisions to clinic communications with patients, reorganization of team meetings before and after clinic and additions to EMR templates. These were introduced during the pilot implementation phase (June through December 2021) and are reviewed in the Results section.

Results

In this pilot project, we collected preliminary data on the impact of communication skills training, as well as the number of documented advance care planning discussions.

Communication skills

Following the training session, eight of nine participants completed the pre/post self‐evaluation survey in which they rated their understanding of palliative care and their readiness to engage in advance care planning discussions before and after their participation in the communication skills training. Over half the participants rated their understanding of palliative care as above average before they attended the session. This proportion increased following the training (62.5% to 87.5%). Similarly, 62.5% of the participants rated themselves as likely or very likely to initiate a care planning discussion before the training, which increased to 87.5% after the training. There was a more pronounced change in how participants rated their preparation for discussing serious news before and after the session (well or very well prepared; 12.5% to 50%). The proportion who rated their ability to manage difficult conversations as above average also increased from 25% to 62.5%.

We included three qualitative questions. (1) What was the main concept you took away from this session? Five comments identified recognition and response to emotion as key concepts in facilitating these conversations. (2) Is there additional information or training that would help you with conversations on goals of care? Three comments indicated that additional training would be more useful after practicing the skills in clinic. Two comments mentioned potential benefits of collaboration with other team members in applying the skills. (3) What skill do you want to put into practice the next time you are meeting with a patient? Specific skills mentioned in individual comments included active listening, silence, and mapping a care plan. Four comments identified responding to emotion.

Modifications in clinic workflow

Pre‐visit calls and letters were revised to include specific questions about care planning. A section for planning recommendations was added to patient instructions. In pre‐clinic team meetings, we review use of specific communication skills, particularly setting an agenda for the visit. During the patient review, we identify care planning needs and designate a specific team member to initiate a discussion. We offer care planning materials and additional visits for those patients and families who want more information or time for discussion. We have developed pilot EMR templates to provide consistent documentation of care planning conversations. Following clinic, we review outcomes of care planning discussions and identify actions needed to implement modifications to care plans.

Advance care planning

We performed chart reviews for all HD clinic visits during the 7 months prior to and following the communication skills training to identify documented advance care planning discussions. In the pre‐pilot phase prior to the skills training (November 2020–May 2021), advance care planning discussions occurred in eight of 64 encounters (12.5%) and in three additional encounters scheduled outside of clinic. During the pilot implementation phase (June through December 2021), advance care planning discussions occurred in 19 of 62 clinic encounters (30.6%) and in six dedicated care planning sessions outside of the monthly clinic. Four families requested additional telephone consultations, primarily with care partners, to follow up on the issues discussed.

Discussion

This report describes the design and pilot implementation of a strategy for providing primary palliative care in HD. To our knowledge, this is the first description of primary palliative care for Huntington's disease in which all interdisciplinary team members received formal training in communication skills and actively participate in goals of care and advance care planning discussions. In developing our program, we built on the foundation provided by the work of dedicated clinicians in both HD and palliative care, particularly neuropalliative care. We hope that sharing our experience to date will support continued development of this expanded model of practice.

Several strategies modeled on specialist palliative care have been developed to provide neuropalliative care in the outpatient setting. 7 , 10 , 12 , 19 In these programs, the composition and structure of the teams vary but most include involvement of a palliative specialist. Recommendations for providing primary palliative care have also been outlined for neurological disorders including movement disorders. 8 , 45 An integrated neuropalliative care approach has been successfully adopted by several clinics focusing on Parkinson's disease, following recommendations proposed by patients and care partners as well as practitioners. 9 , 13 , 19 Positive effects on quality of life have been reported in a clinical trial of specialist neuropalliative care in Parkinson's disease. 46 However, access to integrated and specialist palliative models may be limited by the availability of subspecialty trained palliative care practitioners. Referral may entail transfer of care to a new team, which can be challenging for patients, care partners and practitioners.

In contrast, this report describes a primary palliative care approach in which all interdisciplinary team members incorporate palliative principles directly into their practice. This primary palliative care approach differs from integrated neuropalliative care models, particularly in the early introduction of advance care planning and the involvement of an expanded range of disciplines. 19 Early advance care planning has been recommended for both HD and other neurodegenerative disorders. 8 , 9 , 11 , 15 , 35 This is particularly important in HD, as cognitive changes may develop relatively early in the course and can limit the affected individual's ability to participate in these discussions. 47

The original description of primary palliative care proposed several potential benefits: maintaining existing therapeutic relationships, reducing fragmentation of care, enhancing clinical skills and provider satisfaction, and improving quality of care. 22 Primary palliative care for HD builds on the longitudinal model of care and expertise available in HD specialty clinics. Specialty care in HD requires symptom management for complex movement and psychiatric disorders and support for families living with multigenerational illness. 11 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 HD clinicians have established relationships with patients and care partners to call on when navigating advance care planning discussion.

However, conversations about end‐of‐life can be difficult for patients, families, and clinicians. 52 Most clinicians lack training in the communication skills needed for effective conversations about goals of care. 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 In developing our program, we focused on the core palliative skill of communication. All interdisciplinary team members, representing a variety of disciplines including rehabilitative therapies, participated in communication skills training using evidence‐based strategies from VitalTalk on delivering serious news, responding to emotion, defining goals, and mapping a care plan28, 29 Our goal was to enable each team member to begin a goals of care conversation at any time during the course of HD if the need for advance care planning was identified during their clinical assessment. During the training, practitioners were also encouraged to collaborate with other team members for support in discussion of care planning needs. After the training, more participants felt prepared to engage in these conversations and the number of advance care planning discussions increased.

Recommendations for symptom management in HD have been developed by experienced practitioners and are widely used in HD specialty clinics. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 Often, plans of care must focus on immediate safety concerns. However, these same clinical issues also reflect functional changes due to disease progression. We defined milestones to identify transitions within disease progression that signal the need for advance care planning. 39 , 40 Using these milestones, clinicians can offer anticipatory guidance to individuals and care partners before a crisis occurs. As the disease progresses, goals and priorities may change, affecting choices about care. By addressing advance care planning throughout the illness, practitioners can assist patients and care partners as they reconsider goals of care and prepare for future decisions, including timing of referral to specialist palliative or hospice care.

Our written materials for patient education and support were designed to complement these in‐person discussions and to normalize care planning conversations. We created educational materials with information specific to HD to guide advance care planning from early in the illness (Fig. 1). We reviewed existing materials designed for end‐of‐life discussions in the setting of medical illnesses and found that many required some adaptation for in HD, in which disease progression occurs over many years. We also referenced existing resources without modification (Table SS1).

Changes to our clinic workflow were necessary to accommodate the additional time spent on exploring emotions, goals, and priorities with patients and care partners. In our interdisciplinary HD clinic, patients see practitioners from neurology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, neuropsychology and social work, either in individual appointments on site or in telemedicine appointments that include the entire team. This intensive clinic experience can be emotionally and cognitively demanding for patients, care partners and clinicians, leaving little additional time or energy for complex emotional discussions. Therefore, identifying opportunities for care planning and ordering the priorities of the clinic visit during the pre‐clinic team meeting was essential. By identifying issues ahead of time and developing a plan to address them, we were able to increase the number of advance care planning discussions during clinic. In addition, we scheduled dedicated visits to provide additional time for complex decision‐making when necessary.

Both the pilot and pre‐pilot phases took place during the early years of the COVID pandemic, when telemedicine use increased substantially. As reported previously, our team has conducted telemedicine visits routinely for over 20 years with equivalent recommendations resulting from both visit types. 66 Therefore our team was familiar with conducting remote visits and did not experience this as a barrier. However, during the pilot phase we recognized that advance care discussions via telemedicine benefitted from more strategic planning than needed for discussions conducted in person. Uncertainty about team member roles and responsibilities could disrupt the flow of conversation and required clarification prior to starting the visit. Inadequate privacy, especially in the facility setting where patients have less control over their surroundings, sometimes resulted in postponing a goals of care discussion.

The issues we have encountered during implementation overlap with those reported in developing neuropalliative care clinics. 19 While the specifics of clinic organization vary among programs, there is a high degree of consensus on principles that can guide implementation of palliative care in neurodegenerative disorders which are outlined in Table SS2. 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 To plan for future development of our primary palliative care approach, we are collaborating with a health services researcher in a formal quality improvement process. The core team for quality improvement includes the program coordinator, primary HD team occupational therapist and the health services research specialist. This team will lead changes in work flow, define specific outcomes and design evaluations to assess the impact of the program, in consultation with the interdisciplinary HD team.

To guide the next steps in implementation, we are using a detailed logic model to build on our experience in the pilot phase. 67 This model is a specific planning tool that provides a structure to assess success in accomplishing the program's intended outcomes in a quality improvement process. We have defined specific outcomes in four broad areas following recommendations for assessment from both primary palliative care and integrated neuropalliative care approaches. 7 , 10 , 19 , 22 , 46 These include: (1) advance care planning outcomes such as completion of advance directives, care plan modifications and functional outcomes; (2) referrals to specialist palliative care or hospice and communication with specialist providers; (3) impact on quality of life for both patients and care partners, as well as their perceptions of clinic experience; and (4) provider perception of clinic experience and further assessment of skills development.

Our preliminary results support the potential benefit of a primary palliative care approach to increase engagement in advance care planning. Additional informal observations suggest that this approach may benefit patients, care partners and clinicians in other ways. During the pilot phase, the HD program coordinator received unsolicited positive feedback from several families on the value of these care planning conversations. In addition, team members spontaneously reported benefits of the Vital Talk tools in other settings and noted increased collaboration among team members during the clinic. We have identified existing survey tools to assess several of these areas and have conducted an interactive needs assessment with providers to obtain input on additional steps for implementation. In order to continue to adapt our design, we will use ongoing formative evaluation activities from a model on stages of change. 68

As we continue with these changes in practice, further modifications will be based on assessment of outcomes for patients and care partners as well as clinicians. Positive effects on quality of life have been reported in a clinical trial of specialist neuropalliative care in Parkinson's disease. 46 We anticipate that a primary palliative care approach will have a similar impact in Huntington's disease.

Conclusions

In this report, we have described the initial steps in developing a primary palliative care approach to interdisciplinary HD care. We equipped our team with formal communication skills training, and provide materials on advance care planning to patients and care partners, including some which we developed or adapted specifically for HD. We have modified our clinic workflow to identify indicators for advance care planning and to incorporate these discussions. In adding these elements to our existing interdisciplinary expertise in HD symptom management, we have laid the foundation for a program that integrates primary palliative care practices with interdisciplinary care for HD.

Primary palliative care offers a number of potential advantages as a strategy to provide comprehensive care for HD. Advance care planning can be introduced early in the illness and modified as the disease progresses. The entire interdisciplinary team can contribute expertise in HD symptom management to the advance care plans. Support for patient and care partners in these discussions may be enhanced by the long‐term relationships many families have with HD specialty programs.

From our experience to date, we have drawn several conclusions:

  1. Primary palliative care for HD is feasible in an outpatient interdisciplinary clinic setting and has potential benefits for patients, care partners and clinicians.

  2. A primary palliative approach to care for HD integrates the perspectives of multiple disciplines from both HD specialty care and palliative care.

  3. Intentional communication with patients and care partners about advance care planning helps align the efforts of the entire interdisciplinary team with the priorities of those living with HD.

  4. Successful implementation of primary palliative care in an interdisciplinary clinic requires communication skills training for clinicians, education and psychosocial support for patients and care partners, and modification of clinic operations.

Author Roles

(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.

M.B.H. 1A, B, C; 3A.

D.L.M. 1A, B, C; 3B.

W.A.D. 1C; 3B.

A.D.'A. 1C; 3B.

F.N.D. 1A, B, C; 3B.

Disclosures

Ethical Compliance Statement: Prior to initiating the project, the proposal was reviewed by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research and determined to be a quality improvement project and not to represent research on human subjects. Informed patient consent was not necessary for this work. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.

Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Harrison received a pilot grant from the Huntington's Disease Society of America to support the development of this program. All other authors declare no additional disclosures to report.

Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months: Dr. Harrison received a Center of Excellence Grant from the Huntington's Disease Society of America and is the Site Primary Investigator for the ENROLL‐HD trial sponsored by the CHDI Foundation. Dr. Dalrymple is Site Co‐Primary Investigator for SPARX3, Study in Parkinson's disease of exercise, sponsored by NINDS (1‐U01‐NS113851‐01) and was Co‐Investigator for GAIN, GingipAIN Inhibitor for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease, sponsored by Cortexyme, Inc. (COR388‐010). All other authors declare no additional disclosures to report.

Supporting information

Table S1. This table lists materials developed during this project for provider training and for patient and care partner education. Additional outside resources providing information on care planning are also listed.

Table S2. This table lists aspects of palliative care that patients, care partners and practitioners have identified as central to the provision of palliative care in neurodegenerative disorders.8,9,12–14

Acknowledgments

The Huntington's Disease Society of America supported this project with a pilot clinical research grant and has provided long‐term support to the UVA HD program. Tim Short MD, Director of Hospice of the Piedmont, provided helpful information on primary palliative care and suggestions on initial development. Jessica McFarlin MD, neuropalliative specialist and VitalTalk Faculty, led the communications training and offered valuable feedback. Wendy Novicoff PhD assisted us in survey interpretation and evaluation planning. We want to thank the UVA HD Clinic team for their dedication and commitment to quality care: Hannah Caballero LCSW; Emily Crim RN; Susan Dietrich BA; Renee Fuller OT; Shelley Knewstep‐Watkins OTD, OTR/L; Tracey Lopez MDiv, MS, BCC; Bridget Moss MSN, RN, ACNP; Laurie Pallini, PT; Julie Pitti CCC‐SLP; John Zenker PT; Patrick Kerns MD, PhD and Matthew Burton MD, Movement Disorders fellows.

[Correction added on 14 November, 2022, after first online publication to update copyright line and legal agreement.]

References

  • 1. World Health Organization . Palliative care; 5 August 2020; cited 2022 March 08. 2020; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care
  • 2. Zwerdling T, Hamann K, Meyers F. Extending palliative care is there a role for preventive medicine? J Palliat Med 2005. Jun;8(3):486–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kavalieratos D, Corelli J, Zhang D, Dionne‐Odom JN, Ernecoff NC, Hanmer J, et al. Association between palliative care and patient caregiver outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2016;316(20):2104–2114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ernecoff NC, Wessell KL, Hanson LC, Dusetzina SB, Shea CM, Weinberger M, Bennett AV. Elements of palliative Care in the Last 6 months of life: Frequency, predictors, and timing. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35(3):753–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, Kent S, Kim J, Herbst N, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end‐of‐life care. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2017;36(7):1244–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Robinson MT, Holloway RG. Palliative Care in Neurology. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92(10):1592–1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Creutzfeldt CJ, Kluger B, Kelly AG, et al. Neuropalliative care: Priorities to move the field forward. Neurology 2018;91:217–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vaughn CL, Kluger BM. Palliative Care for Movement Disorders. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2018. Feb 21;20(1):2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hall K, Sumrall M, Thelen G, Kluger B. Palliative care and Parkinson's disease patient advisory council. Palliative care for Parkinson's disease: Suggestions from a council of patient and care partners. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2017; May 22;3:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kluger BM, Fox S, Timmons S, Katz M, Galifianakis NB, Subramanian I, et al. Palliative care and Parkinson's disease: Meeting summary and recommendations for clinical research. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2017;37:19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tarolli CG, Chesire AM, Biglan KM. Palliative care in Huntington disease: Personal reflection and a review of the literature. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov 2017. Apr;11(7):454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kluger BM, Shattuck J, Berk J, et al. Defining palliative care needs in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2018. Nov 16;6(2):125–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Boersma I, Jones J, Carter J, Bekelman D, Miyasaki J, Kluger B. Parkinson disease patients' perspectives on palliative care needs: What are they telling us? Neurol Clin Pract 2016. Jun;6(3):209–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Introduction to Neuropalliative Care . Education in palliative and end‐of‐life care (EPEC) neurology curriculum. International neuropalliative care society. 2021. [cited 2022 March 08]. Available at https://www.inpcs.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3324. Login required.
  • 15. Dubinsky R, The Huntington's Disease Peer Workgroup . Lifting the Veil of Huntington's Disease: Recommendations to the Field from the Huntington's Disease Peer Workgroup. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Booij SJ, Tibben A, Engberts DP, Marinus J, Roos RA. Thinking about the end of life: A common issue for patients with Huntington's disease. J Neurol 2014. Nov;261(11):2184–2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Carlozzi NE, Hahn EA, Frank SA, et al. HDQLIFE site investigators and coordinators a new measure for end‐of‐life planning, preparation, and preferences in Huntington disease: HDQLIFE end‐of‐life planning. J Neurol 2018;265(1):98–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Downing NR, Goodnight S, Chae S, et al. Factors associated with end‐of‐life planning in Huntington disease. Am J Hosp Pall Med 2018;35(3):440–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kluger BM, Persenaire MJ, Holden SK, et al. Implementation issues relevant to outpatient neurology palliative care. Ann Palliat Med 2018. Jul;7(3):339–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lupu D, Quigley L, Mehfoud N, Salsberg ES. The growing demand for hospice and palliative medicine in physicians: Will the supply keep up? J Pain Symptom Manage 2018. Apr;55(4):1216–1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kamal AH, Wolf SP, Troy J, et al. Policy changes key to promoting sustainability and growth of the specialty palliative care workforce. Health Aff 2019;38(6):910–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Quill TE, Abernathy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care—Creating a more sustainable model. NEJM 2013;368(13):1173–1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dahlin C. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care 3rd ed [Internet].Pittsburgh: National consensus project for quality palliative care. 2013. [cited 2022, Jul 09] Available from: www.nationalconsensusproject.org
  • 24. Schwartz CE, Goulet JL, Gorski V, Selwyn PA. Medical residents' perceptions of end‐of‐life care training in a large urban teaching hospital. J Palliat Med 2003. Feb;6(1):37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lester PE, Daroowalla F, Harisingani R, et al. Evaluation of housestaff knowledge and perception of competence in palliative symptom management. J Pall Med 2011;14(2):139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Shaheen AW, Denton GD, Stratton TD, Hoellein AR, Chretien KC. End‐of‐life and palliative care curricula in internal medicine clerkships: A report on the presence, value, and design of curricula as rated by clerkship directors. Acad Med 2014;89(8):1168–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Moyer KM, Morrison LJ, Encandela J, Kennedy C, Ellman MS. A new competency‐based instrument to assess resident knowledge and self‐efficacy in primary palliative. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28. Back AL, Fromme EK, Meier DE. Training clinicians with communication skills needed to match medical treatments to patient values. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:S435–S441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. VitalTalk . VitalTalk Quick Guides [Internet]. c2019. [Cited 2022 March 09] Available at https://www.vitaltalk.org/resources/quick-guides/
  • 30. Bernacki R, Paladino J, Neville B, et al. Effect of the serious illness care program in outpatient oncology: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2019. Jun 1;179(6):751–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Serious Illness Care [Internet] . Ariadne Lab; c 2015–2017 and [Cited 2022 March 09]. 2020. Avaialble at https://www.ariadnelabs.org/areas-of-work/serious-illness-care/
  • 32. Dawson S, Kristjanson LJ, Toye CM, Flett P. Living with Huntington's disease: need for supportive care. Nursing & Health Sciences 2004; Jun;6(2):123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kristjanson LJ, Aoun SM, Oldham L. Palliative care and support for people with neurodegenerative conditions and their carers. Int J Palliat Nurs 2006. Aug;12(8):368–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Simpson SA. Late stage care in Huntington's disease. Brain Res Bull 2007. Apr 30;72(2–3):179–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Travers E, Jones K, Nichol J. Palliative care provision in Huntington's disease. Int J Palliat Nurs 2007. Mar;13(3):125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Johnson MO, Frank S, Mendlik M, Casarett D. Utilization of hospice services in a population of patients with Huntington's disease. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018. Feb;55(2):440–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Carlozzi NE, Downing NR, McCormack MK, et al. Nance MA new measures to capture end‐of‐life concerns in Huntington disease: Meaning and purpose and concern with death and dying from HDQLIFE (a patient‐reported outcomes measurement system). Qual Life Res 2016. Oct;25(10):2403–2415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Carlozzi NE, Boileau NR, Paulsen JS, et al. End‐of‐life measures in Huntington disease: HDQLIFE meaning and purpose, concern with death and dying, and end‐of‐life planning. J Neurol 2019;266(10):2406–2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Shoulson I, Kurlan RA, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in neurodegenerative disorders: Huntington's disease as a prototype. In: Munsat TL, ed. Quantification of neurologic deficit. Boston: Butterworths; 1989:285–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Huntington's disease stages [Internet] . New York: Huntington's Disease Society of America. 2022. Available from https://hdsa.org/what-is-hd/huntingtons-disease-stages
  • 41. Eddy CM, Parkinson EG, Rickards HE. Changes in mental state and behaviour in Huntington's disease. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3(11):1079–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. van Duijn E, Craufurd D, Hubers AA, et al. European Huntington's disease network Behavioural phenotype working group. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in a European Huntington's disease cohort (REGISTRY). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014. Dec;85(12):1411–1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Qualtrics Online Survey Software Qualtrics , Provo, UT https://www.qualtrics.com/
  • 44. Bhanji F, Gottesman R, de Grave W, Steinert Y, Winer LR. The retrospective pre‐post: A practical method to evaluate learning from an educational program. Acad Emergency Med 2012;19(2):189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Creutzfeldt C et al. Neurologists as primary palliative care providers. Neurol Clin Pract 2016;6:40–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kluger BM, Miyasaki J, Katz M, et al. Comparison of integrated outpatient palliative care with standard care in patients with Parkinson disease and related disorders: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2020;77(5):551–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ross CA, Reilmann R, Cardoso F, McCusker EA, Stout JC, Leavitt BR, et al. Movement Disorder Society task force viewpoint: Huntington's disease diagnostic categories. Mov Dis Clin Prac 2019;6(7):541–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Moskowitz CB, Marder K. Palliative care for people with late‐stage Huntington's disease. Neurol Clin 2001. Nov;19(4):849–865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Klager J, Duckett A, Sandler S, Moskowitz C. Huntington's disease: A caring approach to the end of life. Care Management Journal 2018;9(2):75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Dellefield ME, Ferrini R. Promoting excellence in end‐of‐life care: Lessons learned from a cohort of nursing home residents with advanced Huntington disease. J Neurosci Nurs 2011;43(4):186–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Moskowitz CB, Rao AK. Making a measurable difference in advanced Huntington disease care. Handb Clin Neurol 2017;144:183–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Abba K, Byrne HS, Lloyd‐Williams M. Interventions to encourage discussion of end‐of‐life preferences between members of the general population and the people closest to them – A systematic literature review. BMC Palliat Care 2013;12:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Anderson K, Craufurd D, Edmondson MC, et al. An international survey‐based algorithm for the pharmacologic treatment of obsessive‐compulsive behaviors in Huntington's disease. PLoS Curr. 2011. Sep 20;3:RRN1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Burgunder JM, Guttman M, Perlman S, Goodman N, van Kammen DP, Goodman L. An international survey‐based algorithm for the pharmacologic treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease. PLoS Curr 2011. Aug;30(3):RRN1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Groves M, van Duijn E, Anderson K, et al. An international survey‐based algorithm for the pharmacologic treatment of irritability in Huntington's disease. PLoS Curr. 2011. August;3:3:RRN1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Nance M, Management of Late Stage HD in . In: Nance MA, Paulsen JS, Rosenblatt A, Wheelock V, eds. A Physician's Guide to the Management of Huntington's Disease. 3rd ed. New York: HDSA; 2011. Available at http://hdsa.org/shop/publications. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Brotherton A, Campos L, Rowell A, Zoia V, Simpson SA, Rae D. Nutritional management of individuals with Huntington's disease: Nutritional guidelines. Neurodegen Dis Manage 2012;2(1):33–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cook C, Page K, Wagstaff A, Simpson SA, Rae D. On behalf of the contributing members of the European Huntington's disease networks standards of care occupational therapist group development of guidelines for occupational therapy in Huntington's disease. Neurodegen Dis Manage 2012;2(1):79–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Hamilton A, Heemskerk A‐W, Loucas M, et al. On behalf of the contributing members of the European Huntington's disease networks standards of care SLT working group management of speech, language and communication difficulties in Huntington's disease. Neurodegen Dis Manage 2012;2(1):67–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hamilton A, Heemskerk A‐W, Loucas M, et al. On behalf of the contributing members of the European Huntington's Disease Networks Standards of Care SLT Working Group. Oral feeding in Huntington's disease: a guideline document for speech and language therapists. Neurodegen Dis Manage. 2012;2(1):45–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Quinn L, Busse M. On behalf of the European Huntington's disease network physiotherapy working group physiotherapy clinical guidelines for Huntington's disease. Neurodegen Dis Manage 2012;2(1):21–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Johnson AC, Paulsen JS. Understanding behavior in Huntington's disease: A Guide for Professionals, 2022. Available at http://hdsa.org/shop/publications/
  • 63. Nance MA, Lovecky D, Leserman A, Meyer S. Caregiver Guide for Mid to Late Stage Huntington's Disease: For Long‐Term Care Facilities and In‐Home Care Agencies, 2014. Available at http://hdsa.org/shop/publications/.
  • 64. Anderson KE, van Duijn E, Craufurd D, et al. Clinical Management of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Huntington disease: Expert‐based consensus guidelines on agitation. Anxiety, Apathy, Psychosis and Sleep DisordersJ Huntingtons Dis 2018;7(3):355–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Bachoud‐Lévi AC, Ferreira J, Massart R, et al. International guidelines for the treatment of Huntington's disease. Front Neurol 2019. Jul;3(10):710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Harrison MB, Morrissey D. Interdisciplinary telemedicine Services for Huntington's disease: A 20‐year experience. Telemed J E Health 2021. May;27(5):583–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. CDC PPEO Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 1999;48:9‐10. No. RR‐11. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997;12(1):38–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. This table lists materials developed during this project for provider training and for patient and care partner education. Additional outside resources providing information on care planning are also listed.

Table S2. This table lists aspects of palliative care that patients, care partners and practitioners have identified as central to the provision of palliative care in neurodegenerative disorders.8,9,12–14


Articles from Movement Disorders Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES