Skip to main content
Brain and Behavior logoLink to Brain and Behavior
. 2022 Dec 10;13(1):e2837. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2837

Factors associated with cognitive impairment at 3, 6, and 12 months after the first stroke among Lebanese survivors

Celina F Boutros 1,, Walaa Khazaal 2,, Maram Taliani 2,, Najwane Said Sadier 2,3, Pascale Salameh 4,5,6, Hassan Hosseini 1,4,7
PMCID: PMC9847618  PMID: 36495111

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to calculate the rate of post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) by evaluating the cognitive domains among Lebanese stroke survivors at 3, 6, and 12 months post‐stroke, and to identify the contributing factors including pre‐ and post‐stroke related factors.

Methods

A multicenter longitudinal prospective study was conducted in 10 hospitals from Beirut and Mount Lebanon for a 15‐month period. Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Short Form Health Survey (SF12), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to assess cognitive function, disability degree, Quality of Life (QoL), stroke severity, and levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. Then, univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the predictors of PSCI.

Results

Low MMSE scores were found among survivors during the first 3 months post‐stroke (74.8%) of whom 53.7% presented with an MMSE ≤ 17, followed by 46.7% in the 6 months, and 37.6% at 12 months post‐stroke. Follow‐up comparisons showed a significant increase of MMSE scores over time (p < .001), indicating a 37% improvement of the cognitive function over time. The most affected cognitive domain was the attention and concentration at the three time points. Independent factors that were positively associated with low MMSE scores were as follows: sedentary behavior ≥ 12 h/day (AOR = 3.062, p = .033), involvement of the left hemisphere (AOR = 2.710, p = .006), HADS ≥ 11 (AOR = 2.536, p = .049), and high NIHSS scores (AOR = 3, p = .009). Age was the main predictor in the three time periods (AOR ≈ 3, p < .05). Inversely, female gender (AOR = 0.09, p = .027), high educational level (AOR = 0.2, p < .02), employment post‐stroke (AOR = 0.3, p = .023), high Physical Component Summary (PCS) of Quality of Life (QoL) (AOR = 0.8, p < .001), and the use of anti‐diabetic treatment post‐stroke (AOR = 0.17, p = .016) improved MMSE scores to > 23.

Conclusion

The risk of PSCI among Lebanese stroke survivors was high especially in the acute phase, depending on various determinants. Health care providers are invited to implement an emergency rehabilitation program for an appropriate successful management of the risk factors in order to reduce stroke burden and to improve overall cognitive performance.

Keywords: cognitive domains, complications, factors, follow‐up, Lebanon, MMSE, post‐stroke cognitive impairment, PSCI, rate, severity, survivors


graphic file with name BRB3-13-e2837-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Stroke is a widespread health concern affecting approximately 17 million people worldwide every year (Klamroth‐Marganska, 2018). The short‐term, medium‐term, and long‐term consequences of stroke are remarkable, with high mortality and morbidity rates requiring multidisciplinary care on a daily basis (Broussy et al., 2019).

Cognitive impairment following stroke is very common and can lead to dementia, placing an enormous burden on caregivers and the healthcare system (Rohde et al., 2019). The heterogeneous nature of cerebrovascular lesions may have an effect on cognition through various mechanisms including altered blood flow and oxygen supply, chronic inflammation, disruption of axonal tracts, or altered cortical connectivity. Stroke patients have a high potential to develop cognitive impairment within the first year of stroke onset starting from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and ending with severe dementia (Al‐Qazzaz et al., 2014). According to the clinical diagnostic criteria and the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) test tool, MCI is defined by a cognitive decline, an MMSE score between 18 and 23, including four subtypes as follows: amnestic, amnestic plus other domains, nonamnestic single domain, and nonamnestic multiple domains, activities of daily living may be normal or mildly impaired; whereas dementia is a severe cognitive impairment, with an MMSE score ≤ 17, requiring a deficit in performance in ≥ 2 cognitive domains that are of sufficient severity to affect activities of daily living (Dichgans & Leys, 2017; Tombaugh & McIntyre, 1992). One or more cognitive domains may be altered, including attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, and visuospatial cognitive domains (Ballard et al., 2003; Gorelick et al., 2011). However, the most impacted domains are the attention and executive function at various post‐stroke intervals (Cumming et al., 2013).

Two previous studies, in Norway and China, revealed that ≥60% of stroke survivors without pre‐existing cognitive disorder experienced post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) with MMSE ≤ 23 (Ihle‐Hansen et al., 2011; Qu et al., 2015). In Norway, 37.5% developed MCI (18≤ MMSE ≤ 23) versus 19.6% developed dementia (MMSE ≤ 17) within the first year post‐stroke (Ihle‐Hansen et al., 2011).

A systematic review conducted by Lo et al. in 2019 including 13 global studies showed that the highest proportion of PSCI in the 3 to 6 months post‐stroke was found in African Americans (48%) followed by whites (47%), Koreans (45%), Nigerians (40%), and Singaporean Chinese (35%) (Lo et al., 2019). Demographic characteristics, lifestyle, clinical parameters, and stroke‐related factors are classified as important contributors for PSCI (Hagberg et al., 2019; Kalaria et al., 2016; Lo et al., 2019; Mijajlović et al., 2017).

In Lebanon, stroke is identified as the second most common cause of death (El‐Hajj et al., 2016) due to the aging population, high rates of modifiable risk factors, and the low socio‐economic status (Gifford et al., 2022). Based on the countries’ classification of the World Bank (2021–2022), Lebanon is ranked among lower‐middle income countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region (World Bank, 2022). Although studies in Lebanon are still lacking regarding complications post‐stroke, stroke can be perceived as a high morbidity disease that highly burdens the country from all perspectives (Salhab et al., 2018). Several papers were previously published in Lebanon related to the stroke prevalence, risk factors, risk score, care practice, and mortality rate (El‐Hajj et al., 2019, 2016; Khazaal et al., 2021; Lahoud et al., 2018; Salameh et al., 2018; Salhab et al., 2018). However, so far, no studies in the MENA region, including Lebanon, have addressed the rate of PSCI and their predictors pre‐and post‐stroke conditions. This highlights the importance of our paper that aimed at studying the proportion of PSCI by evaluating the MMSE cognitive domains among stroke survivors in Lebanon and identifying the various contributing factors and characteristics—baseline socio‐demographics, pre‐existing conditions, lifestyle, and stroke‐related factors and complications at three time points, 3, 6, and 12 months after stroke.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

To ensure an adequate reporting of this work, we followed The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (von Elm et al., 2014).

2.1. Study design

This is an epidemiological, observational, multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study that was conducted in 10 hospitals from Beirut and Mount Lebanon (five university and five non‐university hospitals). It was conducted over a 15‐month period of follow‐up, starting from February 2018.

2.2. Participants

Participants were any Lebanese subject aged ≥ 18 years old admitted to the participating hospitals between February 2018 and May 2018, being a survivor of first‐time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke identified by the following codes of the International Classification of Diseases‐10 (ICD‐10) (I63‐I61) (ICD‐10 Version:2016, 2016): cerebrovascular accident, stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or embolic/cerebral vascular thrombosis. The diagnosis was confirmed with brain imaging and the clinical definition of the World Health Organization as follows: “it is a clinical syndrome consisting of rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global in case of coma) disturbance of cerebral function lasting more than 24 h or leading to death with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin” (Stroke Guidelines, 2016).

The exclusion criteria were the following: admission for a recurrent stroke or for transient ischemic accident or past medical history with neurologic disorders or cognitive sequelae (dementia, Alzheimer disease, ataxia, Bell's palsy, brain tumor, cerebral aneurysm, epilepsy, seizures, Parkinson disease, meningitis, hydrocephalus, encephalitis, aphasia, brain attack, etc.).

2.3. Sample size

Given that the estimated prevalence of stroke in Lebanon is 3.9% as reported by Jurjus et al. (2009), the minimum sample size was calculated using the Epi‐info 7 program to be 116 subjects. A sample size of 150 subjects was considered in the study taking into account those with incomplete data and others with loss to follow‐up.

2.4. Study procedures

Data collection was done by trained and qualified investigators to minimize errors. Hospitals were approached to secure approval after which eligible subjects are recruited. We selected the eligible subjects from different departments through an access to the paper or web‐based hospital patients’ registries. After that, a face‐to‐face interview with the subjects and their caregivers or legal representatives was essential to get their written consent and do the subsequent follow‐up home visits scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months post‐stroke.

2.5. Questionnaire and scales

A structured standardized validated Arabic questionnaire was used. It was divided into five major sections: socio‐demographic characteristics (age, gender, place of residence, marital status, number of kids, age of subject's custodian, educational level of the subject and their custodian, employment status, number of household members, number of rooms, and type of health insurance), lifestyle (eating habits, practice of physical activity, alcohol and other substances consumption, and the social support), health indicators reported in the patients’ registries (anthropometric indices, family/medical/surgical history, comorbidities, treatment taken), disease and its severity (types/ stroke classification: Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification (TOAST) (Adams et al., 1993; Lindley et al., 1993)/location/ symptoms, length of hospital stay, severity of disease, degree of disability, evaluation of quality of life), and lastly, stroke consequences noticed at 3, 6, and 12 months (neuropsychiatric disorders, cognitive disorders, hyperglycemia, fatigue, post‐stroke pain, falls, pressure ulcers, pulmonary and urinary infections, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, seizures, and recurrence of stroke).

2.6. Outcome measures

MMSE, first developed by Folstein in 1975 (Folstein et al., 1975), is widely used to study the post‐stroke cognition function. It measures seven cognitive domains, including orientation to time, orientation to place, memory registration, memory recall, attention/concentration, language, and visual construction. The cut‐off point is set at 24 defining a normal cognitive function. The severity has been classified into three levels: 24–30 = no cognitive impairment; 18–23 = mild cognitive impairment; and 0–17 = severe cognitive impairment (Tombaugh & McIntyre, 1992) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .882). Recent research has validated the use of the Arabic version of MMSE among the Lebanese population. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater test–retest score correlations were 0.89 and 0.72, respectively. A sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 89.4% were provided (El‐Hayeck et al., 2019).

National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a measurement tool that was created in 1989 by Brott T. and his colleagues (Brott et al., 1989), and reported as the most reliable and valid stroke severity measuring instrument (Young et al., 2005). It is a scale that includes 15 elements for the evaluation of consciousness, language, motor function, sensory loss, visual fields, extra‐ocular movements, coordination, neglect, and speech. It is divided into five levels: 0 = no stroke, 1–4 = minor stroke, 5–14 = moderate stroke, 15–20 = moderate to severe stroke, and 21–42 = severe stroke (FAOTA, 2015) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .942). We used the validated Arabic version of NIHSS, with intra‐rater and inter‐rater agreements of 0.94 and 0.95, respectively (Hussein et al., 2015).

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), initially described by Rankin J. in 1957 (Rankin, 1957), is a scale to evaluate the degree of disability in stroke survivors. This scale is one of the most used tools in clinical trials, given its reliability (Kappa = 0.81), validity, and ability to distinguish between relevant disability levels and recovery status (Banks & Marotta, 2007; Cheng et al., 2014). mRS is divided into seven levels from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The mild disability (independence) is graded 0 to 2 and the moderate to severe disability is graded ≥ 3 (Modified Rankin Scale, 2017) (Cronbach's alpha of ( r ) = .946).

Quality of life, Short form Health survey (SF12), is a questionnaire developed by Ware et al. in 1996 (Ware et al., 1996) and divided into two summary scores: physical and mental component summaries (PCS and MCS). They express the mental and physical functions and overall health‐related‐quality of life. PCS and MCS are computed through the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .540). The validated Arabic translation was considered (Al‐Shehri et al., 2008; Sabbah et al., 2003).

Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke‐Free Status, designed by Meschia et al. in 2000 (Meschia et al., 2000), is an eight‐item questionnaire tackling the stroke symptoms. The purpose of this questionnaire is to verify stroke‐free status of the subjects; however, in our study which enrolled only confirmed stroke cases, the purpose was to report the symptoms experienced by survivors following a defined, structured, and valid questionnaire.

Social Support Rating Scale, developed by Xiao in 1994 (Xiao, 1994), is an instrument of 10 items to measure three dimensions of the social support. Item scores are simply summed up, generating a total support score ranging from 12 to 66. This total support score is classified into three categories: low (≤ 22), moderate (23–44), and high (≥ 45).

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), designed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983 (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), measures the levels of anxiety and depression. It is a 14‐item questionnaire, widely used, divided into two scales: a scale for depression and a scale for anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 7 = normal, 8 to 10 = borderline, and 11 to 21 = abnormal (Vansimaeys et al., 2017). A recent validated Arabic version of HADS scale was published by Al Aseri et al. in 2020 (Al Aseri et al., 2020) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .906).

Fatigue severity scale (FSS) is a nine‐item self‐report questionnaire scale developed by Krupp et al. in 1989 (Krupp et al., 1989). It is the most commonly used tool to investigate the severity of fatigue in different contexts. Each item is classified from 1 (strong disagreement) to 7 (strong agreement). The cut‐off was set to be ≥ 4 (Rosti‐Otajärvi et al., 2017; Valko et al., 2008). The validated Arabic version was used (Al‐Sobayel et al., 2016) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .854).

Visual analogue scale (VAS), first introduced in 1921 (Hayes & Patterson, 1921), is used to express the value of the total impression for the severity of pain by making a mark determining an integer number from 0 to 10. The cut‐off was set to be ≥ 4 (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .866).

Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) is a 4‐item questionnaire developed by Bouhassira and colleagues in 2005 (Bouhassira et al., 2005). It is a reliable scale that differentiates between neuropathic pain and non‐neuropathic pain. For scoring, 1 is given to each positive and 0 to each negative item (total score range 0–10). The cut‐off value for diagnosis of neuropathic pain is a total score of ≥ 4 (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .878). A validated Arabic version was used (Terkawi et al., 2017).

Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), described by Bohannon and Smith in 1987 (Bohannon & Smith, 1987), is an easy scale and commonly used in clinical practice for the measurement and classification of spasticity. This scale grades the muscle tone from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe spasticity). The cut‐off value for diagnosis of spasticity is a total score of ≥ 3 (Cao et al., 2022) (Cronbach's alpha of (r) = .933).

2.7. Data processing and analysis

Collected data were coded, introduced, and entered into the software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 (SPSSTM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). First, descriptive analyses were performed using numbers and percentages for qualitative variables and means with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. In addition, a one way repeated measure Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) (Bonferroni method) was important to assess the MMSE scores over time. Second, the univariate analyses were conducted. The student's t‐test and one way ANOVA were used for the comparison of means of quantitative variables with a normal distribution and equal variances, whereas the non‐parametric (Kruskal–Wallis test) test for quantitative variables with an abnormal distribution and the unequal variances were used. The Chi‐square test was used for the comparison of percentages between two qualitative variables. Then, multivariable analysis using multinomial logistic regressions adjusted for age, gender, and education was made to examine independent determinants of mild and severe cognitive impairment. The variables with univariate association at p ≤ .05 were entered into logistic regression. The goodness‐of‐fit statistic is reported to determine if the model provides a good fit for the data (p > .05). The strength of association was interpreted using the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A p‐value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

A total of 10 hospitals agreed to participate in the study. Out of 183 subjects who met the required inclusion criteria, 150 were recruited in the study (82% of the response rate), of whom 117 completed the whole period of follow‐up (shown in Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram of the steps followed to obtain the sample of the study

3.1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants

In total, 88 (58.7%) were males and 62 (41.3%) were females. The mean age was 73.7 with SD of 12 years. The majority were married (78%), lived with family members (96.1%) and 87% in less crowded houses. An important proportion of the participants were illiterate (38%). In addition, 67.3% were without any profession or retired. On the other hand, 20% of the subjects did not resume their work after having the stroke incident (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Variables Frequency (N) Percentage (%) Mean (± SD)
Gender (N = 150)
Male 88 58.7
Female 62 41.3
Age (N = 150)
30–39 years 1 0.7
40–49 years 7 4.7
50–59 years 15 10.0
60–69 years 29 19.3 73.73 (± 12.08)
70 – 79 years 45 30.0
80–89 years 46 30.7
90–99 years 7 4.7
Marital status (N = 150)
Single 14 9.3
Married 117 78.0
Divorced 2 1.3
Widowed 17 11.3
Family members (N = 128)
Alone 5 3.9
With family members 123 96.1
Residence (N = 150)
Beirut 33 22.0
Mount Lebanon 107 71.3
Bekaa 3 2.0
North Lebanon 2 1.3
South Lebanon 5 3.3
Education level (N = 150)
Illiterate 57 38.0
Primary/Complementary 47 31.3
Secondary 19 12.7
University 27 18.0
Employment status post‐stroke (N = 150)
Person without any profession/ retired 101 67.3
Unemployed 30 20.0
Employed 19 12.7
Social Security (N = 150)
No 25 16.7
Yes 125 83.3
Presence of a caregiver (N = 150)
No 98 65.3
Yes 52 34.7
Caregiver's age (N = 52)
Adult: 20 – 40 years 9 17.3
Middle age: 40 – 60 years 35 67.3
Elderly: > 60 years 8 15.4
Stroke types
Hemorrhagic stroke (ICH) 7 4.7
Ischemic stroke 143 95.3
TOAST Classification
LAA 58 45.7
CE 6 4.7
SVO 63 49.6
OE 0 0.0
UE 0 0.0
Stroke location
Right hemisphere 60 40.0
Left hemisphere 70 46.7
Bilateral hemisphere 10 6.7
Brainstem 1 0.7
Cerebellum 9 6.0

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; CE, cardioembolism; SVO, small vessel occlusion; OE, stroke of other determined etiology; UE, stroke of undetermined etiology.

3.2. Stroke characteristics and its severity

As shown in Table 1, a total of 143 subjects (95.3%) suffered from ischemic stroke classified as follows: 48.8% with small vessel occlusion (SVO), 46.3% with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and 5% with cardioembolism (CE), versus 7 subjects (4.7%) who suffered from intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke. Regarding the affected location, 46.7% were found to have involvement of the left hemisphere while 40% of the subjects had right hemisphere involvement. There were only 6.8% of subjects who had received an intravenous thrombolysis.

The majority (70%) was not able to express themselves verbally or in writing at the time of stroke and experienced a weakness on one side of the body. The stroke severity, degree of disability, and components of QoL were estimated by NIHSS scores, mRS scores, and SF12 scores, respectively, at each time of the follow‐up. At 3 months, 16.8% of the subjects were found to have severe stroke (Figure S1). mRS scores were decreasing over time indicating greater independence in ADL, ranging from 16% to 18% with scores ≥ 5 at 3 months to less than 1.6% at 12 months post‐stroke (Figure S2). Regarding SF12 scores summarized in Table S1, we obtained low scores of physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) components of QoL (means between 28 and 40) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Levels were less than the theoretical average scores (cut‐off of 50 for PCS and 42 or MCS). At index admission, 47 (31.3%) subjects were already on antiplatelet and anticoagulation agents. At discharge, these drugs were prescribed to 141 (94%) subjects.

3.3. Rate of PSCI

Out of 150 enrolled subjects, 27 were deceased (18%) in the 3 months post‐stroke, followed by 3 (2.4%) in the 6 months and 2 (1.7%) in the 12 months of follow‐up. One subject was lost to follow up by the 12‐month visit. Therefore, we could not have their MMSE.

At 3 months post‐stroke, the majority of stroke survivors (74.8%, n = 123) were cognitively impaired of whom 66 (53.7%) with severe impairment (MMSE ≤ 17) and 26 (21.1%) with mild impairment (18 ≤ MMSE < 24), whereas 31 survivors (25.2%) remained cognitively intact (MMSE ≥ 24). The cognitive impairment gradually decreased over time, at 6 and 12 months post‐stroke, with percentages of 46.7% (28.3% severely impaired and 18.3% mildly impaired) and 37.6% (18.8% with mild to severe cognitive impairment), respectively (shown in Figure 2 and Figure S3). Figure 3 and Figure S4 summarize the different cognitive domain scores of MMSE across the three time series. We found that all cognitive domains were affected in the 3‐month post‐stroke with the highest percentage of impairment detected in attention/concentration (96.7%, score < 4) and memory recall (82.9%, score < 3), followed by the visual construction (61%, score = 0), orientation to time and place (50%, score < 4), language (43.1%, score < 5), and memory registration (41.5%, score < 3). A substantial improvement of these domains was highlighted in the following 6 to 12 months post‐stroke, except for the impairment of attention/concentration, which slightly decreased from 10% to 20% but remained to be of particular concern (85% at 6 months vs 63.2% at 12 months).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Severity of cognitive impairment over 3, 6, and 12 months post‐stroke. MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Mean scores of the different cognitive domains of MMSE across the three periods of follow‐up

A one way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the null hypothesis that there was no change in the cognitive function over the time after the first‐stroke (N = 117). The results designated a significant time effect, Wilks’ Lambda = 0.528, F (2, 115) = 51.439, p < .001, n 2 = 0.472. Thus, there was evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Follow‐up comparisons indicated that each pairwise difference was significant, p < .001. There was a significant increase of MMSE scores over time, indicating an improvement of the cognitive function over time.

3.4. Factors associated with cognitive impairment post‐stroke

Univariate analysis was made to compare the subjects with PSCI and the unharmed subjects, at 3, 6, and 12 months (Tables 2, 3, 4 and Tables S2–S, 4).

TABLE 2.

The association between socio‐demographic characteristics and the post‐stroke cognitive impairment among Lebanese stroke survivors

Socio‐demographic characteristics 3 months post‐stroke 6 months post‐stroke 12 months post‐stroke
No PSCI N (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCIN (%) p‐Value No PSCI N (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCI N (%) p‐Value No PSCIN (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCI N (%) p‐Value
Gender
Male 22 (71.0) 16 (61.5) 37 (56.1) .373 39 (60.9) 13 (59.1) 21 (61.8) 0.980 43 (58.9) 13 (59.1) 14 (63.6) .921
Female 9 (29.0) 10 (38.5) 29 (43.9) 25 (39.1) 9 (40.9) 13 (38.2) 30 (41.1) 9 (40.9) 8 (36.4)
Age
< 65 years old 15 (48.4) 7 (26.9) 12 (18.2) .008 23 (35.9) 5 (22.7) 6 (17.6) 0.130 26 (35.6) 4 (18.2) 2 (9.1) .028
≥ 65 years old 16 (51.6) 19 (73.1) 54 (81.8) 41 (64.1) 17 (77.3) 28 (82.4) 47 (64.4) 18 (81.8) 20 (90.9)
Educational level
Illiterate or Primary/Complementary 16 (51.6) 17 (65.4) 49 (74.2) .087 33 (51.6) 20 (90.9) 26 (76.5) 0.001 40 (54.8) 19 (86.4) 18 (81.8) .005
Secondary or University 15 (48.4) 9 (34.6) 17 (25.8) 31 (48.4) 2 (9.1) 8 (23.5) 33 (45.2) 3 (13.6) 4 (18.2)
Employment status post‐stroke
Person without any profession or retired 10 (32.3) 20 (76.9) 48 (72.7) < .001* 38 (59.4) 15 (68.2) 23 (67.6) 0.073* 45 (61.6) 17 (77.3) 13 (59.1) .063*
Unemployed 7 (22.6) 3 (11.5) 16 (24.2) 11 (17.2) 4 (18.2) 10 (29.4) 12 (16.4) 4 (18.2) 8 (36.4)
Employed 14 (45.2) 3 (11.5) 2 (3.0) 15 (23.4) 3 (13.6) 1 (2.9) 16 (21.9) 1 (4.5) 1 (4.5)
Presence of a caregiver
No 27 (87.1) 17 (65.4) 35 (53.0) .005 46 (71.9) 14 (63.6) 19 (55.9) 0.275 52 (71.2) 13 (59.1) 13 (59.1) .402
Yes 4 (12.9) 9 (34.6) 31 (47.0) 18 (28.1) 8 (36.4) 15 (44.1) 21 (28.8) 9 (40.9) 9 (40.9)
HCI
≤ 1 29 (93.5) 22 (84.6) 57 (86.4) .572* 60 (93.8) 18 (81.8) 28 (82.4) 0.115* 68 (93.2) 17 (77.3) 18 (81.8) .071*
>1 2 (6.5) 4 (15.4) 9 (13.6) 4 (6.3) 4 (18.2) 6 (17.6) 5 (6.8) 5 (22.7) 4 (18.2)

Abbreviations: HCI, Household Crowding Index PSCI, Post‐Stroke Cognitive Impairment: It assesses the socio‐economic level, defined by the number of household members (excluding new‐borns) divided by the number of rooms. It has 2 levels: ≤ 1, that is, maximum one person per room reflecting a house less crowded; > 1, that is, more than one person per room reflecting a house too crowded.

TABLE 3.

The association between stroke characteristics and the post‐stroke cognitive impairment among Lebanese stroke survivors

Stroke characteristics and its severity 3 months post‐stroke 6 months post‐stroke 12 months post‐stroke
No PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Mild PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Severe PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) p‐value No PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Mild PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Severe PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) p‐value No PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Mild PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) Severe PSCI N (%) or Mean (±SD) p‐value
Duration between symptoms onset and admission to hospital
≤ 3 h 19 (61.3) 24 (92.3) 55 (83.3) .433 51 (79.7) 18 (81.8) 26 (76.5) .931* 56 (76.7) 19 (86.4) 17 (77.3) .794*
3 to 6 h 5 (16.1) 0 (0.0) 5 (7.6) 5 (7.8) 1 (4.5) 4 (11.8) 6 (8.2) 1 (4.5) 3 (13.6)
≥ 6 h 7 (22.6) 2 (7.7) 6 (9.1) 8 (12.5) 3 (13.6) 4 (11.8) 11 (15.1) 2 (9.1) 2 (9.1)
Intravenous thrombolysis
No 25 (96.2) 22 (91.7) 53 (93.0) .882* 53 (93.0) 19 (95.0) 26 (92.9) 1.000* 61 (91.0) 17 (94.4) 19 (100) .539*
Yes 1 (3.8) 2 (8.3) 4 (7.0) 4 (7.0) 1 (5.0) 2 (7.1) 6 (9.0) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0)
Duration of hospital stay (days) 5.77 (± 4.51) 10 (± 8.26) 9.77 (± 8.90) .001 6.59 (± 4.41) 10.82 (± 9.54) 11.82 (± 10.94) .004 7.92 (± 7.73) 9.32 (± 5.59) 10.32 (± 9.05) .060
Stroke types
Haemorrhagic stroke 0 (0.0) 3 (11.5) 2 (3.0) 3 (4.7) 0 (0.0) 2 (5.9) 3 (4.1) 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1)
Ischemic stroke 31 (100) 23 (88.5) 64 (97.0) .084* 61 (95.3) 22 (100) 32 (94.1) .706* 70 (95.9) 22 (100) 20 (90.9) .445*
TOAST Classification
LAA 11 (42.3) 7 (33.3) 22 (40.0) .731* 20 (37.0) 5 (25.0) 14 (53.8) .287* 26 (40.6) 4 (22.2) 8 (47.1) .386*
CE 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8) 4 (7.3) 2 (3.7) 1 (5.0) 1 (3.8) 2 (3.1) 1 (5.6) 1 (5.9)
SVO 15 (57.7) 13 (61.9) 29 (52.7) 32 (59.3) 14 (70.0) 11 (42.3) 36 (56.3) 13 (72.2) 8 (47.1)
Stroke location
Right hemisphere 13 (41.9) 13 (50.0) 21 (31.8) .129* 25 (39.1) 10 (45.5) 12 (35.3) .186* 28 (38.4) 10 (45.5) 7 (31.8) .006*
Left hemisphere 16 (51.6) 9 (34.6) 33 (50.0) 34 (53.1) 7 (31.8) 15 (44.1) 40 (54.8) 5 (22.7) 10 (45.5)
Bilateral hemisphere 1 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 8 (12.1) 1 (1.6) 3 (13.6) 4 (11.8) 1 (1.4) 3 (13.6) 4 (18.2)
Brainstem 0 (0.0) 1 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0)
Cerebellum 1 (3.2) 3 (11.5) 4 (6.1) 3 (4.7) 2 (9.1) 3 (8.8) 4 (5.5) 3 (13.6) 1 (4.5)
Stroke severity at 3 months post‐stroke
NIHSS < 21 31 (100) 26 (100) 45 (68.2) < .001* 64 (100) 20 (90.9) 16 (47.1) < .001* 70 (95.9) 19 (86.4) 9 (40.9) < .001*
NIHSS ≥ 21 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 21 (31.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) 18 (52.9) 3 (4.1) 3 (13.6) 13 (59.1)
Stroke severity at 6 months post‐stroke
NIHSS < 21 64 (100) 22 (100) 23 (67.6) < .001* 71 (97.3) 22 (100) 14 (63.6) < .001*
NIHSS ≥ 21 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (32.4) 2 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 8 (36.4)
Stroke severity at 12 months post‐stroke
NIHSS < 21 72 (100) 22 (100) 15 (68.2) < .001*
NIHSS ≥ 21 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 7 (31.8)
Degree of disability at 3 months post‐stroke
mRS < 3 25 (80.6) 11 (42.3) 10 (15.2) < .001 41 (64.1) 3 (13.6) 2 (5.9) < .001 39 (53.4) 5 (22.7) 1 (4.5) < .001
mRS ≥ 3 6 (19.4) 15 (57.7) 56 (84.8) 23 (35.9) 19 (86.4) 32 (94.1) 34 (46.6) 17 (77.3) 21 (95.5)
Degree of disability at 6 months post‐stroke
mRS < 3 53 (82.8) 8 (36.4) 4 (11.8) < .001 52 (71.2) 10 (45.5) 2 (9.1) < .001
mRS ≥ 3 11 (17.2) 14 (63.6) 30 (88.2) 21 (28.8) 12 (54.5) 20 (90.9)
Degree of disability at 12 months post‐stroke
mRS < 3 60 (82.2) 13 (59.1) 3 (13.6) < .001
mRS ≥ 3 13 (17.8) 9 (40.9) 19 (86.4)
Quality of life (SF‐12) 3 months post‐stroke
PCS 36.28 (± 7.88) 29.24 (± 6.19) 25.57 (± 4.52) < .001 31.29 (± 8.2) 28.02 (± 5.63) 25.99 (± 5.2) .002 30.75 (± 8.14) 26.84 (± 4.14) 26.57 (± 5.63) .052
MCS 37.96 (± 9.24) 32.76 (± 9.67) 30.56 (± 8.32) .001 35.18 (± 9.81) 33.93 (± 8.46) 28.87 (± 7.11) .003 34.53 (± 9.33) 33.95 (± 9.07) 28.04 (± 7.44) .011
Quality of life (SF‐12) 6 months post‐stroke
PCS 38.56 (± 9.48) 32.47 (± 6.37) 29.65 (± 7.06) < .001 37.13 (± 9.39) 33.24 (±7.52) 29.49 (± 6.58) .001
MCS 37.99 (± 10.55) 36.4 (± 9.61) 29.05 (± 8.18) < .001 37.43 (± 10.33) 35.5 (± 10.94) 27.99 (± 6.93) < .001
Quality of life (SF‐12) 12 months post‐stroke
PCS 43.86 (± 10.59) 34.04 (± 7.85) 29.98 (± 8.15) < .001
MCS 44.22 (± 12.27) 37.08 (± 10.57) 29.11 (± 9.43) < .001

Abbreviations: SD, Standard deviation; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; CE, cardioembolism; SVO, small vessel occlusion; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Severity Scale; mRS, Modified Rankin Scale; SF‐12, Short Form Health Survey‐12; PCS, Physical Component Summary; MCS, Mental Component Summary TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; PSCI, Post‐Stroke Cognitive Impairment.

Kruskal–Wallis test was used when the statistical assumption of homogeneity of variance has been not met.

TABLE 4.

The association between complications post‐stroke and post‐stroke cognitive impairment among Lebanese stroke survivors

Complications post‐stroke 3 months post‐stroke 6 months post‐stroke 6 months post‐stroke
No PSCI N (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCI N (%) p‐Value No PSCI N (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCI N (%) p‐Value No PSCI N (%) Mild PSCI N (%) Severe PSCI N (%) p‐Value
Anxiety 3 months post‐stroke
HADS_A ≤ 7 19 (61.3) 10 (38.5) 31 (47.0) .022 43 (67.2) 7 (31.8) 10 (29.4) .002 45 (61.6) 7 (31.8) 6 (27.3) .014*
8 ≤ HADS_A ≤ 10 8 (25.8) 2 (7.7) 12 (18.2) 8 (12.5) 6 (27.3) 8 (23.5) 11 (15.1) 6 (22.7) 5 (22.7)
HADS_A ≥ 11 4 (12.9) 14 (53.8) 23 (34.8) 13 (20.3) 9 (40.9) 16 (47.1) 17 (23.3) 9 (40.9) 11 (50.0)
Anxiety 6 months post‐stroke
HADS_A ≤ 7 42 (65.6) 10 (45.5) 10 (29.4) .007 45 (61.6) 9 (40.9) 6 (27.3) .008*
8≤HADS_A ≤ 10 8 (12.5) 6 (27.3) 7 (20.6) 10 (13.7) 7 (31.8) 3 (13.6)
HADS_A ≥ 11 14 (21.9) 6 (27.3) 17 (50.0) 18 (24.7) 6 (27.3) 13 (59.1)
Anxiety 12 months post‐stroke
HADS_A ≤ 7 57 (78.1) 10 (45.5) 6 (30.0) < .001*
8≤HADS_A ≤ 10 6 (8.2) 7 (31.8) 3 (15.0)
HADS_A ≥ 11 10 (13.7) 5 (22.7) 11 (55.0)
Depression 3 months post‐stroke
HADS_D ≤ 7 14 (45.2) 5 (19.2) 9 (13.6) < .001 25 (39.1) 1 (4.5) 2 (5.9) < .001 25 (34.2) 1 (4.5) 1 (4.5) < .001*
8≤HADS_D ≤ 10 10 (32.3) 5 (19.2) 5 (7.6) 14 (21.9) 3 (13.6) 2 (5.9) 15 (20.5) 4 (18.2) 0 (0.0)
HADS_D ≥ 11 7 (22.6) 16 (61.5) 52 (78.8) 25 (39.1) 18 (81.8) 30 (88.2) 33 (45.2) 17 (77.3) 21 (95.5)
Depression 6 months post‐stroke
HADS_D ≤ 7 27 (42.2) 2 (9.1) 2 (5.9) < .001 27 (37.0) 2 (9.1) 1 (4.5) < .001*
8≤HADS_D ≤ 10 14 (21.9) 4 (18.2) 3 (8.8) 15 (20.5) 5 (22.7) 1 (4.5)
HADS_D ≥ 11 23 (35.9) 16 (72.7) 29 (85.3) 31 (42.5) 15 (68.2) 20 (90.9)
Depression 12 months post‐stroke
HADS_D ≤ 7 44 (60.3) 4 (18.2) 2 (10.0) < .001*
8 ≤ HADS_D ≤ 10 12 (16.4) 3 (13.6) 1 (5.0)
HADS_D ≥ 11 17 (23.3) 15 (68.2) 17 (85.0)
Falls 3 months post‐stroke
No falls 28 (90.3) 17 (65.4) 32 (48.5) < .001 49 (76.6) 12 (54.5) 14 (41.2) .002 54 (74.0) 11 (50.0) 8 (36.4) .003
At least 1 fall 3 (9.7) 9 (34.6) 34 (51.5) 15 (23.4) 10 (45.5) 20 (58.8) 19 (26.0) 11 (50.0) 14 (63.6)
Falls 6 months post‐stroke
No falls 59 (92.2) 17 (77.3) 22 (64.7) .003 65 (89.0) 17 (77.3) 13 (59.1) .006*
At least 1 fall 5 (7.8) 5 (22.7) 12 (35.3) 8 (11.0) 5 (22.7) 9 (40.9)
Epileptic seizures 6 months post‐stroke
No 64 (100) 20 (90.9) 28 (82.4) .001* 70 (95.9) 20 (90.9) 19 (86.4) .174*
Yes 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) 6 (17.6) 3 (4.1) 2 (9.1) 3 (13.6)
Recurrent stroke 3 months post‐stroke
No 28 (90.3) 26 (100) 60 (90.9) .295* 62 (96.9) 18 (81.8) 31 (91.2) .047* 69 (94.5) 19 (86.4) 20 (90.9) .475*
Yes 3 (9.7) 0 (0.0) 6 (9.1) 2 (3.1) 4 (18.2) 3 (8.8) 4 (5.5) 3 (13.6) 2 (9.1)
Recurrent stroke 6 months post‐stroke
No 63 (98.4) 22 (100) 29 (85.3) .023* 71 (97.3) 22 (100) 19 (86.4) .114*
Yes 1 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (14.7) 2 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 3 (13.6)
Recurrent stroke 12 months post‐stroke
No 73 (100) 21 (95.5) 18 (81.8) .002*
Yes 0 (0.0) 1 (4.5) 4 (18.2)
Fatigue 3 months post‐stroke
No (FSS < 4) 7 (22.6) 1 (3.8) 0 (0.0) < .001* 8 (12.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) .026* 8 (11.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) .109*
Yes (FSS ≥ 4) 24 (77.4) 25 (96.2) 66 (100) 56 (87.5) 22 (100) 34 (100) 65 (89.0) 22 (100) 22 (100)
Fatigue 6 months post‐stroke
No (FSS < 4) 17 (26.6) 2 (9.1) 1 (2.9) .007 19 (26.0) 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0) .002*
Yes (FSS ≥ 4) 47 (73.4) 20 (90.9) 33 (97.1) 54 (74.0) 21 (95.5) 22 (100)
Fatigue 12 months post‐stroke
No (FSS < 4) 47 (64.4) 3 (13.6) 3 (15.0) < .001
Yes (FSS ≥ 4) 26 (35.6) 19 (86.4) 17 (85.0)
Pain 3 months post‐stroke
VAS ≤ 3 21 (67.7) 7 (26.9) 19 (29.2) < .001 33 (51.6) 7 (31.8) 7 (20.6) .008 35 (47.9) 8 (36.4) 3 (13.6) .015
VAS ≥ 4 10 (32.3) 19 (73.1) 46 (70.8) 31 (48.4) 15 (68.2) 27 (79.4) 38 (52.1) 14 (63.6) 19 (86.4)
Pain 6 months post‐stroke
VAS ≤ 3 42 (65.6) 9 (40.9) 10 (31.3) .003 46 (63.0) 8 (36.4) 6 (28.6) .006
VAS ≥ 4 22 (34.4) 13 (59.1) 22 (68.8) 27 (37.0) 14 (63.6) 15 (71.4)
Pain 12 months post‐stroke
VAS ≤ 3 60 (83.3) 12 (54.5) 11 (55.0) .004
VAS ≥ 4 12 (16.7) 10 (45.5) 9 (45.0)
Central pain 3 months post‐stroke
DN4 < 4 26 (83.9) 19 (73.1) 47 (72.3) .447 54 (84.4) 14 (63.6) 22 (66.7) .055 62 (84.9) 13 (59.1) 13 (61.9) .012
DN4 ≥ 4 5 (16.1) 7 (26.9) 18 (27.7) 10 (15.6) 8 (36.4) 11 (33.3) 11 (15.1) 9 (40.9) 8 (38.1)
Central pain 12 months post‐stroke
DN4 < 4 72 (98.6) 17 (77.3) 16 (80.0) .001*
DN4 ≥ 4 1 (1.4) 5 (22.7) 4 (20.0)
Shoulder pain 3 months post‐stroke
No 24 (80.0) 18 (69.2) 36 (54.5) .045 47 (74.6) 16 (72.7) 14 (41.2) .003 51 (69.9) 17 (77.3) 9 (40.9) .019
Yes 6 (20.0) 8 (30.8) 30 (45.5) 16 (25.4) 6 (27.3) 20 (58.8) 22 (30.1) 5 (22.7) 13 (59.1)
Shoulder pain 6 months post‐stroke
No 49 (77.8) 15 (68.2) 16 (47.1) .009 53 (72.6) 16 (72.7) 11 (50.0) .121
Yes 14 (22.2) 7 (31.8) 18 (52.9) 20 (27.4) 6 (27.3) 11 (50.0)
Shoulder pain 12 months post‐stroke
No 66 (90.4) 20 (90.9) 14 (63.6) .013*
Yes 7 (9.6) 2 (9.1) 8 (36.4)
Muscle spasticity 3 months post‐stroke
MAS < 3 28 (90.3) 26 (100) 44 (66.7) < .001 61 (95.3) 18 (81.8) 16 (47.1) < .001 66 (90.4) 18 (81.8) 9 (40.9) < .001*
MAS ≥ 3 3 (9.7) 0 (0.0) 22 (33.3) 3 (4.7) 4 (18.2) 18 (52.9) 7 (9.6) 4 (18.2) 13 (59.1)
Muscle spasticity 6 months post‐stroke
MAS < 3 62 (96.9) 20 (90.9) 17 (50.0) < .001 68 (93.2) 20 (90.9) 9 (40.9) < .001*
MAS ≥ 3 2 (3.1) 2 (9.1) 17 (50.0) 5 (6.8) 2 (9.1) 13 (59.1)
Muscle spasticity 12 months post‐stroke
MAS < 3 72 (98.6) 19 (90.5) 11 (52.4) < .001*
MAS ≥ 3 1 (1.4) 2 (9.5) 10 (47.6)
Subluxation of shoulder at 3 month post‐stroke
No 31 (100) 24 (92.3) 58 (89.2) .167* 63 (98.4) 19 (86.4) 28 (84.8) .012* 70 (95.9) 19 (86.4) 18 (85.7) .108*
Yes 0 (0.0) 2 (7.7) 7 (10.8) 1 (1.6) 3 (13.6) 5 (15.2) 3 (4.1) 3 (13.6) 3 (14.3)
Subluxation of shoulder at 6 month post‐stroke
No 64 (100) 20 (90.9) 33 (100) .033* 73 (100) 20 (90.9) 21 (100) .066*
Yes 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (9.1) 0 (0.0)
Joint contractures 3 months post‐stroke
No 27 (87.1) 17 (65.4) 32 (50.0) .002 49 (76.6) 12 (57.1) 14 (42.4) .003 54 (74.0) 10 (47.6) 9 (42.9) .008
Yes 4 (12.9) 9 (34.6) 32 (50.0) 15 (23.4) 9 (42.9) 19 (57.6) 19 (26.0) 11 (52.4) 12 (57.1)
Joint contractures 6 months post‐stroke
No 53 (82.8) 14 (66.7) 13 (39.4) < .001 57 (78.1) 12 (57.1) 10 (47.6) .013
Yes 11 (17.2) 7 (33.3) 20 (60.6) 16 (21.9) 9 (42.9) 11 (52.4)
Joint contractures 12 months post‐stroke
No 67 (91.8) 16 (72.7) 12 (60.0) .001*
Yes 6 (8.2) 6 (27.3) 8 (40.0)
Pressure ulcers 3 months post‐stroke
No (PU = 0) 28 (90.3) 19 (73.1) 35 (53.0) .001 56 (87.5) 14 (63.6) 12 (35.3) < .001 60 (82.2) 13 (59.1) 8 (36.4) < .001
Yes (PU ≥ 1) 3 (2.4) 7 (26.9) 31 (47.0) 8 (12.5) 8 (36.4) 22 (64.7) 13 (17.8) 9 (40.9) 14 (63.6)
Pressure ulcers 6 months post‐stroke
No (PU = 0) 59 (92.2) 17 (77.3) 12 (36.4) < .001 64 (87.7) 16 (72.7) 7 (31.8) < .001
Yes (PU ≥ 1) 5 (7.8) 5 (22.7) 21 (63.6) 9 (12.3) 6 (27.3) 15 (68.2)
Pressure ulcers 12 months post‐stroke
No (PU = 0) 71 (97.3) 19 (86.4) 9 (40.9) < .001*
Yes (PU ≥ 1) 2 (2.7) 3 (13.6) 13 (59.1)
Confirmed pneumonia 3 month post‐stroke
No 30 (96.8) 22 (84.6) 47 (72.3) .014 60 (93.8) 18 (81.8) 19 (57.6) < .001 65 (89.0) 17 (77.3) 14 (66.7) .046*
Yes 1 (3.2) 4 (15.4) 18 (27.7) 4 (6.3) 4 (18.2) 14 (42.4) 8 (11.0) 5 (22.7) 7 (33.3)
Confirmed pneumonia 6 month post‐stroke
No 63 (98.4) 20 (90.9) 25 (75.8) .001* 72 (98.6) 21 (95.5) 14 (66.7) < .001*
Yes 1 (1.6) 2 (9.1) 8 (24.2) 1 (1.4) 1 (4.5) 7 (33.3)
Confirmed DVT 3 month post‐stroke
No 30 (96.8) 25 (96.2) 55 (83.3) .084* 61 (95.3) 21 (95.5) 26 (76.5) .012* 69 (94.5) 19 (86.4) 17 (77.3) .048*
Yes 1 (3.2) 1 (3.8) 11 (16.7) 3 (4.7) 1 (4.5) 8 (23.5) 4 (5.5) 3 (13.6) 5 (22.7)

Note: The results of all tables are presented in terms of frequencies and percentages and in the form of means and standard deviations. They are presented according to the mild (18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23) and severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 17) occurring at 3, 6, and 12 months post‐stroke. The Chi‐square test was used to verify the association between the independent categorical variables and mild and severe cognitive sequelae.

Abbreviations: HADS_A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression_Anxiety; HADS_D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression_Depression; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; DN4, Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire; MAS, Modified Ashworth Scale; PU, pressure ulcers; DVT, deep vein thrombosis PSCI, Post‐Stroke Cognitive Impairment.

* Fisher's exact test was used in the event of an expected value n < 5. One way ANOVA test, Bonferroni method, was used to verify the association between means and mild and severe cognitive sequelae.

Their mean MMSE scores were 13.08 (± 6.52) and 25.84 (± 1.49), respectively (p < .001) at 3 months. They became 13.80 (± 6.92) and 26.69 (± 1.59) at 6 months versus 14.77 (± 6.72) and 28.37 (± 1.93) at 12 months, respectively (p < .001).

Factors that were significantly associated with severe cognitive function decline (MMSE ≤ 17) in the three time series post‐stroke were the atrial fibrillation (AF) (27% to 46%) (p ≤ .010), sedentary lifestyle ≥12 h/day (55% to 77%) (p < .001), NIHSS ≥21 (30% to 60%) (p < .001), mRS ≥3 (85% to 95%) (p < .001), and low scores of PCS and MCS of the QoL (<30) (p < .05).

In addition to the above, we also found some associations with various complications post‐stroke as follows: HADS_A ≥ 11 (35% to 60%) (p ≤ .022), HADS_D ≥ 11 (80% to 95%) (p < .001), physical disorders as FSS ≥ 4 (85% to 100%) (p ≤ .026), VAS ≥ 4 (45% to 86%) (p ≤ .015), MAS ≥ 3 (33% to 59%) (p < .001), joint contractures (50% to 60%) (p ≤ .013), falls at 3 and 6 months post‐stroke (35% to 60%) (p ≤ .006), pressure ulcers (47% to 68%) (p ≤ .001), and pneumonia at 3 months post‐stroke (28% to 42%) (p ≤ .046).

On the other hand, the relation with other determinants varied across these three time points.

At 3 months, a significant association was found between severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 17) and old age (p = .008) (81.8% of subjects were aged ≥ 65 years old) and the presence of a caregiver (47%) (p = .002). In addition, a mean duration of hospital stay of > 9 days was associated with mild to severe cognitive impairment (p < .001). Adversely, employment post‐stroke (45.2%) (p = .001) showed better cognitive function (MMSE >24).

At 6 months, falls (35.3%) (p = .003), epileptic seizures (17.6%) (p = .001), DVT at 3 months post‐stroke (23.5%) (p = .012), pneumonia that occurred at 6 months (24.2%) (p = .001), and recurrent stroke at 3 and 6 months post‐stroke (9% to 15%) (p ≤ .047), all affected the cognitive function of the recruited subjects resulting in severe damage (MMSE ≤ 17). Shoulder subluxation at 3 months (15.2%) (p = .012) was associated with MMSE ≤ 17, but its occurrence at 6 months (9.1%) was associated with 18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23 (p = .033). However, high level of education (secondary or university education) (48.4%) (p = .049) presented a protective factor for the cognitive function (MMSE > 24) at 6 months.

At 12‐month follow‐up, age ≥ 65 years old (90.9%) (p = .028), having a left hemisphere stroke (45.5%) (p = .006), an ICU stay at stroke occurrence (59.1%) (p = 0.011), evidence of recurrent stroke at 12 months (18.2%) (p = 0.002), falls at 6 months post‐stroke (41%) (p = .006), shoulder pain at 12 months post‐stroke (36.4%) (p = .013), pneumonia at 6 months post‐stroke (33.3%) (p < .001), and DVT at 3 months post‐stroke (22.7%) (p = .048) showed a significant association with MMSE ≤ 17. Moreover, subjects suffering from neuropathic pain (DN4 ≥ 4) at 3 and 12 months presented with mild‐to‐severe cognitive impairment (20% to 40%) (p ≤ .012), whereas high educational level (45.2%) (p = .005) and use of antidiabetic treatment post‐stroke (55%) (p = .007) were associated with normal cognitive function (MMSE > 24).

Multivariable analysis using a multinomial logistic regression model was performed to identify the factors that were independently associated with cognitive impairment at 3, 6, and 12 months after stroke (shown in Table 5). Our data have shown an important independent contribution of different factors to the rate of mild or severe PSCI across the three periods.

TABLE 5.

Independent determinants of post‐stroke cognitive impairment using multinomial logistic regression analysis

Adjusted OR [95% CI] p‐Value
Factors associated with PSCI at 3 months a
Mild PSCI (18 ≤MMSE ≤23)
Employment post‐stroke 0.310 [0.113–0.853] .023
HADS_A ≥ 11 at 3 month post‐stroke 2.698 [1.045–6.968] .040
Severe PSCI (MMSE ≤ 17)
Age 2.371 [1.191–4.720] .014
Sedentary behavior (≥ 12 h/day) 3.062 [1.097–8.549] .033
PCS score of QoL at 3 months 0.795 [0.704–0.897] < .001
HADS_D ≥ 11 at 3 months post‐stroke 2.536 [1.004–6.403] .049
Factors associated with PSCI at 6 months b
Mild PSCI (18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23)
Age 3.259 [1.482–7.166] .003
Secondary or university education 0.059 [0.008–0.458] .007
Severe PSCI (MMSE ≤ 17)
Age 3.059 [1.442–6.487] .004
NIHSS ≥ 21 at 3 months post‐stroke 3.231 [1.335–7.820] .009
Associated factors with PSCI at 12 months c
Mild PSCI (18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23)
Gender, Female 0.087 [0.010–0.755] .027
Age 2.378 [1.164–4.856] .017
Secondary or university education 0.115 [0.021–0.625] .012
PCS score of QoL at 12 months 0.833 [0.719–0.965] .015
Use of anti‐diabetic medication post‐stroke 0.166 [0.039–0.712] .016
HADS_D ≥ 11 at 3 months post‐stroke 3.490 [1.256–9.695] .017
Severe PSCI (MMSE ≤ 17)
Age 2.186 [1.037–4.608] .040
Secondary or university education 0.159 [0.027–0.951] .044
Stroke location, left hemisphere 2.710 [1.328–5.528] .006
NIHSS score at 3 months post‐stroke 3.375 [1.483–7.678] .004
PCS score of QoL at 12 months 0.808 [0.684–0.954] .012
Use of anti‐diabetic medication post‐stroke 0.182 [0.037–0.894] .036

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PSCI, Post‐stroke Cognitive Impairment; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination; HADS_A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale_Anxiety score; PCS of QoL, Physical Component Summary of the Short Form Health survey (SF12) for evaluation of the quality of life; HADS_D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale_Depression score; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

a

Classification table: Global percentage 74.6%, Model fit test < .001, Nagelkerke R‐Square 0.630, Goodness of fit test 1.000.

b

Classification table: Global percentage 78.3%, Model fit test < .001, Nagelkerke R‐Square 0.666, Goodness of fit test 1.000.

c

Classification table: Global percentage 82.5%, Model fit test < .001, Nagelkerke R‐Square 0.669, Goodness of fit test 1.000.

All of these multivariate analyses included all variables and confounding factors that had a value of p ≤ .05 in the univariate analysis. The method of selection of the variables which has been chosen here is the backward stepwise method. The reference category is the absence of PSCI (MMSE ≥ 24).

At 3 months post‐stroke, anxiety was positively associated with 18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23 (AOR = 2.698, 95% CI = [1.045 – 6.968], p = 0.040). Whereas, old age, sedentary lifestyle (≥ 12 h/day), and depression 3‐month post‐stroke increased two to three times the risk of severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 17) (AOR = 2.371, 95% CI = [1.191–4.720], p = .014; AOR = 3.062, 95% CI = [1.097–8.549], p = .033; AOR = 2.536, 95% CI = [1.004–6.403], p = .049, respectively). In contrast, subjects who resumed work post‐stroke and had higher PCS scores of QoL were less likely to develop PSCI (AOR = 0.310, 95% CI = [0.113–0.853], p = .023; AOR = 0.795, 95%CI = [0.704–0.897], p < .001).

At 6 months, old age (AOR = 3.059, 95% CI = [1.442–6.487], p = .004) and severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 21) (AOR = 3.231, 95% CI = [1.335–7.820], p = .009) affected severely the cognitive function (MMSE ≤ 17), whereas high educational level presented as a protective factor for the cognitive function (AOR = 0.059, 95% CI = [0.008–0.458], p = .007).

At the 12‐month follow‐up, old age, HADS_D ≥ 11, high NIHSS scores, continued to exhibit a significant contribution to induce an impairment of the cognitive function (AOR = 2.186, 95% CI = [1.037–4.608], p = .040; AOR = 3.490, 95% CI = [1.256–9.695], p = .017; AOR = 3.375, 95% CI = [1.483–7.688], p = .004, respectively). Moreover, we noted that the left hemisphere stroke increased approximately threefold the risk of late cognitive decline (AOR = 2.710, 95% CI = [1.328–5.528], p = .006).

On the other hand, females were 91% less likely to develop MCI at 12 months post‐stroke (AOR = 0.087, 95%CI = [0.010–0.755], p = .027), and the subjects who were on anti‐diabetic treatment post‐stroke had 82% lower risk of 12‐month mild to severe cognitive impairment (AOR = 0.182, 95% CI = [0.037–0.894], p = .036). Similarly, high educational level and higher PCS scores of QoL stayed having a significant association with higher scores of MMSE at 12 months post‐stroke (AOR = 0.159, 95% CI = [0.027–0.951], p = .044; AOR = 0.808, 95% CI = [0.684–0.954], p = .012, respectively).

4. DISCUSSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind in Lebanon. The main objective was to calculate the MMSE scores among stroke survivors, to evaluate the different cognitive domains and to determine the proportion and the predictors of PSCI at three time points post first‐ever stroke: 3, 6, and 12 months. Overall, PSCI was very high in the first‐ever stroke survivors ranging between 74.8% in the early stage and 37.6% in the late stage. Subjects with a cognitive impairment at an acute phase had very low MMSE scores (< 17) that were associated with poorer functional outcome and QoL. Age, low educational level, high NIHSS scores, low PCS of QoL, sedentary lifestyle, and high HADS_A and HADS_D scores were the main independent predictors of the deficit in MMSE scores among Lebanese stroke survivors. A significant substantial 37% improvement of the cognitive function was seen at 1 year post‐stroke.

Compared to different eastern and western countries, PSCI rate at acute phase in Lebanon is one of the highest rates, similar to the rates in Shanghai, China (88.1%) (Li et al., 2020), and South Korea (69.8%) (Yu et al., 2013), but greater than the rates obtained in USA, France, Britain, Australia, Sweden, India, Norway, Singapore, Nigeria, and Egypt that range between 20% and 50% (Akinyemi et al., 2014; Essmat et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2014). This variability might be explained by the difference in countries, race, and the used diagnostic criteria, in addition to different factors reported in the present study.

Various factors were identified as the determinants of PSCI over 1 year of follow‐up among Lebanese survivors.

Age was the main predictor across the three time points. PSCI decreases exponentially as age increases (Levine et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2014), which can be explained in biological terms by the deposition of β‐amyloid, one of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (Doré et al., 2013).

Interestingly, males were more likely to be affected than females. This observation was statistically significant in the late phase (1‐year post‐stroke) with mild cognition decline (18 ≤ MMSE ≤ 23). This was found inconsistent with the results of most of the previous studies (Au et al., 2017; Jia et al., 2020; Levine et al., 2018).This could be explained by the fact that males in our study have had more comorbidities than females and were more exposed to psychological complications. In addition to these possible reasons that were discussed by Wang and collaborators in 2020 (Wang et al., 2020), some studies reported that gender difference varies according to the type of dementia, with higher rate of Alzheimer's disease in females and more vascular dementia in males (Au et al., 2017; Gannon et al., 2019).

Moreover, previous studies have shown that high educational level and employment post‐stroke are associated with better cognitive performances (Hatem et al., 2016; Kemp et al., 2019; Levine et al., 2018; Mahon et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2014). People with higher reserve can endure more neurological problems and can maintain brain function for longer periods of time than people with lower reserve. They have a more favorable and healthier lifestyle, better compliance to treatment and better access to healthcare leading to less cognitive decline and dementia (Srithumsuk et al., 2020). However, in the present study, illiteracy and lower educational level were remarkable among participants as well as unemployment post‐stroke, consequently affecting their cognitive function.

Our results showed that the odds of severe PSCI increased three times when sitting hours increased to ≥ 12 h/day, which was highlighted also by a study conducted among five population cohorts from Greece, Australia, USA, Japan, and Singapore in 2020 (Maasakkers et al., 2020). Stroke survivors tend to be less active, spend more time sedentary compared to stroke‐free people (Viktorisson et al., 2021). They become less energetic, less concentrated, less motivated, more depressed, more anxious, and more likely to isolate themselves without any accomplishment. Therefore, regular physical activity of at least 30 min of moderate intensity one to three times per week during stroke rehabilitation phase is highly recommended as part of the secondary prevention by the American Heart Association (2021).

Furthermore, AF was found to be a significant risk factor for mild and severe PSCI at early and late stage; in accordance with the literature, AF may result in downstream cerebral hypoperfusion, heightened inflammatory responses, silent ischemia, reduced brain volumes, and cerebral microbleeds, all of which have been implicated in PSCI (Morsund et al., 2019; Siennicki‐Lantz et al., 2008); however, this effect was lost when considering confounding risk factors in our study.

Inversely, the use of antidiabetic medication in our population was shown to be an independent protective factor against PSCI at 12 months post‐stroke similarly to the study of Swardfager and MacIntosh (2017). Therefore, we must highlight the most important approaches in the prevention of cognitive sequelae, including an optimal glycemic control and a healthier lifestyle intervention such as a proper diet and physical activity as mentioned earlier in the paper.

Pendlebury and Rothwell reviewed 73 cohort studies of post‐stroke dementia in a total of 7511 patients and they shed light on the importance of the stroke burden itself (stroke severity, location of the stroke: left hemisphere, volume of the infarct) in the cause of PSCI (Pendlebury & Rothwell, 2009). This is comparable to our findings. The involvement of the left hemisphere was shown to be an independent predictor of severe cognitive impairment at 1 year post‐stroke, increasing threefold the risk of PSCI. Regarding the stroke subtypes, MCI was found slightly higher in lacunar stroke (SVO) compared to non‐lacunar stroke (LAA) but was not statistically significant, similarly to the systematic review and meta‐analyses of Makin et al. (S. D. Makin et al., 2018; S. D. J. Makin et al., 2013). SVO is the most common vascular cause of cognitive impairment affecting the brain diffusely. In addition, the duration of hospital stay > 9 days at the stroke occurrence was associated with decreasing scores of MMSE in the following 3 to 6 months. Prolonged hospitalization worsens the situation of patients, exposing them to serious complications and more sequelae (Mathews et al., 2014).

In the rehabilitation phase, survivors with PSCI are more likely to be dependent in ADL, having high stroke severity and poorer mental and physical QoL (Mohd Zulkifly et al., 2016). Similarly, in the present study, increasing NIHSS scores, HADS scores, and mRS scores and decreasing PCS and MCS and SF‐12 of QoL at 3, 6, and 12 months were positively associated with lower MMSE scores over time. After adjusting for age, gender, educational level, and severity of stroke, anxiety and depression post‐stroke (HADS_A and HADS_D scores ≥ 11), in addition to the lower PCS of QoL, remained as independent strong predictors of PSCI across the three time periods of follow‐up. Motor deficit after stroke, including falls, general pain, neuropathic pain at 3 and 12 month, fatigue, shoulder subluxation, joint contractures, muscle spasticity, DVT, and pressure ulcers were contributing to the reduction in MMSE scores, similarly to numerous international studies (Graber et al., 2019; Harrison & Field, 2015; Lui & Nguyen, 2018; Renjen et al., 2015; Segev‐Jacubovski et al., 2011). Survivors usually experience sleep disturbances, low motivation, low self‐esteem, mood changes, chronic stress, and worries about their future due to disabilities. All these physical and emotional limitations affect their performance in executive function, memory, speed, and motor processing (Quattropani et al., 2018; Mohd Zulkifly et al., 2016). Hence, an emergency rehabilitation program for patients and their families is essential to enable them to achieve their highest possible level of independence. There is a crucial early need to focus on controlling motor movement and psychological factors in the different stages of stroke.

Last, we found that pneumonia post‐stroke induced short‐term and long‐term severe cognitive impairment. Emerging evidence suggests that immune responses are implicated in long‐term cognitive decline and dementia after stroke (Elkind et al., 2020; Wille‐Jørgensen et al., 2005). Autoantibodies against myelin basic protein are associated with increased cognitive decline in the first year after stroke (Becker et al., 2016).

Thus, concurrent impairments should be recognized both in a short‐ and long‐term perspective in order to identify and target the patients in need of prolonged rehabilitation to prevent further functional decline.

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

A number of limitations require consideration. First, the main limitation was the small sample size recruited following the unique study considering a low prevalence of stroke in Lebanon (Jurjus et al., 2009) of 3.9% according to other countries. Second, we failed to compare baseline scores of NIHSS, mRS, and MMSE with the three time series scores because of lack of assessment tools in the participating hospitals. Third, these latter were limited to the regions of Beirut and Mount Lebanon, regardless of the fact that subjects came from all governorates; this affected the generalizability of our results. Fourth, despite the results which were statistically significant, there was a loss to follow up due to the number of deaths at 3 months, the fact that we could not assess their cognitive function that was highly suspected to be impaired; therefore, we believe that the cognitive function is underestimated in our study. Fifth, we should mention that illiteracy in the present study (38% of the participants) was an important confounder and it is well known that illiteracy tends to affect cognitive functioning.

Nevertheless, our study was a multicenter longitudinal prospective study and one of the few such studies carried out in Lebanon which used international standardized, validated, and reliable measuring instruments. We have tried to avoid information bias by using the Arabic versions of these instruments. These instruments were performed by highly qualified and well‐trained investigators through a face‐to‐face interview with the subjects so the degree of bias usually resulting from self‐completed questionnaires due to misunderstanding of the questions was declined. On the one hand, we have employed measures to tap different aspects of post‐stroke sequelae. This is, indeed, the novelty of this study. On the other hand, since the subjects were followed for 12 months, some of the measures were repeated, and it is unclear whether there was an effect on learning (Wesnes & Pincock, 2002). Similarly, another confounding factor should be considered, the phenomenon known as spontaneous recovery in people who have sustained neurological events (Cramer, 2008). Lastly, PSCI is a multifactorial disorder, so we did not miss and relatively considered the majority of significant potential explanatory factors.

Hence, conclusions should be confirmed in a larger cohort. Our findings may be useful to draw hypotheses on stroke burden and its heavy physical and mental implications for further analyses. Future studies should take into account all the weak points and a larger sample size across Lebanon must be considered to confirm our findings.

5. CONCLUSIONS

PSCI is a major cause of handicap, morbidity, and mortality. We concluded that PSCI rate at acute phase in Lebanon is one of the highest rates worldwide. A substantial improvement of the cognitive function was highlighted at 1 year post initial stroke. Various factors were identified as major determinants among Lebanese survivors. We must shed light on the early phase post‐stroke, which is the most critical and sensitive phase affecting the short‐ and long‐term cognitive functioning post‐stroke. Stroke patients should be closely and regularly monitored in the rehabilitation phase, especially in the early phase. Appropriate evaluation of cognitive function, identification of the risk factors, and providing more comprehensive assessment to stroke survivors from the beginning would be useful in the post‐stroke phase. A standardized protocol and rehabilitation program to cope with the burden of stroke should be implemented to best address the management of the risk factors, including broad neuropsychological evaluation besides screening measures to improve the functional outcome, the cognitive function, and to prevent associated consequences. Finally, there is a need to increase public awareness. A valuable coordination, collaboration among healthcare professionals and a solid support from the families and caregivers can contribute to the fast and smooth recovery of stroke survivors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Hassan Hosseini, Pascale Salameh, and Celina Boutros contributed to the conception and design of the study. Celina Boutros, Walaa Khazaal, and Maram Taliani organized the database. Celina Boutros performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the first draft and the sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

FUNDING INFORMATION

The authors declare that this study received funding from Association Robert Debré pour la Recherche Médicale (ARDRM). The funder was not involved in the study design,collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.2837

Supporting information

Supplementary Information

Figure 1S. The severity of the stroke measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). It is divided into 5 levels: 0: no stroke, 1–4: minor stroke, 5–15: moderate stroke, 15–20: moderate to severe stroke, 21–42: severe stroke.

Figure 2S. The degree of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). It is divided into 7 levels as follows: 0: no symptoms; 1: no significant disability despite symptoms; able to perform all the duties and usual activities; 2: low incapacity; unable to accomplish many previous things, but capable of taking care of its own affairs without assistance; 3: inability to moderate; needing help, but able to walk without assistance; 4: moderately serious disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to meet physical needs without assistance; 5: serious disability; bedridden, incontinent and demanding necessary attention and constant nursing care; 6: death.

Figure 3S. The rates of cognitive impairment occurring after 3, 6, and 12‐month post‐stroke.

Figure 4S. The percentage of subjects with/without cognitive domain impairment according to MMSE across the 3 periods of follow‐up.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge the participating hospitals. We thank the patients and caregivers whose contribution made this study possible. In addition, we thank Dr. Sylvia Saade and her student Ms. Mariam Chaalan, who initiated the data collection with us but could not continue the process.

Boutros, C. F. , Khazaal, W. , Taliani, M. , Sadier, N. S. , Salameh, P. , & Hosseini, H. (2023). Factors associated with cognitive impairment at 3, 6, and 12 months after the first stroke among Lebanese survivors. Brain and Behavior, 13, e2837. 10.1002/brb3.2837

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are available upon request due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams, H. P. , Bendixen, B. H. , Kappelle, L. J. , Biller, J. , Love, B. B. , Gordon, D. L. , & Marsh, E. E. (1993). Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 24(1), 35–41. 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akinyemi, R. O. , Allan, L. , Owolabi, M. O. , Akinyemi, J. O. , Ogbole, G. , Ajani, A. , Firbank, M. , Ogunniyi, A. , & Kalaria, R. N. (2014). Profile and determinants of vascular cognitive impairment in African stroke survivors: The CogFAST Nigeria Study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 346(1–2), 241–249. 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aseri, A. , A, Z. , Suriya, M. O. , Hassan, H. A. , Hasan, M. , Sheikh, S. A. , Al Tamimi, A. , Alshathri, M. , & Khalid, N. (2020). Correction to: Reliability and validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an emergency department in Saudi Arabia: A cross‐sectional observational study. BMC Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 9. 10.1186/s12873-020-0305-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al‐Qazzaz, N. K. , Ali, S. H. , Ahmad, S. A. , Islam, S. , & Mohamad, K. (2014). Cognitive impairment and memory dysfunction after a stroke diagnosis: A post‐stroke memory assessment. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 10, 1677–1691. 10.2147/NDT.S67184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al‐Shehri, A. H. , Taha, A. Z. , Bahnassy, A. A. , & Salah, M. (2008). Health‐related quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 28(5), 352–360. 10.5144/0256-4947.2008.352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Al‐Sobayel, H. I. , Al‐Hugail, H. A. , AlSaif, R. M. , Albawardi, N. M. , Alnahdi, A. H. , Daif, A. M. , & Al‐Arfaj, H. F. (2016). Validation of an Arabic version of Fatigue Severity Scale. Saudi Medical Journal, 37(1), 73–78. 10.15537/smj.2016.1.13055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. American Heart Association . (2021, April 29). Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors. Professional.Heart.Org. https://professional.heart.org/en/science‐news/physical‐activity‐and‐exercise‐recommendations‐for‐stroke‐survivors
  8. Au, B. , Dale‐McGrath, S. , & Tierney, M. C. (2017). Sex differences in the prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment: A meta‐analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 35, 176–199. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ballard, C. , Rowan, E. , Stephens, S. , Kalaria, R. , & Kenny, R. A. (2003). Prospective follow‐up study between 3 and 15 months after stroke: Improvements and decline in cognitive function among dementia‐free stroke survivors >75 years of age. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 34(10), 2440–2444. 10.1161/01.STR.0000089923.29724.CE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Banks, J. L. , & Marotta, C. A. (2007). Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials: A literature review and synthesis. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 38(3), 1091–1096. 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker, K. J. , Tanzi, P. , Zierath, D. , & Buckwalter, M. S. (2016). Antibodies to myelin basic protein are associated with cognitive decline after stroke. Journal of Neuroimmunology, 295–296, 9–11. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohannon, R. W. , & Smith, M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67(2), 206–207. 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouhassira, D. , Attal, N. , Alchaar, H. , Boureau, F. , Brochet, B. , Bruxelle, J. , Cunin, G. , Fermanian, J. , Ginies, P. , Grun‐Overdyking, A. , Jafari‐Schluep, H. , Lantéri‐Minet, M. , Laurent, B. , Mick, G. , Serrie, A. , Valade, D. , & Vicaut, E. (2005). Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain, 114(1–2), 29–36. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brott, T. , Marler, J. R. , Olinger, C. P. , Adams, H. P. , Tomsick, T. , Barsan, W. G. , Biller, J. , Eberle, R. , Hertzberg, V. , & Walker, M. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: Lesion size by computed tomography. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 20(7), 871–875. 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Broussy, S. , Rouanet, F. , Lesaine, E. , Domecq, S. , Kret, M. , Maugeais, M. , Aly, F. , Dehail, P. , Bénard, A. , Wittwer, J. , Salamon, R. , Sibon, I. , & Saillour‐Glenisson, F. (2019). Post‐stroke pathway analysis and link with one year sequelae in a French cohort of stroke patients: The PAPASePA protocol study. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 10.1186/s12913-019-4522-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao, J. , Xiao, Y. , Qiu, W. , Zhang, Y. , Dou, Z. , Ren, J. , Zheng, R. , Zheng, H. , & Chen, Z. (2022). Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of corrected slack angle derived from 2D‐SWE in quantitating muscle spasticity of stroke patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19, 15. 10.1186/s12984-022-00995-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheng, B. , Forkert, N. D. , Zavaglia, M. , Hilgetag, C. C. , Golsari, A. , Siemonsen, S. , Fiehler, J. , Pedraza, S. , Puig, J. , Cho, T.‐H. , Alawneh, J. , Baron, J.‐C. , Ostergaard, L. , Gerloff, C. , & Thomalla, G. (2014). Influence of stroke infarct location on functional outcome measured by the modified rankin scale. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 45(6), 1695–1702. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cramer, S. C. (2008). Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Annals of Neurology, 63(3), 272–287. 10.1002/ana.21393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cumming, T. B. , Marshall, R. S. , & Lazar, R. M. (2013). Stroke, cognitive deficits, and rehabilitation: Still an incomplete picture. International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society, 8(1), 38–45. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00972.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dichgans, M. , & Leys, D. (2017). Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Circulation Research, 120(3), 573–591. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Doré, V. , Villemagne, V. L. , Bourgeat, P. , Fripp, J. , Acosta, O. , Chetélat, G. , Zhou, L. , Martins, R. , Ellis, K. A. , Masters, C. L. , Ames, D. , Salvado, O. , & Rowe, C. C. (2013). Cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of the relationship between Aβ deposition, cortical thickness, and memory in cognitively unimpaired individuals and in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurology, 70(7), 903–911. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. El‐Hajj, M. , Salameh, P. , Rachidi, S. , Al‐Hajje, A. , & Hosseini, H. (2019). Cigarette and waterpipe smoking are associated with the risk of stroke in Lebanon. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 9(1), 62–70. 10.2991/jegh.k.181231.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. El‐Hajj, M. , Salameh, P. , Rachidi, S. , & Hosseini, H. (2016). The epidemiology of stroke in the Middle East. European Stroke Journal, 1(3), 180–198. 10.1177/2396987316654338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. El‐Hayeck, R. , Baddoura, R. , Wehbé, A. , Bassil, N. , Koussa, S. , Abou Khaled, K. , Richa, S. , Khoury, R. , Alameddine, A. , & Sellal, F. (2019). An Arabic version of the mini‐mental state examination for the Lebanese population: Reliability, validity, and normative data. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, 71(2), 525–540. 10.3233/JAD-181232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elkind, M. S. V. , Boehme, A. K. , Smith, C. J. , Meisel, A. , & Buckwalter, M. S. (2020). Infection as a stroke risk factor and determinant of outcome after stroke. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 51(10), 3156–3168. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Essmat, A. , El‐Zayat, S. , Elshamy, M. , & Badawy, M. (2021). Neuroimaging indices of vascular cognitive impairment after stroke in a sample of Egyptian patients. Al‐Azhar International Medical Journal, 2(3), 15–19. 10.21608/aimj.2021.63309.1419 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. FAOTA, G. G. , & EdD, OTR. (2015). Stroke rehabilitation: A function‐based approach. Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  28. Folstein, M. F. , Folstein, S. E. , & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini‐mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gannon, O. J. , Robison, L. S. , Custozzo, A. J. , & Zuloaga, K. L. (2019). Sex differences in risk factors for vascular contributions to cognitive impairment & dementia. Neurochemistry International, 127, 38–55. 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gifford, A. , Biffi, A. , Gelaye, B. , & Chemali, Z. (2022). Shedding light on the causes and characteristics of stroke in Lebanon: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 35(5), 655–662. 10.1177/08919887211044753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gorelick, P. B. , Scuteri, A. , Black, S. E. , DeCarli, C. , Greenberg, S. M. , Iadecola, C. , Launer, L. J. , Laurent, S. , Lopez, O. L. , Nyenhuis, D. , Petersen, R. C. , Schneider, J. A. , Tzourio, C. , Arnett, D. K. , Bennett, D. A. , Chui, H. C. , Higashida, R. T. , Lindquist, R. , Nilsson, P. M. , … Seshadri, S. (2011). Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 42(9), 2672–2713. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Graber, M. , Garnier, L. , Duloquin, G. , Mohr, S. , Guillemin, S. , Ramaget, O. , Piver, A. , Tainturier, C. , Bret‐Legrand, C. , Delpont, B. , Blanc‐Labarre, C. , Guéniat, J. , Hervieu‐Bègue, M. , Osseby, G.‐V. , Giroud, M. , & Béjot, Y. (2019). Association between fatigue and cognitive impairment at 6 months in patients with ischemic stroke treated with acute revascularization therapy. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 10.3389/fneur.2019.00931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hagberg, G. , Fure, B. , Thommessen, B. , Ihle‐Hansen, H. , Øksengård, A.‐R. , Nygård, S. , Pendlebury, S. T. , Beyer, M. K. , Wyller, T. B. , & Ihle‐Hansen, H. (2019). Predictors for favorable cognitive outcome post‐stroke: A‐seven‐year follow‐up study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 48(1–2), 45–55. 10.1159/000501850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harrison, R. A. , & Field, T. S. (2015). Post stroke pain: Identification, assessment, and therapy. Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 39(3–4), 190–201. 10.1159/000375397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hatem, S. M. , Saussez, G. , della Faille, M. , Prist, V. , Zhang, X. , Dispa, D. , & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016). Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hayes, M. H. S. , & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98–99. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hussein, H. M. , Moneim, A. , A, E. , T, A.‐E. , Y, A. , Salem, H. H. , Abd‐Allah, F. , Farrag, M. A. , Tork, M. A. , Shalash, A. S. , Dein, E. E. , K, H. , Osman, G. , Georgy, S. S. , Ghali, P. G. , Lyden, P. D. , & Moustafa, R. R. (2015). Arabic cross cultural adaptation and validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 357(1–2), 152–156. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. ICD‐10 Version:2016 . (2016). http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en#/G46
  39. Ihle‐Hansen, H. , Thommessen, B. , Wyller, T. B. , Engedal, K. , Øksengård, A. R. , Stenset, V. , Løken, K. , Aaberg, M. , & Fure, B. (2011). Incidence and subtypes of MCI and dementia 1 year after first‐ever stroke in patients without pre‐existing cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 32(6), 401–407. 10.1159/000335361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jia, L. , Quan, M. , Fu, Y. , Zhao, T. , Li, Y. , Wei, C. , Tang, Y. , Qin, Q. , Wang, F. , Qiao, Y. , Shi, S. , Wang, Y.‐J. , Du, Y. , Zhang, J. , Zhang, J. , Luo, B. , Qu, Q. , Zhou, C. , Gauthier, S. , … Group for the Project of Dementia Situation in China . (2020). Dementia in China: Epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. The Lancet. Neurology, 19(1), 81–92. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30290-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jurjus, A. R. , Tohme, R. A. , Ephrem, G. , Hussein, I. A. H. , & Jurjus, R. (2009). Incidence and prevalence of circulatory diseases in Lebanon: A physician's inquiry. Ethnicity & Disease, 19(1), 1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kalaria, R. N. , Akinyemi, R. , & Ihara, M. (2016). Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1862(5), 915–925. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.01.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van der Kemp, J. , Kruithof, W. J. , Nijboer, T. C. W. , van Bennekom, C. A. M. , van Heugten, C. , & Visser‐Meily, J. M. A. (2019). Return to work after mild‐to‐moderate stroke: Work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29(4), 638–653. 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Khazaal, W. , Taliani, M. , Boutros, C. , Abou‐Abbas, L. , Hosseini, H. , Salameh, P. , & Sadier, N. S. (2021). Psychological complications at 3 months following stroke: Prevalence and correlates among stroke survivors in Lebanon. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2184. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Klamroth‐Marganska, V. (2018). Stroke rehabilitation: Therapy robots and assistive devices. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1065, 579–587. 10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Krupp, L. B. , LaRocca, N. G. , Muir‐Nash, J. , & Steinberg, A. D. (1989). The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives of Neurology, 46(10), 1121–1123. 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lahoud, N. , Salameh, P. , Hosseini, H. , Saleh, N. , Rizk, E. , Hallit, S. , Abbas, M. H. , & Gebeily, S. (2018). Care and discharge outcome of acute stroke in Lebanon: A hospital‐based study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(8), 637–643. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Levine, D. A. , Wadley, V. G. , Langa, K. M. , Unverzagt, F. W. , Kabeto, M. U. , Giordani, B. , Howard, G. , Howard, V. J. , Cushman, M. , Judd, S. E. , & Galecki, A. T. (2018). Risk factors for poststroke cognitive decline. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 49(4), 987–994. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, J. , Wang, J. , Wu, B. , Xu, H. , Wu, X. , Zhou, L. , & Deng, B. (2020). Association between early cognitive impairment and midterm functional outcomes among Chinese acute ischemic stroke patients: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 10.3389/fneur.2020.00020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lindley, R. I. , Warlow, C. P. , Wardlaw, J. M. , Dennis, M. S. , Slattery, J. , & Sandercock, P. A. (1993). Interobserver reliability of a clinical classification of acute cerebral infarction. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 24(12), 1801–1804. 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lo, J. W. , Crawford, J. D. , Desmond, D. W. , Godefroy, O. , Jokinen, H. , Mahinrad, S. , Bae, H.‐J. , Lim, J.‐S. , Köhler, S. , Douven, E. , Staals, J. , Chen, C. , Xu, X. , Chong, E. J. , Akinyemi, R. O. , Kalaria, R. N. , Ogunniyi, A. , Barbay, M. , Roussel, M. , … Stroke and Cognition (STROKOG) Collaboration . (2019). Profile of and risk factors for poststroke cognitive impairment in diverse ethnoregional groups. Neurology, 93(24), e2257–e2271. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lui, S. K. , & Nguyen, M. H. (2018). Elderly stroke rehabilitation: Overcoming the complications and its associated challenges. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2018, 9853837. 10.1155/2018/9853837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maasakkers, C. M. , Claassen, J. A. H. R. , Gardiner, P. A. , Olde Rikkert, M. G. M. , Lipnicki, D. M. , Scarmeas, N. , Dardiotis, E. , Yannakoulia, M. , Anstey, K. J. , Cherbuin, N. , Haan, M. N. , Kumagai, S. , Narazaki, K. , Chen, T. , Ng, T. P. , Gao, Q. , Nyunt, M. S. Z. , Crawford, J. D. , Kochan, N. A. , … COSMIC Collaborators . (2020). The association of sedentary behaviour and cognitive function in people without dementia: A coordinated analysis across five cohort studies from COSMIC. Sports Medicine, 50(2), 403–413. 10.1007/s40279-019-01186-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mahon, S. , Parmar, P. , Barker‐Collo, S. , Krishnamurthi, R. , Jones, K. , Theadom, A. , & Feigin, V. (2017). Determinants, prevalence, and trajectory of long‐term post‐stroke cognitive impairment: Results from a 4‐year follow‐up of the ARCOS‐IV study. Neuroepidemiology, 49(3–4), 129–134. 10.1159/000484606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Makin, S. D. , Doubal, F. N. , Shuler, K. , Chappell, F. M. , Staals, J. , Dennis, M. S. , & Wardlaw, J. M. (2018). The impact of early‐life intelligence quotient on post stroke cognitive impairment. European Stroke Journal, 3(2), 145–156. 10.1177/2396987317750517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Makin, S. D. J. , Turpin, S. , Dennis, M. S. , & Wardlaw, J. M. (2013). Cognitive impairment after lacunar stroke: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of incidence, prevalence and comparison with other stroke subtypes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 84(8), 893–900. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mathews, S. B. , Arnold, S. E. , & Epperson, C. N. (2014). Hospitalization and cognitive decline: Can the nature of the relationship be deciphered? The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 22(5), 465–480. 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Quattropani, M. C., Geraci, A. , & Lenzo, V. (2018). (7) (PDF) Post‐stroke anxiety and depression: Relationships to cognitive rehabilitation outcome. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323723788_Post‐stroke_anxiety_and_depression_Relationships_to_cognitive_rehabilitation_outcome [Google Scholar]
  59. Meschia, J. F. , Brott, T. G. , Chukwudelunzu, F. E. , Hardy, J. , Brown, R. D. , Meissner, I. , Hall, L. J. , Atkinson, E. J. , & O'Brien, P. C. (2000). Verifying the stroke‐free phenotype by structured telephone interview. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 31(5), 1076–1080. 10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mijajlović, M. D. , Pavlović, A. , Brainin, M. , Heiss, W.‐D. , Quinn, T. J. , Ihle‐Hansen, H. B. , Hermann, D. M. , Assayag, E. B. , Richard, E. , Thiel, A. , Kliper, E. , Shin, Y.‐I. , Kim, Y.‐H. , Choi, S. , Jung, S. , Lee, Y.‐B. , Sinanović, O. , Levine, D. A. , Schlesinger, I. , … N, M. (2017). Post‐stroke dementia – A comprehensive review. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 11. 10.1186/s12916-017-0779-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Modified Rankin Scale: Modified Rankin Scale . (2017). http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2172455‐overview
  62. Mohd Zulkifly, M. F. , Ghazali, S. E. , Che Din, N. , Singh, D. K. A. , & Subramaniam, P. (2016, May 31). A review of risk factors for cognitive impairment in stroke survivors. The Scientific World Journal. 10.1155/2016/3456943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Morsund, Å. H. , Ellekjaer, H. , Gramstad, A. , Reiestad, M. T. , Midgard, R. , Sando, S. B. , Jonsbu, E. , & Naess, H. (2019). The development of cognitive and emotional impairment after a minor stroke: A longitudinal study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 140(4), 281–289. 10.1111/ane.13143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pendlebury, S. T. , & Rothwell, P. M. (2009). Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre‐stroke and post‐stroke dementia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. The Lancet. Neurology, 8(11), 1006–1018. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70236-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Qu, Y. , Zhuo, L. , Li, N. , Hu, Y. , Chen, W. , Zhou, Y. , Wang, J. , Tao, Q. , Hu, J. , Nie, X. , & Zhan, S. (2015). Prevalence of post‐stroke cognitive impairment in China: A community‐based, cross‐sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10(4). 10.1371/journal.pone.0122864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rankin, J. (1957). Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prognosis. Scottish Medical Journal, 2(5), 200–215. 10.1177/003693305700200504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Renjen, P. N. , Gauba, C. , & Chaudhari, D. (2015). Cognitive impairment after stroke. Cureus, 7(9). 10.7759/cureus.335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rohde, D. , Gaynor, E. , Large, M. , Mellon, L. , Bennett, K. , Williams, D. J. , Brewer, L. , Hall, P. , Callaly, E. , Dolan, E. , & Hickey, A. (2019). Cognitive impairment and medication adherence post‐stroke: A five‐year follow‐up of the ASPIRE‐S cohort. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223997. 10.1371/journal.pone.0223997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rosti‐Otajärvi, E. , Hämäläinen, P. , Wiksten, A. , Hakkarainen, T. , & Ruutiainen, J. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. Brain and Behavior, 7(7). 10.1002/brb3.743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sabbah, I. , Drouby, N. , Sabbah, S. , Retel‐Rude, N. , & Mercier, M. (2003). Quality of Life in rural and urban populations in Lebanon using SF‐36 Health Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 30. 10.1186/1477-7525-1-30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Salameh, P. , Farah, R. , Hallit, S. , Zeidan, R. K. , Chahine, M. N. , Asmar, R. , & Hosseini, H. (2018). Self‐reported history of stroke and long‐term living conditions near air pollution sources: Results of a national epidemiological study in Lebanon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(3), 153. 10.1007/s10661-018-6545-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Salhab, H. A. , Salameh, P. , Hajj, H. , & Hosseini, H. (2018). Stroke in the Arab World: A bibliometric analysis of research activity (2002‐2016). ENeurologicalSci, 13, 40–45. 10.1016/j.ensci.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Segev‐Jacubovski, O. , Herman, T. , Yogev‐Seligmann, G. , Mirelman, A. , Giladi, N. , & Hausdorff, J. M. (2011). The interplay between gait, falls and cognition: Can cognitive therapy reduce fall risk? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11(7), 1057–1075. 10.1586/ern.11.69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Siennicki‐Lantz, A. , Reinprecht, F. , Wollmer, P. , & Elmståhl, S. (2008). Smoking‐related changes in cerebral perfusion in a population of elderly men. Neuroepidemiology, 30(2), 84–92. 10.1159/000118944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Srithumsuk, W. , Kabayama, M. , Gondo, Y. , Masui, Y. , Akagi, Y. , Klinpudtan, N. , Kiyoshige, E. , Godai, K. , Sugimoto, K. , Akasaka, H. , Takami, Y. , Takeya, Y. , Yamamoto, K. , Ikebe, K. , Ogawa, M. , Inagaki, H. , Ishizaki, T. , Arai, Y. , Rakugi, H. , & Kamide, K. (2020). The importance of stroke as a risk factor of cognitive decline in community dwelling older and oldest peoples: The SONIC study. BMC Geriatrics, 20, 10.1186/s12877-020-1423-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Stroke guidelines . (2016, October 3). RCP London. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines‐policy/stroke‐guidelines
  77. Sun, J.‐H. , Tan, L. , & Yu, J.‐T. (2014). Post‐stroke cognitive impairment: Epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Annals of Translational Medicine, 2(8). 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.08.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Swardfager, W. , & MacIntosh, B. J. (2017). Depression, type 2 diabetes, and poststroke cognitive impairment. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(1), 48–55. 10.1177/1545968316656054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Terkawi, A. S. , Abolkhair, A. , Didier, B. , Alzhahrani, T. , Alsohaibani, M. , Terkawi, Y. S. , Almoqbali, Y. , Tolba, Y. Y. , Pangililan, E. , Foula, F. , & Tsang, S. (2017). Development and validation of Arabic version of the douleur neuropathique 4 questionnaire. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 11(1), S31–S39. 10.4103/sja.SJA_97_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tombaugh, T. N. , & McIntyre, N. J. (1992). The mini‐mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922–935. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Valko, P. O. , Bassetti, C. L. , Bloch, K. E. , Held, U. , & Baumann, C. R. (2008). Validation of the fatigue severity scale in a Swiss cohort. Sleep, 31(11), 1601–1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Vansimaeys, C. , Zuber, M. , Pitrat, B. , Join‐Lambert, C. , Tamazyan, R. , Farhat, W. , & Bungener, C. (2017). Combining standard conventional measures and ecological momentary assessment of depression, anxiety and coping using smartphone application in minor stroke population: A longitudinal study protocol. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1172. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Viktorisson, A. , Andersson, E. M. , Lundström, E. , & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2021). Levels of physical activity before and after stroke in relation to early cognitive function. Scientific Reports, 11, 9078. 10.1038/s41598-021-88606-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. von Elm, E. , Altman, D. G. , Egger, M. , Pocock, S. J. , Gøtzsche, P. C. , Vandenbroucke, J. P. , & Initiative, S. (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 12(12), 1495–1499. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang, J. , Xiao, L. D. , Wang, K. , Luo, Y. , & Li, X. (2020). Gender differences in cognitive impairment among rural elderly in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3724. 10.3390/ijerph17103724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Ware, J. , Kosinski, M. , & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12‐item short‐form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wesnes, K. , & Pincock, C. (2002). Practice effects on cognitive tasks: A major problem? The Lancet. Neurology, 1(8), 473. 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00236-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wille‐Jørgensen, P. , Jorgensen, L. N. , & Crawford, M. (2005). Asymptomatic postoperative deep vein thrombosis and the development of postthrombotic syndrome. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 93(2), 236–241. 10.1160/TH04-09-0570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. World Bank . (2022). New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2021–2022. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new‐world‐bank‐country‐classifications‐income‐level‐2021‐2022 [Google Scholar]
  90. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects . (2013). Jama, 310(20), 2191. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Xiao, S. (1994). The theoretical basis and research application of social support rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 4(2), 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  92. Young, F. B. , Weir, C. J. , & Lees, K. R. (2005). Comparison of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale with disability outcome measures in acute stroke trials. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 36(10), 2187–2192. 10.1161/01.STR.0000181089.41324.70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yu, K.‐H. , Cho, S.‐J. , Oh, M. S. , Jung, S. , Lee, J.‐H. , Shin, J.‐H. , Koh, I.‐S. , Cha, J.‐K. , Park, J.‐M. , Bae, H.‐J. , Kang, Y. , Lee, B.‐C. , & Korean‐Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards Study Group . (2013). Cognitive impairment evaluated with vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards in a multicenter prospective stroke cohort in Korea. Stroke; A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 44(3), 786–788. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.668343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zigmond, A. S. , & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Figure 1S. The severity of the stroke measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). It is divided into 5 levels: 0: no stroke, 1–4: minor stroke, 5–15: moderate stroke, 15–20: moderate to severe stroke, 21–42: severe stroke.

Figure 2S. The degree of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). It is divided into 7 levels as follows: 0: no symptoms; 1: no significant disability despite symptoms; able to perform all the duties and usual activities; 2: low incapacity; unable to accomplish many previous things, but capable of taking care of its own affairs without assistance; 3: inability to moderate; needing help, but able to walk without assistance; 4: moderately serious disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to meet physical needs without assistance; 5: serious disability; bedridden, incontinent and demanding necessary attention and constant nursing care; 6: death.

Figure 3S. The rates of cognitive impairment occurring after 3, 6, and 12‐month post‐stroke.

Figure 4S. The percentage of subjects with/without cognitive domain impairment according to MMSE across the 3 periods of follow‐up.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request due to privacy and ethical restrictions.


Articles from Brain and Behavior are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES