Abstract
Background
In Huafo Mountain, Mouding, Yunnan Province, China, we found black protrusions on the leaf surface of Quercus plants. The collection which we identified as Acrocalymmachuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) is characterised by dome-shaped ascomata, bitunicate asci with pedicel furcate and an ocular chamber and hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate ascospores.
New information
Morphologically, this species is typical with obovoid to ellipsoid, larger ascospores than other known species in Acrocalymma. Phylogenetic analysis also showed that it represents a distinct clade, distant to any other species of Acrocalymma. Therefore, we introduce it as Acrocalymmachuxiongense, a new species of Acrocalymmaceae. This study is adding to the current situation where there are very few species and lack of teleomorph characteristics.
Keywords: morphology, new taxa, pathogen, phylogeny
Introduction
The genus Acrocalymma was introduced by Alcorn and Irwin (1987), to accommodate a root pathogen, Acrocalymmamedicaginis, on Medicago in Australia (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Farr et al. 1998). The anamorph of Acrocalymma has cylindrical and hyaline conidia with a helmet-shaped mucilaginous appendage at each end (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Zhang et al. 2012, Jayasiri et al. 2019). The teleomorph of Acrocalymma has ostiolate ascomata, 8-spored asci and fusiform ascospores, with hyaline sheath (Shoemaker et al. 1991). Zhang et al. (2012) described the second species, A.aquatica Huang Zhang & K.D. Hyde, from submerged wood in Thailand. The third species, A.cycadis Crous & R.G. Shivas, was introduced by Crous et al. (2014) and it differs from A.medicaginis and A.aquatica by its larger conidia. Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) revised the genus Sphaerellopsis and transferred S.filum (CBS 317.76) to Acrocalymma. They also proved that Acrocalymma and Rhizopycnis are congeneric, based on molecular and morphology results, therefore, transferred Rhizopycnisvagum to Acrocalymma. Likewise, Massarinawalkeri is synonymised under Acrocalymma (Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2014). Phylogenetically, the genus Acrocalymma represents an undefined lineage in the Pleosporales, so a new family Acrocalymmaceae was introduced by Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) to accommodate Acrocalymma as the type genus.
At present, Acrocalymma includes 11 species viz. A.ampeli, A.aquaticum, A.bipolare, A.cycadis, A.fici, A.hongheense, A.medicaginis, A.pterocarpi, A.vagum, A.walkeri and A.yuxiense. The major species are reported from terrestrial habitats (Hongsanan et al. 2020a, Hongsanan et al. 2020b, Tennakoon et al. 2021), while A.aquaticum and A.bipolare are freshwater species. A.medicaginis and A.vagum are reported as root pathogens on Medicago and Cucumis, respectively (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Farr et al. 1998).
This study introduces a new species in Acrocalymma collected from Chuxiong, Yunnan, China, based on morphological description and phylogenetic analysis.
Materials and methods
Sample Collection and Isolation
Fresh fungal materials were collected from leaves of Quercus sp. in Huafo Mountain of Mouding County (Yunnan Province, China). The Mountain is located at 24˚09’–25˚40’N, 101˚18’–101˚51’E at an elevation of 1900–2588 m above sea level. The mountain ranges from north to south and is located on the windward side of the southeast airstream, which is warm, humid and rainy and the air humidity is high. This area also has an annual average rainfall of 1029 mm and an annual average temperature of 12.1˚C–13.5˚C (Zhang et al. 2012). The collected specimens were brought to the laboratory in paper envelopes. Samples were examined with a compound light microscope (Zeiss Scope 5). Healthy leaf tissues and the margins of diseased tissues of each leaf spot were cut into 6 mm square sections and surface-sterilised as follows. These sections were initially soaked in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, then 1 minute in sterile distilled water, 2 minutes in 75% ethanol and, finally, 1 minute in sterile distilled water. The sterilised fragments were then plated on potato dextrose agar and incubated at 25°C for 6-8 days or until mycelia growing from the leaf fragments were observed (Yu et al. 2022). The holotype was deposited at the Herbarium of IFRD (International Fungal Research & Development Centre; Institute of Highland Forest Science, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming, China). The ex-type living culture was deposited at the Culture Collection of the Herbarium of IFRD (IFRDCC) (Li et al. 2022). The MycoBank number was registered (Crous et al. 2014).
Morphological Observations
Photographs of the ascomata were taken using a stereomicroscope (Keyence VHX-7000 digital microscope). Observations and photomicrographs were made from material mounted in lactic acid (60%) using a compound light microscope (Zeiss Scope 5) equipped with an AxioCam 208 colour camera with interference contrast optics. All measurements were made with ZEN2 (blue edition) and images used for figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop version 2022 software.
DNA Extraction, PCR Amplififications and Sequencing
Fungal isolates were grown on PDA for 20 days at 25°C in the dark. DNA was extracted from the pure culture with a Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (BioFlux, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Hangzhou, P.R. China). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), along with the 5.8S ribosomal rDNA, was amplified with the primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The partial large subunit (LSU) ribosomal rDNA was amplified with the primer pair LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990, Rehner and Samuels 1994). The amplification reactions were carried out with the following protocol: 20 μl reaction volume containing 1 µl of DNA template, 2 µl of each forward and reverse primers, 17 µl of GoldenStar T6 Super PCR Mix (1.1×). The PCR conditions were: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 50 s at 55°C (ITS) and 55°C (LSU) and 90 s at 72°C and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C (Wanasinghe et al. 2020). PCR amplification products were assayed via electrophoresis in 1% agarose. The PCR products were sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. The nucleotide sequence data acquired was deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Table 1.
Taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis of Acrocalymmaceae and their corresponding GenBank numbers. The newly generated sequences are indicated in bold. NA: Sequence data not available in GenBank. T = ex-type strain.
| Species | Strain no. | GenBank accession no. | Reference | |
| ITS | LSU | |||
| Acrocalymmaampeli | MFLU 19-2734 | MW063150 | MW063211 | Tennakoon et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmaampeli | NCYU19-0008 | MW063151 | MW063212 | Tennakoon et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmaaquaticum | MFLUCC 11-0208 T | JX276951 | JX276952 | Zhang et al. (2012) |
| Acrocalymmabipolare | MD1321 T | NA | MN913734 | Dong et al. (2020) |
| Acrocalymmacycadis | CBS 137972 T | KJ869124 | KJ869181 | Crous et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmachuxiongense | IFRDCC3104 | ON595715 | ON596248 | This study |
| Acrocalymmafici | CBS 317.76 T | KP170619 | KP170712 | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmahongheense | HKAS 111909 T | MW424761 | MW424775 | Mortimer et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmamedicaginis | CPC 24340 T | KP170620 | KP170713 | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmamedicaginis | MFLUCC 17-1423 | MT214338 | MT214432 | Mapook et al. (2020) |
| Acrocalymmapterocarpi | MFLUCC 17-0926 T | MK347732 | MK347949 | Jayasiri et al. (2019) |
| Acrocalymmapterocarpi | NC 13-171 | LC517880 | LC517881 | Unpublished |
| Acrocalymmavagum | CPC 24226 | KP170636 | NA | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmavagum | CPC 24225 | KP170635 | NA | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmawalkeri | CBS 257.93 | MH862398 | FJ795454 | [1] Zhang et al. (2009) [2] Vu et al. (2019) |
| Acrocalymmayuxiense | HKAS 111910 T | NA | MW424778 | Mortimer et al. (2021) |
Phylogenetic Analyses
Sequences of each gene generated from forward and reverse primers were assembled with BioEdit version 7.2.5 (Hall 1999) to obtain consensus sequences. Related sequences were selected and downloaded from GenBank. Each gene dataset was aligned separately by MAFFT version 7.187 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and manually aligned where necessary. Phylogenetic trees, based on LSU and ITS individual datasets as well as a concatenated dataset (LSU and ITS), were analysed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference at the CIPRES web portal (Miller et al. 2010). The ML analysis was carried out using the RAxML‐HPC BlackBox tool (Stamatakis 2014). One thousand non-parametric bootstrap iterations were used with a general time reversible (GTR) model and a discrete gamma distribution, plus estimating the proportion of invariable sites (Stamatakis et al. 2008). Bayesian Inference was undertaken using the MrBayes on XSEDE tool (Ronquist et al. 2012), based on the nucleotide substitution models determined by the Bayesian information criterion using the jModelTest2 on XSEDE tool (Darriba et al. 2012) at the CIPRES web portal. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm of four chains started from a random tree topology with two parallel runs. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations and the run was stopped automatically when the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was summarised after discarding the first 25% of samples. The resulting trees were visualised in FigTree version 1.4.3.
Taxon treatments
Acrocalymma chuxiongense
Y. W. Liu & X. Y. Zeng sp. nov.
C9A75F0A-E0D9-56CA-94F3-B5F6D1C6A8B0
844399
Materials
Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: IFRD9449; recordedBy: Liu Yu-Wei; occurrenceID: living culture IFRDCC3104; Taxon: scientificName: Acrocalymmachuxiongense; kingdom: Fungi; class: Dothideomycetes; order: Pleosporales; family: Acrocalymmaceae; genus: Acrocalymma; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Yunnan; county: Mouding; locality: Huafo Mountain; locationRemarks: Yunnan, Mouding, Huafo Mountain, 2021.10.7, Liu Yu wei; verbatimCoordinates: 25°19'8"N 101°25'7"E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yu-Wei Liu; dateIdentified: 2022; Record Level: language: en
Description
Habitat terrestrial, epiphytic with dome-shaped black protrusions on living leaves of Quercus sp. Teleomorph: Ascomata 50–80 µm high, 270–320 µm in diam. (average = 70 × 280 µm, n = 10), dark brown, gregarious, erumpent to nearly superficial, visible as numerous, raised, dome-shaped areas on host surface, globose, uni-loculate, glabrous with rough walls, coriaceous. Peridium 10–30 µm wide, of unequal thickness, composed of dark brown to black cells, arranged in textura angularis. Asci 130–170 × 40–45 µm, (average = 150 × 40 µm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, pedicel furcate, apically rounded with an ocular chamber. Ascospores 35–45 × 18–20 µm, (average = 40 × 20 µm, n = 40), overlapping, bi-seriate, hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, with conically rounded ends, upper cell larger than lower cell, smooth-walled (Fig. 2). Anamorph: Undetermined.
Figure 2.
Acrocalymmachuxiongense (IFRD9449). a–d Ascomata on living leaves of Quercus sp.; e Vertical sections through a ascoma; f–h Asci; i Ocular chamber; j Pedicel; k–n Ascospores. Scale bars: b = 2000 µm, c = 1000 µm, d = 500 µm, e–h = 50 µm, i–n = 25 µm.
Culture Characteristics: Colonies grew on PDA at 250C in the dark and reached 4 cm in diam., within 14 days, dense, circular, slightly raised in the middle, entire margin off-white to grey in surface view.
Etymology
The specific epithet reflects Chuxiong, from where the specimen was collected.
Notes
The teleomorph of Acrocalymmachuxiongense was similar to A.pterocarpi, but can be distinguished by the shape and size of ascospores. Our new collection has a larger ascospore (35–45 × 18–20 µm) than Acrocalymmapterocarpi (17–21 × 3–5 µm) (Jayasiri et al. 2019). The shape of ascospores of the new collection is obovoid to ellipsoid, while Acrocalymmapterocarpi has fusiform ascospores. Additionally, the upper cells of our new collection’s ascospores are larger than the lower cells, while the upper and lower cells of A.pterocarpi are similar in size. Phylogenetic analysis, based on ITS and LSU sequence data, showed that Acrocalymmachuxiongense forms a distinct lineage sister to A.pterocarpi (Fig. 1). The GenBank accession number for TEF of our new isolate is ON604684. A comparison of the ITS and LSU nucleotides of A.chuxiongense and A.medicaginis (the type) reveals 10 (2%) and 3 (1%) nucleotide differences. Comparing the ITS and LSU nucleotides of A.chuxiongense and A.pterocarpi, there are 11 (3%) and 5 (1%) nucleotide differences, respectively.
Figure 1.
Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenetic tree, based on a combined dataset of partial LSU and ITS sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.9 are shown as ML/BI above the nodes. The new isolates are in red. The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The tree was rooted with Acrocalymmaaquaticum (MFLUCC 11-0208).
Analysis
Phylogenetic Analyses
The alignment comprised 16 strains with 1322 total characters including gaps. The best nucleotide substitution model for LSU and ITS is K80+I and TIM2ef+G, respectively. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded a best scoring tree with a final ML optimisation likelihood value of -2834.090234. Estimated base frequencies are as follows: A = 0.240753, C = 0.220941, G = 0.279900, T = 0.258406; substitution rates AC = 3.347637, AG = 2.128594, AT = 3.236536, CG = 0.316367, CT = 10.359429, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.752805; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.633740. The Bayesian analysis ran (92000) generations before the average standard deviation for split frequencies reached (0.008966). The analysis generated (1842) trees, from which 1382 were sampled after 46 of the trees were discarded as burn-in. Our new collection forms a distinct clade, distant to any other species in Acrocalymma (Fig. 1).
Discussion
In this study, we introduced a new species, Acrocalymmachuxiongense, from living leaves of Quercus, based on phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparisons.
Acrocalymma species are able to produce pycnidia in culture easily (Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2014). It can be seen from Table 2 and Table 3 that, amongst the 11 species of Acrocalymma, only A.pterocarpi, A.hongheense and A.walkeri have teleomorph characteristics and the others have only anamorph characteristics. However, we failed to obtain the anamorph of Acrocalymmachuxiongense under similar conditions. In addition, the ostiole, hamathecium and sheath were not observed in our collection. At the same time, the species of Acrocalymma are mainly distinguished by the size of conidia. It can be seen from Table 2 that the ascospores of our new isolate are the largest compared with A.pterocarpi, A.hongheense and A.walkeri. The ascospores of our new isolate are obovoid to ellipsoid and the other three are fusiform.
Table 2.
Comparison of teleomorph of Acrocalymma sp.
| Species | Ascomata | Asci | Ascospores | Locality | Reference |
| Acrocalymmachuxiongense | 50–80 µm high, 270–320 µm in diam., gregarious, dark brown. | 130–170 × 40–45 µm | 35–45 × 18–20 µm, hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate, upper cell larger than lower cell. | Yunnan | This study |
| Acrocalymmahongheense | 180–220 µm high, 160–200 µm diam., gregarious, dark brown, ostiolate. | 100–140 × 15–22 µm | 25–35 × 9.5–11 µm, hyaline, 1-septate, fusiform, with a sheath, the expansion near the septate. | Yunnan | Mortimer et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmapterocarpi | 140–150 µm high, 130–145 µm diam., scattered, black, without ostiole. | 65–75 × 7–12 µm | 17–21 × 3–5 µm, hyaline, fusiform, 1-3 septate, guttulate, sheath present in immature stage. | Thailand | Jayasiri et al. (2019) |
| Acrocalymmawalkeri | 160–180(225) µm wide, 160–180(225) µm high, covered with light grey hairs. | 50–80 × 8–11µm | 19–22 × 4.5–5.5 µm, pale reddish-brown, 3-septate, fusiform, with a sheath. | Australia | Shoemaker et al. (1991) |
Table 3.
Comparison of anamorph of Acrocalymma sp.
| Species | Conidia | Locality | Reference | |||
| Size | Color | Shape | Apex and base | |||
| Acrocalymmahongheense | 20–35 × 7–9 µm | hyaline | subcylindrical | obtusely rounded and with mucoid ooze at the apex, protuberant and with a rounded hilum at base. | Yunnan | Mortimer et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmayuxiense | 15–21 × 4–5 µm | hyaline | subcylindrical | obtusely rounded at apex and base, guttulate. | Yunnan | Mortimer et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmafici | (12–)13–15(–16) × 2.5(–3) µm | hyaline | cylindrical | cylindrical with subobtuse apex, acutely tapered at base to a small flattened central scar, with flaring mucoid apical appendage, visible in water mounts. | India | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmamedicaginis | (11–)13–15(–16) × (3.5–)4 µm | hyaline | subcylindrical | apex obtuse, tapering at base to truncate hilum, ends with mucoid caps. | Australia | Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) |
| Acrocalymmavagum | (16–)18–25(–28)×(4.0–)4.5–6.0(–6.9) µm | hyaline to brown | cylindrical to fusiform | apex rounded, base obtuse or tapering abruptly to a truncate base, guttulate. | Spain, USA | Farr et al. (1998) |
| Acrocalymmaampeli | 17–19 × 5.5–6.5 µm | hyaline | cylindrical to fusoid | apex obtuse, unicellular, with flaring mucoid apical appendage at lower end, visible in water mounts. | Taiwan | Tennakoon et al. (2021) |
| Acrocalymmaaquatica | 12–17 × 3–4 µm | hyaline | cylindrical to fusoid | truncate at the base and becoming a little narrower at apex with a mucilaginous helmet-shaped appendage. | Thailand | Zhang et al. (2012) |
| Acrocalymmabipolare | 9–12 × 3–5 µm | hyaline | cylindrical to fusiform | with rounded apex and slightly narrow, truncate base, with mucoid polar appendages that are filled with oil droplets, appendages elongate in water to form filaments. | Egypt | Dong et al. (2020) |
| Acrocalymmacycadis | (25–)28–32(–35) × (4–)5 µm | hyaline | subcylindrical | apex obtusely rounded, hilum truncate, guttulate. | Australia | Crous et al. (2014) |
All species of Acrocalymma have sequence data in GenBank, but most have only ITS and LSU sequences and lack SSU and TEF sequences. On the other hand, sequence data of TEF were not used in the phylogenetic analyses due to lack of relevant data. Enriching the sequence data will provide more comprehensive phylogenetic relationships of the genus.
So far, only 11 species of Acrocalymma have been reported, indicating that Acrocalymma has great research potential. The future investigations of Acrocalymma will reveal more undiscovered species.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Natural Science Special Research Fund of Guizhou University, Special Post 2021(25).
References
- Alcorn J L, Irwin J A G. Acrocalymmamedicaginis gen. et sp. nov. causing root and crown rot of Medicagosativa in Australia. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 1987;88(2):163–167. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80211-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Crous P W, Shivas R G, Quaedvlieg W, Van der Bank M, Zhang Y, Summerell B A, Guarro J, Wingfield M J, Wood A R, Alfenas A C, Braun U, Cano-Lira J F, García D, Marin-Felix Y, Alvarado P, Andrade J P, Armengol J, Assefa A, den Breeÿen A, Camele I, Cheewangkoon R, De Souza J T, Duong T A, Esteve-Raventós F, Fournier J, Frisullo S, García-Jiménez J, Gardiennet A, Gené J, Hernández-Restrepo M, Hirooka Y, Hospenthal D R, King A, Lechat C, Lombard L, Mang S M, Marbach P A S, Marincowitz S, Marin-Felix Y, Montaño-Mata N J, Moreno G, Perez C A, Pérez Sierra A M, Robertson J L, Roux J, Rubio E, Schumacher R K, Stchigel A M, Sutton D A, Tan Y P, Thompson E H, Vanderlinde E, Walker A K, Walker D M, Wickes B L, Wong P T W, Groenewald J Z. Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280. Persoonia. 2014;32:184–306. doi: 10.3767/003158514X682395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darriba D, Taboada G L, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods. 2012;9(8):772–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong W, Wang B, Hyde K D, McKenzie E H C, Raja H A, Tanaka K, Abdel-Wahab M A, Abdel-Aziz F A, Doilom M, Phookamsak R, Hongsanan S, Wanasinghe D N, Yu X D, Wang G N, Yang H, Yang J, Thambugala K M, Tian Q, Luo Z L, Yang J B, Miller A N, Fournier J, Boonmee S, Hu D M, Nalumpang S, Zhang H. Freshwater Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity. 2020;105(1):319–575. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00463-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Farr D F, Miller M E, Bruton B D. Rhizopycnisvagum gen. et sp. nov., a new coelomycetous fungus from roots of melons and sugarcane. Mycologia. 1998;90(2):290–296. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1998.12026909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hall T A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999;41(41):95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Hongsanan S, Hyde K D, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe D N, McKenzie E H C, Sarma V V, Lücking R, Boonmee S, Bhat J D, Liu N G, Tennakoon D S, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Jiang S H, Jones G E B, Phillips A J L, Manawasinghe I S, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri S C, Sandamali D, Jayawardena R S, Wijayawardene N N, Ekanayaka A H, Jeewon R, Lu Y Z, Phukhamsakda C, Dissanayake A J, Zeng X Y, Luo Z L, Tian Q, Thambugala K M, Dai D, Samarakoon M C, Chethana K W T, Ertz D, Doilom M, Liu J K, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe S N, Niranjan M, Zhang S N, Ariyawansa H A, Jiang H B, Zhang J F, Norphanphoun C, De Silva N I, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra J D P, Miranda-González R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Sérusiaux E, Abeywickrama P D, Bao D F, Devadatha B, Wu H X, Moon K H, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Bhunjun C S, Chomnunti P, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne M C, Yang J, Rathnayaka A R, Xu J C, Zheng J, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity. 2020;105:17–318. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00462-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hongsanan S, Hyde K D, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe D N, McKenzie E H C, Sarma V V, Boonmee S, Lücking R, Bhat D J, Liu N G, Tennakoon D S, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Jiang S H, Jones E B G, Phillips A J L, Manawasinghe I S, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri S C, Sandamali D S, Jayawardena R S, Wijayawardene N N, Ekanayaka A H, Jeewon R, Lu Y Z, Dissanayake A J, Zeng X Y, Luo Z L, Tian Q, Phukhamsakda C, Thambugala K M, Dai D Q, Chethana K W T, Samarakoon M C, Ertz D, Bao D F, Doilom M, Liu J K, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe S N, Konta S, Niranjan M, Zhang S N, Ariyawansa H A, Jiang H B, Zhang J F, Norphanphoun C, De Silva N I, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra J D P, Miranda-González R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Sérusiaux E, Aluthmuhandiram J V S, Abeywickrama P D, Devadatha B, Wu H X, Moon K H, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Chomnunti P, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne M C, Yang J, Rathnayaka A R, Bhunjun C S, Xu J C, Zheng J S, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere. 2020;11(1):1553–2107. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jayasiri S C, Hyde K D, Jones E B G, Mckenzie E, Jeewon R, Phillips A J L, Bhat D J, Wanasinghe D N, Liu J K, Lu Y Z, Kang J C, Xu J, Karunarathna S C. Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere. 2019;10(1):1–186. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Standley D M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30(4):772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J C, Wu H X, Li Y, Li X H, Song J Y, Suwannarach N, Wijayawardene N N. Taxonomy, phylogenetic and ancestral area reconstruction in Phyllachora, with four novel species from Northwestern China. Journal of Fungi. 2022;8(5):520. doi: 10.3390/jof8050520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mapook A, Hyde K D, Mckenzie E H C, Jones E B G, Bhat D J, Jeewon R, Stadler M, Samarakoon M C, Malaithong M, Tanunchai B, Buscot F, Wubet T, Purahong W. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaenaodorata (Siam weed) Fungal Diversity. 2020;101:1–175. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Miller M A, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees; Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010; New Orleans. 14 November, 2010; IEEE; 2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mortimer P E, Jeewon R, Xu J C, Lumyong S, Wanasinghe D N. Morpho-phylo taxonomy of novel dothideomycetousfungi associated with dead woody twigs in Yunnan Province, China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.654683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehner S A, Samuels G J. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research. 1994;98(6):625–634. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark P V D, Ayres D L, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M A, Huelsenbeck J P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;61(3):539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoemaker R A, Babcock C E, Irwin J A G. Massarinawalkeri n. sp., the teleomorph of Acrocalymmamedicaginis from Medicagosativa contrasted with Leptosphaeriapratensis, L.weimeri n. sp., and L.viridella. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/b91-077 %X The teleomorph of Acrocalymma medicaginis Alcorn & Irwin was formed in pure culture. It is described as a new species, Massarina walkeri. It is contrasted with three somewhat similar species that parasitize legumes: Leptosphaeria pratensis Saccardo & Briard in Briard, Leptosphaeria weimeri n.sp. (anamorph Stagonospora meliloti (Lasch) Petrak), and L. viridella (Peck) Saccardo. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1991;69(3):569–573. doi: 10.1139/b91-077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology. 2008;57(5):758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tennakoon D S, Kuo C H, Maharachchikumbura S S N, Thambugala K M, Gentekaki E, Phillips A J L, Bhat D J, Wanasinghe D N, De Silva N I, Promputtha I, Hyde K D. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtisformosana, Ficusampelas, F.septica, Macarangatanarius and Morusaustralis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi. Fungal Diversity. 2021;108(1):1–215. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00474-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trakunyingcharoen T, Lombard L, Groenewald J Z, Cheewangkoon R, Toanun C, Alfenas A C, Crous P W. Mycoparasitic species of Sphaerellopsis, and allied lichenicolous and other genera. IMA Fungus. 2014;5(2):391–414. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilgalys R, Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990;172(8):4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vu D, Groenewald M, De Vries M, Gehrmann T, Stielow B, Eberhardt U, Al-Hatmi A, Groenewald J Z, Cardinali G, Houbraken J, Boekhout T, Crous P W, Robert V, Verkley G J M. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdomfungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology. 2019;92:135–154. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanasinghe D N, Wijayawardene N N, Xu J, Cheewangkoon R, Mortimer P E. Taxonomic novelties in Magnolia-associated pleosporaleanfungi in the Kunming Botanical Gardens (Yunnan, China) PLОS One. 2020;15(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White T J, Bruns T D, Lee S B, Taylor J W. In: PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Innis M A, Gelfand D H, Sninsky J J, White T J, editors. Vol. 18. Academic Press; San Diego: 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.315-322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Z, Jiang X, Zheng H, Zhang H, Qiao M. Fourteen new species of foliar Colletotrichum associated with the invasive plant Ageratinaadenophora and surrounding crops. Journal of Fungi. 2022;8(2):185. doi: 10.3390/jof8020185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Hyde K D, Mckenzie E H C, Bahkali A H, Zhou D. Sequence data reveals phylogenetic affinities of Acrocalymmaaquatica sp. nov., Aquasubmersamircensis gen. et sp. nov. and Clohesyomycesaquaticus (freshwater coelomycetes) Cryptogamie Mycologie. 2012;33(3):333–346. doi: 10.7872/crym.v33.iss3.2012.333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Wang H K, Fournier J, Crous P W, Jeewon R, Pointing S B, Hyde K D. Towards a phylogenetic clarification of Lophiostoma/Massarina and morphologically similar genera in the Pleosporales. Fungal Diversity. 2009;38:225–251. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Xu Y Z, Zheng Z X, Liu X K, Wang L, Ou X K. Analyses of diversity and distribution characteristics of macro-fungi in Huafo Mountain Nature Reserve of Yunnan Province. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment. 2012;21(1):111–117. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


