Abstract
In this study the taxonomy of the Pheidolepulchella species group is updated for the Afrotropical region and the new species P.klamansp. nov. described. It is integrated into the existing taxonomic system by an updated identification key for the whole group and an update of the known distribution ranges of its members. High quality focus stacking images are provided, with X–ray micro–CT scanned digital 3D representations, of major and minor worker type specimens.
Keywords: Ants, distribution range, identification keys, new species, taxonomy, Taï National Park, X–ray micro–CT, 3D digitalisation
Introduction
The ant genus Pheidole has recently been the focus of extensive taxonomic attention in the Malagasy region. Recent work mainly by Salata and Fisher (2020a, b, 2021) improved the taxonomy of the genus, creating eleven new species groups and adding dozens of new species. Much less attention has been paid to the massive undescribed Pheidole fauna in the Afrotropical region, remaining poorly known with dozens of species waiting to be described. The only modern attempt to organise the genus in the Afrotropics defined six species groups and assigned 67 valid species and subspecies to these groups based on qualitative morphology of the worker caste (Fischer et al. 2012). Fischer et al. (2012) also revised the P.pulchella group containing eleven species, of which seven were newly described. However, despite this work, most of the reorganisation of Afrotropical Pheidole taxonomy is still ongoing, since most valid species and many more undescribed ones need to be assigned to groups, and some new groups will need to be defined. More additions to Pheidole taxonomy are necessary to structure and catalogue their diversity in Africa to create a better base of understanding for the global radiations of Pheidole ants.
Taï National Park (TNP) is the last remaining major intact block of primary forest in West Africa. It was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1982 due to exceptional richness in fauna and flora. Based on several criteria including species diversity, endemism, presence of rare species and/or endangered and critical habitats, the TNP is considered a priority for the conservation of mammals, birds, amphibians, and invertebrates in West Africa (World Heritage 2022). A recent ant inventory by two of the authors (KG, LMK) in the Taï National Park at Ivory Coast yielded approximately 200 ant species and morphospecies (unpublished data), including undescribed taxa for various genera, including Bothroponera, Carebara, Monomorium, and Pristomyrmex, among others.
One of these new species is hereby described as Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. which we place within the P.pulchella group sensu Fischer et al. (2012). Since more material of the group has been sampled since Fischer et al. (2012), we take the occasion to update the illustrated identification key to incorporate the new species, as well as to provide distribution maps with updated distribution ranges for all species. The new species is described based on qualitative morphology of the worker caste, which we illustrate with high quality coloured focus stacking images and 3D models based on x-ray microtomography.
Materials and methods
Terminology follows Bolton (1994). Measurements follow Fischer et al. (2012).
Specimens were examined under a Leica MZ16A stereo microscope and measured at × 100. All images have been modified from originals and edited using GIMP (to compose the figures), IMAGEJ (to scale and add scale bars), and Polarr Photo Editor freeware (to sharpen and improve exposure and contrast). All micro-CT scans were performed at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Japan, using a Zeiss Xradia 510 Versa 3D X-ray microscope operated with the Zeiss Scout-and-Scan Control System software (v. 11.1.6411.17883) and saved in DICOM format. 3D reconstructions of the resulting scan projection data were done with the Zeiss Scout-and-Scan Control System Reconstructor (v. 11.1.6411.17883) and saved in DICOM file format. Details on scanning parameters can be found in Table 5. Postprocessing of DICOM raw data was performed with Amira software (version 6.3). Virtual examinations of 3D surface models were performed by using the ‘volren’ function. The desired volume renderings were generated by adjusting colour space range to a minimum so that the exterior surface of specimens remained visible at the highest available quality. The 3D models were rotated and manipulated to allow a complete virtual examination of the scanned specimens in Amira, and in addition, exported in PLY format to be uploaded to the online 3D model platform Sketchfab (https://sketchfab.com).
Table 5.
Subcaste | Specimen ID | Magnification | Voxel size (μm) | Exposure (s) | Power (W) | Voltage (kV) | Current (uA) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
major | CASENT0764691 | 4 × | 5,7854 | 1,2 | 5,92 | 70 | 85 |
minor | CASENT0745509 | 4 × | 4,6952 | 0,6 | 4,01 | 50 | 80 |
minor | CASENT0764692 | 4 × | 5,3599 | 0,6 | 6,02 | 70 | 85 |
Images of shaded surface display volume renderings were made with the ‘snapshot’ function at the highest achievable resolution (usually at around 1900 × 893 pixels). Surface rendering rotational videos were created in Blender (v. 2.91, Blender Foundation, https://www.blender.org/). For optimal display, surface models exported from Amira were shaded ‘smooth’, scaled to ~ 1 m, illuminated with HDRi lighting, and rotated around their own z-axis based on specimens’ lateral views.
All specimens used in this study have been databased, and the data are freely accessible on AntWeb (2022). Each specimen can be traced by a unique specimen identifier attached to its pin. The Cybertype dataset provided in this study consist of the full micro-CT original volumetric datasets (in DICOM format), 3D surface models (in PLY formats), 3D rotation video files (in MKV format), all stacked digital colour images, and all image plates including all important images of 3D models for each species. All data have been archived and are freely available from the Dryad Digital Repository. In addition to the cybertype data on Dryad, we also provide freely accessible 3D surface models of the holotype and two paratypes of the new species on Sketchfab.
Collection references
NHMUKNatural History Museum, London, UK;
CASCCalifornia Academy of Sciences Collection, California, USA;
FHGC Francisco Hita–Garcia Collection, Okinawa, Japan;
KGAC Kiko Gómez Abal Collection. Barcelona, Spain;
YKPC Yeo Kolo Collection, Lamto Station, Ivory Coast;
RBINSRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium.
Measurements and indices
Measurements and indices follow Fischer et al. (2012). All linear measurements are in millimetres (mm).
HL Head length. Maximum distance from the mid–point of the anterior clypeal margin to the mid–point of the posterior margin of the head, measured in full–face view; in majors from midpoint of tangent between anteriormost position of clypeus to midpoint of tangent between posteriormost projection of the vertex.
HW Head width. Measured at the widest point of the head, in full–face view behind eye–level.
SL Scape length. Maximum scape length, excluding basal condyle and neck.
EL Eye length. Maximum diameter of compound eye measured in oblique lateral view.
MF Metafemur length. Measured from the junction with the trochanter to the junction with the tibia.
MDL Mandible length. Maximum length, measured in oblique frontolateral view, from apex to lateral base.
PW Pronotal width. Maximum width of pronotum measured in dorsal view.
WL Weber’s length. Diagonal length of mesosoma in lateral view from the anterior point of the pronotal slope and excluding the neck, to the posteroventral margin of the propodeum.
PSL Propodeal spine length. In dorsocaudal view, with the apex of the measured spine, its base, and the centre of the propodeal concavity between the spines in focus: measurement is taken from apex to base along the one axis of a dual–axis micrometre, which is aligned along the length of the spine, crossing the second axis at the base of the measured spine, and the latter connecting the base with the centre of the propodeal concavity.
PTL Petiole length. Maximum diagonal length of petiole, measured in lateral view, from most anteroventral point of the peduncle to most posterodorsal point at the junction to first helcial tergite.
PTH Petiolar node height. Maximum height of petiolar node measured in lateral view from the highest (median) point of the node, orthogonally, to the ventral outline of the node.
PTW Petiolar node width. Maximum petiolar node width, measured in dorsal view.
PPL Postpetiole length. Maximum length of postpetiole, measured in lateral view, from anterior beginning of the dorsal slope to the posterior juncture of postpetiole and second helcial tergite.
PPH Postpetiole height. Maximum height of postpetiole, measured in lateral view, from the highest (median) point of the node to the lowest point of the ventral process, often in an oblique line.
PPW Postpetiole width. Maximum width of postpetiole, measured in dorsal view
CICephalic index. HW / HL * 100
EI Eye index. EL / HW * 100
SI Scape index. SL / HW *100
MDI Mandible index. MDL / HW * 100
PSLI Propodeal spine index. PSL / HW * 100
PWI Pronotal width index. PW / HW * 100
FI Metafemur index. MFL / HW * 100.
PeI Petiole index. PTW / PW * 100
PpI Postpetiole index. PPW / PW * 100
PpWI Postpetiole width index. PPW / PTW * 100
PpLI Postpetiole length index. PTL / PPL * 100
Results
Pheidolepulchella species group
Fischer et al. (2012) provide a diagnosis for the group, which remains unchanged with the minor correction of replacing the erroneous P.diomandei (nom. nud.) with P.heliosa. A synoptic list of the P.pulchella group is provided below.
Pheidolebatrachorum Wheeler, 1922
Pheidolechristinae Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidoledarwini Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidoledea Santschi, 1921
Pheidoleglabrella Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidoleheliosa Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidoleklaman sp. nov.
Pheidolenimba Bernard, 1953
Pheidolepulchella Santschi, 1910
= Pheidoleniapuana Wheeler, 1922
= Pheidolepulchellavar.achantella Santschi, 1939
Pheidolerebeccae Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidolesemidea Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
Pheidolesetosa Fischer, Hita Garcia & Peters, 2011
. Pheidole klaman sp. nov.
364634B6-7AAA-5E1E-BB3A-5EC87B5DB692
http://zoobank.org/78E38050-CC84-4A26-B882-CEB9FD9B3521
Material examined.
Major worker: Figs 1A–D, 2A–G, 6A, B, Table 1.
Table 1.
Yellow species (major workers) | |||
---|---|---|---|
P.heliosa (n = 1) | P.klaman (n = 2) | P.pulchella (n = 12) | |
HL | 2.45 | 1.78–1.98 (1.88) | 1.94–2.23 (2.14) |
HW | 2.35 | 1.65–1.75 (1.7) | 2.0–2.28 (2.16) |
MDL | 1.30 | 0.85–0.89 (0.87) | 0.90–1.11 (1.02) |
EL | 0.27 | 0.22–0.23 (0.22) | 0.23–0.26 (0.24) |
SL | 1.24 | 1.03–1.08 (1.06) | 1.06–1.17 (1.13) |
PW | 1.07 | 0.74–0.78 (0.76) | 0.81–1.03 (0.95) |
PSL | 0.27 | 0.29–0.31 (0.3) | 0.24–0.38 (0.32) |
PtL | 0.61 | 0.45–0.47 (0.46) | 0.53–0.64 (0.59) |
PtH | 0.42 | 0.29–0.31 (0.30) | 0.33–0.39 (0.36) |
PtW | 0.31 | 0.21–0.22 (0.21) | 0.20–0.27 (0.24) |
PPtL | 0.42 | 0.36–0.38 (0.37) | 0.33–0.41 (0.38) |
PPtH | 0.54 | 0.4–0.41 (0.41) | 0.37–0.5 (0.44) |
PPtW | 0.70 | 0.43–0.48 (0.46) | 0.42–0.61 (0.52) |
WL | 2.10 | 1.47–1.56 (1.51) | 1.40–1.74 (1.64) |
MFL | 1.98 | 1.44–1.51 (1.47) | 1.67–1.84 (1.74) |
CI | 95 | 88–93 (90) | 98–104 (101) |
EI | 11 | 12–14 (13) | 11–13 (11) |
SI | 52 | 62–62 (62) | 51–56 (53) |
MDI | 55 | 51–51 (51) | 43–50 (47) |
PSLI | 11 | 17–18 (17) | 11–18 (11) |
PWI | 45 | 45–45 (45) | 39–47 (39) |
FI | 84 | 86–87 (87) | 76–90 (81) |
Pel | 28 | 28–28 (28) | 22–28 (25) |
Ppl | 65 | 58–62 (60) | 47–61 (55) |
PpWI | 225 | 210–224 (217) | 204–235 (220) |
PpLI | 145 | 124–126 (125) | 139–166 (157) |
Minor worker: Figs 3A–D, 4A–G, 5A–G, 7A, B, Table 2.
Table 2.
Yellow species (minor workers) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
P.christinae (n = 20) | P.heliosa (n = 8) | P.klaman (n = 7) | P.pulchella (n = 12) | |
HL | 0.88–1.02 (0.98) | 1.06–1.09 (1.08) | 0.77–0.90 (0.81) | 0.86–0.93 (0.89) |
HW | 0.73–0.83 (0.80) | 0.78–0.82 (0.80) | 0.64–0.71 (0.66) | 0.73–0.80 (0.77) |
MDL | 0.58–0.68 (0.64) | 0.64–0.80 (0.69) | 0.55–0.62 (0.57) | 0.58–0.64 (0.61) |
EL | 0.16–0.18 (0.17) | 0.17–0.20 (0.18) | 0.16–0.19 (0.18) | 0.17–0.19 (0.18) |
SL | 1.10–1.35 (1.25) | 1.30–1.43 (1.36) | 1.17–1.32 (1.21) | 1.13–1.24 (1.18) |
PW | 0.49–0.57 (0.54) | 0.57–0.61 (0.60) | 0.44–0.51 (0.46) | 0.48–0.54 (0.50) |
PSL | 0.26–0.34 (0.30) | 0.29–0.40 (0.32) | 0.02–0.23 (0.20) | 0.22–0.26 (0.24) |
PtL | 0.33–0.41 (0.38) | 0.37–0.42 (0.39) | 0.24–0.27 (0.26) | 0.29–0.39 (0.34) |
PtH | 0.17–0.21 (0.19) | 0.19–0.21 (0.20) | 0.18–0.20 (0.19) | 0.17–0.21 (0.19) |
PtW | 0.12–0.13 (0.13) | 0.12–0.13 (0.13) | 0.11–0.14 (0.12) | 0.11–0.12 (0.12) |
PPtL | 0.23–0.28 (0.26) | 0.27–0.28 (0.28) | 0.23–0.28 (0.26) | 0.21–0.26 (0.24) |
PPtH | 0.22–0.27 (0.25) | 0.23–0.28 (0.25) | 0.22–0.25 (0.23) | 0.21–0.24 (0.22) |
PPtW | 0.22–0.27 (0.25) | 0.26–0.30 (0.27) | 0.24–0.27 (0.24) | 0.22–0.27 (0.23) |
WL | 1.14–1.40 (1.30) | 1.48–1.54 (1.51) | 1.18–1.36 (1.23) | 1.16–1.30 (1.25) |
MFL | 1.33–1.63 (1.49) | 1.60–1.74 (1.68) | 1.34–1.53 (1.40) | 1.37–1.51 (1.43) |
CI | 79–84 (82) | 73–75 (74) | 79–83 (81) | 84–90 (86) |
EI | 20–22 (21) | 21–24 (22) | 26–27 (27) | 21–25 (23) |
SI | 144–165 (156) | 163–174 (170) | 182–189 (185) | 146–159 (154) |
MDI | 77–84 (80) | 79–99 (86) | 85–87 (86) | 75–82 (79) |
PSLI | 33–43 (33) | 37–49 (37) | 30–34 (30) | 29–36 (29) |
PWI | 64–69 (64) | 73–75 (73) | 68–72 (68) | 64–68 (64) |
FI | 175–197 (187) | 205–213 (210) | 208–220 (213) | 179–194 (186) |
Pel | 21–25 (24) | 20–23 (21) | 24–29 (27) | 22–24 (23) |
Ppl | 43–50 (47) | 44–49 (46) | 50–55 (53) | 43–50 (46) |
PpWI | 183–217 (199) | 208–233 (219) | 186–209 (197) | 183–225 (195) |
PpLI | 137–171 (149) | 132–150 (139) | 92–105 (100) | 115–177 (146) |
Holotype major worker: Ivory Coast: Montagnes District, Site 05 (Taï N. P.) 200m, 5.8438, –7.3484, 11/11/2019. Hand collected (Gómez, K. & Kouakou, L.). Primary forest, ex. rotten log [CASENT0764691] HNMUK.
Paratype workers: same series, (1 major worker) [KGCOL00585] KGAC; (1 minor worker) [CASENT0745509] FHGC; (1 minor worker) [CASENT0764692] KGAC, (1 minor worker) [KGCOL00587] AFRC; (1 minor worker) [KGCOL00588] NHMUK; (1 minor worker) [KGCOL00590] YKPC; (3 minor workers, in ethanol) [KG04152] KGAC.
Cybertype: we provide virtual 3D data of the major worker holotype (CASENT0764691) and two minor worker paratypes (CASENT0764692 & CASENT0745509) as cybertype dataset, which contains the following data: volumetric raw data (in DICOM format), 3D rotation videos (in mkv format), 3D surfaces (in PLY format), still images of surface volume rendering, and of stacked digital colour images illustrating head in full-face view, profile and dorsal view of the body. The datasets are deposited on Dryad (doi: 10.5061/dryad.mpg4f4r1k) and can be freely accessed as virtual representations of the types. In addition, we also provide freely accessible 3D surface models at Sketchfab (holotype: https://skfb.ly/o68Qw; paratypes: https://skfb.ly/o68Qq & https://skfb.ly/o68Qo).
Diagnosis.
Pheidoleklaman is one of the four known yellow to orange species in the pulchella group, and appears closest to P.pulchella. It is easily separable from the other yellow to orange coloured species in the group as follows:
Minor worker: while P.pulchella has appressed scape pilosity, P.klaman possesses long erect setae on the scapes that are as long as or longer than the scape width. Separation from P.heliosa and P.christinae is based on size, with P.klaman clearly smaller (HW: 0.64–0.71) and with relatively longer scapes (SI: 182–189) than the other two species (HW: 0.73–0.83, SI: 143–174).
Major worker: the major of P.christinae is unknown. The absence of setae laterally on the head and the presence of clearly demarcated antennal scrobes separates P.klaman from P.heliosa. Separation from P.pulchella is also unambiguous, P.klaman clearly being smaller (HW: 1.65–1.75 vs 2.0–2.28 for pulchella), with more elongated head (CI: 88–93 vs. 98–104 in P.pulchella) and longer scapes (SI: 62–63 vs. 50–56). Sculpture is another separation character, with P.klaman being uniformly punctate from mesonotum to propodeum, versus more weakly and irregularly punctate sculpture in P.pulchella. In P.klaman the posterior third of face has faint incomplete longitudinal rugulae at most, reduced to weak, superficially reticulate punctures posteriorly, while in P.pulchella the posterior third of the face is longitudinally rugose and weakly to superficially punctate, changing to obliquely and weakly rugulose towards the posterior head margin.
Description.
With the characteristics described for Pheidolepulchella species group in Fischer et al. (2012) and:
Major worker measurements: Holotype: HL: 1.98; HW: 1.75; MDL: 0.89; EL: 0.22; SL: 1.08; PW: 0.78; PSL: 0.31; PtL: 0.47; PtH: 0.31; PtW: 0.22; PPtL: 0.38; PPtH: 0.41; PPtW: 0.48; WL: 1.56; MFL: 1.51; CI: 88; EI: 12; SI: 62; MDI: 51; PSLI: 18; PWI: 45; FI: 86; Pel: 28; Ppl: 62; PpWI: 224; PpLI: 124
Paratype: HL: 1.78; HW: 1.65; MDL: 0.85; EL: 0.23; SL: 1.03; PW: 0.74; PSL: 0.29; PtL: 0.45; PtH: 0.29; PtW: 0.21; PPtL: 0.36; PPtH: 0.40; PPtW: 0.43; WL: 1.47; MFL: 1.44; CI: 93; EI: 14; SI: 62; MDI: 51; PSLI: 17; PWI: 45; FI: 87; Pel: 28; Ppl: 58; PpWI: 210; PpLI: 126
Head longer than wide (CI: 88–93), frontal carinae and antennal scrobes conspicuous. Scapes relatively long for the group (SI: 61–63). Funicular segments slightly longer than wide, the last three more than twice as long as wide, apical one longer. Pronotum shape in dorsal view rhomboid, with clearly demarcated humeral angles. Promesonotal depression and metanotal groove deep. Primary mesonotal process conspicuous, stepping into a much smaller secondary one. Propodeum dorsally with two rugulae proceeding from the metanotal groove and continuing into the well-developed, long, apically curved spines (PSLI: 17–18). Petiole with very narrow anteroventral laminar process, postpetiole with large, rounded–triangular, anteriorly oriented ventral process, in dorsal view with hexagonal to ellipsoidal shape, and two small translucent flanges extending from medial corners to gaster.
Mandibles glassy smooth. Frons longitudinally rugose, with irregular pattern of moderately long to shorter rugae, spaces between rugae weakly punctate to almost smooth. Rugae grading weaker posteriorly with transverse incomplete anastomoses between them at vertex, fading from this point being gradually replaced by weaker rugulose–punctate sculpture becoming smooth at some patches. Pronotum smooth, rest of mesosoma strongly punctate, with some incomplete rugulae laterally, continuing at the base of the spines and propodeal declivity. Mesopropodeal suture with strongly demarcated longitudinal short cross–ribs. Petiole and postpetiole with the same punctuation as mesosoma, weaker to smooth dorsally. Anterior half of first gastral tergite superficially punctate, posterior half smooth.
Scape pilosity appressed. In full–face view, head without standing setae laterally. Head, promesonotom, petiole, postpetiole, with several setae that are longer than spine length and with additional short appressed pubescence, long setae more abundant on gaster. Colour orange to darker orange, legs paler. Metatibia with short appressed pilosity.
Minor worker measurements (n = 7): HL: 0.77–0.90; HW: 0.64–0.71; MDL: 0.55–0.62; EL: 0.16–0.19; SL: 1.17–1.32; PW: 0.44–0.51; PSL: 0.20–0.23; PtL: 0.24–0.27; PtH: 0.18–0.20; PtW: 0.11–0.14; PPtL: 0.23–0.28; PPtH: 0.22–0.25; PPtW: 0.24–0.27; WL: 1.18–1.36; MFL: 1.34–1.53; CI: 79–83; EI: 26–27; SI: 182–189; MDI: 85–87; PSLI: 30–34; PWI: 68–72; FI: 208–220; Pel: 24–29; Ppl: 50–55; PpWI: 186–209; PpLI: 92–105
Head longer than wide (CI: 79–83), with sides posterior of eye level weakly convex, slightly rounded towards posterior margin. Occipital carina conspicuous, medially and laterally. Mandibles relatively long (MDI: 85–88). Scapes very long (SI: 182–189), the longest in the whole pulchella group. All funicular segments significantly (~ 2 ×) longer than wide, apical three segments at least 3 × as long as wide. Mesosoma as described for the group, with moderately long, apically tapering, posteriorly curved spines (PSLI: 30–34). Pronotal humeri slightly peaked in lateral view, first and second mesonotal processes notorious and pronounced, each of these structures weakly marginate, or at least with some feeble rugulae. Metanotal groove broad and deep. Legs very long (FI: 208–220), relative to body size, the longest of all the pulchella group.
Head, mandibles, pronotum, coxae, legs, postpetiole, and gaster glassy smooth, except for some isolated strong reticulation between eyes and antennal fossae. Mesonotum and propodeum strongly punctate, both laterally and dorsally. Metanotal groove costate. Petiole from micropunctate dorsally to weakly punctate ventrally.
Long, orange erect to semi-erect setae sparsely distributed everywhere, including pro- and mesonotum, propodeum, petiole, postpetiole, and gaster, some longer than spine length. In full-face view, head laterally with semi-erect setae above and below eyes, some longer than eye diameter. Scapes with very abundant semi-erect setae, as long as scape width. Legs also covered with abundant semi–erect to decumbent pilosity.
Colour yellow to pale orange.
Derivatio nominis.
The species name klaman is a non–Latin noun used in apposition and is the Boualé word for pulchella (beauty).
Other material examined.
Ivory Coast: Montagnes District, Site 02 (Taï N. P.) 200m, 5.8312, –7.3429 08/11/2019. Winkler sample (Gómez, K. & Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest in leaf litter (1 worker) [KGCOL00507] KGAC
Ivory Coast: Montagnes District, Site 05 (Taï N. P.) 200m, 5.8438, –7.3484 11/11/2019. Winkler sample (Gómez, K. & Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest in leaf litter (1 worker) [KGCOL00443] KGAC
Identification key to P.pulchella group species
Measurements and indices are sometimes crucial for identification, so we have added detailed comparative measurements and indices for each species separated in yellow forms (Table 1 - minors, Table 2 - majors) and dark forms (Table 3 - minors,Table 4 majors).
Table 3.
Dark species (major workers) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P.batrachorum (n = 6) | P.darwini (n = 10) | P.dea (n = 6) | P.glabrella (n = 6) | P.rebeccae (n = 4) | P.semidea (n = 3) | |
HL | 1.86–2.04 (1.91) | 1.96–2.20 (2.09) | 1.76–1.96 (1.83) | 1.80–2.13 (1.95) | 1.82–1.98 (1.92) | 1.70–1.86 (1.79) |
HW | 1.80–2.0 (1.88) | 1.96–2.23 (2.11) | 1.78–1.94 (1.84) | 1.80–2.15 (1.98) | 1.86–1.98 (1.94) | 1.70–1.82 (1.76) |
MDL | 0.89–1.00 (0.95) | 0.94–1.06 (1.01) | 0.82–0.87 (0.84) | 0.78–0.97 (0.86) | 0.83–0.91 (0.87) | 0.79–0.83 (0.81) |
EL | 0.23–0.28 (0.25) | 0.24–0.27 (0.25) | 0.22–0.23 (0.23) | 0.22–0.27 (0.24) | 0.23–0.27 (0.26) | 0.21–0.22 (0.22) |
SL | 1.01–1.13 (1.07) | 1.01–1.13 (1.06) | 1.01–1.06 (1.03) | 0.94–1.08 (1.02) | 0.94–0.98 (0.96) | 0.98–1.00 (0.99) |
PW | 0.80–0.89 (0.83) | 0.86–0.98 (0.93) | 0.80–0.83 (0.82) | 0.74–0.94 (0.86) | 0.86–0.90 (0.89) | 0.71–0.80 (0.77) |
PSL | 0.28–0.32 (0.31) | 0.33–0.39 (0.36) | 0.29–0.33 (0.31) | 0.31–0.37 (0.34) | 0.24–0.30 (0.28) | 0.29–0.31 (0.03) |
PtL | 0.51–0.57 (0.54) | 0.54–0.67 (0.59) | 0.46–0.50 (0.49) | 0.47–0.57 (0.53) | 0.47–0.56 (0.51) | 0.49–0.56 (0.52) |
PtH | 0.30–0.38 (0.33) | 0.32–0.38 (0.34) | 0.27–0.32 (0.30) | 0.30–0.36 (0.33) | 0.32–0.34 (0.33) | 0.25–0.33 (0.30) |
PtW | 0.22–0.28 (0.24) | 0.21–0.27 (0.23) | 0.20–0.24 (0.22) | 0.20–0.26 (0.23) | 0.21–0.24 (0.23) | 0.20–0.22 (0.21) |
PPtL | 0.33–0.39 (0.37) | 0.33–0.39 (0.36) | 0.29–0.32 (0.30) | 0.30–0.34 (0.32) | 0.31–0.36 (0.33) | 0.31–0.34 (0.33) |
PPtH | 0.37–0.46 (0.41) | 0.37–0.47 (0.42) | 0.32–0.34 (0.33) | 0.33–0.44 (0.38) | 0.36–0.41 (0.39) | 0.34–0.37 (0.36) |
PPtW | 0.48–0.56 (0.51) | 0.47–0.59 (0.54) | 0.38–0.43 (0.41) | 0.41–0.54 (0.47) | 0.46–0.53 (0.50) | 0.44–0.47 (0.46) |
WL | 1.44–1.70 (1.54) | 1.48–1.65 (1.56) | 1.46–1.56 (1.51) | 1.35–1.62 (1.50) | 1.44–1.56 (1.50) | 1.41–1.48 (1.44) |
MFL | 1.48–1.70 (1.57) | 1.56–1.71 (1.62) | 1.46–1.60 (1.49) | 1.40–1.63 (1.51) | 1.48–1.56 (1.50) | 1.41–1.44 (1.43) |
CI | 97–100 (98) | 99–104 (101) | 99–102 (101) | 99–105 (102) | 99–103 (101) | 98–100 (99) |
EI | 12–14 (13) | 11–13 (12) | 11–13 (12) | 11–13 (12) | 12–15 (13) | 12–13 (12) |
SI | 55–58 (57) | 49–53 (50) | 55–58 (56) | 49–53 (51) | 49–51 (50) | 55–58 (56) |
MDI | 47–53 (50) | 42–51 (48) | 42–49 (46) | 42–45 (43) | 44–46 (45) | 43–48 (46) |
PSLI | 15–18 (15) | 16–18 (16) | 16–19 (16) | 16–18 (16) | 13–15 (13) | 16–18 (16) |
PWI | 44–45 (44) | 43–45 (43) | 43–46 (43) | 41–44 (41) | 45–46 (45) | 39–47 (39) |
FI | 80–85 (83) | 75–80 (77) | 79–83 (81) | 75–78 (77) | 75–84 (77) | 79–83 (81) |
Pel | 27–31 (29) | 24–28 (25) | 25–29 (26) | 24–28 (26) | 24–27 (26) | 25–30 (27) |
Ppl | 57–67 (62) | 55–63 (58) | 46–53 (50) | 51–59 (55) | 53–59 (56) | 55–66 (60) |
PpWI | 182–236 (215) | 219–257 (232) | 179–200 (190) | 192–220 (208) | 213–230 (220) | 214–224 (219) |
PpLI | 131–161 (147) | 151–176 (163) | 156–167 (162) | 147–173 (165) | 139–165 (153) | 148–165 (158) |
Table 4.
Dark species (minor workers) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P.batrachorum (n = 15) | P.darwini (n = 15) | P.dea (n = 28) | P.glabrella (n = 26) | P.rebeccae (n = 10) | P.semidea (n = 3) | P.setosa (n = 2) | |
HL | 0.68–0.87 (0.82) | 0.77–0.88 (0.84) | 0.73–0.94 (0.85) | 0.72–0.92 (0.85) | 0.93–1.02 (0.97) | 0.76–0.81 (0.79) | 0.78–0.81 (0.79) |
HW | 0.59–0.74 (0.68) | 0.67–0.76 (0.72) | 0.66–0.86 (0.76) | 0.67–0.86 (0.78) | 0.77–0.82 (0.80) | 0.72–0.78 (0.76) | 0.69–0.69 (0.69) |
MDL | 0.46–0.57 (0.54) | 0.52–0.61 (0.56) | 0.50–0.67 (0.58) | 0.51–0.63 (0.58) | 0.62–0.64 (0.63) | 0.51–0.56 (0.53) | 0.53–0.54 (0.54) |
EL | 0.16–0.19 (0.18) | 0.16–0.19 (0.17) | 0.17–0.20 (0.18) | 0.17–0.19 (0.18) | 0.20–0.21 (0.2) | 0.17–0.18 (0.17) | 0.16–0.19 (0.17) |
SL | 0.9–1.13 (1.09) | 0.99–1.21 (1.08) | 0.94–1.16 (1.07) | 0.87–1.13 (1.02) | 1.27–1.32 (1.30) | 0.86–0.9 0 (0.89) | 0.97–1.03 (0.99) |
PW | 0.40–0.51 (0.47) | 0.44–0.51 (0.48) | 0.42–0.57 (0.49) | 0.46–0.57 (0.51) | 0.54–0.57 (0.55) | 0.46–0.50 (0.48) | 0.47–0.48 (0.48) |
PSL | 0.14–0.24 (0.21) | 0.24–0.30 (0.27) | 0.20–0.28 (0.24) | 0.20–0.36 (0.28) | 0.24–0.25 (0.24) | 0.19–0.23 (0.22) | 0.21–0.23 (0.22) |
PtL | 0.26–0.37 (0.33) | 0.30–0.36 (0.33) | 0.26–0.37 (0.32) | 0.27–0.37 (0.34) | 0.39–0.41 (0.40) | 0.28–0.33 (0.31) | 0.26–0.29 (0.27) |
PtH | 0.14–0.19 (0.18) | 0.17–0.19 (0.18) | 0.16–0.20 (0.18) | 0.17–0.21 (0.19) | 0.20–0.21 (0.2) | 0.17–0.18 (0.17) | 0.17–0.17 (0.17) |
PtW | 0.10–0.13 (0.12) | 0.11–0.13 (0.12) | 0.11–0.14 (0.12) | 0.11–0.13 (0.12) | 0.12–0.15 (0.14) | 0.11–0.11 (0.11) | 0.11–0.12 (0.11) |
PPtL | 0.18–0.27 (0.23) | 0.19–0.24 (0.22) | 0.14–0.22 (0.18) | 0.18–0.23 (0.2) | 0.26–0.28 (0.27) | 0.19–0.22 (0.2) | 0.19–0.21 (0.2) |
PPtH | 0.17–0.23 (0.21) | 0.19–0.22 (0.21) | 0.16–0.24 (0.20) | 0.18–0.24 (0.21) | 0.24–0.26 (0.25) | 0.18–0.21 (0.19) | 0.18–0.20 (0.19) |
PPtW | 0.19–0.24 (0.22) | 0.21–0.26 (0.22) | 0.17–0.24 (0.21) | 0.18–0.27 (0.22) | 0.26–0.30 (0.28) | 0.19–0.22 (0.20) | 0.21–0.22 (0.21) |
WL | 0.96–1.21 (1.12) | 1.08–1.25 (1.16) | 1.01–1.33 (1.16) | 1.01–1.29 (1.16) | 1.32–1.40 (1.36) | 1.01–1.08 (1.04) | 1.04–1.11 (1.07) |
MFL | 1.01–1.38 (1.28) | 1.13–1.38 (1.28) | 1.09–1.44 (1.27) | 1.04–1.35 (1.22) | 1.44–1.58 (1.51) | 0.97–1.07 (1.02) | 1.11–1.19 (1.14) |
CI | 80–87 (83) | 84–89 (86) | 86–93 (90) | 88–95 (91) | 81–83 (82) | 94–99 (96) | 85–88 (87) |
EI | 24–29 (26) | 22–26 (24) | 22–27 (24) | 22–27 (23) | 25–25 (25) | 22–24 (23) | 23–28 (25) |
SI | 153–173 (160) | 140–159 (149) | 133–146 (141) | 123–140 (131) | 161–165 (163) | 114–121 (117) | 141–149 (144) |
MDI | 76–84 (80) | 75–82 (78) | 73–78 (75) | 71–78 (74) | 78–80 (79) | 68–73 (70) | 77–78 (78) |
PSLI | 24–34 (24) | 33–40 (33) | 28–36 (28) | 30–43 (30) | 30–31 (30) | 26–30 (26) | 30–33 (30) |
PWI | 65–72 (65) | 66–68 (66) | 60–68 (60) | 61–69 (61) | 69–69 (69) | 62–65 (62) | 68–70 (68) |
FI | 171–197 (188) | 169–190 (177) | 158–175 (166) | 143–169 (157) | 186–192 (189) | 133–139 (135) | 161–172 (166) |
Pel | 24–27 (25) | 22–27 (24) | 22–28 (25) | 22–27 (24) | 23–27 (25) | 22–24 (23) | 23–25 (24) |
Ppl | 45–50 (48) | 43–52 (46) | 39–47 (42) | 39–55 (44) | 48–53 (50) | 41–45 (43) | 44–47 (45) |
PpWI | 175–200 (188) | 162–217 (190) | 146–192 (169) | 162–209 (186) | 193–208 (201) | 173–200 (185) | 175–200 (189) |
PpLI | 122–164 (141) | 136–174 (152) | 155–229 (173) | 143–206 (171) | 148–152 (150) | 145–174 (155) | 129–145 (137) |
Minor workers
1 | Colour yellow to orange | 2 |
– | Colour reddish brown to black | 5 |
2 | Pilosity on scape and metatibia decumbent (Fig. 7C) | P.pulchella |
– | Pilosity on scape and metatibia suberect to erect (Fig. 7A, E, G) | 3 |
3 | Smaller species (HW: 0.64–0.71) with relatively longer scapes (SI: 182–189) | P.klaman sp. nov. |
– | Larger species (HW: 0.74–0.83) with relatively shorter scapes (SI: 144–174) | 4 |
4 | Head, scapes and legs very long (CI: 73–75, SI: 163–174, FI: 205–213); occipital carina broadly extended and collar-like; standing hairs acute and very abundant, present also on lower meso– and metapleuron, visible in dorsal view (Fig. 7G, H) | P.heliosa |
– | Head, scape and legs relatively shorter (CI: 79–84, SI: 144–165, FI: 175–197); occipital carina narrow, not collar-like; standing hairs often apically truncated or split, generally less abundant, absent on lower meso- and metapleuron (Fig. 7E, F) | P.christinae |
5 | Head in full frontal view laterally with several relatively long, projecting hairs posterior of eye-level (Figs 11A, B, 12D) | 6 |
– | Head in full frontal view laterally completely without or at most with one or two moderately long projecting hairs near eyes or towards posterior margin (Figs 11C, D, 12A, B, C) | 8 |
6 | Head shape elliptical (CI: 80–89); posterior margin relatively narrow and evenly convex; occipital carina with weak median impression, scape pilosity uniformly suberect or decumbent (Figs 11A, B, 13A, B) | 7 |
– | Head shape broadly rounded, posterior margin not evenly convex (CI: 86–90); occipital carina without median impression; scape pilosity decumbent with additional suberect hairs on outer edge (Figs 12D, 13H) | P.setosa |
7 | Head relatively narrow (CI: 80–87); scapes long (SI: 153–173); scape pilosity uniformly decumbent; face almost completely and distinctly punctate (Figs 11A, 13A) | P.batrachorum |
– | Head relatively wider (CI: 84–89); scapes slightly shorter (SI: 140–159); scape pilosity uniformly subdecumbent to suberect; face smooth and shiny to very faintly punctate (Fig. 11B, Fig. 13B) | P.darwini |
8 | Sculpture variable, but head and mesosoma never completely and coarsely punctate; at least medially between eyes and on posterior dorsopronotum superficially sculptured to smooth and shiny (Fig. 11C, D, Fig. 12B, C, Fig. 14C, D, F, G) | 9 |
– | Head and mesosoma almost completely and coarsely punctate (Fig. 12A, Fig. 14E) | P.nimba |
9 | Head longer than wide (CI: 85–95), posterior margin roundly or slightly convex; scapes and mandibles moderately long (SI: 123–149, MDI: 71–78) (Fig. 11C, D, Fig. 12C) | 10 |
– | Head almost as wide as long (CI: 94–99), posterior margin not convex, but almost straight (Fig. 12C); scapes and mandibles shorter (SI: 114–121, MDI: 68–73) (Fig. 12B) | P.rebeccae |
10 | Long or moderately long hairs completely absent on mesosoma and waist segments; petiole and postpetiole without laterally projecting hairs in dorsal view; metatibia pilosity appressed; second mesonotal process and sculpture on propodeum reduced; metanotal groove wide in profile; spines long (PSLI: 30–43) (Fig. 14D) | P.glabrella |
– | Moderately long hairs at least present on waist segments, sometimes also on promesonotum; on petiole and/or postpetiole some laterally projecting hairs in dorsal view; metatibia pilosity decumbent; second mesonotal process and sculpture on propodeum not reduced; metanotal groove relatively narrow in profile; spines slightly shorter (PSLI: 28–32) (Fig. 14C, G) | 11 |
11 | Posterior head margin roundly convex; face and dorsal promesonotum mostly superficially punctate to punctate; second mesonotal process not raised above the level of dorsopropodeum; postpetiole relatively short (PpLI: 155–229) (Fig. 11C, Fig. 14C) | P.dea |
– | Posterior head margin weakly convex, with small median impression; face and promesonotum smooth and shiny, with very few superficial punctures; in lateral view second mesonotal process distinctly raised above the level of dorsopropodeum; postpetiole relatively longer (PpLI: 129–145) (Fig. 12G, Fig. 14G) | P.semidea |
Major workers
Majors of P.christinae, P.nimba, and P.setosa are unknown.
1 | Colour yellow to orange | 2 |
– | Colour reddish brown to black | 4 |
2 | Antennal scrobe conspicuous; sides of head without laterally projecting hairs in full–face view (Fig. 6A, E) | 3 |
– | Antennal scrobe absent or inconspicuous; head in full–face view with laterally projecting hairs (Fig. 6C) | P.heliosa |
3 | Smaller species (HW: 1.65–1.75), with more elongated head (CI: 88–93) and relatively longer scapes (SI: 62). Mesonotum to propodeum strongly punctate. Face sculpture in posterior third with faint incomplete longitudinal rugulae at most, posteriorly reduced to weak, superficially reticulate punctures (Fig. 6B) | P.klaman sp. nov. |
– | Larger species (HW: 2.0–2.28) with broader head (CI: 98–104) and relatively shorter scapes (SI: 51–56). Mesonotum to propodeum weakly punctate. Face sculpture in posterior third longitudinally rugose and weakly to superficially punctate, posteriorly changing to obliquely and weakly rugulose (Fig. 6D) | P.pulchella |
4 | Posterolateral lobes partly smooth and shiny (Fig. 8B, E) | 5 |
– | Posterolateral lobes variably sculptured, never smooth and shiny, from punctate to longitudinally rugulose (Fig. 8A, C, D, F) | 6 |
5 | Lateropronotum alutaceous to reticulated, sometimes with transverse rugulae (Fig. 9B). Head above the eyes rugulose, central rugulae between the frontal ridges reaching the occipital line, occipital corners alutaceous to smooth (Fig. 8B, Fig. 10B) | P.darwini |
– | Lateropronotum glassy smooth (Fig. 9B). Head above the eyes faintly sculptured to smooth, central rugulae between the frontal ridges failing to reach the occipital line, occipital corners glassy smooth (Fig. 8E, Fig. 10E) | P.rebeccae |
6 | Scape and metatibia pilosity fine and inconspicuous, mostly fully appressed; long standing hairs absent on promesonotum (Fig. 9D) | P.glabrella |
– | Scape and metatibia pilosity conspicuous and decumbent; standing hairs often present on promesonotum (Fig. 9A, C, F) | 7 |
7 | Posterolateral lobes of head longitudinally rugose, the rugulae similar to those in the rest of the head, with spaces between rugae weakly to superficially punctate (Fig. 8C) | P.dea |
– | Posterolateral lobes of head punctate, overlain by superficial rugulae (Fig. 8A, F) | 8 |
8 | Central rugulae on the head running to occipital line, sometimes broken, separated apart with wide spaces between them, some transverse rugulae may appear on the upper third of the head, but without creating a reticulum (Fig. 8F) | P.semidea |
– | Central rugulae on the head not reaching the occipital line, close together and not leaving wide spaces between them and without transverse rugulae of any kind (Fig. 8A) | P.batrachorum |
Notes and new distribution data for the Pheidolepulchella group
Distribution maps per species can be found at Fig. 15, 16.
Pheidoledarwini
Republic of the Congo: Env. De Makaba (par Dimonika) (Mayombe) (L. Matile) (1 worker) [EY19812] MNHN.
Pheidoledea
The label for type locality of this species is “Lugombe” with no additional information and Santschi (1921) cites the locality as “Congo Belgue: Lugombe”. The current official type locality is Lugombe (DRC). Congo Belgue comprised several current countries, and Lugombe is a city in Uganda, close to the capital Entebbe, so, we propose to change the type locality from Lugombe (DRC) to Lugombe (Uganda). Our new citation is the first for DRC.
Democratic Republic of Congo: Secteur Nord: Mount Ngulingo, pres Nyamgaleke (Massif Ruwenzori (ex Albert NP)) 2500 m. H. Synave 17-18/08/1953 [RBINSFOR002196] RBINS
Pheidoleglabrella
Previously known from Western Central Africa (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon and the DRC) (Fischer et al. 2012), our findings are first records for the following three countries and expand its distribution from Central to Western Africa:
Ghana: Kumasi, FORIG, near pond, 6.7150, –1.5291, 09/01/2019. Hand collected (Gomez, K.). Fragmented degraded forest (4 workers), ex soil [KG03925C01] KGAC; same data (1 worker), [KGCOL00993] KGAC.
Ivory Coast: Montagnes, Mt. Tonkpi (Man), 1200 m, 7.4542, -7.6372, 23/06–01/07/2018. Malaise (Braet, Y.; Gué, A). Tropical Forest (1 worker) [KGCOL01617] RBINS.
Republic of the Congo: Western Cuvette, Lossi Animal Sanctuary, 0.18, 14.517, 2003. Hand collected (Rodriguez–Teijeiro, J. D.) (2 workers) [KGCOL01013] KGAC.
Pheidolerebeccae
Only two series are cited for this species, the type series from Ivory Coast (Abidjan) and a series from the Atewa Forest in Ghana (Fischer et al. 2012). We found it in the Taï Forest National Park in Ivory Coast, where it seems to be abundant, nesting in rotten logs:
Ivory Coast: Montagnes District: Site 02 (Taï N. P.) 200 m, 5.8312, –7.3429 08–10/11/2019. Pitfall (Gómez, K., Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest (2 workers) [KGCOL00346] KGAC; same data, hand collected on tree trunk (1 worker), [KGCOL00725] KGAC; Site 03 (Taï N. P.) 200 m, 5.8389, –7.3452 09/11/2019. Hand collected (Gómez, K., Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest (1 worker, in ethanol), On tree trunk [KG04031C01] KGAC; same data (1 worker, pinned) [KGCOL00287] KGAC; same data, Winkler sample (2 workers, pinned) Primary forest in leaf litter [KGCOL00342] KGAC; Site 05 (Taï N. P.) 200 m, 5.8438, –7.3484 11/11/2019. Winkler sample (Gómez, K., Kouakou, L.). Primary forest in leaf litter (1 worker) [KGCOL00337] KGAC; Site 06 (Taï N. P.) 200 m, 5.8346, –7.3464 12/11/2019. Hand collected (Gómez, K., Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest (1 dealated queen, 5 majors, > 10w, in ethanol), ex. rotten log [KG04156] KGAC; same series (1 worker, 1 major, pinned), [KGCOL00511] KGAC; Site 09 (Taï N. P.) 200m, 5.8466, –7.3469 15/11/2019. Hand collected (Gómez, K., Kouakou, L.). Primary Forest (1 major, > 10 workers, in ethanol), ex. rotten log [KG04165] KGAC; same series (1 major, 1 worker, pinned) [KGCOL00330] KGAC.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Our special thanks to Dr. Soro Kafana, Head of Ecology Research Station of Taï and Prof. Yeo Kolo, Head of Ecology Research Station of Lamto, who helped us through the process of preparing and executing the sampling in Taï Forest. We are also profoundly grateful to our guides in the Taï Forest (Oulaï Laurent and Guei Emmanuel) for their dedication and hard work during the long hours in the forest. Their knowledge of the forest was always a source of amazement.
We thank the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST) Imaging Section for providing access to the Zeiss Xradia micro-CT scanner and Shinya Komoto for general support. This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) grants-in-aid KAKENHI grants [No. 17K15180 to EPE; No. 18K14768 & 21K06326 to FHG].
Citation
Gómez K, Kouakou LM, Fischer G, Hita-Garcia F, Katzke J, Economo EP (2022) Pheidole klaman sp. nov.: a new addition from Ivory Coast to the Afrotropical pulchella species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae). ZooKeys 1104: 129–157. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1104.81562
Funding Statement
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
Supplementary materials
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. holotype major worker (CASENT0764691) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. paratype minor worker (CASENT0764692) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. paratype minor worker (CASENT0745509) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.
References
- AntWeb (2022) Version 8.75.4. California Academy of Science. [online at] https://www.antweb.org [Accessed 26 May 2022]
- Bolton B. (1994) Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 222 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer G, Hita Garcia F, Peters MK. (2012) Taxonomy of the ant genus Pheidole Westwood in the Afrotropical zoogeographic region: Definition of species groups and systematic revision of the Pheidolepulchella group. Zootaxa 3232: 1–43. 10.11646/zootaxa.3232.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salata S, Fisher BL. (2020a) Pheidole Westwood, 1839 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Madagascar – an introduction and a taxonomic revision of eleven species groups. ZooKeys 905: 1–235. 10.3897/zookeys.905.39592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salata S, Fisher BL. (2020b) Taxonomic revision of the Pheidolesikorae species group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Madagascar. ZooKeys 949: 1–185. 10.3897/zookeys.949.51269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salata S, Fisher BL. (2021) Taxonomic revision of Madagascan species of the Pheidolefervens species–group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). PLoS ONE 16(1): e0244195. 10.1371/journal.pone.0244195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Santschi F. (1921) Quelques nouveaux Formicides africains. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 61: 113–122. [Google Scholar]
- World Heritage (2022) World Heritage. http://world-heritage-datasheets.unep-wcmc.org/datasheet/output/site/tai-national-park/ [accessed on March 2022]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. holotype major worker (CASENT0764691) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. paratype minor worker (CASENT0764692) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.
Data type
Video file
Explanation note
3D rotation video of Pheidoleklaman sp. nov. paratype minor worker (CASENT0745509) based on shaded volumetric surface rendering of full body.