Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2022 Jun 13;199:167–186. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.199.85679

Polypleurumchinense (Podostemaceae), a new species from Fujian, China, based on morphological and genomic evidence

Bing-Hua Chen 1,✉, Miao Zhang 1, Kai Zhao 1, Xiao-Hui Zhang 1, Chang-Li Ge 1
PMCID: PMC9848973  PMID: 36761873

Abstract

We describe Polypleurumchinense, a new species of Podostemaceae from Yunxiao County, Fujian Province, China, based on morphological and molecular data and the genus Polypleurum is recorded here for the first time from China. Polypleurumchinense has a gross morphology similar to P.longistylosum, but it can be distinguished from the latter by its narrower roots, more numerous and longer leaves, shorter stigmas and more numerous ovules per locule. To distinguish the new Polypleurum species and study its phylogenetic position, its complete plastome was sequenced and characterised. The plastome is 132,110 bp in length, including a pair of inverted repeat regions (IRs) of 20,389 bp divided by the large single-copy (LSC) and small single-copy (SSC) regions of 79,022 bp and 12,310 bp, respectively. The plastome size of P.chinense is relatively smaller compared to most angiosperms due to the absence of the ycf1 and ycf2 genes in the IR regions. The phylogenetic analyses also strongly support the separation of the new species from other taxa.

Keywords: Fujian Province, molecular identification, morphology, Podostemaceae, Polypleurumchinense

Introduction

Podostemaceae, widely known as “river-weeds”, are a vast family of unique haptophtic angiosperms that grow in a variety of wetlands in the tropics and subtropics around the world (Philbrick and Novelo 1995; Cook 1996; Koi et al. 2015). During the wet season, the vegetative phase of Podostemaceae is immersed in rapid and turbulent currents and is tightly adherent to the surface of rocks. As the water level drops over the following dry season, the plants sprout, flower, produce fruit and eventually wither (Tǎng and Kato 2020). During the rainy season, the seeds are spread by wind, birds and running water, the seed coat becomes sticky and sticks to the rock surface, the seeds germinate and the seedlings develop submerged (Koi et al. 2015). Their habitats are unique and are hard to recreate if the water of the stream is contaminated.

Phylogenetically, Podostemaceae are placed in the eudicot order Malpighiales and are sister to Hypericaceae (Wurdack and Davis 2009). Podostemaceae contain 200–280 species in 60 genera, widespread mostly in tropical regions, with a few species in temperate regions. Podostemaceae are divided into three subfamilies, i.e. Podostemoideae, Weddellinoideae and Tristichoideae (Kita and Kato 2001; Koi et al. 2015). Podostemoideae evolved structures and properties obviously unknown in Hypericum (Hypericaceae), including loss of apical meristem, reduction or loss of primary shoot and loss of primary root and notably dorsiventral or crustose root and spathella, while Tristichoideae is morphologically similar to Hypericaceae and other terrestrial angiosperms (Koi et al. 2015).

Podostemoideae, the largest subfamily, is divided into various clades, including Ceratolacis, Cipoia, Diamantina & Podostemum, American genera (Apinagia, Castelnavia, Jenmaniella, Marathrum, Monostylis, Mourera, Noveloa, Rhyncholacis, Wettsteiniola), Aulea (Saxicolellaproparte), African genera (Dicraeanthus, Djinga, Inversodicraea, Ledermanniella, Leiothylax, Letestuella, Macropodiella, Monandriella, Saxicolellas.s., Stonesia, Winklerella), Madagascan genera (Endocaulos, Thelethylax) and Asian/Australian genera (Cladopus, Farmeria, Griffithella, Hanseniella, Hydrobryum, Hydrodiscus, Paracladopus, Polypleurum, Thawatchaia, Terniopsis,Willisia, Zeylanidium) (Qiu and Philbrick 2003; Koi et al. 2012).

Podostemoideae are the largest subfamily in the family and are widely distributed in Asia, especially in Thailand (42 species with 4 varieties in 10 genera) (Kato 2006; Kato and Koi 2009), India (28 species in 11 genera) (Khanduri et al. 2015), Laos (17 species in 6 genera) (Koi and Kato 2012), Vietnam (7 species in 5 genera) (Kato 2011). In China, nine species in three genera (Terniopsis, Cladopus and Hydrobryum) were reported from Fujian, Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Hong Kong (Kato and Kita 2003; Qiu and Philbrick 2003; Lin et al. 2016; Kato et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2022).

Polypleurum (Taylor ex Tul.) Warm. is a genus previously known from Sri Lanka, India, Thailand and Laos with 17 species (Kato 2006). It is distinguished from Cladopus and Paracladopus by its more or less flattened, ellipsoid, rough capsule with longitudinal ribs and from Hanseniella, Hydrobryum and Thawatchaia by its ribbon-like root. Polypleurum species differ in number of capsule ribs and stamens. Species in Sri Lanka and India, including P.wallichii (R. Br. ex Griffz) Warm., the type of the genus, have two stamens and eight capsule ribs, while species in Thailand and Laos have a single stamen and eight to fifteen ribs (Kato 2006).

In January 2021, during a field investigation in Yunxiao County, within the Wushan Mountains in Zhangzhou City, Fujian, China, we unexpectedly discovered a little-known Podostemaceae species during anthesis in a stream. The species has a completely distinct morphology from the other three known genera identified in China. In March and August of 2021, we collected its fruits and vegetative parts for molecular study. Based on morphological analysis and molecular phylogeny, we established that our recently obtained specimen is a new species of Polypleurum, a hitherto not recorded genus of Podostemaceae in China.

Material and methods

Morphological description

The morphological description of the new species was based on the study of specimens collected in a variety of spots in 2021. Live material adhering to rock surfaces from a river in Wushan Mountains, Yunxiao County, Fujian, China, was collected for DNA extraction. A stereoscopic zoom microscope (Carl Zeiss, Axio zoom. v.16, Germany), equipped with an attached digital camera (Axiocam) and a digital caliper were used to record details of roots, leaves, bracts, spathella, tepals, stamen, pistil and seeds. Field observations provided habitats and phenology for the new species.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

In this study, total DNA was extracted from freeze-dried material using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The phylogenetic position of the new species was determined by nrITS and plastid matK sequences. The nrITS and plastid matK regions were amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using MiniAmp Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and 1.1xT3 Super PCR Mix (Tsingke Biotechnology, Beijing, China) under the following conditions: 5 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 55 °C, 60 s at 72 °C; and 10 min at 72 °C (Zhou and Jin 2018) and 3 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 90 s at 72 °C; and 7 min at 72 °C (Koi et al. 2012), respectively. The PCR products were treated with Mag-MK 96 Well PCR Products Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai) to remove the extra primers. Sequencing was conducted using the BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and the ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). The primers used for the DNA amplification and the cycle sequencing are listed in Suppl. material 1: Table S1.

Genome sequencing, assembly, annotation and analysis

Purified total DNA of Polypleurumchinense was fragmented, genome skimming was performed using next-generation sequencing technologies on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform with 150 bp paired-end reads and 350 bp insert size by Wuhan Onemore-tech Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China) and 15.88 GB of reads was obtained.

The paired-end reads were filtered and assembled into complete plastome using GetOrganelle v.1.7.5.0 with appropriate parameters, with K-merset “21,45,65,85,105”, the word size being 0.6 (Jin et al. 2020a). Following previous studies, our workflow includes five key steps as well (Camacho et al. 2009; Bankevich et al. 2012; Langmead and Salzberg 2012; Jin et al. 2020a). Graphs of the final assembly were visualised by Bandage to assess their completeness (Wick et al. 2015). Gene annotation was performed using CPGAVAS2 and PGA. The different annotations of protein coding sequences were confirmed using BLASTx. The tRNAs were checked with tRNAscan-SE v.2.0.3. Final chloroplast genome maps were created using OGDRAW.

Phylogenetic analysis

In an attempt to reconstruct the evolutionary history of Polypleurumchinense, phylogenies were constructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses of the nrITS and matK sequences. To construct a phylogenetic tree, based on matK sequence, 114 samples (Suppl. material 1: Table S2) of Terniopsis, Cladopus, Paracladopus, Hanseniella, Hydrobryum, Hydrodiscus, Thawatchaia, Hydrobryopsis, Zeylanidium, Griffithella, Polypleurum, Willisia and Cratoxylum were included in our analysis. Cratoxylumcochinchinense was selected as the outgroup. Each individual sequence was aligned using MAFFT 7.310 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with default settings. A concatenated supermatrix of the two sequences was generated using PhyloSuite v.1.1.15 (Zhang et al. 2019) for the phylogenetic analysis. All missing data were treated as gaps. Gblocks 0.91b (Castresana 2000) was applied to eliminate poorly-aligned regions of the concatenated supermatrix with gaps set as no different from the other positions. The best nucleotide substitution model according to Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) was TVM+F+R3, which was selected by Model Finder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) implemented in IQTREE v.1.6.8. Maximum Likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) under the model automatically selected by IQ-TREE (‘Auto’ option in IQ-TREE) for 1000 ultrafast (Minh et al. 2013) bootstraps. Bayesian Inference phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) under GTR+F+G4 model (2 parallel runs, 2,000,000 generations), in which the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in. Phylograms were visualised in iTOL v.5.

To construct a phylogenetic tree based on nrITS, 42 species of Cladopus, Hanseniella, Hydrobryum, Hydrobryopsis, Zeylanidium, Griffithella, Polypleurum, Willisia and Cratoxylum were included in the analysis (Suppl. material 1:Table S3). Cratoxylumcochinchinense was employed as the outgroup. The study was carried out as described above and, according to the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the optimal nucleotide substitution model was GTR+F+I+G4.

Results

Taxonomic treatment

. Polypleurum chinense

B.Hua Chen & Miao Zhang sp. nov.

7DBB4F15-B145-5039-8613-B9AFF82FFAA8

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77299427-1

Figs 1 , 2 , 3 , 4

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

PolypleurumchinenseA habitat B habit, showing plants (red arrow) on rock surface in rapids C plants adherent to rock surface (photo in aquarium) D roots with tufts of leaves on both flanks E tufts of 1eaves. Scale bars: 5 mm (C); 2 mm (D); 1 mm (E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

PolypleurumchinenseA plants in bud adhering to rock surface B ribbon-like root with young floriferous shoots on flanks C flower bud covered by spathella(s) above bracts (b) D shoots along the flanks of the ribbon-like root between the root branches E, F flower at anthesis on peduncle with ruptured spathella G spathella H flower with spathella removed, stamen, and ovary, arrow shows a tepal on side of stamen I gynoecium without bracts J ovules on ovary septum K, L, M stamen, arrows show two tepals on sides of stamen. Scale bar: 1 mm (C, F, J); 2 mm (B, E, M); 500 μm (G, H, I, K, L).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

PolypleurumchinenseA habitat in the dry season when the river level is reduced B habitat showing mature fruits C elliptic pale bodies along the flank of the root D stalked fruit, showing ribs E dehisced capsule, showing seven ribs on the half of capsule, conspicuous F dehisced capsule, showing persistent valve and seeds G seeds. Scale bars: 20 mm (B); 5 mm (C); 500 μm (D); 400 μm (E); 1 mm (F); 200 μm (G).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Illustration of PolypleurumchinenseA ribbon-like root with tufts of leaves B flower bud covered by spathella above bracts C floriferous shoots along the flanks of the root between the root branches D flower at anthesis on peduncle with ruptured spathella E flower with spathella removed, stamen and ovary, a tepal on side of stamen F stamen G ovules on ovary septum H stalked fruit, showing ribs I seeds.

Diagnosis.

The new species can be easily distinguished from most other species, except Polypleurumlongistylosum, by tufts of leaves on both sides of the root between the root branches, a more or less flattened, ellipsoid, rough capsule with a greater number of longitudinal ribs (> 12), a spathella nearly completely enclosing the ovary and stamen at anthesis, a solitary stamen and a very short capsule stalk (< 2 mm). The narrower roots (0.6–0.8 mm vs.1.0–1.5 mm) with leaves 8–12 per tuft (vs. 4–8), up to 23.1 mm (vs. 5 mm) long, fewer (4 vs. 6) bracts, short spiny or glandular hairs on the spathella (vs. papillate) in the new species differentiate it from P.longistylosum (Table 1).

Table 1.

Morphological differences between Polypleurumchinense, P.longistylosum and P.schmidtianum.

Characteristics P.chinense P.longistylosum P.schmidtianum
Root width/mm 0.6–0.8(−1.0) 1–1.5 2–4
Tufts of leaves position On both flanks, alternate, subopposite or opposite On both flanks Near both sides
The number of leaves 6–12, usually 8–12 4–8 2–4
Leaves length/mm 12.4–23.1 5 1.5–3(−6)
The number and morphology of bracts 4, needle-like 6, needle-like 3–4(−6), sheathed
Bracts length(mm) 5–6 4 2–3
Spathella length/mm 3 - 1.5–2
Spathella coat Short spiny or glandular hairs Papillate Not papillate
Peduncle length/mm 0.7 1 6–7
Tepals length/mm 0.3 0.2 0.5–0.7
Stamen length (mm) 2.9 1.7 1.2
Ovary locular 1 1 2
Ovary length (mm) 1.8 1 1.2–1.5
Stigmas quantity 2, unequal - 2 or 3
Stigmas length (mm) 0.6–1.2 1–1.2 0.2–0.4
Ovules locule 25–35 10–15 25–35
Capsule stalk length (mm) 1.1–1.6 - 6–12
Capsule ribs 12–14, conspicuous 10–12, inconspicuous 8
Open in a new tab
Type.

China. Fujian Province: Yunxiao County, Wushan Mountains, elevation 430 m, 117°14'E, 23°53'N, 4 January 2021, Bing-Hua Chen CBH 04407 (Holotype FNU barcode FNU0041131; isotype FNU barcode FNU0041132).

Root creeping, adhering to rock surfaces, ribbon-like, branched, 0.6–0.8 (−1.0) mm wide, with tufts of leaves on both flanks, not associated with root branching, 2–4 mm apart; leaves 6–12 per tuft, in two ranks, to 17.6 (12.4–23.1) mm long, 0.2–0.4 mm wide, needle-like (Fig. 1). Flowering shoots on both flanks of root, very short; bracts 2–6, needle-like, to 5–6 mm long, caduceus. Flower just prior to anthesis, with only two remaining bracts, pale purplish-red. The anthesis begins when the water level is further reduced, the bracts disappeared, but the base remained. Flower1, bud covered by ellipsoid spathella, spathella stalk ca. 3 mm in length, coated with short spiny hairs or glandular hairs, with a papilla-like tip, the papilla ruptured near apex at anthesis, but persisting spathella base keeps the ovary and lower bottom of stigma enclosed. Pedicel ca. 0.7 mm long; tepals 2, one on each side of stamen, linear, ca. 0.3 mm long; stamen 1, up to 2.9 mm long, protruding from spathella; ovary dark green, ellipsoid, ca. 1.8 mm long, 0.9 mm wide, 1-locular, free central placenta; stigmas 2, forked near base, thin, needle-like, ca. 0.9 mm long, as long as, or slightly shorter than ovary, branched at the top, upper part exerted from spathella; ovules on marginal surface of septum, 25–35 per septum (Fig. 2). Post-pollination, the spathella and ovary developed into a pale ellipsoid, ca. 2 mm long, arranged on both sides of the root, the ovary stalk lengthened and developed into pedicels (ca. 0.7 mm). Mature capsule 12–14-ribbed, conspicuous under microscope, fissured longitudinally; seed yellowish-brown, with shallow groove, ca. 300 μm long (Fig. 3).

Distribution and habitat.

Polypleurumchinense is only known from Fujian, China (Fig. 5), where it grows on rocks in unpolluted streams. In addition, Cladopusaustrosinensis M. Kato & Y. Kita from the same family was found on the rock surfaces in the lower reaches of the stream. Many other plants grow in the surrounding habitat, whose tree layer includes Pinusmassoniana Lamb. (Pinaceae), Ficusfistulosa Reinw. ex Bl. (Moraceae), Caseariaglomerata Roxb. (Salicaceae), Caralliabrachiata (Lour.) Merr. (Rhizophoraceae) and planted Eucalyptusgrandis×urophylla (Myrtaceae) and others; the shrub layer includes Ficuspyriformis Hook. & Arn. (Moraceae), Illiciumdunnianum Tutch. (Schisandraceae); the vegetation layer includes woody vine plants Melodinussuaveolens (Hance) Champ. ex Benth. (Apocynaceae), Dendrotrophevarians (Blume) Miquel (Santalaceae), Toddaliaasiatica (L.) Lam. (Rutaceae), Mappianthusiodoides Hand.-Mazz. (Icacinaceae), Byttneriagrandifolia Candolle (Malvaceae), Uvariaboniana Finet & Gagnep. (Annonaceae) and more; the herbaceous layer includes Arundinagraminifolia (D. Don) Hochr. (Orchidaceae); on the cliff, there are Cryptochilusroseus (Lindley) S. C. Chen & J. J. Wood, Pholidotachinensis Lindl., Dendroliriumlasiopetalum (Willdenow) S. C. Chen & J. J. Wood and other Orchidaceae.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Geographical distribution map of Polypleurumchinense (▲). (Map constructed using ArcGis 9.2 software).

Phenology.

Polypleurumchinense was observed flowering and fruiting in its habitat from December to February when the water level is reduced to partly expose the rocks.

Etymology.

The Zhong Guo Cha Pu Chao (中国叉瀑草). The specific epithet “chinense” refers to China, as the distribution of this genus was first identified there and it was proven to be a new species of Polypleurum.

Conservation status.

According to our investigation, Polypleurumchinense was found in patches attached to rock surfaces in rapid-flowing streams in the Wushan Mountains range in Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province, China. It is difficult to count the exact number of individuals in the population. Its habitat is vulnerable to anthropogenic destruction and projects like reservoir construction. To determine the exact distribution of this species, further fieldwork is required around the Wushan Mountains in Zhangzhou City and nearby mountainous areas. Therefore, we suggest the species be classified as category DD (Data Deficient), according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2022). According to the Updated List of National Key Protected Wild Plants (Decree No. 15) by the country’s State Forestry and Grassland Administration and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, all of the known genera of Podostemaceae found in China are classified in the national secondary protection list. The new recorded genus should also be included on the national secondary protection list during the upcoming revision process.

Morphology

The new species is morphologically similar to most Polypleurum species in that it has ribbon-like roots, tufts of linear leaves on roots, a single flower, a bud covered by spathella and an ellipsoid and rough capsule with longitudinal ribs. However, the new species differs from P.longtistylosum and P.schmidtianum in the length of leaves, the number of leaves per tuft and capsule ribs, as well as the spathella coat appearance (Table 1).

Characteristics of the Polypleurumchinense plastome

The complete plastome of Polypleurumchinense was sequenced and characterised in this study. It is 132,110 bp in length and exhibits a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a large single copy (LCS) region of 79,022 bp and a small single copy (SSC) region of 12,310 bp, which were separated by a pair of 20,389 bp inverted repeat regions (IRs). The gene map of P.chinense plastome is presented in Fig. 6. The gene composition in the plastome of P.chinense could be divided into four categories: genes related to photosynthesis, genes related to self-replication, protein-coding genes with unknown functions and other genes. A total of 108 unique genes were identified in the plastome and it contains 72 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs, and 4 rRNAs. A total of 16 genes were duplicated in the IR regions, including ndhB, rpl2, rps7, rps12, rps15, rrn4.5S, rrn5S, rrn16S, rrn23S, trnA-UGC, trnI-GAU, trnI-CAU, trnL-CAA, trnN-GUU, trnR-ACG and trnV-GAC (Table 2). There were four genes lost, including rpl23, infA and uncommon losses of ycf1 and ycf2. The annotated plastome was documented in GenBank (accession number OL944404).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Circular gene map of the plastid genome of Polypleurumchinense. Genes inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, while those drawn outside are transcribed counterclockwise. Genes are colour-coded according to their functional groups. The circle inside the GC content graph marks the 50% threshold.

Table 2.

Gene contents in the plastid genome of Polypleurumchinense.

Category, Group of Genes Gene Names
Photosynthesis:
Subunits of ATP synthase atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF*, atpH, atpI
Subunits of NADH dehydrogenase ndhA*, ndhB*(x2), ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK
Cytochrome b/f complex petA, petB*, petD*, petG, petL, petN
Subunits of photosystem I psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Subunits of photosystem II psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbK, psbJ, psbL, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ
Large subunit of rubisco rbcL
Other genes:
Subunit of Acetyl-CoA-carboxylase accD
c-type cytochrome synthesis gene ccsA
Envelope membrane protein cemA
Protease clpP
Maturase matK
Self-replication:
Large subunit of ribosome rpl2*(x2), rpl14, rpl16*, rpl20, rpl22, rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1*, rpoC2
Small subunit of ribosome rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 (x2), rps8, rps11, rps12*a (x2), rps14, rps15 (x2), rps18, rps19
rRNA Genes rrn4.5S (x2), rrn5S (x2), rrn16S (x2), rrn23S*(x2)
tRNA Genes trnA-UGC*(x2), trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnfM-CAU, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG, trnI-GAU*(x2), trnI-CAU (x2), trnK-UUU*, trnL-CAA (x2), trnL-UAA*, trnL-UAG, trnM-CAU, trnN-GUU (x2), trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnR-ACG (x2), trnR-UCU, trnS-UGA*, trnS-GCU, trnS-GGA, trnT-CGU, trnT-GGU, trnT-UGU, trnV-GAC (x2), trnV-UAC*, trnW-CCA, trnY-GUA
Unknown function:
Conserved open reading frames ycf3*, ycf4
Open in a new tab

Note: *genes containing introns; (x2) genes present as two copies in the IR regions; a indicates trans-spliced gene.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenies were reconstructed by the Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses using the matK and nrITS sequences. The phylogenetic study, based on matK sequences suggested the two subfamilies, Tristichoideae and Podostemoideae are sister groups. Polypleurum is a monophyletic group within Podostemoideae, which is divided into two subclades. Polypleurum is closer to Griffithella. Polypleurumchinense is sister to P.longistylosum with strong support (PP = 1, BS = 100) and nested in a clade formed by nine other species of Polypleurum. Polypleurumchinense 1 is extracted from the complete chloroplast genome and P.chinense 2 is a cloned matK sequence (Fig. 7). The phylogenetic analysis, based on the nrITS sequences, suggested that P.chinense is sister to a clade formed by Hydrobryopsissessilis, P.stylosum, P.schmiditianum, P.wallichii, P.munnarense, Zeylanidiumlichenoides and Z.olivaceum with strong support (PP = 0.99, BS = 86%) (Fig. 8).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree of Asian Podostemaceae, based on Bayesian Inference of matK sequences. Numbers above and below branches indicate RAxML (left) bootstrap probabilities (BP) and Bayesian (right) posterior probabilities (PP), respectively. Triangles indicate clades containing multiple species (samples) of one genus examined and the vertical lengths of triangles reflect the number of species (samples) examined.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree of Asian Podostemaceae, based on Bayesian Inference of nrITS sequences. Numbers above and below branches indicate RAxML (left) bootstrap probabilities (BP) and Bayesian (right) posterior probabilities (PP), respectively.

Discussion

Morphology

Amongst the 17 known species of Polypleurum, only two species, i.e. P.longistylosum and P.schmidtianum, have a single stamen and the shoots or tufts of leaves borne on both sides of the root between the root branches. Although P.chinense has an overall morphology similar to P.longistylosum, there are some obvious differences, such as narrower roots (0.6–0.8 mm vs.1.0–1.5 mm), leaves appearing in tufts of 8–12 (vs. 4–8) and being as long as 23.1 mm (vs. 5 mm) long; fewer bracts (4 vs. 6); spathella with short spiny or glandular hairs (vs. papillate) on its coat; capsule with 12–14 conspicuous ribs (vs. 10–12 inconspicuous ribs) (Kato 2006). The morphological differences between P.chinense and P.schmidtianum are more prominent. In P.schmiditianum, the roots are wider (ca. 2–4 mm), the peduncle is much longer (ca. 6–7 mm); the ovary is protruding from the spathella at anthesis, 2-locular; the stigmas are much shorter than the ovary; and the capsule is 8-ribbed (Kato 2006) (Table 1). In addition, the previous study reported that the capsule stalk length of Polypleurum species was 4–20 mm (Kato 2006), but the capsule stalk of the new species is less than 2 mm long, which is the shortest of all the known species.

Comparative analysis of the plastomes

A comparison of the plastome of Polypleurumchinense is made with six other species of Podostemaceae with available data (Table 3). The plastome lengths of the seven species varied from 129,074 bp (Terniopsisyongtaiensis) to 134,912 bp (Apinagiariedelii), with T.yongtaiensis being the shortest. For the LCS and SSC regions, the extent of length variation between these species is not evident. The number of PCGs in these species is similar to that of most angiosperms, according to a comparative analysis of gene content (Jin et al. 2020b). The numbers of tRNA and rRNA genes, as well as the GC content, are substantially conserved in all of these plastomes, as shown by our findings. The structure of the IR greatly influences the structural integrity of the entire genome. In all compared species, the ycf1 and ycf2 genes, which are two giant open reading frames found in most higher plants, are lost, resulting in a significant reduction of IR regions, hence reducing the size of their plastomes. The loss of ycf1 and ycf2 genes were also found in the plastome of Poaceae (Guisinger et al. 2010), Geraniaceae (Weng et al. 2014) and Ericaceae (Braukmann et al. 2017). The functions of ycf1 and ycf2 genes are still controversial and they have not been classified as genes involved in the genetic and photosynthetic systems (Drescher et al. 2000). The size of the IR regions varied amongst compared species, largely due to the evolutionary transfer of complete genes from the SSC regions into the IR or vice versa (Chumley et al. 2006; Wicke et al. 2011).

Table 3.

Statistics on the basic features of the plastid genomes of Polypleurumchinense and related taxa.

Species Voucher Accession no. Length (bp) LSC (bp) SSC (bp) IR(bp) GC content (%) No. of PCGs No. of tRNA No. of rRNA
Polypleurumchinense CBH 04407 OL944404 132,110 79,022 (~ 59.8%) 12,310 (~ 9.3%) 20,389 × 2(~ 30.9%) 34.85 74 30 4
Apinagiariedelii C.P. Bove 2513 (R) MN165812 134,912 85,377 (~ 61.0%) 12,437 (~ 8.9%) 21,049 × 2 (~ 30.1%) 34.90 74 30 4
Marathrumutile AMB 497 (ANDES) MN165814 131,951 79,778 (~ 60.5%) 12,283 (~ 9.3%) 19,945 × 2 (~ 30.2%) 35.10 73 29 4
Marathrumcapillaceum C.P. Bove 2493 (R) MN165813 134,374 79,990 (~ 59.5%) 12,302 (~ 9.2%) 21,041 × 2 (~ 31.3%) 35.00 75 30 4
Marathrumfoeniculaceum W. D. Stevens - 32072 MK995178 131,600 79,506 (~ 60.4%) 12,262(~ 9.3%) 19,916×2 (~ 30.3%) 35.10 76 30 4
Tristichatrifaria A. Mesterhazy MLI 128(Z) MN165816 130,285 78,925 (~ 60.6%) 12,662 (~ 9.7%) 19,349 × 2 (~ 29.7%) 36.40 74 30 4
Terniopsisyongtaiensis CBH 04587 OM717943 129,074 79,000 (~ 61.2%) 13,066 (~ 10.1%) 18,504 × 2 (~ 28.7%) 36.20 72 30 4
Open in a new tab

In Polypleurumchinense, Tristichatrifaria and Terniopsisyongtaiensis, the rps15 gene is found at the SSC/IR border, but it is shifted to IRs in Apinagiariedelli, Marathrumutile, M.capillaceum and M.foeniculaceum due to the expansion at the IR/SSC boundary. Jin et al. (2020b) found that the relocation of rps15 gene in M.foeniculaceum did not accumulate significant mutations, either because it occurred recently or because the substitution rate was too low to detect. In P.chinense, the trnG-UCC gene mutates to trnT-CGU and, in M.capillaceum, it is lost. In addition, it is found that all the species compared have a gene inversion from trnK-UUU to rbcLin the LSC region and the size of the inversions for each species is similar (ranging from 51 kb for P.chinense to 52 kb for A.riedelli). It represents an essential mechanism for plastome rearrangements (Mower and Vickrey 2018). The rpl23 gene is lacking in plastomes of the other five compared species, except T.yongtaiensis (Zhang et al. 2022). However, it is present in plastomes of non-Podostemaceae species, such as Bonnetiapaniculata and Cratoxylumcochinchinense (Bedoya et al. 2019; Jin et al. 2020b). We do not know the extent of gene loss amongst other Podostemaceae species in China and future sequencing projects will inevitably offer insights into rates and mechanisms of gene loss in plastid genomes.

Phylogenetic analysis

The present study confirmed Polypleurumchinense is a new species, based on the phylogenetic analysis of matK and nrITS sequences, which indicated that P.chinense is related to P.longistylosum. The phylogenetic study demonstrated that matK sequence performed better for the phylogenetic analysis of P.chinense, which was consistent with the previous studies (Koi et al. 2012; Kato et al. 2017). The ability of discrimination between species based on nrITS was comparatively poor (Khanduri et al. 2015). Despite the fact that nrITS performed quite well (79%) in angiosperms, lower discrimination success was reported for Ranunculales (6.7%) and Laurales (14.3%) (China Plant BOL 2011). The inconsistencies in species ascriptions between nrITS may result from hybridisation and introgression or incomplete lineage sorting (Alvarez and Wendel 2003; Rieseberg et al. 2006; Feliner and Rosselló 2007). As a result, utilising plastid DNA markers alone may not be sufficient to discriminate between closely-related species. Furthermore, using a single individual for each species, based on plastid DNA markers, might be deceptive (China Plant BOL 2011).

The establishment of the new species

The identification of the new Polypleurum brings the total number of genera of Podostemaceae to four in China. The discovery of Polypleurum in China not only enriches the angiosperm flora of China, but also provides strong evidence for a close connection between the subtropical flora of Fujian and the tropical flora of Southeast Asia.

Key to the genera of Podostemaceae of China

1 Flowers axillary; spathella absent; tepals 3; stamens 2 or 3 Terniopsis
– Flowers terminal; spathella present; tepals 2; stamens 1 or 2 2
2 Leaves of fertile stems digitate, 3–9-segmented, scattered, imbricate; capsule smooth Cladopus
– Leaves of fertile stems scale-like or needle-like, distichous; capsule ribbed 3
3 Stamens 2, forked; leaves of fertile stems scale-like; capsules appressed to roots; bracts boat-shaped, entire; roots foliose, with tufts of linear leaves scattered over dorsal surface Hydrobryum
– Stamen 1, simple; leaves of fertile stems needle-like, capsules erect; bracts ribbon-like; roots, ribbon-like, with tufts of leaves along both sides of root Polypleurum
Open in a new tab

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Polypleurum chinense

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ms. D.L. Cai for the illustration and Mr. T. M. Fang and J.M. Li for his kind help during our fieldwork. D.L. Lin assisted in the construction of the phylogenetic tree. This work was financially supported by Special Project of Orchid Survey of National Forestry and Grassland Administration(contract no. 2020-07), the Sub-project VI of National Program on Key Basic Research Project (Grant No. 2015FY110200), the National Special Fund for Chinese Medicine Resources Research in the Public Interest of China (Grant No.2019-39), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2020J05037 to MZ), the Foundation of Fujian Educational Committee (JAT190089 to MZ) and the scientific research innovation program “Xiyuanjiang River Scholarship” of College of Life Sciences, Fujian Normal University.

Citation

Chen B-H, Zhang M, Zhao K, Zhang X-H, Ge C-L (2022) Polypleurum chinense (Podostemaceae), a new species from Fujian, China, based on morphological and genomic evidence. PhytoKeys 199: 167–186. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.199.85679

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Appendix

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

ing-Hua Chen, Miao Zhang, Kai Zhao, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Chang-Li Ge

Data type

Primers, Voucher information (docx. file)

Explanation note

Table S1. Primers used in this study. Table S2. Voucher information for the taxa used in the present study (matK). Table S3. Voucher information for the taxa used in the present study (ITS).

References

  1. Alvarez I, Wendel JF. (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29(3): 417–434. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. (2012) SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology 19(5): 455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bedoya AM, Ruhfel BR, Philbrick CT, Madriñán S, Bove CP, Mesterházy A, Olmstead RG. (2019) Plastid genomes of five species of riverweeds (Podostemaceae): Structural organization and comparative analysis in Malpighiales. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1–14. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braukmann TWA, Broe MB, Stefanović S, Freudenstein JV. (2017) On the brink: The highly reduced plastomes of nonphotosynthetic Ericaceae. The New Phytologist 216(1): 254–266. 10.1111/nph.14681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. (2009) BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10(1): 421–429. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castresana J. (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4): 540–552. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. China Plant BOL (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(49): 19641–19646. 10.1073/pnas.1104551108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chumley TW, Palmer JD, Mower JP, Fourcade HM, Calie PJ, Boore JL, Jansen RK. (2006) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium×hortorum: Organization and evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11(11): 2175–2190. 10.1093/molbev/msl089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cook CDK. (1996) Aquatic Plant Book, second ed. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  10. Drescher A, Ruf S, Calsa Jr T, Carrer H, Bock R. (2000) The two largest chloroplast genome-encoded open reading frames of higher plants are essential genes. The Plant Journal 22(2): 97–104. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00722.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feliner GN, Rosselló JA. (2007) Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(2): 911–919. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guisinger MM, Chumley TW, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. (2010) Implications of the plastid genome sequence of Typha (Typhaceae, Poales) for understanding genome evolution in Poaceae. Journal of Molecular Evolution 70(2): 149–166. 10.1007/s00239-009-9317-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. IUCN (2022) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 15. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines
  14. JinJJ YuWB, Yang JB, Song Y. (2020a) GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology 21(1): 241–272. 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin DM, Jin JJ, Yi TS. (2020b) Plastome structure conservation and evolution in the Clusioid clade of Malpighiales. Scientific Reports 10(1): 9091–9096. 10.1038/s41598-020-66024-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Haeseler AV, Jermiin L. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kato M. (2006) Taxonomic study of Podostemaceae of Thailand 2. Subfamily Podostemoideae with ribbonlike roots and subfamily Tristichoideae. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 57: 1–54. 10.18942/apg.KJ00004622842 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kato M. (2011) Taxonomic enumeration of Podostemaceae of Cambodia and Vietnam. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B 37: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kato M, Kita Y. (2003) Taxonomic study of Podostemaceae of China. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 54: 87–97. 10.18942/apg.KJ00004623216 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kato M, Koi S. (2009) Taxonomic study of Podostemaceae of Thailand 3. Six new and a rediscovered species. Gardens’ Bulletin (Singapore) 61: 55–72. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kato M, Wong MCK, Lo JP, Satoshi K. (2017) A Cladopus species (Podostemaceae) rediscovered from Hong Kong. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 68: 17–22. 10.18942/apg.201615 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khanduri P, Tandon R, Uniyal PL, Bhat V, Pandey AK. (2015) Comparative morphology and molecular systematics of Indian Podostemaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 301(3): 861–882. 10.1007/s00606-014-1121-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kita Y, Kato M. (2001) Infrafamilial phylogeny of the aquatic angiosperm Podostemaceae inferred from the nucleotide sequences of the matK gene. Plant Biology 3(2): 156–163. 10.1055/s-2001-12895 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Koi S, Kato M. (2012) A taxonomic study of Podostemaceae subfamily Podostemoideae of Laos with phylogenetic analyses of Cladopus, Paracladopus and Polypleurum. Kew Bulletin 67(3): 331–365. 10.1007/s12225-012-9399-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koi S, Kita Y, Hirayama Y, Rutishauser R, Kato M. (2012) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Podostemaceae: Implications for taxonomy of major groups. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 169(3): 461–492. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01258.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koi S, Ikeda H, Rutishauser R, Kato M. (2015) Historical biogeography of river-weeds (Podostemaceae). Aquatic Botany 127: 62–69. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2015.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods 9(4): 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin QW, Lu G, Li ZY. (2016) Two new species of Podostemaceae from the Yinggeling National Nature Reserve, Hainan, China. Phytotaxa 270: 049–055. 10.11646/phytotaxa.270.1.5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(5): 1188–1195. 10.1093/molbev/mst024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mower JP, Vickrey TL. (2018) Structural diversity among plastid genomes of land plants in Advances in botanical research Vol. 85. Academic Press, 263–292. 10.1016/bs.abr.2017.11.013 [DOI]
  32. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Philbrick T, Novelo A. (1995) New World Podostemaceae: Ecological and evolutionary enigmas. Brittonia 47(2): 210–222. 10.2307/2806959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Qiu HX, Philbrick CT. (2003) Podostemaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH. (Eds) Flora of China, Vol.5: 190–191.
  35. Rieseberg LH, Wood TE, Baack EJ. (2006) The nature of plant species. Nature 440(7083): 524–527. 10.1038/nature04402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tǎng HT, Kato M. (2020) Culture of river-weed Terniopsischanthaburiensis (Podostemaceae). Aquatic Botany 166: 103–255. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2020.103255 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weng ML, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. (2014) Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31(3): 645–659. 10.1093/molbev/mst257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. (2015) Bandage: Interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 31(20): 3350–3352. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. (2011) The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: Gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Molecular Biology 76(3–5): 273–297. 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wurdack KJ, Davis CC. (2009) Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. American Journal of Botany 96(8): 1551–1570. 10.3732/ajb.0800207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang D, Gao FL, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT. (2019) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang M, Zhang XH, Ge CL, Chen BH. (2022) Terniopisyongtaiensis (Podostemaceae), a new species from South East China based on morphological and genomic data. PhytoKeys 194: 105–122. 10.3897/phytokeys.194.83080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou T, Jin XH. (2018) Molecular systematics and the evolution of mycoheterotrophy of tribe Neottieae (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae). PhytoKeys 94: 39–49. 10.3897/phytokeys.94.21346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Polypleurum chinense
phytokeys.199.85679-treatment1.xml (28.4KB, xml)
Supplementary material 1

Appendix

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

ing-Hua Chen, Miao Zhang, Kai Zhao, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Chang-Li Ge

Data type

Primers, Voucher information (docx. file)

Explanation note

Table S1. Primers used in this study. Table S2. Voucher information for the taxa used in the present study (matK). Table S3. Voucher information for the taxa used in the present study (ITS).

phytokeys-199-167_article-85679__-s001.doc (187KB, doc)

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES