Abstract
In this contribution to the genus Craterellus in northern China, two new species are introduced: Craterellusconnatus and C.striatus. These species and C.atrobrunneolus, initially described in south-western China, are highly similar and closely related. The species delimitation is molecularly supported by multigene phylogenetic analysis of the nr LSU and tef-1α region. Craterellusconnatus is characterised by its medium-sized basidiomata, greyish-brown and smooth pileus with an off-white margin, the hymenophore with a strongly anastomosing vein, turning khaki upon drying, connate stipe, broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores (6.1–7.8 × 4.8–5.9 μm), slender basidia with (2)4–6 sterigmata and the absence of clamp connection. Craterellusstriatus is characterised by its small-sized basidiomata, fibrillose, greyish-brown to yellowish-brown, fully perforated pileus with a brown fringe, the hymenophore with a forking vein, the stipe inflated at the base, broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores (6.8–8.0 × 5.1–6.0 μm), 2–6 spored basidia, encrusted hyphae and the absence of clamp connection. Detailed macroscopic and microscopic descriptions, accompanied by illustrations and a taxonomic discussion, are presented. A key to the Chinese Craterellus species is also provided.
Keywords: Chinese species, molecular phylogeny, morphology
Introduction
Craterellus Pers., typified with C.cornucopioides (L.) Pers. (Persoon 1825), belongs to Hydnaceae of Cantharellales (Hibbett et al. 2014). It is well represented in northern temperate zones and occurs in the tropics (Dahlman et al. 2000). Species in this genus are characterised by funnel-shaped fruiting bodies, hollow stipes, usually dark grey to black or yellow pileus (Corner 1966). Craterellus is an important genus of wild edible mushrooms and is renowned for its high economic, medicinal and ecological values (Pilz 2003). Approximately 162 records of Craterellus (including infraspecific taxa) have been found in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org). However, most of these species have been transferred to other genera, based on a phylogenetic analysis of the large nuclear subunit (nr LSU) and the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), including Cantharellus Adans. ex Fr., Gomphus Pers. and Polyozellus Murrill etc. (Dahlman et al. 2000; Contu et al. 2009; Olariaga et al. 2009; Wilson et al. 2012; Montoya et al. 2021). Nearly 100 names have been considered legitimate in MycoBank (https://www.mycobank.org/) to date.
In China, species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of macrofungi have been investigated in recent years, many new species having been discovered (Zhong et al. 2018; Cui et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020a; Cao et al. 2021a, b; Liu et al. 2021, 2022a, b; Ji et al. 2022; Sun et al. 2022). Craterellus is one of the important fungal genera of macrofungi, 14 species of Craterellus having been recorded in China: C.albidus Chun Y. Deng, M. Zhang & J. Zhang, C.atratus (Corner) Yomyart, Watling, Phosri, Piap. & Sihan., C.atrobrunneolus T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, C.aureus Berk. & M.A. Curtis, C.badiogriseus T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, C.cornucopioides, C.croceialbus T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, C.lutescens (Fr.) Fr., C.luteus T.H. Li & X.R. Zhong, C.macrosporus T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, C.odoratus (Schwein.) Fr., C.sinuosus (Fr.) Fr., C.squamatus T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, C.tubaeformis (Fr.) Quél (Bi 1994; Mao 1998; Dai et al. 2010; Gu et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015; Zhong et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2020a; Cao et al. 2021a, b). Nevertheless, due to their less attractive appearance, which can be confused with the environment, it is challenging to find Craterellus species in the field, causing them to be overlooked and thus remain undescribed. In addition, some species of Craterellus, especially those with the non-perforated pileus, are easily confused with other morphologically similar taxa, for example,, some species of Clitocybe (Fr.) Staude, Gomphus or Polyozellus, making it never easily distinguished from others in fieldwork.
During a recent survey of macrofungi in northern China, we discovered some exciting and novel species of Craterellus. In this contribution, the subsequent morphological and molecular analyses of the transcription elongation factor 1-alpha (tef-1α) and nr LSU sequences represented two new species, C.connatus G. P. Zhao, J. J. Hu, B. Zhang & Y. Li and C.striatus G. P. Zhao, J. J. Hu, B. Zhang & Y. Li which are described and illustrated herein. A key of Craterellus in China is provided as well.
Materials and methods
Vouchers and morphological analyses
This paper is principally based on materials collected by the senior author and collaborators over the past four years in northern China and specimens have been deposited at the Mycological Herbarium of Jilin Agricultural University (HMJAU).
Photographs and descriptions of macroscopic morphological characteristics were made from fresh materials in the field. The colours correspond to the “Flora of British fungi: colour identification chart” (Royal Botanic Garden 1969). Collections were dried in an oven at 45 °C and rehydrated with 95% alcohol. All microscopic observations and measurements were made in ammoniacal Congo red with a 5% aqueous potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution to improve tissue dissociation and matrix dissolution. Melzer’s Reagent was also used in the study. Measurements of basidiospores cite length and length/width ratio (Q) in this format: (minimum–) mean minus standard deviation–mean value–mean plus standard deviation (–maximum measured), Qm = average Q of all basidiospores measured ± sample standard deviation; spore measurements are based on 20 spores. Microscopic features were examined with the aid of the ZEISS Axio Lab A1.
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from dried or fresh material stored in desiccant silica gel. The extraction method followed the nuclear Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Kangwei Century Biotechnology Company Limited, Beijing, China). The amplified segments were the nr LSU and the tef-1α regions. The nr LSU region was amplified using LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990). The tef-1α region was amplified using tefF and tefR (Morehouse et al. 2003). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1 μl template DNA, 1 μl of each primer, 10.5 μl distilled water and 12.5 μl PCR mix (2× Es Taq MasterMix, CWBIO, China). PCR amplification conditions followed Vilgalys and Hester (1990) for the nr LSU region and Morehouse et al. (2003) for the tef-1α region. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel. Sequencing was performed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) using the same primer pairs used for the PCR.
Phylogenetic analyses
This study is based on around 25 specimens, including two outgroups (Hydnumellipsosporum Ostrow & Beenken and Cantharelluscibarius Fr.) (Bijeesh et al. 2018; Zhong et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2020a; Cao et al. 2021b). Sequences of the nr LSU and tef-1α regions were newly produced in this study and downloaded from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Detailed sample information is provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Information on the specimens that were used in the phylogenetic analyses. Sequences that were newly generated in this study are indicated in black bold. T: Type.
| Taxon | Voucher number | Country | GenBank accession number | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nr LSU | tef-1α | ||||
| Craterellusalbidus | HGASMF013581 (T) | China | MT921161 | – | Zhang et al. (2020a) |
| C.albidus | HGASMF0110046 | China | MT921162 | Zhang et al. (2020a) | |
| C.albostrigosus | CAL1624 (T) | India | MG593194 | – | Bijeesh et al. (2018) |
| C.atratoides | TH9232 (T) | Guyana | NG042660 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.atratoides | MCA1313 | Guyana | JQ915119 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.atratus | MCA1070 | Guyana | JQ915118 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.atratus | TH9203 | Guyana | JQ915133 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.atrobrunneolus | Yuan13878 (T) | China | MN894058 | – | Cao et al. (2021b) |
| C.badiogriseus | Yuan 14776 (T) | China | MW979532 | MW999432 | Cao et al. (2021a) |
| C.badiogriseus | Yuan 14779 | China | MW979533 | MW999433 | Cao et al. (2021a) |
| C.caeruleofuscus | MH17001 | USA | MT237468 | – | Genbank |
| C.cinereofimbriatus | TH9075 (T) | Guyana | JQ915131 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.cinereofimbriatus | TH8999 | Guyana | JQ915130 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.cinereofimbriatus | TH9264 | Guyana | JQ915138 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.connatus | HMJAU 61462 (T) | China | OM509448 | ON125915 | This study |
| C.connatus | HMJAU 61462 | China | – | ON125916 | This study |
| C.cornucopioides | HbO53302 | Norway | AF105301 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.cornucopioides | UPSF11801 | USA | AF105299 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.excelsus | MCA3107 | Guyana | JQ915121 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.excelsus | TH7515 | Guyana | JQ915127 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.fallax | AFTOL286 | USA | AY700188 | – | Genbank |
| C.ignicolor | UPSF11794 | USA | AF105314 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.indicus | PUN3884 (T) | India | HM113529 | – | Kumari et al. (2012) |
| C.indicus | MSR7 | India | HQ450770 | Kumari et al. (2012) | |
| C.indicus | MSR8 | India | HQ450771 | Kumari et al. (2012) | |
| C.inusitatus | CAL 1625 (T) | India | MG593195 | – | Bijeesh et al. (2018) |
| C.lutescens | UPSF11789 | Sweden | AF105302 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.lutescens | UPSF11790 | Sweden | AF105303 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.lutescens | UPSF11791 | Spain | AF105304 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.luteus | GDGM46432 | China | MG727898 | – | Zhong et al. (2018) |
| C.luteus | GDGM48105 (T) | China | MG701171 | – | Zhong et al. (2018) |
| C.luteus | GDGM49495 | China | MG806926 | – | Zhong et al. (2018) |
| C.striatus | HMJAU 61463 (T) | China | OM509446 | ON125913 | This study |
| C.striatus | HMJAU 61463 | China | OM509447 | ON125914 | This study |
| C.odoratus | UPSF11794 | USA | AF105306 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.olivaceoluteus | TH9205 (T) | Guyana | JQ915135 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.olivaceoluteus | MCA3186 | Guyana | JQ915124 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.parvogriseus | CAL1533 (T) | India | MF421098 | – | Das et al. (2017) |
| C.parvogriseus | CAL1534 | India | NG059049 | – | Das et al. (2017) |
| C.pleurotoides | TH9220 (T) | Guyana | JQ915136 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.pleurotoides | MCA3124 | Guyana | JQ915123 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.strigosus | MAC1750 | Guyana | JQ915120 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.strigosus | TH9204 (T) | Guyana | JQ915134 | – | Wilson et al. (2012) |
| C.tubaeformis | UPSF11793 | Sweden | AF105307 | – | Dahlman et al. (2000) |
| C.tubaeformis | BB 07.293 | Slovakia | KF294640 | GQ914989 | Buyck and Hofstetter (2011) |
| Cantharelluscibarius | BIO 10986 (T) | Sweden | KR677539 | KX828823 | Olariaga et al. (2017) |
| Hydnumellipsosoporxum | FD3281 | Switzerland | KX086217 | – | Genbank |
Sequences were assembled and edited using the software package Sequencher 5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., USA). Alignment of sequence data was performed with MUSCLE in MEGA 7.0.21 (Kumar et al. 2016). For Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses, the most suitable substitution model for each gene partition was calculated with ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) in PhyloSuite 1.2.2. (Zhang et al. 2020b). BI analyses were performed using MrBayes in PhyloSuite 1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020b), implementing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. Four simultaneous Markov chains were run from random trees, keeping one tree every 200th generation until the average standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01. The Maximum Likelihood analysis was performed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE 8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) in the CIPRES Science Gateway portal (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/tools.action) with the GTRGAMMA model and searching for the most likely tree with 1000 heuristic replicates. The bootstrap support (BS) of ≥ 50% in the ML tree and BPP of ≥ 0.75 indicated statistical significance. The phylogenetic trees were visualised using FigTree 1.4.23 (Andrew 2016).
Results
Phylogeny
Seven new DNA sequences (3 nr LSU, 4 tef-1α) were produced for this study. After removing introns and low-homology regions, the final combined alignment of these two genes totalled 2,027 characters (nr LSU: 1,024 characters; tef-1α: 1,003 characters). The best models for the BI analysis of the concatenated dataset were SYM+I+G4 for nr LSU and SYM+G4 for tef-1α. The most likely tree inferred by ML analysis of the combined dataset exhibited a quite similarly supported topology as the Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.005143. The most likely tree, based on 1000 searches, is depicted in Fig. 1 with associated bootstrap values. Maximum Likelihood Bootstrap (MLBS) and Bayesian Posterior Probability (BPP) were established along the branches. Phylogenetic analyses show (Fig. 1) that our two new species, C.connatus and C.striatus were clustered together with C.atrobrunneolus in a monophyletic clade (MLBS = 99%, BPP = 1.00). C.connatus (MLBS = 88%, BPP = 0.93) formed sister relationships (MLBS = 88%, BPP = 0.87) with C.striatus (MLBS = 60%, BPP = 0.77).
Figure 1.
BI best tree inferred from the nr LSU and tef-1α region analysis for 25 specimens. Branches that received both bootstrap support (MLBS) ≥ 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.75 are in bold; branches supported by either MLBS or BPP are in grey. Both values (MLBS/BPP) are reported along the branches. Taxon names shown in bold indicate the specimens examined in this study.
Taxonomy
. Craterellus connatus
G.P. Zhao, J.J. Hu, B. Zhang & Y. Li sp. nov.
A10BB824-F0E9-53BF-9F4E-B6E9189F50EC
842527
Figure 2.
Craterellusconnatus (HMJAU 60411, holotype) A fresh basidiocarps B connate stipes C margin of pileus D hymenophore. Scale bars: 1 cm (A, B)
Figure 3.
Microscopic characteristics of Craterellusconnatus (HMJAU 60411) A basidiospores B basidia C pileipellis. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B); 20 μm (C).
Holotype.
China. Jilin Province, Jilin City, Jiaohe County, Lafashan National Forest Part, Red Leaves Canyon, alt. 802.5 m, 43.75°N, 127.10°E, 5 September 2018, Bo Zhang HMJAU 61462, GenBank Acc. nos.: nr LSU = OM509448, tef-1α = ON125915, ON125916).
Etymology.
Connatus: referring to several stipes grown together from the base upwards.
Diagnosis.
Differs from other Craterellus species by its greyish-brown and smooth pileus with an off-white margin, hymenophore with a strongly anastomosing vein and the colouration turning khaki upon drying.
Description.
Pileus 18–30 mm in diam., infundibuliform, deeply depressed at the centre, perforated continuously to the base of the stipe; margin inrolled when young, then expand upwards, becoming upturned finally, broadly wavy; surface greyish-brown in the centre, the marginal edge dirty white, smooth. Hymenophore consists of longitudinal, anastomosing veined, off-white, turning khaki when drying and decurrent. Stipe 25–30 × 3 mm, equal to subcylindrical, hollow, central, smooth, greyish-brown. Text fleshy, greyish-brown. Odour light. Taste unknown. Spore print not obtained.
Basidiospores 6.1–6.9–7.8(8.1) × 4.8–5.3–5.9 μm, Q = (1.16)1.20–1.32–1.45(1.56), Qm = 1.32 ± 0.09, broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid, smooth, thin-walled, pale yellow in 5% aqueous KOH, inamyloid. Basidia (40)50–72.5(75) × (6)7.5–8(10) μm, clavate, sterigmata (2)4-6. Cystidia absent. Hymenium in transverse section 125–175 μm thick, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH. Pileipellis scarcely differentiated from the trama, a cutis of vastly inflated hyphae, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (22)27–63(64) × 6–15 μm, thin-walled, branched occasionally, secondary septation absent, hyaline in 5% aqueous KOH. Pileus trama up to 500 μm thick, subparallel, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (29)33–60(125) × (4)5–12(13) μm, cylindrical, thin-walled, branching frequently, secondary septation absent. Subhymenium up to 10 μm thick. Stipitipellis composed of a tightly packed mass of subparallel, narrow, cylindrical hyphae, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (33)37–79(102) × 4–13(16) μm, thin-walled, hyaline to pale yellow in 5% aqueous KOH, branched frequently, secondary septation absent. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat.
Scattered or gregarious in small clusters on the ground in coniferous and angiosperm mixed forests.
. Craterellus striatus
G.P. Zhao, J.J. Hu, B. Zhang & Y. Li sp. nov.
469F80AF-45B6-56DD-8C5B-95D80C31644C
842531
Figure 4.
Craterellusstriatus (HMJAU 60412, holotype) A Fresh basidiocarps B Stipe C Pileus D Hymenophore. Scale bars: 1 cm (A, B)
Figure 5.
Microscopic characteristics of Craterellusstriatus (HMJAU 60412) A spores B basidiobasidia C pileipellis. Scale bars: 10 μm (A); 20 μm (B); 40 μm (C).
Holotype.
China. Jilin Province, Baishan City, Fusong County, Quanyang Town, alt. 780.4 m, 42.23°N, 121.30°E, 22 August 2021, G. P. Zhao, J. J. Hu, and Bo Zhang (HMJAU 61463, GenBank Acc. nos.: nr LSU = OM509446, OM509447, tef-1α = ON125913, ON125914).
Etymology.
Striatus: referring to the fringe of pileus.
Diagnosis.
Differs from other Craterellus species by the fibrillose, greyish-brown to yellowish-brown, fully perforated pileus with a brown fringe, the hymenophore with a forking vein, not anastomosing and non-discolouring upon drying.
Description.
Fruiting body 12–45 mm high. Pileus 3–21 mm in diam., 1–10 mm tall, plane-convex firstly, soon infundibuliform and usually perforated continuous to the base of the stipe; margin inrolled when young, then expanding outwards, old becoming incurved, broadly wavy; surface blackish-brown, cream near the margin at first, gradually lighter to the centre with age, yellowish-brown finally, turning pale greyish-brown when drying, covered with brown fringe and fibrillose scales. Hymenophore decurrent, consisting of longitudinal ridges (<1 mm) with prominent forking, cross vein and off-white. Stipe 11–35 × 1–6 mm, cylindrical, inflated at the base, up to 10 mm in diam., hollow, central, smooth, blackish-brown. Text leathery, dirty white. Odour light. Taste unknown. Spore print not obtained.
Basidiospores (6.5)6.8–7.4–8.0(8.8) × (5.0)5.1–5.5–6.0 μm, Q = (1.18)1.22–1.36–1.53(1.73), Qm = 1.36 ± 0.12, broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline to pale yellow in 5% aqueous KOH, inamyloid. Basidia (34)40–67(68) × 6–9 μm, slender, sterigmata 2–6. Cystidia absent. Hymenium in transverse section 45 μm thick, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH. Pileipellis scarcely differentiated from trama, a cutis of largely cylindrical hyphae, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (30)40–70(73) × (4)5–14(15) μm, thin-walled, encrusted, branched frequently, secondary septation absent, hyaline in 5% aqueous KOH. Pileus trama up to 500 μm thick, subparallel, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (29)33–60(125) × (4)5–12(13) μm, cylindrical, thin-walled, encrusted, branching frequently, secondary septation absent. Subhymenium up to 10 μm thick. Stipitipellis composed of a tightly-packed mass of subparallel, narrow, cylindrical hyphae, yellowish-brown in 5% aqueous KOH; individual hyphae (33)37–79(102) × 4–13(16) μm, thin-walled, hyaline to pale yellow in 5% aqueous KOH, branched frequently, secondary septation absent. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat.
Scattered to gregarious on the ground in a coniferous and angiosperm mixed forest.
Key to reported species of Craterellus in China
| 1 | Clamp connections present | 2 |
| – | Clamp connections absent | 4 |
| 2 | Stipe golden yellow to orangish-yellow | 3 |
| – | Stipe grey | C.atratus |
| 3 | Pileus perforate to the base of the stipe | C.tubaeformis |
| – | Pileus not perforate | C.lutescens |
| 4 | Basidiomata not brown, absolutely light colour | 5 |
| – | Basidiomata greyish-brown to blackish-brown | 7 |
| 5 | Pileus white | C.albidus |
| – | Pileus yellow | 6 |
| 6 | Pileus very small, usually < 10 mm in diam | C.aureus |
| – | Pileus large, usually > 90 mm in diam | C.luteus |
| 7 | Basidiospores 10–15 μm long, average length > 11 µm | 10 |
| – | Basidiospores 6–12 μm long, average length < 11 µm | 8 |
| 8 | Hymenophore smooth to slightly folded | 9 |
| – | Hymenophore with well-developed veins or gill-folds | C.striatus |
| 9 | Basidia long, up to 106 µm long | C.badiogriseus |
| – | Basidia short | 13 |
| 10 | Basidia with 2 sterigmata | 11 |
| – | Basidia with 2–4 sterigmata | 12 |
| 11 | Basidiospores broad, up to 11.5 μm wide | C.macrosporus |
| – | Basidiospores 2–4 μm wide | C.cornucopioides |
| 12 | Pileus surface smooth | C.croceialbus |
| – | Pileus surface often with darker brown raised scales | C.squamatus |
| 13 | Margin dirty white | C.connatus |
| – | Margin not dirty white | C.atrobrunneolus |
Discussion
In our study, two new species formed a sister relationship with Craterellusatrobrunneolus. These three species show close morphological and phylogenetic similarities with each other. All species share the brown pileus, grey hymenophore, hollow stipe, narrow basidia and absence of clamps. Craterellusatrobrunneolus was initially described in south-western China. It is characterised by a dark brown to brownish-grey colouration, convex to plano-convex pileus with shallow depression, but not perforated centre, smooth to slightly folded hymenophore, absence of clamp connections in all tissues, narrow basidia with 2–6 sterigmata and broad ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores (Cao et al. 2021b). Craterellusconnatus is recognised in the field by the medium-sized, nearly fleshy basidiomata with the greyish-brown, fully perforated pileus, an off-white margin, strongly anastomosed, veined hymenophore and hollow stipe. Microscopically, it possesses broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores (Qm = 1.32 ± 0.09), slender basidia with (2)4–6 sterigmata and an absence of clamp connections. Craterellusstriatus is characterised by its small-sized basidiomata, blackish-brown pileus that turns yellowish-brown upon drying and is covered with brown fringe and spinous scales and off-white hymenophore consisting of longitudinal ridges (<1 mm) with prominent forking. It has a hollow and brown stipe and broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores, 2–6 spored basidia, encrusted hyphae and the absence of the clamp connection.
Craterellusatrobrunneolus differs by its dark brown to almost black throughout, convex but not perforated pileus, while C.connatus possesses greyish-brown pileus with an off-white margin and C.striatus possesses yellowish-brown, perforated pileus with brown fringe. Microscopically, C.atrobrunneolus possesses broad ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores, while C.connatus and C.striatus possess broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores. In addition, C.atrobrunneolus have 2–6 spored basidia, while C.connatus have mostly 4–6 spored basidia. Craterellusstriatus have encrusted hyphae, while C.atrobrunneolus did not. Although the two new species have similar microscopic characteristics (spores and basidia), they are separated by their colouration of dried pileus and hymenophore and the configuration of hymenophore. Craterellusstriatus is smaller (both pileus and stipe) than C.connatus. Further, C.striatus has a hymenophore composed of the forked longitudinal ridge and non-discolouring upon drying, whereas C.connatus has an anastomosing veined hymenophore, which turns khaki upon drying. Morphology and phylogenetic analyses indicated that the two new species in this study are not conspecific.
However, Craterellusatrobrunneolus was not included in any subgenus in Cao et al. (2021a). According to our study, C.atrobrunneolus, C.conatus and C.striatus have formed an isolated branch. Further research is needed to obtain a more precise infrageneric classification. Additionally, this study suggests that China, especially north-eastern China, has considerable fungal diversity and possibly many endemic species.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31970020), the Scientific and Technological Tackling Plan for the Key Fields of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (No. 2021AB004), the National Key R & D of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2019YFD1001905-33), Research on the creation of excellent edible mushroom resources and high quality & efficient ecological cultivation technology in Jiangxi Province (20212BBF61002) and the National Key R & D of Ministry of Science and Technology (2018YFE0107800).
Citation
Zhao G-P, Hu J-J, Tuo Y-L, Li Y, Zhang B (2022) Two new species of Craterellus (Cantharellales, Hydnaceae) with veined hymenophore from north-eastern China. MycoKeys 91: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.91.84730
Contributor Information
Yu Li, Email: yuli966@126.com.
Bo Zhang, Email: zhangbofungi@126.com.
References
- Andrew R. (2016) Fig. tree: tree figure drawing tool version 1.4.3. Institute of evolutionary biology, United Kingdom, University of Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
- Bi ZS. (1994) Macrongus flora of Guangdong province. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou, 311–313.
- Bijeesh C, Kumar AM, Vrinda KB, Pradeep CK. (2018) Two new species of Craterellus (Cantharellaceae) from tropical India. Phytotaxa 346(2): 157–168. 10.11646/phytotaxa.346.2.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Buyck B, Hofstetter V. (2011) The contribution of tef-1 sequences to species delimitation in the Cantharelluscibarius complex in the southeastern USA. Fungal Diversity 49(1): 35–46. 10.1007/s13225-011-0095-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cao T, Hu YP, Yu JR, Wei TZ, Yuan HS. (2021a) A phylogenetic overview of the Hydnaceae (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) with new taxa from China. Studies in Mycology 99(1): e100121. 10.1016/j.simyco.2021.100121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Cao T, Yu JR, Hu YP, Yuan HS. (2021b) Craterellusatrobrunneolus sp. nov. from southwestern China. Mycotaxon 136(1): 59–71. 10.5248/136.59 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Contu M, Vizzini A, Carbone M, Setti L. (2009) Identity and neotypification of Craterelluscinereus and description of Cantharellusatrofuscus sp. nov. Mycotaxon 110(1): 139–149. 10.5248/110.139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Corner EJH. (1966) A monograph of Canthareiloid fungi. Oxford University Press, London, 84–98.
- Cui BK, Li HJ, Ji X, Zhou JL, Song J, Si J, Yang ZL, Dai YC. (2019) Species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Polyporaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Diversity 97(1): 137–392. 10.1007/s13225-019-00427-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dahlman M, Danell E, Spatafora JW. (2000) Molecular systematics of Craterellus: Cladistic analysis of nuclear LSU rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research 104(4): 388–394. 10.1017/S0953756299001380 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dai YC, Zhou LW, Yang ZL, Wen HA, Bau T, Li TH. (2010) A revised checklist of edible fungi in China. Junwu Xuebao 29(1): 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Das K, Ghosh A, Chakraborty D, Li J, Qiu L, Baghela A, Halama M, Hembrom M, Mehmood T, Parihar A, Pencakowski B, Bielecka M, Reczyńska K, Sasiela D, Singh U, Song Y, Świerkosz K, Szczęśniak K, Uniyal P, Zhang JB, Buyck B. (2017) Fungal biodiversity profiles 31–40. Cryptogamie. Mycologie 38(3): 353–406. 10.7872/crym/v38.iss3.2017.353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gu XW, Wu RB, He BW, Ying GH, Liu DY. (2012) Edible macrofungi resources in the mountain area of southern Zhejiang. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences 11: 1515–1519. [Google Scholar]
- Hibbett DS, Bauer R, Binder M, Giachini AJ, Hosaka K, Justo A, Larsson E, Larsson KH, Lawrey JD, Miettinen O, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Weiss M, Thorn RG. (2014) 14 Agaricomycetes. Systematics and Evolution, 373–429. 10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9_14 [DOI]
- Ji X, Zhou JL, Song CG, Xu TM, Wu DM, Cui BK. (2022) Taxonomy, phylogeny and divergence times of Polyporus (Basidiomycota) and related genera. Mycosphere 13(1): 1–52. 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumari D, Upadhyay RC, Reddy MS. (2012) Craterellusindicus sp. nov., a new species associated with Cedrusdeodara from the western Himalayas, India. Mycological Progress 11(3): 769–774. 10.1007/s11557-011-0788-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Li H, Yang ZL, Bau T, Dai YC. (2015) Atlas of Chinese macrofungal resources. Central Chinese Farmer Press, Zhengzhou, 692–693.
- Liu S, Han ML, Xu TM, Wang Y, Wu DM, Cui BK. (2021) Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fomitopsispinicola complex with descriptions of six new species from east Asia. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: e644979. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.644979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Liu S, Sun YF, Wang Y, Xu TM, Song CG, Chen YY, Cui BK. (2022a) Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Trametopsis (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) with descriptions of two new species. MycoKeys 90: 31–51. 10.3897/mycokeys.90.84717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S, Xu TM, Song CG, Zhao CL, Wu DM, Cui BK. (2022b) Species diversity, molecular phylogeny and ecological habits of Cyanosporus (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) with an emphasis on Chinese collections. MycoKeys 86: 19–46. 10.3897/mycokeys.86.78305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao XL. (1998) Economic fungi of China. Science Press, Beijing, 821–826.
- Montoya L, Herrera M, Bandala V, Ramos-Fernández A. (2021) Two new species and a new record of yellow Cantharellus from tropical Quercus forests in eastern Mexico with the proposal of a new name for the replacement of Craterellusconfluens. MycoKeys 80: 91–114. 10.3897/mycokeys.80.61443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morehouse EA, James TY, Ganley AR, Vilgalys R, Berger L, Murphy PJ, Longcore JE. (2003) Multilocus sequence typing suggests the chytrid pathogen of amphibians is a recently emerged clone. Molecular Ecology 12(2): 395–403. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01732.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olariaga I, Salcedo I, Parra L. (2009) Proposal to conserve the name Craterelluscinereus (Pers.: Fr.) Donk with a conserved type against Craterelluscinereus Pers. (Basidiomycota). Taxon 58(1): 294–295. 10.1002/tax.581031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Olariaga I, Moreno G, Manjón JL, Salcedo I, Hofstetter V, Rodríguez D, Buyck B. (2017) Cantharellus (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) revisited in Europe through a multigene phylogeny. Fungal Diversity 83(1): 263–292. 10.1007/s13225-016-0376-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Persoon CH. (1825) Mycologia europaea (Vol. 2). Ioannis Iacobi Palmii, Erlangae 4.
- Pilz D. (2003) Ecology and management of commercially harvested chanterelle mushrooms (Vol. 576). Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 1–83. 10.2737/PNW-GTR-576 [DOI]
- Royal Botanic Garden E (1969) Flora of British fungi: colour identification chart. HM Stationery Office, Edinburgh.
- Stamatakis A. (2014) RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9): 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun YF, Costa-Rezende DH, Xing JH, Zhou JL, Zhang B, Gibertoni TB, Gates G, Glen M, Dai YC, Cui BK. (2020) Multi-gene phylogeny and taxonomy of Amauroderma s. lat. (Ganodermataceae). Persoonia 44(1): 206–239. 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun YF, Xing JH, He XL, Wu DM, Song CG, Liu S, Vlasák J, Gates G, Gibertoni TB, Cui BK. (2022) Species diversity, systematic revision and molecular phylogeny of Ganodermataceae (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) with an emphasis on Chinese collections. Studies in Mycology 101: 287–415. 10.3114/sim.2022.101.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson AW, Aime MC, Dierks J, Mueller GM, Henkel TW. (2012) Cantharellaceae of Guyana I: New species, combinations and distribution records of Craterellus and a synopsis of known taxa. Mycologia 104(6): 1466–1477. 10.3852/11-412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Wu D, Deng CY, Zhang M, Dauner L, Wijayawardene NN. (2020a) A new species of Craterellus (Cantharellales, Hydnaceae) from Guizhou Province, China. Phytotaxa 472(3): 259–268. 10.11646/phytotaxa.472.3.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT. (2020b) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong XR, Li TH, Jiang ZD, Deng WQ, Huang H. (2018) A new yellow species of Craterellus (Cantharellales, Hydnaceae) from China. Phytotaxa 360(1): 35–44. 10.11646/phytotaxa.360.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





