Skip to main content
NCBI home page
MycoKeys logoLink to MycoKeys
. 2022 Aug 30;92:95–108. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.92.83928

Two new species of Trichoglossum (Geoglossaceae, Ascomycota) from south Mexico

Javier Isaac de la Fuente 1, Jesús García-Jiménez 2, Tania Raymundo 3,✉, Daniyal Gohar 4, Mohammad Bahram 5, Marcos Sánchez-Flores 2, Ricardo Valenzuela 3, Juan P Pinzón 6
PMCID: PMC9849085  PMID: 36761320

Abstract

Two new species of Trichoglossum are described from south Mexico based on morphological and molecular evidence. Trichoglossumcaespitosum is characterized by the caespitose ascomata, rough and coiled paraphyses and the ascospores with 9–11 septa. Trichoglossumtropicale is characterized by the capitate ascomata, clavate and straight paraphyses and the ascospores with 10–12 septa. Both species grow in the tropical forests of the Yucatán peninsula. Here we provide descriptions and photographs for these species, together with a phylogenetic analyses based on the DNA sequences of nuc rDNA (ITS region and 28S gene) and a comparative table for the species known for America.

Keywords: Earth tongues, Geoglossomycetes, phylogeny, Quintana Roo, Tropical Ascomycetes

Introduction

The members of the genus Trichoglossum Boud. are characterized by club-like ascomata, usually with dark brown to black hues and acuminate setae covering both fertile and sterile parts of the ascomata, septate paraphyses, asci with 4 to 8 spores, and filiform, septate, brown ascospores. The genus is saprotrophic but is also present at the roots of plants as endophytic fungi (Rinaldi et al. 2008; Tedersoo et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2011; Hustad et al. 2013). They have a worldwide distribution in tropical and temperate forests (Mains 1954; Beug et al. 2014). Although the genus has been the focus of many phylogenetic studies, several species lack molecular data, which obstruct a better understanding of its phylogenetic relationships (Schoch et al. 2009; Ekanayaka et al. 2017). So far, 22 species of Trichoglossum are currently accepted (Ekanayaka et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2021; Chakraborty et al. 2022; Dasgupta et al. 2022; Index Fungorum, accessed May 2022).

In Mexico, five taxa of Trichoglossum have been recorded, mainly in temperate forest and even urban gardens: T.hirsutum (Pers.) Boud., T.hirsutumvar.hirsutum (Pers.) Boud., T.hirsutumvar.heterosporum Mains, T.variabile (E.J. Durand) Nanff., T.velutipes (Peck) E.J. Durand, and T.walteri (Berk.) E.J. Durand (Ramírez-López and Villegas-Ríos 2007; Raymundo et al. 2016). Most of the Trichoglossum collections have been made in Central Mexico, followed by a few collections from southern Mexico (Díaz-Barriga 1988; Ramírez-López and Villegas-Ríos 2007; Rodríguez-Alcántar et al. 2021; Valenzuela et al. 2021), so far, no Trichoglossum species has been recorded from the Yucatán Peninsula. In recent years, we have conducted several mycological explorations in southern Mexico, mainly in the state of Quintana Roo. During those explorations, several collections of Trichoglossum species were made, which resulted in identification of two new species. The aim of this study is to describe Trichoglossumcaespitosum and T.tropicale supported by molecular and morphological characters. Further, a comparative table is provided for the species known for America.

Methods

Sampling data

Sampling of macrofungi was carried out in the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, in the Yucatán Peninsula (Fig. 1). The representative vegetation at the sampling sites was an urban garden with Manilkarazapota and an ecotone between a lowland forest and mangrove forest with Yuccaelephantipes, Metopiumbrownei, Gymnopodiumfloribundum, Conocarpuserectus, and Byrsonimacrassifolia. Hand cuts were made in dried specimens and mounted with KOH 5%; Melzer reagent was used to observe amyloid asci apex. At least 30 ascospores, asci, and paraphyses were measured to obtain ranges. The material was deposited at mycological collections of Instituto Politécnico Nacional (ENCB), .Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY), and Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victoria (ITCV).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Map showing the collecting sites.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from silica-gel dried ascomata of the collected samples (specimens JF-208-ITCV and JF-526-ITCV), following a proteinase K protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to Põldmaa et al. (2019). Samples were incubated in 100 µl of lysis buffer [0.8 M Tris-HCl, 0.2 M (NH4)2SO4, 0.2% w/v Tween-20; Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia] and 2.5 μl of proteinase K at 56 °C for 24 h, following by 15 min at 98 °C, and finally centrifuged for 2 min at 8000 rpm. Region nuc 28S rDNA (LSU) was amplified with the primers LR0R (Cubeta et al. 1991) and LR7 or LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), using 5× HOT FIREPol. Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia). The PCR protocol followed consisted of 35 cycles of 95 °C for 40 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. ITS region nuc rDNA The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) was amplified with the primer ITS5-ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The PCR protocol consisted of 35 cycles of 95 °C for 35 s, 58 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. The amplification program was run as follows: denaturalization at 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of denaturalization at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 58 °C for 1 min, polymerization at 72 °C for 2 min, and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. Purification of the PCR products was performed with Exo-Sap enzymes (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri) and sequenced at the Estonian Biocentre (Tartu, Estonia). Sequences were assembled in BIOEDIT 7.2.5 (Hall 1999), and compared against the sequences deposited in NCBI’s database with a blastn analysis, using megablast (highly similar sequences). The sequences generated were deposited at NCBI GenBank.

Phylogenetic analyses

The taxa selection for the phylogenetic analysis was based on the available sequences of ITS and 28S of Trichoglossum in NCBI GenBank database considering the analysis of Geoglossomycetes by Hustad et al. (2013). All main clades within the class are represented, including all representatives of the Trichoglossum clade. Additionally, other specimens with ITS and 28S sequences available were included, such as Hemileucoglossumpusillum (GB: MF353090/NG_060706), Leucoglossumleucosporum (GB: KP272114/KP272115), and an uncultured Geoglossaceae (GB: D1273321/DQ273452). The molecular matrix was aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm (Edgar 2004), and variable and parsimony informative characters were calculated in MEGA 11 (Tamura et al. 2021); the DNA substitution model used in the phylogenetic analyses was selected following the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in MODELTEST 2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012).

A Bayesian inference analysis (BI) was performed in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003; Ronquist et al. 2012) of the concatenated matrix of ITS and 28S regions, which consisted of 1408 positions (703 of ITS and 705 of LSU), with 532 variable sites (37.8%) and 340 parsimony informative sites. (24.1%). The following parameters were set: substitution model GTR+I+G for both markers, two independent runs of 10 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations with one cold chain and three hot chains and the remaining parameters used as default. The substitution rates, character state frequency, gamma shape and proportion of invariable sites were unlinked for both partitions.

Additionally, a Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was carried out using the GTR+I+G substitution model and bootstrap (BS) based on 100 replicates using MEGA 11 (Tamura et al. 2021). The trees produced through the BI and ML analyses were visualized and edited with FigTree v.1.4.3 (Rambaut 2016).

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

For 28S, the blastn analysis of the collected specimens showed high levels of similarity (over 93%) with accessions of several genera within Geoglossales as well as with uncultured fungi from environmental DNA sequencing. The specimen JF-208-ITCV showed a maximum score with Trichoglossumrasum (GB: KY457227) (100% query cover, 98.69% identity), and the specimen JF-526-ITCV with Trichoglossumhirsutum (GB: KC222146) (100% query cover and 95.65% identity). For ITS, the sequence retrieved for the specimen JF-208-ITS was 384 bp in length, spanning the 18S gene (SSU) only (partial), so it could not be used for the phylogenetic analysis; however, the blastn analysis showed that the most similar sequences belong to the family Geoglossaceae: Gluginoglossum sp. (GB: OM672838), and two specimens of Trichoglossum sp. (OM474029, OM672708), all with 78% of query cover and 78.86% of identity. For the specimen JF-526-ITCV the sequence was 528 bp and contained ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2; the most similar sequences in the blastn analysis were several specimens of Trichoglossum sp. from New Zealand, showing a query cover of 100% and identity over 99.24% (OM987287, OL653059, MH578528, OL653016, HQ222864); the most similar sequence of an identified specimen at the specific level was from T.hirsutum, also from New Zealand (query cover 99%, identity 98.67%).

The majority rule consensus tree produced by the BI analysis (Fig. 2) shows a moderately well supported clade (PP = 0.96) confirmed by all specimens of Geoglossomycetes, except for Sarcoleotiaglobosa, which is collapsed at the base of the tree, together with Microglossumolivaceum (Leotiomycetes). Within the clade of Geoglossomycetes, Sabuloglossumarenarium is sister to the rest of the species (with a low posterior probability of 0.73), and two clades are identified, one formed by species of Glutinoglossum, Hemileucoglossum, Leucoglossum, Geoglossum, an uncultured Geoglossaceae, and the specimen JF-526-ITCV sister to Trichoglossumwalteri, with a high support (PP = 1, BS = 100). The second clade is well supported (PP = 1, BS = 99), and it is composed exclusively with the rest of the species of Trichoglossum in which we find the specimen JF-208-ITCV, which is sister to T.rasum with a high posterior probability (PP = 1). Our phylogenetic analysis of T.hirsutum specimens suggests that the species is polyphyletic in its current circumscription. The topology of the ML tree (not shown) shows some incongruences with the BI majority rule tree, such as the position of Hemileucoglossumpusillum and of the specimen JF-208-ITCV, which is here sister to the clade of T.hirsutum-T.octopartitum-T.rasum but with low support (BS = 68). The remaining relationships were congruent with those obtained with the Bayesian Inference analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Majority rule consensus tree produced by a Bayesian Inference analysis of the concatenated matrix of nuc rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 and 28S (LSU) showing the phylogenetic position of Trichoglossumcaespitosum (JF-208-ITCV) and T.tropicale (JF-525-ITCV) (marked with stars) within the Geoglossomycetes. GenBank accession numbers are indicated (ITS/28S). The posterior probabilities are shown above the branches, and bootstrap values (above 50) from a Maximum Likelihood analysis, below.

Taxonomy

. Trichoglossum caespitosum

de la Fuente, J. García & Raymundo sp. nov.

04656CAC-FCEE-5A36-BE95-10207C85F9E2

843008

Figs 3A–E , 5A–D

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Trichoglossumcaespitosum (Holotype) A, B ascomata C paraphyses, setae, and asci D detail of asci E ascospores. All microstructures are mounted in KOH.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

New Trichoglossum from Mexico. TrichoglossumcaespitosumA ascomata B setae C ascus D ascospore. TrichoglossumtropicaleE ascomata F setae G ascus H ascospore.

Holotype.

Mexico. Quintana Roo: Othón P. Blanco Municipality, Chetumal, alt. 8 m, 18°31'N, 88°18'W, 01 December 2015, de la Fuente JF-208-ITCV; Isotype UADY 04867. GenBank: OM727118.

Diagnosis.

Trichoglossumcaespitosum is characterized by the unique combination of characters: Caespitose habit, paraphyses with rugose and coiled tips, and the ascospores of 119–127 × 5–7 µm with 9–11 septa.

Etymology.

Named caespitosum in reference to the caespitose habit.

Description.

Ascomata black, 18–30 × 4–10 mm, clavate to spathulate, stipitate, erect, caespitose, with compressed ascogenous portion of 3–7 mm long, 0.5–1 mm thick, glossoid, ellipsoidal, flattened, sometimes curved, black, hirsute with brownish to black setae projecting from the hymenium; stipe 1–33 mm long, up to 6 mm thick, cylindrical, solid, black to dark brown, hirsute.

Setae 250–300 × 5–9 µm, septate, smooth, straight, dark brown to black. Paraphyses filamentous, septate, with rugose, with wide, coiled to clavate terminal cells of 16–28 × 3–8 µm. Asci 183–221 × 16–20 µm, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at apex, short-pedicellate at the base, hyaline, thin walled, octosporic, inamyloid. Ascospores 119–127 × 5–7 µm, filiform, mostly 9–11 septate, slightly curved, hyaline when young, brown to olivaceous when mature, narrowed and rounded at both ends, thin walled, smooth.

Distribution.

Known from the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, growing on soil under Manilkarazapota in urban vegetation.

Notes.

This species differs from other species by the caespitose ascomata, paraphyses with rugose and coiled tips, and the ascospores of 119–127 × 5–7 µm with 9–11 septa. Trichoglossumrasum Pat. is morphologically similar by the octosporic asci, clavate spathulate ascoma with dark brown hues, and the tropical distribution but it differs in the bigger ascomata (10–60 mm), smaller setae (200–250 × 5–12 µm), larger ascospores (100–140 × 5–8 µm) with 3–7 septa (Mains 1954). Trichoglossumoctopartitum Mains can also be found in the Yucatan peninsula biotic province and shows similar ascoma and ascospore size; nevertheless, the ascomata is never caespitose ascomata and shows 7-septate ascospores (Mains 1954; Ekanayaka et al. 2017). Trichoglossumconfusum E.J. Durand has also similar ascoma size but differs in the smaller ascospores (57–75 × 5–7 µm) with 3–7 septa (Mains 1954).

. Trichoglossum tropicale

de la Fuente, Sánchez-Flores & Raymundo sp. nov.

AF5F3BA3-B67B-53F0-AA62-FED8A6CA0A60

843009

Figs 4A–F , 5E–H.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Trichoglossumtropicale (Holotype) A, B ascomata C asci D detail of setae E ascospore F detail of paraphyses. All microstructures are mounted in KOH.

Holotype.

Mexico. Quintana Roo: Othón P. Blanco Municipality, Pulticub town, alt. 6 m, 19°04'N, 87°33'W, 04 February 2021, de la Fuente JF-526-ITCV, Isotype ENCB 140350. GenBank: OM727119.

Diagnosis.

Trichoglossumtropicale is characterized by the combination of characteristics: capitate ascomata, straight paraphyses with bulbose tips, and the ascospores of 122–132 × 5–5.5 µm with 10–12 septa.

Etymology.

Named tropicale in reference to the tropical occurrence.

Description.

Ascomata black, 15–30 × 2–4 mm, clavate to capitate, stipitate, erect, solitary to gregarious with compressed ascogenous portion of 2–4 mm long, 1–2 mm thick, glossoid, ellipsoidal, flattened, sometimes curved, black, without visible setae. Stipe 10–20 mm long, up to 1 mm thick, cylindrical, solid, black to dark brown, hirsute.

Setae 98–200 × 5.5–6 µm, septate, smooth, straight, dark brown to black. Paraphyses filamentous, septate, with capitate to bulbous terminal cells of 8–46 × 6–10 µm. Asci 155–180 × 16–18 µm, cylindrical to clavate, rounded at apex, short-pedicellate at base, hyaline, thin walled, octosporic, inamyloid. Ascospores 122–132 × 5–5.5 µm, filiform, mostly 10–12 septate, slightly curved, hyaline when young, brown to olivaceous when mature, narrowed and rounded at both ends, thin walled, smooth.

Distribution.

Known from the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, growing scattered on soil under Birsonymacrassifolia.

Notes.

This new species differs from other Trichoglossum species by the combination of characteristics: ascomata with inconspicuous setae (98–200 × 5.5–6 µm), straight paraphyses with bulbose tips, and the ascospores of 122–132 × 5–5.5 µm with 10–12 septa. Trichoglossumtropicale is phylogenetically close to T.walteri but that species has ascospores of 60–125 × 5–6 μm with 7 septa and paraphyses curved to circinate (Mains 1954). A similar species is T.hirsutum due to the capitate ascomata, setae size (up to 225 µm long); differs in the thicker setae and larger ascospores (90–150 × 5–7 µm) with 15 septa (Beug et al. 2014). Trichoglossumvelutipes has similar ascospore septation, but it has four-spored asci and bigger ascospores (110–145 × 6–7 µm) with 7–11 septa (Ekanayaka et al. 2017). Trichoglossumvariabile has similar number of septa, but differs in the presence of four-spored asci, smaller setae (69–183 × 7.6–12 µm), and bigger ascospores (80–150 × 6 µm) with 9–14 septa (Mains 1954; Beug et al. 2014).

Discussion

The results of the phylogenetic analyses are concordant with those of Hustad et al. (2013), recovering the Geoglossomycetes clade (except for Sarcoleotiaglobosa, collapsed at the base), as well as the Geoglossum, Glutinoglossum, and Trichoglossum clades. The inclusion of Trichoglossumwalteri and T.tropicale in this clade make the genus non-monophyletic. Both species, T.walteri and T.tropicale, form a small clade close to Glutinoglossum, nevertheless both species have setae, an absent feature within Glutinoglossum. Based on morphology and phylogenetic data (data set nuc rDNA), we describe and propose Trichoglossumcaespitosum and T.tropicale as new species that inhabit tropical vegetations and associate with Manilkarazapota and Birsonymacrassifolia respectively in the Yucatán Peninsula.

Trichoglossumcaespitosum is very close morphologically and phylogenetically to T.rasum (KY457226; KY457227), but differs because of its ascospores of 100–140 × 5–8 μm, 3–9 septa, bulbous and curved tips paraphyses; this species was described from New Caledonia (Patouillard 1909) and later it was cited from Bermuda, Cuba, Panama (Mains 1954) and India (Prabhugaonkar and Pratibha 2017). Trichoglossumoctopartitum is phylogenetically related but differs mainly in the non-caespitose ascomata and the 7-septate ascospores (Mains 1954). According to our phylogenetic study, T.caespitosum is related to T.hirsutum. This species has been recorded in America, Asia and Europe; nevertheless, this could be a species complex or polyphyletic group and needs further detailed study (Hustad et al. 2013). The main differences between T.caespitosum and T.hirsutum are the caespitose ascomata of the new species and the number of septa per ascospore. Whereas the ascospores of T.caespitosum show 9–11 septa, the ascospores of T.hirsutum generally show 15 septa; ascospores with fewer than 15 septa are rare according to Mains (1954). Trichoglossumtropicale is phylogenetically close to T.walteri (JQ256443) from North Carolina but differs in that it has spores with a size of 90–100 × 4–5.5 μm and paraphyses curved to circinate, besides, the type specimen of T.walteri is from Australia, but it was cited from Brazil, Jamaica, and the United States of America (Durand 1908; Mains 1954).

According to the blastn analysis of the ITS region, several sequences from New Zealand are close to the one obtained from T.tropicale. Nevertheless, those species are not described yet. Ekanayaka et al. (2017) gave a morphological description of a specimen from China that they referred to as T.cf.octopartitum. ITS sequences provided by Hustad et al. (2013) revealed that the species is also located in North America (being Belize the type locality) and Europe as well. Microscopical differences of the American species of Trichoglossum are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of the species of Tricholglossum from America (according 1Mains 1954; 2Chacón and Guzmán 1983; 3Ramírez-López and Villegas-Ríos 2007, and 4this work).

Species Asci (L = length × W = width) Ascospores (L = length × W = width)
T.caespitosum 4 184–220 × 16–20 μm, octosporic 120–128 × 5–7 μm, 9–11 septate
T.confusum 1 150–200 × 12–16 µm, octosporic 45–75 × 5–6 μm, 7 septate
T.farlowii 1 150–180 × 15–20 µm, octosporic 57–75 × 5–7 μm, 3–5 septate
T.hirsutum 1 180–275 × 18–25 μm, octosporic 80–170 × 5–7 µm, 15 septate
T.hirsutumvar.hirsutum 1,2 180–250 × 14–16 (21.5) µm, octosporic (80) 110–140 (170) × 5–7 µm, mostly 15 septate
T.hirsutumvar.longisporum 1 225–275 × 20–22 µm, octosporic (120) 133–180 (195) × 6–7 µm, 15 septate
T.hirsutumvar.irregulare 1 No data (90) 100–150 (165) × 5–7 µm, 15 septate, rarely 16–17
T.hirsutumvar.heterosporum 1,3 175–200 × 17–20 µm, octosporic (95) 120–150 (160) × 5–6 (7) µm, less than 15 septate
T.hirsutumvar.multiseptatum 1 210–225 × 20–25 µm, octosporic (145) 160–195 (210) × 6 µm, 12–22 septate
T.octopartitum 1 175–200 × 18–20 μm, octosporic (80) 100–120 (150) × 4–5.5 μm, 7–9 septate
T.rasum 1 200–225 × 16–24 μm, octosporic (50) 100–140 (175) × 5–8 μm, 3–9 septate
T.tetrasporum 1 175–200 × 20–25 μm, tetrasporic (110) 125–145 (150) × 6–7 µm, 0–17 septate
T.tropicale 4 155–180 × 16–18 µm, octosporic 122–132 × 5–5.5 µm, 10–12 septate
T.variabile 1 150–200 × 18–20 µm, octosporic (80-) 110–130 (-150) × 4.5–6 µm, 4–16 septate
T.velutipes 1 180–200 × 16–20 µm, tetrasporic (90) 110–145 (160) × 6–7 µm, 7–13 septate
T.walteri 1 165–200 × 15–18 μm, octosporic (60) 72–100 (125) × 5–6 μm, 7 septate
Open in a new tab

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Trichoglossum caespitosum
XML Treatment for Trichoglossum tropicale

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks Karina Can, León Ibarra, Silvia Bautista and César Ramiro Martínez-González and Alfonso Daniel Gay-González for field and technical support. García-Jiménez thanks CONACYT, PRODEP, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victoria, and the Estonian Science Foundation grant (PRG632) for financial support. Raymundo and Valenzuela thank the Instituto Politécnico Nacional with the project (SIP): 20220030 and 20221348. Also, we thank the reviewers and editors for their kind observations on the manuscript.

Citation

de la Fuente JI, García-Jiménez J, Raymundo T, Gohar D, Bahram M, Sánchez-Flores M, Valenzuela R, Pinzón JP (2022) Two new species of Trichoglossum (Geoglossaceae, Ascomycota) from south Mexico. MycoKeys 92: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.92.83928

References

  1. Beug MW, Bessette AE, Bessette AR. (2014) Ascomycetes fungi from North America. University of Texas Press, Austin, 502 pp. 10.7560/754522 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chacón S, Guzmán G. (1983) Ascomycetes poco conocidos de México. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Micología 18: 183–218. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chakraborty N, Tarafder E, Paul A, Paloi A, Acharya K. (2022) Trichoglossumbenghalense (Geoglossales, Ascomycota) from India: New to science. Phytotaxa 536(1): 72–82. 10.11646/phytotaxa.536.1.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cubeta MA, Echandi E, Abernethy T, Vilgalys R. (1991) Characterization of anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene. Phytopathology 81(11): 1395–1400. 10.1094/Phyto-81-1395 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772. 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dasgupta D, Baishkhiyar A, Chakraborty N. (2022) A world review on the genus Trichoglossum (Geoglossales, Ascomycota). Kavaka 58(1): 33–39. 10.36460/Kavaka/58/1/2022/33-39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Díaz-Barriga H. (1988) Primer registro de Trichoglossumvelutipes (Geoglossaceae, Ascomycetes) Para México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 2(2): 1–4. 10.21829/abm2.1988.561 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Durand EJ. (1908) The Geoglossaceae of North America. Ann Myc 6: 387–477. [Google Scholar]
  9. Edgar RC. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekanayaka AH, Hyde KD, Gareth-Jones EB, Zhao Q, Elgorban AM, Bahkali AH. (2017) A new species of Trichoglossum (Geoglossales, Ascomycota) from Thailand. Phytotaxa 316(2): 161–170. 10.11646/phytotaxa.316.2.5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hustad VP, Miller AN, Dentinger BTM, Cannon PF. (2013) Generic circumscriptions in Geoglossomycetes. Persoonia 31(1): 101–111. 10.3767/003158513X671235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee SH, Ko PY, Koh KB, Jun YW, Kim YJ, Jung YH, Yoon WJ, Oh DJ. (2021) A new species of Trichoglossum (Geoglossales, Ascomycota) from South Korea. Phytotaxa 527(2): 117–124. 10.11646/phytotaxa.527.2.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mains EB. (1954) North American species of Geoglossum and Trichoglossum. Mycologia 46(5): 586–631. 10.1080/00275514.1954.12024398 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Patouillard N. (1909) Champignons de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Bull. Soc. Myc. France 25: 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  16. Põldmaa K, Bills G, Lewis DP, Tamm H. (2019) Taxonomy of the Sphaerostilbellabroomeana-group (Hypocreales, Ascomycota). Mycological Progress 18(1–2): 77–89. 10.1007/s11557-018-01468-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prabhugaonkar A, Pratibha J. (2017) New record of Trichoglossumrasum from Asia Mycosphere 8(4): 583–591. 10.5943/mycosphere/8/4/7 [DOI]
  18. Rambaut A. (2016) FigTree v1.4.3. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edimburgh, Edimburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  19. Ramírez-López I, Villegas-Ríos M. (2007) El conocimiento taxonómico de Geoglossaceae sensu lato (Fungi: Ascomycetes) en México con énfasis en la zona centro y sur. Revista Mexicana de Micología 25: 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  20. Raymundo T, Soto-Agudelo R, Bautista-Hernández S, Morales-Campos AR, Valenzuela R. (2016) Catálogo de los ascomicetos del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Tlanchinol, Hidalgo. Boletin de la Sociedad Micologica de Madrid 40: 83–108. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rinaldi AC, Comandini O, Kuyper TW. (2008) Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Diversity 33: 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodríguez-Alcántar O, Herrera-Fonseca MJ, Sáldivar-Sánchez AE, Figueroa-García D. (2021) Registros nuevos de macromicetos para Jalisco, México. e-CUCBA 8: 10–20. 10.32870/e-cucba.v0i15.175 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12): 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schoch CL, Wang Z, Townsend JP, Spatafora JW. (2009) Geoglossomycetes cl. nov., Geoglossales ord. nov., and taxa above class rank in the Ascomycota tree of life. Persoonia 22(1): 129–138. 10.3767/003158509X461486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(7): 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME. (2010) Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: Global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza 20(4): 217–263. 10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Valenzuela R, Raymundo T, Reyes P, Guzmán-Guillermo J, Acosta S, Ramírez-Martínez C, Luna-Vega I. (2021) Ascomycetes from the relic forest of Oreomunneamexicana, Oaxaca Mexico. Phyotaxa 528(1): 19–44. 10.11646/phytotaxa.528.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8): 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang Z, Nilsson RH, Lopez-Giraldez F, Zhuang W, Dai Y, Johnston PR, Townsend JP. (2011) Testing soil fungal diversity with earth tongues: Phylogenetic test of SATé alignments for environmental ITS data. PLoS ONE 6(4): e19039. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. (Eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications.Academic Press, San Diego, 135–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Trichoglossum caespitosum
mycokeys.92.83928-treatment1.xml (13KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Trichoglossum tropicale
mycokeys.92.83928-treatment2.xml (14.4KB, xml)

Articles from MycoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES