Abstract
Osteoplastic precursors are critical for fracture repair and bone homeostasis maintenance. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) can promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and secrete vascular endothelial growth factors. However, little is known about its role in precursor osteoblasts; therefore, we further investigated the effect and mechanism of CeO2 NPs in precursor osteoblasts. Cell counting kit-8 analysis was utilized to detect the toxicity of CeO2 NPs on MC3T3-E1 mouse osteogenic precursor cells. Then, alizarin red S staining was employed to assess the degree of extracellular matrix mineralization, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed to measure the levels of osteogenesis-related genes. To identify differentially expressed genes, mRNA-sequencing was performed. Subsequently, GO and KEGG analyses were deployed to identify the major downstream pathways, whereas Western blot was used for verification. CeO2 NPs significantly enhanced the ability of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts to enhance matrix mineralization and increased the expression of osteogenic genes such as runt-related transcription factor 2, collagen Iα1, and osteocalcin. Pathway analysis revealed that CeO2 NPs enhanced the nuclear translocation of β-catenin and activated the Wnt pathway by promoting family with sequence similarity 53 member B/simplet expression, while Western blot analysis indicated the same results. After using a Wnt pathway inhibitor (KYA1797K), the simulative effect of CeO2 NPs was abolished. This study revealed that CeO2 NPs promoted MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblast differentiation by activating the Wnt pathway.
Keywords: Nanoparticle, MC3T3-E1 cells, Osteogenesis differentiation, RNA-seq
Introduction
Osteoblast precursors play a significant role in fracture repair and bone homeostasis maintenance. Maes et al. disclosed that osteoblast precursors and vascular endothelial cells showed co-invasion during fracture healing in mice, indicating that osteoblast precursors are involved in fracture healing [1]. Age-related bone loss is intimately linked to imbalances in bone formation and resorption [2]. Mesenchymal stem cells, distributed in bone marrow and other body parts, follow the blood circulation to reach the bone surface and differentiate into precursors osteoblasts, which further form mature osteoblasts, produce bone matrix, and promote matrix mineralization [3]. Therefore, reduced differentiation of precursor osteoblasts decreased bone formation, leading to osteoporosis. Promoting differentiation of precursor osteoblasts is an important goal for fracture repair and osteoporosis treatment.
Nanoparticles are considered promising in diagnosing and treating diseases. Passive nanoparticles (NPs) have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the clinical treatment of cancer [4, 5]. Kalyanaraman et al. evaluated the safety of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) by implanting 250–1000 mg CeO2 NPs subcutaneously in rats and observing changes in local tissues and major organs after 28 days [6]. The results demonstrated that CeO2 NPs did not significantly stimulate local tissues and showed no toxicity to major organs, implying that cerium oxide nanoparticles have good biosafety. Previous studies have demonstrated that CeO2 NPs are characterized by excellent scavenging ability of active free radicals, mainly based on their potential to simulate glutathione peroxidase and catalase during the transformation of Ce3+ and Ce4+ valence states [7]. Li et al. found that CeO2 NPs reversed the decrease of superoxide dismutase activity in H2O2-induced osteoblast oxidative damage and reduced the production of reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde formation [8]. Wei et al. suggested that CeO2 NPs can induce M2-type differentiation of macrophages and promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells [9]. Similarly, Purohit et al. stated that composite scaffolds with CeO2 NPs significantly promoted bone repair [10]. However, the mechanism by which CeO2 NPs promote osteoblast differentiation has not been fully elucidated.
In this study, we determined the effects of CeO2 NPs on MC3T3-E1 mouse precursor osteoblasts. It was revealed that CeO2 NPs promote the nuclear translocation of β-catenin protein, activate the Wnt pathway, and promote the differentiation of precursor osteoblasts by increasing Fam53B expression.
Material and Methods
Preparation and Characterization of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
Cerium nitrate hexahydrate was added to a mixture of ethylene glycol and double-distilled water and heated to 60 ℃. After adding ammonia, the solution was then agitated until it turned yellowish-white. CeO2 NPs were obtained by high-speed centrifugation. After washing three times, sodium citrate was employed as a surfactant to activate NPs. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was utilized to evaluate particle size and zeta potential. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe the morphology of CeO2 NPs. X-ray powder diffraction patterns were used to evaluate the crystallinity of NPs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was utilized to assess the chemical composition of the surface and valence state of CeO2 NPs.
Cell Culture
MC3T3-E1 mouse precursor osteoblasts cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (HyClone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced after 2–3 days.
Cytotoxicity Test
Cytotoxicity tests were utilized to find suitable concentrations of CeO2 NPs. MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts were inoculated into 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well, and CeO2 NPs at different concentrations (0, 1, 3, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, and 200 µg/mL) at 37 ℃ for 24 and 48 h, respectively. After discarding the medium, it is washed once with PBS. The absorbance value at 450 nm was detected after incubating with non-haematine medium containing 10% cell counting kit-8 reagent (Dojindo) at 37 ℃ for 2 h and 30 min.
Alizarin Red S Staining
The impact of CeO2 NPs on the mineralization of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts was evaluated using alizarin red S staining. After covering the 12-well plates with gelatin, precursor osteoblasts were seeded into the plates at a density of 3 × 104 cells/mL. Precursor osteoblasts were cultured in osteogenic differentiation induction media containing CeO2 NPs at different concentrations (0, 1, and 3 µg/mL). After 14 days of differentiation, precursor osteoblasts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde phosphate buffer for 15 min. We washed the cells with ddH2O and stained them with alizarin red S (Sigma) for 3 min. The image was captured after the sample was rinsed twice. The procedures were independently repeated three times to ensure reliability.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
The effect of CeO2 NPs on osteogenesis differentiation of precursor osteoblasts was further analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis (qRT-PCR) according to the published protocol [11]. We used RNA-quick purification kit (ESscience) to extract total cellular RNA. The cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of RNA utilizing a PrimescriptTM RT reagent kit with a gDNA eraser (Takara Bioindustry) according to manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was diluted with nuclease-free water in a ratio of 1:10. Maxima SYBR green PCR master mix (2 ×) was used for real-time PCR analysis. The program used for real-time PCR included initial denaturation at 95 ℃ for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 ℃ for 15 s, annealing at 60 ℃ for 30 s and extension at 72 ℃ for 30 s. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH expression, and 2−ΔΔCT method was utilized to determine relative gene expression. The primers of runt related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), osteocalcin (OCN), collagen Iα1 (Col Iα1), family with sequence similarity 53 member B (Fam53B), and GAPDH were designed with the aid of NCBI Primer-Blast Tool, which were listed as follows: Runx2 (F) 5′-AGAGTCAGATTACAGATCCCAGG-3′, (R) 5′-TGGCTCTTCTTACTGAGAGAGG-3′; OCN (F) 5′-TAGTGAACAGACTCCGGCGCTA-3′, (R) 5′-TGTAGGCGGTCTTCAAGCCAT-3′; Col Iα1 (F) 5′-GCTTCACCTACAGCACCCTTGT-3′, (R) 5′-TGACTGTCTTGCCCCAAGTTC-3′; Fam53B (F) 5′-ACCTGGATAGAAAATGCCCTCT-3′, (R)5′-GAGGTCTTTGATTAGGCTGGTC-3′; GAPDH (F) 5′-TGACCTCAACTACATGGTCTACA-3′, (R) 5′-CTTCCCATTCTCGGCCTTG-3′.
mRNA-Sequencing
Total cellular RNA was extracted following the same aforementioned method. Messenger (m)RNA for each sample was enriched using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. The first strand cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primer and RNase H. Second strand cDNA synthesis was subsequently performed using buffer, dNTPs, DNA polymerase I, and RNase H. The purified cDNA was subjected to a final reparation, the addition of an A-tailing, and an adapter. Ultimately, cDNA library was sequenced on Illumina Hiseq xTen platform.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blotting analysis was performed as described previously [12]. Total protein was extracted by direct lysis of cells using cold RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Nuclear protein was extracted using a nuclear protein extraction kit (Solarbio) following manufacturer’s protocol. The protein concentration was determined using a Pierce™ BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were fractionated on precast protein improve gels (Yeasen Biotechnology) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore). The membrane was then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk at room temperature for 2 h. After three additional washes with TBST, membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 ℃. The primary antibodies are as follows: Runx2 (mouse mAb; cat. no. ab76956; Abcam), OCN (rabbit mAb; cat. no. ab93876; Abcam), Fam53B (rabbit mAb; cat. no. NBP1-88,976; Novus), GAPDH (mouse mAb; cat. no. ab8245; Abcam), β-catenin (rabbit mAb; cat. no. 51067–2-AP; Proteintech), lamin A/C (rabbit mAb; cat. no. 51067–2-AP; Proteintech). After washing three times with TBST for 10 min, membranes were then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (goat Anti-Rabbit IgG, Cat.no.ZB-2301, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology; goat Anti-Mouse IgG, cat. no. A0216, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed three more times with TBST, protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit (FDbio Science Biotechnology).
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The data comparisons between multiple groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas comparisons between two groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. During the differential expression analysis, all p-values were adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg method. Genes with q ≤ 0.05 and |log2Ratio|≥ 1 are identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). GO enrichment of DEGs was implemented by the hypergeometric test, in which p-value is calculated and adjusted as a q-value. GO terms with q < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched. KEGG enrichment of DEGs was performed using hypergeometric test, in which p-value was adjusted by multiple comparisons as q-value, which was considered significantly enriched when p-value was less than 0.05. Differential expression analysis was performed using DEGseq R package (v1.16), and other analyses were performed using SPSS program version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
Results
Characterization of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
The results of DLS revealed that the mean particle size and zeta potential of CeO2 NPs were 12.13 nm and − 36 mV, respectively (Fig. 1a–b). TEM demonstrated that most nanoparticles were oval in shape (Fig. 1c). The diffraction peaks from powder X-ray diffraction patterns were well matched to the standard cerium oxide pattern (PDF2:34–0394), indicating the high purity of our synthetic nanoparticles (Fig. 1d). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that the relative levels of Ce4+ and Ce3+ were 42.13% and 57.87% (Fig. 1e–f).
Fig. 1.
Characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles. A Particle size distribution. B Zeta potential. C A transmission electron microscopy image. D X-ray powder diffraction patterns for CeO2 NPs. E X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra of CeO2 NPs. F Development of Ce 3d X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra and fitted Ce 3d X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra
Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Promoted Precursor Osteoblast Differentiation in MC3T3-E1 Cells
CCK-8 analysis indicated that CeO2 NPs had a non-significant effect on chondrocyte viability in the range of 0–3 µg/mL (Fig. 2a). Consequently, we used concentrations of 1 and 3 µg/mL NPs for subsequent in vitro experiments. Then, Alizarin red staining and qPCR were utilized to determine the effect of CeO2 NPs on osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. As displayed in Fig. 2b–c, we detected a significant increase in Ca2+ accumulation in the extracellular matrix. Among them, CeO2 NP-mineralized nodules at a 1 µg/ml concentration were the most significant. Additionally, we conducted qPCR to examine the expression of osteogenic marker genes (Runx2, Col Iα1 and OCN) in MC3T3-E1 cells and the effect of CeO2 NPs on enhancing osteogenesis. Compared with the control group, MC3T3-E1 cells treated with CeO2 NPs for 48 h showed significantly enhanced osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2 .
Cerium oxide nanoparticles increased osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblast. A Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on cell viability of MC3T3-E1 cells. B Alizarin red S staining was performed on days 14 after treatment with cerium oxide nanoparticles. C Semi-quantitative analysis of calcium deposits. D qRT-PCR was employed to examine changes in the levels of Runx2, osteocalcin, and collagen Iα1 in MC3T3-E1 cells after treatment with cerium oxide nanoparticles for 48 h
Functional Annotation and Pathways Analysis of Differential Expressed Genes
Considering that 1 µg/mL CeO2 NPs demonstrated the best effect, we used this concentration in subsequent experiments. MC3T3-31 mouse precursor osteoblasts were treated with 1 µg/mL NPs for 48 h, and RNA of it and control group were extracted for sequencing. The results revealed that seven DEGs were upregulated, and four were downregulated compared with the control group. Heatmap indicated that DEGs had similar expression patterns within groups and different expression patterns between groups (Fig. 3a). These DEGs were significantly enriched in 30 GO items, such as negative regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity in biological process and Wnt signalosome in cell composition (q < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, 20 KEGG pathways were substantially enriched, including nitrogen metabolism, prolactin signaling pathway, growth hormone synthesis, Wnt pathway, insulin signaling pathway, and thyroid hormone signaling pathway (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3.
Heatmap and enrichment analysis of cerium oxide nanoparticles induced by differential gene expression. A Heatmap. B GO term enrichment. c KEGG pathway enrichment
Wnt pathway activation is critical in differentiating precursor osteoblasts. As depicted in Fig. 3a, Fam53B gene expression was substantially upregulated in MC3T3-E1 cells treated with CeO2 NPs. The Simplet/Fam53B belongs to a family of proteins (Fam53A, Fam53B, and Fam53C), and previous studies have revealed its involvement in Wnt pathway transduction by promoting β-catenin nuclear translocation [13].
Fam53B Activates the Wnt Pathway by Promoting Beta-Catenin Nuclear Translocation
To determine whether Fam53B gene expression was increased, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis and Western blot (WB) analysis were used for verification. After treating MC3T3-E1 mouse precursor osteoblasts with 1 µg/mL cerium oxide nanoparticles for 48 h, we observed a significant increase in Fam53B expression (Fig. 4a). Subsequently, we determined whether Fam53B bridged CeO2 NPs and β-catenin signaling. We treated MC3T3-E1 cells with different combinations of β-catenin inhibitor (KYA1797K) and CeO2 NPs for 48 h. As expected, Fam53B significantly increased the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and the expression of downstream osteogenic genes OCN and Runx2. KYA1797K partially reversed the effect of CeO2 NPs on osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 4b–d).
Fig. 4.
Cerium oxide nanoparticles activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling to promote osteogenesis differentiation by increasing Fam53B expression. A Fam53B expression in MC3T3-E1 treated with cerium oxide nanoparticles for 48 h using qRT-PCR, Western blotting, and quantification related to GAPDH levels. B The levels of β-catenin protein in the nucleus of MC3T3-E1 treated with 1 µg/mL cerium oxide nanoparticles in the presence or absence of KYA1797K after 48 h. C qRT-PCR was used to examine changes in the levels of Runx2, osteocalcin in MC3T3-E1 treated with cerium oxide nanoparticles in the presence or absence of KYA1797K after 48 h. D Representative Western blot images of Runx2 and osteocalcin in MC3T3-E1 treated as described above. E Quantitative analysis of Runx2 and osteocalcin
Discussion
The role of CeO2 NPs in osteogenic differentiation has been partially demonstrated in previous studies. Lu et al. disclosed that CeO2 NPs promote osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by activating ERK pathway [14]. Vascular invasion is the premise of bone remodeling and fracture repair. Xiang et al. stated that CeO2 NPs promote proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells by increasing the stability of HIF-1αin mesenchymal stem cells and increasing vascular endothelial growth factor expression [15]. However, the mechanism of CeO2 NPs in precursor osteoblasts has not been elucidated.
Although no human pharmacokinetic studies have been performed, CCK-8 analysis suggested that 0–3 µg/mL CeO2 NPs had no significant effect on cell viability of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts. The influence of 1 and 3 µg/mL CeO2 NPs on promoting osteogenesis and its mechanism were further investigated in subsequent experiments. Alizarin Red S staining was performed first. Extracellular matrix mineralization is a major part of bone formation; consequently, the number and size of calcium nodules can be used to measure the degree of osteoblast differentiation. The results demonstrated that CeO2 NPs significantly enhanced the extracellular matrix mineralization of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts, especially at 1 µg/mL. Runx2 and osteocalcin are significant marker genes for osteogenic differentiation, and their expression is increased at different osteogenic differentiation stages [16, 17]. Col Iα1 is a major component of bone matrix and is secreted by osteoblasts. Our study demonstrates that CeO2 NPs significantly upregulated their expression.
Based on previously mentioned results, we suggested that 1 µg/mL CeO2 NPs had the best effect. Therefore, it was used to treat MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts, and total RNA was extracted for mRNA-seq. The results demonstrated that Fam53B gene expression in MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts significantly increased after CeO2 NPs. After treating MC3T3-E1 mouse precursor osteoblasts with CeO2 NPs, we detected a significant increase in Fam53B expression. Thermes et al. found that the absence of Fam53B reduced cell proliferation in medaka fish [18]. Kizil et al. found that Fam53B loss in zebrafish cells reduced nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, a major protein downstream of Wnt pathway, while Fam53B overexpression promoted the nuclear translocation of β-catenin [13]. The bone morphogenetic protein, Wnt, Indian hedgehog, and other proteins are involved in differentiating precursor osteoblasts [19, 20]. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates osteogenic differentiation, bone formation, and the occurrence of various bone metabolic diseases [21]. The canonical Wnt pathway is initiated by binding Frizzled transmembrane receptors, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5), and/or LRP6 bind to secreted Wnts, resulting in activated dishevelled proteins [22]. Subsequently, activated dishevelled phosphorylates glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), inhibiting its function. β-catenin protein was released from the complex of GSK-3β, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and axin. Then, β-catenin protein accumulates in the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus. Using T cell factor/lymphoid enhancing factor (TCF/LEF), β-catenin can activate the expression of c-myc, c-Jun, and other downstream transcription factors, thus promoting the expression of osteogenic genes [23]. In addition, β-catenin increased Runx2 expression (Fig. 5). KYA1797K can promote β-catenin degradation. After adding KYA1797K to the culture medium, we found that promoting MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts differentiation by CeO2 NPs was abolished.
Fig. 5.
Potential mechanism of cerium oxide nanoparticles promoting osteogenesis. β-catenin proteins mediate the canonical Wnt pathway. In the cytoplasm, β-catenin is phosphorylated by the complexes of GSK-3β, APC, and Axin and is subsequently degraded. Wnt stimulation inhibited GSK-3β activity, resulting in β-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm, which translocates into the nucleus later and promotes the transcription of target genes. Cerium oxide nanoparticles promoted β-catenin nuclear translocation by promoting Fam53B protein expression
This study also has certain limitations. We only evaluated the effect of CeO2 NPs in vitro, lacking data in vivo experiments. Therefore, in future studies, we will further evaluate the role of CeO2 NPs in vivo.
Conclusion
To summarize, CeO2 NPs promoted Fam53B expression, which increased the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, thus activating Wnt pathway. Wnt pathway activation contributes to increased expression of downstream osteoblast-related genes, promoting the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 precursor osteoblasts.
Author Contribution
Junchao Luo and Yu Tong conceived the project and designed the experiment. Junchao Luo, Senbo Zhu, Yin Zhang, and Li Cao performed the key experiments and prepare the manuscript. Mingxiang Kong, Yong Li, and Min Luo analyzed the data and composited the diagram. Qing Bi and Qiong Zhang directed the experiment and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.
Funding
This work was supported by the Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Fund project (2019ZB138), Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission (2021KY028), Basic public welfare research plan of Zhejiang Province (GF19H060034), Health Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (2020KY029) and National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81672769), and Basic public welfare research plan of Zhejiang Province (LGF22H060029).
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics Approval
This paper complies with ethical standards and does not require ethical approval.
Consent for Publication
All authors agree to publish this paper.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Junchao Luo and Senbo Zhu contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Maes C, Kobayashi T, Selig MK, Torrekens S, Roth SI, Mackem S, Carmeliet G, Kronenberg HM. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev Cell. 2010;19(2):329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim JM, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB and Shim JH (2020) Osteoblast-osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells 9(9). 10.3390/cells9092073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Blair HC, Larrouture QC, Li Y, Lin H, Beer-Stoltz D, Liu L, Tuan RS, Robinson LJ, Schlesinger PH, Nelson DJ. Osteoblast differentiation and bone matrix formation in vivo and in vitro. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017;23(3):268–280. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amreddy N, Babu A, Muralidharan R, Panneerselvam J, Srivastava A, Ahmed R, Mehta M, Munshi A, Ramesh R. Recent advances in nanoparticle-based cancer drug and gene delivery. Adv Cancer Res. 2018;137:115–170. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alavi M and Hamidi M (2019) Passive and active targeting in cancer therapy by liposomes and lipid nanoparticles. Drug Metab Pers Ther 34(1). 10.1515/dmpt-2018-0032 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Kalyanaraman V, Naveen SV, Mohana N, Balaje RM, Navaneethakrishnan KR, Brabu B, Murugan SS, Kumaravel TS. Biocompatibility studies on cerium oxide nanoparticles - combined study for local effects, systemic toxicity and genotoxicity via implantation route. Toxicol Res (Camb) 2019;8(1):25–37. doi: 10.1039/c8tx00248g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo J, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Tong Y, Ji L, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Bi Q. The application prospect of metal/metal oxide nanoparticles in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021;394(10):1991–2002. doi: 10.1007/s00210-021-02131-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li K, Xie Y, You M, Huang L, Zheng X. Plasma sprayed cerium oxide coating inhibits H2O2-induced oxidative stress and supports cell viability. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(6):100. doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5710-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wei F, Neal CJ, Sakthivel TS, Kean T, Seal S, Coathup MJ. Multi-functional cerium oxide nanoparticles regulate inflammation and enhance osteogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;124:112041. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Purohit SD, Singh H, Bhaskar R, Yadav I, Chou CF, Gupta MK, Mishra NC. Gelatin-alginate-cerium oxide nanocomposite scaffold for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;116:111111. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen XJ, Shen YS, He MC, Yang F, Yang P, Pang FX, He W, Cao YM, Wei QS. Polydatin promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells by activating the BMP2-Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108746. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yuan K, Mei J, Shao D, Zhou F, Qiao H, Liang Y, Li K, Tang T. Cerium oxide nanoparticles regulate osteoclast differentiation bidirectionally by modulating the cellular production of reactive oxygen species. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:6355–6372. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S257741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kizil C, Küchler B, Yan JJ, Özhan G, Moro E, Argenton F, Brand M, Weidinger G, Antos CL. Simplet/Fam53b is required for Wnt signal transduction by regulating β-catenin nuclear localization. Development. 2014;141(18):3529–3539. doi: 10.1242/dev.108415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu B, Zhu DY, Yin JH, Xu H, Zhang CQ, Ke QF, Gao YS, Guo YP. Incorporation of cerium oxide in hollow mesoporous bioglass scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration by activating the ERK signaling pathway. Biofabrication. 2019;11(2):25012. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xiang J, Li J, He J, Tang X, Dou C, Cao Z, Yu B, Zhao C, Kang F, Yang L, Dong S, Yang X. Cerium oxide nanoparticle modified scaffold interface enhances vascularization of bone grafts by activating calcium channel of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(7):4489–4499. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Komori T. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by transcription factors. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99(5):1233–1239. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Komori T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;149(4):313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thermes V, Candal E, Alunni A, Serin G, Bourrat F, Joly JS. Medaka simplet (FAM53B) belongs to a family of novel vertebrate genes controlling cell proliferation. Development. 2006;133(10):1881–1890. doi: 10.1242/dev.02350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grafe I, Alexander S, Peterson JR, Snider TN, Levi B, Lee B and Mishina Y (2018) TGF-β family signaling in mesenchymal differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10(5). 10.1101/cshperspect.a022202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Ohba S (2020) Hedgehog signaling in skeletal development: roles of Indian hedgehog and the mode of its action. Int J Mol Sci 21(18). 10.3390/ijms21186665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Karner CM, Long F. Wnt signaling and cellular metabolism in osteoblasts. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(9):1649–1657. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2425-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maeda K, Kobayashi Y, Koide M, Uehara S, Okamoto M, Ishihara A, Kayama T, Saito M and Marumo K (2019) The regulation of bone metabolism and disorders by Wnt signaling. Int J Mol Sci 20(22). 10.3390/ijms20225525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Hong G, He X, Shen Y, Chen X, Yang F, Yang P, Pang F, Han X, He W, Wei Q. Chrysosplenetin promotes osteoblastogenesis of bone marrow stromal cells via Wnt/β-catenin pathway and enhances osteogenesis in estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1375-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.