Abstract
Background:
Pannexin 1 (Panx1) forms high conductance channels that secrete ATP upon stimulation. The role of Panx1 in mediating constriction in response to direct sympathetic nerve stimulation is not known. Additionally, it is unknown how the expression level of Panx1 in SMCs influences α-adrenergic responses. We hypothesized that the amount of Panx1 in SMCs dictates the levels of sympathetic constriction and blood pressure.
Methods:
To test this hypothesis, we used genetically modified mouse models enabling expression of Panx1 in vascular cells to be varied. Electrical field stimulation on isolated arteries and blood pressure were assessed.
Results:
Genetic deletion of SMC Panx1 prevented constriction by electric field stimulation of sympathetic nerves. Conversely, over-expression of Panx1 in SMCs using a ROSA26 transgenic model increased sympathetic nerve-mediated constriction. Cx43 hemichannel inhibitors did not alter constriction. Next, we evaluated the effects of altered SMC Panx1 expression on blood pressure. To do this, we created mice combining a global Panx1 deletion, with ROSA26-Panx1 under the control of an inducible SMC specific Cre (Myh11). This resulted in mice that could express only human Panx1, only in SMCs. After tamoxifen, these mice had increased blood pressure that was acutely decreased by the Panx1 inhibitor spironolactone. Control mice genetically devoid of Panx1 did not respond to spironolactone.
Conclusion:
These data suggest Panx1 in SMCs could regulate the extent of sympathetic nerve constriction and blood pressure. The results also show the feasibility humanized Panx1-mouse models to test pharmacological candidates.
Keywords: pannexin, smooth muscle, sympathetic nerve, blood pressure
Graphical Abstract
Background
The pannexins are a family of 3 membrane proteins (Panx1, Panx2, and Panx3) that form high conductance channels. In the resistance vasculature, Panx1 is expressed in both endothelial cells (EC) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs).1 In SMC, Panx1 channel opening by α-adrenergic stimulation is one of the best described physiological mechanisms to open the channel as demonstrated by electrophysiology, ATP release, and pressure myography of resistance arteries using genetic models.2-9 Conditional genetic deletion of Panx1 from SMCs prevents phenylephrine stimulated constriction of resistance arteries. In contrast, genetic deletion of EC Panx1 does not affect systemic hemodynamics, but does regulate cerebral myogenic tone.2, 10 As one might expect from these observations, the deletion of Panx1 in SMCs results in a reduction of blood pressure.2, 3
Pharmacological approaches to Panx1 inhibition are difficult to interpret and imprecise. For example, probenecid is an accepted Panx1 inhibitor, however it must be used in mM concentrations, is known to block a plethora of other ion channels, and more recently was unable to be resolved in high resolution structures of Panx1.11 One of the most specific Panx1 inhibitor with single channel efficacy is spironolactone. However, this drug has been used for decades to block the mineral corticoid receptor chronically. As such, making broad assumptions on Panx1 channels using any one drug can be misleading and difficult to interpret. One method to define a role more precisely for Panx1, and possibly compliment the pharmacology, is the use of genetically modified animals.
While it is known that Panx1 contributes to α1-adrenergic stimulated vasoconstriction, its contribution to vasoconstriction in response to direct sympathetic stimulation has not been examined. Additionally, it remains unknown how the expression level of Panx1 in SMCs influences the response to sympathetic stimulation and blood pressure. We hypothesized that the amount of Panx1 in SMCs dictates the levels of sympathetic vasoconstriction and blood pressure. More specifically, that genetic deletion of Panx1 from SMCs impairs sympathetic vasoconstriction and lowers blood pressure, while genetic over-expression of Panx1 in SMCs increases sympathetic vasoconstriction and blood pressure. We tested this hypothesis using a series of mouse models that enabled Panx1 expression to be toggled genetically in SMCs.
Materials and Methods
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Mice
Panx1fl/fl were used as controls and to create inducible smooth muscle knockouts (Panx1fl/fl / Myh11-CreERT2+ as previously described3; iSMC Panx1 KO) or inducible endothelial cells knockouts (Panx1fl/fl / Cdh5-CreERT2+ as previously described12; iEC Panx1 KO). The ROSA26-Panx1TG mouse with LoxP sites flanking a STOP codon was previously utilized by us to over-express human Panx1.7 Like mouse Panx1, human Panx1 is opened by α-adrenergic activation as demonstrated by single-channel recordings and human resistance arteries (e.g., 2). These mice were breed with the Myh11-CreERT2+ to create mice with over-expression of Panx1 in SMC upon tamoxifen induction (ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+; iSMC Panx1 OE). The ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+ mice were then bred with Panx1−/− mice (Panx1−/− mice were originally described13; this cross created mice lacking all endogenous Panx1, but inducible expression of Panx1 only in SMC (Panx1−/− / ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+; Panx1KO-iSMC OE). In all cases, only male mice were used because the Myh11 Cre transgene, which is specific to smooth muscle and does not target cardiac or skeletal muscle, is found exclusively on the Y-chromosome. Littermates were used in all instances. See Table 1 for complete list of mice used in the experiments described herein, as well as their abbreviations in the figures.
Table 1:
Genotype | Induction | Abbreviation |
---|---|---|
C57Bl/6 | none | C57Bl/6 |
Panx1 fl/fl | tamoxifen | Panx1fl/fl |
Panx1fl/fl / Myh11-CreERT2+ | tamoxifen | iSMC Panx1 KO |
Panx1fl/fl / Cdh5-CreERT2+ | tamoxifen | iEC Panx1 KO |
ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+ | tamoxifen | iSMC Panx1 OE |
ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2− | tamoxifen | TG Tamox Control |
ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+ | peanut oil | TG Geno Control |
Panx1 −/− | tamoxifen | Panx1KO |
Panx1−/− / ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+ | tamoxifen | Panx1KO-iSMC OE |
Panx1−/− / ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2− | tamoxifen | Panx1KO-TG Tamox Control |
Panx1−/− / ROSA26-Panx1TG / Myh11-CreERT2+ | peanut oil | Panx1KO-TG Geno Control |
At 6 weeks of age, all mice were injected daily with 1mg of tamoxifen (mixed in peanut oil as vehicle) for 10 consecutive days (up to 8 weeks in age), and then allowed a two-week tamoxifen washout period so that all experiments were performed on mice at the minimum of 10 weeks of age, up to 15 weeks of age. Mice had a 12h light/dark cycle, were kept at 22-24°C, and had access to water and food ad libitum. Mice were used for experiments following the guidelines of the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee.
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry of mesenteric cross-sections from mice were performed as previously described with Panx1 antibody (Cell Signaling 91137).14
Western Blots
Western blots of isolated mesenteric arteries were performed as previously described.15 Antibodies used were Panx1 (Cell Signaling 91137) and beta-actin (Cell Signaling 8457). Total protein for blots was provided by Li-Cor Corporation.
ATP Assays
Both ATP release and intracellular ATP from isolated mesenteric arteries were performed using a ATP Bioluminescence HSII kit (Roche) kit as previously described.3
Electrical Field Stimulation (EFS)
Third order mesenteric arteries were isolated for electrical field stimulation based on previously reported methods.16 Sympathetic nerves on third order mesenteric arteries were stimulated by two platinum electrodes in a bath chamber (STIM-1501; Living Systems Instrumentation). To measure sympathetic vasoconstriction electrical pulses (70 V, 2 ms) were delivered at 4, 8, 12, and 16 Hz. Pulses were performed every 5 minutes.
Urinary norepinephrine (NE)
Urine was collected from mice in metabolic cages after a two-week adjustment period. A norepinephrine ELISA (KA1877, Novus) was used to quantify amounts.
Blood Pressure Radiotelemetry
Blood pressure was measured in conscious, unrestrained mice by radiotelemetry using catheters (TA11PA-C10, Data Sciences International (DSI)) that were implanted in the left carotid artery as previously described.16, 17 Following implant, mice were allowed to recover for seven days before measurements were made. Blood pressure at baseline and induction time points were averaged over a 24 h measurement period. For the effects of spironolactone on acute blood pressure measurements, a continuous base line reading was obtained thirty minutes prior to agent administration.
Statistics
Shapiro-Wilks normality of data was established in all cases. One- or two-way ANOVA’s as well as two tailed t-tests were performed where indicated using GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1. Data is represented as the mean ± SEM with a p-value of <0.05 used as the threshold for statistical significance. For analyses requiring two-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak or Sidak post hoc analysis were used to compare groups.
Results
We have previously shown that phenylephrine (PE)-stimulated constriction of arteries is decreased by pharmacological inhibition and genetic deletion of Panx1 in SMC.3, 5 We have additionally shown that norepinephrine-stimulated constriction is decreased by pharmacological inhibition of Panx1.3 We therefore hypothesized sympathetic nerve-induced constriction may be regulated by the amount of Panx1 that resides in SMC. To test this, we created a mouse with inducible over-expression of Panx1 using a ROSA26 insert7 that was crossed with Myh11CreERT2+ mice (iSMC Panx1 OE mice). In response to tamoxifen treatment, there was a significant increase in SMC Panx1 expressed by iSMC Panx1 OE mice (Figure 1A-B; Figure S1).
To test whether vasoconstriction induced by sympathetic nerve stimulation correlated with differences in SMC Panx1 expression, we used electric field stimulation (EFS) of third order mesenteric arteries from iSMC Panx1 OE mice. In comparison with control mice, there was a significant increase in vasoconstriction (Figure 1C). In contrast, inducible mice lacking SMC Panx1 (iSMC Panx1 KO) had a significantly decreased response to EFS. Confirming a lack of EC Panx1 contribution to systemic sympathetic-driven vasoconstriction, inducible mice lacking EC Panx1 expression (iEC Panx1 KO) had a response to EFS that was comparable to control mice expressing normal levels of EC Panx1 (Figure 1C). There were no differences in EFS-induced constriction in any of the control groups examined (Panx1fl/fl, TG Tamox Control, TG Geno Control) (Figure S2).
To confirm EFS induced constriction was mediated by adrenergic nerve stimulation, we blocked norepinephrine release with guanethidine (10 μM) and blocked α-adrenergic receptors with phentolamine (1 μM). We found both guanethidine and phentolamine reduced EFS-induced constriction in all genotypes except for iSMC Panx1 KO (Figure S3-S4) demonstrating the Panx1 activation by SMCs was downstream from α-adrenergic stimulation.
ATP release is a hallmark of Panx1 channel opening. We therefore investigated ATP release in mice with variable genetic expression of Panx1 in SMC by stimulating isolated third order mesenteric arteries with 10 μM PE. We found iSMC Panx1 KO mice to have significantly inhibited ATP release and iSMC OE mice to have significantly increased ATP release compared to their respective controls (Figure 2A). These results correlate levels of SMC Panx1 expression with levels of ATP release. Mice lacking Panx1 in EC had no change in ATP release in response PE. Importantly, intracellular ATP content was comparable in all the mouse models examined, indicating that strain specific differences in ATP release were due to differences in secretion (Figure S5). Because norepinephrine (Figure S6) and PE stimulates ATP release from third order mesenteric arteries in a Panx1-dependent manner, we hypothesized EFS induces constriction in an ATP-dependent manner. To test this, we hydrolyzed extracellular ATP by adding 50 U/mL apyrase to vessels undergoing EFS. Apyrase reduced EFS-induced constriction in Panx1fl/fl, iEC Panx1 KO, and iSMC Panx1 OE mice, but not iSMC Panx1 KO mice. (Figure 2B-E).
We further investigated the role of Panx1 in EFS induced constriction using pharmacological agents (Figure 3) and peptides (Figure 4) known to inhibit Panx1. We found that 2 mM probenecid18 and 20 μM spironolactone2 both inhibited EFS-induced constriction of vessels from Panx1fl/fl, iEC Panx1 KO, and iSMC Panx1 OE mice, but not iSMC Panx1 KO mice (Figure 3 and Figure S7). Note that spironolactone treatment has less variability than probenecid, which is more difficult to administer due to the high concentrations required for Panx1 inhibition.18
We have previously shown that the internal loop of Panx1 is important for Panx1 activation and localization and that a peptide recognizing this region (PxIL2P) is efficacious in blocking the channel 3, 14, 15, 19. PxIL2P (20 μM) reduced constriction in Panx1fl/fl, iEC Panx1 KO, and iSMC Panx1 OE mice, but not iSMC Panx1 KO mice, comparable with results obtained using pharmacologic inhibitors of the channel (Figure 4A-C and Figure S7). As a control to rule out ATP secretion by connexin hemichannels, we found that the Cx43 peptide inhibitor Gap19 did not affect EFS-induced constriction (Figure 4D-F and Figure S7).
Genetic Panx1 deletion has been used to demonstrate an important role in blood pressure regulation by renin-secreting cells19 (where genetic deletion causes hypertension) and by SMC3 (where genetic deletion causes hypotension). Because iSMC Panx1 OE mice displayed increased EFS induced vasoconstriction we hypothesized these mice would have elevated blood pressure. Blood pressure was measured prior to injection of tamoxifen or peanut oil and again after treatment as indicated in Table 1. Upon induction with tamoxifen (or peanut oil), only iSMC Panx1 OE mice showed a significant increase in blood pressure compared to the pre-induction baseline (Figure 5A). None of the other mouse models had altered blood pressure. By contrast, acute inhibition of Panx1 by intraperitoneal injection of 40 mg/kg spironolactone resulted in a drop in blood pressure in iSMC Panx1 OE mice and transgenic controls which express endogenous SMC Panx1 (Figure 5A). Note that all the mice had any similar levels of urinary norepinephrine (Figure S8).
We further investigated a role for Panx1 in regulating blood pressure by using global Panx1 knockout mice (Panx1−/−). To test only the effect of Panx1 in SMC and no other cell types, we crossed iSMC Panx1 OE mice onto a Panx1−/− background, enabling us to evaluate blood pressure in mice exclusively expressing hPanx1 in SMCs (Panx1KO-iSMC OE; genotypes shown in Table 1). Panx1KO-iSMC OE mice had increased blood pressure after induction with tamoxifen. No difference in blood pressure was observed in control mice which received either tamoxifen (Panx1KO-TG Tamox Control) or peanut oil (Panx1KO-TG Geno Control). Moreover, acute inhibition of Panx1 with spironolactone was only able to reduce blood pressure in Panx1KO-iSMC OE mice (Figure 5B), further supporting a role for SMC Panx1 in sympathetic nerve-mediated changes in blood pressure.
Conclusions
We have previously demonstrated that SMC Panx1 has the capacity to regulate blood pressure.2, 3, 19 Here we build on this work using mouse models that enable Panx1 expression by SMCs to be further regulated, essentially enabling a dose response of Panx1 to be measured. Our findings demonstrate that sympathetic vasoconstriction and blood pressure are dependent, at least to some extent, on the amount of Panx1 expressed by SMCs.
We observed a reduced response to EFS-mediated constriction in iSMC Panx1 KO mice, consistent with previous studies demonstrating decreased constriction in response to α1-adrenergic stimulation.3 We additionally show iSMC Panx1 OE mice have increased EFS-mediated constriction. This occurs through sympathetic nerve stimulation as demonstrated by the ability of guanethidine and phentolamine to inhibit EFS-mediated constriction. iEC Panx1 KO mice responded similarly to control mice suggesting SMC Panx1, and not EC Panx1, regulates sympathetic vasoconstriction. Although mice lacking EC Panx1 have alterations in cerebral myogenic tone, no systemic hemodynamic phenotype has been observed.2, 10 This is consistent with a central role for SMC Panx1 in regulating systemic blood pressure.
Based on the experiments reported here and our previous work, we propose the increased vasoconstriction in response to EFS is due, at least in part, to the release of ATP from the increased number of Panx1 channels in the SMC. ATP release from Panx1 channels has been extensively demonstrated (e.g.20-24), and α1-adrenergic stimulation is one of the most well characterized mechanisms to activate and open Panx1 channels (e.g.2-9). This model is strongly supported by our findings that iSMC Panx1 OE mice have greater ATP release after PE stimulation and the hydrolysis of ATP by apyrase decreases EFS constriction. However, we cannot completely exclude two other possible Panx1-dependent mechanisms to regulate sympathetic vasoconstriction and blood pressure. The first possibility is that changes in Panx1 by SMCs may alter sympathetic nerve activity through a yet to be determined mechanism—possibly SMC intracellular calcium concentrations in SMC, or vesicular nucleotide transporter (VNUT) ATP activity in sympathetic nerves. While we did not directly investigate these possibilities, we found changes in urinary norepinephrine were unaltered across all the genotypes examined, which suggest at least sympathetic nerve activity is unaltered by Panx1 in SMCs. The second possibility is that the vasoconstriction may be due to the capacity of Panx1 channels to facilitate anion transport across the plasma membrane, e.g. Cl−.25 Although our observation that apyrase reduces EFS constriction suggests a role for extracellular ATP in vasoconstriction, we cannot completely rule out a possible additional contribution of anions such as Cl−, since changes in Cl− are a well-known mechanism to induce SMC vasoconstriction26 and are worthy of consideration and future study for Panx1 channel activity.
How ATP released from SMCs participates in the vascular response to sympathetic nerve stimulation remains to be more thoroughly investigated. Here we show that phentolamine and guanethidine do not blunt EFS induced constriction in iSMC Panx1 KO mice (Figure S3-S4). These data suggest α-adrenergic stimulation is largely dependent upon ATP released from SMC Panx1 rather than synergizing with parallel pathways elicited by α-adrenoceptors. Additionally, the precise receptors which respond to the released ATP remain to be elucidated. Others have shown a primary role for P2X receptors in mediating vasoconstriction. However, both genetic models and pharmacologic methods have demonstrated P2X1 is not involved in α-adrenoceptor stimulated vasoconstriction.27-29 We have previously shown blockade of P2 receptors with Suramin and P2Y receptors with reactive blue-2 inhibits phenylephrine induced constriction of thoracodorsal arteries.5 Separately, work by Prada et al also convincingly demonstrated cerebral smooth muscle cells release ATP to activate L-type Ca2+ channels and induce vasoconstriction upon hyperglycemia exposure.30 These studies suggest a role for both P2X and P2Y receptors in mediating the vascular response to sympathetic nerve stimulation with P2Y mediating the effects of adrenoceptor stimulation. Indeed, the sum of these studies is not exclusive, with a possible role for ATP in pre-ganglionic and post-ganglionic having a role that could be vascular bed specific or dependent on the extracellular milieu. We surmise the work demonstrates the importance of purinergic signaling in the vasculature and the need for further investigation.
After being released, ATP can be rapidly metabolized to adenosine which can stimulate adenosine receptors on SMCs and/or endothelial cells31, 32, but how SMC Panx1 may contribute to adenosine signaling remains to be investigated. Note that the rapid metabolism of ATP to adenosine may allow for tight spatial and temporal control of signaling by blood flow, restricting diffusion of the signal to a smaller area along the vascular wall and preventing the signal from being sustained for longer periods of time.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a mouse with only the Panx1 sequence from human was utilized (Panx1KO-iSMC OE). Like many mouse models where the endogenous murine proteins have been replaced by the human protein equivalent (“humanized mouse”), there is strong utility in this type of model system (e.g., 33). In our system we tested whether human Panx1 in smooth muscle alone could alter blood pressure or respond to the Panx1 spironolactone in an intact system. In both cases the mice responded when Panx1 was only present in SMC, and nowhere else in the body. These experiments lay the groundwork for many other studies to not only test the specific role of Panx1 when expressed in only one cell type, but the physiological effects of potential pharmacological interventions using the human form of Panx1.
We demonstrated a role in SMC Panx1 control of blood pressure. We have previously observed a decrease in blood pressure in iSMC Panx1 KO mice as well as accompanying acute inhibition of Panx1 with spironolactone.2, 3 Here we found that overexpression of SMC Panx1 increased blood pressure regardless of levels of systemic Panx1 expression. Additionally, acute inhibition of Panx1 with spironolactone reduced blood pressure only in mice expressing Panx1 in SMCs, further underscoring the importance of Panx1 expressed by these cells in regulating blood pressure.
Spironolactone is a well-recognized antihypertensive agent shown to target mineralocorticoid receptors. We recently demonstrated steroidal mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists also inhibit Panx1 channels and acutely lower blood pressure in mice. In contrast, finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist does not inhibit Panx1 nor does it acutely reduce blood pressure in mice. 2 This suggests that the effect of spironolactone on blood pressure is predominantly due to its effect on Panx1. While chronic blood pressure reduction with spironolactone is primarily mediated through mineralocorticoid antagonism, our data using multiple mouse models to specifically regulate Panx1 expression by SMCs further supports the conclusion that Panx1 inhibition is a critical element of the acute reduction in blood pressure by spironolactone. In addition to adding support for the use of spironolactone to control blood pressure, our data underscore the importance of identifying and considering other agents that target Panx1 in therapeutic approaches to regulate blood pressure.
Perspectives
Together the data presented here demonstrate that the amount of Panx1 in SMC dictates the magnitude of vasoconstriction in response to sympathetic stimulation and consequently regulates blood pressure. Acute inhibition of Panx1 ex vivo decreased EFS-mediated constriction in all groups except iSMC Panx1 KO mice, further supporting the conclusion that SMC Panx1 plays an active role in sympathetic vasoconstriction. However, it is not clear whether Panx1 itself is a good pharmacological target due to its ubiquitous expression. For example, deletion of Panx1 in renin-secreting cells increases blood pressure whereas deletion of Panx1 in SMCs reduces blood pressure. Thus, any pharmacological intervention may have a net-zero effect on blood pressure. For example, recent studies have indicated that probenecid has no effect on blood pressure34, albeit at significantly lower concentrations than those required to inhibit Panx1 channels35. The work from these findings supports targeting cell type-specific Panx1 expression and ATP release as a novel approach to the control of blood pressure. Additionally, these data raise the possibility that high levels of Panx1 expression could represent a risk factor for hypertension. If this is the case, a screen for differential Panx1 expression could have diagnostic value. In addition, strategies that specifically target SMC Panx1 expression may have the capacity to complement approaches that modulate Panx1 channel activity to control blood pressure.
Supplementary Material
Novelty and Relevance.
What is new
We use genetic models to vary Panx1 expression allowing for a dose response of Panx1 to be measured.
We demonstrate the expression of Panx1 in smooth muscle cells dictates the vascular response to sympathetic nerve stimulation.
We use a novel humanized mouse model expressing only human Panx1 in the smooth muscle.
What is Relevant?
These data suggest the amount of Panx1 in smooth muscle cells regulates blood pressure.
Clinical/Pathophysiological Implications?
Smooth muscle Panx1 expression may be a risk factor for hypertension and a useful target for blood pressure regulation.
Acknowledgements
We thank the pannexin interest group at the University of Virginia for critical feedback in development and implementation of the mice.
Sources of Funding
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants T32 007284 (LSD), HL 120840 (KR, UL, and BEI), and HL 137112 (MK and BEI).
Abbreviations
- Panx1
pannexin 1
- SMC
Smooth muscle cell
- PE
phenylephrine
- EC
endothelial cell
- EFS
electrical field stimulation
Footnotes
Disclosures
None.
References
- 1.Lohman AW, Billaud M, Straub AC, Johnstone SR, Best AK, Lee M, Barr K, Penuela S, Laird DW and Isakson BE. Expression of pannexin isoforms in the systemic murine arterial network. J Vasc Res. 2012;49:405–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Good ME, Chiu YH, Poon IKH, Medina CB, Butcher JT, Mendu SK, DeLalio LJ, Lohman AW, Leitinger N, Barrett E, Lorenz UM, Desai BN, Jaffe IZ, Bayliss DA, Isakson BE and Ravichandran KS. Pannexin 1 Channels as an Unexpected New Target of the Anti-Hypertensive Drug Spironolactone. Circ Res. 2018;122:606–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Billaud M, Chiu YH, Lohman AW, Parpaite T, Butcher JT, Mutchler SM, DeLalio LJ, Artamonov MV, Sandilos JK, Best AK, Somlyo AV, Thompson RJ, Le TH, Ravichandran KS, Bayliss DA and Isakson BE. A molecular signature in the pannexin1 intracellular loop confers channel activation by the alpha1 adrenoreceptor in smooth muscle cells. Sci Signal. 2015;8:ra17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.DeLalio LJ, Keller AS, Chen J, Boyce AKJ, Artamonov MV, Askew-Page HR, Keller TCSt, Johnstone SR, Weaver RB, Good ME, Murphy SA, Best AK, Mintz EL, Penuela S, Greenwood IA, Machado RF, Somlyo AV, Swayne LA, Minshall RD and Isakson BE. Interaction Between Pannexin 1 and Caveolin-1 in Smooth Muscle Can Regulate Blood Pressure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:2065–2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Billaud M, Lohman AW, Straub AC, Looft-Wilson R, Johnstone SR, Araj CA, Best AK, Chekeni FB, Ravichandran KS, Penuela S, Laird DW and Isakson BE. Pannexin1 regulates alpha1-adrenergic receptor- mediated vasoconstriction. Circulation Research. 2011;109:80–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiu YH, Medina CB, Doyle CA, Zhou M, Narahari AK, Sandilos JK, Gonye EC, Gao HY, Guo SY, Parlak M, Lorenz UM, Conrads TP, Desai BN, Ravichandran KS and Bayliss DA. Deacetylation as a receptor-regulated direct activation switch for pannexin channels. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Medina CB, Chiu YH, Stremska ME, Lucas CD, Poon I, Tung KS, Elliott MR, Desai B, Lorenz UM, Bayliss DA and Ravichandran KS. Pannexin 1 channels facilitate communication between T cells to restrict the severity of airway inflammation. Immunity. 2021;54:1715–1727 e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Adamson SE, Meher AK, Chiu YH, Sandilos JK, Oberholtzer NP, Walker NN, Hargett SR, Seaman SA, Peirce-Cottler SM, Isakson BE, McNamara CA, Keller SR, Harris TE, Bayliss DA and Leitinger N. Pannexin 1 is required for full activation of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes. Mol Metab. 2015;4:610–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tozzi M, Hansen JB and Novak I. Pannexin-1 mediated ATP release in adipocytes is sensitive to glucose and insulin and modulates lipolysis and macrophage migration. Acta physiologica. 2020;228:e13360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Good ME, Eucker SA, Li J, Bacon HM, Lang SM, Butcher JT, Johnson TJ, Gaykema RP, Patel MK, Zuo Z and Isakson BE. Endothelial cell Pannexin1 modulates severity of ischemic stroke by regulating cerebral inflammation and myogenic tone. JCI Insight. 2018;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuzuya M, Hirano H, Hayashida K, Watanabe M, Kobayashi K, Terada T, Mahmood MI, Tama F, Tani K, Fujiyoshi Y and Oshima A. Structures of human pannexin-1 in nanodiscs reveal gating mediated by dynamic movement of the N terminus and phospholipids. Sci Signal. 2022;15:eabg6941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lohman AW, Leskov IL, Butcher JT, Johnstone SR, Stokes TA, Begandt D, DeLalio LJ, Best AK, Penuela S, Leitinger N, Ravichandran KS, Stokes KY and Isakson BE. Pannexin 1 channels regulate leukocyte emigration through the venous endothelium during acute inflammation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poon IK, Chiu YH, Armstrong AJ, Kinchen JM, Juncadella IJ, Bayliss DA and Ravichandran KS. Unexpected link between an antibiotic, pannexin channels and apoptosis. Nature. 2014;507:329–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang Y, Delalio LJ, Best AK, Macal E, Milstein J, Donnelly I, Miller AM, McBride M, Shu X, Koval M, Isakson BE and Johnstone SR. Endothelial Pannexin 1 Channels Control Inflammation by Regulating Intracellular Calcium. J Immunol. 2020;204:2995–3007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.DeLalio LJ, Billaud M, Ruddiman CA, Johnstone SR, Butcher JT, Wolpe AG, Jin X, Keller TCSt, Keller AS, Riviere T, Good ME, Best AK, Lohman AW, Swayne LA, Penuela S, Thompson RJ, Lampe PD, Yeager M and Isakson BE. Constitutive SRC-mediated phosphorylation of pannexin 1 at tyrosine 198 occurs at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:6940–6956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kruger N, Biwer LA, Good ME, Ruddiman CA, Wolpe AG, DeLalio LJ, Murphy S, Macal EH Jr., Ragolia L, Serbulea V, Best AK, Leitinger N, Harris TE, Sonkusare SK, Godecke A and Isakson BE. Loss of Endothelial FTO Antagonizes Obesity-Induced Metabolic and Vascular Dysfunction. Circ Res. 2020;126:232–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Straub AC, Butcher JT, Billaud M, Mutchler SM, Artamonov MV, Nguyen AT, Johnson T, Best AK, Miller MP, Palmer LA, Columbus L, Somlyo AV, Le TH and Isakson BE. Hemoglobin alpha/eNOS Coupling at Myoendothelial Junctions Is Required for Nitric Oxide Scavenging During Vasoconstriction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2594–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sandilos JK, Chiu YH, Chekeni FB, Armstrong AJ, Walk SF, Ravichandran KS and Bayliss DA. Pannexin 1, an ATP release channel, is activated by caspase cleavage of its pore-associated C-terminal autoinhibitory region. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:11303–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.DeLalio LJ, Masati E, Mendu S, Ruddiman CA, Yang Y, Johnstone SR, Milstein JA, Keller TCSt, Weaver RB, Guagliardo NA, Best AK, Ravichandran KS, Bayliss DA, Sequeira-Lopez MLS, Sonkusare SN, Shu XH, Desai B, Barrett PQ, Le TH, Gomez RA and Isakson BE Pannexin 1 channels in renin-expressing cells influence renin secretion and blood pressure homeostasis. Kidney Int. 2020;98:630–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bao L, Locovei S and Dahl G. Pannexin membrane channels are mechanosensitive conduits for ATP. FEBS Lett. 2004;572:65–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chekeni FB, Elliott MR, Sandilos JK, Walk SF, Kinchen JM, Lazarowski ER, Armstrong AJ, Penuela S, Laird DW, Salvesen GS, Isakson BE, Bayliss DA and Ravichandran KS. Pannexin 1 channels mediate 'find-me' signal release and membrane permeability during apoptosis. Nature. 2010;467:863–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Billaud M, Lohman AW, Straub AC, Looft-Wilson R, Johnstone SR, Araj CA, Best AK, Chekeni FB, Ravichandran KS, Penuela S, Laird DW and Isakson BE. Pannexin1 regulates alpha1-adrenergic receptor- mediated vasoconstriction. Circ Res. 2011;109:80–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gulbransen BD, Bashashati M, Hirota SA, Gui X, Roberts JA, MacDonald JA, Muruve DA, McKay DM, Beck PL, Mawe GM, Thompson RJ and Sharkey KA. Activation of neuronal P2X7 receptor-pannexin-1 mediates death of enteric neurons during colitis. Nature medicine. 2012;18:600–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weilinger NL, Tang PL and Thompson RJ. Anoxia-induced NMDA receptor activation opens pannexin channels via Src family kinases. J Neurosci. 2012;32:12579–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ruan Z, Orozco IJ, Du J and Lu W. Structures of human pannexin 1 reveal ion pathways and mechanism of gating. Nature. 2020;584:646–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wray S, Prendergast C and Arrowsmith S. Calcium-Activated Chloride Channels in Myometrial and Vascular Smooth Muscle. Front Physiol. 2021;12:751008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vial C and Evans RJ. P2X(1) receptor-deficient mice establish the native P2X receptor and a P2Y6-like receptor in arteries. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:1438–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Angus JA and Wright CE. ATP is not involved in alpha1-adrenoceptor-mediated vasoconstriction in resistance arteries. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;769:162–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lamont C, Vial C, Evans RJ and Wier WG. P2X1 receptors mediate sympathetic postjunctional Ca2+ transients in mesenteric small arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H3106–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Prada MP, Syed AU, Reddy GR, Martin-Aragon Baudel M, Flores-Tamez VA, Sasse KC, Ward SM, Sirish P, Chiamvimonvat N, Bartels P, Dickson EJ, Hell JW, Scott JD, Santana LF, Xiang YK, Navedo MF and Nieves-Cintron M. AKAP5 complex facilitates purinergic modulation of vascular L-type Ca(2+) channel CaV1.2. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burnstock G. Purinergic Signaling in the Cardiovascular System. Circ Res. 2017;120:207–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yegutkin GG. Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: Important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:673–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Walsh NC, Kenney LL, Jangalwe S, Aryee KE, Greiner DL, Brehm MA and Shultz LD. Humanized Mouse Models of Clinical Disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2017;12:187–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gliemann L, Tamariz-Ellemann A, Collin Hansen C, Svare Ehlers T, Moller S and Hellsten Y. Is the Pannexin-1 Channel a Mechanism Underlying Hypertension in Humans? a Translational Study of Human Hypertension. Hypertension. 2022;79:1132–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Silverman W, Locovei S and Dahl G. Probenecid, a gout remedy, inhibits pannexin 1 channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295:C761–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.