Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Res. 2022 Dec 3;101(3):354–366. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25151

Emerging Mitochondrial-Mediated Mechanisms Involved in Oligodendrocyte Development

M Gil 1,2,3, V Gama 1,2,3,4,*
PMCID: PMC9851982  NIHMSID: NIHMS1857473  PMID: 36461887

Abstract

Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating glia of the central nervous system and are generated after oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) transition into pre-oligodendrocytes and then into myelinating oligodendrocytes. Myelin is essential for proper signal transmission within the nervous system and axonal metabolic support. Although the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that support the differentiation, survival, integration, and subsequent myelination of appropriate axons have been well investigated, little is known about how mitochondria-related pathways such as mitochondrial dynamics, bioenergetics, and apoptosis finely-tune these developmental events. Previous findings suggest that changes to mitochondrial morphology act as an upstream regulatory mechanism of neural stem cell (NSC) fate decisions. Whether a similar mechanism is engaged during OPC differentiation has yet to be elucidated. Maintenance of mitochondrial dynamics is vital for regulating cellular bioenergetics, functional mitochondrial networks, and the ability of cells to distribute mitochondria to subcellular locations, such as the growing processes of oligodendrocytes. Myelination is an energy-consuming event, thus, understanding the interplay between mitochondrial dynamics, metabolism, and apoptosis will provide further insight into mechanisms that mediate oligodendrocyte development in healthy and disease states. Here we will provide a concise overview of oligodendrocyte development and discuss the potential contribution of mitochondrial mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms to oligodendrocyte bioenergetics and development.

Keywords: glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondria, neural precursor cells, oligodendrocytes, glia, astrocytes, neurons

Introduction

In the central nervous system, oligodendrocytes produce the insulating myelin sheath of neuronal axons. A single oligodendrocyte has the capacity to myelinate several axonal segments1,2. Myelin is composed of a proteolipid-rich membrane that wraps around axons to provide electrical insulation and metabolic support3,4. Segments of unmyelinated regions along myelination axons are created to allow for clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels5,6. These unmyelinated segments are known as nodes of Ranvier, which host the molecular machinery responsible for fast action potential propagation over long distances through a process called saltatory conduction5,711. The brain has a high energy requirement to account for action potential propagation and synaptic transmission. A functional mitochondrial network, in both neurons and glia, is essential for maintaining this metabolic demand12,13. The production of myelinating oligodendrocytes requires a series of finely and highly coordinated mitochondrial signaling events. For example, during critical periods of differentiation, oligodendrocyte lineage cells undergo apoptosis if they do not have access to the appropriate survival signals or if they are not able to integrate14. Integration of healthy oligodendrocytes into the neural circuit is key for meeting the energy demands of the brain. This review will focus on mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms related to morphology, dynamics, apoptosis, and bioenergetics and their role in modulating oligodendrocyte differentiation and survival.

The developmental origin of oligodendrocytes

Neural tube patterning.

The foundation of a functional nervous system begins with a regulated process that produces a highly organized temporal and spatial order known as neural tube patterning15,16. Specific genetic networks establish regionally-restricted progenitor domains along the anterior–posterior and dorsal–ventral axes of the neural tube1719. These domains contain transcription factors that synchronize the organization and fate of progenitor cells, and consequently, give rise to neuronal and glial subtype specification17,20. Activation or repression of the transcription factors is dependent on their location along the dorsal-ventral axis and the activity of sonic hedgehog (Shh) (ventral floor plate), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (dorsal roof plate), and WNT (dorsal roof plate) signals15,2024. Following the induction of progenitor cells, they begin to expand at different rates to form the specialized parts of the nervous system such as the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord. The principles of neural tube patterning have been described extensively15,17,20,25. However, the contribution of metabolic gradients and mitochondrial signals underlying these events remain unexplored.

The cellular environment during neural tube closure is hypoxic as angiogenesis and placental development has yet to finalize2628. Thus, ATP is mainly generated via glycolysis, which is responsible for synthesizing metabolic intermediates such as nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids needed for proliferation and neural development2931. Early forebrain development following neural tube closure is accompanied by expansion of endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and mitochondria32,33. This modification in the mitochondrial landscape and morphology is needed for the metabolic shift to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (discussed in a later section).

Oligodendrocyte production in the spinal cord and forebrain.

Most of our knowledge on oligodendrocyte development originates from chick and rodent studies34. OPCs are the early progenitor cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage and are recognizable by their specific expression of the proteoglycan neural-glia antigen 2 (NG2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα)35. OPCs are generated in sequential waves throughout the developing spinal cord and forebrain3641.

During spinal cord development, there are three waves of OPC production. The first wave is dependent on Shh signaling and its induction of oligodendrocyte-determining proteins Olig1 and Olig2 (Olig1/2), which are required for the development of ventral progenitor cells and the establishment of the ventral progenitor domain (pMN)20,42. This domain gives rise to spinal motor neurons (sMNs) just prior to the production of OPCs43. During this wave, OPCs arise from the pMN domain by division of radial glia in the ventricular zones (VZ) of the spinal cord at mouse embryonic day (E)12.5 and corresponding gestational week 6.5 in humans44. Ventrally-derived OPCs proliferate rapidly and migrate in all directions of the spinal cord. The second wave of OPC production begins at E15.5 and it functions independently of Shh34,40,41,45. It derives from Olig1/2-expressing cells in the VZ of dorsal progenitor domains (dP3–6) through a fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-dependent mechanism45. Dorsally derived OPCs are less migratory than ventrally derived OPCs. Consequently, dorsally derived OPCs remain mainly in the dorsal half of the cord and ventrally-derived OPCs are responsible for 85–90% of the OPCs in the mouse spinal cord46. It could be speculated that these differences in migratory capacity of the dorsally and ventrally derived OPCs could arise due to inherent metabolic signatures and energy states of these cells. The third wave of OPC production occurs in the post-natal ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ)18,37,47. OPCs in the spinal cord begin to differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes prior to birth at around E18.544.

In the developing forebrain, a similar set of sequential waves of OPC production plays out in the telencephalon in a ventral-to-dorsal arrangement. At E12.5, the initial wave commences from Nkx2.1-expressing precursors in the VZ of the ventral medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) and anterior entopeduncular area (AEP)37. In the human forebrain, OPCs are detected in the VZ of the MGE at 7.5 weeks of gestation48. This population of cells migrates to the entire embryonic telencephalon including the cerebral cortex. The following wave is generated from Gsh2-expressing precursors in the lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE) and MGE and they invade the developing cortex at E15.537. The third and final wave begins from Emx1-expressing precursors in the cortical VZ after birth and it is the primary source of OPCs in the mature neocortex36. It was initially believed that MGE-derived Nkx2.1-expressing OPCs are gradually eliminated and replaced by progenitors generated in the second and final wave, but new evidence challenged this concept34,44. Findings from Orduz et al. suggest that not all MGE-derived Nkx2.1-expressing OPCs die in the developing neocortex, and the progenitors that survive have preferential synaptic connectivity with their ontogenetically related interneurons49. The mechanistic details of these highly coordinated survival signals are not completely understood.

The functional significance of the diverse developmental origins of OPCs has prompted further investigation by other research groups5052. A population of OPCs remains in the adult central nervous system in an immature or quiescent state where they are able to generate new oligodendrocytes during aging or disease44,53. Recent findings have uncovered that oligodendrocyte lineage cells are a heterogenous population of cells with different abilities to generate myelin, but also with the capacity to perform additional functions besides myelination52,54,55. Work from Xiao et al. revealed that OPCs play a role in fine-tuning neural circuits, independent of their role in myelination52,56. Research on these additional functions of oligodendrocyte lineage cells could provide insight into the functional heterogeneity of OPCs as well as new mechanisms involved in oligodendrocyte cell-fate transitions. New technical advances could help reveal the metabolic bases for this functional heterogeneity of OPC subtypes.

Regulation of oligodendrocyte lineage cell survival and integration.

The process of generating myelinating oligodendrocytes is gradual, and it involves several intrinsic and extrinsic factors that determine the transition into oligodendrocyte lineage cells5761. OPCs have an intrinsic mechanism that limits the number of cell divisions and drives differentiation into post-mitotic oligodendrocytes62,63. Following terminal differentiation, OPCs become post-mitotic and enter the pre-oligodendrocyte stage14. This stage is defined as a population of cells that are no longer OPCs but have not initiated myelin sheath formation64. In the developing brain, OPCs either transition to mature oligodendrocytes or undergo apoptosis57,65,66. Regulated cell death occurs during neurodevelopment to ensure proper refinement of the neural network6769. Time-lapse imaging of OPC maturation in the adult mouse cortex demonstrates that pre-oligodendrocytes undergo apoptosis if they fail to integrate into the nervous system as oligodendrocytes70. The surviving pre-oligodendrocytes depend on extrinsic and intrinsic factors such as extracellular ligands, secreted molecules, neuronal activity, microRNAs, and transcriptional regulation to become myelinating oligodendrocytes71. Cell-to-cell interactions with astrocytes and microglia are known to promote the survival and function of oligodendrocyte lineage cells14. Oligodendrocytes begin to myelinate by engaging with nearby axons and extending microfilament-rich filipodia-like processes onto their preferred axon46,7174. Following this event, oligodendrocytes undergo a refinement period where sheaths either continue to elongate and stabilize or are retracted73. Once the initial contact with an axonal membrane is stabilized, proteins and lipids are delivered to the growing membrane to generate compact myelin75. In vivo time-lapse imaging in zebrafish indicates that the duration of myelin sheath generation is about 5 hours76. A rapid in vitro protocol involving a co-culture system of rat OPCs and retinal ganglion cells suggests that oligodendrocytes have the capability to myelinate within a 6–12 hour time window77.

Apoptosis in the developing nervous system

The BCL-2 family.

Neuronal apoptosis is highly regulated and critical for the organization of a functional neural circuit69. Apoptosis is triggered if cells are depleted of survival factors or if there is a need for elimination of unwanted, damaged, or misplaced cells during differentiation. Disruption in the balance between cell death and survival can lead to developmental alterations78. While the contribution of non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms to neural development are emerging, most developmental cell death proceeds via mitochondria-mediated apoptosis79,80.

The survival of neural cells is tightly controlled by the BCL-2 family of proteins81,82. All members of this family contain a BCL-2 homology 3 (BH3) domain, which is one of the four BH domains involved in interactions between the proteins. The BCL-2 family is subdivided into three groups based on their function: anti-apoptotic members (BCL-2, BCL-xL, BCL-W, MCL-1, BFL-1/A1), pro-apoptotic members (BAX, BAK, BOK), and pro-apoptotic BCL-2 homology 3 (BH3)-only members (BAD, BID, BIK/NBK, BIM/BOD, BMF, HRK/DP5, NOXA and PUMA/BBC3)8388. The effector proteins promote mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP)82. MOMP triggers the release of intermembrane space (IMS) proteins such as cytochrome c and second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC) into the cytosol81,89,90. In the cytosol, cytochrome c binds to the key caspase adaptor molecule, apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1)91. This interaction triggers homo-oligomerization of Apaf-1 into a caspase-activating complex known as the apoptosome82. The apoptosome recruits and activates the initiator caspase-9, leading to cleavage and activation of effector caspases-3 and −7. Activated caspases-3 and −7 execute their function by cleaving proteins that are responsible for proper cellular function and homeostasis, leading to their degradation.

Several models have been proposed for the regulation of MOMP by BCL-2 proteins82,92,93. A subset of BH3-only proteins known as “activators” bind to BCL-2 effector proteins, BAX and BAK, to promote their activation84. Activation of BAX and BAK induces a series of conformational changes resulting in BAX/BAK homo-oligomerization and MOMP. The anti-apoptotic members of the BCL-2 family inhibit BAX and BAK by sequestration, which subsequently prevents oligomerization and activation94. “Sensitizer” BH3-only proteins inactivate anti-apoptotic proteins by binding to and sequestering them as well84.

During apoptosis in differentiated cells, activated BAX translocates from the cytosol to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), where BAK is constitutively located93. In human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), BAX is constitutively active and localized at the Golgi network, proposing a mechanism that alters apoptotic machinery and allows for rapid translocation to the mitochondria during critical stages of early embryogenesis95,96. This unique regulation of the apoptotic machinery suggests a central function of mitochondrial priming during development. Considering how cells from the oligodendrocyte lineage transition through various stages of development, it can be proposed that a specialized series of mitochondrial-centric checkpoints allow for an efficient transition from OPC to myelinating oligodendrocyte.

Oligodendrocyte development is regulated by the intrinsic apoptotic pathway.

Following neural tube patterning, apoptosis regulates the number of cells that remain in the central nervous system97,98. The BCL-2 family functions early at the onset of neurogenesis99. MCL-1’s anti-apoptotic function has a specific temporal requirement during neurogenesis as it is essential for the survival of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in the developing mouse brain99,100. As differentiation continues, BCL-xL maintains survival of a subset of post-mitotic neurons in the upper layers of the cortex, but not in NPCs101. Thus, MCL-1 and BCL-xL have distinct and overlapping roles as MCL-1 is required for survival of NPCs at the earliest stages of neurogenesis and BCL-xL is critical for the survival of post-mitotic neurons99.

The function of the BCL-2 family of proteins on oligodendrocyte lineage cell transitions has not been well delineated. Itoh et al. provided an extensive mRNA expression profile of the BCL-2 family of proteins during in vitro differentiation of rat oligodendrocytes102. BCLXL and MCL1 are highly expressed in oligodendrocyte lineage cells, particularly in mature oligodendrocytes102. Consistent with mRNA expression, protein expression of BCL-xL is increased during oligodendrocyte differentiation, while BCL-2 decreases from OPC to immature oligodendrocyte. mRNA and protein expression of BAX and BAK remained steady during differentiation102. Whole-cell single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) demonstrates that fetal-derived oligodendrocytes express higher levels of MCL1 and BAX compared to pediatric and adult donor oligodendrocytes80. Late OPCs and early OPCs have higher anti-apoptotic gene expression than pre-oligodendrocytes and mature oligodendrocytes, indicating a gradual switch in apoptosis sensitivity as oligodendrocytes differentiate80. Although both studies cited above are informative as they provide insight into the dynamic expression of the BCL-2 family of proteins during development, the mechanistic and functional implications are not explored. Thus, further investigation is needed to understand the exact mechanisms by which the BCL-2 family of proteins participate in oligodendrocyte development.

Mature oligodendrocytes from BAX/BAK knockout mice are resistant to apoptosis in vitro. Their processes become irregular and fragmented, perhaps indicating functional impairment of the mature cells103. Mice that are deficient in BAX and BAK exhibit numerous differentiated oligodendrocytes in brain regions that are typically myelinated at later developmental stages, suggesting a role of BAX and BAK in spatiotemporal control of myelination (Figure 1)57. Brain-wide deletion of MCL-1 in neural stem cells led to progressive reduction of white matter and myelin, indicating that MCL-1 is required for oligodendrocyte function in mice104. The lack of MCL-1 reduced the number of mature oligodendrocytes, however, the number of OPCs was maintained, indicating that MCL-1 regulates differentiation of OPCs (Figure 1). These findings indicate that in addition to mediating cell death, the BCL-2 family of proteins may execute a separate role in supporting function and differentiation of oligodendrocytes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

OPC differentiation is regulated by mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms. A) Knockout of BAX and BAK triggers early OPC differentiation in brain regions that are ordinarily myelinated at later post-natal stages57. MCL-1 regulates survival of mature oligodendrocytes during the OPC differentiation stage104. B) Inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV prior to OPC differentiation impaired formation of mature oligodendrocyte processes142. Following inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, differentiation of OPCs was blocked144. The mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing center (MICOS) is shown at the cristae junctions.

The BCL-2 family and its role in maintaining mitochondrial dynamics.

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that constantly undergo ultrastructural modifications modulated by fusion and fission events105. Mitochondrial fusion is mediated by mitofusin 1/2 (MFN1/2) and optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), whereas fission is largely mediated by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1)106. The balance between these two events is termed mitochondrial dynamics. These coordinated events are needed to maintain mitochondrial function and are dependent on the metabolic state and requirements of the cell. Mitochondrial fusion functions to maintain normal mitochondrial activity by supplementing mtDNA, lipids, proteins, or metabolites to damaged mitochondrial from the components of healthy mitochondria107,108. Mitochondrial fission maintains proper distribution of mitochondria to meet the local demand for ATP, which is vital in highly polarized neural cells109. Additionally, mitochondrial fission allows for symmetrical segregation of mitochondria between daughter cells during mitosis110.

Fission events are a hallmark of apoptosis, resulting in smaller and increased number of mitochondria111. These DRP-1-mediated alterations to mitochondrial morphology occur early in the apoptotic pathway112114. DRP1 is a large cytosolic GTPase that translocates to the OMM where it uses energy from GTP hydrolysis to execute constriction and fission of the mitochondria115. Blocking mitochondrial fission by downregulating expression of DRP1 inhibits release of cytochrome c and subsequently delays cell death116. Evidence suggests that the association of DRP1 and BAX with the OMM is interdependent114,117. Further studies show that BAX is an essential part of the mitochondrial fragmentation machinery in apoptotic cells118,119. OPA1 also controls apoptosis through cristae remodeling and cytochrome c release120,121. MCL-1 modulates mitochondrial dynamics through interactions with DRP-1 and OPA1 in human embryonic stem cells and human cardiomyocytes122,123. Thus, BCL-2 protein family members have non-apoptotic functions regulating mitochondrial integrity in healthy and apoptotic cells.

Mitochondrial dynamics during differentiation.

Dysfunction of mitochondrial fission/fusion machinery and aberrant mitochondrial fragmentation is a hallmark of several neurodevelopmental disorders124. Mitochondria in the developing mouse brain undergo morphological modifications as cells commit to a neurogenic fate. Mitochondria in embryonic NSCs have an elongated morphology that becomes fragmented in NPCs125. As early-born neurons mature, their mitochondria gradually fuse and become elongated126. The switch in morphology from NSCs to a committed progenitor is accompanied by a metabolic shift of cells from glycolysis to OXPHOS. These mitochondrial morphological changes that occur in NSCs act as an upstream regulatory mechanism of stem cell fate decisions. During asymmetric cell division in neurogenesis, cells that become neurons display high levels of mitochondrial fission, whereas those that undergo self-renewal as NSCs display rapid mitochondria fusion126. Additionally, induction of mitochondria fusion following mitosis triggers most NSCs to undergo self-renewal, altering cell fate.

How mitochondrial dynamics are altered during oligodendrocyte differentiation has not been clearly characterized. Pathological examination of post-mortem brains from patients with vanishing white matter disease (VWMD), a type of leukodystrophy, demonstrated a disproportionately high number of OPCs compared to myelinating oligodendrocyte127,128. Experimental models of VWMD have further demonstrated that OPCs have impaired differentiation capacity and mitochondrial function129. Thus, examining the interplay between oligodendrocyte lineage cell differentiation and mitochondrial function is critical for understanding neurodevelopmental disorders such as VWMD.

Oligodendrocyte Energy Metabolism

Energetic demands of oligodendrocytes.

For myelination to occur, oligodendrocytes must generate expansive membranes that wrap around nearby axons. This process demands a large amount of energy from oligodendrocytes, which must have the capacity to generate ATP and carbon skeletons to produce lipids utilized for long-term myelination72. Cholesterol, phospholipids, and glycosphingolipids account for approximately 70–85% of the dry weight of the myelin membrane130,131. Oligodendrocytes also provide metabolic support to the axons they myelinate, increasing their energetic demands132,133. Oligodendrocytes must constantly maintain energy production to meet the needs of the growing myelin membrane through the developing nervous system.

Glucose is transported from the bloodstream into the perivascular end-feet of astrocytes by facilitated diffusion via glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Glucose is taken up by oligodendrocytes via GLUT1134,135. In astrocytes, glucose is either stored as glycogen or it undergoes glycolysis to generate pyruvate. Pyruvate can either enter the mitochondria where it is oxidized to acetyl-CoA via pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), or it is converted to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Lactate is then exported to oligodendrocytes and neurons via monocarboxylate transporters132. Oligodendrocytes are also capable of processing glucose into pyruvate and exporting lactate to neurons and astrocytes in a similar manner. This is known as the astrocyte-oligodendrocyte-neuron-lactate-shuttle132,136,137. Oligodendrocytes oxidize lactate for metabolic fuel and lipid synthesis138. Additionally, the presence of lactate upregulates mouse OPC differentiation in vitro139. In a hypoglycemic state, proliferation, maturation, and migration of primary rat OPCs is reduced and myelination is inhibited134,140. Lactate is capable of supporting myelination during hypoglycemia134,139. Although not fully understood, results from Yan and Rivkees, Rinholm et al., Sánchez-Abarca et al., and Ichihara et al. suggest that proper function of the astrocyte-oligodendrocyte-neuron-lactate-shuttle is essential for the differentiation of oligodendrocyte lineage cells134,138140.

Oligodendrocyte metabolic switch.

The Cox10 gene encodes a farnesyltransferase involved in the assembly of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), a key component of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) in the mitochondria141. Inhibition of COX in vitro alters the initiation of myelin production and triggers death of OPCs and oligodendrocytes142. Knockdown of Cox10 in vivo following completion of myelination did not alter myelin or axonal function143. These results indicate that OPCs have a high OXPHOS rate before and during myelination, and myelinating oligodendrocytes have low OXPHOS and high glycolytic rates (Figure. 2). This switch to a metabolic state that has increased dependence on glycolysis as oligodendrocytes mature differs from neurons. Uncommitted NSCs cells exhibit a glycolytic metabolism whereas post-mitotic neurons progressively shift to mitochondrial-dependent OXPHOS, as discussed in an earlier section of this review125. Although the mechanism that regulates the switch between energy sources is not well understood, Schoenfeld et al. reports proper function of OXPHOS is an essential component of OPC differentiation. Following treatment with rotenone, a specific inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I, OPCs were not able to differentiate and did not alter viability (Figure 1)144. Inhibition of OPC differentiation was detected by low gene expression of myelin basic protein (MBP) and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (CNPase) comparison to differentiated oligodendrocytes. These results place an emphasis the mitochondrial-dependent OXPHOS requirements that OPCs maintain to become functional oligodendrocytes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A) BCL-2 family of proteins. BH3-only sensitizer proteins inhibit anti-apoptotic proteins, BCL-2, MCL-1, and BCL-xL. BH3-only activator proteins activate BAX and BAK leading to oligomerization of these pro-apoptotic proteins and mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). BCL-2, MCL-1, and BCL-xL inhibit activation and oligomerization of BAX and BAK, thus preventing apoptosis. B) Mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins. Optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) and mitochondrial fusion protein 1, 2 (MFN1, MFN2) promote mitochondrial fusion. Dynamin-related protein-1 (DRP1) and mitochondrial fission 1 protein (FIS1) promote mitochondrial fission. C) Methods and associated mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms. Previously used methods to understand mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms during oligodendrocyte development. As oligodendrocytes mature, they depend less on OXPHOS and more on glycolysis134,143,146. There are changes in the expression of pro and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family genes across development80,102. Regulators of mitochondrial dynamics are increased after differentiation to myelinating oligodendrocytes144. ? = Mechanism is unknown at this developmental stage.

Follow-up studies investigated the overlap between OXPHOS and glycolysis and how it differs between species. Rone et al. found that human adult oligodendrocytes are less metabolically active than adult OPCs and both are less active than oligodendrocytes and OPCs collected from post-natal rats145. They also demonstrated that human adult oligodendrocytes and adult OPCs generate the majority of their ATP from glycolysis, whereas the generation of ATP in oligodendrocytes and OPCs from post-natal rats is mostly dependent on OXPHOS. In this study, human OPCs and oligodendrocytes were obtained from adults that sustained surgical resections as a treatment for non- tumor-related intractable epilepsy. Species differences, the varying developmental states of the cells, and the origin of the human cells may account for the disparity between the energy utilization properties of human and rodent oligodendrocyte lineage cells. In a follow-up study, the authors found that adult rat derived oligodendrocytes generate more ATP through glycolysis than OXPHOS. Conversely, oligodendrocytes that were differentiated in vitro from post-natal rat OPCs have a greater dependence on OXPHOS for ATP production than glycolysis. The opposing developmental stages between adult oligodendrocytes and cultured oligodendrocytes may explain this difference in metabolic requirements146. These properties must be further elucidated in a platform that allows for investigation of healthy human oligodendrocyte lineage cells, such as human stem cell models147.

Mitochondrial morphology in oligodendrocytes.

Mitochondrial dynamics within the thin processes of oligodendrocyte lineage cells have yet to be well characterized. Investigating mitochondrial dynamics in oligodendrocyte lineage cells will provide a greater understanding of how the mitochondria promotes ATP and fatty acid metabolism as oligodendrocytes extend their plasma membrane during axon selection and stabilization of the myelin sheath. Rinholm et el. found that mitochondrial density and length is higher in the primary processes of mouse oligodendrocytes than in the myelin sheath148. The average mitochondrial length in primary processes and the myelin sheath is lower than what is reported in neuronal dendrites, axons, and astrocytes136. Electron microscopy revealed that mitochondria in the cytoplasmic compartments of the myelin sheath were small in size and have few cristae in comparison with neuronal mitochondria. These data may suggest that oligodendrocyte mitochondria perform minimal ATP synthesis via OXPHOS149. Higher spatial resolution may be needed to validate these results. Microarray studies in primary rat OPCs and human oligodendrocyte cell lines demonstrate that mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, mitochondrial electron transport, and ATP synthesis transcripts were activated as a consequence of oligodendrocyte differentiation144. Interestingly, OPA1 and FIS1 were induced, indicating that mitochondria undergo morphological changes during differentiation. Genes related to apoptosis were induced as well, in agreement with findings that indicate that oligodendrocyte lineage cells become vulnerable to apoptosis during development.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

The BCL-2 family of proteins, mitochondrial fission and fusion machinery, and changes to the metabolic state are all mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms that may contribute to the survival and function of oligodendrocytes (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The findings summarized here stem from experiments that measured gene expression. While the findings are valuable, they do not provide an explanation as to how or why these mitochondrial-mediated mechanisms regulate oligodendrocyte development. The function of mitochondrial communication with other organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and peroxisomes in oligodendrocyte development needs to be explored. In addition, members of the BCL-2 family of proteins can regulate the integrity and morphology of not only mitochondria but also peroxisomes, which are required for the maturation of myelinating oligodendrocytes150,151. There is also a critical need for human stem cell models to investigate these mechanisms. The transition to the pre-oligodendrocyte stage is key for integration of mature oligodendrocytes into the nervous system. Due to the small window of time that cells remain in this stage, it has been difficult to investigate the factors that contribute to the function of this cell type. Bridging these gaps in knowledge will allow for development of therapeutics aimed to alleviate metabolic dysfunctions in diseases involving white matter dysfunction.

Significance.

Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating glia of the central nervous system, which are essential for proper signal transmission within the nervous system and axonal metabolic support. How mitochondria-related pathways such as mitochondrial dynamics, bioenergetics, and apoptosis finely-tune the differentiation and function of myelinating oligodendrocytes is not well understood. Considering that altered mitochondrial functions are associated with a wide array of diseases, including leukodystrophies, it is pivotal to examine the molecular details by which mitochondrial-mediated signaling impact oligodendrocyte development and myelination. This manuscript summarizes critical studies in this area and provides insight into the mitochondrial-related changes that take place during oligodendrocyte development. We highlight several gaps in the field of mitochondrial dynamics and bioenergetics in glia development that require further understanding.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Megan Rasmussen for contributing to the figure design. Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 1R35GM128915-01 (to V.G.), the NIH /National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH) 1RF1MH123971-01 (to V.G.), the NIH/NIMH Training in Fundamental Neuroscience 5T32MH064913-19 (to M.G.) and the HHMI Gilliam Fellowship GT15720 (to M.G).

References

  • 1.Popovich PG, Jakeman LB & McTigue DM Glial responses to injury. Encycl. Neurosci 853–859 (2009). doi: 10.1016/B978-008045046-9.00018-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bunge MB, Bunge RP & Pappas GD Electron microscopic demonstration of connections between glia and myelin sheaths in the developing mammalian central nervous system. J. Cell Biol 12, 448–453 (1962). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simons M, Krämer EM, Thiele C, Stoffel W & Trotter J Assembly of myelin by association of proteolipid protein with cholesterol- and galactosylceramide-rich membrane domains. J. Cell Biol 151, 143–153 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfeiffer SE, Warrington AE & Bansal R The oligodendrocyte and its many cellular processes. Trends Cell Biol 3, 191–197 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Black JA, Kocsis JD & Waxman SG Ion channel organization of the myelinated fiber. Trends Neurosci 13, 48–54 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaplan MR et al. Induction of sodium channel clustering by oligodendrocytes. Nature 386, 724–728 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Freeman SA, Desmazières A, Fricker D, Lubetzki C & Sol-Foulon N Mechanisms of sodium channel clustering and its influence on axonal impulse conduction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 73, 723–735 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sherman DL & Brophy PJ Mechanisms of axon ensheathment and myelin growth. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 6, 683–690 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fontenas L & Kucenas S Glial Cell Development. Ref. Modul. Life Sci 1–14 (2017). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.12149-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kordeli E, Lambert S & Bennett V Ankyrin(G). A new ankyrin gene with neural-specific isoforms localized at the axonal initial segment and node of Ranvier. J. Biol. Chem 270, 2352–2359 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dugandzija-Novakovic S, Koszowski AG, Levinson SR & Shrager P Clustering of Na+ channels and node of Ranvier formation in remyelinating axons. J. Neurosci 15, 492–503 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nicholls DG & Budd SL Mitochondria and neuronal survival. Physiol. Rev 80, 315–360 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kann O & Kovács R Mitochondria and neuronal activity. Am. J. Physiol. - Cell Physiol 292, (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hughes EG & Stockton ME Premyelinating Oligodendrocytes : Mechanisms Underlying Cell Survival and Integration. 9, 1–17 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Le Dréau G & Martí E Dorsal-ventral patterning of the neural tube: A tale of three signals. Dev. Neurobiol 72, 1471–1481 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keller RE Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis. I. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer. Dev. Biol 42, 222–241 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jessell TM. Neuronal specification in the spinal cord:inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet 1, 20–29 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rowitch DH & Kriegstein AR Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification. Nature 468, 214–222 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Puelles L & Rubenstein JLR Expression patterns of homeobox and other putative regulatory genes in the embryonic mouse forebrain suggest a neuromeric organization. Trends Neurosci 16, 472–479 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rowitch DH Glial specification in the vertebrate neural tube. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 5, 409–419 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Briscoe J, Pierani A, Jessell TM & Ericson J A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101, 435–445 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spemann H & Mangold H Induction of embryonic primordia by implantation of organizers from a different species. Int. J. Dev. Biol 45, 13–38 (1924). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wharton KA, Ray RP & Gelbart WM An activity gradient of decapentaplegic is necessary for the specification of dorsal pattern elements in the Drosophila embryo. Development 117, 807–822 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilson PA & Hemmati-Brivanlou A Induction of epidermis and inhibition of neural fate by Bmp-4. Nature 376, 331–333 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Placzek M & Furley A Neural development: Patterning cascades in the neural tube. Curr. Biol 6, 526–529 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vasudevan A, Long JE, Crandall JE, Rubenstein JLR & Bhide PG Compartment-specific transcription factors orchestrate angiogenesis gradients in the embryonic brain. Nat. Neurosci 11, 429–439 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morriss GM & New DAT Effect of oxygen concentration on morphogenesis of cranial neural folds and neural crest in cultured rat embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol Vol. 54, 17–35 (1979). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dunwoodie SL The Role of Hypoxia in Development of the Mammalian Embryo. Dev. Cell 17, 755–773 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G & Thompson CB The Biology of Cancer: Metabolic Reprogramming Fuels Cell Growth and Proliferation. Cell Metab. 7, 11–20 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scully D et al. Hypoxia promotes production of neural crest cells in the embryonic head. Dev. 143, 1742–1752 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamaguchi Y, Miyazawa H & Miura M Neural tube closure and embryonic metabolism. Congenit. Anom. (Kyoto). 57, 134–137 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chau KF et al. Downregulation of ribosome biogenesis during early forebrain development. Elife 7, 1–26 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fame RM, Shannon ML, Chau KF, Head JP & Lehtinen MK A concerted metabolic shift in early forebrain alters the CSF proteome and depends on MYC downregulation for mitochondrial maturation. Dev. 146, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richardson WD, Kessaris N & Pringle N Oligodendrocyte wars. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 7, 11–18 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhu Q et al. Genetic evidence that Nkx2.2 and Pdgfra are major determinants of the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation in the developing CNS. Dev 141, 548–555 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Winkler CC et al. The dorsal wave of neocortical oligodendrogenesis begins embryonically and requires multiple sources of sonic hedgehog. J. Neurosci 38, 5237–5250 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kessaris N et al. Competing waves of oligodendrocytes in the forebrain and postnatal elimination of an embryonic lineage. Nat. Neurosci 9, 173–179 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Winkler CC & Franco SJ Loss of Shh signaling in the neocortex reveals heterogeneous cell recovery responses from distinct oligodendrocyte populations. Dev. Biol 452, 55–65 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tripathi RB et al. Dorsally and ventrally derived oligodendrocytes have similar electrical properties but myelinate preferred tracts. J. Neurosci 31, 6809–6819 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vallstedt A, Klos JM & Ericson J Multiple dorsoventral origins of oligodendrocyte generation in the spinal cord and hindbrain. Neuron 45, 55–67 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fogarty M, Richardson WD & Kessaris N A subset of oligodendrocytes generated from radial glia in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 132, 1951–1959 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ravanelli AM & Appel B Motor neurons and oligodendrocytes arise from distinct cell lineages by progenitor recruitment. Genes Dev 29, 2504–2515 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pringle NP et al. Determination of neuroepithelial cell fate: Induction of the oligodendrocyte lineage by ventral midline cells and Sonic hedgehog. Dev. Biol 177, 30–42 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bergles DE & Richardson WD Oligodendrocyte development and plasticity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 8, 1–28 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cai J et al. Generation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells from mouse dorsal spinal cord independent of Nkx6 regulation and Shh signaling. Neuron 45, 41–53 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mitew S et al. Mechanisms regulating the development of oligodendrocytes and central nervous system myelin. Neuroscience 276, 29–47 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tong CK et al. A dorsal SHH-dependent domain in the V-SVZ produces large numbers of oligodendroglial lineage cells in the postnatal brain. Stem Cell Reports 5, 461–470 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Buchet D, Garcia C, Deboux C, Nait-Oumesmar B & Baron-Van Evercooren A Human neural progenitors from different foetal forebrain regions remyelinate the adult mouse spinal cord. Brain 134, 1168–1183 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Orduz D et al. Developmental cell death regulates lineage-related interneuron-oligodendroglia functional clusters and oligodendrocyte homeostasis. Nat. Commun 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Spitzer SO et al. Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells Become Regionally Diverse and Heterogeneous with Age. Neuron 101, 459–471.e5 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.van Bruggen D, Agirre E & Castelo-Branco G Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 47, 168–175 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Marisca R et al. Functionally distinct subgroups of oligodendrocyte precursor cells integrate neural activity and execute myelin formation. Nat. Neurosci 23, 363–374 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dawson MRL, Polito A, Levine JM & Reynolds R NG2-expressing glial progenitor cells: An abundant and widespread population of cycling cells in the adult rat CNS. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 24, 476–488 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Marques S et al. Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Science (80-.). 352, 1326–1329 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Viganò F, Möbius W, Götz M & Dimou L Transplantation reveals regional differences in oligodendrocyte differentiation in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci 16, 1370–1372 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xiao Y, Petrucco L, Hoodless LJ, Portugues R & Czopka T Oligodendrocyte precursor cells sculpt the visual system by regulating axonal remodeling. Nat. Neurosci 25, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun LO et al. Spatiotemporal Control of CNS Myelination by Oligodendrocyte Programmed Cell Death through the TFEB-PUMA Axis. Cell 175, 1811–1826.e21 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zuchero JB & Barres BA Intrinsic and extrinsic control of oligodendrocyte development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 23, 914–920 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bechler ME, Swire M & ffrench-Constant C Intrinsic and adaptive myelination—A sequential mechanism for smart wiring in the brain. Dev. Neurobiol 78, 68–79 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Makinodan M, Rosen KM, Ito S & Corfas G A critical period for social experience-dependent oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination. Science (80-.). 337, 1357–1360 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gibson EM et al. Neuronal Activity Promotes Oligodendrogenesis and Adaptive Myelination in the Mammalian Brain. Science (80-.). 344, 1252304 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Barres BA, L. MA and R. MC A novel role for TH, GC and RA in timing oligodendrocyte differentiation.pdf. Development 1097–1108 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Raff M Intracellular developmental timers. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol 72, 431–435 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Butts BD, Houde C & Mehmet H Maturation-dependent sensitivity of oligodendrocyte lineage cells to apoptosis: Implications for normal development and disease. Cell Death Differ 15, 1178–1186 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Trapp BD, Nishiyama A, Cheng D & Macklin W Differentiation and death of premyelinating oligodendrocytes in developing rodent brain. J. Cell Biol 137, 459–468 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barres BA et al. Cell death and control of cell survival in the oligodendrocyte lineage. Cell 70, 31–46 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Buss RR, Sun W & Oppenheim RW Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 29, 1–35 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pinto-Teixeira F, Konstantinides N & Desplan C Programmed cell death acts at different stages of Drosophila neurodevelopment to shape the central nervous system. FEBS Lett. 590, 2435–2453 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Raff MC et al. Programmed Cell Death and the Control of Cell Survival: Lessons from the Nervous System. Science (80-.). 262, 695 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hughes EG, Orthmann-Murphy JL, Langseth AJ & Bergles DE Myelin remodeling through experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in the adult somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci 21, 696–706 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Emery B Regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. Science (80-.). 330, 779–782 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Snaidero N & Simons M The logistics of myelin biogenesis in the central nervous system. Glia 65, 1021–1031 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Stadelmann C, Timmler S, Barrantes-Freer A & Simons M Myelin in the central nervous system: Structure, function, and pathology. Physiol. Rev 99, 1381–1431 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thomason EJ, Escalante M, Osterhout DJ & Fuss B The oligodendrocyte growth cone and its actin cytoskeleton: A fundamental element for progenitor cell migration and CNS myelination. Glia 68, 1329–1346 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nave KA & Werner HB Myelination of the nervous system: Mechanisms and functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 30, 503–533 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Czopka T, ffrench-Constant C & Lyons DA Individual oligodendrocytes have only a few hours in which to generate new myelin sheaths invivo. Dev. Cell 25, 599–609 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Watkins TA, Emery B, Mulinyawe S & Barres BA Distinct Stages of Myelination Regulated by γ-Secretase and Astrocytes in a Rapidly Myelinating CNS Coculture System. Neuron 60, 555–569 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Grabow S et al. Subtle Changes in the Levels of BCL-2 Proteins Cause Severe Craniofacial Abnormalities. Cell Rep 24, 3285–3295.e4 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kutscher LM & Shaham S Non-apoptotic cell death in animal development. Cell Death Differ 24, 1326–1336 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fernandes MGF et al. Age-related injury responses of human oligodendrocytes to metabolic insults: link to BCL-2 and autophagy pathways. Commun. Biol 4, 1–10 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Akhtar RS, Ness JM & Roth KA Bcl-2 family regulation of neuronal development and neurodegeneration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Res 1644, 189–203 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ & Green DR The BCL-2 Family Reunion. Mol. Cell 37, 299–310 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Giam M, Huang DCS & Bouillet P BH3-only proteins and their roles in programmed cell death. Oncogene 27, S128–S136 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kale J, Osterlund EJ & Andrews DW BCL-2 family proteins: Changing partners in the dance towards death. Cell Death Differ 25, 65–80 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Boyd JM et al. Bik, a novel death-inducing protein shares a distinct sequence motif with Bcl-2 family proteins and interacts with viral and cellular survival-promoting proteins. Oncogene 11, 1921–1928 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Day CL et al. Structure of the BH3 Domains from the p53-Inducible BH3-Only Proteins Noxa and Puma in Complex with Mcl-1. J. Mol. Biol 380, 958–971 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chittenden T et al. A conserved domain in Bak, distinct from BH1 and BH2, mediates cell death and protein binding functions. EMBO J 14, 5589–5596 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kuwana T et al. BH3 domains of BH3-only proteins differentially regulate Bax-mediated mitochondrial membrane permeabilization both directly and indirectly. Mol. Cell 17, 525–535 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Goldstein JC, Waterhouse NJ, Juin P, Evan GI & Green DR The coordinate release of cytochrome c during apoptosis is rapid, complete and kinetically invariant. Nat. Cell Biol 2, 156–162 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rehm M et al. Single-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis demonstrates that caspase activation during apoptosis is a rapid process: Role of caspase-3. J. Biol. Chem 277, 24506–24514 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bratton SB & Salvesen GS Regulation of the Apaf-1-caspase-9 apoptosome. J. Cell Sci 123, 3209–3214 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Shamas-Din A, Kale J, Leber B & Andrews DW Mechanisms of action of Bcl-2 family proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 5, 1–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kalkavan H & Green DR MOMP, cell suicide as a BCL-2 family business. Cell Death Differ 25, 46–55 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rastogi A, Joshi P, Contreras E & Gama V Remodeling of mitochondrial morphology and function: An emerging hallmark of cellular reprogramming. Cell Stress 3, 181–194 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dumitru R et al. Human Embryonic Stem Cells Have Constitutively Active Bax at the Golgi and Are Primed to Undergo Rapid Apoptosis. Mol. Cell 46, 573–583 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu JC et al. High mitochondrial priming sensitizes hESCs to DNA-damage-induced apoptosis. Cell Stem Cell 13, 483–491 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Flemmer RT, Connolly SP, Geizer BA, Opferman JT & Vanderluit JL The Role of Mcl-1 in Embryonic Neural Precursor Cell Apoptosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol 9, 1–13 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hollville E, Romero SE & Deshmukh M Apoptotic cell death regulation in neurons. FEBS J 286, 3276–3298 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fogarty LC et al. Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL are essential for survival of the developing nervous system. Cell Death Differ 26, 1501–1515 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Arbour N et al. Mcl-1 is a key regulator of apoptosis during CNS development and after DNA damage. J. Neurosci 28, 6068–6078 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nakamura A et al. Bcl-xL is essential for the survival and function of differentiated neurons in the cortex that control complex behaviors. J. Neurosci 36, 5448–5461 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Itoh T, Itoh A & Pleasure D Bcl-2-related protein family gene expression during oligodendroglial differentiation. J. Neurochem 85, 1500–1512 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kawai K et al. Maintaince of the relative proportion of oligodendrocytes to axons even in the absence of BAX and BAK. Eur. J. Neurosci 30, 2030–2041 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cleveland AH et al. Oligodendrocytes depend on MCL-1 to prevent spontaneous apoptosis and white matter degeneration. Cell Death Dis 12, 1133 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Detmer SA & Chan DC Functions and dysfunctions of mitochondrial dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 8, 870–879 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liesa M, Palacín M & Zorzano A Mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian health and disease. Physiol. Rev 89, 799–845 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Youle RJ, Van Der Bliek AM, Fusion M & Proteins F Mitochondrial Fission, Fusion, and Stress. 337, 1062–1066 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Mishra P & Chan DC Mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance during cell division, development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 15, 634–646 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Otera H & Mihara K Molecular mechanisms and physiologic functions of mitochondrial dynamics. J. Biochem 149, 241–251 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Spurlock B, Tullet JMA, Hartman JL & Mitra K Interplay of mitochondrial fission-fusion with cell cycle regulation: Possible impacts on stem cell and organismal aging. Exp. Gerontol 135, 110919 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.James DI & Martinou JC Mitochondrial Dynamics and Apoptosis: A Painful Separation. Dev. Cell 15, 341–343 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Karbowski M et al. Spatial and temporal association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and Mfn2 during apoptosis. J. Cell Biol 159, 931–938 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Karbowski M, Norris KL, Cleland MM, Jeong SY & Youle RJ Role of Bax and Bak in mitochondrial morphogenesis. Nature 443, 658–662 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jenner A et al. DRP1 interacts directly with BAX to induce its activation and apoptosis. EMBO J 41, 1–19 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Smirnova E, Shurland DL, Ryazantsev SN & Van Der Bliek AM A human dynamin-related protein controls the distribution of mitochondria. J. Cell Biol 143, 351–358 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Estaquier J & Arnoult D Inhibiting Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission selectively prevents the release of cytochrome c during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 14, 1086–1094 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wasiak S, Zunino R & McBride HM Bax/Bak promote sumoylation of DRP1 and its stable association with mitochondria during apoptotic cell death. J. Cell Biol 177, 439–450 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Maes ME, Grosser JA, Fehrman RL, Schlamp CL & Nickells RW Completion of BAX recruitment correlates with mitochondrial fission during apoptosis. Sci. Rep 9, 1–15 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Youle RJ & Karbowski M Mitochondrial fission in apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 6, 657–663 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Frezza C et al. OPA1 Controls Apoptotic Cristae Remodeling Independently from Mitochondrial Fusion. Cell 126, 177–189 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Gilkerson R, De La Torre P & St. Vallier S Mitochondrial OMA1 and OPA1 as Gatekeepers of Organellar Structure/Function and Cellular Stress Response. Front. Cell Dev. Biol 9, 1–7 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Rasmussen ML et al. A Non-apoptotic Function of MCL-1 in Promoting Pluripotency and Modulating Mitochondrial Dynamics in Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports 10, 684–692 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Rasmussen ML et al. MCL-1 Inhibition by Selective BH3 Mimetics Disrupts Mitochondrial Dynamics Causing Loss of Viability and Functionality of Human Cardiomyocytes. iScience 23, 101015 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Son G & Han J Roles of mitochondria in neuronal development. BMB Rep 51, 549–556 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Khacho M et al. Mitochondrial Dynamics Impacts Stem Cell Identity and Fate Decisions by Regulating a Nuclear Transcriptional Program. Cell Stem Cell 19, 232–247 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Iwata R, Casimir P & Vanderhaeghen P Mitochondrial dynamics in postmitotic cells regulate neurogenesis. Science (80-.). 369, 858–862 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Wong K et al. Foamy cells with oligodendroglial phenotype in childhood ataxia with diffuse central nervous system hypomyelination syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 100, 635–646 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Van Haren K, Van Der Voorn JP, Peterson DR, Van Der Knaap MS & Powers JM The life and death of oligodendrocytes in vanishing white matter disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 63, 618–630 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Herrero M, Mandelboum S & Elroy-Stein O eIF2B Mutations Cause Mitochondrial Malfunction in Oligodendrocytes. NeuroMolecular Med 21, 303–313 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dimas P et al. Cns myelination and remyelination depend on fatty acid synthesis by oligodendrocytes. Elife 8, 1–29 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Poitelon Y, Kopec AM & Belin S Myelin Fat Facts: An Overview of Lipids and Fatty Acid Metabolism. Cells 9, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Philips T & Rothstein JD Oligodendroglia: Metabolic supporters of neurons. J. Clin. Invest 127, 3271–3280 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Lee Y et al. Oligodendroglia metabolically support axons and contribute to neurodegeneration. Nature 487, 443–448 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rinholm JE et al. Regulation of oligodendrocyte development and myelination by glucose and lactate. J. Neurosci 31, 538–548 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Deitmer JW, Theparambil SM, Ruminot I, Noor SI & Becker HM Energy Dynamics in the Brain: Contributions of Astrocytes to Metabolism and pH Homeostasis. Front. Neurosci 13, 1–7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Meyer N & Rinholm JE Mitochondria in myelinating oligodendrocytes: Slow and out of breath? Metabolites 11, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Amaral AI, Meisingset TW, Kotter MR & Sonnewald U Metabolic aspects of Neuron-Oligodendrocyte-Astrocyte interactions. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 4, 1–5 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sánchez-Abarca LI, Tabernero A & Medina JM Oligodendrocytes use lactate as a source of energy and as a precursor of lipids. Glia 36, 321–329 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ichihara Y et al. Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells Directly Utilize Lactate for Promoting Cell Cycling and Differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol 232, 986–995 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Yan H & Rivkees SA Hypoglycemia influences oligodendrocyte development and myelin formation. Neuroreport 17, 55–59 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Diaz F Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency: Patients and animal models. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Basis Dis 1802, 100–110 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Ziabreva I et al. Injury and differentiation following inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV in rat oligodendrocytes. Glia 58, 1827–1837 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Fünfschilling U et al. Glycolytic oligodendrocytes maintain myelin and long-term axonal integrity. Nature 485, 517–521 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Schoenfeld R et al. Oligodendroglial differentiation induces mitochondrial genes and inhibition of mitochondrial function represses oligodendroglial differentiation. Mitochondrion 10, 143–150 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Rone MB et al. Oligodendrogliopathy in multiple sclerosis: Low glycolytic metabolic rate promotes oligodendrocyte survival. J. Neurosci 36, 4698–4707 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Rao VTS et al. Distinct age and differentiation-state dependent metabolic profiles of oligodendrocytes under optimal and stress conditions. PLoS One 12, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lanjewar SN & Sloan SA Growing Glia: Cultivating Human Stem Cell Models of Gliogenesis in Health and Disease. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9, 1–21 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Rinholm JE et al. Movement and structure of mitochondria in oligodendrocytes and their myelin sheaths. Glia 64, 810–825 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Afzal N, Lederer WJ, Jafri MS & Mannella CA Effect of crista morphology on mitochondrial ATP output: A computational study. Curr. Res. Physiol 4, 163–176 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hosoi KI et al. The VDAC2-BAK axis regulates peroxisomal membrane permeability. J. Cell Biol 216, 709–721 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kassmann CM Myelin peroxisomes - Essential organelles for the maintenance of white matter in the nervous system. Biochimie 98, 111–118 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES