To the Editor,
Infant-type high-grade gliomas are rare neoplasms that have superior clinical outcomes and differing molecular characteristics from both childhood and adult high-grade gliomas (1–3). Recently, pediatric high-grade gliomas have been reclassified in the 2021 WHO Classification into 4 subcategories: diffuse midline glioma H3 K27-altered, diffuse hemispheric glioma H3 G34 mutant, diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma H3-wild-type/IDH-wild-type, and infant-type hemispheric glioma (4). Infant-type hemispheric gliomas have distinct molecular profiles with fusion genes involving ALK, NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, and MET (5, 6). However, the biology of infant-type high-grade gliomas located in the brainstem is largely unknown and molecular characterization is lacking. Here, we report a case of congenital high-grade brainstem glioma with a previously unreported PDGFB:APOBEC3C fusion.
Our female patient highlighted in this report initially presented at 2 months of age with failure to thrive and was found to have aspiration on a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of feeding. At that time, a nasogastric tube was placed, and she was discharged with a diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition. At 3 months of age, she presented with seizure-like activity and acute hypoxic respiratory failure in the setting of an upper respiratory viral infection. A CT head revealed a 2.8 cm × 2.9 cm × 2.8 cm posterior fossa mass with obstructive hydrocephalus. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging revealed an expansile, T2 hyperintense, contrast-enhancing brainstem lesion centered at the medulla with extension into the upper cervical spine and pons (Fig. 1A). She underwent posterior fossa craniotomy for biopsy, which pathology revealed an H3 wild-type glioblastoma, WHO Grade 4. Histologically, the tumor was characterized as a high-grade glial neoplasm with primarily monomorphic cells with basophilic to clear cytoplasm, focally surrounded by a myxoid matrix. There was a small focus of necrosis visualized. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis showed that the tumor was strongly and diffusely positive for GFAP, SOX10, and Olig2, with moderate staining for synaptophysin. The tumor was negative for LIN28, EMA, and H3K27M. INI-1 was intact, p53 was wild-type, and H3K27me3 was retained (Fig. 1B). MIB-1 was 7%-10%. Her tumor was negative for a KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, IDH1, IDH2, and H3F3A by next-generation sequencing.
Figure 1.
Clinical characterization of congenital diffuse high-grade glioma. (A) T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showing a diffuse brainstem lesion. (B) H&E section at 20× magnification (top) shows sheet-like to trabecular growth of a monotonous, hypercellular tumor in a myxoid and highly vascular background. Tumor cells are characterized by scant, somewhat cleared cytoplasm, and slightly angled nuclear contours. Rare islands of necrosis are seen with pyknotic and karyorrhectic debris and early calcification. Tumor cells vaguely palisade around the necrosis. Immunohistochemistry for Olig2 (middle) shows diffusely positive staining. H3K27me3 staining by immunohistochemistry is retained (bottom). (C) T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging 2.5 years after completion of chemotherapy and focal radiation.
DNA methylation profiling demonstrated a focal amplification at chromosome 22 (Fig. 2A). Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) of her tumor identified a PDGFB:APOBEC3C fusion at this locus that has not previously been reported (Fig. 2B, C) (7). Given the co-occurrence of focal amplification with an identified fusion transcript, we performed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a PDGFB break-apart probe (Zytovision, Bremerhaven, Germany). This revealed marked 3′ amplification in a dispersed pattern suggestive of double minutes (Fig. 2D). To interrogate the functional activity of this fusion, we performed single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) (8, 9) of canonical PDGF-signaling gene sets using the patient RNA-seq dataset, as well as several infant-type diffuse gliomas (3) and normal brain samples from our institutional repository as controls. This showed an enrichment of PDGF-signaling pathway genes relative to neoplastic or normal controls (Fig. 2E). IHC for PDGFRA and pERK was also strongly positive (Fig. 2F), together supporting the evidence for upregulated PDGF signaling within this tumor sample.
Figure 2.
Identification of a PDGFB:APOBEC3C fusion. (A) DNA methylation reveals focal amplification at chromosome 22 (insert) without other copy number variations. (B) Circos plot visualizing RNA-seq-based detection of fusion event on chromosome 22. (C) Fusion transcript mapped to 22q13.1 containing PDGFB PDGF/VEGF domain and APOBEC3C N-terminal domain. (D) Interphase FISH using PDGFB break-apart probe. 3′ end is labeled in red and 5′ with green; a normal arrangement is indicated by gold or fused red/green signal. (E) ssGSEA enrichment scores for patient sample (n = 1, red), infant-type diffuse gliomas (n = 4, black), or normal brain samples (n = 8, grey) using canonical PDGF signaling gene sets. (F) Immunohistochemistry for PDGFRA (left) and pERK (right).
The patient had a tracheostomy placed for long-term airway support. She was treated with a chemotherapy regimen consisting of 2 cycles of carboplatin and etoposide (10) followed by 2 cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, and imatinib before experiencing a progression on surveillance imaging. She then received palliative radiation to a total dose of 35 Gy in 10 fractions, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) targeting the tumor with a 1 cm expansion. Despite noncurative intent, her tumor displayed marked radiographic regression (Fig. 1C). Her course was complicated by radiation necrosis, which resolved following treatment with dexamethasone and bevacizumab. Remarkably, almost 3 years have now elapsed from her last therapy without evidence of recurrent or progressive disease.
Without more robust preclinical modeling, we cannot conclusively assert that this fusion is sufficient for pathogenesis. However, the PDGF/VEGF domain is in-frame with evidence of functional activity, and comprehensive molecular characterization failed to identify another putative oncogenic event. APOBEC3C upregulation was identified as a high-risk feature in adult-type glioblastoma multiforme, but it has not been previously implicated in the biology of infant-type high-grade glioma (11). It has also been linked as a marker or poor prognosis in adult breast cancer (12). The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) family has been implicated in the carcinogenesis of high-grade glioma, including PDGFRA alterations in diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered tumors of the brainstem (formerly diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, [DIPG]) (13). There is evidence that PDGFB signaling induces cancer stroma in HGG, and that PDGFB induces a pro-inflammatory state in murine models of HGG (14). Together, these findings support the plausibility of the novel fusion described here as the inciting oncogenic event for our patient.
The 2021 WHO revised classification of pediatric diffuse gliomas adds needed pathologic clarity in the era of molecular diagnosis, but it may still fall short in categorizing rare patient populations. Congenital high-grade gliomas are rare entities that differ clinically and molecularly from their adult and childhood counterparts. Here, we discuss a previously unreported fusion of PDGFB:APOBEC3C in a patient with congenital brainstem diffuse high-grade glioma with a favorable clinical course. This highlights the importance of routine molecular characterization, both to better understand the complex biology of this rare disease and to guide prognosis and clinical decision-making for individual patients and families.
Contributor Information
Gregory A Norris, Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Colorado, USA.
Nicholas Willard, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA.
Andrew M Donson, Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Alisa Gaskell, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA.
Sarah A Milgrom, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA.
Brent R O’Neill, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Hala Nijmeh, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Pathology Shared Resource—Cytogenetic Section, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mary Haag, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Pathology Shared Resource—Cytogenetic Section, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Ahmed Gilani, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA.
Nicholas K Foreman, Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Colorado, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Nathan A Dahl, Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Colorado, USA.
Funding
This work was directly supported by the Morgan Adams Foundation; the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1K08NS121592) to N.A.D. The University of Colorado Genomics Shared Resource and Pathology Shared Resource are supported by a Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA046934).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no duality or conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1. Lu VM, Eichberg DG, Luther EM, et al. Distinct survival and clinical profile of infantile glioblastoma: Insights from a national database. Childs Nerv Syst 2022;38:85–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lu VM, O'Connor KP, Himes BT, et al. Effect of surgery and chemotherapy on long-term survival in infants with congenital glioblastoma: An integrated survival analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2020;26:563–571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gilani A, Donson A, Davies KD, et al. Targetable molecular alterations in congenital glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2020;146:247–252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231–1251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Clarke M, Mackay A, Ismer B, et al. Infant high-grade gliomas comprise multiple subgroups characterized by novel targetable gene fusions and favorable outcomes. Cancer Discov 2020;10:942–963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Guerreiro Stucklin AS, Ryall S, Fukuoka K, et al. Alterations in ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET drive a group of infantile hemispheric gliomas. Nat Commun 2019;10:4343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Uhrig S, Ellermann J, Walther T, et al. Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2021;31:448–460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:15545–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 2009;462:108–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Macy ME, Birks DK, Barton VN, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of congenital glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2012;14:931–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wang JJ, Wang H, Zhu BL, et al. Development of a prognostic model of glioma based on immune-related genes. Oncol Lett 2021;21:116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Asaoka M, Patnaik SK, Ishikawa T, et al. Different members of the APOBEC3 family of DNA mutators have opposing associations with the landscape of breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2021;11:5111–5125 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Paugh BS, Zhu X, Qu C, et al. Novel oncogenic PDGFRA mutations in pediatric high-grade gliomas. Cancer Res 2013;73:6219–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ross JL, Chen Z, Herting CJ, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor beta is a potent inflammatory driver in paediatric high-grade glioma. Brain 2021;144:53–69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]